The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-08-14 Planning Commission PacketAgenda Planning Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City H all, Council Chambers Wednesday, August 14, 2019 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes, July 24, 2019 Pla nning Commission Meeting Minutes V.Public Hearings A.Variance request B-19-12 for 5209 Grove Street B.Preliminary Plat - Pla tting and Existing Outlot - Oa k Lane C.Public Hearing: Conditiona l Use Permit, Our Lady of Grace 5051 Eden Avenue VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," t he Board/Commission will invite resi dent s to share r elevant i ssues or concerns. Individuals must l i mi t t heir comments to three mi nutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same i ssue in t he int erest of time and topic. Gener al ly speaking, i tems that ar e elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Indi vi dual s should not expect the Chai r or Boar d/Commission Member s to respond to t heir comment s tonight. Instead, the Board/Commi ssion might refer the mat ter to st a% for consi derat i on at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.2020 Planning Commission Work Plan VIII.Correspondence And Petitions IX.Chair And Member Comments X.Sta 7 Comments XI.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortabl e bei ng part of the publi c proc ess . If you need as s is tanc e i n the way of heari ng am pli :c ation, an interpreter, large-print doc um ents or s om ethi ng els e, pleas e c al l 952-927-8861 72 ho urs in advance of the m eeting. Date: Augus t 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Adminis trative S uppo rt S p ecialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes , July 24, 2019 P lanning C ommis s ion Meeting Minutes Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : P lease approve the attached J uly 24, 2018 P lanning C ommission M eeting M inutes. I N TR O D U C TI O N : AT TAC HME N T S : Description Minutes : Planning Commis s ion, July 24, 2019 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 1 of 6 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers July 24, 2019 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Nemerov, Douglas, Thorsen, Strauss, and Chair Olsen. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Jackie Hoogenakker, Support Staff, Debbie Townsend, Communications Coordinator. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Berube, Bennett, Lee. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the July 24, 2019, agenda. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, July 10, 2019 Commissioner Nemerov moved to approve the July 10, 2019, meeting minutes. Commissioner Douglas seconded the motion. Commissioner Nemerov offered up the amendment to change wording on page 4 to read, “Spack Consulting.” He noted there are a few bullets in the Discussion/Comments/Questions that in his opinion did not relate to the property and are a discussion about form based code and reopening issues that were discussed with the Southdale Small Area Plan and thought those should be removed from the minutes and only reflect the discussion about the project itself and the building itself. He suggested removing the 2nd and 3rd bullet along with the last bullet on page 4. Motion carried as amended. V. Community Comment None. Commissioner Strauss moved that the Planning Commission close Community Comment. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 2 of 6 VI. Public Hearings A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (PUD-14), 3650 Hazelton Road Director Teague presented the request of a revision to the approved PUD redeveloping the 1.25-acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. Teague reviewed the background of this parcel and the applicant would like to go back to the original application for 186 units and 18 stories, reducing the height of the building by one story along with reducing parking from 298 stalls to 277 stalls. Staff recommends approval of the request for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to PUD-14 and the revised Site Plan subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Commissioner Strauss stated the Planning Commission previously reviewed and recommended preliminary approval of the plan with 186 units. Director Teague responded in the affirmative and reported that the City Council, a few weeks after the Planning Commission approval, reviewed and approved the same number of units which was 186. Teague pointed out rezoning is a two-step process with the City Council hearing the final rezoning. At final rezoning the applicant came through with a revised unit count which was approved. Teague concluded that since final rezoning the applicant has expressed they would like to go back to the original application for 186 units, 18-stories. This request requires an amendment to the originally approved plan. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Trace Jacques, ESG Architecture & Design, explained he presented the original proposal on March 28, 2018 to the Planning Commission and to the City Council on April 14, 2018. He indicated the actual unit count at both of those hearings was at the 186 count. He noted the reason for the hearing tonight is regarding the number of units and parking spaces and not design related. With graphics Jacques explained the proposal. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners raised the following: • Chair Olsen wondered why this request was being made. Mr. Tom Lund, applicant, stated this project has been a journey for everyone. He indicated the capital markets and were not able to secure the equity on this project. At the end of the year the project was reviewed differently, the denominator is very important to the capital markets and there were not any buildings that cost as much per unit as this building in the Twin Cities market, the cost per unit needed to be adjusted. He noted the project was able to get the equity needed to do the project with the reduced unit count. • The applicant was asked how they became comfortable with the proposed 1.5 parking spaces. Mr. Lund indicated he was the developer on the Carlyle, Grant Park and Nic on 5th and he believed Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 3 of 6 those were close to 1.5 parking spaces per unit. He indicated there have been other buildings he has worked on along the light rail with less parking spaces. He indicated that the number feels right to him. • It was pointed out there are two things that drive parking, one is the proximity to jobs and the other is the proximity to mass transit, adding this area is limited with both. The applicant was questioned if the proposed parking does not prove to be sufficient does the applicant have a plan B if tenants are unsatisfied and there are concerns. Mr. Lund indicated the industry is seeing less cars at these buildings with Uber and Lyft being frequently used. He noted Millennials appear to be buying one car to be used by a few people as well. Lund noted the decrease is happening slowly, but it is happening. Mr. Jacque explained a lot of it will have to do with the demographic of who will be living in the building but society and use of cars is changing. He noted there will be more businesses coming to the area and more opportunity for walking to work and to shopping in the future. He also noted the water table was higher than expected and the applicant did not want to raise the building higher to accommodate more parking. • It was suggested because this is a rental community the applicant could also drive parking demand through pricing for parking as well. Mr. Lund agreed, adding that was done at the Carlyle building. Public Hearing None Commissioner Nemerov moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Comments/Questions • Commissioners appreciated the discussion of the path to get to this point and was in favor of the proposal, adding it would be a great catalyst for the Southdale District and the long-term vision for the District. It was also remarkable to see the limited negative commentary received about this project. • Chair Olsen appreciated that the applicant came back with the same project, just removing a floor and did not change any materials. Motion Commissioner Nemerov moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to PUD-14 and the revised Site Plan subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Douglas seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 4 of 6 Director Teague presented the 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan. Teague noted over the next couple months, the Planning Commission is asked to consider its work for the next year. Discussion/Comments/Questions/Suggestions • With regard to the District Plan for the Cahill Area Industrial Park; this should not be defined by Cahill because Cahill is actually the boundary. Using Cahill makes this seem like an add-on to the Cahill study. The intention coming out of Community Development was a much broader look at those business parks in Edina and how to revitalize those. That maybe a broader sense of what the Planning Commission wants to do than what is in the 70th and Cahill plan because that was focused on the adjacent properties. The Planning Commission needs to look overall at the tax engine that is the commercial part of Edina. Director Teague indicated that was a good point and he would make adjustments to bring back to the Commission. • Revisit adding drive-thru to the work plan Zoning Ordinance Amendments Workplan, also discuss whether drive-thru’s should be allowed. • Looking at the discrepancies in the height regulations at 70th and Cahill and if that should be pushed up to the Comprehensive Plan initiative where the City acknowledges some changes need to be made. Director Teague thought that was a good idea. • Review and bring to the forefront the parking strategy at 44th and France. Could this also be an initiative of the Planning Commission and the need to dedicate some time to it? Director Teague indicated the 44th and France parking strategy is in the Council Work Plan and CIP. Should the conclusion be that district parking is needed, that will come back to the Planning Commission in its regular land use regulatory review. • Does the Commission need to further review the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines to see if there is anything from that to codify. Director Teague thought that was a good suggestion and could be a topic onto itself. Chair Olsen wondered how that would work because the City does not want to continually be amending the guidelines. She wondered if it was something the Planning Commission should keep track of and see how it plays out. Director Teague stated staff will be following these things and as projects are reviewed if staff finds items that need to be more than a policy staff will bring that forward to the Planning Commission for further discussion on policy vs. Ordinance. Teague noted keeping the Design Experience Guidelines separate on our Work Plan keeps it front and center. • Should there be minimum height requirements in the Greater Southdale Area Guidelines/Southdale Small Area Plan. Teague noted that was not a recommendation; however height limits were discussed by the Southdale Working Group. In the end it was decided not to add that and to keep it as is for now. There are good reasons to have minimums, stressing more discussion are needed on this. It was also suggested that the Southdale Small Area Plan live on its own for a couple of years. It was acknowledged that it can be frustrating to see the one-story buildings being constructed in the area; however, maybe more time should be afforded to the plan and to see how it plays out. • One Commissioner suggested the Commission consider some sort of minimums, perhaps not six stories, but at a level that gets quality construction in that District. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 5 of 6 • It was wondered if the minimum height standard should be a standalone item to study the pros and cons if this was a topic that bears further study before an Ordinance item. A Commissioner thought it should be studied, not just from a design experience point of view but also from a transportation point of view in that if the City wants to reduce parking in buildings that are being built then there needs to be transit and in order to have transit there needs to be density. Chair Olsen indicated her concern was to have a complete separate study because she thought Commission already did adjust a lot of those items when reviewing it. A Commissioner indicated there was not a full discussion of the ramifications of doing this so is the reason a study is needed. Director Teague noted those are all good things to study. Even if something is listed as an item for change to the Ordinance does not mean the Planning Commission needs to make a specific recommendation. Another Commissioner thought this could be an ongoing thing of raising and lowering the minimum over time. Director Teague indicated he would make adjustments to the Work Plan based on the Commissions discussion and would bring this item back to the next meeting to further discuss. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions None. IX. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Miranda commented about climate change that has been in the news lately. He noted climate change is real and everything that is done needs to be looked at to address these issues. Commissioner Miranda also indicated at the last Planning Commission meeting there was discussion about a sidewalk on France, adding he suggested that he wanted to leave it in even though it is a terrible sidewalk; it is decent as a bike path. He noted Seattle is putting in European style intersections with oval shaped islands in the corners with bike lanes protected throughout the intersection. One thing Edina does not do well is that the bike lanes end when it comes to intersections and Minnesota has mixing zones which is the most dangerous place to be on a bike. He thought it behooved the Commission to make sure to look at, especially in the Southdale area and in the City nodes to make sure there are safe bike intersections. Chair Olsen agreed and stated the Commission did have a conversation with the Transportation Chair and Co-Chair and wondered how the Commission can promote that type of design and bringing in more protected bike lanes. Director Teague thought the Transportation Commission should in terms of City Wide, but the Planning Commission can look at it on the project by project basis. X. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported in regard to the Commission recommendation on the France project, the City Council reviewed that at their last meeting and agreed with the Planning Commission recommendation to leave the sidewalk and agreed with all of the conditions that the Planning Commission put on that plan. Planner Teague reported the sub-division on Oaklawn was reviewed and approved by the City Council and the Council agreed with all of the Planning Commission conditions. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Page 6 of 6 XI. Adjournment Commissioner Strauss moved to adjourn the July 24, 2019, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 7:55 PM. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. _____________________________ Jackie Hoogenakker/TimeSaver Date: Augus t 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:Kris Aaker As s is tant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:Varianc e req uest B-19-12 for 5209 G rove S treet Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : Approve the variance as requested I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he subject property, 5209 G rove S treet, is approximately 22,809 square feet in area and is located on the south side of G rove S treet. T he existing home on the lot is a one-story rambler built in 1959. T he applicant is proposing an 8.6 foot side yard setback variance to the west property line to allow for a 301 square foot garage addition to the existing two car garage. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Report and Attachments Engineering Memo <,!HSt:1•/"n<!i'J 1»ns�=�M=� ss;:uppy I1.LVI10)I IIIIIIII I I I II ,-- --;;.=•·· 7 ,----------: �•c~•=••• : : I I II I II I III III I I ----'-I ''-'I ___I � I I � I• I l l l!;i " :� � � � II I I I ,,! I I �!it : 1: 1l1! 111,1• ,d ftl J• J I II I Jim I ,,,.� .... ,.: � I I I II 1,I I I �I I I� L_ -----7 I L ___________ _ 1.le)] I ---------------- :!I lI•· =:i;--------r-!! l u i 1! i 1 I i I ! 1--t! I II__ _J IIIIIIII _____ _J z :s IL O!'. C)·C) _j lL O!'. w � _j D w \)) C) IL �IL �:;; DATE: August 2, 2019 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, Graduate Engineer RE: 5209 Grove Street - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include proposed survey dated 7/1/19, existing conditions survey dated 7/9/19, erosion control plan, and stormwater management report dated 07/9/19. Grading and Drainage The proposed plan includes two additions. Site drains to Grove Street and west towards an unimproved right- of-way and eventually adjacent to private property. Proposed drainage is similar to existing lot with the addition of a rain garden in the rear yard. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Curb Cut No comment. Public Utilities Water is served from Grove Street. Sanitary service lateral location unknown but most likely served from Grove Street. If other, please submit to City for review. O ther Items Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit required before issuing Building Permit. Date: Augus t 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r Item Activity: Subject:P reliminary P lat - P latting and Exis ting O utlot - O ak Lane Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the P reliminary P lat to build on the existing O utlot, subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the attached staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he applicant, L ance E lliott would like to build a new single family home on property that is currently platted as an O utlot. T his lot was originally created in 1975 as part of Warden Acres Austin R eplat and Warden Acres Austin 2nd R eplat. (S ee attached 1975 and 1985 P lats.) Within the 1975 P lat 25 feet of right-of-way was dedicated to the C ity with the intention of building a street to the east from O ak L ane to G arden Avenue. (S ee attached.) An additional 25 feet right-of-way was expected to be taken from the property to the south when it was ready to be developed. H owever, over the past 40+ years the rules in regard to filling in wetlands and flood plains have changed and the property to the south did not develop. (S ee attached floodplain and wetland map. N ote that there is a large wetland to the east, which prevented the street from being built.) T he applicant would like build a private driveway within the existing right-of-way and build a home on the existing lot. Edina city ordinance requires outlots to be replatted prior to any construction. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Staff Report Memo - Engineering Memo - Building Official & Fire Mars hal Site Location Maps & Wetland and Floodplain Maps His tory-Pas t Minutes from Previous Plats Warden Acres Replat (1975) Warden Acres Aus ting 2nd Replat (1985) Applicant Narrative Survey/Proposed Plat Grading & Drainage Plan Stormwater & Weltand Plan Lands cape Plan Site Plan Utility Plan Tree Inventory 500 Foot Median Calculations Nine Mile Creek Waters hed Dis trict Preliminary Approval Exis ting Condition Exis ting Right-of-Way His tory of Subdivis ions Letter from Adjacent Property Owner (5805 Oak Lane Adjacent Property Owner Letter August 14, 2019 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Plat – Platting an Existing Outlot – Oak Lane Information / Background: The applicant, Lance Elliott is proposing to build a new single-family home on property that is currently platted as an Outlot. This lot was originally created in 1975 as part of Warden Acres Austin Replat and Warden Acres Austin 2nd Replat. (See attached 1975 and 1985 Plats.) Within the 1975 Plat, 25 feet of right-of-way was dedicated to the City with the intention of building a street to the east from Oak Lane to Garden Avenue. (See attached.) An additional 25 feet right-of-way was expected to be taken from the property to the south when it was ready to be developed. However, over the past 40+ years the rules in regard to filling in wetlands and flood plains have changed and the property to the south did not develop. (See attached floodplain and wetland map. Note that there is a large wetland to the east, which prevented the street from being built.) The applicant would like build a private driveway within the existing right-of-way and build a home on the existing outlot. Edina city ordinance requires outlots to be replatted prior to any construction. To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. Preliminary Plat; and 2. A lot depth variance from 151 to 138 feet. Within this neighborhood, the minimum lot size is established by the median width, depth and area of all lots within 500 feet of the property. The minimum lot width and area requirements are met. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low-density residential, and contain single-family residential homes. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The existing site is vacant, contains, mature trees and a wetland. See the attached tree inventory. Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-dwelling residential Zoning: R-1, Single-dwelling district Outlots Section 32-9 of the Edina City Code regulates outlots as follows: (a) It is the policy of the city to allow outlots on plats and subdivisions presented to the city for approval pursuant to this chapter, but only for the purpose of simplifying the descriptions of parcels of land that: (1) Would otherwise be excepted from the platted area; or (2) Are to be conveyed or dedicated to the city or other public body. (b) Therefore, any outlots shown on a plat or subdivision approved by the council shall not be, nor deemed to be, lots or parcels, as defined in chapter 36, nor shall any outlots be developed by the erection or placing of improvements on the outlots, unless first replatted into lots and blocks pursuant to this chapter and the applicable provisions of state law. Except, however, improvements may be erected or placed by the city or other public body upon outlots conveyed or dedicated to it. This lot was platted as an outlot in 1985 as part of the Warden Acres Austin 2nd Replat, and the 1973 Warden Acres Austin Replat. (See attached Plats.) It was platted at an outlot subject to future platting of property to the south and west. (See attached history/minutes.) Right-of-way was platted in 1973 to provide access to this lot in the Warden Acres Austin Replat. There was to be a street constructed between Oak Lane and Garden Avenue. Additional right-of-way was to be obtained with the platting of lots to the south to complete the street. (See attached existing right-of-way.) However, the property to the south never redeveloped and the roadway never constructed. This is due in large part to the wetland located to the east. (See attached wetland map.) The outlot under consideration to be built on could be served by a private driveway over the existing right-of-way to provide access to the site. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Lot Dimensions Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 12,800 s.f. 82 feet 190 feet Lot 1 20,064 s.f. 140 feet 138 feet* *Variance requested The proposed subdivision meets the lot area and width requirements, but does not meet the lot depth requirement. (See the attached median calculations done by a licensed surveyor.) Grading/Drainage/Utilities Drainage flows from north to the south toward the wetlands. This drainage pattern will continue. (See attached grading and drainage plan.) The applicant is proposing to capture runoff in a raingarden to slow down and filter sediment before draining to the wetland. The watershed district has required a buffer adjacent to the wetland. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private properties. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of building permit application for each lot. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new home. Any approval of the proposed plat would be subject to meeting all the conditions required by engineering in their review memo dated August 2, 2019. Retaining walls will likely be required at the time of building permit for the construction of the driveway, to minimize impact to the adjacent property. Street Access As mentioned, access to the site is proposed by a private driveway that would be constructed within existing platted public right-of-way. After preliminary approval has been given to a plat or subdivision, the applicant shall enter into an encumbrance agreement to construct the driveway in the right-of-way with the city, on terms and conditions determined by the city. The city engineer has recommended construction of retaining walls with the driveway construction to minimize impacts on adjacent property. Staff recommends that the east-west portion of the right-of-way should be centered in the right-of-way to allow room for landscaping north of the driveway to minimize impacts on the neighboring home to the north. The driveway length from the nearest improved street, Oak Lane is over 200 feet, therefore the new home must be constructed with a fire sprinkler system, as required by the fire marshal. (See attached memo from the fire marshal.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 City Code Considerations Sec. 32-130. – Considerations. The planning commission, in reviewing proposed plats and subdivisions and in determining its recommendation to the council, and the council in determining whether to approve or disapprove of any plat or subdivision, may consider, among other matters, the following: (1) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18 percent or more, are such that the property is not suitable for the type of development or use proposed. (2) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more than 25 percent of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 percent. (3) Comply with section 10-82. (Tree Ordinance) Protected trees may be removed without mitigation, in the following areas: a. Including, and within a ten-foot radius of, the building pad, deck or patio of a new or remodeled building. b. Including, and within a five-foot radius of driveways and parking areas. c. Including, and within ten-foot radius of installation of public infrastructure improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and utilities. Trees outside of these areas would have to be replaced. Sec. 32-131. - Additional considerations. In addition to the foregoing matters, the commission, in connection with its recommendation to the council, and the council in determining whether to approve or disapprove a proposed plat or subdivision, shall specifically and especially consider the following matters: (1) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives and goals of the comprehensive plan. (2) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with chapter 36. (3) Whether the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or the design or type of improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision conforms to, and complies with, the requirements of applicable state law. (5) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals and requirements of this chapter, as varied by variances therefrom, if any. STAFF REPORT Page 5 The proposed plat is compliant with the exception of the lot depth. The median lot depth is not met due to the extremely deep lots to the south. (See attached.) These lots were planned to be divided in half with the construction of the road that was to connect Oak Lane and Garden Avenue. The 138 foot deep lot is reasonable when comparing the adjacent lot depths, which range from 120-138 feet. This lot has already been platted as an outlot, with the assumption that it would be built on in the future. The previous property owner dedicated the right-of-way to the city to provide access. Tree Removal There would be 26 trees removed to accommodate the building pad and driveway. The majority of these trees are Cottonwood; there are a couple of Oak trees that would be removed in the building pad area. There is a lot of Buckthorn. Under the City’s tree ordinance, these trees would not have to be replaced. Any trees removed outside of a 10-foot radius of the building pad, deck, patio, stormwater or utilities, and outside a five-foot radius of driveways and parking areas would have to be replaced. The applicant has provided a landscape plan with this proposal to plant trees along the driveway. Park Dedication As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore, a park dedication fee of $5,000 to plat this outlot into a buildable lot. History of Recent Subdivision Requests in Edina The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in recent years. Please note that the location of this site is not in the vicinity of all of these recent subdivisions, (See attached area map showing the locations of these requests…note that they are located in the Pamela Park Area.) History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) STAFF REPORT Page 6 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. Lot Depth Variance Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is the fact this lot was platted for future development at 138 feet of depth. It met the city standard at that time of 135 feet. Additionally, the road was never constructed to serve this lot, as the property to the south was never developed, likely due to the location of a large wetland. STAFF REPORT Page 7 b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances of the previous platting in this area that includes right-of-way to provide access and future street construction are unique in this area and not common in other R-1 Zoning Districts. These conditions were not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new single-family home would be constructed on an existing lot similar to lot sizes in the Grove Street area. Primary Issues • Is the proposed Re-plat (Platting an Outlot into a buildable lot) with a Lot Depth Variance reasonable for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the proposed subdivision is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. With the exception of the lot depth, the proposed lot meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 2. Lot depth is reasonable in the context of this neighborhood (The Grove Street area) with lot depths ranging from 120 feet to 138 feet. 3. The lot size is similar and in many instances larger than many in the neighborhood. 4. Upon compliance with all city and watershed district requirements for grading and drainage, the proposed subdivision would not have a negative impact on adjacent property. 5. This lot was platted with the assumption that it would be built on in the future. The previous property owner dedicated the right-of-way to the city to provide access. 6. A public road is not likely to be constructed in this right-of-way due to the location of wetland to the east. 7. It is reasonable to serve the site with a private driveway over the public right-of-way to provide access to this lot. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Options for Consideration Denial Recommend the City Council deny the proposed Preliminary Plat with the Lot Depth Variance. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat does not meet the standards outlined in Sec. 32-130. – Considerations as follows: (1) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18 percent or more, are such that the property is not suitable for the type of development or use proposed. (2) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more than 25 percent of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 percent. (3) Comply with section 10-82. (Tree Ordinance) 2. The physical characteristics of the subject property including topography, trees, vegetation, wetland, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, make the subject property unsuitable for development. 3. Development of the site as proposed would be harmful to adjacent properties. 4. A public street to serve this lot will not be built due to topography, mature trees and the location of a large wetland. Approval Recommend the City Council approve the proposed Preliminary Plat with the Lot Depth Variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. With the exception of the lot depth, the proposed lot meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 2. Lot depth is reasonable in the context of this neighborhood (Grove Street area) with lot depths ranging from 120 feet to 138 feet. 3. The lot area is similar and in many instances larger than many in the neighborhood. 4. Upon compliance with all city and watershed district requirements for grading and drainage, the proposed subdivision would not have a negative impact on adjacent property. 5. This lot was platted with the assumption that it would be built on in the future. The previous property owner dedicated the right-of-way to the city to provide access. STAFF REPORT Page 9 6. A public road is not likely to be constructed in this right-of-way due to the location of wetland to the east. 7. It is reasonable to serve the site with a private driveway over the public right-of-way to provide access to this lot. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. Final plat shall include a complete grading and drainage plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 2. At the time of final plat approval, the applicant shall enter into an encumbrance Agreement to construct the driveway in the right-of-way with the city, on terms and conditions determined by the city. The city engineer has recommended construction of retaining walls with the driveway construction to minimize impacts on adjacent property. 3. Prior to release of the final plat, the following items must be submitted: a. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. b. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Curb-cut permits must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. Driveway plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. b. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new home. c. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. 5. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated August 2, 2019. 6. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the building official & fire marshal’s memo dated August 6, 2019, including the new home must be constructed with a fire sprinkler system. 7. Compliance with the tree ordinance. STAFF REPORT Page 10 8. The east-west portion of the driveway should be centered in the right-of-way to allow room for landscaping north of the driveway to minimize impacts on the neighboring home to the north. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Preliminary Plat and Lot Depth Variance subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City Decision: November 6, 2019 DATE: August 2, 2019 TO: Cary Teague, Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, Graduate Engineer RE: Oak Lane: Outlot A 32211721410101 - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the existing conditions survey, and proposed grading & erosion control plan, proposed utility plan, and stormwater & wetland plan revised 5/13/19. A certificate of survey dated 6/28/19 was also reviewed. Grading and Drainage The proposed plan includes full redevelopment of the property. Site drains to a local 1% annual chance floodplain. Proposed drainage is similar to existing lot. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Floodplain Development The proposed lowest floor is at 912’. The local flood elevation is 908.8’. Compensatory storage required if fill is placed in the 1% annual chance floodplain. Applicant to submit earthwork calculations with building permit application. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Curb Cut The applicant proposes a new driveway in the right-of way. A curb cut permit will be required. Staff has concerns with the preliminary grading plan from a constructability and slope stability standpoint adjacent to the driveway. Applicants engineer understood the concerns and stated it would be addressed in the final design. Public Utilities Water and sanitary are served from Oak Lane. A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP-024, which is shown on the utility plan. O ther Items A final Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. A wetland buffer is required and proposed. The wetland delineation is over 5-years old. City will require confirmation from watershed on use of this delineation. Retaining walls may be needed for proposed driveway. If greater than 4-feet, the applicant will be required to submit drawings, cross-section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer. August 6, 2019 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshal Oak Lane House Proposal Information / Background: After reviewing the site plans for the new proposed house on Oak Lane. Do to the location of the new house, angle, length of the driveway and the house having no direct access to a street I would require a 13-D fire sprinkler system be installed. Verify fire hydrant location. 5616 Dalrymple Rd, Edina, MN 55424 Phone: (612) 220-0152 www.elliottdesignbuild.com City of Edina Cary Teague 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Re: Formal platting of Outlot A and related variance request, PID 3211721410101 Dear Mr. Teague, Please see the enclosed applications. Proposed Lot Plat This request is to formally plat Outlot A to create a lot for a single family home. This outlot was held by the original developer for the future development of two residential lots at the time of the original plat, but we are proposing to plat the property into just one lot. Access to the lot is provided via Oak Lane. We have applied for and received approval from Nine Mile Creek Watershed for the development of this lot, including the driveway. A wetland buffer that exceeds the minimal requirements is proposed as well as a large rainwater garden to handle stormwater runoff. The proposed runoff rates are less than existing. A copy of this approval is provided with this application. Below is a summary of the proposed lot. Lot Area: 20,064 SF (Exceeds 9,000SF minimum and 12,800 SF median lot size in 500’ Neighborhood) Lot Width: 149.14 Feet (Exceeds 75 Feet minimum and 82 Feet median lot width in 500’ Neighborhood) Lot Depth: 138.15 Feet (Exceeds 120 Feet minimum but less than 151.6 Feet median lot depth in 500’ Neighborhood, therefore variance is required) As you can see, the proposed lot greatly exceeds the minimum size requirements under Chapters 32 and 63, other than the lot depth is slightly less that the median lot depth based on the 500’ Neighborhood calculation. This is primarily due to the 500’ limit touching the deep lots located on the other side of Benton which is a significant distance from the property. In fact, if only two of those lots missed the 500’ line, the proposed lot would be in full compliance and no variance would be required. Also, something to note, 27 of the 61 lots within the 500’ limit have a lot depth less than our proposed depth. 5616 Dalrymple Rd, Edina, MN 55424 Phone: (612) 220-0152 www.elliottdesignbuild.com Variance Request All of the criteria of the City of Edina Ordinances are met in our Plat Application except Sec. 36-437 (3) Minimum Lot Depth. Although the lot exceeds the standard 120 feet depth minimum by over 18 feet at 138.15 feet, it is slightly shorter than the median lot depth of the lots within the 500’ radius neighborhood of 151.6 feet depth. The “Practical Difficulties” is that at the time of the original plat, the size of the subject property met the minimum lot depth requirements. In fact, it still does. The proposed lot depth of 138.15 is over 18 feet deeper than the minimum size requirement. But, it is technically less than the median lot depth of all the lots within 500 feet of the property based on this secondary provision in the city code. The reason for this is two-fold. There are a number of lots on the south side of Benton Ave. that are extremely deep at 299 feet. Also, some of the property owners in the near vicinity purchased second lots and joined them with theirs, creating double deep lots. If you were to disregard these lots for discussion purposes, our proposed lot would actually be one of the deeper lots in the neighborhood. All of these circumstances are unique to this property and not caused by the petitioner. Once granted, this variance will not alter the essential character of the property or neighborhood. The majority of the lots adjoining the property and in the vicinity have less lot depth than our proposed depth. Also, with a lot width and total area of the proposed lot is over twice the minimum size requirements, this lot will actually look and feel larger than the surrounding lots. Thank you for your consideration and please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lance Elliott, PE Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 (952) 835-2078 ninemilecreek.org Understanding Our Urban Watershed BOARD OF MANAGERS: Bob Cutshall • Erin Hunker • Steve Kloiber • Jodi Peterson • Grace Sheely May 14, 2019 Lance Elliott EDBI 5616 Dalrymple Rd Edina, MN 55424 RE: Conditional Approval of NMCWD Permit 2019-25 for Home Construction at Lot A at the intersection of Grove St. and Oak Ln. in Edina Dear Mr. Elliott, The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has reviewed and conditionally approved the permit application for the project referenced in bold above. The NMCWD permit was approved, but not valid and issued, until the project is in compliance with the following conditions: 1. General Conditions 2. Financial Assurance in the amount of $12,700. 3. Submission of documentation that a drainage easement over the stormwater-management facilities has been submitted to Edina (4.5.4i), if such easement is required by the city. 4. A receipt showing recordation of a maintenance declaration for the on-site storm water management facility and wetland buffer. A draft of the declaration must be approved by the District prior to recordation. By accepting the permit, when issued, the applicant agrees to the following: • Per Rule 4.5.6, an as-built drawing of the storm water facilities conforming to the design specifications as approved by the District must be submitted. A stage-volume relation for the rainwater garden/infiltration basin must also be submitted. • For the release of the $12,700 financial assurance required, Rule 12.4.1b requires demonstration and confirmation that the storm water management facilities have been constructed or installed and are functioning as designed and permitted. Verification, through daily observation logs and photographs, must be provided showing the storm water facilities used for volume retention have drawn down within 48 hours from the completion of two 1-inch (approximate) separate rainfall events. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will hold the permit until items 2, 3, and 4 above are received by the District. Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 (952) 835-2078 ninemilecreek.org Understanding Our Urban Watershed BOARD OF MANAGERS: Bob Cutshall • Erin Hunker • Steve Kloiber • Jodi Peterson • Grace Sheely If you have any questions, please contact Randy Anhorn, District Administrator at (952) 835-2078. Sincerely, Lauren Foley Permit and Water Resources Coordinator 1 Permit #: 2019-25 Project Name: Home Construction – Lot 1, Block1 Warden Acres Austin 3rd Replat – Oak Lane and Grove Street: Edina Approval Date: May 14, 2019 General Provisions 1. All temporary erosion control measures shown on the erosion and sedimentation control plans must be installed prior to commencement of surface or vegetation alteration and be maintained until completion of construction and vegetation is established as determined by NMCWD. If silt fence is used, the bottom flap must be buried and the maximum allowable spacing between posts is 4-foot on center. All posts must be either 2-inch x 2-inch pine, hardwood, or steel fence posts. If hay bales are used, all bales must be staked in place and reinforced on the downstream side with snow fence. 2. All areas altered because of construction must be restored with seed and disced mulch, sod, wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced within two weeks after completion of land alteration and no later than the end of the permit period. 3. Upon final stabilization, the permit applicant is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed throughout the project site. 4. At the entryway onto the site, a rock filter dike being a minimum of two feet in height and having maximum side slopes of 4:1 must be constructed. This rock filter dike will enable construction traffic to enter the site and also provide an erosion control facility. 5. If dewatering is required and sump pumps are used, all pumped water must be discharged through an erosion control facility prior to leaving the construction site. Proper energy dissipation must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. 6. The NMCWD must be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of construction. 7. The NMCWD, its officers, employees and agents review, comment upon, and approve plans and specifications prepared by permit applicants and their consultants for the limited administrative purpose of determining whether there is reasonable assurance that the proposed project will comply with the regulations and criteria of the NMCWD. The determination of the NMCWD that issuance of this permit is appropriate was made in reliance on the information provided by the applicant. 8. The grant of this permit shall not in any way relieve the permittee, its engineer, or other professional consultants of responsibility, nor shall it make the NMCWD responsible for the technical adequacy of the engineer’s or consultant’s work. The grant of this permit shall not relieve the permittee from complying with all conditions and requirements of the permit which shall be retained by the permittee with the permit. 9. The issue of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. 10. This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon the NMCWD or any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting of this permit or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors. 2 11. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property, rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly-owned lands or improvements or interests, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all necessary property, rights, and interest. 12. The permit is transferable only with the approval of the NMCWD (see NMCWD Rule 1.0). The permittee shall make no changes, without written permission previously obtained from the NMCWD, in the dimensions, capacity, or location of any items of work authorized by this permit. 13. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the NMCWD for inspection of the work authorized by this permit. 14. This permit may be terminated by the NMCWD at any time deemed necessary in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit. 15. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specified above. The permittee may, in writing, request that the NMCWD extend the time to complete the project in accordance with NMCWD Rule 1.0. The CITY of EDINA History of Similar Requests EdinaMN.gov 1 2&6 3 4 7&9 8 5 1 History of Recent Similar Subdivisions 1.In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2.In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50- foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3.In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4.In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5.In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7.In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8.In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2)lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.. & width was 60 feet wide.) 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. Approved 10 11 12 Date: Augus t 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.C . To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:Emily Bo d eker, Assistant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:P ub lic Hearing: C ond itional Use P ermit, O ur Lady of G rac e 5051 Eden Avenue Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : R ecommend approval of the C onditional Use permit with variances to O ur L ady of G race C hurch at 5051 E den Avenue. I N TR O D U C TI O N : O ur Lady of G race, the applicant, has submitted a multi-phased master development plan for improvements that include a priest residence, activity center, parish gathering space expansion and a school expansion and other remodeled areas within existing buildings. To accommodate the request, the following is requested: C onditional U se P ermit for the religious institution. R eligious I nstitutions are a conditional use in the S ingle Dwelling U nit D istrict. A height variance to allow the tallest addition on site to be 47’-6”. A 62.3’ street side variance to the east property line (N ormandale R oad). A 25’ variance to the west property line. A 50.6’ rear yard setback variance to the south property line. A sign variance to allow a 100 square foot building sign. A 5’ variance to allow the fence and preschool play area to be placed 10 feet from the property line. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Staff Report Aerial Map CUP Narrative Variance Narratives Concept Phasing Plan New Cons truction Plan Plans Variance Exhibit OLG Building Sign Material Board Engineering Memo Fire Memo Building Memo Sus tainability Ques tionnaire Stormwater Management Plan Traffic Study Plans s tamped July 12, 2019 Revis ed Engineering Memo August 14, 2019 Planning Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit with Variances for Our Lady of Grace at 5051 Eden Avenue Information / Background: Our Lady of Grace, the applicant, has submitted a multi-phased master development plan for improvements that include a priest residence, activity center, parish gathering space expansion and a school expansion and other remodeled areas within existing buildings. To accommodate the request, the following is requested: Conditional Use Permit for the religious institution. Religious Institutions are a conditional use in the Single Dwelling Unit District. A height variance to allow the tallest addition on site to be 47’-6”. A 63’ street side variance to the east property line (Normandale Road). A 25’ variance to the west property line. A 51’ rear yard setback variance to the south property line. A sign variance to allow a 100 square foot building sign. A 15’ variance to allow the fence and preschool play area to be placed up to the property line. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: An office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and a vacant parcel zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center Easterly: Highway 100 Southerly: Single Family Residences; zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and Guided Low Density Residential STAFF REPORT Page 2 Westerly: Grandview Square; zoned MDD-4, Mixed Development District and Guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Existing Site Features The subject property, 5051 Eden Avenue, is 20.67 acres and is the current site of the existing Our Lady of Grace Church. Planning Guide Plan designation: PSP, Public/Semi-Public Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Site Circulation, Traffic & Parking A traffic study was completed by Spack Consulting. The traffic study details impacts to Eden Avenue and Normandale Road intersection. The study recommends a possible roundabout as a long-term solution or other traffic mitigation techniques. Development at the subject property is not the only traffic contributor to the intersection. Engineering staff recommends the applicant pay a $40,000 cash payment to be used for future traffic and pedestrian mitigation measures at the intersection. Access to the site will remain unchanged with the proposed project. No additional parking spaces are required with the proposed project, although a small accessible lot is proposed to be added just north of the sanctuary to improve disabled parishioner or non-ambulatory access to the sanctuary. Parking requirements for churches and other religious institutions are based on the maximum seating capacity of the largest places of assembly. The proposed activity center addition will not seat more than 900 people which is equal to or less than the existing sanctuary space. Building/Building Material The building materials on the proposed building addition include brick to match the existing building, architectural precast, glass, and standing seam metal roof to match. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36-305, a conditional use permit shall meet the following: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; STAFF REPORT Page 3 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located, as imposed by this chapter; and 6. Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff believes that the above criteria are met. Churches are an allowed use in all zoning districts in the City. The Church use on the property currently exists but is just expanding on site. The site would not have an adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities or services. The existing roads currently do, and can support the site. The applicant will be required to pay a fee for the future improvements to the Eden Avenue and Normandale Road intersection. The expansion of the current Church use would not have an impact on adjacent property. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – East Side - South Side– West Side – Preschool Play Yard 95 feet 95 feet 95 feet 95 feet 15 feet ~890 feet 32 feet* 44 feet* (matching existing nonconforming) 75 feet * 10 feet* Building Coverage 25% 17% Maximum Height 40 feet 47.5 feet* Signage 24 square feet 100 square feet* *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the plans proposed reasonable to minimize impacts for the conditionally permitted Use? Yes, the proposal would not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed project is just expanding the church use and school at the subject property. The traffic generated would from this project would have minimal impact on the surrounding intersections and does not currently change the level of service. In the future, when surrounding sites develop, the intersection will need to be improved. The applicant will pay for their portion per the conditions listed in the engineering report. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Per the requirements of a conditional use permit it can be determined that the project: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located; and 6. Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. • Are the proposed variances justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. A height variance to allow the tallest addition on site to be 47’-6”. The proposed height allows for appropriate curriculum, cafeteria space, modern gym space and activity areas. The tallest portion of the addition is located as low on the site as possible to limit impacts to neighbors. The activity center will not be the tallest element on site; the existing sanctuary steeple will continue to be the tallest building. A 63’ street side variance to the east property line (Normandale Road). A 25’ variance to the west property line. A 51’ rear yard setback variance to the south property line. Practical difficulties include the existing location of Our Lady of Grace church and associated parking. There currently are non-conforming setbacks on site and previous setbacks approved with conditional use permits obtained in years past. The proposed setback variances will allow for the new additions to appropriately tie into the existing buildings while preserving mature trees and maximizing open space. The location of the priest’s residence STAFF REPORT Page 5 provides an appropriate transition between the existing school and church into the single family neighborhood. A sign variance to allow a 100 square foot building sign. Although the location of the church and school are located within a residentially zoned property, the site itself allows for signage that would typically would be seen in more of a commercially zoned area due to its size and location. Proposed signage will be located only on the north and east sides of the building facing other commercial and office uses and Highway 100. The size of the sign is reasonable given the size of the structure on which it would be located. A 15’ variance to allow the fence and preschool play area to be placed up to the property line. The practical difficulty with the proposed fence and preschool play area is the existing location of the church, school and parking lots. The proposed play area allows to save some existing mature trees. The location provides convenient and safe access to the play area and helps break up the walls of the gymnasium from public view. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? A height variance to allow the tallest addition on site to be 47’-6”. The existing use and proposed building additions have different height necessities than the surrounding single family homes. The gymnasium is placed low on the lot to help minimize the height from the neighboring properties. The sanctuary steeple will continue to me the tallest structure on site. A 63’ street side variance to the east property line (Normandale Road). A 25’ variance to the west property line. A 51’ rear yard setback variance to the south property line. The existing parking layout and buildings allow for the proposed improvements to be possible in few locations. The proposed layout was determined by maintaining mature trees, enhance public sightlines, and limit the massing in proximity to the single family homes while minimizing the loss of greenspace. A sign variance to allow a 100 square foot building sign. Oftentimes churches are located completely immersed within single family neighborhoods. The size and location of the existing church and school will have limited impact on the surrounding neighborhood and fits with the size and scale of the building. STAFF REPORT Page 6 A 15’ variance to allow the fence and preschool play area to be placed up to the property line. Due to the location of the existing buildings and parking areas, there were limited places for the building additions to be constructed. The proposed play area will be placed adjacent to the proposed gymnasium building between Normandale Road. 3) Will the variances alter the essential character of the neighborhood? The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The applicant will match the existing brick and building materials. A height variance to allow the tallest addition on site to be 47’-6”. The existing sanctuary steeple will remain the tallest element on campus. Other proposed buildings will have flat roofs and will keep a lower profile than the existing two-story class room buildings with a gabled roof. A 63’ street side variance to the east property line (Normandale Road). A 25’ variance to the west property line. A 51’ rear yard setback variance to the south property line. The proposed setback to the south property line will not be any closer than where the existing school structure sits today. The home that will be constructed on the west side of the property is the closest structure to the west property line and will provide a good transition to the single family neighborhoods. A sign variance to allow a 100 square foot building sign. The location of the proposed sign will have limited impact to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The proposed sign will fit the size and scale of the proposed building. A 15’ variance to allow the fence and preschool play area to be placed up to the property line. A fence is allowed to be placed up to the property line on a single family residential lot and therefore will fit in with the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with variances for Our Lady of Grace at 5051 Eden Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 7 1. The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-305 of the City Code. 2. The criteria for the proposed height variance are met. The proposed building additions are placed low on the site to minimize impact to the surrounding neighborhood. The needs for the types of buildings have different height needs to be functional than single family homes. The sanctuary steeple (existing) will remain the tallest structure on the subject property. 3. The criteria for the proposed setback variances are met. The practical difficulties include the location of the existing church and associated parking on the subject property. There are currently non-conforming setbacks that have been approved with previous projects. The location of the proposed buildings appropriately tie the uses in the buildings together while preserving mature trees and maximizing green space. 4. The criteria for the proposed sign variance are met. The proposed signage will have limited impact to the surrounding residential neighborhoods and fits within the size and scale of the proposed building. 5. The criteria for the proposed play area and fence are met. Fences in single family zoning districts are allowed to be placed up to the property line. The location of the play area avoids mature trees and will break up the surface area of the proposed gym wall. 6. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Our Lady of Grace currently exists within the neighborhood. The tallest structure on sight will remain the sanctuary steeple, the existing setback to the south will be maintained with the building additions, the setback to the west is for the proposed residence and will provide a transition into the neighborhood, and the proposed materials match the existing building. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site & building plans date stamped August 7, 2019. • Building materials presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Engineer’s memo dated August 2, 2019. 4. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Fire memo dated August 2, 2019. 4. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Building Official’s memo dated August 2, 2019. Edina, H ennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates 2013, © WSB & Associates2013 Our Lady of Grace August 9, 2019 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 300 ft / Opus AE Group, L.L.C. | 10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343 | 952.656.4444 | www.opus-group.com Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Conditional Use Permit Narrative 12 July 2019 Project Overview: Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church has commissioned The Opus Group to develop a Master Development Plan for submission to the City of Edina through a Conditional Use Permit which is proposing the future development vision of the church community for its 23+ acre site. The proposal envisions a multi-phased project that will develop over time providing Our Lady of Grace maximum flexibility for the parish now and into the future. For clarity, an exhibit follows this narrative to highlight new building footprints on site (Colored Purple) in comparison to existing buildings (colored gray). Refer to Exhibit titled “New Construction”. The initial plans are to erect the Priest Residence in the Southwest corner as part of the first new development on site. It is expected that the Activity Center (Gymnasium and Stage) and Link Building will be a part of the second phase of the project. The Activity Center will not seat more than 900 people, equal to or less than the existing sanctuary seating, in attendance to any one event. Once the Activity Center is complete a new commercial kitchen will be installed within the existing building shell and the current gymnasium, will become a multi-purpose room and cafeteria for the school and parish. A maximum occupancy preschool of 120 children may be erected as part of this second phase or be erected during a later phase as deemed appropriate by Our Lady of Grace. Two additional phases are currently anticipated with no particular order of development in mind. The first is a parish gathering space expansion and the second being a school expansion and parish office interior fit out within existing space. The school expansion, when complete, would allow full school enrollment up to approximately 1,000 students including the Preschool addition. An exhibit has been included to aid in highlighting the various phases and their anticipated order of development if known. Refer to Exhibit titled “Concept Phasing Plan”. Further breakdown of student body can be referenced below. Existing Student Population: 660 students Proposed Maximum Preschool Population: 120 Students Future Classroom Expansion Population: 220 students Total Student Population at full buildout: 1,000 students The development will consist of single and two story structures. The gymnasium will be the tallest structure on site with a height of 45’-0” from finished floor, certain architectural features may reach as high as 47’-6”. The remaining structures will be well below this height and the lower level of the southern wings would be a garden level configuration. For further detail please reference the Architectural Elevations and perspective images. The primary uses of the facility will be a church with ancillary parish administrative offices, school and ancillary school offices, preschool and gymnasium. Existing parking on site fits within the City standards and will not need to be increased as part of the development, however, a small accessible / convenience parking lot is proposed to be added just north of the sanctuary to improve disabled or non-ambulatory parishioner access to the sanctuary. Variances are being requested as part of this CUP and have been applied for through the City Variance application forms. A neighborhood meeting was held on June 24th to solicit feedback from the community. Building Design: The building materials and structure are being designed to be a generational building for Our Lady of Grace. While the church community will soon celebrate its 75th anniversary, the proposed new design is to provide buildings for the next 75 years and on. High quality and durable materials will be used to construct a building that will hold up as well or better than the existing campus structures have over time. The building skin will primarily be constructed utilizing a precast concrete wall system with brick exterior finish. Cast stone string coursing, cornices, medallions, and accents articulating the volumes both vertically and horizontally will break down the scale of the buildings in the Neo-Georgian architectural style of the existing campus. The brick color and cast stone will be a similar blend and color to the existing campus and are further defined with the submitted material board. Curtain wall and punched window glass systems will relate to the existing campus. The masonry will be detailed to complement the existing masonry ornamentation. The Activity Center, the largest building element, has been incorporated into the plan to limit its visual impact to the residential homes to the south. As these homes sit higher than the finish floor of the gymnasium, the perceived height to the residential homes will be lower than the actual proposed 47’-6” parapet height. This element sits at the northeast corner with the majority of the gymnasium parapet being 45’ high. The existing sanctuary steeple will remain the tallest element on campus as no structure or equipment is planned to be taller than this existing focal point. In addition, future building expansion along the southern border is proposed to have flat roofs which will provide a lower profile than the existing two-story classroom buildings which have a gable roof. The building footprints have been strategically placed to preserve as many mature trees as possible. Any trees that would be removed at time of expansions will be replaced per City ordinance or better. As the various phases develop at altering time it will provide a phased planting order which will aid in the presentation of a consistent and long lasting mature shade tree lawn. As part of this preservation of trees in the front lawn, it is proposed to push the activity center within 50’ of the eastern property line requiring a setback variance. The 50’ proposed setback is strategic as it also aligns with the original C.U.P setback guidelines established on this campus prior to the current 95’ C.U.P. setback which was recently changed by City Council. Upon submittal for permit, screen wall design and sight line studies will prove that all mechanical equipment has been concealed or screened from public view at all Right-of-Way frontages. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. | 10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343 | 952.656.4444 | www.opus-group.com Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 12 July 2019 Variance Request #2 – Maximum Building Height Allowed: 3 stories or 40’ Proposed Tallest Structure: 47’-6” Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, while the existing property is zoned R-1, its approved use has a differing density than that of a typical residential property. In order for the Parish and School to provide appropriate curriculum, cafeteria space and activity areas the school drastically needs a modern gymnasium. The building has been located as low on the site as possible to limit impacts to neighbors and internally to the sanctuary. This activity Center will not be the tallest element on campus as the sanctuary steeple will remain as the campus focal point and tallest element. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, the circumstances noted above are that the uses previously approved and proposed require additional building height beyond a typical residential home. Proposed height of the building has been lowered as much as possible while also burying the building on the low end of the site to limit its visual impact to the single family homes to the south. The largest mass has also been located away from the single family homes to limit its impact on the neighbors. With the unique CUP approvals already governing this use and site, it is unlikely that this approval will impact other properties in the vicinity or zoning district as they likely do not have the same or similar zoning and CUP constraints. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses and request are fitting with the purpose of the existing ordinance and uses on site today and will ultimately further enhance the quality of the campus and its outward expression to the public. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design of the future buildings has been intentionally designed to complement the existing architectural style of the campus. Buildings will be constructed of high quality, long lasting materials to provide long-term generational buildings fitting the existing campus and neighborhood context. Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 7 August 2019 Variance Request #3 – Building Setback (Street Side) - Normandale Allowed: 95’ Proposed setback: 32’ Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed reduction of the setback along the eastern property line was set intentionally to match the previously approved 50’ CUP setback while also assuming a consistent relationship along Normandale Boulevard where the property line at the SE increases the Right-Of-Way yard. One of the primary reasons for this setback is to better tie into the existing buildings while also preserving as many mature trees on the property as possible. The largest development will be erected on the former priest residence site which has less mature trees than other portions of the site. The 32’ dimensions preserves the consistent building edge to street relationship at the southeast corner which is established at the northeast corner with a 50’ setback. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, the existing parking layout and campus buildings only allow for the proposed buildings to be located in a few possible locations. We have proposed what we believe to be the best site location to preserve mature trees, enhance the public sightlines in and around the project, limit massing proximity to single family homes, and minimizing greenspace loss. With the unique CUP approvals already governing this use and site, it is unlikely that this approval will impact other properties in the vicinity or zoning district as they likely do not have the same or similar zoning and CUP constraints. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design should not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will likely impact the local vicinity in a positive way with high quality building design and materials fitting of the area. Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 7 August 2019 Variance Request #4 – Building Setback (Rear) – South Property Line Allowed: 95’ Proposed setback: 44’ Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed reduction of the setback along the southern property line was set intentionally to align with the existing school and its relationship to the property line. This dimension was previously approved as part of the previous CUP’s and we are requesting to hold this setback for the future development at the SE corner. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, the existing parking layout and campus buildings only allow for the proposed buildings to be located in a few possible locations. We have proposed what we believe to be the best site location to preserve mature trees, enhance the public sightlines in and around the project, limit massing proximity to single family homes, and minimizing greenspace loss. With the unique CUP approvals already governing this use and site, it is unlikely that this approval will impact other properties in the vicinity or zoning district as they likely do not have the same or similar zoning and CUP constraints. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The intent is to not provide any building closer to the south property line that what exists today. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design should not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will allow transition well to the single family homes to the south. Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 7 August 2019 Variance Request #4 – Building Setback (Rear) – West Property Line Allowed: 95’ Proposed setback: 75’ Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed reduction of the setback along the southern property line was set intentionally for the priest residence as it will tuck the project into a hillside limiting its visual impact to the neighboring residential homes. The priest residence is also the most scaled and fitting style and use to our neighbors to the south. We believe this use is reasonable and fitting with ordinance and previous CUP approvals. No future school expansion on the SE part of the site will project further south than the existing school and administrative buildings that exist today. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, the previous priest residence was located in a position that over time was heavily impacted by the development and increase of traffic along the highway 100 corridor. As the former residence was in need of replacement it does not make sense today to build a residential use in the former location on the frontage of highway 100. It is better fitting to be tucked quietly into the SW corner of the site where it can provide transition from the church and school uses to the single family homes to the south. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. There was a previous priest residence on the site which is being reconstructed in a new location. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design should not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will allow future development to better transition the single family homes to the south. Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 7 August 2019 Variance Request #5 – Building Signage Allowed: 24 SF Proposed: 100 SF Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, while the existing property is zoned R-1, we feels its approved use justifies review of this ordinance. The existing signage area allotment for residential homes is not sufficient for a campus of this size and location. We are proposing to use a more typical commercial building signage area to better align with the commercial projects to the north and Highway 100. Signage will be located only on North (facing commercial) or East (facing highway 100) fronting walls to limit any visual impacts on the residences to the south. With the local context to the north and east we feel the request is reasonable. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, With the unique CUP approvals already governing this use and local site context as this property transitions between residential and commercial it is unlikely that this approval and circumstance will impact other properties in the vicinity or zoning district as they likely do not have the same or similar zoning and CUP constraints or local surrounding context. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and may be more fitting with the commercial development to the north as well as highway 100. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design should not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will allow signage to be appropriately scaled to fit into its context and campus size. Our Lady of Grace Master Development Plan – Variance Application Narrative 7 August 2019 Variance Request #6 – Site Fence and Preschool Play Area Setback Allowed: 15 ft. Proposed: 0 ft. Will the proposed variance relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable? Applicant Response: Yes, Minnesota licensing rules require preschools to have an accessible large motor play area to serve the students in attendance. As the site has laid out with existing parking lot, a goal of building footprint reduction and preservation of greenspace and mature trees the best location identified for the large motor function space is along the east side of the gymnasium and preschool. This location provides convenient and safe access for students while also providing buffering of views of the larger gymnasium walls by providing foreground and activity to draw your eye. We believe the use is fitting and will further activate and enhance the campus edge facing the public domain. Will the proposed variance correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? Applicant Response: Yes, as the project continues to limit the loss of greenspace and preservation of mature trees we feel this circumstance would not be applicable to other properties in the zoning district or vicinity. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance? Applicant Response: Yes, we believe the proposed uses are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and are fitting with the way the site is used today with existing playgrounds along the eastern property frontage. Will the proposed variance not alter the essential character of a neighborhood? Applicant Response: Yes, the proposed design should not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will allow for a safe and secure space for children to play outside without detracting from the existing character of the neighborhood. The project ultimately better highlights the energy and activity of a school with the outward expression of its interior uses. OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, LLC. Opus Design L.L.C. tma VendasIgi0111-0111. OUR LADY OF GRACE - MASTER PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MINNESOTA OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP 1...1-02CRISS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN ZONING TABLE DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS OR 13' (IAN 6 pROPOSED IiAjPATiCE SLIMING AREA N/A 174/0945F ZONING XI R-1 PARCEL AREA NAA 2153 Amy MAA/TUM LOT COVERAGE 25% 1215 CONDITIONAL USES REI1G10115 INSTITUTIONS, ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, PRESCHOOL RELIGIOUS INSTIRITONS, ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, PRESCHOOL BUILDING MAX HEIGHT 35TORIE5 OR 40 X BUILDING SEISACX (NORTH) 95' > 95. (MIMING SETXXCX (EAST) 95' 37 0 BUILDING SETBACK ( WEST) 95' 15. X BUXOM smaalsoorm ST X BUILDING SIGNAGE 24 50 1005E X SITE FENCE 15' CY X PRESCHOOC PLAY AREA 15' V X PARKING STALL COUNT 462 PROMETTEPAI DEVELOPER GEOTECHMDAL OPUS AEGROUp LIE AMERICAN BIGINEERING TESTPIc INC TOMO AREA ROMIMEST 650 CLEVEIATIO AVENUE NORTH MAINETORKA 0/I16243 SIM PAIR. 191T6114 fACRITECT. ChM ENGSPER OMB AE GROW, LAC RAMAT. 102CCIMEITR0AD WEST 12202 VATITEWATER ERNE. MITER:0 IMPETORIKA 101152.5* 14511.0161A AIN 65242 LANDSCAPE ARCMTECT SUAIIEVOR SWEATS( CANOE WA SMIVE11110. LLC 12500 WKIEWATER UWE, SURE 300 WHO EMT 01.001,11.1014 FM. SUFfE110 10011ETOI015 MH 55341 BLOOMINGTON, 501155120 SHEET INDEX T1.0 TIRE SHEET C201 EYISTPM cONDITTONS 52.02 EXISTING coral-TOTS CUES EX1.511.CCt6411C4S C204 DEMOLITION PLAN 0101 OVERALL SPE PLAN C3.02 SRE 1,,,d4 0401 OW., , GRPZINGFUVI 0402 C.AFIXNG PLAN CS01 05.02 ERos Toil CONTROL PHASE I EROSION CONTROL IMAsE 2 GSM 000,1011 COMM NOTES AM DEVILS C01 OVERALL UTILITY PAN 03.02 IBILJTV FIAN mat TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 11.01 OVERALL LAMIArasp Rum/ LIM UnOSCAPE PLAN LAPS LANDSCAPE NOTES-DETAILS A1.0 LONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 51.1 LEVEL! FLOOR PLAN 01.2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 0100 RECTORY FLOOR PLANS AXII EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 5200 410 RECTORY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PERSPECTIVE ISAC.S DIM 08/072019 J. . iS0.40 Fourniea Of..41,1 f B. Partridge C.C.1161 8/8201910:09:00 AM TITLE SHEET SYEEI NNEZA REGEVATION 1,11.114.01-qA 31644000 ISSUE RECORD T1.0 VICINITY MAP 30 30 60 SCALE IN FEET RS I US1 Re ee. ? b¢Poa• -0 °14 Pe 11 •01.7 20 FT CHM LIM FENCE .„.• mee” AO O.. .9 2 1 't t i 1 '7" ) I l . .\ P 0. ... 1 . . , . . ; , > . , % / , P .. -. . Y. . . . : . I.. . . . . , " - . o , . s . . e . 1 0 ‘ . . 0 ' S s . .. 1 . . ' l - . .. 1 - "0 . , . " N .. :: -" . , - „ 1 -n - 1 s - 7 7 \ 4 7 „,_* . - • - •- $ -- t - ,s f.i r y i ., 5 :: - ' . ,,, ” 4,.. M ... 7 e :L”' W000 WALL NE :: ' GONCR :IL . RAVEL / .'...4 ' 2...1 ,51.-- ..-- rwO ' 117erl" --Im GRAVEL GRAVEL .104 •s11.3 I I •• Pgr 0 . 4229951229299 9 1570 (tsins. I 1/1 TO SH W L NO OCATION) (1 BE VACATED WHEN EAST 7 FEET) —1.042, \ \ • gib; \ at, \ '11° Nrio `.\ ,, .nay n \r\ • NCREIE II18 10 FT CHAIN LINN FENCE moo ILII GRAVEL 2191 010. Ill 3NI nu ill IJe7eTA" •200.2 CONCRETE 0002 N 888,CP Sr s ▪ Ern GRAVEL•wee ill aN BITUMINOU S erl ili 129, I - I 1 I 11 I S 6 BI .MA IN 07 TUMOUS .4 MY— 1. / '54 IVATOR WOW 41:11. Ira 11 Iv 1 Yon NE CORNER OF GOV'T LOT 8 -N UNE OF Mel LOT 111.0..7 AN r.4 0 GRASS of MATCH IL / SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 0 I I, I ..... I ;N /- }11'1° .r'ssek. • ,---*, LME POINT-70.3., 5& FROM S ,.. .,,,, ' , -,firgtST'‘4°e ..,A-7,7:4--4/...D' • Of EDEN .2096 ' -......, f vas ,...,... rise. \beer- --- '^3i.9 id CIA. PIeum,..ure 0061.0 • 2e RCP STS A *MO I hereby certify that this survey, pion, re report MS prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I em a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the Ines of the Stole of Minnemta. Doted this 7th day of August, 2015 SUNDE AND SURVEYING. LLC. /p Ar ee J. Caskira.L.S. 1.41nn. Lie. No. 44900 MAP Dom e:vised area on shoot 3 only 6/21/2019 22 ft p 171. BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC end UTILITY SURVEY FOR: OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH ISsusNirk' -viii.',Vivas.- Profref..8444262-8 /a ROP/R1 • 8./ IP R FRI Sec ona8 RJR PSATS00,4144p 041:4 2/20,1 1 of 3 I te 0 Il 111 ilii 711 41 III! I 1 L 1:- `) rp .04 I .00,0 V..c1110,7;,1,7...j7 .11 \I AM. CN ° o . >70 GRAD \ LIJ CI) O Area ex 1,013,018 square feet or 23.256 acres FC;FND O Denotes iron monument set marked with P.LS. No. 44900 • Denotes found iron monument AC Denotes air conditioner ACP Denote. above ground pipe(s) AIS Denotes advertisement/Information sign BBH Denote, boaketbell hoop BE Denote* building entrance BTC Denote, top of bituminous CVO BTL Denote. beaver tall curb CB Denotes catch basin CBOX Denotes control box CM Denotes communication box CMP Denotes corrugated metal pipe COL Denote, building column CST Denote, concrete atop DB Denotes decorative brick pawn ES Denotes electric box EM Denote, electHe meter EMH Denotes electric manhole FF Denotes finished floor FH Denote, lire hookup FOL Denotes fiber optic line FP - Denotes flog pole FW Denotes face of walk top Denotes gutter GAS V Danateo gas val. GP Denotes guard post DRDL Denotes ground light GW Denotes guy wire HCR Denotes handicap ramp HCS Denotes handicap eign H14 Denote, hand hole HAG Denote° communication hand hole HOF Denotes fiber optic hand hole HOD Denotes fire hydrant WV Denotes Invert LA Denotes landscaped area UFT Denotes lift station LP Denotes light pole MC Denote. metal cover MH Denotes manhole OD Demote. overhead door OHC Denotes overhead communication line OHE Denoted overhead electric line OHTV Denotes overhead cable television line Denote, per plan/not Sold verified PIE Denotes poet Indicator vol. PITS- Denotes parking sign PP Denotes power pole PPLP Denotes power and light pole PPU Denotes power pole with underground utility PVC Denotes polyvinyl chloride pipe RCP Denote, reinforced concrete pipe RD Denotes roof drain SAN S Denotes eanitary sewer SANC Denotes :military cleanout SKIM Denotes skimmer ST S Denotes storm sewer STAT Denotes statue SIC Denotes top of surmountable curb TAD Denotes truncated dome TO Denotes telephone be: THP Denotes tetherball pole IC Denotes top of concrete curb TCS Denotes traffic control eign TMH Denotes telephone manhole TRANS Denote, transformer box UGC Denotes underground communication One UGE Denotes underground electric line UGT Denotes underground telephone line UGTV Denotes underground cable tel.islon VCP Denotes vitrified cloy pipe VP Denotes vent pipe W Denotes underground voter One WMH Denotes water manhole WV Dentes water valve APL Denotes Apple tree ARS Denote. Arborvitae SAS Denotes Basswood tree BLCH Denotes Black Cherry tree BOX Denotes BoseIder tree COT Denotes Cottonwood tree CRAB Denotes Crabapple tree EVG Denotes evergreen tree GINK Denotes Ginkgo tree MPL Denotes Maple tree MTASH Denotes Mountain Ash tree PIN Denotes Pine tree PILAW Den tee White Pine tree SHB Dan les shrub SPCC Den tee Colorado Green Spruce tree SPR Dan tes Spruce tree TR Dan tea deciduous tree W1L Den tea Willow tree •11 00X bL ii III ). /, \ pro $,I i. 1 1T I / ,41. i 0 • 1 0- • 1 1 Ls • ..; 11 1A Fn 41 \\ri 4 \ .. :v • ' t". i \ I \i7 Jz \ \ \ \ \ t Z , lik ' \ \ .,.. tze "gf- ..4, \ \ P \ 'k I ..,t •e. t\ t el /CIA sc \ .il....'\ \ ,.\\ \\\ (7 ' ..• \\ \\\ 1 zI'VI 4'-'a.\ 1 I sr...# •LI 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 ,I 7 \ \ .40 1 I I ! I 1 1 t \ 1; i 1 LI 1 , , &IT; / ,,-.1 _ i 1 -. \--. 1 \ ,,III ' /0,./.'40:;: ,; \: \ fk 1\ ,\ \t \ \'\ \ \ . '•E! ,-;,,:, z' '''''' ,..- .;-.3- --1.s• .!!! 01,, '.0 \ .'ik \ / ) 1 / 4,,,, 1 \ k 0 z _L....-..-..-.,.., - „..,. -;13,-- •,- 1-\' I 1 1 n ':17' 455 •11111.0 ONO 001 NIA ./ MATCH I /SEE SHEET I OF 3 RCP sr s foso •01.11 • /- •00.1 • Mad e ea.! G 0 G R EXIST/NC BUILDING AVZ 71•4 4 X 0 4 \ .Mal li .,.%rr uiku SerLJZAI Vil ri.L. .....‘ di. ' Alf 9 r j ' • --, „:„ . .....1k . . ` .' .. A „. \ • 1 7 \ p .. •Aj • 17 .,,!‘ ii NJ M / /AM ._1_.."7:11/./1 3 sAso 1 en, or \ en ../.. '01111. /.r. \ IV101.11 U 5 .. ? 0iu }till; i r 010.A1111,, Igal 1 t-tr4 \ M i 1X‘0.-U L ! „ ' ., 01.11 X/ 08 N89.47'55"W AREA '"Rize ek 9 % 4 NM: Os A S '4433 o 100 102 101 •• 7 110 VMS • .11•11., ROD I I, • ..;,` tux 11.1. ' .t•tA efraApp!Frra re. /Lill,' 41. lax 400N - ts w•A BITUMINOUS LOU '1035./2 S 13 1. C I hereby certify that this survey. plan, or report was prepared by ma or under my direct supervision and that 1 om a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 7th day of August, 2015 DUNCE AND SURVEYING. LLC. By: Ar ee J. Ca o . .L.S. Minn. L•. No. 44900 pRevis. areo on sheet 3 only MAP th, 2 it Ororshp BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITY SURVEY FOR• OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH 51E2E -otq,r6a1FAIE) a vow* au ...in Ip / A. X •T *NM 0100 *Ci D6 Ha II •., SII Iran IP iT I I I I 1 AZ , R;1 CZ Al Iwl fu It JC II III In \ 33 II // 4 LI to I I I / / / JE n lit n n n n n a n r. a a a it noo.. ....),_. r.,,, ,.„ ,..... --.... 1 , or., ' ) IA s' r .4 a' f7''''" : \ k-..,.. • ,... i "4 7 ' \ ''',..4 7 r r \ ,,iCler ,,,,,V . 0-314 \ /13P1'er-j 6J,ir.J01 ,t6'33 rS, . L.- "'. yaw 1-rPP. /',_ -7".' /042j / / ."" 449/ ../ y' / / .....' \ , ro,. ILA PI AT RECORDING INFORMATION The property is currently unplatted per the Hennepin County Poperty Map online. ) BearInge and/or dim...ions Hated within brad.. are per plat or record documents. This survey was prepared without the benefit of current title work. Easements, appurtenances. and encumbrances may exiet In addition to those shown hereon. Thio survey is made. to revIelon upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. •001.7 rr 170- 6 FT CHAIN UNIX FENCE uu,, ASS- 7111/ ibu -s 041 / Ill Asp, 1 //NOS BITUMINOUS •10111 • 901,0 8' RCP RC .7 • MI6 18' RCP AA( 101 K.1 107 w•07.1 0012 Csse Sri 131TUUlsouis .0131 \ \ • 0,1 4./t.71.11 I Mon, l 1 des ma 01 A 01 93,10. • MOS ••t7 • i l7 /vi A/ L'..) GENERA! NOTFS_ I.) Survey coordinate basis: Hennepin County Coordinate System. UTILITY NOTFS_ I.) Utility Information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilitien shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground feature, cannot be occurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed Information is required, excavation may be necessary. 2.) Other underground of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locatione are shown a. marked onsite by thumb utility companies who. locators responded to our Gopher State One Coll. ticket numbers 151752426 k 191564809. 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for preclee onsite location of unit'. prior to any excavation. BENCHMARKS (BM) I.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant north of the service road on the south side of building. Elevation • 919.45 feet 2.) Top of 3rd light pole base frorn the north end of the southwest parking lot on the eouth side of Top base. devotion • 923.55 feet .014 • MO ••16.0 .GBAVEL••04.0 xpbx ••mx lowe BITUMINOUS s.p.• 0.0 9 mix eau 1.1 / 01 oi re7., 11”11.1 Of. e 41i1V ' / . •.... BITUMINOUS • 4,9. xltas '7.0753. ser Sir LINE OF 0091 LOT & 52C. 20 EXISTING 2ItSiTO_RY BUILDING et,.1.1130F GOVT LOT I. 01 . .9111.2 011.010 2.) Top of concrete base of flog pole northeast of northeast building comer. devotion • 921.10 feet 30 ZO 60 11 11 1 SCALE IN FEET Preitel,21-262-8 BR 4X re ROR/21 R.0818/0 ah II> R pir2/ SactleeT8 0.982028.11...g i 2 of 3 Cr) EXI577NG BUILDING N • 4' //1"1:-.: \ - !\\ ‘2' 110° I tell, \st . Ajna.1 I ract r - -rmkrAtegir BM 4*I I I 2:1 EO 2tCr5Air3ITHS' , S ENT. NOT REFLECT RNT. CONDITIONS 7"" c. s \ \ cu, ' , r,c, \ \TN., coius ops. cnoss ,1 4.* \ 1.40.03. MUSD NENN. CA C ri likt iss.)r •. hE woe OF SON'T LOT IS AC. 2. ILP en CONOICTE STOW OUTSIDE MX Sattla roe or LtIVCRVe STOOP OtITSDE DOOR /fee tetta (.7 I CAV'T LOT I. 33 " EA7STING BUZ A piro. .S UNE .A2 *^••• roa r^ Aff Iro0 EX/S77NG 21. STORY BUILDING :he wra ‘c.`v ..,_- AVI13311 e. RCP SI ' S wee ,-- -7 4-49 ,T •tia.1 geZta., =oil: GRASS ••341 12 FT,PH4 ° /14iginf"FETCEN t:171 •0223 CONY CD 0 CO; W O cNi D. 4020 4807.4 .2 CRAVEL•mme ONO 03 ••07.0 Ir 91711MinO 0S IS MT Kea MATCH n E SHEET le H..... ......-- Joe ..., ,...., ..1, e ....- 4 ... .. rf.... / I I 0 .4... 8 ow "1"10011, ..I. ....„ 1 I / al .iti / 8 e f. 1 .9124 , t,... ..L. t e I R 1110 \ •411. e^ MU •11121 --- •sa, , ..„::;•'" „..e.......marac.,-. - tot..krc N1.432 "W.0 g....yc V 24 /1K9 Sr s ID' RCP STS Slat s• s .,„ 13 ITU II I NOUS• Ifolt :gy m B ITUMINOUS al atm Al . - 1035. 12 . g ITU II IN g • OUS I PI' ‘-3.1,23912211111422 ; fi ,. `."q c .TsE 2, E 1 .‘,..,6 6 ?AZ 6 6 I N8.9'47:551Y •4.74.¨ 041 tiara 1301111122 eT 4•17.4 •512.4 NUN 0932 21114012 T UIt i'N,0 Us •913. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED And yiET sg H ; Z. .5 G. C v A" NW COM CS SEG 10, T. 3s. R. 34 That part of Government Lot 8 of Section 28. Township 117 North. Range 21 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing 26 2/3 rods East of Southwest comer of Lot 8; thence North to East line of Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway right of woy; thence Northerly Wong said right of way line to a point distant 703 7/10 feet Southerly along same from Southerly Ilne of Eden Prairie Road; thence East 193 2/10 feet; thence North to center of said rood; thence Northeasterly n orth some to North line of Lot Si thence East to Northeast corner of Lot a: thence South to Southeast corner, thence West to beginning. Except that part thereof lying northeasterly and easterly of the southwesterly and westerly line of the highway taking deecribed in Doc. No. 3799189. Also except the southerly 40 toot of said Eden Prairie Rood. All that part of Government Lot Eight (M. in Section Twenty-Eight (28), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North. Range Twenty-One (21) West, of the fifth Principal Meridian, according to the Government Survey thereof, bounded and described as follows: Commencing at the point where the Easterly line of the right of way of the MInneopolls. Northfield and Southern Railway was located and constructed across sold section Is intersected by a line parallel with and forty (40) feet southerly ot right angles from the center line of the Eden Prairie Road. eo-called, as laid out and located through said Section, which point is hereinafter designated 03 Point 'A". and running thence North Sixty-seven degrees. two (2) minutes Coat, along said parallel line and ot an angle of One Hundred Sixteen (118) degrees, forty-seven (47) minutes, with sold right of way line, o distance of One Hundred Twenty (12D) feet, thence South two (2) degrees, thIrty-three (33) minutes East 408.5 feet too point which is the actual place of beginning of the land hereby conveyed. Thence from said octual place of beginning South two (2) degrees, thirty-three (33) minute, Coot 340 feet; thence South Eighty-nine (89) degrees, Thirty-eight (35) minutes west 193.2 feet to sold Easterly fine of right of ream thence Northerly 340 feet along sold right of way line to a point 353.7 southerly from said Point "A". measured along sold right of way line; thence Northeasterly at an angle of Ninety-four (94) degrees. Forty-eight (48) minutes with said right of way line a distance of 154.3 feet to the actual place of beginning. And All that part of Government Lot 8, Section 28. Township 117. Range 21, West of the 5th Principal Meridian bounded and described as follow= Commencing of the point where the Effecty line of the right of way of the Minneapolis. Northfield. and Southern Railway os located and constructed across said section. la intersected by o line parallel with 2 nd 40 feet Southerly at right angles from the center fine of Eden Prairie Rood, so called. as laid out and located through sold Section. and running thence North 67 degrees minute. East along said parallel line and at an angle of 116 degrees 47 minutes with sold right of way fine. a distance of 120 feet; thence South 2 degreoe 33 minutes, East 408.5 feel; thence West 154.3 feet to sold Easterly line of Railway right of woy at a point 363.7 feet South from the place of beginning, measured along said right of way line; thence North along said Easterly line of Railway right of way to place of beginning. Hennepin County. Minnesota, And The north 150 feet of that part of Government Lot I of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, lying east of the roilroad right of way and west of the west line of the highway taking described In Doc. No. 3799189. Property is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. -T LL ; 2 O O 0 Li; 0 8 DI S OCIIrL 7 5, 521 43 I hereby certify thot this survey, plan, or report was prepared by mo or under my direct supervIelon end that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Doted this 7th cloy of August, 2015 SNIDE ND SURVEYING, LLC. Br Or ee Ca2a.LS. ;Alen. Lk. No. 44900 $, Revised area on sheet 3 only paewe 1711. BOUNDARY, LOCA770IV, TOPOGRAPHIC and U77LI7Y SURVEY FOR: OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH 55 suNDE so. 02". 322-0631-05241 Projeet,8-262-4 fie/Pwita9/11 RETSIS/13 Towle* > Fonpw21 Socliont.721 47091120712001.ewe enzr 194 Date. 06/07/TOIS 3 of 3 MAP Br 0 740 \ CADVivil Sheeta 21740—C2—DEMO.thr9 [DDAOLMON PLAN] BITUMINOU S / 0 OPUS" THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Opus Design Bulk, I.L.C. 1.1.34.,Pme Noomm DIORN2 kambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 WhItanter 01005 aim 300 Ifinnetalka, MN 55343 763.476.60101*bn°. Enpairtrial I Surejna I Pantry I Erdianerardal MIER OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP LAmmENG,Ass 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN VOLLENT.GIR 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP Submittal REMOVE DOST/MG MEE REMOVE COMB. DONT FIRM. EX/SANG BUILDING EXISTING 21 STORY BUILDING .LEag 0 C£ GONE LOT I. I WOVE WOOD 00121/2019 MIER VANitiEi CMA ma.. IT JGP 0-.3351 MEL maNTPADDA I WEN, Emery NIA NM phrt speciLlem. NINA 045 PNPACA try Ore winder Al dr111 supenision and Oarti air a ,GGY e4YELLINNI ENGINEER under the laws of Ma state 101 Chad M. Aye 011.05 04407/12/2011 Pt.nFeh ['arg,E,44a raa.4e n.sreaa attta 9-arlitE DEMOLITION PLAN 34EFINA.1 C2.04 EXISTING a__ Ii 0 c. 1 • Fs ." B.1 V///1 /////4 x NORTH 0 30 GO E6T6 SCALE IN FEET OI 2 11 21 I NODS /08, -DEMOLITION NOTES DERIOLMON NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE- CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A MAR MODERSTANDING OF IRE IL/TEM/EP SCOPE OF 1VORIC 1. THE DESIGN SHOWN IS EASED ON ENGNIEEFFS UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING COhOOLONS. INE MOOG coNorno.srionN 0111116 MN ARE RAMO IL FON ALM ANOTOPOGRAPLIN MAPPING PREPARE° ST SONDE LAND SURVEYING DATED 0621-2019. IF CONTRACTOR DOB NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPIEL AS SHOWN ONTNF MAID WRHOUT DYCEPOON, CONDUCTOR SHALL NAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BTA REGISTERED NOLO SURVEYOR AND SUB MIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR RENEW. 3. THE COMIRACTOR RESPOMILME FOR 012101111011, REMOVAL.. AND DISPOSING INA lOCADON APPROVED BY ALL GOVERN. A LONORNIES PAO IN ACOIRIDANCI WITH APP ...ECM.% OF ALL STRUMMER, PADS. WAILS FLUMES, FONNEMOONS, PARED.. DRIVES. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, untrnEs, ETC- SUCH INAT TILE IMPROVEMENTS 5210071 ON THE MANS CAN BE CONSTRUCEED. ALL FROLITIES TO SE REMOVED SHALE EE UNDERCUT TO MIAMI ANNUM!. AND BROUG/IT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FRI MATERAI PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTEOINICAIELIGNEER 4. [NEARING ANDGRUBRING: COMERACLOR RESPONSILE FOR REMOVING ALL DERRLS FROM TNE MEAN° DiSPOSING THE DEERS INA DONOR MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL b. CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONDS. FOR ENE DISCONNECTION OF MIRY SERLACTS TO MIMING BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF ON 601011165. 7. NFP ACTOR SNAIL COORIMILATE VAIN RESPECT& UMW COMPANIES TO REMOVAL Ni WEIR REVOCATION Of ME NG CONTRACTOR SHALL CCORNNATE WON UMW COMPANIES CONCERN,. PORTLONS ELMORE WIOCH MAY SE PERFORMED MINE UTILITY COMPANIES' FORCES MIDANT FEES WHIC11 ARE TO REPAID TO WRIT( COMPAIRM FOR SERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PARING MIMES AND DOMES S CONTRACTOR 65FECIF10111.7 [MOONED THAT LOCAIIONS OF EMMA. LITTUTIES SMOWN IN THIS PIAN NAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVANABLE ONONEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIMUTE FOR THE LIMON MAPPAG ACCURACY. PRIOR TOSTART OF ANY DIS OUTION ACTIVIER THE CONTRACTOR 91411 NOWT UDINE COMPANIES. HOURS PRIOR TOANT ONAVADON FOR 011-SITE LOCATIONS OF MONO DOLLING THE LOCATIONS OF UTIOTIES MIMI BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY MUM M NNESOTA GOPHER STATE MN CAU AT 600-252-116b OR BRIAS4-0002. 9. THE UPPING LOGI/ONO; AMMON° SEWERS. PINK A/10 LIDLNES SHOWN ARE NOT TO REINTERPRETED AS INF MET LOCATION OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT I.MY OCCUR ON THESRE. NOM EXISTING CONDITIONS AMO PROCEED CAIT12012 ARGON ANT ANTIOPATED FEATURES. GM NOTICE TO AL nil, COMPANIES RE DESTRUCTION AND REMOVALOF ALL SERVICE ONESMO CAP ALL ORES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORT. UNDOES MAN. TO RE ABANDONED SHOM BE REMOVED IF UNDER TME BUILDING INCUBI/NO 10. BEYOND FOUNDATIONS. 10 ELECOUCAL,TELFPHONE. CAME, WATER, FIRER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR CASON. NUMMI° SERENA.° OR RELOCATEOwnII RE COORDINATE D WITH MN REFEREE/0E11TV COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL RE PROVIDED FOR REIOCATION ANDEL°. COORINNAMON WITH TN MOT COMPANY IS NECESSARY T PROVIDE A SM00111 TPAILLTIONIN MON SERVICE. CONTRACTOR.. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO ELOPING DOMES WITNNITNE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 0110.116 CONSTRUCTION. 11. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECTINEPUBLIC ATALL ONES WITH FMK, BARRICADES, 51010.0SURES, ETC, TOTHE REST PRACTICES 12. coanmmoSACCESSSILUSEIMIPPIIMHORETIESUA0.00300107110FERTIFSATALL INIES DURING DEMOLITION OF ENE EXIST/NG FAMINES 13. PMOL TO 0414017110N OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROIDDACES PRETO IN INSTALLED ANDAPPROVED EN THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. 14. CONTINCTOR VALI LIAINSAW-CLIT &PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY INOSEAREAS WHOLE ITS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCION FLANS BUT IF ANT DAMAGE IS INCURRED 011 ANY OF THE SURROUNIKNG PAVEMENT, ETC.THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL DE P.ESPONSTINE FOR ITS REMO/MAN° REPAIR_ IS. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EMSONG FEATURES WHICHARE TOREN.. DAMAGE TOMO( EMSEING CONDITIONS TORE/ RAM WILL BE WINCED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. IS. ABANDON OR REMOVE AllSAINTART, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS COORDINATE...ELMORE...117N CNN AOSTREET RESTORATION SHALL RE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE VAD1 LOCAL STANDARD, 17. CONTRACTORSNALL PREPARE AND SUBMEr TO TINGOVERIL AUTHORNI A TRAFFIC AN NNW PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CEENCOUNTI/STAIE STANDAROSTO REAPPROVED RN THELMA.. GOVERNING AUTHORITY. - VI --i, - 1 I T .,..--;-- _4- I :1---1-1:a \ 1,1 1 .,---- ...- .--; ..... -- i /-- ,il / I .44 ''' i i 1 hi ) 411 f 1 I I 71 I -I I ,I II // ''':=--!1''. :2-L':' ,‘ ' - ' 1 ., ' I . ,,.---IY I ?1:• F-11 1 -111g-51:1 : II F \ 1,2 „...,,._ ,.., p., / . '''\ \ ' -1 ''' \ Z"-- ,. 7 1--111 Ca ---,_ / ..4WPI7 I r r +1, A Ain!. Pr I i ll ' ii (1 A 09 r zafivrAost 1110 I t 1 64.4 I I 1 Ar7Ar".1-4"511 --) KO EIFFAJA Vi I \ rritg \ 1 1 1 IrOl Taia r 1111 f' ) rAt I ,f 1, trAO, , lit ' 1 21KI wzo, ir sior- 'i .dr"A I rAr 4(011,1 1 .41.M.PrAl 'AWAY A WI REMOVECUR I i i , ,,,Ls,: A 141 4 , \ I i 1 1 I , 1 {iii it 1 1 1 li II I iii 111 1111 4 1 i . 1 111 11 I i I la.t 1 11 1 iil A ELOCATE MONUMENT Li AS NEEDED • S. = LEGEND GAS METER INDRANT DONT STORM SEWER DRAW TILE WATERMAN FORCE MAW SAMMY SEWER OVERHEAD MORN NIIDERGROUND TEL MODE UNDERGROUND CABLE IV UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS WIRE FENCE IRON FENCE WOOD FENCE OWN LINK FENCE EDGE Of TREES TREES/ my Rues CONCRETE GUARD POUR SONS CONCRETE CORD SOINAINOUS CURB REMOVE EXISTING UTNITY UNE REMOVE EMIT CONOLETE cults SAW CUT COST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE OXBOW WINN NOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE OUSTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING WADING REMOVE FlOST11/0 °PANDA/RIVE RE51OVE FASTING IANCESCANNG REMOVE Dusnno TREE (SEE 10.01 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN) REMOVE DUSTING REMOVE EM UTILITY 1231= Al2, 1.91714 GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM ,s‘ I 1:1 1111 111:11 11'1;;;STOVLI4E11 . = s ----- ss. : / \ 1 1 r xos :5551;!:555w..v.w.t......•-!..v • • • • • 4 - - E'' IOGTE Futon-1So wELE r ) /1" °.1,," 4 // S r.t, / 3 / r rIOCATE OVERHEAD UTILME ij I I \ \ I -. 4 \ \ /4 t ) • , ,,,, "- l _ - ---\, Q-' \ \ \ \ *r \ 4a A \ \\ \ 1' ‘F / / 7 sit, \ 11 / / c z1 s \ m \\\ 4 4 .... / e -N. •F\ I I t \ \\ „,\. , N ".4,_ ,,, 7 / ./..-- 1 I I I \ .,,F., • ,..-.. irrur.,c......0,....a! ,,,,' tr.0. ~vrei,.® N N. N . N. \ N N 0,,.....; rice, wo A Weir AsPiroftirSsigrAv.rmit, -"0.42MR‘n. -•1111,7mrmat7e:il migaw go. ArAvArrAirArAgrArffra'0201 1E- MIXATE E A plr AW,R\ 140 1 4:,= olz• h, I , 1 X01100 mix 300.1tRAFE,0 -1 1 041 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 6,42.0% 533.11, F-245,14/ Opus Design BUM, L.L.C. ro[08.1 Pair. Poonnin 1.6.0.0110 EGISSPPIA ekSarnbatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Wooster [kW, Sults 300 MInnetonks, MN 55343 763.476.6010 tiephone 091.4 r9 I Senotno I Haying I Eodrocrrenot OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 1.1.471,41715.5 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 374=‘; ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 06/2112019 CMA taunt ss JGP MLL MOM st ospposuppu Iherel :ry carERYIAaYA0 Ow, sp.., Nation cr re* was ponuared by roe au tuner [GPFunsbn and Opt I an a tity Kensed utolonaorul F110102S11 unae.Or Imo of P. nate oltknonuota. Chad M. Aye Ssaannstian 80007/12/2019 Purnotapy sant sornbatelt &Ton OVERALL SITE PLAN 9-1EF PINIE£T1 C3.01 I -LEGEND PROPOSED FASTING NORTH 0 GO 120 Trans DI FEET PROPERTY MGT U2/1 E. GUTTER EASEMENT GOMM. RETAINING Wal comeozeost0 WETUGID WAITS COMETS PAP. MUMS SAWS. LIM SIGN PIPE BOLLARD 5060.800E PARKING STALLS KA ROW 0 SET MOTE C> STANDPRO MITT TA IIISLT PAVING 0E11..0,1 ASPHALT PAVING —CI—SRLdwg (OVERALL SITE PLAN] August °pup A Ac E — U \ PROJECTS \ 21740 \ CAO \OW \ Sheath \ 21 g, as CONCRETE SILAIVAIX 'SEE t3.02 FOR SITE MN /10TES s. 0 10 0 U 5 GR ASS OS' =LEGEND PRO ORD EXISTING PROPERTY ULM CURB 6 GUTTER EASEMENT BUILDING REIN RING WALL WETLAND WAITS MEW, SAVIEUT UNE SIGN STANDARD DIM ASPHALT PAVING " '25=VINC FDOCC.00000 CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE UDE.. PIPS 801.1.ARD NUMBER Of PAVING 0 STALLS PER ROVE KEY NOTE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TIMING MOVEMENT LOCALION • OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 'MIAs. Ran. Weetsia,10.01,10. Opus Design Bold, L.L.C. 0.1.011,-Aadr-0, V0Aria/A,0,11l fj:-arribatek www.sambatek.com 12600 WMPerala Dam Suite 3B0 Minnetonks, IAN 55343 763.476.6010 Mephone Gskeeriv I Sultstg I Plandr0 I Eredronrnalal 00.07 OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN facakCIICAZER 31644000 DO s DITLMIN 0u.S 47.5,.113,os c o C ••3 176' — PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF UTILITY EXTEPION, SPE SHEET-6602 REMOVE ITA'IX1TIRTFOR O 1 -:- ' • --4.,.. ATM .7 ya.my LAY KNE T O Osa is XS' NOUS 6 4 E 0 ELI. CUT RELOCATE NIOPRIKIENT SIGN AS NEEDED ® a 43 ElrL z.t 4, 0 v 1 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY GR GRO4SITEAREA 1, 332474 5E 2353 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SP 07.70 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 439,418 Sr 10.09A6 PROPOSED MIT COVERAGE 429 A DISNRSED AREA 261.0055P 5.99A6 ZONING R1 01311/16 MORD RI PRGPOSB3ZONING =DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1. AB DOA ENVOYS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST-MATH POOL 2 ALL IRIKENSIONS SHOW! NIETO THE MAE OF PURR TO FACE Or NR8 UNLESS OTHERIVFSE NOTED. 