HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-10-23 Meeting Packet AGENDA
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
October 23, 2014
6:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of September 18, 2014
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During “Community Comment,” the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues
or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of
speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on
tonight’s agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair
or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the
matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Arden Park D Neighborhood Draft Engineering Report
B. 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Draft Engineering Reports
C. 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Projects
D. Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 1, 2014
E. Updates
i. Student Member
ii. Bike Edina Working Group
iii. Living Streets Working Group
iv. Walk Edina Working Group
v. Communications Committee
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission
October 23, 2014
Page 2
A. Correspondence
VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
A. Project Updates
X. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way
of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in
advance of the meeting.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS
Thursday October 23 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday November 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday December 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday January 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday February 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday March 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday April 16 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday May 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas & RR's\2014 Agendas\20141023 Agenda.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Edina Transportation Commission VII. A.
Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner ☐
☐
☒ October 23, 2014
Correspondence
No action is necessary.
Attachments:
Attached is correspondence received since the last ETC meeting.
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas & RR's\2014 R&R\20141023\Item VII.A. Correspondence.docx
Vision Edina
Vision Edina is a broad-based and inclusive community visioning
process for the City of Edina. Join your fellow residents,
organizations and business owners in discussions about the long
term potential and prospects for the City of Edina by participating in
a Vision Edina workshop.
Vision Edina will serve as an important foundation for strategic
efforts such as the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital
Improvement Plans. The City has partnered with Future iQ
Partners, an international consultancy company to guide us through the visioning process.
Help continue the conversation:
1. If you belong to a church, club, athletic or neighborhood association, consider hosting a
90-minute Vision Edina workshop during the months of October or November. If you
can commit to ten or more people at your gathering, we will do our best to match a
facilitator for your event! To schedule a session, please contact Heather Branigin at
HBranigin@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0403.
2. Attend a public meeting and give your input. Vision Edina community workshops for
the general public are scheduled for:
Wednesday, November 5: Senior Center, 7:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Thursday, November 6: Southdale Public Library, 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Wednesday, November 19, Senior Center, 7:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
3. Add your thoughts on the process by accessing Speak Up Edina at the following link:
http://speakupedina.org/discussions/vision-edina.
Receive email updates on the project by signing up for City Extra at the City of Edina website:
www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra. For more information about the Vision Edina project, contact
Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, at KKurt@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0415.
VISION
EDINA
future-)G
PAR 1NERS
Create Future Intelligence'
www.future-lqcom
Mark K. Nolan
From: Mark K. Nolan
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 10:02 AM
Cc: Sharon Allison
Subject: FW: League of Women Voters Edina October Meetings
Commissioners,
Please find below an email from the League of Women Voters Edina regarding upcoming meetings in October.
Thank you,
Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
952-826-0322 I Fax 952-826-0392
MNolanAEdinaMN.qov I www.EdinaMN.qov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Suzanne Kerwin [mailto:skerwin(acomcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 12:44 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: League of Women Voters Edina October Meetings
Please forward to the Mayor, City Council and members of Boards and Commissions.
Thank you,
Suzanne Kerwin
League of Women Voters Edina
"Vision Edina"
Thursday, October 9, Edina Senior Center,
Speaker: David Beurle, CEO and Founder of Future iQ Partners
Refreshments and social time are at 9:30.
The program will run from 10:00 — 11:30 AM, including Q and A.
The Thursday, October 9 meeting will be a Vision Edina workshop presented by David Beurle, CEO and Founder of
Future iQ Partners. Future iQ Partners has been contracted by the city to design and facilitate the Vision Edina initiative.
Vision Edina is meant to be an ambitious, broad-based and inclusive community visioning process. It will also serve as an
important foundation for other strategic efforts, such as the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plans.
The Workshops are designed to allow broad community input and discussion about the future of Edina. The Thursday
meeting workshop will build on previous Vision Edina workshops that developed plausible scenarios for Edina. An
1
interactive session exploring the implications of each scenario and discussion about preferred and expected scenarios
will take place. Surveys on the participants' perspectives will be compiled at the end.
Come to the October 9 meeting and share your own ideas about the future of Edina.
Redevelopment in Edina and the City's Comprehensive Plan
Saturday, October 11 at Edina City Hall, Community Room
Speaker: Steve Elkins, Metropolitan Council Representative, District 5.
Refreshments and social time are at 9:30.
The program will run from 10:00 — 11:30 AM, including Q and A.
Steve Elkins, Metropolitan Council Member representing Edina, Bloomington, Richfield and Hopkins, will speak at the
Saturday meeting.
Steve will talk about development in Edina, how zoning and the City's Comprehensive Plan guides redevelopment in the
city and the role of the Metropolitan Council.
The Comprehensive Plan is meant to provide Edina with an outline for future development and was last updated in
2009. The Metropolitan Council requires every city in the seven-county metro area to have such a plan and State law
requires that it be updated every 10 years. Edina's Plan includes chapters on land use, transportation, wastewater,
water supply, storm water management, housing and parks and recreation.
The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non-partisan political organization that encourages the informed and active
participation in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. For more information, please
visit www.lwvedina.orq.
2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Edina Transportation Commission VI. D.
Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
☒
☐
☐ October 23, 2014
Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 1, 2014
Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday October 1, 2014, be
forwarded to City Council for approval.
Information / Background:
It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting. An overview of the comments from
the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for
their November 18, 2014 meeting.
Attachments:
Traffic Safety Committee Report for October 1, 2014.
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\Traffic Safety Committee\Staff Review Summaries\14 TSAC & Min\10-01-14 Cover.docx
1 | Page
Traffic Safety Report of October 2014
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 1. The City
Engineer, Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Sign Coordinator, a representative from the
Planning Department and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting.
From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons have
been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if
they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can do so at the
October 16 Edina Transportation Commission meeting and/or the November 18 City Council meeting.
Section A : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends approval.
A1. Request for signing handicapped parking by the church’s elevator/ accessible entrance
This request comes from the Edina
Morningside Church, asking for
parking spaces near the accessible
entrance of the church to be marked
as handicapped only parking. The
requested area is along Morningside
Road. Typically two parishioners drive
themselves, or are escorted up to the
church, for services, which leads the
requestor to ask for two spaces be
reserved for parking and another to
be used as a drop off zone. Currently
this area is signed as no parking, for
150 feet from the corner of
Morningside and Grimes Avenue,
which is all-way stop controlled.
Morningside is 33 feet wide at this
location and has a nearby traffic
count from 2011, with 1859 ADT and
37.9 mph as the 85th percentile speed
on weekdays, and 1389 ADT and 37.7
mph as the 85th percentile speed on
Sundays. There is 115 feet from the
edge of the pedestrian ramp to the
stop sign, which equates to 80 feet of usable space (30 feet from a stop sign, 5 from a curb cut).
There is currently parking on both sides of the street just to the west of this location, where
there is a street width of 29.5 feet. Sidewalks are present on both sides of the street in this
location.
After review, staff recommends the placement of two handicapped parking stalls in this
location, by placing handicapped parking only signs. To prevent abuses of the intersection, a
no parking within 30 feet of sign placard shall be added to the post of the stop sign. Curbs
Map : Morningside Community Church
Photo : Morningside, looking east, towards Grimes
2 | Page
should be painted blue and the area by the church’s curb cut will should be marked with a
hashing to prevent parking in the area.
A2. Request for crosswalk upgrades across
66th Street at West Shore Drive and
Southcrest Drive
This request was fielded by staff during a
site visit to this location, connecting the
neighborhood to the south of 66th with
the sidewalk, park, and neighborhood on
the north of 66th. Currently, West Shore
has a signed and marked crosswalk in
place, while Southcrest has no
improvements. Pedestrian counts were
taken on West Shore on the morning of
August 5th, with the highest two hour
count having 35 people crossing on the
east leg from 7:30 to 9:30 AM and 35
people crossing the north leg from 8:45
to 10:45 AM. A gap study was
performed on 66th, which found that
during the morning peak hour, the
minimum 5 minute interval for gaps
totaling more than the required
crossing time (20 seconds, based off
width of street and reaction time) was
2 gaps at 7:45-7:50 AM, while the
evening peak had a minimum of 0 gaps longer than the required crossing time from 4:30-4:35
PM, both peak hours met warrants for installation of an Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon. A
pedestrian study was done on Southcrest for 24 hours, from 9 AM on August 12th to 9 AM on
August 13th. The counts for pedestrians crossing 66th at Southcrest had a maximum value of
eleven in a two hour period, this does not meet volume warrants for the City of Edina. Crosswalk
warrants are attached in Appendix B.
After review, staff recommends that an RRFB be placed at West Shore Drive, and no crosswalk
be placed at Southcrest, based on warrants.
Map : 66th and Southcrest (left), West Shore (right)
Photo : Existing crosswalk at 66th and West Shore,
looking east
3 | Page
A3. Request for investigation and resolving of issues related to bike lanes on Interlachen
Boulevard and Blake Road
This request comes from a resident
who feels that the bike lanes on
Interlachen Blvd are dangerous as
Interlachen approaches, and becomes
Blake Rd, due to decreases in width
and the state of repair of the road.
Measurements of the lane widths
were taken, and the lane for bicyclists
reduces in width to 6 inches, while the
state minimum for bicycle lanes is 4
feet, with at least 3 feet of width being
free of obstacles and of consistent
riding surface. Edge lines are
warranted for use along grade
separated roadways and on rural
arterials which exceed 20 feet in width,
and 3,000 in ADT, or elsewhere where
an engineering study indicates a need
for edge line markings. Interlachen has
9758 ADT and 85th percentile speeds of
35.6 mph (2013 MSA count), on the
west end of this section and had 7846
ADT and an 85th percentile speed of
36.3 mph on the east side of this section (count done in 2005). No bicycle related accidents, and
one rollover accident have been reported in the last five years. Further striping detail is in
Appendix A, with visuals for possible alterations.
After review, staff recommends restriping
Interlachen and placing signs at this
location as is shown in the visuals in the
Appendix. This recommendation is based
off the requirements for bike lanes, their
current condition, and standards for
vehicle lane widths.
A4. Request for signage around curves on
Gleason Road, between 78th and Dewey
Hill
Requestor states that many people go at
an excessive speed around the curves
along Gleason, between 78th St and Dewey
Hill Rd. Requestor also states that several
unreported accidents have occurred at
this location, with two reported accidents
Map : Gleason Rd curves investigated
Map : Interlachen Blvd and Blake Rd
Photo : Interlachen Blvd, east of Blake Rd, looking west
4 | Page
in the last five years. The curves in this location were analyzed using the AASHTO Green Book
design manual, and found to have design speeds significantly lower than the 30 mph speed
limit, with the southern curve having a design speed of 24.3 mph and the northern curve having
a design speed of 28.5 mph. Curve warning signs are already in place at these locations. Parking
is prohibited on the east side of Gleason. A counter was placed on Gleason between the two
curves, with a volume of 1395 AADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 32.3 mph.
After review, staff recommends placing advisory speed signs beneath the curve signs already
in place, and adding a curve sign to the southbound side of the road. Other curves should also
be investigated up Gleason to Valley View to ensure that the area is safe for travel at the
current speed limit.
A5. Request for school walking safety along 59th
Street, starting at Concord Avenue
This request has come from multiple parents in
the walking zone of Concord school, who are
concerned about their children’s safety as they
walk on 59th Street, especially at school release.
The concern is that vehicles parked to pick up
children are forcing the walkers to move to the
center of the street towards the one remaining
travel lane. An onsite investigation was conducted
on September 5th, from 2:40-3:30 P.M. the street is 30 feet wide, with parking on both sides, no
sidewalk, but with a crosswalk from the school to the south side of 59th Street, 54
pedestrians(13 on the north side, 41 on the south side), 17 bikes (1 on the north side, 16 on the
south side), and 57 vehicles (43 eastbound and 14
westbound) used the street, while 6 vehicles
parked in the first block from the school to pick up
children, as opposed to using the bays on Concord.
Discussing with the school district, there is the
ability for school buses to alter routes if the City
requests such action. Typical speeds from vehicles
on the street were 15-25 mph. Schools in the area
start at 7:40-8:30 A.M. and end school from 2:40-
3:05 P.M.
After review, staff recommends restricting
parking along the south side of the road during school times (7:00 AM-4:00 PM, School days),
as well as asking the school district to reroute buses to 58th street, which has a sidewalk along
its north side.
Map : 59th from Concord to Ashcroft
Photo : 59th Street, from Concord, looking east
5 | Page
Section B : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends denial
B1. Request for a crosswalk across Metro
Boulevard at the intersection of 76th Street
A request was made for a crosswalk across
Metro Blvd. at 76th St. A pedestrian count was
taken from 10:30 AM on August 18th, to 4:00 PM
on August 19th. The maximum pedestrian count
for pedestrians across Metro in a two hour
period in this time was 18 crossings, with 61
crossings taking place during the study, 38 of
which were on the south side of 76th St. This crossing does not meet the volume warrant for a
crosswalk. Crosswalk warrants are attached in Appendix B.
After review, staff recommends denial of this
request based on not meeting volume warrants
for a marked crosswalk.
B2. Request for Traffic calming or diversion for
Highwood Drive, from Vernon Avenue to Pine
Grove Road
A request was made for traffic calming along
Highwood Dr. from Vernon Ave. to Pine Grove
Rd. Requestor states that traffic uses the
neighborhood as a cut through from Vernon to
Blake during rush hours, when traffic gets
delayed at the intersection. Three successful
counts were taken in areas that had been
counted before in 2010, the northernmost count
had a 2010 volume of 158 AADT and an 85th-
percentile speed of 23 mph, with a 2014 volume
of 135 AADT and and 85th-percentile speed of 23.3 mph; the central count location had a 2010
volume of 436 AADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 29.5 mph, with a 2014 volume of 397 AADT
and a 85th-percentile speed of 27.5 mph; the southernmost count had a 2010 volume of 551
AADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 27.8 mph, with a 2014 volume of 430 AADT and an 85th-
percentile speed of 27.6 mph. There have been no reported accidents along this roadway in the
last 5 years.
After review, staff recommends denial of this request, based on speeds and volume that has
decreased in recent years, and probable low amounts of cut-through traffic.
Map : 76th St and Metro Blvd
Map : Highwood Drive, count areas circled, the
intersection of Vernon and Blake is starred, The black line
is approximately Highwood Drive
6 | Page
B3. Request for a crosswalk at 57th and
France, across France
Requestor states that crossing France at
57th Avenue is difficult and deserves to
have a crosswalk installed at the location.
A 24-hour video study was conducted, with
the peak 2-hour pedestrian volumes of 11.
The crosswalk did not meet pedestrian
volume warrants. Crosswalk warrants are
attached in Appendix B.
After review, staff recommends denial of this request, based on a lack of warrants met.
B4. Request for permission to place blind
driveway sign.
A resident requests clarification on city
policy regarding “Blind Driveway” signs.
The resident’s driveway is close to the
intersection of Lincoln and Malibu, and a
thicket of trees at the intersection
obscures the driveway. Resident was
informed that the city does not typically
install such signs, and resident asked if he
could place his own, such as along Valley
View, west of Gleason.
After review, staff recommends denial of
this request, based on city policy for not placing such signs, and Minnesota Statute that does not
allow other entities to place different signs where they may be seen from the roadway.
B5. Highlands School driveway is very wide, formerly existing crosswalk no longer present
A request came in for repainting a crosswalk
across the driveway for Highlands School.
There had previously been a crosswalk, and
when the driveway was resurfaced, the
crosswalk was not repainted. Currently there
is a sidewalk on the south side of the
driveway, and across Doncaster Way from
the driveway, with a marked crosswalk and
crossing guards across Doncaster Way. The
driveway is said to handle up to three lanes of traffic and was measured as being over 59 feet
wide.
Map : 57th and France
Map : Highlands School driveway at Doncaster
Photo : Driveway and thicket, looking west, towards
Lincoln
7 | Page
After review, staff recommends that the
schools paint this crosswalk, based on
liability concerns and the small amount of
crossings that would likely come from a
marked crosswalk would not warrant a
marked crosswalk. Requestor was given
contact information for Edina Public
Schools maintenance office.
D Items : Other Traffic Safety issues handled
D1. Requests for tree trimming and better sight distances for the signage at Valley View and
McCauley Trail. Photos and information was forwarded to the City Forester who trimmed the
vegetation.
D2. Resident requested better merging facilities on France Avenue at 44th St, was forwarded to the
County, as France is a county road
D3. Request for more traffic control on Gleason at Highway 62, this was forwarded to MnDOT, the
organization that manages traffic control in this area.
D4. Requester states that the construction detours and set up for Tracy Ave emergency work is
confusing and may lead to drivers being in accidents, reviewed the traffic control plan by Q3
(the contractor doing the work), and found it to be in full compliance with MnDOT guides and
regulations.
D5. Resident notes that many people are upset by the back up on McCauley due to 169
construction, requested a temporary no outlet sign be placed such that drivers do not try to use
it as a through route. A temporary sign was placed by Public Works.
D6. Request from a resident on Xerxes about the proposed resurfacing and bump outs that are
associated with the current plan, that Edina stop the placement of the bump outs, was informed
that the County had received similar complaints of the bump outs aesthetics, and that Edina was
not in a position to alter the project.
D7. Resident called and stated that a deaf child sign should be removed due to the family no longer
being present. Engineering called the family with the deaf child, they still live at the location
with the child who is deaf.
D8. Request for information on Browndale Avenue, near the Saint Louis Park border, was given a
count from 2001, which was the most recent in the location requested.
D9. Request for information on Wooddale Avenue, by a planner who is developing a small area plan
for Wooddale and Valley View. Pedestrian and bicycling counts which are being done for
MnDOT were requested and shared.
Photo : Driveway for Highlands School
8 | Page
D10. Request for increased traffic control to be placed at Gleason and McCauley during the 169
construction. MnDOT’s detour did not address the issue and the temporary nature would have
made it difficult to assess the need for a change in traffic control sufficiently for such a decision.
9 | Page
Appendix A: Interlochen Boulevard Striping
Striping plans, red = curb or edge of pavement, green = white line, blue = yellow.
10 | Page
The numbers above reflect the locations shown in this map
Possible signage and striping, at points 1 and 5 (approximately), based off MNMUTCD designs
for a through, motor-vehicle lane drop.
11 | Page
Possible signage and striping from a vehicle’s perspective.
Thank you to Google for the base images these were created on.
12 | Page
Appendix B: Crosswalk Warrants
A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily
apparent as having pedestrian movement.
B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a
minimum of two hours during any eight hour period.
C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the “Vehicle Gap Time”. This is the total
number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak
hour. Criteria for markings are:
o More than five gaps – pavement marking and signage only.
o Four to five gaps – add activated pedestal mounted flasher.
o Less than three gaps – add activated overhead mounted flasher.
D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless
in conjunction with signalization.
E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks:
o Routes to schools
o Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities.
o Locations adjacent to public parks.
o Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street.
o Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street.
F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: October 23, 2014
Agenda Item #: VI. B.
Action El
Discussion
Information 121
Subject: 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports
Action Requested:
Review and comment on the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports.
Information / Background:
Please recall that the Edina Engineering Department presented the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction
project areas to you at your August 21 meeting. Staff prepared the attached draft engineering reports for
the projects. Please review and comment on these reports.
Attachments:
Countryside H Draft Engineering Report
Prospect Knolls B Draft Engineering Report
Dewey Hill G Draft Engineering Report
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \ PROJECTS \ IMPR NOS \ BA413 Countryside FI(2015) \ DESIGN \ETC \ 20141021 Draft Feasibility Submittal \ Item VI.B. 2015 Neighborhood
Reconstruction Draft Engineering Report.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. SOLE St. • Edina, MN 55424
ENGINEERING STUDY
DEWEY HILL G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS
Bonnie Brae Drive, Hyde Park Circle, Hyde Park
Drive, Hyde Park Lane
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-415
October 16, 2014
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
___________________ 43790______________
Chad A.Millner Reg. No. Date
ENGINEERING STUDY – BA-415
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
DEWEY HILL G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
OCTOBER 16, 2014
SUMMARY: The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to
the storm sewer system and fire hydrants, concrete curb and gutter spot
repair, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement.
The estimated total project cost is $1,012,030. The estimated roadway
construction cost is $410,705 and will be funded by special assessments at a
rate of $11,960 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements
and repairs amount to $601,325 and will be funded through the respective
utility fund.
The project can be completed during the 2015 construction season. Staff
believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to maintain a
livable environment and a sound public infrastructure, as initiated by Edina’s
2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20.
LOCATION: The project includes Bonnie Brae Drive, Hyde Park Drive, Hyde Park Circle,
and Hyde Park Lane. Below is a detailed location map of the Dewey Hill G
Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project (Figure 1).
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
Figure 1. Project Area Map
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Dewey Hill G Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering
Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program,
identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project addresses updating
aging infrastructure with improvements associated with the pavement
condition, storm water, sanitary sewer, and watermain systems, and bicycle
and pedestrian facilities.
All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (the “Plan”), the Comprehensive Bicycle
Transportation Plan, the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan,
the Living Street Policy, and sustainable project evaluation.
City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Sidewalk Facilities
Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk facilities
within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of Appendix D, there are no
proposed sidewalk facilities indicated within the project limits.
Bicycle Facilities
Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed bicycle facilities within
the City, as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. As
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
shown in Figure 7.11 of Appendix D, there are no proposed bicycle facilities
indicated within the project limits.
Living Streets Policy and Sustainability Evaluation
The vision statement of the Living Streets Policy expresses the need to look
at future projects differently:
Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance
community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better
health.
Although the Living Streets Plan has not been developed, staff has included
elements that pertain to residential neighborhoods in the rehabilitation of the
infrastructure and replacement of the roadways.
Staff is also including a simple sustainability analysis for this project. We
anticipate a more refined analysis after the development of the Living Streets
Plan that will include review and input from a sustainability team.
Sustainability in engineering projects means delivering our services in a
manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the
community, and funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of
sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. We look at sustainability
as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, improving and
shaping both the present and future of our community so that future
generations are not burdened by the decisions of today.
The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks.
• Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services
such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and
emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the
community?
• Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment,
such as surface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource
diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise, and others?
• Economy: How does the project influence the local economy? What are
the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the
price?
The following is a summary of this evaluation:
Equity: The project maintains access and mobility to the transportation
network. Where available, this includes transportation options for a variety of
user groups including, but not limited to, children, seniors, and disabled
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
individuals. Updates to the fire hydrants provide public safety staff the ease
of connection needed during an emergency.
Environment: The project provides homeowners a piping system to discharge
ground water into; this will eliminate standing water and/or algae buildup
along the curb lines. Construction operations are required to use the smallest
footprint necessary to complete the work, thus protecting the existing natural
environment. The project also analyzes the sanitary sewer to ensure that
inflow and infiltration of clear water is kept out of the system, which minimizes
regional wastewater treatment.
Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into
the future. The proposed roadway section can easily be maintained long-term
with the use of mill and overlays and/or seal coating operations. These
maintenance operations will extend the life of the pavement. The project will
also use less intense construction methods, such as trenchless technology
(i.e., lining the pipes rather than removing and replacing them).
This is a simplified analysis of the project’s sustainability. In the future, we
anticipate correlating this analysis to an in-depth scoring system, displaying
the City’s sustainability to the community.
Staff Issues
The following is a list of issues, some generated by resident comments,
addressed in this report:
• Existing sanitary sewer and watermain system conditions
• Stormwater drainage
• Private utilities
• Existing street lighting
• Existing pavement surface condition
• Existing landscaping, retaining walls, and driveways
• Traffic speed and volume
• Pedestrian accessibility and safety
Resident Input
As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3
years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an
open house on October 8th, 2012. Residents were also invited to a second
open house on September 9th, 2013. Materials from these meetings are
available upon request.
We followed up with a questionnaire to the property owners on June 4, 2014,
inquiring about drainage problems, pedestrian accommodations, street
lighting, and other project-related concerns. The questionnaire was
completed and returned by 25 of the 34 property owners, a return rate of
74%. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix B.
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
The following is a summary of feedback received from residents:
• 2 of 25 (8%*) felt sidewalks were needed; 23 (92%) opposed new
sidewalks
• 7 (28%) identified traffic concerns in the neighborhood
• 6 (24%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood
• 4 (16%) felt street lighting was inadequate and favored upgrades
*Percentages based on number of returned surveys
A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on July 28, 2014 to
discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was
attended by 42 residents representing 35 properties. Materials from this
meeting can be found in Appendix A.
Resident input was also taken in the form of emails regarding the project.
Those emails can be found in Appendix J.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Streets
The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the late
1960s and 70s. All of the streets in the neighborhood currently have concrete
curb and gutter, and the average roadway width is 30 feet. The typical street
section has 4 inches of bituminous pavement over a sand and gravel base,
according to record plans of the original construction. Street sections have
been verified by a recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area.
The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood, but is in
relatively poor condition. The average pavement condition index (PCI) for the
City of Edina is 58 and the average PCI for Dewey Hill G is 20. Examples of
the current street condition can be seen in Photos 1 & 2.
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition
The City of Edina contracts with a consultant to evaluate all bituminous
roadways within the City. The streets are graded based on a number of
conditions, such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling, and potholes.
Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new
road surface and 0 being extremely poor. The City evaluates the PCI values
of streets within a neighborhood to determine a proper maintenance program.
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
Neighborhoods with a PCI greater than 65 are considered for seal coats,
PCIs between 65 and 45 are evaluated for mill and overlays, and PCIs less
than 45 are evaluated for total reconstruction.
The pavement throughout these streets is near the end of its useful life. The
costs to maintain and repair the roadways will steadily increase, and seal
coating or overlaying is no longer feasible.
Traffic and Crash Data
City staff measured traffic volumes and speeds within the neighborhood.
Average daily traffic volumes ranged from 67 to 102 cars per day with 85th
percentile speed ranging from 22.7 to 23.3 mph. The traffic and crash data is
shown in Appendix F.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer system consists of 8-inch and 9-inch vitrified clay
pipe (VCP), 8” ductile iron pipe (DIP), and 8” cast iron pipe (CIP), installed
between 1969 and 1976. Historical records indicate there have been few
sewer back-ups or blockages in the area. The trunk sanitary sewer system
has been televised and will be evaluated for upgrades.
Watermain
The existing watermain system consists of 6-inch DIP and 1 ½-inch copper
pipe, installed between 1969 and 1976. The overall system has experienced
no breaks. The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood and lack the
STORZ nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick
connection of fire hoses.
Storm Sewer
The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District. Further evaluation will be done by staff regarding
drainage issues resulting from the resident questionnaires.
Private Utilities
Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications, and cable
television utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are buried
underground within and outside the street right-of-way.
Street lighting consists of standard “ladder rack,” “postop,” and “coach
lantern” lights mounted on wood poles located throughout the project area as
shown in Appendix H.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks are currently located along the south side of Dewey Hill Road to
the north of the project area, and along the east side of Gleason Road to the
west of the project area.
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
Landscaping
Some properties have vegetation, hardscapes (such as boulders and
retaining walls), or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A
portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed
infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete
the necessary work.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: Streets
The pavement section is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the
subgrade. The existing pavement will be recycled for use as base material in
the new roadway. A minimum of 8 inches of recycled gravel material will be
graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5 inches of
bituminous base and 1.5 inches of bituminous wear course. The
reconstructed gravel and pavement sections will meet the requirements of a
minimum 20-year design life based on projected traffic loadings. With
prescriptive maintenance procedures, including regular seal coating and
periodic thin overlays, the design life can be extended considerably.
Due to the limited scope of the utility repairs, the majority of the concrete curb
and gutter will remain in-place, and the current roadway widths will not be
altered. While our Living Streets Policy sets a design guideline to keep street
pavement widths to the minimum necessary and the draft Living Street Plan
has defined the minimum street width as 27 feet, it is not cost effective to
include these features within this project. It is anticipated that as part of the
next street reconstruction project for this area, the utility systems will have
reached the end of their service lives, thereby requiring extensive
rehabilitation. This will require the removal of the majority of the curb and
gutter, thereby allowing the Living Street design guidelines to be implemented
in a cost effective manner.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
The trunk sanitary sewer has been televised and based on our evaluation,
portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-
pipe (CIPP) methods. Grease deposits and minor cracking account for the
majority of the issues.
Watermain
Watermain improvements include replacing all the gate valves and upgrading
fire hydrants to City standard. Additionally, the undersized 11/2-inch copper
water mains will be upgraded to 6-inch systems and additional fire hydrants
will be installed to meet current public safety standards.
Storm Sewer
Spot repairs will be made to concrete curb and gutter segments that are
deficient or no longer functioning properly. Any new or replaced curb and
gutter is funded through the storm sewer fund, not under the roadway special
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
assessment. The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve
existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood.
Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their
poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property
owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer
system.
The resident questionnaires highlighted a localized drainage issue in the
backyards of 7500 and 7436 Hyde Park Drive (See Appendix E, Figure 1-1,
SWP_24). An existing catch basin structure located in the backyards
connects to the storm sewer system on Hyde Park Drive through an 18-inch
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). It is proposed to upgrade the existing pipes
in this vicinity with 21-inch pipes to help minimize flooding during large rain
events. Staff is reviewing this project with a Water Resources consultant to
determine the feasibility of this improvement. Preliminary costs for this work
to be funded by the Storm Sewer Utility have been included in the project
cost estimate.
Sidewalks
The results from the resident questionnaires show that property owners do
not want to add sidewalks. Staff is not recommending the addition of
sidewalks in this neighborhood.
Other Improvements
Pedestrian Curb Ramps: All pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed to
meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
Lighting: The results of the questionnaire show that property owners do not
want to reconstruct the street lights. Currently, the City does not have a
standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved.
These concerns will be addressed with the Living Streets Plan that is under
development.
Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later
date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies.
The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections;
therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting.
Private Utilities: Private utility owners have expressed some interest in
upgrading portions of their networks within the project limits. This work is not
part of the City’s project, but will be coordinated to occur prior to our
construction activities. A meeting was held with the private utility operators
on August 28, 2014 to introduce the private utility operators to this project.
The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and
concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process,
while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the Engineering and
Public Works staff.
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
RIGHT-OF-WAY
& EASEMENTS: The right-of-ways for Bonnie Brae Drive, Hyde Park Drive, Hyde Park Circle,
and Hyde Park Lane are all 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay
within the right-of-way and no additional easement requirements are
anticipated.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $1,012,030 (Table 1). The total cost
includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs
from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. The estimated
roadway construction cost is $410,705 and will be funded by special
assessments. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $601,325 and will
be funded through their respective utility fund.
Item Amount Total Cost
Roadway: $ 410,705
Roadway Total: $ 410,705
Utilities:
Storm Sewer $ 418,460
Watermain $ 61,915
Sanitary Sewer $ 120,950
Utility Total: $ 601,325
Total Project: $ 1,058,035
Table 1. Estimated Project Costs
ASSESSMENTS: Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 34.33 residential
equivalent units (REU) in the Dewey Hill G project area. Assessments will be
levied against the benefiting adjacent properties, as shown in Appendix C.
The estimated assessment per REU is $11,960 (Figure 2).
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
Figure 2. Preliminary Assessment Map
The formula for calculating REUs for properties that are corner lots is
described below:
Single-Family Residential Corner Lots:
6001 Dewey Hill Rd
= (1 REU) x (1/3 side yard) = 0.33 REU
Engineering Study
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-415
October 16, 2014
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and
necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Dewey Hills G
Neighborhood.
APPENDIX: A. 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting
B. Property Owners Questionnaire
C. Preliminary Assessment Roll
D. 2008 City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities
E. Proposed Storm Water Improvements
F. Traffic and Crash Data
G. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks
H. Existing Street Lights and Signs
I. Living Streets Policy
J. Correspondence with Residents
Project Open House 2012 October 8, 2012
Neighborhood Informational Meeting July 28, 2014
ETC Feasibility Study Review October 21, 2014
Receive Feasibility Report and Public Hearing December 9, 2014
Bid Opening March/April 2015
Award Contract Spring 2015
Begin Construction Spring 2015
Complete Construction Fall 2015
Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2016
APPENDIX A
2015 Neighborhood
Roadway Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
June 4, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood
Dear Resident:
Some streets in your neighborhood are on a list of roadway reconstruction and utility improvement projects being
considered by the City of Edina for the summer of 2015. See the attached map identifying your project area. On April 16,
2013, the City Council adopted neighborhood names and boundaries as part of the Name Your Neighborhood Project.
Please note that your neighborhood name associated with the roadway reconstruction and utility improvements may
have changed. Some neighborhood names stayed the same.
Please save the date of Monday, July 28 to attend an informational meeting from 6 to 8 p.m. to learn about how
projects are funded, a typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted and how you can prepare. A meeting
reminder will be mailed to you approximately two weeks prior.
Meantime, we’d like to hear from you. The City would like your input regarding key components of the project via the
attached questionnaire. Please read the instructions, fill out the questionnaire and return it to us in the enclosed envelope
by June 17.
How the City will use your input:
• Your responses help us design the project. Components of a project vary and are based on both the condition of the
infrastructure and questionnaire responses.
• Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. The estimated special
assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until information is gathered from the questionnaires and a
feasibility report is completed in early September. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2016. The
special assessment is payable over 15 years.
• The special assessment is for the cost of the new roadway. If the neighborhood feels the street lighting needs are not
being met and improvements are needed, the costs would also be a special assessment. Sidewalks are funded through
the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund and thus are not assessed to property owners. The questionnaire helps us
evaluate the need for various items. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not assessed to property owners.
After we review questionnaire responses, we will continue the project planning process. We will present the feasibility
report at the public hearing in December. Construction will begin in spring/early summer and end in late fall of 2015.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon
Allison at 952-826-0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
Sincerely,
Patrick Wrase, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Enc: Project Map, Questionnaire Instructions, Questionnaire, Return Envelope
7404
5832
7308
6004
7301
7420
5828
5925
7304
7609
7416
5836
7312
5829
7305
7309 5920
7431
5833
7309
7412
7515
7313
7424
7519
7429
73047305
7505
7509
5912
7301
7428
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7415
7423
6005
5908
7419
5921
7603
7611
7314
7304
7612
5911
7318
7300
7605
7509
7322
7409
5917
7421
7401
7501
5848
7504
7609
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7505
7417
7607
7405
7501
7401
7326
7411
7316
60056009
7435
7601
5840
5844
7425
7420 7424
7615
7508
7404
59206000
7611
7432
7408
6001
7500
7320
7605
7405
7436
7615
58
2
8
7413
7650-7656
7651
7409 PROJECT LIMITS
DEWEY HILL RD
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
H
Y
D
E
P
A
R
K
D
R
HYDE PARK CIR
HYDE PARK LN
BONNIE BRAE DR
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
2015 Project AreaDewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-415C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
9/24/2014
1
www.EdinaMN.gov
2015 Neighborhood Roadway
Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
July 28, 2014
www.EdinaMN.gov
Countryside H –164 Properties
Prospect Knolls B –39 Properties
Dewey Hill G –35 Properties
Arden Park D –225 Properties
-Consultant Project
Valley View Road –Municipal State Aid
54th Street –Municipal State Aid
Note: Neighborhood Names
2015 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions
•Timeline
•Project Scope
•What You Can Expect
•Funding Sources
•Communication
•How to Prepare
•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
Engineering Technicians Engineering Coordinator
Aaron KuzniaAndrew ScipioniSharon Allison
Environmental Transportation Assistant City Director of
EngineerPlannerEngineer Engineering
Ross BintnerMark NolanPatrick WraseChad Millner
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Project Timeline
July –September 2014Feasibility report and estimates
provided
December/January 14/15Public hearing
January-March2015Plan preparation and bidding
April/May2015 Construction begins
October/November 2015Construction concludes
Spring 2016 Warranty work
Fall 2016 Final assessment hearing
9/24/2014
2
www.EdinaMN.gov
Why My Street?
•Streets that meet specific standards are subject to
reconstruction
•Priority is given to streets with the highest need based on
watermain breaks, sanitary sewer deficiencies, storm
sewer/drainage issues, and Pavement Condition Index
•Reconstruction is usually more cost-effective long-term than
patching or seal-coating
•Streets are grouped together to help prolong pavement life and
maximize the economics of scale for construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Countryside H
Neighborhood
•164 Properties
•1.97 miles of roads
•30,100 square
yards of street
pavement
•8fire hydrants
•49 sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Prospect Knolls B
Neighborhood
•39 Properties
•0.4 mile of roads
•6,100 square yards of
street pavement
•4 fire hydrants
•13 sanitary manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Dewey Hill G
Neighborhood
•35 Properties
•.39 mile of roads
•6,000 square yards
of street pavement
•3 fire hydrants
•8sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•All of streets have curb and gutter
•Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 11/100
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Varied driveway materials
•Some properties already have concrete driveway entrances
9/24/2014
3
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Storm water drainage issues
•Landscaping placed in the right-of-way
•Irrigation systems & pet containment fences in the right-of-way
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Streets
•Curb and gutter replacement –selective
•New roadbed and pavement surface
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Driveways
•Spot driveway entrance replacement
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Utilities
•New fire hydrants and gate valves
•Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement
•Storm sewer upgrades
–Sump pump drain pipe in various locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Sidewalks
•Based on draft Edina Living Streets Sidewalk Facilities Plan
•Final design will be evaluated based on questionnaire responses
and Feasibility Report
Arden Park D
Countryside H
www.EdinaMN.gov
•December 2014 Council Meeting
•Feasibility Study Presented to Council
•Public Hearing for Project
–Opportunity for Project Area residents to voice concerns and
comments for the project
•Vote on Reconstruction Project -Assessed Project
–Requires 4-1 vote by Council to Approve
–4-1 vote required by MN Statute Chapter 429
•Vote on Sidewalk Component –Not Assessed
–Requires a 3-2 vote of City Council to Approve
Edina City Council –Project Approval
9/24/2014
4
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust, noise, vibrations, and
mud
•Localized flooding during
rainfall
•Occasional timeline delays
due to inclement weather
•May be asked to limit water
use
•Homes may be connected to
temporary water line
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Driveways may be
inaccessible for 3-5 days
•Neighborhood streets
may be periodically
inaccessible
•Irrigation and pet
containment systems
mostly likely will be
damaged
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•We will keep you informed
•You will have opportunities
to provide input
•Private utility work is to be
completed before City work
•We will do our best to
minimize inconveniences
•Contractor will
accommodate special access
needs
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
Property Impacts
•Items located within the City’s
right-of-way may be damaged
–Irrigation and pet
containment systems will
be repaired
–You can remove plantings
and other landscape
features before the project
–Disturbed areas will be
seeded after the project is
complete
www.EdinaMN.gov
Other Impacts
•Our goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood
disturbance.
•The City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric,
telephone, and cable TV) to upgrade or repair utilities along
the project area.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Do Taxes Cover Street Projects?
•Roughly 20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses such
as Police, Fire, Parks and Public Works (snowplowing, pothole
repairs, sealcoating, and other street maintenance)
•Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction
9/24/2014
5
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projects are funded by a combination of Special Assessments to
residents, the City’s Utility Funds, and the Pedestrian and
Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
Roadway Costs Sanitary Sewer
Costs
Storm Sewer
Costs
Watermain
Costs
Sidewalks,
Bike lanes,
etc.
Funding
Source Special AssessmentsUtility FundUtility FundUtility FundPACS Fund
www.EdinaMN.gov
Special Assessments
•Assigned to adjacent
properties that stand to
benefit from construction
improvements
•Cover 100% of
roadway costs
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Utility Fund
•Collection of utility service charges paid to the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Concrete curb and gutter (includes driveway aprons)
–Sanitary sewer
–Water main
–Storm sewer
–Sump pump pipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
•Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees
•Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Sidewalks
–Signage
–Crosswalks
–Street striping
www.EdinaMN.gov
Preliminary Assessments
Neighborhood Estimated Assessment
Range per REU*
#of
REUs
SquareYards
of Paving
Square Yards of
Pavingper REU
CountrysideH$8,600 -$10,900172.5930,100 174
ProspectKnolls B$8,800 -$11,20035.526,115 172
Dewey Hill G$9,100 -$11,40033.336,000 180
*Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Payment Options
•Will be billed for the assessment one year after project
completion
•Assessments are payable over 15 years
•Payment options:
1.Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance
charges
2.Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes
3.Roll entire amount to property taxes
4.Defer payment if 65 years old or older
9/24/2014
6
www.EdinaMN.gov
Providing Input
•Public hearings and questionnaire mailed to your home
•Weigh in on:
–Sump pump connection options
–Street drainage issues
–Traffic/pedestrian issues
–Streetlight upgrades
www.EdinaMN.gov
Questionnaire Results
Questionnaire results are available.
Neighborhood % of Questionnaires Returned
CountrysideH 49% (78/158)
ProspectKnolls B 45%(17/38)
DeweyHills G 68% (23/34)
Total Responses To Date 51% (118/230)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Communication Tools
•Become a neighborhood captain to help facilitate project
communication
–Let us know of someone in your neighborhood who might
fit this role
•You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, schedules and
questionnaires via regular mail
•Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun-Current
•Door hangers are distributed when there is time-sensitive
information
•Final assessment notices are mailed one year after construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Extra
“City Extra” emails are the best way to receive regular updates
once construction begins. These are free, weekly email updates
about your project.
•Sign up on City of Edina website, www.EdinaMN.gov
–Check the box next to your project name
•If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates
upon request
•It’s the best way to stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
How to Prepare
•Sign up for City Extra
•Begin financial planning
•Complete questionnaire
•Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around the
street construction timeline
•Ask questions; stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
Contact Us
Email: mail@edinamn.gov
Call: 952-826-0371
Visit:Engineering Department
7450 Metro Blvd.
Hours:7:00 a.m. –3:30 p.m.
9/24/2014
7
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thanks for your time!
Questions?
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
1 LIMV1 frt-G 0 GC /*I 6,00( /5i,h/in 4 n P- T?
2 -1e-(21._ct.A (--__.jZsLL_ 7'13 c
3 I'/,) ..‘2/A‘e f A 51-/e7t) iiie )1(') .),
4 d Nko cox EW i;orf eiar-edoiA D‘r
.6&' Li CPG/A-,,,t_ al: _ 5 t 44 £10
6 ---Vf3-4NN -N4 D_62,C,U" UbStLe OA 6%.r\lk1a.
7 u A ri-4\ SChmck >I) 5 ci 00 A'Wo [ct ku
8 ,51e ff fiey Pr.0.145e-
1 o 4-) deA-se, ,\ 73c).8 ScikeL, 1)r-:
11 1 -7
13 i V-M.--G-re--e -V4 S7 ll G-g--ove-
14 Vke,l/C-red .' q 14-Aoli, eLr.k.
15 /
)
taka-eb - ÷-191147 ral„ 7-7 5-005---- iquibici 4 0---
16 12. 0..,r_ 6-0 rgA5-1A_ -91b t itA64\0 1 A br
17 'j.:7/ /I- ./-z'eri ec .6-e73.2 /5c/A -e., CPrr-c2Q----
18 1--OVIA. /4--tti- LA. a 14 vu ess y c7o'Cut,Xet_IF-F -Q kb
cat Nreid 19 A-4,,,,u 6-,,v3.....,,,.,
20 5-6DTI A4...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
) UJ [zL I Ff
6
CA),\..1 kVe-1(-V (10S\-e
---W1 c rtiAsks-tA
C4r-g
T (te_
(e
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
\Je.c-vpv alYJ-tvy
Utra-v-1,-/
2 A‘///.9 //&
11_10 64t/V77
r (d LJ
ait
A4-At
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1(
ie0C de*
C e_ Le
3--(Ro
0.71k-11/3 vi
-)1S; 03-C33 Ze ut_ <D,4
59)0 Par
GO /t_)) e o- /?ai.
5 3 k,"- f\-rvu
2-al t i\f\fej4/ Cxycetk.
S—K0 6trove
1-(7. ri‘c Ck KC1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
evi (cut--k-> f 1,1 Jotuf
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Number Question Answer
1 What is an REU?An REU is a residential equivalent unit. One single-family home is 1 REU. All single-family homes within a project area are
assessed the same because they will receive the same benefit.
2 Does that include corner lots?
Per the assessment policy, corner lots are assessed a total of 1 REU. Depending on the address, the property may get a 1/3, 2/3,
or 1 REU value for the current project. Past projects may have already charged the property a partial REU. All properties will be
reviewed for reu calculations during the feasibility study phase of the project.
3 How are the REUs calculated?Each single-family home is 1 REU. Other facilities (higher-density residential, industrial, schools, churches, etc.) are assessed
based on land use, total building are, number of units, and access to the project area.
4 What determines the estimate range in the
presentation?
The more details that are known about the project, the more precise we can be with out estimate. The price range presented to
you is based on average unit prices and estimated quantities of work to be done. As we move further along in the design process,
we can give you a better idea of what the assessment will be.
5 When does construction begin?
Pending council approval at the public hearing in December, the contract will be awarded around March or April. Depending on
the contractor's schedule, work typically takes place between May and September or October. A period of 8-10 weeks is
preferred for neighborhood construction, but, like we've seen this year, sometimes weather can extend that timeline.
6 What are the finance charges?Residents are charged at 1% over the rate that the City can borrow money. It is normally between 3% and 5%
7 What happens to mailboxes within the project
areas?
Depending on the project, they may all stay in place, some may have to be relocated, or all may need to be relocated. We will
coordinate with homeowners and the postal service when we know more about the extent of the project.
8 How far into the right-of-way does
construction go?
This type of construction usually extends 10-15 feet behind the curb onto your property. Depending on the extend of the utility
work needed, there may be additional disruptions. All disturbed areas within the project areas will be seeded following
construction.
9 When will I know the extent of the
interruption onto my property?Once construction begins, we will know more about how far into your property we will have to go.
10 How do you determine which driveway aprons
to replace?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. It also depends on if the driveway is constructed from brick pavers or is a lifetime-warranty concrete
driveway.
11
Does the same contractor perform all of the
work, and do the projects happen
sequentially?
When the contracts are sent out for bids, the City typically receives bids from the same dozen or so contractors every year.
Countryside will be bid as one contract, but Prospect Knolls and Dewey Hill will most likely be incorporated into the same
contract. It is possible that the same contractor might be awarded both, but more than likely, there will be multiple contractors.
The scheduling of the work will be dependent on the contractors.
12 Will the new street be asphalt or concrete? Do
we get to have a say in that?
The new streets will be bituminous, not concrete. In the City's experience, concrete streets are more expensive to construction
and maintain. Our staff normally recommends bituminous streets.
13 Will the whole neighborhood have curb
replaced, or do you go house by house?
In these neighborhoods, we are looking at performing spot repair/replacement of curb. This means our inspectors will examine
the entire project area, noting locations where the curb is cracked, settled, flat, or otherwise damaged. It is often more cost-
effective to do this than to replace the entire length of curb in a neighborhood. However, if we find a large portion of the curb
needs replacement, then we will look into potentially replacing all of the curb.
14 Do you seed or sod after the project?
The City has gravitated towards seeding instead of sodding after the projects. Seeding is more drought-resistant, requires less
water, and is more environmentally friendly than sod. In past projects, the City has had better success at getting permanent turf
established with seed than with sod.
15 Does the seeding occur immediately after yard
disruptions?
All restoration work will occur after the first layer of asphalt and before the final layer is paved. This is done to prevent heavy
construction equipment from driving on the new road surface, potentially damaging it.
16 What are the costs involved in the sump pump
installation?
Sump pump drainage pipes will be installed in the project areas where feasible. The costs of installing the pipe are covered by the
City Utility Fund. Once the pipe is installed, homeowners wishing to connect will need to obtain a building permit from the City
and connect themselves. The costs to the homeowner may be between $500 and $1,500.
17
Someone in a project area this year said you
encouraged residents to have their main lines
inspected before the project?
If you need to or would like to replace or upgrade your services, now would be a good time to do so. If you were to wait until
after the project is completed, any holes dug into the new roadway will need to be patched approximately 30' by 30', a cost
which the resident would have to pay for. The City will also work with homeowners who wish to improve their services to have
those costs put on their special assessment if they wish.
18
If we want to upgrade our service, does the
City pay for upgrading/adapting the
connection?
Only if such an upgrade or adaption is required as part of the project. Any changes made beyond City standards will not be paid
for by the City.
19 How much does a 30' x 30' street patch cost?In the City's experience, anywhere between $3,000 to $5,000.
20 Will the water be shut off?There will be occasional water shut-offs during the project in order to replace fire hydrants and gate valves. We will do our best
to limit the number of shut-offs, and let you know ahead of time when and where they are going to occur.
21 What does the sidewalk design look like?
We are looking into designing a 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard between the sidewalk and the back of curb. This
boulevard acts as a safety buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. The sidewalks are only anticipated to be installed along one
side of the streets on which they are proposed. The City is currently studying the property impacts involved with installation to
determine a preferred alignment.
22 Will there be crosswalks?Painted crosswalks will most likely not be included with this project unless they already exist within the project area. The need
for additional crosswalks will need to be evaluated by our Traffic Safety Coordinator.
23 How far into the property will the sidewalk go?
Construction related to installing a new 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard will typically extend an additional 6 feet onto the
property. The boulevard width may vary depending on existing obstacles (trees, driveways, terrain, etc.) that change the
alignment of the sidewalk.
24 What will happen if I have a driveway apron
with concrete aggregate or brick pavers?
If the driveway apron is in poor shape, the City will work with the homeowner to replace it to current City standards. Typically,
we will work with the homeowner and contractor to replace pavers or exposed aggregate driveways. The City does not replace
lifetime guaranty aprons, and any related costs will not be paid by the City. We try our best to distrurb special driveways as little
as possible during construction to avoid replacement costs.
25 How do you install sidewalks in a cul-de-sac?Currently, there are no sidewalks planned for any of the cul-de-sacs within these project areas.
26 Do we have the option to have our driveway
apron replaced or not?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. Typically, we do not leave poor aprons in place. The cost for replacing the aprons is covered under the City
Utility Fund, as your driveway apron is considered a part of our stormwater conveyance system.
27 If we live in an area with surmountable curb,
will you be changing it to bulkhead style?
Since we are only planning for spot replacement of curb, the existing styles will stay in place. The City tends to favor the bulkhead-
style curb over surmountable curb because it conveys stormwater more easily and it helps prevent snowplows from damaging
lawns in the winter.
28
You said irrigation systems and pet
containment fences will probably be
damaged?
If an irrigation system or pet containment fence is damaged, the contractor will perform a temporary repair so the system can
still be used. After the majority of the project is completed, the contractor will then permanently repair all damaged systems
within the project area before final paving.
29 How are the major roadways assessed?
The Municipal State Aid-designated roadways in Edina are maintained and reconstructed with funds obtained from the state gas
tax. Properties that live on State Aid roads are assessed 20% of the project costs. This assessment typically is half that of a
standard residential assessment. The reason for the lower assessment is because residents who live on a State Aid roadway
typically have lower property values and have to deal with much higher volumes of traffic than residents who live in a residential
neighborhood. Both the City's State Aid and non-State Aid assessment policies are available on our website.
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction - 42 People Attended
Question and Answer Session from the July 28th, 2014 Open House Meeting
Held at Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility from 6 to 8 pm
H
W
Y
1
6
9
78TH ST W
VALLEY VIEW RD
VALL
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
DEWEY HILL RD
76TH ST W
70TH ST W
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
58TH ST W
54TH ST W
50TH ST W
44TH ST
W
MALONEY AVE
INTERLACHEN BLVD
YO
R
K
A
V
E
S
66TH ST W
70TH ST W
C
A
H
I
L
L
R
D
XE
R
X
E
S
A
V
E
S
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
S
VERNO
N
A
V
E
SC
H
A
E
F
E
R
R
D
BL
A
K
E
R
D
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
§¨¦169
§¨¦169
§¨¦62
§¨¦62
§¨¦100
§¨¦100
INTERLACHENCOUNTRYCLUB
VANVALKENBURGPARK
BREDESENPARK
BRAEMAR PARKGOLF COURSE
FRED RICHARDSGOLF COURSE
EDINACOUNTRYCLUB
Mud Lake
Lake Edina
Lake
Cornelia
Mirr
o
r
L
a
k
e
Arrowhead Lake
Highlands Lake
IndianheadLake
Mel
o
d
y
L
a
k
e
LakePamela
HarveyLake
HawkesLake
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
L
a
k
e
Cahill
Highlands B
Indian Hills B
Lake Edina
Rolling Green Hilldale
Indian Hills A
Fox Meadow B
Arden Park D
The Heights A
Birchcrest A
The Heights B
Golf Terrace B
Country Club ATodd Park A
Chowen Park C
Countryside A
Highlands C
Lake Cornelia C
Countryside H
Country Club B
Southdale B
Parklawn A
South Cornelia B
Sunny Slope
Prospect Knolls A
Concord E
Lake Cornelia D
Parkwood Knolls F
Lake Cornelia E
Grandview C
Presidents A
Birchcrest B
Melody Lake D
Concord A
Melody Lake A
Minnehaha Woods A
Golf Terrace A
Morningside C
Indian Hills D
Braemar Hills A
Morningside D
Parkwood Knolls C
Birchcrest C
Dewey Hill B
Brookview Heights A
Creek Knolls
Melody Lake B
Concord B
Indian Trails
Brookview Heights B
Highlands A
Parklawn B
Chowen Park A
Bredesen Park B
Morningside B
Parkwood Knolls P
Prospect Knolls C
South Cornelia D
White Oaks A
Parkwood Knolls E
Concord C
Normandale Park D
Creek Valley A
Countryside I
Presidents C
Arden Park C
Presidents B
Presidents E
Highlands D
Grandview B
Southdale C
Braemar Hills C
Morningside A
Bredesen Park D
South Cornelia C
Dewey Hill A
Concord G
Morningside E
Southdale A
Countryside D
Concord H
Minnehaha Woods B
Countryside C
Pamela Park E
Todd Park F
Strachauer Park A
Parkwood Knolls D
Parkwood Knolls M
Pamela Park A
Normandale Park A
Lake Cornelia F
Parkwood Knolls B
South Cornelia A
Chowen Park B
Pamela Park D
Countryside E
Bredesen Park C
Interlachen Park A
Strachauer Park B
Creek Valley C
Parkwood Knolls N Fox Meadow C
Normandale Park B
White Oaks B
Todd Park B
Parkwood Knolls O
Braemar Hills D
Braemar Hills B
Concord D
Parkwood Knolls G
Normandale Park C
Prospect Knolls B
Dewey Hill G
White Oaks C
Dewey Hill E
Parkwood Knolls A
Countryside F
Todd Park D
Minnehaha Woods D
Pamela Park B
Prospect Knolls D
Indian Hills E
Dewey Hill D
Pamela Park C
Countryside G
Minnehaha Woods C
Concord F
Fox Meadow F
Fox Meadow A
Todd Park E
Todd Park C
Highlands F
Melody Lake C
Indian Hills C
Presidents D
Fox Meadow D
Fox Meadow G
Creek Valley B
Parkwood Knolls I
Fox Meadow E
Dewey Hill F
Dewey Hill C
Interlachen Park B
Bredesen Park A
Brookview Heights C
Grandview A
Parkwood Knolls L
Highlands E
Indian Hills F
Arden Park A
Parkwood Knolls H
Parkwood Knolls K
Braemar Hills E
Edinborough
Parkwood Knolls J
Arden Park B
Lake Cornelia A
Countryside B
Country Club C
Lake Cornelia B
Brookview Heights D
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
City of Edina 2014-2019Anticipated Local Bituminous Street Reconstruction
The dates shown on the map represent the anticipated years of construction and are subject to change based on budgetary issues, adjacent projects, resident input and other factors.Not all bituminous roadways within the City are shown. If a road is not highlighted then the potential reconstruction date is beyond the City’s long term planning process.
The City of Edina’s street improvement policy is to assess residents for a portion of the roadway reconstruction costs. Public utility improvements are paid for from the City’s utility fund.
Extensive evaluation regarding the condition of the bituminous pavement, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main were used to set the priority of roadway improvements.
This map only addresses local bituminous streets and does not address State-Aid routes or concrete streets within the City.
Note/Disclaimer
2015
2016
2014
2017
2018
2019
Legend
Anticipated Year
µ
ReconstructionAssessment Areas
Need to zoom into mapto see a neighborhood area.
September 2014Engineering Dept.
APPENDIX B
Property Owners
Questionnaire
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you for your time. Your responses to the attached questionnaire will help us design your
neighborhood’s project. Here is background information that will aid you in filling out the questionnaire. Each
numeral relates to the corresponding survey question.
I. Drainage Service Connection
A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner’s lawn. There are several sump pump drainage issues to
look for. First, if your lawn drains back to your house, sump pump discharges can cause problems with your
lawn, your neighbor’s lawn or your basement. If the sump pump discharge runs down the gutter line, it can
promote algae growth in the street. Finally, discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system using
floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City Ordinance and State Statute.
To prevent the issues mentioned above, your street reconstruction project could include a City sump drain
system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump
pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If the topography and final street designs favor a
sump drain system, you could connect to it. That is why survey questions I.C. and I.D. ask about your sump
pump preferences. Keep in mind that installation of the pipe from your house to the City sump drain system
would be your responsibility, including plumbing modifications connection. However, the City sump drain
system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund.
II. Local Drainage Problems
As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if storm water run-off
stands in the street or sidewalk in front of your house. If this or similar situations are occurring in your area,
please describe it in this section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective action.
III. Private Underground Utilities
It is very important that you fill out this section. Some residents install private underground utilities in the
roadway right-of-way (the area from the edge of the roadway to your property line). The most common
private utilities include lawn irrigation and pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can
damage these utilities. If they are damaged during the street reconstruction project, they will be repaired.
However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, crews can attempt to avoid damaging
them during construction.
IV. Residential Streetlights
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks residents for their input on neighborhood streetlight
systems. Staff is trying to understand if the neighborhood favors upgrading the streetlight system or if the
existing streetlight system meets the needs of the neighborhood. Please keep in mind that costs associated
with improving the streetlight system would be a special assessment. These costs would be determined after
the extent of the improvements is understood.
V. Pedestrian Issues
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks in the
neighborhood. Sidewalks are funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund.
Please note if you know of any pedestrian issues such as a missing segment of sidewalk or an inadequate
pedestrian crossing.
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
Page 2 of 2
VI. Traffic Management
We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues.
VII. Email Updates
One of the primary tools for communicating with you during construction is the City Extra email notification
service. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive email messages from the City
regarding this project.
By signing up for City Extra email notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. The
updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited, when your water may
be shut off for water main replacement and when to have your contractor repair your irrigation system if it
was damaged during construction.
To receive email updates, sign up online at www.EdinaMN.gov. Enter your email address and a password
(new user will need to create a password). Click on email subscriptions. Scroll down the page until you see
your neighborhood project name (Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction). Place a
check mark in the box next to it. Click the “update” button at the bottom right hand corner of the
webpage.
Need Help?
If you have any questions about how to fill out the questionnaire, please contact Assistant City Engineer
Patrick Wrase at 952-826-0443 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison at 952-826-
0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
YOUR HOUSE
CURB LINE
ROW ROW
CURB LINE
EXAMPLE
HOUSE
GARAGE
X
SERVICE
CONNECTION
PIPE HERE
Resident Questionnaire
Dewey Hill G
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you in advance for your time. Your input is important to us. Please read the Questionnaire
Instructions before completing this questionnaire.
I. Drainage Service Connection:
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain? Yes No Unknown
B. Does your home have a sump pump? Yes No Unknown
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
Please sketch in the space to the right:
your house, garage, driveway, sump pump
discharge location and approximately
where along the right-of-way (ROW) line
you would like the service connection
pipe located.
II. Local Drainage Problems
Please describe specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood:
III. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The right-of-
way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes No
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes No
IV. Residential Streetlights:
A. Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system
meeting the needs of the neighborhood?
Yes No
B. Do you favor improving your streetlights?
Yes No
V. Pedestrian Issues:
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes No
B. If yes, where? _________________________________________________________
C. Please describe specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below.
VI. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes No
B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
VII. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes No
Thank you for completing the questionnaire. Please return it to the City in the enclosed envelope by June
17.
DEWEY HILL G NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-415
G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\BA415 Dewey Hill G(2015)\DESIGN\FEASIBILITY\QUESTIONNAIRE\Questionnaire Tabulation.xlsx10/16/2014 1 of 1
Data Entered By:
Last Date Data Entered:
Due Date:
Questionnaires Sent Out:
Questionnaires Returned:
Percent Returned:
DrainageLocal Drainage ProblemsYesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNoExplain Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
House #Street Name
5921 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6000 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Increased and faster traffic on W. 78th St. Dangerous for bicyclists.1
6001 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6004 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 1 1 1 1 Intersection Bonnie Brae & Gleason flood to several inches in downpour.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6005 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 1 1 1 1
Standing water in nature zone behind house.
