Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-08-04_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY DAY, AUGUST 4, 2014 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA 7:05 p.m. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be. removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of.July 15, 2014, And Work Session Of July 15, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per. Pre -List Dated, 7/17/2014 TOTAL $1,491,606.23 And Per Pre -List Dated 7/24/204 TOTAL $2,004,748.29 And Per Pre -List Dated, 7/31/2014 TOTAL,_$1,016,472.40 and Cred Card Purchases dated 5/27/14 — 6/26/14 TOTAL $34,604.26 C. Request For Purchase — Annual Purchase About Town Paper D. New On -Sale Wine and Beer Licenses, Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina, 7171 France Avenue E. Request For Purchase — Community Attitude And Interest Citizen Survey, ETC Institute F. Amendment To Encroachment Agreement, AK Larson Family LLC, 3939 West 50th Street G. Request For Purchase — Award of Bid — Contract 14 -11 Olinger Boulevard Reconstruction H. Request For Purchase — Award of Bid — Contract ENG 14 -12 Alley Improvements I. Request For Purchase — Award of Bid — Contact. ENG 14 -14 France Avenue /Hazelton Road Landscaping J. Resolution No. 2014 -85 Requesting Financial Assistance Via Bridge Bonds From State Of Minnesota Transportation Fund For West 54th Street Bridge K. Request For Purchase — Change Order — Contract ENG 14 -13 Edina Industrial Park Lighting L Request For Purchase - Reallce Ice Water Treatment, Braemar Arena, Cypress, Ltd. M. Ordinance No. 2014 -11 Amending Chapters 12, 20 & 24 Concerning Tobacco & Electronic Delivery Devices N. Ordinance No. 2014 -13 Amending Chapter 7 Concerning Dogs O. Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Amending Chapter 10 Concerning, Pools Agenda/Edina City Council August 4, 2014 Page 2 7:10 P.M. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Edina Robotic Team VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to .do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure ,fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their _. testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try, not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for.all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping cheering, or. booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 7:20 p.m. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive` Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for Frauenshuh. Commercial Real Estate. 5125,•5105, 5 10 1, and 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevar&.Res. No. 2014 -82, Comprehensive Plan; and Res. No. 2014 -83 for Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires roll call of four affirmative votes to approve. Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan, roll call of three affirmative votes to approve.) 8:10 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARING —Final Site Plan Review, Multiple Variances and Preliminary Plat, Mesaba Capital; 7151 York Avenue, Res. No. 2014 -84 (Roll call of three affirmative votes to approve.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to .approve except where noted) 9:10 P.M. A. Sketch Plan — 4121 West 50th Street 9:40 p.m. B. Appointment Edina Community Health Commission 9:45 p.m. C. Human Rights And Relations Commission —.Bias Offense Response And Prevention Plan Agenda/Edina City Council August 4, 2014 Page 3 10:10 P.M. D. Resolution No. 2014- Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Edina Taxicab Code And `,Transportation Options C., Minutes 1. Human Rights & Relations Commission, May 27, 2014 2. Energy & Environment Commission, June 12, 2014 3. Edina Transportation Commission, June 19, 2014 10:15 p.m. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE 10:20 p.m. XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS 10:35 p.m. XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS 10:40 p.m. X111. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA EDINA HOUSING. & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF. MINUTES OF HRA —June 17, 2014 V. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — AWARD OF BID — Contract ENG 14 -14 France Avenue/Hazelton Road Landscaping VI. ADJOURNMENT Agenda/Edina City Council August 4, 2014 Page 4 The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Mon Aug 4 Work Session —Fred Richards Redesign 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Session With Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Aug 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 5 Night To Unite Thurs Aug 7 CANDIDATES INFORMATION SESSION 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 12 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Tues Aug 12 Filing Closes for Municipal Offices On November General Election S:00 P.M. CLERK'S OFFICE Tues Aug 19 Work Session —Blake Road Corridor Study 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Budget Preview 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep I LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 2 Work Session — Grandview Development Partner Interviews 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 16 Work Session — Donations and Sponsorships 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 16 Joint Session With Heritage Preservation Board 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 7 Work Session — 2015 Boards/Commission Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tue Oct 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 21 Rep. Keith Ellison Update 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Business Meeting 5:45 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tree Ordinance 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tue Oct 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 3 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov. 3 Regular Meeting , 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov. 4 GENERAL ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Tus Nov I I VETERANS' DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 15 Work Session - TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thurs Nov 27 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 28 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 15, 2014 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. U. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda as modified to consider Items VIII.D., Sketch Plan Review, 7200 France Avenue; and, VIII.E. Final Alignment of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, prior to Item VIII.A., Student Appointments to Boards and Commissions. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of July 1, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 3, 2014, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $335,285.29; Police Special Revenue $1,666.50; Braemar Memorial Fund $1,529.48; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $180.00; Arts and Culture Fund $370,000; Working Capital Fund $16,578.10; Equipment Replacement Fund $390.00; Art Center Fund $1,157.17; Golf Dome Fund $386.82; Aquatic Center Fund $28,372.41; Golf Course Fund $30,628.70; Ice Arena Fund $4,698.39; Sports Dome Fund $215,307.88; Edinborough Park Fund $19,015.23; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,721.43; Liquor Fund $262,677.37; Utility Fund $88,945.60; Storm Sewer Fund $2,846.20; PSTF Agency Fund $15,295.26; Payroll Fund $3,164.55; TOTAL $1,034,216.38 and for receipt of payment of claims dated July 10, 2014, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $198,491.15; Police Special Revenue $37,318.30; Arts and Culture Fund $323.46; Working Capital Fund $63,966.53; Art Center Fund $1,728.55; Golf Dome Fund $830.87; Aquatic Center Fund $8,135.71; Golf Course Fund $30,657.27; Ice Arena Fund $50,164.13; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,670.11; Liquor Fund $264,463.68; Utility Fund $75,137.65; Storm Sewer Fund $25,231.40; Recycling Fund $46.90; PSTF Agency Fund $1,885.08; TOTAL $760,050.79 IV.C. Approve New On -Sale Wine and Beer Liquor Licenses, Pie Wild, Inc., dba PizzaRev, 7529 France Avenue IV.D. Request for Purchase, Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Software House International — Minnesota State Contract #436392 at $51,311 IV.E. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -13 Industrial Park Lighting Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Killmer Electric Company, Inc. at $154,912.00 IV.F. Accept Traffic Study Report of June 4, 2014 IV.G. Request for Purchase, 2014 Cat 272D Skid Loader, Public Works - Streets, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Ziegler Equipment, Mn /DOT State Bid Contract #71060 at $47,804.00 IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -80 approving Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE UPDATE — RECEIVED Joe Abood, Braemar Golf Course General Manager, introduced himself, described his professional background, and stated he sees great potential with the Braemar Golf Course. The Council welcomed Mr. Abood. V.B. JULY SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED —TOPIC. CONSERVATION INCENTIVES Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to conservation incentives. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. PRELIMINARY REZONING, LOT AREA AND WIDTH VARIANCES, BUILDING COVERAGE VARIANCE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, 3923 49'" STREET, MATHIAS MORTENSON — RESOLUTION NO. 2014-79 ADOPTED TO DENY Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Mathias Mortenson regarding of 3923 49th Street, for preliminary rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; a lot area variance from 15,000 sq. ft. to 8,816 sq. ft.; lot width variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; building coverage variance from 25% to 32 %; and, side yard setback variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. Mr. Mortenson was proposing to tear down a single - family house and construct a new double dwelling unit. Mr. Teague reviewed the Council's past sketch plan consideration and the proponent's attempt to address some of the expressed concerns. It was noted the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the requested rezoning contingent upon approval of the variances. The motion of the Planning Commission related to the requested variances failed on a 4 -4 vote. Staff recommended denial based on the rationale that the combination of variances was too much for this particular site; the building would exceed lot coverage; and, a reasonable use existed. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to the impact of approving the requested rezoning and denying the requested variances, and lot dimensions within this block. The Council acknowledged written public comment received. Proponent Presentation Mathias Mortenson, architect representing the proponent, 2429 Sheridan Avenue, Minneapolis, described design revisions that he believed created an improved project, better fit the neighborhood, and uniqueness of this site. He stated the proposed design accommodated age -in -place housing and asked the Council to approve the request, as revised. The Council asked questions of Engineer Millner relating to site drainage and stormwater storage capacity and of Attorney Knutson relating to variance conditions to restrict the use to a duplex. Mr. Mortenson defined the revised ridge height and stated a preliminary grading and drainage plan had been developed by his civil engineer and submitted to the Council committing to handling 90% of all drainage and runoff on site. Mr. Mortenson stated the hard surface exterior spaces could be constructed of permeable pavers but the proposed rain gardens would meet the sustainability goal. He indicated the solar panels on a south - facing gable would accommodate electrical needs to reduce consumption of resources. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Public Testimony Nancy Thorvilson, 7221 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Jon Andresen; 4804 Maple Road, addressed the Council. Ben Hackel, 7105 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett,.Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Teague addressed issues raised during public testimony on types of variances that' had been considered in,this area. Mr. Mortenson indicated his building footprint I °* eeveFage included all uses on the block but even when considering only the residential -type uses; his, proposal remained in line with the average structure. The Council discussed the proposal and asked questions of Mr. Mortenson and Mr. Teague relating to use of the lower level and site drainage. Support was expressed for the improved design,,sustainability aspects, and redevelopment of a site bordered on either side by a parking lot. Council Discussion & Action Council concern was expressed related to the requested lot coverage variance, lack of hardship required for variance consideration, storm water drainage, ineffective location of two rain gardens at the rear of the property, and potential risk of sanitary infiltration and inflow due to proposed excavations that lacked positive surface drainage. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -79, Denying Preliminary Rezoning from R -1 to R -2; Lot Area and Width Variances; Building Coverage Variances; and, Side Yard Setback Variances, based on the following findings: 2.01 ..The variance criteria are not met. 2.02 The current zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2.03 The multiple variances requested demonstrate the property is not suitable for R -2 zoning. 2.04 There are no'practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. It is not reasonable to deviate from the ordinance requirements when there is nothing unique about the, property that justifies the variances. The need for variances is caused by the - applicant's desire to build such a large two- family dwelling on the site. .2.05 Reasonable use of the property exists with the two -story single family currently located on the property: 2.06 The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. 2.07 The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single - family home or duplex) and -,building a new one. 2.08 Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with. the single family home. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Brindle Motion carried. V11. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII. D. SKETCH PLAN — 7200 FRANCE AVENUE — REVIEWED Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of sketch plan review, which did not include a public hearing, noting the application process that followed included four opportunities for public testimony. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 It was noted the proposal was to redevelop the 3.51 -acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue to tear down the existing outdated office building and redevelop it with a six- and four -story mixed use development project. Proponent Presentation Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, presented elements of the project that included 195 residential units with 40 units being affordable; 26,000 square feet of commercial; and, underground parking. Mr. Dovolis displayed colored artist renditions of exterior elevations. Bruce Johnson, landscape architect, presented a landscape plan, noting it would create a lush environment through the use of plants, stones, and water and include winter interest. Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation and project co- sponsor, described the company's housing portfolio and intention to request housing revenue bonds to allow setting aside 40 affordable units as well as Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to cover the gap in rental disparity between affordable units (81 cents /square foot) to market rate units ($1.19 per square foot). The affordability threshold would be 50% of area median income. Ms. Boisclair described the tenant base for affordable units that would be scattered throughout the buildings and of varied design and number of bedrooms. Mat Pascina, SRF Consulting, presented the findings of the independent preliminary traffic analysis. He reported current trip generation from this site was 500 daily trips and the proposed land use would increase it to 2,500 daily trips with retail (accessed from France Avenue) making up two- thirds of that number. Mr. Pascina stated France Avenue, a six -lane facility, could feasibility handle 40,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day. The roadway was currently handling 28,000 vehicles per day, identifying that additional capacity was available. Mr. Pascina explained how the project would minimize impacts to 72 "d Street and recommended developing travel demand strategies for residents and employees. In conclusion, Mr. Pascina addressed points of access, turning movements, sight lines, and truck maneuvers. Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague explained that to accommodate this request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: building height from four stories to six stories; housing density from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre; and, floor area ratio from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning would also be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Mr. Teague reviewed concerns of the Planning Commission related to height and density, traffic, and to require podium height on the France Avenue side. Council Discussion The Council supported this location for multi - residential housing, having a 140 -foot setback from the closest single - family house to the west, building design elements, underground parking, providing varied (1 -3 bedroom) workforce units, not displacing relatively affordable housing, offering a variety of housing units (townhomes and apartments), landscape features, and creation of a green berm /buffer. FGIIBWiRg diseess+e,A A-f the -7290 FFanrze Avenue sketch, The Council offered the following recommendations: ^cenmmr.ents. reduce intensity of the land use (height, massing, floor area ratio, and density); improve the pedestrian streetscape experience; consider eliminating the sidewalk cut -in and extend the curb; provide a significant podium on France Avenue without creating a step -up facing single - family residential; address traffic circulation to prevent neighborhood impact; encourage multimodal transportation by enhancing bicycle facility and providing interior storage; address stormwater management; provide recreational opportunities for tenants; replace asphalt with green space; and, address and mitigate impacts to the City's infrastructure and schools. The Council acknowledged the City would hire, at the developer's expense, a consultant to conduct a traffic study. The development team was encouraged to keep the neighborhood's interests in mind. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15;2014 VIII.E. FINAL ALIGNMENT OF NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL — APPROVED Eric Nelson, Three Rivers Park District Senior Manager of Engineer and Project Manager of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (NMCRT) within Edina, described the alignment of the trail, areas where easements were needed, and indicated the trail grade would-be ADA compliant. The Council suggested considering a center island and /or a .pedestrian activated stoplight at tail crossing of Tracy Avenue east of the high school. it the aFea of the high °eh^ ^'' It was acknowledged that in Segment 19, Condition-7 required construction of a noise wall between the entrance ramp, the trail, and neighborhood. Mr. Nelson explained that a 20 -foot noise wall in this location would not meet the requirements of Mn /DOT so the cost would fall to the'Three Rivers Park District. Rather, they were proposing construction of a tall privacy fence to provide screening and some sound mitigation. Jonathan Vlaming, Three Rivers Park District Associate Superintendent, stated the Community Action Team had been active in this request and preferred a reasonable, solid privacy wall: He stated they would continue to work with residents to reach a consensus. The Council indicated a wooden fence might be an option. Mr. Nelson stated the District finds there might be opportunity to realign the NMCRT through the former Fred Richards Golf Course property and if approached, would collaborate on that effort. The Council suggested the alignment remain on the southern side and within the green space, which would provide a nice viewscape,and save costs on the length of the trail. Member Sprague left the Council dais. s Mr. ...Nelson reported on public participation efforts, screening and fencing options, anticipated'design, and construction timeline anticipating completion in 2017. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the final alignment of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as presented. Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Nays: None Absent: Sprague Motion carried. Member Sprague returned to the Council dais. VIII.A. STUDENT APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Members Bennett and Brindle described the interview process of 53 student applicants and presented a slate of student appointments and alternates. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, appointing students to boards and commissions as follows -' Fati�•iRg the appoint eR ^4 Arts & Culture Commission — Sophia Munic (senior - reappointment),,Jack Ready (junior — reappointment), Alternates — Claire Lindgren (senior), (Jenna) Claire Kramer (senior); Community Health Commission -- Aditya Mittal (junior _ reappointment), Magen Puerzer (senior), Alternatives — Matthew Jirsa (senior), Emily Reinke (junior); Energy & Environment Commission — Reilly Anderson (senior), Sunaya Padmanabhan (senior) Alternatives —.Ezra Sergent - Leventhal (senior), Maria Kloiber (junior), Emily Ding (junior); Heritage Preservation Board. - Joseph Druckman (senior); Peter Otness (junior), Alternatives — Drew Sposeep (senior), Radhika Tandon (junior); Human Rights . & Relations Commission — .Nicole Gates (junior), Katrina Weinert (senior), Alternates — Christina Wagner (senior), Amy Fang.(senior); Park Board — Asef Chowdhury (senior), Graham Colwell, (senior), Alternates — Talia Willmert (junior), William Staunton (junior); Planning Commission — Taylor Halva (senior - reappointment), Madison Seeley (junior), Alternates — Aanik Lohani (junior), Annie Moorhead (senior); and, Transportation Commission — Jack Campbell (senior), Anna Rummel (senior), Alternates — Rosalie Bruns (junior), Talia Willmert (junior). Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council expressed its appreciation to Members Bennett and Brindle. 1. STUDENT BOARD & COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECOMMENDATIONS —APPROVED Member Bennett recommended applying the attendance requirement (75 %) equally to student appointments, to consider attendance records in January of each year, and to appoint students identified as alternates if the attendance requirement was not met. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to apply the attendance requirement equally to student appointments and establish policy to consider appointment of alternates mid -year. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. DRIVING RANGE AND EXECUTIVE COURSE RENOVATION —UPDATE RECEIVED Parks & Recreation Director Kattreh presented the original schedule and revised schedule for the driving range and executive course renovations that had been significantly delayed due to wet weather in May and June and lengthy permitting process of the Army Corps of Engineers to receive a Letter of Permission. Per the revised timeline, it was anticipated the driving range would open the spring of 2015 and the new Par 3 Course would open June 1 -July 1, 2016. Ms. Kattreh answered questions of the Council relating to replacement of wetlands. The Council indicated support for the revised schedule, as presented. With regard to whether the Fred Richards Golf Course should remain open in 2015, Ms. Kattreh indicated staff had moved forward with Council's direction of March 2014 and did not find the revised schedule was rationale to change course. VIII. C. SKETCH PLAN — 4121 WEST 50TH STREET —TABLED TO AUGUST 4, 2014 It was noted the proponent was not in attendance. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to table consideration of the 4121 West 50th Street sketch plan to the Council meeting of August 4, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. D. SKETCH PLAN — 7200 FRANCE AVENUE This item was considered prior to Item VIII.A. VIII.E. FINAL ALIGNMENT OF NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL This item was considered prior to Item VIII.A. VIII. F. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-787-6 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014- 787-&-accepting various grants and donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS W.A. CORRESPONDENCE Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, MAY 27, 2014 2. PLANNING COMMISSION, JUNE 11, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE— Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, establishing policy to consider mid- term appointments should a vacancy occurred January through June and if an alternate existed; if no alternate existed the project coordinator would post vacancy notice and of-scheduled interview dates; and, if mid -term vacancy occurred July through December the vacancy would continue until the annual appointment schedule unless otherwise directed by the Council. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to change Board and Commission term dates to March V. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 4, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the July 15, 2014, meeting available. Page 7 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 15,2014 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland. called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m.. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:11 P.M. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Lindy Crawford, City. Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; and John Wallin, Finance Director. noted the purpose 'of the work session was to us aiscuss Louncii meeting management get some FINANCIAL AND WORK PLAN UPDATES Assistant Finance.. Director Roggeman provided an update for the second quarter financials reviewing the various funds revenues and expenditures to date. He also gave historical perspectives of each fund. Assistant Manager. Kurt presented the status of the 2014 Strategic Priorities progress to date. BOARD AND.COMMISSIONMANAGEMENT Staff asked the Council for direction regarding an interview date for Planning Commission Applicants. The date will be Wednesday, August 13 with the time to be determined depending upon the number to be interviewed. Council, T e directed staff to get in contact with Cathy Cozad to ascertain her interest in an appointment to the Community Health Commission. Council also directed staff to wait until the next annual appointment process to fill the vacancy on the Construction Board of Appeals. The Council also gave direction regarding mid -year vacancies: 1) January — June, staff will confirm alternates', interest in appointment? then forward name to council for approvals and if no alternate exists, staff will post notice of vacancy, take applications and schedule interviews with the City Council. 2) July — December, the vacancy will continue until annual appointment cycle unless directed, otherwise by City Council. The Council also directed that the expiration dates to mr of Board and Commission members be moved from February I st of each year to March I st of each year to better facilitate the attendance review, and the application and interview process. FUTURE IQ SESSION Council gave direction for staff regarding invitees for the September 9 and 11, 2014 visioning session. Staff will coordinate sending invitations with a target of approximately 150 persons on the list, from a variety of community groups. COUNCILMEETING MANAGEMENT Manager Neal presented City Management. Fellow Coyle's analysis of Edina City Council meetings time spent on various portions of the agenda. The Council and staff discussed time spent on the various issues typically on the City Council's agenda and some potential means to become more efficient in meeting management. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 4, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 . Council Check Register by GL Page- Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 72 7/17/2014 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 154.10 347349 43667300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 77.05- 347356 43694000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 65.70 347354 43871300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 53.55 347351 43871500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 543.60 347350 43871600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 557.75 347355 43886000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.07 347353 90492900 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 187.34 347352 90493000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,501.06 73 7/17/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 21.51- CREDIT 347495 CP -OE- 357032 -1 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 23.30 SIGNATURE STAMP 347296 IN -29986 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.60 REGISTER TAPE 347295 OE- 361182 -1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 88.95 WIPES, ENVELOPES 347035 WO- 944802 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 147.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003063 347036 WO- 944906 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 103.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 347183 WO- 945094 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 360.94 74 7/1712014 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 136.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347455 071114 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 136.64 76 7117/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 414.82 MOWER PARTS 00001340 347090 966411 -00 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 414.82 76 7/17/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 658.34 CUPS, PLATES, CUTLERY 347332 7079 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 549.46 TISSUE, LINERS, BLEACH 347333 7093 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 733.70 TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS 00002064 347097 7110 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,941.50 77 711712014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 560.61 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347215 39879203 552D.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 560.61 364658 7/17/2014 132227 ABBOTT, GINA 18.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347232 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384668 7117/2014 132227 ABBOTT, GINA Continued... - 384669 7117/2014 102971 ACE'ICE'COMPANY 26.70 347347 1804931 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 26.70 384660 7/1712014 129468 ACME -TOOLS 75.60 STARTER ASSEMBLIES 00005427 347032 2712087 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.39- CREDIT 347432 2720627 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 49.21 384661 7/17/2014 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 28.00 PEST CONTROL 347433 892709 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 28.00 384662 7/17/2014 134507 ADKISSON, MEG 1B.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347233 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 384663 7/17/2014 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 7,650.00 SCOREBOARD INSTALLATION 347179 37224 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 7,650.00 384664 7/17/2014 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 164.66 CO2 347281 31479948 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 164.66 384666 7/17/2014 100676 ALL SAFE INC. 39.20 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 347283 130585 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 39.20 384666 7/17/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 78.44 COFFEE 347282 34997 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDIN60ROUGH CONCESSIONS 78.44 384667 7/17/2014 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 207.28 347236 063014 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 283.04 347236 063014 1551.6201 LAUNDRY _ CITY HALL GENERAL 482.62 347236 063014 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT..GENERAL 227.34 347236 063014 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 73.63 347236 063014 5821.6201 LAUNDRY. 50TH ST OCCI'PANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 202.91 CITY OF EDINA 5862.5514 347290 407090197 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL 384670 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 131176 ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING DESIGNS INC. 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 6,223.47 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384667 7/17/2014 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES Continued... 7/17/2014 115.59 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 347236 063014 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 180.32 347236 063014 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 57555 1,569.82 470.00 384668 7/17/2014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 101.50 347127 981.15 COPIER PAPER 347033 10403022 -00 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 143.18- CREDIT 347180 10403148 -00 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 2,799.00 837.97 384672 384669 7/17/2014 119466 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 50.00 32.40- 347235 347288 406240014 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 50.00 383.59 347286 406280197 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 384673 7/17/2014 439.47 132408 347287 407010140 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 667.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347284 407020145 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 347181 AE1060 157.58 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347289 407040472 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 97968 384674 347285 407070180 5730 5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 08060.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 202.91 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 347290 407090197 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,798.14 384670 7/17/2014 131176 ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING DESIGNS INC. 6,223.47 LIGHTING PRODUCTS 00002621 347234 13066 6,223.47 384671 7/17/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 952.00 347126 57555 470.00 347128 57556 101.50 347127 57557 1,275.50 347348 57960 2,799.00 384672 7/17/2014 119466 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES 50.00 JOB POSTING 347235 39881 50.00 384673 7/17/2014 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 1,308.00 TRAINING 347181 AE1060 1,308.00 384674 7/17/2014 101196 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. 134.95 MOTOR REPAIR 00005512 347237 115387 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 08060.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/1512014 7:19:51 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/23/14 CITY OF EDINA 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Council Check Register by GL 150.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 384678 711712014 118955 BCBS OF MN 7/17/2014 - 7/1712014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384674 7117/2014 347434 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. 1470.4329 Continued... FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 134.95 1,676.00 384676 7/17/2014 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 384679 7117/2014 576.30 VEHICLE REPAIR 347034 71197 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 576.30 144.00 PIZZA 347182 384676 7/1712014 5520.5510 100642 BANNERS TO GO ARENA CONCESSIONS 432.00 139.00 LIVING STREETS BANNER 347291 38120 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL CONCESSIONS 139.00 216.00 PIZZA 347293 384677 7/17/2014 5320.5510 102608 BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS, THE POOL CONCESSIONS 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page- 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PACS IS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/23/14 347228 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384678 711712014 118955 BCBS OF MN 1,676.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347434 ARLENE MEINEKE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,676.00 384679 7117/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 144.00 PIZZA 347182 D28IN2299 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 432.00 PIZZA 347292 D28IN2300 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 216.00 PIZZA 347293 D28IN2333 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 216.00 PIZZA 347294 D28IN2337 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,008.00 384680 7117/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 20.00 347357 147146 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 739.15 347358 147147 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 193.34 347129 147148 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 952.49 384681 7117/2014 121393 BIRT, PAULINE 67.43 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347488 3800 57TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 67.43 384682 7/1712014 134516 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 121.80 TOW VEHICLE 347435 484226 1553.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.80 384683 7/1- 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 378.00 CITY OF EDINA 120770 7/15/2014 7:19:51 570.00 Council Check Register by GL 120819 Page- 5 1,889.50 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 364686 7/17/2014 134514 BRADLEY, JON 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384683 7117/2014 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP Continued... 384687 19,110.00 JUNE 2014 FEES 347184 070314 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 19,110.00 581.09 ICE TIME FOR PROGRAMS 347238 2394 -1 1629.6406 384684 7/17/2014 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 384688 351.99 AED BATTERY 00002151 347297 81465991 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 351.99 156.30 DOOR REPAIR 347298 525288S 5720.6180 384685 7/1712014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 364689 941.50 347131 120758 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLASS REGISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 378.00 347130 120770 5822.5513 570.00 347359 120819 5842.5513 1,889.50 364686 7/17/2014 134514 BRADLEY, JON 108.00 MODEL 347436 071114 5110.6103 108.00 384687 7117/2014 123621 BRAEMAR ARENA 581.09 ICE TIME FOR PROGRAMS 347238 2394 -1 1629.6406 581.09 384688 7117/2014 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 156.30 DOOR REPAIR 347298 525288S 5720.6180 156.30 364689 7/17/2014 134616 BUCK, PAULETTE 72.00 ART CLASS REFUND 347437 071114 5101.4607 72.00 384690 7/1712014 134513 C THEMED CONCEPTS 3,500.00 NET REPAIR 347303 14 -276 -1 5311.6180 3,500.00 384691 7/17/2014 120641 CANNON RIVER WINERY 138.00 347360 6795 5842.5513 138.00 384692 7/1712014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 1.12 LATE FEE 347187 500487086 1554.6230 120.57- CREDIT 347186 988232987CR 1552.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLASS REGISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 062014 1481.6186 HEAT CITY OF EDINA 347346 062014 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING Council Check Register by GL 062014 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 347346 062014 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 HEAT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384692 711712014 062014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE Continued... 062014 121.34 OCE MAINTENANCE 347185 988251597 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5511.6186 1.89 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 347346 062014 5761.6186 384693 7/1712014 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 062014 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,284.39 062014 347134 363520 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 347346 3,701.60 5841.6186 347132 363521 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 062014 46.45 HEAT 347133 367668 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 384694 7/1712014 129923 CAWLEY 53.06 NAME BADGES 53.06 384696 7/1712014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 177.35 579.59 739.34 1,195.74 744.93 145.21 157.32 675.37 4,889.35 502.57 21.30 124.09 161.64 233.92 425.09 '2,287.79 13,060.60 384696 7117/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.93 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911 59.63 168.33 169.75 369.52 280.81 57.00 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 347037 V231525 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 347346 062014 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 347346 062014 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 347346 062014 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 347346 062014 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 347346 062014 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 347346 062014 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 347346 062014 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 347346 062014 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 347346 062014 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 347346 062014 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 347346 062014 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 347346 062014 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 347346 062014 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 347346 062014 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 347346 062014 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 347346 062014 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 347438 0056 -7/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 347041 0146 -6/14 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 347041 0146 -6/14 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 347041 0146 -6114 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 347041 0146 -6/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 347041 0146 -6/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 347041 0146 -6/14 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMP' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 120433 COMCAST FIELD USE FOR 2014 SEASON 347241 CITY OF EDINA 1628.4392.03 347441 750.00 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 Council Check Register by GL 177449 -6/14 29.01 8772 10 614 0220686 384698 7117/2014 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 384702 7/17/2014 1,048.93 7117/2014 - 7/17/2014 00079303- 0155300010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384696 7117/2014 347189 123898 CENTURYLINK 5511.61 B9 Continued... 384703 7/17/2014 37.26 347190 347041 0146-6/14 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 590.02 612 E01 -0426 347239 0426 -7/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 104.93 612 E23 -0652 GV -911 347299 0652 -7/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 86.35 952 941 -1019 347040 1019 -6/14 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 590.02 612 E12 -6797 347240 6797 -7/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 109.55 952 826 -7398 347039 7398 -6/14 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 129.06 952 920 -9996 347038 9996 -6/14 2310.6188 TELEPHONE 2,851.16 384697 7/17/2014 118680 CITY OF EDINA 750.00 120433 COMCAST FIELD USE FOR 2014 SEASON 347241 SENIOR SOFTBALL 1628.4392.03 347441 750.00 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 347440 177449 -6/14 29.01 8772 10 614 0220686 384698 7117/2014 220686 -7/14 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 384702 7/17/2014 1,048.93 00079303- 0155300010 347188 155300010 -6/14 5511.6189 071014 361.88 REIMBURSEMENT 00079303 - 0155300018 347189 79303 -6/12 5511.61 B9 75.77 384703 7/17/2014 00079303- 0155300009 347190 79303 -6/14 5511.61 B9 1,486.58 384699 7/17/2014 101860 CITY OF ST. PAUL 929.00 POLICE MOTORCYCLE COURSE 347042 IN00002292 929.00 384700 7117/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 148.96 347361 0118022618 395.90 347362 0128341810 384701 7/17/2014 120433 COMCAST 90.85 8772 10 614 0164959 347441 164959 -6/14 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 347440 177449 -6/14 29.01 8772 10 614 0220686 347439 220686 -7/14 211.27 384702 7/17/2014 133419 COYLE, ANNIE 22.99 REIMBURSEMENT 347300 071014 69.81 REIMBURSEMENT 347300 071014 92.80 384703 7/17/2014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1400.6104 5862.5515 5842.5515 5430.6188 5420.6188 5710.6105 1120.6406 1120.6107 SENIOR SOFTBALL SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page- 7 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER CENT SERV GEN - MIS E911 PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SERV GEN - MIS PSTF ADMINISTRATION E911 SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 7/1512014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384703 7/17/2014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES Continued... 3,195.31 UNIFORMS 347301 29281 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 529.80 GUARD SHIRTS 347302 29858 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 3,725.11 384704 7/17/201.4 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 215.50 114 - 10014090 -3 347043 063014 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 215.50 384706 7/17/2014 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 198.79 BRACKET, V -BELT 00001337 347044 163483 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 198.79 384706 7117/2014 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 848.07 NEWSLETTERS 347191 298419 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 848.07 384707 7/17/2014 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 250.00 ROOF REPAIR 347192 2413 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 250.00 384708 7117/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,320.60 347138 759718 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 92.20 347137 759719 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,627.70 347136 759721 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 121.80 347135 759722 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,162.30 384709 7/17/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 38.33 CHARGER 00005448 347045 917176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.99 SOCKET 00005508 347046 917765 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.32 384710- 711712014 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 100.83 BAKERY 347442 512125 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 58.04 347443 512386 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 42.36 347445 512390 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 101.31 347444 512391 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 110.42 347446 513019 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 412.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1512014 7:19:51 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384711 7/17/2014 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Continued... 13,408.98 JUNE 2014 SURCHARGE 347242 20279053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 13,408.98 384712 7/17/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 556.75 347447 110311893 -6/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 92.50 651972955 347047 651972955 -6/14 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 649.25 384713 7/17/2014 101766 DISPLAY SALES 177.01 FLAGS 347224 INV0095445 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 177.01 384714 7/1712014 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 ED126342 ESCROW REFUND 347448 5713 YORKAVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,095.00 ED122987 ESCROW REFUND 347243 6307 KELLOGG 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 4,595.00 384715 7/17/2014 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 124.00 RENEW EDINA TRADEMARK 347449 1951038 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 124.00 384716 7/17/2014 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 466.04 CAUSTIC SODA 347304 827001068 -14 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 622.10 CAUSTIC SODA 347305 827001123 -14 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,088.14 384717 7/17/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 95.76 AD FOR BID 347453 111103 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 42.56 PUBLISH NOTICE 347452 111104 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 90.44 PUBLISH ORD 2014 -09 347451 111105 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 47.88 PUBLISH ORD 2014 -10 347450 111106 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 2,362.05 EDINA EDITION AD 347244 116245 1500.6575 PRINTING CONTINGENCIES 2,362.05 EDINA EDITION AD 347244 116245 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 968.86 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSPAPER INSERT 347193 118362 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 968.86 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSPAPER INSERT 347193 118362 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 968.87 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSPAPER INSERT 347193 118362 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 7,907.33 384718 7/1712014 103521 ECOLAB EQUIPMENT CARE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 384726 7117/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Council Check Register by GL 12.46 SWAY BAR BUSHING 347247 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary REPAIR PARTS 88.06 PARTS 347050 1- 4478829 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 REPAIR PARTS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384718 7/1712014 PUMPASSEMBLY 103621 ECOLAB EQUIPMENT CARE 69- 143809 1553.6530 Continued... 16.03 43.74 DOOR HANDLE 00002221 347306 93410775 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.60 43.74 347194 75- 122295 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 384719 7/17/2014 CREDIT 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 75- 130708 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 428.66 30.95 SHORTING CAPS 00001333 347454 11015000 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 384726' 7117/2014 30.95 384720 7/17/2014 HOURS SIGN ON DOOR 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 190 -66266 5822.6575 PRINTING 131.68 25.00 MEETING - BILL NEUENDORF 347048 34679 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 25.00 384721 7/1712014 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 10 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 910.00 5/18/14 GET YOUR REAR IN GEAR 347245 070914 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 910.00 384722 7117/2014 117483 ENGELE, LEE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/24/14 347230 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384723 7117/2014 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 1,251.25 5/18/14 GET YOUR.REAR IN GEAR 347246 070914 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 1,251.25 384724 7/1712014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 3350 347363 259 -1360 5862.5515. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 33.50 384726 7117/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12.46 SWAY BAR BUSHING 347247 1- 4468813 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 88.06 PARTS 347050 1- 4478829 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 166.40 BATTERIES 347052 1- ZO1587 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 145.71 PUMPASSEMBLY 347049 69- 143809 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.03 SWITCH 347051 69- 144188 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10.60 MINIATURE LAMPS 347194 75- 122295 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10.60- CREDIT 347053 75- 130708 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 428.66 384726' 7117/2014 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON -. 174.05 HOURS SIGN ON DOOR 347491 190 -66266 5822.6575 PRINTING 131.68 HOURS SIGN ON DOOR 347490 190 -66267 5862.6575 PRINTING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SEA,,' - ' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384726 711712014 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON Continued... 131.68 HOURS SIGN ON DOOR 347489 190 -66268 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 446.80 FRIENDLY REMINDER SIGNS 347307 190 -66309 5310.6575 PRINTING POOLADMINISTRATION 884.21 384727 7/17/2014 133296 FEED THE DOG 2,501.25 LIVING STREETS PROJECT 347054 063014_LS 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 2,501.25 384728 7/1712014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,305.17 CS PARTS 00001367 347055 0089945 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,305.17 384729 7/17/2014 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 347056 2463155 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 384730 7/17/2014 134486 FLINT TRADING INC. 8,967.71 BIKE LANE PAINT MARKINGS 00002619 347057 170892 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 8,967.71 384731 7/17/2014 126851 FLUTE COCKTAIL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/21/14 347225 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384732 7/17/2014 134496 FOCAL POINT FIXTURES INC. 1,830.00 ENGINEERED DRAWINGS 347195 4612 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,830.00 384733 7/17/2014 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEAPOLIS 315.83 PARTS 347058 063014 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.38 PARTS 347058 063014 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 260.70 PARTS 347058 063014 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 674.91 384734 7/17/2014 103185 GERTENS 65.99 FOLIAGE FOR ROSLAND PK 347059 319601/1 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 65.99 384736 7/17/2014 116192 GOLIATH HYDRO -VAC INC: 1,410.00 CLEAN BACKWASH TANK 00001389 347061 18636 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 - Council Check Register by Invoice .& Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384736 7/17/2014 116192 GOLIATH HYDRO -VAC INC. Continued... .1,086.25 CLEAN BACKWASH TANK 00001389 347060 16641 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,496.25 384736 711712014 101103 GRAINGER 92.20 WALL SWITCH KEYS 00002065 347064 9465112481 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 39.98 CAPACITORS 00001358 347063 9478278246 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 13.06 CAPACITOR 00001358 347062 9478679336 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 28.53 DOOR HOLDER 347196 9479548498 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 19.94 SAFETY GLASSES. 00005345 347065 9482352110 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 193.71 384737 7/17/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 3,297.00 347364 168961 5842.5513 COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 685.50 347139 169039 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,160.50 347365 169041 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,143.00 384738 7/17/2014 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.' 215.92 LED 00001346 347066 973381042 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 215.92 384739 7/17/2014 134391 GRIMES, LAURYN 13.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347308 071014 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 13.44 384740 7/1712014 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/24/14 347229 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384741 7/17/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,318.40 JULY 20114 PREMIUM 347496 6784129 -6 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 7.60 COBRA 347497 JULY2014 1550.6043 \ COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,326.00 384742 7117/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 615.22 CHLORINE 347309 3609400 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 312.95 CHLORINE 347310 3614122 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 928.17 384743 7/1'- 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384743 7/17/2014 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS Continued... 1,429.76 JULY 2014 COBRA 347198 48476434 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 12,190.43 JULY 2014 PREMIUM 347197 48479298 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 1,239.93 COBRA 347499 49309053 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 11,887.91 AUG 2014 PREMIUM 347498 49339596 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 26,748.03 384744 7/1712014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 181.92 BEEF PATTIES 347456 025240 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 181.92 384746 7/17/2014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 395.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 347067 35294 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,895.00 EMT CERTIFICATION 347068 35318 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 347069 35520 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,765.08 384746 7/17/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 637.10 JUNE 2014 BOOKING FEES 347070 1000046973 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 637.10 384747 7/17/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 347071 1000046942 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 150.00 384748 711712014 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 200.16 SOAP, FOAM 00002220 347311 601202398 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20D.16 384749 7/17/2014 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 892.50 FIELD PAINT 00001934 347072 102531 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 892.50 - 384760 7117/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 727.00 347141 711176 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,477.00 347140 711177 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 846.00 347142 711590 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,050.00 384761 7117/2014 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY " 492.64 CHLORINE 347312 140623047 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 13 EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FIELD MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 525.00 CITY OF EDINA 20975 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL 420.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 20983 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384761 7/1712014 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Continued... 384764 7/17/2014 492.64 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 384762 7117/2014 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 619.10 PARK BROCHURES 347313 33142 5710.6575 PRINTING 850532 619.10 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 384753 7/1712014 102.48 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 347073 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 14 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION' 525.00 347144 20975 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 420.00 347143 20983 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 945.00 384764 7/17/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 4.74 PVC BUSHING 00001218 347457 850532 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 102.48 BALL VALVES 00001406 347073 853396 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 107.22 384765 7/1712014 126031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 31.84 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 347458 1225394 -6/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 31.84 384766 7/1712014 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 875.00 SAFETYAUDIT 347314 20068520 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 875.00 384767 7/17/2014 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 500.00 DOOR HANGERS, BROCHURES 347074 65272 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 65.00 REGISTRATION FORMS 00007182 347199 65291 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 565.00 384768 7/1712014 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 347315 77554 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 90.00 347316 77555 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 141.50 347317 77556 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 193.00 347318 77557 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 154.50 347319 77558 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ' 630.50 384769 7/17/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 307.50- 347147 2211811 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 400.00 347370 2229386 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLI" R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384769 7/17/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 3,084.94 347367 2240612 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 347368 2240613 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,538.45 347145 2240615 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.05 347146 2240616 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 10,170.29 347366 2240621 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.60 347369 2240622 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 923.80 347460 2245603 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 575.00 347459 2245667 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 16,519.43 384760 7/17/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 16.32 SHOULDER HARNESS 00005338. 347248 68736546 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 16.32 384762 7/17/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.. 204.49 347390 1895675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.68 347383 1895676 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,660:09 347377 1895677 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 567.35 347376 1895679 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 62.74 347375 1895680 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,016.85 347380 1895681 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,091.20 347374 1895683 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,856.63 347391 1895687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,263.44 347385 1895688 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,998.69 347393 1895689 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 482.80 347392 1895690 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,122.47 347386 1895691 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 189.97 347388 1895692 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,503.37 347387 1895693 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,711.76 347381 1895694 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,325.31 347382 1895695 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,420.01 347373 1895696 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,631.18 347371 1895697 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,787.29 347379 1895698 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.37 347372 1895699 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,199.73 347384 1896064 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,486.66 347389 1896065 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 470.68 347378 1897125 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 14.87- 347394 624143 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 34,074.89 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. . Account Description Business Unit 384762 7/17/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued.:. 384763 7/17/2014 134506 KENNEY, JENNIFER 18.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347249 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 384764 7117/2014 116776 - KUSTOM KARRIERS 177.50 TOW VEHICLE 347075 72774 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 177.50 384766 7/1712014 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 129.95 LOGO SHIRTS 347250 SIN1886856 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 129.95 384766 7/117/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 462.69 SCREWS, NUTS, BITS 00005422 347076 9302555975 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 632.30 DRILL BITS, CAN LURE, WASHERS 00001411 347251 9302565916 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,094.99 384767 7/17/2014 101662 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,233.00 ACCIDENT COVERAGE 347200 27837 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 129,229.75 WORKERS COMP INS 347201 27838 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 130,462.75 384768 7117/2014 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM 46.74 UNIFORM PURCHASE 347077 6/15/14 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 46.74 384769 7117/2014 112094 LINDHOLM,ANGELA 21.98 BIRTHDAY CAKES 347320 071014 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 21.98 384770 7/17/2014 100864' MAC-QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 369.00 RELIEF VALVE 00005485 347078 2144687 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.02- CREDIT 347079 9524 1553.6530' REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.98 384771 7/17/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 3,769.92 FUEL FOR GENERATORS 00005701 347080 718484 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,769.92 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384772 7/17/2014 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC Continued... 195.00 FAX MAINTENANCE 347202 75536 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 195.00 384773 7117/2014 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 375.00 REFRESHER TRAINING 347321 15680 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 375.00 384774 7/17/2014 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,368.00 CENTENNIAL SHOWBOAT TRIP 347203 070114 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 2,368.00 384776 7/1712014 101483 MENARDS 163.30 DUGOUT MATERIALS 00001061 347461 55847 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 69.94 KNEEPADS, SNAPSHELL COVERS 00001163 347462 56944 1301.6556 TOOLS 16.70 CONSTRUCTION LUMBER 00001311 347463 59423 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 108.96 ACRYLIC SHEET, BIRCH TRIM 00001316 347464 59461 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 419.34 LIGHTS FOR SHOWMOBILE 00001359 347081 60674 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES 20.06 PORCELAIN SOCKET,, CONNECTORS0001413 347082 60886 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 196.54 NAILS, LUMBER 00001422 347252 61250 1646.6577 LUMBER 996.84 384776 711712014 101987 MENARDS 69.81 WEED SPRAY 00002218 347322 45180 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.81 384777 7/17/2014 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 344,421.00 JUNE 2014 SAC 347253 070914 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES 344,421.00 384778 7/1712014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 365,522.72 SEWER SERVICE 347254 0001035970 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 365,522.72 384779 7/17/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 641.29 VEHICLE REPAIRS 347083 242915 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 641.29 384780 7/17/2014 104660 MICRO CENTER 7/1512014 7:19:51 Page - 17 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT POOL OPERATION SENIOR CITIZENS COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDIN BOROUGH OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.99 HARD DRIVE 34708.4 5080155 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 109.99 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- is Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384780 7117/2014 104660 MICRO CENTER Contlnued... 384781 7117/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,855.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001390 347085 34729 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,590.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 347255 34735 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,445.00 384782 7/17/2014 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/27/14 347231 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384783 711712014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 347492 928025745 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5.34 384784 7/1712014 120012 MINNESOTA CHAPTER OF APA 25.00 JOB POSTING 347323 5146 EDEN RFI 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 25.00 384786 7/17/2014 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 6.50 ENGRAVED PLATE 347324 25504 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE.DEPT. GENERAL 6.50 384786 7117/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 101.60 TASTE OF EDINA HANDOUTS 347493 15469- 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 101.60 TASTE OF EDINA HANDOUTS 347493 15469 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 101.60 TASTE OF EDINA HANDOUTS 347493 15469 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING ` 252.09 50TH /FRANCE POSTCARDS 347494 15624 44012.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 129.00 PARKING BROCHURES 347086 15651 44012.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 294.71 TABLE TOP BROCHURES 347087 15757 44012.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 980.60 384787 7117/2014 132697 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 144.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347325 3675 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 384788 7/17/2014 130960 MNCAR EXCHANGE, THE 225.00 QUARTERLY DUES 347088 523713 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 225.00 384789 711-- 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1,261.00 347148 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,261.00 Council Check Register by GL 384796 7/17/2014 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 ART CLASS REFUND Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384789 7/1712014 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC. Continued... 384796 711712014 2,090.00 FOUNTAIN FOR PARK 00001266 347089 INV33404 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.35 2,090.00 347092 IN52024 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 384790 7/1712014 112.35 100916 MUZAK LLC 240.90 MUSIC SERVICES 347091 50810165 5760.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 240.90 130.91 ZIP LINE ROPE 00002150 347327 384791 711712014 GENERAL SUPPLIES 134504 NEGODA, KYRILL 32.80 PLAYGROUND CHAIN 00001403 347258 541405 20.31 ART SUPPLIES 347256 070714 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 20.31 384798 7/17/2014 384792 7/17/2014 127190 NEILL ADVENTURE CLUB 3,500.00 99.00 7/02/14 GROUP REFUND 347257 070814 5301.4541 GENERALADMISSIONS ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 99.00 384793 7/17/2014 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 495.70 TABLE COVERS 347326 - 289364 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 496.70 384794 7/1712014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 19 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,261.00 347148 91752 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,261.00 384796 7/17/2014 124908 NORDBY, PAT 52.50 ART CLASS REFUND 347465 071114 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 52.50 384796 711712014 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 112.35 TRANSCRIPTION EQUIPMENT 347092 IN52024 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.35 384797 7117/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 130.91 ZIP LINE ROPE 00002150 347327 540813 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 32.80 PLAYGROUND CHAIN 00001403 347258 541405 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 163.71 384798 7/17/2014 130294 O'MALLEY CONCRETE 3,500.00 REMOVE/REPLACE APRON 347093 1214 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 3,500.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364799 7/17/2014 116669 ON CALL SERVICES Continued... 380.20 ACCESS PANEL, SAFETY TIES 347328 2457 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 380.20 384800 711712014 134008 PANDORA MEDIA INC. 333.33 ON -LINE ADVERTISING 347094 SIN118243 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 333.33 ON -LINE ADVERTISING 347094 SIN118243 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 333.34 ON -LINE ADVERTISING 347094 SIN118243 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,000.00 384801 7/1712014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 561.38 347395 8455733 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 829.50 347149 8456209 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,652.31 347396 8456213 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,043.19 384802 7/1712014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,137.40 347095 00402364 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,078.22 347466 00402368 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 209.20 347330 00402369 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 474.00 347397 00544762 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 520.30 347150 01285597 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.87 347204 19506872 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 860.97 347467 45746506 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 852.46 347331 45746519 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 166.40 347329 45746529 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 5,614.62 384803 7/17/2014 100960 PETTY CASH 3.00 347468 070714 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 7.02 347468 070714 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE . 7.28 347468 070714 1504.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 11.00 347468 070714 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 12.00 347468 070714 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 12.00 347468 070714 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 12.79 347468 070714 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 12.87 347468 070714 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 15.77 347468 070714 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.00 347468 070714 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 18.76 347468 070714 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 22.00 347468 070714 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTR! R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 384803 7/17/2014 100950 PETTY CASH 26.88 30.73 39.25 39.26 62.09 100.00 3.21 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 347468 070714 1261.6107 347468 070714 1553.6260 347468 070714 1624.6406 347468 070714 1120.6104 347468 070714 1160.6107 347468 070714 1495.6104 347468 070714 01404.1705.31 347468 070714 5861.6406 384804 7117/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 109.12 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 882.88 347401 54.12 5822.5512 1,228.55 50TH ST SELLING 2,139.40 2633678 771.22 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,261.03 347407 ' 114.24 5842.5513 833.83 YORK SELLING 803.62 2633682 54.12 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 9,252.13 347408 384806 7/17/2014 134503 PHILLIPS, LINDA 25.78 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 25.78 2633684 384806 7/1712014 134609 PIMKINE, ALEXANDRE 24.00 PERMIT REFUND 24.00 5862.5515 384807 7117/2014 533.66 533.66 384808 7/17/2014 64.63 35.07 99.70 Subledger Account Description Continued... MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 21 Business Unit CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLAYGROUND & THEATER ADMINISTRATION FINANCE INSPECTIONS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR VERNON OCCUPANCY 347398 2633675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 347401 2633676 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 347400 2633678 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 347407 2633681 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 347406 2633682 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 347408 2633683 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 347404 2633684 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 347405 2633685 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 347399 2633686 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 347403 2633687 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 347402 2633688 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 347259 6100 ZENITH AVE 5900.2015 347260 ED131886 1495.4112 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC GRAVEL, ATHLETIC FIELD MIX 347261 53833 47078.6710 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN WEED WHIP PARTS 00001300 347469 148711 1641.6406 WEED WHIP PARTS 00001441 347470 150709 1641.6406 CUSTOMER REFUND PLUMBING PERMITS UTILITY_ BALANCE SHEET INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384808 7/1712014 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Continued... 384809 7/17/2014 134601 PRAY, RONALD 24.89 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347262 5017 56TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 24.89 384810 7/17/2014 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 180.50 SEAT CUSHION REPAIR 347098 89210 1553.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 180.50 384811 7/17/2014 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 474.50 FENDER, RUB RAIL, CAP 00005226 347096 3600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 474.50 384812 7/1712014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 180.00 BLADE SHARPENING 347205 270447 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 180.00 . 384813 7/17/2014 134499 ` QUANBECK, DORA 1,484.90 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347263 071014 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,484.90 384814 7/17/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 564.00 RPZ TESTING 00001394 347264 16715 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 564.00 384815 7/17/2014 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 3,012.00 GOGGLES 347334 272312 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 532.35 DIVING RINGS 347335 273270 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,544.35 384816 7/17/2014 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 5.22 BELTS 347265 10775 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5.22 384817 7/17/2014 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 ED122173 ESCROW REFUND 347471 4507 LAKEVIEW 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT DR 2,500.00 5501 BEARD CT 347206 ED121991 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 5,000.00 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 22 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ICE MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384618 7/1712014 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 Continued... 35,190.09 RECYCLING 347099 3545471 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 35,190.09 384819 7/17/2014 133200 RIDGE CREEK CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 ED126541 REFUND 347266 4200ALDEN DR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 384820 7/1712014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 186.50 BUSINESS CARDS 347100 81996 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 186.50 384821 7/17/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 158.86 SOFTENER SALT 00001401 347336 00301259 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 158.86 364822 7/17/2014 134487 ROGERS PRINTING 1,400.25 ABSENTEE BALLOT APPS 347101 42532 1180.6575 PRINTING 1,400.25 364823 7/17/2014 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 308.00 01 MEALS /DUES - BENNEROTTE 347267 2588 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 308.00 384824 7/17/2014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 4,890.00 SOIL APPLICATIONS 347102 908004817 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 975.00 . SOILAPPLICATION 347103 908009083 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,865.00 384825 7117/2014 134600 SABES JCC 63.00 GROUP REFUND 347268 070814 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 63.00 384626 7/17/2014 100988 SAFETY KLEEN `' 1,802.82 VIET PROJECT 347269 62704951 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.40 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 347106 R000081454 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 1,908.22 384827 7/1712014 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 250.00 'SWTV BUTTONS 347105 SH4235 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 975.17 LANYARDS, BADGE HOLDERS 347104 SH4239 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 23 INSPECTIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POOL OPERATION ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS. CONTINGENCIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 5,753.96 CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF EDINA 181 47091.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - Council Check Register by GL 5,753.96 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier:/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384827 7/17/2014 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF - Continued... 1,225.17 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347270 384828 7/17/2014 1600.4390.01 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 44.00 WOOD STAKES 00001295 347472 41214130 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.00 384829 7/17/2014 134497 SCHOENBAUER CONSULTING LLC 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 24 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION 5,753.96 CONSULTING SERVICES 347207 181 47091.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - FRED RICHARDS PARK DESIGN 5,753.96 384830 7/17/2014 134606 SCHROEDER, JENNIFER 18.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347270 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 18.00 3848311= 7/17/2014 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/22/14 347227 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE- ._ 150.00 384832 7/17/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 350.00 ELECTRIC POTTERY WHEEL 347474 071114 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 350.00 384833 - 7/1712014 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 38.13 PAINT 00001238 347475 3038 -3 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 38.13 384834 7117/2014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 269.00 ACROBAT PRO 347337 B02172158 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 269.00 ACROBAT PRO 347337 B02172158 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 538.00 384835 7/17/2014 127619 SIEGEL, LISA 14.92 ART WORK SOLD 327251 102113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.92 384836 7117/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 40.50 ADOPT PARK SIGNS 347473 7863 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.00 SIGN PRINTING 347209 7951 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 60.00 SIGN PRINTING 347209 7951 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 60.00 SIGN PRINTING 347209 7951 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SE' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 280.50 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING 5842.5513 1,059.00 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 347338 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384836 7117/2014 120784 SIGN PRO COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Continued... 20.00 SIGN PRINTING 347208 7957 5822.6575 PRINTING 20.00 SIGN PRINTING 347208 7957 5842.6575 PRINTING 20.00 SIGN PRINTING 347208 7957 5862.6575 PRINTING 384842 7/17/2014. 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 6,860.00 SOUTH DALE OFFICE TRAFFIC STUDY 344571 2382 5720.6180 5520.5510 1600.4390.01 1470.6221 1400.6221 5310.6105 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD PLAYGROUND RANGE RENTAL RANGE RENTAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 25 Business Unit 5U IN J I AtLLINIi YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION 5822.5513 280.50 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 384837 7/1712014 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 1,059.00 RECALIBRATE SYSTEM 347338 80246513 YORK SELLING 1,059.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 384838 7/17/2014 5862.5513 131886 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 45.49 HOT DOG BUNS 347210 244595 YORK SELLING 45.49 384839 7117/2014 134608 SMITH, CHRISTINA 36.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347271 REFUND 36.00 384840 7/17/2014 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 5,310.00 3RD QTR DUES 347107 9081 7,177.00 3RD QTR DUES 347107 9081 440.00 TRAINING ROOM RENTAL 347339 9087 12,927.00 384841 7/17/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 524.50 347155 1179730 1,369.16 347154 1179731 101.89 347157 1179732 2,320.52 347159 1179733 6,850.13 347158 1179734 1,829.75 347156 1179735 2,987.75 347152 1179736 3,480.48 347153 1179737 3,853.00 347151 1179738 5.25 347409 1181135 1,592.25 347411 1181136 3.00 347410 1181137 384842 7/17/2014. 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 6,860.00 SOUTH DALE OFFICE TRAFFIC STUDY 344571 2382 5720.6180 5520.5510 1600.4390.01 1470.6221 1400.6221 5310.6105 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD PLAYGROUND RANGE RENTAL RANGE RENTAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 25 Business Unit 5U IN J I AtLLINIi YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 134498 STROTH, LEROY CITY OF EDIN9 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 85.78 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND Council Check Register by GL 071014 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER 85.78 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 384847 7/1712014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 711712014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384842 7/17/2014 400.00 129891 -SPACK CONSULTING 347476 Continued... 6,860.00- 384843 7117/2014 131966 ; SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES 935.00 MULCH 347272 15659 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 935.00 384844 7/17/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 172.90 SUBSCRIPTION 347108 493121 -6/14 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 172.90 347478 00772061 384846 7/17/2014 72.20 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 347413 834002 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 26 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CONTINGENCIES 205.75 347412 3396 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 384846- 7117/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 134498 STROTH, LEROY 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 85.78 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347273 071014 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER 85.78 384847 7/1712014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. - 350.00 MOVIE RENTAL 347109 DB1940678 400.00 MOVIE IN THE PARK RENTAL 347476 DB1943828 750.00 384848 7/17/2014 106673 TAPCO 1,328.01 SOLAR PANELS 00002616 347110 1457285 1,328.01 364849 7/17/2014 101036., THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 564.00 347477 00772046 534.00 347478 00772061 72.20 347413 834002 2,762.45 347414 834004 3,932.65 384860 7/17/2014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 482.78 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 347211 3001164734 482.78 384861 711712014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 176.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 347213 M20618 1470.4329 5760.6136 5760.6136 2501.6710 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PACS IS 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN - -NERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384861 7/17/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. Continued... 131.00 VETERANS MEMORIAL MEETING 347212 M20620 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 307.00 384862 7117/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 231.00 347415 13 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 231.00 384863 7/17/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 52.55 WELDING GAS 347274 40010918 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.55 384864 7117/2014 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 44,366.85 TS2 CABINETS 00002595 347275 65774 01404.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 44,366.85 384855 7/17/2014 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 111.75 JUNE 2014 USAGE 347111 269634 -7/14 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 111.75 384866 7/1712014 116635 TRAVELERS 1,187.50 347277 000464222 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 770.50 347278 000464223 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,225.00 DEDUCTIBLE 347276 000464611 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,183.00 384867 7/17/2014 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 443.25 SEED MIXTURE 347479 32345 1318.6406- GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 235.55 SEED MIXTURE 347480 -32362 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 940.00 SEED 00001405 347112 32767 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,618.80 384868 7/1712014 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 8,251.60 UNIFORMS 347113 053114 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6;251.60 384869 7/17/2014 126032 UNI- SELECT USA 479.98 AUTO PARTS 347279 063014 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 479.98 384860 7/17/2014 101908 US FOODS CITY OF EDINA 7/15/2014 7:19:51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/17/2014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384860 7/17/2014 101908 US FOODS Continued... 459.78 347481 CUST43805514 -6/ 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 14 477.84 347481 CUST43805514 -6/ 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 14 3,829.37 347481 ' CUST43805514 -6/ 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 14 4,766.99 384861 7/17/2014 114236 USA'BLUE BOOK 258.68 LOCATE FLAGS 00001155 347280 380813 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 256.68 384862 711712.014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 46.47 LIQUOR BAGS 347114 316222 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING - 46.47 - 384863 7117/2014 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,980.00 JULY 2014 SERVICES 347214 30857 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,980.00 384864 7/1712014 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 756.30 347115 9727918751 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.01 347115 9727918751 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 797.31 384865 7/1712014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 535.00 CART RENTAL 347482 605140005 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 2,700.00 USED UTILITY VEHICLE 00002062 347117 61054 5765.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 293.28 STEERING ASSEMBLY 347116 630140027 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,528.28 384866 7/1712014 119464 VINOCOPIA 179.25 347416 0102032 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 123.75 347417 0102033 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 303.00 384867 7117/2014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 57.13 BRATS 347216 79528 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 57.13 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 1,194.50 347419 510529 5842.5513 VERNON SELLING 620.00 Council Check Register by GL 510531 5842.5513 291.12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5842.5513 2,105.62 7117/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384868 7/17/2014 5862.5515 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 159.45 347171 1080201379 Continued... 144.99 LOGO PENS 347118 65991 5822.6575 PRINTING 347170 144.99 LOGO PENS 347118 65991 5862.6575 PRINTING 5862.5513 145.00 LOGO PENS 347118 65991 5842.6575 PRINTING 434.98 384869 7/1712014 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 1,545.28 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 347217 11403388 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,545.28 384870 7/17/2014 103219 WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE INC. 8,937.50 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 347218 339923 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8,937.50 384871 7/17/2014 101973 W1LMOT, SOLVEI 25.76 JUNE 2014 347483 MILEAGE 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 42.56 APR 2014 347483 MILEAGE 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 403.20 MAY 2014 347483 MILEAGE 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 7.28 APR 2014 347483 MILEAGE 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 8.96 JUNE 2014 347483 MILEAGE 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 487.76 384872 7/17/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 408.40 347160 365831 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 266.40 347162 366113 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,014.15 347163 366220 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,344.50 347161 366221 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 384873 7/17/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,194.50 347419 510529 5842.5513 VERNON SELLING 620.00 347418 510531 5842.5513 291.12 347420 510532 5842.5513 2,105.62 384874 7/17/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 144.00 347171 1080201379 5862.5515 159.45 347171 1080201379 5862.5512 4,136.80 347169 1080201380 5862.5513 3,904.40 347170 1080201381 5862.5512 260.60 347172 1080201362 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 29 Business Unit DU I r7 .J I Jt LLINU VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PLANNING PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH RECYCLING RECYCLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7117/2014 - 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 384874 7/17/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 384876 7/17/2014 1,265.80 1,270.57 91.15 228.25 2,366.84 73.15 7,081.76 290.03 104.66 - 111.96- 173.61- 117.50- 18.00- 20,747.07 505.80 348.00 544.00 4,266.65 143.03 64.50 4,935.80 432.00 1,676.00 12,915.78 347166 1080201383 5822.5513 347168 1080201444 5822.5512 5420.5514 347167 1080201445 5822.5512 1090251770 347422 1080201448 5842.5512 347178 347173 1080201449 5842.5513 VERNON-SELLING 347174 1080201450 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 347164 1080201451 5842.5512 5842.5514 347165 1080201452 5842.5515 1090252545 347423 2080043509 5862.5512 347428 347425 2080044575 5862.5512 YORK SELLING 347424 2080044584 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 347426 2080044596 5862.5512 5842.5514 347427 2080044617 5862.5515 22- 01686 -300 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page - 30 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 347485- 1090251769 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 347484 1090251770 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 347178 1090252098 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON-SELLING 347176 1090252543 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 347177 1090252544 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 347175 1090252545 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 347428 1090255336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 347430 1090255337 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 347429 1090255338 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 384876 7117/2014 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 331.77 347486 316421 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.69 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002065 347119 316520 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 632.46 384877 7/17/2014 105740 WSB $ ASSOCIATES INC. 1,550.50 LENNAR PROJECT 347120 1 -01686 -550 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 825.00 - VALLEY VIEW RD DESIGN 347342 1- 01686 -560 01377.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 27,001.10 HAZELTON RD DESIGN 347341 12- 01686 -460 01417.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,335.00 FRANCE AVE PED XING 347343 22- 01686 -300 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 661.50 LENNAR PROJECT 347121 4 -01686 -510 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51,876.50 FRANCE AVE TE CONSTR 347340 7- 01686 -440 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 85,249.60 GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PLANNING BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR PLANNING FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/1712014 — 7/17/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 384877 7/17/2014 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 384878 7/17/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,007.71 51- 4159265 -8 347220 417177265 7411.6185 6,808.52 51- 0837548 -4 347125 417989848 5915.6185 32.99 51- 4151B97 -6 347123 418042903 1646.6185 2,132.13 51- 4966303 -6 347219 418056536 1330.6185 773.05 51- 6137136 -8 347221 418073417 5430.6185 520.75 51- 6229265 -9 347222 418077138 1481.6185 1,900.71 51- 6229265 -9 347222 418077138 1470.6185 37.29 51- 7567037 -0 347124 418093951 1321.6185 1,386.31 51- 6979948 -4 347223 418263905 5821.6185 1,744.14 51- 6979948 -4 347223 418263905 5861.6185 2,129.87 51- 6979948 -4 347223 416263905 5841.6185 389.23 51- 9422326 -6 347122 418291824 1322.6185 4,999.83 51- 6840050 -6 347344 418435137 5921.6165 25,862.53 384879 711712014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 298.00 347431 13100 5842.5513 298.00 384880 7117/2014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 800.00 CPR CLASS 347487 5410626 800.00 384881 7117/2014 134602 ZHANG, YIFEI 50.96 REFUND 347345 070714 50.96 384882 7117/2014 132974 ZINGHOPPERS GROUP LLC, THE 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/22/14 347226 070114 200.00 1,491,606.23 Grand Total 5410.6104 5301.4532 5760.6136 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 7/15/2014 7:19:51 Page- 31 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY WATER TREATMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,486,690.66 A/P ACH Payment 4,915.57 Total Payments 1,491,606.23 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/17/2014 - 7/17/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 653,110.47 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 332.92 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 12,935.97 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 149,711.67 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,537.35 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 19,299.68 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 15,554.65 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,599.63 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,830.00 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,588.15 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 7,943.24 05800 LIQUOR FUND 172,347.92 05900 UTILITY FUND 369,712.48 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 4,295.94 05950 RECYCLING FUND 35,206.33 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,203.61 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,052.82 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 25.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,318.40 Report Totals 1,491,606.23 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po c))i. ge and Mrnnerirec_rin�� �_ �f%� 7/15/2014 7:20:05 Page- 1 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 - Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit .. 78 7/24/2014 _101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,240.65 347891 43870500 ' 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 81.55 347581 43871400-' 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. 221.58 347583 6451700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 241.25- 347584 6452300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 137.98 347582 90493100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 35:66 347724 90498000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,476.17 79 7/24/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 57.41 347699 WO- 945335 -1 7411.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 137.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 347624 WO- 945807 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 156.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003064 347505 WO- 945847 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 347506 WO- 946033 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 114.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00002226 347807 WO- 946707 -1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 6.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 347832 WO- 946805 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 576.71 80 7124/2014 104020 DALCO 229.99 TOWELS, CLEANER 00001454 347518 2765146 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 229.99 81 7/24/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 12,366.00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 347536 42815 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 12,366.00 82 7/24/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 343.25 - POPCORN CUPS 00002067 347714 7095 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 946.50 FLOOR MACHINE 00002067 347713 7117 5761.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 31.09 WAX LINERS 347829 7122 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 62.19 PAPER PLATES, POPCORN BAGS 347824 7123 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 118.85 BLEACH, CAN LINERS 347825 7128 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,501.88 384883 7/2412614 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER OF ICC 200.00 MECHANICAL CODE SEMINAR 347852 1587653 - 7127236 1495:6104 CONFERENCES& SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 5 i 200.00 384884 7124/2014 133622 AARP;DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 460.00 SAFETY DRIVING CLASS 347933 071814 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/2412014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384884 7/24/2014 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM Continued... 460.00 384885 7/24/2014 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 298.32 VAC HOSE 00001395 347500 0140331 -IN 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 298.32 384886 7/24/2014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL- NORTH CENTRAL INC. 2,753.75 JULY 2014 SERVICE 347623 6851850 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,753.75 384887 7/24/2014 106076 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 726.72 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002071 347934 33218 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 726.72 384888 7/24/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 91.60 347580 1804924 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 114.00 347578 1804925 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 70.40 347577 1805647 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.80 347579 1805648 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 353.80 384889 7/24/2014 129458 ACME TOOLS 868.77 TOOLS 347501 2712134 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 868.77 384890 7/24/2014 101166 AHEAD INC 120.11 VESTS 347853 INV0210245 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 120.11 384891 7/24/2014 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 184.12 CO2 347798 31521477 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 184.12 384892 7/24/2014 100675 ALL SAFE INC. 199.80 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 347696 130590 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 199.80 384893 7/2412014 119976 AP LAWN 362.00 WEED WHIPPED /SPRAYED 347697 CNTPK -0614 5761.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 362.00 R55CKR2 L°OGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page - " 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7124/2014 - 7/2412014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No " -. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business. Unit 384893 7124/2014 119976 AP LAWN Continued... 384894 7/24/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 21.78- CREDIT 347802 0009068PU 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 542.82 347800 107532 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 508.84 FOOD 347502 407040405 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL, 681.68 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347799 407100612 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 351.02 CONCESSION PRODUCT 347803 407110425 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 930.53 FOOD 347854 407110557 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 500.46 347801 407140107 5320.5510 COST OF. GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 3,493.57 384896 7/24/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 376.37 COFFEE 347503 1133865 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 376.37 384896 7/2412014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 703.00 347890 58378 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 406.00 347723 58379 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 742.00 347722 58380 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,851.00 384897 7/24/2014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 262.48 JULY SERVICE 347698 070114 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 262.48 - 384898 7/24/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 320.00 GENERAL LABOR ISSUES 347831 133153 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 320.00 384899 7/24/2014 102195 BATTERIES PLUS ' 44.95 BATTERIES 347504 018 - 101475 -01 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.99 EXIT LIGHT BATTERY 00005547 347950 018 - 343502 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 56.95 BATTERIES 00001474 347951 018- 343712 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE " 111.89 384900 7/24/2014 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/05/14 347947 072114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER, . CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN•EXPENSE 200.00 384901 7124/2014. 102346 BEARCOM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 071614 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA 347855 071614 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Council Check Register by GL 071614 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 347855 071614 7/24/2014 - 7124/2014 RANGE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384901 7/24/2014 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 102346 BEARCOM Continued... 