3. CONTRACTOR SNAIL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AIM CONSTRUCT -GUTTER OM' WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB- ALL OTHER AREAS SNAIL BE CONSTRUCTED AS IGO-7ERN CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRAS-MA 4 ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TEETHE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE SI IN WIDTH/IND IS IN LENGTH LIIIIESS 01116R1VBE DIDAATED. 6. CONTRACTOR SWIM REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MCI LOCASIONSAND DIMENSIONS OF BUT PORCHES, PAMPA PRECISE BULB. DiLIENSIONSAND EXACT BUM. unuTE EMPARCE LOCATIONS. 7. REFER TO F MAL PIAT FOR EDP 80111MARIES, LOT MULIBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DISANSIONA A ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTES., HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF ASIA EXISAT AT CURB RAMPS (I:MA/IDA RIOXIMUIA CROSS SLOPE OF LS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE RI ANY DIRECTION ON ASADA PARKING STAAOR A66855 AISLE SMALL BE L5B. THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL REVIEW ARO VERIFY OA GRADIENT WIDE PAID ALONG AMA. ROUTES PRIOR TO PIAONG CONCRETE OR SITIIMINOUS PAVE/REM. AM CONTRACTOR SNAIL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER MINIEINATELY IF THERE ISA DISCREPANCY REMEEN THE GRADIENT Ii TRY BELO VERSUS THE DPS. SPAERENT ABS COORDINATE WITH GRADING COT inArroft. L-T CUPB cur pLL 9. 'NO PARYING. SIGNS SHAUYIE PLACED MONGREL DRNEWAYS AS REQUIRED 11T ISSUE RECORD =KEY NOTES A BUILDING. STOOPS, STAIRS SEE ARCNITELTURAL PLANS 8. 11-61160NPRElt CUR. AND GUITER C. ACCESSISLE RAMP D. PRESCHOOL OUTDOOR PLAY AREA E. OUTDOOR RAY AREA 11.11—t1.10 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal PROPOSED BUILDING ADDMON 5,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF C VQDC C `Teorrmrn• 6.6 6. LILAC 81.1588 BITUMINOUS qq I_TO___67F0306 3ITUMIx 006 0A6,--LFIE 1—( II IT A03 Le. ru. 103. GA 6.4 BITUMINOUS S II NORTH 0 30 60 ISTG=1 SCALE IN FEET OBE 06/21/2019 FAUCTVA•ACE, CMA OFAPtiFf JGP 001.13f MLL REASA012i 116reby certify NM EIA pIKA specillralon or resat was aaa..4....ror0I, arpentAan Kral .4 I am 4.ay Pruned proBssiaral ENGINEER under the Ems of Ne stale ol Mares.. Ot41 Thad M. Aye s Reptaratlan DNA 07/12/2019 AA WINE.. SITE PLAN AIEFIAMEZi C3.02 HIL L 5 LOCI( t \\\ ,--..-- ;:i lf::: ---- -----22...: ....„._ ::-----;:-. :_____ ;: . r r II 4 _ ____—,-, _—---,---------- --------1--.., --,.— ---- ----- ----,,, _,,zt•-_-,7--,.,<..\ „,. -- ..z .,...., \\ ..., -...., \..--,\ N.\\ \,. \ \ \ \ \ \ NN \ \ \ 1 err RICHMOND TV-1.. Ert LliV-2.1;18======',411744=1"'s 2019 — 12:15pm mlorson 1 Opus A & E — U\PROJECTS\21740\CAD\CAASheMs\21 5 —LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY IlMfr CURB &GUT. STORM SEVIER ORAINTILE Bmmllw RUAINI. YPLL VI MAW/ WITS TREELIIIE SPOT ElEWMOSI COMUR RIP PAP OVERRAN/ E.. S011.130SUNGS 121- —11 A.-kJ-AAA-1W 99,23 9025 <=1:1 '42$.2-3 0 IT -0 ", rs• MEC. FOR GRAMM PIA/I NOM NORTH o 80 120 SCALE IN FEET OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Opus fhtl red. Opus Design Bold, LL.C. ,n535.-Pzefiel l,n3r1.01,55104110 --Santatek www.sambatek.com 12800 YnAreetee SW. 300 Minnotonki, MN 55343 763A76.60101elephone Ent wed"; I9uneikb1Pamikip lErrecoarrental PPAK7 OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP garaC,Loms5 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA. MN P.2.1ECIWASER 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP Submittal 07/21/2019 mOSC7 VA.Ei CMA ramia JGP OfOrM BY PALL 11:ereby can* that tAls pl:n.speefi.lion ,.pact tras preva+ 24 rrE orunderm cre8ct Ms.nidon arE11.11 am a ‘208828822 professional EtleflEERLAGet the laws pl.¢ state Of Winne... 41E,1111£ OVERALL GRADING PLAN .rnEi II/VIAER C4.01 NREM ) --s SOU / „ 1 TD 11 905 NORTH 0 30 60 crate IN FEU THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group,L,L.C. P9m rim 16,717.17.16.51.1.16111 7.2.161-1. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. iniiotme.mtia (Sarnbatek Pk www.sambatek.cam 12800 WhReviater 0rIre, &Re 3CD Minnetonka, MN 55313 763.476.6010 leiophone EnObo.V.013..*61Piaerdra t EIntonnxdal OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 7610.1.111£6 31694000 ISSUE RECORD 0711212019 CUP Submittal oor 06/21/2019 R71166,177.116. CMA 01.7716/ JGP 0909Mr MLL Moctry an1H Out thls p9n. spedlicalku rep. as 000,761 by me or gar rrry direct sasenisIon and Out I an a slus/ kens. Braes:19ra I ENOS EFS undeMse lam of S.Ttgle of Kenesa. Of't Chad Itipt Regktra ome. 07/12/2019 AL-.7.647-67, MN OMR- 6.1-6116 GRADING PLAN C4.02 (1) / BITUMINO US / ••LEGEND PROPOSED BOSSING 7. (171171.16706.141.03,17117.7617.1176.11.6117611761070 C.076.717711751116.6.6.0,41116617. 6. 77.70 71671216011,76.6.60.6.779.7.67...117157 41161.91.66765.71.1:113.11.666e1.71.1•970.777.16071.66972.664DL CPSTLY70651.47.1L riLLIDEL 161461017.4110L16 MILL. 61111016166511.11671,06 25.71371.11.71571106.6165.1.11. EL AT 1116 MILT. 0716175011S171.7.1111 010.111.6666.171.11119.1.46.71667313411617.011171.1650.15614/KOL C0.77661101107111760661.16 SO. 57171.1.66 COLVIETEDNACCORILPLE 1V76.111171.7111.71,617111307-1116506.6[1.1110. R 1< 1 P 6 .4E6 1 . 6 7 6 7. 7 7. 1 1 . 7 7 1.667 1 710.6.9.15 .7/ .16.5 517015.4 1-6.1 .0 .6 .1 7 1 0 1.,76. 1 701. 164011757 1.00 1156 1,7. 6 11.. 5 111 7 1-1 7 7 114 61660 1..V 101111E14P L6E11 . 1 1,1 1 71 7 7. 0 11131 1 1 .. 7 7.70 1 / 6 . 7 4 71 0 7 ....6 666 71.5 6 77 7 716 0 0 7 ( 171 1 1 0 . 7 . 1.(1. 6 1 0 1 7 74 .016 01 1 1 14 00 1111 A 07 1 1 T1 7 .61 1A 0. 4 L 1 1 1 4O 77 7N 7 .6 11 S 0 6 0. 1.61 6 1.1 1 ..6 /7 , 17 6 1 0 60 7 ,11 7 16 5 1 17V 1 . 1 . 1.11 - P 1..4O 14 11.10 1110 M 1.0 S 11 A16T73M FLAONLT 6 7.111.767.47 7.0,111576S 117547 0666111771.6567.Tlf6701.01F.. CS 5 Er417 71170 0 76 61.11 1,,63616 .1 1. 07 .16.7117006 76611110116,1602760770.1CONL17110116 COKILACTOff5011.7.7111r1.1161.711641 C01717,736 1. 777611017.1657011_1141.710.71111.66.173.10671176/173.11.11.17 :LTC. 0M717.77=111.'"71111.1F.11:00.1.10'711.177TOMATOMV6114 CON79.4-101657:-6; 11/17.611.311711.0817.11% 51161.5117.6160715.1.1.71.116:11716,17/6513177767017.6711.1616113777114119111696661.60.11607071977111.1. 57101.60110111 MUMS .147911170/7167511t7114111=1:67 , 6=r1.71.6606771:1116.01/%66.1691.661L,1162.77 , 67.1INTS=Er 1.1=1777.017-61713 SELV10337.4167 CONS966.11011161611.61.717114166.10111060.1.6711116-11011.07661.0 57706.17671.7170 NAL 61.1.1.1.1. , 71=6,1156.1.1111141.171,77T1ILLL.171111111.7100.77713.0L111.16£67THE DESPISSMIC06,161.10101170/.....67.11.10111167.611 COSTR•CT01131011.61577.1-1.6616,6 4616.60115711LA-11066....7611510 MEM 17171161617760611117 FLOM PC76176611111,1611116 61.611166601146066E 11611,670196116.7.6011129760111611111.76111705.6116000(11CNALMESS162.7.611061,17171K1iLil ILL 0.01,1761711076811.601.661/107711760667.7676617061+1166.57701.61167.11106.11.111117671.167110 71136116.61.10 01.1116.1.117. 510.611111116.1.061.7107.70114166.1.167 57116,7, CON. 0767167.71616.1.1.77.0.6.10111611.4607INT SYDS11171.1r /76161112111C 11710XLECTIONOVOilffe 0.7166 AMOY* 51043A111a1162167 011.1114.7.11166161.61710 011-517661-610.1.6.16 1177 661111516.L1FOLLEASS.1671.11.0 0171,11.1776.7.07.1716-170111116117166171-771171111764116611/151611.75656110.1106167T9.17 77671.110110£76, /1711011V.E5817.17,651717017.6617.6667.150 ORACIUTIT 07.11.6.6761671.11111.71.117. 7.11.71.6CVANTOCAll. 17077617a71,11017457111117611.1.7 7E7071 MN 770.6601.1.1071015661-511£. 111.77.N.E61.11111G61111,11116.11 DOW61101L071111.1171131.110111.1.71171.7611,771106111.07161.60.167/767FLYINAL ROM 71/.1,146.,776617117611667.7151171,711.5,11.1071175617176611621.7.4767.71. 1;11.176716707,711151161.1.1417166.11111701.1.076016117111.3.11.16.1DVALITOIADOEMPLERSL416.131.1 071116 017E153 501.7111£11111-7.1£71177.0 676.5.1.11.1107611.7.171.760LESI MOT PAW. 117,11LF0.1711116.75 OLIO 57111616.117,11 ROWS 5111.11.76 31V16107.16065.6166 61317.61£60.1.0.5 61 Yin 1717TINGAVIIHAVE161;71111.7_1161.010,110071171.110.61,11111..0.1114761/1.161EPW. TUE POWS 701-01.1.6,01,17 LOSSITUCTON706£ 41.1.1.1.611111.0610 PLO0.70 FD67 KOK. 71771.361.1.161.11.1176767, LE, 6020T. 117. 511n1.76.177111..ATSUOIT6,71.1606111.1161111191.07£11.1.751S17.6,1111V6LIAT FE W.Va. %SUL 61.11017116,1117461 511.6.466001.13CAUSE 01.1.1.170 PIMP. 710114-111:67117£1,7631116.173171111.6167.6.0 01.17. 761.311.11171361607/16,11.61 //111/69 6.71.61,11776.1.10711.17 0.1.7116511776161111717161. ILLS , 7":1 , =216. 76060.7661-71.10619.1751/11141 7.1311767111706£ 511761.66 MEMO 6167.0111716667,017.11663117111£1116,1175 ILL 17117706,117.7.71.17617,71,111716VA6ALLEMP101W61.77.476761.77ALLIOV001IOCCNI7660.71671117,700.. '" '"`"'"'"''"''=1 `°"'"=,.'""616Tg:'uwaE6DOEA0 S£rt0 D"1" ED 11-11111 1741.111,17/177577170.117T- 11611.17.6167.06116COVERW01661.44117461169617CINIP FOSLEAL ILI 71111756326.7.66,6 710643117.77116115, I MAMMON 70 6170567.1017.70 C61.71.1771.6.1.16.11,667111161.10197111611.11.6657.6101177. .10.11.50.407661767.7.11117. 11. C.7.1611-7 7077,11.7601.1P7L16713 16 7116.6.1111EILAVATE0 7.74.7.4610.10.17641.11.£ 6106.6.5 6.79131.61711011.4. (16.19.61-106 416.11. 57.1.9.7160/./61.17116.1,0116.7611.1.6 0411.179116567766166. 1610114107506.54111.6.7111.161.11174LULLIENT., ans.. El6“11467666.6660.7616.7.1711.1.11/660.65. C017767L-1061117.11.51.160.11,67.115.1,1.611/9.75.70 6667121.16160.70.71117.111116% 6 160110 616711611.670115176 01147.1.51114367M757061.717661.61.10 7661071,161.10661111776 -71.10.1611.77.1.77( 0.517.113,11.10.1.16111170711.11,171117.1.61015747.11601.11.117 1116.17671666.407! 6RUYAmvw ARELVILSICTEO 67 11M 1.71661779111071671170 66161.11517,101/7.11. ANT., 71.5 9.611110( ISE FLAWED MALL., EOM 67.6504, 071116 MAW. MUSS /1171‘07.6711167.1760.11/1CELAW1110651.1.1117.67177•7-761.17614.16Cf 16111171.11116111.1110111/111.1.004 117.1.1.46611011 7 , 1061%.25 10.6754611161777196771111.11651077.07170077LOSTALTV 7001,171.10177617.711/16 /7.170r74.7701.11117 610771666.11.1.11£1.117.1.6.11606.S6 7,116.1.117.10/117 11.1.7.111711.7r6r16-771601607.70,1161771E6ETIE ROHS LIMO] 110071/071607177.1 10 17170,147.7. P-11 =4Ir'IrrEM=II' 77.E.1051/4 061111167711.517017171.1167,117715-1616GDA 6.661.5.7141.1 VASE 11716766 6,111.101/1611. BE 7601761161111011611.1.111.17 ''''07="'==ZSTAXEr"'="'"glf="'S''"11fr1117 111111.6.1V7.5 OFT. gEW 156. 111101/1.11.1.670711.116,1651.1767.7261111.11769.77.7LLEELEVATICOI51111.1.1.6711171.671.611767.771.10116777..6.0716.1.01007671077, 1.17.15.15761,11,17101.1.61,141107171.6761.10-11.1661.1.111561.1LIE 15. 7117111617 7.1,71,,,A 61.1344.66717.10.5.1.111V.01110.69-61. 1.01,717 671.1077 7.7.181115 7001 nail 601110 FOOT ILL AFL 1.0FECE,TIOSSO0.51,,t5£4.0(0TOMP(716301,001,KraCRUIIVITHERM331011.RAIXINXIALISS D.71,11 71.11111.111.. GRADING NOTES IOUS L 17.17176 COSTOVISR617011625111196117.1.61116116,51,7111.11147/0.1611117167 46 0 CUED PERM .7761147.7.6L COSTLL71011.61610.1.7.W 11.11611110 616.667/177.1.11071•1161.161-667610Or 71.677741511076.7.17.6617117661[1.73 41.10/1116 1111.5111.161. 11016.71.716715,11111161/1,111111 ALL G... 011511.1167765111.046 71.11.6 FOLITEIVAL MAVEAMAIRIV1.11.011676107141£10K Of 057, °Lan. CL72 60.1.16511.12,0177 A 96Tagfr 4=7' ":11"'67:7710r= 71;17' "17rIrCfr'l.' " CO' .1.17M1111.6110.7.61116.11667.71191,11.767 6 11.66.6.7.611611LETILE1111.1.67.7.711711176L VMS,. 666.67.7.0.17.01/117.61.14. 11116,671117.171.113.1017TR4C106. L.676µ1,-.7/5.6,6ss,117,L,76,7.0,666,16,..66,77,9,6L-6.0 Of 1116 MUT. 036711.106111.1616 .66171016111.6713.16161-01.6.11111176.6061.101111 /171L.0 770766-liSCLLIF-17.1.617311.41111 covsoma-22,429.4sEsomss.a..M. L. WILT 601111170.176471076.6164064066667611117611116.111,16671110 031117-11./CTIC61776.6.9.110.471.7119111.116650121.17.1.0 001.111.117171165146641.17091607.110140N711,106976.111111.6777661111113761171151166ASO 707111(71011771577.7.7076,1761071111110.64 7111161711..1,61.1.7.774.106111.1.10151.7 A.1170187 LIV-11111701.017161111110771.105111.155. 7117 MOT Of 711117611.F.C.61117.1111.0711110 6.0.767.7011/15771767714 761116107TRECOM11.10.26.1116130.767.1.151/0114111107010111CILL6 AWE* 077/11,640.67 077111 01617111LIORSSULTI SURLY. µ 01101.1.91,170/3,111.LINIS .10611AL-1085/111.16011.71.611111791161..661,011577661101121.1117011.6,1761.66.17 LE01.77.71.1ENTS177 TIE 1151.11560157.761e1171..1. ..7125/1465.1.116.106111.11711.161111607.1.11.65.0.71116.116. 110.111774706.56.116,666717,71011101.667714117.73.7.7.607.10501 715157.1.57£61107.161101.30.456.7.1.0.0. 41.0111016441. 0.4166.216 MOS E1702711.13 LEEN COVitEir6 POOLISS09011111 , 0740 PV7/671.1108771 POTED.DECIA1971121.2013 COVIA127011.46,11097.66.1 ACO67 0611.1630067.0097. PROPESIT WHIT NRB HOOTER stoRM SEWER (3-.114 ORNIOILE - - - BUIL011. REPUSSISIG WM. WETLAND OMITS TREEILIE SPOT MAMBOS 99,25 9025 CONTOUR RIP RAP OPERPLOW MY. SOW BMWS 1 H' ISITIJUINOUS 9,5.06 PROPOSED BUILDING I , ' I( 5, 5, SF/ Isn 7711,64.156166.1176.6616101.171111,171,1115011511101.7.61 OF 50-1.14776,1671376 /10411.7111.6411.1.164670.1771.1166.51,1160776611 0771117 WE 70 ..7.776571.101116/ ThECO/1777.67179.01116S,115611.51.71,1117741.1701167SITL 17. CONTRACC715711.11.61777.61617111110CAS61107717,1.160.16,11171401,671611/17£1110 036,71.1111116 SITE 67,1414. C.C6117PIL-11071L. 36.7.11.110.1.71.11.1111.60705011.11.1.961111.057.11111(171LON7101,17161.1, COVITACTOR 416.11.601.171.7W171.11.11.701,LEVENTS :11.11.6.16111117111011.T Off.7.01616.0771111 COXITAL-r09 SVILPOSTPMATEVERS£0.11.11ATO CON,R1 ALLCONDMISL3 VOSCII • 0.1111.166.11T 0160.0170.1.70/61 /I E 1_....„ l 17.1...• / I ! I J -1 / __, .-- ---- - ) I., t„_- ---. ,0 ---,,,-- - --- 4.2 - ..,0,/ ," -' .2 EI \ ----. -- DATE Augual 07, 201 \ 1 (I/ / 1 , \ ' \ \ ‘ it' x 'k \ , _.•/ \ \ t \\ \, 11 \ ..----?---. k.< 1... 7:1-429- ---- ----- ---92,--- --- .., ----- ----. ---- - 1 t 1.11 2----g,-, , ... , 4 , ,,,„1 \ , /I , '(,\ A 1 „ 1 , r .4 \ i ' ( af 1 \ \ I l „ J -1 J \I I 1 ___./ / - 4 \ s. l -„N -; ) i ' /. / / / i ,,, 6 11 sC ) 9 :11 A E Ls( 1,401 16.11 .7-611.161111S1110.71 / 919.10 \ PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5605F SUiEv 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 ri 7655 166H-J- UM INO NS , . I \ I N \ I I LEGEND PROPOSED CURS & GUTTER STORM SEWER CONTOUR RIP PAP OVEREUYN ELEV. ALT FENCE SILT DRE LIMNS Of INSTURBAN. ROE DORMS DIRECTION . OVERLAND FLOW 0-41.—N 0 II —0 Soi TEMPORARY MERTON. DITCH CHEER DAM LIMNS OF DRAINAGE LAWNS BK.01.1. INLET PROTECTION DEVIr-E1 INLET PROTECTPROW.2 TEMEOPARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TERIPORART SEDIMENT BASIN TE1.00./M STOPAGEMO WM. AREA TEMPO.. STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED. WREN, MATS OR BLWIETS AS gHLL INTHESWPPP) GRASS NORTH 0 30 60 VA! r FEET I BITUMINOU S SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDUL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I IAN I FEB I MAR I APR I MAY I JUN I JUL I AUG SEP OCT I NOV I DEC I JAN I FEB I MAR I APR I MAY I JUN; TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES I I I i STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL I I 1 I .1. ROUGH GRADE SEDIMENT CONTROL I I I I lee TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS I I FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION f I T _ GFi A • ,, — Tr- _I— I — SITE CONSTRUCTION I I PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES I I I 11111511 GRADING I I LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION I I STORM FACILITIES I I I P I I I I I I NOTE CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDU LE at+ ar locie%T.Z0 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR \ — • THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AMER WITH THE REST OF THE S'NPFP MUST BE KEPT MITE UNTIL THE NOTICE DETER/41MM 6 FILEO WITH THE ',VENIRE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE TILES-WPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL NAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDEA07110114 REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIM miss DISKOMOTO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIEO. AFTER FIUNG THE NOTICE OF-TERMINATION, THE SW PPP, DICLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, ANDALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUSASTICOTOTHE OWNER, TO RE KEPT ON FIE IN ACCORDANCE MENTHE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESOISED IN THE SWPPP NARPAITVE EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES ITEM I UNIT I QUANTITY SILT FENCE !LINEAR FEET 11,105 SILT DIRE 1 UNEAR FEET 11,305 BID-ROLL IDNEAR HET 10 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 NW I1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1) I UNIT Io INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (11,3) I UNIT IR • REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS • OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, LL.C. Opus Design Bold, LL.C. Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Wbitowator Eklvo, Sita 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 talephcos DIPeeMillS.rAa I FUNix, I OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 1- EITL11110U 1 1 1-14 11 ,1 \lR ift 111)\:\11:1 \f~I •— 110 11 11 1 11_ — • — ,---""„,,zs.,,!,;(/// / r- EXIS77AIG BUILDING I'D /// 4 .\ -' r Pi S>.'" OF GI,. LOT a MC 29 EXISTING .21 5ILL:RY BUILDING VrIfEJF GOVT LOT I, \ EXIT NG BUILDING ED BUILDING if t I' 4i,3 I I l'?;TNALRE",?iy% - ARE 61 NOT REFIECT I *Ray cavamays. , ---\ \ \ OP ASS Ny If I I —v-d c. ,r, MIND IENN. CO. GEy PLA105,. HT I .J. O 1'3'6'M/2019 A.SER CM JGP 1110.6( MLL I pAan, .EPOS +vas prePxedMODOlmSITI.R nett Hroe„ae+ re that I aerta profes.natEMGMEIR under I.., of the sta Chad M. Aye nne.07/12/2019 R PPI p4.04.0.1. mar / E SFEET IMF EROSION CONTROL PHASE / / / \ e DI ti`04/1 -Arei4),JA22 • 0:Waturluai - e. I ao1 FT .13 N89'47'5511, : 1 1035.12 TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ROUGH GRADE/ SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / eUILDINGcoItstriucno1/ SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL. STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING / SEED / TRIAL STABILMATION STORM FACIUOES 11111111111111111 1 1 1 1 1111111 I I I 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 11 1 1 1 1 1111111 I I 1 1 I I 111111 1 I 11 1111 1111111 I 11 1111 1111111 1 11 1111 1111[11 1 11 1 1 1 1 III 1111 I I I I I 1 I 111.1111 I I 1 1 1111111 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I= 13 116 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NWT INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 11P-11 1 UNIT INLET PROTECT/ON DEVICE (11,2) !UNIT INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (11-3) (UNIT AS9 TT / // / ,...rouu au ur a, :,:l`f======';',-=','Ir.'='-':=1:7'.' EATS77NG 5)/ALG/NG our,— r9 Ort a N89•4 755-W BITUNINOU S raj, "IP" 3 VICEffer/M. eff.f020. *141, ,B g LOT IF SOOT car & 300 20 A.6 EXISTING 2 57017Y BUILDING BL, IL LT, Cr KC. 33 COAT Tar 1. LEGEND PROPOSED MST /1G NPR a GUTTER STORM SEWER O-1,--* IJ - t-tt EIRAI.LE CONTOUR - RAD OVEMOW f.. <1.%. SILT FENCE SILTDKE LAIRS Of DISTURBANCE 301. BORTIGS IJ_` DIRECTION OF 0..110110W TEMPORARY ONT0.31011 DITCH CHECK DAM WM OF DPIWIAGE SUBELAS0.1 11,04,31.1 IMET PROTECTION OW. 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEAIPOPART STONE CONSTRUCTION EllTRAUCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT SAL !I TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARE114e AREA TEMPORARY STAI31.4110/1 MEASURE PEE°. MULCH, MMTSOR PIMIKETS AS OUTLINED I/1THESWIVP) Cr) o® OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus PE Group, LL.C. In538-nliadreA Opus Design Buk, LLC. Sambatek VINttiww.sambatek.com 12800 Whitawater Drhe, Site 300 Minnetonka, 10155343 763.476.6010 telephone Emheixi 1 Slemino 1 Morino 1 Drhoornonlal OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP FirLERACCRESS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN KOJELT1811V£5 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP Submittal 06121/2019 CMA JJ 0.0. ST MLL MT., Certify 111.1 OR pbri,pecificationoe reyort wssweparEdbyrrea'anderrnydrect .Peri-War, and.l. am a cl,ylicerued preessiona I ETICII1ETA under the lms a( the .1e of Mire., Chad M. Ayes v•- 111,11trAlon 1 W.:07/12/2019 105,4c,a, us for a et sly* onlot. i,,...15.3-rebt. mu" reque,t Mnix.torda, ofrc.. essT EROSION CONTROL PHASE 2 C5.02 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG W. THE REST OF THE SIM P MUST BE KEPT °MITE UNTIL THE NOME OF TERMAIATION II MED WITH THE MCA. THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP. SWI THE EROSION CONTROL 14.1514E05AS NECESSARY TO IMUDEADOMONALRECIUTLEMETITS, SUCH A ADDITIONA1011140WIED RIPS DEAGNEO TO CORRECT MOUE/AS IDE/1MM. AFTER MAGI-HE NOTICE OF TEIMINATIOTI,THESIWPP, INCIUOING THE ER0.011 CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL N OTICE TO IT RIOT BE SUBMITTED.* THE OW N ET. TO BE KEPT 01111LE 1/1ACCOADMICE W. THE RECORD RETEITTOI REQUIREMENTS DISCAIDED IN THE SW PPP - • ( Caal EEj /?/ /// af''r =trf o c177 ,,,,E ar, .517 _OLT, V EATS NG 1311/LSING, _-- ,- PROPOSED BI NOA DITIOnc, — —..".. .7717„, — \ ./ 1 ___ _ — _ _/ --": ....-;„ / zz,. ././; I -- — — — ---- ____ / / 7 / / --. — — --- — 1 // $. I t I i t 13M #3 I I I I i 1 1 I 1 \ ,.. 1 \ \ \ (-- ..., --„„ ) \ \ \ \ ___ ....- / ) I \ \ \ L_»//`T/J'_ \ \ \ N \ \ \ , I ' ,..e1—.41.4 • N. , - „.00,991.7 o '41111:11 C+ Ir EAU 59, u, Opo A & E - L•\PROJECTS\21740\CAC\Chill\Sheets\21740-C5-EROS.dwg [EROSION CONTROL PHASE 2] 4 / A SS T ,,1 --r !E -pi, I NOUS \ _ 2111/3 ' ti 0.4 0.4 Vre\ ( 915.A FF PROPOSED I 1 BUILDING I ADDITION( _ 7,1 5, SF SET• 0111.1,11NOUS saw ele—E11 1 7035. 72 IX9 pERASSUILTS A ILF,Tigt ED BUILDING "zuT, -SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I IAN I PER I MAR I APR 1 MAY I JUN I JUL I AUG 1 SEPI OCT I NOV I DEC I JAN 1 FEB I MAR I APR I MAY 1 JUN NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE 5,' 1 1/.. 0, • "----7'° ....• ..EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES ITEM 1 UNIT 1 QUANTITY SILT FENCE !LINEAR FEET 11,105 SILT DIKE 1 UNFAR FEET 11,305 BIO-ROCL 1UNEAR FEET IR I REFER TO SHEET 05.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS r /z NORTH 30 60 ffa% STALE 1 i= 11 FEET "- cor 112111002 RAU MORON 1 - UFO. 02,11131105521•11.1 112F1O1042 2 -TOP. 0.115 10"151111.55254211 10421411. MAO 20212F1 0101 LOAD DX. MOOG 0111.1L40111 • 1101.1113067 • OFF-0/41 113513 ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION (IP-2) 1,01. TOW. 20.FF 021FON 25, FF0rFLF4 1. MIAOW S FozF 1.04.5.11 WW22.mVUW5A1021251151111WM114v1N2M. 01:401222255x1161 O 22"01411 02 AMMO EQUAL 102101.212OLVEMF/Ii12IC/101,5 P2tO110.1192122.5111.3.41105 F151101114.191.11005. $.0.12545.2 SMALL 62 111.121011,111 TO LOOTS MOAPh5D 2121-5173,12215 0012I MGM. 1-651,11.44DZMIIIT" "AVMAWAS%%WV%WaVWXV SILT DIKE ON EXISTING PAVEMENT 801121FOC ViEVI LoOrISED 12cmvoL.2.2 2412,3, MM. 449 F222312411 Oar, 2123455o.22 MArol FOAM. 04 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, LLD, i.22:25-21222 rot 22...13115513.32111 3524.-2.4, Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 1,32 5.F....213 2.2.222233,55.12.11111 0000.o3, El).Sarribatek -- • .www.sambatek.com 12800 1.01,3E7wa1er 28114 Sulte 300 MInnsIcfike, MN 55343 763.416.60101X10./20.16 En22844Ing 13.8/40 Faxing I Entonrrentl OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN P50.11111.15521 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 07/21/2019 wo.un.v.ks.s. CMA OWN. JGP 0-221B, SILL I Fe Ft by 0.112(0151012{2100 specilkallon or report .23 p.p.,. 1/ 252 02 2.12F 2W .3. soper03555 Old UFA 12m a 1.301,03421 pro12.2.531 2F4GOFEEL222122 the Lows af the stale 01,4552.220m Ot'a Cad 0 Pehel ogu07/12/2 019 :11,? 11+,41014.51.4 offr.e. EROS ION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS C5.03 1 OA F1A11121 50253016 11161:24 ORM 1101PFED10 01•10171144311 COMAE. USGS MAP 1101705.11 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS / "SITE MAP" 5010 2,33,21.111 NOM M. DM MAIL OE M.O. 11.1101511 SUM OF 011151121202122. MI5 Wel BE T17751,12r{'Ett=1201 ATOP rErr'" =n :=05.11.'"tg TIE affs162111011 2021.2013.41113. 00O211,13-1, VIGFI 211.51511TX 1.941,41114 510E5101E 014 1 ROCK EXIT DRIVE MOTO SCALE a SITE LOCATION MAP MOTTO 301.1 SUMMARY IN ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 0.55 ACE BUILDING AREA 12.19 AGE SEEDED AREA 12.254.0E TOTAL DISTURBED 1 5.99 ACE PRE - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 17.72 ACE POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 110.09 ACT 0212001./021N211 4161.31.0111.2 10350 IMO RO 11 2112,:21052.4. 5015530 111152-656-4511 WE 022114101 / 0111011 121,111.101 511111411f1102111 55.112.231.111.11131.0 SE F03111.123 5E0.21E11 10 Vi011/4 1•02.2 FEN211.1111.22211112 AKIO. 30' ON C1N115 (SEE NOTE 11 Tu AMACENISTPSES.1 ;112.2=21E5 °OMER FINC161.1=1. POST1 214 WOODO15.2212102E 11011.111110.1. 144/2 4.4. 012 301 OMONG MIK, 4.1041.11121121 1151111.4311.0113110212313 L 1101111,10.2 EnCETO FA. 1057 0,4111110.2orcontz 'Fox Inman WO/ F2/221 844.cto ram wax 111AIZEW. TIES 0110 MER 1/58/484.5114441/44810111411146,4 MI WOG MUCH 14.212112 01.2.6053.111 45 Or0122511120124217/12 F401,155151.134 PUNCROLE 12.4511.11/1114111111451. 2. 1011.111.0 5F2111.5 1.50112.1 OTTER. 2.2002.1 22.01 0111211.11121 51111.1 FE 0121.1220 AL40151110 POOL 1500415/122:22 SM. 32111.10INIF 05 NOTED IN 1. 511,1 021111011.221.0.1.5110 5/61021115 WI 1101 LAUF° 0122.111.1i TOE MIGHT. 1112 MILL 114.4,2114/1“ UMW} MOST Or COMOOLTIO 1144124/41.110121111121.22100.120 521:451217510.04111.1141n11024111122112 €UXIM .F 511, FENCE 2/52.212,501211.2.02. 4. 4112XCE1511115.111521.151212511FPORT. __SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION (IP-1) IF0110 5412 VON 10 01011.121111111021.1100 02 DIE 120501115021.111,214 210,0 51,21.2 01.1111,1501010 22235127211 3O5104.113.0 2.2.0.1112.VOrt wan". mn, I NOT. 1 101101211 WFORD1111010 5.1 OF 1021111.114104101022 COMMIE FiALD.12127 ON NIL 00011211111.512001 $1114514511. 22 OVID ORM 1.4.5151.1 10 h. M. 0.312 1014111154154.0011.01.15,0.1111.11113f ACC15510101021172 1013220211041/115 Of P4 GMrt. 4. 5120•111.24162 11.02213 011112 20t1M1/11.1111122.14C1011111W251101.110.2.1, O213152.1111.5141213540.120 C11.11,11441111111102.0111/14 OF T2 E PCON0111WA51122/10.5.10 0222.21015 OF COMM 1111/1150.00 PIM 11:65. 5. 11112.0623/11112.50001 011.51.11 BE 10.501211•410 215.110121 Oft CUOMO OUT 45 laC25.5.3.1”0143.2414.11211,211,0/3W4.5110 11.11121.1101C0/1311.1100,11COM12115.1LOOFFIFFIS 121121COIDF10511142 SITE OFAT 4.212211E0 WWI OIL T. 004214 TIE 2011012TE WAU1Wi11A61111ortO,M 25511/0.520,12520.1112.2 5/1012.12.,0121120 01 0111221162 511401210 MAUI. ACC12110 Of ILO on, =.1 CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA -GENERAL EROSION NOTES' 1 CONYFF LICTION510011.04121.1,0111011012.421.1405104100 COM Pe 6110,51121010 TOW:1 MERE MOOR 2•1515 221142214 1.02.2311116Orni3412.1.5111102JO 5FFOFICA112015 100150/06.11245151.1201.0 512612.0110,225 11117,02.2 51122161111 50f 04.1100151142.101111 1112510.11.1.10111/1.0 001111111011111.4 1512112) 151:01.1.15111 Of nts 02.1155211112040,16 520 21.01.32O1 22)01101.11/41.1 P1/00.1115141:0113 01155113. 2L KOJI 1111.1121 0513 115.40i0121.5.11175111114122101O041150651011210 11902151110 MAIM occumorrs 3. C01412.1.270213112.11 F 125/0112•611 FORCOMETO. 5213,411.24 TOE 4.111.1101.4 F0111141.112.4 421.122.25100.21541.11.151 F0.11021515.1100 Kira. 0111011172.370113 /010 521210,111.17015 115101VID WON 5102541VIATER 201.11M01/ 1111111110•15x441 0111.01 10.11 Of 1115101,F103 TOE M12 OF 1.0,15150.11.111010.00111111411172511151.6111000111401 5111214 GIMP. PILOT VDU 2251.017,5112004221.151 L 20161000 HOWE FAS11.321101/1 THE comturs. TOE 5112112,.0011 OTHER ROJO. 0021/5•011-51.0151611101011111 MF Otr0.42510,611112P023 ▪ (21100.3.00115.11115121.1.6221 1.011042214,211.<121/3 (614-5) A3 1101052”(1112 51111. 111,05. 201111.24705 21.11 01225211.11112C0004 211111VO:01 OF1111 61115 FOID10.0523N foLvEN10/1 FIC4.122.52,100 132C0h511.110MODUNO.OFISTRUCTIC41152014FIFIF0,41220510 WI. IllgO0.11115. 043 TIE WOKE 01.0,15.411201 [SOO FOS 4115 F110 WTI TO Av. BF 11142111 005.04 0111.0102 AS OfF10120 ON HEW. AMMO& SOFFS Or. FE IV fil11211i22.5 0.00120 0110150111005 0.2.0M0.4 EMT° 11011111110:01.1400,21.1. 01-10/6150211203 5. CON11.500.151.11301121,111111/1/11502/O.1.547111 01 14."121111.3 OF THE 4.1501.2215111. 054110.10 01011.01352.1.1 COMSOFF/1113.24121.5111,01120241.110.114.11115 00 11.041231.02 0/.2.1-0(1. 1 PP ii..511.10.011ACTOR 51011111.12511OFITADOMONAL024.111.4.5 1510E0 OF 12/41111044.0.21 01111. 150 FINS 612,51 013411 211.1024114.11511112 WATERS FIFAVIS MP Nr[0451.1014M1In1x1000NOnATEwAT2udP1G13uno VV03FIF15 MIST 22 12.225223510 021511101. 112125. • 201411520011 5F12.1.1 *EO L£,6 1.141111121112CTIIIT P0.22112/1 FIOLIVIID Of TOON.. F12.211 TOE 60101201.5 02 104 IFI:1155.10.11001011521142:5 512211111F110111 041101.110 (1,6 WONRA61511.1.25.1.4215. 5.111INCF. ULF ON THE 01011.011.121.21501 011011012.2810.013. 41.2150 D611.21111. im ot.5 /.1051 NOT OCCUR OUTIOF 1132 MOM. 0111112.122. D. GOFFIN120015.54104 YOU 1301011 0/1121151011.2.11.0222.1111/0121.1100 OO. /1211511.049.201.0.150 22 OM 45114110111,1•21111422011/2VICE /2110 0.0 0113.....3121 1/131126 RAL4.1.2•02.2. 01101011,420.11/101104221M25. CTOCET24211115. OLD 7013211.511125. 10. All Olf.30 WOOER IC0001111111.15,111.1512 WAN NO 22141.1212111/25114,211.11/51. 611042120 70 MOOED 4./.. °FOIL SITE PLO 514411.1F 1012.1.1E0 MID F202210.1111.0150 06F0520. WOK LOGP10.5010 o on MO ON VOL trTrar'''TA'17 SNE "C'f05=i70=1/°7131"M"=PFX,'"1:0TITOUT":01"rlIVC'4""":11"'" CT= SOLIPV03115 MOTU 0c5P33213 0212.0110/1,120 OICOMMV071 5111.0 0241/1/010:15. VOX MUST. 1551.11.1DPIWINT 10 MON W4511021101.¢01110 MUM CON21271 101111141.111 1121W. TO 21.1121112 FROM. MONIES 5FLFC0/11402010021.2111015001115 0,12002121F 0010/221121.1013 411015112. 2 Silin0021011. ARD 45.311650110. NATIO11114.50 FLOTATION MAO WALL it 1121,02.120 ON 91100 5MM P101.64110 CONTA14 /041210131192112100 MEWL. 0511.50110 MOLL 11 M W0511 COUIC311352.0041/11,5212.511-8COS1101101 ST 11115112 01111101.110.112105101142O01011.51442 0111111.710121141 0.15133 0210112 111121135 1010051511511251.01/ 0211.4110011521010.10. . 50110 M.WSUW»;40.¢ea,P1FRFu511LFOE,CO.•0,ROCTIONL omoirnoo OFFAIS 011201WA5115 111/5162 COMM OF 15001111,14051101.1111,07111.114211115201412101.1121:20. 15. 11031.1.0125 vATERW5:01,141014,1. PANT 6 NO 11v420025 51/25.10125 MUST OE 1101114151112.2.11,1•10301440124.92.21,001144201. TO 22110215.211.1.5. UAL 041 OF501.2.2GL 1.251211121/.1551051-02/..22.5 141/5112 11011020 10 FACII/O. VANDA11551.51-0154GEO MHO. OF 11.31.0.500125 WASTE 1.5112 10 CONVII5OCEV101121%/1 4trouvnon 16. 0.11510211 WAHL 20111MONMEVENOON1424.5122.25 12F5112110 TX15 10001121142 SYMP. 51.11.1.21,11.121.5 5000 05 10.12110_22611 /41112P1031-0 501115111161.1.110,11125 UPSLINL AZ7=74 , 20017154110 15 P2110 NOM F01111O 0220221112410.10 214221101.11211 OF 1120111Y F0.12 FEFLOJIFIOWN12111111101115,5AGEMEMILF415,0515111.45#21.12.425r1F52212,11014AND 5/001.2211=11101 BM, MAINE 0FLATION OFT. CON1101.100 110ill ATTMESTL21-1.3'211221511.121/25101:5111121M42:1112221.117121123.511551114221.11101101101.2204. 1 al XI.C1":12r3T/Irall.5.2.21321=2.022[00,0 2 WOW Cool OJT 70 PARI3 110 3 4 Of TO NOGG 01121111F11.501) 1,1122110105 OF THE 31111.112411 1101..01 FINALLY S.221120 ORME sat 1.5210022401422321515151111110121.01104 011 WO 2,2=s45,5. 1122 0: Da: MT, OM. 20412.31202 OF .nont as.. VAS BIDISUWITTED TO Mr WU. 1 MIT MM.. 1222212 You. 21 OE vo•On.0 o021-22.15122/235. woe 6. If 522•141NT 150.5.5101313115110/CTION MIL Oft-53112 0311040.110,15 OF UMW AlU5121 KM.. VIA 55411021.1AND Pi A FRF0211.1 SUFF/021010 51035:102 021502 m4.15 3. 22,22.2111.2 2f2 Fol.t3i1O0FrovI11.0122319e 2 Oil 0114220 F201121101 (EG.F11401VI51221102F1/151/121/500111.0 2.15112.31120 ORO IMAM 521121.5 BY LK 1462/1325 410/011 OISE A511TY 11.110,0 TO 115[105 11)2112 511.151 LoN 2021.21,22.2121.2.51122.5.240222.0 57.4•25 21, COM 1010553 =A 7. NI VOLTR4011111415141151 01 015P21111110 01510,01AT NO 530.11FN112.011 01.5010123,2500.13710V0.COVITIF315 FLACONG 112/0114171POOH ARM 1011051 /11255.111012,1110 mom commcnolo cruel.° corasuurno8488 /44E8441,811440101111111,111113.4150/1 MEL 2-SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE I: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA 3. CONSTRUCTTHE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. 0. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION °EWES 040 EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES, AS SHOWN ON THE PEAU. S. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BA51115, AS REQUIRED. S. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BRIPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER ANDRIC GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. B. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 9. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. PHASE II: I. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2. INSTALL unuriEs, UNDERDRAINS, $1001.1 SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6. PAVE SITE. 7. INSTALL IIILET PROTECTION DEVICES. 8. COMPLETE GRADING ANDINSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING MID MANTING. 9. REMOVE ALL TEIAPORART EROSION AN CI SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE LS STAINLIZED), IF REQUIRED 13Y THE CONTRACT 01.011112120121.5111 FEALE 72.12.4211P051W011 11.01211011115 01 011322 FA51220.5 NU M101211 EOM Vollf F11451 MN OF 3,410 45024:0 00-1110 SOLFFNCIF 5111111141. ON. OF 120.121100101/50 1/522,2210 POMO.511131.21201FPLOCOOOPCITOTIFIA5 510F 220 5.1 BE 1211:01.41.1122020,51.11 14 04110F 025111,111.52122.16 2/421.362,/ 4.2203.12:21551114 602001122011110225 1O151321121.111 02 21112 DEPEFIONG TOE SUMO OF CULY11,11.1V25101511021.1100 slcno0 2575.3)5220110 5.27001102104.2P131.4101i 2.511512021. 0010011170 LOWDOT 512[11.11011512110/13.5753.1.00115151.0145.451.1 61.11)20 01.2021211.1510110121FOL 5.22CIFICATION SIMON 25753210210 257536. 11111143111111. 11102.41111.1C 500.1106.20 01.202.11.VOIEW11111.000151221212.41100 52213011257531.1 ROOLE ORD OF OWL OfTFAVOLOAT 1111.0.2 OSTURIFF0 PO/MOM 011111511215.0.2 01551111.1010N431110,2431111554.52,rt1151021112SA/122112.552MEX111 5.2131120.1.51 PALM 3141162 5.2.11020 01.12201.03101 and 11.1211512 74.21.1145CLOFOLSOIL AMR MINE GPAL44611155 4.50/C41 420/52.111101FOR1r2G2121122 OMR. 11 031111.302.512125116COMPACT045 101122 1251025431200 22.21COOM 52(551111111061 0:011210.00E5 6 WARR 01.1411111.120.2.01510111.5596 5FONFO111.1051 5.41.1110111.31,04111 FOO51 LBW WOOED 2 1.320.023 0111120141210112 .022.1511131CO(.1N21V10.5 0145100111O2111,12103 6.1125.0.5 F MINIM 0:5013k2aNG OFF.5111 01 10 52414111.1215.112111.211401rt Of FFRA54.11/112.4525 1111/5111201Fi0F14110 2.111,0111. 0.4504111 MOON 2.111.1121. 20. 00102 011.5111500.51021.1 2015.011 MILS 52.2211 0112010110 FLOM 2052200.5951.5121110110,111.01101.11,1PLIV01.122. Of 125105. 510011112,0101.20/2 1.04110059011 61 NOTED OM 5112 2521,113112111-211111•1020.20.14111102141n2141,111:2711.101.10.2140115. 115WOOART 500.5100201113 4.051 11051.1111112.1 0110.1111122Trif 5200J111.0411025 6 CANNOT BE F.220 01 51/1.1221101103. 111311100.5102.412201. 20/2211002.59111.5 MN WTI. MIMS 0.12011OUITS 6 OOS. • 510,15114311 11 LEFT 11 501/131111210101041100 II,30,1121.41304 PRISM 2.011:1111•10. F MOOT. MO 2202.3 IL 0111101111 0.11112 01.44625 TIOC1113.02114111011141120.021,10OrPAC1CO5.1 FE 215120257511 FORA1.151010 110 2105250110120.14.531215 CAT ilfiC15. 0.13. ULU 10011C110,1 11C)10 11.0714115051011. 24. ALL 01551221110.51.221.13F 5.2.0.1220 PrIlif .0 02 MN WO/ ONO 041 7105 0.51V02.5 1.2111111,10 02111101115 FOR IMO. 2.0t15151.11710,1 11/51214021 02 622121.0121110ONOUS POMO FOR 11.0 20,1572.11014. -.-_MAINTENANCE NOTES" 4.1.1.21.5U215514110 114-5 MOON 1,1125131OVII1 03421101.12411,0 MIx35,05511412121dL131a1PREYF3mw55Y11 SOUL 62 .414.1020 15112111112:21101141.1011011100 11117111.0 LONGER /15,201.10 200 GOV211110 1.431 02 MUM FIOAl 510641.110.1 11TME511171.11 DESC1.110101M2211.5011 NOM ON 1•4302211 111.151-110111.221 025223711221112.5111112-11021 511-110021 FVFAISFYIN OM DORM ACTIVEC0111.1.131011 orio Ivroo5 11010.11.111/1 1,01.1311011,2.12/11112:11. 1.0112510 24 WOOL /11.1205,152.3.0142FOLOON CON1101.1.1.510.15 Pall 61 0.1.10/..10 if/ MID 1.5 ACCOADAN11 WON 101.1.042,46: 5/C110/1 VOW 30111 Conan! 9,4t 1101020.215222,FOrn152132.14 m2F vain. olains fit .".2,242222.'4" ate n12•6411.204110122.22.412 154141/..,0C24.21225239.22112•2202,2121201.51011F M121310. ir=".°1-1rrfenior ''''":417741-V.1=78%.r. 88,8,4errsam 1 02012152,022 nare1 011511.1F210225 11105112 01,10111/ 1.10.211.3.0152011151111201045/11132111K0512 140CFM[1104010511IF SEOVINT R./21215 1/2 Of LOFFISOFIT 0211211-2621.152 11.216015 121215112 YAK WIN 24 .0111502 062022111.114 AS SOON /SLOW 10O01110145 61111255.1151 3. 111414.411,M101viNUMss1,211rtA51ON 050/25 FOIST 621.22012112011/11.51220111111V.0110111101412111111111025204201.011101111 04 ME 1.151.10112251/21112 STORAGE VOUAIL 12.1.043.01 .1/1210.1. LORI 6123121112120 .11111.1 72 MOO. OF 0.5[01121. 04 25 50011 Ok5 RE11121002.0115.1111035 ALCM ME MOT 10.11115 021112 GENERAL 111.21111. ATER5,40.12114G 014.462 UFO. 20•25111402515111.15, LOOT 011/2511210 FOR IMO. 01510 NM FOP. 020051110 01 120510,21.110.4310116,51 1.210311 0.21.105 5204401, DEPOSITED 1•4500.122 WATER; 1001124•16 01.1041.02,0010.1 2.4.11 0112.121540244151511.255. 115.1111121122.1101.11922110:51111121140VAI 0.25111.151•11.052D5031.1.011.1050.1110 5.-2112/011015.1251411 KAU 011111115/12/1 171 MIS Of 0+533,121111041135 PUMMEL/ 51 1.1.1.1012011.011FFO-11.0.1. MC255 0202511.0175.10111,1101511.2.11,511.11 2.5002911 C110275 TO 011140,111511F 12.101.00113.10ANA 5.24117,111011 141111PC11111DISEVFN CALLAVO11 0011 OF MUM CONIPACIORS 2.0,31121 CONIACIVIGAL1102.41.1611•4157412 F2021241.11.102.1.54.421110.1100 411,10...911116.1411-5. 2100.1 10 00001,0145 11.201025. 0 1 2.51P 0 T 01 10015,1 .010 410 0 V5 OF / 05011010 FO 0IV2.2 II 12 IK2 201 12 1 .3 51402 5F 15 417 2 10 1101 5 4 1 1 , 11111 1 40H 1 AW O M T A E I G O U AM10”501 ..1140110 F101AL 2.13, ororCoset112133 2.22.12 2222, 2.331.22.031241.11124.0 not Ono 527.3 02 310221921220232322,20.21224. =-• INLET PROTECTION FILTER SACK (IP-3) PETS FOR 1.152 MON 115124,40.3 YOWL 51.114111110.1051.112211.010 OE 12.211.2105 11111015.2.6 20/511311111/1111.110,101151011151/1110.040. Opus A & E — UVROJECTS \ 21740 VADVIsil\Shaalt,\ 21740—05—EROS.dwg [EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS] August 07, 2019 — 12:16pm rslorson OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. F.TFE, P.1 Pm vwersOnsNamu EFTNTEN Opus Design L.L.C. CMIBm Pm TM POes. ,ric ,Sarri bate k DOWMW WMTIOR MMIN MMOVilmW PPO-ECT OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA. MN ParEC1,14, 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP SubnoliN MEP 06/2112019 NMEcrENSWET CMA [WNW JGP OWE.. MLL PPEGV.Tm. Ieef MA MN MmspeNkstbn or repw, was prepared twre or under my gMem superthbn and1UM Wm a die eon*. at undar the nolo/ donne Mismsata. Chad Mat kcistraWn NNE: 07/12/2019 OPLITENsus C6.01 www.sambatek.com 12800 Whltmter DM, &its 300 MInnetchke, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone r:.t; OVERALL UTILITY PLAN HIS LS 64 0 RICHMOND 7 Opus A & E — LAPROJECTS \21740 \CAD \MU \Sheets \21740—C6—U1L rA 07. 2019 — 12:16pm -LEGEND PROPOSED COSMO CURB& CUTTER STOMMEWEN 0— M. —0 AM' 0 0— M — SWCEISMVERt' —t— TORMINISANE N0 —0/ 0— Or m . —C) WATERMAN MR— I ,_<,. EASEMENT DRARITNE —FM — DM — — N, — mo WS UNE IL ELECTRIC 1M MENIONE — .F— •SEE C602 roa Emurr MAN NOTES NORTH O 60 110 SCALE FEET I (-111.111- 111-' 0111111D) 411 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ME WANT IMPROVEMENTS MR NOS FROIECTSHALLRE CONSTRUCTEDN ACCORDANCE MN THE 'STL0DM0 UNDOES SPECIFICATIONS. AS PURISM], HT THE COT ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF NELOTA (EMAIL EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COM OF THEM SP ECIFTCROONS. OPUS. r.LEGEND Sasso (Ictlaras a•sts EXISTING FILOPOSED CUPS O GUTTED STORM 5ENER SAMMY SEWER FORCEAMIll (W) WATERMAM EASEMENT MIME GAS LINE ELECTRIC TELEPHONE THE OPUS GROUP 0-11-13 0-- 10-10 4.4 --CD 0- 4-0 1.1. ALL MOTES SHALL BE CONSTRUCHEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH COT RECIONEMENTA 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, NPN OM, INTERFERE Wan OR ATTACH ANT AMCOR NOSETO OR TAP WATERMAIN BEIENMHIGTOTHE COY UNLESS DULY AUTIMMIED TO DO SO Bo THE OTT. MO ADVERSE cONSECILIENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE SALK ARE THEME., OF coNTPAcTOR. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. lOSS 4r Rua rat aerearka .SOLIN W .L.C. - I - -14, - too •- It 1.3. A 61310MUM VERTICAL SEPARATION le INCHES AND NORMONTAISEPARATION Of 10 FEET BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETERS 5 0.6011410 AT ALL WATERMAN NM SEW ER MON (BUILDING. STORM AND SWIM) EROSSINGA ALL MATER.. SHALL RE AS SPECIFIED IN COM1SPWIRCATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HE REIN. 2.1. ALL MATERIALS SHALICOMPLY WITH THE REOLOIEMENTS OF THE OTT. 22. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC 10R-36.0/11.136 NoTE12 OTHERWIE 2.21. AlIsmirrARY sEWER 56,0001 TO WILDING WAIL BE PVC 501 40 CONFORM/IC TO MEM D2665. 2.3. ALLAVATERMAJN ToSE DUCTILE MON - 0.A55 52, 1.1111155 NoTED oTHERMSE. 2.3.1. ALL WATERMANITO NAVE 7.54FET OF COVER OVER TOP Of WATFAMAIN. 232. M./ME INRUSTBLOCKINGAND MELYN000IIO NF RESTRAINTS MALL WATERMANI 10114TS PER OM STADARDS. All5T041.1 SEWER PPE TO BE SMOOTH PiTERIOR DUAL MU HOPE MEM. WATER TIGHT GAsRETs, LRAM NOTED OTHERVASE 2.0.1. ALL MDR /A SEINER PIPE FOR ROOF DRem sERvIcEsTo 11.1.13O15 SHALL RE PVC 56140 CONFORMING TO 1:12655. 25. RIP RAP SHALL BE NN/DOT CIASS 3. 3. COORDINATE. !RAIDING SERviCE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS VOTH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR P RMR TO CONSTRUCTION. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. OssitEss4 Nast Vat Vsarns Itt SSW 1 If Mts.. ekSarnbc www.samb k atek.com MOO Whibmaler Drhs, Sate 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone 031411 200A R.,503.02 1,693_37 -11 REP ST Si-- so IntrY sDatoN pea s000tir Fnulmormi I smeyno i mining I Enmonrronm LIMN MO CONSTRUR OVER EXISTING 35- RCP RE,302.21 1E453.15 ME 16.53.0S 5 2410.00' Ora sr DP E 1DON OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP ALL 11111U3ING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM SANITARY, NATER) WHIN MEMEL OR IEA COVER ARE TO RE HOULATED FROM BMW. TO POINT WHERE OFFET OF COVER ts artievm SOAR 202 CONSTRUCT OVER STING 26-RCP 503.50 1,895.69 OWN ROI 4,903.10 1,893.73 FaTIECTROTT-E. 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, IAN S. CONTRACTOR SNALLTARE All P RECAUTMNS NECISSART TOAVIND PROMPT( DAMAGETOMNACENT moERNES PURIM THE CONSTRUCDON PHASES OF TNG £001411. CONTRACTOR 0111 BE HELD soLEIT RESPON9Ba FOR ANT DAMAGES TO THE AmAcENT pRopmDES occURRUM DURING THE CONSTRUMILNI PHASES OF INES PROJECT. Sr S , 0120 57 IF - 27• HOPE P 2.0056 HOVE @ 2m • 6. SAFETY NOMETOCONTPACTORS2NACCORDANCE WITH GEMRAUX ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTILACTOR WILL BE SOLELY MID COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE MB SITE, INCLUDING MATT OF All PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF DIE WON< THIS RECHMILIAMIT WILL APPLY CONTIMMUSIT AND 110T RE MUTED TO NORMAL WORKING HOWLS. THE DWI OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OR CONTRACTORS PERFORM,. l5 NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE 44101001111EAMLBJA15 OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAP THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. iNDOCONISE4 31644000 321E-12" HOPE'@iWk ISSUE RECORD 7. ALL AFLEAS OLITSIDETHE FROPERIT BOUNDARIES THATARE DISTURBED Br MDT CONSTRUCTION SHML BE RESTORED IN ORD. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES Of TOPSOIL MACE° BENEATH THE SOD. SUBSURFACE MOAMAR...TEM 20,520 CF TOTAL STORAGE 1,e60 LE 35- LOX CV WASHED STONE 1E4E9900 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal A CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONMBLE FOR PROLONG MID MAMTAINING TRMF1C CONTROL DEVICES 5001M BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. FLAGMEN AND 1161175 TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFICINNERE ECESSARY. TRAFFIC COMMA DETRm SHALL CONFORM TO APPROMATI MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OFIRAMPORTATON STANDARD, OROS 203A 8,910.09 1,906.75 01/6112032 14,910.67 1E-90767 9. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED ST AN INDEPENDENT-50. ENGINEER_ EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOMIM UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE 50E5 MALI BE COMPLETED AS RECURRED BY THE 50. ENGINEER. THE LOAM BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SNAIL COMPLY NOTHTNERECHJ.REMENTS Of THE 501.5 ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR...LEM RESPONSNREFORCOOMMMITIMMI REQUIRED SOBS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTORS WITH THEM,. ENGINEER 92 IF 1 HOPE M STAN 100 R,505.62 1E419360 62 1.0 - 0 09 0 0 15011 A GEOTIONECAL ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN [WAITED 01, 301,18` HOPE @ 2.00% - 9 810 COMPANY:AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. ADDRE56,50 CLEVOAND AVENUE NORTH PENAL 661-559 9001 DECEMBER 21,2015 ' . kt1.14 r,, t±4e4f.4.. E'17-11e, coNTEAcTORSHAll OBTAIN A COM OF THIS 50 Ls REPORT. M1111203A 0,910.53 Mal 101 R&90533 1E400 AI STMH 203 0,903.0 1,90055 (NEI t,901.05 (S) 1.,5602 (VO T,504.87 INIV) 10 CONTRACTOR SNAIL SUBMT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FoR MANNMEAND CAT. BASIN STRUCTURESTO SA /ABATER. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW MORO. DAYS FOR MOP DRAWING REVIEW. M ROOF ORAN CONNECTION ,90230 DRAIN ELEVATION Ii II. CONTRACTOR AND MATER,/ SUPPLIERSHAU. DETERMINF THE MR NIMUM DIAMETER REQUAELF FOR OWN STORAISEIVER STRUCTURE. 12. THE UNDERGROUND STORMINATER MST EA1 SHOWN ON THE UTI1111 MAN AND TNE OMMISHEETSIS OR HiFoRMATAINAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DEPICTS THE NINIMMA STORAGE PEQUIREMEHISAND ENE SYSTEM ElEVADONN TNECONTRACTOP (MN THEIR SUPPUE11 ON DESIGNER) SHOE. SUBMIT DES011 DRAWINGS TOTHE ENGIN. FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR To coNsMUCTMIL THE SIGN DRAWINGS SHALL DEPICT THE FINAL LAYOUT AND DETAAS FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE DRAWINGS SHALL RECERTIFIED BC A UCENSED ENG NEER FOR THE STATE IN WRIGHT-HE FROlECT CONSTRUCTED. THE 50131MTTALSNALL INCOME AU. IOCESSAAT FRODUCT INFORMATION. DESIGN CALORATIONS ARO BEDDING REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. MALOWING CONSTRUCTION,ITIE [FROM. ENGINEER SHALL SU3MT A LETTER TO THEOWNER AND ENGINEER INDICATT HOVEY OBSERVED THE INSTALMNON AND THE INSTAILUTON OF THE STORIAVATER SIMMS %MIN CONFORMANCE WEN THE a ROHM DRAW NGS. PVC OF 2005 Itl ROOF DRAIN CCRINKH011 IF.503A6 32 - 10. PVC @UM PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5,000 SE IMF 18' HOPE 2005 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF 238 LT - 1M 10 0200% \ a pes RELOCATED 0000243 AMMARYSERVICE 1,60113 (VERIFY WITH MEP) ST STMH 201A CONSTRUCT OVER EXESONG15. PEP 111E.517.37 1E4DOESS TIMMS .516.6 IE.907.69 59'5 101) se LE - DIP IN CASING PIPE 0 032 .04 CTS DE4120.1 1E,309.52 781158`PVC SDP 3S@052 Le ROOF DRAM CONNECTION COORDINATE MTN MEP,Tri• 1,9041 LF M PVC M 2.0013 SIMS 205 5,516.68 M05.39 261E-6. PVC 20016 125 LE-12. HOPE 2.0014 6'1,00f MINN CONNECOON ,908.00 ‘‘NaNNV, 1 2.51F PVC 1CCAS IO PVC STUB 1,906.05 CRAM 102 8,910.32 1,905.60 DOE 05421/2019 aiNDEGS VA•143-1 CMA sosos JGP CSESIOnt MLL 6- ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 1,90589 CONNECT TO 1110000 M WATER SERVICE CONNEETPOOG IMAMS C6NO.0.1.1 DEPOS 6. ROOF SAM [Of iNK11041 10,1320 (1010 VERILY) 73 It -15. MK 2.00% MH IG 0,921.46 1490.40 arit,o.o.1 STN. 003 RE.52151 1,512.56 1181E-12' NOM M MIK Fscumure SAMAR,' SEANCE =918.11 23 LF PVC SCH 40 63 2.015 VERIFY WATERMAR1 SERVICE LOCATION I Nerd, sera, Vu10Ms POT. Neaf tbnor Fmmt 0166 L-}Ire or under my &tut F66 a nesent.4 and that 1 am a slAsslIcenuel otessbnal ENGINEER urvierthe Lms al Ne stale stissesstta. ‘eA Chad M. Aye 0 fteghtra 1 One: 07/12/2019 u.ar.s, stana..o LY. Ater- C0/ NEC ROOF DRAINS CONFIRM DEPTH .5 IF ax` 12. / HOPE @ 200% MR 044 Ft,926.75 E.91.26 PROPLD BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF L FT R• ROOF NAM CONNECTION 1,50426 U 191 la - B' PVC SIRS 1E1052% ®AIN 303 6' Ea-90el -SERI 90 .96 1671E • 6' 61315 @213X. 151F -EC P600200,6 REIOCATE DRAM' WATERMAN LOCATVII TO RELOCATED IN FIELD IFFOD6111coNSTRUCOON STM/1002 RE.1.913 ,909.68 MEDIA - 104922.50 OR /E4915.11 1:191920 IET907.12 1E,911.77 (On SF-4. SS @ 2.01, 35 LE -6. PVE SCHM 211094. R11103 ,917.00 1,90620 221F-12 HIVE M 2.00% j UTILITY PLAN 177 LF FOWL SOR 35 4/ 04215 .6. I I I r .L.F.0. PVC 5016 35 0 0325 LF-1 • VIATERMAIN LOCATION TO HOPE ta ZOOS 4 40101TO CONSTRUCTION BF LOCATED IN SIELO 4 At 88 44 2, WATER SERVICE ST6111001 RE-916.90 1,909.06 Lsz HOPE @ 200. NEETNASEP C6.02 .C '''':011 ,,,, NE , CT , TO MISTING SANITSIAT SEWER ASANNOtE <Naas otsi NORTH 0 30 60 ITO!gi=1 1 SCALE IN FEET 1981F - Er PVC 50135 0.52% 4 Ts atC0 InNE MH 6E418.10 I,905.70 ONNECT 2. WATEA MICE TO MATING M -NN teas PT. 1032.4 FEE OF PT. OF TEN/ N. LINE POOS OF LOY 13131.11.1110119 : 91T11Y111 0 03 END Lg3i018 OITUYINOUS 225 II 0111.11,1 11003 -M0.71,7"` GRAS S se-r us ] August 07, 2019 — i2:17 0 bi 7, 13ITUMINOLV 0•0?- - .4100r r !MI I -r f c _ a.i , ,,E .,-,.. ..-. i -. rt a , i ..' - 0 11 itw411 AZiC141 ,_ ,-• I ' j 1.g * kepi V . i ll PIVITAIME )1 lergral j- s - - - 0,1 *. -- - --- 9lo - --- _.,. 6.-4111-vt NWPIUMQING OUTLINE PLUS-10. .,, 1 1 1, --- 4. MUIR -- __,3i ____ PROPOSED B WINS-A 9motc. - --:- ____--- - --- / - -_- --41,zoiLs)-; 7) ,297,„;), \ I ....----- ----• / /4s" s , -\/ - / /, /----- --0,k"-----_/ 4 1 $ -ili BM '43 I I i I I I I 1 \ r ;'-.---::,-f-- . ,-"" ,- ...„ 1, \ \ 127 rP...t. az , 1 i \ \ Lc; \ \ \ ' . \ \ . I &A ----• ,1 __1'34133 MT owe Ti A NO TREN IAN : ( /// i , , , 4,„,/, , .. WE Cr =IT LOT B. MC ILI A c c. , r N. LeLE CF CPCNT LOT 1. --, ) 4 ...., - \ W -‘. -s. \ / I ., C. 13 / , - / 4 Rte, EC. BUILDING / C 4.' • Vt%1 • P 131111118003 acsr ap a, as 71894755 17 la-15.12 ac," OK, OPUS' THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Opus Desk") Braid, L.L.C. ,Ixeler414,9.11.411.3 -Sambatek ,www.sambatek.com 12800 Witehaler Drlve, Sale 300 MInnetmka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone Erotreeri-o lOOr 00 IP ing I 67466664611 OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal DOE 06/21/2019 ELEVEWOE3 CMA JGP 019.131. MLL I heel, M.O.. sun,. Om or report was pepoed by me er under my .1ect sopenn,on ar4Out ISM ASLOOTECTentler Loos of 0. Rale of lhnesoO. 444:14, William L De NOVA. 11,13: 07/12/2019 ,r.•er.wII 4red In Wee ap Le. wo Aped =or el Os sun, whch 3.33,...en request Samtatek, NalrettrIE MOO,. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN .3111.91111 L0.01 0 NORTH 30 60 KALE IN FEET TREE INVENTORY SCHEDULE: M = REMOVE TREE - REPLACE WITH NEW TREE (19 TOTAL) R = REMOVE TREE P = PRESERVE TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION MEASURES Tr. Number Sire Tree Name {Condition 100 Removed Prior 1011 16.00 Spruce I Poor 1 102 13.00ISpmce I Good 103 22.00 Sin.. I Good 104 Good 105 i Good 106 eeoe Good 107 25.00 22 11 1 2603, 6 ...000000 0 0000 0 Spruce ppppil l i i s ,u , ,, ,s Poor 108 Good 109 Good Maple 110 Spruce Good 111 8.00 I SPr.c. Good 112 11.00 Spruce Good 113 9.00 1 spruce 1 Good 114 12,16.10,12,14, 13 Elm 115 15.00 Spruce Good 116 40 00 IElm Poor 117 33.00 Oak Poor 11B I 28.00 Elm Good I 119 20.00 Ash Good 1201 1Removed Prior 121 11.00 Elm Poor 122 I Removed Prior 123 4.00 lilac I Poor 1241 5.00 Lilac Good 125 12.00 Spruce Good 126 21.00 Spruce Good 1271 Removed Prior I 128 48.00 Maple Poor 129 27.00 Maple Poor 130 23.001 Ash Poor 131 I Removed Prior 132 33.00 Maple Poor 1331 3.00 Lilac I Good 1341 5.00 Maple I Good 1351 32.0010ak I Good I 136 9.00 Maple Poor 1371 3.00 Maple Poor 1381 4.00 Oak Good 1391 I Removed Prior 1401 7.00 Crabapple I Good 1411 7.001 Maple Poor 142 35.00 Maple Good 1 143 23.00 Maple . Good 144 17.00 Maple Good 145 14.00 Crabapple Good 146 7.14,12.19.15 Maple Good 147 31.001 Ash Good 148 !Removed Prior 149 I Removed Prior 1501 30.00 Ash Good 151 13.00 Maple I Good 1521 100 Crabapple Good 153 Removed Prior 1541 Removed Prior 155 26.00 Oak Good 156 30.00 Oak Good 157 11.00 Oak I Good 158 27.00 Oak Good 159 30.00 Maple Poor 1601 15.00 Maple Good 1611 37.00 Oak . Good 1621 16.00 Maple Good 163 Removed Prior 164 13.001 Basswood Good 1651 2.00 Birch Good 166 2.001Birch I Good 167 Removed Prior 168 4.00 Crabapple Good 169 10' Arborvitae Good 170110' Arborvitae Good 1711 2.00 Evergreen Good 1721 27.00 Oak Good 173 Removed Prior 174 31.00, Oak i Good 1751 24.0010a k Poor 176 0.00 Maple 1 Good 1771 6.00 Maple 1 Good 1781 4.00 Crabapple Good 1791 36.00 Oak Good 1801 2.00 Crabapple Good 181 29.0010ak Good 1821 30.00 Oak Poor 183 16.00 Maple Good 184 3,00 Evergreen Good 185 5,001 Maple Good 186 !Removed Prior PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME CONE CAL SIZE (DY &IPA QV, DP Bewla piatyphylia 'Fargo TEA/Dakota Pinnacle Birch 8& B 2'01l 12 (723 HB Ceith occidentalls/ Commicm H.kbenY B & B CCM. 9 GB (2)B& Ginkgo taIloba 'Autumn Gold' TM / Maidenhair Tree B 2.5.Cal 8 0 HL Gleditsla triacanthos 'Skyline / Skyrne Honey Locust B&B 25'01 14 0 KC Gymriodathis dial. 