1 1 1 1 1 1
Gleason Rd has turned into a heavy traffic zone during rush hour and weekends with traffic exceeding the speed restrictions. Something has to be done before a ped is hit or killed. 1
6001 Dewey Hill Rd 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dewey Hill is used as a by-pass from 169 & 494 to 100 causing problems accessing property and signs.1
7404 Hyde Park Cir 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7408 Hyde Park Cir 1 1 1 No problem.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7416 Hyde Park Cir 1 1 1 1
There is a drainage ditch on the property line in our backyard. When the house behind us (7417 Gleason), the slope was changed. Now with heavy rain and in the spring, we get a lake in our backyard.1 1 1 1 1 1
7420 Hyde Park Cir 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Speeding through traffic avoiding Gleason/Dewey Hill intersection.1
7429 Hyde Park La 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7431 Hyde Park La 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7435 Hyde Park La 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7405 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7415 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 Nothing noticed.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7419 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 None.1 1 1 1 1 1
7424 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 There is a little water collection at the curb after heavy rain.1 1 1 1 1 Absolutely no sidewalk!None 1 1
7432 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1
7436 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 Water in our backyard and 7500 also after heavy storms.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7500 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1
There is storm drain in the corner of our backyard. Sometimes it backs up during torrential storms but always drains. Given the increasing frequency of heavy rains I would like to ensure that this drain continues to function properly and will not ever pose a flooding threat to our home.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7501 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7504 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Please put in a speed bump.1
7505 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7509 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 None that I have noticed.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7515 Hyde Park Dr 1 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
25 12 5 8 12 12 1 1 19 1 20 22 2 8 17 22 2 4 19 2 23 7 18 21 3Surveys Sent 34 74%35%15%24%35%35%3%3%56%3%59%65%6%24%50%65%6%6%68%21%53%62%9%Surveys Returned 25 100%48%20%32%48%48%4%4%76%4%80%88%8%32%68%88%8%8%92%28%72%84%12%
34
June 17, 2014
July 7, 2014
Existing Favors Sidewalk
25
74%
Residential Streetlights Pedestrian Issues
ADDRESS Returned Survey
Sump Pump Discharge Service Line Private Underground Draintile or Footing Drain Has a Sump Pump Willing to Connect Willing to Connect Iriggation Pet fence Email
Construct new sidewalks where?Specific N'hood Pedestrian Comments If yes, where?
Traffic Management
Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Resident Questionnaire Summary as of 9/24/14
Surveys sent: 34 Surveys returned: 25 Return rate: 74%
I. Drainage Service Connection
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain?
Yes: 12 No: 5 Unknown: 8
B. Does your home have a sump pump?
Yes: 12 No: 12 Unknown: 1
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump to a City drain if provided (at your
own cost)?
Yes: 1 No: 19
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains to a City drain if provided (at your own
cost)?
Yes: 1 No: 20
II. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The
right-of-way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes: 22 No: 2
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes: 8 No: 17
III. Residential Streetlights
A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights?
Yes: 4 No: 19
IV. Pedestrian Issues
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes: 2 No: 23
V. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes: 7 No: 18
VI. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes: 21 No: 3
APPENDIX C
Preliminary Assessment Roll
DEWEY HILL G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-415
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount
811621320055 Rolf Running & Judith Running 5920 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320048 Brooks F Poley & Margaret M Poley 5921 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320049 Susan J Wilcox 5925 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320059 Paul K Steen & Melissa A Steen 6000 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320025 James A Mcnulty & Sheran R Mcnulty 6001 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320058 Thomas C Wagner & Rebecca A Wagner 6004 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320024 Mary M Maijer & Carl R Maijer 6005 Bonnie Brae Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320002 Sheila Gregory 6001 Dewey Hill Rd 0.33 3,986.67$
811621320023 Jeffrey E Barin & Wendy S Fox 7404 Hyde Park Cir 1 11,960.00$
811621320022 James P Trainor & Florence J Trainor 7408 Hyde Park Cir 1 11,960.00$
811621320021 Charles D Luther II 7412 Hyde Park Cir 1 11,960.00$
811621320020 George W Westfall & Peggy L Westfall 7416 Hyde Park Cir 1 11,960.00$
811621320019 David Johnston 7420 Hyde Park Cir 1 11,960.00$
811621320033 Patricia E Charnell & Robert D Charnell 7401 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320034 David W Polly & Shirley M Polly 7405 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320035 TCF National Bank 7409 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320036 Troy D Johnson & Tara D Johnson 7411 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320037 Ming Hong Fan & Yan Zhang 7415 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320038 Kehar Singh 7419 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320018 Marlese K Alden 7424 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320017 Karen L Madich & Michael Madich 7428 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320050 Stephen G Bishop & Ann M Bishop 7432 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320051 Robert Mayer & Jody Beresford 7436 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320052 Robert Hussey & Jennifer Collins 7500 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320043 Patrick S Downey & Susan M Downey 7501 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320053 Joseph J Talghader & Vivien W Talghader 7504 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320044 Pankaj Gupta & Kalpna Gupta 7505 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320054 James E Nicholson & Deborah Nicholson 7508 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320045 Rishi Kaushal & Chhavi Chadha 7509 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320046 Thomas Fischer & Barbara J Fischer 7515 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320047 Zakery J Kroschel & Lisa M Bolin 7519 Hyde Park Dr 1 11,960.00$
811621320039 Duane F Anderson 7423 Hyde Park La 1 11,960.00$
811621320040 Jorge E Amadeo 7429 Hyde Park La 1 11,960.00$
811621320041 Nathan Richard Opsata & Evangeline Jaynie Leung 7431 Hyde Park La 1 11,960.00$
811621320042 Richard Letsche/Trustee & Bernadine Letsche/Trustee 7435 Hyde Park La 1 11,960.00$
Total 34.33 410,626.67$
APPENDIX D
City Comprehensive Plan
Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle
Facilities
APPENDIX E
Proposed Storm Water
Improvements
Figure 1-1. Backyard Drainage Problem
between Hyde Park Drive and Gleason Road
APPENDIX F
Traffic and Crash Data
Dewey Hill G Traffic and Crash Data
Traffic Data
Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th Speed, mph
1 Bonnie Brae
Drive 2014 102 22.7
Crash Data
Location Severity Year Month Time
- - - - -
APPENDIX G
Sewer Blocks and Watermain
Breaks
!
!
7404
5832
7308
6004
7301
7420
5828
5925
7304
7609
7416
5836
7312
5829
7305
7309 5920
7431
5833
7309
7412
7515
7313
7424
7519
7429
73047305
7505
7509
5912
7301
7428
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7415
7423
6005
5908
7419
5921
7603
7611
7314
7304
7612
5911
7318
7300
7605
7509
7322
7409
5917
7421
7401
7501
5848
7504
7609
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7505
7417
7607
7405
7501
7401
7326
7411
7316
60056009
7435
7601
5840
5844
7425
7420 7424
7615
7508
7404
59206000
7611
7432
7408
6001
7500
7320
7605
7405
7436
7615
58
2
8
7413
7650-7656
7651
7409
5916
PROJECT LIMITS
DEWEY HILL RD
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
H
Y
D
E
P
A
R
K
D
R
HYDE PARK CIR
HYDE PARK LN
BONNIE BRAE DR
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksDewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-415C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
Sewer Blocks
Watermain Breaks
APPENDIX H
Existing Street Lights and Signs
7404
6004
5925
7309
7431
5833
7309
7412
7515
7313
7519
7429
7505
7509
7428
7313 73127308
7308
7415
7423
6005
5908
7419
5921
5911
7605
7509
7409
5917
7421
7401
7501
7504
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7505
7417
7607
7405
7501
7401
7411
60056009
7435
7425
7420 7424
7508
7404
59206000
7432
7408
6001
7500
7320
7605
7405
7436
7413
7409 PROJECT LIMITS
DEWEY HILL RD
GLE
A
S
O
N
R
D
H
Y
D
E
P
A
R
K
D
R
HYDE PARK CIR
HYDE PARK LN
BONNIE BRAE DR
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
Street LightsDewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-415C
I
T
Y
OFE D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
!"$
!"$
7404
5832
7308
6004
7301
7420
5828
5925
7304
7609
7416
5836
7312
5829
7305
7309 5920
7431
5833
7309
7412
7515
7313
7424
7519
7429
73047305
7505
7509
5912
7301
7428
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7415
7423
6005
5908
7419
5921
7603
7611
7314
7304
7612
5911
7318
7300
7605
7509
7322
7409
5917
7421
7401
7501
5848
7504
7609
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7505
7417
7607
7405
7501
7401
7326
7411
7316
60056009
7435
7601
5840
5844
7425
7420 7424
7615
7508
7404
59206000
7611
7432
7408
6001
7500
7320
7605
7405
7436
7615
58
2
8
7413
7650-7656
7651
7409
5916
PROJECT LIMITS
DEWEY HILL RD
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
H
Y
D
E
P
A
R
K
D
R
HYDE PARK CIR
HYDE PARK LN
BONNIE BRAE DR
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
SignsDewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-415C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
Street Signs
TYPE
D3-X1
!"$R1-1
W-11
APPENDIX I
Living Streets Policy
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Council VIII. A.
Karen M. Kurt
Assistant City Manager
☒
☐
☐ August 20, 2013
Approve Living Streets Policy
Approve Living Streets Policy
Information / Background:
In May 201l, the City Council adopted a resolution in support of Living Streets and directed the Edina
Transportation Commission to work with staff to develop a Living Streets Policy. Key steps in the
development of the policy are outlined below:
ETC formed a Living Streets Working Group. Members Paul Nelson, Jennifer Janovy and Michael
Thompson played a critical role in policy development.
The City received a $15,000 grant from the Bloomington Health Department. These funds were
used to hire a consultant to review current city policies and to provide a framework for moving
forward.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield sponsored a workshop on February 15, 2012 led by representatives
from the National Complete Streets Coalition. Key community stakeholders attended and
participated in a brainstorming session about Edina’s vision for future streets.
The ETC Working Group and staff prepared a draft Living Streets Policy which was reviewed with
the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission,
Park Board, Energy and Environment Commission and Bike Edina Task Force. Feedback is collected
for incorporation into the Living Streets Policy and future Living Streets Plan.
The Living Streets Policy draft is reviewed during a joint work session with ETC and City Council.
Upon policy adoption, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, will begin working with internal and external
advisory groups to draft content for the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the
Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well best practices for community engagement during the design
process.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
Confirmed members of the external advisory group are:
Arnie Bigbee, Human Rights and Relations Commission
Claudia Carr, Planning Commission
Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission
Ellen Jones, Park Board
Bill McCabe, Arts and Culture Commission
Paul Nelson, Transportation Commission
Paul Thompson, Energy and Environment Commission
Courtney Whited, Transportation Commission
Staff is waiting for confirmation from additional representatives from the Planning Commission, Energy and
Environment Commission and Community Health Committee. Additional community expertise will be
sought as needed throughout the process.
Members of the internal advisory team are:
Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer
Jeff Elasky, Police Lieutenant
Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
Cindy Larson, Redevelopment Coordinator
Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer
Bob Pestrud, Parks Foreman
John Scheerer, Street Supervisor
Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal
Additional staff expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Staff is also in the process of
securing a $5,000 grant from Bloomington Public Health that will be used to develop a community education
and outreach plan for Living Streets.
Attachments:
Proposed Living Streets Policy
1
Living Streets Policy
Introduction
Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote
safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy
defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation.
The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy
consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the
“do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related
to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set
by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act.
The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how
the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design
process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk
Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to
this Policy.
Living Streets Vision
Edina is a place where...
Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;
Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;
Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;
Streets are inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity;
Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments;
Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and
private sectors alike; and
Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses.
Living Streets Principles
The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate
these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making
public and private land use decisions.
2
All Users and All Modes
The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of
the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing
safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes.
Connectivity
The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly
connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel.
The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes
preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance
connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit.
The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public
facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas.
The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk
networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the
development.
Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical
termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street
construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and
continuity.
Application
The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving
operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation,
or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes
privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails.
The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land
use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency.
Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of
smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time.
The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and
actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources
as applicable.
All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their
work.
Exceptions
Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and
rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document
proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal.
Exceptions:
3
A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable
condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole
filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance
activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians.
The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a
bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project.
The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of
significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native
vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas.
Design
The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning,
funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks,
paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs.
The City’s design guidelines will:
Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary.
Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use
pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by
context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building,
community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context.
Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed
to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate.
Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes.
Allocate right-of-way for boulevards.
Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets
principles.
Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain
gardens and other features to improve air and water quality.
The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals,
rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will
update the Living Streets Plan.
Context Sensitivity
Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its
neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate
these differences, the City will:
Seek input from stakeholders;
Design streets with a strong sense of place;
Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and
ravines;
Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and
4
Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant
commercial districts.
Benchmarks and Performance Measures
The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating
success include:
Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling;
Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely;
Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably;
An active way of life is available to all;
There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries;
No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and
Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations.
The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may
be identified as this Policy is implemented.
Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department.
Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests.
Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys.
Resident responses to post-project surveys.
The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and
after the project.
Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure.
Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets.
Implementation
The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several
steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to
guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will:
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal
pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings;
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including
street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities;
Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA,
MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts);
Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets
improvements; and
Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private
and regional destinations.
5
Additional implementation steps include:
Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an
ongoing basis;
Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this
Policy;
Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets
principles as established by this Policy;
Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals;
Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes;
Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans
(Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.);
Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP);
Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and
Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy.
APPENDIX J
Correspondence from
Residents
1
Andrew Scipioni
From:Jennifer Collins <jenhussey7500@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, March 13, 2014 8:18 AM
To:Chad Millner
Subject:Re: 20140313 RE: Dewey Hill 2015 Reconstruction Project
Oh, gosh! I don't want you to get rid of it. There are large volumes of water draining into it during
thunderstorms. I just wanted to make sure that whole system was going to be evaluated to make sure drain lines
are clear, etc. when you are doing the road project.
Thanks.
On Thursday, March 13, 2014, Chad Millner <cmillner@edinamn.gov> wrote:
Jennifer,
Thanks for the comments. We are aware of the storm structure in your backyard. A key part of all our
reconstruction projects is assessing the condition of the underground utilities. So yes we would be reviewing the
condition of the storm sewer in that area. A brief look at the elevations in the area, I agree with your assessment
that many of the back yards drain to the area. The water is piped to the pond behind your neighbor's homes
northeast of you. Quickly looking at the system, it appears necessary and I'm going to guess that it needs to stay
in place to convey that water. There may be opportunities to improve it that we will look at during the project
design.
Thanks again for your comments and if you have any other questions, please contact me.
Thanks,
Chad
Chad Millner, Director of Engineering
952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392
cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Collins [mailto:jenhussey7500@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:51 PM
To: Chad Millner
Subject: Dewey Hill 2015 Reconstruction Project
Chad,
My name is Jennifer Collins and I live at 7500 Hyde Park Drive. I was thinking about our future street
reconstruction project today as I was walking and noticing how badly the pavement has deteriorated.
I am contacting you regarding the storm drain that lies in the corner of our back yard. This was installed well
before we purchased the house. It is my understanding that this drain was installed because there was some
flooding in our back yard and adjacent yards sometime soon after the homes in the area were built. The drain
lies at a low point between the homes on Hyde Park Drive and Gleason Road. We get all the water from the
backyards of these homes from Hyde Park Circle to the north and Bonnie Brae Drive to the south draining into
2
this drain. I don't know where the water goes from there. I am wondering if the town is aware of this drain and
if you are planning on assessing its condition, along with the drainage line that runs away from it, during the
road/storm sewer reconstruction project on our street.
Thank you,
Jennifer Collins
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: October 23, 2014
Agenda Item #: VI. B.
Action El
Discussion
Information 121
Subject: 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports
Action Requested:
Review and comment on the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports.
Information / Background:
Please recall that the Edina Engineering Department presented the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction
project areas to you at your August 21 meeting. Staff prepared the attached draft engineering reports for
the projects. Please review and comment on these reports.
Attachments:
Countryside H Draft Engineering Report
Prospect Knolls B Draft Engineering Report
Dewey Hill G Draft Engineering Report
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \ PROJECTS \ IMPR NOS \ BA413 Countryside FI(2015) \ DESIGN \ETC \ 20141021 Draft Feasibility Submittal \ Item VI.B. 2015 Neighborhood
Reconstruction Draft Engineering Report.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. SOLE St. • Edina, MN 55424
ENGINEERING STUDY
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS
Amy Drive, Arbour Avenue, Benton Avenue, Berne
Circle, Grove Street, Merold Drive, Olinger Circle,
Stuart Avenue, Sun Road, Wycliff Road
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-413
October 16, 2014
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
___________________ 43790______________
Chad A.Millner Reg. No. Date
ENGINEERING STUDY – BA-413
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
OCTOBER 16, 2014
SUMMARY: The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to
the storm sewer and watermain systems, spot repair of concrete curb and
gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalks, and complete reconstruction
of bituminous pavement surfaces.
The estimated total project cost is $3,758,845. The estimated roadway
construction cost is $1,874,185 and will be funded through special
assessments at a rate of approximately $10,850 per residential equivalent
unit (REU). Utility improvements and repairs amount to $1,741,930 and will
be funded through the respective utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are
estimated to cost $142,730 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and
Cyclists Safety (PACS) fund.
The project can be completed during the 2015 construction season. Staff
believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to maintain a
livable environment and a sound public infrastructure, as initiated by Edina’s
2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20.
LOCATION: The project includes Arbour Avenue, Olinger Circle, Sun Road, Amy Drive,
Berne Circle, Merold Drive, Grove Street, Wycliffe Road, Stuart Avenue, and
Benton Avenue. Below is a detailed location map of the Countryside H
Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project (Figure 1).
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Figure 1. Project Area Map
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Countryside H Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering
Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program,
identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project addresses updating
aging infrastructure with improvements associated with the pavement
condition, storm water, sanitary sewer, and watermain systems, and bicycle
and pedestrian facilities.
All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (the “Plan”), the Comprehensive Bicycle
Transportation Plan, the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan,
the Living Streets Policy, the Active Routes to School Plan and sustainable
project evaluation.
City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Sidewalk Facilities
Chapter 7 of the Plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk facilities
within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of Appendix E, there are existing
sidewalks on Grove Street between Arbour Avenue and Stuart Avenue and
on Stuart Avenue from Grove Street to Countryside Elementary School.
There are proposed sidewalk facilities on Arbour Avenue between Arbour
Lane and Grove Street, on Sun Road between Arbour Avenue and Olinger
Boulevard, and on Benton Avenue between Stuart Avenue and Tracy
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Avenue. These proposed sidewalks are also included in the City of Edina
Active Routes to School (ARTS) Plan that was approved by the City Council
on June 17, 2014. Additionally, a Public Hearing is scheduled for the
Planning Commission on October 22, 2014 and with the City Council on
November 3, 2014 to consider amendments to Chapter 7 of the Plan. The
amendments include incorporating the sidewalks recommended by the ARTS
Plan and the Living Streets Policy into the Plan.
Bicycle Facilities
Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed bicycle facilities within
the City, as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. As
shown in Figure 7.11 of Appendix E, there are no proposed bicycle facilities
indicated within the project limits.
Living Streets Policy and Sustainability Evaluation
The vision statement of the Living Streets Policy expresses the need to look
at future projects differently:
Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance
community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better
health.
Although the Living Streets Plan is currently in draft form, staff has included
elements that pertain to residential neighborhoods in the rehabilitation of the
infrastructure and replacement of the roadways. It is anticipated that the
Living Streets Plan will be completed by March of 2015.
Staff is also including a simple sustainability analysis for this project. We
anticipate a more refined analysis after the development of the Living Streets
Plan that will include review and input from a sustainability team.
Sustainability in engineering projects means delivering our services in a
manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the
community, and funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of
sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. We look at sustainability
as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, improving and
shaping both the present and future of our community so that future
generations are not burdened by the decisions of today.
The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks.
• Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services
such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and
emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the
community?
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
• Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment,
such as surface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource
diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise, and others?
• Economy: How does the project influence the local economy? What are
the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the
price?
The following is a summary of this evaluation:
Equity: The project maintains access and mobility to the transportation
network. Where available, this includes transportation options for a variety of
user groups including, but not limited to, children, seniors, and disabled
individuals. In addition, the project improves mobility for different types of
users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Updates to the fire
hydrants provide public safety staff the ease of connection needed during an
emergency.
Environment: The project provides homeowners a piping system to discharge
ground water into, eliminating standing water, ice, and algae buildup along
the curb lines. Construction operations are required to use the smallest
footprint necessary to complete the work, thus protecting the existing natural
environment. The project also analyzes the sanitary sewer to ensure that
inflow and infiltration of clear water is kept out of the system, which minimizes
regional wastewater treatment. Bituminous pavements will be recycled on-
site, minimizing truck traffic to and from the site.
Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into
the future. The proposed roadway section can easily be maintained long-term
with the use of seal coating and mill and overlays. These maintenance
operations will significantly extend the life of the pavement. The project will
also use less intense construction methods, such as trenchless technology
(i.e., lining the pipes rather than removing and replacing them).
This is a simplified analysis of the project’s sustainability. In the future, we
anticipate correlating this analysis to an in-depth scoring system, displaying
the City’s sustainability to the community.
Staff Issues
The following is a list of issues, some generated by resident comments,
addressed in this report:
• Existing sanitary sewer and watermain system conditions
• Stormwater drainage
• Private utilities
• Existing street lighting
• Existing pavement surface condition
• Existing landscaping, retaining walls, and driveways
• Traffic speed and volume
• Pedestrian accessibility and safety
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Resident Input
As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3
years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an
open house on October 8th, 2012. Residents were also invited to a second
open house on September 9th, 2013. Materials from these meetings are
available upon request.
We followed up with a questionnaire to the property owners on June 4, 2014,
inquiring about drainage problems, pedestrian accommodations, street
lighting, and other project-related concerns. The questionnaire was
completed and returned by 81 of the 158 property owners, a return rate of
51%. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix B.
The following is a summary of feedback received from residents:
• 15 of 81 (19%*) felt sidewalks were needed; 66 (81%) opposed new
sidewalks
• 26 (32%) identified traffic concerns in the neighborhood
• 28 (35%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood
• 18 (22%) felt street lighting was inadequate and favored upgrades
*Percentages based on number of returned surveys
A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on July 28, 2014 to
discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was
attended by 42 residents representing 35 properties. Materials from this
meeting can be found in Appendix A.
On August 1, 2014, a letter was sent to the residents discussing the proposed
sidewalk facilities. The letter discussed how the new sidewalks are
incorporated into the Edina Active Routes to School (ARTS) Plan, and
explained the separate approval processes for the assessable portions of the
project versus the PACS funded portions of the project. A copy of the letter
can be found in Appendix C.
Resident input was also taken in the form of emails regarding the project.
Those emails can be found in Appendix K.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Streets
The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1962
and 1979. All of the streets in the neighborhood currently have concrete curb
and gutter, and the average roadway width is 30 feet. The typical street
section has four inches of bituminous pavement over a sand and gravel base,
according to record plans of the original construction. Street sections have
been verified by a recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area.
The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood, but is in
relatively poor condition. The average pavement condition index (PCI) for the
City of Edina is 58 and the average PCI for Countryside H is 4. Examples of
the current street condition can be seen in Photos 1 & 2.
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition
The City of Edina contracts with a consultant to evaluate all bituminous
roadways within the City. The streets are graded based on a number of
conditions, such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling, and potholes.
Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new
road surface and 0 being extremely poor. The City evaluates the PCI values
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
of streets within a neighborhood to determine a proper maintenance program.
Neighborhoods with a PCI greater than 65 are considered for seal coats,
PCIs between 65 and 45 are evaluated for mill and overlays, and PCIs less
than 45 are evaluated for total reconstruction.
The pavement throughout these streets is near the end of its useful life. The
costs to maintain and repair the roadways will steadily increase, and seal
coating or overlaying is no longer feasible.
Traffic and Crash Data
City staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at four locations within or
near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes ranged from 300 to 364
cars per day with 85th percentile speeds ranging from 22.2 to 25.5 mph. The
traffic and crash data is shown in Appendix G.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer system consists of 9-inch vitrified clay pipe
(VCP), installed between 1956 and 1978. Historical records indicate there
have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area. The trunk sanitary
sewer system will be televised and evaluated for upgrades.
Watermain
The existing watermain system consists of 6-inch cast iron pipe (CIP) and 6-
inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), installed between 1960 and 1978. The overall
system has experienced relatively few breaks. The fire hydrants are original
to the neighborhood and lack the STORZ nozzle fittings desired by the Edina
Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses.
Storm Sewer
The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District. The Comprehensive Water Resource Management
Plan indicates potential backyard storm water issues, as well as some
possible storm sewer manhole surcharging in large storm events. Further
evaluation will be done by staff regarding drainage issues resulting from the
resident questionnaires.
Private Utilities
Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications, and cable
television utilities are present in the neighborhood. The utilities are a
combination of overhead and underground facilities located in backyards or
along the boulevard.
Street lighting consists of standard “cobra,” “ladder rack,” and “coach lantern”
lights mounted on wood and fiberglass poles located throughout the project
area as shown in Appendix I.
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Sidewalks
Sidewalks are currently located along the south side of Grove Street between
Arbour Avenue and Stuart Avenue, along Grove Street and Wycliff Road in
front of Good Samaritan Methodist Church, and along the west side of Stuart
Avenue between Grove Street and Benton Avenue. There is also a sidewalk
and concrete stairs that connect Countryside Elementary School with the
intersection of Arbour Avenue and Sun Road.
Landscaping
Some properties have vegetation, hardscapes (such as boulders and
retaining walls), or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A
portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed
infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete
the necessary work.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: Streets
The pavement section is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the
subgrade. The existing pavement will be recycled for use as base material in
the new roadway. A minimum of 8 inches of recycled gravel material will be
graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5 inches of
bituminous base and 1.5 inches of bituminous wear course. The
reconstructed gravel and pavement sections will meet the requirements of a
minimum 20-year design life based on projected traffic loadings. With
prescriptive maintenance procedures, including regular seal coating and
periodic thin overlays, the design life can be extended considerably.
Due to the limited scope of the utility repairs, the majority of the concrete curb
and gutter will remain in-place, and the current roadway widths will not be
altered. While our Living Streets Policy sets a design guideline to keep street
pavement widths to the minimum necessary and the draft Living Street Plan
has defined the minimum street width as 27 feet without sidewalks and 24
feet with sidewalks, it is not cost effective to include these features within this
project. It is anticipated that as part of the next street reconstruction project
for this area, the utility systems will have reached the end of their service
lives, thereby requiring extensive rehabilitation. This will require the removal
of the majority of the curb and gutter, thereby allowing the Living Street
design guidelines to be implemented in a cost effective manner.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
Due to an unanticipated mechanical issue with the Edina Public Works sewer
inspection camera, the current condition of the sanitary sewer system is
unknown. Staff is working to obtain sewer condition information from an
alternative source in order to determine the extent of repairs. Costs have
been included based on historical data of street reconstruction projects.
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Watermain
Watermain improvements include replacing all the gate valves and upgrading
fire hydrants to City standard. The replacement of these critical safety
components is necessary to insure proper operation of the water system in
times of need.
Storm Sewer
Spot repairs will be made to concrete curb and gutter segments that are
deficient or no longer functioning properly. Any new or replaced curb and
gutter is funded through the storm sewer fund, not under the roadway special
assessment. The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve
existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood.
Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their
poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property
owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer
system.
A backyard drainage problem was identified in the Comprehensive Water
Resource Management Plan between Grove Street and Benton Avenue (See
Appendix F, Figure 1-1, HL_18). Two existing catch basin structures in the
backyards connect to the storm sewer system on Grove Street through a 21-
inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). It is proposed to upgrade the existing
pipe that runs from the backyards to Grove Street with a 24-inch pipe to help
minimize flooding during large rain events.
The resident questionnaires identified another drainage problem at the pond
between Amy Drive and Sun Road (See Appendix F, Figure 1-2, MD_15).
Staff is working to obtain additional information in order to alleviate potential
flooding at this location. The Water Resource Management Plan
recommended that an additional 0.3 acre-feet of dead storage volume be
provided to meet Minnesota Pollution Control Agency design criteria. At this
time, staff has determined it is not feasible to perform such water quality
improvements on this detention basin. This water quality project could be
implemented at a future date if funding is secured through the CIP process.
A localized drainage issue at the intersection of Merold Drive and Wycliffe
Road (See Appendix F, Figure 1-3, HL_26) was also mentioned in a number
of returned questionnaires. It is may be possible to upgrade the existing 15-
inch storm sewer pipes in this vicinity with 24-inch pipes to help minimize
flooding during large rain events. Staff is reviewing this project with a Water
Resources consultant to determine the feasibility of this improvement.
Preliminary costs for this work to be funded by the Storm Sewer Utility have
been included in the project cost estimate.
Sidewalks
Staff is proposing 5-foot wide concrete boulevard-style sidewalks within the
project area. Based upon preliminary data information, the sidewalks are
currently proposed to be constructed along the west side of Arbour Avenue
from Grove Street to Sun Road, along the east side of Arbour Avenue from
Sun Road to Arbour Lane, and along the north side of Sun Road from Arbour
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Avenue to Olinger Boulevard. Figure 2 shows the existing and proposed
sidewalk facilities. The sidewalk along Benton Avenue from Stuart to Tracy
has been discussed with officials from Countryside Elementary School and
has been determined to be incompatible with pedestrian access to the school
due to conflicts with vehicular traffic accessing the school drop-off zones.
Figure 2. Existing and Proposed Sidewalk Facilities
The sidewalks within this project area were recommended based on Edina’s
Active Routes to School Plan, which aims to increase walking and bicycling to
school, and improve safety conditions for those walking and biking to school.
These sidewalks will provide connections between existing sidewalk facilities
and Countryside Elementary School.
Exact locations were selected by staff based on resident comments, the
amount of available right-or-way, and the number of potential conflicts
compared to other scenarios. The grass boulevard that separates the existing
curb and gutter from the proposed sidewalk will vary between 3 feet and 15
feet in width depending on existing conditions. The separation from vehicle
traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and allows for snow
storage during the winter.
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
The Edina Public Works Department will maintain the new sidewalks along
Arbour Avenue and Sun Road, including snow removal. Segments of existing
sidewalk will be replaced where they are structurally deficient or create safety
hazards.
Staff will continue to study traffic volumes and speeds along Arbour Avenue
and Grove Street to determine if traffic calming measures are warranted as
part of a future project. Staff felt the pedestrian safety issue along Arbour
Avenue would best be addressed with the installation of a new sidewalk.
Resident comments also suggested additional crosswalk markings may be
needed along Olinger Boulevard, connecting the Countryside H
neighborhood with Bredesen Park. Due to safety concerns, crosswalk
markings across Olinger Boulevard will not possible until the installation of
sidewalk along Olinger Boulevard with a future project. Staff will review
existing traffic controls, measure pedestrian counts and vehicle time gaps to
determine if additional crosswalks meet the City’s Local Traffic Control
criteria.
Other Improvements
Pedestrian Curb Ramps: All pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed to
meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
Lighting: The results of the questionnaire show that property owners do not
want to reconstruct the street lights. Currently, the City does not have a
standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved.
These concerns will be addressed with the Living Streets Plan that is under
development.
Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later
date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies.
The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections;
therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting.
Private Utilities: Private utility owners have expressed some interest in
upgrading portions of their networks within the project limits. This work is not
part of the City’s project, but will be coordinated to occur prior to our
construction activities. A meeting was held with the private utility operators
on August 28, 2014, to introduce the private utility operators to this project.
The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and
concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process,
while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the Engineering and
Public Works staff.
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
RIGHT-OF-WAY
& EASEMENTS: The right-of-way is 60 feet wide for all streets located within the project limits.
An easement will be required from Independent School District 273 for
installation of the new sidewalk along the east side of Arbour Avenue near
Countryside Elementary. Staff has discussed this easement with school
officials who were supportive of the project and the easement. Legal
documents are being prepared for the easement at this time. All other
proposed improvements stay within the right-of-way and no additional
easement requirements are anticipated.
CITY COUNCIL VOTING: The Public Hearing will contain two separate motions for voting on the project
improvements. Per State statute, the assessable portion of the project
requires a super majority approval from council (4:1). The Pedestrian and
Cyclists Safety (PACS) portions require a simple majority approval from
council (3:2).
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $3,758,845 (Table 1). The total cost
includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs
from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. The estimated
roadway construction cost is $1,874,185 and will be funded by special
assessments. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $1,741,930 and will
be funded through their respective utility fund. Sidewalk improvements
amount to $142,730 and will be funded through the PACS fund.
Item Amount Total Cost
Roadway: $ 1,874,185
Roadway Total: $ 1,874,185
Utilities:
Storm Sewer $ 1,197,645
Watermain $ 315,095
Sanitary Sewer $ 229,190
Utility Total: $ 1,741,930
Sidewalk: $ 142,730
Sidewalk Total: $ 142,730
Total Project: $ 3,758,845
Table 1. Estimated Project Costs
ASSESSMENTS: Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 172.79 residential
equivalent units (REU) in the Countryside H project area. Assessments will
be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties, as shown in Appendix D.
The estimated assessment per REU is $10,850 (Figure 3).
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Figure 3. Preliminary Assessment Map
The formulas for calculating REUs for properties that are corner lots or non-
single family residential are described below:
Single-Family Residential Corner Lots:
5700 Benton Ave; 5700 and 5701 Grove St
= (1 REU) x (2/3 side yard) = 0.67 REU
5924, 6000, 6012, and 6076 Olinger Blvd; 5813 and 5829 Olinger Rd
= (1 REU) x (1/3 side yard) = 0.33 REU
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
Multi-Family Residential Lots:
6000, 6004, 6008, 6012, 6016, and 6020 Berne Cir
= (1 REU) x 0.8 (duplex REU factor) = 0.8 REU
Public Building Lots:
5701 Benton Ave (Countryside Elementary School) = (70,885 square feet)
Gross Building Area (GBA) / (1,000 square feet) x 0.2 (school REU factor)
= 14 REUs
- 4 REUs (previous assessment for Tracy Ave in 2012)
= 10 REUs
5720 Grove St (Good Samaritan Methodist Church) = (66,340 square feet
GBA) / (1,000 square feet) x 0.8 (church REU factor)
= 10.5 REUs
- 3.5 REUs (previous assessment for Warden Ave in 2014)
= 7 REUs
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and
necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Countryside H
Neighborhood.
APPENDIX: A. 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting
B. Property Owners Questionnaire
C. Sidewalk Letter
D. Preliminary Assessment Roll
E. 2008 City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities
F. Proposed Storm Water Improvements
G. Traffic and Crash Data
H. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks
I. Existing Street Lights and Signs
Project Open House 2012 October 8, 2012
Neighborhood Informational Meeting July 28, 2014
ETC Feasibility Study Review October 21, 2014
Receive Feasibility Report and Public Hearing December 9, 2014
Bid Opening March/April 2015
Award Contract Spring 2015
Begin Construction Spring 2015
Complete Construction Fall 2015
Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2016
Engineering Study
Countryside H Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-413
October 16, 2014
J. Living Streets Policy
K. Correspondence from Residents
APPENDIX A
2015 Neighborhood
Roadway Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
June 4, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Countryside H Neighborhood
Dear Resident:
Some streets in your neighborhood are on a list of roadway reconstruction and utility improvement projects being
considered by the City of Edina for the summer of 2015. See the attached map identifying your project area. On April 16,
2013, the City Council adopted neighborhood names and boundaries as part of the Name Your Neighborhood Project.
Please note that your neighborhood name associated with the roadway reconstruction and utility improvements may
have changed. Some neighborhood names stayed the same.
Please save the date of Monday, July 28 to attend an informational meeting from 6 to 8 p.m. to learn about how
projects are funded, a typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted and how you can prepare. A meeting
reminder will be mailed to you approximately two weeks prior.
Meantime, we’d like to hear from you. The City would like your input regarding key components of the project via the
attached questionnaire. Please read the instructions, fill out the questionnaire and return it to us in the enclosed envelope
by June 17.
How the City will use your input:
• Your responses help us design the project. Components of a project vary and are based on both the condition of the
infrastructure and questionnaire responses.
• Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. The estimated special
assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until information is gathered from the questionnaires and a
feasibility report is completed in early September. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2016. The
special assessment is payable over 15 years.
• The special assessment is for the cost of the new roadway. If the neighborhood feels the street lighting needs are not
being met and improvements are needed, the costs would also be a special assessment. Sidewalks are funded through
the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund and thus are not assessed to property owners. The questionnaire helps us
evaluate the need for various items. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not assessed to property owners.
After we review questionnaire responses, we will continue the project planning process. We will present the feasibility
report at the public hearing in December. Construction will begin in spring/early summer and end in late fall of 2015.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0445 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon
Allison at 952-826-0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
Sincerely,
Patrick Wrase, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Enc: Project Map, Questionnaire Instructions, Questionnaire, Return Envelope
6105
5701
58
1
4
5901
6017
5721
5940
5708
57
1
3
5913
5807
5730
5804
5902
5806
5708
5917
5705
5729
5717
5633
5906
5721
5717
5912
5709 5704
5950
5816
6012
5824
6024
6021
5901
5912
5816
5725
5716
5912
5812
5629
5804
6004
6012
6020
6000
5970
6016
6012
5612
6016
6044
57095713
5704
6000
60056017
5816
6028
5824
5829
6008
5912
5617
5613
6004
5808
6009
5801
5720
5816
5700
5616
6032
5800
5721
5621
5700
5804
6064
5625
57
1
7
58085812
6012
6016
5704
6008
5712
5805
5800
6060
5825
5960
5629
6016
5936
6016
6012
5705
5725
6020
5701
5625
6036
5820
5920
6016-20
5820
5612
58
2
1
5824 5820
5920
5608
5916
5801
5812
5809
58
2
8
6000
5816
6008
5908
6008
6048
5919
6100
5980
58
1
3
5617
5712
5608
5701
5701
58
2
5
5817
5809
6017
5813
5701
6040
6004
5821
5908
6076
5909
58005813
6020
5812
5817
6036
5705
5916
5621
5617
58
0
9
5914
6016
5916
5712
6028
5700
5910
58
0
1
5904
6008
5712
5901
58
0
5
5601
5805
5600
58
1
7
5809
5808
5900
57
1
4
5916
6004
5909
6101
5917
5905
5813
6024
5708
5809
5620
5804
5908
5900
5924
58
3
2
5605
6056
5813
5704
5812
59
0
8
56
2
1
5609
5715
6024
5932
57
1
7
5800
5808
57
0
9
5708
5909
57
1
1
5820
5609
5804
5909
5904
57
0
5
57
0
9
6032
5616
6000
5616
6000
5901
5608
5816
5604
590559135909
6052
5920
5604
5809
5612
5924
6024
5908
57
2
1
5805
5700
5821
5616
5613
5716
5912 5900
5808
6020
6068
5904
5608
5824
5825
5705
58
3
6
5613
5812 5813
5900
5705
5801
5817
5905
5817
5716
5804
59
0
4
5605
59
0
0
5700
5905
58
3
3
5821
5904
5813
5804
5809
5812
5901
58
2
9
5901
56
2
0
5920
58
2
1
59
0
1
58
3
7
5924
6072
5825
5900 5805
5720
5928
5817
5801
5805
5604
5
8
1
6
5708
5712
5805
5708
60
0
0
6
0
1
2
6
0
0
4
6
0
0
8
5824
5804
5
8
2
5
5802
5812
5801
58
1
3
58
1
5
58
1
7
58
1
4
58
1
9
5
8
2
1
5
8
2
3
5
8
1
8
5
8
2
0
5
8
2
7
582
2
5
8
1
6
58115809
58055803
57035701 58315829
5833
5710
PROJECT LIMITS
OL
I
N
G
E
R
R
D
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
OLING
E
R
B
L
V
D
VERNON
A
V
E
MERO
L
D
D
R
GROVE ST
AMY DR
BENTON AVE
SUN RD
OLINGER CIR
A
R
B
O
U
R
A
V
E
ST
U
A
R
T
A
V
E
W
Y
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
BERNE CIR
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
2015 Project AreaCountryside H Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-413C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
9/24/2014
1
www.EdinaMN.gov
2015 Neighborhood Roadway
Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
July 28, 2014
www.EdinaMN.gov
Countryside H –164 Properties
Prospect Knolls B –39 Properties
Dewey Hill G –35 Properties
Arden Park D –225 Properties
-Consultant Project
Valley View Road –Municipal State Aid
54th Street –Municipal State Aid
Note: Neighborhood Names
2015 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions
•Timeline
•Project Scope
•What You Can Expect
•Funding Sources
•Communication
•How to Prepare
•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
Engineering Technicians Engineering Coordinator
Aaron KuzniaAndrew ScipioniSharon Allison
Environmental Transportation Assistant City Director of
EngineerPlannerEngineer Engineering
Ross BintnerMark NolanPatrick WraseChad Millner
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Project Timeline
July –September 2014Feasibility report and estimates
provided
December/January 14/15Public hearing
January-March2015Plan preparation and bidding
April/May2015 Construction begins
October/November 2015Construction concludes
Spring 2016 Warranty work
Fall 2016 Final assessment hearing
9/24/2014
2
www.EdinaMN.gov
Why My Street?
•Streets that meet specific standards are subject to
reconstruction
•Priority is given to streets with the highest need based on
watermain breaks, sanitary sewer deficiencies, storm
sewer/drainage issues, and Pavement Condition Index
•Reconstruction is usually more cost-effective long-term than
patching or seal-coating
•Streets are grouped together to help prolong pavement life and
maximize the economics of scale for construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Countryside H
Neighborhood
•164 Properties
•1.97 miles of roads
•30,100 square
yards of street
pavement
•8fire hydrants
•49 sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Prospect Knolls B
Neighborhood
•39 Properties
•0.4 mile of roads
•6,100 square yards of
street pavement
•4 fire hydrants
•13 sanitary manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Dewey Hill G
Neighborhood
•35 Properties
•.39 mile of roads
•6,000 square yards
of street pavement
•3 fire hydrants
•8sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•All of streets have curb and gutter
•Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 11/100
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Varied driveway materials
•Some properties already have concrete driveway entrances
9/24/2014
3
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Storm water drainage issues
•Landscaping placed in the right-of-way
•Irrigation systems & pet containment fences in the right-of-way
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Streets
•Curb and gutter replacement –selective
•New roadbed and pavement surface
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Driveways
•Spot driveway entrance replacement
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Utilities
•New fire hydrants and gate valves
•Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement
•Storm sewer upgrades
–Sump pump drain pipe in various locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Sidewalks
•Based on draft Edina Living Streets Sidewalk Facilities Plan
•Final design will be evaluated based on questionnaire responses
and Feasibility Report
Arden Park D
Countryside H
www.EdinaMN.gov
•December 2014 Council Meeting
•Feasibility Study Presented to Council
•Public Hearing for Project
–Opportunity for Project Area residents to voice concerns and
comments for the project
•Vote on Reconstruction Project -Assessed Project
–Requires 4-1 vote by Council to Approve
–4-1 vote required by MN Statute Chapter 429
•Vote on Sidewalk Component –Not Assessed
–Requires a 3-2 vote of City Council to Approve
Edina City Council –Project Approval
9/24/2014
4
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust, noise, vibrations, and
mud
•Localized flooding during
rainfall
•Occasional timeline delays
due to inclement weather
•May be asked to limit water
use
•Homes may be connected to
temporary water line
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Driveways may be
inaccessible for 3-5 days
•Neighborhood streets
may be periodically
inaccessible
•Irrigation and pet
containment systems
mostly likely will be
damaged
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•We will keep you informed
•You will have opportunities
to provide input
•Private utility work is to be
completed before City work
•We will do our best to
minimize inconveniences
•Contractor will
accommodate special access
needs
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
Property Impacts
•Items located within the City’s
right-of-way may be damaged
–Irrigation and pet
containment systems will
be repaired
–You can remove plantings
and other landscape
features before the project
–Disturbed areas will be
seeded after the project is
complete
www.EdinaMN.gov
Other Impacts
•Our goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood
disturbance.
•The City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric,
telephone, and cable TV) to upgrade or repair utilities along
the project area.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Do Taxes Cover Street Projects?
•Roughly 20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses such
as Police, Fire, Parks and Public Works (snowplowing, pothole
repairs, sealcoating, and other street maintenance)
•Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction
9/24/2014
5
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projects are funded by a combination of Special Assessments to
residents, the City’s Utility Funds, and the Pedestrian and
Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
Roadway Costs Sanitary Sewer
Costs
Storm Sewer
Costs
Watermain
Costs
Sidewalks,
Bike lanes,
etc.
Funding
Source Special AssessmentsUtility FundUtility FundUtility FundPACS Fund
www.EdinaMN.gov
Special Assessments
•Assigned to adjacent
properties that stand to
benefit from construction
improvements
•Cover 100% of
roadway costs
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Utility Fund
•Collection of utility service charges paid to the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Concrete curb and gutter (includes driveway aprons)
–Sanitary sewer
–Water main
–Storm sewer
–Sump pump pipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
•Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees
•Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Sidewalks
–Signage
–Crosswalks
–Street striping
www.EdinaMN.gov
Preliminary Assessments
Neighborhood Estimated Assessment
Range per REU*
#of
REUs
SquareYards
of Paving
Square Yards of
Pavingper REU
CountrysideH$8,600 -$10,900172.5930,100 174
ProspectKnolls B$8,800 -$11,20035.526,115 172
Dewey Hill G$9,100 -$11,40033.336,000 180
*Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Payment Options
•Will be billed for the assessment one year after project
completion
•Assessments are payable over 15 years
•Payment options:
1.Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance
charges
2.Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes
3.Roll entire amount to property taxes
4.Defer payment if 65 years old or older
9/24/2014
6
www.EdinaMN.gov
Providing Input
•Public hearings and questionnaire mailed to your home
•Weigh in on:
–Sump pump connection options
–Street drainage issues
–Traffic/pedestrian issues
–Streetlight upgrades
www.EdinaMN.gov
Questionnaire Results
Questionnaire results are available.
Neighborhood % of Questionnaires Returned
CountrysideH 49% (78/158)
ProspectKnolls B 45%(17/38)
DeweyHills G 68% (23/34)
Total Responses To Date 51% (118/230)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Communication Tools
•Become a neighborhood captain to help facilitate project
communication
–Let us know of someone in your neighborhood who might
fit this role
•You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, schedules and
questionnaires via regular mail
•Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun-Current
•Door hangers are distributed when there is time-sensitive
information
•Final assessment notices are mailed one year after construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Extra
“City Extra” emails are the best way to receive regular updates
once construction begins. These are free, weekly email updates
about your project.
•Sign up on City of Edina website, www.EdinaMN.gov
–Check the box next to your project name
•If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates
upon request
•It’s the best way to stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
How to Prepare
•Sign up for City Extra
•Begin financial planning
•Complete questionnaire
•Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around the
street construction timeline
•Ask questions; stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
Contact Us
Email: mail@edinamn.gov
Call: 952-826-0371
Visit:Engineering Department
7450 Metro Blvd.
Hours:7:00 a.m. –3:30 p.m.
9/24/2014
7
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thanks for your time!
Questions?
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
1 LIMV1 frt-G 0 GC /*I 6,00( /5i,h/in 4 n P- T?
2 -1e-(21._ct.A (--__.jZsLL_ 7'13 c
3 I'/,) ..‘2/A‘e f A 51-/e7t) iiie )1(') .),
4 d Nko cox EW i;orf eiar-edoiA D‘r
.6&' Li CPG/A-,,,t_ al: _ 5 t 44 £10
6 ---Vf3-4NN -N4 D_62,C,U" UbStLe OA 6%.r\lk1a.
7 u A ri-4\ SChmck >I) 5 ci 00 A'Wo [ct ku
8 ,51e ff fiey Pr.0.145e-
1 o 4-) deA-se, ,\ 73c).8 ScikeL, 1)r-:
11 1 -7
13 i V-M.--G-re--e -V4 S7 ll G-g--ove-
14 Vke,l/C-red .' q 14-Aoli, eLr.k.
15 /
)
taka-eb - ÷-191147 ral„ 7-7 5-005---- iquibici 4 0---
16 12. 0..,r_ 6-0 rgA5-1A_ -91b t itA64\0 1 A br
17 'j.:7/ /I- ./-z'eri ec .6-e73.2 /5c/A -e., CPrr-c2Q----
18 1--OVIA. /4--tti- LA. a 14 vu ess y c7o'Cut,Xet_IF-F -Q kb
cat Nreid 19 A-4,,,,u 6-,,v3.....,,,.,
20 5-6DTI A4...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
) UJ [zL I Ff
6
CA),\..1 kVe-1(-V (10S\-e
---W1 c rtiAsks-tA
C4r-g
T (te_
(e
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
\Je.c-vpv alYJ-tvy
Utra-v-1,-/
2 A‘///.9 //&
11_10 64t/V77
r (d LJ
ait
A4-At
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1(
ie0C de*
C e_ Le
3--(Ro
0.71k-11/3 vi
-)1S; 03-C33 Ze ut_ <D,4
59)0 Par
GO /t_)) e o- /?ai.
5 3 k,"- f\-rvu
2-al t i\f\fej4/ Cxycetk.
S—K0 6trove
1-(7. ri‘c Ck KC1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
evi (cut--k-> f 1,1 Jotuf
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Number Question Answer
1 What is an REU?An REU is a residential equivalent unit. One single-family home is 1 REU. All single-family homes within a project area are
assessed the same because they will receive the same benefit.
2 Does that include corner lots?
Per the assessment policy, corner lots are assessed a total of 1 REU. Depending on the address, the property may get a 1/3, 2/3,
or 1 REU value for the current project. Past projects may have already charged the property a partial REU. All properties will be
reviewed for reu calculations during the feasibility study phase of the project.
3 How are the REUs calculated?Each single-family home is 1 REU. Other facilities (higher-density residential, industrial, schools, churches, etc.) are assessed
based on land use, total building are, number of units, and access to the project area.
4 What determines the estimate range in the
presentation?
The more details that are known about the project, the more precise we can be with out estimate. The price range presented to
you is based on average unit prices and estimated quantities of work to be done. As we move further along in the design process,
we can give you a better idea of what the assessment will be.
5 When does construction begin?
Pending council approval at the public hearing in December, the contract will be awarded around March or April. Depending on
the contractor's schedule, work typically takes place between May and September or October. A period of 8-10 weeks is
preferred for neighborhood construction, but, like we've seen this year, sometimes weather can extend that timeline.
6 What are the finance charges?Residents are charged at 1% over the rate that the City can borrow money. It is normally between 3% and 5%
7 What happens to mailboxes within the project
areas?
Depending on the project, they may all stay in place, some may have to be relocated, or all may need to be relocated. We will
coordinate with homeowners and the postal service when we know more about the extent of the project.
8 How far into the right-of-way does
construction go?
This type of construction usually extends 10-15 feet behind the curb onto your property. Depending on the extend of the utility
work needed, there may be additional disruptions. All disturbed areas within the project areas will be seeded following
construction.
9 When will I know the extent of the
interruption onto my property?Once construction begins, we will know more about how far into your property we will have to go.
10 How do you determine which driveway aprons
to replace?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. It also depends on if the driveway is constructed from brick pavers or is a lifetime-warranty concrete
driveway.
11
Does the same contractor perform all of the
work, and do the projects happen
sequentially?
When the contracts are sent out for bids, the City typically receives bids from the same dozen or so contractors every year.
Countryside will be bid as one contract, but Prospect Knolls and Dewey Hill will most likely be incorporated into the same
contract. It is possible that the same contractor might be awarded both, but more than likely, there will be multiple contractors.
The scheduling of the work will be dependent on the contractors.
12 Will the new street be asphalt or concrete? Do
we get to have a say in that?
The new streets will be bituminous, not concrete. In the City's experience, concrete streets are more expensive to construction
and maintain. Our staff normally recommends bituminous streets.
13 Will the whole neighborhood have curb
replaced, or do you go house by house?
In these neighborhoods, we are looking at performing spot repair/replacement of curb. This means our inspectors will examine
the entire project area, noting locations where the curb is cracked, settled, flat, or otherwise damaged. It is often more cost-
effective to do this than to replace the entire length of curb in a neighborhood. However, if we find a large portion of the curb
needs replacement, then we will look into potentially replacing all of the curb.
14 Do you seed or sod after the project?
The City has gravitated towards seeding instead of sodding after the projects. Seeding is more drought-resistant, requires less
water, and is more environmentally friendly than sod. In past projects, the City has had better success at getting permanent turf
established with seed than with sod.
15 Does the seeding occur immediately after yard
disruptions?
All restoration work will occur after the first layer of asphalt and before the final layer is paved. This is done to prevent heavy
construction equipment from driving on the new road surface, potentially damaging it.
16 What are the costs involved in the sump pump
installation?
Sump pump drainage pipes will be installed in the project areas where feasible. The costs of installing the pipe are covered by the
City Utility Fund. Once the pipe is installed, homeowners wishing to connect will need to obtain a building permit from the City
and connect themselves. The costs to the homeowner may be between $500 and $1,500.
17
Someone in a project area this year said you
encouraged residents to have their main lines
inspected before the project?
If you need to or would like to replace or upgrade your services, now would be a good time to do so. If you were to wait until
after the project is completed, any holes dug into the new roadway will need to be patched approximately 30' by 30', a cost
which the resident would have to pay for. The City will also work with homeowners who wish to improve their services to have
those costs put on their special assessment if they wish.
18
If we want to upgrade our service, does the
City pay for upgrading/adapting the
connection?
Only if such an upgrade or adaption is required as part of the project. Any changes made beyond City standards will not be paid
for by the City.
19 How much does a 30' x 30' street patch cost?In the City's experience, anywhere between $3,000 to $5,000.
20 Will the water be shut off?There will be occasional water shut-offs during the project in order to replace fire hydrants and gate valves. We will do our best
to limit the number of shut-offs, and let you know ahead of time when and where they are going to occur.
21 What does the sidewalk design look like?
We are looking into designing a 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard between the sidewalk and the back of curb. This
boulevard acts as a safety buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. The sidewalks are only anticipated to be installed along one
side of the streets on which they are proposed. The City is currently studying the property impacts involved with installation to
determine a preferred alignment.
22 Will there be crosswalks?Painted crosswalks will most likely not be included with this project unless they already exist within the project area. The need
for additional crosswalks will need to be evaluated by our Traffic Safety Coordinator.
23 How far into the property will the sidewalk go?
Construction related to installing a new 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard will typically extend an additional 6 feet onto the
property. The boulevard width may vary depending on existing obstacles (trees, driveways, terrain, etc.) that change the
alignment of the sidewalk.
24 What will happen if I have a driveway apron
with concrete aggregate or brick pavers?
If the driveway apron is in poor shape, the City will work with the homeowner to replace it to current City standards. Typically,
we will work with the homeowner and contractor to replace pavers or exposed aggregate driveways. The City does not replace
lifetime guaranty aprons, and any related costs will not be paid by the City. We try our best to distrurb special driveways as little
as possible during construction to avoid replacement costs.
25 How do you install sidewalks in a cul-de-sac?Currently, there are no sidewalks planned for any of the cul-de-sacs within these project areas.
26 Do we have the option to have our driveway
apron replaced or not?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. Typically, we do not leave poor aprons in place. The cost for replacing the aprons is covered under the City
Utility Fund, as your driveway apron is considered a part of our stormwater conveyance system.
27 If we live in an area with surmountable curb,
will you be changing it to bulkhead style?
Since we are only planning for spot replacement of curb, the existing styles will stay in place. The City tends to favor the bulkhead-
style curb over surmountable curb because it conveys stormwater more easily and it helps prevent snowplows from damaging
lawns in the winter.
28
You said irrigation systems and pet
containment fences will probably be
damaged?
If an irrigation system or pet containment fence is damaged, the contractor will perform a temporary repair so the system can
still be used. After the majority of the project is completed, the contractor will then permanently repair all damaged systems
within the project area before final paving.
29 How are the major roadways assessed?
The Municipal State Aid-designated roadways in Edina are maintained and reconstructed with funds obtained from the state gas
tax. Properties that live on State Aid roads are assessed 20% of the project costs. This assessment typically is half that of a
standard residential assessment. The reason for the lower assessment is because residents who live on a State Aid roadway
typically have lower property values and have to deal with much higher volumes of traffic than residents who live in a residential
neighborhood. Both the City's State Aid and non-State Aid assessment policies are available on our website.
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction - 42 People Attended
Question and Answer Session from the July 28th, 2014 Open House Meeting
Held at Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility from 6 to 8 pm
H
W
Y
1
6
9
78TH ST W
VALLEY VIEW RD
VALL
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
DEWEY HILL RD
76TH ST W
70TH ST W
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
58TH ST W
54TH ST W
50TH ST W
44TH ST
W
MALONEY AVE
INTERLACHEN BLVD
YO
R
K
A
V
E
S
66TH ST W
70TH ST W
C
A
H
I
L
L
R
D
XE
R
X
E
S
A
V
E
S
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
S
VERNO
N
A
V
E
SC
H
A
E
F
E
R
R
D
BL
A
K
E
R
D
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
§¨¦169
§¨¦169
§¨¦62
§¨¦62
§¨¦100
§¨¦100
INTERLACHENCOUNTRYCLUB
VANVALKENBURGPARK
BREDESENPARK
BRAEMAR PARKGOLF COURSE
FRED RICHARDSGOLF COURSE
EDINACOUNTRYCLUB
Mud Lake
Lake Edina
Lake
Cornelia
Mirr
o
r
L
a
k
e
Arrowhead Lake
Highlands Lake
IndianheadLake
Mel
o
d
y
L
a
k
e
LakePamela
HarveyLake
HawkesLake
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
L
a
k
e
Cahill
Highlands B
Indian Hills B
Lake Edina
Rolling Green Hilldale
Indian Hills A
Fox Meadow B
Arden Park D
The Heights A
Birchcrest A
The Heights B
Golf Terrace B
Country Club ATodd Park A
Chowen Park C
Countryside A
Highlands C
Lake Cornelia C
Countryside H
Country Club B
Southdale B
Parklawn A
South Cornelia B
Sunny Slope
Prospect Knolls A
Concord E
Lake Cornelia D
Parkwood Knolls F
Lake Cornelia E
Grandview C
Presidents A
Birchcrest B
Melody Lake D
Concord A
Melody Lake A
Minnehaha Woods A
Golf Terrace A
Morningside C
Indian Hills D
Braemar Hills A
Morningside D
Parkwood Knolls C
Birchcrest C
Dewey Hill B
Brookview Heights A
Creek Knolls
Melody Lake B
Concord B
Indian Trails
Brookview Heights B
Highlands A
Parklawn B
Chowen Park A
Bredesen Park B
Morningside B
Parkwood Knolls P
Prospect Knolls C
South Cornelia D
White Oaks A
Parkwood Knolls E
Concord C
Normandale Park D
Creek Valley A
Countryside I
Presidents C
Arden Park C
Presidents B
Presidents E
Highlands D
Grandview B
Southdale C
Braemar Hills C
Morningside A
Bredesen Park D
South Cornelia C
Dewey Hill A
Concord G
Morningside E
Southdale A
Countryside D
Concord H
Minnehaha Woods B
Countryside C
Pamela Park E
Todd Park F
Strachauer Park A
Parkwood Knolls D
Parkwood Knolls M
Pamela Park A
Normandale Park A
Lake Cornelia F
Parkwood Knolls B
South Cornelia A
Chowen Park B
Pamela Park D
Countryside E
Bredesen Park C
Interlachen Park A
Strachauer Park B
Creek Valley C
Parkwood Knolls N Fox Meadow C
Normandale Park B
White Oaks B
Todd Park B
Parkwood Knolls O
Braemar Hills D
Braemar Hills B
Concord D
Parkwood Knolls G
Normandale Park C
Prospect Knolls B
Dewey Hill G
White Oaks C
Dewey Hill E
Parkwood Knolls A
Countryside F
Todd Park D
Minnehaha Woods D
Pamela Park B
Prospect Knolls D
Indian Hills E
Dewey Hill D
Pamela Park C
Countryside G
Minnehaha Woods C
Concord F
Fox Meadow F
Fox Meadow A
Todd Park E
Todd Park C
Highlands F
Melody Lake C
Indian Hills C
Presidents D
Fox Meadow D
Fox Meadow G
Creek Valley B
Parkwood Knolls I
Fox Meadow E
Dewey Hill F
Dewey Hill C
Interlachen Park B
Bredesen Park A
Brookview Heights C
Grandview A
Parkwood Knolls L
Highlands E
Indian Hills F
Arden Park A
Parkwood Knolls H
Parkwood Knolls K
Braemar Hills E
Edinborough
Parkwood Knolls J
Arden Park B
Lake Cornelia A
Countryside B
Country Club C
Lake Cornelia B
Brookview Heights D
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
City of Edina 2014-2019Anticipated Local Bituminous Street Reconstruction
The dates shown on the map represent the anticipated years of construction and are subject to change based on budgetary issues, adjacent projects, resident input and other factors.Not all bituminous roadways within the City are shown. If a road is not highlighted then the potential reconstruction date is beyond the City’s long term planning process.