45.00 WALKIE/TALKIES FOR PARADE 347804 4306562 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.00 384902 7/24/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 864.00 PIZZA 347805 D28IN2343 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 216.00 PIZZA 347806 D281N2375 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,080.00 384903 7/24/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 170.75 COFFEE 347952 1185602 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 170.75 384904 7/24/2014 133925 BIX PRODUCE CO. 273.85 FOOD 347507 02920296 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 59.30- CREDIT 347508 173142 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 214.55 384905 7/24/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 4.78- CREDIT 347954 6434CM . 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.52 CLIPBOARDS, PENS 347953 99084 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.74 384906 7/24/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 2,339.50 SITE REVIEW/TOPOGRAPHY VERIF 347625 0167528 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 539.73 WATER TREATMENT RENOVATIONS 347509 0167947 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,879.23 384907 7/24/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 384908 7/2412014 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 26.24 10.43 11.78 12.00 22.51 23.56 70.00 347585 120797 5862.5513 347725 120905 5862.5513 7122/2014 8:02:42 Page - 4 Business Unit SPECIAL ACTIVITIES POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 347855 071614 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 347855 071614 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 347855 071614 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 347855 071614 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 347855 071614 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 347855 071614 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 347855 071614 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 -Council Check Register- by Invoice 8 Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384908 7/24/2014 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE' Continued... 89.51 347855 071614 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 266.03 384909 7/24/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,046.50 SOIL TESTING /OBSERVATIONS 347782 B001516 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,046.50 384910 7/24/2014 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 7/29/14 347620 071514 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 384911 7/24/2014 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 505.09 AG -LIME 347510 1859 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 495.32 AG -LIME 347511 1860 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,000.41 384912 7/24/2014 122074 BUIE,;BARB 23.92 347935 071714 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 55.40 347935 071714 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 114.59 347935 071714 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 193.91 - 384913 7124/2014 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 1,920.00 MNJIS (APR - JUN) 347512 154095 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 384914 712412014 120936 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11,180.98 LEGAL COUNSEL 347783 2851 -88 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 11,180.98 384915 712412014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 646.05 347727 367851 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10,695.75 347892 367852 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 35.70 347726 372389 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 150.75 347893 372390 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 84.00 347894 374125 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,612.25 384916 7/24/2014 129923 CAWLEY 50.86 NAME BADGES 347626 V232624 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7124/2014 i Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384916 7/24/2014 129923 CAWLEY Continued... 50.86 384917 7/24/2014 103711. CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. _ 762.88 347936 2873432 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 11,507.95 347937 2873772 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 12,270.83 - 384918 7/2412014 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.74 952 835 -1161 347514 1161 -7/14 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 154.78 952 285-2951 347784 2951 -7/14 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 205.19 952 835 -6661 347513 6661 -7/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 418.71 384919 7/24/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON _ 49,669.50 JOINT POWERS 347691 60327 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 49,669.50 384920 7/24/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 76.78 00102561- 0200862003 347516 200862003 -7/14 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 89.20 00102561 - 0203163003 347515 203163003 -7/14 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 201.76 00114064 - 0203163012 347939 203163012 -7/14 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 957.81 00101025- 0203600013 347940 203600013 -7/14 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 66.01 00101025- 0203610011 347938 203610011 -7114 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS - 1,391.56 384921 7/24/2014 _ 118457 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PARK & REC 67.87 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347627 REFUND 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 67.87 384922 7/24/2014 120433 COMCAST 24.83 8772 10 614 0023973, 347628 23973 -7/14 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 24.83 384923 7/24/2014 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LLC 16,029.00 WORKERS COMP 347785 1759043 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 16,029.00 384924 7/24/2014 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 350.87 RAIN CHECKS 347856 00070640 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 350.87 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384924 7/24/2014 120638 CREATIVE GRAPHICS Continued... 384926 7/24/2014 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 72.00 JUNE 2014 WASHES 347629 411665 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.00 384926 7/24/2014 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 134.98 114 - 09855685 -4 347700 JUN3014 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 134.98 384927 712412014 134476 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 ED131127 REFUND 347630 5836 ST JOHNS 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 384928 7/24/2014 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 1,076.00 SURE DRY DRYING AGENT 00001409 347517 12468 1642.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,076.00 384929 7/24/2014 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 256.00 ROOF REPAIR 347519 2441 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 256.00 384930 7/24/2014 103020 DALCO ROOFING &.SHEET METAL 240.00 ROOF REPAIR 347631 2366 - 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 240.00 384931 7/24/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 255.30 347586 759720 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 191.60 347732 759854 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 46.10 347729 760681 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,867.05 347728 760682 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19.20 347731 760683 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 235.85 347730 760684 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER' 50TH ST SELLING 4,583.90 347896 760685. 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER JI YORK SELLING 48.00 347895 760686 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,247.00 384932 7/2412014 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 375.00 LEAD REMOVAL 347701 14- 01 -04- 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 375.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 260.00 CITY OF EDINA 1185.6120 7/22/2014 8:02:42 384937 7/24/2014 1185.6120 Council Check Register by GL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS :. Page- 8 ADVERTISING LEGAL 600.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 347692 071614 1470.6406 600.00 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business.Unit 384932 7/24/2014 803.03 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Continued... 519883 384933 7/2412014 803.03 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 384939 7/24/2014 77.91 BAKERY 347857 513273 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 64.59 347858 513634 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 83.36 347859 513928 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - GRILL 56.13 347860 514060 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD _ GRILL- 384934 7/24/2014 5,617.70 5,617.70 384935 7/24/2014 53.47 53.47 384936 7/24/2014 260.00 10057.1 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS ROAD PAINT - 00001227 347520 802152853 1335.6532 123162 DISH 8255 7070 8142 2839 347702 070414 7411.6406 101766 DISPLAY SALES FLAGS 00001402 347521 INVO096690 1646.6103 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND.BALANCE SHEET 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 44012.1705.20 260.00 P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 384937 7/24/2014 1185.6120 129848 DOUGLAS COUNTY LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 600.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 347692 071614 1470.6406 600.00 FIRE DEPT GENERAL 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 384938 7/24/2014 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 803.03 APPAREL 347861 519883 803.03 384939 7/24/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 320.00 50TH & FRANCE PARKING 347522 112259 127.68 AD FOR BID 347523 113246 42.56 PUBLISH NOTICE 347524 117332 47.88 PUBLISH NOTICE 347632 119328 538.12 384940 7/24/2014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 20.75 FUSES 00005325 347525 10957400 34.00 EYEBALL SOCKETS 00001424 347526 11045000 59.04 WIRE 00001424 .347526 11045000 113.79 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND.BALANCE SHEET 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 44012.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT GENERAL 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 SHOES 347863 5698165 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,359.24 GOLF GLOVES 347864 5699460 5440.5511 Council Check Register by GL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 111.46 SHOES 347862 5700231 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,631.06 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384940 7/24/2014 063014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 98.46 Continued... 384941 7124/2014 1646.6201 122879 EXECS. BIG BAND BUILDING MAINTENANCE 163.76 347641 063014 1552.6511 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/06114 347949 072114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 150.00 192.40 347641 063014 1301.6201 384942 7/24/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 188.42- CREDIT 347639 1- 4479489 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 126.88- CREDIT 347640 1- 4479490 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 399.33 ROD END ASSEMBLIES 347633 69- 143617 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 255.71 ALTERNATOR 347634 69- 144646 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 73.93 BATTERY 347636 69- 144695 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 17.03 BULB 347637 69- 144703 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.58 PARTS 347638 69- 144761 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 36.71 TUBE ASSEMBLY 347635 70- 193948 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 488.99 384943 7/24/2014 130136 FADS, SUSAN 137.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347786 070814 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 137.20 384944 7/24/2014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 231.57 AD FOR BID 347527 741667538 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 231.57 384945 7/24/2014 102360 FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY 261.75 FLAG SEALS 00003800 347833 13961 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 261.75 384946 7/24/2014 101475 FOOTJOY 7/2212014 8:02:42 Page- 9 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARKADMIN. GENERAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.36 SHOES 347863 5698165 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,359.24 GOLF GLOVES 347864 5699460 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 111.46 SHOES 347862 5700231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,631.06 384947 7124/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 73.88 347641 063014 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 98.46 347641 063014 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 163.76 347641 063014 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 187.40 347641 063014 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.40 347641 063014 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7124/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384947 7/24/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES Continued... 19.31 347641 063014 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 60.88 347641 063014 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 796.09 384948 7/2412014 134005 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 5,000.00 GIS NEEDS ASSESSMENT 347528 G20 -11169 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5,000.00 384949 712412014 124541 GEYEN GROUP 400.78 CARPET CLEANING 347865 23723 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 400.78 384950 7/2412014 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 390.00 INTERPRETER 347642 071514 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 390.00 384951 712412014 101103 GRAINGER 396.05 DUFFEL BAG KIT, OXYGEN REG 347704 9484011953 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 31.60 EMERGENCY SIGN 347703 9484245775 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 28.92 LAMPHOLDERS 00001429 347834 9485477781 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 97.42 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00001432 347643 9486772339 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 34.79 EMERGENCY SIGN 347705 9486810733 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 35.10 TRAILER BALL 00001404 347808 9487216872 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 954.76 FORKLIFT 347706 9488437444 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,578.64 384952 7/24/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,821.50 347733 169302 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,821.50 384953 7/24/2014 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 208.27 GOLF TEES 347866 52450 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 208.27 384954 7/24/2014 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 35.16 347707 063014 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,144.00 347707 063014 5765.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 1,294.00 347707 063014 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 908.37 347707 063014 5913.6543 SOD 8 BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 3,381.53 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384954 7124/2014 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. Continued... 384956 7/24/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,580.58 JULY 2014 LTD PREMIUM 347529 6803881 -9 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,580.58 384956 7/24/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,346.06 CHEMICALS 00001246 347530 3615949 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 340.79 CHLORINE 00001246 347809 3615972 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 3,686.85 384967 7124/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 181.92 BEEF PATTIES 347867 025251 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 181.92 384958 7/24/2014 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 22.33 UNIFORM PURCHASE 347835 071414 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.33 384959 7124/2014 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 140.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 347644 153023 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 140.00 384960 7124/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEES 347531 1000047198 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,796.70 RADIO FLEET FEES 347532 1000047199 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 763.20 RADIO FLEET FEE 347955 1000047253 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 3,831.90 384961 7/24/2014 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 198.52 PRINTER 347533 54512968 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 477.75 PRINTERS 00004335 347534 54538610 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 242.00 MONITOR 00004335 347535 54542094 5902.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 918.27 384962 7/24/2014 102483 HILTI INC. 228.37 EPDXY GLUE, ANCHORS 00001443 347810 4604441550 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 228.37 384963 7/24/2014 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/29/14 347619 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 712412014 1628.6406 126816 CITY OF EDINA DONATIONS - GOVT FUND 7/22/2014 8:02:42 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 62.20 TOP SOIL, Council Check Register by GL 347956 Page- 12 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary GENERAL SUPPLIES 384966 7/24/2014 131644 7/2412014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384963 7/24/2014 101271 HINDING, CHRIS Continued... 21172 125.00 825.00 384964 7/24/2014 7/24/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 713.01 420.00 347736 712606 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,065.00 347734 712607 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7/24/2014 56.00 104696 347735 712608 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,739.50 FENCING 347897 712875 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 384966 712412014 1628.6406 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES DONATIONS - GOVT FUND 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 62.20 TOP SOIL, SEED 347956 2014056 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.20 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 384966 7/24/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 405.00 347587 21031 420.00 347898 21172 825.00 384967 7/24/2014 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 420.00 MOUND CLAY 347645 14283 420.00 384968 7/24/2014 104696 INTL SECURITY PRODUCTS 256.50 FENCING 347811 ED1001 256.50 384969 7124/2014 100828 JERRY2S FOODS 42.26 347787 063014 75.99 347787 063014 95.81 347787 063014 116.01 347787 063014 330.07 384970 7/24/2014 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 6.39 347708 062514 8.79 347708 062514 13.98 347708 062514 18.43 347708 062514 23.02 347708 062514 43.66 347708 062514 1262.6406 5862.5514 5842.5514 1642.6543 1642.6180 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SOD & BLACK DIRT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRANSPORTATION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger.:, ,:; Account Description Business Unit 384970 7124/2014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE Continued... 44.19 347708 062514 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL y 84.01 347708 062514 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT.- GENERAL 167.66 347708 062514 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE. 176.84 347708 062514 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION 'GEN 338.58 347708 062514 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 495.66 347708 062514 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 536.34 347708 062514 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 811.21 347708 062514 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 416.01 347708 062514 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 242.23 347708 062514 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 70.43 347708 062514 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 222.32 347708 062514 5422:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 49.05 347708 062514 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 497.35 347708 062514 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4,266.15 384971 7/24/2014 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 300.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 347836 JJ5498 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 650.00 RSS FEED FOR MOBILE APP 347812 JJ5499 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 950.00 384972 7/2412014 121075 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 630.50 TOILET RENTAL 347538 77559 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 347537 77763 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 347959 78095 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER-REMOVAL 29.43 TOILET RENTAL 347958 78096 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 347957 78234 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 814.43 384973 7124/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 89.60- 347739 2229766 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,770.78 347737 2240644 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,567.64 347738 2240645 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 108.00 347901 2240650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,175.63 347899 2240651 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 112.95 347900 2240652 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 378.00 347868 2245744 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 18, 023.40 _ 384974 7/24/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384974 7/24/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. Continued... 266.04 TOOLS 347540 68742921 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 30.00 LOPPER 347539 68742951 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 67.53 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001408 347541 68786045 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 50.14 SPRAY HEADS, NOZZLES 00001426 347646 68845504 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 413.71 384976 7/24/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 353.59 347589 1895678 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.96 347740 1895682 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 507.90 347592 1897116 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 178.37 347591 1897117 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 49.12 347590 1897118 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 81.12 347595 1897122 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,750.39 347593 1897123 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 347594 1897124 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.48 347752 1901502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .58 347745 1901508 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 707.63 347902 1901513 5842.5512_ COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.32 347903 1901514 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,157.35 347743 1901515 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 41.98 347750 1901516 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 513.80 347749 1901517 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.16 347904 1901521 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,164.19 347905 1901523 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,090.05 347751 1901525 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,552.11 347742 1901526 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 123.00 347741 1901527 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,149.13 347748 1901528 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.82 347747 1901529 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,751.35 347744 1901530 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 49.06 347746 1901531 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 16.19- 347906 624035 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9.42- 347907 624141 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12.50- 347908 624142 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 24,531.34 384977 7/24/2014 129767 KAPSNER, CARI 40.00 PRIVATE LESSON REFUND 337161 021614 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 40.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2412014 — 7124/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384978 7/2412014 111018 KEEPRS INC. Continued... 22.49 UNIFORMS 00003816 347837 249337 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 163.16 00003816 347838 249337 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.99 00003821 347839 249574 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIREDEPT GENERAL 315.64 384979 7/24/2014 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 50,907.06 RAMP /STREETSCAPE PROJECT 347618 5823692 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 36,076.80 50TH & FRANCE RAMP PROJECT 347617 5823693 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 86,983.86 i 384980 7/24/2014 104979 KOCON; ED 184.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347869 071614 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 184.24 384981 7/24/2014 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 313.20 JUNE /JULY 2014 SERVICE 347647 070114 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS . 313.20 384982 7/24/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 2003 SATURN 347788 DWI TOW 2340.4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND DWI FORFEITURE 180.56 2001 FORD FOCUS 347788 DWI TOW 2340,4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND DWI FORFEITURE 334.30 384983 7/24/2014 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 40.92 UNIFORM JACKET 347789 SIN1903331 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 40.92 384984 7/24/2014 116878 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 32.63 INTERPRETER 347840 3409891 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 32.63 384985 7/24/2014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 485.50 - SCREWS, DRILL BITS 347648 9302569493 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 485.50 384986 7124/2014 134626 LEMIRE, ROGER 87.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 347841 071714 5720:6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATION_ S 87.99 384987 7/2412014 134621 LEVINE, JOSEPH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384987 7/2412014 134621 LEVINE, JOSEPH Continued... 233.04 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347709 5120 LINCOLN .5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 233.04 384988 7/24/2014 129955 LIGHTEN UP LLC 196.90 EMERGENCY POOL LIGHT 00002150 347813 02138 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5,581.50 LED RETROFIT LIGHTS 00001280 347649 02142 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 5,778.40 384989 7/24/2014 112094 LINDHOLM, ANGELA 20.98 BIRTHDAY CAKES 347842 071714 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 20.98 384990 7/24/2014 100868 LOGIS 380.00 347650 38668 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 347650 38668 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,500.00 347650 38668 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,829.00 347650 38668 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,492.00 347650 38668 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,829.00 347650 38668 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,689.00 347650 38668 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,707.00 347650 38668 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 28,768.00 384991 7/24/2014 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 770.36 347596 177256 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 770.36 384992 7/24/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 19,664.73 UNLEADED FUEL 00005447 347543 729250 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,254.42 UNLEADED FUEL 00005445 347542 736010 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22, 919.15 384993 7/24/2014 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 275.00 3CMA CONFERENCE 347544 REIMBURSE 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS .. COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 384994 7/24/2014 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 3,600.00 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS 347790 9202 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,600.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 384994 7/24/2014 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 384995 7/24/2014 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 3,960.00 SEASON PASS CARDS 347814 15565 5311.6406 3,960.00 384996 7/24/2014 106580 MAYER, ALBERT 28.74 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347652 071614 1470.4329 28.74 384997 7124/2014 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 100.00 VOICE OVER 6/23/14 347545 2014- EDINAl 1180.6103 100.00 384998 7/24/2014 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 36.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347651 071514 1330.6406 36.96 384999 7/24/2014 .134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 27,046.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347960 6/14 07121.1705.30 163,891.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347960 6/14 01411.1705.30 142.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347960 6114 03483.1705.30 564.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347960 6/14 05541.1705.30 55,099.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347960 6/14 04399.1705.30 246,744.30 385000 7/24/2014 101483 MENARDS 52.08 FILTERS 00001049 347546 55690 1552.6406 39.69 KNIFE /BLADES 00004168 347547 61237 5422.6406 876.61 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00001431 347653 61682 1646.6577 20.21 CONCRETE MIX 00001450 347815 61921 1646.6530 5.44 CONCRETE MIX 00001450 347816 61923 1646.6530 994.03 385001 7/24/2014 134038 MIDWEST CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS 115,872.78 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347548 070214 01417.1705.30 - 115,872.78 385002 7/2412014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 37.23 CO2, METHAIR 347710 171103735 7413.6545 37.23 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CHEMICALS 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Page- 17 Business Unit POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ELECTION TRAFFIC SIGNALS 5121 STRACHAUERPARK B SIDEWALK EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON. CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS PSTF FIRE TOWER ' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check'Register by GL Page-' 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7124/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier" / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Stibledgec. . Account Description Business Unit 385002 7/24/2014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY _- Continued... 385003 712412014 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 28.00 INVENTORY RECEIPT FORMS 347549 18164140 1400.6575. PRINTING,.,,,, POLICE.DEPT. GENERAL 28.00 385004 7/24/2014 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 786.00 ASPHALT EMULSION 347550 70984 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 786.00 386006 7/24/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 112.00 PAMELA PARK POSTCARDS 347654 15623 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 112.00 385006 7/2412014 101316 MMBA 200:00 SERVER TRAINING 347870 2014 -23 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 200.00 385007 7/24/2014 134530 MPLS COMMODORES, BARBERSHOP CHORUS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/04114 347946 072114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 386008 7/24/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 789.00 347753 91990 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 348.50 347909 91992 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,137.50 385009 7124/2014 104360 NIKE USA INC. - 1,429.39 APPAREL 347872 961439381 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 78.36 APPAREL 347871 961455175 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,507.75 - • 385010 7/24/2014 132509 NOLAN, MARK' 79.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347791 070114 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION ._79.13 386011 7124/2014 130639 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION -" 1,068.00 TRUCK RENTAL FOR PARADE 347655 14-628 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,068.00 385012 7/24/2014. 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385012 7/24/2014 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. Continued... 167.71 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003799 347843 900963629 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.71 385013 7/24/2014 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 24.69 347792 W14060652 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.69 347792 W14060652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.38 347792 W14060652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.07 347792 W14060652 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 74.07 347792 W14060652 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 172.83 347792 W14060652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 222.21 347792 W14060652 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 49.38 347792 W14060652 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER'BLDG /MAINT 24.69 347792 W14060652 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 98.76 347792 W14060652 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.10 347792 W14060652 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 111.11 347792 W14060652 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE - 49.38 347792 W14060652 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.07 347792 W14060652 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 74.07 347792 W14060652 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 49.38 347792 W14060652 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 327.37 347793 W14060657 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,611.25 385014 7124/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 414.76 REPAIR CHAIN HOIST 00001420 347551 540979 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 414.76 385015 7124/2014 101659 ORKIN COMMERCIAL SERVICES 110.00 PEST CONTROL 347552 D- 12079684 -7/14 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110.00 385016 7/24/2014 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 512.02 HVAC REPAIR 00002072 347941 57977 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES'OPERATING 512.02 385017 7/2412014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 32,651.38 FINAL PAYMENT 347961 072514 01393.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MENDELSSOHN A 8,712.82 FINAL PAYMENT 347961 072514 05529.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MENDELSSOHN A RECON 14,213.93 FINAL PAYMENT 347961 072514 03473.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MENDELSSOHN A RECON 16,094.83 FINAL PAYMENT 347961 072514 04389.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MENDELSSOHN A RECON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7124/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385017 7/2412014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. Continued... - 71,672.96 385018 7/24/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 41,572.30 FINAL PAYMENT 347962 JULY25 01398.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINA B 4,623.94 FINAL PAYMENT 347962 JULY25 03477.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINAA RECON ' 7,436.52 FINAL PAYMENT 347962 JULY25 05533.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINAA RECON . 21,834.88 FINAL PAYMENT 347962 JULY25 04393.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINAA RECON 75,467.64 386019 7/24/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 4,338.64 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347963 7/14 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 19,928.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347963 7/14 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE' 40,112.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT. NO. 2 347963 7114 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR_ PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 43,957.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347963 7/14 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON " 253,620.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347963 7/14 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 58,844.99 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347963 7/14 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 420,802.07 385020 7/24/2014 129485 PAPCO INC. 93.83 TOWELS, DISINFECTANT 347711 86779 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 93.83 386021 7/24/2014 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 360.00 347597 14078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 360.00 385022 7124/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 742.95 347755 8457210 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 968:16 347754 8457212 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,297.33 347910._ 8457213 IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 161.25 347911 8457217 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ YORK SELLING 4,169.69 385023 712412014 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 510.00 IT CONSULTING 347656 71214004 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 510.00 385024 7124/2014 119008 PCI ROADS LLC 93,910.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 347964 072514 10098.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB ' 93,910.70 r - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386024 7/24/2014 119008 PCI ROADS LLC Continued... 385025 7124/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,060.97 347873 45746570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 857.76 347712 45746573 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 286.46 347817 45746601 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,205.19 385026 7/24/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 319.15 347600 2633673 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 57.12 347599 2633674 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 183.36 347598 2633677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,296.24 347757 2637352 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,316.53 347912 2637357 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 865.40 347758 2637359 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,442.58 347756 2637360 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 97.12- 347601 3530105 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,383.26 385027 7/24/2014 100963 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 181.40 LIFEPAK POUCHES 00003802 347844 115021499 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 181.40 385028 7/24/2014 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,072.27 RELEASE AGENT, STRIPPER 347553 238355 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 2,072.27 385029 7/24/2014 104235 PLATENBERG, KATHY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/31/14 347622 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 385030 7/2412014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 347971 072114 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 386031 712412014 118747 POTTERS INDUSTRIES LLC 7,644.00 SAFETY MARKING SPHERES 00001259 347818 90924472 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 7,644.00 385032 7124/2014 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES 1,975.00 MN DOT SIGNAL SERVICE CABINET 00001417 347819 37631 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385032 712412014 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES Continued... 1,975.00 386033 7124/2014 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 800.00 GPS 347554 IN200- 1002377 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,840.00 GPS SOFTWARE 347555 IN200- 1002524 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,640.00 386034 7/24/2014 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. 1,400.00 TREE REMOVAL 347820 1411 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,400.00 385036 712412014 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 355.76 SHOCKABSORBERS 347556 3674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 355.76 385036 7/2412014 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 136.01 609425 347822 609425 -06 -14 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.09 622833 347821 622833 -06 -14 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.10 385037 712412014 129727 PRIOR LAKE WINDJAMMERS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/30/14 347621 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 385038 7/24/2014 132063 RAPP, CRAIG 260.00 GROUP RETREAT 347657 07.01.14 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 260.00 385039 7/24/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 143.75 METER LEAK REPAIR 00001399 347965 16723 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 143.75 385040 712412014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 956.97 CRS2 347557 4343 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 956.97 385041 712412014 106324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 360.00 SIREN REPAIRS 347845 98429 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 360.00 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Page - 22 Business Unit SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL "Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2412014 — 7/24/2014 Check # . Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385042 7/24/2014 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE Continued... 37.69 HINGE SPRING 00005463 347658 10762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 37.69 385043 7/24/2014 134620 RED SAVOY PIZZA 91.50 DEPOSIT REFUND 347693 071514 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE 91.50 385044 7/24/2014 125936 REINDERS INC. 1,364.26 FUNGICIDE 00002068 ,347715 3027162 -00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER 1,364.26 385045 712412014 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 253.60 TOILET REPAIRS 347846 63805 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 253.60 386046 7/2412014 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 5,448.84 GOLF DOME PROJECT MGMT 347794 1305018709 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 5,448.84 385047 7124/2014 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 175.40 DOOR LATCHES 00005473 347659 '13338 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 175.40 386048 7/24/2014 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO INC - 244.28 CONTACTASSEMBLY 347660 C66627 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 244.28 PARTS FOR PATCHER 347558 C66658 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 226.54 ROCKER SWITCHES 347661 C66757 1553:6530 REPAIR PARTS 715.10 385049 7/2412014 130857 RYDBERG, WILLIAM 30.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE 297498 091712 1413.6103 30.00 385050 7/24/2014 131676 SAINT'S COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVICE 176.96 COOKIES 347559 0084693 -IN 5421.5510 176.96 385051 7/2412014 134519 'SALVATION ARMY EASTSIDE 368.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347662 REFUND '5701.4541 368.00 712212U14 8:02:42 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSING,. PERMITS & RECORDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL ADMISSIONS GRILL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7124/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385051 7124/2014 134519 SALVATION ARMY EASTSIDE Continued... 385052 7124/2014 117807 SAM'S CLUB 17.34 7715 0903 0487 2906 347716 070714 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 34.98 7715 0903 0487 2906 347716 070714 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 52.32 385053 712412014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 11.48 ACCOUNT # 9350 347560 SEEET N LOW 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 11.48 385064 7/24/2014 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 347847 INV -17127 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 772.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 347848 INV -17166 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 822.00 385056 7/24/2014 100996 SEH 4,355.49 BRAEMAR GC WETLANDS PROJECT 347795 283070 2410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 4,355.49 385056 7124/2014 134527 SEVER, EMILY 100.00 JR LESSON CANCELLATION 347889 REFUND 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 100.00 385067 7/24/2014 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/05/14 347948 072114 5760.6135 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 385058 7/24/2014 134517 SHEFFERT, MARK 479.00 SUMP LINE REPAIR 347561 071414 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 479.00 385069 7/24/2014 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 289.70 JUNE 2014 TIME CLOCK ACTIVITY 347826 13066004 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 289.70 385060 7/24/2014 132136 SMASHBURGER 1,865.94 DEPOSIT REFUND 347694 071514 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS 8 RECORDS 1,865.94 385061 7/24/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Business Unit Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 385061 7/24/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,155.50 347603 1181138 5862.5513 5.25 347602 1181139 5862.5513 .75 347604 1181140 5862.5513 243.00 347764 1182220 5822.5513 4,395.63 347763 1182221 5822.5513 8,646.75 347915 1182222 5842.5513 1,613.45 347913 1182223 5842.5512 80.75 347914 1182225 5842.5513 5,707.75 347759 1182226 5862.5513 1,893.02 347761 1182227 5862.5512 120.75 347781 1182228 5862.5513 167.75 347760 1182229 5862.5515 7,805.99 347762 1182230 5862.5512 31,836.34 385062 7/24/2014 131966 SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES 2,280.00 MULCH 347562 #15659 1643.6103 2,280.00 385063 7124/2014 101004 BPS COMPANIES 87.82 PLUMBING PARTS 00001439 347663 S2933052.001 1646.6530 87.82 385064 7/24/2014 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS 243.75 MONITORING CHARGES 347563 11469903 1552.6103 243.75 386066 7/24/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 347605 3419 5822.5514 126.00 385066 7/24/2014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 28.36 PAINT, STAIN 347874 071514 5410.6406 28.36 386067 7/24/2014 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 7,500.00 STAND PIPE SYSTEM REPAIRS 347664 1314003 1375.6103 7,500.00 386068 7/24/2014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 7/22/2u14 8:02:42 Page - 25 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARKING RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385068 7/2412014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. Continued... 388.90 MERCHANDISE 347875 182602 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 388.90 386069 7/24/2014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 400.00 MOVIE IN THE PARK 347943 DB1946003 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 400.00 385070 7/24/2014 120117 SWEET, AL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/03/14 347945 072114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 385071 7/24/2014 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 347564 944365 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 385072 7/2412014 104932 TAYLOR MADE 272.78 DRIVER 347876 22395999 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 97.64 MERCHANDISE 347877 22403836 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 341.68 DRIVER 347878 22403837 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 76.81 CLUB 347879 22415039 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 788.91 38,6073 7/24/2014 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 330,587.46 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 347966 071814 01404.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 330,587.46 386074 7/24/2014 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 803.95 JUNE 2014 SERVICE 347796 829891378 1400.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 803.95 385075 7/24/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 279.75 347880 834920 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 94.40 347881 834921 5421.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GRILL 149.10 347766 835567 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 284.25 347765 835568 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,307.55 347767 835569 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,115.05 386076 7/24/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 1,092.00 MAGAZINE AD 347882 2014- 116008 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — :7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger - Account Description Business Unit 385076 7/24/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. Continued... 1,092.00 386077 - 7/2412014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 403.50 6/17/14 COUNCIL MINUTES 347565 M20619 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 208.50 7/01/14 COUNCIL MINUTES 347717 M20654 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 612.00 385078 7/24/2014 120595 T- MOBILE 32.59 477067848 347665 062714 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 90.00 4771)67848 347665 062714 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT: GENERAL 122.59 386079 7124/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 31.53 WELDING TANKS 347718 40010919 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 31.53 366080 7/24/2014 124763 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 217.28 COPIER USAGE 347719 257383117 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 217.28 386081 7/24/2014 123649 TOWMASTER 1,141.00 CORNER POSTS, HOUSING 00005435 347827 360257 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS .. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN " 1,141.00 386082 7/24/2014 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 26.20 BACKGROUND CHECKS 347797 06417452 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.20 386083 7/24/2014 134528 'TRAYNHAM, MARY 475.00 REFUND APPLICATION FEE 347932 071614 5751.4524 CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 386084 7/24/2014 103218 TRI STATE BOBCAT 745.00- CREDIT 347567 P33677 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 2,181.66 HYDRO SEEDER RENTAL 347566 R21466 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 2,181.67 HYDRO SEEDER RENTAL 347566 R21466 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 2,181.67 HYDRO SEEDER RENTAL 347566 .R21466 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 5,800.00 386086 7124/2014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385085 7/24/2014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 228.45 WHEELS 00001449 347828 0134180 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 228.45 385086 712412014 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 475.06 MULCH & SEED 347568 32363 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 475.07 MULCH & SEED 347568 32363 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 475.07 MULCH & SEED 347568 32363 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 1,425.20 386087 7/24/2014 131793 U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 3,489.00 CONFERENCES - JAMES HOVLAND 347967 MEMBER 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 3,489.00 386088 7124/2014 131967 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 77.88 ATHLETIC NETS 00001427 347569 1501 - 002381 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.88 385089 7/24/2014 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 107.28 PAGERS 347666 X0319246G 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 107.28 386090 7/24/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 438.85 LIQUOR BAGS 00001512 347849 316243 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 23.34 LINERS 347850 316268 -00 .5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 61.90 CAN LINERS 347883 317180 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.85 CAN LINERS 347884 317180 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.22 TOWELS 347885 317327 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 821.16 385091 7/2412014 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 625.00 BROCHURE DESIGN 347942 2014 -2 1629.6575 PRINTING 625.00 386092 7/24/2014 102970 VER120N WIRELESS 35.01 347968 9728448252 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 35.01 347968 9728448252 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 70.02 347968 9728448252 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 140.04 347968 9728448252 1260.6188 TELEPHONE 210.08 347968 9728448252 1495.6188 TELEPHONE 476.16 347968 9728448252 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 7122/2014 8:02:42 Page - 28 Business Unit MOWING GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CITY COUNCIL FIELD MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL GRILL GRILL ADAPTIVE RECREATION PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/24/2014 - 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385092 7/24/2014 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 589.37 347968 9728448252 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 105.05 347968 9728448252 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 1,660.74 386093 7/24/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,050.00 LEASE CARTS 347888 703140023 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 350.00 LEASE CARTS 347886 703140024 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 315.28 LEASE BEVERAGE CART 347887 703140025 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1,715.28 386094 7124/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 310.74 BULBS, SOCKET EXTENSION 00001421 347570 8430489 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 310.74 385095 712412014 119454 VINOCOPIA 121.75 347768 0102731 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX 82.00 347769 0102732 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 203.75 385096 7/24/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 488.75 347606 62348 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 269.25 347607 62349 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 758.00 386097 7/24/2014 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 25.00 SAFETY BOOTS 347571 071114 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 25.00 385098 7/24/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 163.20 4FT LIGHT BULBS 00001430 347667 15248791 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 326.40 4FT LIGHT BULBS 00001430 347667 15248791 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.90 LIGHT BALLASTS 00001438 347829 15248889 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.31 LIGHT BALLASTS 00001438 347829 15248889 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.90 LIGHT BULBS 00001453 347969 15249065 -00 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 611.71 386099 7/24/2014 134418 WAGNER, LAURIE 220.00 .PROGRAM CANCELLATION REFUND 347970 07/14GOLF 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 220.00 7122/2014 8:02:42 Page - 29 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) GOLF CARS . GOLF CARS GOLF CARS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION CITY HALL GENERAL POOL OPERATION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GOLF REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 510530 5862.5513 347610 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5513 7/22/2014 8:02:42 511406 5862.5513 347772 65975 Council Check Register by GL 111.08 Page - 30 1080204261 5862.5515 4,528.08 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5862.5512 49.15 347776 1080204263 5862.5515 - 6,560.62 7/24/2014 - 7124/2014 1080204274 5862.5513 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385100 7/24/2014 96.15 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 1080204277 5822.5513 Continued... 347921 1080204281 32.11 DUMPSTER SERVICE 347572 6936221 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 347920 32.11 5842.5515 3,586.20 347922 1080204284 5842.5513 385101 7/24/2014 347924 134524 WATERFRONT RESTORATION LLC 5842.5512 . 12.44- 347926 2080044576 5842.5512 2,813.00 PATCH POOL LEAKS 347830 2402 5311.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 2080044600 2,813.00 5.20- 347923 2080047069 5842.5512 - 64.00- 385102 7/24/2014 R08011484 - 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 176.00 347608 366403 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,113.45 347916 366682 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 994.85 347770 366805 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 385103 7/24/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 757.60 960.08 1,274.60 347609 510530 5862.5513 347610 510674 5822.5513 347771 511406 5862.5513 347772 65975 5822.5513 385104 7/24/2014- - 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 80.15 347918 1080201447 5842.5512 " 65.15 347917 1080202380 5842.5513 111.08 347774 1080204261 5862.5515 4,528.08 347773 1080204262 5862.5512 49.15 347776 1080204263 5862.5515 - 6,560.62 -347775 1080204274 5862.5513 609.47 347777 1080204275 5862.5512 133.53 347778 1080204276 5822.5513 96.15 347779 1080204277 5822.5513 4,390.46 347921 1080204281 5842.5512 609.47 347919 1080204282 5842.5512 118.57 347920 1080204283 5842.5515 3,586.20 347922 1080204284 5842.5513 95.00- 347924 2080044570 5842.5512 . 12.44- 347926 2080044576 5842.5512 75.00- 347927 2080044592 5842.5512 27.00- 347925 2080044600 5842.5515 5.20- 347923 2080047069 5842.5512 - 64.00- 347928 R08011484 - 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOOD&SOLD,WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF:GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COSTOF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR COST. OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLIN(' R55CKR2 LOhi5101 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:42 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/24/2014 — 7/24/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No.. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386104 7/24/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 20,659.44 386105 7/24/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 7,343.60 347616 1090255180 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 477.00 347612 1090255331 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD; BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 347611 1090255332 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,561.90 347615 1090255333 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 184.80 347614 1090255334 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 347613 1090255335 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,543.40 347780 1090255782 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,191.75 347929 1090256498 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 295.20 347931 1090256499 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 347930 1090256500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,748.15 386106 7/24/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 13,723.51 51- 6121102 -5 347576 418759435 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7,967.59 51- 6824328 -7 347695 418772602 5420.6185 LIGHT& POWER CLUB HOUSE 632.30 51 -4197645 -8 347574 418913268 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 554.46 . 51- 5619094 -8 347573 418938152 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,813.25 51- 5888961 -7 347575 418947018 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 36,406.33 51- 5605640 -1 347721 419319792 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 3,376.50 51- 6227619 -3 347720 419331808 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 102.80 51- 0010025256 -3 347944 419915574 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 67,576.74 385107 7/24/2014 134625 ZHAO, JIANYING 104.00 TENNIS CAMP REFUND 347851 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 104.00 2,004,748.29 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,988,597.54 A/PACH Payment 16,150.75 Total Payments 2,004,748.29 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2014 8:02:56, Council Check Summary Page- 7/24/2014 - 7/2412014 Company Amount - 01000 GENERAL FUND 257,934.10 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 334.30 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 4,355.49 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 27,046.74 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND. 933,463.92 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 360.00 - 05100 ART CENTER FUND 49.38 - 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 5,475.08 05300- AQUATIC CENTER FUND 22,994.82 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 26,212.39 • 05500 ICEARENAFUND 91.42 05550. SPORTS DOME FUND 2,046.50 05700 EDINBOROUGH'PARK FUND 2,336.12 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 13,563.56 05800 LIQUOR FUND 165,308.51 05900 UTILITY FUND 384,341.30 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 152,353,08 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND - 2,901.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,580.58 . Report Totals 2,004,748.29 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these, claims comply in all material respects - with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing..po icie and procedures to I - R ce' a or Ci r" . R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit. - . 83 7131/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 79.60 .348489 .1810484 5822.5515. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 94.80 348490 1610485 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 174.40 84 7/3112014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,199.00 STORMWATER MGMT 348303 23270354.00 -208 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 3,199.00 85 7/31/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 69.05 348237 43870400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,146.15 348044 43969500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 157.50 348236 43969600 5842.5515 COSTOF•GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 316.65 348045 43969700 5842.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.55 348043 43969800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.10 348046 43971200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,196.93 348494 44082000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 187.10 348491 44082100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.55 348493 44082200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING - 107.55 348492 44082500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 134.79 348048 6454000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 209:56 348235 90531600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 58.56 348047 90531700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,791.04 G 86 7/31/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 30.96 DESK TRAYS 348096 OE- 361526 -1 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 34.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 348212 OE- 361884 -1 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS '277.20 INK CARTRIDGES 348099 OE- 362162 -1 1180.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ELECTION - 72.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES .348098 WO- 947474 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERA_ L 503.15 OFFICE'SUPPLIES 348097 WO- 947537 -1 '1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 151.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003069 348448 WO- 948098 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 27.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 348449 WO- 948229 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 348305 WO- 948627 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,104.02 87 7/31/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 3,470.00 TRUNK SEWER REHAB 348307 0168158 03485.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRUNK SS LINING 3,470.00 88 7131/2014 104020 DALCO R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 88 7/31/2014 104020 DALCO Continued... 239.62 CUPS 00009345 348013 276444 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 453.10 GRILL CLEANER, GLASS CLEANER 348316 2771533 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 692.72 89 7/31/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 6,770.00 WATER REPORT BOOKLETS 00001481 348131 42814 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 6,770.00 90 7131/2014 101483 MENARDS 61.90 CAUTION TAPE, SAW BLADES 00008077 348367 54870 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 340.92 COMMERCIAL DRUM FAN, ALUMINUOD008097 348369 60950 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 13.21 FLASHING, QUAD CLEAR 00001520 348368 62676 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 416.03 91 7/31/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 9.92 HOSE 00006183 348152 966938 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 93.13 SPRAYER NOZZLES 00006183 348153 966943 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 562.70 NOZZLES 00006260 348151 966964 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 153.97 BALL JOINT ASSEMBLY 00006186 348154 968207 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 335.45 ROLLER 00006186 348155 968207 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 335.45 ROLLER 00006186 348156 968207 -02 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 604.53 HYDRAULIC MOTORS 348157 969706 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 25.64 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002070 348429 970927 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,120.79 92 7/3112014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,307.46 TIRES, SERVICE 00005344 348386 210124461 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,307.46 93 7/31/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 630.48 TOWELS, TISSUE, GLOVES 00002172 348388 7080 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 750.72 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES 000D2219 348390 7118 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 136.30 TISSUE 348389 7130 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 297.68 CUPS, PAPER PLATES 348391 7131 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,815.18 94 7/31/2014 104672 SPRINT 15.01 348210 873184124 -140 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.48 348210 873184124 -140 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 48.48 348210 873184124 -140 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKR2 L6GIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 94 7/31/2014 104672 SPRINT 48.98 94.10 132.24 133.95 140.41 157.71 319.92 347.89 390.02 62.89 16.48 R1 R -53 95 CITY OF EDINA 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 746.25 BUMPER 00005443 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 1553.6530 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No, Subledger Account Description Conilnued... 348210 873184124 -140 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1280.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1301.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 348210 873184124 -140 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 348210 873184124 -140 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 348210 873184124 -140 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 95 7/31/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 746.25 BUMPER 00005443 348402 1564787 1553.6530 746.25 96 7131/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 36.95 CONCESSION PRODUCT 348415 39993373 5520.5510 482.66 CONCESSION PRODUCT 348416 40013538 5520.5510 519.61 385108 7/31/2014 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 3,353.03 INSTALL COLD.STORAGE TIMERS 348003 21407161 1552.6103 3,353.03 385109 7/31/2014 130442 ABAS, REBECCA 150.00 DANCING IN THE PARK 348445 CENT LAKES 5760.6136 150.00 385110 7/31/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 16.40 348039 1808368 5822.5515 78.80 348042 1808369 5842.5515 94.80 348040 1808370 5862.5515 105.30 348041 1808925 5862.5515 295.30 385111 7/31/2014 106476 ACE TRAILER SALES REPAIR PARTS 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 3 Business Unit PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 . - CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 - 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- '" Account Description Business Unit �.: 385111 7/31/2014 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES Contlnued... 34.00 LIFT GATE 00005421 348297 S033900 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.00 385112 7/31/2014 132836 ADCOCK, MARIAN 5.14 ART WORK SOLD 347976 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD - ART CENTER REVENUES 5.14' . 385113 7/3112014 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. :. 3,896.25 EVALUATION STUDY 348004 55131 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING.INSPECTION" A- 238,TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC . 3,896.25 386114 7/31/2014 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 7.80 ARTWORK SOLD 347977 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES - 7.80 385115 7/31/2014 134541 ANDERSON, CHAD. 70.00 EMT TEST 348178 REIMBURSE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 385116 7/31/2014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 769.03• CONCESSION PRODUCT 348299 407180458 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 11260.82 FOOD 348301 407180501 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL' 832.73 CONCESSION PRODUCT 348300 407210200 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 393.70 CONCESSION PRODUCT 348298 407220087 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 3,276.28 385117 7/31/2014 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 1,133.60 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS 348302 42437 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,133.60 _ 386118 7/3112014 102012 ARMENIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE - 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/13/14 348443 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 385119 7/31/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 470.00 348219 59176 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 42.00 348218 59177 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 999.00 348267 59178 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.00 348217 59179 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.80. 348268 59180 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29!2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger . Account Description Business Unit 385119 7131/2014 .132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 470.00 348234 59389 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 385120 7/31/2014 100638 BACHMAN2S 36.96 SHRUBS 00006195 348095 526220 5422.6541 36.96 385121 7/31/2014 134610 BADE, TRACY 104.00 ART CLASS REFUND 348446 REFUND 5101.4607 104.00 385122 7/31/2014 134604 BAE, LAUREN 52.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 348447 REFUND 1600.4390.02 52.00 385123 7131/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,457.12 WATER QUALITY ISSUES 348006 23270354.13 -7 04406.1705.20 2,522.00 SANITARY SEWER ASSISTANCE 348005 23271331.00 -6 5925.6103 5,979.12 385124 7/31/2014 134542 BARR, BRENDA 1,680.18 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348179 072214 1470.4329 1,680.18 385126 7/31/2014 121083 BARR, FRANK 78.00 ART WORK SOLD 347978 071414 5101.4413 78.00 385126 7/3112014 134613 BARRIER SYSTEMS LLC 9,875.00. SANDBAG LOADER 00005456 348546 583 5932.6406 3,925.50 POLY SANDBAGS 00005457 348547 584 5932.6406 13,800.50 385127 7/31/2014 118955 BCBS OF MN. 93.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348182 JAMES ABELN 1470.4329 93.31 385128 7/31/2014 134543 BEAVER, LAIRD W 44.51 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348180 072214 1470.4329 44.51 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLASS REGISTRATION TENNIS PROGRAM CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AMBULANCE FEES' ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES' GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES ART CENTER REVENUES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION -IMPR ENGINEER SERVICES - 'SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM'SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT:GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386128 7/31/2014 134643 BEAVER, LAIRD W Continued... 385129 7/31/2014 101343 BEHR, JASON 37.74 K -9 TRAINING EXPENSES 348181 072114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.14 K -9 TRAINING EXPENSES 348181 072114 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.88 385130 7/31/2014 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 154.70 ART WORK SOLD 347979 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 154.70 386131 7/31/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 464.00 348238 150190 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 464.00 386132 7/31/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 63.80 COFFEE 348304 1185259 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 63.80 386133 7/31/2014 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 5,408.35 HOT MIX 348007 22477 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 5,408.35 385134 7/31/2014 133926 BIX PRODUCE CO. 312.90 FOOD 348306 02930881 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 312.90 385135 7/31/2014 102546 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 27,448.00 AUG 2014 PREMIUMS 348450 AUG 2014 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 184,768.50 AUG 2014 PREMIUMS 348450 AUG 2014 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 212,216.50 386136 7/31/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 104.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003845 348183 99337 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 104.42 385137 7/31/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 856.50 348049 120908 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.50- 348050 120989 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 735.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 7/31/2014 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA - 12.00 Council Check Register by GL 348308 072514 5401.4602 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 348368 072514. 5421.5510 7/31/2014 = 7/31/2014 259.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385138 7/3112014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 266.33 CONTROL, RELAY 00005507 348451.. 868636 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 31.47 RELAY 200.00 348455 - 869384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 846.90 SHOES, SEALS, SPRINGS 00005511 348456 669657 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.42 BRAKE HOSE 00005511 v: 348457 '869657X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 202.04 FUEL PUMP, WASHERS 00005514 348458 871736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,368.92 FUEL PUMP 00005515 348459 871824 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,686.20 SLACK ADJUSTERS, BRAKES 348100 348460 872546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 120.00- CREDIT 00005361 348452 CM855093 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,000.00- CORE RETURN 00005383 348453 CM861787 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 379.04- CREDIT 00005424 348454. CM867329 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2.919.24 72.00 ART CLASS REFUND 385139 7/31/2014 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - 12.00 348308 072514 5401.4602 26.84 348368 072514. 5421.5510 259.00 348308 072514 5401.4603 297.84 385140 7131/2014 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/12/14 348442 072914 5760.6136 200.00 386141 7/31/2014 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 348100 34811 5822.6575 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 348100 34811 5842.6575 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 348100 34811 5862.6575 492.00 385142 7/31/2014 134516 BUCK, PAULETTE 72.00 ART CLASS REFUND 348461 5243 5101.4607 72.00 385143 7/31/2014 119455'. CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 34.30 348220 372479 5822.5515 493.35 348220 372479 5822.5514 3,365.45 348222 372480•= 5842.5514 18.55 348221 376665' 5842.5515 3,911.65 385144 17/31/2014 134691 CARON, KRYSTAL LESSONS COST OF GOODS SOLD COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 7/2912014 13:41:43 Page- 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF REVENUES GRILL GOLF REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING PRINTING YORK SELLING = PRINTING VERNON SELLING CLASS REGISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK.SELLING 2,500.00 R55CKR2 1_06IS101 . CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43: ' Council Check Register by GL Page,- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7131/2014 - 7/31/2014' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 385144 7/31/2014 134591 CARON, KRYSTAL Continued... 75.04. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348463 072314 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS - 144.80 CUPCAKES 348462 BRAEMAR GC 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 219.84 385145: 7131/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. - 23.48 ANTI -GLARE IPAD SCREEN 00004336 348102 M214668 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 23.48 385146 7131/2014 100897 `CENTERPOINT ENERGY - 57:05 348101 071414 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 91.39 348101 071414 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 253.22 348101 071414 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 424.42 348101 071414 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 392.93 348101 071414 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT - 39.67 348101 071414 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 67.19 348101 071414 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 185:85 348101. 071414 5420.6166 HEAT CLUB HOUSE -4,502.33 348101 071414 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ' 142.16 348101 071414 5761.6166 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 15.49 348101' 071414 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.78 348101 071414 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 59.13 348101 071414 5841.6186 HEAT YORK-OCCUPANCY - 141.61 348101 071414 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 155.44 348101 071414 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,595.17 348101 071414 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 8,155.83 385147 7131/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 60.15 952 944 -6522 348184 6522 -7/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 60.15 385148 7/31/2014 - 100683 CHEMSEARCH 717.79 WATER: TREATMENT PROGRAM 348309 1566351 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION - 717.79 386149 713112014 123313 CHOICE WOOD CO. 2,500.00 ED132245 REFUND 348185 6500 INDIAN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS HILLS PASS 2,500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/3112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385150 7131/2014 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. Continued... 324.00 LEMIRE CHLORINE MASK 348310 156595 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 324.00 385151 7/3112014 134540 CLIMB THEATRE 361.00 BULLYING PREVENTION SESSION 348186 47178 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 361.00 385152 7/31/2014 121616 COATES ROOFING INC. 475.00 ROOF VENT REPAIRS 348311 15023 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 475.00 385153 7/3112014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 316.96 348239 0128342320 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 316.96 385154 7/31/2014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 825.99 AUG 2014 MAINTENANCE 348008 072214 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 825.99 385155 7/31/2014 120433 COMCAST 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 348486 373022 -7/14 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.11 8772 10614 0419858 348312 419858 -7/14 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 170.14 8772 10 614 0496856 348313 496856 -7114 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 257.02 . 385156 7/31/2014 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 866.61 CABLE TV & ONLINE ADS 348419 9630 -7/14 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 866.62 CABLE TV & ONLINE ADS 348419 9630 -7/14 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 866.62 CABLE TV & ONLINE ADS 348419 9630 -7/14 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,599.85 385157 7/3112014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 44,560.75 HOT MIX 348009 063014 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION " 44,560.75 395158 7131/2014 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 241.16 DOWELS, EPDXY 00001388 348103 0113118 -IN 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 241.16 385169 7/31/2D14 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. R556KR2 L6GIS101 348224 761621 5822.5514 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 2,902.15 348223 761622 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL i 348269 761624 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 348495 762218 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER • VERNON SELLING 9,070.20 7131/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check' #.:, 'wDate Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3851$9. 7/31/2014 4- 149097 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.00 Continued... 2,671.88 KILN PARTS 348011 INV000088972 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 940.31 CLAY 00009339 348010 INV000088973 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 2,968.65 88.61 KILN PARTS 00009341 348012 - INV000089504 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,700.80 386160 7/31/2014 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 1,445.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001482 348105 10501 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,445.20 386161 7/31/2014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 251.45 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348314 3015567 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 667.14 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348315 3015718 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 918.59 385162 7131/2014 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 421.00 ROOF REPAIR 348104 2058 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 421.00 385163 7/31/2014 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 9.10 ART WORK SOLD 347980 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9.10 386164. 7/31/2014 134614 DANIELSON, LOIS .1,631.90 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348488 072814 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,631.90 385165 7/31/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS' ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS VERNON OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,354.70 348224 761621 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,902.15 348223 761622 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,893.35 348269 761624 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 920.00 348495 762218 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER • VERNON SELLING 9,070.20 385166 7/31/2014 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 4.00 BATTERIES 348317 4- 149097 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.00 385167 7131/2014 129884., DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,968.65 AUG 2014 PREMIUMS 348464 F018342- AUG2014 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,968.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OFEDINA 7/29/201413:41:43,, Council Check Register by GL Page- Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 = 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385167 7/31/2014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Continued... 385168 7/31/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 37.90 GREASE GUN, HEX SOCKETS 00005486 - 348318 921101 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN _ 237.00 LIGHTS 00001433 348319 922334 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.90 385169 7/31/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 96.35 BAKERY 348320 514347 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 138.10 348321 514360 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 78.62 348322 514895 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 73.40 348323 515038 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 69.81 348324 515174 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 456.28 385170 7/31/2014 121161 DEX MEDIA 21.40 PHONE LISTINGS 348325 071614 5821.6188 TELEPHONE . 50TH'ST- OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTINGS 348325 071614 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTINGS 348325 071614 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 64.20 385171 7131/2014 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 347981 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.50 385172 7/31/2014 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 788.20 CAUSTIC SODA 348327 827001160 -14 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 769.44 CAUSTIC SODA 348326 827001235 -14 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 1,557.64 _ 385173 7131/2014 120696 DRAPER, LAURENE 79.68 'SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 348420 072214 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.68 385174 7/31/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 57.26 PUBLISH NOTICE 348014 121181 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 106.40 AD FOR BID 348015 121182 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 85.12 AD FOR BID 348016 121163 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 90.44 AD FOR BID 348017 121184 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 339.22 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 _ Council Check Register by GL Page'- 12 _ Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary , 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 ". Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385175 7/31/2014 124503 . EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. Continued... 44.18 RECEPTACLES, SWITCHS, PLATES 00001452 348106 11063900 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 44.18 385176 7/31/2014 125188 EDINAARTCENTER 120.00 POTTERY MUGS 348107 TOM OYE AWARD 1504.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 120.00 385177 7/31/2014 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 <MEETING - BILL•NEUENDORF ' 348108 E.1654.432964.4 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 37345 25.00 385178 7131/2014 113116 EDINA CHEERLEADING 2,850.00 INSTRUCTION 348187 072214 1600.4390.25 CHEERLEADING CAMP PARKADMIN. GENERAL 2,850.00 385179 7/31/2014 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 85.38 MOTOR 00001444 348109 413890 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUBHOUSE 85.38 385180 7/3112014 134012 ELLIOTT DESIGN BUILD INC; 6,352.50 DESIGN SERVICES 348110 733 47073.6710. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 6,352.50 386181 7/31/2014 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 5,324.73 T -90 REPAIRS 348188 74354 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,324.73 _ 385182 7/31/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 1,012.38 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003704, 348189 1660050 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,529.97 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003704 348190 1661686 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE-DEPT. GENERAL 490.68 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 348191 1661894 1470.6510 ..: FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,033.03 385183 7/31/2014 134601 EMMONS & OLPAER, RESOURCES INC. 200.25 STREET SWEEPING MGMT PLAN 348328 01169- 0001 -1 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 200.25 385184 7/31/2014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 348270 259 -1445 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385184 7/31/2014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. Continued... 67.00 385185 7/31/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 104.03 MANIFOLD SET 348335 1 -4491832 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 112.44 BATTERY 348329 69- 145094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10.02 WIPERS 348331 69- 145336 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 60.88 HARDWARE 348330 69- 145409 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8.38 AIR FILTER 348332 69- 145590 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 353.47 OXYGEN SENSORS 348333 69- 145613 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 44.03 WIRE ASSEMBLY 348334 69- 146002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 693.25 385186 7/31/2014 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 324.45 NUTS, BOLTS 00001435 348111 MNTC215139 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 324.45 385187 7/31/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 6,927.65 METERS 00001483 348112 0092441 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6,927.65 385188 7/31/2014 133257 FILBIN, SUSAN 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 347982 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 7.80 385189 7/3112014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 216.79 AD FOR BID 348018 741639296 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 600.00 5146 EDEN RFI 348113 741681500 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 5146 EDEN RFI 348114 741690401 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 137.19 AD FOR BID 348019 741690610 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 237.48 AD FOR BID 348336 741699712 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 207.93 AD FOR BID 348337 741702391 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1,699.39 385190 7/3112014 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 127.00 CHANGE SAFE COMBO 348338 1027008 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 127.00 385191 7/31/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA 685.44 SENSOR COUPLERS 00005488 348339 01429769 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 685.44 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR ART CENTER REVENUES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385191 7/31/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA Continued... 386192 7/31/2014 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 132.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348020 072114 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 132.16 385193 7/31/2014 134638 FRANCE MEDIA INC. 900.00 HEARTLAND REAL ESTATE AD 348115 HL61631 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 900.00 386194 7/3112014 134607 FREEMAN, RUSSELL 110.00 JR GOLF PROGRAM REFUND 348465 REFUND 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 110.00 385195 7131/2014 124620 FRESHWATER HARVESTING INC. 7,500.00 AQUATIC VEGETATION HARVESTING 348021 201410 5938.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,500.00 385196 7/31/2014 134544 FRIBLEY, JACK M 1,050.84 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348192 072214 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1.050.84 385197 7/31/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 311.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348340 45169 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 311.00 385198 7131/2014 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. 13,767.09 FINAL PAYMENT 348116 080114 05501.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 13,767.09 385199 7/31/2014 133258 GORDON, KIM 9.10 ART WORK SOLD 347983 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9.10 386200 7131/2014 101103 GRAINGER 78.40 TP DISPENSERS 00006328 348120 9475854650 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101.16 TIE DOWNS 00006259 348121 9476262242 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.40 FUSES 00008095 348350 9478278253 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 115.34 V -BELTS 00008095 348351 9478278261 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.76 LEAK GAUGE 00006329 348119 9480800078 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.34 OIL CAN, FLASHLIGHT 00002223 348341 9484054508 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7129/2014 13:41:43 Page - 14 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GOLF REVENUES MILLPOND LK VEGETATION CONTROL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS WM -501 RAW WATER WELL9 TO WiP6 ART CENTER REVENUES RANGE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1,178.00 348225 169468 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING _ 20.00- 348240 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 364.50 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1, 522.50 7/31/2014 - . 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385200 7/3112014 101103 GRAINGER 9.10 ART WORK SOLD 347984 071414 Continued... ART WORK SOLD 14.28 LIGHT BULBS 00002224 348342 9484256947 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111.50 INLET, COVER, BOX 00005450 348343 9487337116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 407.19 SHELVING, HOSE, V -BELTS 00007501 348345 9492217691 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 291.53 PAPER PLATES, SPOONS 00005543 348344 9492327599 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 81.60 AIR FILTERS 00001457 348118 9492327615 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111.08 EXIT LIGHT BATTERIES 00005548 348117 9492327623 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 111.08- CREDIT 00005548 348347 9493082581 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.29 VOLT DETECTOR, SCREWDRIVERS 00001442 348346 9493250634 1301.6556 TOOLS 111.08 EXIT LIGHT BATTERIES 00001524 348348 9493655097 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 1,176.00 MARKED ROD W /ACCESSORIES 00001442 348349 9494075402 1301.6556 TOOLS 2,684.87 385206 7/3112014 134645 HARMON, SARA J 385201 7/31/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 84.78 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348193 .072214 7/2912'011413:41:43 Page- 15 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,178.00 348225 169468 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING _ 20.00- 348240 169468REV 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 364.50 348241 169537 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1, 522.50 385202 7/31/2014 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 9.10 ART WORK SOLD 347984 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.10 386203 7/31/2014 100787 GRUBER'S'POWER EQUIPMENT 252.66 FILTERS 00007453 348352 134396 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' 252.66 386204 7/31/2014 104469 GS DIRECT INC. " 93.49 PLOTTER PAPER 00002626 348022 308203 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 93.49 385205 7/31/2014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 213.22 THERMAL ROLLS 00007515 348421 127224 5842.6512 • PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 213.22 385206 7/3112014 134645 HARMON, SARA J 84.78 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348193 .072214 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.78 386207 7131/2014 126270 HARTFORD - ,PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,136.45 AUG 2014 PREMIUM 348466 6817492 -9 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council 'Check Register by invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385207 7/31/2014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS Continued... 5,136.45 - 385208 7/31/2014 126270 'HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS _ 7.60° COBRAAUG 2014 348467 AUG 2014. 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7.60 385209 7/31/2014 126270 HARTFORD. - PRIORITY, ACCOUNTS 3,827:33 AUG 2014 PREMIUM 348468 6828473 -6 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,827.33 386210, 7/31/2014 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 888.00 SOFTBALLS 348213 072114 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 534.63 SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT FOOD 348214 JULY 2014 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 1,422.63 385211 7/31/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,803.34 CHEMICALS 00001246 348122 3618053 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 415.48 CHLORINE 348353 3618190 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 4,296.78 CHEMICALS 00001246 348123 3619426 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 1 - WATER TREATMENT 8,515.60 1 385212 7131/2014 134600 HAYES, HOLLY 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 348357 REFUND 5101.4607, CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 385213 7/31/2014 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 9,150.00 AIR RELEASE VALVES 00002617 348124 C540574 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 920.10 CS KEYS, PARTS 00001480 348125 C644184 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 582.60 SLCOUPLINGS 00001488 348354 C677676 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 10,652.70 ' 385214 7/31/2014 100799 HEDBERG_ SUPPLY 415.95 WATERFALL PUMP 00006180 348127 366795 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 664.48 RIP RAP 348126 372787 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,080.43 385216 7/3112014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 181.92 BEEF PATTIES 348355 025257 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 181.92 348356 025262 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 363.64 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page,- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7131/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385215 7131/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS Continued... 385216 7/31/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 5,585.50 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FEE 348023 0714 -24 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 5,585.50 385217 7/31/2014 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 8/14/14 348444 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 386218 7/3112014 134647 HOFFMAN,•KRISTY 103.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM REFUND 348194 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 103.00 385219 7/31/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,291.00 348271 713689 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,839.75 348242 713977 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,130.75 386220 7/31/2014 100808_ HORWATH, THOMAS 361.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348469 072214 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES &MAINTENANCE 361.76 385221 7/3112014 124698 'HOYE, PAMELA 15.14 ART WORK SOLD 347985 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.14 385222 7/31/2014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 2,09453 MAIL JULY WATER BILLS 348024 91966 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING.- FINANCE 634.58 MAIL JULY LATE NOTICES 348422 92067 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,729.11 385223 7/31/2014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 360.17 348423 608271005 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 360.17 386224 7/31/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 7.40 PVC PIPE 00001469 348128 856681 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 7.40 386225 7/31/2014 134608 INGLIS, SUSAN, i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385225 7/3112014 134608 INGLIS, SUSAN Continued... 105.00 GOLF LESSONS REFUND 348470 REFUND 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 105.00 385226 7/31/2014 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 ISP BUNDLE 348129 12183604 7410.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 27.74 385227 7/31/2014 102640 IPMA -HR 390.00 DUES 348025 24202201 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 390.00 385228 7/3112014 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 250.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTIONS 348130 67058 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 250.00 385229 7131/2014 134533 JANY, PAVEL 500.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 347972 071814 2611.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 500.00 385230 7/31/2014 134533 JANY, PAVEL 500.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 347973 072114 2611.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 500.00 386231 7/31/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 348359 78433 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 213.62 TOILET RENTAL 348358 78436 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 265.12 385232 7/31/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,944.10 348497 2240682 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 73.80 348272 2240683 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,567.35 348498 2240690 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 408.00 348496 2253609 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 9,993.25 385233 7/31/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 10.05 PIPE 00006181 348134 68680053 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 209.68 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 00006188 348133 68826014 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 80.87 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00001446 348132 68896558 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 300.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No .. Subledger Account Description Business Unit. 385233 7/31/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. Continued... 385236 7/31/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. . 3,328.64 348062 .1901500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.41 348058 1901501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 542.64 348057 1901503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 632.36 348052 1901504 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 135.66 348063 1901505 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,154.11 348053 1901506 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 449.09 348064 1901507 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 736.12 348065 1901509 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 170.23 348051 1901510 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,185.19 348056 1901512 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,530.25 348054 1901520 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,727.52 348055 1901522 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,552.31 348060 1901524 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 146.50 348059 1902057 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,179.30 348061 1903125 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,263.O6 348511 1906876 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2.90 346277 1906877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.16 348507 - 1906879 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 388.64 348512 1906881 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.41 348513 1906882 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 280.29 348514 1906884 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,033.28 - 348509 1906885 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,031.48 348508 1906887 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,816.60 348501 1906888 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,090.53 348505 1906889 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 875.27 348503 1906890 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,493.18 348502 1906891 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,626.82 348604 1906893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 600.00 348506 1906894 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,486.04 348500 1906895 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 98.23 348499 1906896 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,074.09 348276 1906897 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,733.29 348516 1906898 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,035.49 348275 1906899 5862.5512 COST OF .GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,948.63 348517 1906900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 732.22 348274 1906901 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 99.48 348273 1906902 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,921.52 348515 1906903 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check #. Date Amount Supplier Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description) Business Unit 385236 7/31/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO: Continued... 99.48 348510 1908264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 93.62- 348094 625914 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.00- 348278 626968 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20.12- 348279 626970 5822.5512 COST OF 'GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH.ST SELLING 60,113.68 385237 7/3112014. 123696 JOHNSTON, TORT ' 48.10 ART WORK SOLD 347986 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3' 48.10` 386238 7/31/2014 102603 JONAS, LENORE 53.32 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 347974 072114 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 53.32 385239 7/31/2014 123053. JUDSON, GARY _ 4.55 ART WORK SOLD 347987 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.55 385240 7/31/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 6.99 UNIFORMS 00603816 348195 249337 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.37 UNIFORMS 00003821 348196 249574 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.36 '386241 7/31/2014 124730 KEITH, BARBARA 7.15 ART WORK SOLD 347988 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.15 385242 7/31/2014 134605 KREOFSKY, DEAN - 28.07 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348471 4532 CASCO AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 28.07 385243 7131/2014 130216 KUEHL, RHONDA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 347989 071414 5101.4413 -ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES. 26.00 -, 386244 7131/2014 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 2,135.16 'WEED /ALGAE TREATMENT 348026 117711 -5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION,CONTR( 1;486.16' .:WEED /ALGAE TREATMENT 348027 117724 5937.6103, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 3,621.