'Espresso111entucly Caketive B&B 2 2.5.01 BO Dimino macrocar./ BoN Oak B & B 4iCAL B C) IL Plia americana 'Boulevard' / Boulevard Unden B&B 2.5•881 a 0 PE D.. americana 'Princehail. / America. an B&B 25.01 5 CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE COY (:). BF Abies balsam./ Balsam Fir B & B 6i 6 OW TREES CODE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE CITY Pli t SB Arnelanchier anadensis 'Autumn Brilliance/ Autumn &Mance SenrIceberry B&B 2'01 12 .1k t to IL Wan. reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B&B 2.Cal 9 11... IF 11. Sydnga reticulala ivory Mlle/ Ivory 511k Japanese Tree Lilac B& 0 201 NORTH 0 60 120 SCALE I T HILL5 IJLOCK I? I C 11 II 0 ND g a o Opus A & E — L•\PRWECTS\21740\GD\Chit\Sleets\21740 q [L1.010verall Landscape Plan] 'twrixAir-• / / / / / / / I ........ . I 0 iG C / Ia C 0 1 a 07 t OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, LLC. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. ‘( .--Sarnbatek • www.sambalek.com 12800 WhIenter Orke, Suite 300 16metcnks, MN 55313 763.476.6010 telephone OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP ,040,40.5 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal OKIE 06/21/2019 V.V.Ei CMA JGP CHOW. MLL PICISTFAIT:ti I hereby tenity tha .SW4, Oa, or te pen naa r.P.E4 by me or Lexdn myd rect saryserv.r4 and.. I am a duly licensed .01C. .011TER under. Ilret3 of .5tate Of 1.91nnesela. 2t Witham L De Reesintion Dan: 07/12/2019 Ns au-, ...kb nt:feaeonra eat Suntatel, Kamelonia,w/1 are 54EETIPIE OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN SEETMATER L1.01 N Sp S -•fa%: :N111,›XleW • PROPOSED BUILDING ( ADDITION c 5,000 SF z PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF IV REETRATER L1.02 NORTH 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET mmmmEDINALANDSCAPECODE CITY OF EDINA MN IANDSCAPE STANDARDS: Minimum re0tirements.N1 areas of a tot whFch are not used or Improved for buildings ,,alring areas, driveways or storage areas shad be landscaped nith a tomb:nation of tree4 undergo, trees, shrubs, ground cover Carl flowers. (1)41Warum numbe r a/ creerstory trees. The rrtitiminn number of overstay trees on a tat shag be the fFire detemined by dhictilg by 40 the number offees in the peKmeter of the totsperiez LOT PERIMETER: REMODEVADDITION TO EALSTIIIG SCHOOL CAMPUS 4317 UN. FT/40 T: 1013 TREES • SHADE TREES/ CONIFERS REQUIRED (1 TREE / 40 LF): 108 TREES • MANY EXISTING TREES ON CAMPUS TO BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADDITIONAL TREES AS SHOWN PIAT TYPE REQUIRED PROVIDED SHAD, "HILLS ..1— —0-- EVERGREEN TREES 0 • ORNAMENTAL TREES • 17 • DETERMINED BY CITY COUNCIL • PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE BOTANICAL /COMMON MAXIE CUNT CAL ROE QTY iii, v A, CCO. OP cod 6:28,28,13 "Far24.114/ Dakota PInmacle Birth B&B 2,1 12 0 NB Gelds occidental / Cannon 8. BBB . /I 4,L 9 0 GB Ginkgo b1892 &Num Gold IM i Mald•Tio, Tree BBB 2-6,1 B 0 NI GlebtsIa lrlwantlasIL064762414••,6449L6,98 B&B XS, 14 0 EC GinwaiNdus dolts Iswell0"/ 34,8.1704.4644 B &B 25"Cal 2 C 00 ) Clueicus mairoca•PI/Eurr Oak BUB CC. 6 C) EL Wu americana "ItoliantiC/ 08:18.61118clen BAB 25,1 4 0 PE Wows amerliana 'Princeton' / American Urn 0.8 25,1 COWERS CODE BOTANICAL/COMMONNMIE CONE CAL SME STY BE Ates WWII./Balsam Fit B&B 5 6 URN:UM CON BOIANICAL / COGHION NAME CONT CAL CUT ilito SB ArnelanchSer rwailensIs "Autunn ErWinie. / Autumn BrEanceSeniisbew B&B 2,1 12 aliik . V/Pr 11 SHInga rel881212 / Japanese Tree Lax 11 . Li 2,1 9 wwx Viro, IL Siring. re1481212 'hwy.' /Nog SA Japanese Tree Ube BBB 2-Cal OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. :=44 lea r.4 Vmstr.11,153.11, Opus Design Build, L.L.C. VSarnbatek wwW.Sambatek.COM 12800 Whitereater 00,0, SAG 300 1.2.nnetonka. h10 55343 763.476.6010 telephone EGE":661.913.8146 IR/Wing I Entonarclal OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 184441849.4 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 0;21/2019 CMA ax vs OF,X61 JGP owpwar MLL 4-CEVADDY I Leidy certIfy ILA 010 mini, plan 6, Hp•H 6requed ey rnewtmder Ire dreg sum. intl.& I am 203y *ens. lAtIOSCAH AROITHCI enter .4larrs M 1243121e of 6114Hsola. *KU., William L D Reestration otte.07/12/2019 H snetsVAANIAle MA 6.99,4•943 wler Iro IBH4 law el .6316&e,66, re' ( SI regwo sarlsalel, ww.elorla,621 New 1 J IF BIRUNINOUS Ana- tool' S 3 (Lai 13 UMIII0 05 10 tap O 1•44i7,": ‹r' L pRoPLD BUILDING ADDITION 560SE 01 ±1 C C 0 I T1.1 61 1'r:0 II r- C C -BM A. -F; ss. 44, rt.& /66x3---- LANDSCAPE PLAN E R rea SITUHINCLIS C C C GRASS BITUMINOUS PREPARE SOL FOR THE ENTRE 8,0 INSTALL 3' LAYER OF MULCH. DO NOT PLACE NI CONTACT W/ SHRUB STEEL APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HIROO. EDGE CONDLONIVARTS COM R FUR TO PLAN MO SINCIFICATIOH LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINER GROWN RANTS EXCAVATE PLANT BED LAIN, DEEPER... ROOT BALLET. SWAY SIDES AND HOTTOM OF PLANTING BED MTH SPADE UNDISTURBED SUBORADE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 4 E-0. P-02 NOTE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT PIE WARRANTY 1E0100. IF STALING IS RAW RFD BY NM CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR TO USE 2 OR 3 STAKE MEMO, WITH I. WEBBING AROUND TRUNK OF THE INTI WIRE OR CARO. TO RE USED) WRAP TME TRUNKS PER110115. ENALL14 zr NEVA° N PIACI PP Of MT 6.1013POSE 1511, OA WWI VAN OfFLO.A11111T11504 ummorvemoLoworr000l.o. Vora oNly.11.1.4 FORAVMM E.1115.1.(10M.04I Of Mar .1.1 ..036EaTKIN VA.MS VAUTSr. Cf1111$11,41111 TREE PLANTING DETAIL OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1.510.1, Ex..° Opus Design Build, L.L.C. +.9 errIFtel V -nea, IC.5).11.5 E, arnbatek • www.sambatok.com 12800 Vinteovelm Drive, &Ate 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone Enclmen015xmfil 1 %ening 1 Entronmcctl PASEO OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA. MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP Submittal DNB 06i21/2019 PROAMemPOL CMA JGP °Wm° MLL 18-061PATEN I Hereby certify Oa NA sun.. Wan or report was P..4 by me or undEr,drecturpermbn and INH l am a d11 licensed IANDSCADE ARCHITFLTundu the taws of Sute of Myrna. CC L Del Resist.] °me 07/12/2019 nn vArl ur.ssnei eared In the ht a Cuaanubawet eved roPPN Ns suney•eich arretalie upon rep.... S.F_Et IMF LANDSCAPE NOTES-DETAILS SEEirer.32 L1.03 O 40 0 BITUMINOUS xt, IA ‘*e 0•1\ S C • - T- -'"-- .tra 4 FT 0.14114 UNE TENC-E 4 I FT CHAIN LOST FENCE 4 Fr al. 111( FEN LILAC BUSHES NORTH 0 ZO 40 NOTES GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE 035.11E CONDO.. MATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE Of THE WOOL 2. THE CONTRACTORSHALLVERTV NAI WWI 0.110 BRIG TO THE ATTENTION Of THE uutoscatrE AROLITECTOLLONPANOES WHICH HIM COMPROMISE THE DESKI1OR INTENT OF T° MOUT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR 511JUL IN RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLY.. WITH ALL APPLICABLE COME REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORE 4. THE CONTRACTORS.° PROTECT DOMING ROADS, CURIO/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES. LAWNS MID ERE ELEBIENTS DURNIO CONSTRUCTION. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED AT NOADOIDDHAL COST TO THE OWNER. L LOCATE ANO TOME. MUMS, INCLUEVIIO IRRIGATION LINES WENT° OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALLAS HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHAH BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OP ANY DAMAGES 70 SAM F. 110101 THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Of ANY CO:611E75TO FACILITATE RANT RELOCATION. 8 THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAT COORMNATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTPN AND PLANTING INSINUATHNI WITH OTHER LONTRACTod WOOING ON SITE 7. 1HE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFIOE109E5 Iv SITE CONDITIONS WHICH 41°,1T NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVALOR WARRANTY. UNINSIRABLF SEE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO TED ATTENTION OF THE ONDSCAPE ARCHITECT P.O. 70 HAIM IVIG OF °OM B. THE PAN TARES PRECEDENCE OVER.° IANDSCAPE LEGENDU 1:11501EPANDFS LUST. ITUOINTIES SHOWN IN THE PLANING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE CONTRACTOR TO VERILY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE NAV. 9. THE SPEOFICATIONS TAKE PRKIDENTE OVER THE PLANTING NOTESAND GENERAL NOTES. 11). EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATE RIAS ETC. WITH HT °LANGE PLASM S . FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS A OC MAXIN1UM SPACING 11. LONG-TO.1 STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL HOT 111ALLOWED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTA/KEINSPECl/011. PLANTING NOTES: 1. NO PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FOAL...EGA. CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COTIPLUF0 III THE LNIMEEPATE ARM. 2. NORA/1MA. PREEN:ERGO° KAMM SHALL .f APPLIED TO All PLANT 8. AT THE MANUFACTURERS F.COMMENDED RATE PRIOR 70 PLANT INSTALLATION. 3. ALL PENNING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE SLNIERICAN STANDARD EOR NURSERY STOCK,. 1,161.060, LATEST EDITION.. THE AVIENCAN SS Of NURSERYMEN, INC MID SHALL CONSITTINE MLNIMUM QUALM RECAIRE VENTS FOR PINED MATERIALS. 0. OVERSTOO TILES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWENTHAL., 6. ABOVE PAVED SURFACES S. ALL PLANTS MIXT ECHO..., VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND MSEASE ASO BE COSIGNER CROWD OR BALLED AND SURIAPPUX AS INDICATED°, THE ULHOSCAPE LEGEND. 6. PLANT MATERIALSTO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 7. ALL TREES MUST RE STRAIGHT TRUINED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPFOP°13. IL THE 141105CAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES TNE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PIANTS ARCH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY...SE, DUERO°. AFTER INSTALLATION. 9. NO SUBSTITIMONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BF ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRI11110 Bl THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10. ...AIN IANTFRIP0 QUANTITIES SHAPES OF NOS UOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE C0117MOOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPUTE COVERAGE OF ALL MINIM BEDSAT SPAONG SHOWN 11103 ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACTCONDITIONS OF PIE ERE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STALING LOCATION MALL PLANT N4TERIAI3 PRIOR TO INSTAUAPOIL 11. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST E COMPLETELY /AULD° A5 SPECNIED. 12 MULCH: SHREDDED HAW:AVOW NIULOL CLEAN AND FREE Of NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS ICATERAL, WALL MA55 PONTINE DEMAND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDCATED AS ROOT MULCH011 DRAWINGS. SU MIR SAMPLE TO IANDSCAPEARCHLTECT PRIOR TO PEINERY DEERE FOR APPROVAL. DELAYER MULCH ON DAY Of INSTRUATION. USE 3L POR SHRUB BEDS TREE RINGS, AND 3. TOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AU.LAULMF3 AND RANTING SOIL QUARTMES TO COMPLETE THE WORX SHOWN OH THE RAIL 14. USE AIITHDESICCAHT OVIITPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL). DECLBUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVEROREUS &LOVED ANIMAL APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WOOER PROTECTION DURING WASPAIITY PERM. 15. WRAP ALL SMOOTHEMRED IMODUOUS TREES PLANTEOINTHEFALL PRIOR TO DOSHIRER 1 AND REINOVF WRAPENO AFTER MO 1. TREE WRAPMNG /M.N. SHALL BE WHITE TWO-WALLED RUSTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUE. FLARE TONNE FIRST MEM 16. All ,ODIOUS, PI AND IAA. PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODEN, PROTECTION PER ANEW 2571312 17. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER. FERTLE PRLABLE LOW CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMON' ION ADO OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS RANT GROWTH R LL ICONIPN WITH /31.30T SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE SELECT TOPSOIL MIXTURE SHA SE FREE FROM KRIEDPACIL SUBSOIL, SIGNES, GHF_MICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOL SUTURE SWILL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 81 AIM 7.5 MO 100-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNOS PER GUM VAR. PI RAIMI. BEDS INCORPORATE TOS AMU. 11190UONONT THE ENTIRE 8E1191 A LATER ANO ROTOTILLING IT PITO.. TOP 12 OF SCHL ATA 1,1 RATP.A.111 PLANT STOCR NOT PANTED OH OAT OF MAIM SHALL.; HEELED MANI/WATERED UNTIL NOTALLATION. PLANTS HOT MAINTAINED NISH° MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ILL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE 10 VFFOFT THAT EACH ELCAVATFO TREE AND SHRUB PR WILL PERCOIATE PRIOR TO INSTALUNG PLANTING IAFENUM AND FLAME THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL THE BOTTOM OF SELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER AND COHNRM THAT THIS WATER IVILL PERCOLATE WITH N A 24.11011R PERIOD. IF THE SOL ATA GIVEN AMA DOES NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN 071 GRAVEL SUMP SH41, BE IIOTALUD OR THE NAMING SHALL BE RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FORTYO COMPLETE GROWN. SEASCHNS (APRA 1 - NOVEMBER IL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE OURPANTIE SHALL COVER THE PULL COST OF REPULCENIENTI INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PULVIIED DENVER,. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PONT INSTRUATION. 2L SEAM:15/1Na OF P AND SEEDING: NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAT ELECT TO PLANT IN OLESEA50115 ENTIRELY AT HiS/HER RISC. 211 POTTED PLANTS INE- 9,21- 1°1 212 DFCIDINUS - 6/11 9/21- 11/1 21.3. EVERGREEN POTTED PUNTS, 9/21.11,1 21.4. EVERGREEN B.. 'NE • SiL 9/21- 1°1 215. TINWSFEDNG, OE - 0.7/20 -9/20 21.E. NATIVE MU SEED N. IA15. 7/20, 9/20.10/20 22 MAINTENANCE WALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AUER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK LS NI MO. PLANT MATERIAL SHINE BE PROTECTED AND MAINTENED MIL THE INIONIATION OF THE PLANTS LS COMPLETE INSPECTION HAS SEEN NOM AND PLATINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE Of THE GUARANTEE. WINTENAIKE SHALL MCLUDE WATERING MULCHING, REMOVAL OF OSAD MATERIALS RE-SET 110 PLANES., PROPER GRADEAND KEEPING PLANTS III A PLUMB POSITION AFTER ACCEPTANCE. THE 04111,11 SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBIUTIES. HOWEVER, THE COMPACTOR SHALL CONNIVE 70 BE RESPOILSIBLE FOR LUPINO INF 'REFS PLUMB...GROOT THE GUARANTEE HO. 23. ANY PUNTMATERNA VIM. DIES WRNS BROW.OR DEFOLIATES (PROP TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) POLL BE PROMPTLY REMOVE. FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED V/1111 NAURU° OF THE SAME SPECIES, MANTEL RAO SAE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECITICATIONS. 24 WATERING: 114417A111 A WATERING SCHEDULE WHEN WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANES ONCE ANSEL III ECTRENIELT HO,DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OPTED AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS Of HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LOVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MILLEN PRO. TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MALE THE NECESSARY ARRAIMMENTS FOR WATER- TURF NOTES: TURF ESTABLISH/40N T SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WRIT THE PROVISIONS OE THE IAN COT 2105 MO 25, EXCEPT...DE.1ED BELO, 1. ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL ALSO RECEIVE 6. OF TOPSOIL PRIOR TO INSTALUNO SOD. TOPSOIL WALL BE FREED, TREE ROOTS. SWOPS. INALCIPIG MATERIAL AND TRASH. ANO SHALL BE ;FLEE OF STONES LARGER THAN It RIOLES PI ANY DIMENSION. 2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SUREACES. FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HUD I'BROW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TULL WE, CURB. FTC 3. 500 SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL ID ME CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGFREO MAL ON .0P.S1EEPER THAN El OR IN DRAINAGE ...LES. SOO SHINE BE STALED SECURELY. E. TURF °NALL OTHER AREAS MSTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHAM OE RESTORED BY SEFDING, MULCHING AND FERTILIZING. 5,E13 AIMEE N1.25.151 WILL BE PLACED AT THE RATE Of ES POUNDS PER ACRE. 5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO SE TURF SEEDED. ARE TO RECEIVE 61 TOP 5011., SEM MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS 0/1TATIED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 410R IN DRUNANE SWALFS INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BULNEET. 6. ALL DISTURBE0 AREAS 70 RECEIVE HATTIE SEED, MET° RECEIVE PLAITING 5014 SEED-MULCH. ANIMATER MINA HATH E. STAND OF GRASS LS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES .EEPER THAN LI OR 14 INLANIAGE SHALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BIANIUT. GENERAL TREE SPECIFICATIONS: 0. .51,11E10AD PARKING LOT TUES.°. BE LIMBED UP TOME FOLLOWING HEIGHT, 1.1. 2. CAL TRIES, LOWEST BRANCH HT. 2. r CALL TREES: 1.01VLST BRANCH T NT 2- TREE CANOPY WIDTH SHALL BE RELATIVE TO HEIGHT/COOPER OF TME AND TYPE Of TREE. OSIIPFIVEX111,3,WItirli 2.2. r CAUPER/12.14. /12 AA WIDTH MIN. 2.3. 3" UNREEL/14.16 11.6-7,100TH 3. CANOIN TREES SHALL NOT NAVE 030018 HATE LEADERS IN LONER HALE Of TREE CROW. 4. A...3 SHALL HAVE STNINIEIRICAL °REMAKE° BRANCHING ON ALL SIDES OF THEME. 5. TREES MAU. NOT BE DIVED PRUNED. 6. TREES SHALL BE FREE OE ...CAL DAMAGE FROM SHIPP-NG AORANDUNO. DAMAGED TREES SHALL BE REJECTED. T. SUMMER DUG TREES SHALL HAVE ROOT.. SITE INCREASED BY 20. 8. TREES WH. CLUED RECOIAMENDO3 GOFER TO HEIGHT RELATIONSHIP SHALL BE REJECTED. IRRIGATION NOTES: L I115141(x IIDO,STIONNDSIET.I IN PLACE. IRRIGATION CONTRACTORTO COORDINATE REALIGNMENT OF IRRIGATION SPRINKLER MAINS AND BRANCH LINES TO THE NEW WELL LOCATION. (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED RD GENERAL CONTRACT.. 2. IRRIGATION GOIITRACTORTO ElEINNATE SPRIAXLER ZONES UNDER PROPOSE. NEW CONSTRUCTION AOCOORELLSATE COVERAGEOF NET/ LAWN AREAS ape. A & E — IAPROJECTS \EPA& \CAIACIA \ShaetA2174 SCALE IN FEET 7 19 20 49 O LOWER LEVEL O // / / / 0 WA4 OA►k 101;211M • 11 a CI 1111 Al ra VMAFTWOr. "In r rap orzzerr .thur INTe on000nno ICj 1000000 fl Th 00 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, LLC. 1,11,1 11...1.4111 952,7[4.161 Opus Design Burld, LLC. r. lte_atel..1, 01.04112 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Sirli &MEM A1.0 KOFC OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PROEC1.0.5.5 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN ITCVECIPLIV.V.A 31644000 ISSUE RECORD DUE 08107/2019 J. Fourniea MUM} a Partridge MLLE.' REGSVAIO1 9.E1-11112 0 0 0 0 ro 0 LEVEL 1 1- =20,01 RED DASHED PREPS t1CI.UDE 10FROVITVENTS YarNEI ID10111. SUE De. F000,1011" 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 000000 0 0 0 P O CD O =LI / / 1 CI ED / / \\.,. /1\ L 8/7/2019 3:07:52 PM M OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.C.L Ect.5 al rat wereberi. WISS3111.0 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 1,9.0 EL.11,1.,9 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN LI-Er111.2ER A1.1 Cr...11/411 OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN FrOlECt11.111. 31644000 ISSUE RECORD OEV07/2019 KOJEC7 VAUC.101 J. Fourniea 0,414 6 f B. Partridge .C.6, RE015.101 A OPUS' THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Grow, LLC. 177A 6rea F.111. .430,010 Opus Design Buikl, L.L.C. ROOF MO.! OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PRONCIADCRESS 5071 EDENAVE, EDINA, MN 31544000 ISSUE RECORD ROOF ROOF RED 00.71F0 MEP INCLUDES 17,90103.1119 1101161 EK151110 20110P. F00177910 MAECT MAGER J. Fourniea G09911.1 B. Partridge CIIECtf. fit .6.17.PROI 017/2019 --_--____---___--____-----_--- ___---------------------_----------------------- - - - - 8/7/2019 3:07:52 PM !Kr, MU LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 0 LEVEL 2 A1.2 97 E0 a 10 20 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612479-8152 wirwlanekcom Our Lady of Grace Rectory 5071 Eden Ave Edina,MN 55436 issue date 00.00.00 NORTH PLANS A100 0 FLOOR 01 PLAN 0 FLOOR 00 PLAN scale NOTED name NS 111111-11111•Irirr ill Ilii= LIVING I=I ROOF PLAN VC7 VB. • r4' Op .(0111111MIIIIMIPMEMIIIIIHNIMPHIIIIIIIM MN*IM II il IM= == VIM I MII MIM OM Beim 711 ... .., E . ITIIMMUMMIIIIIImillland allimillffigi . I. -, -'- -, 11E011 NORTH O FLOOR 02 PLAN IV • r-o• °SOUTH ELEVATION INFILL VW= 1,0- 0 EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION 1/16,1,0' 4.4 0 NORHT ELEVATION 1 11W 1.0 0 NORTH ELEVATION 2 1/16, O V 16 37 0 EAST ELEVATION OVERALL WS, 110. E1ISTOG SC U FERL TY 1.611:10 SANCTUARY LEVEL DS LONER LEVEL( 107 • Cr EXIST6 /0 SCHOOL " 117 EX/ST.1G SCHOOL LONER LEVEL 10 LOWER LEVEL/1021_0 10Lt 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16-= O WEST COURTYARD ELEVATION VW- TO. REM T.G.BUTIT. 0 0 0 EXISTRO SCHOOL LE Ii EXISTNG SCHOOL LOW R 101 LOVER LEVEL ( 107 • 0. ELEVATION KEY NOTES ARCHITECTLVAL PRECAST 0 SOCK - TOMATO-1E10ST,, 0 ALUM WeiDON SYSTEM 0 ALUM CURTA01WALL SYSTEM ® PR EMISHED METAL PARAPET CAP 0 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 0 AVM/VHF° METAL GOOFY NOTE DESIGNIRENT TO MATCH EV516A3 NOTE SCREEN WALL 13031321,1110 sue...1E sm.. WILL WOSETATALL MECHANICM.EOVFMENT MEL BE SCREDEO FROM PU105 YEW AT R.O.W. MONTAGES KEY PLAN OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. .aro Ea. Pad ral kaaara caws.. M2-14-4.4,1 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. MY5510.4111 9S1.1.441. YOrZLYMNIr OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP FROJYYTALT... 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 31544000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 fil9.116YLLGE3 J. Foumiea CUM., B. Partridge or./.106/ FELISTF}10.1 acHmu EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 MATERIAL KEY T111.-1 WA 10 MATCH ADJACENT 01.0 CHAPEL ROLF. LAP SONO TO MAMA .S1.0 CRAM OGS FENS BiNGC TO MATCH OM CAMS - WAFT uni IMMO GOER t 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis. MN 55904 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 20 ft.tar°2‘.4. MO ROM Ap 40,4' Sp, 0 MN& NEI MIA" ' *" " ' In t 7—f r -71T=TI=TrgTgfTfZAT=t=ligt=V II TF=V=ff=r NnillMair11=1 =If = F I— F- 1 NIIIIIIIN,rawill1111.1 MN ILIIENWEIMMIN 'ME 111•_MIIIMERMINEMI ION _mm.:-_poommKtuipms - =En r=,111 NASF,EZ nir 1ST FL000R • I WI EM FLOOR Ail (46,EA-ON BASEMENT WO' 724' FLOOR 7 f1 — IA : JYR I 74g ; :1 IF L -0 440 rT 41-77A i 141"'filitEFI T. NOTED NS 61 11..0f: .. 6636,09 4 —W— F=I —Ufillfff AU rP1, I L 1T 116 - - 4A111111s. scale name www.fanek.com Our Lady of Grace Rectory 5071 Eden Ave Edina,616 55936 NV • 1,0 4t=1-1:7 7 ur.lhe lans of rnilnalaa. Issue date 00.00.00 ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION w • r-o• A200 wgAyT tvC 2019 OPUS' THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Vane. :,11011a sys.u—vm Opus Design Budd, L.L.C. 1.0 (.24 frale. fi0.1 OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PRORLI.C.155 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN FE.Ci NYDER 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/ DATF 12/19 MATIVAVGEW J. Foumiea MOM B. Partridge 0.11961 .ET1MF PERSPECTIVE IMAGES 9.1.12WER A3.0 O BIlUld I 11014S LOUD LOSS.019 SF 13.3 AC 336.414 59 07./4 AC 439,418 SE 10.09 AC 42.9 R. 261.09S SF S.99 AC OPUS --- LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT CURB & GUTTER EASEMENT ,,,,// —DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY VIASS SITE AREA PROPO SED MER PROPO IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE DISTURBED AREA THE OPUS GROUP ZONING OLISMIG ZONING PROPOSED ZONING RI RI L—A-W—V HEAVY OUTS' ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK I4Y a"1 Opus AE Group, L.L.C, 1/..dx..111,51110110 9524.141 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. MENA. DEVELOPMENT NOTES at§ambatek www.sambatek.com 12900 Whnowater DINE, Sulu 360 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.61110 telephone • ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. B. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TD THE RICE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOM]. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALT REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT -.GUTTER OLT WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CUR. ALL OTHERAREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED,. .GUTTER IN-CURB. COORDINATE WMIGRADMG CONTRACTOR. 4. ALLAREAS ARE ROUNDED TOTHE NEAREST SQUARE HOOT. S. ALL PARKING STALLSTO 0E9' IN WIDTH AND UV IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL INANs FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONSAND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. T. REFERTO FINAL PLAT FOR TOT BOUNDARIES. LOT NUMBERS. TOT AREAS, AND TOT DIMENSIONS. B. ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKSALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALT HAVE A MAMMA, LONGITUDINAL SLOPE Of 4.5%, EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:11), ANDA MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF THE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ORAN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE MALL BE 1.514. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PMCING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE ISA DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENTIN ME FRIO VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 6 I 5 0-1-10a-cAG Vail an cit. PI a-s'i RELOCATE MONUMENT SIGN AS NEEDED • 07 V CA‘ Lk CURB CLII- EntlImMIN I BLIAMN I Pinning 'Environmental PROM, OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP • - 5 vo''an") PROXRADIXESS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 9. 'ND PARKING' SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG M.LDRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY. vatfi 6-1 31644000 14' ISSUE RECORD KEY NOTES A. BUILDING..00PS, STAIRS WE ARCHITECTURAL MANS B. 13-613 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C. ACCESSIBLE RAMP C PRESCHOOL OUTDOOR PLAY AREA E. OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal DIEU RUFOUS INC.NETE PROPOSED BUILDING ( ADDITION 5,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF DOE 06f21/2019 PROICVMAGER CMA Dem er JGP EFECIOD BY MLL RMISTRAW21 — PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF I hereby certify Nat this plan. spedllwIlon or report was preped by me or miler my direct supervislon antl marl am a duly 11<msed worn... ENGRG..., the lows al .4 state of Minnesota. Chad M. Aye eglNra 1 Dam 07/12/2019 p1. ap194. w us a wet Vgned cKvr KM. whiNG an hb. up or o eRKM. SKr.. -Ls.rirnvelonim. MN office. 1_50_,Ilyeann SHMILIRE SITE PLAN CON O I TP LILAC BUS," REMO E AN9. REPLACE BITUMINOUS MRS AND PAVEMENT IN KIND AS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY EXTENSION. SEE SHEET C6.02 DI TUN INDUS SECETLUVAM R FT DIM MC MICEJ 611.31 COM) C.0.41 .1.7. 5 LD T DIED C3302 60 NORTH 0 30 SCALE N FEET BUILDING RETAINING WALL CCCCOCOOCI WETLAND WATTS TREELIIIE SAWCUT UNE s SAN PIPE BOLLARD 1,==gre 0 KEY NOTE 0 PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE .—.. TURNING MOVEMENT LOCATION • JOB # 3164407.12.2019Edina, MN Our Lady of Grace Building Signage Plan BUILDING SIGNAGE ZONE - FINAL BUILDING SIGN TO BE NO LARGER THAN 100 SF BUILDING SIGNAGE ZONE - FINAL BUILDING SIGN TO BE NO LARGER THAN 100 SF MEN W O MEN COATS T. UP UP UP UP UP RA M PDO W N DN UP DN DN DN DN UP UP DN UP T.NORMANDALE ROAD07/12/19 OUR LADY OF GRACE -MP 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN SIGNAGE PLAN31644000Location Plan not to scale North Elevation 1/16” = 1’ - 0” East Elevation 1/16” = 1’ - 0” FINAL BUILDING SIGNAGE DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION - OPTION 1 BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION - OPTION 2 Our Lady of Grace - Master Plan Edina, MN Material Board Exhibit 07.12.2019JOB # 31644Perspective not to scale 01 0105020406 0703 ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM COLOR: BONE WHITE 04 PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP05 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MATCH EXISTING 06 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY07ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST01 BRICK MATCH EXISTING02 VISION GLASS COLOR: CLEAR03 DATE: August 2, 2019 TO: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez – Graduate Engineer RE: 5051 Eden Avenue – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were existing conditions survey, grading plans, utility plans, and erosion control plans dated 06/21/2019. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Sidewalk shall conform to Edina Standard Plate 420. Grading/Building Permit 5. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 6. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Grading/Building Permit 7. Provide traffic study and implement city approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 7.1 Traffic study details impacts to Eden Avenue and Normandale Road Intersection. This ultimate project will push this intersections delay from acceptable to unacceptable. The study details a possible roundabout as a long-term solution or other traffic mitigation techniques. It is not reasonable for the applicant to construct a roundabout when they contribute approximately 13% and 18% of the current and future traffic volume, respectively. Staff recommends a $40,000 cash payment to be used for future traffic and pedestrian mitigation measures at this intersection. Grading/Building Permit 8. Curb cut permit required if any entrances are reconstructed or curb replaced. Prior to Reconstructing Entrance 9. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540-545 and be completed prior to mill and overlay project planned for 2020. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 11. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 13.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 13.2 Public works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 14. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 15. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to calculate sewer and water connection charges. Grading/Building Permit 16. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 17. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 18. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 19. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 20. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site stormwater permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 21. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 22. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 23. Relocation of irrigation well is proposed. Coordination with MDH is required along with a well sealing record. Prior to Demolition/Before Construction 24. Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts permit is required. Grading/Building Permit MEMORANDUM Date: August 2, 2019 To: Emily Bodeker, Cary Teague From: Rick J. Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshal Subject: Our Lady of Grace Conditional Use Permit/Variance application Comments: Below are my comments for the conditional use Permit / Variance application for Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church located at 5071 Eden Ave. - If a new water line is installed a fire hydrant is required within 100 feet of the FDC. - A fire hydrant to the north side of the proposed building addition may be needed. - There will by PIV, Riser Room and FDC relocation work needed to existing building. - The proposed buildings will need to be connected to the existing fire alarm system. - May need to upgrade the current fire alarm system to meet NFPA 72. - The new buildings will need to be fully sprinklered per NFPA 13. - Additional signage may be needed including building addressing. - May need to review access to buildings. August 2, 2019 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official Our Lady of Grace Conditional Use Permit 5071 Eden Avenue Information / Background: After reviewing the project plans for the conditional use permit/variance for Our Lady of Grace Church, below are comments for this proposed project. The building will be required to meet the State building, plumbing, mechanical and accessibility codes. - This will require a complete building code analyses and will need to include the type of construction, occupant loads, exits, bathroom count and codes used to design the building or addition. - An Alta survey - A Separate address and building permit will be required for each structure. - New buildings, any additions and the existing building will need to be fully sprinkled per NFPA 13 and certified as such - Verify the bathroom count for the use - Verify the accessible parking meets the building code - Verify the Fire Department access - Verify the fire alarm is up to date and meets NFPA 72 standards - Verify fire hydrant locations Development Questionnaire Over What this is: A brief questionnaire to help community decision makers understand how this development aligns with key focus area of sustainability that ensures both developers and the community long-term value. Why? Through the 2014 Visioning process, environmental stewardship is one of seven strategic focus areas. Vision Edina’s Environmental Stewardship states: “There is a growing awareness of the impact that the built environment has on the natural environment, and the individual and collective responsibility we all have towards good environmental stewardship. Community residents and stakeholders believe that Edina can take an active and ambitious internal and regional leadership role in promoting more comprehensive recycling, smart building, and energy efficiency practices. These themes couple well with the parallel benefits in smarter urban planning, increased transportation options, and application of technology.” Questions Answers Sustainable Design & Energy Have you utilized Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Not at this CUP stage, but we are familiar with both processes and may utilize them upon actual development of the proposed phased projects. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals and/or will they be Energy Star certified? If not, please share the steps you are taking to support energy conservation. At this stage of a Master Development Plan we have not chosen a particular path, but will continue to investigate sustainable practices that make sense for the projects and their scale. For example the existing geothermal well system that supports the School will be evaluated for capacity and opportunity to tie new development into this highly efficient system. Will you be optimizing the roof by installing a green roof? A green roof is not anticipated at this stage, but potential for future PV installation has been discussed though not finalized. Will there be any renewable energy generation on site? Existing geothermal well system is on site and will be evaluated for capacity upon future expansion. The parish has discussed opportunity for photovoltaic panels on the roof of the activity center but no final plans have been confirmed at this stage. Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? This has not been determined at this stage of the project but would likely be evaluated with any sustainability approaches upon further development for build future phases. Comments: Our Lady of Grace takes stewardship of the environment and sustainability very seriously. These conversations are a part of each project development meeting and will be at the forefront of the design thinking as part of any future actual build development. An example of Development Questionnaire Over this approach is the fact that OLG made a decision to install a geothermal HVAC system , at substantial additional cost,when they completed the elementary school renovation in 2011. This decision was made despite the fact that the payback period for the geothermal system was several years beyond the payback period that would positively influence such a decision. Managing Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? Existing: 33% Lot Coverage (67% pervious) Full Build: 43% Lot Coverage (57% pervious) What new services will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) Our Lady of Grace has limited new impervious surfaces to the greatest extent possible while also structuring stormwater detention under the parking surface. While the campus is nearly doubling in built area, should the full buildout happen, we have been able to limit new impervious area to only an additional 10% of the site. How will the landscaping support the natural ecosystem? (i.e. Rain gardens, % native plants, % bee friendly pollinator plants) The landscaping will support the natural ecosystem by using 50% native plantings and adding pollinator plants where applicable. Use of neonicotinoid free pesticides will be implemented as part of the maintenance program to help increase pollinators. Comments: As part of Our Lady of Grace’s stewardship of the environment we first reviewed and maximized the programmatic utilization of the existing facility on site prior to any expansion. We have been able to limit the amount of new building footprint and the size of the footprint through this process. This effort minimizes impervious surface, preserves existing vegetation and mature trees and will provide opportunity to improve upon it. Managing Tree Canopy What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? Canopy coverage estimate from aerial photo prior to building addition/s is approximately 30%. Canopy coverage post construction of full build out is approximately 25% at initial planting. After 5 years expected growth of trees, we expect to be at approximately 30%. Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? It is anticipated that as part of the replanting of trees we will mix in some larger 4 inch trees to maintain a consistent and maturing tree canopy on campus. Fortunately the phasing of development provides opportunity for Our Lady of Grace to steadily improve and increase its Development Questionnaire Over trees coverage over time as they formalize the front lawn and project perimeter. Comments: As part of Our Lady of Grace’s stewardship of the environment we first reviewed and maximized the programmatic utilization of the existing facility on site prior to any expansion. We have been able to limit the amount of new building footprint and the size of the footprint through this process to maximize pervious surface, existing vegetation and mature trees. The activity center for example has been shifted eastward to preserve more of the large mature trees in the front lawn between the sanctuary and gymnasium. Managing Waste Will a recycling service be provided to all businesses on site? Our Lady of Grace is the sole user of the site and they do currently utilize recycling and waste stream services for the facility. Will an organic (i.e. food waste) recycling service be provided to all businesses on site? Organic food recycling is currently being utilized by Our Lady of Grace Comments: Our Lady of Grace will continue to look at opportunity for multiple waste and recycling streams as the community continues to grow. Sustainable Transportation Will there be bike parking near main entrance for guests? Yes, new bike parking is planned to be included at the main entrance of the school and preschool. Additional overflow bike parking is also anticipated as part of the master plan. Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners or guests to use? No current plans are in place for EV charging stations but they may be evaluated at a future phase. Preferred and signed LEV (Low Emitting Vehicle) parking stalls will also be evaluated upon future parking lot improvements. Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? The current uses on the site very much encourage car-pooling and multi-person vehicular trips to and from the site which provides Our Lady of Grace the opportunity to expand while not substantially increasing impervious surface area on site. Our Lady of Grace will continue to encourage car-pooling and multi-passenger trips. Car-sharing stalls similar to the EV charging stations may be evaluated for inclusion during future development phases. Comments: The common belief in the building and planning industry is that the future forecast of car utilization and parking needs will be lower in the near future as autonomous vehicles and car Development Questionnaire Over sharing programs increase. We are delighted to be limiting future parking expansion and preserving green space where ever possible. If parking or circulation is a problem in the future there are many opportunities for Our Lady of Grace to utilize. However our preference would be that future improvements may actually reduce impervious area rather than increase it, should the future utilization of cars allow. PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OUR LADY OF GRACE 5071 EDEN AVE EDINA, MN PREPARED BY: EMILY CASTANIAS CHAD AYERS, PE 07/12/2019 Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 2 PROJECT INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a redevelopment of Our Lady of Grace Church which is at the southwest intersection of Eden Ave and Normandale Rd in Edina Minnesota. The redevelopment will include the following: additions to the existing building, a new handicap accessible parking lot, a redesigned plaza, a redesigned outdoor play area, a new rectory building, and added pedestrian pathways to the existing parking lot. The project is within the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). It is the intent of the project to meet the stormwater management requirement of the City of Edina and the Watershed District through the construction of an underground filtration Best Management Practice (BMP). EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing 23.35-acre site contains a church and a school along with several parking areas. The north end of the site also includes a baseball field and a basketball court. There are 7.90 acres of existing impervious on site. The Geotechnical Report prepared by AET shows soils onsite to be primarily lean clay and clayey sands which may be classified as HSG type D soils with poor infiltration capacities. The majority of the site drains into existing storm sewer and discharges east into an existing 36-inch outlet pipe which discharges into storm sewer along Normandale Drive. The southeast end of the site runs of uncontrolled onto Normandale Drive where it drains into the existing storm sewer. Ultimately the site discharges into Minnehaha Creek approximately 0.50 mile away. There are currently no stormwater BMPs in place. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed site results in a net increase of 2.31-acres of impervious for a total site impervious of 10.21-acres. The new impervious includes additions to the existing building, a new handicap accessible parking lot, a redesigned plaza, a redesigned outdoor play area, a new rectory building, and added pedestrian pathways to the existing parking lot. The proposed activity disturbed less than 40% of the site and resulted in a less than 50% increase in impervious surface. Therefore, MCWD stormwater management rule 5(b) applies and the proposed BMP must only treat and control the area of increased impervious surface. An underground filtration system was designed to treat and control stormwater runoff from 2.31-acres of impervious, which is equivalent to the increase in impervious surface. The proposed system discharges into the existing 36-inch pipe to the east. At the south end of the site water drains into proposed storm sewer which discharges into existing storm sewer along Normandale Drive. Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 3 RATE CONTROL The MCWD requires post development discharge rates not exceed predevelopment discharge rates for the 1-, 10-, 100-year 24-hour rainfall events for all discharge points from the site. The 100 year discharge to the existing 36- inch storm sewer to the east is exceeded, but the combined discharge rates to the ditch are less than that of existing. Runoff rate control calculations were performed in HydroCAD using the Atlas 14 rainfall depths and MSE 3 rainfall distribution. The results of the analysis are below. Detailed calculations may be found in the appendices. Maximum Rate of Runoff (cfs) Storm Event Total Existing Total Proposed 1-year 43.73 38.06 10-year 91.11 79.3 100-year 172.88 172.80 Existing Maximum Rate of Runoff (cfs) Storm Event East South Total Existing 1-year 40.82 3.06 43.73 10-year 84.81 6.68 91.11 100-year 160.69 12.98 172.88 Proposed Maximum Rate of Runoff (cfs) Storm Event East South Total Proposed 1-year 36.48 1.66 38.06 10-year 76.60 3.23 79.3 100-year 167.32 8.55 172.8 Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 4 VOLUME REDUCTION & WATER QUALITY Due to the slow infiltrating soils on site, infiltration was not feasible. Minnehaha Creek Watershed requires an abstraction of 1-inch of rainfall over the impervious area and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District allows for 50% volume abstraction credit for filtration basins. An underground filtration system was designed to abstract 2-inches of runoff over the impervious and infiltrate at 0.8 in/hr. The system will drain into an engineered soil media before entering an elevated drain tile and discharging into on-site storm sewer. 𝑅𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑎 𝐴𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎(𝑎𝑙3 )=𝐴𝑉=1(𝑖𝑙)∗1 𝑎𝑙 12 𝑖𝑙∗𝑁𝑎𝑙 𝐼𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑎 (𝑎𝑙2) 𝐴𝑉=0.5 ∗𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎 𝑅𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑎 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎(𝑎𝑙3)=2 ∗𝐴𝑉 𝑉𝐹𝑖𝑙=2(𝑖𝑙)∗1 𝑎𝑙 12 𝑖𝑙∗𝑁𝑎𝑙 𝐼𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑎 (𝑎𝑙2 ) 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑓(𝑎𝑙3 )=2(𝑖𝑙)∗1 𝑎𝑙 12 𝑖𝑙∗100,458( 𝑎𝑙2 )=16,743 𝑎𝑙3 Volume Control Analysis New Impervious Surface 100,458 sf Design Infiltration/Filtration Rainfall Event 2.0 in Required Infiltration/Filtration Volume 16,743 cf Maximum Allowable Infiltration Rate 0.80 in/hr Required Drawdown Time 48 hrs Maximum Live Storage Depth 3.0 ft Provided Volume Below Outlet 16,767 cf Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 5 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW In the event of a clog in the system or a rainfall event larger than the design events, the grading plan has been designed with emergency overflows to convey runoff through the site. STORMWATER SYSTEM OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE If required by the LGU, indicate an operations & maintenance agreement will be prepared for the project. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL A comprehensive Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) meeting the requirements of the 2018 MPCA NPDES permit will be developed as a part of the proposed plans. SUMMARY The proposed Our Lady of Grace project will meet the requirements of the City of Edina, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the MPCA through construction of and underground filtration system. These BMPs will provide the required rate control, water quality, and volume reduction improvements prior to discharging stormwater runoff from the site to downstream receiving waters. If you have any questions, comments, or additional information regarding this report, please contact me at CAyers@sambatek.com or 763.259.6697 APPENDIX A – DRAINAGE MAPS DEMO LI S H E D 2 0 1 7 1E 2E 5E 4E 3E Project Location Approved:Drawn: Date Submittal / Rev.No. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Client OUR LADY OF GRACE CAMPUS ADDITIONS EDINA, MN CMA EJC 21740 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 100 Jul 12, 2019 - 2:20pm - User:ecastanias L:\PROJECTS\21740\CAD\Xrefs\21740-DRNBASE.dwg 1/2 EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP XX XX XX XX LINK POND REACH SUB-CATCHMENT LEGEND 1S 6S 2S 8S 7S 3S 4S 5S 1P Project Location Approved:Drawn: Date Submittal / Rev.No. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Client OUR LADY OF GRACE CAMPUS ADDITIONS EDINA, MN CMA EJC 21740 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 100 Jul 12, 2019 - 2:19pm - User:ecastanias L:\PROJECTS\21740\CAD\Xrefs\21740-DRNBASE.dwg 2/2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP XX XX XX XX LINK POND REACH SUB-CATCHMENT LEGEND Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 7 APPENDIX B – HYDROCAD MODELS Existing Site 1E NW Road and Lot 2E NE Lot 3E Overland to Road4E SW Building and Lot 5E Uncontrolled to SE 5L Existing to East 6L Existing Total Routing Diagram for 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 7/12/2019 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Existing Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 15.288 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D (1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E) 7.898 98 Paved parking, HSG D (1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E) 23.186 89 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 23.186 HSG D 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E 0.000 Other 23.186 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 15.288 0.000 15.288 50-75% Grass cover, Fair 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.898 0.000 7.898 Paved parking 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E 0.000 0.000 0.000 23.186 0.000 23.186 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=372,370 sf 19.92% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.29"Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=14.28 cfs 0.922 af Runoff Area=281,156 sf 39.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.51"Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=12.55 cfs 0.814 af Runoff Area=103,673 sf 23.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.29"Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 Runoff=4.10 cfs 0.257 af Runoff Area=184,878 sf 65.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.76"Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=93 Runoff=11.04 cfs 0.623 af Runoff Area=67,900 sf 19.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.29"Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=3.06 cfs 0.168 af Inflow=40.82 cfs 2.615 afLink 5L: Existing to East Primary=40.82 cfs 2.615 af Inflow=43.73 cfs 2.784 afLink 6L: Existing Total Primary=43.73 cfs 2.784 af Total Runoff Area = 23.186 ac Runoff Volume = 2.784 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.44" 65.93% Pervious = 15.288 ac 34.07% Impervious = 7.898 ac Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 14.28 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.922 af, Depth= 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 74,187 98 Paved parking, HSG D 298,183 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 372,370 87 Weighted Average 298,183 80.08% Pervious Area 74,187 19.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=372,370 sf Runoff Volume=0.922 af Runoff Depth=1.29" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 14.28 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff = 12.55 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.814 af, Depth= 1.51" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 111,802 98 Paved parking, HSG D 169,354 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 281,156 90 Weighted Average 169,354 60.23% Pervious Area 111,802 39.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=281,156 sf Runoff Volume=0.814 af Runoff Depth=1.51" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 12.55 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff = 4.10 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.257 af, Depth= 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 24,109 98 Paved parking, HSG D 79,564 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 103,673 87 Weighted Average 79,564 76.75% Pervious Area 24,109 23.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.4 173 0.0700 0.28 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 3.6 220 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 14.0 393 Total Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=103,673 sf Runoff Volume=0.257 af Runoff Depth=1.29" Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 4.10 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 11.04 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.623 af, Depth= 1.76" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 120,551 98 Paved parking, HSG D 64,327 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 184,878 93 Weighted Average 64,327 34.79% Pervious Area 120,551 65.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=184,878 sf Runoff Volume=0.623 af Runoff Depth=1.76" Tc=10.0 min CN=93 11.04 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff = 3.06 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.168 af, Depth= 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 13,402 98 Paved parking, HSG D 54,498 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 67,900 87 Weighted Average 54,498 80.26% Pervious Area 13,402 19.74% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=67,900 sf Runoff Volume=0.168 af Runoff Depth=1.29" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 3.06 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Area = 21.627 ac, 35.