The City of Edina’s street improvement policy is to assess residents for a portion of the roadway reconstruction costs. Public utility improvements are paid for from the City’s utility fund.
Extensive evaluation regarding the condition of the bituminous pavement, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main were used to set the priority of roadway improvements.
This map only addresses local bituminous streets and does not address State-Aid routes or concrete streets within the City.
Note/Disclaimer
2015
2016
2014
2017
2018
2019
Legend
Anticipated Year
µ
ReconstructionAssessment Areas
Need to zoom into mapto see a neighborhood area.
September 2014Engineering Dept.
Braemar Golf Course
Bredesen Park
Lewis Park
Walnut Ridge Park
Garden Park
Heights Park
Creek Valley Park
Krahl Hill
Normandale Park
Countryside Park
McGuirePark
BirchcrestPark
Melody LakePark
TingdalePark
Courtney Fields
¹º
ñ
æ
æ
¹º
æ
æ
¹º
æ
æ
¹º
¹º
æ
æ
æ
ñ
æ
ñ
?vA@
?úA@
?úA@
?ÞA@
?vA@
Mud Lake
ArrowheadLake
IndianheadLake
Me
l
o
d
y
L
a
k
e
HawkesLake
Nine Mile Creek
Nine Mil
e
C
r
e
e
k
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
FireStation
Public Works &Park Maintenance
ColonialChurch
CalvaryLutheran
EdinaHighSchool
CrossviewLutheran
CountrysideSchool
St Albans Episcopal Valley ViewMiddle School
Creek Valley School
NormandaleLutheran
St PatricksCatholic
NewCitiesCovenantChurch
GoodSamaritanMethodist
ChapelHillsCongregtional
VERN
O
N
A
V
E
CA
H
I
L
L
R
D
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
70TH ST W
DEWEY HILL RD
VALLEY VIEW RD
78TH ST W
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
OLINGER BLVD
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
MC
C
A
U
L
Y
T
R
L
S
BENTON AVE
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
70TH ST W
VERNON
A
V
E
S
MC
C
A
U
L
E
Y
T
R
L
S
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
VALL
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
CA
H
I
L
L
R
D
VI
E
W
L
N
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
S
L
I
N
C
O
L
N
D
R
S
A
L
L
Y
L
N
HILARY LN
BENTON AVE
M
E
T
R
O
B
L
V
D
CO
D
E
A
V
E
OLIN
G
E
R
B
L
V
D
R
I
D
G
E
V
I
E
W
D
R
68TH ST W
56TH ST W
BROOK DR
SC
H
A
E
F
E
R
R
D
66TH ST W
64TH ST W
60TH ST W
HA
N
S
E
N
R
D
BU
S
H
L
A
K
E
R
D
O
H
M
S
L
N
IN
D
I
A
N
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
D
A
K
O
T
A
T
R
L
GROVE ST
BE
R
N
A
R
D
P
L
DEWEY HILL RD
DA
L
E
A
V
E
DANE
N
S
D
R
LA
N
H
A
M
L
N
L
I
M
E
R
I
C
K
L
N
HI
L
L
S
I
D
E
L
N
WA
R
R
E
N
A
V
E
VALLEY
L
N
63RD ST W
AN
T
R
I
M
R
D
74TH ST W
SH
A
N
N
O
N
D
R
L
I
M
E
R
I
C
K
D
R
WI
L
R
Y
A
N
A
V
E
DOVRE DR
AR
B
O
U
R
A
V
E
D
E
L
A
N
E
Y
B
L
V
D
TIFTON
D
R
76TH ST W
WA
L
N
U
T
D
R
TI
N
G
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
WEST TRL
JO
H
N
S
O
N
D
R
OL
I
N
G
E
R
R
D
RO
L
F
A
V
E
WAR
D
E
N
A
V
E
GA
L
W
A
Y
D
R
BRAEMAR BLVD
JEFF PL
ME
A
D
O
W
R
D
G
BL
A
K
E
R
D
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
D
R
NO
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
R
D
SUN
R
D
62ND ST W
MCCAULEY TRL W
BIRCHCREST DR
AMY DR
C
H
E
Y
E
N
N
E
T
R
L
WE
S
T
R
I
D
G
E
B
L
V
D
PA
R
K
W
O
O
D
L
N
ABE
R
C
R
O
M
B
I
E
D
R
VILLA
L
N
STAUDER CIR
JO
S
E
P
H
I
N
E
A
V
E
LO
N
G
B
R
A
K
E
T
R
L
SCHEY DR
HI
L
L
S
I
D
E
R
D
78T
H
S
T
W
FL
E
E
T
W
O
O
D
D
R
MAR
K
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
D
R
TU
P
A
D
R
PAIUT
E
D
R
CHAPEL DR
NO
R
D
I
C
D
R
KI
L
L
A
R
N
E
Y
L
N
MI
L
D
R
E
D
A
V
E
EV
E
R
E
T
T
P
L
FIELD WAY
KEMRICH DR
GLEASON CT
BISCAYNE BLVD
ASPEN RD
LO
N
D
O
N
D
E
R
R
Y
R
D
KAYMAR DR
DU
G
G
A
N
P
L
Z
EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD
WI
L
L
S
O
N
R
D
ER
I
N
T
E
R
61ST ST W
HIGHLAND RD
77TH ST W
LOIS LN
KN
O
L
L
D
R
S
LOCH MOOR DR
IR
O
Q
U
O
I
S
T
R
L
MADDOX LN
SH
E
R
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
CH
E
R
O
K
E
E
T
R
L
CH
A
P
E
L
L
N
COUNTRYSIDE RD
SUSAN AVE
HY
D
E
P
A
R
K
D
R
ARCTIC WAY
YVONNE TER
APACHE RD
ME
R
O
L
D
D
R
SAMUEL RD
TIMBER RDG
SIOUX TRL
LANGFORD DR
WY
C
L
I
F
F
E
R
D
EDEN PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
COLONIAL WAY
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
W
Y
M
A
N
A
V
E
NA
O
M
I
D
R
SCOTIA DR
PORTER LN
DUNDEE RD
MO
H
A
W
K
T
R
L
WHITING AVE
DE
V
I
L
L
E
D
R
CREEK VAL
L
E
Y
R
D
RI
D
G
E
W
A
Y
R
D
P
O
S
T
L
N
D
O
W
N
R
D
73RD ST W
BALDER LN
N
A
V
A
H
O
T
R
L
DUBLIN
R
D
SH
A
N
E
D
R
58TH ST W
HUNTER ST
NE
W
P
O
R
T
D
R
NORDIC
C
I
R
TRA
L
E
E
D
R
LESLEE LN
HILLSIDE CT
72ND
S
T
W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
D
R
ME
L
O
D
Y
L
N
FORSLIN DR
A
N
T
R
I
M
C
T
N
O
B
H
I
L
L
D
R
AM
U
N
D
S
O
N
A
V
E
MA
R
T
H
C
T
CAM
E
L
B
A
C
K
D
R
JEFFREY LN
D
U
N
C
A
N
L
N
IKOLA WAY
OAK GLEN R
D
ARBOUR LN
CAHIL
L
L
N
ROBERTS PL
GRACE TER
RO
S
E
M
A
R
Y
L
N
CLOVER RDG
STO
N
E
W
O
O
D
C
T
C
E
C
I
L
I
A
C
I
R
INDIAN
H
I
L
L
S
P
A
S
S
PAIUTE PASS
VERNON HILLS RD
W
A
R
W
I
C
K
P
L
CO
N
T
I
N
E
N
T
A
L
D
R
G
L
A
S
G
O
W
D
R
VERNON LN
NO
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
B
L
V
D
D
O
R
O
N
L
N
BRAEBURN CIR
TA
R
A
R
D
SHER
M
A
N
C
I
R
TA
M
A
R
A
C
L
N
LONDONDERRY DR
HARVE
Y
L
N
BLAK
E
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
CREEK VIEW LN
OLINGER CIR
HA
B
I
T
A
T
C
T
VILLAGE DR
SC
A
N
D
I
A
R
D
W
E
S
T
O
N
C
I
R
57TH ST W
SCHAEFER CIR
SHAWNEE
C
I
R
PAYTON CT
IR
O
Q
U
O
I
S
C
I
R
LYLE CIR OA
K
L
N
SC
H
O
O
L
R
D
LEWIS RIDGE
P
K
W
Y
GROVE CIR
B
R
O
R
R
D
PAIUTE CIR
BONNIE BRAE DR
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
C
T
SH
A
U
G
H
N
E
S
S
Y
R
D
GA
R
D
E
N
A
V
E
C
O
M
A
N
C
H
E
C
T
SHANN
O
N
C
I
R
CIRC
L
E
D
R
WOO
D
V
I
E
W
C
T
BERNE CIR
DARCY LN
W
E
L
L
E
S
L
E
Y
P
L
HYDE PARK LN
DO
R
O
N
D
R
CA
H
I
L
L
R
D
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
CREEK VALLEY RD
VALLEY
V
I
E
W
R
D
66TH ST W
HA
N
S
E
N
R
D
LIMERICK
L
N
VALLEY VIEW
R
D
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
B
L
V
D
VALLE
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
NO
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
R
D
NO
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
R
D
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
R
D
61ST ST W
GROVE ST
WILR
Y
A
N
A
V
E
CRESC
E
N
T
D
R
78T
H
S
T
W
NO
R
M
A
N
D
A
L
E
R
D
62ND ST W
CO
D
E
A
V
E
SH
E
R
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
/
Engineering DeptMay, 2014
Sidewalk Facilities: Southwest Quadrant
Living Streets ClassificationCollector & Local Connector
Minor Arterial Proposed Sidewalk
Existing SidewalkExisting Park Pathway
Recommended Active Routes To School SidewalkProposed Regional Trail
APPENDIX B
Property Owners
Questionnaire
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you for your time. Your responses to the attached questionnaire will help us design your
neighborhood’s project. Here is background information that will aid you in filling out the questionnaire. Each
numeral relates to the corresponding survey question.
I. Drainage Service Connection
A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner’s lawn. There are several sump pump drainage issues to
look for. First, if your lawn drains back to your house, sump pump discharges can cause problems with your
lawn, your neighbor’s lawn or your basement. If the sump pump discharge runs down the gutter line, it can
promote algae growth in the street. Finally, discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system using
floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City Ordinance and State Statute.
To prevent the issues mentioned above, your street reconstruction project could include a City sump drain
system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump
pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If the topography and final street designs favor a
sump drain system, you could connect to it. That is why survey questions I.C. and I.D. ask about your sump
pump preferences. Keep in mind that installation of the pipe from your house to the City sump drain system
would be your responsibility, including plumbing modifications connection. However, the City sump drain
system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund.
II. Local Drainage Problems
As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if storm water run-off
stands in the street or sidewalk in front of your house. If this or similar situations are occurring in your area,
please describe it in this section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective action.
III. Private Underground Utilities
It is very important that you fill out this section. Some residents install private underground utilities in the
roadway right-of-way (the area from the edge of the roadway to your property line). The most common
private utilities include lawn irrigation and pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can
damage these utilities. If they are damaged during the street reconstruction project, they will be repaired.
However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, crews can attempt to avoid damaging
them during construction.
IV. Residential Streetlights
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks residents for their input on neighborhood streetlight
systems. Staff is trying to understand if the neighborhood favors upgrading the streetlight system or if the
existing streetlight system meets the needs of the neighborhood. Please keep in mind that costs associated
with improving the streetlight system would be a special assessment. These costs would be determined after
the extent of the improvements is understood.
V. Pedestrian Issues
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks in the
neighborhood. Sidewalks are funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund.
Please note if you know of any pedestrian issues such as a missing segment of sidewalk or an inadequate
pedestrian crossing.
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
Page 2 of 2
VI. Traffic Management
We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues.
VII. Email Updates
One of the primary tools for communicating with you during construction is the City Extra email notification
service. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive email messages from the City
regarding this project.
By signing up for City Extra email notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. The
updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited, when your water may
be shut off for water main replacement and when to have your contractor repair your irrigation system if it
was damaged during construction.
To receive email updates, sign up online at www.EdinaMN.gov. Enter your email address and a password
(new user will need to create a password). Click on email subscriptions. Scroll down the page until you see
your neighborhood project name (Countryside H Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction). Place a
check mark in the box next to it. Click the “update” button at the bottom right hand corner of the
webpage.
Need Help?
If you have any questions about how to fill out the questionnaire, please contact Assistant City Engineer
Patrick Wrase at 952-826-0443 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison at 952-826-
0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
YOUR HOUSE
CURB LINE
ROW ROW
CURB LINE
EXAMPLE
HOUSE
GARAGE
X
SERVICE
CONNECTION
PIPE HERE
Resident Questionnaire
Countryside H
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you in advance for your time. Your input is important to us. Please read the Questionnaire
Instructions before completing this questionnaire.
I. Drainage Service Connection:
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain? Yes No Unknown
B. Does your home have a sump pump? Yes No Unknown
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
Please sketch in the space to the right:
your house, garage, driveway, sump pump
discharge location and approximately
where along the right-of-way (ROW) line
you would like the service connection
pipe located.
II. Local Drainage Problems
Please describe specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood:
III. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The right-of-
way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes No
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes No
IV. Residential Streetlights:
A. Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system
meeting the needs of the neighborhood?
Yes No
B. Do you favor improving your streetlights?
Yes No
V. Pedestrian Issues:
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes No
B. If yes, where? _________________________________________________________
C. Please describe specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below.
VI. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes No
B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
VII. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes No
Thank you for completing the questionnaire. Please return it to the City in the enclosed envelope by June
17.
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
H
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
N
20
1
4
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
B
A
-
4
1
3
Da
t
a
E
n
t
e
r
e
d
B
y
:
La
s
t
D
a
t
e
D
a
t
a
E
n
t
e
r
e
d
:
Du
e
D
a
t
e
:
Qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
s
S
e
n
t
O
u
t
:
Qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
s
R
e
t
u
r
n
e
d
:
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
R
e
t
u
r
n
e
d
:
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Lo
c
a
l
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
Ye
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ex
p
l
a
i
n
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
YesNoYesNo
Ho
u
s
e
#
St
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
58
0
0
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
0
4
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
t
h
a
t
I
a
m
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
0
5
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
!
None11
58
0
9
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
1
3
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
We
t
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
s
p
r
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
1
6
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
4
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
Th
e
r
e
a
r
e
m
a
n
y
h
o
m
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
u
m
p
p
u
m
p
s
th
a
t
d
r
a
i
n
o
n
a
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
c
y
c
l
e
o
n
o
u
r
st
r
e
e
t
.
T
h
e
h
i
l
l
b
e
h
i
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
s
t
h
i
s
ne
c
e
s
s
i
t
y
.
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
59
2
0
A
m
y
D
r
.
1
1
1
1
1
On
t
h
e
b
a
c
k
s
i
d
e
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
El
e
m
b
e
t
w
5
8
2
5
A
r
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
co
r
n
e
r
(
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
5
9
8
0
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
)
.
Th
i
s
a
r
e
a
i
s
v
e
r
y
c
o
n
g
e
s
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
c
a
r
s
du
r
i
n
g
s
c
h
o
o
l
p
i
c
k
u
p
h
o
u
r
s
a
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
su
m
m
e
r
s
o
c
c
e
r
s
e
a
s
o
n
.
T
h
e
c
u
r
v
e
b
e
t
w
59
4
0
a
n
d
5
9
1
2
i
s
a
b
l
i
n
d
s
p
o
t
w
h
e
r
e
p
e
d
s
,
bi
k
e
s
,
a
n
d
e
v
e
n
c
a
r
s
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
h
i
t
.
M
o
s
t
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
l
y
,
t
h
e
b
u
s
d
r
o
p
o
f
f
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
ac
r
o
s
s
f
r
o
m
5
9
8
0
A
r
b
o
u
r
d
r
o
p
s
o
f
f
a
l
a
r
g
e
gr
o
u
p
o
f
m
i
d
d
l
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
e
r
s
t
h
a
t
w
a
l
k
a
r
o
u
n
d
th
a
t
b
e
n
d
.
I
h
a
v
e
g
r
e
a
t
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
t
h
a
t
a
c
h
i
l
d
co
u
l
d
b
e
h
i
t
o
n
t
h
i
s
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
o
f
A
r
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
!
!
!
1
1Attn: Mark Nolan!!! Please consider these areas carefully. Thank you so much :). Another key place where a sidewalk would reduce ped risk is on Olinger Blvd around the curve of Bredesen Park, all the way to the corner of Tracy & Bredesen. This would enable parents/dhildren to safely get to/from the great new playground, tennis courts and ball field.
59
0
5
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
No
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
8
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
9
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
1
2
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
no
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
1
7
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
n
e
a
r
p
o
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
g
r
e
a
t
.
E
n
t
i
r
e
ba
c
k
y
a
r
d
i
s
l
o
w
a
n
d
s
o
g
g
y
i
n
t
h
e
s
p
r
i
n
g
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
2
0
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Al
o
n
g
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
P
a
r
k
/
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
Pa
r
k
1Tracy Ave at 62 near the fire station1
59
2
4
Am
y
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
0
0
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
Al
o
n
g
o
n
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
w
a
l
k
o
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
s
c
h
o
o
l
an
d
a
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
c
a
r
s
c
o
u
l
d
h
i
t
t
h
e
m
.
1Only when idiots cut corner at turn or speed 1
58
0
8
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
Su
m
p
P
u
m
p
d
o
e
s
n
'
t
a
c
t
u
a
l
l
y
e
v
e
r
n
e
e
d
to
t
u
r
n
o
n
,
t
o
m
y
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
1On Arbour Ave & Ln in front of the C'side school, when there are events happening such as soccer games.1
58
1
2
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
58
1
6
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
I
l
i
v
e
a
t
t
h
e
b
o
t
t
o
m
o
f
a
h
i
l
l
.
W
h
e
n
e
v
e
r
i
t
ra
i
n
s
h
a
r
d
I
g
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
m
y
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
.
Of
t
e
n
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
m
e
s
u
p
t
h
r
u
t
h
e
ce
m
e
n
t
f
l
o
o
r
,
e
s
p
.
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
b
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
wa
t
e
r
.
I
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
t
a
b
l
e
i
s
h
i
g
h
be
n
e
a
t
h
o
u
r
h
o
u
s
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
I
d
o
n
'
t
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
a
n
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
11
58
2
5
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
0
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
Ma
n
y
h
o
m
e
s
i
n
o
u
r
n
'
h
o
o
d
a
r
e
s
e
t
u
p
t
o
dr
a
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
o
u
t
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
/
y
a
r
d
s
l
o
p
e
du
e
t
o
w
e
t
t
e
r
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
a
r
e
a
.
I
t
h
i
n
k
i
t
wo
r
k
s
w
e
l
l
.
1
1
1
1
1
Al
o
n
g
A
r
b
o
u
r
,
S
u
n
R
d
d
o
w
n
t
o
Br
e
d
e
s
e
n
.
Ar
b
o
u
r
h
a
s
v
e
r
y
t
i
g
h
t
c
u
r
v
e
s
a
n
d
i
s
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
f
o
r
w
a
l
k
e
r
s
/
b
i
k
e
r
s
.
A
l
s
o
,
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
o
u
r
n
'
h
o
o
d
t
o
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
P
a
r
k
ca
n
b
e
d
e
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
d
u
e
t
o
n
o
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
.
1
Tracy & Benton intersection is bad. The roundabout plan should be implemented.1
59
6
0
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
t
t
h
a
t
w
e
a
r
e
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
.
1
1
1
1
1
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
h
e
s
p
e
e
d
b
u
m
p
o
n
A
r
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
to
s
l
o
w
d
o
w
n
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
.
Pe
o
p
l
e
d
r
i
v
e
q
u
i
c
k
l
y
t
h
e
r
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
bl
i
n
d
s
p
o
t
.
1See above.1
59
7
0
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11Need a light in the areas of 6016 Arbour La.Email Access
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
h
e
r
e
?
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
N
'
h
o
o
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
If yes, where?Traffic Management
AD
D
R
E
S
S
Re
t
u
r
n
e
d
Su
r
v
e
y
Su
m
p
P
u
m
p
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
i
n
e
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Dr
a
i
n
t
i
l
e
o
r
F
o
o
t
i
n
g
D
r
a
i
n
H
a
s
a
S
u
m
p
P
u
m
p
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
C
i
t
y
D
r
a
i
n
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
Ro
o
f
D
r
a
i
n
s
Ir
i
g
g
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
.
i
n
b
l
v
d
.
P
e
t
f
e
n
c
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
me
e
t
s
n
e
e
d
s
Fa
v
o
r
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Ne
e
d
81
51
%
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
s
s
u
e
s
15
8
Ju
n
e
1
7
,
2
0
1
4
Ju
l
y
7
,
2
0
1
4
G:
\
P
W
\
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
S
V
C
S
\
E
N
G
D
I
V
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
I
M
P
R
N
O
S
\
B
A
4
1
3
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
H
(
2
0
1
5
)
\
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
F
E
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
\
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
\
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
T
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
x
l
s
x
10
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
4
1 of 4
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
H
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
N
20
1
4
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
B
A
-
4
1
3
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Lo
c
a
l
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
Ye
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ex
p
l
a
i
n
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
YesNoYesNoEmail Access
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
h
e
r
e
?
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
N
'
h
o
o
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
If yes, where?Traffic Management
AD
D
R
E
S
S
Re
t
u
r
n
e
d
Su
r
v
e
y
Su
m
p
P
u
m
p
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
i
n
e
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Dr
a
i
n
t
i
l
e
o
r
F
o
o
t
i
n
g
D
r
a
i
n
H
a
s
a
S
u
m
p
P
u
m
p
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
C
i
t
y
D
r
a
i
n
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
Ro
o
f
D
r
a
i
n
s
Ir
i
g
g
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
.
i
n
b
l
v
d
.
P
e
t
f
e
n
c
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
me
e
t
s
n
e
e
d
s
Fa
v
o
r
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Ne
e
d
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
s
s
u
e
s
60
2
0
Be
r
n
e
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
Sl
i
g
h
t
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
m
i
d
d
l
e
o
f
c
u
l
d
e
s
a
c
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
60
3
6
Be
r
n
e
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
My
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
e
n
d
s
u
p
l
i
k
e
a
l
a
k
e
w
i
t
h
l
o
t
s
of
r
a
i
n
.
1
1
1
1
1
1Speeds on Vernon are excessive; should be 30-35 mph.1
57
0
0
Be
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
0
4
Be
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
1Traffic from C'side school blocking our driveway and mailbox - heavy traffic morning and afternoon.1
57
1
6
Be
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
t
o
m
y
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
0
0
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Al
o
n
g
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
G
r
o
v
e
S
t
a
s
t
h
e
bu
s
s
t
o
p
/
k
i
d
s
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
/
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
G
r
o
v
e
S
t
.
Se
e
a
b
o
v
e
.
N
o
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
e
x
i
s
t
s
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
on
G
r
o
v
e
o
f
f
o
f
T
r
a
c
y
.
1Drivers drive too fast down Tracy Ave despite speed posting and turn too quickly onto side streets.1
57
0
1
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
Ca
r
s
d
o
n
’
t
a
l
w
a
y
s
y
i
e
l
d
t
o
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
i
n
th
e
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
T
r
a
c
y
A
v
e
f
r
o
m
G
r
o
v
e
S
t
1
Speed exceed 30 mph on Tracy 1
57
0
5
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
1Inability to see cross traffic when stopped at the stop sign without going slightly past the stop sign and blocking the bike lane. At Grove and Tracy.1
57
1
1
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
Sl
o
w
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
t
o
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
a
t
r
e
a
r
o
f
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
(
n
o
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
d
e
)
.
P
o
o
l
i
n
g
d
u
r
i
n
g
wi
n
t
e
r
/
s
p
r
i
n
g
m
e
l
t
a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
.
1
1
1
1
1
No
r
t
h
o
r
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
G
r
o
v
e
-
v
e
r
y
bu
s
y
r
o
a
d
.
Gr
o
v
e
i
s
a
h
i
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
r
o
a
d
d
u
e
t
o
G
o
o
d
Sa
m
a
r
i
t
a
n
C
h
u
r
c
h
,
p
r
e
-
s
c
h
o
o
l
,
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
to
/
f
r
o
m
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
11
57
1
7
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
We
h
a
v
e
a
d
r
a
i
n
i
n
o
u
r
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
(
c
i
t
y
dr
a
i
n
)
.
O
u
r
y
a
r
d
i
s
t
h
e
l
o
w
p
o
i
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
bl
o
c
k
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
p
o
o
l
s
a
f
t
e
r
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
.
Th
e
d
r
a
i
n
i
s
n
o
t
a
t
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
s
t
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
ya
r
d
.
T
h
e
r
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
b
y
t
h
e
dr
a
i
n
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
o
u
t
t
o
w
o
r
k
on
.
T
h
e
y
a
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
r
e
p
a
i
r
i
n
g
i
t
no
w
.
1
1
1
1
1
1Cars travel too fast don't always stop at the stop sign located at grove st and stuart 1
58
1
7
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
1The intersection of Grove and Arbour speed, and confusion in the large intersection.1
58
2
0
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
3
3
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
3
6
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11No Streetlights on the block
58
2
1
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
Ba
c
k
y
a
r
d
i
s
a
l
o
w
-
l
y
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
t
h
a
t
i
s
p
r
o
n
e
to
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
s
p
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
he
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
4
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
Wa
t
e
r
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
s
a
t
f
o
o
t
o
f
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
do
e
s
n
'
t
d
r
a
i
n
a
w
a
y
e
v
e
r
s
i
n
c
e
a
W
M
br
e
a
k
a
f
e
w
y
e
a
r
s
a
g
o
.
T
h
e
r
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
se
t
t
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
r
o
n
m
e
e
t
s
st
r
e
e
t
.
I
'
m
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
w
a
t
e
r
e
v
e
n
t
u
a
l
l
y
se
e
p
s
t
h
r
u
a
n
d
c
o
u
l
d
c
a
u
s
e
s
i
n
k
h
o
l
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
5
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
SW
c
o
r
n
e
r
V
e
r
n
o
n
A
v
e
a
n
d
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
Ro
a
d
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
8
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
0
5
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
i
n
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
o
f
p
o
o
l
i
n
g
/
r
u
n
n
i
n
g
wa
t
e
r
s
a
t
u
r
a
t
i
n
g
o
u
r
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
.
S
e
v
e
r
a
l
oc
c
u
r
e
n
c
e
s
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
o
u
r
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
0
9
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
Co
r
n
e
r
o
f
M
e
r
o
l
d
a
n
d
W
y
c
l
i
f
f
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
58
1
6
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1Intersection of Merold and Grove need a stop sign, preferably westbound on Grove.1
58
1
7
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
0
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
11
59
0
1
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
5
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
11
59
0
8
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
1
2
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
G:
\
P
W
\
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
S
V
C
S
\
E
N
G
D
I
V
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
I
M
P
R
N
O
S
\
B
A
4
1
3
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
H
(
2
0
1
5
)
\
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
F
E
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
\
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
\
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
T
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
x
l
s
x
10
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
4
2 of 4
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
H
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
N
20
1
4
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
B
A
-
4
1
3
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Lo
c
a
l
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
Ye
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ex
p
l
a
i
n
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
YesNoYesNoEmail Access
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
h
e
r
e
?
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
N
'
h
o
o
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
If yes, where?Traffic Management
AD
D
R
E
S
S
Re
t
u
r
n
e
d
Su
r
v
e
y
Su
m
p
P
u
m
p
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
i
n
e
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Dr
a
i
n
t
i
l
e
o
r
F
o
o
t
i
n
g
D
r
a
i
n
H
a
s
a
S
u
m
p
P
u
m
p
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
C
i
t
y
D
r
a
i
n
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
Ro
o
f
D
r
a
i
n
s
Ir
i
g
g
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
.
i
n
b
l
v
d
.
P
e
t
f
e
n
c
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
me
e
t
s
n
e
e
d
s
Fa
v
o
r
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Ne
e
d
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
s
s
u
e
s
59
1
6
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
We
l
i
v
e
o
n
t
h
e
b
o
t
t
o
m
o
f
a
h
i
l
l
a
n
d
h
a
v
e
wa
t
e
r
c
o
m
i
n
g
d
o
w
n
t
o
o
u
r
l
a
w
n
.
I
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
a
t
o
u
r
s
u
m
p
p
u
m
p
di
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
s
w
a
t
e
r
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
l
a
w
n
a
n
d
it
i
s
e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
w
e
t
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
u
m
m
e
r
.
1
1
1
1
11
59
2
0
Me
r
o
l
d
D
r
1
1
1
1
1
We
h
a
v
e
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
n
'
b
o
r
s
u
p
h
i
l
l
f
r
o
m
u
s
ca
u
s
i
n
g
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
r
u
n
o
f
f
t
o
c
o
m
e
o
n
t
o
ou
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
W
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
t
wo
u
l
d
b
e
b
e
s
t
t
o
h
a
v
e
t
w
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
l
o
c
a
t
i
i
o
n
s
t
o
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
ca
p
t
u
r
e
o
f
n
'
b
o
r
'
s
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
g
ou
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
c
a
p
t
u
r
i
n
g
o
u
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
pr
i
o
r
t
o
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
g
o
u
r
d
o
w
n
h
i
l
l
n
'
b
o
r
.
i
f
o
n
l
y
on
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
u
s
e
o
u
r
f
i
r
s
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
C
u
r
b
s
ar
e
n
o
t
s
l
o
p
e
d
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
t
o
d
r
a
i
n
a
l
l
wa
t
e
r
,
c
a
u
s
i
n
g
i
c
e
d
a
m
s
i
n
w
i
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
st
a
g
n
a
n
t
s
u
m
m
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
i
w
t
h
a
l
g
a
e
gr
o
w
t
h
.
S
e
e
1
.
D
.
s
k
e
t
c
h
.
1
1
1
1
1
Th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
n
'
h
o
o
d
.
We
l
i
v
e
v
e
r
y
c
l
o
s
e
t
o
a
n
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
s
c
h
o
o
l
an
d
h
a
v
e
a
l
o
t
o
f
k
i
d
s
t
h
a
t
w
a
l
k
/
b
i
k
e
t
h
r
u
t
h
e
n'
h
o
o
d
a
n
d
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
u
c
h
s
a
e
r
t
o
h
a
v
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
m
t
o
t
r
a
v
e
l
o
n
.
1The intersection of Grove & Merold need stop/yield sign in one direction to avoid accidents. Difficult to see cars as you come around curve. Need traffic mitigation on Hwy. 62 Gleason exit. Traffic backs up significanlty and cars make left turns from right lane trying to avoid having to wait.1
60
0
0
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
1
1
1
1
1
Wa
t
e
r
s
i
t
s
i
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
l
o
n
g
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
c
u
r
b
in
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
o
u
r
h
o
u
s
e
a
n
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
u
n
R
d
.
cl
o
s
e
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Su
n
R
d
.
a
n
d
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
60
1
2
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
1
1
1
1
1
Se
v
e
r
a
l
p
l
a
c
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
st
a
n
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
q
u
i
t
e
s
o
m
e
t
i
m
e
a
f
t
e
r
a
r
a
i
n
.
1
1
1
1
1
Pa
r
k
S
i
d
e
o
f
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
1Speed - Blind Corner from the undergrowth in the park. This is a very dangerous situation and needs to be trimmed back.1
60
7
6
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
1
1
1
1
1
Ci
t
y
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
'
B
'
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
.
He
a
v
y
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
h
o
u
s
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
m
y
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
c
a
u
e
s
s
o
i
l
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
i
n
s
i
d
e
c
u
r
b
ar
e
a
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
d
r
a
i
n
.
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
d
r
a
i
n
c
r
a
c
k
e
d
a
n
d
b
r
o
k
e
n
.
Al
s
o
n
e
e
d
t
o
p
u
t
i
n
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
c
u
r
b
al
o
n
g
m
y
c
u
r
b
l
i
n
e
o
n
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
S
e
e
1.
D
.
s
k
e
t
c
h
.
1
1
1
1
Do
e
s
n
o
t
s
e
e
m
t
o
h
a
v
e
a
n
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
.
1Limit trucks to go thru Olinger Blvd except for delivery or work related drive or parking.1
60
1
6
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
N/
A
1
1
1
1
1
11
60
2
0
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
o
n
m
y
l
o
t
;
g
o
o
d
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
1
1
1
1
Pe
r
h
a
p
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
l
o
n
g
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
1Tracy & 62 (crosstown) by fire station need 4-way stop or roundabouts.1
60
2
4
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
Sm
a
l
l
p
u
d
d
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
.
La
r
g
e
p
u
d
d
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
b
e
t
w
d
i
r
v
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
n'
b
o
r
'
s
y
a
r
d
o
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
d
u
e
t
o
p
o
o
r
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
t
o
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
.
1
1
1
1
1
Se
v
e
r
a
l
h
e
a
v
y
d
u
t
y
g
a
r
b
a
g
e
,
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
y
a
r
d
w
a
s
t
e
t
r
u
c
k
s
p
l
y
on
T
h
u
r
s
d
a
y
s
.
1
60
3
2
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
Co
m
m
u
n
a
l
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
s
o
f
t
e
n
h
a
v
e
st
a
n
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
;
e
n
d
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
n
c
u
l
d
e
s
a
c
in
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
h
o
u
s
e
o
f
t
e
n
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
wa
t
e
r
/
f
r
o
z
e
n
i
c
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
f
r
o
m
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
9
-
M
i
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
o
n
p
a
r
k
si
d
e
o
f
r
o
a
d
;
n
o
t
t
o
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
b
u
t
ye
s
t
o
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
;
h
a
v
e
t
o
w
a
l
k
i
n
st
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
l
o
t
s
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
o
i
n
g
f
a
s
t
!
Sp
e
e
d
i
n
g
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
;
h
a
r
d
t
o
wa
l
k
t
o
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
o
r
o
v
e
r
t
o
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
Pa
r
k
p
l
u
s
i
f
p
u
t
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
p
a
r
k
s
i
d
o
f
st
r
e
e
t
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
/
s
i
g
h
t
in
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
b
u
s
h
y
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
w
t
h
a
t
cu
r
v
e
b
y
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
A
l
s
o
a
p
p
l
i
e
s
t
o
ki
d
s
/
p
e
o
p
l
e
w
h
o
w
a
n
t
t
o
c
r
o
s
s
o
v
e
r
t
o
r
i
d
e
bi
k
e
o
r
r
o
l
l
e
r
b
l
a
d
e
i
n
p
a
r
k
.
1Speeding traffic on Olinger Blvd; a stop sign somewhere in the middle of road betw Vernon & Tracy would help; a crosswalk 1/2 way would also help!1Would like an additional light at curve in street at Olinger Ci
60
4
0
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11Have sprinkler but not operable.
60
5
6
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
60
6
0
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
60
6
4
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
Bi
g
w
a
t
e
r
i
s
s
u
e
i
n
t
h
e
b
a
c
k
o
f
o
u
r
l
o
t
.
Th
e
r
e
i
s
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
h
o
m
e
s
t
o
s
w
a
m
p
th
a
t
f
i
l
l
s
a
n
d
h
o
l
d
s
w
a
t
e
r
,
b
r
e
e
d
i
n
g
t
o
n
s
of
m
o
s
q
u
i
t
o
s
a
n
d
s
l
o
w
l
y
d
r
a
i
n
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
y
a
r
d
t
o
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
I
n
s
p
r
i
n
g
wi
t
h
t
h
a
w
s
o
r
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
s
,
i
t
i
s
a
r
i
v
e
r
.
Bi
g
i
c
e
d
a
m
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
e
n
d
o
f
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
be
c
a
u
s
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
w
o
n
'
t
s
h
o
v
e
l
e
n
o
u
g
h
.
St
r
e
e
t
h
a
s
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
.
Al
g
a
e
f
i
l
l
s
g
u
t
t
e
r
a
n
d
i
t
i
s
s
l
i
p
p
e
r
y
!
1
1
1
1
1
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
Wi
t
h
t
h
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
i
s
s
u
m
m
e
r
t
o
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
,
i
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
b
i
k
e
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
b
u
t
N
O
T
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
.
W
i
t
h
a
s
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
,
h
a
r
d
t
o
ge
t
t
o
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
,
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
p
a
r
k
o
r
t
h
e
sc
h
o
o
l
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
b
i
k
e
a
n
d
c
a
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
T
h
i
s
is
u
n
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
s
e
e
m
s
r
i
d
i
c
u
l
o
u
s
t
o
d
r
i
v
e
a
ca
r
t
o
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
h
e
n
w
e
a
r
e
so close!1Traffic on Olinger Blvd. is too fast. There are no marked pedestrian crossings in sidewalks.1
60
7
2
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
1
1
1
1
1
Ex
c
e
s
s
w
a
t
e
r
f
l
o
w
(
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
)
t
o
S
T
S
o
n
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
i
s
a
l
w
a
y
s
we
t
!
N
e
e
d
a
n
S
T
S
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
i
n
t
o
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
C
i
r
(s
e
e
p
h
o
t
o
s
)
.
W
a
t
e
r
(
r
a
i
n
)
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
ea
s
t
m
u
s
t
f
l
o
w
t
h
r
u
b
a
c
k
o
f
l
o
t
s
t
o
S
T
S
al
o
n
g
e
r
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
.
R
a
i
n
g
u
t
t
e
r
s
t
h
a
t
ar
e
p
l
u
g
g
e
d
w
i
t
h
d
e
b
r
i
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
(
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
)
.
1
1
1
1
1
Ar
o
u
n
d
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
,
e
s
p
.
O
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
.
Dr
i
v
e
r
s
d
o
s
p
e
e
d
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
u
p
o
r
d
o
w
n
Ol
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
(
h
i
l
l
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
sp
e
e
d
)
.
C
u
r
v
e
d
r
o
a
d
a
l
o
n
g
B
r
e
d
e
s
e
n
cr
e
a
t
e
s
b
l
i
n
d
s
p
o
t
s
w
i
t
h
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
t
h
a
t
s
p
e
e
d
(O
l
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
v
d
)
.
1Rush hour traffic on Olinger Blvd from Vernon Ave.1
G:
\
P
W
\
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
S
V
C
S
\
E
N
G
D
I
V
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
I
M
P
R
N
O
S
\
B
A
4
1
3
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
H
(
2
0
1
5
)
\
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
F
E
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
\
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
\
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
T
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
x
l
s
x
10
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
4
3 of 4
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
H
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
N
20
1
4
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
B
A
-
4
1
3
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Lo
c
a
l
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
Ye
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
U
n
k
n
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ex
p
l
a
i
n
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Ye
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
Y
e
s
N
o
YesNoYesNoEmail Access
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
h
e
r
e
?
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
N
'
h
o
o
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
If yes, where?Traffic Management
AD
D
R
E
S
S
Re
t
u
r
n
e
d
Su
r
v
e
y
Su
m
p
P
u
m
p
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
i
n
e
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Dr
a
i
n
t
i
l
e
o
r
F
o
o
t
i
n
g
D
r
a
i
n
H
a
s
a
S
u
m
p
P
u
m
p
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
C
i
t
y
D
r
a
i
n
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
Ro
o
f
D
r
a
i
n
s
Ir
i
g
g
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
.
i
n
b
l
v
d
.
P
e
t
f
e
n
c
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
me
e
t
s
n
e
e
d
s
Fa
v
o
r
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
Ne
e
d
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
s
s
u
e
s
58
0
1
St
u
a
r
t
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Some Cars go through the stop signs at grove and stuart.1
58
0
4
St
u
a
r
t
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1Scool traffic in the mornings and afternoons. Terrible problems when there are school functions. I can't get to my driveway. There should only be parking for school functions (or the church) on one side of Stuart Ave.1
58
1
2
St
u
a
r
t
A
v
e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Co
u
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
-
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
f
r
o
m
s
c
h
o
o
l
us
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
l
o
t
1Parents drive too fast in area to pick up children due to school1
58
0
5
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
1
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
59
0
4
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
Hi
g
h
w
a
t
e
r
t
a
b
l
e
.
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
b
a
c
k
s
u
p
t
o
ci
t
y
l
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
p
o
n
d
2
h
o
u
s
e
s
/
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
aw
a
y
.
O
u
r
s
u
m
p
p
u
m
p
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
s
t
o
o
u
r
ba
c
k
y
a
r
d
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
s
l
o
p
e
d
d
o
w
n
g
r
a
d
e
.
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
I
a
m
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
.
11
59
0
9
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
Af
t
e
r
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
,
w
a
t
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
s
i
n
c
u
r
b
.
1
1
1
1
1
1
59
1
2
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
Th
e
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
e
x
i
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
o
n
d
be
h
i
n
d
o
u
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
c
l
o
g
s
w
i
t
h
d
e
b
r
i
s
du
r
i
n
g
h
e
a
v
y
r
a
i
n
s
.
(
T
h
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
g
r
a
t
e
ca
t
c
h
e
s
d
e
b
r
i
s
.
)
I
r
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
d
e
b
r
i
s
t
o
pr
e
v
e
n
t
t
h
e
p
o
n
d
f
r
o
m
e
n
c
r
o
a
c
h
i
n
g
o
n
ou
r
b
a
c
k
y
a
r
d
.
1
1
1
1
1
1Mis-alignment of Benton Ave at Tracy causes confusion amongst drivers about right-of-way after stopping. Can a sliver of the school property (unused for anything) be taken to re-align the west side of Benton with the east side? Smoother traffic flow would benefit the school and parents.1
59
1
6
Su
n
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
Un
k
n
o
w
n
.
1
1
1
1
11
56
2
0
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
56
2
1
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
o
u
r
h
o
u
s
e
i
s
l
o
w
po
i
n
t
o
f
n
'
h
o
o
d
a
n
d
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
S
T
S
d
r
a
i
n
s
fl
o
w
i
n
t
o
l
a
k
e
b
e
h
i
n
d
o
u
r
h
o
u
s
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
wh
e
n
l
a
k
e
i
s
h
i
g
h
p
u
m
p
e
d
o
u
t
o
f
l
a
k
e
t
o
dr
a
i
n
t
o
9
-
m
i
l
e
c
r
e
e
k
.
N
e
e
d
b
e
t
t
e
r
S
T
S
dr
a
i
n
s
t
h
a
t
s
t
o
p
c
l
o
g
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
l
l
o
w
f
l
o
w
.
1
1
1
1
1
1Please implement one-side parking by church. The various activities at church rarely use the lower parking lot. No matter how many times we ask. It is dangerous for peds and traffic to have parking both sides-two cars can't pass side by side ven in summer. Winter is worse.It seems decisions are based to the advantage of the many oaccasional users vs the fewer homeowners.
56
2
5
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
Fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
H
a
w
k
s
L
a
k
e
i
n
1
9
8
7
o
u
r
ho
m
e
w
a
s
f
l
o
o
d
e
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
e
w
e
r
s
ba
c
k
e
d
u
p
.
L
a
s
t
w
e
e
k
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
r
o
s
e
5
-
f
t
.
No
s
a
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
y
.
1
1
1
1
1
11I am very concerned about accessibility during construction. My wife is profoundly handicapped and cannot walk. The only means for her to leave the property is in her van, so you can understant my concerns, These must be addressed. Thank you.
56
2
9
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
0
4
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ea
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
w
y
c
l
i
f
f
e
r
d
11
57
0
5
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
No
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
0
8
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
Ci
t
y
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
l
a
r
g
e
P
V
C
d
r
a
i
n
t
h
r
u
o
u
r
ya
r
d
t
o
d
r
a
i
n
n
'
b
o
r
y
a
r
d
.
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
1
2
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
57
1
6
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
1
1
1
1
1
no
n
e
1
1
1
1
1
11
81
4
7
1
5
2
0
5
4
2
6
1
2
4
4
3
1
4
5
6
28
5
2
1
3
6
7
6
5
1
6
1
8
5
9
1
5
6
6
2654715
Su
r
v
e
y
s
Se
n
t
15
8
51
%
3
0
%
9
%
1
3
%
3
4
%
1
6
%
1
%
1
5
%
2
7
%
9
%
3
5
%
18
%
3
3
%
8
%
4
2
%
4
1
%
1
0
%
1
1
%
3
7
%
9
%
4
2
%
16%34%45%3%
Su
r
v
e
y
s
Re
t
u
r
n
e
d
81
10
0
%
5
8
%
1
9
%
2
5
%
6
7
%
3
2
%
1
%
3
0
%
5
3
%
1
7
%
6
9
%
35
%
6
4
%
1
6
%
8
3
%
8
0
%
2
0
%
2
2
%
7
3
%
1
9
%
8
1
%
32%67%88%6%
G:
\
P
W
\
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
S
V
C
S
\
E
N
G
D
I
V
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
I
M
P
R
N
O
S
\
B
A
4
1
3
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
H
(
2
0
1
5
)
\
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
F
E
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
\
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
N
A
I
R
E
\
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
T
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
x
l
s
x
10
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
4
4 of 4
Countryside H Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Resident Questionnaire Summary as of 9/24/14
Surveys sent: 158 Surveys returned: 81 Return rate: 51%
I. Drainage Service Connection
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain?
Yes: 47 No: 15 Unknown: 20
B. Does your home have a sump pump?
Yes: 54 No: 26 Unknown: 1
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump to a City drain if provided (at your
own cost)?
Yes: 24 No: 43
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains to a City drain if provided (at your own
cost)?
Yes: 14 No: 56
II. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The
right-of-way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes: 28 No: 52
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes: 13 No: 67
III. Residential Streetlights
A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights?
Yes: 18 No: 59
IV. Pedestrian Issues
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes: 15 No: 66
V. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes: 26 No: 54
VI. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes: 71 No: 5
APPENDIX C
Sidewalk Letter
August 1, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Countryside H Neighborhood
Project Update - Sidewalks
Dear Resident:
At the July 28 neighborhood informational meeting, residents were introduced to the plan for sidewalk
installations to be incorporated with the neighborhood project improvements.
Sidewalks are planned for the following streets:
1. Arbour Avenue from Grove Street to 61st Street West
2. Sun Road from Olinger Boulevard to Arbour Avenue
3. Benton from Tracy Avenue to Stuart Avenue
The sidewalks were included in the project to coordinate implementation of the Edina Active Routes to School
(ARTS) Plan. The ARTS Plan was approved by the Edina City Council on June 17, 2014. The goal of the ARTS
Plan is to increase walking and bicycling to school and improve safety conditions for those walking and biking to
school. The ARTS Plan includes sidewalk and bicycle route improvements throughout the City that will be
implemented in coordination with neighborhood street reconstruction projects.
Attached is Figure 11 from the ARTS plan that shows the walking and biking improvements planned for the
area adjacent to the Countryside Elementary School. Details of the sidewalk construction including the side of
the road for installation and distance from the roadway’s edge have not yet been determined but will be
developed as staff prepares the Feasibility Study for the project.
The Countryside H Neighborhood Reconstruction Project will be presented to the City Council in December
2014. At this meeting a public hearing will be held to solicit input on the project. At the conclusion of the
public hearing, the City Council will vote separately on the street reconstruction portion of the project and on
the sidewalk portion of the project.
The street reconstruction portion of the project is assessable and therefore must adhere to the requirements
of MN State Statute Chapter 429. Chapter 429 require a 4/5 favorable vote of the Council for approval. The
sidewalk component of the project will not be assessed and is therefore not subject to the 4/5 majority vote.
The sidewalk project can be approved by a simple majority vote of 3/5 of the Edina City Council.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering
Technician Andrew Scipioni at 952-826-0440 or ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov.
Regards,
Patrick Wrase
Assistant City Engineer
G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\BA413 Countryside H(2015)\ADMIN\CORR\LETTERS\Sidewalk Update Lett.docx
Æó
Æó
Æó
nm
nm
89:w
89:w
89:w
89:w
!"$
!"$
èéíìë
èéíìë
HawkesLake
NormandaleParkHeightsPark
LakeLocklear
GardenPark
BirchcrestPark
CountrysidePark
BredesenPark
62
Construct sidewalk as partof planned roadway project
Tr
a
c
y
A
v
e
Vernon A
v
e
Olinger Blvd
Ha
n
s
e
n
R
d
Grove StOl
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
Da
l
e
A
v
e
Ar
b
o
u
r
A
v
e
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
D
r
Jeff Pl
Villa Ln
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
D
r
Benton Ave
Valley Vi
e
w
R
d
Ayrshire Blvd
Du
n
d
e
e
R
d
We
s
t
r
i
d
g
e
B
l
v
d
61st St
Sun
R
d
Hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
R
d
Ch
a
n
t
r
e
y
R
d
56th
S
t
Warden Ave
64th St
Highland Rd
60th St
H
i
g
h
w
o
o
d
D
r
Countryside Rd
Mir
r
o
r
L
a
k
e
s
D
r
Gle
n
g
a
r
r
y
P
k
w
y
Me
r
r
i
t
t
C
i
r
Merold
D
r
62nd St
Wy
c
l
i
f
f
e
R
d
Colonial Way
Saxony Rd
Forslin Dr
Idylwood Dr
Ri
d
g
e
v
i
e
w
D
r
Wy
m
a
n
A
v
e
Hunter St
Ridgeway Rd
Kaymar D
r
63rd St
Maddox Ln
Ha
w
k
e
s
D
r
Pine Grove Rd
Windsor Ave
Leslee Ln
Birchcrest Dr
Eden Prairie Rd
St
u
a
r
t
A
v
e
Limerick L
n
Glenbrae
C
i
r
Vernon
L
n
Go
y
a
L
n
Cres
t
L
n
Olinger Cir
He
a
t
h
e
r
L
n
Sh
e
r
m
a
n
C
i
r
G
a
t
e
P
a
r
k
R
d
Red Fox Ct
Ridge Park Rd
Doron Ln
Oriole Ln
Sandpip
e
r
C
t
H
o
l
b
o
r
n
A
v
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
A
v
e
N
o
r
t
h
f
i
e
l
d
A
v
e
Blake R
d
Darcy Ln
Berne Cir
Falcon C
t
Crescent Dr
A
y
r
s
h
i
r
e
B
l
v
d
Grove St
Ha
n
s
e
n
R
d
Benton Ave
61st St
Highlands Elementary
Countryside Elementary
±0 620 1,240310 Feet Figure 11. Countryside ElementaryRecommendations Map
Legend
èéíìë Signal
!"$All-Way Stop
89:w Signed Pedestrian Crossing
Marked School Crossing
School Patrolled Intersection
Sidewalks
On Street Bicycle Facility
Off Street Trail
Proposed Sidewalks
Proposed Priority Regional Trail
Proposed Primary Bicycle Route
Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route
Æó Bike Racks
Speed Zone
Half Mile Radius
Enrollment: 584 studentsNumber in walk zone: 137 students
Construct sidewalk as partof planned roadway project
APPENDIX D
Preliminary Assessment Roll
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-413
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street
Assessable
REU Assessable Amount
3211721310058Helton P Cerqueira & Emma E Marshall-Cerqueira5800Amy Dr110,850.00$
3211721310057David C Garvin & Judith N Garvin5804Amy Dr110,850.00$
3211721310066Margaret A Fischer & Jerome R Fischer5805Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310056Kenneth J Kriester & Elizabeth Kriester 5808Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310065Roger Upson/Trustee & Jean Upson/Trustee 5809Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310055Tina Marie Bain & Robert C Bain Jr 5812Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310064Paul V Gage & Sheryl A Gage 5813Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310054Subhash A Kommura & Sujata Das 5816Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310053Jay A Gould & Sherri H Gould 5820Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310052Thomas H Jennings & Therese M Jennings 5824Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310051Philip J Bohrer 5900Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310063William J Roberts 5901Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310050Stephen T Wehr & Amy L H Wehr 5904Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310062Seyed A Mirsharif & Soheila Mirsharif 5905Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310049Thomas Faulhaber & Margaret Faulhaber 5908Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310061Kelsey S Brown & Peter L Brown 5909Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310048Simon D Raper & Michelle M Raper 5912Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310060David Lilja & Dorothy Lilja 5913Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310047Richard Parry & Mallette Parry 5916Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310059Kristin B Schultes & Benjamin C Schultes 5917Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310042Matthew G Headrick & Cassandra H M Headrick 5920Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310041Kirk Swenson & Kristin Swenson 5924Amy Dr1 10,850.00$
3211721310004Beverly A Shacter/Trustee & Burton B Shacter/Trustee 5800Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310006Kevan K Andish & Olga Andish 5804Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310011Chistopher Monnot 5805Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310007Bruce W Smith & Gail P Beske 5808Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310012Nancy Karen W Callan 5809Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310008Larry A Bloom Jr & Jane Dee Bloom 5812Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310013Audrey M Simmons & Brian J Simmons 5813Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310009Walter L Chapman, Jr & Lockie R Chapman 5816Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310014Scott A May & Jennifer C May 5817Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310010Rupinder & Harpreet Singh 5820Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310015Brian P Price & Mary F Price 5821Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310018Sonja R Roy & Andrew D Roy 5900Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310019John C Huseby & Nancy K Huseby 5904Arbour Ave1 10,850.00$
3211721310020 Kirk A Mathison & Nancy K Mathison 5908 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721310021 James P Norris & Diana L Norris 5912 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721340073 Andreas J Graser & Michaela P Graser 5940 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721340074 John A Haddad & Julieann Haddad 5950 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721340006 Brett Petrusek & Cindy Petrusek 5960 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721340007 William C Duane Jr & Harriet R Campe 5970 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721340008 Carla J Eidahl & Dallas L Steiner 5980 Arbour Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420004 Steven J Enck 5700 Benton Ave 0.67 7,269.50$
3211721420054 ISD 273 (Countryside Elementary School)*5701 Benton Ave 10 108,500.00$
3211721420003 Robert C Bredt & Mary H Bredt 5704 Benton Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420002 Xinying Yu & Xuemin Yang 5708 Benton Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420001 Siavash Shafizadeh & Mitra Sabetmeghaddan 5712 Benton Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420031 Wendy Glenna & Lester Glenna 5714 Benton Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420014 Junius Ho 5716 Benton Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721230214 Gloria Palmer & Marlene J Grassl 6000 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
3211721230215 Gloria Palmer & Marlene J Grassl 6004 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
3211721230212 Lucyann R Carlone & Donald F Kasbohm & Marietta C Kasbohm 6008 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-413
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street
Assessable
REU Assessable Amount
3211721230213 Lucyann R Carlone & Donald F Kasbohm & Marietta C Kasbohm 6012 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
3211721230219 Jeanne Bailey 6016 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
3211721230220 Michael H Samuels & Mary L Samuels 6020 Berne Cir 0.8 8,680.00$
3211721230105 Joaquin Mendez & Melissa Mendez 6024 Berne Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721230106 John S Svenningsen & Amelia Q Svenningsen 6028 Berne Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721230107 John R Rieger & Ildiko Rieger 6032 Berne Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721230108 Anthony E Kamp 6036 Berne Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721420029 Victor Fridlund Jr 5700 Grove St 0.67 7,269.50$
3211721420006 Linda M Klaver & Kenneth J Frank 5701 Grove St 0.67 7,269.50$
3211721420007 Yin Tian 5705 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721420008 Melissa F Johnston 5709 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721420009 Jason E Kalgreen & Carrie J Ellis 5711 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721420030 Jane E Pollard-Fridlund & Wayne V Fridlund 5712 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721420010 Marian L Delaney & Thomas J Delaney Jr 5717 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721420011 Kenneth W Horns & Lori L Horns 5721 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721130065 Good Samaritan Methodist Church**5730 Grove St 7 75,950.00$
3211721310005 Kevin Lawless & April Egan 5809 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310029 Scott L Johnson & Nina M Johnson 5812 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310030 Catherine Hogan & Edward M Hogan 5816 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310093 James P Ebsen 5817 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240031 Lori A Reiland & Earl D Reiland 5820 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310032 Marie M Anderson 5821 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240032 Michael J Swanson & Marsella R Swanson 5824 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310033 Jon W Holm & Bobbi A Holm 5825 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240033 Robert C Thrane & Laura A Thrane 5828 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310034 Michael R Crespo & Dervie Crespo 5829 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240034 Callie M Kalogerson 5832 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310035 Claire Boyum 5833 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240035 Steven J Porter & Ieva B Porter 5836 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310036 Patrick J Neuman & Gamila S Neuman 5837 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240036 John H Hougen & Jeane M Hougen 5900 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310037 Daniel T Reed & Catharine D Reed 5901 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240037 Cheryl A Brock 5904 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310038 Paul D Sheely & Ann*Marie Sheely 5905 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240038 Ross N Tomoson & Tammy J Tomoson 5908 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310039 James W Robertson & Martha A Robertson 5909 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310025 Kuk Yi 5932 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721310026 Michael J Lynch & Diana L Lynch 5936 Grove St 1 10,850.00$
3211721240026 Kevin E Miller & Patricia Anne Shaughnessy 5801 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240013 Walter C Dyson 5804 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240046 George Nickolatos & Jean Nickolatos 5805 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240014 Erica Wu & Zhengliang Wu 5808 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240045 Joseph J Christensen & Teresa A Christensen 5809 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240015 Yeilim Cho & Younghoon Kwon 5812 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240044 John Cochran & Carol Cochran 5813 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240049 Gerald P Lynch & Annette C Lee 5816 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240043 Julia P Eide 5817 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240042 Lisa J Gardner & Andrew T Gardner 5821 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240048 Thomas Cain & Judith Schmitz 5900 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240041 Ryan D Gordon & Sara L Gordon 5901 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240016 Alan D Sweet /Trust & Philothea Sweet/Trust 5904 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240040 Rabab Dairkee & Mufaddal Baxamusa 5905 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240017 Peter A Van Dyke & Alice Van Dyke 5908 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240039 Kevin H Koehler & Mary K Doty Koehler 5909 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240018 Ralf Loeffelholz & Mary B Loeffelholz 5912 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-413
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street
Assessable
REU Assessable Amount
3211721240019 Bradley J Einck & Marion U Einck 5916 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240020 Jay Fourniea & Elizabeth Fourniea 5920 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721240021 John C Buckentine & Laurie A Wien 5924 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721310024 Francis C Ling & Nancy McLaughlin 5928 Merold Dr 1 10,850.00$
3211721310073 David Savageau & Robin Savageau 5924 Olinger Blvd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721310083 Bruce W Dahlke & Gayle M Dahlke 6000 Olinger Blvd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721340064 Kevin L Kajer & Andrea H Kajer 6012 Olinger Blvd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721340070 Benjamin S Leung & Helen T Leung 6076 Olinger Blvd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721340063 Barbara R Mcglynn 6016 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340062 Jonathan R Newberry & Andrea Newberry 6020 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310044 Vijaykumar S Monie & Kamela Monie 6024 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310043 Nancy H Phinney & Scott B Phinney 6028 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310085 Brigid M Spicola 6032 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310086 Scott A Collier & Laura M Collier 6036 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310087 Judith L Girard & Jon R Girard 6040 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310088 R H Larson & Patricia Larson 6044 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310089 Jeffrey A Harkman & Rebecca J Harkman 6048 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310046 Joanne M Heck & Gregory W Heck 6052 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340065 Robert A Oliphant & Ruth L Oliphant 6056 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340066 John Maclennan 6060 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340067 Laurence A Sinesio & Rosalind A Sinesio 6064 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340068 Matthew H Ouska 6068 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721340069 James M Luther & Margaret J Luther 6072 Olinger Cir 1 10,850.00$
3211721310001 Richard W Jahnke & Lisa C Jahnke 5813 Olinger Rd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721310002 James A Tabor & Carolyn A Tabor 5829 Olinger Rd 0.33 3,580.50$
3211721420015 Jason J Urbanski & Molly J Urbanski 5800 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420012 Martin Herbers & Barbara Herbers 5801 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420016 Lynn A Peterson 5804 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420013 Herbert W Schulte & Juliana Schulte 5805 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420017 Michael E Henderson & Jennifer D Henderson 5808 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420018 R Daniel Rasmus & Kari Fedji-Rasmus 5812 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721420005 Leffert G Tigelaar & Barbara A Kyle 5816 Stuart Ave 1 10,850.00$
3211721310076 Sara A Olson & Eric Olson 5805 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310077 Timothy R Moodie & Barbara B Moodie 5809 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310078 Isaac E Phelps 5813 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310067 Jon Sundal & Deborah Sundal 5900 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310079 Donald Hessburg & Donna Hessburg 5901 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310068 Timothy G Matyi & Elaine C Matyi 5904 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310080 Tammy Thomas 5905 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310069 Murray Harris 5908 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310081 Carol J Rosenbaum & Philip B Rosenbaum 5909 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310070 Bruce C Ogren & Elizabeth A Madden Ogren 5912 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310082 Irving Borkon & Sherrill Borkon 5913 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310071 William P Lemmer & Bea A Lemmer 5916 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310072 Mark Christopher C Moore & Christine Rita Moore 5920 Sun Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240006 Alexander K Melton & Kathleen A Melton 5617 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240012 Julia K Mirman & Jacob I Mirman 5620 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240007 Anne M Lee & Gary A Lee 5621 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240008 John W Williams Jr & Jane M Williams 5625 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240009 David M Reding & Courtney E Reding 5629 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240027 Kenneth H Chun 5700 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-413
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street
Assessable
REU Assessable Amount
3211721240010 William N Goldaris & Karen L Goldaris 5701 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240028 James A Karigan & Dena Karigan 5704 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240011 Thomas W Shaughnessy & Marlene Shaughnessy 5705 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240029 James Allen & Elaine Allen 5708 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721240030 Richard Andrew Westen & Karen Louise Roghl Westin 5712 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
3211721310028 Richard L Evans & Kristen R Evans 5716 Wycliffe Rd 1 10,850.00$
Total 172.79 1,874,771.50$
APPENDIX E
City Comprehensive Plan
Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle
Facilities
APPENDIX F
Proposed Storm Water
Improvements
Figure 1-1. Backyard Drainage Problem
between Grove Street and Benton Avenue
Figure 1-2. Backyard Drainage Problem
between Amy Drive and Sun Road
Figure 1-3. Intersection Drainage Problem
at Merold Drive and Wycliff Road
APPENDIX G
Countryside H Traffic and
Crash Data
Countryside H Traffic and Crash Data
Traffic Data
Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th Speed, mph
1 Arbour Avenue 2014 339 22.2
2 Benton Avenue 2014 300 -
3 Grove Street 2005 821 31.4
4 Grove Street 2014 364 25.5
Crash Data
Location Severity Year Month Time
A Property Damage – No Apparent Injury 2005 Feb. 1605
B Property Damage – No Apparent Injury 2005 Dec. 1520
APPENDIX H
Sewer Blocks and Watermain
Breaks
6105
5701
58
1
2
5901
6017
5721
5940
5708
57
1
3
5913
5807
5730
5804
5902
5806
5708
5917
5705
5729
5717 5633
5906
5721
5717
5912
5709 5704
5950
5816
6012
5824
6024
6021
5901
5912
5816
5725
5716
5912
5812
5629
5804
6004
6012
6020
6000
5970
6016
6012
5612
6016
6044
57095713
5704
6000
60056017
5816
6028
5824
5829
6008
5912
5617
5613
6004
5808
6009
5801
5720
5816
5700
5616
6032
5800
5721
5621
5700
5804
6064
5625
57
1
7
58085812
6012
6016
5704
6008
5712
5805
5800
6060
5825
5960
5629
6016
5936
6016
6012
5705
5725
6020
5701
5625
6036
5820
5920
6016-20
5820
5612
58
2
1
5824 5820
5920
5608
5916
5801
5812
5809
58
2
8
6000
5816
6008
5908
6008
6048
5919
6100
5980
58
1
3
5617
5712
5608
5701
5701
58
2
5
5817
5809
6017
5813
5701
6040
6004
5821
5908
6076
5909
58005813
6020
5812
5817
6036
5705
5916
5621
5617
58
0
9
5914
6016
5916
5712
6028
5700
5910
58
0
1
5904
6008
5712
5901
58
0
5
5601
5805
5600
58
1
7
5809
5808
5900
57
1
4
5916
6004
5909
6101
5917
5905
5813
6024
5708
5809
5620
5804
5908
5900
5924
58
3
2
5605
6056
5813
5704
5812
59
0
8
56
2
1
5609
5715
6024
5932
57
1
7
5800
5808
57
0
9
5708
5909
57
1
1
5820
5609
5804
5909
5904
57
0
5
57
0
9
6032
5616
6000
5616
6000
5901
5608
5816
5604
590559135909
6052
5920
5604
5809
5612
5924
6024
5908
57
2
1
5805
5700
5821
5616
5613
5716
5912 5900
5808
6020
6068
5904
5608
5824
5825
5705
58
3
6
5613
5812 5813
5900
5705
5801
5817
5905
5817
5716
5804
59
0
4
5605
59
0
0
5700
5905
58
3
3
5821
5904
5813
5804
5809
5808
5901
58
2
9
5901
56
2
0
5920
58
2
1
59
0
1
58
3
7
5924
6072
5825
5900 5805
5720
5928
5817
5801
5805
5604
5
8
1
6
5708
5712
5805
5708
60
0
0
6
0
1
2
6
0
0
4
6
0
0
8
5824
5804
5
8
2
5
5802
5812
5801
58
1
3
58
1
5
58
1
7
58
1
4
58
1
9
5
8
2
1
5
8
2
3
5
8
1
8
5
8
2
0
5
8
2
7
582
2
5
8
1
6
58115809
58055803
57035701 58315829
5833
5710
5639
PROJECT LIMITS
OL
I
N
G
E
R
R
D
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
OLING
E
R
B
L
V
D
VERNON
A
V
E
MERO
L
D
D
R
GROVE ST
AMY DR
BENTON AVE
SUN RD
OLINGER CIR
A
R
B
O
U
R
A
V
E
ST
U
A
R
T
A
V
E
W
Y
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
BERNE CIR
PROJECT LIMITS
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksCountryside H Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-413C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
Watermain Breaks
Sewer Blocks
APPENDIX I
Existing Street Lights and Signs
6105
5701
58
1
2
5901
6017
5940
5708
5913
5807
5730
5804
5902
5806
5708
5917
5705
5729
5717
5906
5721
5717
5912
5709 5704
6009
5950
5816
6012
5824
6024
6021
5901
5912
5816
5725
5716
5912
5812
5629
5804
6004
6012
6020
6000
5970
6016
6012
5612
6016
6044
57095713
5704
6000
60056017
5816
6028
5824
5829
6008
5912
5613
6004
5808
5801
5720
5816
5700
5616
6032
5800
5721
5700
5804
6064
5625
58085812
6012
6016
5704
6008
5712
5805
5800
6060
5825
5960
6016
5936
6016
6012
5705
5725
6020
5701
6036
5820
5920
6016-20
5820
5612
58
2
1
5824 5820
5920
5916
5801
5812
5809
58
2
8
6000
5816
6008
5908
6008
6048
5919
6100
5980
58
1
3
5617
5712
5608
5701
5701
58
2
5
5817
5809
6017
5813
5701
6040
6004
5821
5908
6076
5909
58005813
6020
5812
5817
6036
5705
5916
5621
5617
58
0
9
5914
6016
5916
5712
6028
5700
5910
58
0
1
5904
6008
5712
5901
58
0
5
5805
58
1
7
5809
5808
5900
57
1
4
5916
6004
5909
6101
5917
5905
5813
6024
5708
5809
5620
5804
6020
5908
5900
5924
58
3
2
5605
6056
5813
5704
5812
59
0
8
56
2
1
5609
5715
6024
5932
57
1
7
5800
5808
57
0
9
5708
5909
57
1
1
5820
5609
5804
5909
5904
5
7
0
5
57
0
9
6032
5616
6000
5616
6000
5901
5608
5816
590559135909
6052
5920
5604
5809
5612
5924
6024
5908
57
2
1
5805
5700
5821
5616
5613
5716
5912 5900
5808
6020
6068
5904
5608
5824
5825
5705
58
3
6
5613
5812 5813
5900
5705
5801
5817
5905
5817
5716
5804
59
0
4
59
0
0
5700
5905
5
8
3
3
5821
5904
5813
5804
5809
5808
5901
58
2
9
5901
56
2
0
5920
58
2
1
59
0
1
5
8
3
7
5924
6072
5825
5900 5805
5720
5928
5817
5801
5805
5
8
1
6
5708
5712
5805
5708
60
0
0
6
0
1
2
6
0
0
4
6
0
0
8
5824
5804
5
8
2
5
5802
5812
5801
58
1
3
58
1
5
58
1
7
58
1
4
58
1
9
5
8
2
1
5
8
2
3
5
8
1
8
5
8
2
0
5
8
2
7
582
2
5
8
1
6
58115809
58055803
57035701 58315829
5833
5710
PROJECT LIMITS
OL
I
N
G
E
R
R
D
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
OLINGE
R
B
L
V
D
VERNON
A
V
E
MERO
L
D
D
R
GROVE ST
AMY DR
BENTON AVE
SUN RD
OLINGER CIR
AR
B
O
U
R
A
V
E
ST
U
A
R
T
A
V
E
WY
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
BERNE CIR
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2014
Street LightsCountryside H Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-413C
I
T
Y
OFE D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
!"$
!"$89:{
!"$
!"$
!"$
!"$
ÅÆÇ
!"$
ÅÆÇÝÞßêÅÆÇÝÞßêÅÆÇÝÞßê
ÅÆÇ
ÅÆÇ
!"$
±²±²
89:?!"$!"$
ÅÆÇËÌ !"$
!"$
!"$
6105
5701
58
1
2
5901
6017
5721
5940
5708
57
1
3
5913
5807
5730
5804
5902
5806
5708
5917
5705
5729
5717 5633
5906
5721
5717
5912
5709 5704
5950
5816
6012
5824
6024
6021
5901
5912
5816
5725
5716
5912
5812
5629
5804
6004
6012
6020
6000
5970
6016
6012
5612
6016
6044
57095713
5704
6000
60056017
5816
6028
5824
5829
6008
5912
5617
5613
6004
5808
6009
5801
5720
5816
5700
5616
6032
5800
5721
5621
5700
5804
6064
5625
57
1
7
58085812
6012
6016
5704
6008
5712
5805
5800
6060
5825
5960
5629
6016
5936
6016
6012
5705
5725
6020
5701
5625
6036
5820
5920
6016-20
5820
5612
58
2
1
5824 5820
5920
5608
5916
5801
5812
5809
58
2
8
6000
5816
6008
5908
6008
6048
5919
6100
5980
58
1
3
5617
5712
5608
5701
5701
58
2
5
5817
5809
6017
5813
5701
6040
6004
5821
5908
6076
5909
58005813
6020
5812
5817
6036
5705
5916
5621
5617
58
0
9
5914
6016
5916
5712
6028
5700
5910
58
0
1
5904
6008
5712
5901
58
0
5
5601
5805
5600
58
1
7
5809
5808
5900
57
1
4
5916
6004
5909
6101
5917
5905
5813
6024
5708
5809
5620
5804
5908
5900
5924
58
3
2
5605
6056
5813
5704
5812
59
0
8
56
2
1
5609
5715
6024
5932
57
1
7
5800
5808
57
0
9
5708
5909
57
1
1
5820
5609
5804
5909
5904
57
0
5
57
0
9
6032
5616
6000
5616
6000
5901
5608
5816
5604
590559135909
6052
5920
5604
5809
5612
5924
6024
5908
57
2
1
5805
5700
5821
5616
5613
5716
5912 5900
5808
6020
6068
5904
5608
5824
5825
5705
58
3
6
5613
5812 5813
5900
5705
5801
5817
5905
5817
5716
5804
59
0
4
5605
59
0
0
5700
5905
58
3
3
5821
5904
5813
5804
5809
5808
5901
58
2
9
5901
56
2
0
5920
58
2
1
59
0
1
58
3
7
5924
6072
5825
5900 5805
5720
5928
5817
5801
5805
5604
5
8
1
6
5708
5712
5805
5708
60
0
0
6
0
1
2
6
0
0
4
6
0
0
8
5824
5804
5
8
2
5
5802
5812
5801
58
1
3
58
1
5
58
1
7
58
1
4
58
1
9
5
8
2
1
5
8
2
3
5
8
1
8
5
8
2
0
5
8
2
7
582
2
5
8
1
6
58115809
58055803
57035701 58315829
5833
5710
5639
PROJECT LIMITS
OL
I
N
G
E
R
R
D
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
OLING
E
R
B
L
V
D
VERNON
A
V
E
MERO
L
D
D
R
GROVE ST
AMY DR
BENTON AVE
SUN RD
OLINGER CIR
A
R
B
O
U
R
A
V
E
ST
U
A
R
T
A
V
E
W
Y
C
L
I
F
F
R
D
BERNE CIR
PROJECT LIMITS
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
SignsCountryside H Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-413C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
Signs
D3-X1
HOME WATCH
!"$R1-1
-./0 R1-4
R7-1D
bcdpf R8-3A
ÅÆÇ S1-1
ËÌ S4-3
W-11
89:?W1-3
89:{W14-2
ÝÞßê W16-7MP
±²X4-2
APPENDIX J
Living Streets Policy
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Council VIII. A.