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385245 7/31/2014 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS Continued... 198.92- 348427 SCR240571 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES YORK SELLING 198.92- 348427 SCR240571 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 99.46- 348427 SCR240571 5822.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 396.98 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 348424 SIN1725548 5822.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 793.98 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 348424 SIN1725548 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 793.98 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 348424 SIN1725548 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES YORK SELLING 115.64 348426 SIN1743184 5822.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 231.28 348426 SIN1743184 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES YORK SELLING 231.28 348426 SIN1743184 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 108.25 348425 SIN1763313 5822.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 216.50 348425 SIN1763313 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES YORK SELLING 216.50 348425 SIN1763313 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,235.93 UNIFORMS 348197 SIN1775375 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 4,843.02 385246 7/31/2014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 489.30 COTTER PINS, BITS, NUTS 00005348 348360 9302584758 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 489.30 385247 7/31/2014 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 27,099.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 348361 47338 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 99,752.00 QUARTERLY INS 348362 47480 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 126, 851.00 385248 7/31/2014 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 675.09 SAND 00006254 348136 210179 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 544.83 CART PATH ROCK 00006257 348135 211226 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,219.92 385249 7/31/2014 130599 LEONARD, RICHARD 65.00 LAUNDRY SERVICE 348472 TOWELS 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 65.00 385250 7/31/2014 101078 LUBE -TECH ESI 221.00 RESET HOME SWITCHES 348363 4558 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.00 FUEL FOBS 00005353 348364 4640 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 371.00 386261 7/3112014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 80.33 WHEEL HUB ASSEMBLY 00005495 348365 2145001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 ' Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 385251 7/31/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 388.81 WHEEL HUB ASSEMBLY 00005495 348366 2145002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 469.14 386.252 7/31/2014 134612 MAJICA,`SERGIO 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8 /07/14 348439 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC,- OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 .385263. 7/31/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 1,323.64 .GAS 00006256 348137 718729 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 1,352.61 DIESEL 348141 742452 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 769.09 GAS 00006364 348139 750490 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,180.08 DIESEL 00006364 348140 750491 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,591.82 GAS 00006364 348138 750492 5424.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES RANGE 6,217.24 385264 7/31/2014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 480.00 HOSTING FEE 348428 197 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL- SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS - 480.00 385265 7/31/2014 134187 MCMAHON, MARY JO 8.13 ART WORK SOLD 347990 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 8.13 386266 7/31/2014 106767 MCPHERSON, KAREN 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 347991 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 386267 7/31/2014 101483 MENARDS 6.45 DORMER FLASHING 00001451 348145 61916 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY = 17.25 -- RETURN.GUTTER 00006189 348144 62104 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 8.47 GUTTER 00006189 348143 62106 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES :MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.64 PROPANE 00006200 348142 62122 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 55.37 TRIM, SCREWS, NAILS 00001466 348146 62213 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 88.68 386268 7/31/2014 101987 MENARDS 22.41 ADHESIVE, TAPE, STORAGE. HANG E30002150 348370 46898 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 126.17 MULCH, ROUNDUP, TAPE 00002227 348372 46907 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 47.52 MULCH 00002228 348371 46994 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS i 196.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 25.00 CITY OF EDINA 386263 7/31/2014 Council Check Register by GL - Council;Check Register by Invoice & Summary MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348199 071814 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 7/31/2014 — 7/3112014 241.64 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No "' Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385258 7/31/2014 &WATER 101987 MENARDS Continued... 386259 7/31/2014 348148 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 367.20 VEHICLE REPAIRS 348373 244249 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 367.20 3,975:00 386260 7/31/2014 385265 134539 METZGER,'RICHARD 134560 MINNESOTA DESIGN BUILD 14.93 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348198 6233 CRESCENT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 348202 5608 WARDEN AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT DR 2,500.00 ED130097 REFUND 348200 14.93 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 386261 7/31/2014 348201 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 7,500.00 213.84 BRAEMAR GOLF MAILING 348374 73685 5410.6235 POSTAGE 386266 7/31/2014 213.84 120301 MINNESOTA MULCH & SOIL 385262 7/31/2014 134603 MILLER, LAURIE MULCH 348149 D11662 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GOLF ADMINISTRATION 25.00 DOG PARK REFUND 1 348474 PARTIAL REFUND 1400.4121 OFF -LEASH DOG PARK PERMIT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION 25.00 386263 7/31/2014 130635 MILLNER, CHAD - 241.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348199 071814 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 241.64 386264 7/31/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &WATER 2,517.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001485 348148 34741 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,457.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001484 348147 34742 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,975:00 385265 7/3112014 134560 MINNESOTA DESIGN BUILD 2,500.00 ED131360 REFUND 348202 5608 WARDEN AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 ED130097 REFUND 348200 5925 VIEW LANE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 ED131359 REFUND 348201 6421 ROLF AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 7,500.00 386266 7/31/2014 120301 MINNESOTA MULCH & SOIL 865.69 MULCH 348149 D11662 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 865.69 385267 7/3112014 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,855.00 STANDPIPE 00001436 348150 0318198 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,855.00 ENGINEERING GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/2912014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice& Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv, No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386.267 7/3112014 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT Continued... 385268 7131/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 13.50 CAMLOCK 00005493 348375 0105823 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.50 385269 .7/31/2014 101316 MMBA 1,666.66 - ANNUAL DUES 348215 2014-2015 5860.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,666.67: ANNUAL DUES 348215 2014 - 2015 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,666.67. ANNUAL DUES 348215 2014 -2015 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5,000.00 385270 7131/2014 108537 MOORE, JOEL 70.01 TRAINING EXPENSES 348203 072114 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.76 TRAINING EXPENSES 348203 072114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES_ &,SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 204.77 - 385271 17/31/2014 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 140.83 WHEELASSEMBLY 00005490 346376 524978F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 140.83 WHEELASSEMBLY, 00005490 348377 524979F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 281.66 385272 7/31/2014 102421 MPGMA 75.00 DUES - JOE ABOOD . 348473 2014 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 75.00 385273 7/31/2014 131577 MRA - THE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 2,000.00 DUES, 348028 09028408 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,000.00 385274 7/31/2014 121125 NEMER, KAREN 9.43. ART -WORK SOLD 347992 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.43 386275 7/31/2014 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC 36.00 TEST KIT SUPPLIES 348378. 4419 5311.6545 ._ CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 36.00 386276 7/31/2014 .104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 256.70 LENS,'STROBES 00005496 348379 36586 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 256.70 - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger ' Account Description Business Unit 385276 7/3112014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, INC Continued... 386277 7/31/2014 '-100933 NORTHWEST,GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. ,- 336.01 ART SUPPLIES .00009348 348029 46139600 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 336.01 385278 7/31/2014 130141 -DENO DISTRIBUTION LLC . 247.50 348066 2547 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 247.50 386279 7/31/2014 103678 OFFICE DEPOT - 71.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 348380 718066963001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 95.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 348381 719855557001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 167.32 385280 7/31/2014 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 44.20 ART WORK SOLD 347993 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ' 44.20 385281 7/31/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 175.01 CHAIN, DRILL BITS 00001465 348382 542188 5923.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS ' 175.01 386282 7/3112014 134606 ORWIG, LEIGH 46.93 REFUND FOR 1 PASS 348475 072414 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 46.93 ' 385283 7131/2014 124619 OVERHOLT, JAMES 333.20- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348476 072214 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 333.20 386284 7/31/2014 .116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 21.13 ART WORK SOLD 347994 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.13 385285 7/31/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 80.34- 348068 .8457422 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 532.25 348067 8457462 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,628.49 348243 8458034 -1N 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 874.04 348280 8458055 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,845.49 348244 8458063 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 387.88 Council Check Register by GL YORK SELLING 348071 2637353 5822.5512 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1,165.37 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 348072 2637354 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385285 "7/31/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 5,546.73 Continued... 348069 8,799.93 5842.5513 136.27 385286 7/31/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2640815 5862.5513 301.20 348245 00631527 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5513 520.85 348384 45746569 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 348285 375.37 5822.5512 348383 45746571 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,147.51 348520 348385 45746638 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 386287 7/31/2014 50TH ST SELLING 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 387.88 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 348071 2637353 5822.5512 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,165.37 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 348072 2637354 5822.5513 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4.64 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 348070 2637355 5842.5513 5,546.73 348069 2637358 5842.5513 136.27 348284 2640815 5862.5513 113.80 348521 2640816 5842.5513 303.31 348285 2640819 5822.5512 2,588.84 348520 2640823 5842.5513 684.58 348522 2640824 5842.5512 1,399.12 348519 2640825 5842.5513 2,020.64 348283 2640826 5862.5513 114.32 348281 2640827 5862.5515 3,212.82 348518 2640828 5862.5512 1,221.25 348282 2640829 5862.5513 13.08- 348286 3531243 5822.5512 18, 886.49 385288 7131/2014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 348.00 348287 21779 5862.5515 348.00 385289 7/31/2014 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENENCE 348477 324707 5720.6620 2,223.86 386290 7/31/2014 105056 POWDERHORN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC. 275.00 AD IN 2014 PROGRAM 348204 EDINAART 5110.6122 CENTER 275.00 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 26 Business Unit YORK SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS GRILL GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29%2014 13:41:43 l Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check #. Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- Business Unit 385291 7/31/2014 133928 PREMIERE LAWN & SNOW LLC Continued... 275.00 CLEAN STREET @ 3412 60TH 348387 1928 1144.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REDEVELOPMENT REGULATION 275.00 385292 7/31/2014 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 480.80 TIRES 00006185 348158 CD1810062 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 421.75 BEDKNIFE 00006185 348159 CD1810117 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 902.55 385293 7/31/2014 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 463.25 BRUSH MOTOR REPAIR 348392 0055024 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 797.40 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 348393 0055062 -IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 1,260.65 385294 7/3112014 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING 949.43 HYDRANT USAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 348205 072214 5901.4626' SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 949.43 385295 7/31/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 372.00 REMOVE /INSTALL TOILET 00002072 348430 16739 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 372.00 385296 7131/2014 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 93.50 DIVING RINGS 00002222 348394 274291 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION ` 93.50 385297 7/3112014 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 ED120802 REFUND 348478 4812 LAKEVIEW 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS DR 2,500.00 ED125482 REFUND 348206 5225 HALIFAX 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 5,000.00 385298 7/31/2014 125936 REINDERS INC. 313.57 PRIMO 348160 3026959 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 499.18 SCIMITAR 00006193 348162 3027307 -00 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,059.00 FERTILIZER 00001458 348396 3027370 -00 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 183.26 FINALE HERBICIDE 00006193 348161 3122460 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,055.01 386299 7/31/2014 132051 RICHARD ALAN PRODUCTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary - 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledg6r - Account Description Business Unit 385299 7/31/2014 132051 RICHARD ALAN PRODUCTIONS Continued... . 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/12/14 348441 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE' 250.00 ;. 386300 7/31/2014 102408 .:RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 28.47 JACK 00005517 348395 1927555412 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS ` EOUIPMENT.APERATION GEN ' 28.47 386301 7131/2014, 101000 RJM.PRINTING INC. - 527.50. BUSINESS CARDS 348431 82184 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 527.50 385302 7/31/2014 134649 ROBARGE EXCAVATING 2,500.00 ED130479 REFUND 348207 5329 HALIFAX 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 385303- 7/31/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 593.00 SOFTENER SALT 348397 00301927 5511.6406` GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 593.00 385304 7/3112014 134648 RODMAN,.DIANA 85.00 ART CENTER CLASS REFUND 348208 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 85.00 386305 7/31/2014 113372 RONNING, TED 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/11/14 348440 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 385306 7131/2014 134616 RYNDERS, ANTONETTE 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348487 072814 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES: FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 385307 7/31/2014 126828 SABRE, HEATING& A/C 297.40 PERMIT REFUND 348479 ED132429 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS _ INSPECTIONS - - 297.40 _ 386308 7/31/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 29.91 •••• •••• ••'• •••9 350 348216 COPY PAPER 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 29.91 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386309 7/31/2014 129828 SAUNDERS; NATE Continued... - 14.30 ART WORK SOLD, 347995 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 14.30 385310 7/3112014 103278 SCHATTAUER, JIM 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/07/14 348438 072914 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 200.00 386311 7/31/2014 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 347996 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 33.80 385312 7/31/2014 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 78.11 K -9 TRAINING EXPENSES 348209 072114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 93.06 K -9 TRAINING EXPENSES 348209 072114 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 171.17 386313 7131/2014 100996 SEH 21.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES 348030 283493 01410.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,459.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 348030 283493 08060.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,209.84 ENGINEERING SERVICES 348030 283493 05502.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,065.63 RICHMOND HILLS PK IMPROV 348398 283642 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 8,756.60 386314 7/3112014 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 499.50 JULY 2014 PREMIUMS 348480 008816 -7/14 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 499.50 386315 7131/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA ' 84.50 ART WORK SOLD 347997 .071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 94.32 POTTERY SUPPLIES 347975 072114 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 178.82 386316 7/31/2014 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO: 79.67 PAINT, ROLLERS, TAPE 00005346 348163 3291 -5 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.67 386317 7/31/2014 119909 SHERWIN•WILLIAMS CO. 155.71 PAINT 348031 5726 -0 - 5761.6532 PAINT 155.71 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 29 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING WM -502 RAW WATER WELL15 TO WTP RICHMOND HILLS PK EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT STREET LIGHTING, ORNAMENTAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA'• 386320 7/31/2014 132195. SMALL LOT MN_ Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1,296.50 348246 719 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 385318 7/3112014 104098 "SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 385321 .7/31/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE'AND.SPIRITS 51,311.00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE RENEWAL 348432 1302199129 1554.6160 432.00 MS OFFICE 365 00004328 348165 B02203145 1554.6160 1182217 1,555.00 MS TRUEUP 2014 348164 B02231048 1554.6160 748.39 53,298.00 1182218 5822.5512 - 385319 7131/2014 50TH ST SELLING 131946' SIMPSON, CANDICE 348227 ' 4.88 ART WORK SOLD . 347998 071414 5101.4413 Subledger Account Description,.. Continued... DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING ART WORK SOLD 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 30 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER REVENUES 4.88 386320 7/31/2014 132195. SMALL LOT MN_ 1,296.50 348246 719 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,296.50 385321 .7/31/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE'AND.SPIRITS .75 348288 1182217 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS;SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 748.39 348073 1182218 5822.5512 ".COST OF GOODSSOLD LIQUOR' 50TH ST SELLING 3,688.35 348227 1182219 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' 50TH ST SELLING 21,622.88 348077 1182224 5842.5512 Cost, OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING' 663.88 348076 1183527 .5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .,YORK SELLING •75 348075 1183528 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.50 348256 1183529 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 147.75 348074 1183530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.50 348226 1183999 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.13 348251 1184000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.75 348254 1184001 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 247.51 348523 1184563 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,524.63 348247 1184564 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,354.57 348248 1184565. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,406.06 348250 1184566 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 80.75 348249 1184567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,368.45 348252 1184568 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.00 348253 1184569 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,775.18 348255 1184570 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50,009.78 386322 7/31/2014 .110977 SOW, ADAMA 68.25 ART WORK SOLD 68.25 385323 7/31/2014. 102698 SPOONER,ANNE 347999 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 385326 7131/2014 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 129409 STEEN, BARB 7/31/2014 — 7/3112014 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385323 .7/31/2014 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 5101.4413 Continued... 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 348000 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 348400 13.00 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 385324 7/31/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 408.63 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page- 31 Business Unity ART CENTER REVENUES' 74.22 FITTINGS- 00001523 348399 S2938694.001 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 74.22 385325 7/31/2014 133068. STEEL TOE'BREWING LLC 126.00 348525 3465 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.75 348524 3466 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES RANGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL " - MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 331.75 385326 7131/2014 129409 STEEN, BARB 82.23 ART WORK SOLD 348001 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 326.40 ART WORK SOLD 348400 072114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 408.63 385327, 7/3112014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 5:36 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 348401 072514 5424.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 118.06 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT. 348401 072514 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES- 123.42 386328 7/3112014 127620 STREETER' &ASSOCIATES 2,500.00 ED124160 REFUND 348481 5612 CONCORD 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT AVE 2,500.00 385329 7/31/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 2,341.30 TIRES 00005489 348403 10126717 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES ;.2,341.30 385330 7/3112014 134546 SUNBERG, JEFFREY 1,209.75 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 348211 072214 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,209.75 386331 7/31/2014 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 766.77 FUNGICIDE 00006184 348166 10183 5422.6545 CHEMICALS .766.77 " 386332 7/31/2014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES RANGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL " - MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/31/2014 - 7/3112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385332 713112014 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. Continued... 375.00 MOVIE RENTAL 348405 D81948265 5760.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER 174.00 MOVIE RENTAL 348404 RG1945736 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 549.00 386333 7/3112014 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 348002 071414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 3.25 385334 7/31/2014 120325 TCC MATERIALS 326.00 MORTAR 00001434 348167 0000661300 5932.6520 CONCRETE 12.00- CREDIT 348168 0000661657 5932.6520 CONCRETE 314.00 385336 7/31/2014 121253 THAYER, LARRY 156.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 348406 072514 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 156.80 386336 7/31/2014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 150.00 348526 00772077 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 670.00 348527 835043 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 165.65 348289 836984 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,208.25 348290 836985 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 548.00 348528 837324 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,741.90 385337 7/3112014 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 720.00 FACILITY USAGE 348482 8444484 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS 720.00 385338 7/3112014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 2,960.00 ELEVATOR SERVICE 348169 6000079591 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,960.00 385339 7/3112014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 341.25 LAMP, MOULDING 00005416 348407 4076680 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 341.25 386340 7/31/2014 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 610.20 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 348032 002014001944 10098.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 610.20 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 348032 002014001944 10099.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 32 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER WEED MOWING CLUB HOUSE GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB BR9 GUS YOUNG BRIDGE REHAB R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385340 7/31/2014 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS " Continued... 1,220.40 386341 7/31/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 43.87 FEED ROLL KIT 348408 10032645 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 28.58 OXYGEN TANK 00001428 348170 10033471 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 236.87 PROPANE FUEL GAS 00005449 348409 10033613 1553.6581 GASOLINE 309.32 385342 7/31/2014 124364 TOLONEN, LORI 289.00 ART CLASS REFUND 348483 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 289.00 385343 7/31/2014 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 534.49 CYLINDER ASSEMBLY 00005513 348410 LC00025076 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 534.49 385344 7/31/2014 123682 TSCHOSICK, RON 213.44 DRAINTILE 348172 072114 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.44 385345 7/31/2014 106243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 4,769.00 50TH STORE REMODEL 348171 214032A -3 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,769.00 385346 7/31/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 720.00 SEED 00006196 348173 32886 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 720.00 385347 7/31/2014 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 5,360.00 STORE SIGNAGE - 50% DOWN 348434 VERNON LIQUOR 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,810.00 STORE SIGNAGE - 50% DOWN 00004404 348433 YORK LIQUOR 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11,170.00 • 385348 ,7131/2014 100060 USPS 4,000.00 ACCT #03620836 348033 071614 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 385349 7131/2014 100050 USPS 1,000.00 ACCOUNT # TMS 202739 348435 072314 1400.6235 POSTAGE 1,000.00 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 33 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/31/2014 - 7131/2014 Check # Date_ Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385349_ .7/31/2014 100050 USPS Contlnued... 386350'7/31/2014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 849.94 CUPS, LIDS; TOWLS, TISSUE 348411 317429 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES -GRILL 30.95 ANTIBACTERIAL WIPES, CUPS 348412 317429 -01 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 532.80 CAN.LINERS 00001460 348413 317840 -00 1645.6182 'RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 1,413.69 385351 7/31/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 70500`; '.CART RENTAL ,' 00006322 348414 627140002 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 127.91 ' BRAKE'DRUM ASSEMBLY 00006191 348174 709140044 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS ,. 832.91 ' 385352 7/31/2014 134611'• VEZMAR, SOHPIA 123.00 ART, CLASS REFUND 348484 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 123.00 385353; 7/31/2614 119454 VINOCOPIA 182.50 348078 0102729 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' 50TH ST SELLING 106.50 348079 0102730 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.00 348529 0103217 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 309.50 346530 0103218 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 683.50 - 386364 7/31/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 163.50 348080 62364 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 163.50 385356 7/31/2014 134609 WAGENER, LORI 110.00 JR GOLF PROGRAM REFUND 348485 REFUND 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 110.00 385356 7/31/2014 103688 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 36.30 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL" YORK FIRE STATION 67.34 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 77.34 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 199.96 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 236.34 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 294.32 - 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 394.50 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 406.70 ; _.. - 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 L06IS101 Check # Date 385356 7/31/2014 CITY OF tDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7131/2014 - 7131/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 406.70 348034 5767- 2808 -3 1552.6182 47.34 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 5111.6182 55.34 348034 5767- 2808 -3 5210.6182 240.40 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 5311.6182 110.46 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 5430.6182 257.25 348034 5767- 2808 -3 5420.6182 321.93 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 5422.6182 613.49 348034 5767 - 2808 -3 5511.6182 945.81 348034 5767- 2808 -3 5720.6182 55.34 348034 5767- 2808 -3 5861.6182 127.42 348034 5767- 2808 -3 5841.6182 4,894.28 385357 7/31/2014 303.20 403.00 706.20 385358 7/31/2014 350.00 350.00 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. LOCATE MAIN BREAK 00001975 348175 5225 LEAK SURVEY 00001975 348176 5240 132064 WINDFELDT,STEPHANIE GRANDVIEW SO VIRTUALTOUR 348035 072114 386359 7/31/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 302.30 1,576.75 1,338.40 3,217.45 348081 366678 -00 348258 367388 -00 348257 367392 -00 5913:6180 5913.6180 1130.6124 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description . Continued... RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH. REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS WEB DEVELOPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/29%2014 13:41:43 Page - 35 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM POOL OPERATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COMMUNICATIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 385360 7/31/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 271.48 348083 511402 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,500.34 348082 511405 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 330.32 348291 512331 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 327.48 348532 512332 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,785.40 348531 512335 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,950.40, 348292 512336 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 178.32- 348084 66032 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 699.48- 348085 66045 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 193.16 - 348086 .66046 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,094.46 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 385361 7/31/2014 130471 IIINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 3,730.58 MERIDIAN 3,730.58 CITY OF EDINA - Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 7/31/2014 - 7131/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 348177 59557627 5422.6545 Subledger Account Description Continued... CHEMICALS 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page - 36 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 385363 7/31/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,800.22 348087 1080204278 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 533.75 348228 1080204279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 50TH ST SELLING 808.15 348229 1080204280 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' 50TH ST SELLING 482.41 348265 1080206920 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR: VERNON SELLING 2,920.48. 348263 1080206921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD 'WINE VERNON SELLING " 5,467.66 348264 1080206922 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.15 348266 1080206923 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 986.67 348533 1080206924 5822.5512 COST,OF GOODS SOL76;LI000R 50TH ST SELLING 1,400.70 348293 1080206925 5822.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.88 348261 1080206926 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,566.23 348262 1080206927 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOWi YORK SELLING 1,434.15 348259 1080206928 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD`\NINE YORK SELLING 1,303.41 348260 1080206929 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 239.65- 348230 2080042834 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 30.00- 348534 2080044539 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING _ 44.00- 348294 2080048725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE VERNON SELLING 84.00- 348296 2080048728 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 92.00- 348295 2080048753 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29.50- 348536 2080048772 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 348537 2080048787 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR.. 50TH ST SELLING 6.00- 348538 2080048805 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33.72- 348535 2080048930 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 29,344.99 385364 7/3112014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 166.20 348545 1090258653 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE - 2,334.25 348091 1090258777 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 838.00 348090 1090256778 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2.927.70 348089 1090258779 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING :. 130.50 348088 1090258780 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,544.75 348093 1090258881 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 216.00 348092 1090258882 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 542.00 348543 1090258883 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5.00 348544 1090258884 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL - 3,564.45 348231 1090260016 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 653.40 348232 1090260017 5842.5514 COST OF., GOODS SOLD BEER ; -' YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,518.75 CITY OF EDINA 348037 3909 900.00 MOVIE MAKER 348038 Council Check Register by GL 2,418.75 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 533.16 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348417 7131/2014 — 7/31/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 385364 7/31/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 43.00 348233 1090260018 5842.5515 4,724.35 348541 1090262715 5862.5514 361.50 348540 1090262716 5862.5514 153.10 348539 1090262717 5862.5515 3,556.64 348542 1090262720 5842.5514 22,760.84 385365 7/31/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 58.00 51- 5276505 -8 348036 419842873 1330.6185 51.26 51- 4420190 -3 348436 420549143 1551.6185 12,610.51 51- 6644819 -9 348437 421067474 5720.6185 12,719.77 385366 7/31/2014 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,518.75 ANIMATION, GAME DESIGN 348037 3909 900.00 MOVIE MAKER 348038 3933 2,418.75 385367 7/31/2014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 533.16 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348417 SW140139433 316.81 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 348418 SW140139482 849.97 1,016,472.40 Grand Total 5125.6103 5125.6103 1553.6180 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS Payment Instrument Totals Checks 987,557.40 A/PACH Payment 28,915.00 Total Payments 1,016,472.40 7/29/2014 13:41:43 Page- 37 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MEDIA STU DIO MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 530,935.52 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 1,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 15,013.17 05100 ART CENTER FUND 9,921.52 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 475.48 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,032.70 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 34,008.76 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,224.40 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 17,755.39 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,470.51 05800 LIQUOR FUND 267,850.08 05900 UTILITY FUND 73,589.98 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 32,333.35 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 104.11 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 25.00 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 1,800.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 11,932.43 Report Totals 1,016,472.40 CITY OF EDINA 7/29/2014 13:41:58 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/31/2014 - 7/31/2014 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies qnd Account Name Date * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/05/28 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/06/12 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/06/20 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/06/20 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2014/06/04 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/05/28 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/05/28 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/02 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/03 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/05 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/10 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/12 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/14 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/16 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014106/16 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/18 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/19 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/23 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/05/27 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/06/01 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/06/03 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC-2014 /06/03 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC-2014 /06/03 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC-2014/06/12 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014/06/13 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014 /06/10 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/06/17 * *9159 CARY TEAGUE 2014/06/06 * *9159 CARY TEAGUE 2014/06/20 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/06/02 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/06/02 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/06/02 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014106/02 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/05/28 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Amount Description $101.91 FLSA guide $395.00 Job posting $150.00 Conference $150.00 Conference $595.00 Registration $90.68 Food $38.31 Food $34.16 Food $107.22 Keyboard cover $34.16 Food $25.92 Food $33.89 Food $94.52 Data plan $51.04 Food $26.72 Food $166.60 Food $49.17 Food $173.75 Food $32.00 Software $14.84 Binders ($205.00) Refund $203.55 Food $7.10 Software $190.28 Food $216.99 Food ($126.12) Refund $13.75 Food $45.00 Seminar $58.54 Food $59.95 Transaction fees -UB $19.95 Transaction fees -UB $19.95 Transaction fees $18.25 Transaction fees $1,137.66 Hotels Merchant City State PAYPAL *LIEBERTCASS 402 - 935 -7732 CA AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK 8164726100 MO CRAGUNS LODGE AND G(BRAINERD MN CRAGUNS LODGE AND G(BRAINERD MN ICA - USA 773 - 7696363 IL GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN APPLE STORE #R054 EDINA MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN EDEN AVENUE GRILL EDINA MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS ROJO MEXICAN GRILL EDINA MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN PINSTRIPES EDINA MN THE 50TH STREET CAFE MINNEAPOLI MN PINSTRIPES EDINA MN VOLGISTICS INC 616 - 456 -538E MI TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN ACT *GTS EDUCATIONAL 1877-551-556C CA PINSTRIPES EDINA MN VOLGISTICS INC 616 - 456 -538E MI PINSTRIPES EDINA MN BYERLY'S ST LOUIS PA MN GRAND VIEW LODGE & TE NISSWA MN BYERLY'S ST LOUIS PA MN MINNESOTA EROSION CC 320 - 685 -5444 MN EDINA GRILL EDINA MN PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -977C TX PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -977C TX PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -977C TX PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -977C TX HILTON HOTELS MILWAUKEE WI Account 1170.6405 1556.6121 1170.6104 1170.6104 1120.6104 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6406 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6188 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6160 1120.6406 1120.6104 1120.6106 1120.6160 1120.6106 1120.6106 1120.6104 1120.6106 1140.6104 1140.6106 5902.6155 5902.6155 1160.6155 1160.6155 1185.6104 G: \Purchasing cards \2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 7/22/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/05/30 $5.50 Parking GOVERNMENT CENTER P MINNEAPOLI MN 1180.6106 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/05128 $140.00 Shopping center mtg MINNESOTA SHOPPING C MSCA -ONLIN MN 1190.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/06/03 $117.00 MILS access fee REALTOR ASSOCIATION /P 312 - 329 -824E IL 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/06/04 $85.00 Workshop MINNESOTA ASSOC OF A:763- 569 -3357 MN 1190.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/06/17 $645.00 ASA dues AMERICAN SOCIETY OF A 703- 478 -222E VA 1190.6105 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2014/05/30 $42.85 Stretch wrap MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5939.6406 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2014/06/09 $785.35 Registration AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK 816 - 472 -610C MO 1281.6104 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/03 $6.50 Shipping USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLI MN 1260.6406 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/05 $86.91 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1260.6406 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/06 $80.45 Charger TRAFFIC DATA INC 952 - 9260916 MN 1262.6406 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/12 $189.77 Drains PAYPAL *CONNIEWHITM 402 - 935 -7732 CA 1263.6104 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/13 $12.96 Shipping USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLI MN 01377.1705.31 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/13 $36.04 Shipping USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLI MN 01412.1705.31 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/06/13 $115.00 Certification GISCI 847 - 824 -776E IL 1263.6105 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAVQ014 /05/30 $271.30 Propane SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1552.6406 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2014/06/09 $75.06 OTHER GANDER MOUNTAIN EDEN PRAIR MN 1553.6530 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2014/06/07 $299.93 Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 1301.6556 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2014/06/20 $213.48 Power tools MILLS FLEET FARM #2,40(OSSEO MN 1301.6556 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/06/04 $99.99 Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 5915.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/06/06 $63.42 Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 5915.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/06/10 $225.00 Disputed transaction STONES THROW RECOR( 323 - 259 -820C CA 5915.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/05/27 $154.12 Disputed transaction BLUE BANANA INTERNET LISKEARD 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/05/28 ($154.12) Disputed transaction BLUE BANANA INTERNET LISKEARD 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/05/29 $162.12 Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615 - 367 -8374 TN 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/05/30 $128.70 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5939.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/05/29 ($162.12) Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/10 ($100.00) Disputed transaction SP * TRAPLORD WWW.TRAPI NY 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/10 ($188.40) Disputed transaction MULTISAFEPAY AMSTERDAM 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/10 ($34.58) Disputed transaction GALIBARDY 44791351519 5923.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/19 $321.55 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5939.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/19 $107.11 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5939.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/19 $150.07 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5939.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/21 $567.00 Supplies HOMEDEPOT.COM 800 - 430 -337E CA 5913.6406 * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/05/29 $52.95 Testing supplies TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES 410 - 4724340 MD 1490.6406 G: \Purch 3 cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB P ising Card Register.xlsx /22/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description * *2929 DAVID NELSON . 2014/05/30 .$6.87 Food * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/10 $17.16 Food * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/18 $96.54 Hard drive * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/19 $84.50 Supplies * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/05/28 $154.50 Boots * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/05/28 $317.80 Hotels * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/07 $3.11 Ice * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/05 $399.00 Training * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/10 $449.91 Uniforms * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/10 $100.00 Certification * *8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2014/06/01 $107.85 Food * *8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2014/05/31 $252.49 Supplies * *8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2014/06/11 $93.00 Office supplies * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/09 $135.05 Textbook * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/16. $21.72 Training supplies * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/18 $63.76 Training supplies * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/19 $11.14 Training supplies * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/23 $153.22 Books * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/05/26 $20.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/05/27 $40.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/06 $893.24 Refrigerator * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/13 $40.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/18 $99.99 Shoes * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/20 $20.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/24 $20.00 Data plan * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014/05/28 $46.95 Labels * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014106116 $499.76 Copy supplies * *4619 TIM BARNES 2014/05/28 $110.41 Cleaning supplies * *4619 TIM BARNES 2014/06/17 $6.49 Shipping * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/05/28 $371.00 Parts * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/05/31 $293.05 Parts * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/02 $128.73 Car detail * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/04 $90.17 Parts * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/09 $53.62 Supplies Merchant City State Account JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6406 JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6406 MICRO CENTER #045 RET ST LOUIS PA MN 1400.6160 IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIP; 201 - 3438004 NJ 1490.6406 LOWA BOOTS LLC 203 - 353 -011E CT 1400.6203 CLARION SUITES MADISON WI 1400.6104 JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 APCO INTERNATIONAL IN 386- 9442422 FL 2310.6104 L A POLICE GEAR INC LAPOLICEGE CA 1419.6203 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF 1800-9606236 UT 2310.6104 DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN '1470.6106 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT: AMZN.COM /E WA 1470.6406 TRAINERS WAREHOUSE 508 - 653 -377C MA 1470.6406 NORTH HENN COMM CLG MINNEAPOLI MN 1470.6104 THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN 1470.6104 CVS #5788 EDINA MN 1470.6104 THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN 1470.6104 AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /E WA 1470.6405 VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -68A4 CA 1470.6188 WARNERS' STELLIAN ED 6512220011 MN 1470.6406 VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMP 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 CHAMPS SPORTS 800 - 8262205 WI 1470.6558 VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 BMK SOLUTIONS CORP 952 - 7463195 MN 1495.6406 CANON SOLUTIONS AMEF 773 - 714 -850C IL 1495.6406 EKCOS INNOVATIONS 925 - 371 -1277 CA 1552.6406 USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLI MN 47078.6710 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 651- 636 -034C MN 1553.6530 NPC *NEW PIG CORP 800 - 468 -4647 PA 1553.6530 MISTER CAR WASH #606 SAINT LOUI. MN 1553.6585 NPC *NEW PIG CORP 800 - 468 -4647 PA 1553.6585 MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 1553.6585 GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 7/22/2014 Account Name Date * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/19 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/05/29 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/05/31 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/02 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/04 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/06 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/12 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/24 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/24 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/24 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/05/29 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/05/29 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/03 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/05 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/07 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/10 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/09 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/18 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06117 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/06/09 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/06/22 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/05/28 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/06114 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/06/17 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/06/21 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/06/25 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2014/05/31 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2014/05/31 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2014/06/06 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2014/06/09 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2014/06/17 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/03 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014 /06/05 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/06 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Amount Description Merchant City State Account $42.90 Sandbag ties MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5939.6406 $7.67 Cabinet key locks AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT; AMZN.COM /E WA 1554.6406 $180.51 Cabinet key locks AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /E WA 1554.6406 $99.90 Screen lock software FS *E- MOTIONAL 877 - 3278914 CA 1554.6160 $79.99 iPad cover for PW AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /E WA 1260.6406 $20.00 Data plan - Gilgenbach VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 $34.06 Cables MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 1554.6406 $79.90 iPad cases for Inspection: AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /E WA 1495.6406 $112.00 iPad cases for Inspection: AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT :AMZN.COM /E WA 1495.6406 $187.96 HD spares AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /E WA 1554.6406 $112.16 Clothing TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5720.5510 $26.98 Cork board TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5310.6406 $65.77 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5320.6406 $43.22 Supplies TARGET 00013565 MINNETONK MN 5320.6406 $16.72 Supplies TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS P/ MN 5311.6406 $24.81 Supplies TARGET 00013565 MINNETONK MN 5311.6406 $29.80 Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5311.6406 $22.90 Food YOYO DONUTS, MINNETONK MN 5310.6406 $26.80 Labels OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5310.6513 $56.81 Food SAVOY PIZZA - EDINA MINNEAPOLI MN 1600.6106 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1600.6188 $335.56 Microwave HOCKENBERGS FOODSEI OMAHA NE 1628.6406 $213.48 Grill THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PA MN 1628.6406 ($21.35) Grill discount THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PA MN 1628.6406 $58.99 Propane SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1628.6406 $30.57 Pickleball AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT :AMZN.COM /EWA 1628.6406 $49.08 Food JIMMY JOHN'S # 829 - M 952 - 2298400 MN 1621.6406 $77.77 Food DOMINO'S 1927 320 - 235 -8277 MN 1623.6406 $94.21 Supplies BACHMAN'S INC #1 MINNEAPOLI MN 47080.6710 $159.98 Tennis roller UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC EDINA MN 1623.6406 $1,258.00 Gym rental EDINA COMMUNITY EDUC 952 - 8483947 MN 1621.6406 $436.63 Supplies S &S WORLDWIDE 800 - 9373482 CT 1624.6406 $25.62 Supplies JO -ANN ETC #2026 EDINA MN 1624.6406 $384.60 Owl pellets BIO COMPANY INC BIOLOGYPRI MN 1624.6406 GAPurch I cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Pi asing Card Register.xlsx 122/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City.: State Account * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/10 $24.95 Popcorn :,AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT: AMZN.COM /E WA 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/11 $61.50 Craft supplies TARGET 00023.135 EDINA.- MN 1624:6406 * *6032 . KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014 /06/11 $331.84 Dye kit TRIARCO MAIL ORDER 800- 328 -336C MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/10 $152.24 Craft supplies S &S WORLDWIDE 800= 9373482 CT - 1624.6406 * *6032. KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/12 $339.12 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN, 1624.6406 * *6032' KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/11 $38.28 Supplies CONTAINERSTOREMINNE EDINA MN 1624:6406, * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014 /06/13 $81.26. Supplies ORIENTAL TRADING CO, 800- 228 -047'E NE 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/13 $129.91 Supplies S &S WORLDWIDE 800 - 9373482 CT 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/18 $49.25 Supplies TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS P/ MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOL 2014/06/19 $330.00 Program LARIAT LANES RICHFIELD- MN 1624.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/06/10 $216.24 Flowers SUN NYSIDE.-GARDENS MINNEAPOLI MN 1643.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/06/19 $374.47 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 5939.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/06/18 $392.04 Safety handbook UNITED RENTALS SAVAGE MN 1646.6610 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE.2014/05/27 $8.99 Slider track JERRY'S 'DO IT BEST HAR EDINA MN 1130.6410 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/,05/28 $95.74 -AP stylebooks AP BOOKSTORE.COM 800 - 3536798, CA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/05/29 $19.99 Stock photography ISTOCK *INTERNATIONAL 866- 478 - 6251 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/05/30 $250.00 Google search GOOGLE *SITE SEARCH GOOGLE.COCA 1130.6124 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014%05/31 $23.16 Facebook ad FACEBK *VSB8V56532 WWW.FB.ME CA 1627.6103 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/02 $65.00 Emmy entry PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402 - 935 -7732 CA 1130.6104 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/02 $175.00 Emmy entry PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402 - 935 -7732 CA 1130.6104 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014106/02 $55.00 Emmy entry PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402 - 935 -7732 CA 1130.6104 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/02 $50.00 Membership PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402 - 935-7732 CA 1130.6105 *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/02 $65.00 Emmy entry PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402- 935 -7732 CA 1130.6104 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/03 $10.72 Photoshop software ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800- 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/03 $11.96 News subscription THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRC 612 - 6734343 MN 1130.6105 * *2293 JENNIFER.BENNE 2014/06/05 $20.00 iPad data - Bennerotte VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOR 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.61.60 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/05 $20.00 iPad data - Martin VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/05 $53.63 Software - Denfeld ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/06 $53.63 Software - Denfeld ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/11 $35.28 Sign frames TARGET 00000059 BLOOMINGT MN 44012.1705.20 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/11 $35.28 Sign frames TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 44012.1 705.20 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/11 $20.00 iPad data - Denfeld VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP, 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/11 $502.05 OFFICE SERVICES GOTOCITRIX.COM 855- 837 -1750 CA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/12 $275.00 3CMA - Gilgenbach PAYPAL *3CMA 402- 935 -7732 CA 1130.6104 GAPurchasing cards \2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 7/22/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/12 $32.10 July 4 parade supplies MICHAELS STORES 3739 BLOOMINGT MN 1132.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/12 $32.17 Software - Bisek ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/14 $32.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/18 $29.95 Online invoicing 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS 416- 481 -694E ON 1130.6103 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/18 $5.00 Spam blocker AKSMT.COM 877 - 273 -3045 CA 1130.6124 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/22 $20.00 iPad data - Swenson VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOR 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1100.6160 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/05/28 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOR 888 - 294 -6804 CA 5440.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/05/27 $130.02 Glow golf balls THE GLOW STORE VICTORIA BC 5424.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/05/29 $12.38 Shipping THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 5440.6122 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/15 $7.50 Weather app APL *APPLE [TUNES STOR 866- 712 -7752 CA 5410.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/17 $2.13 Keys JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5410.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/19 $225.00 Membership ASSOCIATION OF GOLF N 602 - 6048250 AZ 5440.6106 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/23 $995.00 Audio equipment CAM /AUDIOWAREHOUSEi 914 - 347 -320C NY 5410.6406 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2014/06/02 $141.95 Elevator phone ABC CONFERENCING 216- 759 -145E OH 5511.6406 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2014/06/11 $225.00 STAR membership SERVING THE AMERICAN 719 - 5381149 CO 5510.6105 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2014/06/19 $1,562.88 Class registration US FIGURE SKATING 719-635-520C CO 5510.4607 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2014/06/23 $42.94 Markers for class OFFICESUPPLY.COM 866- 302 -5397 WI 5510.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/05/30 $105.62 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/05/31 $436.61 Craft supplies DBC *BLICK ART MATERIA 800 - 447 -1892 IL 5110.6564 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/02 $26.13 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/03 $13.50 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/02 $202.22 Craft supplies BLICK ART 800 - 447 -1892 EDINA MN 5110.6564 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/05 $500.00 Advertising KBEM FM MINNEAPOLIS 612- 668 -173E MN 5110.6122 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/17 $95.40 Supplies HIRSHFIELDS /SOUTHDALI EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/05/31 $85.29 Vacuum bags JOHNSTONS SALES AND: RICHFIELD MN 5421.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/05/30 $19.94 Calendar WE CARD 800 - 9343968 IA 5424.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/04 $181.50 Supplies FOCUSEDTECH 941 - 926 -0624 FL 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/05 $174.60 Wine EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/09 $519.00 Wine EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06109 $172.25 Wine EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/12 $59.30 Batteries TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/18 $215.00 Beer & wine EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/18 $18.50 Beer & wine EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5514 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/22 $10.72 Glassware BED BATH & BEYOND #16: BLOOMINGT MN 5410.6406 GAPurch I cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Pi '3sing Card Register.xlsx '22/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2014/06/02 $30.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOR 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1600.6188 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/06/01 $53.64 Food LITTLE CAESARS 1456 00' RICHFIELD MN 5310.6406 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/05/30 $530.20 Mask kit WATERSAFETY 800 - 987 -723E FL 5310.6610 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/05/31 $818.85 Lifeguard supplies THE LIFEGUARD STORE II 309 - 451 -585E IL 5310.6610 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA' 2014/06/03 $33.74 Postage PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014 /06/04 $126.00 Safety video JEFF. ELLIS &ASSOCIATE: 800-742-872C TX 5310.6610 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/06/09 $83.10 Hats THE LIFEGUARD STORE 11309- 45.1 -585E IL 5311.6201 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA' 2014/06/14 $28.40 Rescue tubes THE -LIFEGUARD STORE II 309 - 451 -585E IL 5310.6513 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/06/22 $71.50 Supplies TARGET 00020461 WEST ST PA MN 5720:5510 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/05/27 $40.38 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5760.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/05/27 $61.49 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/05/30 $106.41 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/05/30 $7.37 Keys . JOHNSON HARDWARE BLOOMINGT MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/03 $217.27 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014106/04 $215.50 Movies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5760.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/06 $9.30 Supplies FASTENAL COMPANY01 BLOOMINGT MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/06 $55.76 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *01.16 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/09 $61.17 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/10 $173.18 Equipment A -Z RENTAL CENTER EDEN PRAIR MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/11 ($5.00) Equipment A- Z.RENTAL CENTER EDEN PRAIR MN' 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/11 $16.08 Supplies GANDER MOUNTAIN ED EN- PRAIR MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/11 $101.31 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/11 $320.87 Signs DIRT CHEAP SIGNS 512 - 2677446 TX 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/12 $56.04 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN' -5761.6406 "' *01.16 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/13 $233.48 Supplies MENARDS 3297. RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/16 $3.92 Adapter AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT:AMZN.COM /E WA 5760.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/17 $36.89 Parts JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5761.6530 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/17 $79.98 Cords AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT:AMZN.COM /E WA 5760.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/17 $90.00 Licenses MN DVS SOUTHDALE 152 EDINA MN, 5760.6105 *`0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/17 $2.20 Licenses MN DVS SOUTHDALE1526 KNOXVILLE TN 5760.6105 * *0116 TOM-SHIRLEY 2014/06/18 $92.07 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT.BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/23 $269.96 Hedge trimmer JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/06/23 $26.02 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0093. STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /05/28 $9.20 Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5821.6406 GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Purchasing Card,Register.xlsx 7/22/2014 Account Name Date * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /05/28 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /05/28 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSA12014 /05/29 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06102 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/09 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/09 * *0093- STEVEN GRAUSAI'2014 /06/09 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/09 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSA12014 /06/10 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/10 *"0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/11 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/19 * *0093 - STEVEN GRAUSA1 201 4 /06/1 9 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/19 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /06/19 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/05/29 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/05/29 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/06/02 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/06/04 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/06/06 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/06/11 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/05/27 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/01 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/04 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/07 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/19 i' *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/23 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/01 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS `2014/06/11 * *0025- GERALD KOPLOS, 2014/06/11 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/17 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/17 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/18 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/20 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Amount Description $9.20 Supplies $9.21 Supplies $22.49 _Supplies $75.09 Parking $30.00 -- Training - $30.00 Training $30.00 Training $8.94 Supplies $51.56 Supplies $75.09 Parking $9.31 Supplies $11.00 Supplies $8.00 Supplies $82.25 Supplies $10.00 Supplies $53.63 Supplies $102.39 Supplies $61.41 Supplies $10.50 Supplies $92.17 WHOLESALE TRADE $12.46 Supplies $223.91 Uniforms $98.94 Email service $23.47 Advertising $113.50 Targets $13.57 _Personal - repaid $60.47 Name tags $80.43 Ammo $26.78 Cleaning supplies $7.23 Supplies $47.12 Supplies $8.55 Cleaning supplies $87.87 Supplies $22.46 Supplies Merchant City State OFFICE MAX EDINA MN OFFICE MAX,.. EDINA MN. OFFICE MAX EDINA MN CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIC EDINA MN MLBA 651-772-091 C MN MLBA 651- 772 -091 C MN' MLBA 651- 772 -091 C MN -' JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EiDINA- ;- MN TARGET - 00000059 BLOOMINGT MN CITY OF EDINXRECEPTIC-EDINA MN MICRO CENTER #045 RET ST LOUIS PA MN ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800-295-551 C I L ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800- 295- 551CIL ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800- 295- 551CIL ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800- 295 =551C IL SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIR MN THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN JERRY'S DO.IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN JERRY'S-DO.IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN .-COM /E WA EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARKE 800- 5954401 TN GOGGLE *ADWS51076688 CC @GOOGL CA CHAMPIONS CHOICE INC 615- 7934066•TN TARGET 00023002 RICHFIELD MN QUICKNAMETAGS 866- 2001234 MI GANDER MOUNTAIN EDEN PRAIR MN MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIR MN THE HOME.DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIR MN TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIR MN Account 584.1.6406 586,1:6406 5841.6406 5820.6260 5822:6406 5842.6406 5862.6406 5861.6406 5820.6513 5820.6260 5840.6513 5842.6406 5841.6406 .5821.6406 5861.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7414.6406 7410.6122 7410.6122 7414.6406 741.1.6406 7414.6406 7414.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 7411.6406 GAPurch, I cards\2014 `purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Pi -sing Card Register.xlsx '22/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 5/27/14- 06/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant $34,604.26 City State Account We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pq)lciep and procedures -date. f GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 7/22/2014 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kaylin Martin, Senior Communications Coordinator Date: Aug. 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase -- About Town Paper Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: July 15 -22, 2014 Company: C.J. Duffey Paper Co. Anchor Paper Recommended Quote or Bid: C.J. Duffey Paper Co. .C�g1�,lrL, ow e • ,�C�RPORA�F'O • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV.C. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $35,049.00 $35,215.04 General Information: To achieve cost savings and to buy a custom -sized sheet that will result in less paper waste, the Communications & Technology Services Department accepted estimates for paper for the next four issues of About Town. The estimated annual savings by purchasing in bulk is estimated to' be nearly 10 percent. Each paper vendor provided an estimate for a Lynx brand paper. Having standardized the magazine at 54 pages, the City will need 506,000 sheets of text - weight paper and 40,000 sheets of cover - weight paper for the next four issues. However, the minimum quantity of cover - weight paper cut to a custom size is now 50,000 sheets. The City has purchased the paper in bulk since 2010. Two estimates were received this year. (Unisource and XPEDX did not submit bids for About Town paper.) The Communications & Technology Services Department recommends, then, that the City purchase the same paper as used in the past (Lynx text and cover) for $35,049 from C.J. Duffey Paper Co. The City has purchased the magazine's paper from C.J. Duffey Paper Co. in the past. Pricing includes the cost of C.J. Duffey Paper Co. storing the paper for the City, with quarterly deliveries to the magazine's printer. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 w9� o fell' Action Requested: Motion approving new an On -Sale Wine & Beer Liquor Licenses for Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina, 7171 France Avenue, for the period beginning August 5, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015. Information / Background: tsi )00 Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina applied for new wine and beer liquor licenses for the restaurant located .in the new Byerly's being_ built at 7171 France Avenue. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for fhe; licenses. The, Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. I have attached Sgt. Draper's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. NCoAPOR 1888 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: New On -Sale Wine and Beer Licenses, Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina, 7171 France Avenue Action Requested: Motion approving new an On -Sale Wine & Beer Liquor Licenses for Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina, 7171 France Avenue, for the period beginning August 5, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015. Information / Background: tsi )00 Byerly's Inc. dba Byerly's Edina applied for new wine and beer liquor licenses for the restaurant located .in the new Byerly's being_ built at 7171 France Avenue. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for fhe; licenses. The, Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. I have attached Sgt. Draper's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. • BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE Establishment: Byerly's, Inc. dba: Byerly's Edina License: On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor July 2014, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The application was submitted by Byerly's, Inc. dba: Byerly's Edina at 7171 France Avenue South, Edina, MN 55435. Byerly's Inc. is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Byerly's Inc. is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary .of State. Byerly's Inc. and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. I was informed that training for alcohol awareness will be conducted and that information will be provided by Karen Radcliff. Owners/Partners/Members: Byerly's, Inc. dba: Byerly's Edina. Russell Thomas Lund III Minnetrista, MN Von Paul Martin Chaska, MN The owners /partners /members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Byerly's, Inc. dba: Byerly's Edina, from obtaining an On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Lt. Tom Draper #150 Le y U) � � To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: IV.E. The Recommended Bid is From: Ann Kattreh ® Within Budget Parks & Recreation Director ❑ Not Within Budget Date: August 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Community Attitude and Interest Citizen Survey, ETC Institute Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 NA Company: Amount'of Quote or Bid: ETC Institute $23,650 plus expenses for two site visits Recommended Quote or Bid: ETC Institute General Information: The Park Board is in the process of completing a master plan for the park system and would like to include an updated Community Attitude and Interest Citizen Survey as part of the master planning process. Staff recommends hiring the ETC Institute as they successfully completed a similar study for the Parks & Recreation Department in 2006. In addition to the type of survey that was completed in 2006, this process will also include a Unmet Needs Analysis and will provide geocoding of surveys. The goal will be to receive 600 completed surveys, which will provide a 95% level of confidence with +/- 4% margin of error. The survey will be six pages long and will be mailed to a sample of homes. Ron Vine, ETC Institute Vice President will also make a presentation of findings at the completion of the project. The timeline for this project is as follows: August 11, 2014 Ron Vine site visit, including Park Board work sessions August 2014 Survey content preparation September 2014 Data collection October 2, 2014 Receive preliminary survey results Week of October 13 Final results presentation by Ron Vine City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER The timing and content of this survey will also assist the Park Board and City Council in providing an additional needs assessment tool for the repurposing of Fred Richards Golf Course. The Park Board will be asked to review and comment on the proposal at the October 6 Park Board meeting. The City Council is scheduled to receive a Fred Richards visioning proposal at the October 21 City Council meeting. This item will be paid for through the 2014 contingency budget. The project was not specifically budgeted. It was requested by the Park Board as part of the master planning process. The total project cost is expected to be $25,650. This includes two site visits at approximately $1,000 per visit. Attachments: ETC Scope of Services Proposal City of Edina = 4801 W. 501h St. a Edina, MN 55424 Scope of Services for Statistically Valid Survey In order to accomplish the objectives for this project, ETC Institute will conduct the following tasks. Task 1: Project Kick -off and Preparing the Survey Instrument Task 1.1: Design Survey Instrument. ETC Institute will work in partnership with City of Edina staff to develop the survey instrument. It is anticipated that 3 -4 drafts of the survey will be prepared before the survey is approved by the City of Edina for testing. The survey will be up to 6 pages in length (allowing for 24 -32 questions, many with multiple components) and takel0 -12 minutes to administer by phone. Task 1.1a: On -Site Meeting. Ron Vine will meet on -site for one (1) day with City officials to discuss survey issues, the visioning consultant, and tour the park system. Task 1.2: Design Sampling Plan. ETC Institute will prepare a sampling plan that will ensure the completion of at least 600 surveys of resident households in City of Edina. The overall results for 600 completed surveys will have a precision of at least +/ -4% at the 95% level of confidence. Task 1.3 Survey Methodology. ETC Institute will administer the mail, phone, and web all with in -house staff. ETC Institute recommends administering the survey by a combination of mail/phone/ and web. Task 1.4: Conduct Pilot Test. Once the draft survey is developed ETC Institute will test the survey with at least 10 residents before the survey is administered. Any problems or issues that are identified will be reported to the City and corrective action will be recommended and taken as appropriate. Task 2: Administering the Survey Instrument and Analysis Task 2.1: Mailing of Surveys. ETC Institute will design the sample so that a mail survey is first sent out by mail to a random sampling of over 3,000 residents of City of Edina, including a metered return envelope to ETC Institute/ETC Institute). The mail survey can also contain a message in the cover letter to non - English speaking households, i.e. Spanish, that will provide a 1 -800 phone number to call to have the survey administered over the phone in that language and the web address to those who want to take the survey by the web. Task 2.2: Web Survey. ETC Institute will develop a web version of the survey for those who want to take the survey over the web. Task 2.3: Electronic Message to Those Receiving the Survey. Two days prior to receiving the mailed survey, each resident household receiving a survey will receive an electronic voice message, informing them about the survey and encouraging them to complete the survey. Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 1 Task 2.4: Initiate phone calling. Approximately 14 days after the surveys are mailed out, extensive phone follow -up is conducted either to encourage completion of the mailed survey or to administer the survey by phone. This approach allows us to target specific demographic groups that may not have responded to the mailed survey to ensure that the demographic distribution of the sample closely compares to the actual composition of the community, by factors such as age, race, ethnicity, income, etc. ETC Institute will additionally use "weighting" as a statistical process in the analysis for further refinement of census comparisons. , Task 2.5: Quality Controls. ETC Institute has an ongoing quality control and quality assurance program in all surveys. The program is designed to give clients "error free" results, and all employees at ETC Institute are directly involved in the program. Dr. Elaine Tatham and Ron Vine, Project Manager directly manage the Quality Control program. Task 2.6: Analyze Data. Following the completion of the survey, ETC Institute will perform data entry, editing, and verification of the survey responses for each survey. In addition to performing cross - tabulations, the analysis tools that will be performed on the resident survey data are listed below. • Task 2.6 -A. Benchmarking Analysis (Normative Comparisons). ETC Institute maintains national and regional benchmarking data from citizen surveys for more than 400 park systems across the country. Comparisons will be made for the City of Edina survey with other national providers, similar size communities, and in comparison to the previous survey results. Task 2.6 -B. Importance -Unmet Needs Priorities Analysis. The Importance -Unmet Needs (I- U) Analysis is a tool that allows public officials to use survey data as a decision - making resource. The Importance -Unmet Needs analysis is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize overall investments by emphasizing improvements in those service categories where the level of unmet needs is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. • Task 2.6C. GIS Mapping. ETC Institute will prepare maps that show the results of specific questions on the survey by location of respondents. Task 3: Final Report and Presentation Task 3.1 Development of Final Report. ETC Institute will provide a final report. At a minimum, the final report will include the following: • an executive summary that includes a description of the survey methodology • descriptive statistics for each survey question, including key demographic characteristics • GIS maps and shape files that show key results on maps of City of Edina • benchmarking Analysis • results of the analysis tools including the I -U Analysis • copy of the survey instrument. • a copy of the database in SPSS or Microsoft Excel Task 3.2: Survey Presentation. ETC Institute will make a presentation of findings of the survey results to City officials and hold a workshop to discuss strategic ways to seamlessly integrate the findings into short and long range decision - making. Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 2 9 Project Schedule for the Needs Assessment Process Indicated below is a draft schedule for completion of the survey effort within 10 -11 weeks of notice to proceed. August S August 30, 2014 • Kick -off meeting on August 11, 2014to visit with City officials, Board, Visioning consultant and tour park system. • ETC Institute provides City examples of surveys for review • Sampling plan finalized • ETC Institute provides the City with a draft needs assessment survey • City provides cover letter • City staff review the content of the draft needs assessment survey and provide feedback to ETC Institute • ETC Institute revises the needs assessment survey based on input from staff • City approves the needs assessment survey instrument for testing • Pilot test conducted • Survey modified if needed and approved for printing (no later than August 20) September 1- September 30, 2014 • Survey instrument mailed out • Web -survey on -line • Press releases issued • Data collection begins for needs assessment survey • Phone calling initiated • Draft report prepared and sent to City • Discussion held on draft report Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 3 October 1- October 21, 2014 • Draft report prepared and sent to City • Discussion held on draft report by phone on October 2, 2014 • Data collection is completed for needs assessment survey a Discuss changes to draft report • Final Report delivered by October 13, 2014 • On site visit to conduct formal presentations and workshop the week of October 13, 2014 Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 4 Ii) rSe"ices to Admini. Responsibilities of the Parties ETC Institute Responsibilities ETC Institute's cost proposal includes the following services: • designing the survey in association with the City of City of Edina • requesting background information • finalizing the methodology for administering the survey • selecting a random sample of households for the City • setting up the database • testing the survey instrument • postage for outbound and in -bound mail • printing and mailing the survey • labor for phone interviews • web -site design • long distance charges • data entry for a minimum 600 surveys • cross tabular analysis of survey results • national benchmarking comparisons • geocoding of results • importance /satisfaction analysis • a summary report with an executive summary, charts, and cross tabs • presentation of survey and study findings and workshop • 1 adobe copy of draft report • 10 copies of the final report • 1 day on -site for project kick -off meetings • 1 day on -site to present findings City of Edina Responsibilities • provide pertinent background materials • identify central issues to be addressed in the survey • approve the survey instrument • provide an electronic map of the City boundaries • provide a signed cover letter for the survey document • place notices in local newspapers and/or other media to inform the public about the survey • identify requests for subanalysis of the data as appropriate • arrange for locations and set -ups of presentations Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 5 City of Edina Citizen Survey Fee Breakdown ETC Institute Services for Needs Assessment Survev Number of Surveys 600 Level of confidence 95% Margin of error +/-4% Length 6 pages Administration Mail /Phone/Web Formal Report Included Sub - Analysis /Banners Included Benchmarking Included Kick -off Meeting Included Geocoding of surveys Included Importance -Unmet Needs Analysis Included Presentation of Findings on Site Professional Fees (plus expenses for site visits ) $23,650 Project Fees are $23,650, plus expenses for two (2) site visits (airfare, car rental, hotel, food, parking, etc.). Billings will occur by the following schedule: 1 st Billing: Upon completion of the initial site visit 15% 2 Billing: Upon completion of initial draft survey 10% 3rd Billing: Upon mailing of survey instrument 25% 4th Billing: Upon receipt of draft report 40% 5th Billing: Upon receipt of final report and site visit 10% Leisure Vision Scope of Services (July 2014) Page- 6 yL .*4 C* To: Mayor and City Council Members Agenda Item #: IV. F.: From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion El Date: August 4, 2014 Information Subject: Amendment to Encroachment Agreement, AK Larson Family LLC, 3939 West 50th Street I cn O ,may Action Requested: Approve amendment to the Encroachment Agreement with AK Larson Family, LLC and authorize staff to work with property owner to complete improvement project. Information / Background: On April 2, 2014, the City Council authorized an Encroachment Agreement (Item VIII. D.) with AK Larson Family, LLC to allow comprehensive exterior remodeling to the "SO and France Building" at 3939 West 50th Street and to clarify terms, of improvements to the Edina Liquor Store facade. The property owner. intends to update the facade to be more compatible with the character of the business district. Similar to most buildings at 50t & France, this building is located directly on the property line. The proposed facade improvements would need to project over the public sidewalk in order to be constructed. After the full construction plans were prepared and reviewed by staff, the need for a clarification to the Encroachment Agreement was identified. At the roofline, the proposed cornice extends beyond the limit defined in the Encroachment Agreement. New light fixtures and new canopies also extend beyond the limits of the original agreement. It is staffs opinion that these details do not violate the spirit of the original agreement and are consistent with common practice in the business district. An amendment has been prepared to clarify the City's interpretation that the City -owned parcel adjacent to the private property serves as a "public right -of -way" rather than a buildable land parcel. With this interpretation, the provisions of Minnesota Building Code, Chapter 32 are applicable. Each of the proposed projections is then permitted on the same basis by which other buildings in the area have projections over public sidewalks. All other terms of the Encroachment Agreement remain unchanged. Attachments: Proposed Amendment Updated site renderings Chapter 32 of the Minnesota Building Code Original Encroachment Agreement (executed) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • . Edina, MN 55424 This page intentionally left blank. FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ( "Amendment ") to the Agreement made effective this _ day of , 2014 ( "Effective Date ") the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 4801 West 50d' Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424 ( "City "), and A.K. LARSON FAMILY, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, 3939 West 50' Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( "Larson "). RECITALS `,WHEREAS, City and Larson entered into an Agreement dated April 2 "d, 2014 ( "Agreement ") concerning encroachment of the Larson building located at 3939 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN, 55424, onto the-City, Property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; WHEREAS, Larson has requested additional encroachments of facade improvements onto Parcel 2 of the City Property pursuant; WHEREAS, the encroachments are consistent with those typically allowed within public right -of -way for horizontal projections of fapde.-improvements pursuant to Chapter 32 of the Minnesota State Building Code; WHEREAS, because the City Property contains a sidewalk and parking lot that is similar to a right -of way, the City is willing to allow the proposed facade improvements and future modifications that project onto City Property, provided the projections meet the requirements for encroachments of horizontal projections of a facade into public right of way pursuant to the Minnesota State Building Code; NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, including the promises and covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Larson agree as follows: I. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement. Paragraph 2(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: a. Except as otherwise restricted under the terms of this Agreement, horizontal projections of above grade facade improvements into Parcel 2 of the City Property shall be in accordance with the requirements for encroachments above grade into public right of way as provided in Sections 3202.2 and 3202.3 of the Minnesota State Building Code. 2. This Amendment shall be considered an integral part of the Agreement and shall be binding upon the City and Larson from the date first above written. Subject only to the modification referred to in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall evidence but one agreement. CITY OF EDINA BY: AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public F] A.K. LARSON FAMILY, LLC.. By: Allen Larson Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by the of A.K. Larson Family, LLC, a Minnesota, limited liability company, on behalf of the company. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 AMP Notary Public 3 EXHIBIT A Parcel 1: That part of the following described premises lying below the elevation of eight hundred ninety - nine (899) feet mean sea level, 1929 adjustment: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the North 123 feet thereof. Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 566016. Parcel 2: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 542800. 4 11 �I��� ►.......il � 1 . lhmt'ARe!'MY'd4 fN1YN>�iNNsrM�&Nf14M%�N il, Reis, i{ i�ii�NU :lilnif!tx}rHMnli.•KU!{uwrli I11 ■x•11 �I , Mil �llli ii i'a iiillli, ,I - r - - i��� ! /�1����1���w,�l���l'- _'�_ =��� �I Al �4 1•�'� VC-L . W S%gRBUCk S COFFEE f ! i 1 CHAPTER 32 SECTION 3201 GENERAL 3201.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall govern the encroachment of structures into the public right -of -way. 3201.2 Measurement. The projection of any,structure or por- tion thereof shall be the distance measured horizontally from the lot line to the outermost point of the projection. 3201.3 Other laws. The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to permit the violation of other laws or ordinances regulating the use and occupancy of public property. 3201.4 Drainage. Drainage water collected from a roof, awn- ing, canopy or marquee, and condensate from mechanical equipment shall not flow over a public walking surface.. SECTION 3202 ENCROACHMENTS 3202.1 Encroachments below grade. Encroachments below grade shall comply'with Sections 3202. 1.1 through 3202.1.3. 3202.1.1 Structural support. A part of a building erected below. grade that is necessary for structural support of the building or structure shall not project beyond the lot lines, except, that the .footings of street walls or their supports which, are :located at least 8 feet (2438 mm) below grade shall not.project more than 12 inches (305 mm) beyond the street lot line. 3202.1.2 Vaults,and other enclosed spaces. The construc- tion and utilization of vaults and other enclosed space below grade. shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the authority or legislative body having jurisdiction. 3202.1.3 Areaways. Areaways shall be protected by grates, guards or other approved means. 3202.2 Encroachments above grade and below: 8 feet in height. Encroachments into the public right-of-way- above grade and below 8 feet (2438 mm) in height shall be prohibited except as provided for in Sections 3202.2.1 through 3202.2.3. Doors and windows shall not open or project into the public right -of -way. 3202.2.1 Steps. Steps shall not project more than 12 inches (305 mm) and shall be guarded by approved devices not less than 3 feet (914 mm) high, or shall be located between col- umns or pilasters. 3202.2.2 Architectural features. Columns or pilasters, including bases and moldings shall not projectmore than 12 inches (305 mm). Belt courses, lintels, sills, architraves, pediments and similar architectural features shall not pro- ject more than 4 inches (102 mm). 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE 3202.2.3 Awnings. The vertical clearance from the public right -of -way to the lowest part of any awning, including valances, shall be 7 feet (2134 mm) minimum. 3202.3 Encroachments 8 feet or more above grade. Encroachments 8 feet (2438 mm), or more above grade shall comply with Sections 3202.3.1 through 3202.3.4. 3202.3.1 Awnings, canopies, marquees and signs. Awn- ings, canopies, marquees and signs shall be constructed so as to support applicable loads as specified in .Chapter 16. Awnings, canopies, marquees and signs with less than 15 feet (4572 -mm) clearance above the sidewalk shall not extend into or occupy more than two- thirds the width of the sidewalk measured from the building. Stanchions or col- umns that support awnings, canopies, marquees and signs shall be located not less than 2 feet:(610 mm) in from the curb line. 3202.3.2 Windows, balconies, architectural features and mechanical equipment. Where the vertical clearance above grade to projecting windows, balconies, architectural features or mechanical equipment is more than 8 feet (2438 mm), 1 inch (25 "mm) of encroachment is permitted for each additional 1 inch (25 mm) of clearance above 8 feet (2438 rum), but the maximum encroachment shall be 4 feet (1219 mm). 3202.3.3 Encroachments 15 feet or more above grade. Encroachments 15 feet (4572 mm) of `more above grade shall not be limited. 3202.3.4.. Pedestrian walkways. The installation of a pedestrian walkway over a public right- of- way'shall be sub- ject to the approval of local authority having jurisdictiom. The vertical clearance from the public right -of -way to the lowest part of a pedestrian walkway shall be 15 .feet (4572 mm) minimum. 3202.4 Temporary encroachments. Where allowed by the local authority having jurisdiction, vestibules and storm enclo- sures shall not be erected for a period of time exceeding 7 months in any one year and shall not encroach more than 3 feet (914 mm) nor more than one - fourth of the width of the side- walk beyond the street lot line. Temporary entrance awnings shall be erected with a minimum clearance of 7 feet (2134 mm) to the lowest portion of the hood or awning where supported on removable steel or other approved noncombustible support. 547 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is entered into effective as of r• Nd , 2014 (the "Effective Date ") by and between A.K. Larson Family, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Larson ") and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "). WHEREAS, Larson owns the property and building located at 3939 West 50th Street in Edina, Minnesota (the "Larson Property ") legally described on the attached Exhibit "A "; and WHEREAS, the City owns the property and building located at 3943 West 50`" Street in Edina Minnesota (the "City Property ") legally described on the attached Exhibit "13 "; and WHEREAS, the City Property and Larson Property which abut each other are subject to a Declaration of Mutual Easements dated January 21, 1977 and recorded as Document Number 1209069 on the I I'" day of February, 1977 in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Construction. Larson will construct a new entrance and clock tower at the northwest corner of Larson Property, and a new facade treatment on exposed northern, western. and southern facades of the Larson Property and the City Property, in accordance with the Plans attached hereto as Exhibit "C" ( "Improvements "). The City consents to the construction of the Improvements, subject to the terms of this Agreement. 2. Conditions. Construction of the Improvements is subject to the following conditions and restrictions: a. The horizontal projection of the facade improvements into the City Property and right-of-way shall not exceed twelve (12) inches at its maximum extension. Any horizontal projections greater than six (6) inches must be at least eleven (I 1) feet above the exterior grade. b. The horizontal projection of the three columns at the northwest corner into the City Property or right -ol =way shall not exceed Iburteen (14) inches. The structural columns shall be located on the Larson Property. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 C. Any costs to repair or maintain the Improvements shall be the full responsibility of Larson. d. All work shall be in accordance with the Plans attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and must be in accordance with the construction documents filed with and approved by the Building Department e. Materials shall be as provided in the Materials Board on file at the City Hall on the effective date of this Agreement. Minor changes to the design or materials may be considered and approved or rejected by the City Manager or delegated staff. Major changes in design or materials are subject to review and approval or rejection by the City Council. g. All work is subject to standard construction and permit requirements of the City Code. h. The public sidewalk must remain open and available at all times. Proper pedestrian protection, such as covered scaffolding, must be provided as directed by the Building Department. Larson must alert building tenants and neighbors to possible disruptions at least twenty -four (24) hours in advance. The public right of way must be completely unrestricted during the duration of the Edina Art Fair, Thursday, June 7 to Sunday, June 10, 2014 and Thursday, June 4, 2015 to Sunday, June 7, 2015. If Larson fails to do so, Larson must pay the City One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day plus the costs to restore the public way to a usable condition. k. If work does not commence prior to July 1, 2015, this Agreement is automatically terminated. If the work is not completed within six (6) months after it begins, the City may cause the work to be removed or completed, as determined by the City, with the costs borne by the Larson. All costs reasonably incurred by the City, including legal and administrative costs, to restore the building shall be the responsibility of Larson. This deadline may be extended due to Acts of God or other circumstances beyond Larson's control. The City's recognition of an extension will not be unreasonably withheld. m. Any damage to the City Property, including but not limited to sidewalks, curbs, and trees, must be restored at the cost of Larson. n. The Improvements are to proceed as a no -lien project in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota regarding public projects. Larson, for itself and for all who claim through Larson, acknowledges and agrees: (i) that because it is a public project, no lien shall attach to the City Property or to any improvements now existing or to be constructed thereon in favor of Larson or any contractor, subcontractor, mechanic, journeyman, laborer, material vendor, lessor of tools or equipment or any other party who may furnish work, materials, equipment, services, tools or machinery for the design or construction of improvements on the land. Larson shall also provide written notice of the no -lien status of this project to all of its contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers, equipment lessors and others that provide labor, material, equipment and /or services for the project. Larson shall defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any suit, lien, damages, losses or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of or relating to claims for payment for work, labor, materials and /or services provided at or for the project and Larson shall also take all available action to have any asserted lien released or removed from the City Property. Larson shall cause any lien filed against the City Property arising out of or relating to the Improvements to be removed or otherwise discharged within five (5) business days after receiving notice of such lien. This section is not applicable to mortgages on the Larson Property. 3. Cost Share. The City shall reimburse Larson for Larson's out -of- pocket -costs for constructing the portion of the facade Improvements on Parcel I of the City Property, but not to exceed Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00). Larson shall submit a detailed description of work to be performed on Parcel I of the City Property and a detailed cost estimate for such work to the City Manager prior to beginning the Improvements. The City may reject the work if the cost estimate and scope of work is not consistent with the terms of this agreement. After completion, Larson shall submit a detailed invoice to the City and the City shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice unless the City disputes the invoice. 