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.45" for 1-Year event Inflow = 40.82 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.615 af Primary = 40.82 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.615 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=21.627 ac 40.82 cfs 40.82 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Area = 23.186 ac, 34.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.44" for 1-Year event Inflow = 43.73 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.784 af Primary = 43.73 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.784 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=23.186 ac 43.73 cfs 43.73 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=372,370 sf 19.92% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.88"Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=31.27 cfs 2.049 af Runoff Area=281,156 sf 39.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.17"Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=25.57 cfs 1.703 af Runoff Area=103,673 sf 23.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.88"Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 Runoff=8.98 cfs 0.570 af Runoff Area=184,878 sf 65.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.47"Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=93 Runoff=20.98 cfs 1.228 af Runoff Area=67,900 sf 19.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.88"Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=6.68 cfs 0.374 af Inflow=84.81 cfs 5.551 afLink 5L: Existing to East Primary=84.81 cfs 5.551 af Inflow=91.11 cfs 5.925 afLink 6L: Existing Total Primary=91.11 cfs 5.925 af Total Runoff Area = 23.186 ac Runoff Volume = 5.925 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.07" 65.93% Pervious = 15.288 ac 34.07% Impervious = 7.898 ac Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 31.27 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 2.049 af, Depth= 2.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 74,187 98 Paved parking, HSG D 298,183 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 372,370 87 Weighted Average 298,183 80.08% Pervious Area 74,187 19.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=372,370 sf Runoff Volume=2.049 af Runoff Depth=2.88" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 31.27 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff = 25.57 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 1.703 af, Depth= 3.17" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 111,802 98 Paved parking, HSG D 169,354 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 281,156 90 Weighted Average 169,354 60.23% Pervious Area 111,802 39.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=281,156 sf Runoff Volume=1.703 af Runoff Depth=3.17" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 25.57 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 16HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff = 8.98 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.570 af, Depth= 2.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 24,109 98 Paved parking, HSG D 79,564 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 103,673 87 Weighted Average 79,564 76.75% Pervious Area 24,109 23.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.4 173 0.0700 0.28 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 3.6 220 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 14.0 393 Total Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=103,673 sf Runoff Volume=0.570 af Runoff Depth=2.88" Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 8.98 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 17HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 20.98 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.228 af, Depth= 3.47" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 120,551 98 Paved parking, HSG D 64,327 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 184,878 93 Weighted Average 64,327 34.79% Pervious Area 120,551 65.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=184,878 sf Runoff Volume=1.228 af Runoff Depth=3.47" Tc=10.0 min CN=93 20.98 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 18HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff = 6.68 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.374 af, Depth= 2.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 13,402 98 Paved parking, HSG D 54,498 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 67,900 87 Weighted Average 54,498 80.26% Pervious Area 13,402 19.74% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=67,900 sf Runoff Volume=0.374 af Runoff Depth=2.88" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 6.68 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 19HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Area = 21.627 ac, 35.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.08" for 10-Year event Inflow = 84.81 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 5.551 af Primary = 84.81 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 5.551 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=21.627 ac 84.81 cfs 84.81 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 20HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Area = 23.186 ac, 34.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.07" for 10-Year event Inflow = 91.11 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 5.925 af Primary = 91.11 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 5.925 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=23.186 ac 91.11 cfs 91.11 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 21HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=372,370 sf 19.92% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.79"Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=60.95 cfs 4.124 af Runoff Area=281,156 sf 39.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.14"Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=47.83 cfs 3.301 af Runoff Area=103,673 sf 23.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.79"Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 Runoff=17.50 cfs 1.148 af Runoff Area=184,878 sf 65.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.49"Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=93 Runoff=37.76 cfs 2.295 af Runoff Area=67,900 sf 19.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.79"Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=12.98 cfs 0.752 af Inflow=160.69 cfs 10.868 afLink 5L: Existing to East Primary=160.69 cfs 10.868 af Inflow=172.88 cfs 11.620 afLink 6L: Existing Total Primary=172.88 cfs 11.620 af Total Runoff Area = 23.186 ac Runoff Volume = 11.620 af Average Runoff Depth = 6.01" 65.93% Pervious = 15.288 ac 34.07% Impervious = 7.898 ac Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 22HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 60.95 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 4.124 af, Depth= 5.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 74,187 98 Paved parking, HSG D 298,183 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 372,370 87 Weighted Average 298,183 80.08% Pervious Area 74,187 19.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1E: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=372,370 sf Runoff Volume=4.124 af Runoff Depth=5.79" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 60.95 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 23HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff = 47.83 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 3.301 af, Depth= 6.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 111,802 98 Paved parking, HSG D 169,354 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 281,156 90 Weighted Average 169,354 60.23% Pervious Area 111,802 39.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2E: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=281,156 sf Runoff Volume=3.301 af Runoff Depth=6.14" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 47.83 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 24HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff = 17.50 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 1.148 af, Depth= 5.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 24,109 98 Paved parking, HSG D 79,564 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 103,673 87 Weighted Average 79,564 76.75% Pervious Area 24,109 23.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.4 173 0.0700 0.28 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 3.6 220 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 14.0 393 Total Subcatchment 3E: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=103,673 sf Runoff Volume=1.148 af Runoff Depth=5.79" Flow Length=393' Tc=14.0 min CN=87 17.50 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 25HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 37.76 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 2.295 af, Depth= 6.49" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 120,551 98 Paved parking, HSG D 64,327 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 184,878 93 Weighted Average 64,327 34.79% Pervious Area 120,551 65.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4E: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=184,878 sf Runoff Volume=2.295 af Runoff Depth=6.49" Tc=10.0 min CN=93 37.76 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 26HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff = 12.98 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.752 af, Depth= 5.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 13,402 98 Paved parking, HSG D 54,498 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 67,900 87 Weighted Average 54,498 80.26% Pervious Area 13,402 19.74% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5E: Uncontrolled to SE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=67,900 sf Runoff Volume=0.752 af Runoff Depth=5.79" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 12.98 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 27HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Area = 21.627 ac, 35.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.03" for 100-Year event Inflow = 160.69 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 10.868 af Primary = 160.69 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 10.868 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Existing to East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Inflow Area=21.627 ac 160.69 cfs 160.69 cfs Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 28HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Area = 23.186 ac, 34.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.01" for 100-Year event Inflow = 172.88 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.620 af Primary = 172.88 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.620 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 6L: Existing Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Inflow Area=23.186 ac 172.88 cfs 172.88 cfs Proposed Site 1S NW Road and Lot 2S NE Lot 3S Overland to Road 4S SW Building and Lot 5S SE to Road 6S New Lot 7S Existing Lot to System 8S Roof Drain 1P Underground Filtration 1L Diversion Structure 2L Proposed To East 3L Proposed Total Routing Diagram for 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 7/12/2019 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Proposed Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 13.609 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D (1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S) 10.189 98 Paved parking, HSG D (1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S) 23.798 90 TOTAL AREA Proposed Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 23.798 HSG D 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S 0.000 Other 23.798 TOTAL AREA Proposed Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 13.609 0.000 13.609 50-75% Grass cover, Fair 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.189 0.000 10.189 Paved parking 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S 0.000 0.000 0.000 23.798 0.000 23.798 TOTAL AREA Proposed Conditions 21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pipe Listing (selected nodes) Line# Node Number In-Invert (feet) Out-Invert (feet) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) n Diam/Width (inches) Height (inches) Inside-Fill (inches) 1 1P 895.55 893.55 100.0 0.0200 0.013 24.0 0.0 0.0 2 1P 896.17 895.67 100.0 0.0050 0.013 4.0 0.0 0.0 Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=361,816 sf 20.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.29"Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=13.88 cfs 0.896 af Runoff Area=257,147 sf 38.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.44"Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=89 Runoff=10.93 cfs 0.707 af Runoff Area=88,167 sf 33.31% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.44"Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 Runoff=3.44 cfs 0.242 af Runoff Area=186,667 sf 71.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.85"Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=11.59 cfs 0.661 af Runoff Area=29,051 sf 60.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Tc=10.0 min CN=92 Runoff=1.66 cfs 0.093 af Runoff Area=17,285 sf 94.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.14"Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=97 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.071 af Runoff Area=17,512 sf 81.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.94"Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Tc=10.0 min CN=95 Runoff=1.13 cfs 0.065 af Runoff Area=79,011 sf 74.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.85"Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=4.91 cfs 0.280 af Peak Elev=901.44' Storage=17,198 cf Inflow=8.84 cfs 0.587 afPond 1P: Underground Filtration Outflow=0.49 cfs 0.587 af Inflow=12.77 cfs 0.732 afLink 1L: Diversion Structure Primary=12.77 cfs 0.732 af Inflow=36.48 cfs 2.922 afLink 2L: Proposed To East Primary=36.48 cfs 2.922 af Inflow=38.06 cfs 3.015 afLink 3L: Proposed Total Primary=38.06 cfs 3.015 af Total Runoff Area = 23.798 ac Runoff Volume = 3.015 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.52" 57.18% Pervious = 13.609 ac 42.82% Impervious = 10.189 ac Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 13.88 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.896 af, Depth= 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 74,174 98 Paved parking, HSG D 287,642 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 361,816 87 Weighted Average 287,642 79.50% Pervious Area 74,174 20.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=361,816 sf Runoff Volume=0.896 af Runoff Depth=1.29" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 13.88 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff = 10.93 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.707 af, Depth= 1.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 99,424 98 Paved parking, HSG D 157,723 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 257,147 89 Weighted Average 157,723 61.34% Pervious Area 99,424 38.66% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=257,147 sf Runoff Volume=0.707 af Runoff Depth=1.44" Tc=15.0 min CN=89 10.93 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff = 3.44 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.242 af, Depth= 1.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 29,367 98 Paved parking, HSG D 58,800 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 88,167 89 Weighted Average 58,800 66.69% Pervious Area 29,367 33.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.5 215 0.0400 0.23 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 2.4 147 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 17.9 362 Total Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=88,167 sf Runoff Volume=0.242 af Runoff Depth=1.44" Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 3.44 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 11.59 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.661 af, Depth= 1.85" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 133,969 98 Paved parking, HSG D 52,698 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 186,667 94 Weighted Average 52,698 28.23% Pervious Area 133,969 71.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=186,667 sf Runoff Volume=0.661 af Runoff Depth=1.85" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 11.59 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff = 1.66 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.093 af, Depth= 1.67" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 17,560 98 Paved parking, HSG D 11,491 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 29,051 92 Weighted Average 11,491 39.55% Pervious Area 17,560 60.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=29,051 sf Runoff Volume=0.093 af Runoff Depth=1.67" Tc=10.0 min CN=92 1.66 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.071 af, Depth= 2.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 16,300 98 Paved parking, HSG D 985 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,285 97 Weighted Average 985 5.70% Pervious Area 16,300 94.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=17,285 sf Runoff Volume=0.071 af Runoff Depth=2.14" Tc=10.0 min CN=97 1.18 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff = 1.13 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.065 af, Depth= 1.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 14,257 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,255 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,512 95 Weighted Average 3,255 18.59% Pervious Area 14,257 81.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=17,512 sf Runoff Volume=0.065 af Runoff Depth=1.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=95 1.13 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff = 4.91 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.280 af, Depth= 1.85" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Area (sf) CN Description 58,800 98 Paved parking, HSG D 20,211 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 79,011 94 Weighted Average 20,211 25.58% Pervious Area 58,800 74.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48" Runoff Area=79,011 sf Runoff Volume=0.280 af Runoff Depth=1.85" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 4.91 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Area = 4.240 ac, 55.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.66" for 1-Year event Inflow = 8.84 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.587 af Outflow = 0.49 cfs @ 13.67 hrs, Volume= 0.587 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 88.8 min Primary = 0.49 cfs @ 13.67 hrs, Volume= 0.587 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 901.44' @ 13.67 hrs Surf.Area= 10,020 sf Storage= 17,198 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 818.6 min calculated for 0.587 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 819.0 min ( 1,613.9 - 794.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 898.50' 1,153 cf 16.40'W x 60.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,428 cf Overall - 1,546 cf Embedded = 2,882 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 899.00' 1,239 cf ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #3B 898.50' 1,552 cf 15.75'W x 86.50'L x 4.50'H Field B 6,131 cf Overall - 2,251 cf Embedded = 3,880 cf x 40.0% Voids #4B 899.00' 1,803 cf ADS N-12 36" x 12 Inside #3 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 3 Rows of 4 Chambers 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #5C 898.50' 2,066 cf 15.75'W x 115.50'L x 4.50'H Field C 8,186 cf Overall - 3,022 cf Embedded = 5,164 cf x 40.0% Voids #6C 899.00' 2,421 cf ADS N-12 36" x 18 Inside #5 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #7D 898.50' 2,526 cf 15.75'W x 141.50'L x 4.50'H Field D 10,029 cf Overall - 3,713 cf Embedded = 6,316 cf x 40.0% Voids #8D 899.00' 2,975 cf ADS N-12 36" x 21 Inside #7 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #9E 898.50' 4,177 cf 21.65'W x 167.50'L x 4.50'H Field E 16,319 cf Overall - 5,877 cf Embedded = 10,442 cf x 40.0% Voids #10E 899.00' 4,709 cf ADS N-12 36" x 32 Inside #9 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 136.7 cf Inside 24,621 cf Total Available Storage Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 16HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group D created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group E created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.55'24.0" Round Outlet Culvert L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.55' / 893.55' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 901.38'22.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 1.000 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 896.17'4.0" Round Drain Tile X 7.00 L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 896.17' / 895.67' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #4 Device 3 898.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.49 cfs @ 13.67 hrs HW=901.44' (Free Discharge) 1=Outlet Culvert (Passes 0.49 cfs of 33.46 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.30 cfs @ 0.82 fps) 3=Drain Tile (Passes 0.19 cfs of 2.94 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.19 cfs) Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 17HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -6.50' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 57.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 60.00' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 16.40' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,238.9 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 1,546.2 cf Displacement 4,428.0 cf Field - 1,546.2 cf Chambers = 2,881.7 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,152.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,391.6 cf = 0.055 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.0% Overall System Size = 60.00' x 16.40' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 164.0 cy Field 106.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 18HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 1 = 83.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 86.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 142.0 cf + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,803.4 cf Chamber Storage 12 Chambers x 177.2 cf + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 2,250.7 cf Displacement 6,130.7 cf Field - 2,250.7 cf Chambers = 3,880.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,552.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,355.4 cf = 0.077 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.7% Overall System Size = 86.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 12 Chambers 227.1 cy Field 143.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 19HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field C Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 6 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -11.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 112.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 115.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 142.0 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,421.1 cf Chamber Storage 18 Chambers x 177.2 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,021.6 cf Displacement 8,186.0 cf Field - 3,021.6 cf Chambers = 5,164.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,065.8 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,486.9 cf = 0.103 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.8% Overall System Size = 115.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 18 Chambers 303.2 cy Field 191.3 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 20HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field D Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 7 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -5.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 138.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 141.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 21 Chambers x 142.0 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,974.9 cf Chamber Storage 21 Chambers x 177.2 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,712.8 cf Displacement 10,028.8 cf Field - 3,712.8 cf Chambers = 6,316.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,526.4 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 5,501.3 cf = 0.126 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.9% Overall System Size = 141.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 21 Chambers 371.4 cy Field 233.9 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 21HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field E Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 8 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 164.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 167.50' Base Length 4 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 3 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 21.65' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 32 Chambers x 142.0 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf = 4,709.1 cf Chamber Storage 32 Chambers x 177.2 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 8.86 sf = 5,877.1 cf Displacement 16,318.6 cf Field - 5,877.1 cf Chambers = 10,441.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 4,176.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 8,885.7 cf = 0.204 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.5% Overall System Size = 167.50' x 21.65' x 4.50' 32 Chambers 604.4 cy Field 386.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 22HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=4.240 ac Peak Elev=901.44' Storage=17,198 cf 8.84 cfs 0.49 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 23HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Area = 4.682 ac, 73.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.88" for 1-Year event Inflow = 12.77 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.732 af Primary = 12.77 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.732 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=4.682 ac 12.77 cfs 12.77 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 24HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Area = 23.131 ac, 42.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.52" for 1-Year event Inflow = 36.48 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.922 af Primary = 36.48 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 2.922 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=23.131 ac 36.48 cfs 36.48 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 1-Year Rainfall=2.48"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 25HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Area = 23.798 ac, 42.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.52" for 1-Year event Inflow = 38.06 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 3.015 af Primary = 38.06 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 3.015 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=23.798 ac 38.06 cfs 38.06 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 26HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=361,816 sf 20.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.88"Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=30.39 cfs 1.991 af Runoff Area=257,147 sf 38.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07"Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=89 Runoff=22.80 cfs 1.509 af Runoff Area=88,167 sf 33.31% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07"Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 Runoff=7.19 cfs 0.517 af Runoff Area=186,667 sf 71.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.58"Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=21.58 cfs 1.278 af Runoff Area=29,051 sf 60.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.37"Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Tc=10.0 min CN=92 Runoff=3.23 cfs 0.187 af Runoff Area=17,285 sf 94.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.91"Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=97 Runoff=2.08 cfs 0.129 af Runoff Area=17,512 sf 81.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.69"Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Tc=10.0 min CN=95 Runoff=2.06 cfs 0.124 af Runoff Area=79,011 sf 74.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.58"Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=9.13 cfs 0.541 af Peak Elev=902.07' Storage=21,038 cf Inflow=17.21 cfs 1.182 afPond 1P: Underground Filtration Outflow=11.09 cfs 1.182 af Inflow=23.66 cfs 1.408 afLink 1L: Diversion Structure Primary=23.66 cfs 1.408 af Inflow=76.60 cfs 6.090 afLink 2L: Proposed To East Primary=76.60 cfs 6.090 af Inflow=79.30 cfs 6.277 afLink 3L: Proposed Total Primary=79.30 cfs 6.277 af Total Runoff Area = 23.798 ac Runoff Volume = 6.277 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.17" 57.18% Pervious = 13.609 ac 42.82% Impervious = 10.189 ac Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 27HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 30.39 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 1.991 af, Depth= 2.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 74,174 98 Paved parking, HSG D 287,642 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 361,816 87 Weighted Average 287,642 79.50% Pervious Area 74,174 20.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=361,816 sf Runoff Volume=1.991 af Runoff Depth=2.88" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 30.39 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 28HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff = 22.80 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 1.509 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 99,424 98 Paved parking, HSG D 157,723 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 257,147 89 Weighted Average 157,723 61.34% Pervious Area 99,424 38.66% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=257,147 sf Runoff Volume=1.509 af Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=15.0 min CN=89 22.80 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 29HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff = 7.19 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.517 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 29,367 98 Paved parking, HSG D 58,800 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 88,167 89 Weighted Average 58,800 66.69% Pervious Area 29,367 33.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.5 215 0.0400 0.23 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 2.4 147 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 17.9 362 Total Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=88,167 sf Runoff Volume=0.517 af Runoff Depth=3.07" Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 7.19 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 30HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 21.58 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.278 af, Depth= 3.58" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 133,969 98 Paved parking, HSG D 52,698 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 186,667 94 Weighted Average 52,698 28.23% Pervious Area 133,969 71.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=186,667 sf Runoff Volume=1.278 af Runoff Depth=3.58" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 21.58 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 31HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff = 3.23 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.187 af, Depth= 3.37" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 17,560 98 Paved parking, HSG D 11,491 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 29,051 92 Weighted Average 11,491 39.55% Pervious Area 17,560 60.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=29,051 sf Runoff Volume=0.187 af Runoff Depth=3.37" Tc=10.0 min CN=92 3.23 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 32HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff = 2.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.129 af, Depth= 3.91" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 16,300 98 Paved parking, HSG D 985 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,285 97 Weighted Average 985 5.70% Pervious Area 16,300 94.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=17,285 sf Runoff Volume=0.129 af Runoff Depth=3.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=97 2.08 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 33HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff = 2.06 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.124 af, Depth= 3.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 14,257 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,255 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,512 95 Weighted Average 3,255 18.59% Pervious Area 14,257 81.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=17,512 sf Runoff Volume=0.124 af Runoff Depth=3.69" Tc=10.0 min CN=95 2.06 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 34HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff = 9.13 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.541 af, Depth= 3.58" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 58,800 98 Paved parking, HSG D 20,211 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 79,011 94 Weighted Average 20,211 25.58% Pervious Area 58,800 74.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=79,011 sf Runoff Volume=0.541 af Runoff Depth=3.58" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 9.13 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 35HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Area = 4.240 ac, 55.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.35" for 10-Year event Inflow = 17.21 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1.182 af Outflow = 11.09 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 1.182 af, Atten= 36%, Lag= 9.7 min Primary = 11.09 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 1.182 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 902.07' @ 12.36 hrs Surf.Area= 10,020 sf Storage= 21,038 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 463.6 min calculated for 1.181 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 464.3 min ( 1,246.1 - 781.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 898.50' 1,153 cf 16.40'W x 60.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,428 cf Overall - 1,546 cf Embedded = 2,882 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 899.00' 1,239 cf ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #3B 898.50' 1,552 cf 15.75'W x 86.50'L x 4.50'H Field B 6,131 cf Overall - 2,251 cf Embedded = 3,880 cf x 40.0% Voids #4B 899.00' 1,803 cf ADS N-12 36" x 12 Inside #3 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 3 Rows of 4 Chambers 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #5C 898.50' 2,066 cf 15.75'W x 115.50'L x 4.50'H Field C 8,186 cf Overall - 3,022 cf Embedded = 5,164 cf x 40.0% Voids #6C 899.00' 2,421 cf ADS N-12 36" x 18 Inside #5 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #7D 898.50' 2,526 cf 15.75'W x 141.50'L x 4.50'H Field D 10,029 cf Overall - 3,713 cf Embedded = 6,316 cf x 40.0% Voids #8D 899.00' 2,975 cf ADS N-12 36" x 21 Inside #7 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #9E 898.50' 4,177 cf 21.65'W x 167.50'L x 4.50'H Field E 16,319 cf Overall - 5,877 cf Embedded = 10,442 cf x 40.0% Voids #10E 899.00' 4,709 cf ADS N-12 36" x 32 Inside #9 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 136.7 cf Inside 24,621 cf Total Available Storage Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 36HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group D created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group E created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.55'24.0" Round Outlet Culvert L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.55' / 893.55' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 901.38'22.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 1.000 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 896.17'4.0" Round Drain Tile X 7.00 L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 896.17' / 895.67' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #4 Device 3 898.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=11.00 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=902.07' (Free Discharge) 1=Outlet Culvert (Passes 11.00 cfs of 35.54 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 10.82 cfs @ 2.71 fps) 3=Drain Tile (Passes 0.19 cfs of 3.11 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.19 cfs) Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 37HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -6.50' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 57.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 60.00' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 16.40' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,238.9 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 1,546.2 cf Displacement 4,428.0 cf Field - 1,546.2 cf Chambers = 2,881.7 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,152.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,391.6 cf = 0.055 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.0% Overall System Size = 60.00' x 16.40' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 164.0 cy Field 106.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 38HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 1 = 83.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 86.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 142.0 cf + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,803.4 cf Chamber Storage 12 Chambers x 177.2 cf + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 2,250.7 cf Displacement 6,130.7 cf Field - 2,250.7 cf Chambers = 3,880.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,552.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,355.4 cf = 0.077 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.7% Overall System Size = 86.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 12 Chambers 227.1 cy Field 143.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 39HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field C Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 6 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -11.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 112.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 115.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 142.0 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,421.1 cf Chamber Storage 18 Chambers x 177.2 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,021.6 cf Displacement 8,186.0 cf Field - 3,021.6 cf Chambers = 5,164.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,065.8 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,486.9 cf = 0.103 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.8% Overall System Size = 115.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 18 Chambers 303.2 cy Field 191.3 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 40HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field D Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 7 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -5.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 138.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 141.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 21 Chambers x 142.0 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,974.9 cf Chamber Storage 21 Chambers x 177.2 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,712.8 cf Displacement 10,028.8 cf Field - 3,712.8 cf Chambers = 6,316.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,526.4 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 5,501.3 cf = 0.126 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.9% Overall System Size = 141.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 21 Chambers 371.4 cy Field 233.9 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 41HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field E Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 8 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 164.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 167.50' Base Length 4 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 3 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 21.65' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 32 Chambers x 142.0 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf = 4,709.1 cf Chamber Storage 32 Chambers x 177.2 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 8.86 sf = 5,877.1 cf Displacement 16,318.6 cf Field - 5,877.1 cf Chambers = 10,441.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 4,176.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 8,885.7 cf = 0.204 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.5% Overall System Size = 167.50' x 21.65' x 4.50' 32 Chambers 604.4 cy Field 386.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 42HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=4.240 ac Peak Elev=902.07' Storage=21,038 cf 17.21 cfs 11.09 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 43HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Area = 4.682 ac, 73.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.61" for 10-Year event Inflow = 23.66 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.408 af Primary = 23.66 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.408 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=4.682 ac 23.66 cfs 23.66 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 44HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Area = 23.131 ac, 42.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.16" for 10-Year event Inflow = 76.60 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 6.090 af Primary = 76.60 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 6.090 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=23.131 ac 76.60 cfs 76.60 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 45HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Area = 23.798 ac, 42.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.17" for 10-Year event Inflow = 79.30 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 6.277 af Primary = 79.30 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 6.277 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=23.798 ac 79.30 cfs 79.30 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 46HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=361,816 sf 20.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.79"Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=87 Runoff=59.22 cfs 4.007 af Runoff Area=257,147 sf 38.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.02"Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Tc=15.0 min CN=89 Runoff=43.22 cfs 2.962 af Runoff Area=88,167 sf 33.31% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.02"Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 Runoff=13.65 cfs 1.016 af Runoff Area=186,667 sf 71.77% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.61"Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=38.43 cfs 2.359 af Runoff Area=29,051 sf 60.45% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.37"Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Tc=10.0 min CN=92 Runoff=5.88 cfs 0.354 af Runoff Area=17,285 sf 94.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96"Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Tc=10.0 min CN=97 Runoff=3.62 cfs 0.230 af Runoff Area=17,512 sf 81.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.72"Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Tc=10.0 min CN=95 Runoff=3.63 cfs 0.225 af Runoff Area=79,011 sf 74.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.61"Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Tc=10.0 min CN=94 Runoff=16.27 cfs 0.999 af Peak Elev=903.00' Storage=24,621 cf Inflow=31.49 cfs 2.239 afPond 1P: Underground Filtration Outflow=27.40 cfs 2.239 af Inflow=42.05 cfs 2.589 afLink 1L: Diversion Structure Primary=42.05 cfs 2.589 af Inflow=167.32 cfs 11.798 afLink 2L: Proposed To East Primary=167.32 cfs 11.798 af Inflow=172.80 cfs 12.152 afLink 3L: Proposed Total Primary=172.80 cfs 12.152 af Total Runoff Area = 23.798 ac Runoff Volume = 12.152 af Average Runoff Depth = 6.13" 57.18% Pervious = 13.609 ac 42.82% Impervious = 10.189 ac Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 47HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff = 59.22 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 4.007 af, Depth= 5.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 74,174 98 Paved parking, HSG D 287,642 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 361,816 87 Weighted Average 287,642 79.50% Pervious Area 74,174 20.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 1S: NW Road and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=361,816 sf Runoff Volume=4.007 af Runoff Depth=5.79" Tc=15.0 min CN=87 59.22 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 48HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff = 43.22 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 2.962 af, Depth= 6.02" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 99,424 98 Paved parking, HSG D 157,723 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 257,147 89 Weighted Average 157,723 61.34% Pervious Area 99,424 38.66% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 2S: NE Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=257,147 sf Runoff Volume=2.962 af Runoff Depth=6.02" Tc=15.0 min CN=89 43.22 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 49HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff = 13.65 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 1.016 af, Depth= 6.02" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 29,367 98 Paved parking, HSG D 58,800 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 88,167 89 Weighted Average 58,800 66.69% Pervious Area 29,367 33.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.5 215 0.0400 0.23 Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 2.4 147 0.0025 1.02 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Curb Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 17.9 362 Total Subcatchment 3S: Overland to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=88,167 sf Runoff Volume=1.016 af Runoff Depth=6.02" Flow Length=362' Tc=17.9 min CN=89 13.65 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 50HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff = 38.43 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 2.359 af, Depth= 6.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 133,969 98 Paved parking, HSG D 52,698 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 186,667 94 Weighted Average 52,698 28.23% Pervious Area 133,969 71.77% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 4S: SW Building and Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=186,667 sf Runoff Volume=2.359 af Runoff Depth=6.61" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 38.43 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 51HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff = 5.88 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.354 af, Depth= 6.37" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 17,560 98 Paved parking, HSG D 11,491 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 29,051 92 Weighted Average 11,491 39.55% Pervious Area 17,560 60.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 5S: SE to Road Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=29,051 sf Runoff Volume=0.354 af Runoff Depth=6.37" Tc=10.0 min CN=92 5.88 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 52HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff = 3.62 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.230 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 16,300 98 Paved parking, HSG D 985 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,285 97 Weighted Average 985 5.70% Pervious Area 16,300 94.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Tc Subcatchment 6S: New Lot Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=17,285 sf Runoff Volume=0.230 af Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=97 3.62 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 53HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff = 3.63 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.225 af, Depth= 6.72" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 14,257 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,255 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 17,512 95 Weighted Average 3,255 18.59% Pervious Area 14,257 81.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 7S: Existing Lot to System Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=17,512 sf Runoff Volume=0.225 af Runoff Depth=6.72" Tc=10.0 min CN=95 3.63 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 54HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff = 16.27 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.999 af, Depth= 6.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 58,800 98 Paved parking, HSG D 20,211 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 79,011 94 Weighted Average 20,211 25.58% Pervious Area 58,800 74.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Tc Subcatchment 8S: Roof Drain Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=79,011 sf Runoff Volume=0.999 af Runoff Depth=6.61" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 16.27 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 55HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Area = 4.240 ac, 55.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.34" for 100-Year event Inflow = 31.49 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 2.239 af Outflow = 27.40 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 2.239 af, Atten= 13%, Lag= 4.1 min Primary = 27.40 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 2.239 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 903.00' @ 12.26 hrs Surf.Area= 10,020 sf Storage= 24,621 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 266.9 min calculated for 2.238 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 267.8 min ( 1,038.0 - 770.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 898.50' 1,153 cf 16.40'W x 60.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,428 cf Overall - 1,546 cf Embedded = 2,882 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 899.00' 1,239 cf ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #3B 898.50' 1,552 cf 15.75'W x 86.50'L x 4.50'H Field B 6,131 cf Overall - 2,251 cf Embedded = 3,880 cf x 40.0% Voids #4B 899.00' 1,803 cf ADS N-12 36" x 12 Inside #3 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 3 Rows of 4 Chambers 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #5C 898.50' 2,066 cf 15.75'W x 115.50'L x 4.50'H Field C 8,186 cf Overall - 3,022 cf Embedded = 5,164 cf x 40.0% Voids #6C 899.00' 2,421 cf ADS N-12 36" x 18 Inside #5 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #7D 898.50' 2,526 cf 15.75'W x 141.50'L x 4.50'H Field D 10,029 cf Overall - 3,713 cf Embedded = 6,316 cf x 40.0% Voids #8D 899.00' 2,975 cf ADS N-12 36" x 21 Inside #7 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 99.4 cf Inside #9E 898.50' 4,177 cf 21.65'W x 167.50'L x 4.50'H Field E 16,319 cf Overall - 5,877 cf Embedded = 10,442 cf x 40.0% Voids #10E 899.00' 4,709 cf ADS N-12 36" x 32 Inside #9 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf x 1 = 136.7 cf Inside 24,621 cf Total Available Storage Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 56HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group D created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group E created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.55'24.0" Round Outlet Culvert L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.55' / 893.55' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 901.38'22.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 1.000 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 896.17'4.0" Round Drain Tile X 7.00 L= 100.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 896.17' / 895.67' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #4 Device 3 898.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=27.25 cfs @ 12.26 hrs HW=902.98' (Free Discharge) 1=Outlet Culvert (Passes 27.25 cfs of 38.37 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 27.06 cfs @ 10.16 fps) 3=Drain Tile (Passes 0.19 cfs of 3.33 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.19 cfs) Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 57HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -6.50' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -6.50' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 57.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 60.00' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 16.40' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,238.9 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf -6.50' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 1,546.2 cf Displacement 4,428.0 cf Field - 1,546.2 cf Chambers = 2,881.7 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,152.