Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-01-10 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAg enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota City Council Cham ber s Wednesday, Januar y 10, 2024 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. Participate in Public H ear ing(s): Call 312-535-8110 Enter access code 2631 642 0716 Password is 5454 Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to g et in the queue to speak A sta8 m em ber will unmute you when it is your turn I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Regular Meeting Min u tes from Decem ber 13, 2023 V.Com m u n ity Com m ent During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Pu b lic Hea rings A.B-24-01 Variance Request for 4603 Merilane VII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents VIII.Sta- Com m ents IX.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli2cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: January 10, 2024 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, P lanning Adminis trative S upport S pec ialis t Item Activity: Subject:R egular Meeting Minutes from December 13, 2023 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the regular minutes from December 13, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description draft minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 1 of 2 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers December 13, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:04 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Felt, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Olson, Hu, Schultze. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Felt moved to approve the December 13, 2023, agenda. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, November 15, 2023 Commissioner Felt moved to approve the November 15, 2023, meeting minutes. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 7300 Metro Boulevard Chair Bennett indicated he would need to recuse himself from discussion due to a conflict of interest. Director Teague presented the request of Hemple Properties for a sketch plan review. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Ben Krsnak, Hemple Real Estate and Mr. Chris Whitehouse, DJR Architects, introduced themselves and made a presentation to the Commission. Also, present was Dr. Todd Geisler, owner of Edina Endodontics. The Commission asked questions of the applicant. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. B. Appointment of Co-Chairs for the Lincoln and Londonberry Small Area Plan Direct Teague indicated the City Council approved the Planning Commission’s 2024 Work Plan on December 5, 2023, which included direction to complete a small area plan for the property surrounding Lincoln Drive and Londonberry Road. The Commission needs to appoint co-chairs for this plan. The Commission discussed the role of the co-chairs and who to appoint. Commissioner Daye and Commissioner Miranda volunteered to be a co-chair on the Lincoln and Londonberry Small Area plan. Commissioner Felt indicated she would also be interested. Motion Commissioner Padilla moved to appoint Commissioners Daye, Miranda and Felt to serve as Co- chairs for the Lincoln and Londonberry Small Area Plan. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Full discussion can be reviewed in the official meeting video. VII. Chair and Member Comments Received. VIII. Staff Comments Received. IX. Adjournment Commissioner Daye moved to adjourn the December 13, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:26 PM. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: January 10, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-24-01 Varianc e R eques t for 4603 Merilane Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance request based on the findings in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he request is for a 56.3-foot front yard setback variance from the 116.4-foot requirement to allow a building addition 60.1 feet from the front lot line at 4603 M erilane. B etter Together E dina AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Site location Engineering Memo Erosion control Exis ting s urvey Applicant Narrative Plans Rendering Staff Pres entation January 10, 2024 PLANNING COMMISSION Kri Aaker, Assistant Planner B-24-01, a 56.3-foot front yard setback variance from the 116.4-foot requirement to allow a building addition 60.1 feet from the front lot line. at 4603 Merilane. Information / Background: Sec. 36-439. - Special requirements. Special setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. a. Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul -de-sac, or on one side of a dead-end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot that both have a front street setback on the same street, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lot s on the same street; or the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all other dwelling units on the same side of that street, between intersections. The property at 4603 Merilane is a single-family residential home. The owners would like to add additional attached garage space with finished square footage above on the west side of the home. The addition would be set back 11.6 feet from the front of the home, and in conformance with the standard side yard setback. However, because of the current location of the home immediately to the east, the required front yard setback average is 116.4 feet. The required 116’+ front yard setback renders the lot unbuildable. A variance is being requested to allow for a front yard setback for this specific lot that would keep a consistent front yard setback to other homes located along the block and be in character with homes to the west along the street. The homeowners of 4603 Merilane are requesting a variance from the above-mentioned requirements for an addition to the west of their exiting garage to include a new tandem garage stall with floor space above to expand bedroom areas. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Meadowbrook golf course/City of Mpls. Pk Bd/City of Saint Louis Park Easterly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Southerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Westerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Existing Site Features The property consists of a brick and stucco single dwelling unit home built in 1971. The home functions as a multi-level/two- story home. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Rear– Yard West Side – Yard South Front – Yard East Side – Yard 25 feet 10 feet 116.4 feet 10 feet 30 feet 13.8 feet *60.1 70 feet Building Height 40 feet 33 feet Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf Impervious Surface Coverage 25% 50% 18.82% 33.17% First Floor Elevation 898.3 897.3 *Requires a variance STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, staff believes the requested variance is justified. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Staff believes that the purpose and intent of the front yard setback ordinance is to maintain consistent front yard spacing from the street of homes along a block in established neighborhoods. In General, most homes align with one another along a given block with the average front yard setback not an impacting variable on a property. The front wall of the subject home and the proposed addition are farther back from the street than the most impacted neighbor to the west. The proposal will be recessed behind the front wall of the subject home by 11.6 feet. The curve of the cul-de-sac places the addition behind neighbor’s garage to the west. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for low density residential, which includes single dwelling units as a primary use. The use of the property will remain a single dwelling unit. The request will allow garage and living space expansion and make interior remodeling modifications to accommodate the preferences of the homeowner. Staff finds that the requested variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is seeking to improve the interior of the home and wishes to expand farther to the west. The variance is needed to address the established average front yard setback requirement given the home to the east’s deep setback (almost 200 ft). The location of the existing building does not allow for an addition to be installed that meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds the request to be reasonable. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. STAFF REPORT Page 4 The property is relatively unique in that it is on a block with one home having an extreme front yard setback as compared with the other homes fronting the north side of Merilane. The proposal by the applicant presents a reasonable location for the addition that cannot be modified to conform to zoning requirements. The front yard setback circumstance was not created by the applicant and is unique to the property. Other homes along the same side of the block can establish an average front yard setback by calculating the neighbors on either side that are closer to the street and more in keeping with existing street scape. The subject property must include the front yard setback of the adjacent neighbor to the east in establishing the average, which requires a much greater setback than the existing home on the subject site. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition will be located behind the most affected neighbor’s garage to the west. Both adjacent homes are oriented away from the subject home and addition and will have minimal if any impact. The addition will blend in with the existing structure and would be difficult to detect as an addition. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a 56.3-foot front yard setback variance from the 116.4 foot requirement to allow a room addition 60.1 feet from the front lot line. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is guided for low-density residential. 2. The primary use of the property will remain a single dwelling unit. 3. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 4. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. 5. The applicant is seeking to improve the interior of the building and add an addition next to the garage into the side yard. 6. The location of the existing building does not allow for additions given the required front yard setback. 7. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 8. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Consistency with the plans included in the January 10, 2023, Planning Commission packet dated stamped December 5, 2024. 2. Compliance with the Engineering Memo dated January 2, 2024. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance (Section 10-82 STAFF REPORT Page 5 Deadline for a City decision: February 6, 2024. © WSB & Associates 2013 Parcels January 4, 2024 Map Powered By DataFi / 1 in = 100 ft DATE: 1/2/2024 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Ben Jore, PE – Senior Project Engineer RE: 4603 Merilane - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included the survey and erosion control plan dated 10/20/2023 and 11/09/23 respectively. Summary of Work The applicant proposes to construct an addition. The request is for a variance to reduce the front yard setback. Easements N.A. Grading and Drainage Site drains to the Meadowbrook Golf Course and then to Meadowbrook Lake. It does not appear that any additional impervious will drain to private property. Stormwater Mitigation The project increase the impervious surfaces by less than 100sf and thus stormwater mitigation is not required. Floodplain Development The site is not within the local 100yr floodplain. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan has been submitted. Street and Driveway Entrance N.A. Public Utilities N.A. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit has been obtained. A well is located onsite as the property. Applicant must seal the well prior to the permit being issued. Currently the applicant is in the process of locating the well. NORTH 133.86N 63° 2 4' 3 8" E 1 3 6. 9 7 NORTH 74.43M mailbox Sign 896.7 896.7 896.2 896.1 896.8897.0 896.7 896.8 896.5 895.8 895.4 896.2 895.0 892.3 896.4 895.7 895.8 895.9 895.6 Manhole rim=895.96 895.9 896.1 896.420" 15 896.6 G 895.5 895.5 895.9 895.9 896.0 897.2 897.0 896.3 894.5 894.2 892.7891.5 892.3 895.1 894.2 891.9891.4 890.7 890.0 889.6 890.3 889.7 890.7 889.8 889.6 892.1 891.6 890.1 889.5 890.0 890.1 15" 891.0 17" 890.8 892.2 E 892.4 13.02.08.014.423.7 22.823.97.13.013.225.1 14.323.9 26.723.7 11.47.8 7.25510 RESIDENCE No. 4603 29.6 35.163.4F e n c e MERI L A N E 895892 893 894 896 897892 8 9 6 896 8 9 58938 9 4 89623.2DETACHED GARAGE 7.3 29.9 80°46 '53 "122.137'0"16'3 1/2"41'2"16'3 1/2"7'5 1/2"23.4 23.6 13.8 60.15 10 L=40 . 