4. Notices. Notices given under this Agreement shall be delivered by (i) overnight courier, (ii) certified mail, or (iii) hand delivery, and addressed as follows or to such other address provided by written notice to the other party: To Larson: A.K. Larson Family, LLC 3939 West 50`x' Street, #200 Edina, MN 55424 To City: City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55424 5. Governing Law. The interpretation and construction of this Agreement, and all matters relating thereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without regard to the choice of law provisions thereof. 6. Recording, This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Larson Property and the City Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date through their undersigned authorized representative§. CITY OF Jame— sl-Tovfand,vMayor By: I, City anager A.K. LARSON FAMILY, LLC 13y: Allen Larson Its �r-,�sa -✓7� 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before rile this day o , 2014, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager 4oft C ity of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. El. O • I ... __ Ifla,w- - M. DEBRA MANGEN NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA M Commi55lon Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OFiL ) The foregoing instrumeplwas acknowled ed before me this g day of CLf GAL , 2014, by Allen Larson the of A.K. Larson Family, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. JANE M. TIMM NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNE]2015 My Commission Expires Jan. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BV: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Associalion 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 RN K EXHIBIT "A" Larson Property Parcel 1: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, except that part of said Tract A lying South of the North 123 feet thereof and below the elevation of 899 feet mean sea level, 1929 adjustment: Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 1054996. Parcel 2: The North 166:5_ feet of the East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the South 43.5 feet of the West 54 feet thereof, and except the South 2.0 feet of the East 6.0 feet thereof, and That part of the following described premises lying above the elevation of eight hundred ninety - nine (899) feet mean sea level, 1929 adjustment: The South 43.5 feet of the North 166.5 feet of the West 54 feet of the East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's'Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and The South2.0 feet of the East 6.0 feet of the North 166.5 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. i 72, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and That' part of,.Lot,43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 43 distant 166.5 feet South of the North line thereof, thence South along said East line to its intersection with Line "A" described below; thence West along said Line "A" to the most Southerly and Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Files of the Registrar of Titles, I- lennepin County. Minnesota; thence North along the most Easterly line of said Tract A to its intersection with the South line of the North 166.5 feet of said Lot 43; thence East, along said South line, to the point of beginning. Line "A ": A, straight line drawn between the most Southerly and Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and a point on the East line of the West 107 feet of Lot 44, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota, distant 181.05 feet North of the South line thereof. Abstract property. EXHIBIT "B" City Property Parcel 1: That part of the following described premises lying below the elevation of eight hundred ninety- , nine (899) feet mean sea level, 1.929 adjustment: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the. North 123 feet thereof. i Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No, 566016. i i Parcel 2: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1426, Hennepin County, Minnesota. i Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 542800. i t 7 EXHIBIT "C" Plans ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5306 S. Hwy. No. 10l MIlcusmeb, MIN SSW Phom (9.52)474 7901 Pa (952) 225 0502 W W WADVSMOOM SOIIVRYFOR: DAN AMMI SURVEyli6Septembg2013 DRAM[): September9, 2013 3E .Memb 242014, to ebawpmpored Improvemeoy. LEGAL DESCRRIP170N: Patel l: 1&T)�'Registasd Imd Smvey No. 1420 Files of tho Regimaz of Title, County of H®epiR euzpt that pat of said TuetA lyme Saath of d.North 123 ER memfaod baba the dewtm of 899 Poet them sea kvcl 1929 Adjmlmed. Seirig rr$bWed lead a b evidmcad by CartiBate of Title X. 566017. Perod 2: - T6IG* 1665 fret afore Eat 60 fat cf I of 43, Auftr`3 Subdivision No. 173, Ham " Comay, MLaaesUy except the South 433 feet ofthe West 54 feet thaw& and c aq%the Scum 2A Let of the, Earl 6.0 I= thereof sad Thai pert o fo0owhtg desatbedpremlto lying above the elevatiaa ofeight hmdted daety -nmc (899) feet mein as level, �tmeat 730S 435 het aftba Norm 166.5 Ponafthe Wert 34&dofOm Fmt60Edoflot43,Auditces THe®eiSmm West slog said Lim "A" m fhe mot 9er�ady sod Eate>jY coma of77sd A, Regit+ ed Imd 9mvey No:1426; FEes of ma Rcgiaae:ofl'Wes, II�n Wmly, 5f®matq them North dog Ore molt Firtojy fine of add T� A to iii im¢satim vrim tlm Scam line afthe Norm 166.5 fiat of avid Inc 43; themes East sloog said Scum liagm the pons ofbeg®Ing. Lure "A": A shill Rae downhot,= me most Somberly sad Easterly came ofTma A, RegiatuedLsad Survey No. 1426, Foes ofhe Rtgt'atrar ofTltles�; Hsemepia County, Mmnesat.6 and a palm en Ile Eart fine of the West 107 f� cf Lett 44, "Attdam'a 3obdivleime No. 172; Remcpia Comely, bEnucsoq disc at 181 AS fed Norm oftho Soon lino thamL SCOPE OF WORE: & LIMITATIONS: 1. nwmg the I-g m slues of bouodmy lh- of me shove logs♦ doecpdoa The nape of our swim does out iodide dd®iamg whet you owe, whirl, b a kgel mach.. Please cheek the kgd damp6m with your seeoNs or caomk with competent legd comet], if —la=y, to mslm mom that it is com and tltd my mmim of rxmd seek a ea+emc.t6 the you wish aloam ®8th smvry, how been shows 2. Showing the haradm of edsting belmovemccht_we deemad Import at 3. Setting new, two mm7s or vedfyiag old mmuneo s to mak tit camas of me �op�y 4. While coo show Proposed us;.or emit® m your p+openy. we — cut a Emilia wifh y— Plena as you w car my tw a Emil; er with the requitca m s of govaammml agoachis a their cmpbym sro. We suggest met you review the survey to confim dust the Proposals wo show are what you Wtmd sad submit the survey to each pvoammtd agenda Om m.omaay have jurisdiedmmoover your *jw sad gam thdr Wpmvsk if you rm betbre begmafog c m emcdm or 3. Shawmg ekvetio�os m ma» a ielamd larxmam to pw some india0m of me topogmphy of the site. We have also pmeddod a bmrbmmk for you use in detemIlaing elewdoes for wa+hudim m this lea The elandom down elate m me bmebmerk pmvidad m thls survey. Lee Est bmchmmlo sod eb.*.t loner we other faame ahowa m b survry when de: ®-Wng arks elcvatiom Er use m this site or beEro begmomg crosonNon. &ARD SYMBOLS &CONVIIff10NS: a1' Dmoaa lR ", l0 pipe mm prat pli�eerkg Stale Liman Number 9275. set, tolm otherwise octal CERTEFICATION: � this plm, sPaoiEcation, report a autyry sea prryued by me a rich my diced sg.Nisioo amd that 3 met a duly le-red Profesdoml Euginrr sad Licmsod Imd Surveyor —der the laws of the mm of MOtmeats 8rmehve �anrLan .TI.. ,` Tyaad Noma Jumes H. Parka Ra. No.: 9235 Date: March 24, 2014 . EXHIBIT C, Page 9 DJYC. NO 130635 PROPOSED 7F °�or1pRS.a"1°nuxr wwaal� i CRdP14C SCAU PROPOSED IMPROYIs31fE M, j 50M 57 F F S 1` S r+sw E h-N-- I. I I io is . I bw I i T I I m. - �p+ I - I ..,a a +s•ss w -- — — — — — — — -- -1 I I I I I j I I " I I I I I I II C� i i I � I I I I I I I � I I � L------ L --------- - - - --y �- • • J - -. ..- - - - - -® - =�1■■■ ■oi■ ■mue ■■ ■® �-------------------- �i� �. _.� -- - � EXHIBIT C, Page I1 G G5ECTION - YPICAL BRICK 44= 1' -0' P? 5ECTION - 4' ADD ON PARAPET 4 =1' -0' MAGNEY Cornerstone ARCHITECTURE, LLC CONSTRUCTION, LLC MN luren,lle@sr.- CA 1:2 701.11.1.w@.mpgpedWmn I Don Ms vA 112 747-=5 md:vum.lu�i9mcbimm BRICK PATTERN STONE PATTERN 5ECTION - 5FANDREL GLA55 AND A (NING a =1'-0" CLOCK TRIM DETAL 1 '2= P -0' AS 1 soar mrn nw =4-5—M, Shed I 50'.h & France Building �••� 0 IBM TEL auml.nn A5 PROPERTY LINE r" I' DRYVIf CORNICE DRY%AT CORNICE rPATTE�RN D"T § PROPERTY LINE 5TONE PATTERN Y ON4'5TEEL571JD OO(NT5TEE 5TUD ORYVIT CORNICE EXTEN510N 51 DRYVR 5TANDING 5EAM BRICK PATTERN AWNING IFRAME ON EX15TING PRECAST PANEL REPLACEMENT WINDOW 5PANDREL PANEL DRYVIT PANEL AWM 5ILL 5UPPORT ANGLE REPLACEMENT WINDOW REPLACEMENT WIND( DRYVTT PANEL RECE55ED 5OFFTT'GI1T DRYVIT PANS REPLACEMENT METAL PANEL RELFSED 5OFFIT LIi 5IGN RECE55ED 50FTIT LIGHT EXISTING STANDING R51XEMENT REPLACEMENT I SEAM AWNING i METAL PANEL METAL PANEL 51GN 51GN U15TING 5TOREFRONT WDW EXISTING 5TANDING EXI5TING 5TANDING AWNING 5EAM AWNING 5ETING 5TOREFRAI D05TNG STOREFRONT WDW EXHIBIT C, Page I1 G G5ECTION - YPICAL BRICK 44= 1' -0' P? 5ECTION - 4' ADD ON PARAPET 4 =1' -0' MAGNEY Cornerstone ARCHITECTURE, LLC CONSTRUCTION, LLC MN luren,lle@sr.- CA 1:2 701.11.1.w@.mpgpedWmn I Don Ms vA 112 747-=5 md:vum.lu�i9mcbimm BRICK PATTERN STONE PATTERN 5ECTION - 5FANDREL GLA55 AND A (NING a =1'-0" CLOCK TRIM DETAL 1 '2= P -0' AS 1 soar mrn nw =4-5—M, Shed I 50'.h & France Building �••� 0 IBM TEL auml.nn A5 �4 Cn To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda' Item #: IV. G:. The Recommended Bid is From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering ®Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: August 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14-11 Olinger Boulevard Mill and Overlay Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: July 29, 2014 September 29, 2014 Company: \� Amount of Quote or Bid: Park Construction Company $591,852.55 McNamara Contracting, Inc. $614,289.50 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $617,775.45 Midwest Asphalt Corporation $619,6513.11 Bituminous Roadways; Inc. $638,559.70 Hardrives, Inc. $709,354.89 Recommended Quote or Bid: Park Construction'Company $591,852.55 General Information: The Olinger Boulevard Mill and Overlay maintenance project extends from Vernon Avenue to Tracy Avenue in 2014. The project will consist of a full depth mill and overlay of Olinger Boulevard with minor upgrades taking place to the sanitary sewer manholes and storm sewer inlets along the route. Crosswalks markings and signage will be included at the location of existing sidewalk intersections with Olinger Boulevard. Olinger Boulevard is an Approved Primary Bike Route in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff has included improved bicycle facilities within this road. The bicycle facilities will include a dedicated bicycle lane along the west/south side of Olinger along the entire route and along the east/north side from Vernon to Olinger, Road. Parking will remain prohibited in these locations. Olinger Blvd Along the east/north side from Olinger Rd to Tracy, the roadway will include a 13 foot shared driving/bicycle lane and a Tfoot parking lane. The 13 foot shared lane required a variance from MnDOT Municipal State Aid which was approved by the State Aid Variance Committee on June 19, 2014. 1 Project funding will come from a combination of Municipal State Aid and Edina sanitary and storm sewer utility funds. In the 2013 Edina Capital Budget, $800,000 was budgeted for the project from Municipal State Aid Funds. The Edina Engineering Department's estimate for the Olinger Boulevard Mill and Overlay Project City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST F,OR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER was $762,288: The bid submitted by Park Construction is:22% lower,than,the Engineers Estimate and within budget allocations planned for in the 2013 -2017 City of Edina cmpital.Improvement Plan. Staff recommends awarding the project to Park Construction Company, Inc. GAFMCENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTSI20141ENG 14-11 Olinger Blvd M &OIBA423 Olinger Blvd M&O\ADMINIMISCIitem IV. G. ENG 14-11 RFR door To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 4, 2014 w91�,r� ow e t til �4 ih �y . , 88 ORr ,aeA Agenda Item #: IV. H. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -12 2014 Alley Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: July 29, 2014 Company: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation Recommended Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: September 29, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $66,274.10 $75,566.21 $66,274.10 General Information: The improvements to the alley between West 55th and West 56th Street and Xerxes and York Avenue were initiated by a resident petition. On November 4, 2013, the City Council received and referred the petition to the Engineering Department for further consideration. The alley between West 54th Street and West 55th Street was not petitioned, but was included by staff due to proximity and similar pavement conditions. A neighborhood meeting for the adjacent properties was held on April 7, 2014 with the vast majority of attendees supporting the project. The Public Hearing for the Alley Improvements was held on May 20, 2014 and the project was ordered by the City Council at the conclusion of the Public Hearing. Project funding will be from direct assessments to the adjacent benefitting properties. The Engineers Estimate for this project was $67,359. Staff recommends awarding the project to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. G:1WV\CENTRAL SVC5IENG DhAPROJECMCONTRACTSUOMENG 1412 Alley Impr1A257 Xerxes Alley_55th to 56thWDMINXMI5C11tem IV. H. ENG 14-12 RFP.dotx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 :To: MAYOR AND CITY, COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. I. The Recommended Bid is From: Chad A. Winer, PE, Director of Engineering ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: August. 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -14 France Avenue and Hazelton Road Landscaping Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: July 24, 2014 September 24, 2014 Company: Hoffman & McNamara Co. Urban Companies LLC Amount of Quote or Bid: $579,979.00 $738,133.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Hoffman & McNamara Co. $579,979.00 General Information: Please recall we are currently completing the France Ave Pedestrian Enhancements Project. Stage 1 and 2 are nearly completed.,,,-This project includes upgrading the intersections of 66th St, 70th St, and 76th St and France Ave along with providing sidewalk facilities along the easterly side of France Ave.where they do,not exist today. WSB and LHB-prepared landscaping and lighting plans for the urban design portion of this project. The - landscaping bid included both France Avenue and,Hazelton Road. The engineers estimate for this project was $597,460.00. By having both road segments on one contract it allows us to manage one contractor with the same requirements for maintenance and replacement. This project has a 3 -year maintenance and establishment period that the contractor is responsible for. It is anticipated the all the landscaping will be installed in 2014. . Hoffman & McNamara Co. -was the low bidder on the Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction landscaping work'aiong Normandale Road near the TH100 sound wall. We have been pleased with their work and maintenance operations associated with this project. The bid opening for the lighting portion of the urban design will be held on August 12. We are anticipating the. cost for both the landscaping and lighting to be between $700 and $900K. These project costs are funded with Centennial Lakes Tax- Increment Financing District funds. Staff recommends awarding the project to Hoffman & McNamara Co. IIG:1PWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DMPROJECTSICONTRACTSU0141ENG 14-14 France Ave_ Hazelton Rd Landstap6ADMIN_A- 2S91MISCIItem IV. I. ENG 14 -14 RFP.docx City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, HN 55424 M w91N��1� o e • ,�C�RPOIiE`��9 • I9Be To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. J. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action M Discussion ❑ Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -85 Requesting Financial Assistance via Bridge Bonds from the State of Minnesota Transportation Fund for the W. 54th Street Bridge Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to pursue additional funding via bridge bonds from the State of Minnesota Transportation Fund for the W. 54th Street Bridge. Information / Background: Please recall that the City Council rejected the bid and authorized staff to rebid the 54th Street project this winter for 2015 construction. The original bid included the bridge over Minnehaha Creek. This action occurred at the June 3, 2014 City Council meeting. This delay allows us the opportunity to apply for MnDOT bridge bond funding that could cover approximately 50% of the bridge cost. This resolution is the first step that allows staff to pursue those funds. We will submit a formal application with a copy of the signed resolution. Per the application rules, the City can open bids on the bridge portion of the project provided we do not award the contract for construction until after we have officially been notified,whether or not we will receive bridge bond funds. This will likely occur in April / May 2015. With the timing of the official approvals, the City will bid the bridge portion of the project separately. This source of funding is part of the state bonding bill that may be approved by the State Legislature in May 2015. Edina's state representatives will be involved in the bonding bill and support for this funding source could be forwarded to them. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution. Attachment: Resolution No. 2014 -85 GAPMENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTS120141ENG 14-6 54th St & BridgMADMINWISMItem IV. J. Res. No. 2014 -85 Bridge Bond.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -85 FOR CREATING A PRIORITIZED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT LIST WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer has reviewed the pertinent data on bridges requiring replacement, rehabilitation, or removal, supplied by local citizenry and local units of government; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has identified a bridge that is a high priority and that requires replacement, rehabilitation, or removal in 2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is hereby authorized to request financial assistance from the State of Minnesota Transportation Fund (bridge bond) program for the 54th Street West bridge over Minnehaha Creek; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer already received final bridge design approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations for State Aid Project 120 - 142 -003 (New Bridge No. 27C00); and NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following deficient bridge is a high priority and the City of Edina intends to replace, rehabilitate, or remove the bridge as soon as possible when funds are available, Old Road Total State Bridge Federal State Aid Proposed Bridge Number Project Funds Funds Funds Construction Number or Name Cost Year 54 in 90640 Street $3,271,000 $1,066,100 - $533,050 2015 West NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests financial assistance via bridge bonds from the State of Minnesota Transportation Fund; and FURTHERMORE, the City of Edina does hereby request authorization to replace, rehabilitate, or remove said bridge. Dated: August 4, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wrvw.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 4, 2014 ow e •'MCORPOttf`T�� • ieaa Agenda Item #: IV. K. The Recommended Bid is ❑x Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Change Order for Contract ENG 14 -13 Edina Industrial Park Lighting Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: N/A Company: Recommended Quote or Bid: Bid or Expiration Date: N/A Amount of Quote or Bid: General Information: The Edina Industrial Park Lighting project will replace the street lighting system located within the Edina Industrial Park. Please recall that on July 15 you awarded the contract of $154,912.00 to Killmer Electric Co., Inc. As mentioned in staffs report, because the low bid was substantially lower than expected, we are increasing the number of lights to be installed in the 2013 -14 phase from 22 to 28. This increases the contract by $38,000 or 24.5 %. It will also reduce the budget required to finish the project in 2015 -16. The total contract amount will be adjusted from $154,912.00 to $192,912.00. Staff recommends approving Change Order No. 1. GAI'MCENTRAL SVCS \ENG 13IVIPROJECTSICONTRACTSI20141ENG 14-13 Industrial Park Lighting1L60 Industrial Park LlghtinglADMINIMIS01tem IV.K. ENG 14 -13 Change Order.dom City of Edina • 4801 W. 5011, St • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Susie Miller, Braemar Arena General Manager Date: August 4, 2014 li a �HI N ,8a8 Agenda Item #: IV.L. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Reallce Ice Water Treatment, Braemar Arena, Cypress, Ltd. Date Bid Opened-or Quote Received: Monday, July 21, 2014 Company: Cypress, Ltd. Recommended Quote or Bid: Cypress, Ltd. Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $27,500 General Information: Reallce is a water treatment system for ice rinks that has been specifically designed and manufactured using 3 -D printing process. The system creates a controlled, intense and structured vortex as the water flows through it The vortex creates hydrodynamic cavitation and increases the velocity of the water to promote the separation of dissolved air and impurities from the water. Impurities and dissolved air act like an insulator when the water changes to ice. This removes impurities and dissolved air from the water, allowing the water to freeze at a higher temperature and saving energy. It is also easier to achieve harder and clearer ice. Staff contacted multiple facilities throughout the US and Canada for references; all have shown significant energy reduction. We will see reductions in gas due to the hot water decrease. We will also see a reduction in electricity due to the compressors running significantly less as we will be able to maintain a warmer ice temp due to the strength and hardness of the ice treated by Reallce. With the significant decrease in hot water required with this Reallce system, a much smaller hot water heater system will be needed. The cost of the Reallce is $27,500. Expected energy rebates will be over $13,000 and the system will provide a return on investment of less than a year. This will be paid for through the Ice Maintenance Contracted Repair Budget This is a sole source purchase. This is a unique product with one manufacturer and Cypress, Ltd. is the only company selling the product. Attachment: Reallce Proforma City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ADVANCED ICE RINK WATER TREATMENT ■ SUSTAINABLE UTILITY COST AVOIDANCE ■ HIGH QUALITY ICE PRO -FORMA PROPOSAL FOR: BRAEMAR ARENA JULY 2, 2014 El Prepared by: Q C r P R E s s LT o Tom Smolarek tjs @cyp- res.com 949 888 0255 Cypress, Ltd. (855) 892 -3861 htto: / /cvo- res.com http:Hrealice.us support@realice.us © CYPRESS LTD I. ABOUT CYPRESS, LTD. Operating since 1990 • Electric, Gas, and Water Utilities Efficiency and Demand Program Management and Implementation • Emerging Technologies Analysis • Rebate Administration Services and Processing • Energy Advisor Services for Commercial, Industrial, Education, Healthcare, Government, and Residential Markets. CA, WA, NV, MN 24/7/365 Bilingual Customer Service Center (CSC) in Hemet, California 7 Rue Delacroix Coto de Caza State: CA Zip Code: 92679 Market Focus: Locations: Main: City: Phone CSC: (877) 811 -8700 Direct: (949) 888 -0255 Web & Email: www.cVp- res.com support@cyp- res.com Key Contact: Tom Smolarek, President tls @cyp- res.com Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Gas Company, Example Clients Xcel Energy, Boulder County CO, Chelan County PUD, Imperial Irrigation District, NVEnergy, Cal Poly SLO, AT &T, LACC and others Energy Advisor Service Cypress, Ltd. helps clients stay at the forefront of energy efficiency and demand innovations through our research and engineering work with emerging technologies (ET) for major utilities (electric, water, and gas) and technology innovators. We assess the technology's potential savings and fit into a customer's specific requirements. Subsequently, through our Energy Advisor Service, we will suggest appropriate, proven, and cost effective products to our clients that we have vetted in the ET Program. Our Energy Advisor Service examines the client's strategic and tactical goals, establishes realistic milestones, and creates a portfolio of utility cost saving measures in order to achieve their goals. We are committed to acting on behalf of our clients to recommend and help deliver their efficient and sustainable energy goals. The primary outcome of our Energy Advisor process is to provide business solutions that deliver results that are focused on sustainability, lower utility costs, operational improvements, and most importantly, the right technology. As a trusted energy advisor, we have been delivering efficiency, demand management and sustainable programs, technical and business consulting, and customer support services for the past 25 years. We support: • Investor and municipal owned utilities, associations, and special utility districts • The commercial, industrial, institution /government, education, and residential customer markets ■ Energy value chain participants such as emerging technology manufacturers, distributors, contractors, and the building design community Key Attributes: • Cypress has been involved in the energy and related technology markets since 1990. • Cypress maintains a California- based, bilingual, 24/7/365, and utility- centric Customer Service Center (CSC). • We utilize a database technology platform called CyNET'" to handle all program administration, data reporting, customer services, communications and dispatch, program applications, and rebate processing. • Cypress understands the best practices of administering'utility programs and applying emerging energy technologies Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 2 © CYPRESS LTD II. REALICETM Technology Overview REALice is a water treatment system for ice rinks, shown in Figure 1, that has been specifically designed and manufactured using a 3 -D printing process. The system creates a controlled, yet intense and structured, vortex as the water flows through it. The vortex creates hydrodynamic cavitation and increases the velocity of the water to promote the separation of dissolved air and impurities from the water. Impurities and dissolved air act like an insulator when the water changes to ice. Thus, removing impurities and dissolved air from the water allows the water to freeze at a higher temperature, saving energy'. Figure 1: The REALICe System Basis for Savings The REALice system changes a few important characteristics of the water that is used for ice making and resurfacing, saving energy: Removes micro - bubbles /degassing of air bubbles: Results in a decrease in viscosity of from 5 -18 %. A lower viscosity means that the water flows more easily over the ice and has better heat transfer. This changes the ice crystals, producing an ice that is more homogenous, hard and clear, and has a higher heat capacity leading to less energy usage in ice rinks'. Temperate or un- heated water can therefore be used avoiding water heated to the typical 140 — 180 degree F range. Hot water is typically used to remove air bubbles. This allows the chiller system to operate at a higher brine temperature, reducing the overall compressor run time. The REALice system allows other ice rink facilitiesZto raise the brine temperature from 4 °F to 8°F. The potential temperature rise is dependent on variables such as ice rink design and size, climate zone, system age, and occupancy rates of the ice center. Using temperate water instead of hot water allows the chiller to be reset a few degrees higher, saving energy. Reduces lime scale: In water treated using the REALice system, calcite is transformed into aragonite, which has a more rounded shape and consequently does not attach itself to other lime scale crystals, pipes, nozzles or other surfaces. Another advantage is that the treated water also acts upon old lime scale deposits, which are reduced and eventually vanish after a period of use. ASHRAE:1010 Refrigeration Handbook: `Water quality affects energy consumption and ice quality. Water contaminants, such as minerals, organic matter, and dissolved air, can affect both the freezing temperature and the ice thickness necessary to provide satisfactory ice conditions. Proprietary treatment systems for arena floodwater are available. When these treatments are properly applied, they reduce or eliminate the effects of contaminants and improve ice conditions and reduce energy use." AND "Hot water generally gives harder ice, because air bubbles are removed..." Z REALice is used worldwide in more than 300 arenas and is part of a growing list of utility incentive programs such as FORTIS BC and Efficiency Vermont. It is endorsed by the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) and was used by the NHL for the 2014 Winter Classic. Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 3 ©CYPRESS LTD Benefits from use of the REALice system: • Harder and clearer ice • Softer water • Reduced gas consumption (BTUs) for heating the water used for resurfacing • No heating is required for resurfacing water • Reduced electric consumption (kWh) and peak energy usage (kW) due to raised brine temperature and subsequent less usage of compressors • Resetting brine from 16 -17F to 20 -24F reduces load on the chiller • Reduction of usage of dehumidifier due to less evaporation • Reduced COZ emissions due to less usage of electricity and gas Additional benefits by not using hot water to resurface the ice: • The device improves the ice to be denser, more even, and more durable under usage conditions • Less humidity in the arena, therefore less draw on the humidifier • Reduced load on the hot water boilers — increases capacity for other uses • The device lowers the viscosity of the water thereby making the water outflow easy despite using ambient temperature of added water. Treated cold water has the same viscosity as non - treated heated water • The device changes the lime scale crystals from calcite to aragonite, which changes the overall shape of the crystals in the water supply. This affect avoids the formation of lime scale deposits. • Less ice cleans needed - less water used Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 4 © CYPRESSLTD III. EXPECTED COST AVOIDANCE SUMMARY This summary report highlights facility electric and gas cost avoidance potential for the Braemar Arena based on the REALice T" technology. Consideration of gas and electric rates and potential utility incentives are based on typical rates in the location. This is a conservative pro -forma summary based on average rates and standard savings from other similar ice rinks, incorporating specifics that we have learned about your site. This overview assumes that there are two (2) REALice systems or resurfacing filling stations supporting a total of 3 rinks, 2 rinks are year round and 1 rink is in operation typically for 5 months. Our cost avoidance assumptions are based on the typical refrigeration and water heating standards for ice rinks consistent with both typical operational practices and the ASHRAE 2010 Refrigeration Handbook. The Braemar Arena electric and gas rates are based on the average commercial customer rates schedules for your location. (Xcel and CenterPoint Energy) Electric: Average Blended $.08 /kWh Gas: Average $0.57 / therm The resultant avoided cost for installing REALice will generate a very good return on investment through avoiding both gas and electric usage costs. We have also included estimated custom utility rebates of $.08 /kWh and $35 /therm for reduced electric and gas usage. Should the project be authorized, Cypress, Ltd. will assist your facility with applying and acquiring the approved utility incentives3. Figure 1: Avoided Costs and Simple Payback Summary for all Rinks Equipment Cost (two REALICE) $55,000 Est. YR 1 Utility Incentives $16,342 Electric & Gas YR 1 Cost Avoidance $23,892 Total YR 1 Cost Avoidance $40,234 YR 1 Cash Flow $(14,766) Simple Payback Years (total equipment cost/ total cost avoidance) 1.37 We have also included a break down of the avoided costs and simple payback for a single REALICE unit serving just the two year round rinks. Figure 2 Avoided Costs and Simple Payback Summary for 2 Year Round Rinks Est. YR 1 Utility Incentives Electric & Gas YR 1 Cost Avoidance Equipment Cost Total YR 1 Cost Avoidance YR 1 Cash Flow Simple Payback Years (total equipment cost/ total cost avoidance) $27,500 $13,244 $19,390 $32,634 $5,134 0.84 3Cypress, Ltd. has more than 25 years assisting customers to obtain utility incentives for savings technologies. Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 5 © CYPRESS LTD Financial Analysis Cypress Ltd. previously conducted a detailed measurement and verification study (M &V) commissioned by Southern California Edison (SCE) on the REALice system". Based on that analysis and our technical understanding of REALice, we have estimated the cost avoidance of a systems for the Braemar Arena. This includes utility savings post installation for the first year, potential utility incentives, and simple return on investment. We have taken a conservative approach in estimating both savings and potential utility incentives. Utility Savings, Simple Payback, Cash Flow, ROI and Carbon Impact: Pro -Forma Estimated Cost and Annual Usage Electricity Natural Gas units kWh therms Physical units per MMBtu: 293 10 TOTAL VALUES Current delivered bundled price per unit r $0.0800 " $0.5700 Annual consumption cost avoidance in physical units YR 1 153,683 20,346 Reduction Percentage YR 1 11.3% 100.0% <- Resurfacing water only, not all domestic use Dollar value of annual energy savings YR 1 $12,295 $11,597 IF $23,892 Annual Recurring Non - Energy Operating Costs and Benefits Current Proposed Net benefit ( +) or cost ( -) TOTAL ANNUAL POTENITAL UTILITY BILL BENEFITS (NO TOU, DEMAND, AUOTDR savings estimated based on bundeld average rates) Energy plus non - energy savings Year $23,892 , Basic Construction/lnstalltaion Budget Value: Construction and /or equipment costs $ 55,b00 Tech Review, Enginnering, Ongoing Support $ - Ongoing Maintenance Costs $ Revenue lost during downtime/project installation $23,892 Other capital_ cost offset subtracted from total $ Net salvage value of old equipment $ - Estimated Value of incentives or rebates YR 1 $ 16,342 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET (Includes Rebate if available ) ......................... $38,658 Simple Payback Defined The period of time required for an Investment to "pay for itself" rough the nual benefit INVESTMENT Project Results SIMPLE _ (includes discount for = = 1.6 years PAYBACK potential utility rebates) $38,658 FIRST -YEAR SAVINGS $23,892 Estimated 5 Year Cash Flow year Year1 Yew Year year Year Program Savings Summary Utility Avoided Costs: Gas & Electric $23,892 r $24,609 I $25,347 r 526,107 r $26,890 Supplies /Repairs /Maint (Ops Savings) r $o IF $0 r $0 r $o r . - $o _ ff -so, Total Cost Avoidance: 11 $0 r $23,892 r $24,609 r $25,347 _ .r 526,107 -r $26690 Cost for Technology (REAUCE) - less Est Rebates so r 538,658 r $0 r so r $0 r $0 Ongoing Support Services r so r $o r $o -r $o IF So r $0 Total Program Cost So r $38,658 r $0 r $0 r $0 $0 _ Net Annual Cash Flow r r LS14,768) r $24609 'r $25,347 r 526,107 r $26,890 Cumulative Net Annual Savings r _$0 $0 r (514,768a _ r $9,843 r $35,1.89 _ r 561,297 r $88,187 Avg. Energy Escalation Rate: 3.0% Principal: (Excludes sales tax) r $55,000 r Less potential utility incentives r $16,342 Net Cost: r $38,658 4 ET09SCE0070 ice Rink Water Treatment System Final.pdf 5 Equipment cost only: Added costs include shipping, sales tax (if applicable), plus 1 -2 hours installation by licensed plumber are required Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 6 0 C Y P R E S S L T D Carbon Impact for Gas and Electric Cost Avoidance: Ten Year Useful Life6 Equivalency Results The sum of the greenhouse gas emissions you entered above is 5,170 l' e-rIC Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent. This Is equivalent to: Annual greenhouse gas emissions from 'Source: http: / /Www.epa.govlcleonenergyl energy- resources lcalculator.html#results Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 7 1,089 , 12,310,462 1 1,853 265 I Passenger vehicles cob MilWyear driven by an Tons of waste sent to the Garbage trucks of average passenger � landfill O O O waste recycled O instead of vehicle landfilled - COZ emissions from _...... ... ... _..._.- ._.._. - - ------ ror- -------- - -- - - - - -- -- - - ror- 581,793 )• 5,553,592 68.4 472 - --- -- - -_... -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- 9 sons of Pounds of coal bumed tanker trucks' worth of homes' energy use for one c consumed X17 I gasoline year ror- -or- rory -or- 4 711 27.7 135,244 f; Wind turbines installed I homes' electricity use railcars worth of coal bumed J ' Incandescent lamps switched to for one year w w CFIs ror ror- Or- rory 12,024 I 215,433 0.001 f: a barrels of oil consumed propane cylinders used coal -fired power plants for home in one year JS barbeques Carbon sequestered by rory ror- rory 132,574. 4,238 39.9 �^ tree seedlings grown for iD years I acres of U.S. forests in one year acres of U.S. 6 forests preserved �: conversion to I cropland in one rory ror- year rory 'Source: http: / /Www.epa.govlcleonenergyl energy- resources lcalculator.html#results Cypress, Ltd. Confidential Page 7 8110 To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item ##: IV.M. From: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator & Community Health Action 0 Commission Staff Liaison. Discussion ❑ Date: 8/4/14 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014- 11. Amending Chapters 12, 20, and 24 of the Edina City Code Concerning Tobacco and Electronic Delivery Devices. Action Requested: Waive second reading and adopt the attached Ordinance, amending Chapters 12, 20, and 24 of the City Code. Information / Background: The attached ordinance is intended to follow Council direction from the June 3rd work session with the Community Health Commission (CHC). The CHC and Council discussed regulating Electronic Delivery Devices as the Minnesota Freedom to Breathe Act regulates cigarettes and related products. The ordinance will also include Electronic Delivery Devices in the definition of tobacco- related device, which would require a City tobacco license for any business selling these items. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501St • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 12,20 and.24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE ;CONCERNING TOBACCO AND ELECTRONIC DELIVERY DEVICES THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 12 -189 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding and amending the following definitions: Sec. 12 -189. Definitions. Electronic delivery device and e- cigarette mean any product.containing or delivering nicotine, lobelia, or any other substance. intended for human consumption that can be used by.d;person to simulate smoking in the delivery of nicotine or any other substance through'inhalation of vapor from the product. Electronic delivery device includes any component part'of a product, whether or not marketed or sold separately. Electronic delivery device does not include any t roduct that has been approved or certified by the United' States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco - cessation product, as a tobacco- dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is marketed and sold for such an approved purpose. Smoking lounge means a location licensed to sell tobacco products where: (a) Excdpt for a bona fide sale of a smoking device, providing.or otherwise making available for use by a customer, potential customer, or any other person a smoking device for the purpose of smoking any tobacco product; (b) Providing in exchange for a fee or any other consideration seating within or access to the indoor area of a tobacco products shop; or (c) it is permitted within the indoor area the sampling of any tobacco product which was not furnished by the tobacco products shop on the date and at the time the sampling occurs. Tobacco - related device means any tobacco product as well. as a pipe, rolling papers or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking of tobacco or tobacco- related products. The term "tobacco- related device" includes electronic delivery devices. Vapor lounge means a location that sells electronic delivery devices where: 1 1771610 (a) Except for a bona fide sale of .electronic delivery devices, it is provided otherwise making available for use bv. a customer, potential customer, or any other person a device or product for the purpose of using an.electronic delivery device product; (b) it is provided in exchange for a fee or any other consideration seatinp, within or access to .the indoor-'area of a shop.that sells electronic delivery devices; or (c) it is permitted within the indoor,area of a shop that sells electronic delivery devices the sampling of any electronic delivery device product which was not furnished by the shop on the date and time the sampling occurs Section 2. Chapter 12 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding section 12 -56 to read as follows: 12 -56. Smoking and Vapor. Lounges Smoking lounges ounges and vapor lounges are prohibited. Section 3. Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Article X to read as follows: ARTICLE X. CLEAN INDOOR AIR ACT Division 1. Generally. 20 -60. Adoption of Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act by reference; prohibition on use of electronic delivery devices in public places. i (a) The following terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Indoor area means all space between a floor and a ceiling that is bounded by walls, doorways, or windows, whether open or closed, covering more than fifty percent (50 %) of the combined. surface area of the vertical planes constituting the perimeter of the area. A wall includes any retractable divider „garage door, or other.physical barrier, whether temporary or permanent. A 0.011 gaw4e window screen with an 18 by 16 mesh count is not a wall. Public place means any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited'to, -restaurants; bars, any other food or liquor establishment; retail stores and other commercial establishments; educational facilities other thanpublic schools, as defined in section 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13; hospitals; nursing homes, auditoriums; arenas; meeting rooms; and common areas of rental 2 17716tv1 (b) Minnesota Statutes H 144.411 to 144.417 are hereby adopted by reference and are made a part of this article. as if set out in full. (c) The use of electronic delivery devices is prohibited in all public places. Section 4. Section 24 -282 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as.follows: . Sec. 24 -282. Tobacco and electronic delivery device use prohibited in public parks. In addition. to the requirements of sections 24 -254 and 24 -255, the use of- electronic delivery devices and tobacco in any form is prohibited in public parks, indoor or outdoor. Section 5. This.ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication.., First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: i Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 3 177161v1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and' acting City Clerk for'the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing. Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its . Regular Meeting of , 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk To: Mayor and City Council From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Date: August 4, 2014 e Agenda Item #: IV. N. Revised Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -13 Amending Chapter 7 Concerning Dogs Action Requested: Adopt ordinance and waive second reading. Information / Background: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ The City Council requested staff prepare a change to the City Code regarding animal control to reflect current practice. Staff drafted the requested ordinance for Council consideration. Attachment Ordinance No. 2014 -13 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DOGS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 8 -264 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 8 -264. DOGS; CLEANING UP FECES-. A. No owner of any dog or any person having the custody or control.,of any dog shall be responsible for cleaning up any feces of the.dog and disposing of the feces in a clean and sanitary manner. Every occupant of a dwelling unit, or "owner if the dwelling unit is not occupied, shall remove dog feces from the unit, the yard; or lot on which the unit is located and dispose of such dog feces in a clean and- sanitary manner. B. Any person having the custody or control of a dog may not allow the dog:to.be on . property, public or private, not owned or possessed by such person without having in his or her immediate possession a device for the removal of feces and a bag or other means to dispose of such feces in a clean and sanitary manner. - C. This Section does not apply to guide dogs accompanying a blind person or to a dog used by police or in rescue actions. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading August 4, 2014 Second Reading Waived Published: August 14, 2014 q. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor REPORT / RECOMMENDATION ORDINANCE NO. 2014=13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DOGS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 8 -264 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Page 2 Section 8 -264. DOGS; CLEANING 'UP FECES. A. The owner of any dog or any person having the custody or control of any dog shall be responsible for cleaning up any feces of the dog and disposing the feces in a clean and sanitary manner. Every occupant of a dwelling unit, or owner if the dwelling unit is not occupied, shall remove dog:feces from the unit, the yard, or lot on which the unit is located and dispose of such dog feces in a clean and sanitary manner. B. Any person having the custody or control of a dog may not allow the dog to be on property, public or private, not owned or possessed by such person without having in his or her immediate possession a device for the removal of feces and a bag or other means to dispose of such feces,in a clean and sanitary manner. C. This Section does not apply to guide dogs accompanying a blind person or to a dog used by police or in rescue actions. SECTION 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and.publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: August 4, 2014 Waived August 14, 2014 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor One ��RBPd08 To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV.O From: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: 8/4/14 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014- 14. Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Pools. Action Requested: Waive second reading and adopt the attached Ordinance, amending Chapter 10 of the City Code. Information / Background: The ordinance will amend existing Edina City Code to align with current Minnesota Statutes and Rules related to the licensing and inspection of swimming pools in the City. This language update also fulfills a requirement of the delegation agreement between the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and the City of Edina. These updates were required by MDH as part of an evaluation of the City's Food, Pools, and Lodging inspection programs, completed in 2013. The proposed changes to the ordinance have been submitted to and reviewed by MDH and will complete the requirements of the evaluation. The ordinance was drafted by the City Attorney. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 201.4 -14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING-..CHAPTER 10 OF THE EDINA CITY" "CODE CONCERNING SWIMMING POOLS The City of Edina ordains: Section I. Chapter IO Article XI of-the Edina City Code is amended to read: Sec. 10 -486. Definitions. ' For the purpose of this article, the following- terms, phrases, words, and their. derivations shall have the meanings given': ASME /ANSI standards means a`safety standard_ accredited by the American National Standards Institute and published by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Backwash piping means the piping which extends from the backwash outlet of a filter to its terminus at the point`of disposal.., Filter means a material or apparatus by which water is clarified: Inlet means the fitting or opening through which filtered water enters the pool. Lifeline anchors means the rings at transition point of the pool. Main outlet means the outlet at the deep portion of the pool through which the main flow of water leaves the pool when being drained or being recirculated. Main. suction means the line connecting the main outlet to the pump suction. Minnesota Statutes means Minnesota Statutes as amended Pool means any structure, chamber, or tank containing an artificial body of water for swimming, diving, relaxation, or recreational use including special purpose pools and wading Pools. Pool deck means the finished area around the pool. Pool depth means the distance between the floor of the pool and the maximum operating level when the pool is in use. Pool floor means the portion of the pool that is horizontal or inclined less than forty-five (45) degrees to the vertical from the horizontal. Pool wall means the portion of the pool that is vertical or inclined more than 45 degrees to the vertical from the horizontal. 1 1769800 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 2 Private residential swffnmfng pool means. a pool connected with a single - family residence or owner - occupied duplex, located on private property under the control. of the homeowner, the use of which is limited to family members or the family's invited "guests: A private residential pool is not a pool used as part of a business. , d or-eyate guests. Public pool means any pool other than a private residential pool, that is: (1) open to the public generally, whether for a fee or free of charge; (2) open exclusively to members of an organization and their guests; (3), open to residents of a multiunit apartment building, apartment complex; residential real estate development; :or other• multifamily residential area; (4) open to patrons of a hotel or lodging or other public accommodation facility; or (5) operated by a,person in a park, school, licensed child care facility, group home,.-motel,. camp, resort, club, condominium, manufactured home park, or political subdivision with the'exception of pools at family..day care homes licensed under Minnesota Statatues Section 245A.14, subdivision 11, paragraph -(a). Recirculating piping means the piping through which the water circulates from the pool to the filter and return to the pool. Recirculation skimmer means a device connected with pump suction used to skim the pool over a self - adjusting weir and return the water to the pool through the filter. Residential special purpose pool: (1) The term "residential special purpose pool" means any basin for holding water which is designed for human use, 100 square feet or less in water surface. area with a water.. depth greater than 24 inches at any point and which is accessory to a single- family residence and is available only to the occupants of a residence and their guests. The term "residential special purpose pool" includes, but is not limited, to, treatment pools, therapeutic pools, whirlpools, spa pools and hot tubs. and Wading i (2) The term "residential special purpose pool" does not include temporary above ground swirwg Pools. Return piping means the piping which carries the filtered water from the filter to the pool. Temporary above ground sMmmin pool means a swimmin g pool which is inflated or assembled above ground or on the ground and is intended by design to be seasonal in nature and available only to the occupants of a residence and their guests. Transition point means the point between the shallow and deep area of the pool. Underwater seats, benches and swimouts means an underwater seat, bench or swimout- located at the perimeter of a pool no greater than 20 inches below the water line and a horizontal depth of 12 inches or more. 1769800 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 .Page 3 Vacuum fitting means the fitting in the wall'of the pool which is used as a::convenient outlet for connecting the underwater suction cleaning equipment. Vacuum piping means the piping which connects the vacuum fitting to the pump suction. Wading pool means any.pool with a maximum depth:of twenty -four (24) inches used or designed to be used exclusively for wading. Width and length determination means the width and length of the pool shall be determined by actual water dimensions. Sec. 10 -487. Private Residential Pools. This section establishes operation and maintenance, design, installation and construction standards. for private residential pools and facilities related to them but does not apply to wading pools. (1) 8er 19-487 Construction permit approval. F No person shall commence any work on the construction of a swimmin pool, or any alteration, addition, remodeling or other improvement, or on any repair to a swimming pool, without first obtaining a permit from the building official. The applicant for a permit shall submit for approval by the sanitarian three sets of identical plans and specifications and pertinent explanatory data relative to design, operation, and maintenance insofar as health. and safety features are concerned in accordance with the standards prescribed by this article. Approval by the sanitarian shall not'pertain to design for structural stability. The building official shall not issue the permit until the plans and specifications have been.approved by the sanitarian. (2) aer10 -498 Plans to be submitted. Plans, specifications and pertinent explanatory data required by section 10 -487 shall comply with the provisions of this article and shall include, but not be limited to, the following, as well as such other data as may be reasonably requested by the sanitarian and the building official: a) The general layout of the entire building lot on which the pool is to be located, distances of the pool from the lot lines, water supply systems, buried sewers and sewage disposal systems, utilities (electric, gas, telephone, etc.) or other sources of contamination within 50 feet of the pool. The -plans shall be drawn to a- scale of not less than one -fourth -inch equals one foot and shall indicate all dimensions, including the effective length, depth and width of the pool deck and similar items. b) Cross section views of the pool. c) Cross section view of scum gutters and skimmers. d) Diagrams showing all pipes, lines, vacuum lines, waste and discharge lines, circulation and other piping and listing material specifications and size. 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 4 e) Pool equipment layout, showing location of filters; pumps, chlorinators, chemical feeds, flow meter gauges, sight glass, strainers, hair and lint interceptors, and the dimensions of the filter room, its location, floor drain, sumps and other pertinent information. f) Liquid capacity of the pool. I, g) Kind, number and size of filters, including. the square footage of the filter area in each unit:. h) Rated capacity of--the filter in gallons per, minute. i) Description of chemical feeds for soda ash and alum, if used. j) Type, kind and description of chlorinator to be installed. k) Type and range of testing equipment, including chlorine. 1) Source of water supply. (3) See. 'ter. Construction in accordance with approved plans; deviation. All swimmin g pools, appurtenances, water supply'and. drainage systems, and other features shall: be constructed in conformity with the approved plans. For any deviation from such plans, a supplementary plan covering'-that portion of the work.involved shall be filed for approval and shall conform to the provisions of this article. (4) Ser :. 10 490. Permit fee. The fee for a permit required by section 10 -487 shall be in the same amount as the fee for a building permit as set forth in section 2 -724. . (5) Se '�-r0 491. Construction. The design and construction, as well as all equipment and materials, shall comply with the following requirements: a) Structural design. The pool structure shall be engineered and designed to withstand the expected forces to which it will be.subjected. All non - masonry constructed walls shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's-specifications. b) Wall design. The top elevation of the pool walls shall not exceed by more than eight inches the highest ground elevation abutting the. pool walls'at any point. In determining such highest ground elevation, no elevation increases shall be considered that are due to fill placed or grading done.in violation of this section:. The, walls shall be vertical to a depth of three feet from the water level. No right angle projection shall be' permitted with exception of steps at the shallow end. 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 5 c) Floor slope. The slope of the floor on the shallow side of the transition point shall not exceed one foot vertical to ten feet horizontal (1:10). The transition point between shallow and deep water shall occur in a water depth of at least five (5) feet, provided that this may be four and one -half (4%2) feet if a safety line is erected at this point. Where the water is five (5) feet or more in depth, the maximum slope shall not exceed one foot vertically to three feet horizontally (1:3), provided that the floor slope from the point of maximum depth to the deep end wall may be one foot vertically in each one foot horizontally (1:1). d) Overflow and surface drainage. The pool and surrounding area shall be constructed and arranged in such a manner that no splash or overflow water shall return to the pool. No surface or roof drainage shall be permitted to enter the pool. e) Finish and cove. Pool floor and walls shall have a cleanable, white or similar light- colored and impermeable surface. The pool floor shall be skid resistant. There shall be as minimum cove or rounded corner of one inch radius or more of the pool floor and wall, or such other interior construction. Where the water depth is less than five feet, the maximum radius or such cove shall be 12 inches. f) Handholds. Handholds shall be provided and consist of a bull -nosed coping not over two and one -half (2 %2) inches thick for the outer two inches or an equivalent approved handhold. The handhold shall not be more than nine inches above the normal water line and shall extend around the entire periphery of the pool. g) Pool deck. Unobstructed deck areas not less than forty-eight (48) inches wide shall be provided to extend entirely around each swimmin pool. No deck may be provided for that side of a swimmin pool forming a common wall with a residential special purpose pool, where the water depth of both the swig pool and special purpose pool are less than fifty -four (54) inches, and where the deck extends around all of those sides of the special purpose pool not sharing a common wall with the swimming pool. The deck shall be constructed above, but not more than nine (9) inches above, the normal water line. The deck area shall be constructed of impervious material, and the surface shall be smooth and easily cleaned and of nonslip construction. The deck shall have a pitch of at least one -fourth -inch to the foot, designed so as to prevent back drainage into the pool. If deck drains are provided, drain pipe lines shall be at least four times the cross sectional area of the drain pipe. The deck drain system shall have indirect connections to the sanitary sewer. The deck drains shall not be connected to the recirculation systems piping. Special features such as waterfalls, a vanishing edge, or other decorative features may occupy a maximum of fifteen (15) feet of deck around a swimming pool. Where the maximum depth of the swig pool does not exceed fifty-four (54) inches of water, one side of the swimming pool deck may be obstructed by special features, except a deck is not needed around the perimeter of a special purpose pool, where the special purpose pool is not located within four feet of a residential swifnFni+�g pool. 1. The pool is accessible from at least one side by a deck. 2. The deck is no less than four feet wide as measured perpendicular to the pool side and no less than eight feet long as measured parallel with the pool side. 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 6 3. The special purpose pool is not located within four feet of a residential swiri+�g pool. 4. The deck elevation is no lower than the elevation at the base of the special purpose pool or no more than nine inches above the normal water line of the special purpose pool. h) Entry/exit. Two or more means of entry/exit shall be provided for all residential �g pools. At least one entry/exit shall be located on the side of the pool at the deep end and one at the shallow end. The entries /exits shall consist of one or a combination of the following: steps, stairs, ladders, step holes, underwater seats, benches and swimouts. Step holes and ladders shall have a handrail on both sides. Underwater seats, benches and swimouts shall be visually set apart. If the pool is designed for use with diving equipment, the underwater seats, benches and swimouts shall be located outside of the required minimum diving water envelope as set forth in American National Standard for Residential Inground SwiffiffliR Pools (ANSI /NSPI -5 2003) a copy of which is on file with the city clerk. Two means of entry/exit shall be provided at the deep end where the width of the pool exceeds thirty (30) feet. i) Diving area. Minimum depths and area shall be as follows: Regulations Deck Level Board Intermediate Board One Meter Board Maximum distance above water 18 inches 30 inches 39.37 inches Minimum water depth five feet from tip of diving board 8 feet 8 feet 8.5 feet Distance of deep point from diving well 10 feet I I feet 12 feet Distance from deep point to transition point 10 feet I I feet 12 feet Minimum diving board overhang 2.5 feet 2.5 feet 3 feet Minimum distance from side wall to center of board 7 feet 7.5 feet 8 feet At least thirteen (13) feet of free and unobstructed headroom shall be provided above diving boards. One depth marking shall be provided in the deck or the wall of the pool above the high water line indicating the greatest depth in feet. Diving structures shall be securely anchored. j) Minimum depth. The minimum depth for all pools shall be three feet except for special purpose pools. k) Above ground swiFnFn*R pools; fill. Except for residential special purpose pools and temporary above ground swimmin g pools, allewed by sectien 10 492, swimming pools that CD are constructed or erected above ground or are designed to be constructed on the ground or above the ground are and shall be prohibited. No fill shall be placed or grading done on a 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 7 property to raise the ground elevation for the purpose of raising the top elevation of the pool walls. (6) See. 10 492. Temporary above ground swimming pools. Temporary above ground swimmin pools are permitted subject to the following restrictions: a) Temporary above ground swimming pools shall be removed and stored indoors between October 15 and April 15. b) Temporary above ground swimming pools shall not have a water surface area in excess of two hundred fifty -five (255) square feet and shall not be capable of having a water depth greater than forty-eight (48) inches. c) Drainage from a temporary above ground swimming pool shall be directed to the sanitary sewer or onto the property where such a pool is located in a manner which prevents runoff onto adjoining properties. Drainage onto a public street or storm sewer system is prohibited. d) Diving boards appurtenant to temporary above ground swimming pools are prohibited. e) Temporary above ground swimming pools shall be equipped with a ring buoy with not less than fifteen (15) feet of line attached or a pole or shepherds crook not less than ten (10) feet in length. f) Temporary above ground swimming pools are exempt from the requirements of the following subsections of Section 10 -487: 1. 10 487. Construction permit approval; 2. 10 488: Plans to be submitted; 3. 10 489. Construction in accordance with approved plans, deviation; 4. 10-490 Permit fee; 5. 10 -491. Construction, except subsection (k) of that subsection; 6. 10-493. Recirculation system; 7. 10 -494. Recirculation pump; 8. 10- 449-5. Pool piping; 9. 10 -496. Recirculating skimming device; 10. 10 497. Inlets; 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 8 11. 10 49A Outlets; 12. 1 0-5$1. Test; 13. 10 504. Safety rope and anchors; and 14. 10-511. Safety precautions. 10 5 13. Public peel, speeial pur-pese peel and spa 1ee& (7) See. 10 493. Recirculation system. A recirculation system consisting of pumps, piping, filters, skimmers, valves and disinfection equipment shall be provided which will clarify and disinfect the swimmin pool water volume in 12 hours or less.. The recirculation system components shall comply with NSF International 50, 1985 2011. (8) See. 10 -494. Recirculation pump. The recirculating pump shall have sufficient capacity to provide the rated flows of the filter system, without exceeding the head loss at which the pump will deliver such flows. The pump motor shall not be operated at an overload which exceeds the service factor. The pool pump shall be equipped on the inlet side with an approved hair and lint interceptor. The basket of the interceptor shall be non- corrosive and have openings not larger than one - fourth -inch in diameter. (9) See. 10 495. Pool piping. The pool piping shall be sized to permit the rated flows for filtering and cleaning without exceeding the maximum head at which the pump will provide such flows. In general, the water velocity in the pool piping should not exceed more than six feet per second. Where velocity is to exceed six feet per second, summary calculations shall be provided to show that rated flows are possible with the pump and piping provided. The recirculating piping and fittings shall meet the following requirements: a) Vacuum fitting location. Where vacuum fittings are provided, they shall be located in accessible positions below the water line. b) Pool recirculation piping. Pool recirculation piping, passing through the pool structure, shall be copper, brass, or approved equal tubing with a minimum wall thickness of L -type. C) Pool piping system. The pool piping system shall be constructed of materials prescribed in the state plumbing code. d) Inspection of pool piping. Except for the pool water supply line, all pool piping must be installed by the pool contractor and must be inspected by the building official prior to covering the system. (10) See. 10 496. Recirculating skimming device. 176980vl Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 9 Recirculating skimming devices shall be provided to skim the surface of the pool, with one unit installed to serve each pool, and such additional units as may be required, to provide a minimum of one for each 600 square feet of pool water surface or fraction thereof. Recirculating skimmers and pool inlets shall be located so that the pool inlets assist the skimming action to adequately remove the film on the pool water surface. When pools are irregularly or specially shaped, skimming devices shall be located in each offset. (1 1) gee. 'ter Inlets. Adjustable inlets shall be located to produce uniform circulation of water throughout the pool without the existence of dead spots. a) Minimum number. A minimum of two inlets shall be required for each pool, with an additional inlet for each additional 40 lineal feet .or fraction thereof of pool periphery over 120 lineal feet. Where automatic skimmers and skimmer - filter units are used, inlets shall be installed so as to direct the flow of water in a horizontal plane to the skimming device inlet. The minimum discharge depth of pool inlets shall be ten inches below the pool operation level. When pools are irregularly or specially shaped, additional inlets shall be installed in each offset. b) Makeup water. Suitable facilities for adding make -up water shall be provided. There shall be no physical connection between the water supply line and the pool system. If the make -up water is added directly to the pool, the fill spout shall be at least six inches above the upper rim of the pool. If the makeup water line discharges to a surge or balancing tank, the point of discharge shall be at least six inches above the rim of the tank. If a hose connection from a sill cock or other plumbing fixture is to be used for supplying makeup water, then an approved vacuum breaker shall be installed between the sill cock or control valve at the fixture and the hose connection. Any sill cock used for this service shall be located under a diving board or installed in a manner approved by the sanitarian so as to remove any hazard. C) Conformance with state plumbing code. The systems supplying recirculated water and makeup water to the pool shall be constructed in conformance with the state plumbing code. (12) gee. '� -$°$ Outlets. a) Main outlets. Main outlets, for purposes of recirculation and emptying the pool, shall be so located as to provide at least two suction outlets connected in parallel with suction outlet covers at the deepest point in the pool if the pool width does not exceed 20 feet. Outlet covers must meet ASME/ANSI standards. If the pool width is more than 20 feet, multiple outlets shall be provided and spaced not more than 20 feet apart, nor more than ten feet from walls. All main outlets shall be equipped with gratings having an area of openings not less than four times the cross - sectional area of the outlet pipe. The gratings shall be designed so that they cannot be readily removed by bathers and will not injure fingers of bathers. b) Drainage. If the pool cannot be drained by gravity, it shall be equipped with valves and pumps for completely emptying the pool. The discharge of the pool water to the sanitary sewer, or other suitable disposal unit acceptable to the sanitarian, shall be at a rate not to 176980vl Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 10 ,exceed 250 gallons per minute. No direct connection shall be made to the sanitary sewer. The outlet from the pool recirculation system shall, terminate at least six inches above-the receptacle connected to. the sewer. The drainage system shall be constructed under the supervision of a licensed plumber and in'conformance with the provisions of the state plumbing code. Water.drained.from the pool, shall not be discharged to the sanitary sewer system during periods of rainstorms. (I 3) See 10 499 T Heater. a) Gas -fired swimming pool heaters and swimming pool boilers shall bear the American Gas Association seal of approval. b) Oil burning equipment shall bear. the Underwriters Laboratory seal of approval. (14) Ser. IQ 960 Water supply. Water supplies serving all sw+mmiin pools shall be of a safe and sanitary. quality or otherwise . acceptable to the sanitarian. The installation.of the poobwater supply piping and connection to the source of supply shall `be under the supervision of a licensed plumber. (15), Sego. Test. All pool piping and the.installation and construction of the pool piping system shall be in accordance with the approved plans. The entire pool piping system shall be tested with an air test of 50 psi and proved tight before covering or concealing. (16) Se_. 10 502. Chemical treatment and peel water quality. All pools shall be provided with a chemical disinfecting method approved by the Sanitarian. Gaseous chlorinating systems shall -not be used as a disinfecting method for residential swimmin pools. (17) Sec.. 10 -503. Indicator kit.:. 176980vi Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page I I An indicator kit capable of measuring the disinfectant in thefree chlerine residuals i pool water accurate within one -tenth part per million shall be provided. (18) See. 10 Safety rope and anchors. A safety rope and anchors shall be provided at the water line when the designed pool operating water level is 4%2 feet or less. (19) Sec. -Eo -505. Electrical requirements. a) Code conformance. All electrical installations provided for, installed and used in conjunction with a swimmin pool shall conform with the provisions of article III of this chapter. b) Electrical conductors. No current carrying electrical conductors shall cross a swimmft pool, either overhead or underground or within ten feet of a swinnFniRg pool except for pool lighting or pool accessories. C) Grounding. All metal fences, enclosures or railings near or adjacent to a swi *R pool which might become electrically alive as a result of contact with broken overhead conductors, or from any other cause, shall be effectively grounded. (20) Sec -1S-506. Operation and maintenance. No swimmin pool shall be used, kept, maintained or operated in the city, if such use, keeping, maintaining or operating shall be the cause of any nuisance or shall be dangerous to life or detrimental to health. (21) See. 10 507. Inspection. The sanitarian shall have authority to inspect any residential sing pool at any reasonable time during construction and thereafter to determine whether or not the provisions of this article regarding health, sanitation, operation and safety are being complied with. The building official shall have authority to enter upon any premises to inspect work done and installations made under any permit issued pursuant to this article. (22) See. 10 -508 Shielding light. Lights used to illuminate any swimmin pool shall be so arranged and shielded as to reflect light away from adjoining premises. (23) See. 10 Location. No portion of a swimmin pool, except a residential special purpose pool, or any appurtenance shall be located within ten feet of any side or rear lot line, nor in the required front yard as provided in chapter 36. No portion of a residential special purpose pool or any appurtenance shall be located within five feet of any side or rear lot line, nor in the required front yard as provided in chapter 36. 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 -14 Page 12 (24) Sec — 10 -3 10. Fence. All sw+mmin pools shall be completely enclosed by a nonclimbing -type fence. All fence openings or points of entry into the pool area enclosure shall be equipped with gates. The fence and gates shall be at least four feet in height and shall be constructed of number I I -gauge woven wire mesh corrosion - resistant material, or of other materials approved by the building official. All gates shall be equipped with self - closing and self - latching devices placed at the top of the gate or otherwise inaccessible to small children. All fence posts shall be decay or corrosion - resistant and shall be set in concrete bases, or other suitable protection. The openings between the bottom of the fence and the ground or other surface and the openings between the vertical pickets shall not be more than four inches. Except a special purpose pool need not meet the fence requirement provided: a) , The special purpose pool is equipped with. a safety cover listed in, accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard F 1346, Standard Performance Specification for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements for All Covers for SwifflffliA Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs. b) The safety cover is secured and locked in place at all times the special purpose pool is not occupied. (25) SeF-10 51 1. Safety precautions. a) Ring buoys. Every residential swimming pool shall be equipped with one or more throwing buoys not more than 15 inches in diameter and having 60 feet of 3/16 -inch Manila line attached, and one or more light but strong poles with blunted ends, not less than 12 feet in length, for making reach assist or rescue. b) Diving board height. The height of diving boards above the pool water level shall be in accordance with section 10 -487 (5) (i). 10- 491(9). The sanitarian may authorize greater diving board heights when it is shown that such increased height will provide an equally safe diving board height- maximum pool depth ratio. (26) Sec. 10 31? Other design and equipment. Any swimmin g pool, the design and equipment of which incorporates features other than those set forth in this article, shall be subject to review and approval by the sanitarian in accordance with acceptable standards and in conformance with current public health and safety practices. Sec. 10 -488. Public Pools. This section established operation and maintenance, design, installation and construction standard for public pools and facilities related to them. (1) Construction and operation. Any public pool shall be constructed and operated in accordance with Minn. Stats. 176980v1 Ordinance No. 2014 =14 Page 13 § 144.1222. Minn. Stat. Chapter. 157 and Minnesota Rules parts 4717.0150 through 4717.3975. Plans to construct a new swimming public pool or remodel an existing .s +rig up blic pool must be submitted to the state department of health for formal plan review and approval prior to' any work being done. No person shall construct, alter, remodel, improve or repair a swi ing up blic pool without first obtaining required permits from the building official. (2) Rules en file. Three copies of said rules, each marked "Official Copy," are on file in the office of the clerk and shall remain on file for use and examination by the.public. (3) Official investigation. The sanitarian .and building official may enter upon any premises for the purpose of conducting preconstruction surveys, intermediate construction investigations and operational investigations. Such entries may be made at such times as may be deemed necessary to determine that the facilities are constructed in accordance with approved plans, and maintained and operated in accordance with the requirements of the rules described in this section. (4) Valid license. No person shall operate or maintain a public or'semi- public swimmin g pool or public or semi - public special purpose pool without having first obtained a valid license issued by the city. The provisions of'article II of chapter 12 shall apply to all licenses required by this subsection and to the holders of such licenses. a) In addition to the applicant's name and address, the applicant for a license shall furnish the address of the premises where the pool is situated or is to be situated. b) The fee for a license required by this section shall be in the amount set forth in section 2 -724. c) Licenses issued pursuant to this article shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. d) It shall be the duty'of the sanitarian to enforce the provisions of this section. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: August 4, 2014 1 Second Reading: Waived Published: August 14, 2014 Attest 176980v1 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland; Mayor %-A 0 tll Jy AGENDA ITEM V. A. Edina Robotics FIRST Team 1816 The Green Machine [-� No packet data Oral presentation Information coming To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action M Discussion M Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Developme Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate. 5125, 5105, 5 10 1, and 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Ni Boulevard. Res. No. 2014 -82, Comprehensive Plan; and Res. No. 2014 -83 for Preliminary Rezoning and I Plan. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Resolutions approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff memo dated April 9, 2014; and unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. The Commission recommended several conditions that have been added to the conditions in the attached resolution, including providing more open space between the building and street, and providing additional landscaping. Information / Background: Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5. 108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, .Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. (See property location on pages A I -A8 and the applicant narrative and plans on pages A 12 —A32 in the Planning Commission staff report.) To accommodate the request, the following would be required: I . Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District - l to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 30 and 25 feet. 3. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council, the second step would be Final Rezoning to PCD -2 and Final Site Plan & Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 feet to 30 and 25 feet. The second step would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment in this first step would be a final action. The subject site is guided for Office Uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The above mentioned commercial sites located south of the subject property, are guided for Industrial use and are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff is recommending that these commercial sites also be included.for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial to bring the existing uses into compliance. These parcels include the following: ➢ 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard. These uses include a small commercial strip center, Burger King and Dairy Queen; each of which are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. The Shell convenience gasoline station is zoned PCD-4, Planned Commercial District. Sketch Plan reviews for proposed development of this site were done in 2013 and 2014. (See Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A69 -A77 of the Planning Commission Staff Report.) The applicant has attempted to address as many of the issues raised during Sketch Plan review as possible. The two most notable changes are bringing the building up to the street to create a more pedestrian, friendly environment along the street, and relocating the drive - through. (See the previous Sketch Plan on pages A33 -A34.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolutiion No. 2014 -82, Comprehensive Plan • Resolution No. 2014 -83, Rezoning • Planning Commission minutes, April 9, 2014 • Planning Commission staff report RESOLUTrM NO. 2014-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED ON EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. 1.02 The subject site is guided for Office Uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The above mentioned commercial sites located south of the subject property, are guided for Industrial use and are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, these commercial sites also are being considered for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial to bring the existing uses into compliance. These parcels include the following: ➢ 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard. These uses include a small commercial strip center, Burger King and Dairy Queen; each of which are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. The Shell convenience gasoline station is zoned PCD -4, Planned Commercial District. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: ➢ A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. 1.03 The properties are legally described as follows: ➢ 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Lot 3, Block 1, Edina Interchange Center 6th Addition, Hennepin County, Minn. ➢ 5125 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Lot 1, Block 1, Glasers Addition to Edina, Hennepin County Minn. ➢ 5105 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Lot 2, Block 1, Glasers Addition to Edina, Hennepin County Minn. ➢ 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Lot 10, Block 8, Edina Interchange Center, Hennepin County Minn. ➢ 7700 Normandale Boulevard - Lot 11, Block 8, Edina Interchange Center, Hennepin County Minn. 1.04 On July 9, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-82 Page 2 „ Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to thelollowing findings: 1. The proposed land uses-are consistentwith existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD- Z.zoning would,: complement and enhance this limited retail area. 2. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties to the south is really a housekeeping item, as it was,, mistakenly guided for industrial use. 3. Neighborhood Commercial is.defined as small to moderate -scale commercial, serving primarily adjacent neighborhoods. Primary uses are retail and services, offices, studios, institutional use. Existing uses in this area include a gas station, limited retail and convenience food. All ure permitted uses within the PCD -2 and PCD -4 Zoning Districts. 4. The proposal would meet the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. Building Placement and Design: Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region: e. Buildings should�be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale: 5. The traffic study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. Section 3. APPROVAL. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows; subject to Met Council approval: The following properties are Guided NC, Neighborh000d Commercial: ➢ 5125, 5105, 5101, and 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard. (See legal descriptions on Exhibit A.) RESOLUTION NO. 2014-82 Page 3 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2014-83 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PCD -2, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office/ light industrial uses. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Edina Interchange Center 6th Addition, Hennepin County, Minn. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 30 and 25 feet. 1.04 This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council, the second step would be Final Rezoning to PCD -2 and Final Site Plan & Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 feet to 30 and 25 feet. The. second step would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. 1.05 On July 9, 2014, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff memo dated April 9, 2014. A motion to approve the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan failed on a 3 -3 Vote. The Commission recommended several conditions in their motion that have been added to the conditions in the attached resolution. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-83 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 5 and 6 above, in_regard to rezoning property. Subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The project would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties; would,not result in an overly intensive land use; would not result in undue traffic congestion or hazards; and with the exception of the setback variances would conform to all zoning ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. Section 3. APPROVAL r NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning to PCD, Planned.Commercial- District and Preliminary Development Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary,' Development Plans dated June 6, 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated July 15, 2014. 5. Approval of the requested Front Yard Setback Variances. 6. The patio space shall be re- apportioned to provide more open spacebetween the building and Edina Industrial Boulevard. 7. The proposed landscaping shall be increased, and should include consideration of additional plantings along the building; and boulevard trees along Edina Industrial Boulevard, subject to review and approval of the city engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-83 Page 3 Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 4, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk �J VII. C. Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Variances. Frauenshuh. 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office/light industrial use. Teague explained to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 30 and 25 feet. 3. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Teague further noted this "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary requests be approved by the City Council, the second step would be Final Rezoning to PCD -2 and Final Site Plan & Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 feet to 30 and 25 feet. The second step would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment in this first step would be a final action. Planner Teague stated staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: ➢ To re -guide 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard from O, Office to NC, Neighborhood Commercial; and re -guide 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard from 1, Industrial to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Approval is subject to the following findings: I . The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. 2. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties to the south is really a housekeeping item, as it was mistakenly guided for industrial use. Page 1 of 6 3. Neighborhood Commercial is defined as small to moderate -scale commercial, serving primarily adjacent neighborhoods. Primary uses are retail and services, offices, studios, institutional use. Existing uses in this area include a gas station, limited retail and convenience food. All are permitted uses within the PCD -2 and PCD -4 Zoning Districts. 4. The proposal would meet the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. 5. The traffic study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. Continuing, Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -I, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and build a 10,000 square foot retail building as proposed subject to the following findings: I .The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 5 and 6 above, in regard to rezoning property. Subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The project would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties; would not result in an overly intensive land use; would not result in undue traffic congestion or hazards; and with the exception of the setback variances would conform to all zoning ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. Approval is further subject to the following Conditions: Page 2 of 6 I . The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated June 6, 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated July 15, 2014. 5. Approval of the requested Front Yard Setback Variances. Appearing for the Applicant Dave Anderson, Frauenshuh and Nick Sperides, Sperides Reiners Architects Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson addressed the Commission and gave a brief run - through of the revisions to the plans since their last meeting with the Commission. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that the proposed sidewalk going north doesn't appear to connect, and wondered if there was a way to ensure there is a sidewalk connection north. Mr. Anderson responded that connection would be reviewed. Platteter said it makes sense to him to have a connection to the north so people in the offices to the north could walk to the site instead of driving. Commissioner Platteter asked if the transformer would be screened. Mr. Sperides responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Terhaar, Wenck & Associates if he found any issues with traffic flow. Mr. Terhaar responded that for the most part traffic flows well and will continue to work well. He acknowledged there are times when there is back up at left lane ramp; however it does clear rather quickly. Forrest asked if Terhaar believes this "use" would generate more traffic than the present use. Terhaar responded in the affirmative, adding they believe there will be an increase during the PM peak hours. Commissioner Carr complimented the applicant on their design changes and questioned what the proposed exterior stone looks like. Mr. Sperides explained at final review they will be presenting a material that would better highlight the materials and color scheme. Commissioner Platteter asked if there is a bus stop in the area. Mr. Anderson responded in the affirmative; however, there is no bus shelter. Commissioner Lee commented that it appears the site will be losing the existing green buffer zone. Commissioner Scherer agreed, adding she also has a concern that the Page 3 of 6 introduction of three overstory trees isn't enough. Commissioner Schroeder said he has an issue with drainage noting off Metro Boulevard there is a low area along the sidewalk that could flood during a heavy rainfall. He added in his opinion it's not a good idea to have people walk to the building through a stream of water. Mr. Sperides agreed, adding he would review the engineering drawings and "take care" of any drainage issues. Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing; no one was present. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioners Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Kilberg commented that in his opinion the redevelopment of this site establishes a good precedent. He said with this proposal pedestrians are better served. Kilberg complimented the drive - through redesign, adding in his opinion its much better than at sketch plan. Continuing, Kilberg stated he likes the rain garden feature. In conclusion, Kilberg said he likes the location of the building instead of having to view a sea of cars. Kilberg said he supports the proof of parking, the improvement to traffic flow and is in favor of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague if the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan should include the property to the east. Planner Teague said at this time it would be best to only focus on the subject site. Commissioner Lee commented if the goal of the Commission is to bring new buildings up to the street the Commission should be clearer in what they mean when they suggest that an applicant "pull the building" up to the street. She stated the solution presented is good; however, engaging the street could be better defined. Continuing, Lee said she also likes to see boulevard trees and does have a concern that the existing trees and green buffer would be lost with this redevelopment. Chair Staunton said the intent of "pulling the building" up to the street was to engage the street. Commissioner Schroeder explained that the direction from the Commission to relax the setback of the building from the front street was to create an engaging street front with patio spaces, etc. Schroeder said the Commissions goal was to achieve an active engaging pedestrian friendly experience at front building fagades; however, at times achieving that goal was difficult because the applicant(s) may have certain restraints (safety). Page 4 of 6 Mr. Sperides said they would work toward creating more active patio areas. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that the corner of Edina Industrial Boulevard /Metro Boulevard is busy; and encouraged the applicant to add more vegetation in that area. The discussion continued focusing_on the parking area and public'space and ways to better achieve balance. Commissioner Carr suggested that the applicant use pavers in the two patios and other areas because when viewing the site there appears to be a lot of concrete. Mr. Sperides responded that at this time the materials for the hard surface areas haven't been finalized; however, would keep in mind the use of pavers. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded. the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder asked if the motion allows for movement flexibility along the north side of the building patio area. Commissioner Lee said she would also like to see additional landscaping added. Chair Staunton suggested adding their issues as an amendment to the motion. Commissioner. Schroeder moved to amend the motion to include as an additional condition a reapportionment of the public space on the north side to create more useable space on the south side. Commissioners Platteter and Carr accepted that amendment. Commissioner Lee moved to amend the motion to include as an additional condition the addition of vegetation and trees on the boulevard area. Commissioners Platteter and Carr accepted that motion subject to findings. A brief discussion ensued with Mr. Anderson pointing out with regard to the request for additional plantings on the boulevard there is a concern that tenant identification and signage could.be compromised. Commissioner Lee commented that with careful selection of plantings such as deciduous trees any impact should be minimal. Chair Staunton called for the vote; all voted aye; preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan approved 7 -0. Page 5 of 6 t{'95��1'rjr o� e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 23, 2014 VI.C. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. (See pages Al -A4.) Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. (See page A5.) North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. (See property location on pages Al -A8 and the applicant narrative and plans on pages Al 2—A32.) To accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 30 and 25 feet. 3. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council, the second step would be Final Rezoning to PCD -2 and Final Site Plan & Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 feet to 30 and 25 feet. The second step would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment in this first step would be a final action. The subject site is guided for Office Uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The above mentioned commercial sites located south of the subject property, are guided for Industrial use and are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (Pages A8,and A11.) Therefore, staff is recommending that these commercial sites also be included for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial to bring the existing uses into compliance. These parcels include the following: ➢ 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard. These uses include a'small commercial strip center, Burger King and Dairy Queen; each of which are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. The Shell convenience gasoline station is zoned PCD-4, Planned Commercial District. See the Zoning for the area on page A2, and the Comprehensive Plan designations for the area on pages A8 and A11. The proposed use of the subject property at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. Sketch Plan reviews for proposed development of this site were done in 2013 and 2014. (See Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A69 -A77.) The applicant has attempted to address as many of the issues raised during Sketch Plan review as possible. The two most notable:changes are bringing the building up to the street to create a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, and relocating the drive- through. (See the previous Sketch Plan on pages A33 -A34.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: An office building; Zoned POD -1, Planned Office District and guided O, Office. Easterly: An office building; Zoned POD -1, Planned Office District and guided O, Office. Southerly: Burger King and Shell convenience gasoline center, Zoned PCD- 2 and PCD-4, Planned Commercial District; and guided for I, Industrial. Westerly: The old GM Plant currently leased by Filmtec; zoned PID, Planned Industrial and guided Industrial. 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.3 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains an office with surrounding surface parking on all sides. (See pages Al —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Site Circulation O — Office. POD -1, Planned Office District -1. Access to the site would continue to be from Edina Industrial Boulevard and ,Metro Boulevard: There are currently two curb cuts to Edina Industrial Boulevard. The access closer to the intersection would be eliminated. Traffic Study Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A37 —A68.) The study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. No improvements would be needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the proposed project Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 25 overstory trees and a full complement of understory shrubs. The applicant is proposing 27 overstory trees, including existing and proposed. The trees would include a mixture of Elm, Honey Locust, Crabapple, Linden and Aspen. (See pages A21 and A30:) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading for the retail space would take place at the back of the building or parking lot area. Trash would be collected within the building and at the trash enclosure area in the northeast corner of the parking area. The material of the enclosure would be brick to match the proposed building, as required by City Code. (See pages A22 and A26.) Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed�the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached W page A35 -A36. The applicant should address the engineer's memo as part of the Final Rezoning process. Building /Building Material The building would be constructed of high quality brick and ledgestone. The building would be finished on all four sides. (See renderings on pages A14— A19.) A materials board would be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council as part of final rezoning of the site. Drive - through Stacking Space The proposed drive - through lane would be accessed on the east side of the site, with the pick -up window on the east side of the building. The drive - through lane would contain six stacking spaces behind the menu order board and nine spaces from the pick -up window. (See page A22.) City Code requires five spaces, although the Code does not specifically refer to coffee shops. A traffic study, done by Wenck and Associates, found that the traffic from the proposed use would not impact the adjacent roadways. The study shows that additional stacking would line up with the drive -aisle area. (See page A42.) Signage The applicant would be required to meet all signage regulations of the PCD -2, Zoning District. Compliance Table 4 City Standard (PCD -2) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — Edina Ind. Blvd 35 feet 30 feet* Front — Metro Boulevard 35 feet 25 feet* Rear — East 25 feet 50+ feet Side — North 25 feet 40+ feet Building Height 4 stories 1 story Maximum Floor Area 1.5% .16% Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls (Site) 56 55 (proof of parking for 1 stall) 4 Drive Aisle Width 24 Feet 24 feet *Variance requested Rezoning Per Section 36 -216 of the City Code, the commission may recommend approval by the council based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Should the City Council approve the Amendment to designate the future land use oUthe site to neighborhood commercial; the proposal would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing land uses to the south, which are commercial. The proposed project would meet several Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, including the following: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. (2) Is consistent with,the preliminary site plan as approved and modified by the council and contains the council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the final site plan. The proposed plans are consistent with most of the comments by the Planning Commission and City Council per the Sketch Plan review. Any 5 conditions imposed in this preliminary review would be'required to be presented as part of the Final Rezoning application. (3) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. The proposed retail uses are consistent with the retail uses to the south, and currently being considered to the east. This limited retail area would provide uses beneficial to the office and industrial areas to the north and west. (4) Will not result in an overly intensive land use. The proposed square footage would be less than the existing office building on the site. A traffic study was done and found that the proposed uses could be supported by the existing roadways. (5) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. Again, Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic study which concluded that the proposed uses could be supported by the existing roadways. (6) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code. With the exception of the front yard setback variance requested to bring the building up to the street, the proposed project would conform to all zoning ordinance requirements of the PCD -2, Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. (7) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. As mentioned above, the proposed retail uses are consistent with the retail uses to the south, and currently being considered to the east. This limited retail area would provide uses beneficial to the office and industrial areas to the north and west. It would provide convenience retail and dining options for the nearby employment area. 0 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial, reasonable for this area? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site and area for the following reasons: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the, south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses.-The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance-.this limited retail area and the Industrial areas to the north and west. 2. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties to the south is really a house keeping item, as it was mistakenly guided for industrial. use. 3. Neighborhood Commercial is defined as small to moderate -scale commercial, serving primarily adjacent neighborhoods. Primary uses are retail and services, offices, studios, institutional use. Existing uses in this area include a gas station, limited retail and convenience food. All are permitted uses within the PCD -2 and PCD-4 Zoning Districts. 4. The proposal would meet the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. 7 5. The _traffic study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. • Is the Rezoning to PCD -2 appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PCD -2 is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 5 and 6 above, in regard to rezoning' property.. Subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the project would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The project would not be detrimental.to the surrounding properties; would not result in an overly intensive land use; would not result in undue traffic congestion or hazards; and with the exception of the setback variances would conform to all zoning ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendments Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: ➢ To re -guide 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard from O, Office to NC, Neighborhood Commercial; and ➢ Re -guide 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard from I, Industrial to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. 8 2. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties to, the south is really a housekeeping item, as it was mistakenly guided for industrial use. 3. Neighborhood Commercial is defined as small to moderate -scale commercial, serving primarily adjacent neighborhoods. Primary uses are retail and services, offices, studios, institutional use. Existing uses in this area include a gas station,. I im ited retail and convenience food. All are permitted uses within the PCD -2 and PCD-4 Zoning Districts. 