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,391.6 cf = 0.055 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.0% Overall System Size = 60.00' x 16.40' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 164.0 cy Field 106.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 58HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 1 = 83.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 86.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 142.0 cf + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 1,803.4 cf Chamber Storage 12 Chambers x 177.2 cf + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 2,250.7 cf Displacement 6,130.7 cf Field - 2,250.7 cf Chambers = 3,880.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,552.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,355.4 cf = 0.077 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.7% Overall System Size = 86.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 12 Chambers 227.1 cy Field 143.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 59HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field C Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -11.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 6 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -11.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 112.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 115.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 142.0 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,421.1 cf Chamber Storage 18 Chambers x 177.2 cf -11.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,021.6 cf Displacement 8,186.0 cf Field - 3,021.6 cf Chambers = 5,164.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,065.8 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,486.9 cf = 0.103 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.8% Overall System Size = 115.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 18 Chambers 303.2 cy Field 191.3 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 60HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field D Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= -5.00' x 7.10 sf x 3 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 7 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long -5.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 138.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 141.50' Base Length 3 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 2 + 10.5" Side Stone x 2 = 15.75' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 21 Chambers x 142.0 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 7.10 sf = 2,974.9 cf Chamber Storage 21 Chambers x 177.2 cf -5.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 3 Rows + 14.00' Header x 8.86 sf = 3,712.8 cf Displacement 10,028.8 cf Field - 3,712.8 cf Chambers = 6,316.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,526.4 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 5,501.3 cf = 0.126 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.9% Overall System Size = 141.50' x 15.75' x 4.50' 21 Chambers 371.4 cy Field 233.9 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 61HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration - Chamber Wizard Field E Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf Row Length Adjustment= +1.00' x 7.10 sf x 4 rows 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 8 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Row Adjustment +3.50' Header x 1 = 164.50' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 167.50' Base Length 4 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 21.0" Spacing x 3 + 14.4" Side Stone x 2 = 21.65' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 32 Chambers x 142.0 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 7.10 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 7.10 sf = 4,709.1 cf Chamber Storage 32 Chambers x 177.2 cf +1.00' Row Adjustment x 8.86 sf x 4 Rows + 19.25' Header x 8.86 sf = 5,877.1 cf Displacement 16,318.6 cf Field - 5,877.1 cf Chambers = 10,441.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 4,176.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 8,885.7 cf = 0.204 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.5% Overall System Size = 167.50' x 21.65' x 4.50' 32 Chambers 604.4 cy Field 386.7 cy Stone Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 62HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Underground Filtration Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=4.240 ac Peak Elev=903.00' Storage=24,621 cf 31.49 cfs 27.40 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 63HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Area = 4.682 ac, 73.68% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.64" for 100-Year event Inflow = 42.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 2.589 af Primary = 42.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 2.589 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 1L: Diversion Structure Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=4.682 ac 42.05 cfs 42.05 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 64HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Area = 23.131 ac, 42.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.12" for 100-Year event Inflow = 167.32 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.798 af Primary = 167.32 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.798 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 2L: Proposed To East Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Inflow Area=23.131 ac 167.32 cfs 167.32 cfs Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"21740_Underground Filtration_07112019 Printed 7/12/2019Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 65HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01876 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Area = 23.798 ac, 42.82% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.13" for 100-Year event Inflow = 172.80 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 12.152 af Primary = 172.80 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 12.152 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 3L: Proposed Total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Inflow Area=23.798 ac 172.80 cfs 172.80 cfs Our Lady of Grace Stormwater Management Plan Page 8 APPENDIX C – GEOTECHNICAL REPORT I hereby certify this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: _________________________ Max Moreland, P.E. License No. 52665 Date: _July 3, 2019______________ Traffic Impact Study Our Lady of Grace Expansion Edina, Minnesota Traffic Impact Study i Our Lady of Grace Expansion Executive Summary Background: Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church and School is proposing an expansion to the campus located on the southwest corner of the Eden Avenue & TH 100 interchange in Edina, Minnesota . The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed development on the study roads and intersections where significant imp act is anticipated. Mitigation measures will be analyzed and recommended if traffic operations are expected to be below traffic engineering standards. It should be noted minor impacts are expected on corridors not analyzed in this study and improvements al ong those corridors may be needed in the future to accommodate incremental traffic growth from this and ot her area developments. Results: The principal findings of this study are: • The proposed expansion of Our Lady of Grace is expected to generate approximately 1,380 new trips during an average weekday, 300 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and 190 new trips during the p.m. peak hour. • The surrounding roadway corridors are anticipated to be able to accommodate the traffic from this expansion. • Most study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably through the 2030 Build scenarios. • In the 2030 No-Build scenario, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection is forecast to have higher than desired delays in the a.m. peak period. • In the 2030 Build scenario, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection is forecast to have higher than desired delays in the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. • The northbound queues at Eden Avenue/Site Ac cess are long in all weekday peak hour scenarios. • Traffic operations within the site during school peak periods are orderly. The afternoon pickup period lasts for approximately 15 minutes after school is released. Recommendations: The following items are recommended based on the analyses contained in this study: • Once the K-8 school experiences a growth in student population of 110 students more than the current student enrollment (totaling 770 students compared to the existing 660 students), either: o The K-8 school have at least two start and end times that vary by at least 15 minutes. Or o A single lane roundabout be constructed at Eden Avenue/Normandale Road. • Additional bicycle parking stalls be included on site as needed. • A new one-way road connecting to Normandale Road south of the Central Access not be constructed. Traffic Impact Study ii Our Lady of Grace Expansion TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ................................................................... 3 3. Forecasted Traffic ..................................................................... 8 4. Corridor & Intersection Analyses........................................... 10 5. Site Analyses ........................................................................... 19 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................... 22 7. Appendix .................................................................................. 23 LIST OF TABLES & CHARTS Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics ............................................................................... 3 Figure 1 – Existing Study Intersections .................................................................................. 4 Figure 2 – Weekday Daily Volumes ......................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 – Sunday Daily Volumes ........................................................................................... 6 Table 2 – Vehicle Volumes On Site ......................................................................................... 6 Table 3 – Site Access Usage ................................................................................................... 7 Table 4 – New Weekday Trip Generation ................................................................................ 8 Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity ...................................................................... 10 Chart 2 – Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections ............................................ 11 Chart 3 – Peak Hour Delays: All-Way Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ........................ 12 Chart 4 – A.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ........ 13 Chart 5 – P.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ......... 13 Chart 6 – Sunday Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ... 14 Figure 4 – Eden Ave/Normandale Rd Roundabout Concept ............................................... 16 Chart 7 – Peak Hour Delays: Eden Ave/Normandale Rd with Mitigation ........................... 17 Table 5 – Peak Period Parking Demands from ITE Parking Generation ............................ 19 Figure 5 – Proposed School & Preschool Pick-up/Drop-off Operations ............................ 20 Traffic Impact Study 1 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 1. Introduction a. Proposed Expansion Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church and School is proposing an expansion to the campus located on the southwest corner of the Eden Avenue & TH 100 interchange in Edina, Minnesota. Following are key attributes of the proposed development: i. Access to the site will remain at the three accesses along Normandale Road and one access on Eden Avenue per the concept development plan shown in the Appendix. ii. The proposed expansion will include the addition of a rectory, parish life center, gymnasium/school addition and preschool. iii. Addition of a new parking area including at least 35 accessible parking stalls bringing the total vehicles parking on site to 461 spaces. iv. Addition of bicycle parking spaces on site as well as two pedestrian pathways throughout the large eastern parking lot. v. Enrollment for the school is forecast to grow from the current 660 students to 1,000 students in 10 to 15 years, including the 120-student preschool. vi. The development is expected to be fully occupied by 2030 for the purposes of this study. b. Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed expansion. The traffic impacts are studied on the roads and intersections where significant impact is anticipated, and improvements are recommended where mitigation is needed. For those not familiar with the general concepts and terms associated with traffic engineering, The Language of Traffic Engineering guide is included in the Appendix. c. Study Objectives The objectives of this study are: i. Document how the study intersections and roadways currently operate. ii. Forecast the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed expansion. iii. Determine how the study intersections and roadways will operate in the future with and without the proposed expansion. iv. Recommend appropriate mitigation measures, if poor operations are identified. v. Document the existing parking demand for the site and forecast the future parking demand for the site. vi. Review the existing and future site layouts and recommend changes, if any, to improve safety and circulation. The roadways corridors studied in this document include those surrounding the proposed site, which are: i. Vernon Avenue ii. Eden Avenue Traffic Impact Study 2 Our Lady of Grace Expansion iii. Normandale Road/Arcadia Ave iv. Grange Road/Willson Road For the purposes of this traffic study, the study intersections closest to the proposed development and where the greatest impact is expected were chosen for review and include: i. Eden Avenue/Site Access ii. Normandale Road/Northern Site Access iii. Normandale Road/Central Access iv. Normandale Road/Southern Access v. Vernon Avenue/Eden Avenue vi. Eden Avenue/Normandale Road vii. Eden Avenue/Grange Road It should be noted traffic expected from the proposed expansion will have minor impacts on other corridors and intersections beyond those studied here. Furthermore, this study does not account for existing roadway conditions such as pavement quality or appropriate drainage. Traffic Impact Study 3 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 2. Existing Conditions a. Corridor Characteristics As mentioned, the proposed site is located on the southwest corner of the Eden Avenue & TH 100 interchange in Edina, Minnesota. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the key roadway corridors around this site and within the study area. Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics Name Designation1 Classification2 Speed Limit Lanes Transit3 Peds/ Bicycles Vernon Ave S Hennepin CSAH 158 A Minor Arterial 30 mph 4 divided 3 routes 9 buses Sidewalks both sides Eden Ave Edina MSA 163 Minor Collector 30 mph 3 undivided 2 routes 6 buses Sidewalks both sides east of Normandale Sidewalk south side west of Normandale Normandale Rd Edina MSA 178 Minor Collector 30 mph4 2 undivided 1 route 3 buses Sidewalks west side Grange Rd Local Minor Collector 30 mph 2 undivided None No sidewalks Arcadia Ave Local Minor Collector 30 mph 2 undivided None Sidewalk east side Willson Rd Local Minor Collector 30 mph 2 undivided None Sidewalks west side 1 CSAH = County State Aid Highway, MSA = Municipal State Aid Route. 2 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update 3 Number of routes around the proposed site followed by the frequency of transit service during the peak periods. 4 20 mph school speed zone. b. Study Intersection Characteristics The Vernon Avenue/Eden Avenue is under signalized control. The Eden Avenue/Normandale Road and Eden Avenue/Grange Road intersections are under all- way stop control. The site access intersections are under side -street stop control. Figure 1 shows the existing traffic control and lane configuration at the study intersections. Traffic Impact Study 4 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Figure 1 – Existing Study Intersections c. Traffic Volumes Intersection video was collected at the existing study intersections under normal weekday conditions in May 2019 as well as on a Sunday in June 2019 . Using these videos, 48-hour turning movement counts were obtained at the study intersections. The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours for site traffic were found to be from 7:45 to 8:45 a.m. and 2:45 to 3:45 p.m. The Sunday peak hour for the site was found to be 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. The counts from these three peak hours were used at the study intersections for analysis. Sunday data was not collected at the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection but volumes on the roadway are known from the counts at the surrounding intersections and turning movement counts could be approximated for the Sunday peak Traffic Impact Study 5 Our Lady of Grace Expansion hour. The turning movement count data from the counts is contained in fifteen-minute intervals in the Appendix. Based on the turning movement volumes, the current daily weekday and Sunday traffic volumes on each study corridor are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 – Weekday Daily Volumes Traffic Impact Study 6 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Figure 3 – Sunday Daily Volumes d. Site Volumes The site has three main parking areas; the southwest lot with 60 spaces, the northwest lot with 45 spaces and the east lot with 323 spaces. Not including parallel parking or a few garage spaces along the southern edge of the site, there are a total of 428 parking spaces on site. From the turning movement counts at the four site access points, volumes within the Our Lady of Grace site can be found. The peak vehicle volumes on site that were found are shown in Table 2. Table 2 – Vehicle Volumes On Site Time Period Time Vehicles On Site Weekday Morning 9:00 a.m. 209 Weekday Midday 12:00 p.m. 97 Weekday Afternoon 3:00 p.m. 172 Weekday Evening 6:45 p.m. 171 Sunday 10:00 a.m. 273 As shown in Table 2, the time with the highest number of vehicles on site is during Sundays. All peak parking periods are well within the capacity of the parking lot. Traffic Impact Study 7 Our Lady of Grace Expansion e. Site Operations Review Using a combination of intersection cameras, drone footage and on -site visits, the operations at the site were reviewed. The area of focus is the start and end times for the school. Overall, it was found that operations run very smoothly at this school compar ed to others Spack Consulting has reviewed. Pickups and drop-offs occur in an orderly fashion in designated areas without many vehicles being parked or stopping throughout the site. In the a.m. period, there were approximately 145 car drop offs in addition to 14 buses. Bus drop-offs occur on the east side of the eastern lot while car drop-offs occur in the southwest lot. The queue for vehicle drop -offs was fully contained in the southwest lot. In the p.m. period, there were approximately 75 car pickups that occurred with 23 buses picking up students. Buses were located on the east side of the east lot with cars using the southwest lot. The queue of cars extended into and around the northwest lot at its peak totaling approximately 1,500 feet. In both periods, very few cars used the Normandale Road access points compared to the Eden Avenue access point with buses exclusively using the two northern Normandale Road access points. Table 3 shows the percentages of site traffic using the different access points in different time periods. Table 3 – Site Access Usage Time Period Eden Ave Access Northern Normandale Rd Access Central Normandale Rd Access Southern Normandale Rd Access Weekday AM Peak Hour 79% 10% 6% 6% Weekday PM Peak Hour 72% 16% 7% 5% Weekday Daily 64% 16% 9% 11% Sunday Peak Hour 55% 23% 15% 7% Sunday Daily 55% 23% 15% 7% Traffic Impact Study 8 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 3. Forecasted Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the development site based on the methods published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The ITE manual compiles studies from across the country to provide a national average traffic for various land uses. Trip generation rates for the school expansion and preschool addition are based on the collected counts at Our Lady of Grace. Per the procedure in the Trip Generation Manual, local trip generation data is used when possible and supplemented with national ITE data when local data is not available. The rates collected at Our Lady of Grace are slightly lower than those from the ITE manual for private K-8 schools as well as daycare centers. The main increase in trips due to this expansion is anticipated to be from the expansion of the school. To conservatively acco unt for an increase in trips due to the relocation and expansion of the parish offices, trips due to three thousand square feet of new office are included in the forecasts. Sunday increases in traffic volumes are not anticipated as a part of this expansion. The resultant new trips generated by the proposed expansion are shown in Table 4. A detailed trip generation table showing the exact breakdowns is provided in the Appendix. Table 4 – New Weekday Trip Generation Land Use Code – Source Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 220 - ITE Rectory (multi-family housing, low rise) – 2 units 8 8 0 1 1 0 OLG Preschool – 120 students 236 236 60 44 33 33 OLG Private K-8 School – 220 students 432 432 111 80 60 60 710 - ITE Admin Offices (general office) – 3,000 feet2 15 15 3 0 0 3 1 OLG = Trip generation data collected from existing Our Lady of Grace school. Our Lady of Grace School has indicated that the preschool start and end times will not line up with the K-8 school start and end times. Therefore, for the future analysis only the new trip generation due to the K-8 school is added to the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes. A trip distribution pattern was developed for the generated traffic going to and from the proposed development. This pattern is based on the existing traffic volumes, site access and access to the regional transportation system . The general trip distribution pattern for this study is: Traffic Impact Study 9 Our Lady of Grace Expansion i. 10% of the generated traffic to/from the south/west on Vernon Avenue. ii. 10% of the generated traffic to/from the north on Vernon Avenue. iii. 30% of the generated traffic to/from the north on TH 100 via Arcadia Avenue & Grange Road. iv. 30% of the generated traffic to/from the south on TH 100 via Eden Avenue. v. 5% of the generated traffic to/from the east on Eden Avenue. vi. 15% of the generated traffic to/from the south on Normandale Road. Traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per this distribution pattern. b. Non-site Traffic Forecasting The impacts of the proposed development are studied in the year 2030. To forecast future traffic volumes in the study area outside of the proposed expansion’s traffic, the general growth in traffic is considered. Based on future year 2040 forecast from t he Draft Edina Comprehensive Plan from May 2019, a growth rate of approximately 0.3% per year is anticipated for the area. Using that annual rate leads to a 3% growth rate between 2019 and 2030. This growth rate was applied to all movements in the study ne twork except for those directly accessing Our Lady of Grace, since those movements will only be increased with the development’s forecast trip generation. Applying this background growth rate to the existing traffic volumes established the 2030 No-Build forecasts. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for the 2030 Build scenarios by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development to the non-site forecast volumes. The resultant 2030 Build peak hour forecasts are shown in a figure in the Appendix. Traffic Impact Study 10 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 4. Corridor & Intersection Analyses a. Corridor Vehicular Analysis While many factors contribute to a road feeling congested, the two biggest factors are volume, how many vehicles are using the road, and capacity, how many vehicles the road can accommodate a day. Transportation professionals use these pieces of information to create a ratio of volume to capacity. For example, a road with a volume to capacity ratio of 1.0, where the traffic demand is nearly equal to the traffic supply, will feel congested to motorists. Below is a rough guide of the daily traffic volumes different types of roads can accommodate based on Exhibits 16-16 and 12-39 of the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. If the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on a roadway is below the threshold, then it is considered un-congested. If the daily volume falls inside the range, the road is almost congested, and if the daily volume is over the threshold the road is congested. • 2-Lane (one in each direction with left turn lanes at busy intersections and coordinated signals), undivided streets, are considered congested with a volume between 8,900 to 18,300 vehicles per day. • 4-Lane, undivided streets (two in each direction with left turn lanes at busy intersections and coordinated signals), – 18,600 to 36,800 vehicles per day. • 6-Lane, divided streets (three in each direction with left turn lanes at busy intersections and coordinated signals), – 29,100 to 55,300 vehicles per day. To provide an initial planning level screening, Chart 1 provides volume to capacity ratios of the study corridors during each of the study years to determine if any of the roadway corridors are candidates for additional through lanes. As seen in Chart 1, corridor volumes are expected to remain within capacity through the study scenarios. Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity Congested: volume/capacity of 1.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Eden Ave Normandale Rd Vernon Ave Arcadia Ave Grange RdVolume to Capacity RatioExisting 2030 No-Build 2030 Build Traffic Impact Study 11 Our Lady of Grace Expansion b. Intersection Vehicular Analysis Individual intersections can perform poorly during peak periods while the overall roadway corridor is operating with an uncongested daily volume to capacity ratio lower than 1.0. Therefore, capacity analyses are performed for the study intersections to determine if they need improvements such as turn lanes or an upgrade in traffic control. The existing and forecasted turning movement volumes along with the existing intersection configurations and traffic control were used to develop the average delay per intersection in each study scenario. The delay calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition using the Vistro software package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service (LOS) grades and queue lengths, are included in the Appendix. Also, included in the Appendix is a guide explaining the Level of Service grade concept. Chart 2 shows the average peak hour delay per traffic signal controlled intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E boundary of 55 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable traffic signal operation in Minnesota. Signal timing was provided by Hennepin County. Chart 2 – Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections Chart 3 shows the average peak hour delay per all way stop sign controlled intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E boundary of 35 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable all-way stop and roundabout operation in Minnesota. The Highway Capacity Manual sets the threshold lower at all-way stop signs and roundabouts then at traffic signal controlled intersections based on the theory motorists have more patience at traffic signal controlled intersections and accept longer delays at a red light. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Vernon Ave/Eden Ave - AM Vernon Ave/Eden Ave - PM Vernon Ave/Eden Ave - SundayAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2030 No-Build 2030 Build LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s Traffic Impact Study 12 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Chart 3 – Peak Hour Delays: All-Way Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Chart 4 (a.m. peak hour), Chart 5 (p.m. peak hour) and Chart 6 (Sunday peak hour) show the 95th percentile queue lengths on the busiest stop sign controlled approach at intersections with side street stop sign control. Average delays are not calculated for intersections with side street stop sign control because the vast majority of vehicles going through the intersection are on the main roadway and have zero delay, which leads to low overall average delays. At side street stop sign controlled approaches to busy roadways, the average delay for all the vehicles on the appr oach often exceeds 60 seconds. This can be the case for a few vehicles waiting at the stop sign where improvements would not be justified due to the low traffic volume. Based on our experience, improvements are not warranted at these types of intersections until the 95th percentile queue at a stop sign is in the five to ten vehicle range. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Eden Ave/Normandale Rd - AM Eden Ave/Normandale Rd - PM Eden Ave/Normandale Rd - Sunday Eden Ave/Grange Rd - AM Eden Ave/Grange Rd - PM Eden Ave/Grange Rd - SundayAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2030 No-Build 2030 Build LOS E = 35s LOS C = 15s Traffic Impact Study 13 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Chart 4 – A.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Chart 5 – P.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Eden Ave/Site Access - NB Normandale Rd/North Access - EB Normandale Rd/Central Access - EB Normandale Rd/South Access - EB95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2030 No-Build 2030 Build Queue = 10 Queue = 5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Eden Ave/Site Access - NB Normandale Rd/North Access - EB Normandale Rd/Central Access - EB Normandale Rd/South Access - EB95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2030 No-Build 2030 Build Queue = 10 Queue = 5 Traffic Impact Study 14 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Chart 6 – Sunday Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections As seen in Charts 2 through 6, most of the study intersections are forecast to have acceptable operations through the 2030 Build scenarios with the exception of the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection and the Eden Avenue/Site Access intersection. The three site accesses on Normandale Road experience lower volumes, both from the site and on the through road, than the access on Eden Avenue. These accesses are not anticipated to need additional outbound lanes to accommodate future traffic increases. c. Vehicular Mitigation Analysis Per the above analyses, most of the study intersections and corridors will operate acceptably throughout the study scenarios. However, the following intersections and corridors are identified as having sub-standard operation in the following scenarios: i. Eden Avenue/Normandale Road in the 2030 No-Build a.m., 2030 Build a.m. and 2030 Build p.m. scenarios. ii. Eden Avenue/Site Access in all a.m. and p.m. scenarios. It is noted that the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection has slightly higher delays than desired in the 2030 No-Build scenario. However, the average delays are only slightly into the LOS E range and are only present for a portion of the peak hour . Because of that, mitigation would not be needed if traffic volumes were at those levels. Eden Avenue/Normandale Road For Eden Avenue/Normandale Road, the eastbound and westbound approaches have the highest volumes. With two lanes already present on each of these approaches at 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Eden Ave/Site Access - NB Normandale Rd/North Access - EB Normandale Rd/Central Access - EB Normandale Rd/South Access - EB95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2030 No-Build 2030 Build Queue = 10 Queue = 5 Traffic Impact Study 15 Our Lady of Grace Expansion the intersection, there is an inability to add additional through lanes on Eden Avenue without impacting the bridge over TH 100. Three options therefore remain: • Make no changes • Make a traffic control change • Decrease traffic volumes The high delays at this intersection during the peak hours analyzed are a direct result of school related traffic from Our Lady of Grace. The school traffic occurs in high volumes over short periods of time, as is the case at many schools. Because of those intense peaks in traffic, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersect ion operates with high delays and long queue lengths during th e school peaks. However, those peaks last for less than 30 minutes during both the a.m. and p.m. school peak periods. Outside of those periods this intersection operates with acceptable levels of delay and queue. Since the periods of poor operations are short, the intersection could be left as it is today and the levels of queueing and delay could continue to be tolerated during those periods. This approach is typical for access point s to a school, but less so for public intersections, though this intersection is very closely spaced to school access points. Another option would be to change the traffic control. This location is unlikely to meet signal warrants outside of the peak periods, so the traffic control type that would allow for the best vehicle operations during all hours of the day would be a single lane roundabout. Figure 4 shows a rough sketch of how a roundabout at this intersection would fit. Note that the southbound access onto TH 100 could be converted to a right- turn only with any vehicle wishing to turn left onto the TH 100 ramp being able to utilize the roundabout to make that maneuver. This removes a merging conflict point. A five- leg roundabout could also be constructed to bring the TH 100 ramp entry directly into the roundabout. Pedestrian crossings would be able to be included on all legs of the roundabout. Traffic Impact Study 16 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Figure 4 – Eden Ave/Normandale Rd Roundabout Concept Even with the addition of westbound U-turns at the roundabout, the 2030 Build scenarios would operate with acceptable delays well under what they are with today’s traffic volumes. While the intersection is busiest during the peak periods of the school, it is relatively busy throughout the day. On a wee kday, Our Lady of Grace vehicles account for approximately 13% of the entire traffic going through the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection. A roundabout at this location would improve operations throughout the entire day and would therefore be a benef it to a significant amount of vehicles not related to the school. While the conversion to a roundabout would improve intersect ion operations, another way to improve operations would be to reduce the vehicle demand at the intersection. The 2030 Build analysis was conducted assuming the growth of the K-8 school to be 880 students, up from the current 660 students. It was also assum ed that there is one starting and one ending time for the school. If the starting and ending times for different grades were staggered into two or more groups and did not occur at the same time, the vehicles going to and from the site would be spread out o ver a longer period of time. That would remove the intense peaking of traffic volumes which causes poor operations at this intersection as well as the site access. Chart 7 shows forecast peak hour delays at the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the two mitigation options. Traffic Impact Study 17 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Chart 7 – Peak Hour Delays: Eden Ave/Normandale Rd with Mitigation As seen in Chart 7, the conversion to a roundabout would significantly decrease peak hour delays. A staggered start/end time would also improve the peak hour delays. The a.m. peak hour would still be in the LOS E range, but, as mentioned before, this would only be for a portion of the peak hour. Based on these results, it is recommended that the K-8 school have at least two starting and ending times at least 15 minutes apart from each other. These times should also be staggered from the preschool start and end times. If these items are not feasible for the school to do, the conversion to a single lane roundabout is recommended. Either of these mitigations would only be needed if the K-8 school realizes a large portion of the full growth of 220 students it is anticipating. If school population does not grow, intersection operations will resemble the 2030 No-Build levels and mitigation would not be needed. For the 2030 Build scenario in the a.m. peak hour, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection begins to operate with LOS F levels of delay when the K-8 school population is increased by 110 students (770 total students as compared to the current enrollment of 660 students). It is at that level of K-8 school growth that mitigation of either staggered start/end times or a roundabout would be needed. With the preschool traffic not occurring at the same time as the K-8 traffic, the addition of that land use will not present the need for mitigation. Eden Avenue/Site Access The northbound queues on the site access at Eden Avenue are currently long during the peak periods and are anticipated to grow with the addition of school related traffic. These queues currently are and will be contained within the site without spilling onto public roadways. As discussed, long queues and delays are common and expected around schools during their peak periods. Though these queues are long er than would 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Eden Ave/Normandale Rd - AM Eden Ave/Normandale Rd - PMAverage Delay (seconds)2030 Build - Roundabout 2030 Build - Staggered Release LOS E = 35s LOS C = 15s Traffic Impact Study 18 Our Lady of Grace Expansion be desired at an intersection, they dissipate rather quickly. If start and end times are staggered, these queues will be significantly shorter though spread out over a longer period of time. If a roundabout is constructed on Eden Avenue at No rmandale Road, the progression along Eden Avenue is forecast to improve with reduced queues and delays which will positively impact operations at the site access. No intersection modifications are therefore recommended at the Eden Avenue/Site Access intersection. Traffic Impact Study 19 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 5. Site Analyses a. Parking Analysis With the addition of a new accessible parking area, the total number of vehicle parking stalls on site will be 461. As previously mentioned, the highest parking demand for the site occurred on a Sunday. Edina City Code lists the minimum parking requirement for a church to be at least 1/3 of the maximum seating capacity of the largest assembly. With approximately 620 seats in the nave, that leads to at least 207 parking stalls being needed on site. This is well below the capacity of the site. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has put together a document, ITE Parking Generation, 5th Edition, that compiled parking demand data from different land uses. Using that data, peak period parking demands were calculated for each land use of this development for a weekday. Those peak period parking demands are summarized in Table 5. Table 5 – Peak Period Parking Demands from ITE Parking Generation Land Use Peak Parking Demand Weekday Sunday Elementary School (660 students) 86 -- Middle School/Junior High School (220 students) 20 -- Daycare (120 students) 29 -- Church (620 seats) -- 136 Total 135 Stalls 136 stalls Based on these demands, even if multiple events were occurring at once, the 461 spaces on site can easily accommodate the parking demand throughout the week. Looking at Table 2, the peak number of vehicles on site during school periods was 209. Directly factoring that up to account for the change in student population from 600 to 1,000 students, that would put the peak number of vehicles on site at 317. Even though many of these vehicles are not parking, this number is still within the parki ng capacity of the lot even when several aisles of the east lot are being utilized by buses . b. Concept Site Review The concept site plan contained in the Appendix was reviewed to determine if the plan meets city requirement’s, provides appropriate circulation, and minimizes conflicts. Following are key transportation elements of the concept site plan: i. Car Circulation: The existing circulation around the site during school pickup and drop-off periods is very organized and works well with all queues being conta ined on site. With additional students being added to the school, the pickup and drop - off queues are anticipated to grow. The morning drop-off queue will still be able Traffic Impact Study 20 Our Lady of Grace Expansion to be accommodated well within the site. The afternoon pickup queue may extend to or beyond the edge of the site if staggered release times are not in place. To improve student safety, Our Lady of Grace School is proposing to alter the pick-up/drop-off procedures for the school to consolidate most entry and exit points to one location at the school building. Figure 5 shows the proposed paths for K-8 and preschool operations provided by Our Lady of Grace School. Figure 5 – Proposed School & Preschool Pick-up/Drop-off Operations Traffic Impact Study 21 Our Lady of Grace Expansion Figure 5 shows two layout options for the K-8 pick-up process. Both are mostly the same with one having vehicles wrap around the southwest parking area to give more stacking room as needed. With the orderly operations existing on site today, it is anticipated that if these new layouts are clearly communicated with parents ahead of time and clearly marked during pick-up/drop-off periods that orderly operations will continue. Staff, signage or cones/barriers may need to be in place when the transition to the new operations is first made to ensure all vehicles follow the directed path. It is noted that the western portion of the main east parking lot , and potentially the southwest parking lot, will not be able to be used during pick-up periods as vehicles will be wrapped around that area. Any staff parked in that area will need to wait until the pick-up period is over to leave the parking lot. The preschool will utilize the eastern part of the main east parking lot for pick- ups and drop-offs. Buses for the K-8 school will not be present during this time so there will be no mixing of buses and passenger vehicles in this portion of the lot. A new one-way roadway is shown in the layout in Figure 5 connecting to Normandale Road south of the existing central access. This new access is not needed from a capacity standpoint and it is not anticipated to be needed to accommodate queues. This will create an internal intersection just fee t away from the Normandale Road/Central Access intersection. Additionally, closely spaced intersections along public roadways are not desirable from a safety standpoint. It is therefore not recommended to construct this new roadway and access. ii. Bus Circulation: Buses currently use the northern Normandale Road access to enter the site and the central Normandale Road access to exit the site. The two eastern parking aisles in the east lot are utilized for buses. Bus operations will remain in this portion of the site to limit mixing with other vehicles and pedestrians within the site. Buses will not be present during the preschool pick- up/drop-off periods. iii. Bicycle Stalls: As enrollment for the school increases, it is recommended there be an increase in bicycle parking areas. Bicycle parking will be included on the northern side of the school building. It is recommended that bicycle parking usage be monitored and more stalls be added as needed in the future. iv. Walking Paths: Two new walking paths will be included on site leading from the school building to the ball fields on the north end of the site . These paths will provide a dedicated walking path for pedestrians increasing visibility and safety and keep them from mixing with pick-up/drop-off traffic. Traffic Impact Study 22 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic impacts of the proposed development were thoroughly studied and the principal findings are: • The proposed expansion of Our Lady of Grace is expected to generate approximately 1,380 new trips during an average weekday, 300 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and 190 new trips during the p.m. peak hour. • The surrounding roadway corridors are anticipated to be able to accommodate the traffic from this expansion. • Most study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably through the 2030 Build scenarios. • In the 2030 No-Build scenario, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersection is forecast to have higher than desired delays in the a.m. peak period. • In the 2030 Build scenario, the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road intersect ion is forecast to have higher than desired delays in the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. • The northbound queues at Eden Avenue/Site Access are long in all weekday peak hour scenarios. • Traffic operations within the site during school peak periods are orderly. The afternoon pickup period lasts for approximately 15 minutes after school is released. The following recommendations are made based on the above findings: • Once the K-8 school experiences a growth in student population of 110 students more than the current student enrollment (totaling 770 students compared to the existing 660 students), either: o The K-8 school have at least two start and end times that vary by at least 15 minutes. Or o A single lane roundabout be constructed at Eden Avenue/Normandale Road. • Additional bicycle parking stalls be included on site as needed. • A new one-way road connecting to Normandale Road south of the Central Access not be constructed. Traffic Impact Study 23 Our Lady of Grace Expansion 7. Appendix A. Site Plan B. Traffic Volume Figure C. The Language of Traffic Engineering D. Traffic Counts E. Trip Generation Table F. Level of Service (LOS) G. Capacity Analysis Backup • AM Existing • PM Existing • Sunday Existing • AM 2030 No-Build • PM 2030 No-Build • Sunday 2030 No-Build • AM 2030 Build • PM 2030 Build VICINITY MAP OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 13:401..11.11 umeaka wow= la 162.4441 OUR LADY OF GRACE - MASTER PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL Opus Design Build, L.L.C. tssan.r. 1.1-retria11.53114110 MASH. 020.1.1. 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MINNESOTA PFA,CT OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP MIER ADYESS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN SHEET INDEX 11.0 TITLE SHEET 0201 EXISDNOCONDMONS 0202 =LISTING CONDITIONS 0203 00.911NOCONOMONS 0204 OENOLITION PLAN 0301 OVERALL SITE PLAN 0302 SITE PLAN 0401 OVERALL GRADING FLAN 04.02 GRAIDNG PLAN 0501 EROSION CONTROL PHASE 1 0602 EROSION CONTROL PHASE 2 C51/3 EROSION CONTROL NOTESANODEMILS C841 OVERALL HOLM/ PLAN 0802 UTILTD! PLAN L13.01 TREE PRESERYKDON PLAN L1.01 OVERAUAND/SCAPE PLAN 11 02 LANDSCAPE PLAN L103 !LANDSCAPE NOTESAETARS 51.0 I LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AM LEVEL 1 FLOOR PUN Al2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN A100 !RECTORY FLOOR PLANS A2.0 [ EXTERIOR EEO/KOONS A200 RECTORYEXIERIONELEVADONS 93.0 (PERSPECTIVE IMAGES UT ZONINOTARIE OUF.LOP.EREELESLAINUMN MOM= 0.1101:05E0 NADLANCE BURCONG AREA N/A 97,318 5F (EWING) 174,044 SF (NEW) ZONING 14-1 11.1 PARCEL AREA N/A 2353 Acre MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 23% 32.676 (EXISTING) 423% (NEVN X CONDMONAL USES RELIGIOUS NSIITUTIONS, REMENTARM10015, PRESCHOOL RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, ELEIHENTAILWEDVD 4, PRESCHOOL X WILDING MAX HEIGHT 3 STORIES OR 40 WRONG SETBACK (INTERIOR SIDE) 3111.1.11113MI i:11.1.112:11 BUILDING SET13ACK (STREET SIOE) BUILDING SETBACK (FRONT) 95' 11.11111: MME=12:1MMINZME 30 BUILDING SIGNAGE 29 SF 100 SF X PAIDCING STALL COUNT 427 462 (NE 1EXLST1NG) W) PROJECT10431 LIDIMUIEFIL 4arFniveAT OPUS RE GROUP. LIC NIEMAN ERGINEERND TESTING, IND 10350 MEN ROAD WEST S50 CLEVELAND AVENUE NORTH UNNETONI,A. NN 53343 SANT PAUL. MN 55114 ASLIAIEGL ORA AEGROUP,110 10350 MEN ROAD WEST 1/NNETONIA NM 5E313 I`NTF.R. SA/PSALM 17203WH0TLIVATER DRIVE, SIRTE3C0 IINNETON39 LIN 55343 j ANTIFTAPG IM(1.1117IT- SAMSATEIC 12E03 WHITEWATER CANE. SLIDE 300 NNETONNA. NH 55343 SUMO= &MOE LAND SURVEYING, liC 0031 CAST BLOOLLNGTON FWY. SIM 118 81.009UNGION, 4555120 sar 07112/2010 AMER WM. J. Fournles muRm B. Partridge 0.10. PEGSIPATOI EFFFIE TITLE SHEET PROFC7 NArse3i 31644000 ISSUE RECORD T1.0 0O fn z Z I:. 0 (/) Z Lu 5<- 0 8 S O „>---2T • ,^VG, an NE fO D !DIG 4,IW W jet 01** #,. BRIDGE 0 .411 NE CORNER OF GOVT LOT 8 N LINE OF GOVT LOT B OO e Jo. 0,1 \ T2v,„ 8e, ,s° rCN , 009' OUZ I N..' __,- J Ir l ) 4 j IV / • A. 7 ,,, s , / 1 /,/ li. ''_-• IETFtT'i III It IT'( 7'-,/ IT 0 .-- R A7s arae 1 \ e o , / / li4 Igii i I 0 S §2___I /Das "6. M il Ir'il' II?" '°"° "°"..,,`"- .i. \ ...._ - III nnI i llai ti ll ill I ' I 'II : / -I-- NIA T§ Ili hill ;P' I' 11 I/ ,I I I.1:PER O° in i OC EASEMENT FOR R PURPOSES ' 1 IIII il i il I In, yo.,e!'gcAll:;1?, :-,',!;J:ryTt,., ' .1. :1114! 1 1 i; HI .7; il l III ! i , AD . BUILT 0 EAST 7 MET) 1 1 11 s ''''' i I I I N s' 1 .202B ..4.,,,„_, I- 71 \ -,-- , . L„.., /, , hi; ?Ili I Oil 1 II Ill I --/ 5', II Ill [ I , I 22 i. 0 1 ! dlit„ 0 .2„ • ,210.2 , lit 1 ,.,..,, A T , q 1 ;1(", \ I n .ii ni iliii ill \ . m I it ' ' ' \, .I., II :1 Di , : \ \ \ tl-, \ I li I I lint:11 it I 1 I, Inli III Il'ff 1 ,1T I I I ;11 1 4,1 I 1,1-'''''1... 1,.. ... \ ,..\* \GRASS . 1 , 1 III 1 11/1 YI 1 4,,,, 1 dal SY , 1 11 I :...iIII I/. il ',,/ \ ..... I III , \ li. , 11 Tli I II I II .11 1 II 1 1 I I I n 11 I 1 t 1 i IV ,,, I i ini ‘ 1 1 IIIIIi 1, ; I 1r >11 .7P,1:.:-Jy,T,'E.I. 7 ... "I ''' 610 6Tri MAIN r448'50.40.E I ' ift0 t vnyi 1 I 111 . i OR. \ \ \ v.A.- .4 / i - 1 .0' ve„,es LINK FENCE „ 7-I2, .40 ,.,ALTEL ---, '''''---EOGE OF-s--_:-..Y S /7 i H 1 'T., JO' i , ET 'r:--- ..• cos.T"--- -ZT:IFAPIT 1 / / "-T I 1 m,,,,TEOc&ss II‘N-- ." ''' . i li 1 "4" sasc c II ..‘ ,I, 111 ii iti-i—. #i /,11 / // / BITUMINOUS AM' -7////// CI 4 / // / /i i, ii CS C63 1 il / ' LIP ocii . so ii,011, ' irr. 0 1,-- mix 0 1 e n 11 .. il l //' m in ar20 4 11.. im im it I t a ii • L- ii .2, m m ill' g . i . ,, a ft / . al II I 71 MATCH 4_ W17 ,,,,.e. .,./ 1 111 I 1 ,1 / SEE SHEET /20F orm-ie. III n ri, / 3 II I iiie II f if BITSIAINO%S, . m I II II \ I 2.2 2. 111 il Kw .2022 22 II I • II /// ,.,-N . / n •:.: di n Ilif A L NE a- EDEry \--T-,( '--°' '-- ----------- "--..-7.rV-< ..".- II a IN X' II -N. • I Ir..I \,h 164 A r I i 40 '1 \ --------)''')------- Z.- , SAL ON ( t. 1°! ir A r rrl ) I' I I \ .2ia A ( ,' •2167 \ : '. Frr;11 7 r ,r- ' ..\ .7. r' e' 2 /78 211 L, 141i ,A2 I / 2 GRAVEL "oral pI 23,710 ps. GRAVEL .N5o.• CONCRET 666 6 • .7.0 °"' 8 8C8 SF S \ S" SVP ST, S29.2 2T1-7-.12p 1127,S P 21/20197 Oaro emi •°061 ..J11r7FENX 1.4, CONCRETE -Flo' 0 FT CHAIN NK FEN. I hereby certify that this survey, plan. or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. •sio.7 c‘, N --7'],f/3 i2OLS 02.6 BITUMINOUS 6 OGI .."1,210/0 SYSITY /.VI 11:02 vain Dated this 7th day of August. 2015 SUNDE AND SURVEYING, LLC. Revised Orea on sheet 3 onl IM BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITY SURVEY FOR: OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH 55 LAND SURVEYING Sj-BSI-STS (.34: 25s-see-2us7 RETE 30 SCALE FEET Pre 2-a 52/1,:900/24 14,4/8/SS Rong,11 SectiorvIS na.9.126.28001.dir2 N N 30 60 A-4 Dert, 08/07/20, // 1 of 3 20 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE GRAvEL roma rye. r0004 •ocno -woo -NO 80 r s„, STs U,OcA V.,10 BITUMINOUS /w,4 ,fit etbi EXISTING BUILDING AC Denoted air conditioner ACP Denotes above ground pipe(s) AIS Denotes advertisement/Information sign BOH Denote, basketball hoop BE Denotes building entrance BIC Denotes top of bituminous curb BR Denotes beaver toil curb CB Denotee catch basin CBOX Denotes control box COX Denotes communication box COP Denotes corrugated metal pipe COL Denotee building column CST Denotes concrete ate', DO Denotes decorative brick pavers ER Denotes electric box EM Denotes electric meter EON Donal., electric manhole FF Denotes finished Poor FH Denotes fire hookup FOL Denotes fiber optic line EP Denotes flag pole FW Denotes face of walk top Denotes gutter GAS V Denotes gas valve GP Denotes guard post CRDL Denotes ground light OW Denotes guy wire HCR Denotes handicap ramp HCS Denotes handicap sign NH Denotes Ilona hole HHC Denotes communication hand hole HOE Denotes fiber optic hand hale HYD Denotes fire hydrant INV Denotes invert LA Denotes londoeoped ore° LIFT Denotes lift station LP Denotes light pole MC Denotes metal cover MH Denotes monhole OD Denotes overhead door OHC Denotes overhead communication line DHE Denotes overhead electric line OHTV Denotes overhead cable television line - -(P) Denotes per plan/not field verified Ply Denotes post Indicator valve POS Denotes parking sign PP Denotes power pole PPLP Denotes power and light pole PPU Denotes power polo with underground utility PVC Denotes polyvinyl chloride pipe RCP Denotes reinforced concrete pipe RD Denotes roof drain SAN S Denotes sanitary sewer SANG Denotes sanitary cleonout SKIM Denotes skimmer STS Denotes storm sewer STAT Denotes statue STC Denotee top of surmountoble curb TAD Denotes truncated dome TB Denotes telephone box TOP Denotes tetherboll pole TC Dorsetes top of concrete curb TCS Denotes traffic control sign TON Denotes telephone manhole TRANS Denotes transformer box UCC Denotes underground communication line UGE Denotes underground electric tine UGT Done too underground telephone line UGTV Denotes underground cable television VCP Denotes vitrified day pipe VP Denotes vent pipe W Denotes underground water line WMH Denotes water manhole WV Dent. water valve APL Denotes Apple tree APB Denotes Arborvitae WAS Denotes Basswood tree BLCH Denotes Black Cherry tree BOX Denotes Boxelder tree COT Denotes Cottonwood tree CRAB Denotee Crabapple tree, EVC Denotes evergreen tree OINK Denotes Ginkgo tree MPL Denotes Maple tree MTASH Denotes Mountain Ash tree PIN Denoteo Pine tree PINW Den tea White Pine tree SHB Don toe shrub SPCG Den les Colorado Green Spruce tree SPR Den too Spruce tree TR Den toe deciduous tree WIL Den t s Willow tree id go o.4 OOO/07.1‘ \ sraTo mortoulrfor40 N OPT wa3 vas "CARD ON see. !