0 0 R=65 . 0 0 =35° 1 5 ' 3 2 " =04°46'09" L=160.36 R=1926.52 Gen StepsP a v e r s P a v e r sS t e p s CoveredC o n c. B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e rP a v e r sStoopW a l lWalls S u r f a c e STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC. No. 3504175 B i t u m i n o u sProposed AdditionSilt Fence or Biorolls STORM SEWER EASEMENT WATER MAIN EASEMENT #1966 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 WALLINGS ADDITION FIRST REPLAT 4603 MERILANE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA HAGE & COMPANY 275 MARKET ST, SUITE 567 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55405 SCALE IN FEET 200 40 F:\survey\wallings addition first replat\1-1\01 Surveying - 90395\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgC1 OF C1 DATE:LIC. NO.: SHEET NO. PROJECT: 90395REVISIONSDESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JEFFREY A. PRASCH, P.E. 11.09.23 52706 ABL JAP GRP INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE 2 C1 MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC OVERFLOW HOLES (2 IN X 4 IN HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) USE REBAR OR STEEL ROD FOR REMOVAL (FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB BOX REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2 IN X 4 IN). EXTEND 10 IN BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES, LENGTH VARIES. SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES. L W 1 2 W 12 IN 8 IN INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET 1 2 L 5 FT MINIMUM LENGTH POST AT 6 FT MAXIMUM SPACING PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LBS TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36 IN WIDE TIRE COMPACTION ZONE MACHINE SLICE 8 IN - 12 IN DEPTH FLOW FLOW SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED) NOT TO SCALE 1 C1 2 FT MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENTEXISTING GROUND FLOW 45° STRAW SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG 1 IN X 2 IN X 24 IN LONG WOODEN STAKES. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL FROM TRENCH ON UPGRADIENT SIDE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG PLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG IN SHALLOW TRENCH (1 IN - 2 IN DEPTH) 8 IN - 10 IN EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPACE BETWEEN STAKES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1 FT FOR DITCH CHECKS OR 2 FT FOR OTHER APPLICATIONS. BIOROLLS NOT TO SCALE 3 C1 EXISTING GROUND GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA SHALL APPLY EXCEPT WHERE MODIFIED BY THESE DOCUMENTS. 2."GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (1-800-252-1166) SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY CONFLICTS. 4.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5.EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED TO PROVIDE 4" TOPSOIL COVERAGE OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. 6.THE BUILDING PAD MUST BE PROVIDED WITH POSITIVE DRAINAGE. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 7.AFTER THE SILT FENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED REMAINING SEDIMENT SHALL BE SMOOTHED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 8.NO FINISHED SLOPE SHALL EXCEED 4H : 1V UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. METHODS OF MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (I.E. SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXIT, INLET PROTECTION, ETC.) SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 2.INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY INLET THAT MAY RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS OF THE PROJECT. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (FLOODING / FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. THE PERMITTED MUST RECEIVE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE CITY ENGINEER VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. 3.INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S, SUCH AS SILT FENCE, AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. 4.RETAIN AND PROTECT AS MUCH NATURAL VEGETATION AS FEASIBLE. WHEN VEGETATION IS REMOVED DURING DEVELOPMENT, THE EXPOSED CONDITION OF LAND SHALL BE KEPT TO THE SHORTEST PRACTICAL PERIOD OF TIME, BUT NOT LONGER THAN 60 DAYS. ANY EXPOSED AREAS EXCEEDING THIS TIME-FRAME SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WITH STRAW MULCH, WOODCHIPS, OR ROCK (STRAW MULCH IS PREFFERED). AREAS BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE AND AREAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION ARE EXEMPT FROM TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 5.ANY STEEP SLOPES (3H : 1V OR STEEPER) EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING OR BY OTHER MEANS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CEASING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE STEEP SLOPES. STOCKPILES MAY BE PROTECTED BY AN ANCHORED TARP OR PLASTIC SHEET. 6.PROVIDE DUST CONTROL AS NECESSARY. DUST CONTROL CAN INCLUDE WATER. 7.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC PAVEMENT AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS OR AS NEEDED. 8.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY 7 DAYS, OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ALL RAIN EVENTS GREATER THAN 1.0" IN 24 HOURS. CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 9.SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. 10.AFTER FINAL GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL CONSIST OF 4 INCHES TOPSOIL, AND SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER APPLIED BY METHODS AND RATES RECOMMENDED IN MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 2575 AND MN/DOT SEEDING MANUAL, OR SOD. THE SEED MIX SHALL BE MN/DOT 25-151. 11.NO CONCRETE WASHOUT ALLOWED ON SITE, TRUCK BASED SELF CONTAINMENT WASHOUT DEVICES REQUIRED. 12.OIL STAINS ON CITY STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED UP WITH FLOOR DRY, AND DISPOSED OF AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIAL. 13.ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE SHALL BE STORED CLEANED UP AND DISPOSED OF PER EPA STANDARDS. 14.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 15.