Karen M. Kurt
Assistant City Manager
☒
☐
☐ August 20, 2013
Approve Living Streets Policy
Approve Living Streets Policy
Information / Background:
In May 201l, the City Council adopted a resolution in support of Living Streets and directed the Edina
Transportation Commission to work with staff to develop a Living Streets Policy. Key steps in the
development of the policy are outlined below:
ETC formed a Living Streets Working Group. Members Paul Nelson, Jennifer Janovy and Michael
Thompson played a critical role in policy development.
The City received a $15,000 grant from the Bloomington Health Department. These funds were
used to hire a consultant to review current city policies and to provide a framework for moving
forward.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield sponsored a workshop on February 15, 2012 led by representatives
from the National Complete Streets Coalition. Key community stakeholders attended and
participated in a brainstorming session about Edina’s vision for future streets.
The ETC Working Group and staff prepared a draft Living Streets Policy which was reviewed with
the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission,
Park Board, Energy and Environment Commission and Bike Edina Task Force. Feedback is collected
for incorporation into the Living Streets Policy and future Living Streets Plan.
The Living Streets Policy draft is reviewed during a joint work session with ETC and City Council.
Upon policy adoption, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, will begin working with internal and external
advisory groups to draft content for the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the
Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well best practices for community engagement during the design
process.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
Confirmed members of the external advisory group are:
Arnie Bigbee, Human Rights and Relations Commission
Claudia Carr, Planning Commission
Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission
Ellen Jones, Park Board
Bill McCabe, Arts and Culture Commission
Paul Nelson, Transportation Commission
Paul Thompson, Energy and Environment Commission
Courtney Whited, Transportation Commission
Staff is waiting for confirmation from additional representatives from the Planning Commission, Energy and
Environment Commission and Community Health Committee. Additional community expertise will be
sought as needed throughout the process.
Members of the internal advisory team are:
Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer
Jeff Elasky, Police Lieutenant
Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
Cindy Larson, Redevelopment Coordinator
Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer
Bob Pestrud, Parks Foreman
John Scheerer, Street Supervisor
Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal
Additional staff expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Staff is also in the process of
securing a $5,000 grant from Bloomington Public Health that will be used to develop a community education
and outreach plan for Living Streets.
Attachments:
Proposed Living Streets Policy
1
Living Streets Policy
Introduction
Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote
safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy
defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation.
The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy
consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the
“do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related
to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set
by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act.
The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how
the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design
process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk
Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to
this Policy.
Living Streets Vision
Edina is a place where...
Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;
Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;
Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;
Streets are inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity;
Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments;
Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and
private sectors alike; and
Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses.
Living Streets Principles
The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate
these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making
public and private land use decisions.
2
All Users and All Modes
The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of
the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing
safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes.
Connectivity
The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly
connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel.
The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes
preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance
connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit.
The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public
facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas.
The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk
networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the
development.
Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical
termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street
construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and
continuity.
Application
The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving
operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation,
or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes
privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails.
The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land
use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency.
Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of
smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time.
The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and
actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources
as applicable.
All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their
work.
Exceptions
Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and
rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document
proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal.
Exceptions:
3
A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable
condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole
filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance
activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians.
The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a
bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project.
The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of
significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native
vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas.
Design
The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning,
funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks,
paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs.
The City’s design guidelines will:
Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary.
Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use
pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by
context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building,
community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context.
Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed
to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate.
Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes.
Allocate right-of-way for boulevards.
Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets
principles.
Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain
gardens and other features to improve air and water quality.
The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals,
rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will
update the Living Streets Plan.
Context Sensitivity
Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its
neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate
these differences, the City will:
Seek input from stakeholders;
Design streets with a strong sense of place;
Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and
ravines;
Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and
4
Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant
commercial districts.
Benchmarks and Performance Measures
The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating
success include:
Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling;
Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely;
Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably;
An active way of life is available to all;
There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries;
No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and
Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations.
The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may
be identified as this Policy is implemented.
Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department.
Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests.
Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys.
Resident responses to post-project surveys.
The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and
after the project.
Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure.
Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets.
Implementation
The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several
steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to
guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will:
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal
pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings;
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including
street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities;
Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA,
MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts);
Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets
improvements; and
Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private
and regional destinations.
5
Additional implementation steps include:
Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an
ongoing basis;
Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this
Policy;
Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets
principles as established by this Policy;
Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals;
Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes;
Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans
(Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.);
Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP);
Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and
Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy.
APPENDIX K
Correspondence from
Residents
1
Andrew Scipioni
From:Jamie Cynor
Sent:Thursday, December 05, 2013 8:52 AM
To:'Winton, Liz'
Cc:Chad Millner
Subject:RE: Question regarding Countryside reconstruction and Utility Improvement
Attachments:Assessment History Handout.pdf
Liz,
At this time we don’t have any cost for this project. With the letter that we sent out we attached a table that shows the
past project cost which will include the public hearing cost and the final assessment cost.
I hope this helps and contact me with any further questions.
Jamie Cynor, Senior Engineering Technician
952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392
JCynor@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Winton, Liz [mailto:LizWinton@edinarealty.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 10:51 AM
To: 'cmiller@edinamn.gov'
Cc: Jamie Cynor
Subject: Question regarding Countryside reconstruction and Utility Improvement
Good Morning Chad,
I represent a builder that just recently purchased 5700 Grove Street. We received a note from the Seller regarding the
2015 Roadway Reconstruction and Utility Improvements. We are wondering what the cost will be to the future
homeowner.
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Elizabeth George Winton
Realtor/New Home Sales
Brandl Anderson Homes
EDINA REALTY BUILDER'S MARKETING GROUP
6800 France Avenue, Edina MN
visit www.brandlanderson.com
612-366-1290
1
Andrew Scipioni
From:Matt Ouska <Matt.Ouska@highjump.com>
Sent:Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:51 PM
To:Chad Millner; Jamie Cynor
Cc:Christina Ouska (christina.ouska@gmail.com)
Subject:RE: 20131125 RE: 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Chad – I appreciate your response back, sorry for the lengthy delay in my response back to you. Wondering if from
where we are at from a ‘season’s’ perspective it would make the most sense to have you come out in the spring when
the melt begins and you are able to get a better view of the lay of the land? If that piece doesn’t matter and you’d like
to come out during the winter that is fine too – I will try and coordinate the meeting with our neighbors on our side of
the circle, they are interested in meeting with you as well.
Thanks,
Matt
From: Chad Millner [mailto:cmillner@EdinaMN.gov]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 5:09 PM
To: Matt Ouska; Jamie Cynor
Cc: Christina Ouska (christina.ouska@gmail.com)
Subject: 20131125 RE: 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Matt,
Thanks for the comments.
As part of all our projects we look for comments from residents on issues and concerns. Depending on what is occurring,
what infrastructure is in place that can help address the issue, cost, and easements, we try to address those concerns.
This is not always possible but we will look into the issue and communicate with you.
I would like to meet with you onsite to begin discussions about the issue. From there staff will analyze the options that
would be available.
Thanks,
Chad
Chad Millner, Interim City Engineer
952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392
cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Matt Ouska [mailto:Matt.Ouska@highjump.com]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 3:21 PM
To: Chad Millner; Jamie Cynor
Cc: Christina Ouska (christina.ouska@gmail.com)
Subject: 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Chad/Jamie –
1
Andrew Scipioni
From:Frank Petrovic on behalf of Edina Mail
Sent:Friday, August 01, 2014 12:43 PM
To:Chad Millner
Subject:FW: Berne Circle construction
Frank Petrovic, Customer Service Representative
952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389
FPetrovic@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: John Svenningsen [mailto:svennmd@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 1:55 PM
To: Edina Mail
Cc: svenningsen@mac.com
Subject: Berne Circle construction
We live at 6028 Berne Circle. I ran into a city surveyor today who informed me that our cul-de-sac is due to be
replaced next year. He mentioned that, in the process of digging on our property line he may have scraped
some of the protective coating off of the Comcast cable that runs to our house. Fortunately, at least for now,
the cable and Internet service seems to be working ok. I am emailing you though, at his suggestion, to go on
record that we also have an Invisible Fence buried around the outside of our property. Please ask your
Engineering department make a note of that so as to decrease the likelihood that someone working for the
city will break it if they happen to do any more digging on our property.
Thanks,
John Svenningsen
952-922-9333
1
Andrew Scipioni
From:Patrick Wrase
Sent:Monday, September 22, 2014 12:00 PM
To:'gandalee6@q.com'
Cc:Chad Millner; Brian Olson
Subject:Handling of Storm Surge - Hawkes Lake
Mr. Lee,
In response to your email to Brian Olson from June 19th regarding the outlet to Hawkes Lake and the response of the
Lake to the heavy rainfall received on June 19, we have examined the hydraulics of this component of the City of Edina
watershed system. The examination included verifying the existing operating conditions of the Hawkes Lake lift station
and performing several “runs” of the city of Edina hydrology/hydraulic stormwater runoff computer model.
The outlet from Hawkes Lake is a pumped at a rate of 2.0 cubic feet per second (cfs). This compares to a pumping rate
from Highlands Lake at 1.0 cfs. Therefore, Hawkes Lake will be drawn down even though Highlands Lake is being drawn
down simultaneously with a net outflow rate of 1.0 cfs out of Hawkes Lake (2.0 cfs out – 1.0 cfs in). Each full day of
pumping from Hawkes will remove approximately 86,400 cubic feet of water from Hawkes Lake, net of the inflow from
Highlands Lake. Given that Hawkes Lake has a surface area of approximately 414,000 square feet and a stage increase of
5.7’, Hawkes Lake will be pumped back to its normal water level (NWL) approximately 27 days after a 100-year rainfall
event has occurred, provided that no further rainfall occurs. By comparison, Highlands Lake with its 1.0 cfs outflow
pumping rate and larger surface area at approximately 708,000 square feet and a stage increase of 4.9’ will take 40 days
to reach its NWL.
Water pumped from Hawkes Lake makes its way south and west to a pond located south of Amy Drive and east of
Olinger Road. During a 100-yr rainfall event, this pond, known as MD_15 in the City of Edina Comprehensive Water
Resources Plan, is modeled to increase in depth by 4.5 feet during the 100-year rainfall design event. This bounce in the
pond surface level comes within 0.7’ of the lowest adjacent structure during the 100-year rainfall event. For comparison
purposes, the surface level of Hawkes Lake is projected to peak 1.7’ below the lowest building and Highlands Lake is
modeled to peak within 0.2’ of the lowest adjacent building.
There is a goal of protecting of all structures within Edina from a 100-year rainfall event. Hawkes Lake is shown to
adequately meet that goal through the hydraulic modeling efforts conducted during the preparation of the City of Edina
Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan in 2011. Highlands Lake is narrowly capable of meeting this goal
but reducing the outflow would subject properties to flooding. Pond MD-15 is also narrowly capable of meeting the
100yr design event protection but increasing flow rates out of Hawkes Lake would subject additional properties to
flooding concerns. Edina is a nearly fully developed community and development of the natural lands have increased
runoff volumes over natural conditions. In order to mitigate the impacts of post development runoff, engineering
design has utilized both manmade and natural water bodies to store and convey surface water runoff and to strive for
an equal level of protection for all Edina residents. That goal has been achieved in the vicinity of Hawkes Lake. It is not
possible to increase the flow rate out of Hawkes Lake as doing so would have adverse impacts on water bodies and
properties located downstream from Hawkes Lake.
Please contact me at your convenience if you would like to discuss this information in greater detail.
Thank You,
2
Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer
952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392
PWrase@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: ANNE LEE GARY LEE [mailto:gandalee6@q.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:16 PM
To: Brian Olson
Subject: Handling of Storm Surge - Hawkes Lake
I'm concerned about the handling of any storm surge and how that impacts Hawkes Lake, where we live. I'm
particularly now concerned about possible heavy rain tonight given the lake level right now. The response is
not what we had been promised when we worked with Roger Glanzer to have the new pumps installed in
approx 2004.
My discussion with the city and Roger Glanzer was that if the city pumps out of Highland Lake at essentially
the same rate as is being pumped out of Hawkes Lake, then Hawkes lake level can never recede until Highlands
lake first reaches it's shut off level. So in periods of extended heavy rain, the Hawkes Lake level would
continue rising with no ability to pump the level down. To this, Roger Glanzer promised that if this situation
occurred, the city would bring in additional gas powered pumps and pump up Merold to drain to 9 mile creek as
was done in 1987. That is, the city would make sure to manage Hawkes lake so that the water would not reach
our homes.
When I called today given the prediction of additional heavy rain to explain this and then request the additional
pumps. I was told none were available. All were already out and running. Hawkes Lake is a critical juncture
in the city's storm sewer plan and to not have the promised equipment is not acceptable. When I tried to
explain to Gary from your department why there would be a pumping issue, he said there was no issue, that all
pumps were working and that no one is gets pumped out first and he didn't really listen to what I was
saying. When I tried to explain the promise from Roger Glanzer regarding additional pumps, all I was told is
that Roger no longer works here. This is also a problem. If the city cannot keep in reserve additional pumps
to a make sure a key component of their storm sewer system will work as promised, then I would like to reopen
the issue that the pumps installed on Hawkes are not able to adequately maintain Hawkes Lake levels during
periods of extended heavy rain.
It was the city's decision to incorporate Hawkes Lake as a component of the storm sewer. Hawkes Lake now
takes runoff from a much wider area than naturally would occur. By incorporating Hawkes Lake into the storm
sewer, a man made decision creates the risk for flooding on Hawkes Lake, as opposed to homes that
reside along a creek. I fear now the city won't keep its promise to those who reside on Hawkes Lake, part of the
storm sewer system.
Let's hope in this case, a situation will be averted and then we can address this to make sure a problem never
arises.
2
I am a resident of 6068 Olinger Circle in the Countryside area. I didn’t have an opportunity to make it to the open house
regarding this project back in September but just wanted to provide some feedback here. I don’t know if the scope of
what I am addressing is too large in relation to the proposed project but it seems like an appropriate time to address
this. I am all for reinvestment back into the community, including the aging infrastructure in our area. I understand
the nature of assessments and their ability to support this continued investment. I do have a significant concern
regarding the proposed project though given a core issue that exists on our side (southwest) side of Olinger
Circle. There is a large amount of slope in our backyard and drainoff that comes from up above on higher land (not
sure how far up it begins). The water flow is such that during high moisture times of the year, there is often times
visible flowing water through our backyards, which is fondly known as the Olinger River. Yes we joke about it, the fact
is it is a major problem. Our house would not stay dry without the services of dual sump pumps in the basement that
generally run for 3-4 months out of the year. Many of the houses on our side have similar sump pump/drainage setups
and some of them drain around to the front of the house to the road. One look at the road/asphalt out in front of our
particular house and you can see the impacts of the sheer volume of water that is redirected to drain down the road.
It is very difficult for me to think about investing a significant amount of money in redoing the road out front without a
decidedly different answer of how to address a very clear issue with water flow/runoff that exists. Is there something
that you can consider in conjunction with this project to help us address this so that the overall project makes more
sense for us? We are additionally considering some major landscaping investment in our backyard so we could
potentially help aid a change, but I know that the core problem I am addressing has existed for a very long time and
many long term residents of Olinger Circle would appreciate a better long term solution.
Thanks I look forward to your response.
Matt
Matt Ouska | Chief Financial Officer
HighJump Software | Direct: 1.800.328.3271 Ext. 1202 | Cell: 612-220-3277
matt.ouska@highjump.com
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: October 23, 2014
Agenda Item #: VI. B.
Action El
Discussion
Information 121
Subject: 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports
Action Requested:
Review and comment on the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Draft Engineering Reports.
Information / Background:
Please recall that the Edina Engineering Department presented the 2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction
project areas to you at your August 21 meeting. Staff prepared the attached draft engineering reports for
the projects. Please review and comment on these reports.
Attachments:
Countryside H Draft Engineering Report
Prospect Knolls B Draft Engineering Report
Dewey Hill G Draft Engineering Report
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \ PROJECTS \ IMPR NOS \ BA413 Countryside FI(2015) \ DESIGN \ETC \ 20141021 Draft Feasibility Submittal \ Item VI.B. 2015 Neighborhood
Reconstruction Draft Engineering Report.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. SOLE St. • Edina, MN 55424
ENGINEERING STUDY
PROSPECT KNOLLS B NEIGHBORHOOD
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Claredon Drive, Dewey Hill Road, Schey Drive
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-414
October 16, 2014
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
___________________ 43790______________
Chad A.Millner Reg. No. Date
ENGINEERING STUDY – BA-414
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
PROSPECT KNOLLS B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
OCTOBER 16, 2014
SUMMARY: The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to
the storm sewer system and fire hydrants, concrete curb and gutter spot
repair, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement.
The estimated total project cost is $836,685. The estimated roadway
construction cost is $428,780 and will be funded by special assessments at a
rate of $11,740 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements
and repairs amount to $407,905 and will be funded through the respective
utility funds.
The project can be completed during the 2015 construction season. Staff
believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to maintain a
livable environment and a sound public infrastructure, as initiated by Edina’s
2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20.
LOCATION: The project includes Schey Drive, Dewey Hill Road, and Claredon Drive.
Below is a detailed location map of the Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood
Roadway Improvement Project (Figure 1).
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Figure 1. Project Area Map
INITIATION & ISSUES: The Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering
Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program,
identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project addresses updating
aging infrastructure with improvements associated with the pavement
condition, storm water, sanitary sewer, and watermain systems.
All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (the “Plan”), the Comprehensive Bicycle
Transportation Plan, the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan,
the Living Street Policy, the Active Routes to School Plan and sustainable
project evaluation.
City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Sidewalk Facilities
Chapter 7 of the Plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk facilities
within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of Appendix D, there are no
proposed sidewalk facilities indicated within the project limits.
Bicycle Facilities
Chapter 7 of the Plan addresses locations of proposed bicycle facilities within
the City, as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. As
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
shown in Figure 7.11 of Appendix D, there are no proposed bicycle facilities
indicated within the project limits.
Living Streets Policy and Sustainability Evaluation
The vision statement of the Living Streets Policy expresses the need to look
at future projects differently:
Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance
community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better
health.
Although the Living Streets Plan has not been developed, staff has included
elements that pertain to residential neighborhoods in the rehabilitation of the
infrastructure and replacement of the roadways.
Staff is also including a simple sustainability analysis for this project. We
anticipate a more refined analysis after the development of the Living Streets
Plan that will include review and input from a sustainability team.
Sustainability in engineering projects means delivering our services in a
manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the
community, and funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of
sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. We look at sustainability
as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, improving and
shaping both the present and future of our community so that future
generations are not burdened by the decisions of today.
The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks.
• Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services
such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and
emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the
community?
• Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment,
such as surface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource
diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise, and others?
• Economy: How does the project influence the local economy? What are
the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the
price?
The following is a summary of this evaluation:
Equity: The project maintains access and mobility to the transportation
network. Where available, this includes transportation options for a variety of
user groups including, but not limited to, children, seniors, and disabled
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
individuals. Updates to the fire hydrants provide public safety staff the ease
of connection needed during an emergency.
Environment: The project provides homeowners a piping system to discharge
ground water into, eliminating standing water and algae buildup along the
curb lines. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint
necessary to complete the work, thus protecting the existing natural
environment. The project also analyzes the sanitary sewer to ensure that
inflow and infiltration of clear water is kept out of the system, which minimizes
regional wastewater treatment.
Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into
the future. The proposed roadway section can easily be maintained long-term
with the use of mill and overlays and/or seal coating operations. These
maintenance operations will extend the life of the pavement. The project will
also use less intense construction methods, such as trenchless technology
(i.e., lining the pipes rather than removing and replacing them).
This is a simplified analysis of the project’s sustainability. In the future, we
anticipate correlating this analysis to an in-depth scoring system, displaying
the City’s sustainability to the community.
Staff Issues
The following is a list of issues, some generated by resident comments,
addressed in this report:
• Existing sanitary sewer and watermain system conditions
• Stormwater drainage
• Private utilities
• Existing street lighting
• Existing pavement surface condition
• Existing landscaping, retaining walls, and driveways
• Traffic speed and volume
• Pedestrian accessibility and safety
Resident Input
As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3
years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an
open house on October 8th, 2012. Residents were also invited to a second
open house on September 9th, 2013. Materials from these meetings are
available upon request.
We followed up with a questionnaire to the property owners on June 4, 2014,
inquiring about drainage problems, pedestrian accommodations, street
lighting, and other project-related concerns. The questionnaire was
completed and returned by 19 of the 38 property owners, a return rate of
50%. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix B.
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
The following is a summary of feedback received from residents:
• 2 of 19 (11%*) felt sidewalks were needed; 16 (84%) opposed new
sidewalks
• 4 (21%) identified traffic concerns in the neighborhood
• 1 (5%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood
• 2 (11%) felt street lighting was inadequate and favored upgrades
*Percentages based on number of returned surveys
A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on July 28, 2014 to
discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was
attended by 42 residents representing 35 properties. Materials from this
meeting can be found in Appendix A.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Streets
The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the early
1960s. All of the streets in the neighborhood currently have concrete curb
and gutter, and the average roadway width is 30 feet. The typical street
section has 3 inches of bituminous pavement over a sand and gravel base,
according to record plans of the original construction. Street sections have
been verified by a recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area.
The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood, but is in
relatively poor condition. The average pavement condition index (PCI) for the
City of Edina is 58 and the average PCI for Prospect Knolls B is 24.
Examples of the current street condition can be seen in Photos 1 & 2.
Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition
The City of Edina contracts with a consultant to evaluate all bituminous
roadways within the City. The streets are graded based on a number of
conditions, such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling, and potholes.
Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new
road surface and 0 being extremely poor. The City evaluates the PCI values
of streets within a neighborhood to determine a proper maintenance program.
Neighborhoods with a PCI greater than 65 are considered for seal coats,
PCIs between 65 and 45 are evaluated for mill and overlays, and PCIs less
than 45 are evaluated for total reconstruction.
The pavement throughout these streets is near the end of its useful life. The
costs to maintain and repair the roadways will steadily increase, and seal
coating or overlaying is no longer feasible.
Traffic and Crash Data
City staff measured traffic volumes and speeds within the neighborhood.
Average daily traffic volumes ranged from 46 to 84 cars per day with 85th
percentile speeds ranging from 24.6 to 26 mph. The traffic and crash data is
shown in Appendix E.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer system consists of 9-inch vitrified clay pipe
(VCP), 8-inch and 10-inch cast iron pipe (CIP), installed between 1964 and
1965. Historical records indicate there have been no sewer back-ups or
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
blockages in the area. The trunk sanitary sewer system has been televised
and will be evaluated for upgrades.
Watermain
The existing watermain system consists of 6-inch CIP, 1-inch and 2-inch
copper pipe, installed between 1964 and 1965. The overall system has
experienced relatively few breaks. The fire hydrants are original to the
neighborhood and lack the STORZ nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire
Department for quick connection of fire hoses.
Storm Sewer
The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District. Further evaluation will be done by staff regarding
drainage issues resulting from the resident questionnaires.
Private Utilities
Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications, and cable
television utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are buried
underground within and outside the street right-of-way.
Street lighting consists of standard “ladder rack,” “acorn,” and “coach lantern”
lights mounted on wood poles located throughout the project area as shown
in Appendix G.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks are currently located along the south side of Dewey Hill Road to
the south of the project area, and along the west side of Gleason Road to the
west of the project area.
Landscaping
Some properties have vegetation, hardscapes (such as boulders and
retaining walls), or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A
portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed
infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete
the necessary work.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: Streets
The pavement section is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the
subgrade. The existing pavement will be recycled for use as base material in
the new roadway. A minimum of 8 inches of recycled gravel material will be
graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5 inches of
bituminous base and 1.5 inches of bituminous wear course. The
reconstructed gravel and pavement sections will meet the requirements of a
minimum 20-year design life based on projected traffic loadings. With
prescriptive maintenance procedures, including regular seal coating and
periodic thin overlays, the design life can be extended considerably.
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Due to the limited scope of the utility repairs, the majority of the concrete curb
and gutter will remain in-place, and the current roadway widths will not be
altered. While our Living Streets Policy sets a design guideline to keep street
pavement widths to the minimum necessary and the draft Living Street Plan
has defined the minimum street width as 27 feet, it is not cost effective to
include these features within this project. It is anticipated that as part of the
next street reconstruction project for this area, the utility systems will have
reached the end of their service lives, thereby requiring extensive
rehabilitation. This will require the removal of the majority of the curb and
gutter, thereby allowing the Living Street design guidelines to be implemented
in a cost effective manner.
Public Utilities
Sanitary Sewer
The trunk sanitary sewer has been televised and based on our evaluation,
portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-
pipe (CIPP) methods. Root intrusion and minor cracking account for the
majority of the issues.
Watermain
Watermain improvements include replacing all the gate valves and upgrading
fire hydrants to City standard. Additionally, the undersized 1-inch and 2-inch
copper water mains will be upgraded to 6-inch systems and additional fire
hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards.
Storm Sewer
Spot repairs will be made to concrete curb and gutter segments that are
deficient or no longer functioning properly. Any new or replaced curb and
gutter is funded through the storm sewer fund, not under the roadway special
assessment. The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve
existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood.
Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their
poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property
owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer
system.
Sidewalks
The results from the resident questionnaires show that property owners do
not want to add sidewalks. Staff is not recommending the addition of
sidewalks in this neighborhood.
Other Improvements
Lighting: The results of the questionnaire show that property owners do not
want to reconstruct the street lights. Currently, the City does not have a
standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved.
These concerns will be addressed with the Living Streets Plan that is under
development.
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later
date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies.
The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections;
therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting.
Private Utilities: Private utility owners have expressed some interest in
upgrading portions of their networks within the project limits. This work is not
part of the City’s project, but will be coordinated to occur prior to our
construction activities. A meeting was held with the private utility operators
on August 28, 2014 to introduce the private utility operators to this project.
The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and
concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process,
while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the Engineering and
Public Works staff.
RIGHT-OF-WAY
& EASEMENTS: The right-of-ways for Schey Drive, Dewey Hill Road, and Claredon Drive are
all 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within the right-of-way and
no additional easement requirements are anticipated.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $836,685 (Table 1). The total cost includes
direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs from the
start of the project to the final assessment hearing. The estimated roadway
construction cost is $428,780 and will be funded by special assessments.
Utility improvements and repairs amount to $407,905 and will be funded
through their respective utility fund.
Item Amount Total Cost
Roadway: $ 428,780
Roadway Total: $ 428,780
Utilities:
Storm Sewer $ 180,155
Watermain $ 105,500
Sanitary Sewer $ 122,250
Utility Total: $ 407,905
Total Project: $ 836,685
Table 1. Estimated Project Costs
ASSESSMENTS: Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 36.53 residential
equivalent units (REU) in the Prospect Knolls B project area. Assessments
will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties, as shown in
Appendix C. The estimated assessment per REU is $11,740 (Figure 2).
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Figure 2. Preliminary Assessment Map
The formulas for calculating REUs for properties that are corner lots or non-
single family residential are described below:
Single-Family Residential Corner Lots:
5908 and 5924 Dewey Hill Rd
= (1 REU) x (1/3 side yard) = 0.33 REU
Engineering Study
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Improvements No. BA-414
October 16, 2014
Single-Family Residential Side Lots:
7117 Tralee Dr
= (1 REU) x (1/3 side yard) = 0.33 REU
Multi-Family Residential Lots:
7203 Gleason Rd
= (1 REU) x 0.8 (duplex REU factor) x 2 units x (1/3 side yard)
= 0.53 REU
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and
necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Prospect Knolls B
Neighborhood.
APPENDIX: A. 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting
B. Property Owners Questionnaire
C. Preliminary Assessment Roll
D. 2008 City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities
E. Traffic and Crash Data
F. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks
G. Existing Street Lights and Signs
H. Living Streets Policy
Project Open House 2012 October 8, 2012
Neighborhood Informational Meeting July 28, 2014
ETC Feasibility Study Review October 21, 2014
Receive Feasibility Report and Public Hearing December 9, 2014
Bid Opening March/April 2015
Award Contract Spring 2015
Begin Construction Spring 2015
Complete Construction Fall 2015
Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2016
APPENDIX A
2015 Neighborhood
Roadway Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
June 4, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood
Dear Resident:
Some streets in your neighborhood are on a list of roadway reconstruction and utility improvement projects being
considered by the City of Edina for the summer of 2015. See the attached map identifying your project area. On April 16,
2013, the City Council adopted neighborhood names and boundaries as part of the Name Your Neighborhood Project.
Please note that your neighborhood name associated with the roadway reconstruction and utility improvements may
have changed. Some neighborhood names stayed the same.
Please save the date of Monday, July 28 to attend an informational meeting from 6 to 8 p.m. to learn about how
projects are funded, a typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted and how you can prepare. A meeting
reminder will be mailed to you approximately two weeks prior.
Meantime, we’d like to hear from you. The City would like your input regarding key components of the project via the
attached questionnaire. Please read the instructions, fill out the questionnaire and return it to us in the enclosed envelope
by June 17.
How the City will use your input:
• Your responses help us design the project. Components of a project vary and are based on both the condition of the
infrastructure and questionnaire responses.
• Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. The estimated special
assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until information is gathered from the questionnaires and a
feasibility report is completed in early September. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2016. The
special assessment is payable over 15 years.
• The special assessment is for the cost of the new roadway. If the neighborhood feels the street lighting needs are not
being met and improvements are needed, the costs would also be a special assessment. Sidewalks are funded through
the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund and thus are not assessed to property owners. The questionnaire helps us
evaluate the need for various items. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not assessed to property owners.
After we review questionnaire responses, we will continue the project planning process. We will present the feasibility
report at the public hearing in December. Construction will begin in spring/early summer and end in late fall of 2015.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon
Allison at 952-826-0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
Sincerely,
Patrick Wrase, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Enc: Project Map, Questionnaire Instructions, Questionnaire, Return Envelope
7308
5905
7412
6 2
7204
4
7100
7121
7202
7104
7140
7305
7100
7028
5912
7101
7105
7300
7104
7205
7117
7209
7141
5908
6201
7145
7301
7119
59005904
7109
7032
7115
7137
7105
7400
5916
7304
7121
7201
7123
7408
7308
7312
5829
7305
7115
7310
70297131
7302
7309
7208
5920
7129
7109
5833
7125
7309
7128
74047412
7313
7216
7200
73047305
7116
5912
7301
7212 7306
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7204
59207133
5908
7203
7213
7314
7217
7304
7205
5911
7318
7300
7322
7409
71247120
7209
59177401
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7417
7405
7401
7326 5824
7411
7316
60056009
7420 7424
74047408
7320
7405
58
2
8
7413
7409
PROJECT LIMITS
C
L
A
R
E
D
O
N
D
R
DEWEY HILL RD
S
C
H
E
Y
D
R
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
D
E
W
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
2015 Project AreaProspect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-414C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
18 8 8
,e
9/24/2014
1
www.EdinaMN.gov
2015 Neighborhood Roadway
Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
July 28, 2014
www.EdinaMN.gov
Countryside H –164 Properties
Prospect Knolls B –39 Properties
Dewey Hill G –35 Properties
Arden Park D –225 Properties
-Consultant Project
Valley View Road –Municipal State Aid
54th Street –Municipal State Aid
Note: Neighborhood Names
2015 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions
•Timeline
•Project Scope
•What You Can Expect
•Funding Sources
•Communication
•How to Prepare
•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
Engineering Technicians Engineering Coordinator
Aaron KuzniaAndrew ScipioniSharon Allison
Environmental Transportation Assistant City Director of
EngineerPlannerEngineer Engineering
Ross BintnerMark NolanPatrick WraseChad Millner
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Project Timeline
July –September 2014Feasibility report and estimates
provided
December/January 14/15Public hearing
January-March2015Plan preparation and bidding
April/May2015 Construction begins
October/November 2015Construction concludes
Spring 2016 Warranty work
Fall 2016 Final assessment hearing
9/24/2014
2
www.EdinaMN.gov
Why My Street?
•Streets that meet specific standards are subject to
reconstruction
•Priority is given to streets with the highest need based on
watermain breaks, sanitary sewer deficiencies, storm
sewer/drainage issues, and Pavement Condition Index
•Reconstruction is usually more cost-effective long-term than
patching or seal-coating
•Streets are grouped together to help prolong pavement life and
maximize the economics of scale for construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Countryside H
Neighborhood
•164 Properties
•1.97 miles of roads
•30,100 square
yards of street
pavement
•8fire hydrants
•49 sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Prospect Knolls B
Neighborhood
•39 Properties
•0.4 mile of roads
•6,100 square yards of
street pavement
•4 fire hydrants
•13 sanitary manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project Details –
Dewey Hill G
Neighborhood
•35 Properties
•.39 mile of roads
•6,000 square yards
of street pavement
•3 fire hydrants
•8sanitary
manholes
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•All of streets have curb and gutter
•Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 11/100
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Varied driveway materials
•Some properties already have concrete driveway entrances
9/24/2014
3
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing Conditions
•Storm water drainage issues
•Landscaping placed in the right-of-way
•Irrigation systems & pet containment fences in the right-of-way
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Streets
•Curb and gutter replacement –selective
•New roadbed and pavement surface
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Driveways
•Spot driveway entrance replacement
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Utilities
•New fire hydrants and gate valves
•Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement
•Storm sewer upgrades
–Sump pump drain pipe in various locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed Improvements -Sidewalks
•Based on draft Edina Living Streets Sidewalk Facilities Plan
•Final design will be evaluated based on questionnaire responses
and Feasibility Report
Arden Park D
Countryside H
www.EdinaMN.gov
•December 2014 Council Meeting
•Feasibility Study Presented to Council
•Public Hearing for Project
–Opportunity for Project Area residents to voice concerns and
comments for the project
•Vote on Reconstruction Project -Assessed Project
–Requires 4-1 vote by Council to Approve
–4-1 vote required by MN Statute Chapter 429
•Vote on Sidewalk Component –Not Assessed
–Requires a 3-2 vote of City Council to Approve
Edina City Council –Project Approval
9/24/2014
4
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust, noise, vibrations, and
mud
•Localized flooding during
rainfall
•Occasional timeline delays
due to inclement weather
•May be asked to limit water
use
•Homes may be connected to
temporary water line
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Driveways may be
inaccessible for 3-5 days
•Neighborhood streets
may be periodically
inaccessible
•Irrigation and pet
containment systems
mostly likely will be
damaged
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•We will keep you informed
•You will have opportunities
to provide input
•Private utility work is to be
completed before City work
•We will do our best to
minimize inconveniences
•Contractor will
accommodate special access
needs
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
Property Impacts
•Items located within the City’s
right-of-way may be damaged
–Irrigation and pet
containment systems will
be repaired
–You can remove plantings
and other landscape
features before the project
–Disturbed areas will be
seeded after the project is
complete
www.EdinaMN.gov
Other Impacts
•Our goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood
disturbance.
•The City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric,
telephone, and cable TV) to upgrade or repair utilities along
the project area.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Do Taxes Cover Street Projects?
•Roughly 20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses such
as Police, Fire, Parks and Public Works (snowplowing, pothole
repairs, sealcoating, and other street maintenance)
•Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction
9/24/2014
5
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projects are funded by a combination of Special Assessments to
residents, the City’s Utility Funds, and the Pedestrian and
Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
Roadway Costs Sanitary Sewer
Costs
Storm Sewer
Costs
Watermain
Costs
Sidewalks,
Bike lanes,
etc.
Funding
Source Special AssessmentsUtility FundUtility FundUtility FundPACS Fund
www.EdinaMN.gov
Special Assessments
•Assigned to adjacent
properties that stand to
benefit from construction
improvements
•Cover 100% of
roadway costs
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Utility Fund
•Collection of utility service charges paid to the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Concrete curb and gutter (includes driveway aprons)
–Sanitary sewer
–Water main
–Storm sewer
–Sump pump pipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund
•Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees
•Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City
•Covers 100% of:
–Sidewalks
–Signage
–Crosswalks
–Street striping
www.EdinaMN.gov
Preliminary Assessments
Neighborhood Estimated Assessment
Range per REU*
#of
REUs
SquareYards
of Paving
Square Yards of
Pavingper REU
CountrysideH$8,600 -$10,900172.5930,100 174
ProspectKnolls B$8,800 -$11,20035.526,115 172
Dewey Hill G$9,100 -$11,40033.336,000 180
*Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Payment Options
•Will be billed for the assessment one year after project
completion
•Assessments are payable over 15 years
•Payment options:
1.Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance
charges
2.Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes
3.Roll entire amount to property taxes
4.Defer payment if 65 years old or older
9/24/2014
6
www.EdinaMN.gov
Providing Input
•Public hearings and questionnaire mailed to your home
•Weigh in on:
–Sump pump connection options
–Street drainage issues
–Traffic/pedestrian issues
–Streetlight upgrades
www.EdinaMN.gov
Questionnaire Results
Questionnaire results are available.
Neighborhood % of Questionnaires Returned
CountrysideH 49% (78/158)
ProspectKnolls B 45%(17/38)
DeweyHills G 68% (23/34)
Total Responses To Date 51% (118/230)
www.EdinaMN.gov
Communication Tools
•Become a neighborhood captain to help facilitate project
communication
–Let us know of someone in your neighborhood who might
fit this role
•You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, schedules and
questionnaires via regular mail
•Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun-Current
•Door hangers are distributed when there is time-sensitive
information
•Final assessment notices are mailed one year after construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Extra
“City Extra” emails are the best way to receive regular updates
once construction begins. These are free, weekly email updates
about your project.
•Sign up on City of Edina website, www.EdinaMN.gov
–Check the box next to your project name
•If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates
upon request
•It’s the best way to stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
How to Prepare
•Sign up for City Extra
•Begin financial planning
•Complete questionnaire
•Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around the
street construction timeline
•Ask questions; stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
Contact Us
Email: mail@edinamn.gov
Call: 952-826-0371
Visit:Engineering Department
7450 Metro Blvd.
Hours:7:00 a.m. –3:30 p.m.
9/24/2014
7
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thanks for your time!
Questions?
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
1 LIMV1 frt-G 0 GC /*I 6,00( /5i,h/in 4 n P- T?
2 -1e-(21._ct.A (--__.jZsLL_ 7'13 c
3 I'/,) ..‘2/A‘e f A 51-/e7t) iiie )1(') .),
4 d Nko cox EW i;orf eiar-edoiA D‘r
.6&' Li CPG/A-,,,t_ al: _ 5 t 44 £10
6 ---Vf3-4NN -N4 D_62,C,U" UbStLe OA 6%.r\lk1a.
7 u A ri-4\ SChmck >I) 5 ci 00 A'Wo [ct ku
8 ,51e ff fiey Pr.0.145e-
1 o 4-) deA-se, ,\ 73c).8 ScikeL, 1)r-:
11 1 -7
13 i V-M.--G-re--e -V4 S7 ll G-g--ove-
14 Vke,l/C-red .' q 14-Aoli, eLr.k.
15 /
)
taka-eb - ÷-191147 ral„ 7-7 5-005---- iquibici 4 0---
16 12. 0..,r_ 6-0 rgA5-1A_ -91b t itA64\0 1 A br
17 'j.:7/ /I- ./-z'eri ec .6-e73.2 /5c/A -e., CPrr-c2Q----
18 1--OVIA. /4--tti- LA. a 14 vu ess y c7o'Cut,Xet_IF-F -Q kb
cat Nreid 19 A-4,,,,u 6-,,v3.....,,,.,
20 5-6DTI A4...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
) UJ [zL I Ff
6
CA),\..1 kVe-1(-V (10S\-e
---W1 c rtiAsks-tA
C4r-g
T (te_
(e
2015 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
July 28th, 2014
NAME ADDRESS
\Je.c-vpv alYJ-tvy
Utra-v-1,-/
2 A‘///.9 //&
11_10 64t/V77
r (d LJ
ait
A4-At
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1(
ie0C de*
C e_ Le
3--(Ro
0.71k-11/3 vi
-)1S; 03-C33 Ze ut_ <D,4
59)0 Par
GO /t_)) e o- /?ai.
5 3 k,"- f\-rvu
2-al t i\f\fej4/ Cxycetk.
S—K0 6trove
1-(7. ri‘c Ck KC1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
evi (cut--k-> f 1,1 Jotuf
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Number Question Answer
1 What is an REU?An REU is a residential equivalent unit. One single-family home is 1 REU. All single-family homes within a project area are
assessed the same because they will receive the same benefit.
2 Does that include corner lots?
Per the assessment policy, corner lots are assessed a total of 1 REU. Depending on the address, the property may get a 1/3, 2/3,
or 1 REU value for the current project. Past projects may have already charged the property a partial REU. All properties will be
reviewed for reu calculations during the feasibility study phase of the project.
3 How are the REUs calculated?Each single-family home is 1 REU. Other facilities (higher-density residential, industrial, schools, churches, etc.) are assessed
based on land use, total building are, number of units, and access to the project area.
4 What determines the estimate range in the
presentation?
The more details that are known about the project, the more precise we can be with out estimate. The price range presented to
you is based on average unit prices and estimated quantities of work to be done. As we move further along in the design process,
we can give you a better idea of what the assessment will be.
5 When does construction begin?
Pending council approval at the public hearing in December, the contract will be awarded around March or April. Depending on
the contractor's schedule, work typically takes place between May and September or October. A period of 8-10 weeks is
preferred for neighborhood construction, but, like we've seen this year, sometimes weather can extend that timeline.
6 What are the finance charges?Residents are charged at 1% over the rate that the City can borrow money. It is normally between 3% and 5%
7 What happens to mailboxes within the project
areas?
Depending on the project, they may all stay in place, some may have to be relocated, or all may need to be relocated. We will
coordinate with homeowners and the postal service when we know more about the extent of the project.
8 How far into the right-of-way does
construction go?
This type of construction usually extends 10-15 feet behind the curb onto your property. Depending on the extend of the utility
work needed, there may be additional disruptions. All disturbed areas within the project areas will be seeded following
construction.
9 When will I know the extent of the
interruption onto my property?Once construction begins, we will know more about how far into your property we will have to go.
10 How do you determine which driveway aprons
to replace?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. It also depends on if the driveway is constructed from brick pavers or is a lifetime-warranty concrete
driveway.
11
Does the same contractor perform all of the
work, and do the projects happen
sequentially?
When the contracts are sent out for bids, the City typically receives bids from the same dozen or so contractors every year.
Countryside will be bid as one contract, but Prospect Knolls and Dewey Hill will most likely be incorporated into the same
contract. It is possible that the same contractor might be awarded both, but more than likely, there will be multiple contractors.
The scheduling of the work will be dependent on the contractors.
12 Will the new street be asphalt or concrete? Do
we get to have a say in that?
The new streets will be bituminous, not concrete. In the City's experience, concrete streets are more expensive to construction
and maintain. Our staff normally recommends bituminous streets.
13 Will the whole neighborhood have curb
replaced, or do you go house by house?
In these neighborhoods, we are looking at performing spot repair/replacement of curb. This means our inspectors will examine
the entire project area, noting locations where the curb is cracked, settled, flat, or otherwise damaged. It is often more cost-
effective to do this than to replace the entire length of curb in a neighborhood. However, if we find a large portion of the curb
needs replacement, then we will look into potentially replacing all of the curb.
14 Do you seed or sod after the project?
The City has gravitated towards seeding instead of sodding after the projects. Seeding is more drought-resistant, requires less
water, and is more environmentally friendly than sod. In past projects, the City has had better success at getting permanent turf
established with seed than with sod.
15 Does the seeding occur immediately after yard
disruptions?
All restoration work will occur after the first layer of asphalt and before the final layer is paved. This is done to prevent heavy
construction equipment from driving on the new road surface, potentially damaging it.
16 What are the costs involved in the sump pump
installation?
Sump pump drainage pipes will be installed in the project areas where feasible. The costs of installing the pipe are covered by the
City Utility Fund. Once the pipe is installed, homeowners wishing to connect will need to obtain a building permit from the City
and connect themselves. The costs to the homeowner may be between $500 and $1,500.
17
Someone in a project area this year said you
encouraged residents to have their main lines
inspected before the project?
If you need to or would like to replace or upgrade your services, now would be a good time to do so. If you were to wait until
after the project is completed, any holes dug into the new roadway will need to be patched approximately 30' by 30', a cost
which the resident would have to pay for. The City will also work with homeowners who wish to improve their services to have
those costs put on their special assessment if they wish.
18
If we want to upgrade our service, does the
City pay for upgrading/adapting the
connection?
Only if such an upgrade or adaption is required as part of the project. Any changes made beyond City standards will not be paid
for by the City.
19 How much does a 30' x 30' street patch cost?In the City's experience, anywhere between $3,000 to $5,000.
20 Will the water be shut off?There will be occasional water shut-offs during the project in order to replace fire hydrants and gate valves. We will do our best
to limit the number of shut-offs, and let you know ahead of time when and where they are going to occur.
21 What does the sidewalk design look like?
We are looking into designing a 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard between the sidewalk and the back of curb. This
boulevard acts as a safety buffer between pedestrians and vehicles. The sidewalks are only anticipated to be installed along one
side of the streets on which they are proposed. The City is currently studying the property impacts involved with installation to
determine a preferred alignment.
22 Will there be crosswalks?Painted crosswalks will most likely not be included with this project unless they already exist within the project area. The need
for additional crosswalks will need to be evaluated by our Traffic Safety Coordinator.
23 How far into the property will the sidewalk go?
Construction related to installing a new 5-foot sidewalk with a 5-foot boulevard will typically extend an additional 6 feet onto the
property. The boulevard width may vary depending on existing obstacles (trees, driveways, terrain, etc.) that change the
alignment of the sidewalk.
24 What will happen if I have a driveway apron
with concrete aggregate or brick pavers?
If the driveway apron is in poor shape, the City will work with the homeowner to replace it to current City standards. Typically,
we will work with the homeowner and contractor to replace pavers or exposed aggregate driveways. The City does not replace
lifetime guaranty aprons, and any related costs will not be paid by the City. We try our best to distrurb special driveways as little
as possible during construction to avoid replacement costs.
25 How do you install sidewalks in a cul-de-sac?Currently, there are no sidewalks planned for any of the cul-de-sacs within these project areas.
26 Do we have the option to have our driveway
apron replaced or not?
It depends on the current structural condition of the apron, if it is cracked or settled, or if it is preventing the flow of storm water
down the curb line. Typically, we do not leave poor aprons in place. The cost for replacing the aprons is covered under the City
Utility Fund, as your driveway apron is considered a part of our stormwater conveyance system.
27 If we live in an area with surmountable curb,
will you be changing it to bulkhead style?
Since we are only planning for spot replacement of curb, the existing styles will stay in place. The City tends to favor the bulkhead-
style curb over surmountable curb because it conveys stormwater more easily and it helps prevent snowplows from damaging
lawns in the winter.
28
You said irrigation systems and pet
containment fences will probably be
damaged?
If an irrigation system or pet containment fence is damaged, the contractor will perform a temporary repair so the system can
still be used. After the majority of the project is completed, the contractor will then permanently repair all damaged systems
within the project area before final paving.
29 How are the major roadways assessed?
The Municipal State Aid-designated roadways in Edina are maintained and reconstructed with funds obtained from the state gas
tax. Properties that live on State Aid roads are assessed 20% of the project costs. This assessment typically is half that of a
standard residential assessment. The reason for the lower assessment is because residents who live on a State Aid roadway
typically have lower property values and have to deal with much higher volumes of traffic than residents who live in a residential
neighborhood. Both the City's State Aid and non-State Aid assessment policies are available on our website.