_`['-..wan ormt-cy- 0400 r` III. \ J ([7 ''"[' ''''' 1 •°[." -1 t • \ _. '' M PONT 280.0 FEET 7- (MAW DEM ,/ Atie59'40T ISZEIS MEAS. r P0 • 8 FT CHAIN-, LINK FENCE T-Iere ‘--EPLE 8,CP or \!..° /HI ii IP I 1 Jill/ / / t /I fill 1 ,,,,,,, '//// 7 ' 1 ,,,,, .---- / [ //I 71 / n= ,,. • -7 MATCH ,., ly rN 1 / SEE _SHEET I OF 3 : , .7,7, • ',.[", tat ... 9--. L . I EGFNO O Denotes iron monument set marked with P.L.S, No. 44900 • Denotes found iron monument BITUMInou s ens _. DI 7. FROM "[:["V[ In BEN PRATUG„, DIP • D13/1 582.28'12M AICAS. CT.88.CtPk. 'r* DODIO DODD •011.7 911. BiTUMiNOuG. iv Ar I 010.1 D/I0/1 ) . / 1 I I ,,, l' r _y ‘-'11 1 I 41, \ t / • ) ?) ) ..(.. ,1)1 \ ). \ , \ \ I 10 / ;7"),\ \ °')'• \ \ \ \ 0\ 1 I / t \ 1 0 I it . 4x, 1-1,•.°2..5,.` \. 4L 0 ' • )5 '; a • 4 ti • * - 5 DI IV' \° .;27/.7 DT2 .'-. 'I- -? .-- '-' . \ \. \ \ \ at .. • ‘,1 4.1,, -"mi.. 0 0,17\ 02i 2 [ 0 \ ni-)1 1 "C)''''' 02222 DJ di Ay ‘21 S,I /' ill , Olt 4" ie \ 6 /3 1 .1113 ,,,,,,,, '1'-.1 I i ic .1 \ 1 " \ 11; • [4, / III . If / ..41 . 1, 40 00; i Alp • • • • • 4t. 44..54045,;[, o, \ i- et * ,g.' //..-, - ?di '....s. .I • • • sit • • • it A • • • .1 ez • '' •,.; 1.1 , • • I A' 4 / \ ...., ....",... ,-, / / JD / •°.' ., /I' ..,,, \ .... 7,„22 2' •0.0 ./I (.1122 0422.\ ‘1\ " \'\:\ \ ':'\\ \\ \ \ I \ 1;: . \ ,s t. ' :: , / . - ,:i \ wee .., '222°,2, 020.0 \ \ I \\ \ Oh, \ \\ 41s- \ \ \ , „,, \ N 02 SLI / \ , ..{.. 0,22, ei ' / "00 [‘'. '"" "/I. \ . 7 / V .5 # ' # 022 1 \ I''',"I '' I '''';"'' • N 6E, STOOP wan \ :79571 2 004 § DI T Nat., • DID, SOT OTC hiammilc owe i1035. 12 N ETE TTGF 589 .47'55"W /// r-1.-S. LINE OF GOVT LOT 8. SEC, 28 AEG EXISTING 211STORY BUILDING rt.L.11 , OF Cool' LOT 1. PLAT RECORDING INFORMATION The property is currently unplatted per the Hennepin County Poperty Map online. Soeringo and/or dirnonolono Meted within Procketo ore per plot or record document. This survey won prepared without the benefit of current title work. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist In addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. /7' GENERA] NOTES 1.) Survey coordinate basis, Hennepin County Coordinate System. ()111 ITY NOTES_ I,) Utility information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be occurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information la required, excavation may be necessary. 2.) Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locations ore shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket numbers 151752426 191564809, 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for precise onoito location of utilities prior to any excavation. PEN OHM ARKS (BM) I.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant north of the service road on the south side of building. Elevation = 919.45 feet 2.) Top of 3rd light pole base from the north end of the southwest parking lot on the south side of concrete bore. Elevation = 923.55 foot 2.) Top of concrete base of fog pole northeast of northeast building corner. Elevation = 921.10 feet wOt AREA Area = 1,013.018 square feet or 23.256 acres 30 30 60 1 c. Z. S 0 1,-;" I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lase of the State of Minnesoto. Dated this 7th day of August, 2015 ii i iief_i SONDE AND SURVEYING, LLC. By, evlsed area on sheet 3 on dote BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITY SURVEY FOR: OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH D SURVEYING eel°°-z4a cis n -see- Sze) Alnelo cOrn Prope,08-282-8 /A,909/14 Ro1,918/3., roorn.0.-117 R Section.28 SCALE FEET F1e:98252.9001 2 of 3 Ai IN O N to 0 0 z Z 17- E to z >7 0 *07 174 Din el V.:T •01•4 • 0.1.4 111 •1117.0 Vile I la BITUMINOUS IE N. 'T LOT I 01.117C 0,1.3117C arr- Ort -r- arretasnse, A/89'47'55V 51 • ...•••••-. •1110.3 net. •017 -..•••••e, •000.2 CONCRETE ets ...on IC et sal C 6.. L .1.1tet FEN .144 GRASS r L,,7 *1" eta • 00.04 • 003.0 GRAVEL•was •1•-•• 10 • rep BITUMINOU S • MATCH E SHEET • - • • - VISA Kee •5 „a/ O 011.3 1.7 01 •01 .010 BiTuleiNOUS • jos ¨ A° A 1 L4C.FR Nana. smog nor itaGRV re.,0 •1107 • \ O r979=1 ConnItel, ArRC.S" GRASS B /SOU • itommagiommertuo- EXISTING BUILDING r Inwh -2!;„%v Lu w 0 z .0t) I I- Ly1 w 910.2 O E4 \ .\ \ \ - -r° ..,, , \ \ - `, \ , 's I 21 \ \ \ \roc, .,, futi bp irAre i., .-sices \ \ \ GRASS ...."' NM Mt* .... \ \ liti-e74;14C.IPER 'LI ,,..., OLI p? l4th771 ro.o Xt.. CO. C..!.7t ere..hee ..it.,,......... _../ ,„... - ,-- -- --"" ./._ __ ......,,.. raMtitt rr t9...,. '4> Tars ),'). ' _ --- -7, --Gelc-;.n.sis/C ., R . 5_,P.,/ /*psi .....74 _., 7 .i, ..... /.7,,, .."' N / ?iia, ease' I / C338 IRRIGATION t 0071,..-iii:Roassr, _ .,,,,r. ( / --- _/4`. 7 ' 1 I •elS1 .=, ko A ff.-D- .4,1R% ON HER RE S MAY NOT REFLECT I an, coNomoas CCP OF OSVCREER STOW 00190E 0004 GUY SOS.I0 rep OF CONCRETE STOOP 00TODE CLOOR t G EV - 92120 FT. EXISTING 2! STORY BUILDING rtd . NLOf GOVT LOT 33 -- ELFI, SEC 33 S CRETE r 4,• f7 i L. L. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED That part of Government Lot 8 of Section 28. Township 117 North. Range 21 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing 26 2/3 rods East of Southwest corner of Lot 8; thence North to East line of Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway right of way: thence Northerly along said right of .y line to a point distant 703 7/1 0 feet Southerly along same from Southerly line of Eden Prairie Road; thence East 193 2/10 feet; thence North to center of said rood: thence Northeasterly along same to North line of Lot 8: thence East to Northeast corner of Lot 8; thence South to Southeast corner; thence West to beginning. Except that part thereof lying northeasterly and easterly of the southwesterly and westerly line of the highway taking described in Doc. No. 3799189, Also except the southerly 40 feet of said Eden Prairie Road. And All that part of Government Lot Eight (8), In Section Twenty-Eight (28), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty-One (21) West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, according to the Government Survey thereof, bounded and described as follows: Commencing at the point where the Easterly line of the right of way of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway was located and constructed across said section is intersected by a line parallel with and forty (40) feet southerly at right angles from the center line of the Eden Prairie Road, ea-canal, as laid out and located through said Section, which point is hereinafter designated as Point "A", and running thence North Sixty-seven degrees, two (2) minute. East. along sold parallel line and at an angle of One Hundred Sixteen (116) degrees, forty-seven (47) minutes, with said right of woy line, o distance of One Hundred Twenty (120) feel, thence South two (2) degrees, thIrty-three (33) minutes East 408.5 feet to a point which la the actual place of beginning of the land hereby conveyed. Thence Worn said actual place of beginning South two (2) degrees, thirty-three (33) minutes East 340 feet; thence South Eighty-nine (89) degrees, Thirty-eight (38) minutes west 193.2 feet to said Easterly line of right of way, thence Northerly 340 feet along said right of way line to a point 363.7 southerly from said Point "A", measured along said right of way line; thence Northeasterly at an angle of Ninety-four (94) degrees. Forty-eight (48) minutes with said right of way line a distance of 154.3 feet to the actual place of beginning. Ng 5 g 33 H Ra mod area sheet 3ory on NW CORNER OF SEC..-C' 19. T. 2s, IL 24 1.1 ,, AP 6/2 01 And All toot part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117. Range 21, West of the 5th Principal Meridian bounded and described as folio.: Commencing at the point where the Easterly line of the right of woy of the Minneapolis, Northfield, and Southern Railway as located and constructed across said section, is Intersected by a line parallel with and 40 feet Southerly at right angles from the center line of Eden Prairie Road, so called, as laid out and located through sold Section, and running thence North 67 degrees 2 11101latee. Ea. along sold parallel line and at an angle of 116 degroae 47 minutest with said right of stay line, a distance of 120 feet; thence South 2 degree.; 33 minute, East 408.5 feet; thence West 154.3 feet to said Easterly line of Railway right of way at a point 363.7 feet South from the place of beginning, measured along said right of way Ilne; thence North along sold Easterly line of Railway right of woy to place of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota. And The north 150 feet of that part of Government Lot I of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 21 West. lying east of the railroad right of way and west of the west lino of the highway taking described in Doc. No. 3790189. Property Is located In Hennepin County, Minnesota. OoN 00/0)/2015 3 of 3 Ootano TON: BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITY SURVEY FOR: OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH I i ISANfisNuRvPS -",i7:;;Frikr'°";:i•-• 2"-E„ " 00-162-0 St/1.0009/24 Fs 010/50 Town010.117 Arnow11 Soctl0008 .0.90.7600001.0. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report wos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Mot I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Doted This 7th day of August, 2015 SUNDE AND SURVEYING. LLC. aigrg,- Arae J. CathorM.P.L.S. Minn. Lic. Na. 44900 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET REM ELOCATE UNDERGROUND GM 7r-A.OVE WOOD FEN E 0 N SO1 RD / / / / / / / / ZELOCATE TRANSFOMIER — DEMOLITION NOTES 1. DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPROIENSNI. COMRACTOR MAIL VISIT ME SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK. 2. THE DEEM N.OWN 15 BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF FIGHTING CONDMONS. THE EXISTING coNornoNs SHOWN ON INS PIM ME BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHIC PUPPING PREPARED BY SUNDE LANE/SURTO/MG DATED 06-21-2019. If CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT DOTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WMIOUT DIGESTION, COMPACTORSHALL HAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BMA REGISTERED LAND MRVETOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 3. THE CLIHMUCTOR LS RESPONSIRM FOR MARALMON, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING INA LOCATION APPROVED STALL GOVERNING ALITHOIIMES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPUCABLE 'SOAPS DF ALL STRUCTURES. PAM, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, MMES, ETC-, SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE EMS CAN RECONSTRUCTED. M1 FAOLMES TO RE REMOVED MALI BE UNDERCUT TO WHAM MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER ME GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 4. CLEARING AND GRUBBING, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DEMO.. THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR 15 RPMEIMELE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DENTIMION AND DEPOSAL. 6. COIMMCTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ME DISCONNECTION OF AMITY SERVICES TO COSTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS. 7. COMPACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE MM' COMPAMES PRIOR TO REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF MMES. coNnueroa SHALL COORDINATE WM1 OMEN COMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAT RE PERFORMED BE THE MIMI' OLIMPAMEN FORCES AND ANT FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTIMEMEIPAIRES FOR SERVICES CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYINGM. FEES AND CHARGES. S. CONTRACTOR LS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED MAT LOCADONS Of MISTING UTILITRIS SHOWN 01.1.1SPUIN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UMW MAPPING ACCUPACT. PRIOR TO START OF AMMEINOMION ACTIVITY, THE COMAACTOR SNAIL NOIIGT IfIRIET COMPANIES 4.9 HOURS PRIOR TO ANT MCMAHON F011 ON-SITE LOCATIONS Of DIMING LITILMES. THE LOCATIONS OF MM ES SHALE BE OBTAINED BE hIE CONTRACTOR BE CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1156 OR 5.51-454-0C112. 9. THE MAPPING LOCATION OF. MISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND MIMES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE MACE LOCATION, OR AS THE OMY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE VERIFY EXISTING COMMONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANDOPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL MINT COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE USES AND CAP All ONES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK MMES DETERMINED TO BEALLONODNED SWILL RE REMOVED If UNDER THE BURRING INCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS. 10. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS ONES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED MAO BE COORDINATED WITH SHE AFFECTED unary COWAN, ADEQUATE TIME MALL BE PROVIDED MR Ram.. um CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE IMUTECOMPANT IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN IMIUTISEPROCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAT CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING MMES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY WEND CONSTRUCTION. 11. CON-MAMA MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT AL1TMES WM1 FENCES MRR1CADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC, TO THE BEST PRACTICES 12. COPMNUOUSACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT A11 RUES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE DUSTING FAOLMES. 13. PRIOR TO DEMOMION OCTURRING, All EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARETO BE INSTALLED AND APPROVED 111' THE LOCAL ALITHORHT 14. COIVIRKTOR SHALL LINT SAVCCIIIKKAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONEMHOSE AREAS WHERE EEG REQUIRED AS SHOWN °WHIM CONSTRUMION PLANS BUT IF ANT DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL ANO REPAIR. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROIEM EXAMING FEATURES1414101 ARE TO REMAIN. DANILAGETO ANY DOTING CONDITONS TO REMAIN MIKE REPLACED AT COMPACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16. ABANDON °REID...ALMA/Inn WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER MIT STANDARDS COORDINATE AIEWORK WM1 CM, ALL STREET RESTORATION MAO BE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE TOTH LOCAL STANDARDS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHIM PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFIC AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TIMFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVED BEE NE I OCAL GOVERNING AUTHORIIT. OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. OM. FEW,. ITE4.44,15S10-011 Opus Design NM, L.L.C. L H.LL ITAM-14181 EL410117 H2454.4m Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whiterrater Drive, Suite 300 Afinetonka, IAN 55343 763.4766010 telephone Engteednq I Surceftio I Rannbig I Errifronmental PRIMES OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP FELCUPCIALCRESS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN PRIEM NYE. 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal ran 06/21/2019 CMA CMA [PAM JGP ACME RE MLL RPOSTAIM ILIEMI m-HOT VAI 05 420E medfloa104 1417771 PAW. 17,4 or under wry.. super.. and Mal I am a .1y Licensed prufrAsIonal ENGINEER alder the M. of the TOE Minnesota. L El d M . Aye .0 07/12/2019 ALHAE9vELLE A at SLEEP., NG-new T office. MEET Trill DEMOLITION PLAN C2.04 NI REMOVE WOOD FENCE — LEGEND sret F IN FEET LOCATE MONUMENT STUNS NEEDED 0 / / / / / 0 Off '" RELOCATE OVERHEAD MME'S / Ara EXISTING GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM XC ~lC Cd \ • 0 0 0 /a ELOCATE IRRIGAt -s. l WELL gel x 0 /-/ig /(:;e3:1,/ / / 0 REMOVE DUSTIN TRANSFORMER AND CONCRETE GAS METER HITIRANT LIGHT STORM SEWER DRAIN THE WATERMAIN FORCE MA N SANITARY SEWER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CABLE IV UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GM TARE FENCE IRON FENCE WOOD FENCE MIEN LIM FENCE EDGE OF TREES TREES / SHRUBS CONCRETE GUARD POLES SIGNS CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS CURB BUILDING REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINE REMOVE EXIST CONCRETE CURB SAW CUT EMT BM.1511110US PAYEE ENE REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE MISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING REMOVE MMHG GRAVEL DRIVE REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING REMOVE EXIST VS TREE IEEE 1.0.01 TREE PRESERVATION PIM) REMOVE MISTING REMOVE EXISTING LIMIT! REMOVE EMT. FENCE REMOVE EXISTING WRIT LDM.ME tij r r erio PA r= rer. EXISTING X B M -LEGEND PROPOSED Da81.8 PROPERTY WAIT CURB A GUTTER EMBALMS BUILDING RETAINING WAIL WETLAND LIMOS "ERMINE SAVEGUT LINE SIGN PIPE BOGARD NUMBER Of PARA. STAGS PER ROW KEY NOTE STANDARD DUN ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIGMA. EE 13.05 SOP SETE PULES NOTES NORTH 0 60 120 04 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. BBE Pal AsA Wrap., SESOO fiESP.ALLE Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Iwmeue vua lima. EN SPEWS, WASS. Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whiter rater orfe, SUBB 300 Unnetorika, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone EngIneerN I Sunettg I Fianntig I Erreironmenta! PAILIESP OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PAGEGT MOMS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN FFDEC1,411., 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal LATE 06/21/2019 CMA CMA AVM in' JGP OGOTO MLL I hErelw certify dart. pI specification or report APE PreparesIlw Ere or under, died super.on And., arn S Oury BEAALPd prorpasional ENG/NEEP under the lEvA or LEA Lute of Minnesota. OVERALL SITE PLAN SiEEL 1.531 C3.01 SCALE IN FEET 40\CAD\CW\Shees\2 - L.\PROJECTS\21 -s e Q_ ISO _ I — 18'__3 STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DOTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDOYAIN PROPERTY UNIT OM &GUTTER EASEMENT MMHG T PINING W. WETIAND OMITS TEEN,. SAWCUT UNE SIGN PIPE 8011/1811 (i) NUMBER OF PARKING STA. PEA ROW KEY NOTE (3 PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TIMING MOVEMENT LOCATON • 1.025999 3369745E 439,426 PF 7333 AC 07.74 AC 1903 AC 429% 539 AC RI AREA GROSS SITE AREA EXISTING IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE DISTURBED AREA ZONING COSTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 7.7 C3.02 SITE PLAN SNEET 11J1E-31 NORTH 0 30 60 KALE 16 FEET L REMOVE AND 017141a BITUMINOUS CURB AND PAVEMENT IN MOPS REQUIRED FOR IMLITY EXTENSION, SEE SHEET C6.02 —DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY =DEVELOPMENT NOTES I. ALL DIANNVOIN ARE ROUNDED TOTHE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2. ALL DIME1190115 %OWN ARETO THE FACE OF CORBY° FACE OF C1/38 UNINGOTHERWITE NOTED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTPUET.GUTTER OUT. WHEREWATER ONAINSAWAY FROM CUM. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS 'GUTTER IN' CURE 010818NATE WINI GRADING CONTRACTOR. 4. ALL AREAS AKE 801100110 10 ENE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5. All 'AMONG STALLS TO BEB IN WIDTH AND le IN LENGTH OHMS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. COMPACTONSHAIL KERR TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOP EMT LOCATONS AND DIMENSIONS Of EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS MO EYACT BOWING MINTY ENOUVICE LOCAVONS. 7. REFER TO PINAl PLAT MAIM 801.1NONAIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT ARIAS, AND LOT DIM/INSIONS. B. ALL GRADIENTS. SIDEWAIKS ALONG THE ADA 0.0UTE SHALL HAVEN MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 49* EXCEPT AT CURB RNM1.51014 ANON MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF1.5%. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS ANLESHAIIBEL314 THE CONTRACTORMIALL REVIEW AND VERIFYINEGISADIENT IN THE NODAL°. THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO RACING CONCRETEOR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. THECONTPACTOR SHALL NOON THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN NYE GRADIENT NINE FIND VERSUS THE DESIGN GRAINEHT AND COOPOINATE MTH GRADING CONTRACTOR- 9. 'NO PARKING' SIGNS MAU BE RACED MONG All DRIVEWAYSAS REQUIRED BY OW. =KEY NOTES A. BOLDING, STOOPS, STARS SEE APOOTECNIKIL PLANS B. 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C. ACCESSIBLE RAMP 0. PRESCHOOL OUTDOOR PINY AREA E. OUTDOOR PINY AREA PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5,0005E f r FELSTPAII,M J_ Chad M. Aye 197 GO' 219' 5 4' • OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. IN. ANIMA Irrt•ENNIN MK. /1 83044114 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. .33.82.01PI 1944triANN MOO 0 844444141 Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 WhItenlet 0361, Salta 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone Eneteedng 1 Sunsyfig 1 Pemba IESatonmertal iTOIECV OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PROELT.1.113 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN 18 0.153 CUT RELOCATE MONUMENT SIGN 10 NEEDED N EURSCUT _ 1 — 74' ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal NIITN/ 44017801844 NUS, specIllollon or Wort was prepared by Bel , under my drecl psuperhybrt and NMI am a OvN MaY14491 professional ENGINEER say. ART of Ne state of hannesda. 4 06m:07/12/2019 — 21.d aapy of lbs. upameguest 51/9891614. 1,4091014. NG of,. PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF — LEGEND PROPOSED maroin PROELI MY. 31644000 \G\ PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF 0 6 17 -LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING NORTH 0 60 120 NrAl F 59 FEET I 7LT— --L - 90S COO rr 4— 4, 9 1 7T' 4 —0— 4 4 tL-444. 4L0'4 • 2, F- 4( 4SEE 4.02 FOR GRADING PLAN NOTES — \ PROJECTS \ 211740 \ CAD \ Civil\Sheets 21740—G4—GRDEdwg [OVERALL GRADING PLAN] July 12, 2019 — 12,08pm mlarson PROPERTY MAR CURER GUTTER STORNI SEWER DRAINTLE RETAINING WALL WETIAND LIMITS TREELINE RIP RAP SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR OVERPLOW ELEV. SOIL BORINGS Co— 44 —fl 90.2.5 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. IMX.BlericarlOwl Irtrterro 6904rtle PD-635141. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. rtrixheo.u. L''Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whiterrater Drive, Suite 300 titvinetorka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone 0,5004000 ISuiveving I Fare® IEOsSuOrnlSTui OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP maxi' 'mass 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN DID.EtilerreiER 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 06r21/2019 orroxOf WAX. CMA OrtUvirr JGP OXDIEDIrr MLL PEGSIPAFON I hereby centre Oat OW Van.speellictlon or report ens moored OS ewer are,/ rreorte sopertrolon 362 05205 am a do/y Oren., wok...ENGINEER under Vie loos of .state of Minnesota- Chad M. Aye Resara me. 07/12/2019 P'IrM Se 225 ="" 'oeu. IAN orr OVERALL GRADING PLAN D,IEETIOASER C4.01 9096, PROPERTY MT CURB S GUTTER STORM SEWER 79 -13 ORAMTISE RETROOK W. WerLAND 30105 TRETURE SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. SOL EGRINGS OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 11151.P49,1W 1.....9113.104312 902$ Opus Design Build, L.L.C. .x.;291550110 42.3. Sambatek w w w.s a m bate k.c o m 12800 Whiterater Mire, Suite 300 Hanetooka,1,81 55343 763.476.6010 telephone ErvpIrwring I St»ey»I I Palatil4 I ErniromentA 2120.ECT OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP ROA, SCORESS 5071 EDEN AVE, MINA, MN PRCLECT1236£1 31644000 A sosor 1,0110E TO COW... CONTRAROMil. BE .-1.11.11 FORCT;DM.1 TRE. VET 92.1.214.21,121.1.3132111040.D.DERITOLDDLD 91,041., TIDSREDVDO.T WEL ARM COR.301.331,49 ROT RE LIMITED TO ROW, W022146120.1.111. DUTY 0219,22.4,;24 OR ON INT DEV60,110 CONDUCT 0993.0113.21. 03111..LORS ,R20,1.2111201 IVITADCDTO ViCILIDE 2,12.2111E ADECD. , THE CONTRACTC349 SUETY VER., 92, OR DEAR DIE CO.RUCLI. STE CONITACTDR D. COMPLETE THE NE CA.; COLLMV,M9.111.92.1),A111,122,131.-4,101,02TREOW,R,OIS ENDILL211 ALL 3C9.11-5114.19,62 031.110 LVIDTCNIWERSSOIS ENC., 1.114,TOR DV, RESPON.LE FOR C004.99411..11,129.31,01 1151.3.0 in.9)201093.11111502LS <=,Z, 6031109.4.2.2/31.)4,025.004411AS USN 0.41FTED BY: 031.1.1.12.21 E.DLIEIRD MD. we .DRIM3,9013114ELARD AVENUE .1TH 631,9-9201 02C32,231.21. 20.13 COILTRACTD3 DV, 0311201 A CC. 091193.119.320311) CDNIVALLORD.0034,212 DEW4112.3. 451.40.21,0.4.0.11111211,..,034111.1.032 R. MDR TO PLACERIBIT 02 ME M. SASE, TEST RM., 62,22.4.20 TRE STREET OLDFAKITILD ASSA 31266.4.43£ COLIT.10)132.1. PROD, 4.112.13.90),,E.9.111,GROSIWPGLITOF TOOLS T. TEST R01-13.3.. BE ATTIE MEM. OF TILE 90, ORDATIR .39111,21:01.11.1.434.101.121311...21112,132.0.ECLICINCRDESUBD,D2904.3.1.1.63 0944)9,201/4.0.3. K. THE REOLL.1.3 02 Rif SO, INVITER. -903.07 I 9. .1/222/11912.102301.11141320 0122.2.11; 031,11.01,31,14. UMW LAMM. /390190.1. NOT MS.\ TEST DOLL REMCDT LAV312211912 9011741.342 SITE /23.90•42CATSURABLE 501AT ROALLOMLINAL COMO. OWILDR. COVMACTORSRALL SE 1.1046-131.2.11.1130.2201541211.39.118011.4.20 PEDESTRIVITRADICCOLDICIL DEVCES 31101 AS DDLMCA-96. WARS. 9.110“......)201121113. CONTROL. 14CVELADIT TIMM WHERE 91,11,1.13.1C OM. C.CES. 90.1,3912.110 029.9.2 4.15012.9.11.10911.324.1109 ST.4.1423S. 11. COTT. TRE,s MOOD. lirl.20110)49.17.1114,R000T 4240/01.4.014,32,0„ 11(2,CULD,REDTT 2,11422.211;11,112 9132.33.4 RE 0,31.41113.90,22,9416,S A/29 MUMS CA.. WALL EC 17.0320 ;120,VDETING ADAC. 101112,311091.23. rICINI=TRICR.C14342.4.9 REMO. TO T. 0911.1. 11031 ,s TILE .T. CONTRACI ,... .9ErLENT,1344217.4CILD ;ALL DSTAIX OREM,. REDLIT 9.213.49.4 0.2.111.111,11E RAO. 1.39110LILD RE REMOVED 0.42.1.113.1 AND CUT3 41.41162 22.22,12.2010 TOIRMALLE .11991.1.4, TOTILCITLE.113 TRUSS., REMOVED VMDCLUTALL11101.11931.1.1110033/1301,1,3 FORTIC.021 3.103.1.16ECOVAIERED NOM. TO TIE 6.229 ...ION ARO NO .6, WV. VALI REMADE 903.1 3-14. RESTRXTED ASE4.3.31-1/111AVISIDE ALL DEDDARTSOTREED ARRAS OUTSDE OF LIE OLEDDRATEDC019,13311,1 LOS; .11GETATICAI .229 .119.013.2.4.393V11129.1. 901.7 11.4. .1.11.191.4.2,1144.3.033 OFF WITII.GLITORVIDEPOLTOW1.214.22141.110.131112. STASISASS140. IRE TUE GROTECDON DC. AT ROI. 32.43112.30.013.141410201111.1.9.1.144112. 224,2113,13VT 02,1 G.SCITATENCING .11.1.1.2, WORE WOMODIAVELDISONDITE ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal - 9052, 11,3 RODT GRIDE. 022032 311.1.3.10 ROM., AD ROOTS., RE .2.1.E0 4.00121114£12,15.31A.S SL. CUTTING WITIL A MVO; FOR*0019.416.13T 114 WORM 01.14W. 17,1990, PICCECT. PITO DIE COSTRUCT10.1122.1182.0310 MOP. .01)211..1114.123.232,,AOSTAT. 305GL_ 11; AN C.1623R2,23,TALIVE WILL DE AVATARS ATALLT1V, DLI.DIDEGROMILITYARD 01611,11041 TERICID. 1, RAMER TNALL SEED 01300 WU SE MEDAL. SILE RASE Or MAIM MSS ID A TEMISTER DESTRV3,0111.0.3133 221.41112... .4.3. TO BE .DED FOR CROWN MITT. PCR203,917310111; CORSTROCTO)4109,1E TO RE DEIMIDLECI OWL.. 4.223,211TAT. CLCILL. CCM; WILL SE1,921.39.11.21£42.0,1, 9]6 38 89651 9.00 PEE • I •- i • 111 110O, 041422.2...1.5 NEAR TREE133.3111142.011LOSE WU. ON THE 0.433/1.11.1.132 02311.221,41112126..20 ORME MDT. M.0 TDOCRARTS. 12. MAME MPS. MOM 4.3 TO REFDRIVER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOOL. DI AC. 132.1.020 TIED, DINTRACTOR SHALL WV. MOM; OMS. MR Rea 0.1E STEE,..01120. ESCES311321.3114.1.16211.0 21,431,31222 O., OF A.; PADS. ROADIVAIDALLO MONO AlLEAS CONTRACTOR R.L.31.130.44 CLITAREAS,WDERE .21310 .31023,21111,112.4 931,11 02 6 MARE.932.19,43.4.1120.2.121310 6213,31-62133,0.4 13,141211 DODD. b 90300 979 TROLO4 2)1,04/0991TRUCTIOR;ALLOC.1311142 ORT., 009217.4CTORDIALL 00.111 T.0.1039.4,1C.4.123.1,21511,CDDRT DE EN.. CV.TVIITLIORT. 31.1120.4111.11., TP.26 SR. NOT ES REMOAD OR IV..29.3.1 MOLT 0,112134,..1.1. APPROVEDOTTILED.DEL 1112 WARM. 9,1421C014.12.4 14.911)1 OF 10 )2,11/03,112 LAC 03. WIC. D. TILE ElCAVADDLI 4199/41,3123301)94. ERMA. 1.1691.1., 021300T .4...01900.1411C4,141, COWNWARDAND 0131WAFD MOM TIE FRSCRIEDSURFAC,34.4DELIEVAT1.13121.01902.ROW OLCAVADOR STLAI,E11039.1ED T01312 2.03ED 32,21.3.3 ELEV., ADD S3.16.2 406(2,1130111,710........ 9.1234.11.93 02 TNE .4.117,014,42999 44221100.45 031.5.01.41/00,23.1,1110.105-323. SR. SE0.12.1019AX131.229 .4.142 P.., Or DRUM. BORROW IL.WILDIT II; SLOP, 134022D2 MOT 15580.55x901 TO 1 300TVERTICAL 14. .32421.14314,443.1.09.110, COVIILACILICSIAL1LINVORVIT WADE/VW WIT91.11.11913 Di .4..;31.2,13,133.1 .J.S. MVOS A .0,2931 394.0 AIRSAC.111121.0141E0TOAVID,VATX LWOW LEV. ORROGMETW. POSITS %TRILL ELEV.. .51.11, MUTH. SUO P.M .1035.G G.B. AREAS TX, NAVE REOL 1.3,13 6.49111349. BC PROTICITO 31.11SURSEODENT CORSTRUCI. 0231,D091,111.4211CARD13.1031 FE. ALL AMEASTILAT LIAVE BECOME 112111216.41,3110.3.;31,14.1...., MOE ALL 9.1.2, 06111,313 RITILECONTR,TORS 04,9.41109,2113.1. BE .1013 TO EL.104121112,214.4 09022411.0ITIC41,1213. RECILDIDALEVIS CC 11; P. W.- TC0.2.4333 915.70 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5,000 SF 111,01.391.4.1.691.63U1.13.C.4410 AMA, EILIVATION 32191 NOT., 51112341.310.10 MOT., OR 610 200,211. TDEPILESC4SED ELEVATION AT AMY POW WHERE LATA9 .413/1113 1.392. 33, TISCSTRIET OR 1D,R, ASIA SUSC.-.0.31199.9292ACCELEVALIC413144.11.3.3.1.1.2211.210113 FOOT.. C..10 TOOT 13E.V.TILEPRESO,FOELEVADOLIOSAVIT02.41117.0.9.32.314.1114.- PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,7005F -917 919.70 -I*, 9D1-7k-:773 Z . . 07/21/2019 CMA EL JGP IDIED. BY MLL PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF Chad M. Ap! m2007/12/2019 GRADING PLAN fr » 4 DELT ILIADDL 60 C4.02 SCALE IN FEET 3. ALL GRAD. SIDELVALSS AMR.. ADAROVIT901111AVE A .../VILOVILIDDLCALSLOPS OT4-...1310319,1.33., 1421,4, 4.4331.11234 0103S SI. 0213; W.D.1.140, MN 0.1. ON MO. DA., STALL DRA022-4,31,1421.0.2 49 LS; C... 13911.REAFW VTR, PIE 611.22 DI THE DOD 210.11EADARODTID PARDRTO .095 COS., 0,21123.4.11. CONTP.OR SHALL NOT,. 222,EERIVAD.TELVDTLIERE13.3.9411,6MVSEN LILE 6.3231T 134 THE MID VER51231142 DE.9 04....3200,9141-2. V202.2.11111.,024,1,01321. 4 C.19.01.11.1..PRECALIDONS DECESSARTTO AV. GRO.1113.413,0 P11,231111.1171, 0.72,11214 4.36 021113 PROEM 02.1.0.4.2 KID ,DLY 11.0263, SOR 71.0.131.1. MOROI. 001232341,11,1111.2 .211.1104 0911.43,C). 3.11. DYSTRARC41.11.114,....1,26 COMSTRIJCLION AMIDES TLI DESCRILATED.. RA, WITIVIL DLL 034)91.13011.1 RIDTPXTEDTO .42.0441.10.3111)32 FELDTOSAVEADODIG1,111214,21ECTED 31 THE C., 11; ..1152102333311;01213.02.102.3.1,1041901...SWODIONCLUDS.RUTAVT BE IILLTEDTO 301 4203 OTHER MATER. srocc...1714E.0...111,10,.. OF..4.0111- CR MICA TOM I.., COURCI. OF 0114TROCUTS.3.303,3) W2113,029,9,11323...11161111139.2231 1, E201103/..1.4 WMIAVSERCAVAD091.0.142,133112.0.1,3.22.332.2041,90,21G.N. 612.22 WK.. ROOT 411192,112E 921.4216 ARDS.. 4.7.1011.411.3.4104 OEMS O., 1.1" 22.01.10224 VAIRS SD. NOD. TIRE FOLLOW. 4.90 02 COMPLETED UNDER THE DRECT 31322.3)941 OR DIE 42.3.3.21VE 11, TREE REMO. 033119.3,0193,1921.11112.15. REIROVIDSEPATATELT. 92.0110 THE RUM Of ALL TREE0,M/. 09 19ALIC30I10 01.Of11AE S O12 11139903...ET7S03 10112111,15 RI DIE RESTICCTED AREASSI...821921.0 IN LK MODS 13.c 4.2,39,131.112RICETETD301.31.1.162.43321,0,1.4 030 2017,;942 0,21.12;1112 MOM CLEVATION. 01,3 MEL. OPERVOSEST 5492ELA TOD5011.1.1BEC).3011311.1.13 vSla RICIL CV TILE9220.1223113,0.21. 912124.341 0OW1E1ED,12.21.313DORTACE OR 3DILVA1ER919331; 03.1.o1R.41111.120,12.13.23350111,121, TO AR A.30.19,111; CONTRACTOR. OR SMFORT SWAM VATERALTOTILESITE SMALL DETE,ENITLE LOCATION OF .1111.1.ROADS MAT VAT RE REC.32310 021.1.341211; SLIT GR.. OOLLMLICDO,90 ROADS OM FRODO4 ARD 3£13.21;091120,912 0..TORSNALL COLDLY VITIVIDE IDCT.M.NTS 03 TILE ELDII ROURVAIL 0.144CTORSILALL 20ST WSLAIIVER.2.1.9 CDV,TWITII.0031041102)..0.41 C.20 Fr COVER.D.140.4 Or DROIRDALTLVAY. - LEGEND PROPOSED - GRADING NOTES 294390320 0111TOLF, ARE TOF34.0 R., ELEVATOR. SPOT flEVAISOLDAL01.22320133,122.3.01,91,314.1.C. 2. CONTRACTD4 REVEW PAVEVOIT 62.417,21 .DIDISCT.TIEROLLDIRDLID WRIER D2.1931AWAY FROM . 00123,3924.3 SMALL GE COLIMLICITO AS .TLER 24) ORD NORTH 30 DOMING PROPOSED CURB GUTTER STORM SEWER l ..—G DRAWN LE — — Go — CO/DOUR RP MP OVIRELOW ELEV. 6023 ND FENCE SILT INNE WAITS OE CASTURRANCE NOME II SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW NORTH 0 30 60 =SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN 1 FEB I MAR APR MAY JUN I JUL AUG 1 SEP OCT NOV I DEC JAN I FEB I MAR APR MAY 1 JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES II 1 1111 I11111 I I I STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 11 1111 11111111 ROUGH GRADE/SEDIMENT CONTROL I 1 I I I I I II 1 I TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS 1 1 I 1 I I I I FOUNDATION/ BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 1111 1 I 1 II I SITE corisnucnou I I 1.111 III I I I PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES I I 1 1 1 1 I 11 11 I FINISH GRADING I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1J 1 LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABIUMT1014 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 STORM FAOLMES I I 1 1 L I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 [ I 111( I I I 1 I 1 I I NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE —NOTE TO CONTRACTOR THE EROSION CONTROL PIAN SHEETS ALONG WE REST OF TIE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT UNSER UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH TIM /ARCA TILE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP. INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIRED BLIPS DENG NED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIN TO AFTER DUNG THE NONCE OF TERIAINATION,THE SNAPP, INCLUDING DIE EROS.. CONTROL PLAN SELECTS, AND All REVLSIONS TO rr MUST BE SUMMED TO INC OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON RD IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE RECORD RETENTION REQUREMENTS DESCRIBED NITRE SWEEP NARRATIVE. —EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 1,105 SILT DIRE UNEAR FEET 1,305 RIO-ROLL UNEAR FEET X CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE DP-1) UNIT 0 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 111-21 UNIT 8 • REFER TO SHEET 05,03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS \Sheets \ 2174 —LEGEND TEMPORARY DIVERSION INTOI CHECK DAM OUTS OF DRAINAGE SU 0-RASIN 1310-ROLL DAD PROTECTION DEVICE 1 PRET PROTECDON DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCNON ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASH TEMPORARY STORAGE AND ?MCI. AREA TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES DEED, MULCH, MAR OR BLANKER AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) SD— OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1/6.1 66. lArmtnixt ADA1.011 RDIDA.A. Opus Design Buitl, L.L.C. osss.ssorr.: 100011 ''S'ambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whitowater EON, Suite 300 lmetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone EnginERRAg I Stmeing1Panning I TrAtormeMal OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP PROACTID/Nos 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN PROISLINADER 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 06/21/2019 FR6.67 WPC. CMA IPANI JGP C.60.8Y MLL MtALRAr. I berth/ [BRIE Mat this OA spedfication repos was DN.. ID me or ...n/JDAN.Nml supeniVon and Dull arn cluN Ra. professvral ENGINEER ...Ns the la-AN 6.6. nate of W.v....atv • Chad M. Ay • uv .%.F1 001 07/12/2019 Mss wan revert al Sxtatetk EROSION CONTROL PHASE 1 6-5.01 LL LL vnl E IN FEET PROPOSED BUILDING [ ADDITION 560 SF IP LL LL LL .4-5¢•11) wy 0 II-, WPM =LEGEND =SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN I FEB I MAR APR I MAY I JUN I JUL AUG I SEP OCT I NOV I DEC I JAN FEB I MAR I APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I STRIP & ST(XXPILE TOPSOIL 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I ROUGH GRADE/ SEDIMENT CONTROL I 1 1 1 I 1 1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS i I I 1 I FOUNDATION/ BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 1 I I I I 1 SITE CONSTRUCTION I 1 I I I 1 1 PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES ( ..I 1 FINISH GRADING I I I I1 ( 1 1 LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION I I I I I 1 .1 I STORM FACILITIES I I i 1 1 I I 1 1111 I I I I 1 1 I I — 9 —0 CURD & utr ER STORM SEWER DRAIMME CONTOUR PP RAP OVERFLOW E.. SILT FENCE NUDGE ohms OF DISTURBANCE NMI= SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW OPUS THE OPUS GROUP 9025 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Wratria.IPOSIMM1 R36.141 --H Opus Design Build, L.L.C. PAM IMMA.M114.0010 NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE CONTROL PHASE 2] r=r 0 1 =NOTE TO CONTRACTOR INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 4 '-8ambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whamater Dthe, Suite 300 7M631771'.60FOMINdephooe55343 THE EROSION CONTROL MAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWEEP MUST BE FEET °MOE wen THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS HUD WITHTHE !AKA THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWEEP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PUN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADOMONd. OR MODIFIED BOPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS !MINED. AFTER FILL. THE NOTICE OF TERAWINATION, THE SWEPP, ViCLUONG IRE FROVON CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, ARO ALL REVISIONS TO TRUST BE SUE/AMID TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WIDITHE RECORD auemnon REOUIREALENTSDESOTHIED INTHESWPPP NARRATIVE. F4411444,9 Sunerb-g I Fannhg I EnVmmerrtal TEMPORARY STABILIIARON MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPPE) EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PROJECTS \ 21740 \ CAD \ Ci.il \ Sheets \ 21 PROJECT MOMSS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN PROECT IMEPR 31644000 ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE UNEAR FEET 1,105 SRT DIRE UNEAR FEET 1,305 RIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET X CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE ORD) UNIT 3 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE HP-2; UNIT 16 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (11,3) UNIT 3 • REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal \=\ -lager -iiirrsDidbliko iriir -Sibarsorallic- 9..00 Fy- 10 BD430 FFE 91,70 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,7005E — — le tel -- —161111/1t LI WATTR SERPCE PER ASSUILT DATE 06/21/2019 MAR IPAr0ER CMA DMA, rit JOP IPECA600 MLL AreGSTPATOD BM 44,2 I hereby certify that. PTA sp.:Marlon or report pros prepared try me or under my erect superTiPon and Pot I am a duty icersed prep.:km.0400ER peathe tows of Ore Pate of M.o.. PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF Chad M. Aye t.1 7.. ,,,,,,,,,,, 07/12/2019 p +. • • a 000.Po IOTo let reKrt Pro,. upon roomer:TSw.06,, RP-oeterto, IAN orTee_ 11 1 - s *ill L_ , o- -sommn- mfflti- Nom ,seaso t*-AiligAtgVisp...ip- usiiir 17 —ali. -5D- - - — 4 4 —(9-- 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 jr. EROSION CONTROL PHASE 2 14= }V.= — ST\ 91.110.R r 60 C5.02 SCALE IN FEET 00 d Ja PROPOSED DISTING TEMPORARY DAMRSION DITCH CHM( DAM LAMS OF DRAINAGE SUBPLASIN 100-ROU. INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1 NORTH 0 30 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS / ''SITE MAP" ,7 41 7rir FOI. OMANI BF FATEMOSECURFLE T 70 O WOE. YM WET TOFFEES IFORT 30' CEM. PIM I) SENATE FAST. OVERLOPPIO MOS OF SIIMENCIE IMTERAL FAST TO ALMOAT MOM WITI • TOFF WMF 1115 MOM. EMR5 -SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION (IP-1) NOTTOSCALL =CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NOT TOSCALE ITER CONCRETE WA901. AREA SOLI BE ROTAUEOFOOR WWI MOIL. PIACIIIMIT PISTE 2. COMER WALNUT AMA TOLL M IIID WTIx IAA.. 10 ALE TROMIASTIG W. 3. MOTE TOMO. CONTROL IS MOUNTIE ACCESSTO 03NOTTF WM.. AR. IS OFF PAPEIMM. 906 SILUR DE POMO AT OR CORSTRUCOM EIMPACE. AT THE WASHOIII RAM MEMSEVOIERE M REMSOM TO CLEARLY PIMMIETHE I11MTI011 OFT116 • COMMIE WATIOUT MATO OPRTO. OF EONMTEMOIXMo IMAMS S. TO COMM WIMOUT AIM WAIL BE MIMI. ANDEMARGED OR OEM. OUT AS 10.164.7 TO MILMAPI GAM. FOR WASIEDOTICAME. 6. AT TO MO OF COMM.101014 ALL COMPO T VAIL RE ROMPED IDM ME ME MITIOPMED OF MAN ROMTEll WAIT STE 2 WWI OLE COMM. WATIOLIT AMA IMPAMMO. TIT TOURS. MM.. RE MEMO AM OW.. OR OMFAMSF STMT O20 A LIANT. ACCFIIFD IT TO 9611 TO MOICATETIM LOCATION OF THE COMAE. WMTOUT AMA BERM AROUND PFATIFTER RIM MP 1.11111.11 1 4,441.13444 RFOUPPOIO GOMA. WASTE COMM. 014/ALIII1 FAIMMIA ENT ROYER). (..) 011001,10.0a 31011MM. PDF ROES -ROCK EXIT DRIVE 1.0,(12 SCALE COMITTGOON MIA USGS MAP POMO.. ERILECTOR PINT OVOROW 1-COMA OF FRT. ATM. OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX III FILTER ASSFOALT CU 111611-110W EOM NAPM 11101 ROAD DRAM CAMP. M.O.. • REM. 3067 • MFR. A3312 =ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION (IP-2) MOTTO MLLE 5.11.1.111010 NA11.011.MOVED EILIMMOR CONOWEPRIELIEXT WI/MOM E16.6.31 AVM. MR MTN. APPLEATIONS. MAW. SNAIL RE FL.F17 EMMET. MPS MEW/ MO AW STRIPAIDM 60. FOCA APR011 OR TREVOR OF CPO SHIM RE FOLD. Ut11.1 DN SMIMI EC MD 6.0 GOWN I OVERUI ROMOACIMI.1 ITCOIMIENTATOM 1.21,211xat ROOM POIRMFO PIT OM MIT RUM OXIMUOUS PAILIMPT. [MOM GOMM. OR AMU. PARROTT -SILT DIKE ON EXISTING PAVEMENT 1.0,0 SCALE 04 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1..1. 1 122 122•1220/1221021,2 222.242 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. P.2.1 1.241212129222110 222.11.44 r4ambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 WAterratec DM, Sutte 300 Menet:des UN 55343 763.476.6010 teleph004 ETOMPRIP I &M90 Ffi351161 EIMEORAPARP OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP i20.£22.22.2 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 212262/22.264 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 06/21/2019 224213212.4222 CMA DRUMM JGP OEFOTOPY MLL EMSTRATIN Pansp.allat. o rep. .as prep. try me or under my died pervhSan and.. I am a Atly kerued praional FROMM IMO the taws 01.state or Minnesota. -GENERAL EROSION NOTES* 1 COM11.611011 SNAIL COMMWMIALLAPTICAME COM AM. COMIALICILT 10 MOLE WHERE 60101161 EMT MEM. LOCAL ILINSOCTORAL ROM. SIFOMA1101. MEMAYMIES STARLIAMMIFOREATORS. TM LIORISIIMPENT SIFORGAPON TOMATM. • THEWOROWATER KUM. PROMMT011 TAR WPM) IS COOP.. OF OM ORAIN. IFF439011 516.0(.111311 CONTROL ..11-136 MOO. TT STANDARD OFTAI. INF RAP MARA... IMAITIONCES, METE HMO MO ALL SURTO/FM REPORTS APORTATED OLIGUIMATS 3. 00/111.17. WAIL SE RELOSIMIE HO COOTITING a SOVIIIIINO 111E AIMEATX. FORTHE AGICAG.FRALSTORIAVATER MOT FOR COMMUCTINIACIATV. /110.1711ACTOPS AMO SURGOTIPAMORSIMOVILI MTIM STORM WATER POL11001IFITIMITIOR MALL 0.7.1A WM OF TIT MEM MO TO SIAM OF IAMESOIA HATORAL POLLUTANT 060...IMMATIOX MST IA MIMI ..7 (MOB FFRITE ISSMORUOIST I. 2018) WORT MOTOR WIT TT COMP. TT SWEEP ARO AM MT FA ROAM LOCIATENT6 MUST REMIT REMIT. W ANG cotennucnov. CONTFACTIMMIL NIKEVENT UST POWAGEIVENT (VAMPS MOUND BY T. AMP MUMS COMPACTOR MAL MIME TM INSPECTION MAIHRIalia MINE PAR RAO DIS'. IREVOITION .01A 11.1.6 OF CONORUITION MO UNTO CONSTROCOOP E COORIME. ISMAIROVEDRY ALL AMMO. MO TNE110.2 OF TOUAMINPI PIOT NFA REIN RIFT LUNE ROCA MOTOR TIF OTTER OR OFFRATOR AS APPROVED OR PEROTADOMONAI MAPS OPALM PIRLEOMMO AS OCIATED sycomornoxsArwmoomoroucomo OWNER THROLICOOVE AIL P.M OF OMMAKEIOH. 5. COMPACTOR TOLL EMMY WIN IP.AEYJEG RFOTREODITS PI PAW 21.1113 MITE GOMM IMMO. fi BOIS MO CONTROLS GM MINNA TOME.. STA, OR LOVE ALOAROMPTS OR WPM. Of MACE.. /3 AFILYABLE MIITIOCTOR SM. MATINEMADOMMIAL COMO. AS 011.11 II BY IMMO. MOM OR OWX. 7. MGR. RUST CLEM. DOWN. PM TAM WATERS FUMES FOR MY 60.111.1/011.111OR UMW.. STATE WATERS ORREGITAMEMEMIAMIS OUST RE AIMIUMFD ONSET AT OM TM. ▪ CONTROMOR SPAM IMITROF CLEARING TOTE RIATIAMI MOO MAMA. 0/1/5 MOIRA. BEEK MAMA: PEROT. THE 1501.00.1.1 OF TT MFR.. TOM SW/IMI MIME MC TAM TOM AF MOM" TFUNFAMO (LG. WRIMAGS. WM. 675113, RT.NMLFG)OMTIE DEVELIAMENT STE REHM WDM MOM PRO.. OSTU.IMALREMS OUT NOT MOIR ONTOF MIMI. OF ROTIOLLACE • 6 TOOT MINTRAMOR LOLL OFAOTEOV FLAIMMTDAPPORE PARING RAO TOMPF AREA WHIT SPAT ALSO BF MO AS T. FOUPRFOFTMNMFFMMCFMO CLEW. ARFA DIPTITH MAD. AREA MP /ARMOR lOCATINOFORTAIIMFAMITES. Of FEE MASA ANET0LF7 MERTES SO ALL WREN WATER TOMMIE TWO. VOIMF GIIMING. OMAIM.FTG) OUST IT U1.11,70 A COMO AREA OF TO 51. IF LOPTIOMOANT MATO OA DOPOSFEL 110 ERATO .01.311/ AMTVIO ON WE IL All 1.11111.10 SOL. WAS IFS GEMPATED CONCROE WATOOPTOPOOTOM RIM ONTAINOMP A LFAMPROOF COMMOIEMFACRIIT OR MOVOTOBLE MET A CORPOCIFE) OAT UPFR 5 ROT ACCEPTS. TT TWO APO EOM WASTES RPM NOT COMM TM MOM. ARO TITRE OUST POT SF RUPOFF MOOT. 031101/. WASHOUT OPER... OR MEM MITI ARO ROM WASIM OUST RE DOUSED OF PROKTIAM COOTJANGE WITH MOM REGIRATIONS PMUST BF PM.. ADAM. MUCH WASHOUT MONT TO %FORT COMM. FIRAFRIE. MARTO. TO UMW THE PROF. MOM. OLF-COMAPIELI COMM. WASTOPTS OM CONOTTEDFOVERVERMMARF ROMEO . SITOOTO 121. MP GMAT ARSOAANG VATFALUSAMEI FLOM.. 6001. SWIM BF MNNTAMF0OV ME OR REAMIAVARAELETO COMM MT MEOW FUEL OR 011.6. EMUS.. IIARS 33. OUST ORME STY MAIL BE COVIROUILL OFF OF RIMOR 0113/210 TITIR IFTRCLOTA MOD OR TOM TOMOS FOR TURIMARRESSIC. OFERMIONS IS PROTWITT 24. MOP WASTE COMMIX OTTO, MAO. 6 COYOTE IMUMOS. FLORIO. MOM IAPMPIASM., FAMG COMMA.. DEMOUTOM ITEM 1/011). WASTE OMIT M.S. OF PROPERLY& OUST COMM WTM MTA OtSFOSAL 15. MAIM001)5 IMTAMS. OR. CASON. PORT MLA/MOLT SUISTMLFS OUST BE PROPOM OTTO. AMMO. STOMA. COMMHOMPT, 70 PROEM MLA TEAM MI OO. 0.71./API. ACCOST° STUMM AREAS OUST IF PROAD.70 IMMO MOATS. STORAGE L WPM. OF XAVADOUS WARE OUST IT PI COOMOACE WITH MPG REGUOTOM 16. All STORM WATER POOT11011 PROMATEW MEASURES FRESENT. OR TM PIM. MO POW ORM SPAT INMATIO AS SOON OS PRKIIMBIE ARO PROMO SOIL 061111.016 MIMES MIME 17. DITIOSEDROPT0113 OF T. OM MERE CONSTR.11.1ACIAATENASSTOPIF 61.11 6F TOIPORAMESEETED. 14 MS OF PIACTROG SEELVT6 OTT BE IR ACCORIAMM OSIDOT SEED IRMA/ POORER 21.111 M21112 OFSFROOP ON MESE.. OF TOM% (SEE OMEN SIEMICATOP SECTION 2176 OSEFOMG IMINOTATORMUGATIOR RATE.. COMORO). OMPOESITOOMTOR WPM 2.6763.11.70MM M ARMED PI ACORD.. WE. 1). RAM 511610.11011 SCION /PS-WA. 25-75-1G. ALITOIMMAR XYDRAUTC STIR SUMO. IR APPORPAPM WITIOMOOTSPECTICATOP SECTOR 2173371 ORME US. IR EOM MTWPORMYMLMOL 1E. OSTORAFT PORTIONS. INF STE M. COMMLICTOMALIROM PAS Ft RAWMOLV STMFFEI OWL BF IFIUMAUTIR PRAM= THEY ARFAS51.1113F517.1DIEVIAMOROMICE WTI EMMET TMT DESOIDED MTh ITE . GRATING PLAV MOMMIATOSCAPF PIM FOR MOAT. FOWL 15 COMMACTORS OR SURGOIORAMOR5 WASE ROAM. ,AF FOR UMW. SEIRMOMFROOGOMETANCES IMO TEROOM., SIFITATOR SAMOTOT RAF TOMB. AS EEO/MEM WATR OPALITIMANAPEO.1 RASOSSELOCINT OAST IF STAMM° 70 IMMO IT FROM BEM MORI 114.1.0 TM PAS h. COWMAN., OR PLIATIAGEWATS 1260.1.611. WITTE OR rowMMWATOM TIMOUT OF FEARIANFAT MOM MUST IF SUF,10017 10 RULER TT BITOTO OMMI LAMM. XL OPMEEl OFISPI SOO. 5700111E...613110. AREAS 311A11 11) FROMM° FROM FROWN A•10 SMATTIMITI MUM. PAPLEOFITA1101/ OF BOPS. STOMPILF MD BORROW AMA IDEATIONS 61.11 OF NOTE/ ON TT SPE MAP/A0 PERMIT. DI ACCTROM. WITHE.FML FEROTTFOUTOMPTS 21. MOPOPARMOT STOLL.. VIM NAVES. FENCE OR OMER GEFFEITIF SLOW. 0.11,1101.3. GUAM. IMMO STOKE WATERS, PiElL1ONGSTOROWATER 0111MM/ACF5 500145 GM& PUTIMISTFAT 0110l. RE AMES LOLL MUM IN • ROM liFITO 0.6.0110MAGTIF MATTO FM. TO MOP. RUNOFF VOOCITIES Mn TROMP/ 13. DUE TOT. PRAM CIIMPFS DURING TIF DEVFLOOLFRT OF THE PROT.. CONTRACTOMMIL BF FISPOMME FOR MUST. THE EROSION PLOPTIOL WARW. .2 TREES Off. WAS. ▪ oaannox MOMS. MGM MEW. E.... All OOKSTRUCTION POLL REVAMP. AT TIE F. OF FA. WORCRIO 6.211.1).61115 L.P.. wine.. Foil °nun cownturno.oto PLACFMAT OF GRAVEL OA WM.. MANG .110.1.1) C011511.1,0i1- MAINTENANCE NOTES' IIIMPLASM. SUMO ON TIM fROSIMINIO SFIMONT COMBO KAY, MO PI TT MOOR WATER POILUM. PREVENT. MAP LOLL RE OAPITORFO IT FIALMINKTOPAL COMO. PRIMP ICNGeA MITRED FOR A COOPLITIO TIME OF WORM MAL STARIMATOP MTM SITE TM DESIMMT. COMM PERSON MOTO ON MOM OUST ROME. AMT.TM GOPPIAUGOOP 011SOF OM EVEN SEVIN DAMMAM ACME GONSTRUCTOR ARO WM. 1010111. AMA A PAPP.. EMT WM. TIM OS TM6 2,1HOLTS. AM EROSMI RAO SFOTIFITATOPI COMROCLIETUR6 PULL IT CLEM. MO RUM. IR ACONDAME MORN. 1. AILS. MIMS OLIO SE REPAIRED. ROMMEL OR SUMEINT. VOMI INV WOVE NOMUNCTONAL OR TO MOVE. REACITS1/2 OF TIE 11F/611. OF TO FFAGETHFSE MOMS MUSTIE OA. MINA 21 NORM Of OPCOVIAT. OR ASSOON /MUM 03.010. ALLOW AMOS TERIKTATIAMPOLOANDIT SFOLOOTATON MOM OUST IL MOM) MT SEIRMENT MOM. MOM. DEM OF HNE. COLLECTEIMITIF ATM MAU. 1/2 TT STORAGE • TROPAGE APO RI MOM RECOOPLETO WT. 71 ROOM OF LITONFRE EON SOLIR MEMO CONOMORS AILOW AMMO. PART01-10, OF TIT 6 EMR/1 IMMO. 3. ATOM WEAR 1.11.0116 CPOIMPF WOES MD LOW.SISTERS OUST BE POMO. FOR LODEN. OFSECORENT REING MOST. SY MOTOR. COMMAMOR MIST MOORE. OEITAS APO SWAMI, MOST. MOIL. WPM, .6111.46 ORMINGE WAYS. MT. AMOS. MO OTTER MARIAM 51170.42 AA RESTRAIMMEMMAS MERE S.M. Al MOM IN WORD SOd ME PFAIOVIcl MD ST AB93.1.1.11/ MT MI. I SEM ()) 0. Oki INSCOVERY MUSS PRICILIDLO MEGA, REGATORT011 .101..765 11.611.1.3. COPTIOCTIO MAIL USE ALL MASOTTI. EFFORT 70 DUNN MOMS 6 IFIFMUITIL MAMA ANESTAMPATPLI MTV TRIO PUTS WIMP SEVER EALFADOI ORM Of OITNIMIG ACCESS COPTIALTOR RITIONSTIE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, MGM. SIAM AND FETA. AUTHOR.. MD RIGLIVINO AM MMUS. RELIT. PRIOR TO COPLOGIE. AMMAR COHSTRULTIMOTELEPPLE110110.110N3 WM RE IMIECIED FOR FEMME Of OFFARE SFEIMEXT 11.03M 0.0 PAVFOSUIP/MS.11.....O.F. OM ME AMOY. .031 ALL 0.-6111 PAVED STREAM WIT. 1/ TOMS OMMONERE OR P ATERGAME, W.. A SIMPER T OEM OPOLE ECM PAM 9.116.12 OF ERE MIMEO PEW. S. COMMCIOR 1.6.1160. FOR 11. OPERATOR MORIMITENOMM TERVORAMOM FERVARMIT WATER PURIM OAMPEOFM RAM AS WET ASOM EROSION FRIVENTOP RAD SFOOLENT CONTR.. PAM IOR DOLMA MAPF CMISTRUCTON MOM MOT TM TIE IRRAITF-FOOMERLOONSITI PIERMOTEF IIRSASSUMO GOMM EROTPTA. TO MAIM TOM OF TM NKA OMER. MOM CAM AIL ARMS OF THE SITE TOT TAW PM REM )17.11 TIMM. ORTM SPE NM 1.1110EAGO. FOOL OIAML4110. /AT A .0E1 HAS M SUPOITED TOME OKA EL IF SITIMMESGMLS TIE 60.1.1.11. SILL OF F-Sn ACLVIIMATION Of ODOM. M.R. BF REMOVED T A MOPPA AROMA FRONFAMMUF11001720 ROW. 0.51111RIPACTS MG. RIO.. ...Pt PI MEM OMIT. WASPOI WO MOM SEWERS MME NOT RAT ANOMMOSE A SAFEFOOMAIRIO USERS Of FIMUCIERFERS). / ALL 111.7M710,1 AREAS OUST OE OSIMIED 70 EPOIRE TOT AO SMOOT MOO OPPOTP OTISTALIMION ACTOIM6 PIACILM INF IRTITRAIIMI ARAAMMO. MIAS MP FATHOM TIM 03/0.11011 TOCORTRUCTION MAMAIDIT MM. ACROSS TO PORTIO11011 AREA =SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTI N PHASE I. 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA 3. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ON DUSTING STORM STRUCTURES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 5. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS, AS REQUIRED. G. HALT ALL ACTIVME5 AND CONTACTIHE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF .MPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 7. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. FL BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 9. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUC11.IRES. PHASE II: 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6. PAVE wit. 7. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 8. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. 9. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT =AREA SUMMARY IN ACRES PAVEMENTAREA ILO ACi BUILDING AREA 12.19 Mt SEEDED AREA 12.25 ACi TOTAL DISTURBED 15.99 AC* PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 17.72 ACI POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 110.09 ACL 0.110.11/010•M OPUS PROM.. 10360 AR. RO W TFL 1.171.1371.0 3I1 01 53343 432-656.0 PM MEMS M / GENOA cornx-rolt SII282211.2[221, GEWSTRUCI 1.11110). MUDAILIC SOF ST. OF 211 12E26. FRAME DROP OUT MN MATE =SITE LOCATION MAP POT TO SCALE AllA01112 WOVEN WM RPM 70 MOROSE 131111 IIIREF.011113 MONTI FASTMEAMILF ROTE I' RC SIAM WOW NEM FFIM PIT MATFICAL COVER ROM 201 WOMMI TAO RIM WOVEN EARL 141/2 W.6' KM OFSFI OPOMOMIA. ulAccootoma ASTM DM61 LATER ilIMPPG mml I- ATOM IllE WOE. IMF FFM. TO A(11 ROST MOTIF MOTGOILE TOTHI WO/01 MO FORCE (SO.. LOOT 301 WITI TOM MAE TES ORITITA FAS1711.3. AT SVACIT WTEKII.F TOR r OF INF F/MUL KRIM FROMM MOON." M OfORTSIMOIN. ME FMK. WM FAM PLOCTURF MMO' VOITICALIERMAT. I WN. MVO TOMO OF PIM.. LIATFRIAL MEM.. OTTE IIIIMPALL RE OPFAMMED ACROSS TVO POST. 3. IMMOIAME MUMS KNOW. AS NOSED PI TIMOVIPP....6 OF ACOMPEATIMICIOEMS MINOT MEW ORIMLITIE MOT OF TT MOM IMPOOPOCE CLEMOUT OUST BE GOLOMMED 1.00.11.70 MAW ROMMAATFO SOMER. FROM REAOLVE ORIMALFME TOW OF THEP. FM. ORIEMAIABOVR GRAM 0. ALL 611.), FINCEINIFTS TOIL IMO. VOIT SOFPORE 2. 