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AFTER PERMANENT STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 16.TEMPORARY PUMPED DISCHARGE POLLUTION PREVENTION TECHNIQUES: "DANDY DEWATERING BAG" BROCK WHITE CO. USA. 17.ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MUST BE BIODEGRADABLE WITH LOOSE-WEAVE NET. 18.PROJECT MANGER KERRY HAGE PHONE No. 763-286-3369 EMAIL: Kerry@Hagehomes.com USE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT FENCE OR BIO-ROLLS PER DETAIL 1/C1 OR 3/C1 Proposed Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 3,431 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 1,758 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,184 sq ft Percentage 33.17% Existing Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 2,769 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 2,330 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,094 sq ft Percentage 32.69% 7601 73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 11.17.23 PROPOSED GRADING 11.29.23 CONTACT PERSON Contact info: Kerry Hage Hage Homes Cell: 763-286-3369 Email: kerry@hagehomes.com NORTH 133.86N 63°24 '38 " E 136 .97 NORTH 74.43MmailboxSign896.7896.7896.4896.5895.9896.2896.1896.0896.8897.0896.7896.8896.5895.8895.4893.2894.0895.7895.7895.8896.2895.0892.3896.0896.0895.9896.4896.3894.2894.2892.6GF892.7893.5896.4896.3896.3892.7892.8897.2894.2896.3896.5896.4895.7895.8895.9895.6897.9895.7FFE897.3Manholerim=895.96895.9896.4896.1896.4895.820" 15896.6895.8896.0896.3896.5G896.2896.3896.3895.3895.5895.5895.9895.9896.0897.2897.0896.3894.5894.2892.7891.5892.3895.1894.2891.9891.4890.7890.0889.6890.3889.7896.2896.2896.2895.1895.0896.1896.2896.2896.3897.7WO896.6895.1895.0895.0895.0895.0895.1896.4892.3WO892.1893.7892.0891.9891.9891.9890.7889.8889.6892.1891.6890.1889.5890.0890.115"891.017"890.8891.8891.8892.1892.2WO892.7E891.9891.8891.9892.2892.1892.413.02.0 8.014.4 23.722.8 23.97.13.013.225.114.323.926.723.711.47.87.2 5 510 RESIDENCENo. 460329.635.163.4F e n c eMERILANE8958928938948 9 6 8 9 7 89289689689589389489623.2DETACHEDGARAGE7.329.980°46'53"122.137'0"16'3 1/2"41'2"16'3 1/2"7'5 1/2"23.423.613.8892.7892.1892.060.15 10L=40.00R=65.00=35°15'32"=04°46'09"L=160.36R=1926.52GenSteps P a v e r sP a v e r sS t e p sCovered C o n c.B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e r P a v e r s StoopW a l l WallsS u r f a c eSTORM SEWEREASEMENT PER DOC.No. 3504175B i t u m i n o u s Proposed Addition Silt Fenceor BiorollsSTORM SEWEREASEMENTWATER MAINEASEMENT#1966x000.0Denotes Existing ElevationDenotes Iron MonumentDenotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Existing ContoursDrawn BySignedGregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992Scale: 1" = 20'F.B.No.Project No.I certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.revAddress:Legal Description7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.com903951133-27Site Plan Survey For:4603 Merilane AvenueEdina, MNPrepared this 26th day of September 2023. HAGE & COMPANY Lot 1, Block 1, WALLINGS ADDITIONFIRST REPLATHennepin County, MinnesotaProperty located in Section 29, Township 117,Range 21, Hennepin County, MinnesotaF:\survey\wallings addition first replat\1-1\01 Surveying - 90395\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgBasis forbearings isassumedSurveyors CertificateProperty Zoned R-1, ResidentialBuilding Setback Requirements per Zoning Ordinance Front - 30 feet** (116.4' average of Block) Side - 10 feet Rear - 25 feetBenchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the intersection ofMerilane and Mait Lane. Elevation = 894.14 feet (NGVD 29)Proposed Building CoverageLot Area18,642 sq ftResidence3,431 sq ftCovered Stoop79 sq ftTotal3,510 sq ftPercentage18.83%NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests.Proposed building information must be checked withapproved building plan and development or gradingplan before excavation and construction.Proposed grades shown on this survey areinterpolations of proposed contours from thedrainage, grading and/or development plans.NOTE: The relationship between proposed floorelevations to be verified by builder.NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats ofrecord or information provided by client.Denotes Tree Protection Fence10-20-23 added tree protection fencesProposed Impervious SurfaceLot Area18,642 sq ftResidence3,431 sq ftCovered Stoop79 sq ftFront Pavers &Steps127 sq ftBack Pavers685 sq ftBack Steps41 sq ftBit. Driveway1,758 sq ftConc. Apron63 sq ftTotal6,184 sq ftPercentage33.17%11-17-23 easement west line, proposed gradingDenotes Proposed ContoursDenotes Surface DrainageNeighboring Setbacks:4604 Merilane Ave. = 34.4 feet4602 Merilane Ave. = 198.4 feetAverage Setback = 116.4 feet11-29-23 average setbacks NORTH ARROW ARCHITECTURE / www.northarrowarch.com / (612)850-2469 / 2855 Autumn Woods Drive, Chaska MN 55318 VARIANCE APPLICATION SUMMARY Property Address: 4603 Merilane, Edina, MN Property ID: 29-117-21-12-0016 Present Zoning: R1 Description of Variance Requested The property at 4603 Merilane is a single family residential home. The owners would like to add additional attached garage space with finished square footage above on the west side of the home. The addition would be back from the front of the home, and within the standard side yard setback. However, because of the current siting of the home immediately to the east, the front yard setback is being called out as 116’ vs. 30’. A 116’ setback would render this lot unbuildable. Therefore, a variance is requested to allow for traditional setbacks for this specific lot that would keep it in line with the existing character of the street. The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As shown in the supporting documents, a 116’ setback from the street would result in an unbuildable lot. Any addition of any sort would be encroaching on the noted setback, and would be unworkable. The proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. This home sits at the start of what is being interpreted as a cul-de-sac, without the benefit of the yard and siting of the other homes around the perimeter. The homes immediately to the west and on the north side all relate to the street and are much more in keeping with the typical zoning requirements for the city of Edina. To the east and south, the remaining homes all relate to a setback more aligned with the cul de sac, and