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction - 42 People Attended
Question and Answer Session from the July 28th, 2014 Open House Meeting
Held at Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility from 6 to 8 pm
H
W
Y
1
6
9
78TH ST W
VALLEY VIEW RD
VALL
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
DEWEY HILL RD
76TH ST W
70TH ST W
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
58TH ST W
54TH ST W
50TH ST W
44TH ST
W
MALONEY AVE
INTERLACHEN BLVD
YO
R
K
A
V
E
S
66TH ST W
70TH ST W
C
A
H
I
L
L
R
D
XE
R
X
E
S
A
V
E
S
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
S
VERNO
N
A
V
E
SC
H
A
E
F
E
R
R
D
BL
A
K
E
R
D
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
§¨¦169
§¨¦169
§¨¦62
§¨¦62
§¨¦100
§¨¦100
INTERLACHENCOUNTRYCLUB
VANVALKENBURGPARK
BREDESENPARK
BRAEMAR PARKGOLF COURSE
FRED RICHARDSGOLF COURSE
EDINACOUNTRYCLUB
Mud Lake
Lake Edina
Lake
Cornelia
Mirr
o
r
L
a
k
e
Arrowhead Lake
Highlands Lake
IndianheadLake
Mel
o
d
y
L
a
k
e
LakePamela
HarveyLake
HawkesLake
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
L
a
k
e
Cahill
Highlands B
Indian Hills B
Lake Edina
Rolling Green Hilldale
Indian Hills A
Fox Meadow B
Arden Park D
The Heights A
Birchcrest A
The Heights B
Golf Terrace B
Country Club ATodd Park A
Chowen Park C
Countryside A
Highlands C
Lake Cornelia C
Countryside H
Country Club B
Southdale B
Parklawn A
South Cornelia B
Sunny Slope
Prospect Knolls A
Concord E
Lake Cornelia D
Parkwood Knolls F
Lake Cornelia E
Grandview C
Presidents A
Birchcrest B
Melody Lake D
Concord A
Melody Lake A
Minnehaha Woods A
Golf Terrace A
Morningside C
Indian Hills D
Braemar Hills A
Morningside D
Parkwood Knolls C
Birchcrest C
Dewey Hill B
Brookview Heights A
Creek Knolls
Melody Lake B
Concord B
Indian Trails
Brookview Heights B
Highlands A
Parklawn B
Chowen Park A
Bredesen Park B
Morningside B
Parkwood Knolls P
Prospect Knolls C
South Cornelia D
White Oaks A
Parkwood Knolls E
Concord C
Normandale Park D
Creek Valley A
Countryside I
Presidents C
Arden Park C
Presidents B
Presidents E
Highlands D
Grandview B
Southdale C
Braemar Hills C
Morningside A
Bredesen Park D
South Cornelia C
Dewey Hill A
Concord G
Morningside E
Southdale A
Countryside D
Concord H
Minnehaha Woods B
Countryside C
Pamela Park E
Todd Park F
Strachauer Park A
Parkwood Knolls D
Parkwood Knolls M
Pamela Park A
Normandale Park A
Lake Cornelia F
Parkwood Knolls B
South Cornelia A
Chowen Park B
Pamela Park D
Countryside E
Bredesen Park C
Interlachen Park A
Strachauer Park B
Creek Valley C
Parkwood Knolls N Fox Meadow C
Normandale Park B
White Oaks B
Todd Park B
Parkwood Knolls O
Braemar Hills D
Braemar Hills B
Concord D
Parkwood Knolls G
Normandale Park C
Prospect Knolls B
Dewey Hill G
White Oaks C
Dewey Hill E
Parkwood Knolls A
Countryside F
Todd Park D
Minnehaha Woods D
Pamela Park B
Prospect Knolls D
Indian Hills E
Dewey Hill D
Pamela Park C
Countryside G
Minnehaha Woods C
Concord F
Fox Meadow F
Fox Meadow A
Todd Park E
Todd Park C
Highlands F
Melody Lake C
Indian Hills C
Presidents D
Fox Meadow D
Fox Meadow G
Creek Valley B
Parkwood Knolls I
Fox Meadow E
Dewey Hill F
Dewey Hill C
Interlachen Park B
Bredesen Park A
Brookview Heights C
Grandview A
Parkwood Knolls L
Highlands E
Indian Hills F
Arden Park A
Parkwood Knolls H
Parkwood Knolls K
Braemar Hills E
Edinborough
Parkwood Knolls J
Arden Park B
Lake Cornelia A
Countryside B
Country Club C
Lake Cornelia B
Brookview Heights D
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
City of Edina 2014-2019Anticipated Local Bituminous Street Reconstruction
The dates shown on the map represent the anticipated years of construction and are subject to change based on budgetary issues, adjacent projects, resident input and other factors.Not all bituminous roadways within the City are shown. If a road is not highlighted then the potential reconstruction date is beyond the City’s long term planning process.
The City of Edina’s street improvement policy is to assess residents for a portion of the roadway reconstruction costs. Public utility improvements are paid for from the City’s utility fund.
Extensive evaluation regarding the condition of the bituminous pavement, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main were used to set the priority of roadway improvements.
This map only addresses local bituminous streets and does not address State-Aid routes or concrete streets within the City.
Note/Disclaimer
2015
2016
2014
2017
2018
2019
Legend
Anticipated Year
µ
ReconstructionAssessment Areas
Need to zoom into mapto see a neighborhood area.
September 2014Engineering Dept.
APPENDIX B
Property Owners
Questionnaire
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you for your time. Your responses to the attached questionnaire will help us design your
neighborhood’s project. Here is background information that will aid you in filling out the questionnaire. Each
numeral relates to the corresponding survey question.
I. Drainage Service Connection
A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner’s lawn. There are several sump pump drainage issues to
look for. First, if your lawn drains back to your house, sump pump discharges can cause problems with your
lawn, your neighbor’s lawn or your basement. If the sump pump discharge runs down the gutter line, it can
promote algae growth in the street. Finally, discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system using
floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City Ordinance and State Statute.
To prevent the issues mentioned above, your street reconstruction project could include a City sump drain
system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump
pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If the topography and final street designs favor a
sump drain system, you could connect to it. That is why survey questions I.C. and I.D. ask about your sump
pump preferences. Keep in mind that installation of the pipe from your house to the City sump drain system
would be your responsibility, including plumbing modifications connection. However, the City sump drain
system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund.
II. Local Drainage Problems
As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if storm water run-off
stands in the street or sidewalk in front of your house. If this or similar situations are occurring in your area,
please describe it in this section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective action.
III. Private Underground Utilities
It is very important that you fill out this section. Some residents install private underground utilities in the
roadway right-of-way (the area from the edge of the roadway to your property line). The most common
private utilities include lawn irrigation and pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can
damage these utilities. If they are damaged during the street reconstruction project, they will be repaired.
However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, crews can attempt to avoid damaging
them during construction.
IV. Residential Streetlights
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks residents for their input on neighborhood streetlight
systems. Staff is trying to understand if the neighborhood favors upgrading the streetlight system or if the
existing streetlight system meets the needs of the neighborhood. Please keep in mind that costs associated
with improving the streetlight system would be a special assessment. These costs would be determined after
the extent of the improvements is understood.
V. Pedestrian Issues
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks in the
neighborhood. Sidewalks are funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund.
Please note if you know of any pedestrian issues such as a missing segment of sidewalk or an inadequate
pedestrian crossing.
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
Page 2 of 2
VI. Traffic Management
We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues.
VII. Email Updates
One of the primary tools for communicating with you during construction is the City Extra email notification
service. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive email messages from the City
regarding this project.
By signing up for City Extra email notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. The
updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited, when your water may
be shut off for water main replacement and when to have your contractor repair your irrigation system if it
was damaged during construction.
To receive email updates, sign up online at www.EdinaMN.gov. Enter your email address and a password
(new user will need to create a password). Click on email subscriptions. Scroll down the page until you see
your neighborhood project name (Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction). Place
a check mark in the box next to it. Click the “update” button at the bottom right hand corner of the
webpage.
Need Help?
If you have any questions about how to fill out the questionnaire, please contact Assistant City Engineer
Patrick Wrase at 952-826-0443 or pwrase@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison at 952-826-
0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov.
YOUR HOUSE
CURB LINE
ROW ROW
CURB LINE
EXAMPLE
HOUSE
GARAGE
X
SERVICE
CONNECTION
PIPE HERE
Resident Questionnaire
Prospect Knolls B
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you in advance for your time. Your input is important to us. Please read the Questionnaire
Instructions before completing this questionnaire.
I. Drainage Service Connection:
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain? Yes No Unknown
B. Does your home have a sump pump? Yes No Unknown
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
Please sketch in the space to the right:
your house, garage, driveway, sump pump
discharge location and approximately
where along the right-of-way (ROW) line
you would like the service connection
pipe located.
II. Local Drainage Problems
Please describe specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood:
III. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The right-of-
way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes No
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes No
IV. Residential Streetlights:
A. Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system
meeting the needs of the neighborhood?
Yes No
B. Do you favor improving your streetlights?
Yes No
V. Pedestrian Issues:
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes No
B. If yes, where? _________________________________________________________
C. Please describe specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below.
VI. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes No
B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
VII. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes No
Thank you for completing the questionnaire. Please return it to the City in the enclosed envelope by June
17.
PROSPECT KNOLLS B NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-414
G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\BA414 Prospect Knolls B(2015)\DESIGN\FEASIBILITY\QUESTIONNAIRE\Questionnaire Tabulation.xlsx10/16/2014 1 of 1
Data Entered By:
Last Date Data Entered:
Due Date:
Questionnaires Sent Out:
Questionnaires Returned:
Percent Returned:
Drainage
Local Drainage Problems
Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
House #Street Name
7300 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7302 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7304 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7308 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1
7310 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 I don't think we have any.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7312 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1
Connecting drain not physically possible with slope. No drainage issue - on top of culdesac so all runs down from us.1 1 1 1 1 We are on a culdesac so very little ped traffic.1 1
7318 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 N/A Crosswalk at end of Claredon Dr crossing Dewey Hill Rd.1 Crosswalks are needed in additional areas with stop for ped signs.1
7322 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7326 Claredon Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5908 Dewey Hill Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dewey Hill sees lots of speeding to and from Braemar.1
5916 Dewey Hill Rd 1 1 1
None on my property. Standing water past neighbor (5912) and on northside of big power box.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5920 Dewey Hill Rd 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5924 Dewey Hill Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maybe northside of Dewey Hill Rd; already on southside.1 But drivers could slow down on Dewey Hill.1
7203 Gleason Rd 1 1 1 1
None
1 1 1 1 1
Intersection of Schey & Gleason,
1
The intersection of Schey & Gleason is a 3-way stop. Many vehicles do not stop. Often when cars do stop (full or partial) they accelerate quickly creating significant noise. This intersection is a hazard for peds due to this driver behavior. A way needs to be created to enable safe ped passage and reduce noise. Possibly a roundabout Also, intersection does not have crosswalk.1
7121 Schey Rd 1 1 1 1 1 Hill enough for surface drainage.1 1 1 1 1
Need a wheelchair entrance at sidewalk by Gleason Rd & Schey Rd by the stop sign westside. Thank you.1 1
7125 Schey Rd 1 1 1 1 1 None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7209 Schey Rd 1 1 1 1 1 None-drainage is to the retention ravine to the north of my lot.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7216 Schey Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 People run the stop sign at Gleason & Schey daily/hourly.1
7300 Schey Rd 1 1 1 1 1 None known.1 1 1 1 1 1 1
19 3 11 5 5 13 1 8 1 16 15 4 4 15 16 2 2 17 2 16 4 15 17 2Surveys Sent 38 50%8%29%13%13%34%3%21%3%42%39%11%11%39%42%5%5%42%11%39%45%5%Surveys Returned 19 100%16%58%26%26%68%5%42%5%84%79%21%21%79%84%11%11%84%21%79%89%11%
38
June 17, 2014
July 7, 2014
Existing meets needs Favors improvement Sidewalk Need
19
50%
Residential Streetlights Pedestrian Issues
ADDRESS Returned Survey
Sump Pump Discharge Service Line Private Underground Utilities
Draintile or Footing Drain Has a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Iriggation sys. in blvd.Pet fence
Email Access
Construct new sidewalks where?Specific N'hood Pedestrian Comments If yes, where?
Traffic Management
Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Resident Questionnaire Summary as of 9/24/14
Surveys sent: 38 Surveys returned: 19 Return rate: 50%
I. Drainage Service Connection
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain?
Yes: 3 No: 11 Unknown: 5
B. Does your home have a sump pump?
Yes: 5 No: 13 Unknown: 1
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump to a City drain if provided (at your
own cost)?
Yes: 0 No: 8
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains to a City drain if provided (at your own
cost)?
Yes: 1 No: 16
II. Private Underground Utilities
A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The
right-of-way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes: 15 No: 4
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes: 4 No: 15
III. Residential Streetlights
A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights?
Yes: 2 No: 17
IV. Pedestrian Issues
A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Yes: 2 No: 16
V. Traffic Management
A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes: 4 No: 15
VI. Email Updates
A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes: 17 No: 2
APPENDIX C
Preliminary Assessment Roll
PROSPECT KNOLLS B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-414
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PID Owner House No.Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount
0811621230067 Karol D Emmerich 7300 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230061 Richard J Emmerich & Karol Emmerich 7302 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230010 Karol Emmerich 7304 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230028 Jeffrey Robbins & Susan Stiles 7305 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230013 Franklin E Tappen & Carol L Tappen 7306 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230014 John E Cronin & Anne M Cronin 7308 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230015 Kimberly H Perry & Michael K Perry 7310 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230009 Arvid A Povilaitis & Mary E Povilaitis 7312 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230016 Ping Wang 7314 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230008 Jayne A Komadina 7316 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230017 Kristyne E Grev & Garret H Grev 7318 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230007 Keith Flom & Joan H Flom 7320 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230018 Gary Bringgold 7322 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230006 David Anderson & Kyoung Lee 7324 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230019 Peter Hang & Elizabeth C Hang 7326 Claredon Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230005 Darrell Cash & Mary Ellen Cash 5908 Dewey Hill Rd 0.33 3,874.20$
0811621230004 Wayne E Prochniak & Pamela N Prochniak 5912 Dewey Hill Rd 1 11,740.00$
0811621230003 Kevin T Wand 5916 Dewey Hill Rd 1 11,740.00$
0811621230002 Scott Al-Najim & Jennifer L Al-Najim 5920 Dewey Hill Rd 1 11,740.00$
0811621230001 Todd R Haymaker & Andreea I Haymaker 5924 Dewey Hill Rd 0.33 3,874.20$
0811621230035 Becky G Hollenkamp & Brant P Hollenkamp 7203 Gleason Rd 0.53 6,222.20$
0811621230033 Jon L Otterlei/Trustee 7121 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230034 Nathaniel W Shea & Sabine M Shea 7125 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230051 Michael J Grunwald 7200 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230052 H Stuart Erickson 7201 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230050 Yuhang Cheng & Qi Ling 7204 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230053 Philip T Colton & Michelle M Colton 7205 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230068 Timothy J Keenan & Ann B Keenan 7209 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230049 Robert M Toomey & Sally A Toomey 7212 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230048 Sara C Ribbens / Trust 7216 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230047 John W King 7300 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230064 Joseph M Medina & Jenny J Medina 7301 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230046 Andrew J Winton & Judi A Lamble 7304 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230056 David W Foley & Martha K Foley 7305 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230045 Derek Anderson & Cheryl Meyer 7308 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230057 Karisa Sprague 7309 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230044 Michael J Hutson & Beth E Hutson 7312 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230058 Jacob L Smith 7313 Schey Dr 1 11,740.00$
0811621230030 Christopher R Fogel 7117 Tralee Dr 0.33 3,874.20$
Total 36.52 428,744.80$
APPENDIX D
City Comprehensive Plan
Update – Sidewalk and Bicycle
Facilities
APPENDIX E
Traffic and Crash Data
Prospect Knolls B Traffic and Crash Data
Traffic Data
Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th Speed, mph
1 Schey Drive 2014 84 25.8
Crash Data
Location Severity Year Month Time
- - - - -
APPENDIX F
Sewer Blocks and Watermain
Breaks
7308
5905
7412
6 2
5901
4
7100
7121
7202
7104
7140
7305
7100
7028
5912
7101
7105
7300
7104
7205
7117
7209
7141
5908
6201
7145
7301
7119
59005904
7109
7032
7115
7137
7105
7400
5916
7304
7121
7201
7123
7408
7308
7312
5829
7305
7115
7310
70297131
7302
7309
7208
5920
7129
7109
5833
7125
7309
7128
74047412
7313
7216
7200
73047305
7116
5912
7301
7212 7306
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7204
59207133
5908
7203
7213
7314
7217
7304
7205
5911
7318
7300
7322
7409
71247120
7209
59177401
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7417
7405
7401
7326 5824
7411
7316
60056009
7420 7424
74047408
7320
7405
58
2
8
7413
7409
5916
PROJECT LIMITS
C
L
A
R
E
D
O
N
D
R
DEWEY HILL RD
S
C
H
E
Y
D
R
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
D
E
W
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksProspect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-414C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
18 8 8
,e
Sewer Blocks
Watermain Breaks
APPENDIX G
Existing Street Lights and Signs
5905
5901
7100
7121
7202
7104
7140
7305
7100
5912
7101
7105
7300
7104
7205
7117
7209
7141
5908
7145
7301
59005904
71097115
7137
5916
7304
7121
7201
7123
7308
7312
5829
7305
7310
7302
7309
7208
5920
5833
7125
7309
7412
7313
7216
7200
73047305
5912
7301
7212 7306
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7204
59207133
5908
7203
7213
7314
7217
7304
7205
5911
7318
7300
7322
7209
59177401
5924
59216001
7324
7405
7401
7326
7316
60056009
74047408
7320
7405
58
2
8
5916
PROJECT LIMITS
C
L
A
R
E
D
O
N
D
R
DEWEY HILL RD
S
C
H
E
Y
D
R
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
D
E
W
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
Xcel EnergyWash AcornWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square
Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square Xcel EnergyCoach LanternWood Square
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackWood Square
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackWood Square
Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackWood Square
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
Street LightsProspect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-414C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
18 8 8
,e
!"$!"$89:z!"$
!"$
7308
5905
7412
6 2
5901
4
7100
7121
7202
7104
7140
7305
7100
7028
5912
7101
7105
7300
7104
7205
7117
7209
7141
5908
6201
7145
7301
7119
59005904
7109
7032
7115
7137
7105
7400
5916
7304
7121
7201
7123
7408
7308
7312
5829
7305
7115
7310
70297131
7302
7309
7208
5920
7129
7109
5833
7125
7309
7128
74047412
7313
7216
7200
73047305
7116
5912
7301
7212 7306
7300
7313 73127308
7308
7204
59207133
5908
7203
7213
7314
7217
7304
7205
5911
7318
7300
7322
7409
71247120
7209
59177401
5924
5921
7416
6001
7324
7417
7405
7401
7326 5824
7411
7316
60056009
7420 7424
74047408
7320
7405
58
2
8
7413
7409
5916
PROJECT LIMITS
C
L
A
R
E
D
O
N
D
R
DEWEY HILL RD
S
C
H
E
Y
D
R
G
L
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
D
E
W
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
/
Engineering DeptOctober, 2014
SignsProspect Knolls B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-414C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
18 8 8
,e
Street Signs
TYPE
D3-X1
!"$R1-1
89:z W14-1
APPENDIX H
Living Streets Policy
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Council VIII. A.
Karen M. Kurt
Assistant City Manager
☒
☐
☐ August 20, 2013
Approve Living Streets Policy
Approve Living Streets Policy
Information / Background:
In May 201l, the City Council adopted a resolution in support of Living Streets and directed the Edina
Transportation Commission to work with staff to develop a Living Streets Policy. Key steps in the
development of the policy are outlined below:
ETC formed a Living Streets Working Group. Members Paul Nelson, Jennifer Janovy and Michael
Thompson played a critical role in policy development.
The City received a $15,000 grant from the Bloomington Health Department. These funds were
used to hire a consultant to review current city policies and to provide a framework for moving
forward.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield sponsored a workshop on February 15, 2012 led by representatives
from the National Complete Streets Coalition. Key community stakeholders attended and
participated in a brainstorming session about Edina’s vision for future streets.
The ETC Working Group and staff prepared a draft Living Streets Policy which was reviewed with
the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission,
Park Board, Energy and Environment Commission and Bike Edina Task Force. Feedback is collected
for incorporation into the Living Streets Policy and future Living Streets Plan.
The Living Streets Policy draft is reviewed during a joint work session with ETC and City Council.
Upon policy adoption, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, will begin working with internal and external
advisory groups to draft content for the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the
Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well best practices for community engagement during the design
process.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
Confirmed members of the external advisory group are:
Arnie Bigbee, Human Rights and Relations Commission
Claudia Carr, Planning Commission
Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission
Ellen Jones, Park Board
Bill McCabe, Arts and Culture Commission
Paul Nelson, Transportation Commission
Paul Thompson, Energy and Environment Commission
Courtney Whited, Transportation Commission
Staff is waiting for confirmation from additional representatives from the Planning Commission, Energy and
Environment Commission and Community Health Committee. Additional community expertise will be
sought as needed throughout the process.
Members of the internal advisory team are:
Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer
Jeff Elasky, Police Lieutenant
Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
Cindy Larson, Redevelopment Coordinator
Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer
Bob Pestrud, Parks Foreman
John Scheerer, Street Supervisor
Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal
Additional staff expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Staff is also in the process of
securing a $5,000 grant from Bloomington Public Health that will be used to develop a community education
and outreach plan for Living Streets.
Attachments:
Proposed Living Streets Policy
1
Living Streets Policy
Introduction
Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote
safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy
defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation.
The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy
consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the
“do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related
to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set
by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act.
The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how
the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design
process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk
Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to
this Policy.
Living Streets Vision
Edina is a place where...
Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;
Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;
Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;
Streets are inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity;
Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments;
Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and
private sectors alike; and
Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses.
Living Streets Principles
The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate
these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making
public and private land use decisions.
2
All Users and All Modes
The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of
the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing
safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes.
Connectivity
The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly
connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel.
The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes
preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance
connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit.
The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public
facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas.
The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk
networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the
development.
Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical
termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street
construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and
continuity.
Application
The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving
operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation,
or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes
privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails.
The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land
use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency.
Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of
smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time.
The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and
actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources
as applicable.
All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their
work.
Exceptions
Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and
rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document
proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal.
Exceptions:
3
A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable
condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole
filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance
activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians.
The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a
bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project.
The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of
significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native
vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas.
Design
The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning,
funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks,
paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs.
The City’s design guidelines will:
Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary.
Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use
pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by
context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building,
community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context.
Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed
to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate.
Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes.
Allocate right-of-way for boulevards.
Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets
principles.
Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain
gardens and other features to improve air and water quality.
The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals,
rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will
update the Living Streets Plan.
Context Sensitivity
Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its
neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate
these differences, the City will:
Seek input from stakeholders;
Design streets with a strong sense of place;
Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and
ravines;
Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and
4
Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant
commercial districts.
Benchmarks and Performance Measures
The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating
success include:
Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling;
Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely;
Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably;
An active way of life is available to all;
There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries;
No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and
Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations.
The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may
be identified as this Policy is implemented.
Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department.
Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests.
Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys.
Resident responses to post-project surveys.
The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and
after the project.
Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure.
Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets.
Implementation
The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several
steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to
guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will:
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal
pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings;
Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including
street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities;
Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA,
MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts);
Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets
improvements; and
Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private
and regional destinations.
5
Additional implementation steps include:
Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an
ongoing basis;
Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this
Policy;
Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets
principles as established by this Policy;
Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals;
Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes;
Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans
(Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.);
Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP);
Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and
Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: October 23, 2014
Subject: Arden Park D Neighborhood Draft Engineering Report
Action Requested:
No action requested.
Agenda Item #: VI. A.
Action
Discussion al
Information
Information / Background:
The City is working with SEH Inc. on the draft engineering report for 2015 Arden Park D Neighborhood
Reconstruction Project. This project involves reconstruction of the roadways including bituminous
pavement and curb and gutter, and also includes upgrading existing utility infrastructure systems including
storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer. Sidewalks are also planned to be added to Arden Avenue, West
52nd Street, and Minnehaha Boulevard. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special
assessment, respective utility funds, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds, and Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District (MCWD) funds
Please note that this project implements principles of the Living Streets Policy and draft Living Street Plan. It
continues our change of thinking about the use of our streets from primarily auto-centric to the
incorporation of pedestrian-friendly elements and what is required for a balanced, multi-modal
transportation system.
SEH Inc. will provide a brief presentation of the project and will take questions from the ETC. Staff and the
consultant are requesting that commissioners review and provide feedback on the draft engineering report.
Attachments:
Draft Arden Park D Neighborhood Engineering Report
G: \ Engineering \ Infrasiructure \Streets \ Traffic \TRANSP COMM\ Agendas & RR's \2014 R&R\20141023\ltem VLA. Arden Park D Draft Engineering Report.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 506 St. • Edina, MN 55424
ENGINEERINGSTUDY –BA-412ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTCITY OFEDINA
ARDEN PARKNEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTIONOCTOBER 15, 2014
SUMMARY:This project implementsprinciples of the Living Streets Policy and draft Living Street Plan. It continues our change of thinking about the use of our streets from primarily auto-centric tothe incorporation ofpedestrian–centricelementsand what is required for a balanced, multi-modal transportationsystem.
This project involves reconstruction of the roadways including bituminous pavement and curb and gutter. The project also includes upgrading existing utility infrastructure systems including storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer. Sidewalks are also planned to be added toArden Avenue, West 52ndStreet, and Minnehaha Boulevard.
The estimated total project cost is $8,008,000.Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment,respective utilityfunds, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) funds.The estimated roadway cost is $2,465,000, and the estimated sanitary sewer service cost is $586,000.Both of these costswill be 100 percent funded by special assessments at a rate of $13,600per REU. Properties not receiving new sanitary sewer services will be assessed at a rate of $10,900perREU. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $4,468,000 and will be funded through respective utility funds.
The project can be completed during the 2015construction season. Due to the proximity with the 54th Street Project, we anticipate bidding the two projects together for potential economics of scale savings and construction coordination.
Staff and consultant believe the project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the infrastructure as initiated by Edina’s Vision 20/20 –“Livable Environment” and “A Sound Public Infrastructure” and also in the City’s Living Streets Policy and draftLiving StreetsPlan.
LOCATION:The projectareaincludes Bruce Avenue (Arden Ave to W 50th St), Bruce Place (Bruce Ave to end of Cul-De-Sac), Arden Avenue (W 52nd St to W 50thSt), Minnehaha Boulevard (W 54th St to W 52nd St), Jay Place (Cul-De-Sac to W 50th St), Juanita Avenue (W 52nd St to Indianola Ave), Indianola Avenue (W 52nd St to W 50th St), Alley (end of Alley to W 52nd St), Halifax Avenue (W 54th St to W 51st St), Gorgas Avenue (W 52nd St to Cul-De-Sac), West 52ndStreet (Arden Ave to France Ave). Figure 1isa detailed project location map of the Arden Park Neighborhood Roadway ImprovementProject.
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 1-Project LocationMap
INITIATION & ISSUES:The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s street reconstruction program and identified in the Capital Improvement Program. As part of the project the City collaborated with the MCWD to address Minnehaha creek water quality issues as they relate to the surface water runoff from this project area. This project addresses updating aging infrastructure issues associated with the pavement condition, storm water, sanitary sewer and watermain systems.
All Engineering projects arereviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan,the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, the Living Streets Policy, andthe Active Routes to SchoolsPlan.
Recall staff met with the Council on April 1, 2014 during a Council work session to discuss applying the principles of the Living Streets Policy and a possible partnership with the MCWD to this project. This project area has opportunities to apply both.
City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Sidewalk FacilitiesChapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalks facilities and funding options within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of AppendixH,there are proposed sidewalk facilitiesplannedwithin the project limitsalong
Page 2of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Minnehaha Boulevard, Arden Avenue, Indianola Avenue, Juanita Avenue, 51st Street and a portion of 52nd Street.
Recall at the August 19,2014 City Council meeting that weagreed to only consider additional sidewalks alongArden Avenue, West 52nd Street, Minnehaha Boulevard, and Indianola Avenue near West 50th Street.This was based on additional traffic volume data.
Bicycle FacilitiesChapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed bicycle facilities within the City as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Figure 7.11 of Appendix Hdoes not identify proposed bicycle routes within this neighborhood.
City of EdinaComprehensive Water Resource Management PlanThe project is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The 2011Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan indicates nopotential flood areasin the neighborhood.Further evaluation will be performedregarding drainage issues resulting from the questionnaires.
Living Streets Policy EvaluationThe vision statement of the Living Streets Policy, attached in Appendix K,expresses the need to look at projects differently in the future:
Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance
community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better
health.
The draft Living Streets Plan, attached in Appendix K,indicates the infrastructure that should be included when analyzing a roadway for reconstruction.
Sustainability in engineering projects means delivering our services in a manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the community, and funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. We look at sustainability as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, improving and shaping both the present and future of our community so that future generations are not burdened by the decisions of today.
The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and risks.
x Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the community?
Page 3of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
x Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment, includingsurface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise and others?
x Economy: How does the project influence the local economy?What are the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the price?
The following is a summary of this evaluation:
Equity: The project maintains access to the transportation network. Updates to the fire hydrants provide public safety staff the ease of connection needed during an emergency.
Environment: The project provides for an increase in the sediment control capacity of the storm sewer network and helps to control localized flooding. The project provides homeowners a piping system to discharge ground water into; this will eliminate standing water and/or icebuildup along the street curb lines. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work thus protecting the existing natural environment. The project also analyzes the sanitary sewer to ensure that inflow and infiltration of clear water is kept out of the sewersystem, which minimizes regional wastewater treatment.
Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into the future. The proposed roadway section can easily be maintained in the long term with the use of mill and overlays and/or seal coating operations. These maintenance operations will extend the life of the pavement. The project will also use less intense construction methods, such as trenchless technology; i.e., lining the pipes versus removing and replacing them.
This is a simplified analysis of the projects sustainability. In the future we anticipate correlating this analysis to an in-depth scoring system displaying the City’s sustainability to the community.
Staff IssuesThe following existing issues and/or featuresare addressed in this study:
x Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle safety
x Poor condition of existing pavement surface
x Storm water quality and drainage
x Existing landscaping, retaining walls and driveways
x Existing mature trees
x Existing landscaping and driveways
x Sanitary sewer and watermain condition; areas missing adequate water mains
x Existing residential roadway lighting
x Drainage and erosionalong the alley
Resident InputThe Engineering Department follows a practice of notifying residents two years prior to apotential reconstruction project.The residents of this Page 4of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
neighborhood were invited to an Open House on October 8, 2012to discuss the City’s process for street reconstruction.A copy of the presentation from this meeting is included in Appendix A.
Residents were then invited to another Open House on September 9, 2013 to discuss the City’s process for street reconstruction. A copy of the presentation from this meeting is included in Appendix A.
A residentquestionnaire was sent to the property owners on June 10, 2014.The questionnaireswere completed and returned by 99of the 285property owners, a return rate of 35%.
Aquestionnaire was also sent out on August 26, 2014, to residents adjacent to the existing alley to the south of West 52nd Street between Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue. The questionnaires were completed and returned by 19of the 23 residents. Both the full questionnaire and responses are included in Appendices B&E.
The first questionnaire included questions regarding history of the resident’s properties and public spaces such as the homeowners existing drainage service connection, and private underground utilities. The questionnaire then went onto ask questions about the existing street lights in the neighborhood, and Living Streets Elements such as pedestrian issues, natural resources, and traffic management in the neighborhood. The results from the questionnaireare shown in Table 1.
ARDEN PARKPROJECT –Results from June 10, 2014Questionnaire Sheet
Questionnaires Sent Questionnaires Returned
Change Existing Lighting Traffic Issues
YesNoYesNo28511229755849% of Returned Questionnaires 39%26%*67%*52%*44%*
*Percentages are based on responses of returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire.
Table 1 –Questionnaire Results
The alley questionnaire included questions regarding the condition of the alleyway to the south of West 52nd Street between Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue. The results from this questionnaire is shown in Table 2.
Page 5of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
ALLEY QUESTIONAIREResults from August 26, 2014 Questionnaire Sheet
Questionnaires Sent Questionnaires Returned
PreferredOption
1Repave Alley
2Repave and Add Onto Alley
3DoNothing
YesYesYes2319379% of Returned Questionnaires 83%16%37%47%
53%
*Percentages are based on responses of returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire.
Table 2–Alley Questionnaire Results
A neighborhood informational meeting was held on July 31, 2014to discuss improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by52residents representing 40properties.A copy of the presentation and public input from this meeting are includedinAppendixC.
Another neighborhood informational meeting was held on September 22, 2014 to discuss preliminary assessments and proposed utility improvements.The meeting was attended by 57residents representing 47properties. A copy of the presentation and public input from this meeting are included in Appendix F.
Staff InputA draft engineering report was provided to the public works, fire and police departments.
Public Works: The public works department commented on the,
Fire Department: The fire department had the following comments
Police Department:The police department commented on the …
EXISTING CONDITIONS:Public Utilities
Water Main and Sanitary SewerPipesWater main pipe material is cast iron andthe sanitary sewer pipe material is vitrified clay.The sanitary sewer lines and water mains were constructed in the early 1940’s.
The neighborhood is typically served by six-inch (6”) diameter water main pipes, except the southerly block of Halifax Ave which contains an eight-inch (8”) diameter watermain. Currently, no water main pipe exists along Minnehaha Boulevard and abutting properties receive their water from private wells.
Page 6of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Thevalves and fire hydrants along the water main pipe are operable, vary in age and lack the STORZ nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses.
No water main pipe breaks have been recorded in the neighborhood. In order to better understand the integrity of the water main system, it was acoustically tested during July 2014. The testing provided remaining pipe wall thickness data to help staff assess the condition of the pipes. Results of the tests are described in the proposed improvements section.
The majority of the neighborhood is served by nine-inch (9”) diameter clay sanitary sewer pipes, although the northerly end of Halifax Avenue is served by aneight-inch (8”) sanitary sewer clay pipe. A twenty-four inch (24”) sanitary sewer pipeencased in concrete, exists along the west side of the neighborhood from approximately West 52nd Street to West 54th Street.
Due to equipment issues with oursanitary sewer televising equipment, the conditions of the sanitary sewer pipes within the neighborhood areunknown. It is anticipated that the sanitary sewer pipeswill be lined with a cured-in-place pipe (CIPP)except portions of Arden Avenuethat were previously lined.We anticipate reviewing the CCTVprior to the final design of the project.
Water and Private Sanitary Sewer Service PipesWater service pipes within the neighborhood are copper pipes and vary in diameter.
Since 1988, there have beenforty-eight (48) City-owned water service pipe break and leak repairs.Nine (9) of the water service pipe repairs have occurred in the last five (5) years.Locations of the City-owned water service pipe repairs are shown in AppendixL.
Private sanitary sewer service pipes are likely 4-inch or 6-inch diameter clay pipes. Based on their age, the City should expect that cracks and separated joints have developed along these pipes similar to the mainpipe. These faults in the pipe facilitate tree root intrusion and the infiltration of clear ground water into the City’s sanitary sewer network.
Storm SewerThe storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The majority of the surface water for the neighborhood typically drains westerly to Minnehaha Creek vialongitudinal street slopes and concrete curb and gutters. From the gutters,the storm water drainsto a storm sewer system that beginsin the 50th Street and France Avenue area.From there, stormwaterdrains southward along Halifax Avenue then westward along West 52nd Street to Minnehaha Creek.
Based on a hydraulic modelof the existing storm sewer pipes in the neighborhood, most arecurrently large enough to convey storm water following smaller size storm events.However, the existing storm sewer
Page 7of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
system does not have capacity for large storm events as reaffirmed from notes from residents and City staff.This is illustrated in the blue shaded areas and highlightedcurb and gutters in Figure 2.
The modeling and input reflects an undersized storm sewer system. This usually causes localized flooding or surface discharges from storm sewer structures.However, it does not cause structural flooding in the area.
A portion of the storm sewer system between Jays Place and Indianola Avenue is located under Edina Covenant Church. The condition of those pipes is a concern of both City staff and the church.
Figure 2 –Surface Water Ponding/Flooding Areas
Thirty (30) propertyowners told us they operate sump pumps via returned questionnaires. The City’s GIS records indicate that 96 residents utilize sumppumps. They use these pumps to discharge ground water away from their homes. In most cases, their pumps discharge onto the ground water onto their yards or an adjacent street.
Private UtilitiesProviders of privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are either overhead or buried underground both within and outside the street ROW.
Results from the questionnaire indicate sixty (60)residents own and operate alawn irrigation system and ten (10) own and operate an underground pet containment system within the project boulevards.
Page 8of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
StreetsThe roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the 1940’s and have seen many repairs and upgrades since that time.As-builtconstruction plansare unavailable that wouldindicate which upgrades have been completed.The neighborhood’s existing streets are surfaced with bituminous pavement. Patches, overlays, and sections of alligator cracking are present at random locations throughout the project area as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3–Typical Pavement Condition
The streets vary in width between 24feet and 30feetwith existing concrete curb and gutterand parking on both sides of the streets.The majority of the streets are 30 feet wide.The concrete curb and gutter is inpoor condition. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood and it is in generally poor conditionlikely due to its age.
The existing geometry of the intersection at Halifax Avenue and 51st Street creates a long radius curb line on the north side of the intersection that allows southbound vehicles on 51st Street that turn right onto Halifax Avenue to comfortably maneuver through the intersection at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. Oftentimes, this results in vehicles crossing over the centerline and entering the northbound lane on Halifax Avenue. The existing geometry of this intersection is shown in Figure 4.
Page 9of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 4-Halifax Avenue South and West 51st Street
The existing geometry of the intersection at Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place createslarge surface areasof pavementandintersection corners with long radius curb-lines.This existing geometry allowsvehicles to comfortably maneuver through the intersection at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. This situation can lead to diminishedpedestrian crossing safety and requires additional city resources during snow removal operations. The existing geometric configuration of the intersection is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5-Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place
The existing geometry of the cul-de-sacs for Bruce Avenue and Gorgas Avenue are larger than necessary.
AlleyApublic right-of-way alley for access to homes along both Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue exists from West 52nd Street to West 54thStreetas shown in Figure 6. The alley is improved with bituminous pavement for approximately the north 420feet or from 5224 Halifax Avenue to West 52nd Street. A portion of the alley adjacent to 5228, 5232, and 5236 Halifax
Page 10of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Avenue consists of a gravelsurface. The portion of the alley from 5236Halifax Avenue to 5332Halifax Avenueis unimproved. Currently, City public works staff maintains the gravel portion of the alley approximately 3-4 times per year.
Figure 6-Alley south of W 52nd St between Minnehaha Blvd and Halifax Ave.
As part of this study, 14soil borings were taken in the project area. The borings identified a3¾ inch to 7-inch thick bituminous pavement with a7-inch to 20-inchthick layer of sand with traces of gravelbeneath the street pavements.Even thoughthe pavement is in poor condition, thepresence of this aggregate base layerprovides a stable foundation beneath thestreet surface.
The average pavement condition index (PCI) for the City of Edina is 57and the average PCI for Arden Park as projected for 2014is 17.
The City of Edina hasa consultant systematically evaluate all bituminous roadways within the City. The streets aregraded based on a number of conditions such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling and potholes. Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100with 0 beingextremely poor and 100 representing a brand new road surface. The City evaluates the PCI values of streets to determine a proper maintenance program. Streets with a
Page 11of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
PCI less than 45 are evaluated for total reconstruction, PCI’s between 45 and 65 are evaluated for mill and overlays, and PCI’s greater than 65 are considered for seal coats.
Street grades vary throughout the area from approximately 0.5percent to 8percent.
The pavement surface throughout these streets appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement is no longer feasible.
There are approximately sixteen (16)driveways featuring brick paver block edging in the project area. Figure 7depictsa driveway withbrick paver block edging found in the project area.
Figure 7-Paver Edge Driveway
Residential Lighting Street lighting in the project area consists of combination of City owned and Xcel Energy owned street lightsas shown in AppendixJ. The City owned street lights are a combination of Acorn and Cobra style lightswith direct bury cable.Xcel Energy street lights are Cobra cut-off style lights and are mostly located at intersections throughout the neighborhood. A cut-off style street light is a street light that does not project or reflect light upward and meets standards set by the Dark Sky Association.
Traffic and Crash DataCity staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at ten locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes ranged from 120to 1,170cars per day with 85th percentile speed ranging from 25.0 to 32.0mph. The traffic and crash datais shown in AppendixI.
LandscapingThe majority of property owners have vegetation in the ROW. Many of these landscape items are located directly behind the curb or around existing fire hydrants. Some of these landscape items will need to be removed in order to
Page 12of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
complete the necessary reconstruction work.Figure 8shows a typical landscaping feature found in the project’s ROW.
Figure 8–Landscaping Within ROW
PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS:This project involves reconstruction of existing roadways including bituminous pavement,existingcurb and guttersand portions of any poor subgrade soils.The project also includes upgrading existing infrastructure including the storm drainage system, water system, and sanitary sewer system. Upgrades to the storm sewer also include connecting sump pump drain pipes as needed.Upgrades to the water system also include the addition of a water main pipe along Minnehaha Boulevard between 54th Street and 52nd Street.
Public UtilitiesThe scope of the water main, sanitary and storm sewer reconstruction should meet the following parameters:
x Protect boulevard trees.
x Provide continuous sewer and water service to residents.
x Maintain pedestrian and vehicle access in the neighborhood during construction.
x Reconstruct private sanitary sewer service pipes betweenthe City-owned sanitary sewer pipe and ROW line.
x Encourage property owners to reconstruct their private sanitary sewer service pipe between the ROW line and their homes prior to construction.
x Reconstruct the City-owned waterservice pipe between the watermain pipes and curb stop box within the City’s ROW. Reconstruction should also include replacing all of the curb stops.
x Encourage property owners to reconstruct their private water main service pipes between the curb stop and their homes.
Water Main andSanitary Sewer PipesBased on the results of the pipe integrity testing, segments of the existing watermain pipe are in satisfactorycondition and will not be upgradedincluding onArden Avenue,Juanita Avenue, Indianola Avenue, Gorgas
Page 13of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Avenue, and West 52nd Street. The existing water mainpipesalong Bruce Avenue, Bruce Lane, and Halifax Avenue will be replaced using the pipe bursting method. New water mainpipeswill be installed where they do not exist today along Minnehaha Boulevard.Drawing 1in AppendixMshows the locations of the existing pipes to remain and the proposed pipe burstingreconstruction methods to be utilized.
Anew water main pipe will be placed along Minnehaha Boulevard, which will help the overall redundancy of the distribution system, while providing optional service to homes that currently are not connected to the City system.We heard from some residents that the new watermain should be located in the alley instead of Minnehaha Boulevard. After review, it was determined this was not a viable option because it would not provide watermain to all the affected properties and the cost would be substantially higher due to the limited working area within the alley.
The project will replace all of the existing fire hydrants with new City standard hydrants and will replace all existing gate valves. New hydrants will also be added in locations where the distance between the existing hydrants exceeds the recommended 350-foot spacing.
All of the proposed improvements to the water main system will optimize water flow for firefightingand improve water quality.
During improvements tothe water main pipenetwork, residents will have continuous water service.If necessary, temporary water main and service pipes will be placedon the ground along the boulevards and front yards of the neighborhood. These temporary pipes are connected to sections of the existing water main. Continuous water service is provided to each home via its outside garden hose spigot.The contractor will need access into each affected home tomake a proper temporary water main connection.
The project will reconstruct the sanitary sewer pipes using a trenchless reconstruction method called cured in place pipe lining.Spot repairs will be made to the sanitary sewer pipes that have sagged, cracked or where offset joints occur. The City’s CCTVinspections will provide the exact locations of these repairs. Wherever necessary, the repairs will be completed using open cut repair methods. In sensitive locations, repairs will be completed using trenchless repair methods.
Approximately 60% of the sanitary sewer manholes are constructed with brick or concrete block.All of the brick / block manholes will be will be lined with cement mortar.Allsanitary manholes will have castings and adjustment rings replaced.
Sanitary Sewer Service and Water Service PipesAlong with upgrading the street, the City also plans to upgrade the publicly owned water service pipes and privately ownedsanitary sewerservicepipes within the right-of-way. Upgrading these pipes will ensure that the water and sanitary sewer services will be safe and reliable for the foreseeable future.
Page 14of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Besides helping to keep safeandreliable sanitary sewer and water serviceuse, upgrading all of the private and public underground utility lines helps ensure that the new street will stay in good condition by decreasing the chances that the street will need to be disturbedin order to repair old or leaking underground utilities.
Property owners will be allowed to have the cost of any private sanitary sewer service or water service upgrades financed through the City’s special assessment financing system. Staff will provide the interested property owners with information on how to proceed with this option.
Sanitary Sewer ServicePipes:Because the City is upgrading the publicly owned pipes and the roadway above these pipes, we will require that property owners upgrade the privately owned sanitary sewer service line shown as segment “C” below.Both segments “C & D” are privately owned. The only exception will be for properties whose pipes have been upgraded in the past 15 years.
Figure 9–Typical Section Showing Sanitary Sewer Service
A property owner will have two options to upgrade their sanitary sewer service pipe:
1.They may hire their own private contractor to do the upgrading work. This option allows the property owner to choose their own contractor and finance the cost of the work at their discretion. 2.They may have the City’s contractor do the upgrading work. The City’s contractor will replace the segment of private sanitary sewer service pipeshown as segment “C”above for a flat cost of $2,700.
Water Service Pipes:The City will also be upgrading the publicly owned portion of the water service shown as segments “A & E”below.There will be no special assessment for this work.
SEGMENTOWNERSHIP CProperty Owner DProperty Owner GCity
Page 15of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 10–Typical Section Showing Water Service
Storm SewerAll of the concrete curb and gutter in the neighborhood will be replaced. Tobegin to address some of the storm sewer capacity issues, infiltration areas are proposed to be installed along Jay Place (pervious paver system) and the northerly block of Halifax Avenue (infiltration pipe), see Figure 11.
Figure 11-Storm Sewer Infiltration Areas
Theexisting storm sewer system will be upgraded with additional inlets and pipesas shown in Figure 12.These upgrades willaddress localized flooding within the neighborhoodand improve surface flow.
SEGMENTOWNERSHIP BProperty Owner ACity ECity FCity
Page 16of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 12-Storm Sewer System Improvements.
Staff recommends re-routing the storm sewer pipes that are located under Edina Covenant Church through their driveway and parking lot. The pipes under the church will be filled with a flowable fill material and abandoned in place. The church has agreed to provide the necessary easements over the new alignment of the storm sewer pipes for future maintenance purposes.
Installation of sump drains will be installed where feasibleto allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system.
Private UtilitiesCenterPoint Energy has indicated they willupgrade a portion of their system within the project limits. The upgrade areas include a new gas main and services along Gorgas Avenue and Halifax Avenue from W 54th St to W 52ndSt and also a new gas main along W 52nd St from Minnehaha Blvd to Indianola Ave. This work is not part of the City’s project but will be coordinated to occur prior to the start ofconstruction.
The City will coordinate other private utility relocations or upgrades prior to the start of construction.
Page 17of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Any damage to privately-owned pet containment and irrigation systems caused by City reconstruction activities will be repaired by the City.
Streetsand SidewalksTypical street, sidewalk and boulevard widths are discussed in the draft Living Streets Plan. We began our discussions withthe neighborhood using those standards applied to the context of this neighborhood. The location and size of the sidewalks drove the widths of the streets, sidewalks, and boulevardsand the location of parking.
The location of the existing boulevard trees influenced the initial design of the sidewalks to a 5-ft wide sidewalk with a 1-ft exposed aggregate concrete strip on the back of curb. This is not our preferred option. Residents had concerns about the aesthetics of that type of facility. Considering that the existing sidewalk facilities within the neighborhood are 4-ft wide, we are able to provide a more aesthetically pleasing facility using a 3-ft wide boulevard and a 4-ft wide sidewalk.
Per the draft Living Streets Plan, streets with sidewalks have a typical street width of 24-ft with parking on only the sidewalk side. Streets without sidewalks have a width of 27-ft with parking only on one side. The implementation of parking on only one side of the street begins to consider the amount of parking needed along a residential street and the space available for pedestrians.
The proposed widths of these streets along with any additions of sidewalks areshown in Table 3.
Street Street Width Face to Face of Curb(feet)
Boulevard Width(feet)
Sidewalk On one side(feet)
Arden Ave2434–east side
W 52nd St –west of Alley(1)2414–south sideW 52nd St –east of Alleyto Halifax Ave S(1)2434–south side
Minnehaha Blvd–south half(2)2408–west side
Minnehaha Blvd –north half(2,3)27varies8–west side
Gorgas Ave, Indianola Avesouth of 5016, Juanita Ave, Bruce Ave 27No Sidewalks No Sidewalks
Indianola Ave north of 50202755–west side
Halifax Ave24Varies 4–existing east side(1)Alley is located between Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue(2)Parking on west sideonly(3)Street width allows parking on both sides if future demand warrants
Page 18of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Table 3 –Proposed Street Widths and Sidewalks.
The typical proposed streetsection for Arden Avenue and West 52nd Streetis shown in Figure 13:
Figure 13-Proposed StreetSection for Arden Avenue and West 52nd Street
The project will recycle all the existing bituminous street pavement on-site.Theexisting bituminous will be mixedtogether with the existing aggregate base course below itand then reincorporated into the project to replace poor subgrade soils,utility trench backfillor street aggregate.
To enhance pedestrian safety within the neighborhood crosswalks are proposed to be added to the 52nd Street intersections of Halifax Avenue andMinnehaha Boulevard.
The proposed geometry ofthe intersections of Halifax Avenue withWest 51stStreet and Bruce Avenue withBruce Place are shown in Figures14and 15.The outside curb locations of the intersection of Bruce Avenue with Bruce Place will be retained due to the need to retain the existing island. A 6-foot wide island is proposed in the intersectionWest 51st Street and Halifax Avenue to control vehicle turning movements forcing motorists to reduce speeds and travel in the appropriate lane when turning into the neighborhood.
Revisions are proposed to the cul-de-sac geometrics at Bruce Avenue and Gorgas Avenue as shown in Figures 16 and 17. These improvements will help reduce the overall impervious surface of the project.
Page 19of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 14-Halifax Avenue South and West 51st Street
Figure 15-Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place
Figure16-Bruce Avenue Cul-de-sac
Page 20of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Figure 17-Gorgas Avenue Cul-de-sacAlleyDue to storm water ponding and gravel erosion, the alley between Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue is proposed to have the gravel area paved with bituminous shown as Option 2 in Figure 18.The existing storm water structure between 5217 and 5221 Minnehaha Blvd in the alley will also be adjusted to allow for better drainage. The improvements are storm water related and not to the scale staff originally had in mind with the initial questionnaire. Therefore they will not be assessed to the residents.
Figure18-Proposed Alley Improvements
Page 21of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
The proposed improvementsacknowledgemany of the comments and concerns raised by residents and staff throughout the information gathering process while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the engineering and public works staff.
Residential Lighting The original questionnaire was sent out askingif residents wanted to upgrade the street lights in the project area. The results from Table 1 show that property owners do not want to upgradethe street lightsystem.Since the questionnaire was sent out, City staff has reviewed the condition of the existing City-ownedlights. They were found to be at the end of their serviceable life and included direct bury cable. The City-owned lighting system willreplaced with the project. No additional lights are proposed.An additional questionnaire was sent out to residents asking about the preferred styleof light. The results of the questionnaire can be foundin Appendix X. Questionnaire will be sent after ETC meeting.
RIGHT-OF-WAY& EASEMENTS:Existing right-of-ways (ROWs) in the neighborhood varies from 20feet to 60feet wide. A 20-foot ROW exists for the alley between Halifax Avenue and Minnehaha Boulevard. A25-foot ROW existsfor Jay Place.50-foot ROWs exist for Bruce Avenue, Bruce Lane, Juanita Avenue, Indianola Avenue,ArdenAvenueandHalifax Avenue.60-foot ROWs exist for Gorgas Avenueand Minnehaha Avenue.No additional right-of-way or easementacquisitionsare anticipated in order to complete the proposed improvementsexcept for the storm sewer improvements at Edina Covenant Church. They are willing to donate the required easements necessary for future maintenance
CITY COUNCIL VOTING:The Public Hearing will contain two separate motions for voting on the project improvements. Per State statute, the assessment portion of the project requires a super majority approval from council (4:1). The PACSfunded components requires a simple majority approval from council (3:2).
PROJECT COSTS:The estimated total projectcost is $8,008,000. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment, utility, Minnehaha Creek Watershed DistrictandPACSfunds. The estimated roadway cost is $2,465,000, the estimated sanitary sewer service cost is $586,000and the estimated lighting cost is $101,000.All ofthese costs will be 100 percent funded by special assessments at a rate of $13,600per REU. Properties not receiving new sanitary sewer services will be assessed at a rate of $10,900per REU.
Utility improvements and repairs amount to $4,468,000and will be funded through respective utility funds.Storm water treatment costs will be paid for by MCWD funds in an amount of $164,000(preliminary, not officially approved).Any pedestrian safety enhancement such as crosswalks andsidewalks will be funded through the PACSFund in an amount of $224,000.
The total estimated project cost is $8,008,000 (2014Dollars). The estimated project costsare summarized in Table 4.
Page 22of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
ITEMESTIMATED COST 2 MCWD3CITYRESIDENTSSanitary Sewer Pipe $1,735,000Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Between the Pipe and the Right-Of-Way Line1
$586,000
Water Main Pipe and Service Pipe Up To and Including Curb Stop Box $1,520,000
Storm Sewer$1,213,000 Storm Water Treatment$164,000Street Reconstruction1 $2,465,000Lighting System1 $101,000PACS $ 224,000Sub-total$4,692,000 $3,152,000 $164,000Total$8,008,000
1 Cost to be assessed to residents2Costs are given in 2014dollars3Preliminary, not officially approved
Table 4-Summary of Total Estimated Project Cost
ASSESSMENTS:The assessments are based on the City’s Special assessment policy, dated August 21, 2012.
An estimated special assessment rate of approximately $13,600(2014Dollars) per residential equivalent unit (REU) is proposed to be levied against property owners in the project areawho receive benefit from theproposed street and lighting improvements and have a sanitary sewer service connection in the City’s ROW. There are 217REU’s in the project areathat qualify for this assessment rate.The remaining 19.42REU’s in the project area with no sanitary sewer service connection in the City’s ROW will beexempt from the sanitary sewer service assessment.The estimated total assessment rate is summarized in Table 5.
ITEM ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 1 NUMBER OF REU’SStreet Reconstruction $10,500238.42Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Between the Pipe and the Right-Of-Way Line $2,700217
Lighting$400238.42Total$13,600
1 Assessment rate is given in 2014dollars
Table 5-Summary of Total Estimated AssessmentRatesper REU
Drawing 2in Appendix Msummarizes the application of the estimated assessment rates. City-owned well #3 is located within the neighborhoodon
Page 23of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
Halifax Avenue. Due to the permanent need for this facility, no levied assessment is planned for that parcel.
The methodology for calculating the REUs for City owned property along the west side of Minnehaha Boulevard is described as follows:
Park Property:
5230/5363Minnehaha Blvd-Arden Park:
5REUs = Layout of park property with similar size buildable lots in the neighborhood.
The methodologies for calculating other assessments that are notequal to 1 REU are as follows:
Church Property:
Edina Covenant Church -4201 50th St W
5 REU’s=(18,001 sf / 1,000 sf) x(0.8 REU’s per 1,000 sf) = 14 REUx (1/3 side yard),
Residential Corner Lots:
5336 and 5337 Halifax Ave and 5333 Minnehaha Blvd: 0.67 REU’s = (1 REU) x (2/3 side yard)
5132 France Ave: 0.33 REU’s = (1 REU) x (1/3 side yard)
Commercial Property:
4213-15 50th St W (2 unitduplex):0.50 REU’s = (0.8 REU’s per duplex unit) x (2 units) x (1/3 side yard)
4121 50th St W(10 units):0.17 REU’s per unit = (0.50 REU’s per apartment unit)x(1/3 corner lot)
4075 51st St W(44 units):0.17 REU’sper unit =(0.50REU’sper apartmentunit)x(1/3corner lot)
5200 France Ave(20 units):0.17 REU’s per unit=(0.50 REU’s per apartment unit) x (1/3 corner lot)
The City will consider deducting that portion of the assessment for the sanitary sewer service pipe repair if the resident:
x Reconstructs their own private sanitary sewer service pipe between the sanitary sewer main and the ROW using their own contractor or
x Has reconstructedtheir sanitary sewer service pipe between at least the sanitary sewer mainand ROW line with PVC pipe or by use of trenchless methods in the last 15 years.
A copy of the preliminary assessment roll is included in AppendixG.
Page 24of 25
EngineeringStudy Arden Park Neighborhood Improvement No. BA-412October 15, 2014
PROJECT SCHEDULE:The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
FEASIBILITY:Staffand consultant believes the construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the public infrastructure in the Arden Park Neighborhood.
APPENDIX:A.2012 and 2013 Open House PresentationB.Property Owners Questionnaire and ResultsC.July 31, 2014 Informational Meeting Presentation and InputD.City Council Decision on Indianola and Juanita SidewalksE.Property Owners Questionnaire Results(Alleyway)F.September 22, 2014 Informational Meeting Presentation and InputG.PreliminaryAssessment RollH.City Comprehensive Plan UpdateI.Traffic and Crash DataJ.Existing Street Lights and SignsK.Living Streets Policyand draft Living Streets PlanL.2015 Water Main and Service BreaksM.Appendix DrawingsDrawing 1 –Proposed Water Main MapDrawing 2 –Preliminary Assessment Map
Project Open House 2012October 8, 2012
Project Open House 2013September 9, 2013
Neighborhood Informational MeetingJuly 31, 2014
Neighborhood Informational MeetingSeptember 22, 2014
Edina Park Board October 6, 2014
Edina Transportation Commission MeetingOctober 23, 2014
Receive Feasibility Report and Public HearingDecember9,2014
Bid Opening(bid with West 54th Street Project)March/April 2015
Award ContractSpring 2015
Begin ConstructionSpring 2015
Complete ConstructionFall 2015
Final Assessment HearingFall 2016
Page 25of 25
APPENDIXA
2012OpenHouse
2013OpenHouse
www.EdinaMN.gov
Anticipated 2014 & 2015
Neighborhood Roadway
Reconstruction Projects
Open House Meeting
October 8, 2012
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions
•Timeline
•Project Components
•Funding
•What You Can Expect
•Communication
•How to Prepare
•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
Engineering Technicians: Eng. Coordinator
Jamie CynorAaron KuzniaJeff FrahmJeff BuffieSharon Allison
Environmental Eng.Asst. City EngineerDirector of Engineering
Ross BintnerChad MillnerWayne Houle
www.EdinaMN.gov
Clover Lane Addition
Edina Terrace
Hawkes Addition
Morningside
Walnut Ridge
Anticipated 2014 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Edina Highlands Lakeside
Glen View Addition
Holands
Hyde Park
Anticipated 2015 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Timeline
August/SeptemberFeasibility report and estimates
provided
December/January Public hearing
January-MarchPlan preparation and bidding
April/MayConstruction begins
October/November Construction concludes
SpringWarranty work
Summer/FallFinal assessment hearing
www.EdinaMN.gov
Why My Street?
•Streets that meet specific standards are subject to
reconstruction.
•Priority is given to streets with the highest need based on
watermainbreaks, sanitary sewer deficiencies, storm
sewer/drainage issues, and Pavement Condition Index.
•Reconstruction is usually more cost-effective in the long-term
than patching or seal-coating.
•Streets are grouped together to help maximize the economics
of scale for construction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
What is Included?
•Always included:
–Roadway –replacing the entire roadbed
–Curb and gutter –all or pieces
–Utility upgrades
•Sometimes included:
–Sump pump drainage system
–Sidewalks
–Streetlights
–Traffic management
•Full project scope is based on the condition of the
infrastructure and resident questionnaire responses
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Utility Improvements
•New fire hydrants and gate valves
•Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement
•Storm sewer upgrades
–Sump pump drain pipe in various locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Roadway Improvements
•Curb and gutter
•New roadbed and pavement surface
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Roadway Improvements
•Spot driveway end replacement
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projects are funded by a combination of special assessments to
residents and the City’s Utility Fund
•Assessments are assigned to adjacent properties that stand to
benefit from construction improvements
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Special assessments to residents cover 100 percent ofroadway
costs.
•Sidewalks and streetlights are not included in special
assessments.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•The Utility Fund is a collection of utility service charges paid to
the City
•Utility Fund covers 100 percent of:
–Concrete curb and gutter
–Sanitary sewer
–Storm sewer
–Water main
–Sump pump pipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Other Impacts
•Our goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood
disturbance.
•The City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric,
telephone and cable TV) to upgrade or repair utilities along the
project area.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Do Taxes Cover Street Projects?
•Roughly 20 percent of your property taxes go to the City for
expenses such as Police, Fire, Parks and Public Works
(snowplowing, pothole repairs, sealcoating, and other street
maintenance).
•Your taxes do not pay for street reconstruction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Payment Options
•You will be billed for the assessment one year after project
completion
•Assessments are payable over 15 years
•Payment options:
1.Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance
charges
2.Pay 25 percent; balance rolls to property taxes
3.Roll entire amount to property taxes
4.Defer payment if 65 years old or older
www.EdinaMN.gov
•We will keep you informed.