4. The proposal would meet the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas, that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to . create pedestrian scale. 5. The traffic study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. Preliminary Rezoning to PCD -2 & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -. 1, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and build a 10,000 square foot retail building as proposed. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 5 and 6 above, in regard to rezoning property. Subject to approval E of the. Comprehensive. Plan Amendment; the project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The project would not be detrimental to the surrounding'properties; would not result in an overly intensive land use; Would not result in undue .traffic congestion or hazards; and with the exception of the. setback variances would conform to'all zoning ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed.land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses.in this area. The: uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed, limited retail uses and_ PCD -2 zoning would complement and`enharice this limited retail area. Approval is subject to the following. Conditions: 1. The °Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated June 6, 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter .36 of the City Coder 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the engineering memo_ dated July 15, 2014. 5. Approval of the requested Front Yard Setback. Variances. Deadline for a city decision: October 1, 2014 10 J 1 City of Edina 7 �� - -.. 17733770 70 51N (7.}e 7t(' „a�7T J� jtlJ r:,l C_ 7 !90)49 4 1 Idis Z i WebpphMdpFoiwro :t 77 r,:oJU� {{al ){ 1., sit i 4737 Smraund7np Houso llmLUr 5 A 24 Laba15 �9P 1Pa3 1713 5 it 170 "of lnV a! / {3 Ilausof7umborl8bels wsa.37ct: 77[0 77so {7» Lnhefs 1 41f . iris coy urlamo �i coy urNls Nil Fa I 71 71 {t 71M 7733 930 67N 1370 file vol *9 3 71 ]73 O I-Aa llamas LnYas .10 EJ �17671�" 0 r'iJ�[V ..• 0 Folks W6 > j 2lU 1J FIN 71oI 3151 1450 7401 0 Pallals 7! '•71 %�7 N)!! 1: {(8!777 7525 1 73,7 SId7 S/W 3fa 1102 5197 St 4374 19 i7 7503 o it I 1503 If 431JIA I {DI� {%'d7 f03l 1501, i10J� 7673 ISN.1cos, T 71 7673 1613 ! r 1)<91f1` )$'a 19014v 19Yl77311 v iw 140 7615 16/3 � 770D 76 -- - 3too 49,o . nrpsY7i 7,ano-.�•7� 7), s;I71A,r 7611 !r]7, Il �]J�711f 17{ . 7p7 7 tJ 7703 s7.V 77N 5t0f 3175 s10f 77n1 t !! {!at 14 {als nco 6373 am$ 3157 8101 1771. 571s 1131 Rod Me !673 24 7711 17j 6075 970 apt 531) s1N SPIV 7100 7203 ld17 7f01377137J1 3771 Vol Ojai S real law loo] fats 11i0 OjN 7872 lost lj$ fill Felt if 00 3681 � 5722 7laa 4y Ton /Ib '411PI, age Pw 3381 Sell ' ® 4; IN slot scot 97018775 e,m ells e7u1 Val 8W4b2j,ulJ 16 slid un�.al.nMns e.I•q..eia'im3 tots 6104 a71967ol aoxea —�� If •'Y.••S'o� I' ��ilyii 1i7(l 'r-- Otis sets t UYA a IG(9 r1 t4 [dIQ ii4P Y4 ^.9t75,M,aJ•»ifnW*�,�+a, C( flip tl(r 9X6 Ifl! !••: ft N(t 11701 /�1 Iols t4tc If/S /fKC w/9 wts k�� slaerca ❑ `r�'� eft 2 1?•Pol =HnF• =t+manu loot., lrtc ' Ifgl rrlt Inc In[ O Imnt- h•Dac + =olra ® Not fret U "11e�- ;:.a5r+511.N DHt ; DHt 9Nl r 1019 i� /On 109 IP•-i.0 • ?'=: H+Wlrb:e . t2tl IJlclltflol[ 2121 A� roll Iv.,F Dml��ob H. =.el50tld ® w!t got$ flfT •rrt/q Iv.wam,cwxHa -virabr ,/. � - Iwrar°rue••a[= •�dIFOVa Ir 5194 lu•vomnor ar• =vlr9ga `g ` Drtt 6211 ;nlc firs m[s gc[f sfst 9655' IwnOrrl= i�aH• =•sdll pNd of r`ICEJ Oltt DO[t\ -. \ , Myna olq H =�rlrODa ❑ 1 , ftlf a Fi]fitr�i ter u twna la H= elraoa ❑ � lOts' \ p1[f fD!! Ntt )n[ tt rr�69 t JIM I - OmF -n,l Pu m /.Ilflllr[ 1?•�ar:•c ^ry r✓ =mica ❑ � Ntt alt [ © DIG) rolc N!L Ic�rsaM1�++� =-+�F• 4ii-a7l J If (Vol IwwOP -� =«•7 H'~•AI['a7r ® of «r 6 i fH[ fill ol 1691 1 ?•40f- ?'• +'t=J 9•a d1L07d � � 1`IfflJ lfLr s . Iw;= Orveraa�faa=pe1107d ® fOSrJDf ft �rrr Y Mt flit Iu.cDrwal xow.mt6amf ® 10/ 6[026 rJf[; r ' .• -� t twra,=— +ec :•aa[�!nf5am[ - ['Orr t 2114 bKh p .lost trig 2619 tlri nE Qiff ft9[ Ht _ OK! KIr fc,nar�e :,-aaD ranROan ❑ rlp 9Lrr tr e � `- ___�._ {iFyl% IH-vOE•nms: -•1 =Yl oar ❑ 6! [! . ri I DOt1 rJ Oulua2 Ntr 19i5 ION soft { i{t t[K [ r rail 4 9ylnd ❑ D JLt9re satin ❑ iftl..' . girt fam711DyQ7 ❑ rr for[ Nrt 601 Ofrt tuts 6229 INL 11711 town LII� %� et! itogD7Pwr111aa-04 ft► O[n axu sm I!► �' " AM ,pw7,ogwntl o;noH !i A1[I'.7Dfl� IJ2c frrt bi lots `�— r slag D7 tit! •, - ._. f] 1t "is , ogwnll.snop Dulp..P„P5 t ►tOR pf! Jr. .. .� �nptt .: wn)eai PaVIUIPIDIH r0alt /6 f01►r t ..oft 7Oftt f l�ri [ wts ffrf puofSO� 1z N 7112 •.� jft_. f Otte Oit[ _ eu►p3 jo fq!j City of Edina ,� -- - - -17..- i7 1.7,.--- - -•'-i In r ---- {� - ---- -- LCCana ;@n 7 �rr' a � sunoumm�p siouso liwuhcr _ 17° _ - :5. •� , 1 -�• ., cs .,i ♦ labels sral. •Slel slat Ira '''"55iii n . /sos n • 'sru Ilausu 11—bar Lahol3 1'1'1 L, St -111 —o Labels `- �•fll. rAn r' t '1'r I. tv at - .1 (( r b ; City 1.1,01, ,, Crechs £ ,�„� av s`.s <n.. ` wa ra..� - i { 'R' t f ; -`+ f � i ❑ LaFO flames ❑ Parkc . •7 `�.. tl l:1 ,i~ 1 - �(�� .iti'e !i ❑ Parcols 1 - •,• - l•1Ff+ 7013 Acrfal Plio!o .! ° , .•' 7446 i� - �rf' r• :�. „a _ g" Slo)I 3l0f. • -. WNA naIMfUlt 1340 -- g I7 Rl SYN _ a _ P } �+••', , � stns' 1 ,. ,� '7 -- •.e-�' - si j lrF +�...,.1, r r e... •i�;'' 1.: t I'i1 Ir • 1 f 7713 n SISI _. • :.! ' r. s -. i 1 - /`aal .• ,i 1.,. lei' _. s��:`0.;yi •.•1,1.1 r 1 a e I)><• � „'111 , _ Y rd.� li' � 1 �„ �� I ! a •� yif: 1 .itedl t it.. It _•.�L f mss.,! ,� � `a . taro . - -- — s7ca� _ _ ;t+. •..� 1:..,_- ��.r_:.v •• a � 1 � - J ti'•1- ( -i'U tLl rl lj7 ern � Inn. �.._...,._. -.,. r�.- _ „�„s�•;�:'r"� =I �,� ' . _ 4�_�`�' c.il�l�l�]rtn+ I -a I 1 1 113 k� Google earth feet 700 meters 200 g- Google earth feet 500 meters 100 4R CIf SETt 65 K-5 A7 a� for living, learning, raising families & doing businessr��� 2008 Comprehensive Plan) City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS �1--r-i J r, ^;,u; Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 el-I .afar living, learnlilgrraWng familles & doing'business 7 2008.Compre-hensive Plah Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses. Development . density Mixed Use Guidelines Guideline' ategories AA Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or Mixe -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, oor to Area Current ampler: than one neighborhood (and pedestrian and Ratio -Per �n 0 50 an France beyond city boundaries). streetscape current primary uses; Retail, office, amenities; enco age Zoning Code: o Grandvie service, multifamily residential, or require str tured maximum of institutional uses, parks and parking. By1 dings 1,5 open space. "step d Wn" in height 1 : 2 ertical mixed use should be from tersections. 50th @ units /acre e uraged, and may be 4 orles at req ed on larger sites. lance; 3 -6 stories at Grandview CAC The mos ' tense district in Form -based design" Community Activity terms of'us height and standards for building Floor to Area Center coverage. placement, massing Ratio -Per Example: Greater Primary uses; Re office, and street -level current Southdale area (not lodging, entert m t anal treatment. Zoning Code; including large multi- residential u s, comb ed or in Buildings should be maximum of family residential separate ildings. placed in appropriate 0.5 to 1.0* neighborhoods such Secon ry uses: Institution 1, proximity to streets to 2-3 as Centennial Lakes) recr tional uses. create pedestrian units /acre ed use should be encourage , scale, Buildings "step down at boundaries and maybe required on larger 'th lower- density sites. dis acts and upper stone "step back" from str t, More string \t design standards for buildings > 5 st. es. Emphasize pede5tr circulation; re- introduce flner- grained circulation patterns where %: feasible. I Applies to existing predominantly Performance Industrial industrial areas within the City. standards to ensure Floor to Area Primary uses: industrial, compatibility with Ratio: Per manufacturing. Secondary uses: adjacent uses; Zoning Code: limited retail and service uses. streaking of outdoor 0:5 activities, Edina Comp Plan Updato 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Desig►7 MI 4 -29 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 5 Existing language xxxx l Language recommended xxxx V Language stricken �i -k- destinations. greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Floor to Area Ratio: per current Zoning Code* Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories NC Small- to moderate -scale Building footprints 2--3 5 -12 residential Neighborhood commercial, serving primarily the generally less than dwelling units /acre Commercial adjacent neighborhood(s). 20,000 sq. ft. (or less Floor to Area Ratio -Per Current examples: Generally a node' rather than a for individual current Zoning Code: g • Morningside 'corridor.' Primary uses are retail storefronts). Parking is maximum of 1.0* commercial core and services, offices, studios, less prominent than institutional uses. Residential pedestrian features. • Valley View and Wooddale permitted. uses p Encourage structured • 70th & Cahill Existing and potential parking and open neighborhood commercial space linkages where districts are identified for further feasible; emphasize study. enhancement of the pedestrian environment. OR Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing 2- 312 -30 residential Office - Residential thoroughfares or between higher- streetscape and dwelling units/ acre No current examples intensity districts and residential building appearance, Floor to Area Ratio -Per in City. Potential districts. Many existing highway - improve pedestrian current Zoning Code: examples include oriented commercial areas are and transit maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Pentagon Park area anticipated to transition to this environment. and other I-494 more mixed -use character. Encourage structured corridor locations Primary uses are offices, attached parking and open or multifamily housing. space linkages where Secondary uses: Limited retail feasible; emphasize and service uses (not including the enhancement of "big box" retail), limited the pedestrian industrial (fully enclosed), environment. institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. O This designation allows for Provide Floor to Area Ratio - Per Office professional and business offices, buffer/ transition to Zoning Code: Current examples generally where retail services do adjacent residential Maximum of 0.5 include the office not occur within the development uses. Use high quality Existing language xxxx l Language recommended xxxx V Language stricken �i -k- Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Plan Update Southwest Quadrant Figure 4.6C 00 0.5 Miles 41( 4P P I tcgh t Na rcoi tv 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Redevelopment Project Narrative In connection with recent discussions, this narrative and the enclosed drawings provide an overview of the redevelopment plan for the property at 5108 Industrial Blvd. ( "Property "). Overview Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is the owner of the Property, located at the northeast intersection of Edina Industrial Blvd and Metro Blvd. The Property consists of approximately 1.3 acres with an existing one -story multi- tenant commercial building located on the site. In July of 2013 and March of 2014, Frauenshuh submitted plans as a sketch plan review and met with the planning commission and City Council to discuss the concept of repositioning the property for retail oriented use given the area service, demand and property characteristics. The feedback on the concept of retail use was favorable, while certain design, pedestrian access, circulation and parking considerations were noted as refinements needing further development. The Property will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning from POD1 (Planned Office District) to PCD2 (Planned Commercial District), and a Variance to accommodate a broader range of retail use on the Property. Rezoning would be consistent with existing neighborhood zoning and land use patterns and would be processed with a site plan review application. Redeveloament Plan Hiahliahts The enclosed plans illustrate the redevelopment concept for the Property. The existing structure would be removed from the site and the new building plan would be constructed in one phase. The redevelopment plan provides the opportunity to create a new, very functional building and site plan with a highly attractive architectural aesthetic, improved traffic flow in and out of the site and good circulation, parking and pedestrian orientation for retail tenants and customers. The building will be constructed on the southwest corner of the property with a total square footage of 10,000 sq.ft., thus creating a pedestrian friendly site layout and parking configuration for retail use. Several food service providers and neighborhood retail uses have expressed interest in the redevelopment plan and location. Some of the redevelopment plan highlights would include: • Creation of high quality and consistent architectural aesthetics (incorporation of stone, glass, metals and high quality building signage); • Placement of the building — in response to the sketch plan review comments,- to reduce interface between pedestrians and vehicles — adjacent to the street with parking on the North. • Reduction of vehicular access from streets from 3 (existing) to 2. • Installation of pedestrian enhancements, including sidewalks, interior walkways, outdoor seating areas and related improvements; • Improved site landscaping including boulevard trees and shrubs and internal landscape elements conductive to the retail environment; • Drive - through on the east side of the building, subject to tenant requirements; • Reconfiguration of parking layout (56 spaces) , ApL Improved internal vehicle access and site circulation. Design of the Drive thru on the east side of the building will be complimented by a rain garden feature. Variance Request The Applicant wishes to request a variance to allow the front yard setback to be reduced from 35' -0" to 25' -0" in order to respond to the comments from the sketch plan review which suggested that the building placement address the need to accommodate the pedestrian movement in the area. This variance will allow for improved outdoor common space development near the tenant entrances, green space enhancement on all sides of the building, and improved vehicular flow on the site. Pedestrian movement along the sidewalks on the south and west will be able to access the building without crossing parking areas. 413 n NORTH ELEVATION WITH DOLOR 3/32" = V -0" 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL FRAUENSHUH NORTHE�vnTION -OW614 Commercial Real Estate Group SQa- , - li, CL tiNFN11WS Il4.l \F.NS 1NfIi1iF.('IN. 1M. \/IEYV FROM SOUTHEAST 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RFFAIL 0.0014 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group M d VIEW FROM NORTHWEST 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL 060614 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group VIEYN FROM SOUTHWEST 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL FRAUENSHUH . Commercial Real Estate Group SQa- , ' � SOUTH ELEVATION WITH DOLOR _ SRa, \. 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL SOUTH REVATION - 060614 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group 3/32 = 1' -0 .. " r LEDGE5TONE 6RIGr ELEVATION WITH COLOR 3/32" = 1' -0" S.Ra,. 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS 1 GLP55 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group I :201- 0" I 10' - 0" I I 29' - 4" 32' - O" I I 29' - 4" 10` - O" 201- 0" I I I I I I I O G- I - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - m m I TENANT I TENANT TENANT I TENANT TENANT TENANT I j E O ET LE-, UTL I i) p ry UTIL ry COMMON GRAPHIC WALL IT- PATIO PATIO I SEATING i n FIRST FLOOR NORTH \f/ SRa. 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD RETAIL FRAUENSHUH FLOOR PLAN 060614 Commercial Real Estate Group aea�oss �+ua aecxrteeca, we WIN 1� a6 JC • S as OUR Mo pq Fa 1� m/ cwm �: f iS! ri�s■{` -<�141 um MrMJ2 tw KIM IYIi ISO NO Im �IJ � n 18i ISl1 on IN RPM 1 /j Ailllii lNiW.PW` IS No ra r A� �. �ISi S 89'31'30" E 318.01 ncassoRy - I I I � I THT 31 a 56 PARKING SPACES GEI 10 1 I ^I o I RAIN I I GARD€�J P Z • I I �_ I I it � r_.. I I I kPRqIjJ I MENU "ORDER I I ` -- N 8931'30" W 318.01 MONUMENT SIGN NORTH 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD SRa— SITE PLAN FRAUENSHUH WITH GARBAGE ENCLOSURE AND ORDER BOARD •c 1 "= 30' -0" JULY 16, 2014 F L:II ., . Ir•II;U`.:I I F.I;I_. ;`. -.... ICI NORTH LL 0 2200440 SCA181 IN MET I� J SI IE PLAN NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INIORMATDN K M.q DOFI A FRLD . UWIY BY L01<K -�- ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINCS FROM THE CITY Of ED— LOUCKS _ AtSOfNIfS DOTS NpI GIIARANI1l IH [ACCIIgALY Of INfO0.M1fgN PRLT/DID BV MWN[SfiM"NE, . IA STAR CfATIHE [[17111[FC NOHfEAIgN PfR �1[R SIAT[ONF Ull' PRDR 10 COMM[NC WG ANY GRAD Wli L%Gt \'AigN W UNO[RCRO111.0) WORE. T.CONSANDIlSIMELHFID VIRBYIOGCIFF 1. [INAlDNS OI E %KING NfNCFM[INGE — OCINSTRUC TON NACE —IN[ ONEFAPRgR10C0 COMIR Af1NIlY I CONE SfytII NOTIFY IHf [NGWfl Of ANY NCIES N IHE PL DISCREPANCIES OR VART SHOWN IRON IHI PLANS. . All DI FACE OF f11RB IWL[SS O THE lWISI NDRD, DEAF FOOT ERATAL CURB S. PRpYgI OOT1APERAIAH CURB — ANDSI. A. All LED IN ACCORDANCE CCORDAN E WITH GFIIEP AND SIDIW N PER T L BI fO 11t=I AND G THE INSCITY.iN LAND —1 PLANS ADDIFI[MLNISO( nit HARD —1 UNCATIO AND ARCIRI[f.TIIMI PUNS FOl ANY ADMfgNgl ANT PAIDNS. " -" —SIGNIFICANT 1gNDIDIN IMPRCN NOT E:NRMED ARE AND OUTAIT ARCHEMIIHKSl AND LANDCAPIBIDANDPRON LDES LANDSCAPING, PING, GHIHFARCHHICN[AI LANDSCAPE PUNS.DIK INCLUDES LIGHIID OTHLR lS. AT Of At I R. 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GAYERWWHBIHUSSAIL EDATS N TEDOFAll AND QJSUNOSGIPO fI COMMDN DRNLS AN LOTS WIIHW LIE UNLESS NOILD DIIM1RWKL. DPARKING 9. SIIIFTS D UTILITIES, TOR GOADING AND4'W PARKING CLOT PAVE 10. ALL PARKWG lDl PAVEMENT AWlKINGS SINLL Of <' WIDE WHIT[ PANTED SEE RING. I1. DKABI f D PARKING SIGNAG 6 PAV[Mf Ni MAPEINCS SIMII BF IN ACCORDANCE WIIN ADA A MMUICD, STALL COUNT ANALYSIS PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING STALLS 11 PROPOSED ATM PARKING SIA11S TOTAL PR LD STATES 55 WARNING THE "ISTIN CTO! TINA BE RS. LLC1R1F FOR CAII WG FOR IOCATgNI OF All ANIVS IIIIDNLS.IHE UIFIRCCDPERAIIWIIHALLOTRIIY COMPgNRS IN hMIN1A W MC T11[IR 51 Rt'ICE AND/OR RFIOCAIDN O! IIN[S, THE CONFRACIOR SHAH CONTACT GOPIIFIF STATE ONE CAII AT KS IASIUOD} AI LUST 40 HOURS IN ADVANCE IOR IHE LO IDNS OF ALL I INDFRLROIIND W IRf S, CABIFS, CONDIIITS, PWS, MANHOLES. VAIVFS OR OUTERBURIIDSTRUC.IURL501FOREDI NG.TFILCOWI CIDRSFNTL REPAIR OR RIPIACF ME ABOVE WHEN DAMAGI D DURIN000NSTROCTION AT NO COST IO TIIE OWNER. ® C Gopher State One Call XIdKn N "dI.I- aRO -iv -Ilse .RL fA x Y G � DD � � O jHh i1; r� Q Q a Q Q a ~J m W O r EG L • SrFE PLAN P1om Ia 1 pMwl M, cluKmn vry C2 -1 9_ t,WNFR: HARKI. AWN Pf?- FPTIF� 1.l s L �fi . � 1 1— n II 14 1- I S: Er(6TNt: PRONJSED � �, -. 1KYIxAUHK a+n+ourr \�fW�� 4 �ISYM�RM9 M ++cwN.MN.KYe O fj Z j •: Y.A,1Rw.rN s L �fi . � 1 1— n II 14 1- I S: Er(6TNt: PRONJSED � �, -. 1KYIxAUHK a+n+ourr \�fW�� — ST —... G �ISYM�RM9 M ++cwN.MN.KYe O B ® —55 —_. unrlr,sN. • MNIARr NWLt —RL1— Y.A,1Rw.rN NORT'X 0 220040 9CAlil - IN GRADING PLAN NOTES 1, 5ACK('20tND MORMATNEN H BASED ON AFIELD NMVEY [Y t—%S ASSOCISTES AM RKMD URIIY DRAWMGS FmA1 TM CIIY Of [RDDRIYH PARK LOIK'.Ks ATEOCNI[T ROES NOT GUAIANI(f 111[ ACCl1M[Y Of MORMAIION PROVO[D RY OTH., . 2 RIF CONIRACIM NMII R[F![ TO 1H ARCNIfCI1MA1 MNS IM !%ACT LOC IIfXK TRICK R OMENSp180F RULg DINS AND SITIIrt TIONP F DOYIN—KDP0[CNfS NNPi. MDOCtS,.tMY tLIU Lt Ml RhRM.ISM NMA 1. 11ECCMTRACTf T TA[EAll PRfUVTKxASNt CESSARY TOAYORI PIOPRTY THEMU TOAD Mi PROPfiD R S I iHf Cpl iR AWU PHASF OF THR PMRCI. THEM WlllRH. RFSPOMIBEEFMANYDAAE Of TO ADNCENT PROPICCO RANT I WITH DIMING THE CDNSTED OOM RM1 01 THIS IrtSCT. A.NT CtOR ACCORDANT WITH [RY AND YACCEPTL CONSIRUCTI(MRCONVD 111E COSIT IWRWIITRFSOLHYfAL CERR AYRfSKMRTN fMCOf"EKI AI Tiff OE TH( WORK THIS RMIEtt M ALL ILL AMY N EFTIN RIY DURNG IHf BE TO Clf TRIW THR- 11RFARNT WILL APRYCONTMIgIKIY AND NOT Pf INRTFD i0 NO1EFOR WMKINL: C[ . T. BEFURI BEGINNING CONSTRIKTION THE COURAffOR f"t I NfCl A TEAM ORARY FNT ENIRANCf PADAIALl POINTSDf VEHCIEfT f!(M1IHf PRMKINT.SAq ROCK PRONCTCF PAD SIMII BE AMINTAMFD [Y THE fONTRAfiM IM IHF IXIRATgN Df THE PRCNM 6. 1 InTERI SI DtEDNTE R AND IN AMIROL AWf WITH SIMII k RAAFT QUICE OUND THE (NIIR! N N NRIMFTR AND N AC IOR FQAWR W ITH NPDFS PERMIT lFOUIRfMfNTS. IRAll —It FIMINI PRACTIE WANDCITE' T FI K IND %IS. ).All SNJI HFV Al1IN15 N[%VN IFPRfSFUT IINS11fD 51RfAfF M U1R111 llli IIEVATIDNSTMUSSOIHEtWKf N(lif D. R.) NY IEO5Mt IO VERIEY lARTMG MfORMAIK)N PRRSR 10 [ UNSIRI f LION AND NtflfYINGM O CKANYMNA RfPANCIIT. 9. RRTNG IrRITY IOCATlY15 ASfE[ Cltt AS-0IrRT PUNS AMl {RID SHOR. 10. SEE LRAL O EN iM10* CYt— Ill TLMMAIKM 11. fEN[RAl COHTtACIM MUSTVE[RY All TO M CRARs ANWIVNTKM L 14ND FI.HNKEIfDf1 C—TTEFVATkCI N IW -f(W DI RE IAINING WALL 'NO A I l— Of RE TAINING WAI L IM -I IK:IIIN NNI IP•I( NMI `C.1Cff CURE ,—IT[* LINE NDT: UICH — RIMS nRl 1 IM Ilts II B1 IS THAN SLOW TINE IT —DON. NOTE: SPOT It YATKINSAT CURB I MIS INDRATI RASE OF CURB AND UITER IM 111. RIM IMEI[UVATIONSUNIESSOTHERWNf NO11 O. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR "It BE [ESPO , FOR CALLING FOR LMA TIONS Of ALL E%KTPR: I TRFIIf1 THEY SHAII COOFIAAT WITH All LDNTY COMPANIES IN MANTAININ(: IHFIR %I RVKI AND OR ERMA ION IN IMS. 111E CONI TOR SHAH CONTACT fUP1IER STAR ONE TAI AT 651-ASUCIIIl AI I EAST AN TOURS M AMAMI FOR THE IMATRx6 OF At IINOI RCJIDI -NO WWI S, CABI IS, f IENDS DS. PpES, AMNIOIEi, VALVES OR DIIIER MIRRO SRIICIIIRts BFIORt DK %LNG. INE IONI RACiM SINI1 REPAR M R[PIAfE illF AROVf WFNN DAIMG[O DURING I:UNSIRLY'IgN AI NO COSt Irr 1111 c 'N1R. SY4. I �Ip4 .�5 l�Mt Gopher State One Call *0.L FCT: I- OV -ri1- C S Z !A Q a Q pp Z{ 15g� 4� 2Y i a Q a Q a a UHH J W (D a � O Q Lr) w R GRADING H DRAINAGE PLAN IIp.RI W 1)A140.9 BRAWNr. ve CNKK®p. VW 0 -1 L _ r Jl •NWDLR �LRVAu \ r lir -' r . 1 e. // CONNECT IO 1RY5OPE NGSFIMOIAH NOf \ Y61A�WAIM WIM TIE SLAY. tINTRACTOe 10 A YONTMA S 1 roIOC. ASLfOWN. HTFRMENT TEREUY'D. O 0 w e0 %. IN Im NOTES 1 IPCOAD TRRITN DRAWINC.5 FROM iNf CITYa`EDENA, l[kc%LS�ASSO('UTES DOES NOTT OARANTIE THE AGYOUCY Of INFORMATION FRONDED RY OTHERS. AL ITARS'SEWfR,S— SEWER ANO WATERMAN LJOTLS SISALL RE FILRNISHED AND INS RECTI-11.1 THE RENT— rnF S'Itt AwO THE %1ANDARO PIITFS ifOfKA1RlN p 111E OlY fNGlHfta ASSOM110N OF MNwfNDTA IRAMI. Iwe FDTlPN. MfpF PWf CONNKHxJ.TN IN ALL CON[:RETI STRU'TI!RES.NNII N =WITH WATER TKHT MATE[MIS LM VIRN : AN AAM OR WAT71— USAFT OR BROOl' CASTNNfUC1 RL .1-1, OR APPRONO Un Al . WHERE THE ALIGNMENT PNQ L-DIS THE DL OF THEC fa�Al DIEIN CIE�uo:WEOw� DYe`o II W�EIEauMn. ntlSWITAIYALWFI MAIN ONE SHALL BE Sp %5. All sArAIAn KWlR 5f11Y10E5 LULL ee 1 SEE SHEETS CR-T AND TH IYAyTRACT 59fCJFGIRSSd TOR — DTRrry LHTALS AND ,TIUO SHVKE pfTALS. A tt PR REF#JING LWLL e1 CCAIPACTID SAND OR I- GRAHSAt MATERIAL PIR ¢HE tOLJMFMFNIS OF 111E CDY. ALL CO.YA — —1. RE I'l—EO PEa TH F(JLelEMfND aF 111E CFAM s W GTEEX HII CONTRACTOR 51ULL NDTAN WY GONLA RATE ONE Gll AT 60.SA+Im2 AT l[AST to HOI RS PRIp TO PFRFORAP%G ANY F%CAVATION CL OwIXRGOLNO W011c 6. WgEST ALL FA6iIrY. ST%LJC1Ua15l,= TUNC AND MNATIF TO OF THE PROPOSED C.RwO 115F1 10 PAYEDTM.- MUST MO1 CWNHS E Efl}�LD��WENLSNiCM I. F11lOA P. ED PWf MATERIAL. e. STORM SEWIRPW FLULLMEETOIE% CEfDASHTO `MN4MINWIMPWISTIFFW%Pft J. OH5r—PDN PARING LULL BE -5111" NOON- STREET INd LRCUOINOI t,=DNG ALLOWED. I IR SEO CA^iELEPNONE6 FLECTR KSE RYT¢SAEAPMDXRMTF L(lCA1gNS ONI\ T'OWNIRAMMI GFNFRALMNTRACTOR it WvaOP[5`FO SERVK(LCOCATION VARY LDN.— TLY01Cf1N11- THENGINIR �T BE NOTIFIFO PRIOR TO THE INSTALIATION OF TIR SERVKE. I 1A 6CONDITION Of E %STING EO-- .IAED.COMACI FIGINFFRFORALTERNATIVE ADfP—NAL`SERVKESMAYE 5T." WARNING I11f CONTRACTOR LUI I N RISPON U TOR 1111 tNG 10! 1- 111DNB O1 All EIIb11N VILIIILS.THEYA tC MTLWITHALLUIWnCOAtWSIPM MAIPHA11— I HEIK%WWLANDIORQLQA1a1N01L S. IH CONTACC TOR LULL CONTACT ET%NE! O Ail CMl ULI Al K I�S�Omx AI Ft. C FIOl1RS IN ADVANCE TOR T. V LVES OR OTOf All EMNDLROROINO 1111 I.CABI ft. ITT CONpNL T E LS. MANHTllS. VALVES A OR W1LAMED ATIO I W EN - DIC.CANC.THLCONTRACTOR NO COST TO OR RFIIACF IH AROAF WHEN IMANC {D ODeENL CONSIeu_ICIN AI NO CO51101H IAVHt. '0m GLL�Yw Yu Gopher State One Call R5;_ a ,XL TREE 1= t 4� a g � a W La 8yp R� pt G F 3w4. C i .5f i la laa J OD O r o� L . UTILITY PLAN pAwlb INK I CNTGY®b VN C4 -1 6 �c 3 LE 5T ELEVATION',: � PANTED BOLLARD CENTER SUPPORT 2 50UTN ELEVATION T.O. GATE 107' -0" 5. 0. GATE 100' -8" PAVEMENT 100' -0" HEAVY DUTY HNGES, PANTED 2'X 2' STL. TUBE, PANTED CORRUGATED METAL PANEL, PANTED GATE LATCH WITH LOCK DROP BOLTS/PNS ON NSIDE OF ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD INSIDE ENCLOSURE, BITUMNCUS PAVEMENT OUTSIDE OF ENCLOSURE PRE- FNISHED METAL COPING BRICK TO MATCH BUILDING OPLAN eo L 114'.I' -o' NORTH S-Ra- 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD I TRASH ENCLOSURE 07.10.2014 151 FRAUENSHUH Homo euxeu ueenene.ac s rlb cit fj X SCALE: 1INCH= 20 FEET mvrs s «e .wmm� ma inei i Td. y .1 Th. .a sla ...m a sux.w ..am m m. t. Nm.m.ra Th. -11. - BOUNDARY ,AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY For: FRAUENSHUII COMPANIES BLOOMINGTON SrTB: .1. m— INmm— sou—A EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC. LAND SURVEYORS OM LyeW s A—m BCuDI Blmmleryl , MN. SSLTy T.I. SS24044SeI Fm IIU4S45yM .upwxp.aem 1- 3 -8545T A 2014257 1OF1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' r i I-bt I — I, I—b mt—e dnl.r aro AJ.ibn. N.m Lamkh auto. �1 v.w.rlr NOTES CORRESPONDING TO EASEMENTS: t,:i...sns .max. u a�w a sa°sn r bi - ' 8 J Q... e n m pxo ..sox. u swr s mas'�"'� ,. E : - o m " pecan .max, u smr d xvbn J� `- i STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS: Kv W� ci - -'� I GENERAL NOTES: 1111 r`LL! AT (11* ..w...r nsamen • e.9 man m+l.+`..'°`.m. a--.W- "'iii ns�"10uwma.i : ma:vi m �rw io::`osmor: u.umrrar, � R LEGEND .m..r 0 wr• wm "r :Po">,�mb'ci"'°°ru. m�s.:e.: • � ••�- � wr r.v rb ' wpm m bm., — -- r— � a�mmma.s� ..�• r.49 �nm �wNLLr"ae u9e. a�.�r "•sw s ses.s m e1 rp.�r 4 m! r Mme i ,m.,e� !Yti 6 ® Hpaem D m v ua. a T. � w in n ee' br r w w�sser m w. ww rr°e.:e ar sm �rm-e lexw inn wue. }: m. upp • .WirWi nn f� . We p.us r.,ew n i r (Diem ne.) �+, wt 'r a s�l me mw Almp Sl xo loo so o b dO m . r w a r nw nm++in a wb sep�a > m mms�bem . e h b d re r w u.r ..Rw 0 w r a Ir W a.s. in ". M v T SCALE IN FEET X SCALE: 1INCH= 20 FEET mvrs s «e .wmm� ma inei i Td. y .1 Th. .a sla ...m a sux.w ..am m m. t. Nm.m.ra Th. -11. - BOUNDARY ,AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY For: FRAUENSHUII COMPANIES BLOOMINGTON SrTB: .1. m— INmm— sou—A EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC. LAND SURVEYORS OM LyeW s A—m BCuDI Blmmleryl , MN. SSLTy T.I. SS24044SeI Fm IIU4S45yM .upwxp.aem 1- 3 -8545T A 2014257 1OF1 r' r \ \ 1 �rFFETenx ® cI21 p YOI pMe Gopher State One Call iai IML:�l4D- 2lz -iN� eMnlrvnwTnER SFAVKL nrvoi ox RDOCnrnry or U11, m ronwnrvas Iry TI_E Z. GENERAL NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORW WON IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOU:KS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD U11I DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF EOINA. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GLIAMWEETMACCURACYOFINFORAMT PRO DBYOTHERS. 2.W HAVE SHOWN BURRO STRUCTURESAND UTILITIES ON ANOFOR SERVING THE SITE 10 THE BEST M i-K ABILITY, SUIR T TO THE FOLLOWING RESIRCDONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS W NOT CONStSTENTLY RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GORIER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY PIAIPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE MIUM OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM TMR ANN 1.1 TO THE CL—TLS STRLICTIIMF OR fACNTY -THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE TMR IURRDCfION. If A PRNATf SERVICE TOAN ADJ N 'S SITE CROSSES THISSITE MA SERVICE 10 THIS SITE CROSSESAN ADIOIMR, IT AMY NOT BE LOCATFO SINCE MOST C FMTORS WILL NOl MARK SUCH •PRIVATE' SERVICES. C. SNOW AND CE CONDITIONS WRING WINTER MONTHS ANY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VRIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTKM. D. AMPS PROVIDED BY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FRED LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR IPICOEICLIISNE. E. THE SURFACE HATLMES AND FLIVATM)NS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE LOCAITD BY LOI9CM ASSOCIATES. V ALL OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY NFORANTIDN AND LOCATION B N ON THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED FROM/ RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CLIENT AND IM CITY OF EDRN RECORDS. G. EXTREME CAUTION MOST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PUCE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY UW TO NOTIFY:R STATION E CALLAltUST4RHOURSNADVAN CEAT65114S4 2. 1. THERE AMY BE OTHER UTILITIES ON THE SITE THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PUN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOILS RESFONSNNTY TO REMOVE THE UTILITIES. HIDDEN THE ENGINEER R THERE ARE OTHER SERVICES FOUND. I� a Mall 2 5 J � O 0 N w . EXISTING CONDITIONS IEO.KEND tBdR6Y ORAWII N. Y/IS [IMID H. VN C1 -1 NORTN 0 2200440 SCA18 IN PL6T LEGEND � Property Monument ........... cm «ae con «sla Wr6 O. ..W EI4CtrIC — — — — LEIC«ryomB Elecirk IAUIerAOVM TNepnone �— Cw G- l Sear p s t S M.« St $ Ebctrk Nalar Q ElZ11, Bo. O Eleclrk Nmnde Po.a HSWmI t • G I. Vn Monhola Cae Vaw O CplM6min m L*I P O Co. MN.r TNSpnme Mmnda p TNapnme Box ® SaI ItWy Mm W. mSt «m Mpnnae M' O. w... Ir (Dbm.He M InMee) fL \ Cmil«me Tr.e (DI. —tw k In ) — —90627 — E.bl.1 Contour X 934.3G E.IIER9 Spot Eie it WttH X 931.1 E.bting Spol Elawtbn ® cI21 p YOI pMe Gopher State One Call iai IML:�l4D- 2lz -iN� eMnlrvnwTnER SFAVKL nrvoi ox RDOCnrnry or U11, m ronwnrvas Iry TI_E Z. GENERAL NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORW WON IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY LOU:KS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD U11I DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF EOINA. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES DOES NOT GLIAMWEETMACCURACYOFINFORAMT PRO DBYOTHERS. 2.W HAVE SHOWN BURRO STRUCTURESAND UTILITIES ON ANOFOR SERVING THE SITE 10 THE BEST M i-K ABILITY, SUIR T TO THE FOLLOWING RESIRCDONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS W NOT CONStSTENTLY RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GORIER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY PIAIPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE MIUM OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM TMR ANN 1.1 TO THE CL—TLS STRLICTIIMF OR fACNTY -THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE TMR IURRDCfION. If A PRNATf SERVICE TOAN ADJ N 'S SITE CROSSES THISSITE MA SERVICE 10 THIS SITE CROSSESAN ADIOIMR, IT AMY NOT BE LOCATFO SINCE MOST C FMTORS WILL NOl MARK SUCH •PRIVATE' SERVICES. C. SNOW AND CE CONDITIONS WRING WINTER MONTHS ANY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VRIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTKM. D. AMPS PROVIDED BY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FRED LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR IPICOEICLIISNE. E. THE SURFACE HATLMES AND FLIVATM)NS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE LOCAITD BY LOI9CM ASSOCIATES. V ALL OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY NFORANTIDN AND LOCATION B N ON THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED FROM/ RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CLIENT AND IM CITY OF EDRN RECORDS. G. EXTREME CAUTION MOST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PUCE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY UW TO NOTIFY:R STATION E CALLAltUST4RHOURSNADVAN CEAT65114S4 2. 1. THERE AMY BE OTHER UTILITIES ON THE SITE THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PUN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOILS RESFONSNNTY TO REMOVE THE UTILITIES. HIDDEN THE ENGINEER R THERE ARE OTHER SERVICES FOUND. I� a Mall 2 5 J � O 0 N w . EXISTING CONDITIONS IEO.KEND tBdR6Y ORAWII N. Y/IS [IMID H. VN C1 -1 I ..wwww S — a 2 v S ��jj j NI� 4 15 ♦ I �l+X Ia Y Y y yy r r rw-wvl f N —ea3— — `/ '16w h ( I� ®� E 1 I S 1 O I I \ � — x-611 fi: ♦i % ♦ :•�•i i O� 00• • • Ofifi �•i r i m p� 7 �I `I k 7 4 J, All FL)H1' II'JD; STRlAi- t i.il.)I_F% /ARD - ->r -wow w -1 —www rwwww— T- w— ww=`�w w- �y —531— Luc nw l d'n.' y JI' >• `4 �T'1n i• —~ —Ton— Ttk ---uK � \ Yvr <�- x u — — \ L 01 ME 40 \� wN.Fx ro.owcE »remraTfs _ _ Fn'i6reo.cT. _ w»c wi•�uE�E~eciorF.unoraru Eumirivra..wNaaE m�F rs squwaw »Twu.wFr co »nNwuxr All norN Ml-ronnauF SCALE M FEET Tr"::vw:FMe »n n »p T»F ceNe: xaw» o» xxFraa a e; �rsE. »"`o::rx v.cw�x.Mro,�,an..� ula�oro..oavu.woao.r.-rs numD•wTexirea. F»G.fF•. cDNSnvnoNrs•TEelawnwF�T nex - LEGEND Q • prpwlY Nanumens L C- M. ,) Con.r.I. C- af M M Uvwne.e Elpirk ;� - -- -emu— Unewgroune EI•elrk — unewyo.ne TNpnon. < ® E. S•r« le.lrk M.I. O Eleclrk Box O 0 EI•clrk MonDd• power Pa. � ® pnl Unknown M- L'— • wla voles • C.ICnD.eh iBlr 0 • Llynin I.,. D.. M.Iw TNpnona Nonnola 7 TN n Mann�ol> 9 Wow Spnll «y Nmnda Slwm u «nd• Dpfeuou. Tree (DI«nalw M Incne.) � ConIf— Tr.• (Db .lw h Inch..) — - 906— — Exblln9 Contour % 551.21D E•ielilq SpoI EM.— Dulles % 931.3 Exi•1 h Spot EMwlkn WARNING r11TINI we T»Fw sFEV•'F.snu /G• 46Gr xlgN a lwFS.�px»ES i» xewE w »F» w,Nxr[p pFelnr. C.oNSns �IpNn11» °rvosf ro 1MOwNwE ®Gopher State One Call + T_ _C l- a,z -I�e ®eFNG»E Exwr•rGmKwESF a emnu»olne.vwc ®xfMwE F%6TwC. °FLUNG N IE R aENwE ExrsiMG Glee a cuiTtc a IiTelslfa ® eEMwEFx6leulYN1, 'z y. mg H dill co mg � S h 71 3 J W O • DEMOLMON PLAN w»� C1 -2 DEMOLITION NOTES ups noT \� wN.Fx ro.owcE »remraTfs _ _ Fn'i6reo.cT. _ w»c wi•�uE�E~eciorF.unoraru Eumirivra..wNaaE m�F rs squwaw »Twu.wFr co »nNwuxr All norN Ml-ronnauF UITY pecinvew ai T»°NE �oiQw.ca Tr"::vw:FMe »n n »p T»F ceNe: xaw» o» xxFraa a e; �rsE. »"`o::rx v.cw�x.Mro,�,an..� ula�oro..oavu.woao.r.-rs numD•wTexirea. F»G.fF•. cDNSnvnoNrs•TEelawnwF�T nex WARNING r11TINI we T»Fw sFEV•'F.snu /G• 46Gr xlgN a lwFS.�px»ES i» xewE w »F» w,Nxr[p pFelnr. C.oNSns �IpNn11» °rvosf ro 1MOwNwE ®Gopher State One Call + T_ _C l- a,z -I�e ®eFNG»E Exwr•rGmKwESF a emnu»olne.vwc ®xfMwE F%6TwC. °FLUNG N IE R aENwE ExrsiMG Glee a cuiTtc a IiTelslfa ® eEMwEFx6leulYN1, 'z y. mg H dill co mg � S h 71 3 J W O • DEMOLMON PLAN w»� C1 -2 GENERAL NOTES LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: — WmFU6rNCtbrvunWNS eDnrWG ronENAMEANU rvEMYYaEr AM R[WUFENAIIV •EiuurlDxvnmorlra mx�rucra�uwv wGAON VR LA nciSNV�o Qiv..tim Nruw ff,sroa ®cN.NUO..airzNrn rNfYwrcrs cooanleroN Nis efru towlem,w nawwun�lv..D urT. w.FArn.E•vcn TSAOFM ,u uwEnrW muEArnueu o�wANO WUnwrors ravuNwcMwceM �m¢n s�wts��o�er°ow ssSD�aorvSnDNO.IU.. �NTUCrDV as.m iuxu�r�inroN�Tro Fn sf un rn.avu�rwo sou oarnww�i�� w�•nrslxwcrlwmc MVAroNB ANT IAUU¢FOwAE SNUI St waoeoASry rnorsRa sNw.vuw Alra+.fSt.N°ar`o`rw�wa.f°Nm anlcAi�w+�`Q'u" u�.wlw.wsua,u.w,uut roav,.rc sw wsT.suA NUiro sF�arvsWUw�roFl�rv�va�wA.m rAUruFU �sucrm "�noNSamsmeu���i:lrwwaw:utE rxANr usrwr. nEESro MX, . clnemurrtr ANU Omu uDnNC arArzNrs uFFU UVON iFVEr rraD•rl'u�cPoC`orortooi�•m.a . am LA.--.1 ro mmr rosuNwssiio rou Awv'�f rN.esrlrscrwomen -.71 mesruuvra A—AIL swru w..c.t uASTSUNrsArr�vresmsNSw numt. D5[lVArfL WIDY Ip[ nNSnICFON ANOMm'UNUS[uFAIMIIF[.rOF twF.rt Nr ��W �R�,fF lMrrnK Oa'L IOOt•.,AND 944L�FUN ADP.•SIMFNI FfVU• mRlt' Or➢ vY lRtlU41)�AUCS�CANRLamrdlroraAANO FD B MRroM AeoxFiWBID OADC MoneoMGNOIOWDI rrNN6 I:fAOVAl Ar0 WDW4 ANr ETUN¢ wuF: raFIxxTYU5lfi AxnOwOrtuNDS C.Vf AFD•IRCr. RANUroF®mROVm MNTff] ®lnF•DBM[IAN[FSIN IRRIGATION NOTES: QlunnreFSm.'N sw.lt e�atwrtDA®su¢o AfsvxN C1xY6BY+E6AEEnl•Nrsa FF[ HFr FAN RM10—ANpl LAT—RANAW DrwAEARaFFrrF[ivYlMloM ANDNFwSUIUON.1T9 L.D¢FUrIDYwrt-YrunDas Iw,uswRS�MCrsTw MMITTE�fvfWmorvcofASW Fo eauc[rWYlAll•wuuVSUUUYANU MNnDA1DAAA4 ur:Fw nofmr, ANDa QLOTAroN. AFOUND AND ABUF'1wc BuE➢wc IiwNMroN.tDN1vAC1M a ND, ro rlvr4YAClOFFTAY4M[Nr. AuN MpfplAFmn NIOCwIONOI •5t��� GNAT pf nF[uNDYnrt(9NFU[IM SIFAF1MV6llIHOVNO wfm AwAl(l•L1wwNmGFP + sO¢ulA! I.mOFCArt.Fegm¢TAwst EEYe W. MTA ARfOPIwn ro rKEmF.Tnn roNOndVF AND roMNIANRVYLL p10YVm MxutFAOYn uION.xsuuwroNwlM oDNrucrM ro nc000v5n ua sfusw ErFO •`rwrn. mTM. ui•u eo iAx�AU onm Am�omrcu�Efinrm wuu wwlm nrt oFVCAroNABE roefwAnun afclwlrlmn nANTwvsoarsan RANrn,c mr R.rY•mANUrACrsxr.,.+s,su:raF.SM . sr eE r r W—� LEVARD aJ OIIO3SE'� IPFPI• r1Ela11owNYC if[rs w TfIF rtfF Muml ALL I.t° "1°cs` rwl a°A1aui:�w1Dw`' «mor ==D'nalwm.rw 7 Dnmwrmuui�uE a�o`wcn so�o ul�. `m'wo�rs`o�wls. U! YD Y.YFS H. ro ttarvF r D®..D.. NNDwOOD ATr H AND fIBrr MAT WfID 6V[u. memomwuDYVOODYIIaolwmF ND�wI[D weuF r 1[tP YIANUFACNn6 tt�>ywDVDAroN�uNMt A�LLUUFO ®�Hl¢iA� —FE.—T. --w N onD9n/uAroN. r1UNC M�THE D'lNF nAGx111FCrfvp TO 14IXVm¢N1 A —.N. mNnA — W Wu .— AwslTrm eEVUFnFM mF ow.a•x - J �, / ,e Of W Z Li U Lil U Z Q U L.J Z Q Z LJ ® Gopher E o0 State One Call 0. N[D�m0- t1t_jiBt PUNT PAUTFE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS — ovnsrogr nR e[pumMNT: 1 nn WY wuvw U.OE u IlOr RlWtrm:IDnIP. n¢x BEGUCfYt F . -tea: 6 X1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL X PERENNIAL PUNTING XX 'b fA HIM,ag a will ;lLs � a 444444 Ef J p Q B d • LANDSCAPE PLAN RO•.CIND: 1xOBG9 mnuAFn. rB 060ID W. L1 -1 �J C— ROOTSR ML CQAAPdgIIDPUMi RnFR IOPLAN IrelF'L SWJY 80RONAND 9060E NOFE SNRIBS TO BE MCID 50 USt TOKPLAMSO t@ W CCrirNFdB n6 FLUSH xarlFmovoRUCRADL V MLCN- E'DEIP- RESPEC LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SR SPEC \� MCZ.GAUTM4.SEE SPEC M VAPM.REFER TORAN J -I PIANIRX SOL -SEEM. _L _I -__ =-L• � BwlumcwaLmR X SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL "XX rNt Ye.l'a VAS R[� MOHS[EIDFCS EOmI.SEE RE6 EOQ VARES -RF RAN FRANIDIITH5044 AF LOOSLN RMS OF I I_ • JI — I RANFAIAIEPIAL F®R n)FLAWM X PERENNIAL PUNTING XX 'b fA HIM,ag a will ;lLs � a 444444 Ef J p Q B d • LANDSCAPE PLAN RO•.CIND: 1xOBG9 mnuAFn. rB 060ID W. L1 -1 a a 1 CI I I 7 a i - -- -- - - - - -- — — — — — — — -- --0 is i �. g 5108 RETAIL sloe ED NA INDUSTRIAL BLVD 952 '" EDINA, MN p wxw.sr wnEas�+c.ca.� VR p PRFIJMINARY�K a p NOT FOR �� � O � �. �F�I�ES REI�FASARCHRECfS,�� CCU a m €� �LL M 44444 J 9 N 4 � Z i 0 • ELEVATIONS noica r+o: vom.v C�'EC[ED B/: gabs A2 W U Q w JK 8 J � a e ,i 0a Litl c e S ^ 111, i 3;450 SF RETAIL I .r. �� • S 8fl'3'3 - 318.01 4 - DRIV�THR , 5,285 SF �I OFFICE / RETAIL r 8 Cr U 61 PARKING SPACES bTT N 89'31'30" W 318.01 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD (PUaUC R4W OF ■kF) 9 u d 0 u Q -+ - oa0000- DI WE,p — DRIVE -THRU GARBAGE SIGNAGE `MONUMENT �la- 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD SITE PLAN '= 0'-V A FEBRUARY 4402014 FRA�TENSF$�T�I 3 I SR 4400 WEST OLD SF{N(OPEE MAD sun M MOOMtX.7ON, M W SOTA 55437 DH: 954.996.9664 � — FK 954.996.9663 sreemosmms�mens me Www.SR- PO4McTSw -c- W 5OUTHYEST P9i5PELTNE ,0 T5ut-PN6 CONCEPT 5108 EDNA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group 4 DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: Chad Millner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: . 5108 Edina Industrial Blvd —Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. I. City Standard Plates available here: http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section = construction_ standards 2. A separate permit is required from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District: www.ninemilecreek.org 3. Developer's agreement will be required for installation of public water fire hydrant and the installation of public sidewalk. Survey 4. See traffic and street comment below. Soils S. Submit soils, soil boring and geotechnical report. Details 6. No comments. Traffic and Street 7. 5' concrete walk on Industrial Blvd and intersection is outside of public road easement. I recommend either vacating existing easement and platting or dedicating new easements to clean up the property record. 8. Commercial entrance should follow standard plate 400 and 410. 9. Consider concrete armoring on northern nose of eastern entrance island near filtration basin. Vehicle tracking in this area is very likely. 10. Split large pedestrian curb ramp on Metro /Edina Industrial into two separate, with raise curb section in between. Sanitary and Water Utilities 11. Show existing utility connections. 12. Relocate hydrant at corner of Metro /Edina Industrial out of sidewalk area, avoid conflict with monument signage. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 AW Storm Water Utility 13. Provide hydraulic and hydrology calculations that meet Nine Mile Creek Watershed District standards. Capacity is available public stormwater system in NMS _5 subwatershed, downstream of project. 14. Consider connecting into city CB 6375 just to the SE of FES B, as it's a shorter run. 15. Provide copies of maintenance agreement for private stormwater systems. 16. A revised SAC unit determination will be required at building permit application. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 17. Provide erosion, sediment control plan that meets provisions of MPCA construction site general permit. Other Agency Coordination 18. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits may be required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.E&naMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 A3t Wenck Wenck File #3022 -02 July 14, 2014 Traffic Impact Study for 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard in Edina, MN Prepared for: CITY OF EDINA FRAUENSHUH Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 A3i Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. ............................1 -1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ....................................................... ............................2 -1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................. ............................3 -1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...................................................................... ............................4 -1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................ ............................5 -1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... ............................6 -1 7.0 APPENDIX ..................................................................................... ............................7 -1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................ ............................2 -2 FIGURE2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ ............................2 -3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................ ............................3 -2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES ............ ............................4 -3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ............... ............................5 -3 i July 2014 3��Wencl< The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new retail building located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard in Edina, MN. The project site is currently occupied by a single story office building. The project location is shown in Figure 1. this study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • Edina Industrial Blvd. /Metro Boulevard • Edina Industrial Blvd./TH 100 west ramps • Edina Industrial Blvd. /project access • Metro Blvd. /project access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve replacing the existing office use with a new retail building. The site will.include 58 parking spaces. Access for the site is provided on both Metro Boulevard and on Edina"° Industrial Boulevard. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2015. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown in Table 1. Table 1' Proposed Land Uses and Sizes SF = square feet The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed redevelopment project is expected to:generate a net total of 218 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 186 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Trips generated by the proposed development do not change the level of service of movements at any of the analyzed intersections. • The project trips have minimal impact on the overall traffic operations. No improvements are needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the proposed project. 1 -1 July 2014 A31 m-- Wenck Land Use Siie Unit General retail _ 3,535 SF Fast food restaurant without drive -thru 31950 SF Coffee shop with drive -thru 2,090 SF SF = square feet The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed redevelopment project is expected to:generate a net total of 218 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 186 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Trips generated by the proposed development do not change the level of service of movements at any of the analyzed intersections. • The project trips have minimal impact on the overall traffic operations. No improvements are needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the proposed project. 1 -1 July 2014 A31 m-- Wenck 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new retail building located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard in Edina, MN. The project site is currently occupied by a single story office building. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study. examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • Edina Industrial Blvd. /Metro Boulevard • Edina Industrial Blvd./TH 100 west ramps • Edina Industrial Blvd. /project access Metro Blvd. /project access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve replacing the existing office use with a new retail building. The site will include 58 parking spaces. Access for the site is provided on both Metro Boulevard and on Edina Industrial, Boulevard. The proposed land uses and sizes.are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Proposed Land Uses and Sizes Land Use Size Unit General retail 3,535 SF Fast food restaurant without drive -thru 3,950 SF Coffee shop with drive -thru 2,090 SF SF= square feet The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2015. 2 -1 July 2014 } W e n c k RED FOX ZT. APPROXIMATE SCALE TGTON V� 82.893 '. 0 2300' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY i "r Wencl< FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. Engineers • Scientists I I IN EDINA, MN AY 21 MELODY LAKE 24. 749MAIMALE 25.LAMTAHA Lk 26. HORIIANDALE 27. JOSEPHIIE Ao 28. COLONI L CT. 29.I1MTH FIELD 30.RIDGUIEW Al M. 69th , 32. ROLF AVE. 31 ROOERTS F 4AZE00H Ri 34. DIRCHCREST 35. R. 63rd ST. S6.HARCY LN. 37. MILLER'S D 39: CHIFiCH PL. — _d S. TOWHDALE D7 95. FORES' 99. VALEN FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION t �J C CD 77 Wenck Engineers • Scientists 58 PARKING SPACES r r r i 000( X10,000 SF i O�ICE / RETNl- i I 144 - -m• VAN-- qt vt { v� y, L N 89'31'30' W 31 &01 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD N APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 45' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. IN EDINA, MN FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN °a 0 0 o O 0 O Q Ld D d m !s ml rK z w Wenck Engineers • Scientists 58 PARKING SPACES r r r i 000( X10,000 SF i O�ICE / RETNl- i I 144 - -m• VAN-- qt vt { v� y, L N 89'31'30' W 31 &01 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD N APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 45' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. IN EDINA, MN FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site currently houses a single story office building. The site is bounded by Metro Boulevard on the west, Edina Industrial Boulevard on the south, and existing office uses on the north and east. Near the site location, Metro Boulevard is a two -lane, two -way street with turn lanes at major intersections. Edina Industrial Boulevard is a five lane, two -way street with turn lanes at major intersections. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Edina Industrial Blvd. /Metro Blvd. (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn /through lane and one through /right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through /right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn /through /right turn lane. The northbound approach serves as access for an existing retail area. Edina Industrial Blvd./TH 100 west ramps (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through /right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane ,and one right turn lane. Metro Blvd. / proiect access (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound project access approach. The northbound approach provides one through /right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn /through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn /right turn lane. Edina Industrial Blvd. / proiect access (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound project access approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and two through lanes. The westbound approach provides one through lane and one through /right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn /right turn lane. 3 -1 July 2014 K3 rf �Wenck J r"1 � Wenck Engineers • Scientists TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD IN EDINA, MN N APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 85' FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts oft he proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2016. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2014 Existing. Turn movement volumes collected in February 2014 for the MnDOT signal.timing project were used for existing conditions. The existing volume information includes trips generated by uses near the project site. • 2016 No- Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 2.0 percent per year to determine 2016 No -Build volumes. The 2.0 percent per year growth rate was based on 'both recent growth experienced near the site and expected future growth. • 2016 Build. Trips generated by the existing office building were removed and trips generated by the proposed uses were added to the 2016 No -Build volumes to determine 2016 Build volumes. Trip Generation The expected development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Ninth _Edition', published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent gross total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. A 10 percent reduction was applied to account for internal trips between the various uses. The resultant net trip generation estimates are, shown in Table 4 -1. Table 4 -1: Weekdav Trio Generation for Pronosed Land Uses Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday AM Peak Hour , Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Deily In Out Total In Out Total Total General.retail 820 3,535 SF 2 2 4 6 7 13 136 Fast food restaurant without drive -thru 933 3,950 SF '2 2 4 47 45 92 2545 Coffee shop with drive -thru 937 2;090 SF 107 103 210 40 41 81 1540 Totals 111. 107 218 93 93 186 1 4221 SF= square teet The a.m. peak hour trip generation for the general retail and fast food restaurants assumes these uses are not open before 9 a.m. This is typical for these types of uses. The trips shown during the.a.m. peak hour are for deliveries and employees. 4 -1 July 2014 _Wenck J As shown in Table 4 -1, the proposed development will add a net total of 218 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 186 trips during the p.m. peak hour. The total trips can be categorized in the following two trip types: • New Trips. Trips solely to and from the proposed development. • Pass -By Trips. Trips that are attracted from the traffic volume on roadways immediately adjacent to the site. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for new trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 20 percent to /from the north on Metro Boulevard • 30 percent to /from the west on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 15 percent to /from the north on TH 100 west ramps • 33 percent to /from the east on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 2 percent to /from the south on the south frontage road Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network:using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during .the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4. A 4 -2 July 2014 -r Wenck n T11 1-4426 II -/-/12 -/a9 g T r� O �T rn n co C rn �93/97/ 4/493 93/97/97 n ACCESS ,� rn a � 3941410/398 rn — 465/484/490 f-- 24/25/25 1021106/114 400/416/425 —� 1/1/1 M t 0 �o �i -/-/12 -/a9 g T� O R rn n co C rn �93/97/ 4/493 93/97/97 PROJECT LOCATION ACCESS 5132/m 1 137/134 m v F 288/300/304 j 1 -15/16/16 32/33/41 � 9/83 797/827 —� n 0/0/0--+ A m Wenck Engineers - Scientists PROJECT LOCATION AM PEAK HOUR V) W U Q t: Co T T 'L-4-151 J Lj F— 883/919/696 - 1-/20� EDINAINDUSTRIAL 534/556/543 BLVD. PM PEAK HOUR of, T z 'L-- / -136 J y I F 435/453/444 - /-/26---t EDINAINDUSTRIAL 1292/1344/1317 ­30- BLVD. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. IN EDINA, MN As7 2014 2016 NO -BUILD 2016 BUILD x txxn(x u� o o co v�o°o V—rn V'7 N j I � 361/376583 783/815/827 27/28/29 FIGURE 4 a �H 3 0 0 4191436/436 +-271/2821300 f— 77/80/80 I r Q T o�0 'L' i� WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES 3 8 a m oCm t-9/9/9 �93/97/ 4/493 93/97/97 61/6317 419/436/460 —3- 75/78!79 v Lo r N � r 2014 2016 NO -BUILD 2016 BUILD x txxn(x u� o o co v�o°o V—rn V'7 N j I � 361/376583 783/815/827 27/28/29 FIGURE 4 a �H 3 0 0 4191436/436 +-271/2821300 f— 77/80/80 I r Q T o�0 'L' i� WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high- density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop- and -go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. 5 -1 July 2014 �,�Wenck The LOS results for the study, intersections are described below and shown in Figure S. All LOS worksheets are included in the Appendix for further detail. Edina Industrial. Blvd: /Metro Blvd. (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B. During the'p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Edina Industrial Blvd./TH 100 west ramps (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C. During the p.m. peak hour under all scenarios, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Metro Blvd: /project access (minor street stop sign control) During the a.m.. peak hour under the 2017 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. Durmgthe p.m..peak hour "under the 2017 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Edina Industrial Blvd/project access (minor street stop sign control) During the a.m. peak hour under the 2017 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS C or better. . The overall intersection operates at LOS A. During the p.m. peak hour under the 2017 Build scenario, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Overall Traffic Impacts As described above and shown in Figure 5, the project trips have minimal impact on the overall traffic operations. No improvements are needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the, proposed project. t I'< a� g T� � a? aaa aaa �B� j I f— BBB '_C/C/C C /C /C j C/c /C I la T CC/C ---, aaa ACCESS =,4AWenck Engineers • Scientists AM PEAK HOUR CD co U Q �aaA wurw -/-/A EDINA INDUSTRIAL A/A/A BLVD. PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT w LOCATION I a UU CL Iaa ^A/AIA ACCESS 0 IT m � aT aT t PROJECT LOCATION a aa t- _ A/A/A F-AIA/A A►A/A sB/s� BBB —� I T B/B/B --;� aaa I'< a� g T� � a? aaa aaa �B� j I f— BBB '_C/C/C C /C /C j C/c /C I la T CC/C ---, aaa ACCESS =,4AWenck Engineers • Scientists AM PEAK HOUR CD co U Q �aaA wurw -/-/A EDINA INDUSTRIAL A/A/A BLVD. PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT w LOCATION I a UU CL T 0 IT A/A JA y F �A/A/A /aA EDINA INDUSTRIAL _ A/A/A BLVD. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. IN EDINA, MN ATO 2014 2016 NO -BUILD F2016 BUILD xxtxx XX CL 0 0 m_l—ABB n BBB rrilCil�'i~. B/B/B B/B/B C/C /C e CCC� c/c/C - eeLn 990 2014 2016 NO -BUILD F2016 BUILD xxtxx XX FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS t CL 0 m_l—ABB rrilCil�'i~. C /C/C C/C /C e C/C/C 000 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS t 60 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed redevelopment project is expected to generate a net total of 218 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 186 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • Trips generated by the proposed development do not change the level of service of movements at any of the analyzed intersections. • The project trips have minimal impact on the overall traffic operations. No improvements are needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the proposed project. 7.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets 7 -1 July 2014 m'J� Wenck Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88: W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 718/2014 Lane Group - - EBL EBT EBR WBL ' WBT WBR NBL NBT N8R SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 102 400 1 24 465 394 3 22 22 112 9 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Toper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prof) 0 3504 0 0 3299 0 0 1740 0 1770 1684 0 Flt Permitted 0.601 0.930 0.988 0.725 Said. Flow (perm) 0 2127 0 0 3071 0 0 1724 0 1350 1684 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 385 23 16 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (fl) 1027 558 197 721 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.5 16.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (°/b) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 529 0 0 929 0 0 49 0 118 25 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 15.1 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.33 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.63 0.08 0.26 0.04 Control Delay 14.2 8.1 9.0 14.6 8.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.2 8.1 9.0 14.6 8.8 LOS B A A B A Approach Delay 14.2 8.1 9.0 13.6 Approach LOS B A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 51 4 21 1 Queue Length 95th (it) 90 91 25 64 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 947 478 117 641 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 2121 3064 1002 777 976 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.05 0.15 0.03 Intersection Sumitiary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 45.5 Control Type: Actuated - Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212014 am.syn afl Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale Blvd /SB TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 7/812014 Lane Group ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WET ' 'WBR NBL NBT OR A 'SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 61 419 75 93 456 9 13 23 153 592 68 387 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prof) 1770 3458 0 1770 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.412 0.366 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 767 3458 0 682 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 2 194 407 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 558 910 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 20.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 520 0 98 489 0 14 24 161 623 72 407 Turn Type pm +pt NA pm+pt NA Soil NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 18.0 28.0 15.0 25.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Effct Green (s) 41.9 34.1 43.6 35.0 8.4 8.4 8.4 22.9 22.9 22.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.38 0.46 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.25 vlc Ratio 0.14 0.39 0.23 0.36 0.08 0.14 0.50 0.71 0.15 0.58 Control Delay 13.6 22.1 12.0 17.7 38.2 39.0 9.1 35.1 25.1 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.6 22.1 12.0 17.7 38.2 39.0 9.1 35.1 25.1 6.2 LOS B C B B D D A 0 C A Approach Delay 21.2 16.8 14.7 23.8 Approach LOS C B B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 105 24 77 7 13 0 165 32 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 179 m49 127 25 36 38 204 60 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 830 609 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 552 1324 480 1373 196 207 348 1106 600 785 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.39 0.20 0.36 0.07 0.12 0.46 0.56 0.12 0.52 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 15 (17 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay. 20.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity UGlizalion 52.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212014 am.syn �rl iyS T Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88: W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 7/812014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBN Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 106 416 1 25 484 410 3 23 23 117 9 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prol) 0 3504 0 0 3299 0 0 1738 0 1770 1680 0 Flt Permitted 0.585 0.929 0.988 0.724 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2070 0 0 3068 0 0 1723 0 1349 1680 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 382 24 17 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1027 558 197 721 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.5 16.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (96) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 551 0 0 967 0 0 51 0 123 26 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 18.8 18.8 15.1 15.1 15.1 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.33 vlc Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.09 0.28 0.05 Control Delay 14.8 8.4 9.3 15.3 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.8 8.4 9.3 15.3 9.0 LOS B A A 8 A Approach Delay 14.8 8.4 9.3 14.2 Approach LOS B A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 55 5 22 2 Queue Length 95th (fl) 95 98 27 69 16 Internal Unk Dist (ft) 947 478 117 641 Turn Bay Length (fi) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 2054 3047 991 768 963 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.27 0.32 0.05 0.16 0.03 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.1 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am nb.syn h) y Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale Blvd /SB TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 7!812014 Lane Group EBL EBT ESR WBL W6T WBR NBL_ W' NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 63 436 78 97 474 9 14 24 159 616 71 403 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 3458 0 1770 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.395 0.348 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 736 3458 0 648 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 22 2 194 424 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 55B 910 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 20.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 541 0 102 508 0 15 25 167 648 75 424 Turn Type pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 18.0 28.0 15.0 25.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Effcl Green (s) 41.2 33.3 42.9 34.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.37 0.48 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.42 0.24 0.38 0.09 0.14 0.52 0.72 0.15 0.58 Control Delay 14.0 22.9 12.5 18.2 38.2 39.2 10.0 34.7 24.7 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.0 22.9 12.5 1B.2 38.2 39.2 10.0 34.7 24.7 6.1 LOS B C B B D D B C C A Approach Delay 21.9 17.3 15.6 23.5 Approach LOS C B B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 112 25 81 8 13 0 172 33 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 187 m52 132 26 37 42 212 62 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 830 609 656 Turn Bay Length (lt) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 535 1294 460 1342 196 207 348 1106 600 797 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.42 0.22 0.38 -0.08 0.12 0.48 0.59 0.13 0.53 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 15 (17 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Ma>amum vlc Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am nb.syn J Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88: W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 7/812014 Lane Group EBL E8T EBR 'WBL MY WBR N -8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <2> 0 0 <2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 114 425 1 25 490 398 3 23 23 115 9 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3504 0 0 3306 0 0 1738 0 1770 1647 0 Flt Permitted 0.583 0.928 0.987 0.724 Said. Flow (perm) 0 2063 0 0 3071 0 0 1721 0 1349 1647 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 368 24 31 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1027 558 197 721 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.5 16.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 568 0 0 961 0 0 51 0 121 40 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Elfcl Green (s) 19.0 19.0 15.1 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.33 We Ratio 0.67 0.65 0.09 0.27 0.07 Control Delay 15.3 8.5 9.3 15.2 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.3 8.5 9.3 15.2 7.6 LOS B A A B A Approach Delay 15.3 8.5 9.3 13.3 Approach LOS B A A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 56 5 22 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 100 98 27 68 20 Internal Link Dist (ft) 947 478 117 641 Turn Bay Length (It) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 2047 3050 987 766 948 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.28 0.32 0.05 0.16 0.04 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.2 Control Type: Actuated - Uncoordinated Maximum Wic Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am b.syn kS 1 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale Blvd /SB TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 71612014 Lane Group Y EBL - 'E6T EBR ` W6L WB7 WBR NBL NBT N6R SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 72 460 79 97 493 9 14 24 159 616 71 411 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Sald. Flow (prot) 1770 3461 0 1770 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.376 0.334 0.950 0.950 Sald. Flow (perm) 700 3461 0 622 3529 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 21 2 194 433 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 558 910 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 20.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 567 0 102 528 0 15 25 167 648 75 433 Turn Type pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 18.0 28.0 15.0 25.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Efict Green (s) 41.4 33.3 42.6 33.9 8.4 8.4 8.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.37 0.47 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.26 vlc Ratio 0.18 0.44 0.25 0.40 0.09 0.14 0.52 0.72 0.15 0.59 Control Delay 14.2 23.2 12.7 18.7 38.2 39.2 10.0 34.7 24.7 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.2 23.2 12.7 18.7 38.2 39.2 10.0 34.7 24.7 6.1 LOS B C B 8 D D B C C A Approach Delay 22.2 17.7 15.6 23.4 Approach LOS C 8 B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 119 25 84 8 13 0 172 33 0 Queue Length 95th (fl) 51 197 m53 i39 26 37 42 212 62 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 830 609 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity(vph) 522 1295 449 1331 196 207 348 1106 600 803 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sptllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reducin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.15 0.44 0.23 0.40 0.08 0.12 0.48 0.59 0.13 0.54 intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset 15 (17 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL. Start of Green Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8°% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am b.syn M Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: Metro Blvd & access 7/812014 Movement WK WBR NBT NBR SBL SB7 Lanes 1> 0 1> 0 0 <1 Volume (vehlh) 15 26 527 8 15 137 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 27 555 8 16 144 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right lum flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 174 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 735 559 563 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 735 559 563 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 95 98 cM capacity (veh1h) 381 529 1008 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB .1 Volume Total 43 563 160 Volume Left 16 0 16 Volume Right 27 8 0 cSH 463 1700 1008 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.33 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 1 Control Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 1.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 1.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am b with access.syn W Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: W. 77th St & access 718!2014 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lanes 1 2 2> 0 1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 20 543 896 51 46 17 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0°% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 21 572 943 54 48 18 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 301 257 pX, platoon unblocked 0.89 0.92 0.89 vC, conflicting volume 997 1298 498 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 760 875 202 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free °% 97 81 98 cM capacity (vehlh) 758 259 719 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 W3 2 SB 1 Volume Total 21 286 286 629 368 66 Volume Left 21 0 0 0 0 48 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 54 18 cSH 758 1700 1700 1700 1700 313 Volume to Capadly 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.37 0.22 0.21 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 0 20 Control Delay (s) 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.0 19.6 Approach LOS C Intersection S-0nmary Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity Utirization 36.6°% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 am b with access.syn �� 0 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88: W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 7/812014 Lane Group 'E8L EBT „ EBR ML WBT MR NBL NBT NBR SBL $BT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <2 0 0 2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 32 797 0 15 288 132 5 3 16 479 6 62 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3370 0 0 1674 0 1770 1608 0 Flt Permitted 0.919 0.910 0.967 0.741 Said. Flow (perm) 0 3253 0 0 3073 0 0 1636 0 1380 1608 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 85 17 65 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1027 556 176 489 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.0 11.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (36) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 873 0 0 458 0 0 25 0 504 71 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Effcl Green (s) 25.4 25.4 31.6 31.6 31.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.36 0.45 0.45 0.45 v1c Ratio 0.74 0.39 0.03 0.81 O.D9 Control Delay 25.0 15.6 6.8 28.3 4.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.0 15.6 6.8 28.3 4.0 LOS C B A C A Approach Delay 25.0 15.6 6.8 25.3 Approach LOS C B A C Queue Length 50th (ft) 167 60 2 177 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 300 123 14 338 22 Internal Link Dist (ft) 947 478 96 409 Turn Bay Length (ft) - 170 Base Capacity (vph) 1594 1549 1145 961 1140 Slarvalion Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.30 0.02 0.52 0.06 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 69.8 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maiamum v1c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212014 pm.syn 161 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale Blvd /SB TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 718/2014 Lane Group EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 361 783 27 77 271 419 18 83 337 269 41 141 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prof) 1770 3522 0 1770 3217 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.231 0.332 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 430 3522 0 618 3217 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 3 246 160 160 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 558 866 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 19.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 380 852 0 81 726 0 19 87 355 283 43 148 Turn Type pm+pl NA pm +pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 45.0 75.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Effct Green (s) 94.4 82.5 68.0 60.1 26.2 26.2 26.2 17.4 17.4 17.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.55 0.45 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.44 0.24 0.51 0.06 0.27 0.87 0.71 0.20 0.46 Control Delay 23.7 22.5 13.2 9.4 47.5 53.1 53.4 74.0 61.4 11.2 Queue Delay 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.8 23.2 13.2 9.4 47.5 53.1 53.4. 74.0 61.4 11.2 LOS C C B A D D D E E B Approach Delay 23.4 9.8 53.1 53.2 Approach LOS C A D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 171 260 17 0 16 74 196 139 38 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 307 360 34 289 37 118 300 189 78 55 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 786 609 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 636 1937 342 1435 436 459 511 439 238 342 Starvation Cap Reductn 18 672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiltback Cap Reduchi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.67 0.24 0.51 0.04 0.19 0.69 0.64 0.18 0.43 Intersection $6rnin6ry Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 20 (1396), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3° ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212014 pm.syn 4a Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88: W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 71812014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <2 0 0 2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 33 829 0 16 300 137 5 3 17 498 6 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prat) 0 3532 0 0 3373 0 0 1673 0 1770 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.917 0.906 0.969 0.740 Said. Flow (perm) 0 3245 0 0 3062 0 0 1637 0 1378 1606 0 Right Turn an Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 84 18 68 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1027 558 176 489 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.0 11.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 908 0 0 477 0 0 26 0 524 74 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 26.4 26.4 33.2 33.2 33.2 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.36 0.36 0.46 0.46 0.46 We Ratio 0.77 0.41 0.03 0.83 0.10 Control Delay 26.7 16.4 6.5 30.1 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.7 16.4 6.5 30.1 3.9 LOS C B A C A Approach Delay 26.7 16.4 6.5 26.8 Approach LOS C B A C Queue Length 50th (ft) 189 67 2 204 1 Queue Length 951h (ft) 316 129 14 361 22 Internal Link Dist (ft) 947 478 96 409 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 1523 1482 1110 930 1106 Starvation Cap Reducin 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.32 0.02 0.56 0.07 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cyde Length: 72.4 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Ma)dmum vlc Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 pm nb.syn 63 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale Blvd /SB TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 7/8/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR ML MT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 376 815 28 80 282 436 19 86 351 280 43 147 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prol) 1770 3522 0 1770 3217 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.206 0.321 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 384 3522 0 598 3217 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 3 248 160 160 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 558 866 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 19.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 887 0 84 756 0 20 91 369 295 45 155 Turn Type pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 45.0 75.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act Effct Green (s) 92.9 80.9 65.3 57.3 27.2 27.2 27.2 17.8 17.8 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.54 0.44 0.38 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.47 0.26 0.55 0.06 0.27 0.88 0.72 0.20 0.47 Control Delay 28.8 23.8 14.1 10.3 46.8 52.4 55.2 74.3 61.2 12.4 Queue Delay 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.9 24.5 14.1 10.3 46.8 52.4 55.2 74.3 61.2 12.4 LOS C C B B D D E E E B Approach Delay 25.9 10.6 54.3 53.7 Approach LOS C B D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 193 283 17 0 16 77 211 144 40 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 346 378 35 314 38 122 321 196 81 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 786 609 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 616 1903 324 1381 436 459 511 441 239 343 Starvation Cap Reductn 6 639 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.70 0.26 0.55 0.05 0.20 0.72 0.67 0.19 0.45 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 20 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 16 V:1302210212016 pm nb.syn 66ik Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 88. W. 77th St & Metro Blvd 7/812014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR 'Wk WBT WBR NBL *NBT NBR . SBL SBT S_BR Lane Configurations 0 <2 0 0 2> 0 0 <1> 0 1 1> 0 Volume (vph) 41 837 0 16 304 134 5 3 17 489 6 74 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prof) 0 3532 0 0 3377 0 0 1673 0 1770 1604 0 Flt Permitted 0.906 0.905 0.968 0.740 Said. Flow (perm) 0 3207 0 0 3062 0 0 1635 0 1378 1604 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 79 18 78 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1027 558 176 489 Travel Time (s) 23.3 12.7 4.0 11.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( °�) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 924 0 0 478 0 0 26 0 515 84 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Penn NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 a 2 6 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 26.9 26.9 32.7 32.7 32.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.45 0.45 0.45 vlc Ratio 0.78 0.40 0.03 0.83 0.11 Control Delay 26.8 16.3 6.6 30.2 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.8 16.3 6.6 30.2 3.8 LOS C B A C A Approach Delay 26.8 16.3 6.6 26.5 Approach LOS C B A C Queue Length 50th (ft) 190 67 2 203 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 325 131 14 350 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 947 478 96 409 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 1503 1477 1107 928 1106 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v1c Ratio 0.61 0.32 0.02 0.55 0.08 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 72.3 Control Type: Actuated - Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2° ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 pm b.syn i Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Normandale MAW TH 100 Ramps & W. 77th St 718/2014 Lane Group EBL E8T EBR WBL WBT WBR - NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2> 0 1 2> 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 Volume (vph) 383 827 29 80 300 436 20 86 351 280 43 155 Ideal Flow (vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 325 25 75 0 250 250 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 3224 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.195 0.316 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 363 3522 0 589 3224 0 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 3 232 160 163 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 558 866 689 736 Travel Time (s) 12.7 19.7 15.7 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 403 902 0 84 775 0 211 91 369 295 45 163 Turn Type pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Total Split (s) 45.0 75.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Lost Tlme (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Act NO Green (s) 92.9 81.0 64.7 56.8 27.2 27.2 27.2 17.8 17.8 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.54 0.43 0.38 0.18 0.16 018 0.12 012 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.47 0.27 0.57 0.07 0.27 0.88 0.72 0.20 0.49 Control Delay 31.3 23.9 14.3 11.5 47.0 52.4 55.2 74.3 61.2 13.4 Queue Delay 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.3 24.7 14.3 11.5 47.0 52.4 55.2 74.3 61.2 13.4 LOS C C B B D D E E E B Approach Delay 26.7 11.7 54.3 53.4 Approach LOS C B D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 212 290 17 0 17 77 211 144 40 0 Queue Length 951h (ft) 366 386 35 345 40 122 321 196 81 70 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 786 609 656 Turn Bay Length (It) 350 325 75 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 609 1903 317 1364 436 459 511 441 239 345 Starvation Cap Reductn 6 635 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.71 0.26 0.57 0.05 0.20 0.72 0.67 0.19 0.47 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 20 (13 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 pm b.syn AI Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: Metro Blvd & access 71812014 Movement W8L WBR NBT N69" $BL SBT _ Lanes 1> 0 1> 0 0 <1 Volume (veh1h) 9 12 174 8 20 560 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0°% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 13 183 8 21 589 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 174 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 819 187 192 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 819 187 192 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 99 98 cM capacity (vehm) 340 855 1382 Direction Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 22 192 611 Volume Left 9 0 21 Volume Right 13 8 0 cSH 518 1700 1382 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.11 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 1 Control Delay (s) 12.3 0.0 0.4 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 12.3 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS B Interse6 n Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6°% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 pm b wilh access.syn , �7 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: W. 77th St & access 718/2014 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lanes 1 2 2> 0 1> 0 Volume (vehlh) 26 1317 444 36 47 10 Sign Control Free Free Slop Grade 0% 0% 0°% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 1386 467 38 49 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 301 257 pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 505 1234 253 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 505 748 253 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 81 99 cM capacity (vehlh) 1056 266 747 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WS 2 SB.1 Volume Total 27 693 693 312 194 60 Volume Left 27 0 0 0 0 49 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 38 11 cSH 1056 1700 1700 1700 1700 300 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.18 0.11 0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 0 18 Control Delay (s) 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 20.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 V:1302210212016 pm b with access.syn W Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Mr. Bona agreed to do his best, adding he w: to a '! . . . . . . .. . . . I ILI I I I & ' III. services, building would be submitted for City Cound r ie Commissio to know that trees would be removed and driveway however, a landscaping plan and /or list ly end by th Commission. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENE iATIONS A. TIF Resolution — Pentagon Park P oposal Cc Commissioner Fischer recused himself from th vote; explain Increment Financing. Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if the Co mission ' being a Pentagon Park Proposal/TIF District is consiYla" the ComF responded in the affirmative. Bill Neuendorf addressed the Commission ee City has Associates to help create a Pentagon Park T t Financir Motion th the Comprehensive Plan works with the City on Tax to specify that the intent of the nsive Plan. Planner Teague Nick Anhoff of Ehlers & Commissioner Grabiel moved to dopgthe Resolution finditg that proposed TIF Plan and modifications to the Redevelop ent P n conforms to the neral plans for development and redevelopment of the Ci . Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- qG • Zo\\�% B. Sketch Plan Review — 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN \`n\ 2 L Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission Frauenshuh presented a redevelopment sketch plan in 2013 on this site. At that time their intent was to remodel the existing office building into retail space. Continuing, Teague said at this time Frauenshuh is proposing to rezone the site from POD, Planned Office District I, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and tear down the existing structure and build two new buildings with retail and office use. Teague asked the Commission for their comments. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson Page 9 of 14 ,t w ciuw�fkk J jIbJ1 a comprombqt hat may work; however as previo y mentioned without seeing it it is difficult to design or env on. It was; suggest hat staff conditions (all) be available for review at the Council level. Concluding, Commissioners nk the developers for their response to their earlier comments adding in their opinion this will be a go oject and possibly the first in the redevelopment of the Grandview area. Ayes; Carpenter, Pgfts, Platteter, Carr, Forres-t'Staunton. Motion carried. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review— Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group ­5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive - through. Currently the building on the site contains a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. Aaker explained to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Continuing, Aaker reported that the property is located just west of Highway 100 and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses include a gas station, Burger King, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. The proposed use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. Aaker noted this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Page 10 of 15 t7v Council." Therefore, the decision to require a Small Area Plan can be made by the City Council at the Sketch Plan review. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson, Frauenshuh and Nick Sperides, SRa Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson addressed the Commission and reported their intent is to rezone the property from POD1, (Planned Office District) to PCD2, (Planned Commercial District). Anderson explained this is a sizeable employment area, adding their goal is to repurpose the p rope rty:to,ybetter serve neighborhood commercial service demands and the economic viability of the. property. With graphics Anderson pointed out "before" and "after.. ", schematics of the property noting the building is low level. If the Commission and Council are agreeable to repurposing the property the following changes to the property would include: • Implement an updated landscape plan • Improve and repair the build in.g's:exterior, to include bighting, awnings and other architectural features • Create a better pedestrian experience by including walkways and outdoor seating areas • Potential for a drive - through option • Reconfigure the parking in keeping with ordinance requirements and • Improved internal vehicle access and circulation..; Concluding Anderson asked the Commission for their opinion on the sketch plan. Discussion ; sd Commissioner Platteter commented that.he likes the concept; however, believes this is a hard site to get in and out of. Platteter suggested reconsidering access points (eliminate west entry along Edina Ind. Blvd.) and changing the location of.the proposed drive - through; possibly to the rear. Continuing, Platteter also suggested energizing the corner of Metro Blvd /Edina Inc. Blvd. to be more pedestrian friendly. Concluding, Platteter stated he understands the requested change, adding it would continue the synergy of the areas service component; however, this is a hard site. Mr. Sperides responded that they looked at different scenarios for the drive - through but found out that moving it to the rear wouldn't work because of the three lanes (in, out & Drive - through), circulation and the difficulty in ensuring that the driver is on the proper side. Commissioner Platteter agreed driver placement was an issue, he noted in the Grandview area a drive - through is located between buildings; in the middle. Mr. Sperides added they are open to revisiting drive - through placement, adding they don't know if a drive - through would be part of the equation; however, want that option kept open because it's important to retail. Continuing, Sperides said another point they needed to keep in mind was stacking. Platteter agreed, adding as presented he is unsure if stacking would be adequate. Mr. Page 11 of 15 A.71 Sperides pointed out adequate stacking capacity is also very important for the retailer; without adequate stacking the business would suffer too. Chair Staunton commented that it is important to both the Commission and City Council that adequate stacking space is provided for drive- through window components. Staunton asked the applicant what their vision is for this property. Mr. Anderson said Frauenshuh observed this area was undergoing a change and creating an opportunity to repurpose the property in response to that change would benefit everyone. Anderson said what they do know is that the employment base is there and retail services to.respond to that base are needed. Continuing, Anderson said the vision is to capture the current activity in a positive manner. Anderson added in his opinion this area has become more of a mixed use area; reiterating the introduction of more retail is good. Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion this area is very challenging and if redeveloped a complete traffic analysis needs to be completed. Planner Aaker responded If a formal application to rezone the property is submitted a traffic analysis is a requirement of_that process. Commissioner Carr said she realizes this Is only in_the "sketch plan" phase; however if redeveloped she would like the applicant to pay attention to. aesthetim, "such as lighting, landscaping, outdoor seating areas, etc. to create a more attractive place to visit andview.: Anderson commented the intent would be to revitalize the site. Commissioner Forrest commented that she's not sureshe's on board with the rezoning request. Forrest said she is concerned with parking, . vehicle circulation and the potential drive - through space. Continuing;. Forrest pointed out as previously mentioned by Commissioner Potts that much depends on the outcome of the traffic analysis. Mr. Anderson said the initial thought was to gain Commission and Council input on the proposed rezoning. Anderson said if that support was present it would allow them to prepare a site plan supported by a completed market and traffic analysis for formal review. Anderson explained that is the reason why the plans presented aren't firm, reiterating they felt the first step was to gain input on the rezoning. _ A discussion ensued on if the Commission felt extending the PCD zoning designation to this side of the street makes sense. Commissioners expressed the opinion that pedestrian and vehicle safety is of the utmost importance, pointing out the volume of activity is this "neighborhood" is very high. Commissioners also observed that it is difficult to make a decision without the facts; such as tenant mix and how that mix relates to traffic. Page 12 of 15 .47 -a Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Aaker If the site were rezoned would all uses within the PCD -2 zoning district be allowed. Aaker responded in the affirmative; adding parking requirements need to be met for each use which could limit uses. The discussion continued on the rezoning clarifying without the traffic analysis and knowledge of the uses in the tenant space it is difficult to make an educated decision. Commissioners suggested moving forward keeping in mind how important the relationship is between traffic and use. It was further noted that if it is found that pedestrians do want,to cross the street both ways having these amenities makes sense and would be of benefit to the area and areas users. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their comments, adding'they would speak with City staff before submitting the sketch plan to the City Council. B. Res\ZoniOrdinance. Redevelopment Ordinance —'Recap from City Council Meet Staunn ed the Commission of the numerous meetings held on residentla edevelopment and amendni Ordinance. Staunton said the Commission forwarded thel inaIdraft to the City Counci July 1 `h meeting Staunton:stated he along with Commissi ers Forrest and Potts attended thng to pres nt the Commission's 'recommendations. Stau on stated after Council action thercern that th Council didn't understand the intent of a Commission on specific issues; maing height, 2nd st step elimination and setbacks. Chair Staunton said in speaking with City'%@ff he felt there was a ry/ed to reiterate to the Council the Commissions intent on one set of items ( #3 p memo) and ref red the Commission to the attached statement of intent and graphics. _ Clarifying Staunton said at their July 16'..h. meeting the o cil adopted a 30 -foot cap on building height and elimination of the second floor setback; however a ined to adopt the side yard setback formula. Staunton added he doesn't want to second guess t Coun 'I and Is agreeable with their decision; however, reiterated he wants to make sure they nderstood t e Commissions intent on side yard setback as part of a "bundle" that works simul neously. Staunt referred to the table provided In the Ordinance amendment on side yard setbac and wondered if the uncil thought this table was too cumbersome. Staunton said the goal of a Commission was also top vide the public with greater clarity in the Ordinance; however, the ouncil may not have felt this was chieved in the Commission's final draft. Staunton told the Commission would be forwarding his statement along wit he graphics provided by Commissioner Potts to th Council before their final reading on the Ordinance a endments at their August 5`s meeting. Stau on asked the Commission for their input on the " statemen ". He acknowledged the stat ent also recommends that on lots narrower than 75 -feet in width that there be at least a total of �5% of the lot width (with a minimum setback no less than what currently exists). Page 13 of 15 47- CJ� 600VJ(J Minutes din it Council/August 20 2013 i J e Motio arri d. VIII.B. SKETCH FLAN —5801 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD —REVIEWED Assistant Planner Presentation Ms. Aaker presented the sketch plan to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive- through. Currently, the building contained a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site, and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1) A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -I, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2; and, 2) A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Ms. Aaker reported the subject property was located just west of Highway 100 and across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses included a gas station, Burger King, and small retail strip center. North and east of the site were office /light industrial uses. Use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. This property was located within an area the City designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan stated that within the Potential Areas of Change, a development proposal that Involved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning would require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan would rest with the City Council. Ms. Aaker stated staff had noted the following issues for discussion in relation to the sketch plan: 1) Drive - through in front of the building with consideration of moving it to the back of the building; 2) Elimination of the existing western access to Edina Industrial Boulevard, as the access was too close to the Intersection; 3) Concern over a lack of parking space for conversion into retail spaces; 4) The parking shortage could further increase if a restaurant use were to go into the site; 5) If the drive - through were to be moved to the back there might not be adequate area for two -way circulation; and, 6) Office land uses to the north and west. Ms. Aaker stated the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal and generally believed that the use was appropriate as long as adequate parking was provided. The Council discussed sidewalks and connectivity, parking, pervious surface requirements, and stacking in relation to the sketch plan. Proponent Presentation David Anderson, Frauenshuh, stated the intent was to re- energize this corner of the City. Mr. Anderson discussed that in relation to parking, some of the retail uses on the site might be serving pedestrians, which would reduce the parking demand, that the drive - through proposed on the site offers flow, and that there was also the potential to reduce the square footage of the building to lower parking requirements. The proponent was aware of the discussion on stacking in relation to the site. The Council discussed landscaping with Mr. Anderson, and encouraged engaging the public from the curb area to the building. The importance of connectivity and safe pedestrian crossing, including a buffer between the sidewalk and street, and squaring off the corner to slow traffic down was discussed. The Council requested review of the zoning options for potential uses and to ensure the required parking was provided. Council support was expressed for a neighborhood retail use in the area under the category of Planned Commercial. A drive- through on the site was discouraged. The Council agreed that a Small Area Plan should not be necessary for the sketch plan as presented. VIII.0 RESOLUTION NO. 2613Z ADOPTED— ACCEPTING Mayor Hovland explained that in oTtkr to comply w' adopted by Resolution and approved fou vorable Page 8 V IOUS DONATIONS - ADOPTED wit Statutes; all donations to the City must be votes of the Council accepting the donations. V Discussion Commissioner Platteter noted that previously the City Council indicated a small area plan was not required for this redevelopment, adding he wonders if that decision would change if this was split into two lots. Planner Teague said the Council as they did with the previous sketch plan would decide if this proposal met the threshold to initiate a small area plan. Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson told the Commission the property consists of 1.3 acres with an existing one -story multi - tenant building. Anderson said in July 2013 they appeared before the Commission with a renovation concept of all retail. The Commission found the retail aspect acceptable, but had certain circulation and parking concerns. Continuing, Anderson explained the proposal before the Commission is a two - building redevelopment. The existing building would be removed and two new buildings would be constructed in phases depending on the timing of tenant occupancy. Discussion Commissioner Forrest stated she likes the new plan; however is a little disappointed that once again the buildings are in a sea of asphalt. Forrest suggested that if the applicant proceeds with a formal application they need work on creating a more pedestrian friendly attractive area. Commissioner Schroeder said as proposed the site doesn't appear to be pedestrian oriented. He said he also feels the landscaping doesn't meet the goal the Commission has set for redevelopment. Continuing, Schroeder also commented that he has concern with the directional flow of the proposed drive - through. Concluding, Schroeder said if the trend in this area is redevelopment one parcel at a time this may be a good time to consider a small area plan. Developing on a lot to lot basis doesn't create cohesiveness. Commissioner Potts agreed with previous comments and added the site as presented appears over parked and in his opinion minor changes could occur to better address pedestrian access and introduce more green space on the site. Concluding, Potts also suggested that the development team take another look at the location of the trash enclosure. Commissioner Carr indicated she liked the concept of two different buildings; however believes the building(s) should be moved farther forward, adding additional green space and parking to the rear. Mr. Anderson responded that their goal this evening was to get feedback on the two building retail concept. He added they are considering incorporating wider sidewalks and an enhanced plaza seating area, creating a more pedestrian feel to the development. Page 10 of 14 P Commissioner Grabiel added that he supports the idea of retail in this location; adding, it's needed. Continuing, Grabiel pointed one the City needs to be careful in their attempts to bring buildings to the street because in his opinion it hasn't always been successful. Commissioner Platteter said he too agrees that the site may be over - parked; adding another concern he has is with the drive - through circulation. Continuing, Platteter stated he was a bit disappointed with the layout of the site adding in his opinion both options; pedestrian friendliness, reduced parking with more landscaping could be accomplished. He concluded that the goal of this development should be to provide options for the public; walkers, vehicles, everyone. Nick Sperides responded that they considered other options for the drive - through facility acknowledging the difficulty of a drive - through. Continuing, Sperides said that the drive - through set up was designed as presented because most of the traffic flow is off Edina Industrial Boulevard. He acknowledged the path to the drive- through is circuitous, adding he was willing to take another look at it. Concluding, Sperides said the goal was to develop a high quality neighborhood retail service area. He stated they would review the circulation patterns and adjust as needed. Commissioner Grabiel questioned if the drive - through was really needed. Commissioner Scherer commented that she was disappointed there wasn't a safer route to get from the sidewalk to the proposed coffee shop Chair Platteter suggested that the development team visit the-site and create a "mock -up" with cones to ensure that the drive- through flow works safely. Concluding Platteter thanked the applicants and noted the direction moving forward should be to address traffic circulation, especially as it relates to the drive - through, ensure safe pedestrian access, reduce parking, add landscaping and create more common space. MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague addressed the Co missio a xplained this is another Sketch Plan proposal (same area) to tear down the existing offs e b ' g and built a new retail office building with drive - through on the north end. Teague explained ' e app cant proceeds to accommodate the request a rezoning would be needed from POD ann d Offic District I, to either PCD -2, Planned Commercial District - 2 or PUD, Planned U ' evelopme t. Teague ngt� similar to th_ e previo��reiterljted erty is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a "Potential Area of Change. Teagu and noted that the City Council did not recommend a Small Area Plan as part of the recent Sketch Plan of the site to the east. Page 11 of 14 Council conce was expressed about the appropriateness of retail use and a driv ugh (which resulted in reduced parkin in this location. Mr. Dovolis agreed this was a y gateway location with good visibility from the hig ay, which attracted retailers. He explai at surface parking was proposed due to the high water table d high cost to construct a bui g on stilts. Mr. Dovolis described the formal shared parking arrangemen nd mixed uses that 'g t include retail and office. The drive -thru on the north side could be used by a sho enant. He stated support for rezoning to POD as it had yielded a quality building /develo�dwich at and France. The Council asked questio Attorney Kn on and Engineer Bintner related to the shared parking arrangement or proo parking, should the adja t use change in the future. Mr. Knutson advised if that occurred, i ould be an issue between the tenant property owner. To assure adequate parking, Mr. Teagu uggested addressing specific uses and eliminat uses (i.e., restaurants) that would drive needJaf parking. The Council supported staff interaction with M /DOT to address points of access. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED -5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the sketch plan proposal of Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group to tear down the existing 12,196 square foot structure at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, build two new buildings totaling 9,450 square feet, and change the use from office to retail including a drive -thru. He described the uses of the existing building. It was noted that to accommodate this request, it would require a rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1 to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2; and, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Mr. Teague advised that the Planning Commission considered this sketch plan proposal at its February 12, 2014, meeting and expressed concern related to site circulation. Proponent Presentation David Anderson, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, 7101 W 78th Street, Suite, Minneapolis, described site elements, adjusted points of access, and refinements made to the sketch plan to address concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. He stated they have paid attention to parking need and outdoor seating/green space because the focus would be on restaurant and food related users. Mr. Anderson noted this was a small site of 1.3 acres that required small -scale buildings to accommodate site circulation and green space. Nick Sperides, Sperides Reiners Architects, 42 W. Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, presented the site plan and reviewed the traffic circulation, drive -thru and sidewalk locations, one curb cut, reduced building size by 715 square feet, and more common space. He then presented exterior building materials, noting the similarity to Starbucks and Whole Foods at Centennial Lakes. The Council considered the sketch plan proposal and recommended the following: PUD zoning to create flexibility and coordinated development; relocate entrance /exit away from adjoining curb cut; consider proof of parking options rather than being over parked; enhanced redesign of upper parapet to reduce utilitarian appearance; inclusion of a matching crosswalk at the southwest corner; flipping building locations to ease drive -thru access; bicycle racks at both buildings; moving the buildings closer to the street; additional greenspace including an island with trees and garden; specific storm water plan to accommodate the high water table; modify the vehicle centric design to better accommodate pedestrian access; create sidewalk across the berm to connect with Metro Boulevard sidewalk; provide pedestrian connectivity between the two buildings; and additional planting breaks within the parking lot. With regard to the suggestion to flip the buildings, Mr. Sperides explained it would create conflict in traffic movements and reduce parking capacity. Page 4 1+17 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL �roR�B� Agenda Item #: VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action M Discussion M Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Final Site Plan Review, Multiple Variances and Preliminary Plat, Mesaba Capital; 7151 York Avenue, Res. No. 2014 -84. Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -84, approving the Site Plan Review, Variances and Preliminary Plat. Planning Commission Recommendation: On July 9, 2014 motion to approve the site plan and variances failed on a 3 -3 Vote. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Plat. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) The Commission recommended several conditions in their motion that have been added to the conditions in the attached resolution. The applicant has revised their plans to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. (See attached.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan, Variances and Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — October I, 2014) Mesaba Capital is requesting review of a proposal to build a four -story 100 -unit senior assisted living building west of the existing Yorktown Continental Senior Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The housing would include 70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care units. Ten percent (10 %) of the units would be for residents below 50% median income level. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5- A33 in the Planning Commission Staff Report.) Features of the building include congregate dining with three meals provided per day; private dining; a coffee shop; a lounge area on each floor; a library; a computer room; a craft room and a fitness facility. Parking is provided underneath the building. The existing surface lot for the 12 -story building has been relocated to the east side of the building and the number of surface stalls for that building increased from 123 surface stall to 140. The Planning Commission and City Council have considered sketch plan reviews of the subject property in 2013 and 2014. (See minutes from those meetings on pages A34 -A41.) The applicant has taken the feedback from the sketch plan review and revised the plans to include: Locating the building on the York side of the site; pulling the building up close to the street; adding green space; providing porches /decks in the front to engage the street; and increasing sidewalks and pedestrian connections. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: ➢ Site Plan Review to construct the new 4-story building; ➢ Front Yard Setback Variance from 46 feet to 20 feet; ➢ Density Variance to allow 364 total -units on the site from 182 units allowed under current zoning (the existing building is nonconforming with 264 units); ➢ Parking Variance from 194 exposed and 91 enclosed spaces to 162 exposed and 64 enclosed; and ➢ Variances to allow one bedroom units under 500 square feet, and two bedroom units over 850 square feet. ➢ Preliminary Plat. ATTACHMENTS: ® Resolution No. 2014-84 ® Revised Plans date stamped July 29, 2014 ® Planning Commission minutes, July 9, 2014 Submittal from the Yorktown Continental Resident Association • Planning Commission staff report dated July 9, 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-84 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES AND PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BUILD A FOUR -STORY 100 -UNIT SENIOR LIVING APARTMENT AT 7151 YORK AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mesaba Capital is requesting to build a four -story 100 -unit senior assisted living building west of the existing Yorktown Continental Senior Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The housing would include 70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care units. Ten percent (10 %) of the units would be for residents below 50% median income level. 1.02 The Planning Commission and City Council considered sketch plan reviews of the request. The applicant has taken the feedback from the sketch plan review and revised the plans to include: Locating the building on the York side of the site; pulling the building up close to the street; adding green space; providing porches/ decks in the front to engage the street; and increasing sidewalks and pedestrian connections. 1.03 To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review to construct the new 4 -story building; 2. Front Yard Setback Variance from 46 feet to 20 feet; 3. Density Variance to allow 364 total units on the site from 182 units allowed under current zoning (the existing building is nonconforming with 264 units); 4. Parking Variance from 194 exposed and 91 enclosed spaces to 162 exposed and 64 enclosed; and 5. Variances to allow one bedroom units under 500 square feet, and two bedroom units over 850 square feet. 6. Preliminary Plat. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: See attached. 1.05 With the exception of the requested Variances, the proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance Requirements. 1.06 On July 9, 2013, a motion to approve the proposed Site Plan and Variances subject to findings and conditions failed on a 3 -3 Vote by the Planning Commission. 1.07 The applicant submitted revised plans to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ... VA._ .r,rrr ..,... - or') o')7 4441 - V­ QG ')_Q')A_0'AQQ RESOLUTION NO. 2014-84 Page Two Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed new building would be separated and screened from the single- family homes to the east by the existing 12 -story building. 2. There are adequate utilities to support the site. 3. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 4. The Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. The proposed project is located close to the Fairview Southdale Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing. 5. The variance criteria are met. a. The practical difficulty is the location of the existing building located in the middle of the site. The applicant has located the building up close to the street to create an active environment with pedestrian connections. b. The building could be shifted back to meet the setback requirement. However, in doing so the green space proposed between the two buildings would be lost. c. Minimum and maximum unit dwelling units was intended to promote affordable housing. The applicant is also proposing 10% of the units for affordable housing, in addition to the 263 existing affordable units on the site. d. The larger two bedroom units over 850 square feet are reasonable to promote a variety of housing options within the development. e. The unique circumstance is the existing location of the building on the site, which does not have any underground parking. It has been the city's general policy with previous similar requests, to not build parking stalls when they are not needed. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-84 Page Two The proposal will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new structure would be designed to be integrated and complement the existing 12- story building. The new 4 -story building being brought up close to York Avenue would be consistent with recent development on France and York, with buildings being brought close to the street to engage it and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/ redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. 7. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approval of the Site Plan, Variances and Preliminary Plat at 7151 York Avenue for Mesaba Capital. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: RESOLUTION NO. 2014-84 Page Two aSite plan date stmped June 13, 2014. Grading plan date 'Stamped June 13; 2014. Utility plan date stamped June 13, 2014. Landscaping'plan date stamped June 13, 2014. Building elevations date stamped June 13, 2014 o Revised Plans date stamped July 29, 2014 Building materials board as presented'at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner. is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo dated June 25; 2014. 7. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Ten percent (10 %) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. 9. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10% over state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a. building permit. 10. Prior. to issuance of a building permit the easement along York Avenue would have to be vacated, and utilities (if any) relocated. 11. Signage shall be allowed for both the existing and proposed buildings/ lots per the PSR-4 standards outlined in Section 36, Article XIII in the City Code. 12. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls constructed by adding addition parking stalls. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-84 Page Two 13. Work with city staff and Metro Transit to make improvements to the existing bus stop per the submitted narrative date stamped July 29, 2014. 14. All mechanical equipment must meet the city's noise standards. If necessary, noise abatement shall be installed on the equipment to meet the standards. 15. Landscaping shall be enhanced, in particular along the north and south lot line with over -story trees to fill in the open areas. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 4, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 12014 City Clerk E��, I A Legal Description - Parcel 1 nn C;3 MESABA CAPITAL PARTNERS All that part of Lot 2 Block 3, "Yorktown ", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 841370, lying west of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point 166.88 feet east along the north line from the northwest corner of Lot 2 to a point 135.72 fee east along the south line from the southwest corner of Lot 2 and there terminating. Mesaba Capital Development 15201 Eden Avenue Suite 250 1 Edina, MN 55436 June 12, 2014 A discussion ensued on the difference between Planning and Engineering requirerp(et`s with regard to drainage and storm water maintenance and the fact that the drainage and grad was submitted immediately prior to this meeting and that the Commission had no time to 7i ;the new plans. Commissioner Carr asked Mr. Bintner if at the end of the day has the a gi Bering standards been met and if he was comfortable with his assessment. Mr. Bintner respond i the affirmative; reiterating the plans submitted on July 9th are acceptable him. Previous plans wer n t. Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Jim Stromberg, 3940 49th St. West informed Commigi?ners he lives in the neighboring house, addi likes the proposal as submitted and would welco 2 this rebuild into the neighborhood. Stromber pointed out this neighborhood is currently a nei 9rhood of change, reiterating he likes the pla presented. / Chair Staunton asked if anyone else Q ° xlatteter moved to close the public �� motion carried. `\ Continued Discussion Commissioner Olsen not two as proposed. Commissioner Motion :e to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Olsen seconded the I he mentioned at the last meeting she she supports the request; adding in All voted aye; one driveway is adequate; nion the standards have been met. Comm 9/si ner Carr moved variance approv_ -I/ i ed on staff findings and subject to staff condi i s with the additional condition t j t e applicant present to City Staff a copy of the I ins submitted to Mr. Bintner on July 2014. Commissioner Platteter seconded the on. Ayes; Scherer, Olsen, Plattet�rj,Carr, Forrest. Nays; Lee, Staunton. Motion cyarried. 4 -2 C. Site Plan Review with Variances. Mesaba Capital Partners, 7151 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mesaba Capital is requesting review of a proposal to build a four -story 100 -unit senior assisted living building west of the existing Yorktown Continental Senior Page 3 of 10 Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The housing would include 70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care units. Ten percent (10 %) of the units would be for residents below 50% median income level. Features of the building include congregate dining with three meals provided per day; private dining; a coffee shop; a lounge area on each floor; a library; a computer room; a craft room and a fitness facility. Parking is provided underneath the building. The existing surface lot for the 12- story building has been relocated to the east side of the building and the number of surface stalls for that building increased from 123 surface stall to 140. Teague reported that the Planning Commission and City Council have considered sketch plan reviews of the subject property in 2013 and 2014 Planner Teague noted to accommodate the request; the following land use applications are requested: ➢Site Plan Review to construct the new 4 -story building; ➢ Front Yard Setback Variance from 46 feet to 20 feet; ➢Density Variance to allow 364 total units on the site from 182 units allowed under current zoning (the existing building is nonconforming with 264 units); ➢ Parking Variance from 194 exposed and 91 enclosed spaces to 162 exposed and 64 enclosed; and ➢Variances to allow one bedroom units under 500 square feet, and two bedroom units over 850 square feet. ➢Preliminary Plat. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with the proposed variances at 7151 York Avenue based on the following findings: I. The proposed new building would be separated and screened from the single - family homes to the east by the existing 12 =story building. 2. There are adequate utilities to support the site. 3. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 4. The Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. The proposed project is located close to the Fairview Southdale Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing. 5. The variance criteria are met. a. The practical difficulty is the location of the existing building located in the middle of the site. The applicant has located the building up close to the street to create an active environment with pedestrian connections. Page 4 of 10 b. The building could be shifted back to meet the setback requirement. However, in doing so the green space proposed between the two buildings would be lost. c. Minimum and maximum unit dwelling units was intended to promote affordable housing. The applicant is also proposing 10% of the units for affordable housing, in addition to the 263 existing affordable units on the site. d. The larger two bedroom units over 850 square feet are reasonable to promote a variety of housing options within the development. e. The unique circumstance is the existing location of the building on the site, which does not have any underground parking. It has been the city's general policy with previous similar requests, to not build parking stalls when they are not needed. f. The proposal will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new structure would be designed to be integrated and complement the existing 12 -story building. The new 4 -story building being brought up close to York Avenue would be consistent with recent development on France and York, with buildings being brought close to the street to engage it and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below. • Site plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped June 13, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for Page 5 of 10 one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo dated June 25, 2014. 7. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Ten percent (10 %) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. 9. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10% over state energy code guidelines. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit the easement along York Avenue would have to be vacated, and utilities (if any) relocated. 11. Signage shall be allowed for both the existing and proposed buildings /lots per the PSR -4 standards outlined in Section 36, Article XIII in the City Code. Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new two lot subdivision at 7151 York Avenue for the proposed project subject to the following findings: I. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: I. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $500, 00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Appearing for the Applicant Della Koplin, Mesaba Capital Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague what the affordable unit count is for this project. Planner Teague responded that the affordable element is proposed at 10 units out of 100 units. Staunton further asked Teague if the subject site is conforming. Planner Teague responded the site as it exists today is non- conforming. Commissioner Carr noted the front yard setback variance request illustrated on the plans and inquired if the City has established a formula in the greater Southdale area to "achieve" a uniform front yard setback. Continuing, Carr stated in her opinion it appears there is a hodgepodge of front yard setbacks Page 6 of 10 in the area, with some recently approved. Planner Teague responded that Commissioner Carr is correct; there isn't an established front yard setback formula for the greater Southdale area. Carr said she would like to see the City draft a uniform plan /policy /guide on front yard setback and the buildings relationship to the street. Carr pointed out the City is working toward creating a living streets policy, adding it would be important to establish standards for sidewalks, boulevards (trees in -off), landscaping, etc. Commissioner Scherer referred to the mechanicals for the building, adding attention to the noise emitting from the chiller needs to be considered. Scherer explained in the past the City had chillers relocated because they violated noise standards. She suggested that the applicant "test" the chiller noise to ensure it's properly located. Continuing, Scherer said she also agrees with the comments from Commissioner Carr and her suggestion that the City consider establishing consistent front yard setbacks and boulevard treatment for the Southdale area. Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague how the affordable housing element is enforced. Planner Teague responded the property owner must provide written confirmation. Applicant Presentation Ms. Koplin addressed the Commission introducing members of the development team; Eliana Carter, rsp, David Die, Yorktown Continental. Ms. Carter delivered a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the project. She said it was very important that the new building provides community and a sense of dignity as people age. The intent of the new building is to become a "sister" building to the existing Yorktown Continental, which is currently undergoing major renovations. The "sister" buildings are of a different scale; however, they have focused on integrating the two buildings by using similar organizing elements with the exterior expression. Continuing, Carter said the connection between buildings through the common courtyard is very important for the project. She added a protected drop -off area is proposed for the new building and they are considering a heated walkway between structures. Carter further reported that all deliveries would be accommodated inside the building. Ms. Carter concluded that the first floor is proposed as an activity zone for both buildings and the 4th floor would contain the memory care units. Commissioner Forrest reiterated the need to "test" the noise emitting from the chiller before placing it in the designated area to ensure it doesn't violate limits. Forrest further stated she's bothered by the size of the building wall along York Avenue; adding it looms, suggesting that the applicant introduce podium height to soften the impact. Commissioner Platteter commented in his opinion the proposed building is set too close to York Avenue. Platteter further stated he would like the building fagade to appear more welcoming questioning if there is a door onto York Avenue. Continuing, Platteter said more articulation could also be added to the south fagade to break up the mass. Platteter said he would echo Commissioner Forrest's comment concerning chiller noise. Concluding, Platteter further questioned the right turn radius into the ramp, adding to him the radius appeared rather tight. Page 7 of 10 Ms. Koplin told the Commission the siting of the building closer to York Avenue was at the request of the Commission. In response to the question about a front door Ms. Koplin indicated there isn't a front door because of safety concerns. Commissioner Forrest pointed out without a door on York Avenue a resident of the building would have a long walk to the bus stop. Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. The following residents spoke to the issues: Bernice Brown, 7151 York Avenue Daniel Spear, 7151 York Avenue Sara Amaden, 7151 York Avenue Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Motion carried. Discussion In response to comments made regarding the entrance to the building Ms. Carter informed the Commission that the current redesign and remodeling of the existing building also includes relocating the current entrance to the other side of the building. Chair Staunton referred to the buildings as being "sister" buildings and asked if tenants in the existing building at 7151 York Avenue can easily move across to the new building. Ms. Koplin explained that movement can occur; however, there are two different property owners and requirements with much depending on the individual's financial status. Koplin reiterated all units in the new building are available to residents of the existing building; however, if they require an "affordable" unit there could be a wait because the new building has 10 affordable units. Koplin further noted that the majority of the units in the 7151 building are "affordable" units. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to reconsider internal traffic flow, adding she has some concerns including the turn radius previously mentioned by Commissioner Platteter. Ms. Koplin responded they would review the turn radius into the ramp as suggested. Chair Staunton noted that the applicant is also requesting a preliminary plat and asked Planner Teague how the City measures density on a site like this. Planner Teague responded that the site(s) is considered one tract; even if there would be two lots. The discussion ensued with Commissioners summarizing the following: Page 8 of 10 • The Commission acknowledged they suggested that the building be moved closer to York Avenue at Sketch Plan review however, were disappointed in the result for the following reasons: a) no door onto York Avenue; b)more detail and articulation is needed on the York Avenue elevation, consider using podium height as depicted in the Comprehensive Plan (the building appears to "loom" over York Avenue); c)more detail is needed on the porch facing York Avenue, d) add interest to the south sidewall , e) provide more landscaping. • Reconsider the interior circulation and turning movements of vehicles; • Revisit the ramp access, especially the turning radius; • With regard to deliveries consider establishing time frames for deliveries that don't coincide with resident movements; • Continue to work with the MTC on the bus stop; there needs to be connectivity from the new building to the public bus stop; • Keep the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in mind when considering redevelopment (podium height) • Reconsider the impact of the proposed building on the existing building. • Take another look at the chiller and its proposed location to ensure the noise from the chiller doesn't violate noise standards and negatively impact the residents of 7151. A discussion ensued between Commissioners on the need to provide more consistent directions to applicants at Sketch Plan review. The Commission acknowledged they suggested moving the building closer to the street; however didn't achieve their goal. Commissioners indicated at this time they believe there hasn't been enough study on establishing a consistent front street setback in the greater Southdale area and what that setback should look like. It was further noted that bringing buildings closer to the street is only part of the equation. Continuing, Commissioners stated if the City desires a more urban landscape there should be guidelines that create an active street front that engages the street; not just a building moved closer to the street. Planner Teague responded the Commissions goal in suggesting that an applicant(s) locate buildings closer to the street was the result of their desire to eliminate viewing a "sea" of parking lots in front of buildings (which was the way the City was previously developed). Concluding, Teague said if the City were to establish a specific front yard setback number in the greater Southdale area the City could lose negotiating tools. Chair Staunton commented it appears that the City is experiencing an increase in requests for multifamily buildings in the greater Southdale area. Staunton said he is becoming a bit nervous about density adding this may be the time to initiate further study on this issue, adding he is speaking about long range discussions. Concluding, Staunton said he can support the request for increased density at this site; however, is concerned with the density increases happening throughout the area. Ms. Koplin stated she wants to resolve any issues and deliver a great product. Page 9 of 10 Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend site plan approval with variances based on staff findings, subject to staff conditions with the following recommendations: • Noise study be done for the rooftop mechanical equipment to ensure code compliance • Review turning radius to ramp • Reconsider a front entry facing York • Continue working with MTC on the bus stop • Increase landscaping • Add articulation to the south building wall • Develop a Proof of Parking Agreement • Submittal of a plan of how the sustainable goals will be must Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion, Commissioner Scherer stated she can't support the request as submitted because the building is too close to the street. Commissioner Carr also indicated she cannot support the request as presented. Ayes; Olsen, Platteter Staunton. Nays, Scherer, Lee. Motion failed 3 -3. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Preliminary Plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 10 of 10 nn C;1 MESABA CAPITAL PARTNERS City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Continental Gardens Senior Housing Mesaba Capital Development proposes to develop a 100 -unit senior care facility in Edina, Minnesota. The proposed building will be on the property of The Yorktown Continental Apartments, a 12 -story building of 264 one bedroom apartments for independent seniors. The site, 7151 York Avenue, is within walking distance to the Galleria, Southdale Mall, Target, CVS, Walgreens, Cub Foods, Byerly's, YMCA, entertainment venues, and The Hennepin County Library Government Center. Bus lines are conveniently located in front of the site on York Avenue. The current parcel is 5.85 acres and zoned PSR -4, Planned Residence District. The parcel is planned to be subdivided and replatted during the entitlement process. Mesaba Capital Development along with Health Dimensions Group + Premier Management, Welsh Construction and RSP Architects believe this is a strong development opportunity and aligns with the visions and goals of the City of Edina. Why Approve This Proiect? Land Use & Density • Leverages land with higher residential density, lower vehicle ownership and usage. • Delivers senior housing that is needed within the market. • Deliver affordable housing that is needed within the market. York Avenue • Connects and engages, continuing the City's vision for a walkable community. • Promotes health with walking and biking distance to shopping, entertainment and services. Transportation/Transit • Provides an integrated and efficient transportation system that affords m ;orTity, convenience and safety for residents. • Mesaba Capital in discussion with Metro Transit to improve bus stop and connect6P, \�= to Senior Living Building. C� Affordable Housing • Adds units to the current inventory, assisting the City of Edina in reaching their goal. Sustainability • Supports City objective to exceed State sustainability goals via: o Selection of building materials sourced locally and/or manufactured from rapidly renewable resources. o Careful placement on site to maximize both density and green space. o Site selected to support mass transit and transportation alternatives to private vehicle use. The Senior Living Building will include independent living, assisted living, and memory care options. Health Dimensions Group + Premier Management offer industry- leading expertise in consulting and management of senior living properties. This team understands the opportunities and challenges inherent with providing services to the aging. Their experienced leaders create customized approaches specific to the unique needs and circumstances of the market, residents and facility. Mesaba Capital engaged Health Dimensions Group to provide a summation of current senior living providers in the Edina area. The summary provided results documenting currently high occupancy levels in the area with one property currently in fill up, offering high price points, and experiencing good market acceptance. Overall Project Goals: • Create a sense of Community Pride • Provide a warm and inviting environment • Connection to Nature — indoor and outdoor • Sense of quality and dignity • Maximize the potential of the site The proposed building is four stories in height with underground parking. The 100 -unit facility is being programmed and designed to accommodate a continuum of aging, including Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care Units. The total square footage of the project is proposed to be 121,300 NSF. The parking for the parcel is planned for 64 stalls enclosed below the Senior Living Building, 17 visitor and 10 employee surface parking. The facility will provide at least ten percent of the total units as affordable housing; individuals below the 50% median income level will have reduced monthly rents. Senior Living with Services 70 units) Private apartments with full kitchens and laundry. Support services for thgse'Who have more complex care requirements. Staff is on -site 24- hours -a -day. • Independent Living is for seniors who wish to eliminate the burden of home ownership for an apartment and facility offering numerous conveniences and amenities. • Assisted Living is for seniors who wish to live as independently as possible, yet may require assistance with some of the activities of daily living. • The facility will create a dynamic environment that promotes activities throughout the day. Memory Care (30 units) The private memory care apartments at Continental Gardens will be secure and specially designed for those with mild to moderate memory loss from Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia. The area is designed to bring comfort, peace and familiarity to the residents while providing exceptional care. Proposed Building Features: • Congregate dining w/ three meals a day. • Private dining • Coffee Shop • Lounge areas on every floor • Library & Computer Room • Craft Room • Fitness Facility Site Planning The new Senior Living Building has been oriented primarily north and south on the site to activate the York Avenue streetscape. • The building is positioned a minimum of 28' -0" from York Avenue. • The building is setback 20' -0" from the west property line. • This building position creates and maximizes two distinct and unique green spaces; • Front streetscape of 30' -0 "+ and an interior courtyard of 90' -0" shared between the two buildings. • Increase southern and western sunlight into the courtyard, while shielding the outdoor areas from prevailing northwesterly winds with two layers of evergreen trees. York Avenue Boulevard and Streetscape: • Create an urban style setting. • First floor resident stoops provide and articulate the masonry base, interspersed with two seating areas with benches and bollard lighting connecting pedestrians to the site. • York Avenue Front Porch, connected to the interior common spaces; ,creates an*. ,\. active space for residents and neighbors to meet and socialize -N.. • Landscaping and Garden • Two rows of over story shade trees promote the classic boulevar� (�'� feel; 8' -0" boulevard west of sidewalk is new trees, east of sidewalk existing to remain. • Formal foundation plantings accent the building with a similar amount of plant material prosed for each resident apartment. • Small fon -du -lac retaining wall levels out the sidewalk to create the connection from porch to York Avenue sidewalk, eliminating need for ramp. The retaining wall will use the familiar stone material found through Edina. • An ornamental garden entrance opens to the sidewalk, connecting the Senior Housing front porch and garden. The gate opens into an informal perennial garden with masses of native color and texture. Interior Courtyard • The courtyard will provide privacy for the residents, a break from the frantic pace of everyday life, and a protected space for activities to be held. • The courtyard will be a shared amenity for both residents of the Senior Housing building and Yorktown Continental. • A climate controlled walkway, has been designed to residents to move between the buildings in inclement weather. • Landscaping • Perennial flowers and grasses highlight the drop -off entrance area with a stone maintenance edge. • Two rows of large evergreen trees will provide a screen to the loading dock while protecting the courtyard from the north/northwest winds. • A large, flexible green space highlights the courtyard and is bordered by an informal planting bed of shrubs, perennials and white birch trees. • Fire -pit • Raised resident garden areas. Infiltration Area • A sod strip borders the parking area to keep a clean, manicured look. • Infiltration areas will be seeded with native grass mixtures. • Around the basins, area will be seeded with native grass mixtures and will be enhances with wildflowers to add season color and interest. • East Side of the basins will be planted with evergreen trees to screen the parking areas from residential area. • Existing raised garden will be relocated to the south side of the basins. Bus Stop Location and Concepts: Mesaba Capital Development has been in conversation with Metro Transit, Hennepin County and Tom Nolan, Transportation Planner for the City of Edina regarding �1e _best solution for Mass Transit to support 7151 York Avenue. The site is currently supported with two transit stops: o York Avenue South & Hazelton Road (north of site) with a bench and transit sign. 0 7245 York Avenue South (south of site) with a shelter and transit sign. • There will not be a new bus stop located at 7151 York Avenue South, due to operational distances between stops and current bus routes. • Bus stop improvements under discussion: o York Avenue South & Hazelton Road to received a new heated shelter. Size 4' -0" x 12' -0" 0 7245 York Avenue South to received new heating in the existing shelter. o Working through an review and approval process: • Joe Edwards, Metro Transit ( 4612 - 349 -7676) ■ Brad Smith, Metro Transit Supervisor, Operations ( #612- 418 -1133) ■ Eric Draeger, Hennepen County Real Estate, ( #612 -596 -0300) Building Exterior Design The exterior design for the Senior Living Building has been developed with two key objectives; our building should be integrated with the York Avenue streetscape in terms of scale and articulation, while also relating well to the existing twelve -story apartment building which shares our site. In recognition of the difference in overall scale and site placement, we have focused on integrating the two buildings by using similar organizing elements within the exterior expression. The existing building exterior has a hierarchy in which large, framed areas have been subdivided horizontally into smaller panels. A similar vocabulary has been used in developing the new Senior Living Building. Taking cues from the existing building, the relatively large faeades have been broken into smaller, framed areas within which horizontal panels create visual texture and interest. The use of a masonry base relates both to the existing adjacent building and the warm brick tones seen in many of the residential Edina neighborhoods. Above the masonry base, residential areas are sheathed with cement fiber siding in a combination of light tan and warm gray. A rich brown ribbon runs through all the facades as an organizing element that helps tie the residential areas and common spaces together. The color palette also relates to the materials planned for the exterior renovation on the neighboring building. At the fourth floor, the building steps back to provide areas where Memory Care residents may be outdoors in a supervised and protected environment. Rooftop mechanical units are clustered at the north and south ends of the building adjacent to the elevator enclosure. These areas are shielded by low screen walls and are held back from the roof edges to further minimize the perceived building height and massing. Communal areas of the building have been developed with an emphasis on transparency and connectivity between indoor and outdoor activity areas. The "front porch" along York Avenue provides an elevated. patio adjacent to the public functions inside and from which residents can observe the: activity along the sheet. On the courtyard (east) side, the health and wellness functions have been located to take advantage of the adjacent outdoor landscape. The entire courtyard area.is available to residents of both the new Senior Living Building and the existing apartment building. The exterior spaces have been designed to support a variety of, functions including outdoor fitness classes, social gatherings for both large and small groups and residerits.L, gardening areas. Additionally, - sidewalks have been included around the entire two- parcel site and to the adjacent park to offer residents the opportunity to exercise and enjoy the outdoors. North of the courtyard, the delivery access is buffered by coniferous trees which not only provide year -round visual screening, but also provide shelter from prevailing northwesterly winter winds. At the main entry, the drive is roughly centered on the courtyard space where it can provide access to both buildings. The. entry drop -off is sheltered by a central porte cochere providing protection from the elements and a preview into the courtyard beyond. Canopy structures are provided over heated sidewalks extending from the porte - cochere to each building. The porte chochere and canopies will be treated similarly to other public areas of the project in both scale and materiality. Mechanical Design & Systems: • . Private resident apartments will be heated and cooled with a combination of electric &.gas single package vertical units. (Magic -Pak) Facility Common Areas will be heated and cooled vis gas fired furnaces with Air Conditioning Condensers located in the parking garage. .• . Commercial Kitchen will require a make -up air unit and exhaust fans located on the 4th floor level roof, concealed by the building on three sides. ISHEEP INDEX 1 A100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AND SHEET INDEX 1 A101 FIRST FLOOR PAN Am FLOOR PANS- GARAGE LEVEL AND FLOORS 2-0 A103 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 410< SITEENTRYVIEVVFROMY ACROSS YORK AVENUE i A105 VIEW FROM AWALONORK AVENUE 1'iIRECTIDNAI Y SI NAG - r - A107 CLOSEUP VIEW RAND SHARED COURTYARD - A107 PORTE COCHERE AND SHARED y .. -. mnw.. p A108 ENTRY TO PARKING GARAGE AND DELIVERY AREA 19WiMFPi"� "�•T° E3 A1N BIRDSEYEVIEW FR OM SOUTH -• STAFF PARKING ED A110 SITE CIRCULATION �•r,,, 10 STALLS 09' -0' ED -p A111 PROOF OF PARKING DIAGRAM oil I ®t P �: �. $s ®�s��o• P i ` I r' • BUILDING E I ; • . • ®A�4e�O�AOi g48 f I I ®��O :; •� WIMP ARM 'a 7 al Gardens Continent Site Entry View from York Avenue,, . ' FAA _ ComUnunmo| Gardens w"=u.C"nita/ u"=*p""m Final Development Application ' SITE ENTRY VIEW FROM YORK AVENUE Close Up View along York Avenue Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Final Development Application I CWSfUPVIEW ALONG YORK ,AVENUE Garden & Porch Entrance Elevation Enlarged BOtAlevard Flan Foundation Plantings Fon -du -lac stone Retaining Wall — max 2' -0" height 8' -0" classic boulevard — new trees on west side of 6' -0" sidewalk and existing trees on east side of 6' -0" sidewalk XW Continental ax,donx Me=bam*tal o=°*w°"m mE"mvumv 1\11/l '`''° rr .,A um_ LANDSCAPE PLAN I••�I p 1 SLNE t+�m'Y • °� ° �tm DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL z NP SCUe w� Ltm CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL 9 NOSGIE a o° 3' a @SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NO SGIE Ip111j1 PLANTING SCHEDULE: LANDSCAPE NOTES: t. lwuva GrmwmrmpYb Wwpmbdab•b•lmriro .r b•m..rgmbroro r ®m.�mmm •nerro rm• d r..r mmr mbabrm+hnrrrmgbb mrrorm. +m.°mis p.hwo.my.armtm Rmhwhm1r.6.tla.Mpltro�tl�sWm.• 0. rly ®hw•nmmmi¢M.nin••evLLn.Wy..gomgw MMYhm•. Mm�tl ®Imb�tl•h NM�w �mbP •Y w4m••.MeNw.m•n.htltl irot�mq•mtlm �A.rbYar�iroY ~memo �va mbwro�iY•ohrr W�e+nw•Iberr +rm�r Pr+rooLL � b°rh•°abmrw rMtl9emstivtl.eaYw•rlr a Mwetl�e4r sm rwfq•mtnrorwe•hemlbnnboe °MgYr•mwYroerL T•hu°oms®wrwmLL r w mm• Mnr• Y• tl• pn�q \rsm��l°.y°mmdM•••mr•tlbYOUntla ro mm n°nv� � w b e•m! W °F • r rr m m••!CM hm•i m W rw ti egvmmbinmmnwb wlblbromrmmm Wm°•e�smuma t1 n ®mehYV bpmlrei8sypbm•brlYWLibgeFy u Mytlb�lmwrmwq ,Ir..Wmrvoppmrrmsrrpmro. imwrm�rtmbOP rol1mweml/L ti uprbato pm.baltlrolmer�mbmrm.rr Ytlq. u uemW °ermsemabn•rera•MarrM•.r•n®m. TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: RequlreQ rm M••mYe+ +we•a.a� �re1 PI ra rYb n ®Pt • ID • f ml•a s1 P1u Wrnr Pt •s•nmroor +I Pl+s Wrobe Pt •a•nmmrtm Wasob°no Pt•A•rmo.oM mTm�mPt•a•tmum r M°°•^•8 Ed,W g Tme Cmdl mm,..r.....m.. TatW New Tmm Requlmd - 25 TPtel Now Tmn Pmpw d =2T •nnm • 1••+9°m•m�r �iTEI� ro•r'r���mro1m� Continental Gardens Mesoba Capital Development DOWN �GZ�T��ttttttttttt��r�r�f �\ �rw..�... ..-•-- '...ter.- .:r- •��- >_!*+c\._� LANDSCAPE NOTES: t. lwuva GrmwmrmpYb Wwpmbdab•b•lmriro .r b•m..rgmbroro r ®m.�mmm •nerro rm• d r..r mmr mbabrm+hnrrrmgbb mrrorm. +m.°mis p.hwo.my.armtm Rmhwhm1r.6.tla.Mpltro�tl�sWm.• 0. rly ®hw•nmmmi¢M.nin••evLLn.Wy..gomgw MMYhm•. Mm�tl ®Imb�tl•h NM�w �mbP •Y w4m••.MeNw.m•n.htltl irot�mq•mtlm �A.rbYar�iroY ~memo �va mbwro�iY•ohrr W�e+nw•Iberr +rm�r Pr+rooLL � b°rh•°abmrw rMtl9emstivtl.eaYw•rlr a Mwetl�e4r sm rwfq•mtnrorwe•hemlbnnboe °MgYr•mwYroerL T•hu°oms®wrwmLL r w mm• Mnr• Y• tl• pn�q \rsm��l°.y°mmdM•••mr•tlbYOUntla ro mm n°nv� � w b e•m! W °F • r rr m m••!CM hm•i m W rw ti egvmmbinmmnwb wlblbromrmmm Wm°•e�smuma t1 n ®mehYV bpmlrei8sypbm•brlYWLibgeFy u Mytlb�lmwrmwq ,Ir..Wmrvoppmrrmsrrpmro. imwrm�rtmbOP rol1mweml/L ti uprbato pm.baltlrolmer�mbmrm.rr Ytlq. u uemW °ermsemabn•rera•MarrM•.r•n®m. TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: RequlreQ rm M••mYe+ +we•a.a� �re1 PI ra rYb n ®Pt • ID • f ml•a s1 P1u Wrnr Pt •s•nmroor +I Pl+s Wrobe Pt •a•nmmrtm Wasob°no Pt•A•rmo.oM mTm�mPt•a•tmum r M°°•^•8 Ed,W g Tme Cmdl mm,..r.....m.. TatW New Tmm Requlmd - 25 TPtel Now Tmn Pmpw d =2T •nnm • 1••+9°m•m�r �iTEI� ro•r'r���mro1m� Continental Gardens Mesoba Capital Development DOWN E,m DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING SCHEDULE: z rroscAte A� Etm CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE NOTES: ] N08HIE , ,assn. �..�aam YS WwvemWaWbe®.IW YnWm.la •r � tr��.°,wv 1, Etm SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N06SJLLE r n.0.vulYretidw VMav+vVVe,N4mtYYa. YamY A evh� A WWeVabhW Vreyan vtlrY�aveubna,vW htrreW n. vtlr.h�YVwgmwnrnmhvaquu.ev.nnrrW W Ynartlp,nh owes Ya.rr.wwtltluY wanrYvamve.b.� utln,YtlrY Wravtr. wuYYbnm�rlrw•YxYSweimr..• A 64Ya�u�.�ehAYmbn�ere�RYw�b�lm esam.s�.elY eweY.e.ms,is e YpYergep�gmpvYnmorsasme.v. Ml���.msvrYY� vnevavvnn.+V�vsver.vwl� ee,tiv,bbvahreYw6bev,.eYq Ym ®n� mrymwvlvYG haYl�e OV Vrtltr�iNeM.��iY� WY'a C.aA�uYV tlwetl tlMrlr A wWpWNwtlniWt ie°neaawh�w..aanlvtlwtrruW wu pYehYVr tlmtr4iml n.he,q.adwura�W b ,n m,nlW nnn.mhYYye�eb.P.W YYYnm6WYph +Yea vrbev.e�tl WeiPYYrmu.Ya�.]•trve YnYboh.emCren ,z !¢ edule .smvYWwrsmsWp.Ypyep.ee4lYYa n. wativhN.Ver.Weq e.mm.Yemar:atr Y.Y6 1l wnwbrtrtr YYtreYyiy.lrry,rtrpmlew ynv.sNa.etrWww,. mn Yutrn.ppep.w,v, eY�weaevw. ,A Ngnhewmtl,,.crm.vYYa eaae.wrmm.r.enY,Yb. ,. um„eY..nrY,rn.enr..Y.ee.n . tla TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: RagWmd: * PI]vebvtrnlu•os•]omew) Ne]smprwlY•a•,e ..meam.�w- m•.omrw, ERISIIng Tree C.&V m.wYarYwbs....tr.Y tr,.w.eae-w..a ToI]INew Tmw Requlmd- a Elm LANDSCAPE PLAN Total Now Tmea Pmp—d w 3T E' 1 -tiPV wt n<I PIEP.CE PIN14 ASSOCIATES i, w Z O Q O Z W J Q H z W Z H Z O U Z 7 O 1d >9 PfR1W lAtmSCaPE L100 i i �w ....... _... Etm CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE NOTES: ] N08HIE , ,assn. �..�aam YS WwvemWaWbe®.IW YnWm.la •r � tr��.°,wv 1, Etm SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N06SJLLE r n.0.vulYretidw VMav+vVVe,N4mtYYa. YamY A evh� A WWeVabhW Vreyan vtlrY�aveubna,vW htrreW n. vtlr.h�YVwgmwnrnmhvaquu.ev.nnrrW W Ynartlp,nh owes Ya.rr.wwtltluY wanrYvamve.b.� utln,YtlrY Wravtr. wuYYbnm�rlrw•YxYSweimr..• A 64Ya�u�.�ehAYmbn�ere�RYw�b�lm esam.s�.elY eweY.e.ms,is e YpYergep�gmpvYnmorsasme.v. Ml���.msvrYY� vnevavvnn.+V�vsver.vwl� ee,tiv,bbvahreYw6bev,.eYq Ym ®n� mrymwvlvYG haYl�e OV Vrtltr�iNeM.��iY� WY'a C.aA�uYV tlwetl tlMrlr A wWpWNwtlniWt ie°neaawh�w..aanlvtlwtrruW wu pYehYVr tlmtr4iml n.he,q.adwura�W b ,n m,nlW nnn.mhYYye�eb.P.W YYYnm6WYph +Yea vrbev.e�tl WeiPYYrmu.Ya�.]•trve YnYboh.emCren ,z !¢ edule .smvYWwrsmsWp.Ypyep.ee4lYYa n. wativhN.Ver.Weq e.mm.Yemar:atr Y.Y6 1l wnwbrtrtr YYtreYyiy.lrry,rtrpmlew ynv.sNa.etrWww,. mn Yutrn.ppep.w,v, eY�weaevw. ,A Ngnhewmtl,,.crm.vYYa eaae.wrmm.r.enY,Yb. ,. um„eY..nrY,rn.enr..Y.ee.n . tla TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: RagWmd: * PI]vebvtrnlu•os•]omew) Ne]smprwlY•a•,e ..meam.�w- m•.omrw, ERISIIng Tree C.&V m.wYarYwbs....tr.Y tr,.w.eae-w..a ToI]INew Tmw Requlmd- a Elm LANDSCAPE PLAN Total Now Tmea Pmp—d w 3T E' 1 -tiPV wt n<I PIEP.CE PIN14 ASSOCIATES i, w Z O Q O Z W J Q H z W Z H Z O U Z 7 O 1d >9 PfR1W lAtmSCaPE L100 To: EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Re: TEXT FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 4, 2014 YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL RESIDENT ASSOCIATION OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL APARTMENTS 7151 York Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 July 30, 2014 Information /Background Project Description • Continental Gardens - Does not deliver affordable housing. 10 %, or 10 units for residents at 50 below median income: Median income of Minnesota household per year, 2008 to 2012 = $59,162. (Census Bureau) Federal Poverty Guideline, $11,670 peryear. (Minnesota Department of Health) ® Truck deliveries, early morning and day -long for high maintenance residents of Continental Gardens will all' be delivered underneath windows of Yorktown Continental Residents on North side of existing building, disturbing sleep, rest, peaceful and pleasant living conditions that they enjoy now. ➢ With prevailing Northwest winds, fumes and odors will blow into windows of Yorktown Continental residents over parking ramp for Continental Gardens. • Garbage and recyclable trucks will not go down ramp unless heated; cannot enter building unless there is a 13'6" height door. • Parking lot for existing building is not 123 surface stalls but 157- resulting in a decrease of 17 stalls, from 140 in current plan. Count of -cars on existing lot averages 148. REGARDING 'PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL REVIEWS FROM 2013 - 2014 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS — A34 -A41, April 24, 2013 A., Sketch Plan Review - Continental Gardens Assisted living, 7151 York Ave..S. Planner Presentation • Addition was 76 moderately priced units on larger open space on East side with sky way attaching buildings. Current addition on West side is larger building in much smaller space. • Continental Gardens units are at market price and density now is increased to 64 units per acre on entire property. Applicant Presentation • As of the date of this text, it is unknown whether Yorktown Properties has secured final HUD financing or approval for its rehab. Documentation supplied to support long delays and conflicting communication about financing this much needed rehabilitation. • There are no interior connections between buildings to facilitate shared activities as of the July 9 meeting. Direct path between buildings is screened off by shrubs and trees. • Placing the new building on the west side will have negative impact on existing building. 1 2 Discussion • Most if not all current Yorktown Continental residents will not be able to afford to move to market rate building. • Current building will need heated canopies and walks between buildings to prevent ice build -up and dangerous walking conditions for elderly residents. Parking ramp will have to be heated. This will Not lead to energy savings. • Current plan does nothing to improve walkability but actually inhibits residents from both buildings gaining direct access to the street. Without door on York Ave. and parking ramp on the North, residents would have to walk further around building to get to street, store or bus. ➢ Placing the new building on the York side would place 30 memory care residents close to a busy street. With door on York Ave., extra staff would have to watch residents constantly • Current plan seems to have done very little study on existing Yorktown Continental building. • Berm in front of existing building with established trees serves as buffer and lessens the scale of building now. • CVS as a store close to the street does not have resident balconies overlooking a dusty noisy street. ➢ The streetscape along the current York Ave. corridor is pleasant now with tree lined sidewalks and setbacks allowing separation from a busy suburban street and people's homes. Response to Minutes /Edina City Council /May 7, 2013 • Independent elderly and assisted living requires large demand for services, home health care workers, taxis, food service, etc. ➢ EMT has visited Yorktown Continental 200 times in the past year from July, 2013 — 2014; there are always 1 or 2 police cars in attendance with each incident. Proponent Presentation • Do they have County Elderly Waiver Units for tenants of Continental Gardens? There is no current connection between buildings. • Yorktown Continental is not connected to street and requires residents to walk farther to get to street. Response to Minutes /Edina City Council /May. 2014 • Density ➢ Current development is already over code and in a high density area. 3 Development Address Units Unit's - Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 6500 France, Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 LennarA\rickes Site 6725 York 240 52 • Porte - cochere at end of building requires fragile elderly and disabled residents to walk farther to carry groceries, leaving and entering on winding paths in winter and heat of summer. Pedestrian connections around the perimeter of the site also require residents from both buildings to walk farther to get to the street. Elderly Yorktown residents already have trouble going the distance to Target and back. ➢ Porte - cochere is not covered in plans. • Current plan is eliminating most of green space now available and enjoyed by residents. • There is no direct connection between the two buildings, and after the landscaping our current front door would be screened off by shrubs and trees, creating an enclosed environment without a view. ➢ Sidewalk connection between buildings exits existing building through nonexistent door in office. Again, Mesaba Capital seems to have done very little study on existing Yorktown Continental building. • If parking variance is allowed it would leave Yorktown Continental with 137 surface stalls and 4 less handicap spaces which are all in use. Parking in current plan of 157 spaces is already inadequate for current residents. ➢ Existing parking for Yorktown Continental is close to building on all sides. New plan would have residents (70 with walkers) traveling farther to get to cars. With the snow removal we saw last year and the number of resident falls, this does not portend well. • The existing building now has 8 enclosed parking spaces which are sorely envied. Covered parking would be practical for senior residents. ➢ Would underground parking at Continental Gardens be available to residents of Yorktown Continental? How much would the spaces cost? • The site plan33 proposed as the sketch plan is not viable as proof of parking. Need to show parking plan in scale on site plan A100 with 223 surface stalls. • Loading and trash zones are not shown on plans or room given for it. Is it screened from residents in existing Yorktown Continental building? • Will Mechanical equipment on new building be screened from residents in existing building for noise control? 4 • How long will residents of Yorktown Continental be without power in heat of summer? Will they have to be without gas or water while the utility Easement is moved? Response to Variances addressed at July 91h Edina Planning Commission Building Setback 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. New building would create practical difficulties in existing building. Creating access to only one door would cause congestion; no loading, unloading zone, Garbage trucks, EMT, etc. Yorktown Continental houses nearly 300 elderly and disabled residents who need a lot of assistance. New building would remove berm with close to 30 mature trees that bloom in spring screening residents from dust and noise from busy street. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created. The location of the existing building is not unique, the buildings to the North and South are also located in the middle of the property. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? The new building would be the only one along this corridor of York Ave. that would be brought up to the street. The existing buildings are set back with mature trees lining the street, creating a safe and enjoyable pedestrian experience. MAJOR CONCERNS OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL RESIDENTS • Congestion with only one door: Garbage, EMT, Delivery trucks all sharing one door could have serious consequences. • If Yorktown Continental is not funded for remodeling our new front door will be over whelmed with every service required to maintain a 300 resident independent senior living facility. • Mature trees, flower beds and gardens will be sacrificed to parking lot. • A single larger parking lot located further from the current building would be hazardous and present mobility issues. ➢ Fewer parking stalls and 4 less handicapped spaces as well as elimination of garages would necessitate our finding parking elsewhere. Home health care workers have to park in office lot next door now. Will our building be remodeled? • We have been told this ever since Premier took over management of Yorktown Continental in 2012. (See Attachments) 5 Status of Current Vehicle Congestion 7151 York Ave S. at vehicle entrances front and back Daily or M -F Cabs 4 per day M- Sun. ay. 5 minutes Metro Mobility 6 per day M -F ay. 10 minutes VEAP 2 per day M- F ay. 5 min Fed Ex 1 per day M -F 15 minutes Walgreens M -F ay. 15 minutes CVS M -F ay. 15 minutes Resident Visitors / pickups for appts. ay. 3 day M- S(including Holidays) (front and back) ay. 10 Minutes Home Health Aides /cleaning aides ay. 3 day (M -Sun) ay. 60 min Social workers ay. 2 per day M -F ay. 60 min Physical Therapy - ay. 2 per day M -F ay. 60 min Postman (M -Sat) ay. 30 min. to one hour VOA lunches, (delivery truck, plus 1 -2 volunteers per day) ay. 30 min. for truck, 2 hours for volunteers Waste Management — 6 dumpsters/ pick up once a week 10 to 15 minutes. Garbage pickup —three times a week, 10 minutes Mom's meals (M -F) ay. 30 min. Meals on Wheels -(M -F) ay. 30 min Lancers Foods M -F, ay. 15 min. 7151 York Avenue South ✓,,. J (V � ��� % Edina, Minnesota 55435 g r t: 952 8311448 •+ f: 952 8312461 Management & Development Corporation www.legacymn.com January 20, 2012 Dear Yorktown Resident: At yesterdays Board Meeting, Residents and Board Members were presented with a plan to refurbish the Yorktown building. The building is coming up on its 40th birthday and will require extensive refurbishment to maintain its excellent reputation as we move into the future. While no decisions have yet been reached by the Board, we are requesting that each resident assist in this process by noting their comments, concerns and ideas for Yorktown's refurbishment on the enclosed questionnaire. -We are working with Ms. Terri Cermak of Cermak and Rhoades Architects, to design and plan the necessary improvements to the building. Ms. Cermak has extensive experience in the rehabilitation and refurbishment of affordable senior housing and comes highly recommended. Many of the planned renovations will serve all residents here at Yorktown. Items such as the replacement of all windows with new energy efficient windows, new roof, energy improvements to the heating and ventilating systems are already in the improvement plan. Refurbishment to the individual apartments would include such items as replacement of appliances, kitchen and bath cabinets and fixtures, countertops, closet doors and floor finishes. We would appreciate your assistance in this process. We have included a resident questionnaire for your suggestions and comments and ask that you take the time to let us know what improvements you think should be included in the refurbishment, especially improvements to your individual apartment. The attached questionnaire is by no means all inclusive; please feel free to add to the questionnaire anything you feel needs to be addressed. Please return the questionnaire to the management office by February P. Some residents at yesterday's meeting were concerned about the impact this plan would have on their individual situation and rent. We do know, after discussions with HUD, that: 1) Section 8 Rents will not increase, 2) Section 236 and Market residents who qualify will have access to Section 8 vouchers, and 3) No resident will be required to move due to the refurbishment. Thank you for your assistance; we will be having additional resident meetings in the future to update ea on our progress and to answer resident questions and concerns. Jie ully , ivens 17 Patrick Lamb Premier M A N A G E M E EN T October 16, 2013 Dear Resident: Yorktown Continental Apartment 7151 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 P: 952 - 831 -1446/ F: 831 -5418 The Department of Housing and Urban Development subsidizes the rent of your apartment through the project -based Section 8 program. Federal law requires that owners provide tenants with a one -year notification before the expiration of a Section 8 contract. The Section 8 contract that pays the government's share of your apartment rent at Edina Yorktown Towers expires on September 30t', 2014. While there will be no immediate change in your rental assistance, we are required to inform you of our intended actions when the contract expires one year from now. This letter is to notify you that we intend to renew the current Section 8 contract when it expires September 30, 2014. If Congress makes funds available, which it has in the past and is expected to in the future, we will renew the Section 8 contract. However, in the unlikely circumstances that we cannot renew our contract, it is our understanding that, subject to the availability of funds, HUD will provide all eligible tenants currently residing in a Section 8 project -based assisted unit with a tenant based assistance. If you have any questions or would like information on the Section 8 Program, the following sources may be of assistance: Contract Administrator Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101 (651) 284 -3179 HUD Field Office Department of Housing and Urban Development 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 370 -3051 HUD Web http: / /hud.gov- Click on "rental help" rl M } A f- !-dcb1e October 31, 2013 RE: 150 -Day Notificati_ ion Letter to Tenants When Owner Prepays Mortgage on a Preservation Eligible Project I Dear Resident: As you are aware, we are in the process of refinancing Yorktown Continental so we can do a substantial rehabilitation. We are arranging for a new FHA- insured loan through HUD to pay off (prepay) the old FHA - insured loan. The attached scope of work lists the improvements we will be able to provide. Yorktown is 40 years old and has never had a substantial rehabilitation. This refinance will allow us to do improvement work that is necessary to make sure Yorktown Continental will continue to provide excellent affordable housing for another 40 years. Yorktown Housing Group, Inc., the owner of Yorktown Continental, has decided to pay off (prepay) the mortgage for this property which provided assistance from the Federal Government. Section 219 (a) (1) (b) (3) of the HUD Fiscal Year 1999 Appropriations Act requires that owners provide at least a 150 -day, but no more than 270 -day, notice to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the local government having jurisdiction over the property, and to each tenant of the owner's intent to pay off (prepay) the mortgage. This letter meets that requirement by notifying you that we intend to pay off (prepay) the mortgage insured by HUD. For tenants who do not receive Section 8 rental assistance, paying off the mortgage (prepayment) could result in an increase in the rent for your unit. It does not necessarily mean that your portion of the rent will increase. If you are living in your unit on the date we prepay and you are income eligible, you may be eligible to receive an enhanced rental voucher. An enhanced rental voucher would enable you to continue living here paying the amount currently charged for your unit or, in most cases, 30% of your monthly adjusted income for rent. The enhanced voucher will pay the difference between your contribution to rent and the total rent we charge for your unit. In addition, you may use the housing voucher to move to another eligible unit of your choice. If you decide to move to another property, the voucher becomes a regular housing choice voucher without the enhanced assistance, and you may end up paying more rent. In order to stay in your current unit with enhanced voucher assistance, the Metro HRA must determine that 1) the rent for the unit is reasonable in relation to rents charged for comparable unassisted units in the area; 2) you meet all eligibility requirements for receiving Section 8 assistance; and 3) the unit is safe and sanitary, meeting the housing quality standards established for the housing voucher program. Enhanced rental vouchers will allow us to do more rehabilitation of Yorktown Continental. We have notified HUD of our intent to pay off (prepay) the mortgage. If you have questions, you may contact Tiffany Mielke at the Minneapolis HUD office, 612-370-3051 (ext. 2244). . Sincerely, I . 4 se L. Holmberg, Pr t IV Affordable Homes far A Sole Voting Member of Yorktown Housing Group, Inc.v NOTICE TO TENANTS OF INTENTION TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO MHFA FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE RENTS Date of Notice: 5/14/14 Take notice that on 6/2/14 we plan to submit a request for approval of an increase in the maximum permissible rents for Yorktown Continental to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). The proposed increase is needed for the following reasons: 1. Finance comprehensive rehab of the property The rent increases for which we have requested approval are: A copy of the materials that we are submitting to MHFA in support of our request will be available during normal business hours at 7151 York Ave South, Edina, MN 55435 For a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice for inspection and copying by the Tenants of Yorktown Continental and, if the tenants wish, by legal or other representatives acting for them individually or as a group. During a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice, tenants of Yorktown Continental may submit written comments on the proposed rent increase to us at 7151 York Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. Tenant representatives may assist tenants in preparing those comments. (If, at MHFA's request or otherwise, we make any material change during the comment period in the materials available for inspection and copying, we will notify the tenants of the change or changes, and the tenants will have a period of 15 days from the date of service of this additional notice (or the remainder of any applicable comment period, if longer) in which to inspect and copy the materials as changed and to submit comments on the proposed rent increase). These comments will be s u b mitted t o MHFA, along with our evaluation of them and our request for the increase. You may also send a copy of your comments directly to MHFA at the following address: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Attention: Krista Turner, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101, and Re: 09244135; Yorktown Continental. MHFA will approve, adjust upward or downward, or disapprove the proposed rent increase upon reviewing the request and comments. When MHFA advises us in wrimlg of its decision on our request, you will be notified. If the request is approved, any allowable it lcrease will be put into effect only after a period of at least 30 days from the date you are served with that notice and in accordance with the terms of existh Ig leases. Note: There is no change to the resident payment portion for all Section 8 residents and there will be vouchers provided for all 236 units. Residents will still pay 30% of income. Present Rent Proposed Increase Proposed Rent Bedroom's Basic Market Basic Market Basic Market 1 BR Small 493 560 382 355 875 915 1 BRLarge 515 585 382 355 897 940 2 BR236 582 661 494 609 1,076 1,270 1 BRSm236 493 560 307 1355 800 915 1 BRLg 236 515 1582 285 1358 1800 940 A copy of the materials that we are submitting to MHFA in support of our request will be available during normal business hours at 7151 York Ave South, Edina, MN 55435 For a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice for inspection and copying by the Tenants of Yorktown Continental and, if the tenants wish, by legal or other representatives acting for them individually or as a group. During a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice, tenants of Yorktown Continental may submit written comments on the proposed rent increase to us at 7151 York Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. Tenant representatives may assist tenants in preparing those comments. (If, at MHFA's request or otherwise, we make any material change during the comment period in the materials available for inspection and copying, we will notify the tenants of the change or changes, and the tenants will have a period of 15 days from the date of service of this additional notice (or the remainder of any applicable comment period, if longer) in which to inspect and copy the materials as changed and to submit comments on the proposed rent increase). These comments will be s u b mitted t o MHFA, along with our evaluation of them and our request for the increase. You may also send a copy of your comments directly to MHFA at the following address: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Attention: Krista Turner, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101, and Re: 09244135; Yorktown Continental. MHFA will approve, adjust upward or downward, or disapprove the proposed rent increase upon reviewing the request and comments. When MHFA advises us in wrimlg of its decision on our request, you will be notified. If the request is approved, any allowable it lcrease will be put into effect only after a period of at least 30 days from the date you are served with that notice and in accordance with the terms of existh Ig leases. Note: There is no change to the resident payment portion for all Section 8 residents and there will be vouchers provided for all 236 units. Residents will still pay 30% of income. his brochure is being distributed to you because the United TStates Department of Housing and Urban Development, which has ultimate jurisdiction over the project in which you live, has provided some form of assistance or subsidy for this apartment building. As part of its dedication to maintaining the best possible living environ- ment for all residents, your HUD field office encourages supports the following: • Management agents and property owners communicate with residents on any and all issues. • Owners and managers give prompt consideration to all valid resident complaints and resolve them as quickly as possible. • Residents' right to organize and participate in the decisions regarding the well-being of the project and their home. Along with your owner /management agent, you play an important rolled in making your place of residence --the unit (apartment), the grounds, other common areas--a better place to live and in creating a com- munity you can be proud of. This brochure briefly lists some of your most important rights and responsibilities to help you get the most out of your home. VM 0 o y ar tit, H...1 , Npi- AWL ae. zs, octant Residents in HUD- assisted multifamily housing can play an important role in decisions that affect their Project. Different HUD programs provide for spe- cific resident rights. You have the right to know under which HUD program your building is assisted. To find out if your apartment building is covered under any of the following categories, contact your management agent. If your building was funded under Section 236,221 (d)(3)/BMIR, Rent Supplement Program, Section 202 Direct Loan Program, Section 202/811 Capital Advance Programs, or is assisted under any applicable project -based Section 8 programs, and prior HUD approval is required before the owner can prepay, you have the right to participate in or be noti- fied of, and comment on, the following: • An increase in the maximum permissible rent. • Conversion of a project from project -paid utilities to tenant -paid utilities or a reduction in tenant utility allowance. • Conversion of residential units in a multifamily housing project to a nonresidential use or to condominiums, or the transfer of the project to a cooperative housing mortgagor corporation or association. • Partial release .of mortgage security. • Capital improvements that represent a substantial r addition to the project. • Nonrenewal of a project -based Section 8 contract. Any other action which could ultimately lead to involuntary temporary or permanent relocation of residents. _I ,. Prepayment of mortgage. tvu+v ' . RUN r+! %p teaN A ty91N�11.r�, o`� e U) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 9, 2014 VI.C. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mesaba Capital is requesting review of a proposal to build a four -story 100 -unit senior assisted living building west of the existing Yorktown Continental Senior Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. (See property location on pages Al -A4.) The housing would include 70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care units. Ten percent (10 %) of the units would be for residents below 50% median income level. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5- A33.) Features of the building include congregate dining with three meals provided per day; private dining; a coffee shop; a lounge area on each floor; a library; a computer room; a craft room and a fitness facility. Parking is provided underneath the building. The existing surface lot for the 12 -story building has been relocated to the east side of the building and the number of surface stalls for that building increased from 123 surface stall to 140. The Planning Commission and City Council have considered sketch plan reviews of the subject property in 2013 and 2014. (See.minutes from those meetings on pages A34 -A41.) The applicant has taken the feedback from the sketch plan review and revised the plans to include: Locating the building on the York side of the site; pulling the building up close to the street; adding green space; providing porches /decks in the front to engage the street; and increasing sidewalks and pedestrian connections. The new four -story building serves as podium height to the existing 12 -story building located in the middle of the lot. The green space increase is due to reducing the number of surface parking stalls, which were felt to not be needed for the residents. The building has been designed to relate to the existing 12- story building which is also being remodeled. Pedestrian connections have been added around the perimeter of the site and to connect the two buildings. While they applicant did not connect the two buildings to provide an interior connection I between the two buildings as recommended, they di&add sidewalk connection with a canopy over the top. (See pages A14 and A16..) To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: ➢. Site Plan Review to construct the new 4 -story building; 9 Front Yard Setback Variance from 46 feet to 20 feet; Density, Variance to allow 364:total:units on the site from 182 units allowed under current zoning (the existing building is nonconforming with .264 units); Parking; Variance from 194 exposed and 91 enclosed spaces to 162 exposed and 64 enclosed; and Variances to allow one bedroom units under 500 square feet; and two bedroom units over 850 square feet. Preliminary Plat. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Office; zoned P00-1, Planned Commercial District and guided Community y` Activity Center. Easterly: Adams Hill Park and single-Family Homes located in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Durham Apartments; zoned PRD-4 and guided high density residential. Westerly: Yorktown mall; zoned and guided for commercial use. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.85 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a 12- story 264 unit apartment building with surrounding surface parking. (See page A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: HDR — High Density Residential. (See page A3.) Zoning: PSR-4, Planned Senior Residential (See page A3a.) Site Circulation Access to the site would be from York Avenue only. The existing right -in and right -outs on the site would remain the same. 2 Parking The following is required for parking per unit: .5 exposed spaces; .25 enclosed spaces; 1 space per company vehicle; 1 space per employee. Based on these requirements, the applicant is required to provide 194 exposed parking spaces and 91 enclosed spaces. The existing building does not contain enclosed parking, and is therefore nonconforming. The proposed new building would meet the requirements for underground parking. For the overall parking required, variances are requested. The proposed parking includes 162 exposed parking spaces and 64 enclosed. The site plan proposed at the sketch plan showed 223 exposed spaces. This plan could be used as proof -of- parking, should additional parking be needed. However, the applicant believes the number of spaces proposed would meet the needs of the residents. WSB conducted a parking study and concluded that the number of parking stalls proposed would support the residents. (See attached parking study.) Green space is added as a result of the reduction in parking stalls that was presented at sketch plan. Traffic Study WSB and Associates also conducted a traffic study. (See the attached study.) The study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. A traffic signal will be needed at Parklawn and York in the 2030 with or without this project. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 63 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 63 over story trees, including existing and proposed. The trees would include a mixture of Maple, Oak Spruce, Crabapple, Pine and Birch. (See pages A8, A18 and A29.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading and trash area would take place adjacent to the underground garage entry, and would be screen from the neighboring property to the north. (See page A8a.) Mechanical Equipment Mechanical equipment is proposed on the roof of the building. This equipment must be screened on the roof from the adjacent property including the new building. (See pages A10 and A6.) Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A42. Most notable is the existing 30 -foot utility easement along York Avenue. A portion of this easement would have to be vacated and the utilities (if there are any) relocated, if the building is to be constructed with a 20 -foot setback. Building /Building Material The building would be constructed of cement panels, prefinished metal, precast brick and lap siding. The Building would be designed to be integrated with the existing 12 -story brick building on the site. (See renderings on pages A10- A17.) A materials board will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. Density The PRD-4 zoning district allows a maximum density of 1 unit per 1,400 square feet. Given the 5.85 acre size of the site, the code would allow a maximum of 182 units. The density of 182 units would be 31 units per acre. The proposed density of 64 units per acre would be on the higher end of the density range for the City's high density residential development as indicated in the table below. Please note that the development would not be as dense as the 6500 France project. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 4 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69t" Street 114 30 6500 France — Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 LennarnWickes Site 6725 York 240 52 The Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. The proposed project is relatively close to the Fairview Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. (See page A53.) The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing and sustainable design principles are proposed in the applicant narrative. Variance — Building Setback Per Section 36 -98 of the City Code, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The practical difficulty is the location of the existing building located in the middle of the site. The applicant has located the building up close to the street to create an active environment with pedestrian connections. (See page A8a.) The building could be shifted back to meet the setback requirement. However, in doing so the green space proposed between the two buildings would be lost. The Comprehensive Plan encourages buildings to be brought up to engage the street. The following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan would be met: "Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment." 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the location of the existing 12 -story building located in the middle of the site. These circumstances are unique to the property. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed new structure would be designed to be integrated with and complementary to the existing 12 -story building. The new 4 -story building being brought up close to York Avenue would be consistent with recent development on France and York with buildings being brought close to the street to engage it and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. Variance — Density & Unit Size Per Section 36 -98 of the City Code, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 2 the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances and density are reasonable. As mentioned above, the Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. The proposed project meets most all of these items. The site is close to the Fairview Southdale Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. (See page A53.) The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing and sustainable design principles are proposed in the applicant narrative. As has been standard with recent projects, a condition of approval shall be to attempt to meet an energy savings goal of 10% over state energy code guidelines. Minimum unit size for one bedroom dwelling units was intended to promote affordable housing. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units for affordable housing, and the existing 264 units on the site are all affordable housing. The majority of the one bedroom apartments are 500 square feet and larger; only a few would be slightly less than 500 square feet. The larger two bedroom units over 850 square feet are reasonable to promote a variety of housing options within the development. The Planning Commission has this issue on its work plan to eliminate minimum and maximum dwelling unit sizes. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The site currently contains a 12 -story senior housing building in the middle of the site. The circumstances existing on this site are generally unique to this property. 7 3) Will the variance alter: the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed new structure would be designed to be integrated and complement the existing 12-story building. The new 4 -story building being brought.up close to York Avenue would be consistent with, recent development on France and York being brought close to the street to engage it and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. Variance Parking Stalls Per Section 36 -98 of the City Code, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying,with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land. cannot be.put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with. the code and. that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and "aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. A parking study was conducted by WSB Associates,that concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the site. The study concludes that the proposed senior housing could functiort adequately with the proposed parking. (See page A53.) Parking stalls could be added to the site if needed. As demonstrated in the sketch plan for development of the site, there is room on 223 exposed parking stalls. A condition of any approval should be that if parking becomes a problem, the additional stalls must be provided. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the existing location of the building on the site, which does not have any underground parking. It has been the city's general policy with previous similar requests, to not build parking stalls when they are not needed. 8 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a more exterior parking and reduce green space. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed. Preliminary Plat The applicant is also requesting a Preliminary Plat to create separate lots for the proposed and existing building. (See the plat on page A30.) The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. Shared parking and drive -aisle access agreements would need to be established across the lots. Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Chapter 32 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space. Fees in lieu of land dedication may be paid at $5,000 per dwelling unit. The development would create 100 new dwelling units; therefore, a $500,000 parking dedication would be required. The fee would be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars or subdivision approval for recording with Hennepin County. Oj Compliance Table * Variance is required ** Subject to Council Approval 10 City Standard (PSR -4) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — York Avenue 46 feet 20 feet* Front — Xerxes 46 feet 100+ feet Side — North 46 feet 100 feet Side — South 46 feet 54 feet Setback to R -1 140 feet 250 +(R -1 in Richfield) Building Height Four stories and Four stories and 46 feet 48 feet Building Coverage 35% 20% Density — 30+ units max — 364 units total Comprehensive Subject to Council 64 units per acre ** Plan Approval Density — 1 unit per 1,400 s.f. of 364 units* Zoning Ordinance land area = 182 units Maximum Floor Area Per Dwelling - 1 bedroom 500 -700 s.f. 392* - 667 - 2 bedroom 750 -850 s.f. Over 1,200* Community 15 s.f. per unit 2,100 s.f. dining facilities /services 1,500 required & 550 s.f. siting area required & Usable 36,000 s.f. 4,000 s.f. outdoor Area patio /fire pit area (50,000 s.f. of open space in the rear yard Parking Stalls .5 exposed space 162 exposed* .25 enclosed spaces 64 enclosed* 1 space per vehicle Proof of parking to 223 1 space per employee exposed spaces. New 194 exposed & 91 building meets the enclosed required enclosed parking (existing building is nonconforming) Parking Stall Size 8.5'x: 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance is required ** Subject to Council Approval 10 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Are the proposed Variances for density, unit size and front yard setback reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable for this site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed new building would be separated and screened from the single - family homes to the east by the existing 12 -story building. 2. There are adequate utilities to support the site. 3. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 4. Senior housing generates less traffic that a market rate all age apartment building would. 5. The Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. The proposed project is located close to the Fairview Southdale Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. (See page A53.) The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing and sustainable design principles are proposed in the applicant narrative. (See pages A5 -A8.) 6. As demonstrated above, the variance criteria are met. 7. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: 11 a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Staff Recommendation Site Plan with Variances Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with the proposed variances at 7151 York Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed new building would be separated and screened from the single - family homes to the east by the existing 12 -story building. 2. There are adequate utilities to support the site. 3. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 4. The Comprehensive Plan allows density for senior housing to exceed 30 units per acre under the following circumstances: Proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. 12 The proposed project is located close to the Fairview Southdale Hospital; the building is separated from low density residential housing by the existing 12 -story building; there is adequate utility capacity to serve the site; transit service is available on York Avenue; and a traffic study was done, and determined that the project could be supported by the existing roads. The parking for the new building would be enclosed and underground. Open space is provided between the two buildings, with sidewalk connections. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be for affordable housing. 5. The variance criteria are met. a. The practical difficulty is the location of the existing building located in the middle of the site. The applicant has located the building up close to the street to create an active environment with pedestrian connections. b. The building could be shifted back to meet the setback requirement. However, in doing so the green space proposed between the two buildings would be lost. c. Minimum and maximum unit dwelling units was intended to promote affordable housing. The applicant is also proposing 10% of the units for affordable housing, in addition to the 263 existing affordable units on the site. d. The larger two bedroom units over 850 square feet are reasonable to promote a variety of housing options within the development. e. The unique circumstance is the existing location of the building on the site, which does not have any underground parking. It has been the city's general policy with previous similar requests, to not build parking stalls when they are not needed. The proposal will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new structure would be designed to be integrated and complement the existing 12 -story building. The new 4 -story building being brought up close to York Avenue would be consistent with recent development on France and York, with buildings being brought close to the street to engage it and create a more pedestrian friendly environment. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: 13 a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 13, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped June 13, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter - of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 14 4. Submit ,a copy, of the Nine Mile.Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meetithe district's requirements: 5. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo dated June 25, 2014. 7. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements_ per Section 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Ten percent (10 %) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. 9. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10% over state energy code guidelines. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit the easement along York Avenue would have to be vacated, and utilities (if any) relocated. 11. Signage shall be allowed for both the. existing and proposed buildings /lots per the PSR-4 standards outlined in Section 36, Article XIII in the City Code. Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Recommend that the City. Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new two lot subdivision at 7151 York Avenue for the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. _ Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Plat must be considered within, one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void: 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $500,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Deadline for a city decision: October 1, 2014 15 City of Edina 24 6803 8096817 68126809 6812 6809 6812 6809 6812 6809 6813 6812 6809 �24W 6809 682068176820681► 68706817 682068176B2166206Ef7 214296828 68256828 BB25 6828 6829 6628 6826 68'6 68286825 33 6617 U39 6833 6838 6933 6836 6659 6626 683368!766306653 1941 6844 68416844 6811 6844 6841 68468116845 65446041 7fJ4 1133 %;•; �, / %'' 714428761 660 2944 2814 2800 7139 2700 7145 72017200 7201 T200 72017200 7201 Zd 7200 72017208 7200 7208 7209 7108 7269 7 0 7214 72157214 72157214 722S 7214 7215 7207 7220 72217220 72217220 72217220 7221 7200 7226 7227 7226 7227 7226 7227 7226 7277 7235 72]0 72337272 72]37232 72531231 7233 7245 72M 72]97236 723117238 7230 ..1290 7244 72437244 72457244 7245 . 70161/17 f 71 7335 foil 4C 16 q�q���17 YoAmam Park 7900 7301 I'M 7301 Y300 7702 2 .176 7315 7308 79097708 7709 7308 7809 ]821 7 .1 7315 7314 77157314 73157314 7313 f0 606 5 7321 7320 75217320 73217320 7321 15 18 7328 73277328 73277326 7727 'Y4 4 6 7355 3020 3014 3000 2910 2800 2818 73337332 73337332 7733 4 9'51 292429122824 7332 73997338 V339 7330 7339 d0 4A'�51 30193017 1923 2901 2811 774473457774 73457344 7346 7373 - C — M LOka p;a.,,,,,.,01 __ _ _ E�13;7412 017! - 74057404 2401401 7401 jM- 7401 Z-ft Z4F1_7,4A0 .7401_ j��4 J0 3400 7600 15�7d 74051408 74097408 74091408 - 74001409 74097408 7� 097 74137414 74157414 74157414 741S7414 74187414 7410 7421742 0 74217420 74217420 74217420 74217410 PARtaA f4NAVE 74277425 74277428 74277426 74217426 74277426 170 74337432 74337432 74337432 74337432 74337432 / 7401 G al ka ah 3451 433.74 774444 74457444 74457414 744574" 74452600 .�. 7401 7401 4 e 7671 75017500 T50f SAef 7501 al i PID: 32028242.10004 7151 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 &H Legend Mghlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Noma Labels .I City Limits �f Creaks 0 Lake Mamas Lakes OParks OParcels B97NSTW 69016'900 6801 6900 69016904 69016900 68016900 6901 3303 6905 086909 6909 69096813 69058809 69056900 6909 3wf 9121 Sf3 6917 691769176916 68136917 69136917 6913 g216925 6921 8920 69/78921 6021 E929 69216923 E921 7460 �� 6M 6923 6M 6933 69296877 6978 6937 8929 6932 &a49 9296933 6929 dfj3 69" 6929 g929 6932 6929 7210 7100 6972 6M 6932 6937 6 376941 69376941 6937 70THSrw 69M49694068736Ji416940 69i5 94S 6944 694969" 16944 69456944 6945 70077000 7001 70017000 2809 28772821 2011 2517 700! 70097008 7009"07 70097008 2605 1977 7602 70197014 18]0 70117024 7021 70277040 70112869 70217020 261026m02918 7001 7901 3501 7001 "100 7000 78293009 90012911 18271813 2809 2715 7037 3009 2915 2905 290! 2801 7045 2924 2914 2904 2824 2811 2800 7045 1700 2605 7101 3650 7101 701970112921 18272817 28017101 3303 3005 30012819 2815 2907 HAZFJ-7UYR0 4 020 3008 2920 2916 2024280=02714 7447 % % %! '�•': 2908 2808 3695 3Nlf /'J•`,•' j' 7124 2877 20671845 2809 2501 2713 270! 7171 7I5 7fJ4 1133 %;•; �, / %'' 714428761 660 2944 2814 2800 7139 2700 7145 72017200 7201 T200 72017200 7201 Zd 7200 72017208 7200 7208 7209 7108 7269 7 0 7214 72157214 72157214 722S 7214 7215 7207 7220 72217220 72217220 72217220 7221 7200 7226 7227 7226 7227 7226 7227 7226 7277 7235 72]0 72337272 72]37232 72531231 7233 7245 72M 72]97236 723117238 7230 ..1290 7244 72437244 72457244 7245 . 70161/17 f 71 7335 foil 4C 16 q�q���17 YoAmam Park 7900 7301 I'M 7301 Y300 7702 2 .176 7315 7308 79097708 7709 7308 7809 ]821 7 .1 7315 7314 77157314 73157314 7313 f0 606 5 7321 7320 75217320 73217320 7321 15 18 7328 73277328 73277326 7727 'Y4 4 6 7355 3020 3014 3000 2910 2800 2818 73337332 73337332 7733 4 9'51 292429122824 7332 73997338 V339 7330 7339 d0 4A'�51 30193017 1923 2901 2811 774473457774 73457344 7346 7373 - C — M LOka p;a.,,,,,.,01 __ _ _ E�13;7412 017! - 74057404 2401401 7401 jM- 7401 Z-ft Z4F1_7,4A0 .7401_ j��4 J0 3400 7600 15�7d 74051408 74097408 74091408 - 74001409 74097408 7� 097 74137414 74157414 74157414 741S7414 74187414 7410 7421742 0 74217420 74217420 74217420 74217410 PARtaA f4NAVE 74277425 74277428 74277426 74217426 74277426 170 74337432 74337432 74337432 74337432 74337432 / 7401 G al ka ah 3451 433.74 774444 74457444 74457414 744574" 74452600 .�. 7401 7401 4 e 7671 75017500 T50f SAef 7501 al i PID: 32028242.10004 7151 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 &H Legend Mghlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Noma Labels .I City Limits �f Creaks 0 Lake Mamas Lakes OParks OParcels IX City of Edina 6103— 80968,7,68126MOM6809 68126409 C412 6W9 6813 6V2 6800 Legend 4 24 x1 6805 6620661768206617 66M 6817 66206817682188206817 Surrounding Hou eNumbDr 21 0829 6829 6825 6826 U25 68286825 6828 6815 6929 CS28 61125 Labels W 3368376836683368366833 68366893 68366633683768.7669!3 NDU6e Number Labd. CO v9rH Sf 1 6847664566;4 68456644684168446817 68446841 6644 6841 Sfrest NemO Labels 09TH3TW 69016900 6901 Gm 69016904 $9016900 60016900 6901 �J City Limlts 6909 6909 69056913 69036909 69056909 6905 / Creeks 136917 691369176016 043- 896917 6013 69178911 Lks NamO 216925 69216920 005 6928 0425 $929 68216915 6921 73 2B 693-9 6929 032 6929 $928 0429 69326929 ED Lakes 6939 69336932 8.3-3% 97 6941 6940 68416940 6937 684' 6937 Parks 6945 6945 5$944 0443 6944 60478944 69456044 6945 Zoning 70THSTW 70017000 7001 70017000 2808 18170821 2811 2377 � APD {Aetamnbu ➢ardn7DtuLy1 015700 770152901 Ttl08 70"7004 2006 2313 28300820 O A1DOa41fuc3 Da•�pmtnt otmaj 7001 -358 �` 70217020 6112604!5202516 70217020 70212000 2836 2610 2600 2516 7020 ■ Afpp.9 }51kad Omdnpveal pttria) I'm 000 7829 9009 9001291 f 2623 2813 ?000 27}5 ® AIWO {s1ic5Dmaloprvn pttt+ni 70313005 2915 2905 2901 2801 . PCD.1 {Pbnn:3 Carmnvrabl DLtr: -) 7045 2924 2914 2904 2824 2812 2800 7045 2000 PCD-2(Pb —d Cen td Dide.) 101 96.50 2605 p 901530772927 2823 2913 28017101 PC0.71Pbnn�Cc�nachl Dnitia) 300530012515 28152807 ® PCD4(Pb —J Cns 1.1 Dwt4n) 14A7dTCWRp 20 7008 29208988 N24 T80U 2714 2808 O pfp {'fan Wwde ai D'ei.id7 ..SSS 3e7 3043 27/32701 . PUDiBb 2111.4oia"MJ 171 15 713228772861284528092801 D POO- 1 {Phavn30Rim Di-'I=0 7144 2970" 2860 2844 2814 2600 7126 0700 D ►00d(P7mnoi Ofrw Dt Aj 1145 . ►RD-1;Pu n,i R-5l DLW1) 2 7100 71017200 720 }7200 7207 7200 7207 72007208 72097208 720972W 72W ® 7RD.2(M- 3Acatis:ial Dtbj 7214 72137214 72157214 72157214 7215 ® PRO-3 S7b -d Rea'9anW Dkb6a) 7220 722172M 12217120 1221 7250 7221 7200 7220 72277226 72277226 722772M 7227 PAD•e {Pkrme3R.- idenWDeUie.) 72597232 72337232 72937232 7233 ® PRD -5 {f4nneiRd3aca1 DIAM) ?2 72397238 7230 72457256 Y239 2 . PWAiPlaonc39at;x 0Lti iZt) 7298 7244 72457244 72457244 7245 775 ■ R- 1{Slnpb De M.aU 7/781 '71 21 •.••;1011 7300 7]017900 73011`.700 7301 ® R- 21aa4at anys.q uneJ 24 61 yE'T1. 109 24 7308 73097308 73027306 7509 futm ;Reylwtal Nciimd 041.7:: f) 82 •• .'24 1707 •'.10Q4{� 5 7315 7314 73157314 79157314 7315 +� •�: •: �- "<915478 2 • 1 7321 2720 75212310 73217926 7321 7326 73277326 73277326 7327 Parcels .8f lf. 2432 733! 3020 3014 9000 281026002818 73737332 773!7!!2 7333 451 : •::. 90 00 51 2924 2912 282-0 7332 73997336 73391338 7339 C y '8024 w °. •• • a,P15.20540f 2812 m 73457344 7?q 7744 7741 30/93013 2�Q12907 7344 7314 SO -040174(12 - 7403740!- - 74037481 74077490 74017400 M017400 7 -001 - •. 21.10 _ _i 9 24097408 7 -0097109 3300 �•' S ;44' IJ00 5 �Ja57d0{ - 74097408 74097408 71097400 13 4097! 06 74157414 74157414 74157414 74157414 74157414 7419 '`. 741174/ 74217420 7421.7420 74117420 74217420 74217420 .` PARKIAWHAVE 74277426 74277426 74177426 74277426 74271428 ' ,• •� , 74257490 74397432 74337432 74337432 74337472 745374M Y ]451 T~ � 7434 7439 7438 7439 7438 7479 7438 74397438 74787438 7.3-77x436; 74457444 74452444 74457444 74457444 74452600 uae.eefsaaa•awWi msmam 740 24 0 ®Td08 75017500 75012601„ 7301 ''t •'� PID: 3202824210004i�`tf�{ x'(-1.8 117Y���L •,i. 3-i e 7151 York Aare 5 • `'a`i.. Edina, PIN 55435 9uuJ IX City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 .RE: Continental Gardens Senior Housing Mesaba Capital Development proposes to develop a 100 -unit senior care facility in Edina, Minnesota. The proposed building will be on the property of The Yorktown Continental Apartments, a 12 -story building of 264 one bedroom apartments for independent seniors. The site, 7151 York Avenue, is within walking distance to the Gallera Southdale Mall, Target, CVS, Walgreens, Cub Foods, Byerly's, YMCA, entertainment venues, and The Hennepin County Library Government Center. Bus lines are conveniently located in .front of the site on York Avenue. The current parcel is 5.85 acres and zoned PSR -4, Planned Residence District. The parcel is planned to be subdivided and replatted during the entitlement process. Mesaba Capital Development along with Health Dimensions Group + Premier Management, Welsh Construction and RSP Architects believe this is a strong development opportunity and aligns with the visions and goals of the City of Edina. Why approve this project? Land Use & Density • ' Leverages land with higher residential density, lower vehicle ownership and usage. • Delivers senior housing that is needed within the market. •. Deliver affordable housing that is needed within the market. York Avenue • Connects and engages, continuing the City's vision for a walkable community. • Promotes health with walking and biking distance to shopping, entertainment and services. Transportation /Transit • Provides an integrated and efficient transportation system that affords mobility, convenience and safety for residents. • Mesaba Capital in discussion with Metro Transit to improve bus stop and connect to Senior Living Building. Affordable Housing • Adds units to the current inventory, assisting the City of Edina in reaching their goal. Sustainability o Supports City objective to exceed State sustainability goals via: • Selection of building materials sourced locally and /or manufactured from rapidly renewable resources. o Careful placement on site to maximize both,density and green space. • Site selected to support mass ,transit and transportation alternatives to private vehicle use. The Senior Living Building will include independent living, assisted living, and memory care options. Health Dimensions Group + Premier Management offer industry- leading expertise in consulting and management of senior living properties. This team understands the opportunities and challenges inherent with providing services to the aging. Their experienced leaders create customized approaches specific to the unique needs and circumstances of the market, residents and facility. Mesaba` Capital engaged Health Dimensions: Group to provide a summation of current senior living providers in the Edina area. The summary provided results documenting currently high occupancy levels in the area with one property currently in fill up, offering high price points, and experiencing good market acceptance. Overall Project Goals: • Create a sense of Community Pride • Provide a warm and inviting environment • Connection to Nature - indoor and outdoor • Sense of quality and dignity • Maximize the potential of the site The proposed building is four stories in height with underground parking. The 100 -unit facility is being programmed and designed to 'accommodate a continuum of aging, including Independent Living, Assisted Living and Memory Care Units. The total square footage of the project is proposed to be 121,300 NSF: The parking for the parcel is planned for 64 stalls enclosed below the Senior Living Building, 14 visitor and 10 employee surface parking. The facility will provide at least ten percent of the total units as affordable housing; individuals below the 50% median income level will have reduced monthly rents. Senior Living with Services (70 units) Private apartments with full kitchens and laundry. Support services for those who have more complex care requirements. Staff is on -site 24- hours -a -day. • Independent -Living is for seniors who wish to eliminate the burden of home ownership for an apartment and facility offering numerous conveniences and amenities. • Assisted Living., is for seniors who wish to live as independently as possible, yet may require assistance with some of the activities of daily living. • The facility will create a dynamic environment that promotes activities throughout the day. ` Memory Care (30 units) The private memory 'care apartments at Continental Gardens will be secure and specially designed for those with mild to moderate memory loss from Alzheimer's and other forms of �4 dementia. The area is designed to bring comfort, peace and familiarity to the residents while providing exceptional care. Proposed Building Features: • Congregate dining w/ three meals a day. • Private dining • Coffee Shop • Lounge areas on every floor • Library & Computer Room • Craft Room • Fitness Facility Site Planning The new Senior Living Building has been oriented primarily north and south on the site to activate the York Avenue street scape. Mesaba Capital Development has applied for a variance allowing the building to be located 20' from the west property line along York Avenue. This location is desirable in that it minimizes the impact on the residential units in the adjacent existing building, with respect to exterior views and access to natural light. Placing the building farther west also maximizes the green space available for outdoor amenities that will be shared between buildings. This placement also increases southern and western sunlight into the courtyard, while shielding the outdoor areas from the prevailing northwesterly winds during winter months. The proposed placement is also in keeping with the essential character of the neighborhood along York Avenue. York Avenue Streetscape In placing our new Senior Living Building along the 'front lot' of the site, our goal is to create an urban style setting, fronting the first level of our four story stepped facade. Along York Avenue, the first floor stoops provide an articulated masonry base interspersed with on- grade seating areas adjacent to the sidewalk. As the existing grade slopes downwards toward the south, the landscape falls away to reveal more of the building's base. Our proposed streetscape will also include new tree plantings, site furnishings, lights, and sidewalks. Building Exterior Design The exterior design for the Senior Living Building has been developed with two key objectives; our building should be integrated with the York Avenue streetscape in terms of scale and articulation, while also relating well to the existing twelve -story apartment building which shares our site. In recognition of the difference in overall scale and site placement, we have focused on integrating the two buildings by using similar organizing elements within the exterior expression. The existing building exterior has a hierarchy in which large, framed areas have been subdivided horizontally into smaller panels. A similar vocabulary has been used in developing the new Senior Living Building. Taking cues from the existing building, the relatively large fagades have been broken into smaller, framed areas within which horizontal panels create visual texture and interest. The use of a masonry base relates both to the existing adjacent building and the warm brick tones seen in many of the residential Edina neighborhoods. Above the masonry base, residential areas are sheathed with cement fiber siding in a combination of light tan and warm gray. A rich brown ribbon runs through all the A-7 facades as an organizing element that helps tie the residential areas and common spaces together. The color palette also relates to the materials planned for the exterior renovation on the neighboring building. At the fourth floor, the building steps back to provide areas where Memory Care residents may be outdoors in a supervised and protected environment. Rooftop mechanical units are clustered at the north and south ends of the building adjacent to the elevator enclosure. These areas are shielded by low screen walls and are held back from the roof edges to further minimize the perceived building height and massing. Communal areas of the building have been developed with an emphasis on transparency and connectivity between indoor and outdoor activity areas. The "front porch" along York Avenue provides an elevated patio adjacent to the public functions inside and from which residents can observe the activity along the street. On the courtyard (east) side, the health and wellness functions have been located to take advantage of the adjacent outdoor landscape. The entire courtyard area is available to residents of both the new Senior Living Building and the existing apartment building. The exterior spaces have been designed to support a variety of functions including outdoor fitness classes, social gatherings for both large and small groups and residents' gardening areas. Additionally, sidewalks have been included around the entire two- parcel site and to the adjacent park to offer residents the opportunity to exercise and enjoy the outdoors. North of the courtyard, the delivery access is buffered by coniferous trees which not only provide year -round visual screening, but also provide shelter from prevailing northwesterly winter winds. At the main entry, the drive is roughly centered on the courtyard space where it can provide access to both buildings. The entry drop -off is sheltered by a central porte cochere providing protection from the elements and a preview into the courtyard beyond. Canopy structures are provided over heated sidewalks extending from the porte cochere to each building. The porte chochere and canopies will be treated similarly to other public areas of the project in both scale and materiality. 