would not affected by this variance. The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. This variance will allow the home to be updated within the zoning that would be found on a typical Edina lot. The proposed variance will not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood. The character and siting of this home is in keeping with the homes immediately to the east along Merilane. The design as planned does not alter the nature or character of the home, as can be seen in the supporting documents. NORTH ARROW ARCHITECTURE / www.northarrowarch.com / (612)850-2469 / 2855 Autumn Woods Drive, Chaska MN 55318 VARIANCE APPLICATION SUMMARY Property Address: 4603 Merilane, Edina, MN Property ID: 29-117-21-12-0016 Present Zoning: R1 Description of Variance Requested The property at 4603 Merilane is a single family residential home. The owners would like to add additional attached garage space with finished square footage above on the west side of the home. The addition would be back from the front of the home, and within the standard side yard setback. However, because of the current siting of the home immediately to the east, the front yard setback is being called out as 116’ vs. 30’. A 116’ setback would render this lot unbuildable. Therefore, a variance is requested to allow for traditional setbacks for this specific lot that would keep it in line with the existing character of the street. The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As shown in the supporting documents, a 116’ setback from the street would result in an unbuildable lot. Any addition of any sort would be encroaching on the noted setback, and would be unworkable. The proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. This home sits at the start of what is being interpreted as a cul-de-sac, without the benefit of the yard and siting of the other homes around the perimeter. The homes immediately to the west and on the north side all relate to the street and are much more in keeping with the typical zoning requirements for the city of Edina. To the east and south, the remaining homes all relate to a setback more aligned with the cul de sac, and would not affected by this variance. The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. This variance will allow the home to be updated within the zoning that would be found on a typical Edina lot. The proposed variance will not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood. The character and siting of this home is in keeping with the homes immediately to the east along Merilane. The design as planned does not alter the nature or character of the home, as can be seen in the supporting documents. NORTH 133.86N 63° 2 4' 3 8 " E 1 3 6. 9 7 NORTH 74.43M mailbox Sign 896.7 896.7 896.4 896.5 895.9 896.2 896.1 896.0 896.8897.0 896.7 896.8 896.5 895.8 895.4 893.2 894.0 895.7 895.7 895.8 896.2 895.0 892.8 892.3 896.0 896.0 895.9896.4896.3894.2 894.2 892.6 892.5 GF 892.7 892.6 893.5 896.4 896.3 896.3 892.7 892.8 897.2 894.2 896.3 896.5 896.4 895.7 895.8 895.9 895.6 897.9 895.7 FFE 897.3 Manhole rim=895.96 895.9 896.4 896.1 896.4 895.8 20" 15 896.6 895.8 896.0 896.3 896.5 G 896.2 896.3 896.3 895.3 895.5 895.5 895.9 895.9 896.0 897.2 897.0 896.3 894.5 894.2 892.7891.5 892.3 895.1 894.2 891.9891.4 890.7 890.0 889.6 890.3 889.7 896.2 896.2 896.2 895.1895.0 896.1 896.2 896.2 896.3 897.7 WO 896.6 895.1 895.0 895.0895.0 895.0 895.1 896.4892.3WO 892.1 893.7 892.0 891.9 891.9891.9 890.7 889.8 889.6 892.1 891.6 890.1 889.5 890.0 890.1 15" 891.0 17" 890.8 891.8 891.8892.1 892.2 WO 892.7 E 891.9891.8891.9 892.1892.2 892.2 892.1 892.4 13.0 2.08.014.423.7 22.823.97.13.013.225.1 14.323.9 26.723.7 11.47.8 7.25510 RESIDENCE No. 4603 29.6 35.163.4F e n c e MERI L A N E 895892 893 894 896 897 892 8 9 6 896 895 8 9 3 8 9 4 89623.2DETACHED GARAGE 7.3 29.9 80°46 '53 "122.13L=40 . 0 0 R=6 5 . 0 0 =35° 1 5 ' 3 2 " =04°46'09" L=160.36 R=1926.52 Gen StepsP a v e r s P a v e r sS t e p s CoveredC o n c r e t e B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e rP a v e r sStoopW a l lWalls S u r f a c e STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC. No. 3504175 B i t u m i n o u s F:\survey\wallings addition first replat\1-1\01 Surveying - 90395\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg Basis for bearings is assumed Surveyors Certificate x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Denotes Iron Monument Denotes Found Iron Monument Denotes Existing Contours NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. Drawn By Signed Gregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 Scale: 1" = 20' F.B.No. Project No. I certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. rev Address: Legal Description 7601 73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 90395 1133-27 Existing Conditions Survey For: 4603 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN Surveyed this 7th day of June 2023. HAGE & COMPANY Lot 1, Block 1, WALLINGS ADDITION FIRST REPLAT Hennepin County, Minnesota Property located in Section 29, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Property Zoned R-1, Residential Building Setback Requirements per Zoning Ordinance Front - 30 feet** (116.4' average of Block) Side - 10 feet Rear - 25 feet Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the intersection of Merilane and Mait Lane. Elevation = 894.14 feet (NGVD 29) Existing Building Coverage Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 2,769 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Total 2,848 sq ft Percentage 15.28% Existing Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 2,769 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 2,330 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,094 sq ft Percentage 32.69% NORTH 133.86N 63° 2 4' 3 8 " E 1 3 6. 