•You will have opportunities to provide input.
•Private utility work is to be completed before City work.
•We will do our best to minimize inconveniences, but
construction does not come without pain points.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust, noise and mud.
•Localized ponding during
rainfall.
•Timelines sometimes delayed
due to weather.
•You may be asked to limit water
use.
•Your home may be connected to
a temporary water line.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Your driveway may be
inaccessible for up to seven
days.
•Roadways to your home may be
periodically inaccessible.
•The contractor will
accommodate special access
needs.
•Irrigation and pet containment
systems may be damaged.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
Property Impacts
•Items located within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged
–Private utilities will be repaired if you notify us of them.
–You can remove plantings and other landscape features
before the project.
–The City will seed or sod in the right-of-way after the
project is complete.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Providing Input
•Public hearings and questionnaire mailed to your home
•Weigh in on:
–Sump pump drainage options
–Are there traffic issues in your neighborhood?
–Are there drainage issues in your neighborhood?
–Pet fences and irrigation systems
–Any other concerns?
www.EdinaMN.gov
Communication Tools
•Become a neighborhood captain to help facilitate project
communication.
–Let us know of someone in your neighborhood who might
fit this role.
•You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, schedules and
questionnaires via regular mail.
•Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun-Current.
•Door hangers are hung when there is time-sensitive
information.
•Final assessment notices are mailed one year after construction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Extra
“City Extra” emails are the best way to receive regular updates
once construction begins. These are free weekly email updates
about your project.
•Sign up on City of Edina website, www.EdinaMN.gov.
–Check the box next to your project name.
•If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates
upon request.
www.EdinaMN.gov
How to Prepare
•Begin financial planning
•Complete questionnaire
•Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around the
street construction timeline
•Ask questions; stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
Contact Us
Email: mail@edinamn.gov
Call: 952-826-0371
Visit:Engineering Department
7450 Metro Blvd.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thanks for your time!
Questions?
www.EdinaMN.gov
Anticipated 2015 & 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Projects
Open House Meeting
September 9, 2013
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions•Timeline•Project Components•Funding•What You Can Expect•Communication•How to Prepare•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
Engineering Technicians: Eng. CoordinatorJamie CynorAaron KuzniaJeff Frahm Sharon Allison
Environmental Transportation Assistant City Director of Engineer Planner Engineer EngineeringRoss Bintner Mark NolanChad Millner Wayne Houle
www.EdinaMN.gov
Arden Park DCountryside FProspect Knolls BDewey Hills G
Anticipated 2015 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
ParkwoodKnolls BGolf Terrace BStrachauerPark A
Anticipated 2016 Projects
www.EdinaMN.gov
Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Timeline
July/AugustFeasibility report and estimates providedDecember/January Public hearingJanuary-MarchPlan preparation and biddingApril/MayConstruction beginsOctober/November Construction concludesSpringWarranty workSummer/FallFinal assessment hearing
www.EdinaMN.gov
Why My Street?
•Streets that meet specific standards are subject to reconstruction.•Priority is given to streets with the highest need based on watermainbreaks, sanitary sewer deficiencies, storm sewer/drainage issues, and Pavement Condition Index.•Reconstruction is usually more cost-effective in the long-term than patching or seal-coating. •Streets are grouped together to help prolong pavement life and maximize the economics of scale for construction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
What is Included?
•Always included:–Roadway –replacing the entire roadbed–Curb and gutter –all or pieces–Utility upgrades•Sometimes included:–Sump pump drainage system–Sidewalks–Streetlights–Traffic management•Full project scope is based onthe condition of the infrastructure and resident questionnaire responses
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Utility Improvements
•New fire hydrants and gate valves
•Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement
•Storm sewer upgrades
–Sump pump drain pipe in various locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Roadway Improvements
•Spot replacement of curb and gutter•New roadbed and pavement surface
www.EdinaMN.gov
Typical Roadway Improvements
•Spot driveway end replacement
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projects are funded by a combination of special assessments to residents and the City’s Utility Fund•Assessments are assigned to adjacent properties that stand to benefit from construction improvements
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Special assessments to residents cover 100 percent ofroadway costs.•Sidewalks are not included in special assessments.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•The Utility Fund is a collection of utility service charges paid to the City
•Utility Fund covers 100 percent of: –Concrete curb and gutter–Sanitary sewer–Storm sewer–Water main–Sump pump pipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Other Impacts
•Our goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance.•The City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric, telephone and cable TV) to upgrade or repair utilities along the project area.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Do Taxes Cover Street Projects?
•Roughly 20 percent of your property taxes go to the City for expenses such as Police,Fire,Parks and Public Works (snowplowing, pothole repairs, sealcoating, and other street maintenance). •Your taxes do not pay for street reconstruction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Payment Options
•You will be billed for the assessment one year after project completion•Assessments are payable over 15 years•Payment options:1.Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges2.Pay 25 percent; balance rolls to property taxes3.Roll entire amount to property taxes4.Defer payment if 65 years old or older
www.EdinaMN.gov
•We will keep you informed.•You will have opportunities to provide input.•Private utility work is to be completed before City work.•We will do our best to minimize inconveniences, but construction does not come without pain points.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust,noise, vibrations, and mud.•Localized ponding during rainfall.•Timelines sometimes delayed due to weather.•You may be asked to limit water use.•Your home may be connected to a temporary water line.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Your driveway may be inaccessible for 3-5 days.•Roadways to your home may be periodically inaccessible.•The contractor will accommodate special access needs.•Irrigation and pet containment systems mostly likely will be damaged.
What You Can Expect
www.EdinaMN.gov
Property Impacts
•Items located within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged–Irrigation and pet containment systems will be repaired.–You can remove plantings and other landscape features before the project.–The City will seed in the right-of-way after the project is complete.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Providing Input
•Public hearings and questionnaire mailed to your home•Weigh in on:–Sump pump drainage options–Are there traffic or drainage issues in your neighborhood?
www.EdinaMN.gov
Communication Tools
•Become a neighborhood captain to help facilitate project communication.–Let us know of someone in your neighborhood who might fit this role.•You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, schedules and questionnaires via regular mail. •Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun-
Current.•Door hangers are hung when there is time-sensitive information.•Final assessment notices are mailed one year after construction.
www.EdinaMN.gov
City Extra
“City Extra” emails are the best way to receive regular updates once construction begins. These are free weekly email updates about your project.•Sign up on City of Edina website, www.EdinaMN.gov.–Check the box next to your project name.•If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request.•It’s the best way to stay informed.
www.EdinaMN.gov
How to Prepare
•Sign up for City Extra•Begin financial planning•Complete questionnaire•Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around the street construction timeline•Ask questions; stay informed
www.EdinaMN.gov
Contact Us
Email: mail@edinamn.govCall: 952-826-0371Visit:Engineering Department7450Metro Blvd.
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thanks for your time!
Questions?
APPENDIXB
Questionnaire
June 10, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Arden Park D Neighborhood
Dear Resident:
Streets in your neighborhood are on a list of roadway reconstruction and utility improvement projects
being considered by the City of Edina for the summer of 2015. See the attached map identifying your
project area. On April 16, 2013, the City Council adopted neighborhood names and boundaries as
part of the Name Your Neighborhood Project. Please note that your neighborhood name associated
with the roadway reconstruction and utility improvements may have changed. Some neighborhood
names stayed the same.
In the meantime, we’d like to hear from you. The City would like your input regarding key
components of the project via the attached questionnaire. Please read the instructions, fill out the
questionnaire and return it to us in the enclosed envelope by June 20.
How the City will use your input:
x Your responses help us design the project. Components of a project vary and are based on both
the condition of the infrastructure and questionnaire responses. One new component that staff is
considering for your neighborhood is incorporating elements of the City’s Living Streets Policy.
The draft plan guides the City in designing safe streets that balances the needs of drivers,
pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance
community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide
meaningful opportunities for active living and better health.
x Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. The
estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until information is
gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed in early September. You will
not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2016. The special assessment is payable over 15
years.
x The special assessment is for the cost of the new roadway. If the neighborhood feels the street
lighting needs are not being met and improvements are needed, the costs would also be a special
assessment. Sidewalks are funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund and thus are not
assessed to property owners. The questionnaire helps us evaluate the need for these items. Other
utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are
funded through the utility fund and are not assessed to property owners.
After we review questionnaire responses, we will continue the project design process. We will present
the feasibility report at the public hearing in December. Construction will begin in spring/early
summer and end in late fall of 2015.
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
June 10, 2014
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions, please contact SEH Project Manager Toby Muse at 952-912-2616 or
tmuse@sehinc.com or Director of Engineering Chad Millner at 952-826-0318 or
cmillner@EdinaMN.gov.
Sincerely,
Chad A. Millner, PE
Director of Engineering
Enc: Project Map, Questionnaire Instructions, Questionnaire, Return Envelope
5300
5209
5205
3909-15
5230
5333
3945
4075
6
4400
5330
3928-3948
5015
4
50
0
0
5030
5
5321
7
5026
51
00
5024
5019
8
5119
5209
5120
5036
5028
5301
13
4401
5200
5313
4421
5117
4100
5038
5114
5116
1
5008
5006
5027
5213
5336
5010
5332
5241
5217
5328
5324
5312
5316
4121
3904-22
5221
5036
5320
5400
50
0
0
-
2
8
5013
5328
5200
5004
5201
5308
5036
5304
5023
5300
5021
5228
5040
5217
4913
5336
39
2
4
5400
5104
49
3
3
5006
5400
5341
5300
5316
5125
5228
5124
5116
5312
5101
5311
5236
5328
5013
5232
5012
5205
5236
5224
5240
5204
5113
5328
5212
5115
5200
5309
5354
5208
5216
5201
5220
5225
4910
5305
5101
44
3
1 5117
3917-43
5225
5221
5233
4919
5229
50
3
4
1
50
3
2
44
2
5
5229
44
2
9
5000
5317
5329
5325
5109
5002
5017
5021
5321
5313
5221
5016
5333
5337
5016
5100
5225
5211
5111
5241
5032
5309
42
1
3
-
15
5107
5025
5301
5305
5028
5241
5105
4201
5028
4917
502
7
5029
5001
5110
42
0
1
5401
5003
5121
5005
4919
5233
5237
5029
5112
5103
5
5125
5033
4207
5007
5101
5044 5100
5128
5109
5120
5232
5003
5129
5000
5125
5109
5009
5115
5124
5018
5108
5
0
2
2
5
0
2
0
4915
5001
5036
5105
5101
42
0
9
-
1
1
51135112
5022
5201
5401
5032
5011
5004
5116
5005
5037
5002
5101
5337
5401
5130
5332
5007
5324
5307
5008
5301
5020
5400
5320
5100
5228
53085308
5325
5220
5304
5324
5015
5337
5117
5316
5108
5104
5331
5304
5300
5324
5105
5349
5224
5109
5104
5305
5351
5216
5120
5212
5224
5300
5308
5232
5124
5304
5121
5217
5116
5346
5120
52405236
5228
5325
5320
5357
5336
5117
5113
5331
5133
5112
5128
5301
5351
5312
5133
51175108
5132
5313
5232
5216
5112
5128
5232
5114
5108
5319
5343
42
0
0
52
2
7
4928
5113
5109
5116
5104
5318
5133
5220
5018
5100
5129
5013
5236
5336
5105
5017
5348
5124
5129
4936
5125
5120
5023
5011
5128
4932
4920
5121
4914
4924
5136
5009
51365137
522
4
4929
5024
5010
5017
5132
4911
5132
5021
5105
5129
5019
5112
5016
5014
5012
5117
4914
5015
4925
5137
5019
4916
5200
5121
5050
4912
5116
5034
5354
4908
5137
49
2
6
-
5
4
5020
5233
7
39
0
1
-
0
7
3908
4050
5332
3915
52
0
0
5025
PROJECT LIMITS
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
H
A
L
I
F
A
X
A
V
E
W 50TH ST
MI
N
N
E
H
A
H
A
B
L
V
D
AR
D
E
N
A
V
E
W 54TH ST
B
R
U
C
E
A
V
E
W 52ND ST
BRUCE AVE
BRUCE P
L
GO
R
G
A
S
A
V
E
W 51ST ST
IN
D
I
A
N
O
L
A
A
V
E
JU
A
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
JA
Y
P
L
/
Engineering DeptJune, 2013
2015 Project AreaArden Park D Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-412C
I
T
Y
OF
E D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you for your time. Your responses to the attached questionnaire will help us design your
neighborhood’s project. Here is background information that will aid you in filling out the
questionnaire. Each numeral relates to the corresponding survey question.
I. Drainage Service Connection
A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner’s lawn. There are several sump pump drainage
issues to look for. First, if your lawn drains back to your house, sump pump discharges can cause
problems with your lawn, your neighbor’s lawn or your basement. If the sump pump discharge runs
down the gutter line, it can promote algae growth in the street. Finally, discharging the sump pump
into the sanitary sewer system using floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City
Ordinance and State Statute.
To prevent the issues mentioned above, your street reconstruction project could include a City sump
drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from
private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If the topography and
final street designs favor a sump drain system, you could connect to it. That is why survey questions
I.C. and I.D. ask about your sump pump preferences. Keep in mind that installation of the pipe from
your house to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility, including plumbing
modifications. However, the City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund.
II. Local Drainage Problems
As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if storm water run-
off stands in the street or sidewalk in front of your house. If this or similar situations are occurring in
your area, please describe it in this section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective
action.
III. Private Underground Utilities
It is very important that you fill out this section. Some residents install private underground utilities in
the roadway right-of-way (the area from the edge of the roadway to your property line). The most
common private utilities include lawn irrigation and pet containment systems. Utility and roadway
reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged during the street reconstruction
project, they will be repaired. However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities,
crews can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction.
IV. Residential Streetlights
As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks residents for their input on neighborhood
streetlight systems. Staff is trying to understand if the neighborhood favors upgrading the streetlight
system or if the existing streetlight system meets the needs of the neighborhood. Please keep in mind
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
June 10, 2014
Page 2 of 4
that costs associated with improving the streetlight system would be a special assessment. These
costs would be determined after the extent of the improvements is understood.
V. Living Streets Elements
As part of this neighborhood street reconstruction project, staff will seek to incorporate design
elements from the City’s Living Streets Policy (http://edinamn.gov/LivingStreets) and draft Living
Streets Plan. This plan guides the City in how it designs new streets to be safer and more accessible
by seeking to balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that
promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve
environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health.
Transportation
According to the draft Living Streets Plan, Arden Ave., Minnehaha Blvd., and Halifax Ave. are
considered Local Connector streets. The proposed typical section for these types of streets is shown in
Figure 1. Please note that according to the draft Plan sidewalks are required on Local Connectors on
at least one side of the street. Additionally, shared bicycle facilities are not proposed for this project.
FIGURE 1 – PROPOSED CONNECTOR STREET TYPICAL SECTION
All other streets in the neighborhood are considered Local Streets. The proposed typical section for
local streets is shown in Figure 2. Note that sidewalks are optional on Local Streets; however, context
criteria are applied to these street types to determine if a sidewalk is required. These include the
following:
x Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehicles.
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
June 10, 2014
Page 3 of 4
x 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph.
x There is a history of crashes involving pedestrians walking along the roadway.
x Transit stop(s) are present.
x The street is identified as an active (safe) route to school, park, or commercial destination.
x A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations.
x Site lines, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see
pedestrians walking along the roadway.
x The street width is less than 27 feet.
FIGURE 2 – PROPOSED LOCAL STREET TYPICAL SECTION
Figure 3 attached shows streets with existing sidewalks and other streets where new sidewalk will be
considered. The design team will present impacts associated with new sidewalks at neighborhood
meetings later this summer and ask you for your input. You will be notified approximately two weeks
prior.
Specific Living Street elements that will lessen impacts from sidewalk construction are narrowing the
width of the pavement by limiting parking to one side of the street. As part of the questionnaire, staff
would like to know which side of the street a proposed sidewalk would be best served along a
particular street. Sidewalks are funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund.
Resident Questionnaire Instructions
June 10, 2014
Page 4 of 4
In the questionnaire, please note if you know of any pedestrian issues such as a missing segment of
sidewalk or an inadequate pedestrian crossing.
Storm Water Management
One of the primary components of Edina’s Living Streets vision is the active pursuit of environmental
stewardship, including setting goals for the reduction of storm water volume and unfiltered street
water flows into our local waterways. Living Street applies techniques such as impervious surface
reduction, bio-retention, filtration, sediment capture, and infiltration and reuse of stormwater. These
stormwater treatments should be applied in a cost effective and strategic way to best integrate with
various transportation modes and the neighborhood aesthetic.
In the questionnaire, please describe the quality of nearby natural resources and surface waters.
VI. Traffic Management
We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues.
VII. Email Updates
One of the primary tools for communicating with you during construction is the City Extra email
notification service. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive email messages
from the City regarding this project.
By signing up for City Extra email notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur.
The updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited, when
your water may be shut off for water main replacement and when to have your contractor repair your
irrigation system if it was damaged during construction.
To receive email updates, sign up online at www.EdinaMN.gov. On the main page, near the upper
right corner, place your cursor over the For Residents tab and click on City Extra. Enter your email
address and a password (new user will need to create a password). Click on E-mail Subscriptions.
Under the Engineering section, place a check mark in the box next to Arden Park D Reconstruction.
Click the “update” button at the bottom left hand corner of the webpage.
Need Help?
If you have any questions about how to fill out the questionnaire, please contact SEH Project Manager
Toby Muse at 952-912-2616 or tmuse@sehinc.com or Director of Engineering Chad Millner at 952-
826-0318 or cmillner@EdinaMN.gov.
YOUR HOUSE
CURB LINE
ROW ROW
CURB LINE
EXAMPLE
HOUSE
GARAGE
X SERVICECONNECTIONPIPE HERE
Resident Questionnaire
Arden Park D
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Thank you in advance for your time. Your input is important to us. Please read the Questionnaire
Instructions before completing this questionnaire.
I.Drainage Service Connection:
A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain? Yes No Unknown
B. Does your home have a sump pump? Yes No Unknown
C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains Yes No
up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)?
Please sketch in the space to the right:
your house, garage, driveway, sump
pump discharge location and
approximately where along the right-
of –way (ROW) line you would like the
service connection pipe located.
II.Local Drainage Problems
Please describe specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood:
III.Private Underground Utilities
A.Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The
right-of-way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.)
Yes No
B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way?
Yes No
IV.Residential Streetlights:
Is the existing streetlight system meeting the needs of the neighborhood?
Yes No
Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Do you favor improving your
streetlights?
Yes No
V. Living Streets Elements:
A.Please describe specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below.
B.Please describe how you perceive the quality of nearby natural resources and surface
waters. (Example: good/poor aesthetics, vegetation, wildlife habitat, or recreation use)
VI.Traffic Management
A.Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues?
Yes No
B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur?
VII.Email Updates
A.Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service?
Yes No
Thank you for completing the questionnaire. Please return it to the City in the enclosed envelope
by June 20.
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Data Entered By:
Last Date Data Entered:
Due Date:
Questionnaires Sent Out:Per Sharon
Questionnaires Returned:
Percent Returned:
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
House #Street Name412150th St W #100412150th St W #101412150th St W #102412150th St W #201412150th St W #202412150th St W #203412150th St W #204412150th St W #300412150th St W #301412150th St W #302412150th St W #G1412150th St W #G2412150th St W #G3412150th St W #G4412150th St W #G5412150th St W #G6412150th St W #G7412150th St W #G8412150th St W #G9
4213 50th St W421550th St W
4075 51st St W #10111111Water down on 52nd & Halifax, year-round puddles in front of 5036 Halifax, 5109-5117 Indianola
111151st & Halifax lots of foot traffic to the shops; Crosswalk at Halifax & 51st is very dangerous and the wheel chair ramps are treacherous in winter.
Creek is generally in good shape. During storms and during spring thaw it gets cloud and smelly.
1Halifax is a "cut-through to avoid 50th & France and is driven at excessive speed. The crosswalk at the Halifax curve is particularly dangerous to seniors.
1-
4075 51st St W #102407551st St W #103407551st St W #104407551st ST W #10511111Small issue with sidewalk settling by our building.1111Not enough sidewalks - in favor of walks on @ 52nd St, Arden Ave & Minnehaha Blvd
1Crosswalk dangerous at 51st & Halifax - need more lights.1
4075 51st ST W #106407551st ST W #107111 1111Crossing 51st St. People drive too fast.14675 W 51st St.- the Lantern; trying to get out of ramp onto 51st St. 1
4075 51st ST W #108407551st ST W #10911111 111Hard to see around cure on W 51st St behind Lund's.1Still hard to cross at pedestrian walkway on 51st St.1Visually Impaired Senior Citizen
4075 51st ST W #110407551st ST W #111407551st St W #201407551st ST W #202407551st St W #203407551st ST W #204407551st St W #205407551st St W #206407551st St W #207407551st St W #20811111unknown1111Pedestrian and automobile confusion, traffic speeds too fast. 151st & Halifax1The Lantern does have underground utility on the boulevard.4075 51st St W #2091111 51st between France & 50th St is one big roadway. There should be speed bumps on 51st so drivers can see the pedestrian flashing lights.
1Cars on 51st once they leave either France Ave or 50th St race to get around this area & walking across 51st is a constant danger.
1
4075 51st St W #210407551st St W #211407551st St W #301407551st St W #302407551st St W #303407551st St W #304407551st ST W #305407551st ST W #306407551st ST W #307407551st ST W #308407551st ST W #309407551st ST W #310407551st St W #311
June 20, 2014
September 5, 2014
112
39%
285
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
10/13/2014 1 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
4075 51st ST W #401111 111Crosswalk to go to Lund's. Should be reduced speed.okay1Sidewalk on the west side of Lund's is not cleared in the winter. 1
4075 51st St W #402407551st St W #40311111111Crossing Halifax & 51st need additional crossing lights like on 69th 1Speeding between 50th S on Halifax to East & West on 51st St to/from France Ave.
1
4075 51st ST W #404407551st ST W #405407551st ST W #406407551st St W #407407551st St W #408407551st ST W #409407551st St W #410407551st St W #411
4201 52nd St W420752nd St W
5000 Arden Ave5001Arden Ave111111111 115002Arden Ave5003Arden Ave5004Arden Ave11111I'm not aware of any at my home.1111Difficult to cross 50th without going to the lights at Wooddale or Lund's.Arden Park is delightful.1 Access onto or across 50th is horrific, and I have no recommendation for fixing it.1 Attractive streetlights would be a valuable addition.
5005 Arden Ave5006Arden Ave111111111Need sidewalks-desperately! Pedestrians forces to walk in the street, too close to vehicles. This is particularly unsafe for children.
1Street is too wide which allows for higher traffic speed. Suggest sidewalk on 1 side and lower speed limit.
1
5007 Arden Ave5008Arden Ave5009Arden Ave11111Water pools behind 5009 & 5007 Arden on Jay Place.1111We would like sidewalk on the west side of Arden.1People drive too fast -should not be a 30 MPH speed limit! Kids are frequently playing - lots of kids.
1
5010 Arden Ave5011Arden Ave5012Arden Ave111111111 115013Arden Ave5014Arden Ave5015Arden Ave5016Arden Ave5017Arden Ave111111111none good115018Arden Ave5019Arden Ave11111none1111no sidewalks, roads in rough shapeexcellent local parks115020Arden Ave5022Arden Ave11111None by our house.1111No ped issues. We do not favor sidewalks. We definitely do not want parking limited to one side!
I perceive the quality to be good.11
5101 Arden Ave5103Arden Ave11111We are on the high/dry end of our street. Thus, we do not have significant water drainage issues, if at all.
1111northing significantPerpetual problem with standing water in the 51st Street & Juanita Ave intersection.11
5105 Arden Ave5107Arden Ave11111none1111Sidewalk would be nice on west side of street.good1too many cut thrush from 50th & France, down Bruce & Arden 1
5109 Arden Ave5110Arden Ave1111North side of Bruce place needs a catch basin, after heavy rain water collects inArden Park, the park needs to be drained
1111Primary issue entrance to Arden Park at 52nd & Minnehaha motorists do not stop at stop sign. Pedestrians and bicyclists have to be cautions when leaving the park.
Overall, good!1Vehicles ignoring stop signs at 52nd & Minnehaha. Also, fast morning cars on Arden - cut through traffic. Speed bumps?
1
5111 Arden Ave5112Arden Ave11111We have 2 sump pumps and would like to connect both to the City drain if possible.
11 ?11 11
5113 Arden Ave11111Extensive new const. to our north has caused overflow into our backyard. Is this under consideration in your "living streets" mandate.
1111Children play in the streets nearby-despite the proximity of Arden Park. Do they needs a hard surface area for ball games/e.g. basketball? In the park?
Our proximity to Arden Park makes it attractive from many perspectives.11
5114 Arden Ave5115Arden Ave5116Arden Ave1111Significant standing water at base of our driveway after any rain and from neighbors sump pump drainage. Also, huge lake forms all along our front street with major rains. Exceedingly slow storm sewer drainage.
1111Overall, good11
5117 Arden Ave11111The storm sewer by the fire hydrant on our property frequently backs up during a heavy rain causing the street to flood.
1111nonegood11
10/13/2014 2 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5000 Bruce Ave11111111stoplights are not timed well to allow pedestrians and cars to cross 50th St.
good150th St. should be better marked to go to 1 lane at Wooddale heading East. Would recommend no left turn signs onto 50th St during rush hour.
1
5001 Bruce Ave1111none1111No issues, not in favor of having sidewalks added to our street!great near nice parks1Where 50th goes from 4 lanes to 2. It is not enforced and people almost drive on our boulevard. Brutal in winter.
1
5002 Bruce Ave1111none115003Bruce Ave5004Bruce Ave1111none1111None. Our street gets very little car traffic. I am not in favor of sidewalks.Beautiful natural resource, lots of wildlife, enjoy tubers, canoes, and kayakers enjoying the creek.
11
5005 Bruce Ave5006Bruce Ave5007Bruce Ave5008Bruce Ave111 1111No sidewalks on Bruce, curve at Bruce and Bruce Place unsafe for ped, bikers and cars; ped crossing across 50th at either Bruce or Arden would really help safety.
Love creek in backyard; flooding is causing damage to our yard this year.1Turning from Bruce Ave to 50th St is very difficult. A stop sign at 50th would help; during backups of heavy traffic it can take 15 min before someone lets us out & it's unsafe.
1
5009 Bruce Ave111 1111 1Difficult to turn left onto 50th St - sometimes it takes 3-4 min to get a clearing.
1
5010 Bruce Ave11111overflow from Minnehaha Creek; backyard unusable 1111 150th St extremely difficult to get on between 7-9 Am and 4:30-6:30 pm 1
5011 Bruce Ave1111none1111noneArden Park, creek, Wooddale Park enjoyable 11
5012 Bruce Ave5013Bruce Ave11111111 150th & Bruce; impossible turning onto 50th or crossing at any time of the day!1
5015 Bruce Ave111none1111nonegood1A little heavier during rush hour.15016Bruce Ave1111111I look forward to the addition of sidewalks. I wish every street had a sidewalk on at least one side.
Minnehaha Creek is a wonderful resource,children use it daily, birds and wildlife numerous.I would like to see the City discourage residents from using it to dispose of landscape waste. I have a neighbor who throws in sizeable pieces of trees & shrubbery which become obstacles for canoers & Kayakers. I also have a neighbor who pours old gasoline into the creek each summer.
11
5017 Bruce Ave111111111 115018Bruce Ave5019Bruce Ave5020Bruce Ave5021Bruce Ave5022Bruce Ave111 1111none on our cul-de-sacgreat - creek, Arden Park1Signage on cul-de-sac confusing, sign says Bruce Place/Bruce Ave; cars always turning around in the cul-de-sac area; the cul-de-sac should have 1 street sign and the thru street a different name sign.
1
5023 Bruce Ave5024Bruce Ave5026Bruce Ave
5025 Bruce Pl5027Bruce Pl5028Bruce Pl5029Bruce Pl11111Grate at end of Arden Ave (west side of street) as it turns east to become 52nd St - constantly becomes plugged with debris.
1111limit pedestrian traffic no need for sidewalks!!!good11
5030 Bruce Pl5032Bruce Pl5034Bruce Pl5036Bruce Pl5038Bruce Pl111at the corner of Bruce Place & Arden there needs to be some kind of drain on the SW corner; SW corner of Arden & Bruce
1111no sidewalk means we walk in the street, kids play in the street as they walk to Arden Park.
Fantastic!1Access to 50th St especially during rush hours. Please add signage to keep intersections clear/unobstructed when traffic is backed up.
1
5132 France Ave
5200 France Ave #25200France Ave #45200France Ave #65200France Ave #85200France Ave #105200France Ave #125200France Ave #145200France Ave #165200France Ave #18
5200 France Ave #205200France Ave #225200France Ave #245200France Ave #26
10/13/2014 3 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5200 France Ave #285200France Ave #305200France Ave #325200France Ave #345200France Ave #365200France Ave #385200France Ave #405200France Ave #??111Live in Brownstones. Do not know if this survey applies to us.111NoneGood11
3915 52nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W391552nd St W
5100 Gorgas Ave11111Cul-de-sac standing water 3+ inches deep along curb @ 5100 Gorgas 11115100 Gorgas walking access to 50th/France (existed before Lanterns Condo Construction in 70's)
1No traffic issues on Gorgas, but in neighborhood. Halifax & 50th/France Intersection
1
5101 Gorgas Ave5104Gorgas Ave5105Gorgas Ave5108Gorgas Ave5109Gorgas Ave5112Gorgas Ave5113Gorgas Ave5116Gorgas Ave11111none1111nonegood1speeding cars, people think it’s a through street - need more signage so cars don't speed down to turn around
1
5117 Gorgas Ave5120Gorgas Ave5121Gorgas Ave5124Gorgas Ave5125Gorgas Ave5128Gorgas Ave11111No surface drainage issues with our home.1111none on our streetneed better storm water treatment before runoff flows to Minnehaha 11
5129 Gorgas Ave111111 15132Gorgas Ave5133Gorgas Ave111111111 115136Gorgas Ave5137Gorgas Ave5200Gorgas Ave
5000 Halifax Ave1 Our condo unit is not in the Arden Park Neighborhood5032Halifax Ave111Water pools along curbs/driveways along west side of Halifax between 51st & 51st; in front of our house & neighbors house
111Larsous crossing seems dangerous; traffic comes past our house very fast; I've through that marking the turn @51st & Halifax a right turn only during rush hours would help.
A sidewalk on the west side of Halifax might help pedestrians be more safe when walking to 50th & France area; also putting flashing lights on the road near crossing might help pedestrians be more safe.
11
5036 Halifax Ave111Water collects at the end of my driveway.1111sidewalk on one side is adequate1speed 51st-54th; 51st St. curve entering Halifax needs improvements 1
5100 Halifax Ave111 1111sidewalk on one side is adequate1speed 51st-54th; 51st St. curve entering Halifax needs improvements 1
5101 Halifax Ave5104Halifax Ave5105Halifax Ave5108Halifax Ave11111none1111Cars drive too fast on Halifax! Sidewalk on east side of the street is helpful; however waling on Halifax is not safe.
okay1Halifax south of 50th St is the "Lund's super highway." Our neighborhood must consider installing a speed bump (or multiple bumps) on Halifax to manage the speed of traffic.
1
5109 Halifax Ave11111There have been back-up sewer drain problems with both n'bors on my side of street.
1111At the corner of Halifax & W. 51st, cars still don't stop when peds are in crosswalk. The flashing warning sign needs to be lowered or be moved closer to the intersection. Drivers cannot see it. Also a stop sign would work better.
1See ped issues. Also we've noticed increased employee overflow parking on street due to businesses.
1
5114 Halifax Ave11111On Halifax at the corner of 51st St and by the entire curbside area in front of the brick house, there is always standing water, mostly from their water sprinkler "overshooting"; but also rain. The pavement/tar has broken up because it's always wet.
1111nonegood - overallIncreased volume and speed on Halifax Ave due to traffic jams and stop lights on France Ave, motorists avoid this by driving on Halifax . The City of Edina needs to reduce or disperse traffic from Halifax. Residents are concerned that Halifax will be "finished" but the non-stop HUGE construction trucks from all the demolitions will continue and damage theroad.
1
5115 Halifax Ave5116Halifax Ave5117Halifax Ave
10/13/2014 4 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5120 Halifax Ave111111111Support bike lane & one side parkingUpgrade ice house at Arden Park including restrooms at park for summer use.Speeding on street and rolling stops at 51st & Halifax 1
5121 Halifax Ave5124Halifax Ave5125Halifax Ave11111No problem, except during heavy rainfalls on Halifax and 52nd street - when city drains plug up with leaves.
1111None - City installed sidewalk some 3 years ago.good1Speeding, high traffic volumes, people taking shortcuts going north on France, then west on 52nd St. then north on Halifax to get to Lund's and to Hwy 100.
1
5128 Halifax Ave11111Standing water in street where there are low spots, sewer drains overwhelmed at 52nd Halifax during storms and snow melt.
1111Streets where there are no sidewalks present a danger to kids, adults and pets.
Good aesthetes, except for city structures, specifically Arden Park building (warming house) never open for resident use and ugly and in disrepair, also ugly city pump/water house.
1Drivers not stopping at stop sign and speeding. 52nd and Halifax, people must walk in the street on 52nd St connecting to Arden Park.
1
5129 Halifax Ave5133Halifax Ave5137Halifax Ave1111Neighboring 5133 Halifax roof drain connected to a City drain because of drainage issues. 52nd & Halifax has major ponding issues with storm drains becoming clogged or backing up; grates become clogged too easily.
1111Arden Park & Minnehaha Creek area are very nice assets for the area.1Too much of a cut through neighborhood for 50th & France congestion. Cars frequently run 52nd & Halifax crossway stop signs.
1
5200 Halifax Ave5201Halifax Ave5204Halifax Ave5205Halifax Ave11111Water does not drain properly at 51st & Juanita; Halifax seems to dram well except NW corner of Halifax & 52nd sometime has standing water.
1111Ped crossing 51st & Halifax is dangerous! I have been nearly run down by cars as I cross at crosswalk on foot; police enforcement of non-yielding cars would be appreciated.
good11
5208 Halifax Ave111111111The crossing from Halifax across 51st to Lund's is blind to southbound drivers coming south from 50th extremely dangerous location of the crosswalk. Please fix so that pedestrians/cars can see each other. Mores crosswalk to west side of Halifax extremely important.
Fast traffic/cut through street 54th to 52nd Halifax 1
5209 Halifax Ave11111 111Build a sidewalk on the north side of 54th from France to Brook view good1Consider a speed bump on Halifax between 52nd & 54th 1
5212 Halifax Ave111111111All is good with 1 sidewalk on Halifax between Lund's and 54th 1Speeding on Halifax, too many builders blocking 1 to 2 sides of Halifax - makes passage down block difficult and dangerous
1
5213 Halifax Ave5216Halifax Ave11111none1111There is only a sidewalk on 1 side of street, kids have to cross the busy street to access it further, there is not good pedestrian connections to Arden Park.
good1People drive too fast on Halifax1
5217 Halifax Ave5220Halifax Ave5221Halifax Ave111111111good115224Halifax Ave11111We are on an alley and drainage is terrible with all the new homes (change in elevation and sprinkler systems) there is 1 drain that gets clogged all the time. Really need to assess drainage issue in alley.
1111We live on Halifax Ave and were assessed for the sidewalk on east side of street. Would be really helpful to be on west side as well.
Arden Park is a block away and well used. In a low area so ice skating area/field tend to flood.
1Halifax is a cut through street. Many young children in neighborhood and so mush construction. Safety issue!
1
5225 Halifax Ave5228Halifax Ave5229Halifax Ave111111111 115232Halifax Ave111111111Streets are too dark at night. We do not need more sidewalks.fine1Some cars use Halifax as an alternative to France. Too much traffic in early/evening results.
1
5236 Halifax Ave111 1111Halifax added sidewalks on one side 115240Halifax Ave5241Halifax Ave11111Our sump pump runs frequently, drainage issue from Calvary Church parking lot.
1111Excellent sidewalk on Halifax, for snow removal from City pump site usually delayed/non-existent.
1Too many people use Halifax to access 50th/France/Lund's 1
5300 Halifax Ave111111111 1Too much traffic, used as alternate to avoid France Ave.1
5301 Halifax Ave5304Halifax Ave111111111Traffic on Halifax is speedy by fast, making it unsafe for kids.1Traffic travels too fast down Halifax making it unsafe for kids.1
5305 Halifax Ave5308Halifax Ave11111House built at 5304 with no gutters - water directed down side of property flows out to property at 5308 with spring snow melt
1111Many people do not use sidewalk, on street run or walk with stroller, or bike with kids in opposite direction of cars or one on each side of street.
This quality is diminished with all the concrete driveways and new houses & multiple lights on all night. Good vegetation, wildlife habitat on Hahn Creek.
1Constant construction vehicles, speeders, people on road (e.g. strollers, walkers, bikers, kids on scooters.
1
5309 Halifax Ave5312Halifax Ave11111none1111Sidewalks limit problems - except with constant reconstruction of homes.
good1Congestion on France/50th moves traffic to Halifax.1
5313 Halifax Ave5316Halifax Ave
10/13/2014 5 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5317 Halifax Ave5320Halifax Ave11111Spring thaw sewer drains get backed up on both east & west side of Halifax @ 5320 drain access point and pools develop that nearly cover the width of the street.
1111Halifax sidewalks have significant improved pedestrian access on Halifax. Will Halifax residents be refunded for the cost of our sidewalk (assessed) given all other residents requiring sidewalks for safety will be covered by City?
1Halifax speed is a problem!1
5321 Halifax Ave5324Halifax Ave5325Halifax Ave5328Halifax Ave5329Halifax Ave5332Halifax Ave5333Halifax Ave1111In fall, leaves clog street drain on corner of 54th and Minnehaha Blvd. 1111West of Minnehaha along creek, trees need to be better maintained since encroach onto street impairing view of peds.
Minnehaha Creek and Falls are vital part of neighborhood aesthetics. 1Difficult to see around corners of Minnehaha Blvd where vegetation encroaches onto street from park/creek
1
5336 Halifax Ave5337Halifax Ave
5016 Indianola Ave5017Indianola Ave5020Indianola Ave5021Indianola Ave5024Indianola Ave11111Some standing water in street during heavy rain.1111People walk in streets - no known sig- issues.good1Only during Art Fair - not a problem - short lived 1
5025 Indianola Ave11111Water backup on the street at the bottom of the hill near the field O'Brien's 1111Would like to block street between houses & Edina Covenant Church to block cars from going down street. Can't turn left anyway!
1Difficult to turn left onto 50th St from Indianola during traffic hours.1
5029 Indianola Ave11111None - good drainage area1111Street curves prevents speeding; don't need sidewalk We live in a lovely, old neighborhood with unique features. We do not need sidewalks.
11
5033 Indianola Ave1111none 1111none that I am aware ofgood1Occasional construction blockages.15037Indianola Ave111111111Kids playing in street.good1Thru traffic can be fast- children play in the street, sidewalk would help.1
5100 Indianola Ave11111none1111No pedestrian issues. Don't need a sidewalk, we need parking both sides.
11
5101 Indianola Ave111 1111 1We are in a tear-down neighborhood- workers parking totally congests the street.Art Fair many are parking in our neighborhood.
1
5104 Indianola Ave11111none1111No pedestrian issues, people like walking on this street. No sidewalks needed.
It's perfect11
5105 Indianola Ave5108Indianola Ave111111111 115109Indianola Ave111111111very happy with neighborhood, as isgood to very good1
5112 Indianola Ave5113Indianola Ave11111Street has humpback in middle. The bottom of our driveway has standing water after any precipitation, winter freezes constant ice this needs to be modified.
1111In favor of sidewalk on east side of Indianola. 52nd & Indianola towards Arden Park is crest of hill- need a line for pedestrian or bikes so cars can't cross that line. Arden Park entrance needs to be painted or marked so people know that is an entry to the neighborhood park.
very good11
5116 Indianola Ave5117Indianola Ave11111none1111We don't want sidewalks. very nice; Arden Park is beautiful1Drivers sometimes drives too fast. 15120Indianola Ave11111Minor water in street by DW1111No issues, little trafficGood115121Indianola Ave111In the front of our house the street has a low spot, drainage/ice is a problem.1111I think the park should be redesigned to better suit a larger number of residents; would love to see outdoor sport court!
11
5124 Indianola Ave111Water does pool in front of our house. It also polls across the street from us.1111We don't need a sidewalk on our street; but one on 52nd would be helpful to connect to Arden Park.
11
5125 Indianola Ave5128Indianola Ave11111In the street in front of our house.1111good1People cut through and drive way too fast! Lots of young kids playing.1
5129 Indianola Ave111111111 115132Indianola Ave1111In the middle of the block water collects due to a low spot.1111Many residents walk on this street sidewalk would be nice for safety.Arden Park is very good. Sidewalk on the park side of Minnehaha Parkway would be nice. During heavy rain parts of the park & the asphalt sidewalk thru the park is flooded - should be raised.
1Street is used to bypass 50th & France, speeding is a concern since kids are playing/biking in the street. A stop sign would be great at Indianola & 52nd St.
1
5136 Indianola Ave111111111Do not want sidewalk. There would be a huge disruption to my landscaping, irrigation and invisible fence.
11
5028 Juanita Ave5032Juanita Ave11111Standing water in street gutter in front of 5032 Juanita and at 51st and Juanita 111Street lighting - maybe. Needs additional information.Arden Park is a very nice park.1Left turn from Indianola or Arden to 50th westbound is a problem.1
10/13/2014 6 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5036 Juanita Ave11111We live on the low point of Jay Place, the street runs downhill into our yard and floods garave every spring. Sometimes 1-2" of standing water over the garage door
11Do not want sidewalks 11
5040 Juanita Ave111Water collects in the curve on Juanita after it rains.1111 1Our only legal access from the property (to 50th St from Jay Place) can be near impossible to get onto at various times of the day.
1
5044 Juanita Ave11111Standing water in front of our house. Our streets don't need more hardscape. 1111Juanita quiet - no issues. See return questionnaire for further information. Such as don't support sidewalks, bike lanes, one side parking, narrowing lane, etc.
Arden Park is fine.Arden Ave very busy and always has parked cars on both sides of street, but yards are small and sidewalks would add too much hardscape on the 50th block.
1
5100 Juanita Ave111Standing water in front of our house (small depression at curt).1111Sidewalk not needed on 51st or Juanita.Good. Please keep Arden Park relatively undeveloped- no net loss of natural space at Arden Park.
1Difficult access at 50th. Too much speed on Arden Ave and Minnehaha Blvd.1
5101 Juanita Ave5104Juanita Ave5105Juanita Ave11111none 111nonefine115108Juanita Ave5109Juanita Ave1111none1111none - we do not want sidewalks good115112Juanita Ave11111My neighborhood is built on 12' of granular fill - no issues.1111no issues - no sidewalk wantedvery good11
5113 Juanita Ave5116Juanita Ave11111Water pools at 5044 Juanita and doesn't drain to city drains.1111none - Juanita does not need a sidewalk. Bruce Ave better served by a sidewalk than Juanita or Indianola. In the event the City ignores the wishes of the stakeholders and residents on Juanita, the odd (east) side of Juanita would be better served by a sidewalk.
1The City is forcing a sidewalk on a street that doesn't need one.1
5117 Juanita Ave5120Juanita Ave11111Minor water in street by our driveway.1111No issues…very little traffic.good115121Juanita Ave5124Juanita Ave11111My driveway accumulated storm water.at apron. I assume this will be corrected with the City's reconstruction.
1111Minnehaha Blvd not safe for walking, sidewalk around Arden Park will be helpful. There is no reason for sidewalk on Juanita, Indianola, Arden or 51st. These streets are safe. Sidewalks on the local street type would be a waste of the PACS fund. I adamantly oppose them.
Please leave area around Minnehaha Creek through Arden Park to 54th St natural and preserve the wildlife vegetation.
1See attached letter to return questionnaire.1
5125 Juanita Ave5128Juanita Ave11111111 115129Juanita Ave111 111 We've very happy with the park.115133Juanita Ave111111111A walking path is needed from 52nd St. to 54th St. Along Minnehaha Blvd on the park side. At present children & adults have to walk in the street. It is a dangerous situation.
When the bridge is completed (51st St.) we need to beautify the rail and bridge area.11
5137 Juanita Ave
5201 Minnehaha Blvd5205Minnehaha Blvd5209Minnehaha Blvd11111Water collects at the end of my driveway where it hits the road. 1111I'm not aware of any such issues.I value the natural look of the park & creeks - the less invasive the project is the better.11
5217 Minnehaha Blvd11111Runoff from alley washes into our backyard disturbing our landscaping.Needs to be corrected. Need to keep the drains in alley cleared!
1111noneacceptable1Parking should be on park side only.1
5221 Minnehaha Blvd1111Park has much standing water when rink melts. Poor drainage in park so standing water can prevent use of grassy areas during summer. Alley behind our house has poor drainage and sewer gets clogged easily with much sediment and water will back into our driveway and garage.
1111Park needs sidewalk. Many walkers & kids use park. There are curves which prevent good visuals for pedestrians to cross to park safely.
Creek needs dredging very badly - lots of dead vegetation in creek overtime prevents its flow.
1When parking is restricted to one side of street (i.e. Art Fair) need to prevent parkingon East (resident) so we can see traffic to get out of driveways.
1
10/13/2014 7 of 8
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTON2014 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Drainage Add'n Comment
Local Drainage Problems
YesNoUnknYesNoUnknYesNoYesNo Explain YesNoYesNoYesNo YesNo YesNoYesNo
Existing Streetlight System Meeting the needs of the Neighborhood
Residential Streetlights
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Drainage Service Connection Private Underground Utilities
Drain tile or Footing DrainHas a Sump Pump Willing to Connect to City Drain Willing to Connect Roof Drains Irrigation sys. in Blvd.Pet containment system Favors Upgrading Street Lights
Email Access
Email Access
Pedestrian Issues Perceive the Quality of Nearby Natural Resources and Surface WatersIf yes, where?
Neighborhood or Roadway have Traffic Issues
Traffic ManagementLiving Streets Elements
5225 Minnehaha Blvd11As the City has been aware for over a decad the drainage issues and flowage of sediment in the alley betw M'haha Blvd and Halifx has been an ongoing proble. Contributory to such is theunfinished portion of the alley, still used for vehicular travel, which continues to erode, w/drainage depositing sand on the finished portion of the alley. For the last number of years the alley has served as the roadway and staging area for heavy truck use involved in construction projects, contributing to the deterioration of the alley. In addition, the useo f class aggregate, applied to the unfinished portion of the alley, has somewhat mitigated the problem but still provides the source of sand and gravel flowing down the alley. In general, drainage also is not sufficient to reach the existing alley drain, pooling prematures. approved landscape irrigation from new homes adds also to natural rainfall. In general, this alley is not a great place to walk for adults or the many kids in the n'hood.
1111Having grown up and still enjoy walking the area - personally see no pedestrian issues.
Think the aesthetics of the natural environment and park - great asset to the n'hood.
11
5229 Minnehaha Blvd111Water pools in street at end of our driveway.1111Walking on Minnehaha Blvd very dangerous with limited visibility and fast moving cars. Accident waiting to happen.
Arden Park turns into standing water in spring/early summer.11
5230 Minnehaha Blvd5233Minnehaha Blvd11111Existing drainage is satisfactory.1111Minnehaha Blvd -if sidewalk is considered imperative to place it on Arden Park side for safety reasons and protection of mature trees.
All of the above are critical to the park environment site should be preserved.1Speed of vehicles is excessive - should be limited to 20 mph for safety of children.
Under no circumstances should the alleyway between Halifax and Minnehaha Blvd. be a through way between 52nd St and 54th St. or be paved. This raises serious home security, safety and illicit activity concerns and issues.
1
5241 Minnehaha Blvd5301Minnehaha Blvd11111none1111Need a speed bump on Minnehaha Blvd.Arden Park - great nearby walking path.1Speed - need speed bump on Minnehaha Blvd.1
5309 Minnehaha Blvd5313Minnehaha Blvd5321Minnehaha Blvd5333Minnehaha Blvd11111In fall, leaves clog street drian on corner 54th & Minnehaha Blvd.1111On westside Minnehaha along creek, trees need to be better maintained since encroach outs streets impairing view of peds.
Minnehaha Creek and Falls are vital part of neighborhood aesthetics.1Hard to see around curves of Minnehaha Blvd when vegetation encroaches out street from creekside/park.
1
4201 W 50th St
11233502734735136213797037119883252975 58499811SurveysSent28539%12%18%9%12%26%2%5%22%5%28%25%13%4%34%10%26%20%17%34%4%SurveysReturned 112 100%29%45%24%30%65%4%12%55%12%71%63%33%10%88%26%67%52%44%88%10%
10/14/2014 8 of 8
APPENDIXC
7/31/14Informational
Meeting
July 16, 2014
2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Arden Park D Neighborhood
Informational Meeting Reminder
Thursday, July 31, 6-8 p.m.
Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility
7450 Metro Blvd, Edina
Join us to learn more and to provide input.
If you’re not able to attend the meeting, the presentation will be posted to our website after the
meeting. If you have questions please contact project manager Toby Muse with SEH at
tmuse@sehinc.com or 952-912-2616, or engineering specialist Sharon Allison at
sallison@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0449.
10/13/2014
1
www.EdinaMN.gov
2015ArdenParkDNeighborhood
RoadwayImprovements
BAͲ412
InformationalMeeting
July 31, 2014
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions•ProjectLocation•Process&Timeline•ProjectDetails•Funding•WhatYou CanExpect•CommunicationTools•HowtoPrepare•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
Introductions
SEHStaff
ProjectManagerProjectDesigner
Toby MuseJoeClement
CityStaff
DirectorofEngineeringAsst.CityEngineerEnviron.Engr.Transp.PlannerEngr.Coordinator
ChadMillnerPatWraseRossBintnerMarkNolanSharonAllison
www.EdinaMN.gov
Project
Location
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProjectLocation
•54th Street•0.5milesof
road•Bridgeover
Minnehaha
Creek
www.EdinaMN.gov
WhyMyStreet?
•Streetsthatmeetspecificstandardsaresubjectto
reconstruction•Priorityisgiventostreetswiththehighestneedbasedon
watermainbreaks,sanitarysewerdeficiencies,storm
sewer/drainageissues,andPavementConditionIndex•ReconstructionisusuallymorecostͲeffectiveinthelongͲterm
thanpatchingorsealͲcoating•Streetsaregroupedtogethertohelpprolongpavementlife
andmaximizetheeconomicsofscaleforconstruction
10/13/2014
2
www.EdinaMN.gov
WhatisIncluded?
•Alwaysincluded:–Roadway–replacingtheentireroadbed–Curbandgutter–Utilityupgrades•Sometimesincluded:–Sumppumpdrainagesystem–Sidewalks–Streetlights–Traffic management•Fullprojectscopeisbasedontheconditionofthe
infrastructureandresidentquestionnaireresponses
www.EdinaMN.gov
Process
www.EdinaMN.gov
TypicalTimeline
SeptemberFeasibilityreportand
estimatesprovided
November/DecemberPublichearing
DecemberͲFebruaryPlanpreparationandbidding
April/MayConstructionbegins
October/NovemberConstructionconcludes
Spring2016Warrantywork
Summer/Fall2016Finalassessmenthearing
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProjectApprovalProcess
•PublichasarighttospeakatPublicHearing•TwoVotes:–1st Vote–AssessmentApproval;need4:1infavor–2nd Vote–PACS*Components;need3:2infavor
*PACS=PedestrianandCycleSafety
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadway
Details
•285Properties•283Privately
Owned•2CityOwned•2.2milesofroads•0.5milesof
sidewalk
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadwayDetails
•Streetsoriginallyconstructedinthe1940’s•Majorityofstreetshavecurbandgutter•Existingstreetwidthsare29Ͳftto30Ͳft
10/13/2014
3
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadwayDetails
•AlleybetweenHalifaxAveandMinnehahaBlvd•Pavement/gravel/turf•Existingwidthis10Ͳftto12Ͳft
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadwayDetails
•LandscapingplacedintherightͲofͲway
•Irrigationsystems&petcontainmentfencesintherightͲofͲway
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadwayDetails
•Varied drivewaymaterials
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadway
Details•Existingsidewalks
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtility
Details•StormSewer•TrunkWater
Mainand
ServicePipes•Trunk
Sanitary
SewerMain
andService
Pipes•Private
Utilities
www.EdinaMN.gov
Existing
Stormwater
Management
Details•Improve
Stormwater
Qualityat
MinnehahaCreek
10/13/2014
4
www.EdinaMN.gov
QuestionnaireResults
Neighborhood
%of
Questionnaires
Returned
HasaSumpPump ChangeExisting
Lighting
Neighborhood
TrafficIssues
YesNoYesNoYesNo
ArdenParkD36%(104/285)31(30%)68(65%)26(25%)72(69%)55(53%)44(42%)
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements
•Removeandreplacepavementsurface•Newcurbandgutter
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements
•Drivewayapronsandendreplacements
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•City’sComprehensivePlan
anddraftLivingStreets
Plan
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•CityLivingStreetsPolicy•…transportationsystem
thatprovidesahighly
connectednetworkof
streetsthat
accommodateallmodes
oftravel•…enhanceconnectivity
forpedestrians,
bicyclistsandtransit•….prioritizenonͲ
motorized
improvementstokey
destinations
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•HalifaxAvenueisexample
10/13/2014
5
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•IndianolaandJuanitaAvenuesareexamples
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•ProposedSidewalk
Locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•Proposed
Sidewalk
Locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed
Stormwater
Management
Details•Permeable
Pavement
System•Subsurface
Perforated
StormSewer
Pipe•Grass
Swale/Filtration
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed
Stormwater
Management
Details•Subsurface
PerforatedStorm
SewerPipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed
Stormwater
Management
Details•Subsurface
PerforatedStorm
SewerPipe
10/13/2014
6
www.EdinaMN.gov
www.EdinaMN.gov
Proposed
Stormwater
Management
Details•GrassSwale•RainGarden
Filtration
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Projectsarefundedbyacombinationofspecialassessments
toresidents,theCity’sUtilityFund,andPedestrianandCyclist
SafetyFund(PACS)•Assessmentsareassignedtoadjacentpropertiesthatstandto
benefitfromconstructionimprovements
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•Specialassessmentstoresidentscover100percentof
roadwaycosts•Sidewalksarenotincludedinspecialassessments•CityusesPACS fundingtocoverthecostofsidewalks
www.EdinaMN.gov
Funding
•TheUtilityFundisacollectionofutilityservicechargespaidto
theCity
•UtilityFundcovers100percentof:–Concretecurbandgutter–Sanitarysewer–Stormsewer–Watermain–Sumppumppipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
OtherImpacts
•Ourgoalistostreamlineprojectsandminimizeneighborhood
disturbance•TheCityencouragesprivateutilitycompanies(gas,electric,
telephoneandcableTV)toupgradeorrepairutilitiesalong
theprojectarea
10/13/2014
7
www.EdinaMN.gov
DoTaxes CoverStreetProjects?
•Roughly20percentofyourpropertytaxesgototheCityfor
expensessuchasPolice,Fire,ParksandPublicWorks
(snowplowing,potholerepairs,sealcoating,andotherstreet
maintenance)•Your taxesdonotpayforstreetreconstruction
www.EdinaMN.gov
PaymentOptions
•You willbebilledfortheassessmentoneyearafterproject
completion•Assessmentsarepayableover15years•Paymentoptions:
1.Payentireamountuponreceivingbilltoavoidfinance
charges
2.Pay25percent;balancerollstopropertytaxes
3.Rollentireamounttopropertytaxes
4.Deferpaymentif65yearsoldorolder
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Wewillkeepyouinformed•You willhaveopportunitiestoprovideinput•PrivateutilityworkistobecompletedbeforeCitywork•Wewilldoourbesttominimizeinconveniences,but
constructiondoesnotcomewithoutpainpoints
WhatYou CanExpect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust,noiseandmud•Localizedfloodingduringrainfall•Timelinessometimesdelayed
duetoweather•You willbeaskedtolimitwater
use
WhatYou CanExpect
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Your drivewaymaybe
inaccessibleforuptoseven
days•Roadwaystoyourhomemay
beperiodicallyinaccessible•Thecontractorwill
accommodatespecialaccess
needs•Irrigationandpetcontainment
systemsmaybedamaged
WhatYou CanExpect
www.EdinaMN.gov
PropertyImpacts
•ItemslocatedwithintheCity’srightͲofͲwaymaybedamaged–Privateutilitieswillberepairedifyounotifyusofthemin
advanceoftheproject–You canremoveplantingsandotherlandscapefeatures
beforetheproject–Inareaswheretheboulevardisdisturbed,theCitywill
plantseedintherightͲofͲwayaftertheprojectiscomplete
10/13/2014
8
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProvidingInput•Publichearingsandquestionnairemailedtoyourhome•Weighinon:–Sumppumpdrainageoptions–Istheexistinglightingsystemmeetingtheneedsofthe
neighborhood?–Aretheretrafficordrainageissuesinyourneighborhood?
www.EdinaMN.gov
CommunicationTools
•Becomeaneighborhoodcaptaintohelpfacilitateproject
communication–Letusknowofsomeoneinyourneighborhoodwhomight
fitthisrole•You willbenotifiedofallmeetings,hearings,schedulesand
questionnairesviaregularmail•PublichearingnoticesarealsopublishedinEdinaSunͲCurrent.•DoorhangersareplacedwhenthereistimeͲsensitive
information•Finalassessmentnoticesaremailedoneyearafter
construction
www.EdinaMN.gov
CityExtra
“CityExtra”emailsarethebestwaytoreceiveregularupdates
onceconstructionbegins.Thesearefreeweeklyemailupdates
aboutyourproject•SignuponCityofEdinawebsite,www.EdinaMN.gov–Checktheboxnexttoyourprojectname•Ifyoucannotreceiveemail,wewillmailyouCityExtra
updatesuponrequest•It’sthebestwaytostayinformed•Don’tdelay;signup!
www.EdinaMN.gov
HowtoPrepare
•SignupforCityExtra•Beginfinancialplanning•Completequestionnaire•Coordinatehomeandyardimprovementprojectsaroundthe
streetconstructiontimeline•Askquestions;stayinformed
www.EdinaMN.gov
ContactUs
Toby Muse,SEHProjectManager
Phone:952.912.2616
Email:tmuse@sehinc.com
ChadMillner,DirectorofEngineering
Phone:952.826.0318
Email:cmillner@edinamn.gov
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thankyou!
Questions?
Chad Millner, Director of Engineering952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business-----Original Message-----From: tpaulson@1992ventures.com [mailto:tpaulson@1992ventures.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:02 PMTo: Joni BennettCc: Scott H. Neal; Karen M. Kurt; Chad MillnerSubject: Re: Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Council Member Bennett,
Thank you for your response. I write to you today in opposition of adding sidewalks to Juanita Avenue, Indianola Avenue, and West 51st Street. As you stated, the sidewalk plan for the City labels these streets as "Proposed" sidewalks, not mandatory sidewalks. I have attached an excerpt from section 4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan which clearly states, as the number one Land Use Goal, "1. Protect and preserve the essential character of existing residential neighborhoods." I, along with most of my neighbors, believe adding sidewalks to these streets would change the essential character of our existing neighborhood -and not for the better. Part of the character of our neighborhood is small lots and open streets. Adding sidewalks to these streets would result in even smaller lots and narrower streets. As for the "transportation network", please tell me how these three streets, which most of the residents of Edina probably don't know exist-and even fewer ever use, complete an essential part of the "transportation network". Please vote against adding sidewalks to these streets. Thank you,Troy Paulson
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:21:12 -0500, Joni Bennett <jonibennett12@comcast.net> wrote:Dear Mr. Paulson,>> I have not seen the letters you refer to in your email. I expect that > they will be included in the Feasibility Study that Council members > will review before the public hearing on the project.>> Sidewalks are an essential part of the city's transportation network. > In ordering the construction of a new sidewalk, the City Council > considers feasibility and the city's Comprehensive Plan, the Living > Streets Policy (approved August 20, 2013) and its implementation plan > (nearing completion). Edina's2008 Comprehensive Plan Update contains > a Sidewalk Facilities plan. Figure 7.10 depicts existing and proposed > future sidewalks, including a sidewalk on Juanita Avenue. The Juanita > Avenue sidewalk also was proposed in the 1999 Comprehensive Plan > Update.>> Most, but not all, new sidewalks in Edina are constructed in
> conjunction with street reconstruction. The practice reduces the cost > and inconvenience of the construction.>> Prior to 2013, Edina policy allocated the cost of some, but not all, > new sidewalks to adjacent property owners. The city used State Aid > funds to build sidewalks on State Aid Streets. The city and school > district split or shared in the cost of sidewalks located near schools > and business districts. The Juanita Avenue sidewalk, depicted in > Figure 7.10 as a school/business sidewalk, would have been funded by a > combination of city funds and special assessments (50%).>> In December 2012, the City Council created a Pedestrian and Cyclist > Safety Fund. That fund now covers the full cost of all new sidewalks.> In other words, the property owners on Juanita Avenue will not be > assessed for the cost of a new sidewalk.>> Please let me know if you have other questions. Sincerely yours,>> Joni Bennett>Edina City Council Member> jonibennett12@comcast.net On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:30 AM, > tpaulson@1992ventures.com wrote:>> > Dear Mayor and Council Members,> > > I am writing today regarding the roadway reconstruction project> proposed for Arden Park D Neighborhood. More specifically, my > questions relate to Juanita Avenue.> > > In August 2013, residents on Juanita Avenue received a letter> from the City highlighting aspects of the project. The letter also > included the following statement, "A future questionnaire will help us > evaluate the need for sidewalks and streetlights."> > > In June 2014, residents on Juanita Avenue received another letter> from the City and a questionnaire regarding the project. The > questionnaire included questions about streetlights, but no questions > about sidewalks. Buried in the questionnaire instructions was the > statement, "As part of the questionnaire, staff would like to know > which side of the street a proposed sidewalk would be best served > along..."Keep in mind, this was not a question on the questionnaire, > nor was it a question on whether or not residents want a sidewalk.> > > In subsequent conversations, Chad Millner indicated the CIty's,> and Council's plan to add a sidewalk to Juanita Avenue. > > > Here are my questions:> > > 1) What evaluation took place between August 2013 and June 2014> that led to the City and Council determining that Juanita Avenue needs > a sidewalk?> > > 2) Were the residents of Juanita Avenue part of the evaluation?> > > I look forward to each of your individual responses to these> straightforward questions. > > > Respectfully,> > Troy Paulson> > 5116 Juanita Avenue> > > >
(2
)
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
b
y
T
r
o
y
P
a
u
l
s
o
n
(
5
1
1
6
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
A
v
e
)
a
n
d
D
a
v
e
P
o
s
t
h
u
m
u
s
(
5
1
0
0
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
A
v
e
)
.