70 3) PRATT NOM) ROM IMISMIAT MULL. PRIOR TOOT STAM OF ANISIM A/10.0(13013 SHALL. POPICIE FOTO.. MOI IMPFAIL LIMITE/I.EF OF OMEO. 51011.1111. A TOP MLS NG OF XEIN GO OA REICOVAL APO 2.22,C22, ENT Oi THE GRAVEL AS 1..20122202. 02,1 FREE ROO LOILEGTO NUT MUM MEW PRIOR. 001...) NOM) TIIMILAILL/14.0.110)17...MOMMTPP O.11.011). M121222 6122:21.12,F2201•210W 0\90,22r 2.22R2.1.201.21225 AM 2 =RM. .2.21112,1,24122/1112.212242L MATC2122122021.24 22122 WARD ALUM 122 DIM .2% 0{.11.12.22.21212112=11 OtOar 1=2 11)R=. OITA OTIS. VA 22,2212.2.21212r22 1 PUT WENT. colas 2252 SI K22020 r0.1 MI MEW 20,2122.2001 MTN 22 22/01. usag. 222022,41222 421.11, wrax .22.1712 0212,12 1211.2904.221-2.12A2 1•22,1294 RS232 MUM& Of sea vera MOJILMT131 OR ALL26.1a10 A WOW MY NET 0. 062,222,2 4/21.222112:22Or.(61.17276.2:,17:6213A Mar 822.211.2/22222221.2221 06,20,222 NMI COLIPUT. C2,112 ACM21 1. %nangartaari. 062222 MUM. MO WM/ . 02:2372122,1 2221 22 21,22,232r9.0M.E12.12.2101222X2262.22. ISOMETRIC RAW =12.211 tr. Ver., 201222.02122,212r,2 022422,[2.,.. 9.11:222420.1XIMWANI.2.222222202.1-02 •= INLET PROTECTION FILTER SACK (IP-3) = N.TS. FORUM ONE PI MED ARMS MORE YOM. IMOSARF TOILTEEITIMF VFM LOW.FILTERSACMIUST RAVE OVERFLOW TOM TO PREVENT ITIRTNO. COMO WEE... AMI OF 3. UM GADO. MINOS. FENCE OAT.. MAUL OF CV INTO MOUND WORST. TR OCOAPIAMORIMM- UR MEI 62.12,11.11T 212,16/211/22.222,2202 2101221221122 114.2.2112.2020220 hillref ropy/12Am.. aa72.122i 1.00252.01242, USE 2202411:2A r12222.2 20 INT119011.2 AVA. -e_ Chad M. Aye caw 07/12/2019 e'r7,2a ay.* deeea A saa'ATMO. . us kr a ore signeclapal lannetordad.Moli4m 9.22-1712E EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS C5.03 Opo A & E - L,\PROJECTS\21740\CAD \avil\Sheett \21740-05-EROS.dwg [EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS] J 12o NORTH 0 6o OPUS' THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. I.LPEFAREot Irmtrly 55.412 GE2.4141 Opus Design Build, LLC. InstEra Foommt PAW. A.55.141. GSM.. Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12000 Whitenter Dire, Suite 300 lAmelonka, 601 55343 763.47E6010 tHepbone Engheerhg ISurveybp1Pannhp tErnirormental POOR. OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP PARKE NORM 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN PAMECTNA.e 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal LITIE 06/21/2019 MORO LYNG, CMA DRAW. .1GP OLEO, IN MLL R£4317.11. I here-Nowt/1y Hot. L,LLA SEEPREallom or report was Re-pared rne or muter Ary daNct FENNY.. awl Out I am a duty kens.] professtorHIENGINEER .00 15. tows of the L.. of Mitnesota. Chad M. Ay t.1 0.00 07/12/2019 a we HREAP copy E.t.a wooem Et RETAILERS, oelo• OVERALL UTILITY PLAN HIMETERN.R C6.01 — L: \ PROJECTS \ 21740 \ CAD \ \ Sheets \ 21740-06—WILdwg [OVERALL UTILITY PLAN] July 12, 2019 — 12:09prn mignon „V \ =111.51'.75Z,, L L J E.:2 54571— I ra:i. 174.—L/457-- LEGEND PROPOSED EMIL. CURB EL GLITTER Roam SEWER 0—)) —E3 SMEARY SEWER 0—• 0 FORCEMSON ISANt kIIRI —0 WATERMAN EtI— —FIEI EASEMENT DRAW. — ILL — III — GAP UNE ELECTRIC UE TELEPHONE 'SEE MOE FOR HEMLINE,. NOTES SCALE IN FEET 1. THE UNLITT IMPROVEMENTS FOR 11115 PROIEC1SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD LITILMESSPECINCATIONS. AS PUBUSHED BY THE CDT ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CUM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL 08011110 COPY Of THESE SPECIFICATIONS. LI. ALL unums SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WON OTT REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED EXISTING CURB B GUTTER STORM SEWER A BB SEWER 0- FORCEMAIN ISM.) 10- pu -(S) WATERMAIN 19.- I --41- Easpwurr DRANTILE - - GASOIE 0_ ELECTRIC 10 TELEFHONE VI - -- --- - --- I 1 , - CONNECT TO EXISTING IAN 1E494.30 CBMH 2004 RE-990307 1E493.37 2211-24° CBMH 200 HOPE @ 100% I CONSTRUCT OVER MEMO 36. RCP RE402.27 _ 28 - 30" 1E493.45 1E9693.15 N,E HOPE @ 1.0035 C . 0/1 ,,,,, STR7UCI;VE: , 1 'I 99 8 0 9169 57 LT. 27" HDPE @100£ 2611-24. HOPE @ 2.001 • -321.F -12" r tv% F HDPE @ 2. • SUBSURFACE F420 CFVPATTORAGE CBMH 201 RE9903.14 1E493.73 11. CONTRACTOR AND MAME. SUPPUER SHALL DETERMINE DIE MINIMUM DMMETER REQUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. 12. THE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE UTIU12 MAHAN° THE OFTML SHEETS 6 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0102 AND DEPICTS THE MINIMUM STORAGE REQUIREMENTS AND THE SISTBM ELEVATIONS. THE corfnucToR (WITH THEIR SUPPUER OR DESIGNER) SHALL SUBPAR DESIGN DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER FOR RENEW AILD APPROVAL PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. THE DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL DENGUE. FINAL LAYOUT AND DETAILS TOT OWSTRUCTION.INE DRAWINGS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A UCENSED ENGINEER FORTHE STAN IN WHKH THE PROJECT 6 CONSTRUCTED. THE SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE All NECESSARY PRODUCT INFORMATION, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND BE00016 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. FOLLOWING ODNSTRUCTION, THE CERTIFYING ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER INDICATING THEY OBSERVED THE INSTALLATION ANO T1E INSTALLATION OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEM WAS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CERTIFIED DRAWINGS. NORTH 0 30 60 P11.1 Kali IN FEET -UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES OPUS - LEGEND THE OPUS GROUP 12. CONTRACTOR SHALT NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OA HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAN BEUDNGING TO THE OW UNLESS ODES AUTHORIZED T000 SO Br THE (IMAM ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE UP311.1 OF CONTRACTOR Opus AE Group, L.L.C. Ma. lizaS Mai Ifen..10159,1411, 652.441 13. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 ItrliES ANO HORBOIRALSEPAMPON OF 10-FEET BETWEEN OIESTJE FIFE DIAMETERS IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (61111.0010, STORM AND SANITARY) CR055111. Opus Design Rued, L.L.C. TDST am Mot P. Prrec0614...1.00 =Ma. 2. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPEOHCATIONS EXCEED AS 1110010E0 HEREIN. 2.1. ALL MATEMALS SHALL COMPLY WON THE REQUIREMEHIS OF THEW, 21. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SOR.35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.2.1..SITNITARY SEWER SERMCIS TO BUDDING SHALL BE PVC MN 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM 02665. 2.3. All WATERMAN TO BE DUCTILE IRON -GUMS 52, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.3.1. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 73-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERIAMN. 2.3.2. PROVIDE THRUST BLOODING AND MEOMNICA1 /011. RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATEIUMUN 70003 PER CITY STANDARDS. 2.4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIM DUAL WALL HOPE PIPE WISH WATER TIGHT GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.4.1. ALL STORM SEWER 1.7 FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SO140 CONFORMING TO ASTM 02665. 2.5. RIP RAP SHALL BE WON CLASS 3. 3. COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AIM !INERT ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO DONSTRUCDON. 4. All BUBDING SERMCE CONNECTIONS (STORM SANITARY, WATER) WrIll FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER ARE TO BE INSUIATEIT FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE SEM OF COVER IS ACHIEVED. gambatek WWW.SaMbatek.corn 12800 Wrgerater Wee, Sufte 300 ADmaton28, MR 55343 763.476 6010181pbone Engbezdng I Save,45101P01nIng I ErtAranmertta1 OUR LADY OF GRACE-MP OVAIACivil \ Sheet.: \ 2 PRoact ACM6S9 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN S. CONIRACTORSHALLTAXE.L PRECAUDIDN5 NECESSARY TO AV.° PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PRAMS OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE HEM SOLELY RESPONSMIE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCITON PHASES OF 11116 PROJECT. CBMH 303 - 0E=904.70 1E9901.20 - 6. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE Willi GENERAL. ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION 11-49., CONTRACTOR WILL BE 501111 ANO ODMPLETELT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE 100 SITS INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS ANO PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OP THE WORK THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UMITED TO NORMAL WORDNG HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OP THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF 00XIIMCTORG PERFORIAANCE ISNOT I/RUMFORD INCLUDE REVIEW Of THE ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. PTDECT HAMER 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 7. AU. AREAS OUTSIDETHE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UNITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODSTED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLA.D 8E0E1E11911E500. fl COEGRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING MD MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL OEMS SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARM/16516M, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT Of TRAFFIC WHERE NEUSS., TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal ,A0V1'41=615•TONE 1,899 00 CBMH 2036 RE410 09 N9906.75 C66111 UDR 1119910 67 1E9907.67 r- 9. ALL SOILS TWINS SHALL BE COMPLETED BE AN INDEPENDENT.. ENGINEER-EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE Of REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSOCIABLE WES SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEERTHE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SODS ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORMNATING ALL REQUIRED SODS TESTS AND 501ANSPECTIONS WEN THE SOILS ENGINEER- 92 - 12 HDPE @ 1.0% STMIS 100 RE990S.62 1E96.99.60 62 - 16. HOPE @ 2.00. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT!. BEEN COMPLETED IT: 94 If - 12" _„/ HOPE @ 2.00C 1011- HOPE @ 2.0016 COWAN, AMERICAN ENGINEEMNG 113111NG, INC ADDRESS: 550 CLEWIANO AVENUE NORTH PHONE: 651-6595001 DATED: ()MEMBER 21 2015 44 1 .9 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN 1E9901_46 (E) STRUCTURES TO SAMBAS.- CONTRACTOR SHAD. ALLOW 5 WORXING DAYS FOR SHOP DRAWING FIND VERIFY ROOF 45 Ls - Er r9T1'1351 R _Z-------] CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPT OF THIS SOILS REPORT. I, REVIEW. DRAIN ELEVATION ,,,,,, @ 0.000 OATH 101 6E9906.33 16950034 STAN 203 RE9908.49 1E990356 (NE) 1,901.45 (ST 1E499.2 (V) 1E404.87 (NMN 6' ROOF OWN CONNECTION 1E9902.30 38 LF-6' 1 PVC 61 2.0.4 1 10' ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 1E9903 46 PROPOSED BUILDING ( ADDITION ( 5,0005F 32 If -SO PVC @ 2.006 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF - LF - 181 E10CA0ED BUILDING SANITAAP SERVICE 1E9909.13 (VERIFY MN MEM HOPE @ 2.0071 1114/1204A CONSTRUCT OVER COSTING 1S. RCP RE991237 1,40673S STRAY 205 1E9007.89 98 Lf-8' 01P IN CASING PIPE @ 0.52 MH OS RE9920.1 1E950852 78 If - 8' PVC 8' ROOF DWI CONNECTION COORDINATE WITH MEP,ITP 1E4061 j" 8. PVC STUB PVC @ 2.00X 1,906.46 STMH 204 RE 916.68 1E9909.39 SOR 35 0.52 6. ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 1E990800 PVC @ 1006 C10.1102 RE410.32 1E9905.60 CATE 06/21/20i9 PROSECTIMNAMER CMA MUM ST JGP DEC., EY MLL M ROOF DRAM CONNECTION 1E9905.69 CONNECT TO 10051ING 6' WATER SERVICE CONNECT ROOF DRAINS CONFIRM DEPTH 99181 MH 05 RE 1E990811 6' ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 1E9913.24 DIELO VERIDN 73 LE 915. HOPE @ 2.076 'RVA. 1E40640 511•01403 FLE9821.61 1E41236 1181, 12' HOPE @ 2.00% F£631.11,1 • • • POIMIDEPTH I CONNECT ROOF DRAM 11 VDT/ FT WATERMAIN SERVICE LOCATION M SANITARY S.MCE 1E9 91831 73 LF 4. PVC 50140 @ 2.06 1 hereby Dotty DIN MN MO, spedamclon or r,:ort T940111414.4 mem1.91001, 'opera.. 4.10011arn shOs &mord p124-63.."*1 ENGINEER under the trars of the ISO ttf Atamesma. 155 LP - 121 HOPE @ 2.001C IAN 0411 RE9924.75 1E991815 8' ROOF DRAM CONNECTION 1E9190816 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 5605F 35 LF - 61. PVC SCH 40 @ 201756 191 .- 81 PVC _,/// 152 - 503 5@052% @COM SOB 35 @ 2.0N a . d M .. A , Y . 8 81 Date, 07/3212019 N CBMH IN 1E40736 15 If -B PVC 0/ 2.00% RELOCATE HYDRANT WATERMAIN LOCATION TO 66 LOCATED IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SUMS 402 RE9919.13 1E990938 9-11,ET 1111E 22 LF - 121 HOPE @ 2.0116 STMH 400 R9910 4 1E406.04 UTILITY PLAN \ • 2' WATER SERVICE %LF- 81 PVC SDR 35 @ C752% 1 40 LF 121 WATERMAN LOCATION TO HOPE @ 2006 BE LOCATED IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 4 4 17711 -SI PVC SDR 35 M1152. 1.11.103 116417.00 1E9906.20 01. BB BP N-- RE9= 1E40908 152.- 12' HOPE @ 2.0096 NEST liaMB C6.02 198 LF - 8. PVC 500 35 @ 0.52% M1101 RE9918.10 1E9905.70 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1E40437 CONNECT 2" WATER SERVICE TO ED.. 4` TREE INVENTORY SCHEDULE: M = REMOVE TREE - REPLACE WITH NEW TREE (19 TOTAL) R = REMOVE TREE P = PRESERVE TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION MEASURES OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1US1avalwa Lawer1ANNMOLIII Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Tree Number 100 Tree Name Condition 0.441.44 1M4. ILIPWWW101.0.4110 411.69.1.14 Removed Prior 101 16.00 Spruce Poor 102 13.00 SPruce Good Sambatek 103 22.00 Spruce Good 104 16.00 Spruce Good 105 15.00 Spruce Good 12800 Patentee Me, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.47E6010 telephone 106 23.00 Maple Good 107 20.00 Maple Poor 6.00 Maple Good 108 Eno 'Waring I Sunsoto Ilhannaig IEneka1MeMal 109 25.00 Maple Good 110 12.00 SPruce Good OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP 8.00 son.. Good 111 112 11.00 Spruce Good 17254 FEE OF PT. 0 OF 1271 113 9.00 SPruce Good 12,16,10,12,14, 114 13 Elm Good PECLECTICORDS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 115 15.00 Spruce Good F - - I-- --- 43 - - - t -1--- :1 ---- -0-- , 1_--- --- 1 116 40.00 Elm Poor IL UNE PODS ( Cr GOV 117 33.00 Oak Poor FP0.13710.1 31644000 118 28.00 Elm Good 119 28.00 Ash Good 120 Removed Prior ISSUE RECORD 121 11.00 Elm Poor 122 Removed Prior 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 123 4.00 Lilac Poor 124 5.00 Lilac Good 125 12.00 Spruce Good 21.00 Spruce Good 126 127 Removed Prior 48.00 Maple Poor 128 27.00 Maple Poor 129 23.00 Ash Poor 130 131 Removed Prior 132 33.00 Maple Poor 186 3.00 Lilac Good 133 5.00 Maple Good 134 135 32.00 Oak Good 136 9.00 Maple Poor 137 3.00 Maple Poor 4.00 Oak Good 138 139 Removed Prior 140 7,00 Crabapple , Good 141 7,00 Maple Poor 142 35.00 Maple Good 23.00 Maple Good 143 -135 NEW BUILDING OUTLINE PLUS 10' 131 R 130 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF 144 17.00 Maple Good NEW BUILDING OUTLINE PLUS 10' 145 14.00 Crabapple Good BUILDING ADDI11a e 5,000 146 7,14,12,19,15 Maple Good 147 31.00 Ash Good 148 Removed Prior 149 Removed Prior 150 30.00 Ash Good 151 13.00 Maple Good 3,00 Crabapple Good 152 Toe 153 Removed Prior BrB 154 Removed Prior 155 26.00 Oak Good 156 30.00 Oak Good 6' P45 SAP 5 157 11.00 Oak Good 158 27.00 Oak Good 159 30.00 Maple Poor 160 15.00 Maple Good 161 37.00 Oak Good 06/21/2019 PAGLIESTM,MI CMA ORDWAY JGP GMEWEDIEr MLL 162 16.00 Maple Good 163 Removed Prior 13.00 Basswood Good 164 12o WAIZASSUDE 2.00 Birch Good 165 2.00 Bach Good 166 167 Removed Prior 168 4.00 Crabapple Good IEGNIPATOS 1 herebypealtyWat h.uney. phn or report was WM1010411:ry rt. IF Lacier ray Mact supewislon and UM 1 an1 0 diary Ucermd LANDSCAPE ARCNITECT under Me lama, Ma State of wiams00., Arborvitae Good 169 10' Arborvitae Good 170 10' NO TREES IMPACTED @ RECTORY SITE Ti, 02 171 2.00 Evergreen Good 172 27.00 Oak Good 173 Removed Prior PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 560 SF William L. Rghva 174 31.00 Oak Good 2 Darr. 07/12/2019 175 24.00 Oak Poor PM ce 44,41 04 ES Da A mistrad mcry of Mb sumwatin Is Sawkatek,WwWor 6' Da4 PEP ASSIA 8,00 Maple Good 176 rmatal 177 6.00 Maple Good 4.00 Crabapple Good 178 NEW BUILDING OUTLINE PLU aatEr NNE 36.00 Oak Good 179 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 2.00 Crabapple Good 180 29.00 Oak Good 181 182 30.00 Oak Poor ro,17,-rr' 16.00 Maple Good 183 MEET NADER 3,00 Evergreen Good as 184 , L0.01 185 0,00 Maple Good NORTH 186 Removed Prior o 30 60 30511 IN FEET OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY (2) OP Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' TM/ Dakota Pinnacle Birch B & B 2"Cal 12 C) NB Celts occidentalis / Common Hackberry B&B 4'CAL 9 C GB Ginkgo blloba 'Avtumn Gokll TM / Maldenhalr Tree 82) B&B 2.S'Cal 0 HL Gledesla trlacanthos 'Skyllne./Skylka Hone/ Locus, 8 & B 2.5'Cal 14 0 BC Gymnocladus Medea 'Espresso' / Kentucky Coffeetree B & B 2.5•Cal 2 0 BO Quercus macrocarpa/Burr Oak B & B 4'CAL 6 ( BL Ufa americana 'Boulevard' / Boulevard Under 4 B & B 2.5"Cal 0 PE Ulmus amerkana 'Princeton' /American Elm B&B 2.5'Cal 5 CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME COAT CAL SIZE QTY (:). BF Ables balsamea / Balsam Fir B&B ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME CONE CAL SIZE QTY 0 SB Amelanchler canadensis 'Autumn BriMance / Autumn Brilliance Servicebeny B&B 2.Cal 12 7-1 IL Syringa reticular. /Japanese Tree Lila< B&B 2"Ca1 9 ( 1/4 1) IL Syringe reticulata 'Ivory Silk' / Nory Silk laps nese Tree lilac B & B 2'Cal 3 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 5.04113 '''Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12000 Whitexater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763.476.6010 teieprone EngheerIng 10000164 I kameng IErnironmestal OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP ROI. WORM 6071 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal 0612112019 PACUM11..5. CMA JGP MLL REMM/11. I ... cert. OM Nb survey, ptan or re.rt v. pre.a.m bmeor unc.mrdeeeSmON* and Nat I am a.4 Merved LANDSCAPE ARMITNT viler the 14. of theState mentsork WBliam L D Resastra Dare:07/12/2019 Me aaaaa for a v.v.. co. avaaa0k upon repot at ktitof.e. ./MrirriE OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01 120 SCALE IN FEET O NORTH 60 — EDINA LANDSCAPE CODE CITY OF EDINA MN LANDSCAPE STANDARDS: Minimum requirements. All areas of a lot which are not used or Unproved for buildings, parking areas, drtuewayu or storage areas shall be landscaped with a combination of overstay trees, unden-tory trees, shrubs, ground cover and flowers. (I)Minimum number of overstary trees. The minimum number of aye/story trees ono tat shall be the figure determined by dividing by 40 the number of feet in the perimeter of the lotspeciez LOT PERIMETER REMODEL/ADDIRON TO MS-TING SCHOOL CAMPUS 4317 UN. FT/40= 108 TREES SHADE TREES/ CONIFERS REQUIRED II TREE /40 Lf): 108 TREES MANY EXISTING TREES ON CAMPUS TO BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADDITIONAL TREES AS SHOWN PLANT TYPE REQUIRED PROVIDED SHADE TREES 1 60 EVERGREEN TREES • 0 • ORNAMENTALTREES • 17 • DETERMINED BY CITY COUNCIL • PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME CONS CAL SHE MY G OP Betula platyphalls Margo' TNI/ Dakota Pinnacle Birch B&B 2'Cal 12 0 HB Ceilis its-6&ntans /Common PacJibeme B & B 4LCAL 9 (2) GB GInIqo bnoba 'Autumn GOT NV / Mei:HMIs, Tree B & B 25•Cal 8 0 PL CassecHM trIamnthos 'SlyI / 3 Locust B&B 2.5•Cal 14 0 KC Gyrnnocladus /Ilona 'Espresso' / KentvtiLy Coffeettee B & B 2-3•Cal 2 BO Quern. massocarpa /Burt Oak0 B & B CCAL 6 C) BL Tina ante/Rana "Bou'evarcl' /BouRtammainden B&B 25•Cal 4 0 PE Litmus sm... 'Princeton' / American Elm B&B 2.6•Cal CONIFERS CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME CONT CAL SHE SIN .1 ::: 1 BF Maks Ralsarriea / Balsam He B&B FAN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL/ COMMON NAME CONE CAL SHE OW 0 SB Amelanehler pnBslenuLs 'Autumn &Mance' /Autumn Balance Senekeberre 8 &II MI 12 11. Sycings reficuLats /Sang nese Tree Len B&B VCal 9 IL SyrIngs reticulate 'Note Stak' / Nay Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B&B 2•Cal OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 0.8.11kraJ Vareettia.159.114111 IS2-655.141 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 1251.1,41. 951-43.141 Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whiterrater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, Mt.) 55343 763.476,6010 telephone Enohaerhg I Stneche I Panrmo Eneromnentg OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP I.0.1.76£55 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN FROMCIMbell 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07112/2019 CUP Submittal OUT 06/21/2019 FROM WOE. CMA DI. BY JGP 01.1EIM MLL ...5110.4141 I hereby Certffy t survey,pWnrapwtyrx prepared by me or under rrry direct super.* ane that I arts a cluNqIceresti LANOSOVE ARCM-Ea unatiar Han laws ceche State of I :nr,ota. L orte, 07/12/2019 ..11.1.13 for a wet igned copy& nralzble.on Ispues1 Jra, 9-Erl Pn.E LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.02 60 30 NORTH SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION c 5,000 SF 0 0 0 0 6 6 00 00 PROJECTS \ 21740 \ CADVivir \ SheelA21740 O N --- 0 BM #3 ADDITION 560 SF PROPOSED BUILDING 11 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 54,700 SF Trt NORTH 0 20 40 TREE PLANTING DETAIL \ PROJECTS \ 21740 \ CAD \ \ Sheeth \ 2 NOTE: CONfILLCTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMS POSED. THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD IF STAYING IS REQUIRED BELLE CONDMONS, CONTRACTOR TO USE 2 OR 3 STAKE METHOD WITH 11 WEBBING AROUND TRUNK OE TREE (NO PARE OR CALLING TOLL USED) WRAP TREE TRUNKS PER NOTES 1.0017 MUM. MT, CIINDE, CdADR (11.101.%2W Xi-STASE &MIR MU. TREE 1/111111001,ASE VESLE TOP Or 1.1.1.0MIL LOVA SCEL LEVE, 1..11 TOP Of ROM FALL TO 030g 1ST LL' OA L.C-611,011 ORM ROOT IF NEEDEO.SET ROOT M WIN 0.10,§001' 1,10/f PIILAONT GUDE CO NOT ONERIIIP OF ROOT BALLWITXSO, Pat., WU OF WEE.01.1...0(.1.11/11X PULE.. LA1101140,11ACI. WITII TUE TRUNK 1.0VE EVAIN,WVE. ROM MO KW f0.04.1 TOPNALF Of 00011.1 MID 4.1.1 SAUCEA EFTC.EME Of 1.01,01L EDGE CONOMMI VAt PUCE.= BALl.l.311.11... COMIACTM.1 SOWN SA6OF TUE PIT Wrr11 W.41) TO UMW. PREINSOSCI1 TNN Ns. PAM TO SNOACKFICAS, CAVIAR IA NA OM. DU UNIT %WM ACCCEIL.670 MTN 0 6.1 1.71.6. SAM MI.81.1114 MOT ROOT 1,1.06 /101-9. PAH 046 PUNTING PIT 4.1"0.6. DEVial TWIN AOOT INSTALL 3. LAYER OF MULCH DO HOT PLACE IN comitkOW/ sRetta Rot APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERMODE EDGE CONDMON VARIES PREPARE SOIL FOR WE ENTIRE BED EDGER, REFER TO MAN AND SPECIFICATION LOOSEN ROOTS. CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS EXCAVATE PLANT BED MIN. 4' DEEPER THAN T AND BOTTOM OE MA.. BED '',...W1111 SPADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL P02 -NOTES GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIE COMRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE M. AND BECOME EALLUAR WITH THE EXISTING CLLLOMONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE WORE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO WE ATTENTION Of DIE IANDSCAFE ARCHITECT 13SOLESANCES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGUUTIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORE A. THE CONTRACTOR SHAG PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBLLGUTTERS, TRAILS, TREESEAVNIS AND NW ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCDON DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED ANEMOR REPLACED AT NO ADDMONAL COST TO WE WNER. 5. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL MENTES, /NCLUILLIG IRRIGATION LINES, WISH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY DEBIT. AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL .B HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACT. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WE PROTECTION AND RRWR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME HONEY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FA LITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 6. THE IANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL 030111XNATE TNE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORM. OHM.. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE fOR OFGOENOLS SITE MINT., WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PUNT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLES. CONDITIONS saw BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE AROMICT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORE EL THERM TAXES PRECEDENCE OVER ME IANDSCAP E LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EMT. QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE NAMING SONDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUA/EMUS SHOWN ON THE PAN. 9. THE SPECIRCATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVERT. PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES 10. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP UNE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FEND. ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BESTED-STEEL FENCE POSTS 61 0.C.1443AUM SPACING. IL LONGTERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-NE VALI NOT BE ALLOWED. 12- CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRIMM, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. PLANTING NOTES: 1. NO MANES SHALL BE INSTALLED Mt FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMECNATE AREA. 2. AGRANULAR PRE-EMERGENT HERMODE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT BEDS AT THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED RATE PRIOR TO PLANT INSULATION. 3. AU.PLANTING STOCK SNAIL CONFORM TO THE 'AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOLE- ANS11,613,1ATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINHAUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS 4. OVERSTORY TREES SHAD. BEGIN BRANCIANG NO LOWERS.. S ABOVE PAVED SURFACES. 5. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BUNAPPED AS INDICATED 01 THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 6. PLANT MATERMIS TO BEIN5TAl1FDPEAPLNIIIHG DETAILS 7. METRE. MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADEDAND !METALL RED...NTS SNORED. EL THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PINGS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY WORE, DURING, OR AFTER B.A.T.. 9. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WINING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10. ALL PANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROPIMATE- CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RSPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE Of ALL PUNTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO DI E LLACTCONDITIONS OF THE SITE THE LANDSCAPEARCHNECT SHALL APPROVE THEM/MG LOCATION OF. PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALIATION IL ALL PIA.. AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED' MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 12. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELEWRIOUS MATERIAL !NALL MASS NAMING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROTI MULCH ON DRAYANGS SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MORT° SEINE. 011.311 FOR APPROVAL DELAYER MUT.. DAY OF INST.ATION. USE 3. FOR SHRUB BEDS, TREE RINGS, AND 3. FOR PEREMO.GROUND COVER WEDS, OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MADAM. FOR ALL MULCHES AND PUNTING SOIL GUMMIES TO COMPLETE THE WORE SHOWN ON EDIT KAN. 14. USEANTIMESKCANT (VATTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DEODUOUS MANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND i0A EVERGREENS MOVED ANTAME. APPLEAS PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTION. All EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE ATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DUN. WARRANTY PERIOD. IS. WRAP AU.SMOOTILBARNED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER I AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY I. TREE MPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE MEW TWOW.E13 PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK ELUDE TO THE FIRST BRANCH. 16. ALL DFODUOUS, PINE, AND LARCH PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODENT PROTECTION PER IANDOT 2571311 17, KAMM° SOIL FOR TREES.SHNURS AND GROUND COVERS FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT 0% MN). HUMUS AND CAPABLE. SUSTAINING VIGOROUS LLJUIT GROWTH RSMAII COMELY IVITH 141.130T SPECIFICATION 3377 TYPED SELECT TOPS._ MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPAN< SUBS., STONES, CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOI MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-13-10 FERTILIZER AT PATE Of 3 POUNDS PER ER YARD. IN PUNTING BEDS INCORPORATED-ES MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED INA 6 LAYER AND ROTOTILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12. OF SOR. ATA ET RATIOANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED !NAND WATERED UNTIL ...ANON. PLANTS NOT MAINTAMED INGLIS LUMBER WILL BE REJECTED. 13 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERITYTMTAOt EXCAVATED TREE AND SHRUB PIT WILL PERCOLATE P.M TO INSTAUMG PLANTING MEDIUM AND PLANTS TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL RUTIN BOTTOM OF S.CTED NOUS WITH MX INCHES OF WATER AND CONN. THAT THIS WATER PALL PERCOLATE WITHIN A 2430. PERIOD. IF THE SOIL ATA GIVEN AREA.. NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC ORMN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED OR THE PLANTING SHALL BE RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BYE. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 19. ALL PIAMS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLEIE GROWING SEASONS (APRIL I - NOVEMBER 11 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEOFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FILL COST Of REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS 26 COMPACTOR SHALL NOTIFY WE LANDSCAPE AROUTECTALLEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELP., THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALIATION. 2L SEASONS/II ME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONDUCTOR MAY ELECT TO PATTIH OFF-SEASONS E.RELY AT HG/MR RISA 21.1. POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1, 9/21 - 11/1 212. DECTOUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1) 9/11 - 11/1 213, EVERGREEN POTTED PARS: 4/1 - 6/1) 9/21-11/1 21.A EVERGREEN 983: 4/I . 5/1) 9/21 - 11/1 713 URFAAWN SEEDING: 4/1.6/1;0/0'9/20 21.3 NATIVE MIX SEEDING: 4/15 -7/20 S/20-TNE. 22. MANETENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY ALLEN EACH PORTION OF THE WORE IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIALISM. BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, LLSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED DICAUSIVF Of THE GUARANIES MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULGVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD AUTEMALS, RESETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND BEF111. PLANTS IN TO TE RESPONSIBILMES HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BF RESPONSIBLE NOR SCE KEEPING THE TREES PLUMS THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. kW PIANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOUATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTAMLL OF THE WORM SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND FLEPLACED VM11 MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. WATERING :MAINN A WATERING 50301./LE W A WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL MAN. ONCE A WEEK. ELLTIENIELY HOT, 0. WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. OIECE MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETFYIMINE NEED. CONTRACTORS.. MAKE THE NECESSARY ARPANGEMENTS FOR WATER_ TURF NOTES: TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE PATH THE PROVISIONS OF THE MN/OOT 2105 AND 2575 EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. 1. ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL ALSO RECEDE 61 OF TOPSOIL PRIORI° INSTALLING SOD .TOPSOIL 0001 BE FREE OF TREE ROOTS, STUMPS. BUIL.. MATER. AND TRASH, AND SHALL BE FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN 1 f INCHES IN ANY ONENSION 2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVE0 SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF 5013/SEM SHALL BE HELD I. BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAM, SIAM, CURB, ETC. 3. SOD SHALL BE IND PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED MIME ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR LN DRAINAGE SWALES, SODSHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 4. TURF ON ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED BY SEEDING, MULCHING ANO FERTILMNG. SEED MIXTURE NO.23151 WALL BE RACE/ AT THE RATE OF 65 POUNDS PER ACRE. 5. . DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH AND WATER MOIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DUNNAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. . DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE SEED, ARE TO RECEIVE PLANTING SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS LS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 31 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. GENERAL TREE SPECIFICATIONS: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE OWED UP TO THE FOLLOWING HEIGHTS: 1.1. 2. CAL TREES: LOWEST BMA. 6' HT. 1.2. 3. CALA TREES: LOWEST BRANCH 7' HT. 2. TREE CANOPY WIDTH SHALL BE RELATIVE TO HEIGHT/CAMPER OF TREE AND TYPE OF TREE 2.1. CALIPER/6-8' HT: 34' WIDTH MIN. U. 2' CAUPER/12-14' HT: 4-5' 1,411. 23. 3. CAUPER/1416' HT: EH-ENNUI MIN. 3. CANOPY WEBS SHALL NOT HAVE COOMAINATE LEADERS IN LOWER HALF OF TREE atom. 4. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE WILLAFTRICAL OR BALANCED BRANCHING ON ALL SIDES OVINE TREE 5. TREES SHALL NOT BE TIPPED PRUNED. 6. TREES SHALL BE F. OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE FROM SHIPPING AND HANDLING. DAMAGED TREES SHALL BE REJECTED. 7. SUMMER DUG TREES SHALL HAVE ROOTBALL in INCREASED BY 203 3 TREES WHICH EXCEED RECOMMENDED CALIPER TO HEIGHT REIATIONSHIP MUM. BE REJECTED. IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PLACE. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RE-AUG NMENT OF IRRIGATION SPRINKLER MAINS AND BRANCH LINES TO THE NEW WELL LOCATION. (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR) 2. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO ELIMINATE SPRINKLER ZONES UNDER PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION AND COORDINATE COVERAGE OF NEW LAWN AREAS OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. ,333. wnwng 16nmetria,14.31.11, Opus Design 130)Id, L.L.C. t....an 1.4.0.459.11, HMS. sgambatek www.sambatek.com 12800 Whitenter Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 761476.6010 telephone El-mgt.:J.1N I SLEIVIIN I riantilg ErleirOliMeltd OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP NagrpLCFES, 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN RaELTNIAleti 31644000 ISSUE RECORD 07/12/2019 CUP Submittal DUE 06/21/2019 3.0.40,031 CMA LIPAMST JGP maim, MLL FT:C.711 \PON I hereby uNFEIEOIIEGNOI .PBI PL rep. vas preyAnEd nn ar under my d'neelsvper.on and Ma I an a &A.B., LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under IM Inn oLLABSIne of .nesota. 144;t4;,_ Vey William L D 2 Nt, 07/12/2019 for westmnd copy of upon rtnres at t 052 LANDSCAPE NOTES-DETAILS 94,Ei WEER L1.03 SAIF IN FEET II II fl -0. V Yu at 11111111U1111 01-4 7 Eaatmatm Met L' L ,J Cualiaar ern 1011010 _,1 P c. 130013E3 3333.01. 7/11/2019 11:07:55 AM LOWER LEVEL 0 10 20 SO' 8e OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1031..11. 1333.410465313013 1163133041 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 110101.03•111.1 133.413.1651430131 070.30.31 KC, EC1 OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP \\\\ i ,\ 330.1,03903 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN REMECT/1.31381 \ i 3164,1000 ''.\ ISSUE RECORD WEE 07/12/2019 J. Fournlea DEMME B. Partridge DEC1.13SE FS33301103 Sttll 311E LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.0 5- OPUS 41a_ STI 1-2.r THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1.0.41011.5134. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. IOW 51.1.11.1 653110110 E2.111.41 CCIP.SAWR ISSUE RECORD DAZE 07/12/2019 FPO= ILMIEll J. Foumlea ORM B. Partridge DIEGG.11, 1.111.01 9-=.1111E LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN A1.1 j c+.43.,anv 117-P /ar I tkrr1 I .C.F FEE _11- 1101:1011 MOM Ij O. 15 2,7 45 SO D 0 0 ecS DASIED AREAS NM IMF UPROVEIMENTSIVMMI THE EOSINS BULDP4G FOOTPRINT LEVEL 1 r= NAP rl 11 oss ROOF FO.ER OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP F.ECT.WESS 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN 31644000 ISSUE RECORD ROOF mmntt RED DASHED/REA NCLUDES INPROVEMENTS WORN THE DOSING BULLING FOO1PRINT 7/11/2019 11:08:11 AM - LEVEL 2 = as°. 07/12/2019 ROWT.W. J. Foumlea EM Fr B. Partridge CIECKED LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN MEET li•BER A1.2 10. 20. 4v ea ROOF pt% OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1.r...11.15330-0110 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 1280...ttal t PLANS NORTH NORTH Mlle crrotott, scale NOTED name NS issue date 00.00.00 ROOF PLAN FLOOR 02 PLAN EILEV EC, ELEV 1E1 GAR,HE 11=—Lj tt-1 STOR • 5 CR 5 CR 5TCR E,1 • 1 • t-ECH LAL}ORY Ft .titt,r6 7.noc+-1 =_-=r r HALL 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 PS12-879-8225 F16124379-8152 tomovianek.com Our Lady of Grace Rectory 5071 Eden Ave Edina,MN 55436 FLOOR 01 PLAN °FLOOR 00 PLAN A100 mryipht Tan. 2009 DUSTING SCHOOL UPPER LWEI, CIL CF EASING SANCTUARY LEVEL LOWER LEVE0906au DO' -0' cc PEN memo T.O. SULOCV,3_, orr --e• r EXISTING SCHOOL UPPER LEVEL 117, EOSMNGESCHR LEVT- LOVI L OL, 101. - c' LOWER LEVEL (00019 V16.= CO' SOUTH ELEVATION VW. PO' 1 — WEST COURTYARD ELEVATION ,LOWER LEVEL MOM 0(1 100' c' EAST ELEVATION OVERALL ' = OT DATE: 7/12/201911: BIWA:pc, DAM: DO STING SCHOOL UPPER i LEVELS ` is BLOW. SCHOOL LOWER LEVEL 101•-6'„L 6 148'-P 01- If 18 92 SC EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION NORHT ELEVATION 1 5 our = r-cr Anti 6MA TO.P4REI D. . As, LOWER LEVEL e000i_c, 1W-IT A SOUTH ELEVATION INFILL 11 16=,'-0' 6 NORTH ELEVATION 2 EXISTING SCHOOL UPPER LEVEL 117-0" DUSTING SCHOOL LOWER LEVEL_Ac 101 ,r •-• 1Pari EXISTING SCHOOL UPPER i l i fivEps, EXISTING SCHOOL 1.? LOWE.RIEVEL `.a !P_z_ LOWER LEVE4,661. cc KEY PLAN .0 A20 s'IK 6 DAED OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP ISSUE RECORD PEOSTPAI. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SiEFT.E. A2.0 T.O. SU= os Cil 2 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group, L.L.C. IOW 1.06. Unatria, 504 4110 Opus Design Build, LLC. KGEOB.R.115•1 WM., NI m.o. 652450111.1 T.0.131.1.4ripA. 6 urTo' EXISTING SCHOOL UPPER LEVEL 11,_ 117 - -cc LOWER LEVE I L . (90 0 c_As ELEVATION KEY NOTES IT ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 2 BRICK-TO MATCH FASTING 3 ALM WINDOW SYSTEM ',4 ALUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM , PREFIRSHED MEIAL PARWEI CAP S STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 7 ' PRETINISHED METAL CANOPY NOTEDESIGN NOWT TO MATCH EASING NOTE: SCREEN WALL DESIGN AND SORT LNE S1UDES WELPROVETHATALL MECRAN:CAL EOUPMENT VOL BE SCREENED CRON PUBLIC VEW AT ROW.FRONTAGES MIER .0.35 5071 EDEN AVE, EDINA, MN PROStET MASER 31644000 EXISTING SCHOOL LOWER LEVEL 101'- 6' cc 01 FLOCK „,_0, .13V-G" eAss,str los scale 1181110 NOTED NS FLOOR S 01 FLOCK ld116I-OT 5405000 210 K.., IST FLOCIR l*ECOI-0.1 54sErarr --------------- , MATERIAL KEY RCKF 70 MATO-I 4CJ4CElT OLG Cdo-L ROCF 118 E. 26th Street Suhe 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 F2612.879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanakcom Our Lady of Grace Rectory 5071 Eden Ave Edina,MN 55436 LOT 5'000 TO MATCH CI, 0,440E DORI-ER', SOCK TO MATCH OLG CAT ,E VERFT WITH BUILDNG 0,512 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION issue date 00.00.00 ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION LE' A200 loOKOFITool,2019 tylndeniplo, orlwasprapored Lyme /soon-An ann. I ado-dare, lool ▪ den :..ami ISSUE RECORD Erol PLOT DATE: 7/11/2019 11:08:11 AM OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Gran), L.L.C. umtameisslualso 90,161-11,1,1 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. la351.11.1VM ir.. IN 59.118 07/12/19 111,115C10.81 J. Foumlea B. Partridge C.001111 REI.1131,1111 PERSPECTIVE IMAGES A3.0 GPA OUR LADY OF GRACE - MP RelaTADISIESS 5071 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN PinECTICLIEll 31644000 Location Plan not to scale East Elevation 1/16" = 1' - FINAL BUILDING SIGNAGE DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Our Lady of Grace Edina, MN Building Signage Plan 07.12.2019 BUILDING SIGNAGE ZONE - FINAL BUILDING SIGN TO BE NO LARGER THAN 100 SF North Elevation 1/16" = - 0" / — BUILDING SIGNAGE ZONE - FINAL BUILDING SIGN TO BE NO LARGER THAN 100 SF r t- • BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION - OPTION 1 BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION - OPTION 2 x 11=MI 4111 (05) (04) 06 01 01 Perspective not to scale 01 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 02 BRICK 03 VISION GLASS MATCH EXISTING COLOR: CLEAR 04 ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM COLOR: BONE WHITE 05 PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP 06 STANDING SEAM METAL 07 PREFINISHED METAL ROOF CANOPY MATCH EXISTING OPUS THE OPUS GROUP Our Lady of Grace - Master Plan Edina, MN Material Board Exhibit 07.12.2019 DATE: August 2, 2019 Revised 7.1 August 13, 2019 TO: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez – Graduate Engineer RE: 5051 Eden Avenue – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were existing conditions survey, grading plans, utility plans, and erosion control plans dated 06/21/2019. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Sidewalk shall conform to Edina Standard Plate 420. Grading/Building Permit 5. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 6. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Grading/Building Permit 7. Provide traffic study and implement city approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 7.1 Traffic study details impacts to Eden Avenue and Normandale Road Intersection. This ultimate project will push this intersections delay from acceptable to unacceptable. The study details a possible roundabout as a long-term solution or other traffic mitigation techniques. It is not reasonable for the applicant to construct a roundabout when they contribute approximately 13% and 18% of the current and future traffic volume, respectively. Staff recommends a $40,000 cash payment to be Future Permit when enrollment increase exceeds 110 students used for future traffic and pedestrian mitigation measures at this intersection. Traffic study contemplates impacts to Eden Avenue and Normandale if the K-8 school enrollment increases by 110 or more from the current level. Under this scenario, the traffic study offers two alternatives to maintain acceptable operation of the intersection: (1) at least two staggered start times and end times varying by at least 15 minutes for the K-8 school; or (2) construction of a single lane roundabout at the Eden Avenue/Normandale intersection. Staff recommends no action related to this topic until new construction leads to an increase in the K-8 enrollment that exceeds 110 additional students (increase from current 660 to 770 or more). At that time, an update to the traffic study would be required along with staggered start and end times, as noted above, would be required. If applicant chooses not to, or cannot, stagger start and end times, applicant would be required to share in costs of a new single lane roundabout, calculated by proportion of the increased percentage of traffic that applicant contributes to the intersection due to the increase in enrollment. Participation in costs may be by cash payment or land easement/contribution as mutually determined by the City and applicant. Any “phase” not designed around expansion of the K-8 school population (priest residence, preschool, activity center and additional offices and learnings spaces) would be permitted without any funding requirement as currently listed above. 8. Curb cut permit required if any entrances are reconstructed or curb replaced. Prior to Reconstructing Entrance 9. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540-545 and be completed prior to mill and overlay project planned for 2020. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 11. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 13.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 13.2 Public works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 14. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 15. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to calculate sewer and water connection charges. Grading/Building Permit 16. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 17. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 18. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 19. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 20. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site stormwater permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 21. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 22. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 23. Relocation of irrigation well is proposed. Coordination with MDH is required along with a well sealing record. Prior to Demolition/Before Construction 24. Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Date: Augus t 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r Item Activity: Subject:2020 P lanning C ommission Work P lan Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : Approve the 2020 P lanning C ommission Work P lan. I N TR O D U C TI O N : Attached is a draft of the P lanning C ommission Work P lan for 2020. T he purpose of C ommission work plans is to ensure that the priorities of the City C ouncil and C ommission are aligned, and that the C ity has the appropriate financial and staff resources to support C ommission work. S taff updated the list based on feedback at the last P lanning C ommission meeting. E ach item listed should be agreed upon by the commission as a whole as to whether it should be recommended to the C ity C ouncil for P lanning C ommission consideration. I f one or two commissioners think one topic is a good idea, but the rest do not, then it should not be on the work plan. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Staff Memo 2020 "DRAFT" Planning Commis s ion Work Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: August 14, 2019 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan Attached is a draft of the Planning Commission Work Plan for 2020. The purpose of Commission work plans is to ensure that the priorities of the City Council and Commission are aligned, and that the City has the appropriate financial and staff resources to support Commission work. Staff updated the list based on feedback at the last Planning Commission meeting. Each item listed should be agreed upon by the commission as a whole as to whether it should be recommended to the City Council for Planning Commission consideration. If one or two commissioners think one topic is a good idea, but the rest do not, then it should not be on the work plan. The draft plan contains a lot of time consuming initiatives. The Commission should consider what it can realistically get done over the next year. In October, each Commission Chair will present their 2020 Work Plan to the City Council in a Work Session. 2020 Commission Work Plan Instructions Commission work plans are developed by the commission. Not the staff liaison. Schedule September Meetings: Commission Approves proposed work plan. Plans due to MJ by September 25 October 1 Work Session: Chairs present proposecd work plan to Council. Chair must be present. November 19 Work Session: City Manager and staff liaison present proposed revisions. December 3 Council Meeting: Council feedback incorporated and City Council approves work plan. January 1: Commissioner officially starts implementing work plans. General Each section with a white background should be filled out. List initiatives in order of priority Parking Lot: These are items the commission considered but did not propose as part of the work plan. These items are not considered approved and would require a work plan amendment approved by Council to allow the commission to begin work. Initiative When writing initiatives, start with the action (council charge). Make sure the following points are addressed 1) What is the specific action/outcome 2) Describe what the commission will do 3) Describe wha the outcome(s) will look like Examples: Review and recommend a building energy benchmarking policy. Study and report on possible city actions to reduce access and usage of vaping for youth. Initiative Type New Initiative – not on previous work plan and has completion date Continued Initiative – carried over from a previous work plan with a revised target completion date Ongoing Responsibility – annually on the work plan and may or may not have a target completion date Event – Events coordinated and implemented by the Commission, not the City. Completion Date Provide a target date for the initiaive to be completed by. If the date has passed, provide an update in the progress field Council Charge City Manager will propose council charge for Council consideration.If Council charge changes, initiative action will be updated. Budget - Staff Liaison Completes If funds are available, the staff liaison must provide the amount that will be used. If funds are NOT available, the staff liaison must explian the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support - Staff Liaison Completes Note additional staff support needed including the hours and responsitilities. Select all that are needed. Planning 2020 DRAFT Planning Commission Work PlanInitiativeInitiative Type Completion Date Council ChargeOngoing20203 (review and recommend)Lead Commissioners Budget Staff SupportFunds AvailableStaff LiaisonInitiativeInitiative Type Completion Date Council ChargeContinueQ3 20203 (review and recommend)Lead Commissioners Budget Staff SupportFunds availableStaff LiaisonInitiativeInitiative Type Completion Date Council ChargeEvent 2020/213 (review and recommend)Lead Commissioners BudgetStaff SupportFunds not availableStaff LiaisonProgress Report:Review and RecommendComprehensive Plan Follow-up. Make revisions as required by the Met Council. * Rezoning of 7101-7155 Amundson Avenue from Industrial use to Commercial/Mixed Use. * Increase Heights in the 70th and Cahill Area. Staff Liaison Comments: To bring Zoning into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan as required by Met Council.City Manager Comments:Review and RecommendStaff Liaison Comments: Planning Staff spends the majority (over 80%) of its time in support of land use applications brought before the planning commission and city council. City Manager Comments:Progress Report:The Planning Commission is responsible to review all Land Use applications submitted to the City of Edina. Land Use applications include: Variances; Site Plan Review; Sketch Plan Review; Conditional Use Permits; Subdivision; Lot Line Adjustments; Rezoning; and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. To accomplish this responsibility the Planning Commission meets twice per month, on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month. The Planning Commission typically reviews 3-4 of the above requests each agenda.Review and RecommendPlanning Study of the Edina Business Park. (The office/industrial area between Highway 100, Cahill Road, 70th Street and Edina's southern boarder.) This Study would include recommendations from Chapter 10, Economic Competitiveness. Staff Liaison Comments: This is a Comp. Plan recommendation in both the 70th/Cahill SAP and Chapter 10, Economic Competitiveness. Staff has made a request of the City Council to provide funds in the 2020 Budget. InitiativeInitiative Type Completion Date Council ChargeEventQ4 20203 (review and recommend)Lead Commissioners Budget Staff SupportFunds availableStaff LiaisonInitiativeInitiative Type Completion Date Council ChargeEventQ4 20203 (review and recommend)Lead Commissioners Budget Staff SupportFunds availableStaff LiaisonCity Manager Comments:Progress Report:Progress Report:Review and RecommendZoning Ord. Amendments: Items to be considered for change to the Ordinance: drive-throughs; basement requirement; one-foot rule; two car garage; allow s.f. homes in R-2 District; allow secondary dwelling units; restaurant odor; tree ordinance; upgrade building material requirements; building height.Staff Liaison Comments: These are items to be considered for change to the Ordinance, it does not conclude that a change will be recommended.City Manager Comments:Progress Report:Review and RecommendGreater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines - Consider codifying recommendations within the guidelines and creating a checklist to use for reviews of redevelopment proposals.Staff Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: Commission Initiative Type Select Commission Name New Arts & Culture Continue Heritage Preservation Ongoing Community Health Event Human Rights & Relations Planning Transportation Parks & Recreation Energy & Environment Council Charge Budget Staff Support 1 (study and report)Funds available Staff Liaison 2 (review and comment)Funds not available CTS (including video) 3 (review and recommend)Other 4 (review and decide) Initiative Start Start your initiative with an action Study and Report Review and Comment Review and Recommend Review and Decide