9 7 NORTH 74.43M mailbox Sign 896.7 896.7 896.4 896.5 895.9 896.2 896.1 896.0 896.8897.0 896.7 896.8 896.5 895.8 895.4 893.2 894.0 895.7 895.7 895.8 896.2 895.0 892.8 892.3 896.0 896.0 895.9896.4896.3894.2 894.2 892.6 892.5 GF 892.7 892.6 893.5 896.4 896.3 896.3 892.7 892.8 897.2 894.2 896.3 896.5 896.4 895.7 895.8 895.9 895.6 897.9 895.7 FFE 897.3 Manhole rim=895.96 895.9 896.4 896.1 896.4 895.8 20" 15 896.6 895.8 896.0 896.3 896.5 G 896.2 896.3 896.3 895.3 895.5 895.5 895.9 895.9 896.0 897.2 897.0 896.3 894.5 894.2 892.7891.5 892.3 895.1 894.2 891.9891.4 890.7 890.0 889.6 890.3 889.7 896.2 896.2 896.2 895.1895.0 896.1 896.2 896.2 896.3 897.7 WO 896.6 895.1 895.0 895.0895.0 895.0 895.1 896.4892.3WO 892.1 893.7 892.0 891.9 891.9891.9 890.7 889.8 889.6 892.1 891.6 890.1 889.5 890.0 890.1 15" 891.0 17" 890.8 891.8 891.8892.1 892.2 WO 892.7 E 891.9891.8891.9 892.1892.2 892.2 892.1 892.4 13.0 2.08.014.423.7 22.823.97.13.013.225.1 14.323.9 26.723.7 11.47.8 7.25510 RESIDENCE No. 4603 29.6 35.163.4F e n c e MERI L A N E 895892 893 894 896 897 892 8 9 6 896 895 8 9 3 8 9 4 89623.2DETACHED GARAGE 7.3 29.9 80°46 '53 "122.137'0"16'3 1/2"41'2"16'3 1/2"7'5 1/2"23.4 23.6 13.8 14.0 L=40 . 0 0 R=6 5 . 0 0 =35° 1 5 ' 3 2 " =04°46'09" L=160.36 R=1926.52 Gen StepsP a v e r s P a v e r sS t e p s CoveredC o n c. B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e rP a v e r sStoopW a l lWalls S u r f a c e STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC. No. 3504175 B i t u m i n o u sProposed Additionx000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Denotes Iron Monument Denotes Found Iron Monument Denotes Existing Contours Drawn By Signed Gregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 Scale: 1" = 20' F.B.No. Project No. I certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. rev Address: Legal Description 7601 73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 90395 1133-27 Site Plan Survey For: 4603 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN Prepared this 26th day of September 2023. HAGE & COMPANY Lot 1, Block 1, WALLINGS ADDITION FIRST REPLAT Hennepin County, Minnesota Property located in Section 29, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Proposed Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 3,431 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 1,758 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,184 sq ft Percentage 33.17% F:\survey\wallings addition first replat\1-1\01 Surveying - 90395\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg Basis for bearings is assumed Surveyors Certificate Property Zoned R-1, Residential Building Setback Requirements per Zoning Ordinance Front - 30 feet** (116.4' average of Block) Side - 10 feet Rear - 25 feet Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the intersection of Merilane and Mait Lane. Elevation = 894.14 feet (NGVD 29) Proposed Building Coverage Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 3,431 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Total 3,510 sq ft Percentage 18.83% NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed grades shown on this survey are interpolations of proposed contours from the drainage, grading and/or development plans. NOTE: The relationship between proposed floor elevations to be verified by builder. NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. Denotes Tree Protection Fence 10-20-23 added tree protection fences NORTH 133.86N 63° 2 4' 3 8 " E 1 3 6. 9 7 NORTH 74.4313.0 2.08.0 14.423.7 22.823.97.13.0 13.225.1 14.323.9 26.723.7 11.47.8 7.210 RESIDENCE No. 4603 29'-8" 35 ' -2 "63'-5"F e n c e MERI L A N E 23'-3"DETACHED GARAGE 7'-4" 29'-11"80°4 6 ' 53 "122.137'0"16'3 1/2"41'2"16'3 1/2"7'5 1/2"23.4 23.6 13'-9"60'-2"L=40 . 0 0 R=6 5 . 0 0 =35° 1 5 ' 3 2 " =04°46'09" L=160.36 R=1926.52 StepsP a v e r s P a v e r sS t e p s CoveredC o n c. B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e rP a v e r sStoopW a l lWalls S u r f a c e B i t u m i n o u sProposed Addition116' SETBACK LINE UNBUILDABLE AREA UP UP DOWN FAMILY ROOM UTILITY GUEST BEDLAUNDRY UTILITY REC ROOM GARAGE STORAGE FOUR SEASON OORCH UP GUEST BED LAUNDRY UTILITY SPA/GYM GARAGE STORAGE LIVING ROOM EXISTING WALL NEW WALL NOTES: ·SEE A-200/201 FOR WINDOW TAGS ·ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE BEDROOM- ABOVE 6'-10 1/2"16'-0" 9'-0"41'-6"16'-4"3'-8"1 A-200 2 A-200 2 A-201 1 A-201 1 A-300 3'-0"2'-6"5'-0"2'-6"3'-0"7'-8"3'-2"2'-3"2 A-300 EXPOSE EXISTING FIR CEILING AND REFINISH/PAINT POSTS AT EXISTING STRUCTURAL LOCATIONS 1'-0" TEMPERED GLASS AT INTERIOR GLASS WALLS 5'-1"5'-10"5'-1"4'-1"3'-2"3'-1" 18'-11 1/2"5'-1 1/2" DOWN UPDOWNDOWN DOWN PRIMARY BED WIC WIC PRIMARY BATH KITCHEN DINING FOYER BED 1 BED 2 GREAT ROOM DN FOYER EXISTING WALL NEW WALL NOTES: ·SEE A-200/201 FOR WINDOW TAGS ·ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE MODELNUMBERTRADENAMEPRODUCTMATERIAL FAMILY ROOM UTILITY DW STR/REC UP DN DN REF/ FRZ STOR. DRAWERS/SHELVES BANQUETTE DECK/TERRACE OVER SLEEPERS- SLOPE TO INTEGRAL GUTTER AT PERIMETER 10'-0"4'-3"4'-0"5'-1"4'-3"3'-5 1/2" 7'-6" NEW PLANTER BOX NEW PLANTER BOX 16'-0"5'-7 1/4"4'-4"7'-4"4'-4"5'-4"2'-1"4'-9"12'-2"2'-1"6'-4 1/2"3'-9 1/2"16'-2"DINING ROOM GREAT ROOM KITCHEN POWDER ROOM BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 1 PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIM. CLOSET PRIM. BATH FP10'-0"4'-3 1/2"1'-10 1/2"16'-0"41'-6"3'-0"10'-0"3'-0"7'-7 3/4"2'-10 1/4"4'-3 1/2"2'-10 1/4"3'-7 1/2"4'-3 1/2"3'-7 1/2" 10'-0"11'-6 1/2"15'-8 1/2"3 1/2" 2'-8"5 1/2"2'-8"3'-11"2'-8"2'-6 1/2"7 1/2"2'-8"5'-7"5'-6"10'-0" 5'-8"2'-7 1/4"2'-8"3'-7"DASHED LINE INDICATES LINE OF ADDITION NEW STAIR UP TO UPPER LEVEL INFILL FRAMING AT CURRENT DROPPED GREAT ROOM- LEVEL WITH KITCHEN FLOOR PLANE NEW STAIR TO FAMILY ROOM LEVEL 10'-1 1/2"6'-2"3"2'-4 1/2"2'-10"4'-0"3'-7"13'-1"15'-11 1/2" 2'-7"13'-4 1/2"2'-2"7'-11"2'-6"13'-3"2'-2 1/2"12'-9 1/2"4'-10"NEW DOORS AT EXISTING OPENINGS- SEE ELEVATIONS FOR LAYOUT ALIGN WALL W/ EXISTING CORNER 3'-7" REMOVE EXISTING SHOWER SD CM CO DETECTOR SMOKE DETECTOR SDCMSDSDSDSD CM 1 A-300 WASHTOWER 5'-7"5'-2"5'-7"2X6 WALL FRAMING2X6 WALL FRAMING2X6 WALL FRAMING 8'-1 1/2" 11'-2 1/2" 2'-8" LAUNDRY 8"2'-1"2'-10"1 A-200 2 A-200 2 A-201 1 A-201 2 A-300 POSTS AT EXISTING STRUCTURAL LOCATIONS DOWN DOWN OPEN TO BELOW ATTIC BEDROOM BATH BED 2 PRIMARY BED BELOW ATTIC OPEN TO BELOW HALL DOWN OPEN TO BELOW ATTIC BEDROOM BATH BED 2 ATTIC OPEN TO BELOW HALL GUEST SUITE WIC SUITE BATHDNSTAIR CLEARANCE EXISTING WALL NEW WALL NOTES: ·SEE A-200/201 FOR WINDOW TAGS ·ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FINISH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 8'-2 1/2"19'-10"7'-6"28'-11 1/2"2'-11"4'-10"15'-3"DASHED LINE INDICATES LINE OF ADDITION 1 A-300 OPTION- ADDITIONAL BUNKROOM CONNECTED TO BEDROOM (REQUIRES EGRESS WINDOW IF ADDED) SD CM CO DETECTOR SMOKE DETECTOR SDCMSDSD SD SD 1 A-200 2 A-200 2 A-201 1 A-201 2 A-300 DASHED LINE INDICATES