(2
)
20
1
4
A
r
d
e
n
P
a
r
k
D
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Su
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
J
u
l
y
3
1
,
2
0
1
4
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
n
s
w
e
r
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Me
e
t
i
n
g
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Me
e
t
i
n
g
T
i
m
e
:
6
p
m
t
o
8
p
m
Nu
m
b
e
r
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
An
s
w
e
r
1W
h
a
t
wi
l
l
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
bu
f
f
e
r
be
ma
d
e
ou
t
of
?
It
wi
l
l
be
ate
x
t
u
r
e
d
co
n
c
r
e
t
e
,
li
k
e
l
y
ex
p
o
s
e
d
ag
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
.
2A
r
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
an
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
li
m
i
t
e
d
to
on
e
si
d
e
?
Y
e
s
,
th
e
y
wi
l
l
be
on
th
e
sa
m
e
si
d
e
of
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
.
3W
h
a
t
ar
e
yo
u
do
i
n
g
to
co
m
p
r
o
m
i
s
e
th
e
la
n
d
us
e
co
n
c
e
r
n
?
St
a
f
f
wi
l
l
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
tr
e
e
re
m
o
v
a
l
s
by
st
a
y
i
n
g
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
of
th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
roadwayasmuchaspossible
an
d
de
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
th
e
bu
f
f
e
r
wi
d
t
h
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
ro
a
d
an
d
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
4W
h
y
no
t
ju
s
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
ro
a
d
?
Th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
ov
e
r
a
l
l
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
pr
o
p
o
s
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
in
th
i
s
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Staffispresentingthis
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
to
yo
u
to
n
i
g
h
t
an
d
we
l
c
o
m
i
n
g
yo
u
r
fe
e
d
b
a
c
k
.
Th
e
r
e
ha
s
no
t
be
e
n
adecisionmadeyet.Itwillbe
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
'
s
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
to
de
c
i
d
e
wh
e
t
h
e
r
to
ma
k
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
to
th
e
ro
a
d
w
a
y
s
andinclusionofsidewalk.
As
of
no
w
,
th
i
s
is
th
e
pl
a
n
st
a
f
f
wi
l
l
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
to
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
.
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
staffistaskedwithlookingat
mu
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
ne
e
d
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
an
d
ad
h
e
r
i
n
g
to
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
LivingStreetspolicyand
dr
a
f
t
pl
a
n
.
5
Wh
o
do
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ne
e
d
to
sp
e
a
k
to
to
di
s
c
u
s
s
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
co
n
c
e
r
n
?
Th
e
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
ul
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
ma
k
e
s
th
e
fi
n
a
l
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
ba
s
e
d
on
st
a
f
f
'
s
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
Allcomments,
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
,
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
to
n
i
g
h
t
wi
l
l
be
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
an
d
gi
v
e
n
to
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
aspartofthefinal
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
st
u
d
y
.
6
Wh
y
ar
e
th
e
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
s
/
s
u
r
v
e
y
s
lu
m
p
e
d
to
g
e
t
h
e
r
an
d
no
t
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
by
st
r
e
e
t
s
?
We
se
e
th
e
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
s
on
th
e
re
t
u
r
n
e
d
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
s
,
bu
t
we
ca
n
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
sendingafollowͲupsurvey
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
fo
r
in
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
7
Wh
a
t
is
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
fo
r
th
e
pu
b
l
i
c
an
d
wh
a
t
is
go
i
n
g
to
be
se
n
t
to
th
e
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
(E
T
C
?
)
Al
l
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
:
em
a
i
l
s
,
co
m
m
e
n
t
s
,
me
e
t
i
n
g
mi
n
u
t
e
s
,
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
,
et
c
.
wi
l
l
allbeavailableinthe
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
st
u
d
y
.
8
Wh
e
n
wi
l
l
re
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
to
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
,
if
ma
d
e
,
be
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to
be
vi
e
w
e
d
by
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
?
Th
e
r
e
wi
l
l
be
an
o
t
h
e
r
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
me
e
t
i
n
g
he
l
d
in
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
Followingthatmeeting,the
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
st
u
d
y
wi
l
l
be
po
s
t
e
d
on
l
i
n
e
as
we
l
l
fo
r
re
v
i
e
w
an
d
co
m
m
e
n
t
.
9
Is
th
e
in
p
u
t
fr
o
m
th
e
su
r
v
e
y
be
i
n
g
ta
k
e
n
in
t
o
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
?
Ye
s
,
fo
r
ex
a
m
p
l
e
,
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
pl
a
n
an
d
li
v
i
n
g
st
r
e
e
t
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
includedsidewalksonboth
si
d
e
s
of
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
in
th
i
s
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
St
a
f
f
ha
s
al
r
e
a
d
y
de
c
i
d
e
d
to
li
m
i
t
th
e
sidewalkstoonesideofthe
st
r
e
e
t
fo
r
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
10
W
i
l
l
th
e
r
e
be
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
gi
v
e
n
at
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
?
Ye
s
,
st
a
f
f
wi
l
l
gi
v
e
are
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
.
11
Wh
y
is
Br
u
c
e
Av
e
no
t
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
to
ge
t
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
an
d
Ju
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
an
d
In
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
ar
e
?
Th
e
r
e
is
atr
a
n
s
i
t
st
o
p
at
on
e
en
d
an
d
apa
r
k
at
th
e
ot
h
e
r
en
d
.
Th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
la
y
o
u
t
in
th
i
s
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
is
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
plan.Thisplanningdocument
wa
s
ve
t
t
e
d
by
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
gr
o
u
p
s
,
Ci
t
y
st
a
f
f
an
d
co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
an
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
.
12
H
o
w
ar
e
yo
u
go
i
n
g
to
ha
n
d
l
e
th
e
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
in
Ar
d
e
n
Pa
r
k
?
Ar
d
e
n
Pa
r
k
is
adi
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
ar
e
a
to
ad
d
r
e
s
s
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
si
n
c
e
it
is
in
afl
o
o
d
pl
a
i
n
,
wh
i
c
h
helpsalleviateflooding
is
s
u
e
s
fo
r
th
e
en
t
i
r
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
We
wo
u
l
d
ra
t
h
e
r
ha
v
e
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
in
th
e
pa
r
k
thaninyourhomes.
Th
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
as
pa
r
t
of
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
st
r
e
e
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
,
we
ar
e
notlookingtoraisetheelevation
of
th
e
pa
r
k
in
asi
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
wa
y
si
n
c
e
th
e
r
e
ar
e
he
a
v
y
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
fr
o
m
th
e
wa
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
district,theMnDNR,
et
c
.
13
Wh
y
gi
v
e
ou
r
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
asi
d
e
w
a
l
k
wh
e
n
ot
h
e
r
s
wh
o
wa
n
t
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
do
n
'
t
ge
t
th
e
m
?
St
a
f
f
is
do
i
n
g
it
s
be
s
t
to
re
v
i
e
w
an
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
ma
s
t
e
r
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
includingthe
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
pl
a
n
an
d
dr
a
f
t
li
v
i
n
g
st
r
e
e
t
s
pl
a
n
.
Pa
g
e
1of
2
Nu
m
b
e
r
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
An
s
w
e
r
14
Ca
n
yo
u
co
m
m
e
n
t
on
wh
a
t
wi
l
l
ha
p
p
e
n
wi
t
h
th
e
al
l
e
y
be
t
w
e
e
n
Ha
l
i
f
a
x
an
d
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
?
We
ar
e
lo
o
k
i
n
g
fo
r
in
p
u
t
fr
o
m
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
ab
u
t
t
i
n
g
th
e
al
l
e
y
.
It
iscurrentlynotpartofthe
pr
o
j
e
c
t
,
an
d
if
it
be
c
o
m
e
s
pa
r
t
of
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
th
e
co
s
t
of
th
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
wouldbeanadditional
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
to
th
o
s
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
If
it
be
c
o
m
e
s
apa
r
t
of
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
,
th
e
al
l
e
y
willNOTextendto54thstreet
an
d
wi
l
l
on
l
y
be
pa
i
d
fo
r
by
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
wh
o
ab
u
t
th
e
al
l
e
y
.
15
D
o
e
s
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
ha
v
e
to
be
5'
?
Th
i
s
is
th
e
wi
d
t
h
pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
by
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
an
d
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
st
a
f
f
in
or
d
e
r
to
satisfyADArequirementsand
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
16
D
o
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ha
v
e
to
ke
e
p
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
cl
e
a
n
?
Y
e
s
.
In
th
e
fu
t
u
r
e
,
th
e
ci
t
y
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
co
u
l
d
ta
k
e
ov
e
r
th
e
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
.
17
H
o
w
do
we
ac
c
e
s
s
th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
st
u
d
y
?
We
ha
v
e
th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
co
u
n
t
s
an
d
sp
e
e
d
da
t
a
,
no
t
afo
r
m
a
l
st
u
d
y
.
Th
a
t
da
t
a
wi
l
l
bepartoftheengineeringstudy
an
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
av
e
r
a
g
e
da
i
l
y
tr
a
f
f
i
c
co
u
n
t
s
,
av
e
r
a
g
e
85
t
h
pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
sp
e
e
d
s
,
an
d
datesandtimesofwhenthe
tr
a
f
f
i
c
wa
s
me
a
s
u
r
e
d
by
st
r
e
e
t
.
18
H
o
w
do
we
co
n
t
a
c
t
th
e
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Me
m
b
e
r
s
?
Th
e
i
r
co
n
t
a
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
ca
n
be
fo
u
n
d
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
we
b
s
i
t
e
(e
m
a
i
l
s
,
ph
o
n
e
numbers,etc.)
19
W
h
a
t
is
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
st
r
e
e
t
pl
a
n
wh
e
r
e
no
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
ar
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
?
Th
e
cr
o
s
s
Ͳse
c
t
i
o
n
s
in
c
l
u
d
e
a2Ͳwa
y
17
'
dr
i
v
i
n
g
la
n
e
an
d
a7'
wi
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
la
n
e
ononeside.
20
Th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
st
r
e
e
t
fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
wi
l
l
be
na
r
r
o
w
e
d
no
ma
t
t
e
r
wh
a
t
ha
p
p
e
n
s
wi
t
h
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
?
Ye
s
21
W
h
a
t
is
th
e
co
s
t
of
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
wi
t
h
o
u
t
Ju
a
n
i
t
a
an
d
In
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
?
Co
s
t
s
of
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
ar
e
fu
n
d
e
d
by
th
e
PA
C
S
(P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
Cy
c
l
i
s
t
Sa
f
e
t
y
Fu
n
d
)
,
theyarenotassessed.Wedo
no
t
ha
v
e
in
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
co
s
t
s
pe
r
st
r
e
e
t
,
bu
t
co
u
l
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
th
a
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
toyouuponrequest.
22
W
h
a
t
is
th
e
ty
p
i
c
a
l
RO
W
in
Ed
i
n
a
?
6
0
'
23
W
h
a
t
is
th
e
lo
g
i
c
be
h
i
n
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
on
on
l
y
on
e
si
d
e
in
s
t
e
a
d
of
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
?
Th
i
s
id
e
a
is
apa
r
t
of
ou
r
dr
a
f
t
Li
v
i
n
g
St
r
e
e
t
s
pl
a
n
th
a
t
wi
l
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
se
v
e
r
a
l
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
includingareductioninthe
fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
of
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
wh
i
c
h
wi
l
l
re
d
u
c
e
ov
e
r
a
l
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
co
s
t
s
an
d
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
andthecosttomaintainless
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
ov
e
r
ti
m
e
.
24
W
i
l
l
th
e
r
e
be
"n
o
pa
r
k
i
n
g
"
si
g
n
s
?
Ye
s
25
Wi
l
l
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
st
i
l
l
be
pu
t
in
on
51
s
t
St
r
e
e
t
if
Ju
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
an
d
In
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
do
no
t
ha
v
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
?
No
,
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
on
51
s
t
St
wo
u
l
d
be
re
m
o
v
e
d
if
th
e
Ju
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
/
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Avesidewalksareremoved.
Th
e
r
e
wi
l
l
be
no
"d
e
a
d
en
d
"
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
26
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
vo
l
u
m
e
/
s
p
e
e
d
is
apr
o
b
l
e
m
on
Ha
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
.
Do
e
s
na
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
a
st
r
e
e
t
re
a
l
l
y
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
i
s
?
Ye
s
,
th
a
t
is
th
e
tr
e
n
d
fr
o
m
ot
h
e
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
we
'
v
e
se
e
n
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
.
It
fo
r
c
e
s
driverstopaycloserattention
to
wh
a
t
th
e
y
ar
e
do
i
n
g
an
d
ty
p
i
c
a
l
l
y
re
d
u
c
e
s
th
e
av
e
r
a
g
e
sp
e
e
d
of
th
e
ve
h
i
c
l
e
.
27
H
o
w
do
e
s
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
/
n
o
pa
r
k
i
n
g
af
f
e
c
t
th
e
Go
r
g
a
s
Av
e
cu
l
Ͳde
Ͳsa
c
?
T
h
e
r
e
wi
l
l
be
no
pa
r
k
i
n
g
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
in
th
e
cu
l
Ͳde
Ͳsa
c
.
Pa
g
e
2of
2
APPENDIXD
CityCouncilDecisionon
IndianolaandJuanita
Sidewalks
Minutes/Edina City Council/August 19, 2014
Page 4
VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.
VIII.B. MINUTES:
1. PARK BOARD, JUNE 10, 2014 AND JULY 8, 2014
2. PLANNING COMMISSION, JULY 9, 2014
Informational; no action required.
IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received
X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received
X.A. INDIANOLA/JUANITA SIDEWALK PROJECT – DESIGN REVISED
The Council asked questions regarding the proposed sidewalks within the Indianola/Juanita road
reconstruction project. Mr. Millner referenced the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Plan, described staff’s
contact with the Indianola/Juanita neighborhood, and stated he would not recommend sidewalks in that
area based on present traffic warrants. The Council discussed the sidewalk project, noting this project
was currently under design. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague,
directing staff to revise the project plans to remove the sidewalk loop from Indianola/Juanita
and the two 51st Street stubs. Juanita from 50th Street to 500 feet south of 50th Street will
remain in the project area until traffic warrants can be completed and analyzed. .
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received
XI.A. POLICY: CONFLICT OF INTEREST – REFERRED TO FUTURE WORK SESSION
Mr. Neal explained that in the past, the City had relied on State Statutes for conflict of interest guidelines.
Based on the Council’s direction at its last meeting, staff drafted a Conflict of Interest Policy using the City
of Brainerd’s Conflict of Interest Policy as a template. It was noted the Planning Commission had, for
some time, been considering whether to adopt a Conflict of Interest Policy.
The Council indicated support for a uniform policy addressing conflict of interest. Staff was asked to
provide additional information relating to how the draft policy compared to State Statute regulations, case
law comparisons, enforceable consequences, preparatory language, and other relevant information. The
Council asked staff to inform the Planning Commission that it was working on this policy and directed staff
to place this item on a future Work Session agenda for additional discussion.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned
at 9:16 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 2, 2014.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the August 19, 2014, meeting available.
APPENDIXE
AlleyQuestionnaire
$XJXVW
$OOH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
$UGHQ3DUN'1HLJKERUKRRG5RDGZD\5HFRQVWUXFWLRQ
3UHOLPLQDU\HQJLQHHULQJLVQRZXQGHUZD\IRUWKHDERYHUHIHUHQFHGSURMHFW<RXUUHVSRQVHWRWKLV
TXHVWLRQQDLUHZLOOKHOSXVFRQVLGHUZKHWKHURUQRWWRLQFOXGHDOOH\LPSURYHPHQWVDVSDUWRIWKHSURMHFW,I
LQFRUSRUDWHGWKHFRVWRIWKHVHLPSURYHPHQWVZRXOGEHDGGHGWR\RXURYHUDOOVWUHHWDVVHVVPHQW%DVHGRQ
SUHYLRXV&LW\DOOH\LPSURYHPHQWSURMHFWVWKHFRVWW\SLFDOO\UDQJHVIURP
$OOH\LPSURYHPHQWVFRQVLVWRIUHVXUIDFLQJWKHDOOH\ZLWKQHZSDYHPHQWDQGLPSURYLQJGUDLQDJH7KUHHRSWLRQV
DUHEHLQJFRQVLGHUHG$VVKRZQRQWKHDWWDFKHGPDSRSWLRQLQFOXGHVSURSHUWLHV RUDQJH DQGZRXOG
LPSURYHRQO\WKHSRUWLRQRIWKHDOOH\WKDWLVFXUUHQWO\SDYHG2SWLRQLQFOXGHVSURSHUWLHV EOXH DQGZRXOG
H[WHQGLPSURYHPHQWVWRLQFOXGHWKDWSRUWLRQRIWKHDOOH\WKDWLVFXUUHQWO\JUDYHOHG2SWLRQLVWROHDYHWKH
DOOH\LQLWVFXUUHQWFRQGLWLRQ
,I\RXUSURSHUW\LVRUDQJHRQWKHPDSSOHDVHDQVZHUTXHVWLRQRUEHORZ,I\RXUSURSHUW\LVEOXHRQWKH
PDSSOHDVHDQVZHUTXHVWLRQRUEHORZ2SWLRQZLOOQRWEHLQFRUSRUDWHGZLWKRXWRSWLRQ6WDIIZLOO
DQDO\]HWKHQXPEHURIUHWXUQHGTXHVWLRQQDLUHVDQGWKH¶<HV·YRWHVWRGHWHUPLQHWKHVFRSHRIWKHDOOH\
LPSURYHPHQWV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ UHSDYHH[LVWLQJSDYHPHQW "<HV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ UHSDYHH[LVWLQJSDYHPHQWDQG
DGGSDYHPHQWZKHUHWKHUHLVFXUUHQWO\JUDYHO "<HV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ GRQRWKLQJ "<HV
7KDQN\RXIRUFRPSOHWLQJWKHTXHVWLRQQDLUH3OHDVHUHWXUQLWE\6HSW :HZLOOQRWLI\\RXRIWKHUHVXOWVRI
WKLVTXHVWLRQQDLUHDWDQHLJKERUKRRGLQIRUPDWLRQDOPHHWLQJODWHULQ6HSWHPEHU,I\RXKDYHTXHVWLRQVSOHDVH
FRQWDFW&KDG0LOOQHU'LUHFWRURI(QJLQHHULQJDW RUFPLOOQHU#(GLQD01JRYRU7RE\0XVHZLWK
6(+,QFDW RUWPXVH#VHKLQFFRPRU6KDURQ$OOLVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ6SHFLDOLVWDW RU
VDOOLVRQ#(GLQD01JRY
6LQFHUHO\
&KDG$0LOOQHU
'LUHFWRURI(QJLQHHULQJ
Arden
Park
OPTION 1
OPTION 2
51285129513651375128
5363
5200
5204
5208
5212
5216
5220
5224
5228
5240
5236
5232
5300
5304
5301
5241
5233
5229
5225
5221
5217
5209
42014207
5201
5205
JUANITA AVE
INDIANOLA
AVE
H
A
L
I
F
A
X
A
V
E
M
I
N
N
E
H
A
H
A
B
L
V
D
Project: EDINA 128385
Figure
1
Arden Park D Neighborhood
Alley ImprovementsMap by: MSS
Projection: Hennepin County Coords
Source: Henn. County, City of Edina,
Microsoft Virtual Earth Edina, Minnesota
IPa
t
h
:
P
:
\
A
E
\
E
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
1
2
8
3
8
5
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
A
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
m
x
d
Date: 8/25/2014
010050Feet
OPTION 3
DO NOTHING
6HSWHPEHU
$OOH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
$UGHQ3DUN'1HLJKERUKRRG5RDGZD\5HFRQVWUXFWLRQ
3UHOLPLQDU\HQJLQHHULQJLVQRZXQGHUZD\IRUWKHDERYHUHIHUHQFHGSURMHFW<RXUUHVSRQVHWRWKLV
TXHVWLRQQDLUHZLOOKHOSXVFRQVLGHUZKHWKHURUQRWWRLQFOXGHDOOH\LPSURYHPHQWVDVSDUWRIWKHSURMHFW,I
LQFRUSRUDWHGWKHFRVWRIWKHVHLPSURYHPHQWVZRXOGEHDGGHGWR\RXURYHUDOOVWUHHWDVVHVVPHQW%DVHGRQ
SUHYLRXV&LW\DOOH\LPSURYHPHQWSURMHFWVWKHFRVWW\SLFDOO\UDQJHVIURP
,PSURYHPHQWVFRQVLVWRIUHVXUIDFLQJWKHDOOH\ZLWKQHZSDYHPHQWDQGLPSURYLQJGUDLQDJH7KUHHRSWLRQVDUH
EHLQJFRQVLGHUHGDVVKRZQRQWKHDWWDFKHGPDS
2SWLRQLQFOXGHVSURSHUWLHV RUDQJHVROLGVKDGHGORWV DQGZRXOGLPSURYHRQO\WKHSRUWLRQRIWKHDOOH\
WKDWLVFXUUHQWO\SDYHG
2SWLRQLQFOXGHVSURSHUWLHV EOXHVROLGVKDGHGDQGEOXHKDWFKHGORWV 7KLVZRXOGH[WHQGLPSURYHPHQWVWR
LQFOXGHWKDWSRUWLRQRIWKHDOOH\WKDWLVFXUUHQWO\JUDYHOHGDVIDUDVWKHJDUDJHWR+DOLID[$YH67KHILYH
VROLGEOXHVKDGHGORWVKDYHDOUHDG\UHFHLYHGWKLVTXHVWLRQQDLUH
2SWLRQLVWROHDYHWKHDOOH\LQLWVFXUUHQWFRQGLWLRQ
3OHDVHDQVZHUWKHTXHVWLRQVEHORZDQGLQFOXGHDQ\FRPPHQWVDV\RXVHHILW2SWLRQZLOOQRWEHLQFRUSRUDWHG
ZLWKRXWRSWLRQ6WDIIZLOODQDO\]HWKHQXPEHURIUHWXUQHGTXHVWLRQQDLUHVDQGWKH¶<HV·YRWHVWRGHWHUPLQHWKH
VFRSHRIWKHDOOH\LPSURYHPHQWV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ UHSDYHH[LVWLQJSDYHPHQW "<HV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ UHSDYHH[LVWLQJSDYHPHQWDQG
DGGSDYHPHQWZKHUHWKHUHLVFXUUHQWO\JUDYHO "<HV
'R\RXIDYRU2SWLRQ GRQRWKLQJ "<HV
7KDQN\RXIRUFRPSOHWLQJWKHTXHVWLRQQDLUH3OHDVHUHWXUQLWE\6HSW:HZLOOQRWLI\\RXRIWKHUHVXOWVRI
WKLVTXHVWLRQQDLUHDWDQHLJKERUKRRGLQIRUPDWLRQDOPHHWLQJRQ6HSW,I\RXKDYHTXHVWLRQVSOHDVHFRQWDFW
&KDG0LOOQHU'LUHFWRURI(QJLQHHULQJDW RUFPLOOQHU#(GLQD01JRYRU7RE\0XVHZLWK6(+,QF
DW RUWPXVH#VHKLQFFRPRU6KDURQ$OOLVRQ(QJLQHHULQJ6SHFLDOLVWDW RU
VDOOLVRQ#(GLQD01JRY
6LQFHUHO\
&KDG$0LOOQHU
'LUHFWRURI(QJLQHHULQJ
Arden
Park
OPTION 1
OPTION 2
5363
52015200
5204
5208
5212
5216
5220
5224
5228
5240
5236
5232
5300
5304
5308
5312
5309
5301
5241
5233
5229
5225
5221
5217
5209
42014207
5201
5205
52ND ST W
H
A
L
I
F
A
X
A
V
E
M
I
N
N
E
H
A
H
A
B
L
V
D
Project: EDINA 128385 Figure1
Arden Park D Neighborhood Alley ImprovementsMap by: MSSProjection: Hennepin County CoordsSource: Henn. County, City of Edina, Microsoft Virtual Earth Edina, MinnesotaI
Pa
t
h
:
M
:
\
A
E
\
E
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
1
2
8
3
8
5
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
A
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
m
x
d
Date: 9/10/2014
010050Feet
OPTION 3DO NOTHING
ARDEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2014 ALLEY QUESTIONNAIREIMPROVEMENT NO. BA-412
Data Entered By:KA
Last Date Data Entered:October 3, 2014
Due Date:Sept. 9, 2014
Questionnaires Sent Out:23
Questionnaires Returned:83%
Percent Returned:
Do you favor Option 1 (repave existing pavement)
Do you favor Option 2 (repave existing pavement and add pavement where there is currently gravel)?
Do you favor Option 3 (do nothing)?
YesYesYes
House #Street Name420152nd St W115204Halifax Ave115208Halifax Ave11Strongly oppose any improvements.5212 Halifax Ave115216Halifax Ave11Divert the $ to put sidewalks on the west side of Halifax. PLEASE!!!5220 Halifax Ave115224Halifax Ave115228Halifax Ave115232Halifax Ave115300Halifax Ave115304Halifax Ave115308Halifax Ave11Why is 5308 included there is no alley or access.5209 Minnehaha Blvd115217Minnehaha Blvd115221Minnehaha Blvd115225Minnehaha Blvd115229Minnehaha Blvd115233Minnehaha Blvd115301Minnehaha Blvd11The owner is in favor of paving alley only if the last two lots (one being his) gets gravel and slight grading (ruts there now).5200 Halifax Ave5236Halifax Ave5240Halifax Ave5241Minnehaha Blvd
19379SurveysSent2383%13%30%39%SurveysReturned 19 100%16%37%47%
ADDRESS ReturnedSurvey
Alley Improvements
Additional Comments
10/13/20141 of 1
APPENDIXF
9/22/14Informational
Meeting
September 9, 2014
Arden Park D
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
Informational Meeting
Monday, Sept. 22, 6-8 p.m.
Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility
7450 Metro Blvd, Edina
Please plan to attend this informational meeting for an update on the following:
o Proposed Assessment
o Sidewalk Improvements
o Alley Improvements
o Streetlight Improvements
o Private Sanitary Sewer Improvements
o Stormwater Management Improvements
Proposed assessments will be available and will include the costs for street reconstruction, private
sanitary sewer and streetlight improvements.
If you’re not able to attend the meeting, the presentation will be posted to our website after the
meeting. If you have questions please contact project manager Toby Muse with SEH at
tmuse@sehinc.com or 952-912-2616, or engineering specialist Sharon Allison at
sallison@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0449.
10/13/2014
1
www.EdinaMN.gov
2015ArdenParkDNeighborhood
RoadwayImprovements
BAͲ412
InformationalMeeting
September 22, 2014
www.EdinaMN.gov
Agenda
•Introductions•ProjectLocation•Process&Timeline•ProjectDetails–Utilities–Sidewalks–AlleyUpdate–RoadwayImprovements•PreliminaryAssessments•Q&A
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProjectLocation
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProjectTimeline
TimelineDescription
September,2014Feasibilityreportandestimates
provided
October2014ParkBoardandETCreviewfeasibility
report
December9,2014Publichearing
DecemberͲFebruary,2014Ͳ15Planpreparationandbidding
April/May,2015Constructionbegins
October/November,2015Constructionconcludes
Spring2016Warrantywork
Summer/Fall2016Finalassessmenthearing
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProjectApprovalProcess
•PublichasarighttospeakatPublicHearing•TwoVotesoftheCityCouncil:–1st Vote–AssessmentApproval;need4:1infavor–2nd Vote–PACS*Components;need3:2infavor
*PACS=PedestrianandCycleSafety
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•StormSewer•TrunkWaterMainandSanitarySewerPipes•WaterandSanitarySewerServicePipes•Lighting
10/13/2014
2
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•StormSewer
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•TrunkWater MainandSanitary
SewerPipes•WaterandSanitarySewerService
Pipes
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•TrunkWaterMainPipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails
•48RecordedWater
ServiceBreaksͲ
1988toPresent
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•TrunkWaterMainPipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•TrunkSanitarySewer
Pipe•Pipesareclay•InflowandInfiltration
isoccurringinthe
system
10/13/2014
3
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails•TrunkSanitarySewerPipe•Knowntocontainmineral
depositsandroots•CCTVcurrentlyunderway
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingUtilityDetails
CityOwnedSystem
•LightingSystem•CityOwnedSystem
hasreachedtheend
ofitsusefullife
www.EdinaMN.gov
ExistingRoadwayDetails
•AlleybetweenHalifax
AveSandMinnehaha
Blvd•Pavement/gravel/turf•Existingwidthis10Ͳft
to12Ͳft•Drainageissues
www.EdinaMN.gov
AlleyQuestionnaireResults
No.of
Questionnaires
Sent
No.of
Questionnaires
Returned
%
Returned
Option1
PaveArea
Previously
Paved
Option2
PaveAreaof
Existing
Pavement
andGravel
Option3
DoNothing
231252%237
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadway
Improvements•Proposed
Sidewalk
Locations
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements•ProposedSidewalkLocations–ArdenAveand52nd St(eastoftheexisting
alley)
10/13/2014
4
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements•W51st StreetandHalifaxAveSIntersection
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements•BruceIslandReconfiguration
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements•BruceAvenueCulͲDeͲSac
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedRoadwayImprovements•GorgasAveCulͲ
DeͲSac
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails
•StormSewerImprovements•Greenareasindicateadded
inletsorimprovedsurface
flow•Pinklinesindicatenew
stormsewerpipes
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedStormwaterManagementDetails•Subsurface
PerforatedStorm
SewerPipe(shown
inpurple)•PerviousPaver
Blocks(shownin
green)
10/13/2014
5
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails
•TrunkWaterMain•ExistingWaterMainto
beRetained(Blue)•ExistingWaterMainto
beReplaced(green)•NewWaterMain
Location(pink)
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails•TemporaryWaterSystem
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails•WaterServicePipes•Replaceallservice
pipesandcurbstops
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails•TrunkSanitarySewerPipe
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails•SanitarySewerServicePipes
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedSanitarySewerServiceImprovements•HomeownercanreconstructsegmentCusingtheirown
contractorand–IftheworkisdoneperCitycode,youhavetheoptionto
addthecosttoyourstreetassessment,or•TheCitywillreconstructsegmentCusingitscontractorand
thecostisautomaticallyaddedtothecostofyourstreet
assessment
10/13/2014
6
www.EdinaMN.gov
ProposedUtilityDetails
•Lighting
www.EdinaMN.gov
PreliminaryAssessments
ArdenParkDNeighborhood EstimatedAssessment
perREU #ofREU’s
Street$10,000Ͳ $12,400238.42
SanitarySewerService$2,700225
Lighting$400238.42
Total PreliminaryAssessment$13,100Ͳ $15,500
www.EdinaMN.gov
•Dust,noiseandmud•Localizedfloodingduring
rainfall•Timelinessometimes
delayedduetoweather•Your drivewaymaybe
inaccessibleforuptoseven
days•Roadwaystoyourhomemay
beperiodicallyinaccessible,
usuallyduringdaytime
workinghours.•Irrigationandpet
containmentsystemsmaybe
damaged
WhatYou CanExpect
www.EdinaMN.gov
ContactUs
Toby Muse,SEHProjectManager
Phone:952.912.2616
Email:tmuse@sehinc.com
ChadMillner,DirectorofEngineering
Phone:952.826.0318
Email:cmillner@edinamn.gov
www.EdinaMN.gov
Thankyou!
Questions?
20
1
4
A
r
d
e
n
P
a
r
k
D
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Su
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
e
p
t
2
2
,
2
0
1
4
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
n
s
w
e
r
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Me
e
t
i
n
g
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Me
e
t
i
n
g
T
i
m
e
:
6
p
m
t
o
8
p
m
Nu
m
b
e
r
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
An
s
w
e
r
1W
h
a
t
is
th
e
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
fo
r
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
th
a
t
ast
r
e
e
t
ge
t
s
asi
d
e
w
a
l
k
?
T
h
e
r
e
ar
e
se
v
e
r
a
l
cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
.
On
e
of
th
e
mo
s
t
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
is
wh
e
n
ast
r
e
e
t
ex
c
e
e
d
s
500ADT.
2I
s
th
e
'L
i
v
i
n
g
St
r
e
e
t
s
'
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
in
it
s
fi
n
a
l
fo
r
m
?
Th
e
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
is
in
dr
a
f
t
fo
r
m
an
d
in
it
s
fi
n
a
l
re
v
i
e
w
st
a
g
e
s
.
It
st
i
l
l
ne
e
d
s
re
v
i
e
w
fromacoupleoftheCity's
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
s
la
t
e
r
th
i
s
ye
a
r
an
d
in
t
o
ea
r
l
y
ne
x
t
ye
a
r
.
3
Wh
y
do
e
s
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
go
on
th
e
sa
m
e
si
d
e
of
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
as
th
e
hy
d
r
a
n
t
s
?
Th
e
hy
d
r
a
n
t
ca
n
go
in
th
e
bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
wa
l
k
an
d
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
or
on
thehousesideofthewalk.
4
W
i
l
l
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
pa
r
a
l
l
e
l
th
e
cu
r
b
an
d
gu
t
t
e
r
or
me
a
n
d
e
r
?
F
i
n
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
wi
l
l
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
th
i
s
bu
t
ge
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
th
e
y
wi
l
l
pa
r
a
l
l
e
l
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
.
5D
o
e
s
ana
r
r
o
w
e
r
st
r
e
e
t
re
d
u
c
e
th
e
av
e
r
a
g
e
sp
e
e
d
?
Y
e
s
it
do
e
s
re
d
u
c
e
sp
e
e
d
s
.
6W
h
y
it
is
ago
o
d
id
e
a
to
na
r
r
o
w
Ju
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
to
27
'
?
Is
it
sa
f
e
?
A
27
'
st
r
e
e
t
wi
l
l
sl
o
w
do
w
n
tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
be
le
s
s
ex
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
to
bu
i
l
d
an
d
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
.
7
W
i
l
l
mo
v
i
n
g
th
e
cu
r
b
li
n
e
in
af
f
e
c
t
my
sp
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
s
du
r
i
n
g
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ye
s
,
th
e
y
wi
l
l
be
im
p
a
c
t
e
d
an
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
is
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
re
p
a
i
r
i
n
g
bothirrigationsystemsand
pe
t
fe
n
c
e
s
.
8C
a
n
are
s
i
d
e
n
t
pa
y
ex
t
r
a
fo
r
awi
d
e
r
st
r
e
e
t
?
Th
e
27
'
wi
d
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
wi
t
h
o
u
t
wa
l
k
s
ha
s
be
e
n
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
si
n
c
e
20
0
6
an
d
no
pr
o
g
r
a
m
isinͲplaceforresident
fu
n
d
e
d
wi
d
e
n
i
n
g
.
9C
a
n
th
e
cu
l
Ͳde
Ͳsa
c
s
be
na
r
r
o
w
e
d
to
60
'
wi
t
h
o
u
t
ha
m
p
e
r
i
n
g
us
e
?
Th
e
Ci
t
y
ha
s
ch
e
c
k
e
d
th
e
cu
l
Ͳde
Ͳsa
c
s
fo
r
th
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
th
e
la
r
g
e
r
vehiclesthattheCityusesand
ha
v
e
ba
s
e
d
th
e
60
'
di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
on
th
a
t
.
10
W
i
l
l
on
e
Ͳsi
d
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
be
im
p
o
s
e
d
on
al
l
st
r
e
e
t
s
?
Y
e
s
.
11
On
e
si
d
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
ma
y
ca
u
s
e
in
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
fo
r
th
e
ch
u
r
c
h
at
50
t
h
an
d
Wo
o
d
d
a
l
e
th
a
t
us
e
s
Br
u
c
e
Av
e
on
Su
n
d
a
y
.
Th
e
y
ca
n
st
i
l
l
us
e
al
l
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
bu
t
ju
s
t
on
on
e
si
d
e
.
12
Ca
n
th
e
wa
t
e
r
ma
i
n
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
fo
r
th
e
ho
m
e
s
on
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
be
pl
a
c
e
d
in
th
e
al
l
e
y
so
th
a
t
it
is
cl
o
s
e
r
to
th
e
ho
m
e
s
?
Th
e
al
l
e
y
is
ve
r
y
na
r
r
o
w
an
d
in
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g
awa
t
e
r
ma
i
n
wi
l
l
be
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
be
c
a
u
s
e
ofthis.Thisoptionwillbe
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
an
d
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
th
e
fi
n
a
l
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
st
u
d
y
.
13
D
o
e
s
awa
l
k
ha
v
e
to
go
on
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
?
Th
e
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
wa
l
k
is
ca
l
l
e
d
fo
r
in
th
e
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
pl
a
n
an
d
is
ju
s
t
i
f
i
e
d
by
thetrafficcounts.Ifaresident
wi
s
h
e
s
to
ex
p
r
e
s
s
aco
n
t
r
a
r
y
op
i
n
i
o
n
,
we
wi
l
l
li
s
t
e
n
to
th
e
i
r
in
p
u
t
.
14
C
a
n
mo
r
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
be
ad
d
e
d
to
Ar
d
e
n
Pa
r
k
?
Th
i
s
wa
s
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
lo
o
k
e
d
at
bu
t
du
e
to
alo
n
g
li
n
e
of
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
ma
t
u
r
e
tr
e
e
s
orsteepslopesadjacenttowest
si
d
e
of
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
,
th
e
r
e
is
no
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
sp
a
c
e
fo
r
bu
m
p
ou
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
.
Th
e
ParksDepartmentwillsoon
lo
o
k
at
re
v
i
s
i
n
g
Ar
d
e
n
Pa
r
k
as
pa
r
t
of
ama
s
t
e
r
pl
a
n
an
d
ma
y
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
ex
t
r
a
parkinglocationsaspartofthat
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
.
15
Ar
e
th
e
r
e
an
y
sa
f
e
t
y
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
ab
o
u
t
na
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
wh
e
r
e
no
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
ar
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
in
or
d
e
r
to
gi
v
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
th
e
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
ge
t
of
f
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
?
Th
e
ma
n
y
Ci
t
y
st
a
f
f
an
d
co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
th
a
t
ha
v
e
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
th
i
s
is
s
u
e
ha
v
e
fo
u
n
d
noreasonsforconcern.
16
Ha
v
e
th
e
r
e
be
e
n
an
y
ac
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
wi
t
h
in
j
u
r
i
e
s
on
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
wi
t
h
o
u
t
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
?
No
kn
o
w
n
ac
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
ha
v
e
oc
c
u
r
r
e
d
bu
t
th
a
t
do
e
s
no
t
eq
u
a
t
e
to
th
e
r
e
be
i
n
g
noriskofaccidentswithhigher
tr
a
f
f
i
c
vo
l
u
m
e
th
e
r
e
.
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
cr
a
s
h
da
t
a
wi
l
l
be
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
in
th
e
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
study.Oneofthestrongest
th
e
m
e
s
in
al
l
Ci
t
y
Ͳwi
d
e
pu
b
l
i
c
op
i
n
i
o
n
su
r
v
e
y
s
ha
s
be
e
n
th
a
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
pr
e
f
e
r
moresidewalks.
Pa
g
e
1of
2
Nu
m
b
e
r
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
An
s
w
e
r
17
Wi
l
l
th
e
na
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
of
th
e
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
on
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
ma
k
e
it
mo
r
e
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
al
l
th
e
bi
k
e
r
s
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
?
Th
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
8'
wi
d
e
wa
l
k
wi
l
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
e
sa
f
e
t
y
fo
r
th
o
s
e
no
t
in
ave
h
i
c
l
e
byseparatingthemfrom
th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
by
th
e
cu
r
b
i
n
g
.
18
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
is
un
s
a
f
e
no
w
du
e
to
pa
r
k
i
n
g
on
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
wi
l
l
on
l
y
be
al
l
o
w
e
d
on
th
e
pa
r
k
si
d
e
.
19
Th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
an
d
54
t
h
ca
n
be
sl
i
p
p
e
r
y
in
th
e
wi
n
t
e
r
an
d
th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
la
r
g
e
'Y
"
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
al
l
o
w
s
tu
r
n
s
to
be
ma
d
e
un
d
e
r
th
e
s
e
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
Th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
wi
l
l
be
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
to
ma
k
e
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
at
mo
r
e
ofa90degreealignment.
20
Do
e
s
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
of
wa
t
e
r
an
d
se
w
e
r
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
an
op
e
n
cu
t
ex
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
?
No
,
tr
e
n
c
h
l
e
s
s
me
t
h
o
d
s
ar
e
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
an
d
wi
l
l
be
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
in
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
12
W
i
l
l
ga
s
li
n
e
s
be
re
Ͳdo
n
e
wi
t
h
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
?
Al
l
of
th
e
pr
i
v
a
t
e
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
wi
l
l
be
no
t
i
f
i
e
d
an
d
Ce
n
t
e
r
P
o
i
n
t
of
t
e
n
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
so
m
e
ofitsfacilitiespriortothe
st
r
e
e
t
wo
r
k
.
13
W
i
l
l
Xc
e
l
En
e
r
g
y
pl
a
c
e
wi
r
e
un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
?
T
h
i
s
on
l
y
ha
p
p
e
n
s
wh
e
n
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ge
t
to
g
e
t
h
e
r
an
d
pa
y
fo
r
th
e
wo
r
k
.
14
Ar
e
un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
po
w
e
r
ca
b
l
e
s
sa
f
e
r
th
a
n
ab
o
v
e
gr
o
u
n
d
be
c
a
u
s
e
tr
e
e
s
wo
n
'
t
br
e
a
k
th
e
m
?
Wh
i
c
h
is
sa
f
e
r
is
un
k
n
o
w
n
bu
t
Xc
e
l
co
u
l
d
an
s
w
e
r
th
i
s
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
.
15
Wi
l
l
an
y
t
h
i
n
g
be
do
n
e
to
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
e
po
o
r
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
at
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
,
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
an
d
W52
n
d
St
?
In
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
wi
l
l
be
ma
d
e
by
ut
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
in
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
te
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
andplacinglargerdraingrates.
Th
e
st
o
r
m
se
w
e
r
pi
p
e
s
in
52
n
d
St
wi
l
l
no
t
be
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
in
si
z
e
du
e
to
ala
r
g
e
expenseandsignificant
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
.
16
H
o
w
ma
n
y
sq
u
a
r
e
ya
r
d
s
of
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
ar
e
in
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
?
W
e
do
no
t
ha
v
e
th
a
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to
n
i
g
h
t
bu
t
th
i
s
wi
l
l
be
re
p
o
r
t
e
d
intheengineeringstudy.
17
Th
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
ap
p
e
a
r
s
to
hi
g
h
e
r
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
th
a
n
so
m
e
ot
h
e
r
Ci
t
y
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
Wh
y
?
So
m
e
ot
h
e
r
Ci
t
y
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
ha
v
e
asl
i
g
h
t
l
y
lo
w
e
r
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
be
c
a
u
s
e
th
e
y
ar
e
notascomplete.Thoseproject
of
t
e
n
re
t
a
i
n
mu
c
h
of
th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
cu
r
b
an
d
gu
t
t
e
r
th
a
t
is
ama
j
o
r
as
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
cost.
18
W
h
y
is
pa
r
k
i
n
g
pl
a
c
e
d
ne
x
t
to
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
?
I
t
is
de
s
i
r
e
d
to
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
th
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
an
d
th
e
mo
v
i
n
g
tr
a
f
f
i
c
as
fa
r
as
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
19
H
o
w
do
e
s
pa
r
k
i
n
g
on
on
e
si
d
e
of
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
af
f
e
c
t
sn
o
w
p
l
o
w
i
n
g
?
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
t
e
n
pl
o
w
s
in
tw
o
st
a
g
e
s
.
Th
e
fi
r
s
t
cl
e
a
r
s
th
e
tr
a
v
e
l
la
n
e
s
an
d
th
e
la
t
e
r
stagecleanstheparking
ar
e
a
s
.
20
Th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
at
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
at
W50
t
h
St
an
d
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
ca
n
ba
c
k
up
fo
r
alo
n
g
ti
m
e
.
Is
th
i
s
is
s
u
e
be
i
n
g
lo
o
k
e
d
in
t
o
?
No
,
th
i
s
is
aco
n
c
e
r
n
fo
r
W50
t
h
St
tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
wi
l
l
no
t
be
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
by
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
reconstruction.
21
Sn
o
w
p
l
o
w
i
n
g
ma
y
pu
s
h
sn
o
w
pa
s
t
th
e
3'
bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
an
d
on
t
o
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
on
Ar
d
e
n
Av
e
.
Wi
l
l
th
e
Ci
t
y
re
m
o
v
e
th
i
s
sn
o
w
?
Sn
o
w
re
m
o
v
a
l
wi
l
l
be
th
e
re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
th
e
ho
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
al
t
h
o
u
g
h
th
i
s
po
l
i
c
y
maychangeovertime.
22
Wh
o
is
li
a
b
l
e
sh
o
u
l
d
an
in
j
u
r
y
oc
c
u
r
on
asi
d
e
w
a
l
k
?
On
wh
o
s
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
it
?
Th
e
ou
t
c
o
m
e
of
pa
s
t
su
i
t
s
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
si
m
i
l
a
r
is
s
u
e
s
is
un
k
n
o
w
n
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
bo
t
h
theCity'sinsuranceandthe
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ho
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
'
s
in
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
ar
e
in
v
o
l
v
e
d
.
Th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
wi
l
l
be
on
Ci
t
y
property.
23
Sh
o
u
l
d
th
e
r
e
be
pa
r
k
i
n
g
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
in
cu
l
Ͳde
Ͳsa
c
s
si
m
i
l
a
r
to
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
?
Th
i
s
is
s
u
e
wi
l
l
be
fu
r
t
h
e
r
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
.
24
On
e
si
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
ma
k
e
s
la
r
g
e
ge
t
Ͳto
g
e
t
h
e
r
s
mo
r
e
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
du
e
to
lo
n
g
e
r
wa
l
k
i
n
g
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
.
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
.
25
On
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
wr
o
t
e
aco
m
m
e
n
t
in
su
p
p
o
r
t
of
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
if
th
e
3'
gr
a
s
s
bl
v
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
an
d
th
e
wa
l
k
wa
s
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
.
Pa
g
e
2of
2
APPENDIXG
PreliminaryAssessmentRoll
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
1
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#1
0
0
0
.
1
7
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
2
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#1
0
1
0
.
1
7
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
3
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#1
0
2
0
.
1
7
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
4
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#2
0
1
0
.
1
7
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
5
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#2
0
2
0
.
1
7
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
6
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#2
0
3
0
.
1
7
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
7
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#2
0
4
0
.
1
7
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
8
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#3
0
0
0
.
1
7
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
1
9
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#3
0
1
0
.
1
7
10
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
4
2
0
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
4
1
2
1
5
0
t
h
St
W#3
0
2
0
.
1
7
11
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
4
E
d
i
n
a
Co
v
e
n
a
n
t
Ch
u
r
c
h
*
4
2
0
1
5
0
t
h
St
W5
12
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
7
P
e
t
e
r
Ot
n
e
s
s
4
2
1
3
Ͳ15
5
0
t
h
St
W0
.
5
0
13
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
1
J
a
m
e
s
&An
n
e
Wi
d
t
f
e
l
d
t
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#1
0
1
0
.
1
7
14
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
2
F
l
o
y
MBa
r
t
h
e
l
c/
o
Ca
r
o
l
We
i
d
t
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#1
0
2
0
.
1
7
15
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
3
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
Ba
r
r
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#1
0
3
0
.
1
7
16
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
4
S
u
s
a
n
Mc
K
e
n
n
a
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#1
0
4
0
.
1
7
17
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
5
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
&Sh
e
i
l
a
Bu
f
f
i
e
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
0
5
0
.
1
7
18
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
6
J
o
h
n
Du
d
y
c
h
a
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
0
6
0
.
1
7
19
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
7
A
m
y
Ke
r
b
e
r
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
0
7
0
.
1
7
20
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
8
P
a
t
t
i
&Me
l
Fr
i
s
c
h
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
0
8
0
.
1
7
21
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
9
W
il
l
i
a
m
Ke
l
l
e
r
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
0
9
0
.
1
7
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
20
1
5
A
r
d
e
n
P
a
r
k
D
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
N
o
.
B
A
-
4
1
2
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
10
/
6
/
2
0
1
4
Pa
g
e
1of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
22
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
0
E
r
d
m
a
n
Al
Sc
h
e
n
c
k
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
1
0
0
.
1
7
23
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
1
R
o
b
e
r
t
&Ma
r
y
He
a
l
y
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#1
1
1
0
.
1
7
24
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
2
D
o
n
a
l
d
Hj
e
l
l
e
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
1
0
.
1
7
25
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
3
E
l
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Pu
r
d
y
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#2
0
2
0
.
1
7
26
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
4
C
a
r
o
l
y
n
Di
c
k
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
3
0
.
1
7
27
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
5
R
o
s
a
l
i
e
&An
g
e
l
a
Va
s
c
e
l
l
a
r
o
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#2
0
4
0
.
1
7
28
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
6
M
a
r
y
Ha
r
r
i
g
a
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
5
0
.
1
7
29
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
7
B
e
a
t
r
i
c
e
Th
a
c
h
e
r
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
6
0
.
1
7
30
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
8
C
h
r
i
s
t
i
n
a
Do
u
k
a
s
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
7
0
.
1
7
31
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
1
9
R
o
y
Pa
l
m
q
u
i
s
t
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
8
0
.
1
7
32
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
0
J
a
m
e
s
Co
n
w
a
y
Sr
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
0
9
0
.
1
7
33
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
1
L
i
s
a
&Ga
r
y
Wi
g
n
e
s
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
1
0
0
.
1
7
34
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
2
L
y
n
d
o
n
De
a
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#2
1
1
0
.
1
7
35
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
3
D
a
v
i
d
&Su
e
l
l
e
n
Bu
c
k
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#3
0
1
0
.
1
7
36
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
4
P
a
m
e
l
a
Mo
r
f
o
r
d
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#3
0
2
0
.
1
7
37
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
5
S
s
r
b
a
r
a
Su
b
a
k
Kr
u
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#3
0
3
0
.
1
7
38
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
6
J
e
r
o
m
e
Ja
l
l
o
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#3
0
4
0
.
1
7
39
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
7
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
Jo
b
i
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
0
5
0
.
1
7
40
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
8
T
h
o
m
a
s
&Ma
r
y
Kr
o
t
h
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
0
6
0
.
1
7
41
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
2
9
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
Er
i
c
k
s
o
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
0
7
0
.
1
7
42
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
0
R
o
s
l
y
n
&Ja
m
e
s
Ha
w
l
e
y
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
0
8
0
.
1
7
43
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
1
C
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
e
Lo
c
k
a
r
t
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
0
9
0
.
1
7
44
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
2
H
e
n
r
y
Sm
i
t
h
&El
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Ca
m
p
e
a
u
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#3
1
0
0
.
1
7
45
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
3
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
&Ja
n
i
c
e
Ke
t
c
h
a
m
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#3
1
1
0
.
1
7
46
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
4
J
u
d
y
&Ga
r
y
Ne
l
s
o
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#4
0
1
0
.
1
7
47
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
5
A
r
d
i
s
St
e
v
e
n
s
o
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
0
2
0
.
1
7
48
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
6
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
&Ly
n
n
Wa
r
d
e
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
0
3
0
.
1
7
49
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
7
D
y
a
n
Ha
r
l
e
m
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#4
0
4
0
.
1
7
50
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
8
H
e
l
e
n
Co
n
w
a
y
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#4
0
5
0
.
1
7
51
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
3
9
D
e
a
n
Be
l
b
a
s
/
T
r
u
s
t
e
e
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#4
0
6
0
.
1
7
52
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
4
0
M
a
r
y
Ki
n
e
r
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
0
7
0
.
1
7
53
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
4
1
T
h
e
o
d
o
r
a
Bo
o
s
a
l
i
s
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
0
8
0
.
1
7
54
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
4
2
P
a
t
r
i
c
i
a
Aw
e
s
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
ST
W#4
0
9
0
.
1
7
55
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
4
3
S
a
n
d
r
a
Lo
g
e
l
i
n
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
1
0
0
.
1
7
56
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
4
4
D
a
ph
n
e
Si
o
r
i
s
40
7
5
5
1
s
t
St
W#4
1
1
0
.
1
7
Pa
g
e
2of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
57
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
5
R
o
b
e
r
t
Wh
i
t
e
&El
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Wh
i
t
e
4
2
0
1
5
2
n
d
St
W1
58
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
6
G
o
r
d
o
n
Ot
t
e
r
l
e
i
4
2
0
7
5
2
n
d
St
W1
59
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
3
M
a
t
t
h
e
w
Au
g
u
s
t
s
o
n
&Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
Au
g
u
s
t
s
o
n
5
0
0
0
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
60
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
4
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
Pa
l
m
5
0
0
1
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
61
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
2
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Po
s
t
&Lo
r
i
Po
s
t
5
0
0
2
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
62
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
5
P
a
u
l
Ek
m
a
n
&Ma
r
y
Ek
m
a
n
5
0
0
3
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
63
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
1
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
Lu
p
i
e
n
t
5
0
0
4
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
64
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
6
J
o
h
n
St
r
o
m
&Na
n
c
y
St
r
o
m
5
0
0
5
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
65
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
0
G
o
r
d
o
n
Wr
i
g
h
t
&Sh
e
l
l
y
Wr
i
g
h
t
5
0
0
6
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
66
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
7
M
a
r
k
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
&Je
m
m
a
Fu
l
l
e
r
t
o
n
5
0
0
7
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
67
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
9
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
Ga
e
r
t
n
e
r
&Ka
t
h
l
e
e
n
Ga
e
r
t
n
e
r
5
0
0
8
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
68
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
8
D
a
n
i
e
l
Br
i
n
k
m
a
n
&El
l
e
n
Br
i
n
k
m
a
n
5
0
0
9
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
69
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
8
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Kr
a
u
s
s
&Vi
c
t
o
r
i
a
Sp
l
c
h
i
n
e
t
s
k
y
5
0
1
0
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
70
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
5
9
J
o
h
n
Kl
o
b
u
l
a
r
&Le
i
g
h
Kl
o
b
u
l
a
r
5
0
1
1
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
71
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
7
R
o
b
e
r
t
Li
t
t
l
e
&He
a
t
h
e
r
Li
t
t
l
e
5
0
1
2
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
72
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
0
L
a
u
r
a
Be
n
s
o
n
&Pe
t
e
r
Ha
u
g
e
n
5
0
1
3
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
73
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
6
J
o
h
n
Fo
x
&Jo
a
n
i
e
Fo
x
5
0
1
4
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
74
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
1
B
e
t
s
y
Jo
Si
m
o
n
&Ja
m
e
s
Hi
n
i
k
e
r
II
I
5
0
1
5
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
75
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
5
L
a
u
r
e
n
Pe
i
c
h
e
l
&Wi
l
l
i
a
m
Pe
i
c
h
e
l
5
0
1
6
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
76
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
2
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
No
r
d
s
t
r
o
m
&Ke
l
l
y
No
r
d
s
t
r
o
m
5
0
1
7
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
77
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
4
J
o
h
n
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
&An
n
e
l
y
s
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
5
0
1
8
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
78
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
3
R
a
c
h
e
l
El
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
&Bu
r
k
e
El
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
5
0
1
9
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
79
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
3
J
u
l
i
a
n
a
El
s
t
a
d
&Jo
h
n
El
s
t
a
d
5
0
2
0
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
80
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
1
J
o
h
n
Ke
n
n
e
f
i
c
k
&An
n
e
Ke
n
n
e
f
i
c
k
5
0
2
2
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
81
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
4
J
a
m
e
s
Ty
s
o
n
&Ja
n
Ty
s
o
n
5
1
0
1
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
82
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
5
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
O'
L
e
a
r
y
&No
r
a
O'
L
e
a
r
y
5
1
0
3
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
83
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
6
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Eb
b
e
r
t
&Ro
b
i
n
Eb
b
e
r
t
5
1
0
5
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
84
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
7
P
a
u
l
Ca
v
a
n
o
r
&St
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
Ca
v
a
n
o
r
5
1
0
7
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
85
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
8
J
o
h
n
Wh
e
a
t
o
n
&Ke
l
l
y
Wh
e
a
t
o
n
5
1
0
9
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
86
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
7
D
e
n
n
i
s
Ma
e
t
z
o
l
d
&Li
n
d
a
Ma
e
t
z
o
l
d
5
1
1
0
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
87
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
6
9
M
i
c
h
e
l
e
Ta
f
o
y
a
&Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
Wa
l
t
o
n
5
1
1
1
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
88
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
6
C
r
a
i
g
St
r
a
u
s
s
&Le
i
g
h
St
r
a
u
s
s
5
1
1
2
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
89
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
7
0
P
a
t
r
i
c
i
a
Wi
l
l
i
a
m
s
/Tr
u
s
t
e
e
5
1
1
3
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
Pa
g
e
3of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
90
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
5
M
a
r
k
Ra
h
n
&Ra
c
h
e
l
Ra
h
n
5
1
1
4
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
91
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
7
1
E
d
w
a
r
d
Mu
r
d
o
c
k
&Li
n
d
a
Mu
r
d
o
c
k
5
1
1
5
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
92
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
4
D
a
v
i
d
Gr
o
t
h
&Ga
i
l
Gr
o
t
h
5
1
1
6
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
93
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
7
2
B
r
i
a
n
Ol
s
e
n
&Le
s
l
i
e
Ol
s
e
n
5
1
1
7
A
r
d
e
n
Av
e
1
94
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
6
G
a
r
y
Di
e
t
z
&Ma
r
j
o
r
y
Di
e
t
z
5
0
0
0
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
95
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
7
P
a
u
l
Br
o
w
n
&Re
b
e
c
c
a
Br
o
w
n
5
0
0
1
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
96
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
5
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
Ol
s
o
n
&Pa
t
r
i
c
i
a
Ol
s
o
n
5
0
0
2
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
97
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
8
K
a
t
h
r
y
n
Mo
r
k
/
Tr
u
s
t
e
e
&Pe
t
e
r
Mo
r
k
/
Tr
u
s
t
e
e
5
0
0
3
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
98
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
4
T
i
m
o
t
h
y
Sh
a
u
n
Su
d
e
i
t
h
&Me
r
t
y
c
e
Mr
v
o
s
5
0
0
4
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
99
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
9
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
St
a
n
l
e
y
&Li
s
a
Mc
f
a
r
l
a
n
d
5
0
0
5
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
3
J
o
e
l
Hu
t
c
h
e
s
o
n
,
Tt
e
5
0
0
6
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
0
J
a
n
e
t
Ma
r
p
l
e
&Da
v
i
d
Ma
r
p
l
e
5
0
0
7
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
2
A
n
g
e
l
a
La
r
s
o
n
&Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
La
r
s
o
n
5
0
0
8
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
1
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
Ar
m
a
c
o
s
t
&Cy
n
t
h
i
a
Ar
m
a
c
o
s
t
5
0
0
9
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
1
C
a
r
l
Ma
l
m
q
u
i
s
t
5
0
1
0
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
2
D
a
v
i
d
Mi
t
c
h
e
l
l
&Jo
a
n
Mi
t
c
h
e
l
l
5
0
1
1
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
2
0
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Cu
s
h
m
o
r
e
&Ca
r
o
l
Cu
s
h
m
o
r
e
5
0
1
2
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
3
J
a
m
e
s
Ri
c
e
&Di
a
n
e
Ri
c
e
5
0
1
3
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
4
P
a
t
r
i
c
i
a
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
5
0
1
5
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
10
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
9
A
St
o
d
d
a
r
d
Cr
a
n
e
&Lu
c
i
a
Cr
a
n
e
5
0
1
6
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
5
C
a
r
y
Ha
r
v
e
y
Sc
h
i
l
l
i
n
g
5
0
1
7
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
8
L
i
n
d
s
a
y
Kn
a
p
p
&Sa
r
a
h
Kn
a
p
p
5
0
1
8
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
6
M
a
t
t
h
e
w
Gr
a
c
z
y
k
&Ka
t
h
e
r
i
n
e
Gr
a
c
z
y
k
5
0
1
9
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
7
P
e
t
e
r
Gr
a
n
d
e
&El
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Gr
a
n
d
e
5
0
2
0
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
7
S
c
o
t
t
Ol
s
o
n
&Le
a
h
Ol
s
o
n
5
0
2
1
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
6
S
h
a
r
o
n
Fl
e
m
i
n
g
&Jo
h
n
Fl
e
m
i
n
g
5
0
2
2
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
8
D
a
v
i
d
Ed
s
t
a
m
&Ti
n
a
Ed
s
t
a
m
5
0
2
3
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
5
A
n
d
r
e
w
Cr
a
g
g
&Kr
i
s
t
e
n
Cr
a
g
g
5
0
2
4
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
4
D
o
u
g
l
a
s
Mc
e
l
r
a
t
h
&Ka
r
e
n
Mc
e
l
r
a
t
h
5
0
2
6
B
r
u
c
e
Av
e
1
11
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
3
9
J
o
s
e
p
h
Ne
u
b
e
r
g
e
r
&El
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Bo
o
5
0
2
5
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
0
T
i
m
o
t
h
y
Pr
y
o
r
&Pa
t
r
i
c
i
a
Bo
o
ͲPr
y
o
r
5
0
2
7
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
3
M
a
r
k
Mc
c
a
r
y
&Di
a
n
e
Mc
c
a
r
y
5
0
2
8
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
4
2
S
t
e
v
e
n
Vo
g
t
&Gi
n
a
Vo
g
t
5
0
2
9
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
Pa
g
e
4of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
12
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
2
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
Ho
v
a
n
e
c
&Th
e
r
e
s
e
Ho
v
a
n
e
c
5
0
3
0
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
1
V
a
l
e
r
i
e
Pa
u
l
y
Es
t
a
t
e
&Ph
i
l
l
i
p
Pa
u
l
e
y
Tr
u
s
t
e
e
5
0
3
2
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
1
0
T
o
d
d
Pe
t
e
r
s
o
n
5
0
3
4
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
9
J
a
s
j
i
t
Ah
l
u
w
a
l
l
a
&Ha
r
s
o
h
e
n
a
Ka
u
r
5
0
3
6
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
2
0
0
0
8
C
a
l
v
i
n
Si
m
m
o
n
s
&Sa
n
d
r
a
Si
m
m
o
n
s
5
0
3
8
B
r
u
c
e
Pl
1
12
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
6
1
J
o
s
e
p
h
La
p
e
n
s
k
y
5
1
3
2
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
0
.
3
3
12
9
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
1
6
Bu
r
t
o
n
Co
h
e
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
0
.
1
7
13
0
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
1
7
Be
v
e
r
l
y
&Ch
r
i
s
t
i
a
n
Ge
y
e
r
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#4
0
.
1
7
13
1
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
1
8
Br
a
d
l
e
y
Er
i
c
k
s
o
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#6
0
.
1
7
13
2
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
1
9
Jo
s
e
p
h
&Ph
y
l
l
i
s
Le
o
n
a
r
d
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#8
0
.
1
7
13
3
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
0
Di
a
n
e
Do
n
n
i
n
o
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#1
0
0
.
1
7
13
4
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
1
No
o
n
a
n
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
LL
C
II
I
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#1
2
0
.
1
7
13
5
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
2
Jo
e
&Ph
y
l
l
i
s
Ko
h
l
e
r
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#1
4
0
.
1
7
13
6
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
3
Ji
m
Ma
t
s
o
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#1
6
0
.
1
7
13
7
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
4
Ca
r
o
l
Sk
a
n
s
e
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#1
8
0
.
1
7
13
8
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
5
Ma
r
i
e
Ja
c
o
b
s
e
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
0
0
.
1
7
13
9
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
6
Da
v
i
d
&Ro
b
i
n
La
r
k
i
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
2
0
.
1
7
14
0
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
7
Th
o
m
a
s
&Sh
a
r
o
n
Th
i
e
l
e
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
4
0
.
1
7
14
1
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
8
We
s
t
l
a
k
e
Br
o
w
n
s
t
o
n
e
LL
C
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
6
0
.
1
7
14
2
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
2
9
Ja
m
e
s
We
i
n
e
r
t
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#2
8
0
.
1
7
14
3
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
0
No
o
n
a
n
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
LL
C
II
I
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#3
0
0
.
1
7
14
4
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
1
An
d
r
e
w
&Ma
r
i
l
y
n
Ja
c
k
s
o
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#3
2
0
.
1
7
14
5
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
2
Va
l
e
r
i
e
Pe
d
e
r
s
o
n
Re
v
LG
TR
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#3
4
0
.
1
7
14
6
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
3
Ni
g
e
l
&Hi
l
a
r
y
Ma
c
L
e
o
d
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#3
6
0
.
1
7
14
7
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
4
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
&Ba
r
b
a
r
a
Do
n
a
t
e
l
l
e
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#3
8
0
.
1
7
14
8
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
3
5
Jo
h
n
&Sh
e
r
r
y
No
o
n
a
n
5
2
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
e
Av
e
#4
0
0
.
1
7
14
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
0
J
u
n
e
Bl
u
m
e
n
s
o
n
5
1
0
0
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
2
P
e
t
e
r
Ke
l
l
e
r
5
1
0
1
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
1
R
o
n
a
l
d
Hu
b
e
r
&Le
e
a
n
n
e
Pa
r
s
o
n
s
5
1
0
4
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
6
8
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
Le
i
b
o
l
d
&Ch
a
r
l
e
n
e
Le
i
b
o
l
d
5
1
0
5
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
7
A
n
d
r
e
w
Ca
s
t
e
l
l
a
n
o
&Su
s
a
n
Ca
s
t
e
l
l
a
n
o
5
1
0
8
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
0
J
e
r
e
m
y
Zi
e
g
l
e
r
&Er
i
c
a
Zi
e
g
l
e
r
5
1
0
9
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
Pa
g
e
5of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
15
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
6
M
a
r
i
e
Ke
n
w
o
r
t
h
y
5
1
1
2
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
2
C
r
i
m
s
o
n
De
s
i
g
n
&Bu
i
l
d
,
LL
C
5
1
1
3
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
8
J
a
n
i
c
e
La
r
s
o
n
5
1
1
6
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
4
C
y
n
t
h
i
a
St
o
r
r
s
5
1
1
7
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
15
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
0
T
i
n
a
Lo
r
l
e
b
e
r
g
5
1
2
0
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
6
F
a
i
t
h
Ma
r
k
s
5
1
2
1
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
5
A
r
i
e
l
La
c
s
a
m
a
n
a
5
1
2
4
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
1
S
h
a
d
o
w
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
,
LL
C
5
1
2
5
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
7
M
i
c
h
e
l
l
e
St
Cl
a
i
r
Ho
b
b
s
&St
e
v
e
n
Ho
b
b
s
5
1
2
8
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
3
H
a
r
t
l
e
y
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
5
1
2
9
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
6
2
D
o
n
Ha
r
d
a
c
k
e
r
5
1
3
2
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
5
6
N
a
n
c
y
Ch
r
i
s
t
e
n
s
e
n
5
1
3
3
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
6
3
A
m
a
n
d
a
LPe
t
e
r
s
o
n
5
1
3
6
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
6
0
N
a
n
c
y
Me
n
z
e
l
5
1
3
7
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
16
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
2
F
r
e
e
b
o
r
n
Ol
d
f
i
e
l
d
5
2
0
0
G
o
r
g
a
s
Av
e
1
17
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
0
D
a
v
i
d
&Li
n
d
a
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
5
0
2
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
1
T
r
o
y
Ni
c
k
e
l
&Me
g
a
n
Ni
c
k
e
l
5
0
3
2
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
2
C
a
r
y
Sc
h
i
l
l
i
n
g
5
0
3
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
7
C
a
r
y
Sc
h
i
l
l
i
n
g
5
1
0
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
3
J
M
S
Cu
s
t
o
m
Ho
m
e
s
,
LL
C
5
1
0
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
8
M
a
r
k
Pa
t
r
i
c
k
Mc
D
a
r
i
s
&Su
s
a
n
n
a
Ho
p
e
Mc
D
a
r
i
s
5
1
0
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
4
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Gr
o
p
p
e
t
t
i
&Sh
a
n
d
a
Gr
o
p
p
e
t
t
i
5
1
0
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
9
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
Ha
m
i
l
t
o
n
&Er
i
c
a
Ra
t
h
5
1
0
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
5
R
o
n
a
l
d
Po
b
i
e
l
&Mo
n
a
Po
b
i
e
l
5
1
0
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
17
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
0
D
a
v
i
d
Ma
e
t
z
o
l
d
5
1
1
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
7
8
J
a
m
i
e
l
Ak
h
t
a
r
&Ad
r
a
n
a
Ak
h
t
a
r
5
1
1
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
1
E
t
h
e
l
Du
n
n
5
1
1
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
7
S
c
o
t
t
Bo
r
e
n
e
5
1
1
7
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
2
B
e
n
n
e
t
t
Po
r
t
e
r
II
I
&Ma
r
y
Jo
Po
r
t
e
r
5
1
2
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
8
9
N
i
c
h
o
l
a
s
Va
n
w
i
n
k
l
e
&Sa
r
a
h
Va
n
w
i
n
k
l
e
5
1
2
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
3
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
e
Li
n
d
e
m
a
n
&Jo
h
n
Li
n
d
e
m
a
n
5
1
2
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
4
H
a
n
s
Lo
e
f
f
l
e
r
5
1
2
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
4
R
o
g
e
r
Na
s
h
&Na
n
c
y
Na
s
h
5
1
2
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
18
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
9
8
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
Ra
d
d
e
r
5
1
2
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
Pa
g
e
6of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
18
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
5
9
A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r
Bl
a
k
e
Ha
n
l
o
n
&Sa
r
a
h
Ha
n
l
o
n
5
1
3
3
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
0
5
8
T
h
o
m
a
s
Fl
e
t
c
h
e
r
&Pa
t
r
i
c
i
a
Fl
e
t
c
h
e
r
5
1
3
7
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
4
R
o
b
e
r
t
So
u
k
u
p
&De
n
a
So
u
k
u
p
5
2
0
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
3
D
e
v
a
n
s
h
u
Ka
n
s
a
r
a
&Ro
m
a
Ka
n
s
a
r
a
5
2
0
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
5
M
a
r
y
Ba
l
o
g
h
5
2
0
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
1
A
n
d
r
e
w
Ar
t
h
u
r
&Ch
r
i
s
t
i
e
He
i
k
e
s
5
2
0
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
6
N
i
c
k
Dz
a
n
d
z
a
r
a
&Ji
l
l
Ro
c
h
e
l
e
a
u
5
2
0
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
0
T
h
o
m
a
s
Be
r
g
s
t
r
o
m
&Me
l
i
s
s
a
Do
w
n
e
y
5
2
0
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
7
D
Wa
y
n
e
We
n
g
e
r
&Ca
r
o
l
y
n
We
n
g
e
r
5
2
1
2
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
4
9
B
e
r
t
Mc
d
o
n
o
u
g
h
&Ma
r
i
e
Mc
d
o
n
o
u
g
h
5
2
1
3
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
19
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
8
S
t
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
Vi
t
t
5
2
1
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
4
8
H
a
r
l
a
n
d
Ha
l
v
o
r
s
o
n
5
2
1
7
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
5
9
J
o
s
h
u
a
Re
i
n
e
r
&Je
n
n
i
f
e
r
Re
i
n
e
r
5
2
2
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
4
7
D
e
v
e
r
e
Br
e
k
k
e
&Jo
y
c
e
Br
e
k
k
e
5
2
2
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
0
J
o
h
n
Sm
a
b
y
&Li
n
d
a
Sm
a
b
y
5
2
2
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
1
R
e
f
i
n
e
d
,
LL
C
5
2
2
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
1
J
o
s
e
p
h
Sr
i
v
e
r
&Al
l
i
s
o
n
Sr
i
v
e
r
5
2
2
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
0
L
i
s
a
Ha
r
m
e
n
i
n
g
&Je
f
f
r
e
y
Ha
r
m
e
n
i
n
g
5
2
2
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
4
O
r
l
a
n
d
o
Fl
o
r
e
s
&Ma
r
t
i
Fl
o
r
e
s
5
2
3
2
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
3
S
t
e
v
e
n
Do
m
k
e
&Li
s
a
Do
m
k
e
5
2
3
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
20
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
2
K
e
i
t
h
Ne
l
s
e
n
&Ka
t
h
e
r
i
n
e
Ne
l
s
e
n
5
2
4
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
4
1
M
a
t
t
h
i
a
s
Fe
l
d
k
a
m
p
&Mi
r
i
a
m
Ki
m
5
2
4
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
5
J
o
h
n
Me
e
n
a
n
/
T
r
u
s
t
e
e
&Ch
r
i
s
t
i
n
e
Me
e
n
a
n
/
T
r
u
s
t
e
e
5
3
0
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
4
0
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
De
e
t
s
&Je
n
n
i
f
e
r
De
e
t
s
5
3
0
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
6
J
o
h
n
Ki
r
c
h
n
e
r
&Ca
t
h
e
r
i
n
e
Ki
r
c
h
n
e
r
5
3
0
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
9
H
a
r
t
l
e
y
Jo
s
e
p
h
Dr
a
n
n
e
n
5
3
0
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
7
J
a
c
q
u
e
l
i
n
e
Mi
t
h
u
n
5
3
0
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
8
T
C
Ho
m
e
b
u
i
l
d
e
r
s
,
IN
C
5
3
0
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
8
K
a
r
e
l
La
i
n
g
5
3
1
2
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
7
M
a
r
k
Wa
t
e
r
l
o
o
&El
i
z
a
b
e
t
h
Wa
t
e
r
l
o
o
5
3
1
3
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
21
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
6
9
R
o
b
e
r
t
Pe
c
h
m
a
n
&Ma
r
i
e
Pe
c
h
m
a
n
5
3
1
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
6
M
i
k
e
Ma
r
i
n
o
v
i
c
h
5
3
1
7
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
0
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
Do
b
b
s
&Ni
c
h
o
l
e
Do
b
b
s
5
3
2
0
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
3
A
l
e
j
a
n
d
r
o
Da
n
i
e
l
Le
r
n
e
r
&Je
n
n
i
f
e
r
Co
r
r
o
u
5
3
2
1
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
1
J
o
h
n
Cr
i
s
t
&An
n
e
Bi
s
h
o
p
5
3
2
4
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
Pa
g
e
7of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
22
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
2
K
a
t
h
l
e
e
n
O'
D
e
a
5
3
2
5
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
2
G
i
n
o
Pe
l
u
s
o
&Ri
t
a
Pe
l
u
s
o
5
3
2
8
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
3
1
J
o
h
n
Hu
l
t
m
a
n
&St
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
Hu
l
t
m
a
n
5
3
2
9
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
3
J
u
l
i
e
Fr
o
m
m
e
l
t
&Ja
m
e
s
Fr
o
m
m
e
l
t
5
3
3
2
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
9
5
T
C
Ho
m
e
b
u
i
l
d
e
r
s
In
c
5
3
3
3
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
1
22
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
4
J
o
h
n
Ad
a
m
s
&Ce
c
i
l
e
Ad
a
m
s
5
3
3
6
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
0
.
6
7
23
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
9
3
D
e
l
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
5
3
3
7
H
a
l
i
f
a
x
Av
e
0
.
6
7
23
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
0
D
r
o
m
o
l
a
n
d
LL
C
5
0
1
7
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
7
2
G
r
e
g
o
r
y
Da
k
i
n
&Ca
r
i
Da
k
i
n
5
0
2
0
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
1
S
t
e
v
e
n
Fa
r
s
h
t
&St
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
Fa
r
s
h
t
5
0
2
1
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
7
1
J
e
n
n
i
f
e
r
Se
r
v
i
c
e
5
0
2
4
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
6
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Ro
h
l
f
s
e
n
&Mi
m
i
Ch
o
Ro
h
l
f
s
e
n
5
0
2
5
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
5
C
l
i
f
f
o
r
d
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
&Vi
r
g
i
n
i
a
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
5
0
2
9
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
4
R
o
b
e
r
t
Gr
i
f
f
i
t
h
s
/
T
r
u
s
t
&Ma
r
y
Gr
i
f
f
i
t
h
s
/
T
r
u
s
t
5
0
3
3
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
0
3
R
o
b
e
r
t
La
r
s
e
n
&Al
i
c
e
La
r
s
e
n
5
0
3
7
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
23
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
3
D
a
v
i
d
Po
s
t
h
u
m
u
s
&Ga
y
l
e
Po
s
t
h
u
m
u
s
5
1
0
0
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
2
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
Fo
x
5
1
0
1
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
4
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
Bu
s
c
h
&Ma
r
y
Mc
M
a
h
o
n
Bu
s
c
h
5
1
0
4
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
1
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
Do
n
a
h
u
e
&Gi
n
a
Do
n
a
h
u
e
5
1
0
5
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
5
S
t
e
v
e
n
St
a
s
t
n
y
&Er
i
n
St
a
s
t
n
y
5
1
0
8
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
0
B
e
t
h
Kl
e
m
m
e
n
s
e
n
&To
d
d
Kl
e
m
m
e
n
s
e
n
5
1
0
9
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
6
S
t
e
v
e
n
Bl
o
o
m
q
u
i
s
t
&An
d
r
e
a
Bl
o
o
m
q
u
i
s
t
5
1
1
2
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
9
C
a
r
y
n
Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
s
&St
e
p
h
e
n
Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
s
5
1
1
3
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
7
J
o
h
n
Ra
i
c
h
e
r
t
5
1
1
6
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
8
D
a
n
i
e
l
Yo
u
n
g
&Gr
a
y
c
e
Be
l
v
e
d
e
r
e
Yo
u
n
g
5
1
1
7
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
24
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
8
E
u
g
e
n
e
Li
n
k
&An
n
Hi
r
s
c
h
5
1
2
0
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
7
S
t
e
v
e
n
Ch
r
i
s
t
i
a
n
s
o
n
&Kr
i
s
t
e
n
Ch
r
i
s
t
i
a
n
s
o
n
5
1
2
1
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
2
9
S
t
e
v
e
n
Lo
n
d
o
n
&Tr
i
s
h
a
Lo
n
d
o
n
5
1
2
4
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
6
J
a
d
e
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
&An
d
r
e
a
Mc
E
l
l
i
g
o
t
t
5
1
2
5
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
0
I
n
g
o
Sc
h
u
l
z
5
1
2
8
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
1
5
S
a
c
h
i
n
Me
h
t
a
&Ke
l
l
y
Me
h
t
a
5
1
2
9
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
1
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
&Ja
n
e
t
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
5
1
3
2
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
25
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
2
T
i
m
o
t
h
y
Se
e
l
e
y
&Me
l
i
s
s
a
Se
e
l
e
y
5
1
3
6
I
n
d
i
a
n
o
l
a
Av
e
1
Pa
g
e
8of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
25
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
5
1
E
r
i
c
h
Sc
h
e
l
l
h
a
s
&Al
i
n
e
Sc
h
e
l
l
h
a
s
5
0
2
8
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
25
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
5
2
D
a
n
a
Wi
d
s
t
r
o
m
&Li
s
a
Bj
e
r
k
e
n
5
0
3
2
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
25
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
2
3
5
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
Au
s
m
a
n
&Sa
r
a
Au
s
m
a
n
5
0
3
6
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
2
8
0
P
a
t
r
i
c
i
a
Bi
e
r
s
d
o
r
f
&Da
n
i
e
l
Bi
e
r
s
d
o
r
f
5
0
4
0
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
2
8
1
T
o
d
d
Sc
h
i
e
f
f
e
r
t
&An
d
r
e
a
Sc
h
i
e
f
f
e
r
t
5
0
4
4
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
3
R
o
g
e
r
Bi
l
d
s
t
e
n
&An
n
e
Bi
l
d
s
t
e
n
5
1
0
0
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
2
M
e
g
a
n
Mc
B
u
r
n
e
y
&Da
n
i
e
l
Ka
t
a
n
5
1
0
1
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
4
P
a
u
l
Ma
t
t
h
e
w
Kl
i
n
e
&An
n
a
Kl
i
n
e
5
1
0
4
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
1
J
e
r
e
m
y
Ea
t
o
n
&Ma
r
y
An
n
e
Ea
t
o
n
5
1
0
5
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
5
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
Mi
l
l
e
r
5
1
0
8
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
0
P
a
u
l
Ha
m
m
o
n
d
&Su
z
a
n
n
e
Ra
n
d
5
1
0
9
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
6
K
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
e
Ho
w
e
s
&Da
v
i
d
Se
b
e
r
s
o
n
5
1
1
2
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
26
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
9
K
e
r
r
y
Ko
c
h
&La
u
r
e
n
c
e
Ko
c
h
5
1
1
3
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
7
T
r
o
y
Pa
u
l
s
o
n
&Li
n
d
a
Pa
u
l
s
o
n
5
1
1
6
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
8
K
i
m
b
e
r
l
y
Ka
l
l
e
v
i
g
5
1
1
7
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
8
K
u
r
t
Ha
l
v
a
&Li
z
a
b
e
t
h
Ha
l
v
a
5
1
2
0
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
7
M
a
r
g
o
Ko
s
m
a
s
5
1
2
1
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
4
9
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
Sw
a
n
d
b
y
5
1
2
4
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
6
S
h
e
i
l
a
Gu
z
i
k
&Th
o
m
a
s
Gu
z
i
k
5
1
2
5
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
5
0
N
a
n
c
y
Ta
r
b
o
x
5
1
2
8
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
5
M
a
r
l
i
n
Wi
e
m
e
r
&An
n
Wi
e
m
e
r
5
1
2
9
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
4
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
Sa
n
d
o
&Ma
r
y
Sa
n
d
o
5
1
3
3
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
27
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
3
3
T
h
o
m
a
s
Da
v
i
d
s
o
n
Jr
5
1
3
7
J
u
a
n
i
t
a
Av
e
1
28
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
7
R
y
a
n
En
g
l
e
&Pa
t
r
i
c
i
a
En
g
l
e
5
2
0
1
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
1
0
8
P
e
t
e
r
Br
o
s
i
u
s
&Ro
s
a
n
n
a
St
a
f
f
a
5
2
0
5
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
9
R
i
t
a
An
n
Le
h
n
e
r
t
5
2
0
9
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
8
R
o
b
r
t
Be
n
n
e
t
t
&Ca
r
o
l
Be
n
n
e
t
t
5
2
1
7
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
7
J
o
s
e
p
h
Je
l
l
e
n
&Ro
s
e
m
a
r
y
Je
l
l
e
n
5
2
2
1
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
5
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
6
N
a
n
c
y
Ca
r
l
s
o
n
5
2
2
5
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
6
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
5
K
e
r
r
y
Mc
G
r
a
i
n
&No
r
a
Mc
G
r
a
i
n
5
2
2
9
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
7
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
3
0
0
9
6
C
i
t
y
of
Ed
i
n
a
(A
r
d
e
n
Pa
r
k
*
*
)
5
2
3
0
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
5
28
8
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
4
M
a
u
r
i
t
z
Mo
r
t
e
n
s
o
n
Jr
&Al
i
c
e
Mo
r
t
e
n
s
o
n
5
2
3
3
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
28
9
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
2
M
a
x
Hi
n
t
z
&Sa
n
d
r
a
Hi
n
t
z
5
2
4
1
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
29
0
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
1
F
i
l
m
o
r
e
En
g
e
r
&Ka
t
h
l
e
e
n
En
g
e
r
5
3
0
1
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
Pa
g
e
9of
10
PI
D
N
a
m
e
H
o
u
s
e
No
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
REUAssessableAmount
29
1
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
8
0
K
e
r
r
i
Hi
n
i
k
e
r
&Mi
c
h
a
e
l
Hi
n
i
k
e
r
5
3
0
9
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
29
2
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
9
D
a
v
i
d
Sa
t
i
n
&Li
l
a
h
Ek
i
m
5
3
1
3
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
29
3
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
7
8
L
i
n
d
s
a
y
Mc
c
a
b
e
&An
n
Mc
c
a
b
e
5
3
2
1
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
1
29
4
1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
4
0
0
9
9
L
i
s
a
O'
B
r
i
e
n
5
3
3
3
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
Bl
v
d
0
.
6
7
To
t
a
l
23
8
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
*1
8
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
5
,
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
8
,
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
6
9
,
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
7
0
,
an
d
18
0
2
8
2
4
4
1
0
1
7
3
ar
e
th
e
au
x
i
l
a
r
y
PI
D
s
.
Fo
r
as
s
e
s
s
i
n
g
pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
,
onlytheprimary
PI
D
is
us
e
d
.
**
Up
d
a
t
e
d
8/
1
by
Sh
a
r
o
n
pe
r
Ch
a
d
Ͳ
5bu
i
l
d
a
b
l
e
lo
t
s
.
Pa
g
e
10
of
10
APPENDIXH
CityComprehensivePlan
Update–SidewalkandBicycle
Facilities
APPENDIXI
TrafficandCrashData
LocationDateM-F ADT M-F 85% SpeedArden Ave, N of W 50th St10/01/01-10/06/01993-5016 Arden Ave09/27/99-10/07/9950528.35116 Arden Ave09/27/99-10/07/9965225.4
Bruce Ave, N of W 50th St10/01/01-10/06/01679-
Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19977475-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19957439-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19936639-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19916516-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19897952-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19876378-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19859021-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19838053-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19816748-Halifax Ave, S of W 50th StMSA 19797043-Halifax Ave, S of W 52nd St9/23/05-10/01/0588232.6Halifax Ave, S of W 52nd St09/03/03-09/11/0377332.1Halifax Ave, S of W 52nd StMSA 19751725-5115 Halifax Ave05/22/08-05/31/08120830.15115 Halifax Ave08/03/07-08/10/07113330.45236 Halifax Ave09/23/05-10/01/0588432.35236 Halifax Ave04/11/00-04/17/00875335236 Halifax Ave10/20/99-10/27/9927033.55240-5300 Halifax Ave05/22/08-05/31/0893429.45240 Halifax Ave08/03/07-08/10/0788730.4
Minnehaha Blvd, N of W 54th St05/18/12-05/25/1251326.2Minnehaha Blvd, N of W 54th St11/01/11-11/04/1145226.3
W 50th St, E of Wooddale AveMSA 20091661631.7W 50th St, E of Wooddale AveMSA 20051841036.8W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)07/23/01-07/27/011122338.3W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19979229-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 199711541-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 199512949-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 199513752-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 199310944-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 199311091-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19919877-
BA-412 Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
LocationDateM-F ADT M-F 85% SpeedW 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 199110463-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 198914242-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 198911175-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19879279-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 19878495-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19859815-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 19859000-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 198310166-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19817800-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (WB)MSA 19818700-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19777344-W 50th St, E of Wooddale Ave (EB)MSA 19756600-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 2009854722.6W 50th St, W of France Ave (Recount)MSA 2009726022.6W 50th St, W of France Ave4/12/06-4/14/0611436-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 20051142927.7W 50th St, W of France Ave09/10/01-09/14/0110442-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 199712434-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 199513443-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 199313279-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 199111610-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 198913260-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 198711025-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 198512560-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 198310456-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 198111597-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 197912823-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 19779246-W 50th St, W of France AveMSA 19759,513-
W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 2009667828.2W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 2005645030.6W 51st St, W of France Ave06/20/02-06/29/02264733.5W 51st St, W of France Ave08/20/01-08/24/012449-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19975524-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19956130-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19935430-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19916156-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19896016-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19875347-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19855715-W 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19835,493-
LocationDateM-F ADT M-F 85% SpeedW 51st St, W of France AveMSA 19753908-
W 54st St, E of Minnehaha Creek Bridge05/18/12-05/25/12235330.2W 54th St & Minnehaha Creek Bridge05/05/08-05/13/08273430.1W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 2013243726.5W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 2009257727.8W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 2005272129.7W 54th St, W of France Ave07/09/02-07/16/0216120.3W 54th St, W of France Ave04/10/01-04/17/0188232.2W 54th St, W of France Ave06/20/00-06/29/0041832.1W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19972818-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19952824-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19932390-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19912319-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19893168-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19872520-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19852293-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19832248-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19812283-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19792391-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19771847-W 54th St, W of France AveMSA 19751568-
Sat. ADT Sat 85% Speed Sun. ADT Sun. 85% Speed----45129.539429.553925.849025.8
----
----------------------------------------8423275031.376131.463031.4----87529.676929.190029.984629.384232.275031.393433.277132.524532.517134.26612954329.570130.666130.1
4002635026.2----
----1429136.71202336.6--------------------------------
City of Edina Traffic Records
Sat. ADT Sat 85% Speed Sun. ADT Sun. 85% Speed--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------191432.4180832.4------------------------------------
Sat. ADT Sat 85% Speed Sun. ADT Sun. 85% Speed----
208030116629.8220130.1207429.6--------231930.1176030.111320100199153280431.437230.128730.6------------------------------------------------
TimePeds(SB)SBVehicles NBPedsNBVehicleSBBikesSBTrucksNBBikesNBTrucks
4:0000000000
4:1500000000
4:3000000000
4:4500000000
5:0000010000
5:1500000000
5:3000100000
5:4500100000
6:0000000100
6:1510000000
6:3001000000
6:4501030000
7:0000000010
7:1521000100
7:3013200000
7:4510000000
8:0030220000
8:1501010000
8:3012000000
8:4512010000
9:0002030000
9:1500100000
9:3032011000
9:4500000000
10:0022021000
10:1520000000
10:3000010002
10:4512000010
11:0000020000
11:1503020000
11:3000000000
11:4531010000
12:0001050000
12:1501020000
12:3000100000
12:4500000000
13:0000010000
13:1500000100
13:3001010010
13:4500100000
14:0023000000
14:1501010000
14:3000010000
14:4501100000
15:0000010000
15:1503000000
TimePeds(SB)SBVehicles NBPedsNBVehicleSBBikesSBTrucksNBBikesNBTrucks
15:3005011000
15:4501003000
16:0003102000
16:1500000000
16:3020021000
16:4502001000
17:0016100000
17:1551011000
17:3001000010
17:4501010000
18:0003110000
18:1521020000
18:3022320000
18:4500030010
19:0030012010
19:1512010000
19:30100810000
19:4501110000
20:0030100000
20:1520301000
20:3000111010
20:4500010010
21:0000010000
21:1500100000
21:3000400000
21:4520000000
22:0010000000
22:1500000000
22:3000000000
22:4500000000
23:0001000000
23:1500000000
23:3010010000
23:4500000000
0:0000000000
0:1500000000
0:3000000000
0:4500000000
1:0000000000
1:1500000000
1:3000000000
1:4500000000
2:0000000000
2:1500000000
2:3000000000
2:4500000000
TimePeds(SB)SBVehicles NBPedsNBVehicleSBBikesSBTrucksNBBikesNBTrucks
3:0000000000
3:1500000000
3:3000000000
3:4500000000
4:0000000000
TOTALPedsPassengerCarsBikesHeavyVehicles
93117235
DateofDataCollection
HoursofDataCollection
6/22/2014Ͳ6/23/2014
4AMͲ4AM
!
"
#
#
$
%
&
&
'
(
(
(
)
*
#
!
"!
!#$
#
#
"! "
#
%%
!
%&
"! !
!
"
"! !
"
%
"
#
!
"
#
#
$
%
&
&
'
(
(
(
)
'
&
*
#
"
"!
(
"!
#
#
'
!
'
"! !
"
#
!
#
++&,-,-
'
!
"
#
#
$
%
&
&
'
(
(
(
)
*
#
"
!
"
(
( "!
!#$
"
#
%
!
%
"! !
"
&
#
!
!
"! !
"
'
#
"
"
!
"
#
#
$
%
&
&
'
(
(
(
)
*
#
"
(
( "!
#
## !
#
%%
!
'
!
&
#
#
#
!
&
#
#
#
++&,-,-
! " #$%&' !()*)+,-./%! " 01'&! ()2)3))3))3))3) )3))+,0 %. /-./%! /.!
& .
4
%
++&,-,-
APPENDIXJ
ExistingStreetLightsandSigns
APPENDIXK
LivingStreetsPolicy
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Council VIII. A.
Karen M. Kurt
Assistant City Manager
܈
܆
܆ August 20, 2013
Approve Living Streets Policy
Approve Living Streets Policy
Information / Background:
In May 201l, the City Council adopted a resolution in support of Living Streets and directed the Edina
Transportation Commission to work with staff to develop a Living Streets Policy. Key steps in the
development of the policy are outlined below:
x ETC formed a Living Streets Working Group. Members Paul Nelson, Jennifer Janovy and Michael
Thompson played a critical role in policy development.
x The City received a $15,000 grant from the Bloomington Health Department. These funds were
used to hire a consultant to review current city policies and to provide a framework for moving
forward.
x Blue Cross and Blue Shield sponsored a workshop on February 15, 2012 led by representatives
from the National Complete Streets Coalition. Key community stakeholders attended and
participated in a brainstorming session about Edina’s vision for future streets.
x The ETC Working Group and staff prepared a draft Living Streets Policy which was reviewed with
the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission,
Park Board, Energy and Environment Commission and Bike Edina Task Force. Feedback is collected
for incorporation into the Living Streets Policy and future Living Streets Plan.
x The Living Streets Policy draft is reviewed during a joint work session with ETC and City Council.
Upon policy adoption, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, will begin working with internal and external
advisory groups to draft content for the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the
Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well best practices for community engagement during the design
process.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
Confirmed members of the external advisory group are:
x Arnie Bigbee, Human Rights and Relations Commission
x Claudia Carr, Planning Commission
x Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission
x Ellen Jones, Park Board
x Bill McCabe, Arts and Culture Commission
x Paul Nelson, Transportation Commission
x Paul Thompson, Energy and Environment Commission
x Courtney Whited, Transportation Commission
Staff is waiting for confirmation from additional representatives from the Planning Commission, Energy and
Environment Commission and Community Health Committee. Additional community expertise will be
sought as needed throughout the process.
Members of the internal advisory team are:
x Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer
x Jeff Elasky, Police Lieutenant
x Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
x Cindy Larson, Redevelopment Coordinator
x Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer
x Bob Pestrud, Parks Foreman
x John Scheerer, Street Supervisor
x Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal
Additional staff expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Staff is also in the process of
securing a $5,000 grant from Bloomington Public Health that will be used to develop a community education
and outreach plan for Living Streets.
Attachments:
Proposed Living Streets Policy
1
Living Streets Policy
Introduction
Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote
safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental
sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy
defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation.
The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy
consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the
“do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related
to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set
by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act.
The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how
the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike
facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design
process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk
Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to
this Policy.
Living Streets Vision
Edina is a place where...
x Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;
x Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;
x Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;
x Streets are inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity;
x Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments;
x Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and
private sectors alike; and
x Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses.
Living Streets Principles
The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate
these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making
public and private land use decisions.
2
All Users and All Modes
The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of
the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing
safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes.
Connectivity
x The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly
connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel.
x The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes
preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance
connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit.
x The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public
facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas.
x The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk
networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the
development.
x Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical
termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street
construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and
continuity.
Application
x The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving
operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation,
or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes
privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails.
x The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land
use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency.
x Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of
smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time.
x The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and
actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources
as applicable.
x All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their
work.
Exceptions
Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and
rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document
proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal.
Exceptions:
3
x A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable
condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole
filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance
activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians.
x The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a
bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project.
x The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of
significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native
vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas.
Design
The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning,
funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks,
paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs.
The City’s design guidelines will:
x Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary.
x Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use
pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by
context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building,
community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context.
x Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed
to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate.
x Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes.
x Allocate right-of-way for boulevards.
x Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets
principles.
x Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain
gardens and other features to improve air and water quality.
The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals,
rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will
update the Living Streets Plan.
Context Sensitivity
Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its
neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate
these differences, the City will:
x Seek input from stakeholders;
x Design streets with a strong sense of place;
x Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and
ravines;
x Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and
4
x Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant
commercial districts.
Benchmarks and Performance Measures
The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating
success include:
x Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling;
x Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely;
x Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably;
x An active way of life is available to all;
x There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries;
x No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and
x Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations.
The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may
be identified as this Policy is implemented.
x Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department.
x Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests.
x Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys.
x Resident responses to post-project surveys.
x The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and
after the project.
x Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure.
x Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets.
Implementation
The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several
steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to
guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will:
x Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal
pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings;
x Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including
street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities;
x Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA,
MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts);
x Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets
improvements; and
x Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private
and regional destinations.
5
Additional implementation steps include:
x Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an
ongoing basis;
x Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this
Policy;
x Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets
principles as established by this Policy;
x Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals;
x Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes;
x Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans
(Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.);
x Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP);
x Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and
x Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy.
APPENDIXL
2015WaterMainandService
Breaks
5300
5209
5205
3909-15
5230
5333
3945
4075
6
4400
5330
3928-3948
5015
4
50
0
0
5030
5
5321
7
5026
51
0
0
5024
5019
8
5119
5209
5120
5036
5028
5301
13
4401
5200
5313
4421
5117
4100
5038
5114
5116
1
5008
5006
5027
5213
5336
5010
5332
5241
5217
5328
5324
5312
5316
4121
3904-22
5221
5036
5320
5400
50
0
0
-
2
8
5013
5328
5200
5004
5201
5308
5036
5304
5023
5300
5021
5228
5040
5217
4913
5336
3924
5400
5104
49
3
3
5006
5400
5341
5300
5316
5125
5228
5124
5116
5312
5101
5311
5236
5328
5013
5232
5012
5205
5236
5224
5240
5204
5113
5328
5212
5115
5200
5309
5354
5208
5216
5201
5220
5225
4910
5305
5101
44
3
1 5117
3917-43
5225
5221
5233
4919
5229
50
3
4
1
50
3
2
44
2
5
5229
44
2
9
5000
5317
5329
5325
5109
5002
5017
5021
5321
5313
5221
5016
5333
5337
5016
5100
5225
5211
5111
5241
5032
5309
42
1
3
-
15
5107
5025
5301
5305
5028
5241
5105
4201
5028
4917
50
2
7
5029
5001
5110
42
0
1
5401
5003
5121
5005
4919
5233
5237
5029
5112
5103
5
5125
5033
4207
5007
5101
5044 5100
5128
5109
5120
5232
5003
5129
5000
5125
5109
5009
5115
5124
5018
5108
5
0
2
2
5
0
2
0
4915
5001
5036
5105
5101
4
2
0
9
-
1
1
51135112
5022
5201
5401
5032
5011
5004
5116
5005
5037
5002
5101
5337
5401
5130
5332
5007
5324
5307
5008
5301
5020
5400
5320
5100
5228
53085308
5325
5220
5304
5324
5015
5337
5117
5316
5108
5104
5331
5304
5300
5324
5105
5349
5224
5109
5104
5305
5351
5216
5120
5212
5224
5300
5308
5232
5124
5304
5121
5217
5116
5346
5120
52405236
5228
5325
5320
5357
5336
5117
5113
5331
5133
5112
5128
5301
5351
5312
5133
51175108
5132
5313
5232
5216
5112
5128
5232
5114
5108
5319
5343
42
0
0
52
2
7
4928
5113
5109
5116
5104
5318
5133
5220
5018
5100
5129
5013
5236
5336
5105
5017
5348
5124
5129
4936
5125
5120
5023
5011
5128
4932
4920
5121
4914
4924
5136
5009
51365137
522
4
4929
50245010
5017
5132
4911
5132
5021
5105
5129
5019
5112
5016
5014
5012
5117
4914
5015
4925
5137
5019
4916
5200
5121
5050
4912
5116
5034
5354
4908
5137
49
2
6
-
5
4
5020
5233
7
39
0
1
-
0
7
3908
4050
5332
3915
52
0
0
5025
PROJECT LIMITS
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
HA
L
I
F
A
X
A
V
E
W 50TH ST
MI
N
N
E
H
A
H
A
B
L
V
D
AR
D
E
N
A
V
E
W 54TH ST
B
R
U
C
E
A
V
E
W 52ND ST
BRUCE AVE
BRUCE P
L
GO
R
G
A
S
A
V
E
W 51ST ST
IN
D
I
A
N
O
L
A
A
V
E
JU
A
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
JA
Y
P
L
/
Engineering DeptApril, 2014
2015 Watermain and Service BreaksArden Park D Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-412C
I
T
Y
OFE D I N A MIN
N
E
S
OTAINCORPORATED
1 8 8 8
,e
APPENDIXM
AppendixDrawings
Arden
Park
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
5200
4075
4121
5133
5137
5133
51375132
5132
5136
5105
5100
5104
51015101
5105
5109
5112
5108
5115
5109
5113
5117
5121
5117 5116
5121 5120
5125
5129
51255124
51285129
5028
5032
50365037
5033
5029
5025
5100
5104
5108
5114
5116
5120
5124
51285129
5125
5121
5117
5113
5109
5105
5101
5100
5104
5108
5112
5116
5120
5124
5128
5132
51365137
5133
5129
5125
5121
5117
5113
5109
5105
5101
5100
5104
5108
5112
5116
5120
5124
5128
50285032
5017
5021
42014213
5024
5020
5036
5040
5044
5116
5114
5112
51105038
5036
50345032
5030
5028
5026
5024
5022 5020
5018
5016
5012
5010
5008
5006
5004
5002
5000 5001
5003
5005
5007
5009
5011
5013
5015
5017
5019
5021
5023
5025
5027
5022
5029
5020
5018
5016
5014
5012
5010
5008
5006
5004
5002
5000 5001
5003
5005
5007
5009
5011
5013
5015
5017
5019
5101
5103
5105
5107
5109
5111
5113
5115
5117
5230
5363
24
5329
5325
5321
5317
5313
5309
5305
5301
5241
24
5221
5217
5213
5209
5205
520052015200
5204
5208
5212
5216
5220
5224
5228
5240
5236
5232
5300
5304
5308
5312
5316
5320
5324
5328
5332
5336
5321
5313
5309
5301
5241
24
5233
5229
5225
5221
5217
5209
5337
53335333
5229
5225
42014207
5201
5205
54TH ST W
52ND ST W
KELLOGG AVE
OAKLAWN AVE
BROOKVIEW AVE
HA
L
I
F
A
X
LA
MAPLE RD
52ND ST W
P
A
R
K P
L
INDIANOLA AVE
W O O D D A L E L A
51ST ST W51ST ST W
JAY
PL
B
R
U
C
E
P
L
GORGAS AVE
51ST
ST
W
BRUCE AVE
B
R
U
C
E
A
V
E
A
R
D
E
N
AVE
A
R
D
E
N
A
V
E
JUANITA AVE
MINNEHAHA
BLV
D
Project: EDINA 128385
Drawing
1
Arden Park D Neighborhood
Roadway ReconstructionMap by: MSS
Projection: Hennepin County Coords
Source: Henn. County, City of Edina,
Microsoft Virtual Earth Edina, Minnesota
I
Pa
t
h
:
P
:
\
A
E
\
E
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
1
2
8
3
8
5
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
.
m
x
d
Date: 10/6/2014
0350175
Feet
Arden
Park
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
5200
4075
4121
5133
5137
5133
51375132
5132
5136
5105
5100
5104
51015101
5105
5109
5112
5108
5115
5109
5113
5117
5121
5117 5116
5121 5120
5125
5129
51255124
51285129
5028
5032
50365037
5033
5029
5025
5100
5104
5108
5114
5116
5120
5124
51285129
5125
5121
5117
5113
5109
5105
5101
5100
5104
5108
5112
5116
5120
5124
5128
5132
51365137
5133
5129
5125
5121
5117
5113
5109
5105
5101
5100
5104
5108
5112
5116
5120
5124
5128
50285032
5017
5021
42014213
5024
5020
5036
5040
5044
5116
5114
5112
51105038
5036
50345032
5030
5028
5026
5024
5022 5020
5018
5016
5012
5010
5008
5006
5004
5002
5000 5001
5003
5005
5007
5009
5011
5013
5015
5017
5019
5021
5023
5025
5027
5022
5029
5020
5018
5016
5014
5012
5010
5008
5006
5004
5002
50005001
5003
5005
5007
5009
5011
5013
5015
5017
5019
5101
5103
5105
5107
5109
5111
5113
5115
5117
5230
5363
24
5329
5325
5321
5317
5313
5309
5305
5301
5241
24
5221
5217
5213
5209
5205
520052015200
5204
5208
5212
5216
5220
5224
5228
5240
5236
5232
5300
5304
5308
5312
5316
5320
5324
5328
5332
5336
5321
5313
5309
5301
5241
24
5233
5229
5225
5221
5217
5209
5337
53335333
5229
5225
42014207
5201
5205
50TH ST W
54TH ST W
WOODDALE
GLEN
52ND ST W52NDSTW
49 1/2 ST W
53RD ST W53RD ST W
INDIANOLA AVE
52ND ST W
51ST
ST
W
KELLOGG AVE OAKLAWN AVE
BROOKVIEW
AVE
HA
L
I
F
A
X
L
A
51ST ST W
P
A
R
K
P
L
51ST ST W
W O O DD A L E L A
EDIN A CT
JAY
PL
MAPLE RD
GORGAS AVE
FRANCE
AVE
S
B R U C E AVE
BRUCE AVE
HALIFAX AVE
A
R
D
E
N
AVE
A
R
D
E
N
A
V
E
JUANITA AVE
MINNEHAHA
BLVD
Project: EDINA 128385
Drawing
2
Arden Park D Neighborhood
Roadway ReconstructionMap by: MSS
Projection: Hennepin County Coords
Source: Henn. County, City of Edina,
Microsoft Virtual Earth Edina, Minnesota
I
Pa
t
h
:
P
:
\
A
E
\
E
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
1
2
8
3
8
5
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
.
m
x
d
Date: 10/6/2014
0350175
Feet
Legend
ProjectLimits
Assessment Rate
0.17 REU (per unit)
0.33 REU
0.50 REU
0.67 REU
1.00 REU
5.00 REU
Not Assessed
1
MINUTES OF
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMUNITY ROOM
SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
6:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake
and Whited.
ABSENT Member Iyer.
New student members Ana Rummel and Jack Campbell were introduced and welcomed.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Whited to approve the amended meeting agenda. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2014
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to approve the amended minutes of August 21,
2014. All voted aye. Motion carried.
COMMUNITY COMMENT
Adam Gildner, 5436 Brookview Avenue, said he was in attendance to provide an update to the ongoing requests from
residents for a 4-way stop sign at 55th & Brookview. Mr. Gildner said a request was made June 2010, March 2011 and again in
July 2014. He said he understood that the criteria was not met to warrant installing stop signs but believes special
consideration should be given because of the near-miss accidents that are seen almost daily. He said there is broad support
in the community for control improvements at the intersection which he believes would be low cost and easy to fix (he
stated that there is not a speed issue).
REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 13, 2014
A.1. Planner Nolan was asked why the video study was done during the mid-day when the busiest is the mornings and
evenings and he said this was probably due to availability of the camera. Discussion ensued about members’ experiences and
observations of the intersection and the consensus was that an alternative to stop sign was needed. Traffic calming in
general will be added to a future agenda for discussion.
A.2. Planner Nolan was asked about the proposal and he said it was for installation of the north-leg crosswalk (west-leg has
existing crosswalk).
B.1. Member Janovy said she did not see the reason for denying warrants. She recommended a better explanation for the
denial and moving the request to Section C to review the warrants more critically.
B.2. The consensus was that traffic calming was needed instead of stop signs. Traffic calming will be discussed at a future
date not just for this intersection but to address citywide concerns.
B.3. The posted speed limit is 30 mph and planner Nolan explained that this was a temporary situation that would be
corrected before staff could implement anything.
B.4. Member Janovy suggested forwarding this request to Park & Recreation.
C.7. Planner Nolan said the City does not have a policy for handicap permit parking.
2
D.1. This request is partially related to TH-169 reconstruction.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to approve the August. 13, 2014, Traffic Safety
Committee Report with the following amendment: move B.1. to Section C and refer B.4. to the Park and Recreation
Department.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan
Planner Nolan said the Planning Commission (PC) will be holding a public hearing on Oct. 22 for feedback on the plan. He said
the PC is holding the public hearing because City Council plans to amend the Transportation Comprehensive Plan to include
the Sidewalk Facilities Plan immediately upon approval and the PC is the authorized body to handle this.
Planner Nolan said the plan was developed with input from the ETC, Living Streets Advisory Group, and Engineering staff. He
said staff reviewed each sidewalk and supporting data and some were removed or added based on supporting criteria.
Feedback provided by the ETC included the following:
• If City Council approves this plan, the sidewalk on Valley View Road that was not approved as part of Birchcrest B
Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction should be included in construction next year because it is on the plan for
installation.
• Be transparent with the data for each sidewalk; verify that the sidewalks on the plan are the ones that make sense;
do they advance the vision of the community for the residents to be able to travel safely, independently and have
mobility; is the right criteria being used; does it create a network. Consensus was yes and it is a plan that can change
in the future if needed.
• Staff did a good job of using supporting data for the sidewalks that are included.
• Revise page 2, 3rd paragraph to read ‘Sidewalks and paths provide safe movements for individuals of all ages and
many abilities.’
• Should the plan state construction schedule? Planner Nolan said the Living Streets Plan is probably a better place to
talk about construction schedule.
• Planner Nolan was asked if Park & Recreation was included and he said staff is having ongoing conversation with
Director Kattreh.
• In addition to including supporting data, also include what hasn’t been decided yet, for example, the side of street
the sidewalk will be on.
• City Council should hold the public hearing and then forward the approved plan to the PC for inclusion in the Comp
Plan. The concern is that the plan is the ETC’s responsibility and not the PC’s. There are probably legal and
philosophical reasons for amending the Comp Plan but it does not need to be done immediately.
• Can the ETC and PC have a work session to make sure the PC understands the ETC’s vision of the plan since they are
taking public comments?
• This plan is very different than the previous sidewalk map; are sidewalks prioritized? Planner Nolan said the
understanding is that Active Routes to School will get priority.
• What is the risk of the PC holding the public hearing? Residents may feel short-changed if they are not heard directly
by the City Council. It needs public acceptance and if it appears that they did not reach out to the public it could
backfire.
• A risk might be that certain sidewalks are taken out. Planner Nolan said he was led to believe the PC would not do
this.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to recommend approval of the Sidewalk Facilities
Plan, and whereas, the plan reflects thoughtful construction of criteria, is data driven, and most importantly is consistent
with the vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all residents.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
3
2015 Valley View Road Reconstruction Draft Engineering Report
Planner Nolan said staff has already identified changes that will be made before the report goes to City Council. Public
Works, Fire and Police are also reviewing the report. Staff is recommending decorative streetlights along the sidewalk based
on feedback from the ETC and residents, and residents are currently being surveyed to determine the style of light. Planner
Nolan said he would take comments back to the project engineer.
Comments
• What caused traffic volume to go down so much from 2005?
• Add the new Sidewalk Facilities Plan to the report when it is approved.
• Explain the purpose of the right-of-way to residents and that they are not taxed on land in the right-of-way; this may
help to get more support for sidewalks.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Nelson to forward the report with comments.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
2015 Work Plan Approval
Planner Nolan will make minor amendment to the plan.
Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Whited to approve the plan.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Ordinance Discussion: Bicycling in Municipal Parking Facilities
Member Janovy said the current ordinance does not allow riding bike in municipal facility and this includes parking lots. She
suggested striking the word “bicycle” as the simplest fix as recommended by Bike Edina.
Another recommendation was to add ‘except for the purpose of parking and/or thru travel’ at the end of the current
ordinance because the intent is to allow all modes of transportation but prevent people from recreating in these areas,
example, skate boarders.
It was asked if they are trying to fix a problem that does not exist and chair Bass said recommending a revision to the
ordinance allows them to make future plans for municipal facilities where they may want to have bike parking, repair
stations, etc., similar to other cities.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to draft an advisory communication
recommending that City Council add ‘except for the purpose of parking and/or thru travel’.
After further discussion the motion was withdrawn because there wasn’t consensus that this was the right solution although
there was acknowledgment that the current ordinance creates a hurdle for future changes.
Member Janovy suggested writing an advisory communication to the City Council similar to the one they did for the taxi cab
ordinance revision where they did not suggest a solution.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Nelson to write an advisory communication to the City
Council recommending that the ordinance be revised. The advisory will clearly state the ETC’s intent but not suggest any
particular revision language.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Walk Edina Working Group
Member Boettge who will chair this working group said it will be similar to Bike Edina and will be a forum for pedestrians to
talk about pedestrian safety issues. Chair Bass recommended pursuing a Walk Friendly designation similar to the Bike
Friendly designation as one of their first goals.
4
Motion was made by chair Bass and seconded by member Olson to approve the Walk Edina Working Group and appoint
member Boettge as chair.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Updates
Student Members
Student member Rummel asked if the ETC controlled the high school’s parking lot and she was told no, but they’ve often
talked about having a student body that would help to identify solutions. Member Rummel said a traffic circle may help
because this would prevent drivers turning left from waiting a long time to get out. Planner Nolan said the school district
recently received bids for reconfiguring the parking lot but they were rejected because the bids were too high. He said city
engineer Millner is meeting regularly with the school district on this issue.
Bike Edina Working Group – Minutes of August 14, 2014
Member Janovy said they had a guest that talked about bike maps; next month is their annual meeting and they will work on
their Work Plan and bring to the ETC for approval.
Living Streets Working Group
The group reviewed and revised the Sidewalk Facility Plan.
Communications Committee
The committee wrote a blog post. One concern from the beginning was that they would not contribute to blog posts if they
were not promoted by the other media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. and it was not. They asked if they could do
video blogs and asked about the requirements for photos releases. Planner Nolan will follow up on this.
CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - no discussion.
CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Member Nelson said it was interesting reading a Star Tribune article about the lid over TH-100 that he suggested 4-years ago
when they asked for crazy ideas for the Grandview area. He said it was interesting seeing it coming up for discussion.
Regarding the high school traffic, member Nelson said eventually they’ll have to begin discussion of this area to find a
solution. He thanked planner Nolan for promoting Living Streets in the high school homecoming parade.
Member Whited thanked planner Nolan for his work in submitting the request for the traffic study in the Chowen area to the
University of Minnesota.
Member LaForce said he noticed two ‘cross traffic does not stop’ signs at the top of the TH-100 ramp at Benton, an area that
he’s mentioned in the past. Planner Nolan said he was not aware of their installation and that it was probably done by
MNDOT. He said he attended the City’s visioning session and the conversation seemed to have been focused on
transportation and sidewalks and everyone in attendance seemed to be in agreement that sidewalks are needed. He said he
was not sure if this was a true representation of the citizenry or just a group of like-minded people.
Member Boettge asked student member Rummel her opinion of school bus drivers in reference to how they drive and traffic
at the high school. Member Rummel said the bus drivers use every opportunity to get back on the road as quickly as possible
but she thinks student drivers are the biggest problem.
Member Janovy said she would like to learn more about a sidewalk that City of St. Louis Park recently installed on W. 39th
Street. She said they went to great expense to install a sidewalk on a low volume street and one of their councilmembers
explained that it was done because it was a route to school and a couple other reasons that justified the cost. She compared
this to Wooddale Avenue that failed due to cost because adding bump outs would have required moving catch basins even
though this would have made it better.
5
STAFF COMMENTS
2014 Project Update:
• The three remaining neighborhood roadway reconstruction projects are on schedule for completion this fall; two are
already completed;
• France Avenue Pedestrian Intersection Enhancement – stage 3 is on schedule for completion in Oct. The County does
not allow ‘stop here on red’ signs so staff is looking at adding stop bars;
• The roundabout at Hazelton Road is open;
• 2014 Sidewalk Improvements – York Avenue is completed; Vernon Avenue started this week; Valley View Road is
next;
• Olinger Blvd mill and overlay started this week;
• Xerxes Avenue at crosstown mill and overlay is starting tomorrow and the bump outs next week;
• The advisory communication to City Council regarding revision of taxi cab ordinance was approved;
• The 60th & Chowen area traffic study that was submitted to University of MN was not selected; there are fewer
students in the fall so it is on the list for consideration in the spring;
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned.
ATTENDANCE
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2014
NAME TERM J F* M A M J J A S O N D SM
2/27
SM
3/10
WS
3/18
# of
Mtgs
Attendance
%
Meetings/Work
Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 10
Bass, Katherine 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80%
Boettge, Emily 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100%
Campbell, Jack student 1 1 10%
Iyer, Surya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80%
Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100%
LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100%
Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90%
Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100%
Rummel, Anna student 1 1 10%
Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3 30%
Spanhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75%
Van Dyke, Jackson student 1 1 2 20%
Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80%
*Cancelled due to weather
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Allison, Secretary
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Date: October 23, 2014
Subject: 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Projects
Action Requested:
No action requested.
Agenda Item #: VI. C.
Action El
Discussion
Information
Information / Background:
As part of the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund budgeting and management process, staff tracks
available funds from year to year, and projects these funds into future years. The utility franchise fees
generate approximately $1.1 million per year for PACS-eligible projects, and staff budgets for 95% of this
amount each year. When PACS Funds go unused, at the end of the year those funds are rolled over into the
next year's PACS Fund budget. Staff is estimating that approximately $600,000 will roll over from 2013 to
2014 funds (this includes a $500,000 rollover from 2012 to 2013, much of that due to higher-than-expected
revenues for 2012 — a "partial" year for the PACS Fund). This rollover amount also includes approximately
$125,000 in PACS Funds for construction costs associated with the Birchcrest B Neighborhood
Reconstruction program (specifically, the sidewalk on the west side of Normandale Road), which was
delayed from 2013 to 2014.
Based on the anticipated 2015 budget amount of approximately $1.7 million and estimated
construction/installation costs, staff is recommending the attached list of projects be implemented and
funded by the PACS Fund in 2015:
Attachments:
Recommended 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Projects
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\ Agendas & RR's \ 2014 R&R \2014 I 023 \ Item VI.C. 2015 PACS Fund Projects.docx
_
City of Edina
Recommended 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Projects
Project Type Street Location Sidewalk Length Notes
Sidewalk Normandale Road 1,100' (Benton to Valley View) Birchcrest B 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Arden Ave S 1,250' (50th St to 52nd St) Arden Park D 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Minnehaha Blvd 1,530' (52nd St to 54th St) Arden Park D 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk W 52nd St 760' (Arden to Halifax) Arden Park D 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Indianola Ave 195' (50th St to 5016 Indianola) Arden Park D 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Arbour Ave 1,660' (Grove to 61st St) Countryside H 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Sun Rd 945' (Olinger Blvd to Arbour) Countryside H 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Sidewalk Interlachen Road 1,185' (Oxford to Vernon) Active Routes to School Recommendation
Sidewalk Vernon Ave 1,745' (Gleason to Blake) Adjacent to parks, filling gap on minor arterial road
Sidewalk 65th St W 375' (Valley View to 6500 France) Sidewalk gap, contingent on construction of 6500 France
Sidewalk Valley View Rd 2,750' (McCauley Tr to Mark Terr) 2015 MSA project (80% MSA, 20% PACS Fund)
Sidewalk W 54th St 2,200' (Wooddale to France) Delayed 2014 MSA project (80% MSA, 20% PACS Fund)
Sidewalk Heritage Drive 200' (York to Xerxes) Filling in short sidewalk gaps on south side
Sidewalk Miscellaneous sidewalk project(s) 3,000' - 3,500' $300k-$400k sidewalk project(s) under evaluation
Ped Safety W 69th St (Galleria-Southdale) N/A Mid-block RRFB crossing (replace existing steady beacon)
Ped Safety 2 RRFB crossings N/A Locations TBD
Bike Facility Miscellaneous pavement markings N/A Locations TBD