LINE OF ADDITION TO ROOF- CONTINUE ROOF PITCH AT NEW NEW DORMER- MATCH PREVIOUS/EXISTING NEW ADDITION- SIDING AND TRIM TO MATCH EXISTING ADD NEW DECORATIVE SDL'S TO EXISTING WINDOWS- INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR (TYP) NEW WINDOWS- MATCH EXISTING WIDTH AND RAISE SILL HEIGHT TO CLEAR KITCHEN COUNTER AT INTERIOR- FIELD VERIFY HEIGHT PRIOR TO SELECTION NEW PLANTER BOX AT INFILL FROM REPLACEMENT WINDOW REPLACE EXISTING GARAGE DOOR WITH NEW AND MATCH W/ NEW DOOR AT ADDITION EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EXEX EX ELCA2955E (OR SIM.) EGRESS WINDOWS- TEMPER WHERE REQ. DECORATIVE GABLE VENT NEW WINDOW IN EXISTING OPENING- REVISE WINDOW HEIGHT TO MATCH WINDOWS IN ADJACENT BEDROOM (TEMP. AS REQ.) 100'-0" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 91'-0 3/4"T.O. LOWER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 89'-5 3/8"T.O. LOWER LEVEL REC ROOM FLOOR 99'-0"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING 107'-11 1/2"B.O. MAIN LEVEL CEILING 109'-2" T.O. UPPER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 97'-11 3/8"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING- LOWER 118'-0 1/2"B.O. HIGHEST CEILING DASHED LINE INDICATES LINE OF ADDITION TO ROOF- CONTINUE ROOF PITCH AT NEW NEW DORMER- MATCH PREVIOUS/EXISTING NEW ADDITION- SIDING AND TRIM TO MATCH EXISTINGADD NEW DECORATIVE SDL'S TO EXISTING WINDOWS- INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR (TYP) NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS AT GREAT ROOM- COORDINATE FRAME SIZE IN FIELD IN EXISTING WINDOW OPENING WIDTH NEW DECK OVER EXISTING SUNROOM- EXISTING SLOPE TO REMAIN W/ SLEEPERS TO INTEGRAL DRAIN AT EAVE ELCA2955E (OR SIM.) EGRESS WINDOWS- TEMPER WHERE REQ. ELCA2943E (OR SIM.) TRANSOM WINDOWS6'-9 1/4"3'-0"NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS AT FAMILY ROOM- MARVIN ELEVATE OR APPROVED ALTERNATE 5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" ELCA2543 EX EX EX EX EX VIF VIF VIF ELCA2943E (OR SIM.) 100'-0" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 91'-0 3/4"T.O. LOWER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 89'-5 3/8"T.O. LOWER LEVEL REC ROOM FLOOR 99'-0"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING 107'-11 1/2"B.O. MAIN LEVEL CEILING 109'-2" T.O. UPPER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 97'-11 3/8"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING- LOWER 118'-0 1/2"B.O. HIGHEST CEILING NEW PLANTER BOX NEW DECK OVER EXISTING SUNROOM- EXISTING SLOPE TO REMAIN W/ SLEEPERS TO INTEGRAL DRAIN AT EAVE NEW ADDITION- BEYOND ADD NEW DECORATIVE SDL'S TO EXISTING WINDOWS- INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR (TYP) ADD NEW DECORATIVE SDL'S TO EXISTING WINDOWS- INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR (TYP) EX EXEX EX EXEX NEW WINDOWS- MATCH EXISTING WIDTH AND RAISE SILL HEIGHT TO CLEAR KITCHEN COUNTER AT INTERIOR- FIELD VERIFY HEIGHT PRIOR TO SELECTION 100'-0" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 91'-0 3/4"T.O. LOWER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 89'-5 3/8"T.O. LOWER LEVEL REC ROOM FLOOR 99'-0"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING 107'-11 1/2"B.O. MAIN LEVEL CEILING 109'-2" T.O. UPPER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 97'-11 3/8"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING- LOWER 118'-0 1/2"B.O. HIGHEST CEILING NEW ADDITION- SIDING AND TRIM TO MATCH EXISTING NEW DORMER- MATCH PREVIOUS/EXISTING EX EX EX ELCA 2555 OR APPROVED ALTERNATE ELCA 2555 OR APPROVED ALTERNATE ELCA2543 OR APPROVED ALTERNATE EX ELCA 2531 OR APPROVED ALTERNATE 100'-0" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 91'-0 3/4"T.O. LOWER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 89'-5 3/8"T.O. LOWER LEVEL REC ROOM FLOOR 99'-0"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING 107'-11 1/2"B.O. MAIN LEVEL CEILING 109'-2" T.O. UPPER LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR 97'-11 3/8"B.O. LOWER LEVEL CEILING- LOWER 118'-0 1/2"B.O. HIGHEST CEILING NORTH 133.86N 63° 2 4' 3 8" E 1 3 6. 9 7 NORTH 74.43M mailbox Sign 896.7 896.7 896.2 896.1 896.8897.0 896.7 896.8 896.5 895.8 895.4 896.2 895.0 892.3 896.4 895.7 895.8 895.9 895.6 Manhole rim=895.96 895.9 896.1 896.420" 15 896.6 G 895.5 895.5 895.9 895.9 896.0 897.2 897.0 896.3 894.5 894.2 892.7891.5 892.3 895.1 894.2 891.9891.4 890.7 890.0 889.6 890.3 889.7 890.7 889.8 889.6 892.1 891.6 890.1 889.5 890.0 890.1 15" 891.0 17" 890.8 892.2 E 892.4 13.02.08.014.423.7 22.823.97.13.013.225.1 14.323.9 26.723.7 11.47.8 7.25510 RESIDENCE No. 4603 29.6 35.163.4F e n c e MERI L A N E 895892 893 894 896 897892 8 9 6 896 8 9 58938 9 4 89623.2DETACHED GARAGE 7.3 29.9 80°46 '53 "122.137'0"16'3 1/2"41'2"16'3 1/2"7'5 1/2"23.4 23.6 13.8 60.15 10 L=40 . 0 0 R=65 . 0 0 =35° 1 5 ' 3 2 " =04°46'09" L=160.36 R=1926.52 Gen StepsP a v e r s P a v e r sS t e p s CoveredC o n c. B i t u m i n o u s C a n t i l e v e rP a v e r sStoopW a l lWalls S u r f a c e STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC. No. 3504175 B i t u m i n o u sProposed AdditionSilt Fence or Biorolls STORM SEWER EASEMENT WATER MAIN EASEMENT #1966 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 WALLINGS ADDITION FIRST REPLAT 4603 MERILANE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA HAGE & COMPANY 275 MARKET ST, SUITE 567 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55405 SCALE IN FEET 200 40 F:\survey\wallings addition first replat\1-1\01 Surveying - 90395\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgC1 OF C1 DATE:LIC. NO.: SHEET NO. PROJECT: 90395REVISIONSDESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JEFFREY A. PRASCH, P.E. 11.09.23 52706 ABL JAP GRP INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE 2 C1 MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC OVERFLOW HOLES (2 IN X 4 IN HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) USE REBAR OR STEEL ROD FOR REMOVAL (FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB BOX REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2 IN X 4 IN). EXTEND 10 IN BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES, LENGTH VARIES. SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES. L W 1 2 W 12 IN 8 IN INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET 1 2 L 5 FT MINIMUM LENGTH POST AT 6 FT MAXIMUM SPACING PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LBS TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36 IN WIDE TIRE COMPACTION ZONE MACHINE SLICE 8 IN - 12 IN DEPTH FLOW FLOW SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED) NOT TO SCALE 1 C1 2 FT MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENTEXISTING GROUND FLOW 45° STRAW SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG 1 IN X 2 IN X 24 IN LONG WOODEN STAKES. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL FROM TRENCH ON UPGRADIENT SIDE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG PLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG IN SHALLOW TRENCH (1 IN - 2 IN DEPTH) 8 IN - 10 IN EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPACE BETWEEN STAKES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1 FT FOR DITCH CHECKS OR 2 FT FOR OTHER APPLICATIONS. BIOROLLS NOT TO SCALE 3 C1 EXISTING GROUND GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1.THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA SHALL APPLY EXCEPT WHERE MODIFIED BY THESE DOCUMENTS. 2."GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (1-800-252-1166) SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY CONFLICTS. 4.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5.EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED TO PROVIDE 4" TOPSOIL COVERAGE OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. 6.THE BUILDING PAD MUST BE PROVIDED WITH POSITIVE DRAINAGE. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 7.AFTER THE SILT FENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED REMAINING SEDIMENT SHALL BE SMOOTHED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 8.NO FINISHED SLOPE SHALL EXCEED 4H : 1V UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. METHODS OF MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (I.E. SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXIT, INLET PROTECTION, ETC.) SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 2.INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ANY INLET THAT MAY RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS OF THE PROJECT. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (FLOODING / FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. THE PERMITTED MUST RECEIVE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE CITY ENGINEER VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. 3.INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S, SUCH AS SILT FENCE, AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. 4.RETAIN AND PROTECT AS MUCH NATURAL VEGETATION AS FEASIBLE. WHEN VEGETATION IS REMOVED DURING DEVELOPMENT, THE EXPOSED CONDITION OF LAND SHALL BE KEPT TO THE SHORTEST PRACTICAL PERIOD OF TIME, BUT NOT LONGER THAN 60 DAYS. ANY EXPOSED AREAS EXCEEDING THIS TIME-FRAME SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WITH STRAW MULCH, WOODCHIPS, OR ROCK (STRAW MULCH IS PREFFERED). AREAS BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE AND AREAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION ARE EXEMPT FROM TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 5.ANY STEEP SLOPES (3H : 1V OR STEEPER) EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING OR BY OTHER MEANS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CEASING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE STEEP SLOPES. STOCKPILES MAY BE PROTECTED BY AN ANCHORED TARP OR PLASTIC SHEET. 6.PROVIDE DUST CONTROL AS NECESSARY. DUST CONTROL CAN INCLUDE WATER. 7.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC PAVEMENT AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS OR AS NEEDED. 8.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY 7 DAYS, OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ALL RAIN EVENTS GREATER THAN 1.0" IN 24 HOURS. CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 9.SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. 10.AFTER FINAL GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL CONSIST OF 4 INCHES TOPSOIL, AND SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER APPLIED BY METHODS AND RATES RECOMMENDED IN MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 2575 AND MN/DOT SEEDING MANUAL, OR SOD. THE SEED MIX SHALL BE MN/DOT 25-151. 11.NO CONCRETE WASHOUT ALLOWED ON SITE, TRUCK BASED SELF CONTAINMENT WASHOUT DEVICES REQUIRED. 12.OIL STAINS ON CITY STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED UP WITH FLOOR DRY, AND DISPOSED OF AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIAL. 13.ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE SHALL BE STORED CLEANED UP AND DISPOSED OF PER EPA STANDARDS. 14.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 15.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AFTER PERMANENT STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 16.TEMPORARY PUMPED DISCHARGE POLLUTION PREVENTION TECHNIQUES: "DANDY DEWATERING BAG" BROCK WHITE CO. USA. 17.ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MUST BE BIODEGRADABLE WITH LOOSE-WEAVE NET. 18.PROJECT MANGER KERRY HAGE PHONE No. 763-286-3369 EMAIL: Kerry@Hagehomes.com USE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT FENCE OR BIO-ROLLS PER DETAIL 1/C1 OR 3/C1 Proposed Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 3,431 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 1,758 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,184 sq ft Percentage 33.17% Existing Impervious Surface Lot Area 18,642 sq ft Residence 2,769 sq ft Covered Stoop 79 sq ft Front Pavers & Steps 127 sq ft Back Pavers 685 sq ft Back Steps 41 sq ft Bit. Driveway 2,330 sq ft Conc. Apron 63 sq ft Total 6,094 sq ft Percentage 32.69% 7601 73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 11.17.23 PROPOSED GRADING 11.29.23 CONTACT PERSON Contact info: Kerry Hage Hage Homes Cell: 763-286-3369 Email: kerry@hagehomes.com EdinaMN.govFront Yard Setback Variance Request4603 Merilane Proposed survey Sec. 36-439. - Special requirements.Established front street setback. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot that both have a front street setback on the same street, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots on the same street; or the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all other dwelling units on the same side of that street, between intersections. Existing and proposed floor plans