4C6 00 'f N9I5 3101SSIM z 3WnNO MOM 7 9NIXUVd UO1151A • , r 000 Apr, AaP�<D04�a4� + N'dfM ®<►��� ®< a IllID��< ,.Tr r dva, 3101553J7tl wl �C d , R.0-,6 � Slltl3i-0 7amllno 9N dBd JNIMUtld H1n05 d03SsnU X. 035OdOUd IUVA ANf1Qa 9Nlalln9 03 OdOUd r � o 3Uli wl ; 71d .7n 9NX aMl- ,flAdl ' 4 ®W �4 i Wd AMU 009D �gag,JJYY'a''' �7 'Al oon N�dAlNnWOHdlmu MD I6/ MONLONS 00 'f N9I5 3101SSIM z 3WnNO 9.0-.6 d Slltl1S Z I 7 9NIXUVd UO1151A H73W r 000 v� a IllID��< ,.Tr r dva, 3101553J7tl wl �C d , R.0-,6 � Slltl3i-0 7amllno 9N dBd JNIMUtld H1n05 vov VOtl 00000 vav vav O O C7 C] O 0 9Nlallna AU015 Z I 9NU.SIX3 .0 -.6 J Slltl1S 01 9NIXtltld 4dtl1S 3NIl A1H3dOHd/ 03SOdOHd 3aVN3W0Ud Ol NOIIJ3NN07 N9I5 3WnNO 7 H73W r v� IllID��< ,.Tr r dva, wl �C d , �F i d03SsnU X. 035OdOUd IUVA ANf1Qa 9Nlalln9 03 OdOUd r � o 3Uli wl ; 71d .7n 9NX I ,cmu Tuuo -a I I I I I I I wra I O nm � I I coma I I I W,., ----------- -- i- L .......... j I k rH I I I I I e I I I I I I I \ I I I \ I I I — — — — 7 iy Y Continental Gardens Mesaha Capital Development Final Development ADDlication ®mom» ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN I Q� EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION e� s SOUTH ELEVATION Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Final Development Application 2617 M1 W AP vwn w,nowc LM ONILI/ I %IlMnn 1111ATIMI A103 Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Final Development Application . ......... ......... ------------- SITE ENTRY VIEW FROMYORKAVENUE Al 04 View from across York Avenue Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Final Development Application VIEW FROM ACROSSYORK AVENUE A105 Close Up View along York Avenue . . ....... . .. Continental Gardens Masaba Capital Development Final Development Application CLOSE UP VIE W ALONGYORK AVENUE A] 06 View at Porte Cochere and Shared CourtyaY;'= (` ""'Lo �J i FAA Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Final Development Application VIEW AT PORTE COCHERE AND SHARED COURTYARD A107 0, Up! ■L� �� � r�rr f i I IM ,� ,fib � :: FAA Continental Gardens Mosaba Capital Development -inal Development Application ENTRY TO PARKING GARAGEAND DELIVERY AREA ".11 W109, Birdseye View Continental Gardens Mosaba Capital Development Final Development Application MY )"Min BIRDSEYEVIEW Al 09 VII Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development Checker rw ---------------- I------------ +.._.....__......_.._.... .... ...... 3D IMAGE 3D �J V arxE Iwa L,00 LANDSCAPE PLAN f SCALE: ,-=2ip - L,ee DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE L,00 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL w SCALE pr✓ —E[ _ uoo SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE PLANTING SCHEDULE: M W-1111111 v��OrJ MM Erzm QMW 111073111 LANDSCAPE NOTES: I. [.Wep. wrb waw..Y.Pbb..Nbq ebberor..r r,r.,W..M1, «.d.wn. GraWM. s, WpMpN «hswY�nYYgrYFquro mnvucum lw es «nvrosrnpblmm•abn urw. � bwunbsP Ob�i+Y�eb nueesr YpbssYSn�bs abnNmMrn.uvrom«rWWr . n s YObYYIrIroYM[klwrNl. IIYIbsrolewauW sAawsysOSWUr,sMwae Y YYrIr14a NMrlrrnNMauYrl An MnrrE, Ylrtl Kp.lewW.roY c. AsrYYbebrobYyYyMplsllby arorYYbY roerb.rnr. 1 snel ndru sl «crorW.em lns. s.srpnsn.apo��wa...ns:n Mo�Ne IN eal ralenWr LLer M1wn IM tlme M Arol wpury eY rro armr. As pbrw sMSW eeW rn mrm•lu rrmreawhq awrYbralbr nn erlMywrunue mrM. c Yx. .bubaunrYbuYbns�NYWYrsVO.lIWawW YUw.0 awes NM rw scn b«rY ISJS?w rp« nsMw«bnagw w« ebrb sIJ d snbYebY yruq bra •nr r mna I mprusgb«xer xrasa upwrel ,ti nrpiv.Yi wr mrbbeiN W« b w u�.qn rw9nl [aMM la n mrm d�rn.An nonim tb.rrq Imin«mn. I xNi.�emlu pnurr nur>w.Nnnp wnnl'Irr..r >Iw +amp wn.nmmbwsc•m t2 Eqp -m•brW «Iwneeb ue Wb« PYr PM Wsr NiniuW SlsWS. ,l NpxsmYbmuN pbey�YlYwbweaWwwrY.rrroYe YpbsYgall.l.0 ,, p'ad9eslrrYrlNYiYYrrs'. roers.urpreY pyerlrowmn«pbwr wprr 'gTOprorb IYttinramYrYl�e ,s. Npbrle[Yb.ystl«.bwinlb. em so- «wwbarpPYAx..pr.arYws. ,s. NYrbM�P�MYb.n «rmbee« «per e.rou.esrrspro a.bs.Y.W.s.a:. TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: Required: m• n.n /.e Iw psxnw t]plylt iw �I RI10' uere. Wr lll' ps •I nrYa W . wars 1 IEI1s' uMr e n IJI' 11 • e mnesa upl ieW n... na• Irr « -.1� � 20., •.roa »I Existing Tree Credit: Is1 Email mw..n T.ssb a —i—biwwfA'[ap.r Tolal New Trees Repldred = 26 Total New Trees Proposed= 26 FAA �tTEI� oin Continental Gardens Mesabo Capital Development e•Ab TT VR _05/20/14 e: Nr.+'xP'.+rn YA -r W+s urn Preliminary Landscape Plan A I PROJECT NAME: CONTINENTAL GARDENS A PROJECT NAME: YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL' OWNER: MESAEIA CAPITAL - OWNER: YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP ARCHITECT: RSP ARCHITECTS A ARCHITECT: CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEER: PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEER: PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES O LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT: ARTEKA COMPANIES A LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT: ARTEKA COMPANIES V7 YORK TO Kf\/ OWNER: YORKTOWN Od7CE COURT I I 3 L _ r W PIERCE PINI & P.I.O. NO. 92-02824-21 -0003 I 1„ 1 T— ��IA� HIPrfE'S Llt,jgo LN 1. n HILLS _ li AREA -UNDER EASEMENT O OWNER DAVID R. ANDE BON e I, ❑ e5 W I DENISE,, ELDSTROM NO. 92-028 -29 -12 B li PROPOSED - li PROPERTY LINE ._ _ 04 I 1 �Acn n a WEST 71 !'i STREET mi _._ (OUBLICBIaHT OF W4p 1_ _ _ Continental W' � O L 0 T 2 — -, � Gardens ILu _ a W ( Mesaba Capital � — L K R ,n nm Development Q 11000 DDDD LAY YORE; TO rVfv i o — i OWNER: CT' OF RICHFIELOI P.I.P. NO. 32-028-24-13-M7 PROJECT -- LIMITS LINE J HIPPE `. I 5 FINAL A,•.E VIE W � DEVELOPMENT i ` TEf 'RA. .'E I APPLICATION 6a6aBeoexve. �, �. Au oJK wnana — /� - -�— —�1 -- —'� - -- -- - - - - -- L -- OWN ER: WINDSOR VENTURE 1 \ P.I.D. NO. 32-028 -24-24 -0001 / 1ORKT061V ^J _ PRDJECT KEY PLAN �1PROJECT KEY PLAN _ m CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND INSPECTION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS r'tlLUx pnawl. emr aweum eaww �uwnm s�MOamO nrt n so�ema ..s aam ..w d GENERAL NOTES EROSION CONTROL NOTES u°�m +nim,� omx+ e. mew _omYO�e® m ememe Rio. � f°ao ru:°Oiwruno°�`a° .wAw aewomaw� m s �c°PL.. eW�uw U. a mane. uen rmn, ev�raOeiYp1� °0i u m aM. aomm�n .aoia RE I 16t= 0 EI r ® imcx 0 g,� u aamamm .FAA a.... PIERCE PINT$ ASSOCIATES ..00.- Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND O OWNER.' YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT SEE YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL P.I.D. N0.32-02&24.21 -0003 RENOVATION PLANS FOR PROJECT INFORMATION V SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN Imo' .! �7 —I( X � I WEST 711, STREET M' W 42M OWNER WINDSOR VENTURE P.I.O. NO. 32-M-24-24-0001 OWNER: CITY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 324M24.13.0087 r / PIERCE PINT ASS CtTEI Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION C400 Z �3 nWNVkt DAVID R. ANDERSON A DENISE a ELOSTROM P.I.D. NO. 32 02&24-1,10028 deb ggd Imo' .! �7 —I( X � I WEST 711, STREET M' W 42M OWNER WINDSOR VENTURE P.I.O. NO. 32-M-24-24-0001 OWNER: CITY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 324M24.13.0087 r / PIERCE PINT ASS CtTEI Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION C400 w is i0.R1\ TOWN I EE YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL OWNER. YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT RENOVATION PLANS I OWNER WINDSOR VENTURE PJO. NO. 32-028-24-24-0001 ORK 10 M/'/\/ k. O LU t f-r-1 T- I N. I P;`�E •.S LINgoLN HIL LS OWNER. DAVID R. ANDERSON & DENISE S. ELDS-0- P.I.D. NO. 32-028-20.12-48 L WEST 71112 STREET 11. NO- 32-028-24-13-0067 r / PIERCE PINI ASSOCIATE5 Continental - Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL Rh DEVELOPMENT Vl� "V ,- E APPLICATION % ALA .. .... ..... L GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN QRA?ING,ANQ .DRAINAGE PLAN i I I I I I io co I - c IAy� I I W= I �zY I ,I I I , I II II i I .I I � r YORK TO WN SEE YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL OWNER: YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT RENOVATION PLANS P.I.D. NO. n-028s 21- 03 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION r U1. 11 r / .� PIERCE PINT& ASSOCIATES Continental Gardens Mesahe Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AU m OW WK IV I UTILITY PLAN � FUTILITY PLAN .� I a' a OWNER: WINDSOR VENTURE \ P.I.D. NO. 32- 028 -24-24 -0001 1 ORKTOWN r U1. 11 r / .� PIERCE PINT& ASSOCIATES Continental Gardens Mesahe Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AU m OW WK IV I UTILITY PLAN � FUTILITY PLAN .� I a' a 0 i W 3 HIPPE'S LIN,;'('�L N II HI1_LJS nW I SON OWNER: DAVV R. AND & PLO' NO. 32-0 9-24 7 -00�8 oa 1 WEST 711/2 STREET f—cxmx my) I I -^ s OWNER CITY OF RICHFIELD P.I.O. NO. 32-02&2x13-0087 -- I YAf;E67EW r U1. 11 r / .� PIERCE PINT& ASSOCIATES Continental Gardens Mesahe Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AU m OW WK IV I UTILITY PLAN � FUTILITY PLAN .� L ZY >0 IR t1 II 'A 8 PM D- W. —372' PARCEL 1 mill I J11111111111111 1111111 OWNER, YORFCrOwN OFFICE couRr RID. NO. 32 -02&2421-0003 ................. A o -DING SMACK 13W OWNER: WINDSOR VENTURE P.I.D. NO. 32-026-242"wi PARCEI-2 d'a -d III ----------- -.1-... 1 PID. N(a). 0.1 Md. AM =4 WEST 71112 STREET ...N. p- l*' I'A&01'6� WCj.j NSCHEDULEB N. -A.: M, U-0 'o ER- crryoFpjcHFiaD P-1. NO. 32-U"4-13-0087 R• I BUILDING SETBACK UNE f4rM. —c—g—M- VICINITY MAP ALZ;CZLAND MILE ;URVEY FOR: YORKTOWN HOUSING GROUP, INC. X Gorman Surveying, in ­4 051 141 J TT LEGEND F — d OWNEFt DAWDP- NA DEVISE & ELDSMMOH PARCEI-2 d'a -d III ----------- -.1-... 1 PID. N(a). 0.1 Md. AM =4 WEST 71112 STREET ...N. p- l*' I'A&01'6� WCj.j NSCHEDULEB N. -A.: M, U-0 'o ER- crryoFpjcHFiaD P-1. NO. 32-U"4-13-0087 R• I BUILDING SETBACK UNE f4rM. —c—g—M- 7 ALZ;CZLAND MILE ;URVEY FOR: YORKTOWN HOUSING GROUP, INC. Gorman Surveying, in ­4 VICINITY MAP YORKTOWN OWNER. YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT P.J.D. NO. 32-a28-2421-W07 H/PIPE'S ZiF &.8p LINCOLN HILLS I OMER DAVID It ANDElSON a r 9 I DENISE S. ELDS... 5T RLD. NO. 32-02&�4-12416 R-E WEST 71 STREET D L 0 j& 8 L YORKTO CITY OF RICHFIELD NO. 32-026-24-13-0087 >i _kw m 7— IPPE'S 4" -TERRACE 1, OWNER- WINDSOR VENTURE P.I.D. NO. 32-1128-24-24-001 YORKTOWN EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY FOR: YORKTOWN HOUSING GROUP INC Fj;'—I Gorman Surveying, Inc. ICI o It tgg � PROJECT NAME: CONTINENTAL GARDENS _ D PROJECT NAME: YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL OWNER: - MESABA' CAPITAL: ARCHITECT: RSP ARCHITECTS = 0 OWNER: YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP a - - -� CIVIL ENGINEER: PIERCE PINT &ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECT: CERMAK RHO9DES ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEER: PIERCE PINT &ASSOCIATES O Vii LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT:. ARTEKA COMPANIES D LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT: ARTEKA- COMPANIES PIERCEPINI& I YORK TO 44 i A55OCIATES OWNEii YORKTOWN OI'pp FICECOURT, - - I j 3 �6 �- 'T- P.I.D. NO. M -02& 24.21.0 I W R _ 989.597 - -a �.� HIS '� gE s. er I I L1,,,iCI ()LN $ ��I I y L S_ 1 I- _ ®p wua AREA .UNDER EASEMENT FINAL ❑ - I ! y OWNER: DAVID R. ANOEFSON& IDEmses. ELDSTROM DEVELOPMENT, g R7 P.I.O. N0.32-029.24 -12 ou�e APPLICATION _ �y �1 PROPOSED PROPERTY ® V wZ 16 � LINE - I m 4 I WEST 71 � i . STREET rvueue 9Cxr°f w <n I O L 0 T L– ��,_ - - - --T— — Iz I I I I e � � � � UDDD DDDD .. x09'Sx 4IW gym... - I Y YORI-: To wr a" e OWNER: CITY OF P.I.D. NO. 32-028-24-13-0087 2RICHFIELD P. PROJECT LIMITS LINE - R I 'r. ; _ I11PPE 000 1 A1. r VIE IN z o. a Lu W I - �r � err L W z OWNER: WINDSOR VENTURE - - CJ '- 1 , P.I.D. N0 02.029 -24-24 -9991 Z ORKTO11IN PROJECT KEY PLAN -'• r+� nn uoo_ DEsrwtE CIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING SCHEDULE: x No i`. _uoo CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1 s NO SGIE uvaQ°O° Ma �°w°wY�.aWwM°aaN, I:Mq.ae:eepW:aeremm.n. O V mm wvm. eaw� .wwemmenruwmm.awa.au.u.::°wm. anm �y / �( / / / `I I � to +a. wwaerwmaarwe..e n.ramwm..mraar:uw:r e. _... -- — / 1, 1 .......... . uoo SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 10' "' 0` tlY°"°'°^"'°•" "' °itl°ei°pOb °mn°"°"°'m�ii1i°`�` T Nq 6r•re boo TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: p I — ' ^✓ ! I �m �e a.. w .. Ine.rwr.w.w•a•emv+owl p :..:.:.. rear Weee,IM']e.emWml .. ..: -... ... _ I I . Total Naw Trees Requlmd 38 uao LANDSCAPE PLAN Total New Treas Proposed = 37 t BG1lE t•Rf1� .�. MR PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 5. Pr z O a 0 z uj J H Z w Z Z U �z t2 IOr—:T: bi 2AV p[�naNARI e.. _0U] UZ ­N LIUU rill ev V., Nx PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES Z-1 C) C) :z LU cC LU C) C-D A 7 L108 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING SCHEDULE: 2 NO SCALE WON 111IM11111 0 O Effnill EMN [C1C1l�1'7�010 Lrao CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE NOTES: ] NO SCALE Cam.pw • if. .- �J�aWxm cVl6n m wmr Lroo SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NO SCALE �� ,•airy I. lnWOp .I.I.YrW Nn ptlgm WrtYrp NCb Yrmm. YrriYxfr.►avr9vs. i pb WrapvebiygWmb'.mbYNNr.l b.lwpm.Nwpb.rnaY.vma , ebaW m.p.nl. >. x.Weu.p wmd Wrepse udR aOr.ab.ro mmNabnlm bmmmq.blN YMIe01.b m.. IIWnb. rgpYq.dbmroW�.roWn.a.dga. urommW pbwm r°p°rou.b".gq:m.ISnroW qa.b mbroe.rm. s. ryo wuro�aroi. eoi�eWy�. lm' pawmmuN :InwMromd....e...Y..bmea.r+s.. Cbl.repul � nme` wtl NWN., een.bi =d W e.A, N=. aw.ro0.4®q.om, mm.�.ero.r . Y Nyq. wprrormnowe. 0. R.pN NUmueebpm .M lvrnpN+Ngros.YevNromnmmer. t Mlabr.Ymrnm.IMrpbgrodmP.bH hs. maprne Ow.baeN W.b gwl.�an naN ron.I.NrY•nrvwwwro.amn.�i � w W ma.ruw I..la. e bwY.NO.end brueo9n.namtl eowrp���nree apvalna.ro.NUw Wien o. �bYW rtls'�Mr mw mlAwm Yro ®ro aee ronYrmer ea M.bpNN I YHYgNa ®.Nib WbnL Tls WewPwr.anuYW wreryen.lb rw u. Tim.a0.8.rN..ngN UPNN mrobn mre roroadNaw�ronlu mmNrybuWM. , Wap.wmWpwlYe..Niw.Wlq.N xpnnTNynd.Nroaee wY anro Y+Wmp nM. li rM.bmrYl.bwnbW =tl Mb.smr.wW O.a. pdr.0.TlbMenNMNu I Np.m.AdtmN psrbp.no NUr�s... MWnmgro CwNrdpmmYb mr11.1�11 , eppNp nwsw w.mey.Iwa,.wWrprolmwpW.rnwJSembl br Nb pwwa. tra..Ni Nw+gwi pb b Ial etl mrni.m Y,. rs. NpW brebe.pvle..imilaapam mYbbW mmas,mbroa...NeW. , «. NN.e.e.a..arw,db..a . robro®pp.= .rro..wdY . lbm m..ru..e.mrw..«. TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: Required: Rarw tw mnroYr ,rm, N. m ro. w.n m xvw>ra«w�at•tm.tl.n Wl ae u wp�aa w • ae.,n nnss�wwr....w•v•,,l Ipl.swb.rliw. W • m • a m.re.e wl al ss•wwr.m. w. a. p NmpN wl Existing Tree Credit: 0)&-p nro. 1. m s.we l=.a mr mpi.e 1.1 mupx rn..l Total New Trees Required = 38 Total New Trees Proposed = 39 LIDO LANDSCAPE PLAN ^ ^ 1 SCALE: -2&V `� 2d Ife; W r�� �S- _m PIEKCE PINI & ASSOCIATES �m �U z CD Q CD Z W J Q Z W z z W p U v Z Yit CD PRELIMINARY m LANDSCAPE PLAN X100 VICINITY MAP Z OI o r: I ... B ,!Ill. - - -'-.-'- -'- I Nines: .. . Im III UIEOINC m 1 IN A I ram I $ I I IOwN rr DAVDR.AND d ]. a rr.mlErblJ,m],d. Wlmma.ma. Am.muua.mrm.biymEmam . mn.rrm. Yq.Yrw mbm.e.b Bbrmb ien. SEreAef j l P a BmU]mG TmTBAer UK I I 1i F' I l a ursrua , �. ar.r.bbxm.a.vr. Pbm.as.m B..IS.. -. rn m. :. I I I I I a I Iy �f2 1 xm Teu.msr `m°.emaawemmNmmm m.Im.meram.brrNamm- ,rewu:n1 I I I L a Ime..]mm..,rmm. mmpme® Nbw. m. umc .rl.mrtie.G.aorrlmrrm.,muv.AU�� Bmxwma ®wuee®nuEnrmaroAxrorvAna II It i -:o'o - - - - -� -- ), r,00+„mam,mm.s r.axa� >waollviar.p.a..,. co) I ]0100 I III ! I I ma. -' I I t -- WEST 71 %2 STREET BUBVEY FlF]Ie PBA SUewwbl r IN UTN1Tr EASOmrY I I I 0 puetRgONr Mtw ' I I W Ii Fl N0.B NSe ®UEB I II I I L— elm ,OmTlab WmC.e.Ofrm.q. a.m ...moan Bmm eN°P1_. . — — — — — — — — — IfE>, a: wur mmmmp). vmnmmm. mp. m. ..mb.lme.lmaa.ImmTa,b.,YaNrm.a' IZ Z W I I I i I 1. PARCEL 2 I I i t I 11ma Blmm. eramvNmml ....mwplmmma.mFmrmww,rm�vlm ,.. m®m.R.urmmmevdwB®9.b�. III ! PARCEL 1 ! I I 1 i •. •- I 1 10' EABEIEHT PER OOC 0. 10)7)2& FlEIr N0.0.1 mmm w..atlbmaam.as..m I,Em4 N.]b]egm,mm.mmn®mNb.rmM m0.nnr Na 101tmmrJrrbmtibY. e�T I I I Se,EDUIE B rrmm ana 6mm0 - - - a..0 . - -- -- .... — d I I I EEOALOEDCmm I I I I I I I Na 32-028242r j (j I 0 I I I �mm 'CRYOFRICHFOD Na 22-02624- 130087 I Aurrminxama], tivmm•.. m..mmmaml�eaWS..mltmsdmm.4.Mm.� Bmm R.mW.Or.h.,H.aanC ar.mT6 NnHia0.MOrm.tma.m.a.becB.Btio' b�.°"". �oN.riar® m�a x�m m. mvrmrm dam.imu avT(rrmaae.w ,' I I bm4rp 1 I rmnmW]ax]; 7vMmr. mmmmmwlm�.agms..m.Nmxmmnr.r®vma .�r. II I II I I I j 0 0 I I I I I I emml.m,ti.ar.b.,m . a.ano.e]rmmTS lmMnlq mmrmwa.mer. Wm: �. Bumw .cm.,.a,xr... tine. mma...mu.....mm�mwxm.mmlanb�r', mia a .ua bxmlm.um..r ®mlaxs�a e..mmmup I j I �• - I I cEBeFlUnax; %� - / I e 11. ��i 1\ I �� j �// 0° ` I I I I I I I I l.. smmm. ml. m®.. rwmmee. mosmme .bmmmme.almmem[am.NbeNocmmr. �.. �: B.rxxu'iY,aml�aumamA�l.ruACSY IaYTIL �TO�NIABmgYylpvbmm�l'�l: 6mmuC ee.ONplM.bbKTN1®Ilmtl Tb ervrya 9mq,.am.abe. x011 Ymmrf,T ,l - I Tee. tim mnntiml. EO.. emmmtlmtirm� �j \ , •— BL.L"G SEIBAfJr NE / 1 BUIU)ING XTBAC I 1 UNE j I I ®q.mmlracTm.ammaded�rgs.... .msnNmb.mS BO.bemm mmm.mmm,rlm.n amv,gmm0b Pmrvatwmglte'JUO •. �4 rrm. mllax.^brmn ml Bl. F.En.lrmmm•r.m Rlb Wp�'s�._ / `t \ - -mss_ ._._ ------------- - Canvnwry I / I 65L4. -- ' , u � r\ M EsmA ucElue No. sw�� Gre: 5 /iv /4- I G.IA N0.32-078- 242q-00pf � I r,v mAn4EmYle,�mssa]s ALTAIACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: YORKTOWN HOUSING GROUP, INC. I German Survevina, Inc. aww - awn I.M. .owm.,..a.m NVe.m I,Gelz K,iNemFEET ir.m"""m lunsa+:.l�o roe G4CNED B'I: GTE 14412 B 1 � I I 1 � I mo EM Ims rv� e w j` 2g w I .D I 1 aF 0 ® �1GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OWNER .'YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT SEE YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL PJ.D. NO. 32-028- w- 21-0B0� RENOVATION PLANS FOR PROJECT INFORMATION OWNER: WINDSOR VENTURE P.I.D. NO. 32-028-24 -24 -0001 OWNER: CRY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 97 -07A24- 13-OOB7 s — Vr ASSOCIATES r.. Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Lra GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C500 O rn LIJ P :3 ' N W OWNER: DAVID R. ANDERSON A DENISE-. ELDSiROM P.I.D. NO.37078 -24 -/BOMB 7N ��GG EFI z r1 Ua I — WEST 71 STREET IaMCBICBTCPWAI) OWNER: CRY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 97 -07A24- 13-OOB7 s — Vr ASSOCIATES r.. Continental Gardens Mesaba Capital Development FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Lra GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C500 0 I I — OWNER: YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT SEE YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL = It P.ID. NO. Jd- 039[4 -21-M RENOVATION PLANS Z o FOR PROJECT INFORMATION ; i i seisms - -- I - - -� i m i1O1mr°Oi �'" Itc-m-xs�c smw�r m sms. I a'v-aswao,ffi m. cL.am ® �1UTILITY PLAN ❑ I _ I.:._'� OWNER DAVID R. ANDERSON A DENISE S. ELDSTROM P.I.D. NO. 3702924- /2-0028 I: W ■,4m 1Lnsw WEST 71'2 STREET IPU■NO■IORTOF 7 F Q a � � I � ® . -Rec se.zw eam•... I m - - -� i m i1O1mr°Oi �'" Itc-m-xs�c smw�r m sms. I a'v-aswao,ffi m. cL.am ® �1UTILITY PLAN ■ - - -snr ss sxE uzss -.. OWNER: WINDSOR VENI LORE P.M. ND. 32- 028.24. 24.0001 OWNER. CITY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 32-0292413-0087 PIERCEPINI& ASSOCIATES Gardens Mesaba Capital Development s I• I UTILITY PLAN C600 _J C� `i Kboa I: ■,4m 1Lnsw ■ - - -snr ss sxE uzss -.. OWNER: WINDSOR VENI LORE P.M. ND. 32- 028.24. 24.0001 OWNER. CITY OF RICHFIELD P.I.D. NO. 32-0292413-0087 PIERCEPINI& ASSOCIATES Gardens Mesaba Capital Development s I• I UTILITY PLAN C600 _J dote Ran RELOCATED I PA 50 UG STALLS ACCES CURB CUT I DELIVERY i EXISTING EX1871NG 12 STORY BUILDING PRO ED BUILDING SETBACK BUI DING COURTYARD L w D 0 I I rL x EXISTING COMMON DRIVEWAY AREA I'- ----' - �ORT OCHERE EXISTING CURB CUT NIESAIIA CAPITAL 5 (D Lu I a I I I W I I � CITY OF EDINAI I I I I I ADAMS HILL PARK I I COMMUNITY CITY OF RICHFIELD GARDEN I I I I ` KING N OR I NI I EXPOSED : 223 STALL I ENCLOSED: 50 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 27 STALLS P• S P A^ C H 1 T Z C T S ® Survey date stamped: April 9, 2013., o Building plans/ elevations date stamped: A it 9, 2013. Appearing for tiftApplicant Jean ReKamp Larsen, chitect. Discussion Commissioner Potts asked Ms. sen if they are plan ing on re -using the existing foundation. Ms. Larsen said she doesn't'believe so; owever at this me that hasn't been formerly determined. Commissioner Forrest asked if the Ash a wo d be removed. Ms. Larsen said she believes that three will be OK. \ Commissioner Plat teter asked if drainage as nsidered. Ms. Larsen responded in the affirmative adding that there is a French drain and ainage pacity between the structures: Public Hearing. \ Chair. Staunton asked if anyone ould like to speak to t issues; being none Commissioner Forrest moved to close the public hear' g. Commissioner Scherer con,ded the motion. Public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Scher,��'r commented that he loved seeing that the buil 'ng wall was "broken" up, adding she supports the refjuest as submitted. Motion sf Commissioner Potts moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review — Continental Gardens Assisted Living, 7151 York Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan request to build a 76 unit assisted living. building, attached to the existing Continental Gardens Senior Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The proposal is to create a "senior campus," and build the addition to the east side of the building. The units are Page 5 of 9 A3# described by the applicant as "moderately priced." The building would be four stories tall and be connected by an elevated skyway to the existing twelve (12) story 264 unit apartment building. The existing site is 5.85 acres in size; therefore, the density is 45 units per acre. With the proposed addition of 76 units; the density would increase to 58 units per acre. The property is zoned Planned Senior Residential District -4, PSR -4 and guided High Density Residential. The applicant is requesting a Sketch Plan review to solicit comments from the Planning Commission and City Council. Opinions or comments provided to the Appearing for the Applicant Terri Cermak with Cermak & Rhoades Architects. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague if this request was similar to the request reviewed and approved at 7500 York Avenue. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. The 7500 Co -op partnered with Ebenezer to construct a similar facility. Commissioner Carr said at this time her comments concern landscaping, indicating if they proceed with an application they will need a landscaping plan and materials board to ensure' compatibility in exterior materials between the existing and new building. Carr said she wants the final outcome to look like it's designed as one, not piecemeal. Chair Staunton said it appears to him that the use is good; adding if the Commission agrees with the proposed use and increased density what the Commission needs to express is if the configuration of the new building is "right" and if the design is "right ". Applicant Presentation Ms. Cermak addressed the Commission and explained the property owners are undertaking a large renovation project on the existing building that includes new windows, landscaping and walkability features. Ms. Cermak said the proposed new structure is designed to be a natural progression of the existing building. She explained a "skyway" is proposed to facilitate the movement of residents between buildings. Cermak said she believes the design of the new structure minimizes impact to surrounding properties because of the grade and buffer. She stated close attention would also be paid to the Richfield side of the property. Concluding, Cermak reported that interior space would be created to facilitate shared activities between buildings Page 6 of 9 �3� Discussion Chair Staunton asked Ms. Cermak if the intent was for people to relocate between buildings as a permanent move or would they rotate in and out. Ms. Cermak responded at this time they are still doing the market analysis; however, they believe when one moves out of the" independent" living senior building their move to the new assisted living facility is permanent. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague how Richfield would "hear about this ". Teague responded they will be informed when /if a formal application is made. Teague explained a public hearing notice is sent to property owners (including Richfield) within 1000 -feet of the subject site. Richfield would then pass this notice on to their residents. Commissioner Carr asked Ms. Cermak if other designs were considered. Ms. Cermak responded that they are in the process of design; however, need to take a lot into consideration (windows mechanical) when tying the proposed building to the existing building. Commissioner Potts said that overall he appreciates the property owner coming before the Commission with the sketch plan adding he also likes the "residential" feel of the proposed building. Continuing, Potts suggested that they look at implementing sustainability measures either through Leed certification or working with Xcel on their energy programs. Potts said when -- - - this- come -s- before -thE-C- ommisskmfor #ormal_ review- he-would- like -to -see what measures -were - — -- - taken to reduce energy consumption. Potts also noted this project is an increase in density. Commissioner Platteter commented when designing the new building the applicant needs to consider "what the City gets from this ". He suggested looking for ways to create walkability, possibly implementing bike paths, landscaping, etc. to create a better pedestrian experience. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged the difficulty in working with an existing building and agreed with Commissioners Potts and Platteter that sustainability and walkability were important. Commissioner Schroeder said what's important to him is how the site is viewed and how to formulate a new pedestrian environment. He noted in the 1970's large buildings were setback from the street; however, over the past few years the Commission and Council have been working on creating more of a pedestrian centered corridor in the greater Southdale area. He noted there are new developments within the greater Southdale area that are now closer to the street, adding to the pedestrian experience. Schroeder also noted there is no sidewalk connection from this building to the street reiterating the goal of the City is to foster a greater pedestrian experience. Concluding, Schroder said he was curious how the new building would function if it was placed on the opposite side. Schroeder said placing the new building on the York side would lessen the scale of the very tall older building and may create a very good . experience for residents of the buildings and the City. Page 7 of 9 Ms. Cermak responded that was looked at; however, maintaining front yard setbacks would be a problem. Commissioner Schroeder explained there are ways to work with the City to allow construction of a building closer to the street and mitigate increased density. Schroder pointed out the CVS site; as a recent example of a redevelopment that also addresses the pedestrian experience. Chair Staunton also noted the available PUD zoning process which is one way to work with the City when a site has "issues" with the zoning ordinance. He added PUD is a tool that can be implemented to allow flexibility from City zoning requirements including density and setbacks. Staunton suggested taking a fresh look at this development by keeping sustainability in mind and trying to create a streetscape that services more than just automobiles. Commissioner Platteter commented that to him connectivity is important, adding he would like to see an area created where the pedestrian feels welcome. He pointed out finding a way to connect the subject buildings to the library and YMCA would not only be good for the pedestrian experience but it would be an important.amenity to the residents of the building(s). Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the applicant look at this site as a clean slate that puts the pedestrian first with a design that challenges the City. Chair Staunton thanked Ms. Cermak for her time B. Zoning Ordinance Update — Residential Development VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. Page 8 of 9 A31 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 7, 2013 VI.C. P IMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, 3909 WEST 49 '/: STREET, FRANK HOLDINGS LLC /SPALON MO GE, RESOLUTION NO. 2013-43 - APPROVED Mr. Teague prese ted the request of Spalon Montage to divide its property at 4936 Fr ce Avenue back into two lots for t e purpose of potentially selling the new lot in the /mmencled new building was proposed at this tim The existing property and buildings would remain This property was originally platted as tw ots. The proponent combined them a few years now requesting to divide them back per the riginal plat. Staff and the Planning Commission approval of the proposed preliminary plat. The Council asked questions of r. Teague, City Attorney Knutson, and ity Engineer Houle relating to the encroachment agreement in plat for the side of the building. This eliminary plat would not cause any changes to the encroachment agree )Vent; the agreement would sty be in effect. Mayor Hovland opened the public hea Public Testimony There was none. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded b M ber Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovl d Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and move doption X Resolution No. 2013 -43, approving a Preliminary Plat at 3909 West 49'/: Street, based on a following dings: 1. The lots were original platted as p oposed. 2. There are no immediate reques for changes in use o he property or existing buildings. Member Brindle seconded them ion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Spragu ,Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V11. COMMUNITY CO MENT Mary Ames, Parishioner f St. Richard's Catholic Church, 7650 Penn venue South, addressed the Council. VIII. REPORTS / ECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLD ON NO.2013 -41 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS D NATIONS Member Ben tt introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2013 -41, Accepting Various Donations. ember Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: nnett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Mot' n carried. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN, 7151 YORK AVENUE Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the Sketch Plan for 7151 York Avenue. The proponent proposed to build a four - story 76 -unit assisted living complex attached to the Continental Gardens Senior Living apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The proposal was to create a senior campus: and build the addition to the east side of the building. The building would be four stories tall and would be connected by an elevated skyway to the existing twelve -story 264 apartment building. The existing site was 5.85 acres in size; therefore, the density was 45 units per acre. With the proposed addition of 76 units, the density would increase to 58 Page 7 1f 3'1 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 7, 2013 units per acre. The property was zoned Planned Senior Residential District — 4, PSR -4 and guided High Density Residential. The units are described by the proponent as "moderately priced." There was discussion on the cap for High Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan, of 30 units per acre, noting that assisted living units would have less demand than other high density uses for transportation and parking while having the same demand for in- ground utilities. It was noted that EMT service was well positioned for this area, and police service for this type of development would be in low demand. Mr. Houle provided the Council with information on sewer and water capacity in relation to the Metropolitan Council. He advised that the Comprehensive Plan projected 20 to 30 years into the future, was approved by the Metropolitan Council, and included a high- density land use in the Greater Southdale Area, as well as housing in commercial areas of the City. Those numbers were taken into account by the Metropolitan Council in determining the size of the relief sewer that was built through Richfield. Proponent Presentation Terri Cermak, Cermak, Rhoades Architects, answered questions of the Council relating to affordability, anticipated number of staff, layout and amenities, and transit connections. Comments from the Council for future discussions on the plan were: the importance of the percentage of County Elderly Waiver Units that would be guaranteed, revising the plan from a second -story skyway to a first -floor connection, creating a circle on the south end of the site as opposed to widening the space between the buildings, including a sidewalk extension to the street, the importance of "pedestrian friendly," and completion of a market study with penetration rates. Staff was directed to provide the Council with additional information on the density cap relating to senior plans in PSR Districts, including why the cap was set and how this project related to the cap. IX. CORRESPOND CE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDEN Mayor Hovland acknowledg the Council's receipt of various corres ndence. IX. B. MINUTES: 1. ENERGY & ENVIR MENT COMMISSION M UTES, MARCH 12, 2013 2. VETERANS MEMORI COMMITTEE MIN ES, MARCH 15, 2013 3. ART CENTER BOARD UTES, MARL 8, 2013 4. PLANNING COMMISSIOA(VIINUTErIL 10, 2013 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — ceived There was discussion on Safe Routes to Sch I lating to Concord School. Students that live across the street on School Road were now being req red to \25/25/5etweeln us to school due to there not being a sidewalk in place to access the school. It was not that pecused improvements have been completed at other schools in the City. Two options hat had bted to the Council in the May 2012 Franchise Fee Feasibility Study were: A) assess ent split of etween the City /School District /Residents for sidewalk c onstruction from Conc rd School to Road; and, B) assessment split of 50/50 between the City /School Distri for sidewalk co fr Ruth Drive to Concord School. It was noted that the residents woul not be assessed fose idewalk project in accordance with the current policy. Moved by ember Brindle, seconded by Member Sprague, approving that Option A (sidewalk construction fr Concord School to Normandale Road) of the May 2012 Franchise Fee Feasibility Study be upda d and presented to the Council for consideration. Page 8 431 con pt model to secure affordable housing with integrated services and adult guidance fo omeless teens 8 -19 year olds). She estimated that in the area of Edina, there were 250 to 300 ng people in need of 's type of housing and the requested 39 units was based on available funding. The Council as d questions of Ms. Blons who assured the Council that they wer ommitted to being the best landlord in na and if necessary, 24 -hour staffing would be provided. S stated Lydia Apartments, built for chronicallyltkmeless adults with mental health and chemical dep ent issues, provided 24 -hour services and she woulcheck whether any of their other buildings pr ed 24-:hour service. Ms. Blons stated this would not be'4 shelter or'drop -in facility. She answere questions of the Council related to Beacon's services and progra ming to successfully move young a into the community. Sarah Larson, Project Manager with Beacon, indicated th otal development cost was estimated to be over $10 million with an estimated' er unit cost of $25 .000. It was noted that this estimated cost was similar to that of Nicollet Square (42 units) and most �oyf er projects submitted to Minnesota Housing. Ms. Blons assured the Council that this wouldge qualitoliousing of which Edina would be proud. With regard to financing, she indicated they would addre\,s�s COT containment and were required to acquire a site prior to obtaining financing. Beacon believed there�jad been a high level of support for this Edina location. Bart Nelson, Urban Works Architectur .-kclisplaydtLthe location map, pointing out the abundance of parking, bus stops, and close proximit, p�t0 the transit ss ion. He described elements of the plan and how this project would meet the City's. stainability objet es\providing Ms. Larson indicated the funding for this project required compliance w0h the standards of Mota Green Communities which included exceeding the State's energy stodard by 15 %. Following discussion of th 3330 — 66`h Street sketch pla Cou '1 offered the following comments: creating an integratereetscape and integrated fence n; than in topography to create more daylight into the thr lower -level studios; providing of parking o address parking shortage; providing for outdoor bicycle parking; providing indoor storage duri the off season; designing articulated buildi surfaces; exceeding State energy guidconsideration o ordable housing rather than specialty using so the City had a higher level of coand, providing best actice relating to 24- hour servic he Council expr essed support for having thin Edina, adaptive us f this site that was in close p • imity to transportation, and meeting the Schtrict's and City's core v e of not leaving anyone - hind. The Council indicated that a Small Area as not needed in this inst ce as it was a good' erim use and allowed the area to develop organically overtime. 11FBlons stated they had been in conversation with the neighborhood and received a good response. The uncil encouraged the proponent to continue working with the neighborhood to address their concerns. VIII. B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED — 7151 YORK AVENUE Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the sketch plan to build a four -story building with 100 units (70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care suites) of assisted living west of the Yorktown Continental Senior Living Apartments at 7151 York Avenue. The existing site was 5.85 acres in size with a density of 45 units per acre. With the proposed addition of 100 units, this density would increase to 64 units per acre. Mr. Teague reviewed the Council's past consideration for a 76 -unit senior housing project. He displayed the site plan, noting its orientation along York Avenue, surface and underground parking. It was noted that while the Comprehensive Plan described High Density Residential as 12 -30 units per acre, density for senior housing might be increased. Mr. Teague presented site conditions that could be considered for higher density in this instance. It was noted the Planning Commission considered this sketch plan at its April 23, 2014, meeting. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to site plan revisions since the Planning Commission's consideration. Page 5 W Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2014 Mr. Neal noted that tonight's consideration related to a sketch plan review of the proposed new building and at a future meeting, the Council would be asked to consider conduit financing for a major improvement project within the existing building. With regard to affordability, early indications were that the number of affordable units might be decreased by seven to eight. That issue would be addressed once conduit financing was addressed. Mr. Neal explained the terms of conduit financing for a private /non- profit development and advised that the City would not carry the liability of the payment and it would not impact the City's bond rating. Mr. Teague indicated that along with the subdivision request, parking would be addressed and a park dedication fee required. The Council acknowledged that recently, higher- density projects were being submitted due to the price of the land and density needed to appeal to a developer and City. The Council suggested addressing density in the Southdale District on a broader view. Mr. Teague concurred and stated it was staff's intent to present a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission and City Council to address those very issues. Proponent Presentation Della Kolpin, Senior Partner with Mesaba Capital, clarified that Mesaba was purchasing the land from the current owner and developing the 100 -unit assisted living building. The conduit financing was related only to the existing apartment building structure. The land would be replatted to create two separate parcels. Mr. Neal stated of the 263 apartments, 179 apartments qualified for Section 8 housing. However, that property was not under consideration in this site plan review. Ms. Kolpin stated of the 100 units, at least 10%, or 10 units, would be affordable. She stated their goal was to create a campus for continued senior living and there would be joint programs and facilities to optimize and utilize spaces. Alanna Carter, RSP Architects, presented project goals to create a sense of community pride, create a warm and inviting environment, connecting indoor and outdoor spaces, connection to nature, sense of quality and dignity within the building, inclusion of a health center, providing a coffee bistro and library, and maximizing the site to the York Avenue side. The Council referenced the suggestion of the Planning Commission to narrow the setback to York Avenue to 20 feet in an effort to enhance the courtyard between the two buildings. The Council asked whether that additional area had instead been converted into a drive entrance. Ms. Carter explained the need for a safe entry and drop off area away from the drive and benefit of a porte - cochere for senior residents and senior visitors. Ms. Kolpin indicated it was felt the reduced parking would still meet the needs of the residents. Ms. Carter concurred and noted the reduction allowed the creation of additional green space to the south and north of the existing building. She stated they were in conversations with Metro Transit to request a new bus stop location, possibly incorporating the York Avenue bus stop within a building extension. Following discussion of the 7151 York Avenue sketch plan, the Council offered the following comments: creating an at -grade enclosed and heated (four- season) pedestrian connection between the two buildings; support of the welcoming covered porte - cochere; maintaining podium height; inclusion of benches to engage with the streetscape and bus stop; providing all- season landscape interest; locating building mechanicals to not create a visual impact to units within the existing building; providing accessible and useable green space in consideration of a setback variance; integrating building design and materials that related and were complementary with the 12 -story apartment building; and, assuring engagement with the York Avenue streetscape. VIII.C. MASTER REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH PENTAGON REVIVAL, LLC —APPROVED Page 6 AIR DATE: June 25, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: Chad Millner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 7151 York Avenue — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. Survey 1. New building encroaches into existing 30' utility easement along York Avenue. Easement will need to be vacated and rededicated with new dimensions. Some private utility relocation will be required. 2. ALTA mentions scenic and open space easement along rear 10' of property. Easement restrictions should be reviewed as some grading is proposed in this space. Soils 3. Submit record of soils borings and soils investigation. Traffic and Street 4. Landscape and sidewalk along York will require further review. Provide pedestrian improvements across York Avenue at Hazelton. 5. Utility connections propose open cut connection to sanitary and water main on the southbound lane of York Avenue. Provide staging and detour plans that describe and limit road closures. Sanitary and Water Utilities 6. Show all existing utilities for connection purposes and label all utilities "Private." 7. Utility connections propose wet tap and new sanitary manhole in south bound lane of York Avenue. 8. Trench drain at new underground parking is proposed to connect to sanitary sewer system. This system is sensitive to surface inflow. Provide positive drainage away from, and limit tributary drainage area to trench drain. Storm Water Utility 9. Provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations that meet Nine Mile Creek Watershed District rules. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 10. Final plans will require storm water pollution prevention plan consistent with State construction site permit. Other Agency Coordination 11. Coordination with Hennepin County will be needed for new and modified access points to York and proposed road closures. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ({- 12. A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as MDH, MPCA, and MCES. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 (k� //� SB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction - & Associates, Inc. Memorandum DATE: July 1, 2014 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE. 7151 York Avenue Redevelopment Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -57 Background 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the development of a proposed 4 story Senior Housing and Memory Care facility. The facility is proposed to be located in the front lot of the existing 7151 York Avenue, Yorktown Continental senior apartment building. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between Parklawn Avenue and Hazelton Road. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site development includes 100 units with 30 units as Memory Care and 70 units as Assisted Senior Housing. Access to the site will be from the two existing driveways on York Avenue. Currently both driveways provide right - in/right -out access. With the development plan both driveways will remain as right - in/right -out. The northern driveway will be relocated to the north approximately 25 feet. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and Hazelton Road • York Avenue and site driveways • York Avenue and roundabout/rotary access to apartments • York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. A43 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 2 of 12 .Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic- control include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is north /south a 4 -lane divided `B" Minor Arterial Hennepin County roadway. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on York Avenue is 15,000 vehicles per day. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: York Avenue at Hazelton Road- Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching Hazelton Rd — one right, two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Hazelton Rd — one right/through, one through, one left EB Hazelton Rd approaching York Ave — one right, one through/left WB Driveway approaching York Ave — one right/through/left York Avenue at existing site entrances.— Sidestreet Stop control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrances — two through (no access to site) NB York Ave approaching Site Entrances.— one right/through, one through WB Development Driveways approaching York Ave — one right out only York Avenue at Roundabout/Rotary - Sidestreet Yield control - SB York Ave approaching Roundabout/Rotary - two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Roundabout/Rotary — two through, one. left York Avenue at Parklawri Avenue — Sidestreet Stop control SB. York Ave approaching.Parklawn Ave — one right, two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Parklawn Ave — one right/through, two through, one left EB Parklawn Ave approaching York Ave — one right, one through /left WB Driveway approaching York Ave — one right/through/left AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were collected at the area intersections in 2012 and 2013. The counts were factored to the existing 2014 conditions using the Hennepin County State Aid traffic projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period The projected 2014 traffic volumes were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study with the projected 2014 weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 3 of 12 Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will .occur between existing conditions and any given future year due to other. development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic from to the future analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic growth, other specific none development related traffic near the site was determined and included with the overall background traffic. These projects included: 6125 York Avenue - The City recently approved the proposed redevelopment of the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between 66th Street and 69`h Street across from Southdale Shopping Center. The proposed site redevelopment includes 242 multifamily residential units and 11,500 sf of retail uses. The site is planned for completion by 2015 and is included for the 2016 analysis. Byerly's Redevelopment - The City has been working:with Lund Food Holdings for the reconstruction of the existing Byerly's grocery store site, located in the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazeltori Road to include: a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment: building; a six/seven- story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area, and; a six- story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail: space on the first level. This project is currently under construction and will be partially completed in 2014 and assumed to be fully completed for the 2016 analysis. Think Bank Development - The City recently approved the proposed redevelopment of the Szechuan Star site at 3655 Hazelton Road adjacent to the Byerly's site to include an 8,441 sf bank building with a four lane drive thru. The project is planned for construction in 2014 and assumed fully completed for the 2016 and 2030 analysis years. Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion — The proposed plan includes the expansion .of the emergency center ; urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of "a 77,500 sf (gross area), two -story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. This project has been approved by the City Council. It is assumed that it will . be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) — The City recently aTroved the redevelopment of the properties in the southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 65 Street. The proposed site included redevelopment of both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65th Avenue site with a five story 96,500 sf medical office building. However, recently the City was presented a revised site plan changing the use on the site to a 209 unit senior housing and skilled care facility. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. _ ... .. 47 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 4 of 12 Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the mall would have an additional 143,880 sf of.leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space will be occupied and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. Future Restaurant Development — A future restaurant is anticipated in -the northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately -300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will not be developed by 2016 but, will be open and included and included as part of the 2030 background traffic. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip- generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition.. The table shows the Saturday peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table 1- Estimated Additional Background Triv Generation Use Size PM,Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out $l25 York Redevelopment 11,500 sf and 242 units 220 128 92 133 34 99 Byerl 's Redevelopment 73,450 sf and 234 units 411 231 .180 369 174 195 Think Bank Development 8.441sf 206 103 103 102 58 44 Hospital Expansion 77,500 sf 24 10 14 36 21 15 Senior Housing 209 units 40 18 22 27 18 9 Southdale A artnients 232 units 144 94 50 118 24 94 Shopping Center ' 143,880 sf 533 256 277 138 '86 52 Restaurant 8000 sf 79 47 32 87 48 39 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Development Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed 7151 York Avenue project is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the,Instithte of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91" Edition. The table shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. A+� 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 5of12 Table 2 - Estimated Development Site Trip Generation Use Size units ADT PM Peak AM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Assisted Living 30 1 80 40 40 7 3 4 5 2 3 Memory Care 70 168 1 84 1 84 1 13 1 6 1 7 11 7 4 Total New Trips 248 1 124 1 124 1 20 1 9 1 11 1 16 9 7 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition Trip Distribution Site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed, 30% to the north, 40% to the south, 15% to the east and 15% to the west. The generated trips for the proposed 7151 York Avenue development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on York Avenue, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes. Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2016 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development traffic growth to the existing traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated 7151York Avenue development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4 — 7 shows the projected 2016 and 2030 No -Build and Build weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Methodolozy The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. A43 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 6 of 12 Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and /or,great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through - street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. A +1 Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < -10 5 10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >,80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. A +1 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 7 of 12 Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Existin,e Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and 2014 traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are /would be operating at an overall LOS B or better during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Table 4 — Existin,Q (2014) Level of Service B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. ol PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at Hazelton Road B (B) 13 A (B) 6 York Ave at North Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at South Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at North Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersections York Ave at South Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersections York Ave at Parklawn Ave A (C) 6 A (C) 2 B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. ol 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 8 of 12 Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2016 which is the year after the proposed 7151 York Avenue site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 - 7. Table S — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS B or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Overall delays will only increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions. However, with the increase in traffic, some movements in the York Avenue at Parklawn Avenue intersection will be operating in the PM peak hour at an LOS E in 2016 and an LOS F by 2030. By replacing the Stop Signed controlled intersection with Traffic Signal control, the movement levels of service with improve to LOS B by 2030. Table 5 — Forecasted No Build - Level of Service B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build, shows that, assuming the addition of the 7151 traffic and Traffic Signal control at Parklawn Avenue, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS B or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. All movement will be also be operating at LOS C or better in 2016 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Its � 2016 2030 PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh ) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at Hazelton B (B) 14 A (B) - 6 B (C) 15 A (B) 6 Road York Ave at North Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at South Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at North Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersection York Ave at South Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersection York Ave at Parklawn A (E) 6 A (C) 2 B (F) 14 A (C) 2 Ave (Stop Control York Ave at Parklawn A (B) 6 A (A) 3 Ave (Signal Control) B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build, shows that, assuming the addition of the 7151 traffic and Traffic Signal control at Parklawn Avenue, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS B or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. All movement will be also be operating at LOS C or better in 2016 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Its � 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 9 of 12 Tahle 6— Forecasted Ruild Accec.c Alternative I - Level of.4ervice B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Queuinm Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2016 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queues with and without the proposed 7151 site development. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2016 and 2030 conditions, the maximum and average queues do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage on York Avenue. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. Observations at the other none site access intersections showed that, in some cases the maximum queues were exceeded. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In all cases the queues exceed the storage in the left turn lanes by 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less and would clear without blocking the adjacent driveways or intersection and not impacting through traffic. A5/ f 2016 2030 PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at Hazelton B (B) 14 B (B) 12 B (C) 15 A (B) 6 Road York Ave at North Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at South Site A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Driveway York Ave at North Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersection York Ave at South Roundabout A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Intersection York Ave at Parklawn A (E) 6 A (C) 2 B (F) 14 A (C) 2 Ave (Stop Control) York Ave at Parklawn A (B) 6 A (A) 3 Ave (Signal Control) B = Overall LOS, (C) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Queuinm Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2016 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queues with and without the proposed 7151 site development. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2016 and 2030 conditions, the maximum and average queues do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage on York Avenue. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. Observations at the other none site access intersections showed that, in some cases the maximum queues were exceeded. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In all cases the queues exceed the storage in the left turn lanes by 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less and would clear without blocking the adjacent driveways or intersection and not impacting through traffic. A5/ f 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 10 of 12 Parking Demand The parkingdemand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the existing and . anticipated` use forth_ the site and the PSR -4 zoning. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of 285 parking spaces. The current site plan includes 226 spaces. Table 8 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Tahlo R — ParkinQ Roauired ner ON Code Use Size Rate Parking Required I Parking Pr" ovided Existing Senior Housing 264 units 5 exposed and .25 enclosed / unit + 1 /employee + 1 /company vehicle 194 exposed 91 enclosed 162 exposed 64 enclosed Assisted Living 70 units Memory Care 30.units Total Parking 15 Total Parking 285 226 Source: City of Edina — PCU "Zoning District The parking :demand was also analyzed based: on industry standards. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`h Edition. Table 9 below shows the estimated parking generation rate and the anticipated peak parking demand, on atypical weekday. It. shows that the site could be supported with 200.parking spaces. Even if the site was assumed to be:100 %senior housing it would require 216 spaces. This would represent the worst case conditions for the parking assuming the proposed full development of the site. Tnhlo 9 —.Vlo Parkino nornnnd nor 1TF. Use Size Rate Weekday Parking Re uired Senior Housing 264 units .59 /unit 156 Assisted Living 70 units .41 /unit 29 Memory Care 30 units ' .48 /unit 15 Total Parking 200 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking analysis the parking included with the proposed site plan would not meet City Code requirements, however, based on industry standards it is anticipated that adequate parking is being provided for the proposed development plan. A parking variance would therefore be required. ATI 7151 York Ave Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina July 1, 2014 Page 11 of 12 Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed 7151 York development project includes the addition of 100 senior housing and memory care units. The site is anticipated to generate 20 new trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 16 new trips in the weekday AM peak hour. • The Existing (2014) traffic operations analysis shows that all the intersections and driveways on York Avenue are operating at overall LOS B or better for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS B or better for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. • By the 2030 at the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue with or without proposed 7151 site development, Traffic Signal control will be required to maintain movement LOS at acceptable levels. • Intersection traffic operations with the proposed 7151 development site in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS B or better for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, assuming Traffic Signal control at York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur as a result of the proposed full build conditions in 2016 or 2030. • Based on the parking analysis a parking variance would be required. The available parking included with the proposed 7151 development site does not meet the City's Code however, based on industry standards it is anticipated that adequate parking is being provided for the proposed development plan. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Construct the access and pedestrian accommodations as shown in the site plan (Figure 2). 2. Provide a parking variance for 59 parking spaces on the site. This could be accommodated using proof of parking. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed 7151York Avenue development plan. As3 APPIEN]DffX 0 m a 0 V =-LJ N Jti �iP p� c wR G1 EW a CH OWEN A a N D a CU RVE Q 2n RD D W. 62 nd ST. ' ST. DDD r\ D D W. 62 nd ST. j /D O� a SST T . W z a D J w x <q a a o G AR � °o a w / o Too ft 1400 ft 35• q Y a 35. 36. p w Li ° l � � > > o Q F-> W64 th W. S h 64 th ST. [MINNESOTA 6 O>- Q I Ll � W L W Cf Y a a > a W U o OD a a W. z o 65 th ST. a C O ssth ST, w r J Z Z d O Z W C7 U 3 FST, Q 3 W J � Cr� Lake ¢ o CD ST. < z W, 66th a e � a °0 0000 0 i o s Cornelia SOUTHD ALE �� fl a p y o > CIR. 2��MINNESOTA F- ��� LPOONP 68 th a < <D � ROYCA r� ALFOANZ Q ST E0 1 w 0 UPPER B RD. ��� �P° a a �P wl TER• oz DUDS ON 69th (�DRD Y w °� 4 L z � W. 69th ST. U 'E ° ST. DU WA o a z Q Q Q O� 0000°0 0 Q A7 38. BERRY o 44 n- O v J D �� �P G 70th o > w � � C W. D , a ILT <� D LARD =ANDOVER RD. a MAVELL E w~ m J D� SG N � � DAD � D ASP p C BEL VIDERE LA o LU qSt CgRF J _ o DR' HAZELTON RD• 9 r lv1 pRf C w o w TRr �' ASPASIA CIR• 44Rf Y o a J o x CIR. DUNygA' DUN MpRf W. _ °' 72 nd ST. Project } �9 N Nq RD. z O ,-re e¢ 39. o DRS f<<SW M O o o 91ST z Location HIBISCUS Q DRTH DR. _ 0/;O( J a CL Q 4; AVE. M 0 J oo > FONDELL DR. w N w DR• PHLOX 3 GILFORD DR. o cx v z d m w� ow J � 4? 4th HIBISCUS > Y> J a L- CT• o w ST. ST. Lake a ao a U PARKLAWN AVE. AVE. Edina � EDUM a o W, 75th QOPPy S ORE SLN• o eP��( PLAZA r r D 'o LA, N Y G DR. a a a W. 76th ST. v Z = w a x BLVD. , W. Y x s o o x _ \ \\ 77th ST. J Go o w � W > o MINNESOTA DR. IL VIKING Of DR. � o °o 4 14 A.. I Traffic and Parking Study Figure 1 2 e �- 7151 York Avenue - Senior Living Development �.a City of Edina, Minnesota AS ' Project Location Map Ins Filenames Ks \01686- 570\Ccd \£rnin/tsV686 -57 f/0 -02 - Site Pbn l.Opn 1 ��� ��L'•�r_. ,..ra��;. "- Vii. ;�i e�i °949+WQ+D °0 °ibO �_ bd°64di �< 0 • 4 4b °611 f�4 F 1 Traffic i.l — — M •moo +i Y4•QD °A i�r4� GYP 64 ei - • ♦4 ♦000! i � J • 1 Parking Study 7151 York Avenue - Senior Living Development City of Edina, / kq r i On r ! 0(0) 7 (20) U*L a o lol C 29 (24) o a — T On d d b I= 0 (0) . J 1 6 U 62(239) .0 4. azeltori�Rd A 9 t P o(o) t P 0(0) y e a e 4 0(0) .. ... a: 'j, 54(61) e m a•' 7 (20) r ,y p (p) •� illy C 29 (24)A4 '�.. - *. qtr' (SAX t`i -'r•.t , - - 1•... i"' : - 0 (0) =1 d1 9 4 P s 0(c) _ - �'� ' ,F � ",x `"Tra 73 (20) y 3'A f f i c C i rc rt h' r . _ tf 4w 8 (6) a r- 22 (1q N R r 1 (0) + _ - - - .. •` '_ 1e d V 0 (p) LEGEND' rt= Traffic Gild sout�h� o (0) or _ I 47 (93) -P o — m e On of Interest '' +-` 0(0) ~ � F e 24(84) 50 (75) AM (PM) Counts 24(6) 0 (0) d 1 b U 0(0) OR m NO V- � i On ! 0(0) 7 (20) U*L a o lol C 29 (24) o a — T On d d b I= 0 (0) . J 1 6 U 4m o(o) 0(0) °�_ A 9 t P o(o) t P 0(0) y e a e 4 0(0) .. ... a: 'j, 54(61) e m a•' 7 (20) ` r ,y p (p) •� Oi — C 29 (24)A4 p (p) J b b re.0(0) l^I 0 (0) =1 d1 9 4 P 0(c) _ s s s, 73 (20) y 8 (6) a r- 22 (1q N R r 1 (0) + _ .. 1e d V 0 (p) LEGEND' ( I o (0) or _ I 47 (93) -P o — m e Intersection O of Interest '' +-` 0(0) ~ � F e 24(84) 50 (75) AM (PM) Counts Turning Movement Direction 91rt Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 ) 7151 York Avenue — Senior Living Development Peak Hour Turning Movements J(e • <4„ City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Existing Condition V- � 115 V 1 161 1 J 1 v6.. V.1 1,.Y r S ' µ 1' Soufh Site '"Driveway. ' 'Traff Cilrc i rth', all JIM NO 9� r :> Traffic Gi - Sout_h'� t ..1. — _.�,,,z�.,,��_rk, ...saw[•. —r.i . 1 �' �. Yin. 4�'•w' —��`s t= _ _ _ tt t ) 'EQ '. t3* _ t ' �• f -' - - - tt - - - - \ 3 I.. AUG -!OIL L A a I LEGEND Intersection of Interest d, 0 �t 'Parklawn Ave - ► �..: —i .R .,� 3,111 _ , t ,_♦, COUNTY ��97f. , � �__ L.rw� � Traffic • Parking • • ®' 7151 York 1 venue — Senior Living Development Peak Hour Movements Cit� of Edina, Minnesota 2016 No Build Condition ks1 Y�r �' °, 4Fi Y• 8(16) •vs A>� 1 N, :1 • d 1 b b C; o(o) � 0 (0) A 9 4 P p a 63 (242) ? a� • • 0 58 700 S - t 115 V 1 161 1 J 1 v6.. V.1 1,.Y r S ' µ 1' Soufh Site '"Driveway. ' 'Traff Cilrc i rth', all JIM NO 9� r :> Traffic Gi - Sout_h'� t ..1. — _.�,,,z�.,,��_rk, ...saw[•. —r.i . 1 �' �. Yin. 4�'•w' —��`s t= _ _ _ tt t ) 'EQ '. t3* _ t ' �• f -' - - - tt - - - - \ 3 I.. AUG -!OIL L A a I LEGEND Intersection of Interest d, 0 �t 'Parklawn Ave - ► �..: —i .R .,� 3,111 _ , t ,_♦, COUNTY ��97f. , � �__ L.rw� � Traffic • Parking • • ®' 7151 York 1 venue — Senior Living Development Peak Hour Movements Cit� of Edina, Minnesota 2016 No Build Condition ks1 r a— a 24 (BI " 1 [13) d d b 4-' 0 (0) °.J a 9 t P' 0 (0) y G 0(c) �► jrjr = v azelton Rd J 8 d U On 0(0),23 dl 9 t P 59 (66) a ®_ Nor 6(1n � 0(0) b 1 r{,r` ETraff i C irc rt h`, c .'. +A - h` ;'ice. Traffic Orel Sod2Y Y lO OR ;* , r�. r 1 _ 33 (20) b 6 (6) 6(5) d d b U �► 0 (0) LEGEND l 0(0) g a g t P F — F t f 49 (96) Intersection of Interest 0(0) O �� 25 (66) L 50 (75) AM (PM) Counts f �' N Turning Movement Direction ^J�ti Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 �\ ® /y 7151 York Avenue — Senior. Living Development Peak Hour Turning Movements •.,,,.�• City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Build Condition C 38 (14) a 24 (BI d d b � D (0) 0 (0) °.J a 9 t P' 0 (0) y G 0(c) �► 0(0) r 0(0) J 8 d U On 0(0),23 dl 9 t P 59 (66) a '•' _ 6(1n � 0(0) b 33 (20) b 6 (6) 6(5) d d b U �► 0 (0) LEGEND l 0(0) g a g t P F — F t f 49 (96) Intersection of Interest 0(0) O �� 25 (66) L 50 (75) AM (PM) Counts f �' N Turning Movement Direction ^J�ti Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 �\ ® /y 7151 York Avenue — Senior. Living Development Peak Hour Turning Movements •.,,,.�• City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Build Condition on 1 •: `.4 + k 68(263) azelton�Rd� rR... , rz.. -�i F.h• .. F ~.,-- ` ®` North Site Driv ay -� E South Site'Driveway, - _Traffic h." --- +- w. CilrcL rt�® = ., r .. Traffic Crrcf _- ____ 1 - L: it � cy `'` -1.. 1 ee.l OR t` } Y I� i I�•i ..r .�':1 _ _ I wv Y I s 1 t �. y �1�1 "t�]J f i In �e LEGEND - .0 Intersection of Interest �.. _ 'k OR. �r - ParROW Ave r <: Turning Movement Direction IMFO� COUN Traffic and Parking Study Figure 6 ®� Development •- Minnesota 2030 No : on 1 Ai'MI � � � _�� ^+yi' . 1 S yie• 1�� �tl �, 1 L!i azelt�on Rd 1.,:. ^Y ®.. North Site Drive ay On On 5 , 0 (CO _ _ ' °' ® South Site-Driveway . OR r a i t.: h1T`rVffhiC- Circ rtl'. -- f \ , ${ r * t Op `Traffic Gird So hi � r OR UP- t j A On .:5 On r6 0(0) i 16 a t 10 ..7 4 i i 1 y 1 LEGEND or • Intersection of Interest y }� ® "ParRIawn J• ` Av R = Ave f >y i 50(75) AM (PM) Counts L _ ' HENNEPIN � N � Turning Movement Direction L"T" ~ad illy f� 4 a L Traffic and-Parking Study Figure 7 e t4 7151 York Avenue — Senior Living Development Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Build Conditiori J'�P X61 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Connie Mahler <conniemmahler @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:26 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: WHAT IS EDINA DOING? Hello, I live on 72nd and York Avenue South and I can't help but wonder what the City of Edina is trying to do to those of us who have lived here for a very long time. The enormous buildings that are going up are ruining the beauty of this area and it goes without saying adding more and more cars, traffic to York Avenue. We already have enough traffic and these projects that are going up will make it even worse. Also - yet another structure where Borofka's Furniture was. That was a wonderful furniture store and they were forced out so that another apartment can go up. Shame on you. We needed the furniture store much more than yet another apartment building. Does Edina need to be that hungry for tax money? Connie Mahler, a concerned property owner Jackie Hoogenakker From: Nancy <n_cozad @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:48 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7151 York Ave I am concerned about the traffic on York Ave. What is the hurry. They are building 3 large apartment buildings in this area. Is it possible to wait to approve this until the other buildings are complete so we can learn how bad the traffic will be? Jackie Hoogenakker from: Connie Mahler <conniemmahler @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday,.June 29, 2014 7:26 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: WHAT IS EDINA DOING? Hello, I live on 72nd and York Avenue South and I can't help but wonder what the City of.Edina is trying to do to those of us who have lived here for a very long time. The enormous buildings that are going up are ruining the beauty of this area and it goes without.saying adding more and more cars, traffic to York Avenue. We already have enough traffic and these projects that are going up will make it even worse. Also - yet another structure where Borofk'a's Furniture was. That was a wonderful furniture store and they were forced out so that another apartment can go up. Shame on you. We needed the furniture store much more, than yet another apartment building. Does Edina need to be that hungry for tax money? Connie Mahler, a concerned property owner Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jo Stephens <jmstephens71 @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 12:03 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7151 York Ave, Edina I am not very excited about the possibility of another multi - person dwelling. I have only lived in Edina for 2 years, and have seen changes coming too fast. We moved here from a south Minneapolis neighborhood near the light rail, to get away from a area that was adding too many residents to handle the infrastructure of so many more cars, and people for the neighborhood to handle, because of business people and money moguls trying to cash in on the light rail. I think the city needs to think about where the money and budget for providing services for all these new residents, and workers in the area is going to come from. And it better not be from my taxes going up, but the businesses causing and real- estate speculators that are creating the needs. Joanne Stephens 7200 York Ave S #217 Edina Imstephens7l @hotmail.com To Whom It May Concern: I object to the construction of yet another residential facility in the immediate neighborhood of my residence at 7200 York, In addition I propose a moratorium on further multi-family. housing in our'area until the impact of the Wickes project and the nearly 500 new units already under construction next to Byerly's and at the corner, of Xerxes and 69th Street can be assessed. My primary concern is the addition of hundreds of new cars on the streets in our area, where it is already difficult to get out onto York Avenue at certain times of the day and certain days of the week. This is a serious safety issue. I am also concerned about my property values. If increased traffic congestion makes car travel in the greater Southdale area more miserable than it already is, I believe it will reduce the value'of my property. Thank you for considering my views on the matter. Sara Amaden 7200 York South #304 Edina, MN 55435 952- 797 -2281 i To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: August 4, 2014 Subject: Sketch Plan Review —4121 West 501h Street. Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. iI ` ��roRPORA�G� 1000 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. Action ❑ Discussion Information ❑ Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two - story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages A I -A3 of the Planning Commission Memo.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A15 in the Planning Commission memo.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRDA and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRDA, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. Planning Commission Consideration: On June 25, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) Concerns /issues raised by the Planning Commission included: ➢ Lack of parking. ➢ Introducing office use in the neighborhood could change the character of the area. ➢ Access is off a residential street. ➢ What is the public benefit in using a PUD to allow the use? ➢ Concern over the previous use of the space as an office. In response to the concerns of the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a new narrative for the project. (See attached date stamped July 29, 2014.) ATTACHMENTS: Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting Revised Narrative date stamped July 29, 2014 Planning Commission Memo, June 25, 2014 Page 2 Co issioner Schroeder said at this time /ae esn't have an issue wit he mix of uses or density, owever, does have a concern thre residents of the b i ding will cut through the neighborh d to go north /west. Schroednted out a reside ial neighborhood and school are located to a north and west of the site and speci attention needs to be paid to the potential for c through traffic. Con, Schroeder aid he also has a concern with traffic maneuvering an raffic movements both Fr ce and West 72nd Street. Schroeder acknowledged whi le the p ject has much abo it he believes traffic will be the major drawback. Schroeder said h was suppor co ecting the open space to the north with the project as a playground /pub ' space; , believes that area may be "open space" to filter storm water for the neighbo ood. uding, Schroder said the architecture is good, but the access points are difficult. Chair Staunton stated he echo's co en from other Commissioners, adding he likes the mixed use aspect of the project b believes ere are some challenges with circulation; acknowledging that the mixed se concept do spread out the traffic. Continuing, Staunton said he was not alarmed by a height; however, ere was a reason the Comprehensive Plan deliberately guided this ar a for no more than four ries. Staunton acknowledged at the time the Comprehensive PI was revised the City was ope ting on the premise that four stories west of France Ave a was best. Staunton said in this ins nce the Commission and Council need to figure ou if this is still the case and what this area o Edina can handle. Concluding, Staunton said s not opposed to the redevelopment plan; it s promise; however, the City needs to be re this type of density can be handled in this area. Chair'Kaunton thanked Mr. Dovolis and Ms. Boisclair for their prese tion, adding he looks fo rd to the formal application. B. Sketch Plan — 4121 West 50th Street Planner Presentation Planner Teague said the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building., The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD -4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development Page 9 of 13 to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. Planner Teague concluded that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. Appearing for the Applicant Matt Duffy Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if the "uses" are already present on the site. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He said the request would formalize the current use of the building. Commissioner Carr questioned if soundproofing would occur to mitigate noise from the office use. Planner Teague responded he is not certain how that would be handled; pointing out the use already exists. Applicant Presentation Mr. Duffy explained that Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and building, adding the current zoning of the site is PRD -4, Planned Residence District -4. Duffy further explained the history of the site and that the owner would like to continue to use the second floor as his office space. He added all units are insulated for noise and the use of the 2 ^d floor as office space would only occur during the daytime hours. Duffy said there would be no retail customer traffic, reiterating the office use would operate during regular office hours, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. Concluding, Duffy said in 2009 the building was remodeled to accommodate eight residential units with a lower level unit remodeled to accommodate handicap accessibility. Concluding, Duffy noted the property owner resides in the neighborhood and would enjoy having his family and friends stop by for a visit while he is at work in the building. Discussion Commissioner Scherer questioned the number of units. Mr. Duffy responded he believes there will be six units. Chair Staunton said he has a concern that the requested change in use introduces an element in the area that's not typical, adding parking could also present an issue. Staunton acknowledged that the requested change in use makes him a little nervous; pointing out it could be considered Page 10 of 13 "commercial creep ". Staunton suggested engaging the neighborhood to discuss the proposed use. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that this location isn't commercial and the proposed change in use in his opinion isn't compatible with the nature of Indianola. Commissioner Forrest questioned the applicant on the timing of this request pointing out the renovations occurred a number of years ago. Mr. Duffy responded that the scale of the property owners business is changing and he would like to formally accommodate this change. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged she resides in the neighborhood and did inquire about the use of the residential building as office. Continuing, Forrest pointed out the permitted use of this site is only residential- permitting apartment units; not office, and asked Mr. Duffy how many residents now reside in the building. Mr. Duffy responded he is unaware of the current tenant count; but did acknowledge the nature of the residential tenants is mostly transient. Concluding, Forrest said she is concerned that presently there is a violation of use occurring on this site, adding her main concerns are that at present the building appears deserted and rezoning the site to PUD would be an extension of commercial creep. Forrest stated she would keep an open mind if the rezoning moves forward; however, reiterated she doesn't like the introduction of commercial into this area. Chair Staunton explained to the applicant in a request to rezone a site to PUD there needs to be a community benefit. Staunton said when a formal application is made the applicant needs to address what the benefit to the community would be if this property was rezoned from residential to PUD. Staunton thanked the team for their presentation. C. Liehtinl,Ordinance Staff Comments Planner Teague submitte draft copy of an ordinance amendment regardin ghting and asked the Commission for their co ments. Teague further. asked the Commis . n to note the attached candle requirements frrm other cities. Discussion /Comments A discussion ensued with Commissioners a nowledgin that the City of Edina appears to allow much brighter lighting in comparison with oth cit All agreed that it was time to craft an ordinance that aligns more close/standar and in neighboring cities. Concluding, the C ommission staneeds be done on the proposed ordinance that would include definitions, ligndards an more comprehensive look at all lighting issues. The discussion co ommissioners cknowledging that while the proposed ordinance may not as comprehensive as the City ne s the current language is an excellent start providin e City with standards while a more comp hensive discussion ensues on lighting. It was rther discussed that during this period that the pr sented Ordinance should Page 11 of 13 cww� n 1 (JArrN��'� - V��JtiSt'\ No 120120ug - 4121 West 50th Street Dromoland, LLC's Proposed Planned United Development Planned Unit Development — Proposed Use Description Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and the building located at 4121 West 50`h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (the "Property "). Dromoland, LLC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of EGO Holdings, LLC, a single member LLC owned solely by Edgar Gerald (Jerry) O'Brien. The Property is currently zoned PRD -4. Historically, the building's primary use since Dromoland has owned it has been as a multi -unit residential building with limited professional space on the second floor used as the building's management and leasing office. However, Mr. O'Brien would now like to use the existing second floor space and obtain approval for the second floor use, as may be necessary, for institutional (non - retail) investment management business purposes, resulting in the Planned Unit Development ( "PUD ") proposal that follows. Dromoland's proposed PUD would seek rezoning the Property to a mixed use classification. Such a change would accommodate both the building's current primary use as a multi -unit residential building as well as allow for the use of the existing second floor office space to house a proposed institutional investment business. The proposed PUD would also allow for the repurposing, as necessary, of a portion of the building's second floor that currently includes the building's management/leasing office, a large gathering area, and two fully equipped and rentable residential units. The repurposing would take advantage of the existing configuration and, with minor renovations, allow for the entire second floor space to be used for institutional investing purposes to the extent the entire second floor is needed for such purposes. If not, the two residential units would remain for lease to individual residential tenants. To the extent expansion is someday required, the modest renovations would include converting the two existing residential units into office space by removing non -load bearing walls, and creating walkways between what are now separate units. Such changes would not include any modifications to the exterior of the building. The total square footage of the proposed complete second floor office space would be approximately 4,250 square feet. Unlike many financial service and investment brokerage offices, Dromoland's proposed use will have no retail customer traffic although it will maintain normal business hours of approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday- Friday, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. The work hours will co -exist well with the residential uses of the building, because the tenants typically would be gone during the workday when employees would be working in the office. Dromoland anticipates a maximum of 20 employees in the event a full expansion of the second floor is completed for business uses. As for parking, the Property currently can accommodate approximately 19 -20 parking spaces (9 interior and 10 -11 exterior). If further parking is required, Dromoland is in the process of contacting several adjacent property owners for future parking options, including: 1) the US Bank and Lunds Holding Company (primary tenant in US Bank Building across the street from the Property) about leasing spaces; 2) Minister of the Edina Covenant Church across Indianola Avenue about leasing parking spaces; and 3) Hooten Dry Cleaning about leasing parking spaces behind the vacant building. The Building In 2009; Dromoland remodeled both the exterior and interior of the 1950s Georgian multifamily building. The exterior facade was enhanced with the addition of a front porch including white columns and a functional balcony on the second floor. Inside, the. building was completely renovated into eight residential units. Most of the units have two bedrooms and 1 % bathrooms. The lower level unit. recently was renovated into a handicap accessible unit, including a walk -out patio. Since the renovation, the buildmg has been used as temporary housing for Edina residents who typically are remodeling theirpermanent homes; executive transfers searching for homes, or, in one recent situation, by a family renovating their home to accommodate accessibility needs of their son who suffered a debilitating sports injury. During the extensive 2009 renovation of the Property, great .care was taken to promote energy eff cieincy, accessibility and, reuse and 'repurposing of the existing building. The remodel included energy efficient appliances and windows, LED lighting, and abundant natural. light that was maximized by the building's enhanced design. In fact, the design work was so meticulous that it won the 2010 ROMA design award from the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (details at: http:// www. stonehearthremodeling .com /awards.html). Community. Benefits Allowing the proposed PUD and use has many community and neighborhood benefits, including: ® Maintaining the vacant residential lot. behind the Property as green space. The lot is zoned for a single - family residence, although Mr. O'Brien has converted the lot into a T- ball field for use by the building's tenants and; neighborhood children (by invitation) and as a visual neighborhood amenity. The field was recently resurfaced with new infield dirt and re- seeded for use this summer. For the foreseeable future, Mr. O'Brien plans to keep the T -ball field as is; however, Mr..O'Brien is willing to consider occasional use of the T- ball field by the City as a staging area for various nearby municipal construction projects. a Using :the second floor as a community gathering space, hosting neighborhood meet and greets for local and national politicians, civic groups, and local hobby clubs (e.g. scrapbooking and book groups). Mr. O'Brien foresees this type of use continuing. ® The Property provides short-term housing for Edina residents remodeling their homes. This use enables residents to stay in the neighborhood, manage the remodeling more effectively, and provides an opportunity for their children to ride school buses to their schools rather than their parents having to ,drive them by car. The proposed PUD continues to provide this valuable neighborhood service for Edina residents. K • Repurposing an existing space within the recently remodeled building. The second floor space is rarely used by tenants and the second floor residential units are not leased as often, primarily because prospective tenants prefer fewer stairs. • Before Mr. O'Brien purchased the building, the previous owner had plans to demolish the building and put a new building with many more units and a much more intense use for the area. When Mr. O'Brien purchased the building, he made a concerted effort to remodel the existing building, maintaining its current dimensions to keep the neighborhood character intact. The proposed use would improve the economics of maintaining the existing building rather than tearing it down. • Buffering the residential neighbors on Indianola Avenue from the more intensive commercial uses on West 50th Street, including the US Bank Building, while providing a sensible and non - intrusive transition use between the 501h and France commercial district and the South Harriet Park residential neighborhood. • Allowing Mr. O'Brien's proposed use will enable Mr. O'Brien to walk or bike to work instead of driving to and from another location. Neighborhood Discussions about Proposed Use In preparation for the anticipated PUD rezoning request, Mr. O'Brien has spoken to several neighbors about his proposed use. To date, Mr. O'Brien's proposed use has been well- received and Mr. O'Brien is not aware of any negative comments. MMB: 4820 - 0388 -2524, v. 1 3 CITY OF MEMO City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 wgil��t� Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com t4 U) . • ,,� ,moo i� Date: June 25, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 4121 West 50th Street The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages Al -A3.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A15.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD-4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO w91��,1� o e�''�� v � �O However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. The following is a compliance table that demonstrates how the proposed building would comply with the PRD -4 standards and show residential densities in Edina. The proposed office use is currently not allowed in the existing PRD -4 Zoning District. Compliance Table * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adiacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Proposed (PRD -4) Front — 50th Street 35 feet 30 feet* Front — Indianola 35 feet 25 feet* Side — south 35 feet 40+ feet Side — east 35 feet 20 feet* Building Height 4 stories or 2 stories 48 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 21% Density — Comp. Plan 12 -30 units max 12 units /acre Parking Stalls 1.25 enclosed space + .75 9 enclosed = 11 surface ** (Commercial District) surface spaces per unit 1/200 s.f. for office 25 surface +8 enclosed required * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adiacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 4907 4916 ;�q 3948 39a4� I 395 4917 1 _'•30 �318q� _,I 16 • -s49 f12 STREET .'JEST - 4909 4470 4921 o 411 ..4924 4925 ?24 24 '24 - —. -4930; �4 # .i4 3915 4936 -- 4915 402 - - - 1 i -- 24'� 4917 019 5t- OX ,5003 46-0 5 i :5007 ;500 4832 :21 -4100 ;3930 - 3902 _. -50TH- STREET ,JEST EST lit .24 24 3911 -` z. I LU 4201 I' 15016 '�!� 5017 �. .. 3443 24 - — '50?0 { o r i3945 ,4 I .? 50!21 I: i �pZq i ;� � 4 I r�ili5 5000 4050 15034 x]36 ��5032.- :426 i --. +`•�_� __ 5013 -� i '50 29 -.5026 f . T _ __ 15036 ,5ts15 .. 15040 1 SO I ;'�— '-• 4 1 `;. ' 15450 15017 7 5041 i 5+ 37 5035 Sim ;5103 VEST 5105 ,5104 x, — { i ZE 5101 ;510Q { 5]d1 1 5109 I 5105 --04 -1 �� f 15113 15112: s w ! Parcel I Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N ID: 1 A -T -B: Print Date: 6/20/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel i Tax Address: Total: Property ! Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: 1 Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel ; Sale - - Area: Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! a Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home - stead: Parcel Area: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: ka, -,i - �W W ., �K - -- - - -- – — 0 6 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Legend LDR- Law Dangly Reldentlal OR - OOlce ReidertIM rde- Regiomi Medea] LDAR- Low Denelq AOanred ReldedMl 0- office OsP - Open space and Parke MDR. Me0lumDenslry Resieeralal - MXC.MMad Use CenMr ®P!P- Pubaclsenc -Public - FOR - High Density Residential - CAC - Com-ft Activity Center IAH- LkdteeAccess Hig" - NC- Neighboftod C—clel - I- Induea7al e` g � is 4z� st t {r 3 � .1 f � E t 1 N 4 a il'tC . dd o. n o a► M E a � �.. a utllrber L■ t ^� W Z I � 7 - m 5 Height Limits .! , 2 Stories: 24' °J Stories: 36 e 3 z 4 Stories: 48' 0 6 Stories: 72' Standard Height El NC i 0 Podium Height`1, u, r f9s~ LM e ` o City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS e l 154th It seih It r i "NC i w_s$1- -- se Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design !13 0 W Oath !t Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Northeast Quadrant FgLre4.6A �Y 0 0.5 Miles 4 -53 APPLI T �14R(I+T) L)-E 4121 West 50th Street Dromoland, LLC's Proposed Planned United Development Planned Unit Development — Proposed Use Description Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and the building located at 4121 West 501' Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (the "Property "). Dromoland, LLC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of EGO Holdings, LLC, a single member LLC owned solely by Edgar Gerald (Jerry) O'Brien. The Property is currently zoned PRD -4. Historically, the building's primary use since Dromoland has owned it has been as a multi -unit residential building with limited professional space on the second floor used as the building's management and leasing office. However, Mr. O'Brien would now like to use the existing second floor space and obtain approval for the second floor use, as may be necessary, for institutional (non - retail) investment management business purposes, resulting in the Planned Unit Development ( "PUD ") proposal that follows. Dromoland's proposed PUD would seek rezoning the Property to a mixed use classification. Such a change would accommodate .both the building's current primary use as a multi -unit residential building as well as allow for the use of the existing second floor office space to house a proposed institutional investment business. The proposed PUD would also allow for the repurposing, as necessary, of a portion of the building's second floor that currently includes the building's management/leasing office, a large gathering area, and two fully equipped and rentable residential units. The repurposing would take advantage of the existing configuration and, with minor renovations, allow for the entire second floor space to be used for institutional investing purposes to the extent the entire second floor is needed for such purposes. If not, the two residential units would remain for lease to individual residential tenants. To the extent expansion is someday required, the modest renovations would include converting the two existing residential units into office space by removing non -load bearing walls, and creating walkways between what are now separate units. Such changes would not include any modifications to the exterior of the building. The total square footage of the proposed complete second floor office space would be approximately 4,250 square feet. Unlike many financial service and investment brokerage offices, Dromoland's proposed use will have no retail customer traffic although it will maintain normal business hours of approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday- Friday, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. The work hours will co -exist well with the residential uses of the building, because the tenants typically would be gone during the workday when employees would be working in the office. Dromoland anticipates a maximum of 20 employees in the event a full expansion of the second floor is completed for business uses. As for parking, the Property currently can accommodate approximately 19 -20 parking spaces (9 interior and 10 -11 exterior). If further parking is required, Dromoland is willing to explore several options, including, but not limited to, approaching the neighboring church to lease parking spaces in the church's lot as well as looking into similar arrangements with other commercial neighbors. 1 As The Building In 2009, Dromoland remodeled both the exterior and interior of the 1950s Georgian multifamily building. The exterior fagade was enhanced with the addition of a front porch including white columns and a functional balcony on the second floor. Inside, the building was completely renovated into eight residential units. Most of the units have two bedrooms and 1 '/Z bathrooms. The lower level unit recently was renovated into a handicap accessible unit, including a walk -out patio. Since the renovation, the building has been used as temporary housing for Edina residents who typically are remodeling their permanent homes, executive transfers searching for homes, or, in one recent situation, by a family renovating their home to accommodate accessibility needs of their son who suffered a debilitating sports injury. During the extensive 2009 renovation of the Property, great care was taken to promote energy efficiency, accessibility and reuse and repurposing of the existing building. The remodel included energy efficient appliances and windows, LED lighting, and abundant natural light that was maximized by the building's enhanced design. In fact, the design work was so meticulous that it won the 2010 ROMA design award from the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (details at: htW: / /www.stonehearthremodeling .com/awards.html). Civic Involvement As long -time residents of Edina, Mr. O'Brien and his wife, Lisa, are actively involved in the community. From sponsoring Edina events and projects to hosting numerous neighborhood events for residents, the O'Briens are inextricably intertwined in the community. In addition to the O'Briens' city involvement, the O'Briens host many community gatherings where neighbors have a chance to meet and interact with local, state and national policymakers. Similarly, the O'Briens are long -time financial supporters, board members and volunteers with Greater Minneapolis United Way; Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery; Edina Public School District; Minnesota Community Foundation & St. Paul Foundation; University of Minnesota Weisman Museum of Art; and are dependable contributors to the Edina Community Foundation and Edina Ed Fund. Mr. O'Brien's Background Mr. O'Brien has lived in the Twin Cities for more than 20 years and in Edina since 1995. Mr. O'Brien was recruited to the area by Cargill where he worked in its financial businesses for 17 years. Mr. O'Brien left Cargill with the goal of creating a new company, in partnership with Warren Staley (retired CEO and Chair of Cargill and an Edina homeowner for decades). Since leaving Cargill, Mr. O'Brien has managed investments for himself and Mr. Staley, but was limited by a non - compete from managing third party capital. Mr. O'Brien has fully satisfied the terms of his non - compete and now has the opportunity to expand his investment activity to include managing investments for select institutional investors (e.g. college endowment, state retirement plans, family offices). 2 Neighborhood Amenity Dromoland also owns the vacant lot adjacent and behind the Property. The vacant lot is currently used as neighborhood green space. The lot is zoned for a single - family residence, although Dromoland has converted the lot into a T -ball field for use by the building's tenants and neighborhood children (by invitation) and as a neighborhood amenity. The field was recently resurfaced with new infield dirt and re- seeded for use this summer. For the foreseeable future, Dromoland plans to keep the T -ball field as is. Neighborhood Discussions about Proposed Use In preparation for the anticipated PUD rezoning request, Mr. O'Brien has spoken to several neighbors about his proposed use. To date, Mr. O'Brien's proposed use has been well- received and Mr. O'Brien is not aware of any negative comments. Personal Reasons for Proposed Use On a personal level, Mr. O'Brien wants to use this existing space because he lives in the neighborhood, his mother -in -law resides in the condominiums next door to the Property (the Henley), and he enjoys having his family and friends pop -in to visit while walking around 50` & France. MMB: 4811 -3004 -6235, v. 1 3 Al .firing ROMA award - winning design modeled in classical style, Edenderry of Edina features high executive apartment units that accentuate kable" lifestyle while allowing short driving dis- ks within the entire Minneapolis /St. Paul region. Aed near Edina's 50th and France entertainment ict, this exclusive living opportunity will make feel right at home and part of the community. a "" EDENDERRY OF EDINA The Edenderry of Edina uniquely offers premium, well- appointed apartments that are within walking distance to shops, restaurants, grocery and enter- tainment establishments. or i9d V The timeless ideals of order, symmetry and grace are reflected throughout the propert Every Edenderry of Edina unit enjoys: Located in the heart of historic Edina, you customize - • 2 Bedroom, 1' /z Bath unique • Award Winning Design 4 Minnesota, living in comfort and luxury has never been more accessible. include: • In -unit Laundry • Abundance of Natural Light �1 ' ' • ±1,000 square feet • Spacious Grounds s Short Term, c7) _ 2 Kids or Dog Friendly • Granite Countertops • Walking Distance to Shops % Ordinatio Symmetria Eurythmia Outdoor Hardwood Floors •Edina School District Order Symmetry Grace Storage • LG Appliances • Heated Parking Option hil,�I:.,1,ah�h�h;h,l ; ,,1,11,E =., :,il,rhll �l ,h;i�;l r hihihi) al_ �I_► hrh�l, �h�1 :"ihlh�hil�h�l,al,ih�l^il =ii fi;il�! i!�!�J 3 Ju l= Ir�i;il"t? ! J! 0 -:;I iJ -141Al 71 INTERIOR PHOTOS OF EDENDERRY OF EDINA, UNIT 300 1 —UM Unit 300 �y i il_II - - �1, - Unit 300 Personal Office ni t3 00 Dining AO o— �J J lL r•0/ FLOOR PLAN ELEVATfONS SHOWN ARE REFERENCED TO A BENCHMARK AS NOTED ON SHEET 1 OF 2 L.C.E. — DENOTES. 1MITED COMMON ELEMENT C.E. - DENOTES COMMON ELEMENT (Lt K!+• 4 [sc rcr.�s N �RrµN n �[ SONS 0. FM CIC NUMBER 1935 .A CONDOMINIUM THE EDENDERRY OF EDINA CIC PLAT UNrf 100 ww am o. � 6YN adwlp.M.1 BASEMENT UNIT 201 - I�: uxt 2d2 na tuwtn� a nw ntr+w r mrmtawm.waa �+ � uvo un.,u..m� nw. ac) C n u,Qr 04 9 maclldw.Or.PHd � �. aulaf1Cd10w6f] 1 ,J FIRST FLOOR wtta zruw ua.r! a (Mt unt q __wau mww tuwr e 1� RlK, q Rp N.vllF dYM 0 • nR R9LL a1 Imw .unm Haut c L RWlO weft-.) lwva r —0 Ry I q GARACH n. un1n a N1� wn maio-q.. aABAGG UBIT 7. OARACr E- UNN' 11 rwy nee...e. GARAGE :�1L 6 . a-. i J.�.•cym wn, wn i +•,r �r�rxLS..nl .Rrmner 441p.ptnt.pl) I � i ' 1 II I SECOND FLOOR DETAIL A DETAIL B (NO SCALE) (NO SCALE) .-. wrt c..•t+aaarlre w,t�� w� 1 •..L L, ilw•<uaol r vcin� � ! t to1K0 RMA! lIC6r11 � I �"Yd X77' ( iA• UNIT 102" mUL/ I l! !I • P• Rdf,l1 .dyp Otv.ri.vNp. ' a �'—lYd 6ttltri tfOb ; w��r � ,uwrl . eeuw Cu� l WRC Owbt gn,rR t IP+A LQ(id) WOO ep•O, eIrY!• —� � �� 9r•AR •a0Y � • Daclarant may subdivide, Gambino o[ eon"rl unit - lnlo additional units, common elemtint- ar 11mitod COmman elements. e'll Carlson sneer a eF x s1aFls UNIT Am • r I OMT 101�r Lj !!— ".a• BASEMENT UNIT 201 - I�: uxt 2d2 na tuwtn� a nw ntr+w r mrmtawm.waa �+ � uvo un.,u..m� nw. ac) C n u,Qr 04 9 maclldw.Or.PHd � �. aulaf1Cd10w6f] 1 ,J FIRST FLOOR wtta zruw ua.r! a (Mt unt q __wau mww tuwr e 1� RlK, q Rp N.vllF dYM 0 • nR R9LL a1 Imw .unm Haut c L RWlO weft-.) lwva r —0 Ry I q GARACH n. un1n a N1� wn maio-q.. aABAGG UBIT 7. OARACr E- UNN' 11 rwy nee...e. GARAGE :�1L 6 . a-. i J.�.•cym wn, wn i +•,r �r�rxLS..nl .Rrmner 441p.ptnt.pl) I � i ' 1 II I SECOND FLOOR DETAIL A DETAIL B (NO SCALE) (NO SCALE) .-. wrt c..•t+aaarlre w,t�� w� 1 •..L L, ilw•<uaol r vcin� � ! t to1K0 RMA! lIC6r11 � I �"Yd X77' ( iA• UNIT 102" mUL/ I l! !I • P• Rdf,l1 .dyp Otv.ri.vNp. ' a �'—lYd 6ttltri tfOb ; w��r � ,uwrl . eeuw Cu� l WRC Owbt gn,rR t IP+A LQ(id) WOO ep•O, eIrY!• —� � �� 9r•AR •a0Y � • Daclarant may subdivide, Gambino o[ eon"rl unit - lnlo additional units, common elemtint- ar 11mitod COmman elements. e'll Carlson sneer a eF x s1aFls P r r +0" SITE PLAN b - v_w76 91T 11r OY.10 1TOM MO ARDIT. CAPPED w0t w8 4=1 • - OOw111 TTMw GM COMM _ OVOTf9 OO.STY10 cQ,atTE bW6A= moor+ _ COMM Corm W rt. Q= ALTABrY6 WALL - CQWQIT WdO,t Lac - tvt/2s Uwvt mrMQT nnmrr CL - Q70M Cmum amaxT OFFICIAL F j l.E CIC NUMBER 1935 A CONDOMINIUM THE EDENDERRY OF` EDINA CIC PLAT n1' c S i 5 v i H S i R A°. Er , R A it _ — -- 1 ecnQOVmt ��Aa— •�ia�L Ny commiufM Cyvn AA:Ky w-mm Hs wb omLtA wL w Ih. tlC P,A A.. bw r.M. ma, eppo..d bb ,AMA a.i of CfldlA/oR .:4WD YMbm P. a.- NrM,,Y// k cfi� YY w.M z I �j Carlson ft01ESS1011AE 199vicE9 �t .J LJ .1 I �C W A .L. t•_ J1 Y0 t d n WOWAM Tp lwTp.TTTOMAMT AT SOYOWiT WAMM Of MWT COM 011tEt1 Af0 §MMUL A. Ammm. a -m - 01/.1. rw Omm IBM TO iviP irii:n JV�.i:J I jI 1 Qmmm MWOMMi AE To WMA CW *r fQ=ALOI YBFM 1 9m1�1� a1 uwt Nc Cw eW i 1T efA ma w tl WWifj1 Yb.11 .A m.AVd �N =Alr IM Aar eoaT Na Cb i Tinat vN0 COWL ne taix fu0i %camammtM. TIEiO�OS[ai1Y jX[YaY� Y,�w trcrad�,Y�tlOme lh• .•Yom) a0 ,b, .1 bt 1 ma m M t.t A. W_,. -SMKNS IS, AMMOM 70 YOYICAPWA' aq 6.1 ,hk tJU qaA I.V axumttlj mP&a a i fmoelAv, r.A.vM OT Yv..bl. SWW_ 9.e . N.1�W T aSial._A Ybn.Kls oW OVL f .rl . NT YewM W B.bY YYY • ham' doT .r �•V{Ah�YR . 10� "" ALL r tO.Mmt• W.M. fbmlu 1Waf =mar Y.iatmotA ran w Aje j_&% Tr rr va, bt —t .a. u.ww.rwYM r.w. ,u uu. 38n aer a SL9r1A yLc - 2d.Ta9 h mw.. ft a w& ,sw s.,..y . w.mu• uw... rb. AB1s�, ..4�Aadlennu JlrSti,Fra11R.�� ,letaT �,. Q[pr . rIh1M.Db W CbMnb2aA GeW. � l Tbu, 1 xiytboo, pmwmt 1. Yhrswb W.bbA S.etge arW2 -,OUP. mormyewy mai m �Y�Y,.0 �mub.ol sat wtir'se°OYa�W and act �u.'�ie. mom. a Yw S,Yt. M'wm,mtu Bmiu IIMT i� a•ra ,A�IY!®rlO..�.. mt2 dlm 11{rriW" M-b. 00. rM 0017 A3 Yim.gb Lfe.tl. !W bM 1 .Comity or 11a 4 'tom Pp Pba lvh.m .e. aWm.li6Ob brow m. 00 AMON" Of UIMMOftf. . . 90AA >v Wlm a • 3MY . W i Mabmd po_, Mbnewb tk.,w Me. 710a7� ��Aa— •�ia�L Ny commiufM Cyvn AA:Ky w-mm Hs wb omLtA wL w Ih. tlC P,A A.. bw r.M. ma, eppo..d bb ,AMA a.i of CfldlA/oR .:4WD YMbm P. a.- NrM,,Y// k cfi� YY w.M �j Carlson ft01ESS1011AE 199vicE9 ,omw� vmomu amirl-I SvA x a m Aj v ?iced 0 0 :-7-166 BASEMENT //._i/ ----------------------------- . . . . . . . . . . ..... ------------- . ...... VIM Z-01 WOW M f t Nr AS ............... ..... . . ........ . ........ ------ ------- -- - - - - - --------------- - - - - - --- 44 - - ------- - --- il -- INN a a rw- r, to. -- Vw if- rall, 4 Aol-j amew 6XVIAX-01-t-Ift.1% NO R ii FLOOR 413 vii. w mk ;-W-Mo MUM 4,Y), omic"W'. MBER .. 1935 NDOMINIUM JERRY OF EDINA JQ PLAT -�'wm wwwf ik -90 0-11 "mum-ti SO NA m 0. vlfx f cl. m :;v- ----------- sr R:R E WOM OAA114 W—W.Arl --cea-mo low ROM MAO owr M-k -AWAA vkt DETAIL, A -pivo hl'� pw r sxa DETA W-10MCM&A re DETAIL, A -pivo hl'� pw r sxa DETA W-10MCM&A k OfloAL SITE PLAN "IC UMB E 1935 9 w = SET IA* By .10 Am mOfRf3lofT- a "atlas au:a x' w CREfE �[�"�' /��j �j w „• frE7fOM ro= Nm lNOMIman THE EDE • DE . D NI GEf.aM EKi +lklti.Ctldll 'sMAA.0 LAIC; rtassx�txr .. aEN.OiES E7G &11X0 L11 if. ataG°+<f�rt�:flB.tTA4L ti Ct�IfaNT EfENFJIT ». ClW= 1ESff1E0 .CGUJM ELLt"r C.E. iii u=. C.Ox im UVAMT tAt. r •r t°ti +Ie 7 1 .y! (+. tai E �f° .f 140 f70 Y:r L, , i. a e Lrs L is € ,i t_ +«.nr sw..rw y.... ......tlC/J[XlF.RS3-JIIY �fI.YlI:Y.Gt� fry � k ' 30000 1 K `r r ,4 1! a ti t• w s 7'^tiJf xt 1d i ;ort t^r '.f � - f'lgce.l �7'[Kt/ Y 1L1; v. Y:r L, , i. a e Lrs L is € ,i t_ +«.nr sw..rw y.... ......tlC/J[XlF.RS3-JIIY �fI.YlI:Y.Gt� fry � of LIU •f \JV�q• CityofEdina.com City Standard Proposed (PRD -4) Front — 50th Street 35 feet 30 feet* Front — Indianola 35 feet 25 feet* Side — south 35 feet 40+ feet Side — east 35 feet 20 feet* Building Height 4 stories or 2 stories 48 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 21% Density — Comp. Plan 12 -30 units max 12 units /acre Parking Stalls 1.25 enclosed space + .75 9 enclosed = 11 surface ** (Commercial District) surface spaces per unit 1/200 s.f. for office 25 surface +8 enclosed required * Existing Conditions of LIU •f \JV�q• CityofEdina.com The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. CityofEdina.com Issues to consider: ➢ Would a small area plan be necessary? ➢ Would the uses be compatible in the area? CityofEdina.com To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Sketch Plan Review -4121 West 50th Street. Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. NO `1 9910 AK/ 1x06 Agenda Item #: VIII-C. Action ❑ Discussion x❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two - story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages A I -A3 of the Planning Commission Memo.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A IS in the Planning Commission memo.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRDA and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. Planning Commission Consideration: On June 25, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) Concerns /issues raised by the Planning Commission included: 9 Lack of parking. Introducing office use in the neighborhood could change the character. Access is off a residential street. 9 What is the public benefit in using a PUD to allow the use? 9 Concern over the previous use of the space as an office. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, June 25, 2014 Page 2 B. Sketch (Plan — 4121 West 50th Street Planner presentation Planner Teague said the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD -4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: Rezoning from PRD-4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. Planner Teague concluded that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. Appearing for the applicant Matt Duffy Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if the "uses" are already present on the site. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He said the request would formalize the current use of the building. Commissioner Carr questioned if soundproofing would occur to mitigate noise from the office use. Planner Teague responded he is not certain how that would be handled; pointing out the use already exists. Page 9 of 11 A®®licant (Presentation Mr. Duffy explained that Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and building, adding the current zoning of the site is PRDA Planned Residence District -4. Duffy further explained the history of the site and that the owner would like to continue to use the second floor as his office space. He added all units are insulated for noise and the use of the 2nd floor as office space would only occur during the daytime hours. Duffy said there would be no retail customer traffic, reiterating the office use would operate during regular office hours, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. Concluding, Duffy said in 2009 the building was remodeled to accommodate eight residential units with a lower level unit remodeled to accommodate handicap accessibility. Concluding, Duffy noted the property owner resides in the neighborhood and would enjoy having his family and friends stop by for a visit while he is at work in the building. Discussion Commissioner Scherer questioned the number of units. Mr. Duffy responded he believes there will be six units. Chair Staunton said he has a concern that the requested change in use introduces an element in the area that's not typical, adding parking could also present an issue. Staunton acknowledged that the requested change in use makes him a little nervous; pointing out it could be considered "commercial creep ". Staunton suggested engaging the neighborhood to discuss the proposed use. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that this location isn't commercial and the proposed change in use in his opinion isn't compatible with the nature of Indianola. Commissioner Forrest questioned the applicant on the timing of this request pointing out the renovations occurred a number of years ago. Mr. Duffy responded that the scale of the property owners business is changing and he would like to formally accommodate this change. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged she resides in the neighborhood and did inquire about the use of the residential building as office. Continuing, Forrest pointed out the permitted use of this site is only residential- permitting apartment units; not office, and asked Mr. Duffy how many residents now reside in the building. Mr. Duffy responded he is unaware of the current tenant count; but did acknowledge the nature of the residential tenants is mostly transient. Concluding, Forrest said she is concerned that presently there is a violation of use occurring on this site, adding her main concerns are that at present the building appears deserted and rezoning the site to PUD would be an extension of commercial creep. Forrest stated she would keep an open mind if the rezoning moves forward; however, reiterated she doesn't like the introduction of commercial into this area. Chair Staunton explained to the applicant in a request to rezone a site to PUD there needs to be a community benefit. Staunton said when a formal application is made the applicant needs to Page 10 of 11 Page 11 of 11 CITY OF MEMO City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com ei k,, Cl) Date: June 25, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 4121 West 50th Street The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages Al -A3.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with. 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A15.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD-4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. The following is a compliance table that demonstrates how the proposed building would comply with the PRD -4 standards and show residential densities in Edina. The proposed office use is currently not allowed in the existing PRD -4 Zoning District. Compliance Table * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adjacent roadways. City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Proposed (PRD -4) Front — 50th Street 35 feet 30 feet* Front— Indianola 35 feet 25 feet* Side — south 35 feet 40+ feet Side — east 35 feet 20 feet* Building Height 4 stories or 2 stories 48 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 21% Density — Comp. Plan 12 -30 units max 12 units /acre Parking Stalls 1.25 enclosed space + .75 9 enclosed= 11 surface ** (Commercial District) surface spaces per unit 1/200 s.f. for office 25 surface +8 enclosed required * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adjacent roadways. City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 '24 24 g §46 i �;5 :cis -I ,4} -,I', 49 1/2 STREET WEST 4i01) f r24 •24 i ej. 4 7� 4 3 ! 4S30 -- � 3902: l 50TH STREET WEST :24 i,�} .-3511 I j ' I I I f I. - - -- i I "1b 50 I'.5 29 SD28 1 -i Uj y 1 w —ILL1�1 I l5ie,r�ffJ1 1 =,1 Parcel A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N ID: Print Date: 6/20/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel Tax Address: Total: - Property Sale 490 t I sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no N 4�J11 : .4624 4925 i Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and -4417 completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale ... 461`! _4y �r, I , - STREET : "t +EST RUM A rhinkGreen! son i � W. � LU u 500' I 4 r -, .2 — — z. z ¢f1�F ;5ii�10 V._...... _..... .... _ i _" � L STREET_ WEST (5105 0'4 1 151 , T �,jf�1 I cinl7 ' rriir� lali +$ r1031.5aii4 �. �t1'1 15112 '24 24 g §46 i �;5 :cis -I ,4} -,I', 49 1/2 STREET WEST 4i01) f r24 •24 i ej. 4 7� 4 3 ! 4S30 -- � 3902: l 50TH STREET WEST :24 i,�} .-3511 I j ' I I I f I. - - -- i I "1b 50 I'.5 29 SD28 1 -i Uj y 1 w —ILL1�1 I l5ie,r�ffJ1 1 =,1 Parcel A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N ID: Print Date: 6/20/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel Tax Address: Total: - Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale ... Area: + Code: COPYRIGHT 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A rhinkGreen! u I l _ 71 OW, 4C, I I I PP _u AAA I I 11 u - ' 51 I; _L!' Parcel Map Scale: V = 100 ft. N A -T -B: ID: ! Print Date: 6/20/2014 Owner ' Market Name: I Total: Parcel ! Tax Address: Total: I Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: pate; implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale Area: Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 i A 'Viink Green! W ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business �t`� 2008 Comprehensive Plan Lenend y. Future Land Use Plan with City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Northeast Quadrant FgUre 4.6A Data Source: URS 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design A3 4 -53 m ..for living, learning, raising families & doing business ry 2008 Comprehensive Plan A Legend: Potential Areas of Change ,asy ;, �5 W 390 St 1- North France Avenue 2 - Neighborhood Corrrrercial Nodes • _ 3 - ConTmnity Commercial Nodes I < r 4- 5outhdaleArea :1 e� m 6- CorrmerciallOffce Corridors ' 1. �u rlt Lo!Il� r- rlc H Jul k Wd iG9� dg�N.�M e�Y'`a � � ��.y1(j.;sf �� �jDw � F�' � � ���]/,'�$• ��. .. -� 'u YY' j StR7 \ Qua JOW .i t� 4 5 '�t -9'.�• �.r ' 1 = � L �y .s r2. '!T'7 IY�K it,?l 1 ' s � a; DRUM w e n sl e Ilun A „� DINT" s1S ���,•�, F �PY�nkit� 'lid �r � NEW E �Gt T WISSthS, fC, t1 . i2;6�+ ,� SSC N! GGi 11 St �..1 lam• ti gig •;, ' S. p, V, — _ �t.0��L i3 � �.r rr• —a _ - — o a �. -� sjCj" r e r !'. '� �.L, / 1 *' � rc1 54'.°y F _ . • W u e• r ,{ C ran, V 111 r, 3 •�Y �'F��Y,.- _l"ocwev tinl ad�l�jl( - 1 Oft' r ` ia nls Parklawn n it" n n zo _1 l z i ysi. WE���c A �. —L — �luu`rrr Irk %on ^ w r9rn S1 s• /mow sot�h sr Figure 4.4 o%e 7 City of Edina Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Potential Areas of Change Date 'ofAerial Photography: August 2006 ��� �y 0 0.5 Wes Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -33 APPLI (VT �f 1-18 �,+ f I JE 4121 West 50th Street Dromoland, LLC's Proposed Planned United Development Planned Unit Development — Proposed Use Description Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and the building located at 4121 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (the "Property "). Dromoland, LLC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of EGO Holdings, LLC, a single member LLC owned solely by Edgar Gerald (Jerry) O'Brien. The Property is currently zoned PRD -4. Historically, the building's primary use since Dromoland has owned it has been as a multi -unit residential building with limited professional space on the second floor used as the building's management and leasing office. However, Mr. O'Brien would now like to use the existing second floor space and obtain approval for the second floor use, as may be necessary, for institutional (non - retail) investment management business purposes, resulting in the Planned Unit Development ( "PUD ") proposal that follows. Dromoland's proposed PUD would seek rezoning the Property to a mixed use classification. Such a change would accommodate both the building's current primary use as a multi -unit residential building as well as allow for the use of the existing second floor office space to house a proposed institutional investment business. The proposed PUD would also allow for the repurposing, as necessary, of a portion of the building's second floor that currently includes the building's management/leasing office, a large gathering area, and two fully equipped and rentable residential units. The repurposing would take advantage of the existing configuration and, with minor renovations, allow for the entire second floor space to be used for institutional investing purposes to the extent the entire second floor is needed for such purposes. If not, the two residential units would remain for lease to individual residential tenants. To the extent expansion is someday required, the modest renovations would include converting the two existing residential units into office space by removing non -load bearing walls, and creating walkways between what are now separate units. Such changes would not include any modifications to the exterior of the building. The total square footage of the proposed complete second floor office space would be approximately 4,250 square feet. Unlike many financial service and investment brokerage offices, Dromoland's proposed use will have no retail customer traffic although it will maintain normal business hours of approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday- Friday, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. The work hours will co -exist well with the residential uses of the building, because the tenants typically would be gone during the workday when employees would be working in the office. Dromoland anticipates a maximum of 20 employees in the event a full expansion of the second floor is completed for business uses. As for parking, the Property currently can accommodate approximately 19 -20 parking spaces (9 interior and 10 -11 exterior). If further parking is required, Dromoland is willing to explore several options, including, but not limited to, approaching the neighboring church to lease parking spaces in the church's lot as well as looking into similar arrangements with other commercial neighbors. A5` The Building In 2009, Dromoland remodeled both the exterior and interior of the 1950s Georgian multifamily building. The exterior fagade was enhanced with the addition of a front porch including white columns and a functional balcony on the second floor. Inside, the building was completely renovated into eight residential units. Most of the units have two bedrooms and 1 '/2 bathrooms. The lower level unit recently was renovated into a handicap accessible unit, including a walk -out patio. Since the renovation, the building has been used as temporary housing for Edina residents who typically are remodeling their permanent homes, executive transfers searching for homes, or, in one recent situation, by a family renovating their home to accommodate accessibility needs of their son who suffered a debilitating sports injury. During the extensive 2009 renovation of the Property, great care was taken to promote energy efficiency, accessibility and reuse and repurposing of the existing building. The remodel included energy efficient appliances and windows, LED lighting, and abundant natural light that was maximized by the building's enhanced design. In fact, the design work was so meticulous that it won the 2010 ROMA design award from the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (details at: bgp://www.stonehearthremodeling.com/awards.html Involvement As long -time residents of Edina, Mr. O'Brien and his wife, Lisa, are actively involved in the community. From sponsoring Edina events and projects to hosting numerous neighborhood events for residents, the O'Brien are inextricably intertwined in the community. In addition to the O'Brien' city involvement, the O'Briens host many community gatherings where neighbors have a chance to meet and interact with local, state and national policymakers. Similarly, the O'Briens are long -time financial supporters, board members and volunteers with Greater Minneapolis United Way; Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery; Edina Public School District; Minnesota Community Foundation & St. Paul Foundation; University of Minnesota Weisman Museum of Art; and are dependable contributors to the Edina Community Foundation and Edina Ed Fund. Mr. O'Brien's Background Mr. O'Brien has lived in the Twin Cities for more than 20 years and in Edina since 1995. Mr. O'Brien was recruited to the area by Cargill where he worked in its financial businesses for 17 years. Mr. O'Brien left Cargill with the goal of creating a new company, in partnership with Warren Staley (retired CEO and Chair of Cargill and an Edina homeowner for decades). Since leaving Cargill, Mr. O'Brien has managed investments for himself and Mr. Staley, but was limited by a non - compete from managing third party capital. Mr. O'Brien has fully satisfied the terms of his non - compete and now has the opportunity to expand his investment activity to include managing investments for select institutional investors (e.g. college endowment, state retirement plans, family offices). 2 �6 Neighborhood Amenity Dromoland also owns the vacant lot adjacent and behind the Property. The vacant lot is currently used .as neighborhood green space. The lot is zoned for a single - family residence, although Dromoland has converted the lot into a T -ball field for use by the building's tenants and neighborhood children (by invitation) and as a neighborhood amenity. The field was recently resurfaced with new infield dirt and re- seeded for use this summer. For the foreseeable future, Dromoland plans to keep the T -ball field as is. Neighborhood Discussions about Proposed Use In preparation for the anticipated PUD rezoning request, Mr. O'Brien has spoken to several neighbors about his proposed use. To date, Mr. O'Brien's proposed use has been well - received and Mr. O'Brien is not aware of any negative comments. Personal Reasons for Proposed Use On a personal level, Mr. O'Brien wants to use this existing space because he lives in the neighborhood, his mother -in -law resides in the condominiums next door to the Property the Henley), and he enjoys having his family and friends pop -in to visit while walking around 50t & France. MMB: 4811- 3004 -6235, v. 1 3 M . tx 7 11� `7.065 - j OHM, CIC NUMBER 1.93 No, R45 2SS FLOOR PLAN A caNna.NUNiuM BENCHMARK S NO ARE N Sk Er I . A - THE `EDENDERRY � OF EDIN:A_ HENCNMARI{ AS NOTED. ON SFJEET 1 0f'. 2 - - LCZ DENOTES.LIMREO COMMON ELEMENT QW PLAT C.E. •- DEN07ES COMMON ELEMENT unli i00 - .�..�• Iwrm ,ay nronn ��D,o °'i m rwxui.:ua'rma., ,/" X1,4. RIKm A_ 1MI{0 a01Ntu 61MMA -. ru euxr m terRh [Wlml ,Inner • l4[ r[IIAN Inaaa raww nWW, •— nr[ a,n A 11 • Sr118 0.1, tea umrr Ica + j UNl ullPl' Pet naaorn,.w� .� I'p I ulrrr 20a Aow na.w m4Ta•4tw,Iw.WIJ �,� N laliknaa �•� �,� _^� _ � r 1 o ^r�' UNIT 403 aa yy� WltT 204. rrawxl[•.,oru rnwnrurr®.ma� - R 1 �. tlaw rcnn[vi a J ( a� {a<azIK,�J t � mnm xw rrars,rw am. m n:.r �.i,•ne eaw. arwra riax n�e�mn•r. _ - _ . tut ecru m riw,mon.rra� 1 i i INC �faM 4aa14[ ; I 1,rlw cmum rmaa,p 1 � I II UtUnT y�iq u .. tit>�90P - rm, rlvxxa wwr I� i u m+W I.ema BASEMENT SECOND FLOOR DETAIL A DETAIL B rs-- {NO SCAL1:y (40 'SCALE) - urer a 0 Pnew nt+�m:i '. ,wno wwa owxro ^YOUW�FmOA = YYrNfN/WnIWr... i1N/FLIrNrI. L4S1[yEOw4/nMY,C I 6A6AG17 °°•`a rOO� f wnaa wwa a.rau yawl• ©e . � �YS �� ni 'OARACE Eil� Y4(If� (rr.lW LLNOIf I -.• lYN0.0 4MtlY lln,e,l1 \� I�1 �I7a •. ^ weie[wo-m j" am,n,a.r. tL'�1 ,Laa�7� UNN' 8 3 •! 1 I ulur r02. ; rwao nrr+,na.rn. � �..._� " a...,, ' - u,.m auw urwc a-- �_'•f` . - Ane,ru � was cwnv, WVnll mwaa .srtnra re4r° flue rsq 1•mOr un r nn >rmuc wu4> 0.1 ue I -. j I WAGE}t rrrca 4.atX ntinM a _2A I aam rasa aru •r. r,auu u¢In . r slaucc.eow 1 uma cm.rnnmon.J lTfj 1 .. s,au,c worm �unnn�nuw.a-�� r6 FIRST FLOOR • Docloraut may subdhAdc, combine oe.. convert' Unito into eedttionol unita, common olamentp nr lhnited common elements ccdson F0.pla3310PA1 rEAVICES _ ,mnw.a.w•rcnwa••aMrwa ullPl' Pet naaorn,.w� .� I'p I ulrrr 20a Aow na.w m4Ta•4tw,Iw.WIJ n N , {al[9 KVwWWr� r UNIT 403 WltT 204. rrawxl[•.,oru rnwnrurr®.ma� - R 1 �. tlaw rcnn[vi a J ( a� urer a 0 Pnew nt+�m:i '. ,wno wwa owxro ^YOUW�FmOA = YYrNfN/WnIWr... i1N/FLIrNrI. L4S1[yEOw4/nMY,C I 6A6AG17 °°•`a rOO� f wnaa wwa a.rau yawl• ©e . � �YS �� ni 'OARACE Eil� Y4(If� (rr.lW LLNOIf I -.• lYN0.0 4MtlY lln,e,l1 \� I�1 �I7a •. ^ weie[wo-m j" am,n,a.r. tL'�1 ,Laa�7� UNN' 8 3 •! 1 I ulur r02. ; rwao nrr+,na.rn. � �..._� " a...,, ' - u,.m auw urwc a-- �_'•f` . - Ane,ru � was cwnv, WVnll mwaa .srtnra re4r° flue rsq 1•mOr un r nn >rmuc wu4> 0.1 ue I -. j I WAGE}t rrrca 4.atX ntinM a _2A I aam rasa aru •r. r,auu u¢In . r slaucc.eow 1 uma cm.rnnmon.J lTfj 1 .. s,au,c worm �unnn�nuw.a-�� r6 FIRST FLOOR • Docloraut may subdhAdc, combine oe.. convert' Unito into eedttionol unita, common olamentp nr lhnited common elements ccdson F0.pla3310PA1 rEAVICES _ ,mnw.a.w•rcnwa••aMrwa r +0" u9nc1R� F14b .IOW. SM PLAN CIC NUMBER 1935 e - Gowns sm IN vr.u• Leal ummvmr cum untnsVWI A CONDOMRUM e - xrllom GMUO x GI mNGme Gowns rmm GGI Nwlwllx TIME EDENL�wDyTE+RRAYr� OF EDINA - omom mavlo �Gflntert aaq ,— dic• PL& �+rtrrrrra - Gowns EasnllG 1.0 IT. "am VT—,JIG t4Mr.- GGUlalr GLSmR Lac - Gowns mm rammp numrr GL - n5r10fE9 CWIxG1 mnl..l' It -- — — - -. -- -- _— — —_ — -- — — — -- -- — L Jhamaa N. DO. Ir. db ngrldppy/ tulrt) {IWt lhd tiPA[ H01 unevl2am_Y/ N'rgYlcaae eN ��y���.v�aW by ma Lv U:q G0 JMa of GC IIIIU9ER 1935 A GQ91GlL31U, V� mn1UWR Cl nC110. Oehq IPhrtod agem 1 w —Ig GO 101 er 1A1 Z me 94 OI LnL % 0Na 1. •3MMIS In mlluat1 IR. "Qbc orw and Ind ml1a-0t 3at . thIe h %= 9141 �a-Wj drpty — L., t -m U-4 tm C.Aw udv Vrc Aa Wcn{Ppl0.I ,,� two WyY ')/eq .,pyre /VRM�01[A . my �r- lb-1 U. UVA I.— Gw^9ry ukl q m Lx"fal I r-W 40u) 9rAM Ur x- INr9m'A Ib fared 'eg Ninumanl .nP PrN.eabSOm m.. roe mlt a�6 4er m ])W jf uic— 2kcA pl T- Pe R @Ga1- taM Surryry. UNnnPly tlwvas qP d97Yi. OI: - Slaiast» ^'-�nruweat 11er . GarP1K If Nr C.—W. GPVU A. Uraw d. lbp..a --1 1a LIA— P mm. U.- 51!'.0.1"K. "my sgnllr mat KI IWawal a'CraPmvnla M Inv'l41a1una Gui4'S1Vgt me eNla axe Iha eyamv aanrrry mete hm mwunit as wlntentNGy a.mlaasd, Md tueL L Ml a PAY Welpdntl OyManr ruder the bwa al tae 9ta11 avmaamis "Iii Gervr.ktapaftrAm— m mq, Odul 1 Nrjala."ml. NLQ•lLUq� ov . uwruaa Utmfv u...l,a 1W9] S' IX Cr dhth=41A .GG911Y 9F lle, xgbc% 'Iti, iurgoN9 baSwM/R aav ParwUd4al Mrnv mq lhi) 2`11Ltwr a atGl..w.,r,r . 15f�. bT Gann a wyqu t a PlauuMa.rbG9tq>,• ulw.agm lluan 101, IrG57. ��p+,1L•l�Al � �.� trofor P4a9y {braGa3a)3 tC'+�1'p IAmnwla NY �ClrmifilOA G1pYaa �_= �.i�'2at�l 4.GILttL' M°GLL 1lemapN framly� 1Mlefete ihn all PWL hot b— hear... aL"r IN, �fL.: G. al n91Wn P, peen IlennapN �an+r lurwl9r X Oca4scul filmaOIOIUR SERVICES awNarA- alcwrso- w.a.,a ii G J I 5 U^ i• f J i R E E w � A 0 - .• •• 14 .0 � T 0C(WIRAmt, � r.�T`1 r a�a, +S.T _1 /� '� •�• �. �-• Lf l s, g + 61 Sf 9a- �Ofl l9dT GL 9M/S.1S 'MV. )4r' ZC e d f.rA Y r af.l' n �ii.tC. ;r a nhlw /Ae vwr ... iAr [� I � +C �' c�am� nF�w+lAi`•I� _.�.. � C����R „/f. "� -- „ D w r '�- `• £ � 140 00 .Q Z r. E it f10B'J0'�11'Vr.__ 5 9 F. �� de ITPl hm la lr"A 4, I I Il �J OepkSa lllgx ePl eunmrd ®IC151AItlU tar Mi ()P,lap9ltlf Ar SOJGIEIar 01ALppiO G91'SOUN!!!Q•'f0 alrrli rac a IlSn19A1tli1. LNAfFwn G' IIS;f 50111 CInEEr 4N 16'fGLI01.f. q� a� +d AmLOe. 3even4tl - rW9JS rue (rtavG. iD39) rA:GOfrF0.4.CWIt / ftlE(a1DAGIGllG:4 UAim AVW6Y 94. 1990. SU' lC RJ stcf TAM= l1 1g9p A5 tgOlYOtr NC 0957'9019 6lN�LEi G _451U7 4tACF.1lIE ' L Jhamaa N. DO. Ir. db ngrldppy/ tulrt) {IWt lhd tiPA[ H01 unevl2am_Y/ N'rgYlcaae eN ��y���.v�aW by ma Lv U:q G0 JMa of GC IIIIU9ER 1935 A GQ91GlL31U, V� mn1UWR Cl nC110. Oehq IPhrtod agem 1 w —Ig GO 101 er 1A1 Z me 94 OI LnL % 0Na 1. •3MMIS In mlluat1 IR. "Qbc orw and Ind ml1a-0t 3at . thIe h %= 9141 �a-Wj drpty — L., t -m U-4 tm C.Aw udv Vrc Aa Wcn{Ppl0.I ,,� two WyY ')/eq .,pyre /VRM�01[A . my �r- lb-1 U. UVA I.— Gw^9ry ukl q m Lx"fal I r-W 40u) 9rAM Ur x- INr9m'A Ib fared 'eg Ninumanl .nP PrN.eabSOm m.. roe mlt a�6 4er m ])W jf uic— 2kcA pl T- Pe R @Ga1- taM Surryry. UNnnPly tlwvas qP d97Yi. OI: - Slaiast» ^'-�nruweat 11er . GarP1K If Nr C.—W. GPVU A. Uraw d. lbp..a --1 1a LIA— P mm. U.- 51!'.0.1"K. "my sgnllr mat KI IWawal a'CraPmvnla M Inv'l41a1una Gui4'S1Vgt me eNla axe Iha eyamv aanrrry mete hm mwunit as wlntentNGy a.mlaasd, Md tueL L Ml a PAY Welpdntl OyManr ruder the bwa al tae 9ta11 avmaamis "Iii Gervr.ktapaftrAm— m mq, Odul 1 Nrjala."ml. NLQ•lLUq� ov . uwruaa Utmfv u...l,a 1W9] S' IX Cr dhth=41A .GG911Y 9F lle, xgbc% 'Iti, iurgoN9 baSwM/R aav ParwUd4al Mrnv mq lhi) 2`11Ltwr a atGl..w.,r,r . 15f�. bT Gann a wyqu t a PlauuMa.rbG9tq>,• ulw.agm lluan 101, IrG57. ��p+,1L•l�Al � �.� trofor P4a9y {braGa3a)3 tC'+�1'p IAmnwla NY �ClrmifilOA G1pYaa �_= �.i�'2at�l 4.GILttL' M°GLL 1lemapN framly� 1Mlefete ihn all PWL hot b— hear... aL"r IN, �fL.: G. al n91Wn P, peen IlennapN �an+r lurwl9r X Oca4scul filmaOIOIUR SERVICES awNarA- alcwrso- w.a.,a �umnw� -i ww-m -t wwwo 4 I d u —� te-3—w kr -4. BRAMMEN'T -------- -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ M" M,& 4 D P V'R ON --- — — ....... . . .. ..... . ....... ........... ------- 44 OR a 1 ------- --------- --------- FLOOR M" M,& 4 D P V'R T-71 "."Apaa Ff ""0' w. - m M IL ND E t I, ?Gripe E U J Q PLAT -; � D,- — � v6% M - 00 MAP www 6 - --------- "."Apaa Ff ""0' w. - m M ...... .... 9 VAll IV i : ro P-11 wo-f S,�w vw- IN DOW $w GCE PA ON SECO-1,11.147D DE' L. A 191§0 scmllo-li hl'� DED - -- - -- - ------------------------------------------ ........ ..... .. SIT19- PUN 'NUMBER 1-935 CIC A CONDOMINIUM THE ED ENDS RRY OF.EDINI 'dIC- PJ "Pitym E AT. MOILS emsfifia U10 MW NN omm LTIZ. — am= u0m == XLt=t m — MGM mum na= tot. r- rt S, T :8 Ar P it' , A --- ------- Vt V-1,7-1r-fll iw /N. ww2, SMI$ ui VM A !W -& . 1 41.1 '43 rP g.* Jt I I ip r v ji 1. 4- 4 A L I- E :8 Ar P it' , A REPORT RECOMMENDATION w9t1r o Itltltl To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: MJ Lamon, Action Project Coordinator Discussion 0 Date: August 4, 2014 Information 0 Subject: Appointment To Community Health Commission Action Requested: Appoint Cathy Cozad to the vacancy on the Community Health Commission for a term ending March I, 2016 Information / Background: As directed by City Council at the July 15th, 2014 City Council Work Session, Cathy Cozad was contacted and asked to serve for the remainder of a vacancy on the Edina Community Health Commission. Cathy is willing to be appointed. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ri To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott Neal, City Manager • "A�AYOR%`��O • �eee Agenda Item #: VIII. C. Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Human Rights and Relations Commission- Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan Action Requested: Approve the proposed amendments to the Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan and direct the City Manager to establish periodic reporting procedures of all bias offenses that occur within city departments or are observed by city staff. Information / Background: The Edina City Council adopted the first Bias Hate Response Plan on May 5, 1997. The City Council directed the Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) to review the Plan at least once per year and provide recommended amendments as needed. The Edina City Council updated the Plan in 2003, 2008 and most recently in 2011. The purposes of the Plan are to 1) establish a procedure for appropriate and timely local response to bias offenses thus showing strong community support for the victim and zero community tolerance for bias offenses that occur within the boundaries of the City of Edina; 2) to raise awareness of bias offense responses within the community; and 3) to establish a network of community resources that can be activated as needed. After the August 2013 graffiti incident at SouthView Middle School, the HRRC Bias Offense Response and Prevention subcommittee met with representatives of the Police Department, Administration Department, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Parks and Recreation Department to learn about department reporting procedures for incidents of bias offenses. In addition, the subcommittee met multiple times to discuss revisions to the current Bias Hate Response Plan. A draft of the revised plan was recommended by the full HRRC on June 24, 2014: RESOLVED, that the 2014 Amended Bias Offense fense and Response Plan be adopted by the Human Rights and Relations Commission and be transmitted to the City Council, and together with the Recommendation that it be adopted by the Council as the City's Plan and Procedural Process should Bias Offenses under Minnesota Law occur within the City or upon public property owned, leased or used by other public bodies located within the City. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 HRRC Recommended Changes to the Current Plan: 1. Revise plan title and language to align language with Minnesota Statue 611 A.79, Subd. 1. The plan title and content was revised to remove the term 'hate crime' and was replaced with 'bias offense'. 2. Revise Community Resources Network List. The previous list named specific individuals, not positions, that quickly went out of date. New relevant organizations were added to the list, including the Richfield and Hopkins Public School Districts, Hennepin County and reference to professional mediation organizations. Edina is no longer a member of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions, so that organization was removed from the list. 3. Introduction added. To provide additional plan context and record, an introduction section was added at the beginning of the document. 4. Language of Minnesota Statute 61 IA. 79, Subd. 1 added as an appendix. This language provides the definition of a 'bias offense' and is referenced in the document. S. General language clean -up. Inconsistencies were raised and revised to allow for general document consistency. 6. Plan Process revisions. a. Step 1: upon receipt of a substantiated report. The Plan commences once a report of an incident that may constitute a bias offense has been received by the Police Department and substantiated. This is a change from the original language because it puts the plan into action earlier, as the Police Department would not need to conclude an investigation before the Chief, City Manager, and HRRC Chair would meet to discuss the event and an appropriate level of response. The substantiation allows the Police Department to verify that the offense occurred (i.e. it was not a prank 9 -1 -1 call), and ensures that the Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan will be initiated before the case is closed. b. Step 2: addition of a Data Practices Consent Form. Victims' rights are protected. To comply with Data Practices laws, the Chief of Police will not share victim information with the HRRC Chair until after a signed consent form has been received. Upon receipt of the consent form, the HRRC will contact the victim and provide support. A copy of the Community Resources Network List will be included with each consent form provided to a victim by Police so the victim has access to resources, even if they don't want to work directly with the HRRC. In the event that the initial victim does not sign the consent form, but separate victims come forward, the HRRC will be able to support those additional victims. c. Steps 3 -6: clarify process. Changes were made to these steps based on current practices and respect for the privacy of the initial victim if additional victims come forward or if a community-wide response is planned. d. Step 7: new step — involving public property. Previously, the plan had not included any specifications related to offenses occurring on public property. If an offense takes place on public land or property, the new language initiates the plan regardless of the will or interest a REPORT /;RECOMMENDATION Page 3 of the owning agency. There will be an opportunity for the owning agency to become part of the plan process, but that - organization or agency will not be able to stop or prevent implementation of the plan. This is :a major change and could potentially position the City of Edina is a precarious situation if the owning agency has strong feelings against implementation of the plan or is opposed to the possibility of public attention to the offense. e. Steps 8 -10. general language clean up. A copy of the full revised plan, together with 'appendixes and the Data Practices Consent Form, are included on pages 4- 10 of this report As mentioned above, the HRRC Bias Offense Response and Prevention Subcommittee also compiled significant data related to how internal City department handle incidents of bias offense. Upon review by the full- HRRC body, the following resolutions were also passed on June 24, 2014: RESOLVED, that the City Manager, subject if necessary to City Council approval, establish Periodic Reporting Procedures, including written formats tailored to each City Department, regarding the reporting of incidents of bias under Minnesota Law occurring within City Departments- or observed by City employees while interacting with the public in the course of performing their duties. RESOLVED FURTHER, that Reporting Forms substantially similar to those developed by the Parks & Recreation Department be utilized by each City Department; and that an annual tabulation of bias incidents occurring within each Department or observed in interactions with the public be provided to the City Manager for transmission to the HRRC, Mayor and City Council on a regular basis. Summaries of the reports from each department visit are included:on pages I 1 -15 of this report of Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan CITV OF EDIAI e QIASMATC CRIME OCfDOWE MD DDCVCAITIG Al PI .A.04 INTRODUCTION The Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) first drafted the Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan (the Plan) in 1994. The HRRC proposed the Plan to the Edina City Council in March 1997, and the City Council adopted the Plan with some slight revisions on May 5. 1997. The Edina City Council directed the HRRC to review the Plan at least once per year and provide recommended amendments as needed. The Edina City Council updated the Plan in 2003. 2008, and most recently in 2011. and 2014. Minority population increases continue among the City's residents, workforce, and school population. Approximately. 20% of the Edina's School District population is identified as ethnic minority, according to school district information. With increasing diversity in the City and school populations, attention is called to the Plan to ensure participants are prepared to implement its provisions should triggering incidents occur. PURPOSES To establish a procedure for appropriate and timely local response to bias 1hate r-re ,ps offenses thus showing strong community support for the victim and zero community tolerance for bias. %ite- eFknes offenses that occur within the boundaries of the City of Edina; To raise awareness of thus - issue bias offense responses within the community; To establish a network of community resources that can be activated as needed. The Edina j €HRRC) provides or coordinates support to victims of biasihte- er-imes offenses and rop vides leadership in the community in he pFeyentien -ef 1 iasi1 ate EFiFnes to prevent such offenses through education and collaborative community action against prejudice and bigotry. However, it is not the role of the Edina HRRC, ewevf -, to investigate soeh _. bias offenses. "ATE CRIME BIAS OFFENSE DEFINED eRhanced penalties. against the > > • A bias offense is defined by Minnesota Statute Section 61 IA.79, Subd. 1, a copy of which is included in Appendix A. PARTNERSHIP Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 Q A .)1� CR l� Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan The GeFAFAessffieR Edina HRRC mus will partner with the citizens and organizations in-the community in order to provide timely -and meaningful support to victims of biasihate C:;,e? offenses. Local community partners are identified in Appendix B. Community Resources Network. Key partners include: • Edina Police Depa �ment Chief • Edina City Manager • , Edina Mayor and City Council, if appropriate • Edina School OistFict Superintendent, if appropriate • Local media, if appropriate • Professional mediation organizations, if appropriate RESPONSE AND PREVENTION PLAN PROCESS: 1) Subject to the limitations in the Minnesota Stat Chapter " The Government Data Practices :Act, Minn. Stat. Chapter 13, the Edina Police Department will notify the,City. Manager and the HRRC Chair d......-mtned to be ••a'wd. upon receipt ofa substantiated report of an event or incident which may constitute a bias offense under Minnesota Statute. Together, the Edina Police Chief, City Manager; and €e sieR HRRC Chair will determine the appropriate level of response„ including any necessary public statements. 2) The Edina City Manager will notify the Mayor of and City;Council as appropriate. won receio of a signed'Data Practices Release Form from the victim(s) tKe. ;rHRRC Chair will promptly contact the victim(s) to offer support and determine what at further response from the City or community the victim desires and Abe determine the appropriateness. If the Edina Police Chief informs the HRRC Chair that the initial victim(s) request privacy or if the victim(s) does not return the release form, the HRRC Chair will make no contact. 3) The Chair will call upon members of the Community Resources Network as needed, respecting the privacy of the initial victim. Community response options include: • Contact appropriate members of Community Resources Network to inform them of a bias /;ate -eFiFne offense and request their support and participation in the response. Rights is netified. • Only where appropriate and after consultation with the initial victim(s) and the Edina City Manager, the GemmissieR HRRC and /or Community Neetwork r-epresentatiYes members may plan a community -wide response. 4) HRRC Chair or designee will initiate initial and follow up contact with the victim(s) should he in person or by phone. Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 'L a g; Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan 5) GeFnFnuss*en Cha"F eF designee will initiate fellew up egntaet On eme beyond as apff9ffiate. 5) 6 -After follow -up has occurred, the EeMMissiee -HRRC and Community Noetwork reffeserte members involved shall meet as necessary to review the preeess of response and take action or make changes. b) The Gemmissien HRRC will send letters of appreciation to Community Neetwork feff=== ctNes- members involved. 7) In the event that public property, including any building, structure or vehicle, is damaged or defaced as a result of an action that may constitute a bias offense under Minnesota law, the provisions of this Plan shall be implemented. The term "public property" means propem owned, leased, or used by the City of Edina or any other government, or its agencies, divisions, or entities. However, in the event that the public property is owned or operated by a government or its agencies, divisions, or entities other than the City of Edina, such owner or operator shall be offered the opportunity to become a part of the Plan. 8) The EsFAR;issiee -HRRC Chair will provide a summary report of the response to the Edina City Council and Police Chief. 9) At least annually, the Eemmissien HRRC will review the overall process and recommend necessary amendments to the Edina City Council and Police Chief. 10) The Gemmissien HRRC will periodically sponsor public information sessions, education and training to promote the understanding and prevention of hateibias eFimes o ffenses through collaborative community action. Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 8 26-1 1 Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan Mawi,He.,r. APPENDIX A 2013 Minnesota Statues: https: / /www.revisor.mn.gov /statutes / ?id =61 I a.79 61 IA.79 CIVIL DAMAGES FOR BIAS OFFENSES. Subdivision 1. Definition. For purposes of this section, "bias offense" means conduct that would constitute a crime and was committed because of the victim's or another's actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined in section 363A.03, age, or national origin. Subd. 2. Cause of action: damages and fees injunction. A person who is damaged by a bias offense has a civil cause of action against the person who committed the offense. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the greater of. (1) $500: or actual general and special damages, including damages for emotional distress. A plaintiff also may obtain punitive damages as provided in sections 549.191 and 549.20 or an injunction or other appropriate relief. Subd. 3. Relation to criminal proceeding; burden of proof. A person may bring an action under this section regardless of the existence or outcome of criminal proceedings involving the bias offense that is the basis for the action. The burden of proof in an action under this section is preponderance of the evidence. Subd. 4. Parental liability. Section 540.18 applies to actions under this section, except that (1) the parent or guardian is liable for all types of damages awarded under this section in an amount not exceeding $5.000: and (2) the parent or guardian is not liable if the parent or guardian made reasonable efforts to exercise control over the minor's behavior. Subd. 5. Trial: limitation period. (a) The right to trial by jury is preserved in an action brought under this section. (b) An action under this section must be commenced not later than six years after the cause of action arises. Subd. 6. Other rights preserved. The remedies under this section do not affect any rights or remedies of the plaintiff under other law. History 1996 c 468 s I Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 8 -211 ti al Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan J � APPENDIX B Community Resources Network ORGANIZATION CONTACT TELEPHONE Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission « .,:.. 'ro", r"w� Staff Liaison � ' a�Tre rod 4od7 952 - 927 -8861 Edina Police Department Chief n Police 952 - 826 -1610 City of Edina teal, City Manager ore 826 0401 952 - 927 -8861 Edina City Council jim Heyland, Mayor 612874 -8550 952 - 927 -8861 Edina Public School District #273 Gwen , 4 993 s-v�44 v 4046 —rrry 952 - 848 -4000 Superintendent Richfield Public School District Superintendent 612- 798 -6000 Hopkins Public School District Superintendent 952 - 988 -4000 Rights CeFnFn.ssfens a 1 661 0 56 Edina Chamber of Commerce AFrie I .• n Manta Executive Director 952 - 806 -9060 Hennepin County County Attorney 612- 348 -5550 Owner /operator of "public property" if Call the Human Rights and Relations Staff 952 - 927 -8861 not the City of Edina Liaison for assistance Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 826 -1 1 v��A• n, ° e f Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan ( )° Professional Mediation Organizations Call the Human Rights and Relations Staff 952- 927 -8861 Liaison for resource list &ate-Minnesota Department of Human Rights Commissioner 65°' 594 651- 539 -1100 Revisions recommended by HRRC June 24, 2014 Revisions Recommended by staff July 9, 2014 8-26 11 1 Resolutions of the Edina HRRC Re: Bias Offenses Response Plan RESOLVED, That the 2014 Amended-Bias Offense and Response Plan be adopted by the Human Rightsand. Relations Commission and be transmitted to the City Council; and together with the Recommendation that it be adopted by the Council as the City's Plan and Procedural Process should Bias Offenses under Minnesota Law occur within the City or upon public property owned, leased or used by other public bodies located within the City. Re: Reporting of Bias by City Departments RESOLVED, That the City Manager, subject if necessary to City Council approval, establish Periodic Reporting Procedures, including written formats tailored to each City Department, regarding the reporting of incidents of bias under Minnesota Law occurring within City Departments or observed by City employees while interacting with the public in the course of performing their duties. RESOLVED FURTHER, That Reporting Forms substantially similar to those developed by the Parks & Recreation Department be utilized by each City Department; and that an annual tabulation of bias incidents occurring within each Department or observed in.interactions with the public be provided to the City Manager for transmission to the HRRC, Mayor and City Council on a regular basis. Deleted: & Deleted: Motions approved by HRRC on -June 24, 2014 Deleted: May 27, 2014 Edina Police Department Informed Consent to Release Private Information Pursuant To Minnesota Statute § 13.05. Subd. 4 Government Data Practices Act On (DATE) the Edina Police Department responded to a (type of call) at (address or location) (incident). After an investigation, it was determined'that this incident could be considered a bias offense. The Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) provides support to victims of bias offenses and maintains a zero - tolerance for bias offenses within the City of Edina. You are a victim of this incident, but victim information is considered private data. The Edina Police Department has not, and will not, release your. contact information to the HRRC without your informed consent. The Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC) would like to offer its services to you re ag rding the above incident. Please indicate below whether you would like to be contacted by the HRRC to receive information on the support and • services the HRRC provides, and return this form in the enclosed self- addressed envelope within 10 days. No. I do not want to be contacted by the HRRC regarding support services. Yes. I would like to be contacted by the HRRC for support services. I authorize the Edina Police Department to release my name, address, and telephone number, to the HRRC. (Signature) Date Attachment: Community Resource Network Contact Information Edina Police Department Administration 952 - 826 -1610 4801 W. 50 Street FAX 952 - 826 -1607 Edina MN-55424 -1394 TDD 952 - 826 -1630 'a e ����� in E 9 �y less To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #- VIII. D. From: Debra Mangen Action M City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: August 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -81 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -81 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -81 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Braemar Golf Course For Future Golf Course Equipment Purchases: Braemar Mens Club (BMC Event) $165.00 Richard Leonard $50.00 Braemar ens Club Memorial Weekend Event $50.00 Steve Bloomquist $25.00 Edina Art Center: Lisa & Neil Benson Electric Kiln Rick Bock 50 Books & Watercolor Paper Eddie Fesler Paint Bottles & Fiber Paper Emrich Veanne Two Art Books Evangeline Brat Clay Mary Jo Franshe $100.00 in honor of Harriet Campe Geri Biebel Chavis Poetry & Story Therapy Book Stephen Danko 19 Frames - Various sizes Edina Park & Recreation Department: Edina Give & Go Edina Community Foundation New Horizon Academy Kinderbery Hill Child Development Centers (XCumbers Fairview Hospital & Clinics Cal Ripken Jr. Cal Ripken Jr. Edina Swim Club Dated: August 4, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK $495.00 Summer Program Fees - Families In Need $5,000.00 Donald Nyrop Memorial Fund $250.00 $400.00 $400.00 $1,700.00 Autographed Cal Ripken Jr. Jersey Autographed Cal Ripken Jr. Photograph Ultraviolet Light Disinfection System — Edinborough Park Pool James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 4, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. Z A, o e� U) TP O �y ,aBB Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REDEEMER TEL. (612) 926 -5414 FAX (612) 926 -2245 5440 PENN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419 -1539 e -mail: pastor@lccronpenn.org secretary@lccronpenn.org July 15, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland Members of Edina City Council 4801 W. 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of City Council, On behalf of Lutheran Church of Christ the Redeemer, we would ask you to support the 66 West Apartment proposal of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Although located in southwest Minneapolis, we have active members in Edina, Richfield and the other southwest suburbs this project would serve. LCCR has a history of advocating for affordable housing and ending homelessness in our communities. We believe that we should be about making sure that everyone has the safety and security of a place to call home. Many youth become homeless through no fault of their own. Struggling to complete their education and figure out -how to become independeant adults on their own is a lot to ask of any good kid. A short-term investment in these young people at a critical time pays huge dividends. Many of us were involved in the establishment of Nicollet Square, the project in Minneapolis that 66 West is modeled on, and have visited it since it's been in operation. It's proven to be much more than we'd hoped for and is giving its residents what they need to move ahead with their lives more quickly than we'd expected. We're really excited about the idea about a location near Southdale with good transportation and job opportunities that would be in the comfort zone of the suburban kids who need help. It's hard to imagine a better setting. We've committed a significant gift from our last Capital Campaign to the project. We hope that you too will embrace the vision behind this project. Sincerely, Q_ t� ZT . — The LCCR Congregation Council ORK-1- / �j A ft � Mary lbing, pastor Heather Branigin From: Kara Rios <riosmk131 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:57 PM To: Cary Teague, Edina Mail Subject: Edina Development Plan Concerns Dear Mr. Teague, We write to you as concerned residents who have lived in Edina for over 10 years. As business owners, we understand the need for our suburb to be progressive in our development plans. What is concerning to us is the sheer number of high- density apartments /condos/mixed use living/retail spaces going up in our suburb over the last 2 -3 years. While those that are underway obviously will move forward, we would ask the Council to take the concerns of the tax paying residents of Edina seriously and to simply SLOW the pace of development so that we can all see and feel the impacts it has on the already intense traffic levels we are experiencing in the Southdale area. We realize some of this is due to road construction (much of which is to accommodate the new structures already approved). Edina does not want to make a positive reputation for land developers at the expense of the reputation is has with residents. We believe we are pushing that envelope as it is. Specifically, we'd ask the Council NOT to approve the following proposed projects: -7200 France redevelopment. This structure, in addition to the apartments going next to Byerly's will put too much strain on France Avenue traffic and will likely push traffic through the residential neighborhood nearby, which also houses Cornelia Elementary. Our children deserve to have their safety taken into consideration. -66 West Apartments. This plan is on the agenda for the Planning Council for July 23rd. While we are supportive of the type of housing and services this would offer, we remain concerned that the overall growth in this area is too much too fast. We would like to see this proposal resubmitted AFTER the completion of the currently approved projects. Please incorporate this email into the appropriate records. Respectfully, Kara & Mike Rios 5116 Duggan Plaza Edina, MN 55439 Heather Branigin From: David Hlavac <davidhlavac @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:22 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; mmariew @hotmail.com Subject: 7200 France Dear Edina City Council - As you prepare tonight to discuss even more high - density residential development in the France /York Avenue corridors, I wanted to make you aware of my position as a neighborhood resident. PLEASE consider carefully the impact that these residential developments will have on traffic, parking, public school enrollment, use of municipal services, etc. before you approve this project, which I believe does not fit the scale and character of the neighborhood. I am not a NIMBY type of person - one of the reasons why I love living in the Cornelia neighborhood is because of its urban feel and proximity to retail /restaurants. But with nearly 1,000 new dwelling units planned for a 1 -2 square -mile area, with seemingly very little consideration given to traffic, parking and transit, I cannot help but feel that Edina is destined to become a "little Bloomington," complete with the problems that such density brings to a community. As it stands, there are few public transit options in Edina (I work in the Edinborough Corporate Center), and while there have been improvements in biking and walking accessibility, much more needs to be done from a mass transit standpoint to serve such exponential growth in housing density. I would urge the council to consult with the Board of Education as well, to determine the impact housing growth will have on enrollment and class size. The district is already strapped for cash and space and is on the cusp of being over - crowded at the elementary level. Consider the impact this development will have on the district and on Cornelia Elementary School in particular. I realize that healthy cities must grow and change to stay desirable for new residents and businesses. I am not opposed to growth itself, as long as it is done with a keen eye to the quality -of -life impact it will have on existing residents. Please consider whether we need another high - density development on what is now a mostly low- density residential and light. commercial side of France Avenue, particularly with so many units now under construction that (as far as I am aware) are not even fully leased. Taking more time to study this proposal can only yield good things for Edina - there is no need to rush. Thank you for your consideration David Hlavac From: Dgwags(a)aol.com [mallto:Dgwagss @ aol.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: NO MORE DEVELOPMENT ON FRANCE AVENUE Dear Mr. Teague, I recently heard about the City Council considering additional development at 720o France Avenue. I am shocked that this would even be considered. Do you ever drive down France in morning rush hour or at 4:30 in the afternoon? It is grid locked. The area needs no more development or density. New apartments are going up across the street at Byerly's and a few short blocks away at Southdale. As a Cornelia neighborhood resident, my ability to get out onto France and get to work has already been negatively impacted by the dividing of France Avenue for the new Byerly's. We already have the potential for hundreds more cars a day with the current projects. Enough is enough. When the City has to make multiple amendments to it's comprehensive plan to accommodate development you shouldn't be developing the site in this manner. The plan was made so we don't get over crowded. Who wants to become another Eden Prairie with empty strip development after empty strip development? The City of Edina ruined it's gem at 5oth & France with over development. It is so crowded most people I know don't bother to go down there. Parking is a hassle. Don't ruin the Cornelia neighborhood too. Sincerely, Deborah Wagner Heather Branigin From: NINA HOLIDAY -LYNCH <lucymilt @msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:35 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66West Affordable Housing Please Edina City Council do support the passage of the Affordable 66 West Housing with supportive services for young adults in the Southdale neighborhhood of Edina. It very important to support our youth of this community. Nina Holiday -Lynch Edina resident. Heather Branigin From: Katie Mader Halcrow <katiemader @gmail.com> Sent Tuesday, July 15, 201410:10 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; swensonannl @gmail.com; Cary Teague Cc: Casey Halcrow; Katie Mader Subject: Re: Concerns about 72nd & France Development Dear Mr. Teague, Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members, I just wanted to send you a quick note to thank you for your work at the meeting tonight. While my neighbors and I are still concerned that this was, indeed, "asking for the moon" so that another slightly scaled -back proposal looks, comparatively, very reasonable, I appreciate your comments tonight and your attention to this matter. I had never been to a city council meeting to date, so I also appreciated the mayor's explanation of the process and insight gained from watching the public hearing on the property 4923 49th Street. It is my hope that this project will undergo the same rigorous critique as that property, especially as it regards city infrastructure, water drainage, and Cornelia Elementary School. Thank you again for your time and your service to our city. Sincerely, Katie Halcrow 7313 Cornelia Drive On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Katie Mader Halcrow <katiemaderna,gmail.com> wrote: Dear Mr. Teague, Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members, My husband and I live at 7313 Cornelia Drive (one block south of 72nd & Cornelia). As a resident very near to the proposed development of the property on the corner of 72nd and France, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposal as it currently stands. At first when I heard there was a 6 -story complex proposed at 72nd and France, I thought there must have been some mistake. To ascertain exactly what this project would entail, I immediately watched the video of the City of Edina's Edina Planning Commission meeting on June 25th, 2014. While the idea of 100% underground parking, the incorporation of green principles, and the promised 20% affordable housing all sound positive, I am greatly concerned about this project and the precedent this sets for other areas abutting residential, single - family homes in the city. I have some major concerns: 1. The mass and density of the development. a. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Heights higher than 4 stories. This proposed development is 6 stories — a 50% increase on current regulations. As Susan Lee stated, six stories have been approved near the Southdale area — but that area is not in proximity to any residential building. This kind of development is unprecedented on the west side of France — in particular because of the residential neighborhood to which this proposal is adjacent. b. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Density more than 30 units per acre (very recently, this was only 16 units per acre); this proposed development is 50 — a 66% increase on current regulations and over 200% increase on previous regulations. c. Current Comprehensive Plan states that the Floor Area Ratio will not be more than .5; the proposal is for 1.88 —an over 275% increase. Why do we have regulations in the Comprehensive Plan if these regulations can be so significantly changed for any given development? 2. Traffic congestion (due in large part to the proposed building density and floor area ratio). a. There is already a huge mixed -use area under construction across the street at Byerly's, which will add significantly to traffic congestion on France. This was a major concern with that project when it was proposed for development. The idea of putting a - what seems to be - even larger and more dense multi -use building with almost 200 units as well as restaurants and retail will continue this issue on France as well. b. In addition, as Michael Schroeder noted, residents who will now be living in the complex (at minimum around 200 cars — more likely 300 +) who desire to go north or west will go down 72nd to Cornelia. This will turn the street in front of Cornelia Elementary School into a thoroughfare, making the area less safe for children walking to and from the school. A grassy median will do nothing to stem this traffic. Indeed, if the developer were to begin to adequately address this concern, Cornelia Drive would be dead -ended at Lynmar Lane, - splitting the road in two. This would allow current neighborhood residents to turn left and go to the stoplight at Hazelton to access France, and the influx of new residence would be funneled back onto France Avenue from 72nd ensuring that the school area would remain low- traffic and safe. The developer mentioned that Sunrise senior residence as a comparable site to the new development in terms of a multi -unit residential property in the area. I am sure I do not have to point this out to the Council or Commission, but there is a large difference between the traffic density incurred by the Sunrise senior residence and the proposed site development with its 200+ units of development. When my husband and I moved into the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina in 2011, we chose our home in large part due to the location's quiet neighborhood. We felt that Edina, with its Comprehensive Plan, would protect us from this exact type of development, which — as it stands — would likely lead to decreased real- estate values, severely increased traffic, and a substantially un- residential back -yard view. It is my hope that the consequences of this project will be considered and the project will be significantly modified (in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan) to protect all Edina residents from significantly changes to their neighborhood landscapes. Thank you very much for your time and your service to our city, Katie & Casey Halcrow katiemadera-amail.com casey. halcrow(ZO mail. com 952- 994 -0631 Heather Braniain From: Matthew Wiandt <matthew_wiandt @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 201410:42 PM To: cteague @edina.mn.gov; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Ging Wiandt Subject: Support for Pursuit of 7200 France Ave Development Mayor Hovland, Mr. Teague and City Council Members, My wife and I live in the South Cornelia neighborhood and we enthusiastically support the potential 7200 France Avenue project. We base this support on the beliefs that a densely populated community creates vitality for a neighborhood and can be thoughtfully integrated into a retail, commercial and residential district. When we contemplated buying our home in 2011, we paused to consider whether Southdale Mall and the surrounding area might someday decline. Too many suburban malls and shopping centers lose their appeal and contribute to a decline in surrounding property values. Southdale certainly benefits from attracting consumers from neighboring communities. However, the competition for shoppers' dollars is fierce. The retail square footage per capita has increased dramatically in recent years and is further threatened by online commerce. Investments in high quality residential projects can strengthen the Southdale community - resulting in continued access to a variety of vibrant shops and restaurants as well as access to high value infrastructure such as public transportation and hopefully, in the future, such services as Uber or Lyft. Many will argue whether an influx of renters will lack a stake in the community. I would argue a dearth of rental options could cause Edina to miss out on a generation that is re- evaluating whether their preferred lifestyle is best supported through home ownership. Frankly, we were also turned off by the auto - centric, circa 1950s design of the area and have been delighted to see the investment in pedestrian and bike - friendly amenities. The purchasing value of 195 new households far exceeds the added burden of maybe 300 automobiles, especially when nearby shops are withing walking distance. Many of the low rise commercial buildings on the west side of France seem to contribute little to the community. Several appear to have significant vacancy rates and certainly do not enhance the corridor. These commercial buildings lack the layouts and amenities sought by many small businesses. We believe the integration of residences and retail would be a better transition from a commercial district to a single family neighborhood. Mixed use areas are highly desirable as seen in the more new housing starts in Minneapolis than any other city in the Twin Cities. Development comes in cycles. I urge you and your staff to take advantage of the investor support for residential projects in Southdale to further strengthen the Southdale area and the South Cornelia neighborhood. Certainly, any design would need to minimize environmental and transportation impacts. Recent developments in Edina give me confidence the City of Edina can do this. Thank you for your consideration. Matthew & Virginia Wiandt 4404 Gilford Dr. Heather Branigin From: Kay Bochert <kbochert@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014.7:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West i i I am so pleased that this important housing is to be in Edina. There are hundreds of homeless youth in the western suburbs who deserve a chance to start their independence with more tools. This is the best antidote to the cycle of crime and lack of skills. Kay Bochert _- kbochertgcomcast.net 213. Coventry Court Edina. 55435 "Be the change you want to see in the world." Gandhi Heather Branigin From: Jeanne Exline <exlin001 @umn.edu> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:10 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland re: Beacon Good Morning, We are residents of Richfield and wholly support the Beacon 66 West project for young adults in the western suburbs. It is a perfect site; jobs, transportation, affordable and safe. Please give this important issue your support too. Jeanne and Jack Exline 6711 Lake Shore Dr. #702 Richfield, MN 55423 Heather Branigin From: Della Kolpin <dkolpin @mesabacapital.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 12:47 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Bo Nickoloff Subject: Continental Gardens @ 7151 York Avenue I Mesaba Capital Dear Mr. Hovland, My name is Della Kolpin, senior partner at Mesaba Capital Development, located in - Edina, MN. Mesaba Capital is the developer for Continental Gardens, the Senior Housing project located at 7151 York Avenue. Our team presented at sketch plan review during the City Council meeting on May 20. We appreciate your time and comments to date regarding our development. We have submitted our formal development application and will be in attendance at the August 4th City Council meeting. Bo Nickoloff and I would appreciate an opportunityto meet with you to discuss our submittal and modifications following the sketch plan review and prior to the council meeting. We have set aside a few days in the coming weeks and hope that we can find a time that is convenient for you. • Monday, July 21 (except 1:30 PM to 3:00 PM) • Tuesday, July 22 (except 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM) • Wednesday, July 23 Please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Thank you very much and we look forward to meeting with you. Della Kolpin, AIA I Senior Partner Mesaba Capital Partners 2501 Eden Avenue Edina, Miunesota. 612.84o.98o1. . mesa bacapital.com Heather Braniain From: Mathias Mortenson <mathiasmortenson @ gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 16,2014 1:30 PM To: James Hovland Subject: 3923 49th Street Mayor Hovland, I just wanted to express appreciation for the consideration you showed both me and my project at last night's Council meeting. It turns.out I chose to focus on the wrong aspects of the proposal, .a result of some faulty advice as well as a misread on my part of what councilpeople's concerns would be. You did ;give me every opportunity, however, to explain/describe /argue for the other positive qualities of the project, and for;that I am thankful. And of course, although I sensed you personally liked the project, I do definitely understand your vote. I suspected drainage and runoff would be a core issue; I just wasn't able to do enough to assuage the Council's concerns. So .... back to the drawing board! Literally. Thanks again for your attention and consideration. Regards, Mathias 1 Heather Branigin From: Olson <joloz3 @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartment Project Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members: I am writing to ask you to support the zoning changes necessary to make the 66 West Apartments a reality! Why? ....Although I am a resident of St. Louis Park, I believe strongly that the site on 66th street being considered for this affordable housing project is as close to ideal as one could hope for. As you are aware, this Beacon Interface Housing Collaborative project will provide affordable, supportive housing for young adults who are experiencing homelessness .... many of whom are from our southwest metro suburbs. The highly familiar Southdale area would provide opportunities for safe transportation, jobs, education and services that.many other west metro locations could not. In addition to meeting your own affordable housing goals, saying yes to this project would make Edina a recognize_ d leader in the fight against youth homelessness that would benefit the entire.southwest metro area. Why do I care? .....Sometimes homeless young adults are not who we think they are. There are many reasons why one becomes homeless. I learned this when I worked'for many years in a counseling office at a.local private college. Almost all college students have big dreams for their future but today more and more students are faced with large tuition bills, low paying.part time jobs, no family financial support, and personal and family issues that prohibit them from living at home I discovered, along with struggling to get a,good education and working to pay the bills, some_were alsoRhomeless! Also, to my surprise, they often came from our west metro suburban communities where for many going to college was expected, getting a good-job was expected, being successful was expected... The high cost of college residential halls was not an option, nor was paying extremely high apartment rents; so, they "hid" by living in their cars or did dorm room hopping... until they got caught. Many bright students with limited options and resources but lots of potential were forced to quit college and future dreams were never realized. 66 West Apartments will not solve the problem of growing numbers of suburban homeless young adults, but those who are behind this project know that affordable and supportive housing can make a huge difference in providing stability and security! Our young adult suburban citizens need to know their communities are caring and understanding. We have an opportunity right now to respond and make sure this project is successful. It is the right thing to do! Thank you for your thoughtful consideration on this important vote, Lois Olson, retired 3917 Lynn Av So, SLIP Member of Edina Community Lutheran Church Heather Braniain From: Andy <fotness @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:53 PM To:. Edina Mail Subject: 66 west project for homeless youth Dear City Council members, Mayor Hovland, and City staff: For two decades] have volunteered for outreach projects through my community of faith, St. Stephens Episcopal Church, - and,through the - League of Women Voters Edina. I hope you will support this project which addresses the youth homelessness in our area of the metro. Please consider thoughtfully the necessary zoning changes which will be necessary .l support the changes Beacon is requesting: sincerely, Andy, Otness 5433 Kellogg AVe. 612 - 978 -1681 J i j f S E S 1 i i Heather Branigin From: Elizabeth n Michael Laliberte <thelalas2004 @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 west - Edina project To whom it may concern, I am a firm believer in supporting this teen housing program and believe in Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative for their vision, work and interaction within this community. I have had pleasure of working as a consultant with this organization for the past 9 months and to see these people on action and hear the stories of the people that come into their office to thank them has touched my heart deeply in ways words cannot fully express. I know this organization is for the people and the funds actually get to the programs. We are not fully aware as a community how much our youth is traumatized by not having a secure place to rest their heads at night. So when you turn out your light for the evening and have a good night's rest .... know that there are teens out wandering the streets looking for a place to call home for a couple of hours. Please give this project a chance and you will have a profound effect on changing lives. God bless, Elizabeth Laliberte Heather Branigin From: Betsy Cussler <betsycussler @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Jim and members of the Edina City Council, I am writing in support of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative's project for homeless and precariously housed youth that is being planned for 3360 66th Street West in Edina. Why do I support this project? First of all, because there is a need. These youth are not always visible, but studies estimate that we have between 200 and 300 homeless or precariously housed youth in the southwest suburbs right now. Without stable housing, pursuing further education and getting regular employment become much more difficult and unlikely. Why Beacon? I have been a supporter of Beacon from its beginning over 10 years ago as Plymouth Church Neighborhood Foundation. More recently I was heavily involved in a more recent project, Nicollet Square (on Nicollet at 37' Street), which serves specifically youth. The building is new construction, completed in December 2010, with efficiency apartments for 42 youth, as well as a large social common room, a computer room, a work -out room, and laundry facilities. More important, Beacon provides on -site support staff who help the tenants with job and life skills. Since opening, Nicollet Square has served 90 youth; as their lives stabilize and they get jobs and become more financially independent- -not to mention more self - confident and self - respecting, the tenants move on, making room for someone else. At Nicollet Square, nearly all of the tenants have jobs and 40% of those with high school diplomas or a GED (some of which were acquired while they were living there) are now pursuing higher education. Simply, having a home has changed their lives - -for the better! Now several congregations in Edina and neighboring communities want to bring this miracle to the southwest suburbs and specifically to Edina. Thirty -four years ago my husband and I moved here from Pittsburgh with our four children. Like many people, we chose Edina because of its reputation as a community that cares for youth; proof of this commitment to youth are the excellent schools (in which I was a teacher for 21 years) and the fine community sports programs. 66West will be an extension of our commitment to young people, slightly older youth- 18 -22, but still youth who need a home at a critical point in their lives. Usually through no fault of their own, these youth do not have the family support, and the home, that most young people take for granted. 66West will meet that need. I urge you and the City Council to support this project. Let's make Edina proud of putting youth first and proud of leading the way once again. Thank you, Betsy Cussler 5825 Vernon Lane, Edina 55436 952- 922 -2299 2 Heather Branigin From: Bernie Beaver <bbeaver44 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:57 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Allison Johnson; Dylan Bonlender Subject: 66 West Apartments Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am a member of the task force from Edina Community Lutheran Church that is partnering with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative to develop apartments for young people in the southwest metro area who may otherwise be homeless. I am writing to encourage you to support the necessary variances and approve the plan to develop a facility at 3360 West 66th Street, to be known as 66 West Apartments. The number of homeless people in the Metro area is substantial and growing and includes our fellow citizens from the suburbs, including Edina. Our task force and Beacon have decided to focus on providing an appropriate facility for young people (generally ages 18 -24) who are in need of a boost to have a permanent address from which to build their lives. The new 66 West Apartments will enable these young residents to find employment and further their education while receiving counseling services to assure success and the ability to move forward to become productive members of our community. We are now faced with an opportunity to provide that facility in an ideal location with access to transportation and jobs. 66 West Apartments will be developed by an experienced professional organization with a proven track record of success in development and property management. The proposal for 66 West Apartments will include 39 studio apartments along with common areas, which would be normal for an apartment building of comparable size. In addition, there will be office space for property management and counselors. Beacon, or an agency which they may retain, will screen applicants to find those most likely to be successful in building improved lives with the housing and counseling options offered at this property. While there will only be 39 residents at the facility at any given time the property may benefit more than 250 people over a ten year period with an average turnover rate of 18 months. Beacon has conducted an extensive search to find a suitable location for this facility and has concluded that this is the best available option at this time. To reject this opportunity to build and to deny the future residents to live in these apartments at this time and in this place will set the search back several years. Please approve this application so that 66 West Apartments can become a reality. Bernie H. Beaver 6225 Fox Meadow Lane Edina, MN 55436 Heather Braniain From: dmiller <deanne:miller @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 201410:49 AM To:, Cary Teague; Edina Mail Subject: France Ave & 72nd I'm sorry I was :unable to attend the meeting regarding the density apt/retail project slated for 72nd and France. As a resident of the neighborhood I believe the proposed design would have a very negative impact. There are several reasons but the. most notable is the increase in automobile traffic. I am not anti- apartment complex. Indeed, it makes a great deal of sense to concentrate populations near support services and resources. In a perfect world the entire structure would be "affordable housing ". How that became a dirty word is beyond me. It's not the people that make the proposed monstrosity so repugnant it's the cars. Under NO circumstances should there be any auto entrance /exit on 72nd. 72nd is a primary foot traffic and bike route for many people. There is a park and school just down the street. All motorized traffic needs, to be directed on and off from France Ave. There needs, really needs, to be a pedestrian/bike bridge across France at this location. There needs to be a 20' landscaped promenade between 72nd and the structure; Exs: hM://www.n5tpies.com/2:61'4/01/15/realestate/comm'erc'ialjust -over- the - bridge- from - manhattan- queens- plaza- undergoes -a- major- renewal.html htt-p://www.fxack29ui)town.cbrn/urban-desi sg,/railcorridor /ideas/ideas.htm You might say there isn't anything beautiful to look at on 72nd (or France Ave for that,matter) but there will be if you build it And developers will build it if we, the city - the people of the city, insist they do. The area is desirable enough not to give it away to the lowest bidder - but to the smartest. Edina is so special - please don't trash it with walmart development. Deanne Miller 1 Heather Branigin From: dmiller <deanne.miller @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 201410:55 AM To: Cary Teague, Edina Mail Subject: Re: France Ave & 72nd If you are able - walk through Track29 in uptown - its possible to build population -dense housing in old neighborhoods that don't treat established residents like doormats. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:49 AM, dmiller <deanne.millerQgmail.com> wrote: I'm sorry I was unable to attend the meeting regarding the density apt/retail project slated for 72nd and France. As a resident of the neighborhood I believe the proposed design would have a very negative impact. There are several reasons but the most notable is the increase in automobile traffic. I am not anti - apartment complex. Indeed, it makes a great deal of sense to concentrate populations near support services and resources. In a perfect world the entire structure would be "affordable housing ". How that became a dirty word is beyond me. It's not the people that make the proposed monstrosity so repugnant. it's the cars. Under NO circumstances should there be any auto entrance /exit on 72nd. 72nd is a primary foot traffic and bike route for many people. There is a park and school just down the street. All motorized traffic needs to be directed on and off from France Ave. There needs, really needs, to be a pedestrian/bike bridge across France at this location. There needs to be a 20' landscaped promenade between 72nd and the structure; Exs: httn: / /www.nvtimes. com/2014 /O 1/ 15 /realestate/commercialliust- over - the- bridize- from - manhattan- aueens- plaza - undergoes- a- maior- renewal.html http : / /www.track290towrLcom/urban- design htW://www.ura.gov.sp,/railcorridor/ideas/ideas.htm You might say there isn't anything beautiful to look at on 72nd (or France Ave for that matter) but there will be if you build it. And developers will build it if we, the city - the people of the city, insist they do. The area is desirable enough not to give it away to the lowest bidder - but to the smartest. Edina is so special - please don't trash it with walmart development. Deanne Miller Heather Braniain, From: Laurie Olson <lawolson @icloud.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: regarding Edina Resident support for 66 West Project. Attachments: Resident Letter Supporting 66 West.pdf, ATT00001.htm Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members Bennett, Brindl, Sprague and Swenson. Attached for your consideration, please find a copy of my letter requesting support for Beacon Interfaith's 66 West project. Thanks. Laurie Olson Laurie A. Olson, Esq., LLC lawolsoggicloud.com (952.693.1629) This electronic communication is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 1f you received this email and were not the intended recipient, are advised that any dissemination,'dtstribution of copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the communication in .error, please delete it and notify the sender. Thank you. 1 Laurie A. Olson 4700 Sunnyside Road• Edina, MN 66424 Phone: 952.927.7498 • E -Mail: lawolson@icloud.com July 17, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindl Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Dear Dear Mayor Hovland, Ms. Bennett, Ms. Brind], Mr. Sprague & Ms. Swenson: I am writing to request your support for Beacon Interfaith's 66 West Project. My husband and I have been Edina residents for over thirteen years, and we have three kids enrolled in the Edina Public Schools. While I feel very blessed to be able to live in and raise kids in this terrific community, I recognize that many others come from far more challenging backgrounds without social, emotional or physical support needed to thrive. Beacon Interfaith and its faith community partners have demonstrated a history of commitment and success in meeting important needs of the many people who are part of our communities but are not necessarily visible. In my opinion, Edina's location and its community of caring people uniquely position the City to allow for the successful construction and operation of a housing solution geared to meeting the needs of homeless, at -risk youth. By having safe, stable shelter those served by 66 West would be better positioned to reframe their futures. I would like to see Edina be part of that reshaping. As an Edina resident, I am supportive of Project 66 West, and I would like to see my city leaders support it as well. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Laurie A OCson Laurie A. Olson Heather Braniain From: Nancy Peterson <njopete @msn.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 20141:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Homeless youth housing Dear Edina City Council, In your deliberations please consider some of the reasons young people are homeless. They might not feel safe at home because of violence and sexual abuse. Their family might be homeless and they are now too old to be admitted into family shelters at night. They might be.living with a grandparent who is in subsidized housing and the time they can stay in that location has ended. Their family mighthave entirely disintegrated as a unit and they- have no idea how to go it alone without any form of support. The reasons are many and usually through no fault of their own. Thank you for listening to my concern. Together we can all help turn young lives around. Nancy Peterson, Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Sharon Aadalen <saadalen @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July,18, 201410:37. AM To: Edina, Mail Subject: 66 West, affordable housing for young adults in Edina We are residents of Edina (1973 -2011 at 4924 Dale Drive; Edina 55424; 2011 - present at 7100 Metro Blvd, Edina 55439) and members of Edina Community. Lutheran Church, west 54th St., Edina (1973 - present). Having a:home is an inestimable foundation fora positive sense of self and becoming a contributing citizen. Having been fortunate to have a home, we have joined with others in our faith community10 address the need for housing for people in our midst who are homeless. Being good stewards of resources for the growth, and strengthening of everyone in our locMiand greater communities is a part of who are as people of faith. Sharon has been a mentor to and in relationship with a person who has experienced homelessness since the age of 14. Now 27, this person continues to struggle-to build the foundation home provides. What a difference the opportunity for stable, affordable, secure housing such as that proposed for 66 West in Edina by the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative would have meant to this person and so many other homeless youth in our community. The need for housing for youth in Edina and south western suburbs has been well documented. The location at 66 West is ideal due-to the proximity provided to job opportunities, transportation and services. The city of Edina is attempting to meet goals related to affordable housing, and the 39 units of affordable apartments planned at 66 West will contribute to meeting that goal. We encourage Mayor Hovland and the City Council leadership to support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 west a reality. Thank you for your thoughtful and diligent study of this very important proposal. We look forward to your support. Respectfully, Sharon P. Aadalen, PhD, RN and Richard J. Aadalen, MD Sharon Aadalen 7100 Metro Blvd #106 Edina, MN 55439 -2105 Tel: (Land Line) 952 - 925 -1478 (Mobile) 612-96570259 E -mail: saaaalen @emall.com Heather Braniain From:. Debby McNeil <mcneiledina @gmail,com> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:51 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Beacon Interfaith and partners project at 3330 West 66th Street Dear`Mr. Mayor and City Council members, I support Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, Edina Community Lutheran Church, and their religious partners, in creating 66 West Apartments at 3330 West,66' Street. As you know, Beacon and partners are planning 39 studio apartments, with supportive services, for young adults ages 18 -24 who do not have a permanent home. So many things recommend this project. For example: -- Beacon is a high- quality and experienced developer of affordable housing, with 19 buildings completed or in, process according to their website, beaconinterfaith.or�. -- Beacon will be maintaining support services right in the building. - -The young people will be tenants and pay rent for their individual apartments. - -The building is conveniently located near many entry -level jobs for youth at Fairview Southdale hospital /medical building and Southdale mall. - -The public transportation is terrific, so young people would not need a car to get to work or school. Metro Transit buses stop right in front of the building and there is a central bus hub across the street in the mall parking lot. i - -Edina Community Lutheranand other churches are supporting this effort. Why should this project be built in Edina? Some of the young people who will benefit from 66 West apartments are already spending time here in our. community. They may be "couch surfing" with friends in Edina or living by day, in places 'like the library or the mall. They may be riding city buses in Edina. How many of our kids could function all alone and move forward in life under these circumstances? Edina is not a gated community. Many people, including young adults without permanent homes, spend time here. Beacon is offering a powerful way to help these young people go to school, get a job, and make their-lives a success. Improving their(lives will make Edina. as a whole abetter place to live. Edina is a community that cares about, and takes care of;, the young people in our town. By approving 66 West apartments, we will be offering a healthy environment and opportunity to all the young people in our community, including those who may need it and benefit from it, the most When the 66 West Apartments project comes before you, I hope you will approve it. Thank you for your consideration, Debby McNeil 5501 Benton Avenue, Edina 55436 952- 925 -9095 Edina resident since 1987 2 Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Project - Construction Update July 18, 2014 Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), operator of the metro -area wastewater collection and treatment system, is continuing rehabilitation work on aging and deteriorating regional sanitary sewers in the area of 50th St. and Knox Ave. in the Lynnhurst Neighborhood of Minneapolis. Current and Upcoming Work Temporary pumps and pipes are conveying wastewater around the existing regional sanitary sewer that will be rehabilitated. To operate the pipes and pumps, we have had to close the southbound lane of traffic in. the 4900 block of Knox Ave., and restrict traffic on 51st St. between James Ave. acid Knox Ave. Crews have been cleaning the sewer that is to be rehabilitated, and should complete that work early the week of July 21. During that week and possibly part of the week of July 28, we will install a liner in four segments of the sewer to create a new pipe within the existing pipe. Much of this Work will be done overnight to reduce the impact on traffic on 501h St. (which will remain open with two traffic lanes on the south side of the street during the work) and reduce impact on other construction that is taking place at Mount Olivet Church. There will be noise from the operation of pumps, generators and a boiler truck, but not the louder noise that comes from sawing through pavement and excavation. After the liners are installed, the temporary pumps and pipes will be removed and paved areas will be restored. Some of this work also will need to occur during overnight hours. Project Background Where and When Will the Work Take Place? Regional sewer rehabilitation project areas are located as follows (see enclosed map): • Along Knox Ave. — from just north of 50th St. to 51st St.: June to August 2014. • West of Lake Harriet — portions of 47th St. (west of Washburn Ave.), portions of 48th, 49th and 50th Sts., and portions of York, Zenith, Drew and France Aves.: July to September 2014. • Along and near Lake Harriet — 47th St. east of Washburn Ave., Lake Harriet Pkwy. from 474h St. to Knox Ave., and Knox Ave. from Lake Harriet Pkwy. to just north of 50th St.: December 2014 to February 2015. • Along Minnehaha Creek from Knox Ave. to Girard Ave.: December 2014 to February 2015. Regional sewer replacement project areas are located as follows (see enclosed map): • 47th St. from Washburn Ave. to the alley to the alley between Washburn and Vincent Aves.: November 2014 • 49th St from Chowen Ave. to the alley between Chowen and Drew Aves.: December 2014 How Will the Work Be Done? Both the sewer replacement and the sewer rehabilitation work will require diversion of wastewater through temporary pipes that generally will be above ground, but they will be buried at driveway entrances and roadway crossings. Except as allowed by the Minneapolis Traffic Department, these temporary sewer pipes will not block any roadways. Small excavations will be needed at all maintenance holes and at several additional locations for the temporary sewer pipes. The sewer replacement work on small sections of 47th St. and 49th St. will involve excavation and removal of the old sewer pipe and maintenance holes, installation of new support piling, installation of new sewer pipes and maintenance holes, and restoration of affected street, sidewalk and landscape areas. The affected sections of these streets will need to close while the work is taking place. MEoTROP�OL�ITAN Heather Braniain From: John Kleiber <jakleiber13 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 201411:21 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Ideas for The Fred Hi Edina powers - that -be, I hope you've heard this idea for The Fred already, but here's one for multiple uses that might work. I love golf, but I admit I have not played The Fred a lot. I'm nearing retirement, and I have lived in Edina for 30 years. I think this is worth a look as I would like to golf The Fred more, and still accommodate "younger" ideas. I think this can be done without trashing The Fred. Please note that these are all potential revenue ideas. 1- GOLF (a little re- layout to par 27, i.e. all par 3's) 2 - Frisbee Golf (re- layout the Fred course to put Frisbee "holes" along the existing golf holes. Okay, I don't know if we charge a fee to play Frisbee golf at Rosland Park. 3 - "Soccer" golf - see Star Tribune article about it for Bloomington's Hyland Park. A smart park designer could fit that into The Fred too. Fees are mentioned in the article. httD://www.startribune.com/local/west/24710363 I.html 4 - Lawn Bowling - see Star Tribune again. I am in an "after- work" golf league at Golden Valley's Brookview golf course. They have build a lawn bowling area that's almost ready to open. Ifs not all that large and by cutting some of The Fred holes a little shorter a smart park architect could fit one into The Fred. Having looked at the into posted at Brookview, this is definitely a revenue sport. hilp://www.startribune.com/local/west/25621611 I.hbnl Please give it some consideration, I hope my idea isn't too late! I've also submitted most of this (they have a word count limit) to The Sun Current. Yours truly, John Kleiber 6709 Limerick Lane Edina, MN 55439 952 -944 -3704 Heather Branigin From: gcampbell @gwendy.me Sent: Sunday, July 20, 201411:46 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments development Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Tam an Edina resident living approximately 1.2 miles from the proposed Beacon Interfaith Housing C llaborative's proposed development, 66 West - Apartments, to provide stable, supportive housing for young adults in our community. I whole- heartedly support this ^project and encourage you to do so, also. Aside from the basic humanitarian rights to have stable housing and the tools to become self - sufficient, this project makes long -term economic sense to our community. Every public dollar: spent for supportive housing returns $1.44 to taxpayers and a higher level.of education and lifetime earnings to formerly homeless youth. (Wilder Foundation, 2012) 30% of homeless adults experienced homelessness as a child. I see these children daily in my work at People Serving People, the largest emergency shelter for homeless children''and families in Minnesota, which houses an average of 353 people /day. With the 66 West Apartments, we have an opportunity close to home to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty for young adults in our own community. These young adults'do not choose to be homeless • Those who were homeless as children may lack the supportive family environment that most of us take for granted. . • These young adults may not have seen self- sufficient behaviors, such as employment & stable housing, modelled by the adults Jn their lives. • Their basic K -12 education may have been disrupted frequently due to unstable housing, leaving them less equipped to support themselves. Over 24% of Hennepin County's homeless population lacks even a high school diploma. • These young adults may have undiagnosed or untreated mental health issues, aggrevated by unstable housing. • Finally, these young adults are sometimes fleeing from a home environment so abusive, it makes living on the streets or couch - hopping more attractive than one's own bed. Young people are most at risk of homelessness. Youth ages 21 and younger comprise 46% of our state's homeless population. We can help break that cycle of homelessness for young adults here in our community. 66 West Apartments gives young adults in our community an opportunity to build a stable, self - sufficient future for themselves and their children, an invaluable opportunity that we enjoyed as children. I ask you to join me in supporting this valuable development in our community. Thank you, Gwen Campbell 6600 Southcrest Dr, Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Michele Cox <jim michelecox @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 21, 201410:52 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: Proposed 66 West Apartments My name is Michele Cox and my husband, Jim Cox, and I would like to show our support for the 66 West project. We live at 5729 Abbott and know what an ideal location this area on 66th St. would be for young adults trying to get back on their feet and avoid homelessness. The proximity to bus routes, medical facilities, pharmacies and other necessities would alleviate stresses already in their lives. As members of Christ the King Catholic Church, a participant in Families Moving Forward which provides temporary housing to the homeless, we know the need and reality of help for those, who for many reasons, find themselves homeless. How much better to find ways to help young adults before they find themselves in that situation! Jim and I feel very fortunate to have a house we can go home to and feel an obligation to do what we can to assist others in achieving that same security. Sincerely, Jim and Michele Cox Sent from my iPad J Heather Braniain -.From: LAURA HOPE MELTON <hopemelton @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 21, 20141:20 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.com; skrents @aol.com Subject: Letter Supporting 66 West Attachments: Letter 66 West. pdf Please find attached a letter supporting 66 West, affordable and supportive housing for homeless youth. Hope Melton 4825 Valley View Road Edina, MN, 55424 i L. HOPE MELTON 4825 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDINA, MN 55424 hopemelton @hotmail.com July 21, 2014 Dear Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council; This letter is written to request your support for 66 West, affordable housing with supportive services for young adults. The main reason to support 66 West is that it is the right, and the financially responsible, thing to do. Supporting efforts that promote healthy youth development is what caring communities do, and Edina is a caring community. When these efforts increase the chances that disadvantaged youth will lead healthy, productive lives, the return to taxpayers is many times the investment. In addition, as someone who spent over 35 years creating and managing nationally recognized, innovative programs on behalf of disadvantaged children and families, I recognize that 66 West has all the attributes of successful programs. It has excellent leadership and a professionally supported staff, it takes a comprehensive, longer term, coordinated approach to the complex problems of homeless youth, it pays careful and consistent attention to evaluating its results, it reaches out to surrounding communities for support, and it follows the young people it serves for a significant period after they are "launched" into independence. I am proud of this community because it strives for, and achieves, excellence in providing healthy development opportunities for all its children. In that sense, supporting 66 West is fully consistent with Edina's character and history. Respectfully, L. Hope Melton Heather Branigin From: Elgin Manhard <emanhard @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West To Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council Our names are Elgin and Sally Manhard. We live at 5529 Village Drive, Edina, 55439. We are long time members of Colonial Church. We have long had an interest in finding ways to help the homeless and teens in our Minnesota Communities. We were — in our younger years — actively involved in youth ministry at Colonial and through Young Life. We have worked with Families Moving Forward — housing homeless families for a week at a time at our church. We have helped feed the homeless in various places. We believe many are homeless because of addiction or other issues but we also believe there but the grace of God go I. Many find themselves homeless — not where they ever expected to be. Life throws curve balls sometimes and we need to be a compassionate community. We are very excited to advocate for the establishment of housing and services for homeless teens. We are excited to think Edina — our Edina — would do this!! I ask that you all support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Thank you Sincerely, Elgin and Sally Manhard 952- 944 -5541 emanhard@comcast.net Heather Branigin From: Betsy Cruz <speedyb50 @hotmail.com> Sent Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:30 PM To: Edina Mail; ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: Please support 66 West Apartments Hello, My name is Betsy Cruz, and I am writing as a member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina to ask for your support for the 66 West Apartments. I am also writing as an educator; I teach at Kennedy High School in Bloomington. Not only will 66 West Apartments be a safe place for homeless young adults to live, but they will also be a place where homeless youth can develop a support system by learning from caring adults. This relationship and education piece is so critical. We don't expect people to learn to read, write or do math without instruction. We can't expect people to learn how to budget, apply for college, or successfully interview for a job without instruction. Normally, families provide instruction and modeling in these areas, but not every person is fortunate enough to have a family that is willing and able to educate their children on these life skills. Rather than shrug our shoulders and condemn them to a cycle of struggle, we have the opportunity, now, to help these homeless young adults become independent, successful members of our society. I have taught students who were homeless, students who were orphans, students whose families could not support them. As an educator, I do everything I can to fill in the gaps for these students, but it's not enough. It was heartbreaking to watch my homeless student return to the home he had fled and have to transfer schools, simply because he had no place here to stay any longer. It is heartbreaking when students tell me they didn't have a dinner last night, that they sleep on the living room floor in a sleeping bag, and that their electricity was cut, that there is no caring adult at home to sign their grade report, and on and on. I have seen firsthand how our youth struggle to move forward with their lives when they are worried about their basic survival. If this is what happens to them in high school, what will happen to them after high school? It is easy to think that youth homelessness is not a big issue here in the suburbs, but I've seen it, and it is. We have a chance now to alleviate that problem. What kind of a community would refuse to help the most vulnerable, the least fortunate, and those with so much potential? What our homeless youth need right now can be provided with 66 West Apartments, and I urge you to support them. Sincerely, Betsy Cruz 8109 Dupont Ave S Bloomington, MN 55420 1 Heather Braniain From: chaugenl @comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:59 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: I support Homeless Youth Supportive Housing at 66 WEST!! Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council - I am writing to give my full support for the proposed supportive housing facility for homeless youth to be located at 3330 66th Street West . It has become'clear that there are homeless youth in the western suburbs and there are currently no housing facilities in this area to address their needs. This facility will fill the needs of some 39 young adults and provide much needed supportive services to get these young people out into the world in a more positive way. This is the perfect location for this type of housing complex. There is abundant access to jobs and it is in close proximity to'the Metro's transit system. These two things will give the highest assurance for the success of 66 West's residents. In addition, this will help fill some of the affordable, housing objectives of the City of Edina! Please, I urge you to support 66 West and approve this project as it is currently proposed. I ask you to not forgo . building'something that will positively shape the, lives of young adults today in lieu of future development that may or may not come to that site anytime in the near future. Thank you.for your consideration. Christine Haugen ECLC Task Force.Member 5408 Girard Ave S 1 Pride KEVIN JOHNSON Mayor of Sam—ro Vice Praidenn STEPHANIE RAMPUNGS -BLAKE Mayor of Bslaimom Second Vke Preside.. MICK CORNETT Mayor of OWahoou Gay Pau Praidenm ELI7ABETH B. KAUTZ Mayor d B —ilk MICHAEL A. NUTTER Mayor dPhiladelphia DONALD L PLUSQUELLIC Mayor of Akron JOSEPH P. RILEY. JR. Mayor dCharlaren. SC Trmam: GREGORY A. BALLARD Mayor. d Indiampofu STEPHEN K. BENJAMIN Mayor of&I —bia, SC J. CHRISTIAN BOLLWAGE Mayor of Elioberh JAMES BRMNARD Mayor of Darnel, IN ALVIN BROWN Mayor of JacksonviRw FL MICHAEL B. COLEMAN Mayan dColumbur, OH JOY COOPER Mayor of Hallandale Beach T.M. FRANKLIN COWNIE Mayor of Der Molna, IA GREG FISCHER Mayor of Louisville MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU Mayor dN— Odom BRENDA L LAWRENCE May_ d SourhAdd JOHN R. MARKS 111 Mayor dTallaha PEDRO E. SEGARRA Maya, of Hartford ASHLEY SWFARENGIN Mayor of F-- Advi_ry Board: BRYAN K. BARNETT Mayor of Raehaaer Hilh RALPH BECKER Mayor of Sak Lake Gay SHANE T. BEMIS Mayor of Graham ARDELL F BREDE Maya' Ro of ehara, MN CHRISTOPHER L CABALDON Mayor of Was 5acmmenro ROBERT CLUCK May_ of Arlingmn, TX BUDDY DYER Mayor of Orlando BILL FINCH Mayor of Bridgeport GIROLYN G. GOODMAN May_ of Ls Vega SYLVESTER'SU7 JAMES, Jr. Mayor of Ka_as Chy, MO WILLIAM P. KENOI Mayor of Hilo EDWIN M. LEE Mayo of San Fmcism MARY ANN LUTZ May. of Monrovia KIM M[MILLAN Mayor oFGarlaviRe KENNETH D. MIYAGISHIMA May. of La Cruces LORI C. MOSELEY hlay_ d Miasma FRANK C. ORTIS May. of Ikmbreko Pin. ED PAWLOWSKI Mayor ofAllenro,•n MIGUEL A PULIDO mayor of Soma A- MIKE RAWLINGS Mayor of Dalhr RAUL G. SALINAS May. of Laredo JAMES J. SCHM= May. of Greta Bay FRANCIS G. SLAY Mayor of SL Louis PAULSOGLIN Mayor of Madison, YPI MARK STODOLA Mayor f Liark Rock MARILYN STRICKLAND May_oFT oma BETH VAN DUYNE May. of Irving BRIAN C. WAHLER Mayor of piZ —y SETfI WARREN Mayor of Neuron CEO and Eaecu6. Di- TOM COCHRAN I THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 EYE STREET, NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 TELEPHONE (202) 293 -7330 FAX (202) 293 -2352 URL: www.usmayors.org July 17, 2014 The Honorable James B. Hovland Mayor of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland: Last month at The U.S. Conference of Mayors 82nd Annual Meeting in Dallas, TX, we unveiled a revised Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement.. Today, we write specifically to ask you to join with your colleagues in this national mayoral effort to sustain and expand local climate protection efforts by joining as a signatory. As you will see in the enclosed Agreement, it envisions a shared agenda of local actions that seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt our cities to changing climatic conditions. For nearly a decade now, it has been mayoral leadership that has defined the nation's work on this issue, whether it is reducing city energy use through energy efficiency and renewable energy, growing new jobs and businesses who are delivering new energy technologies, or helping change behavior so together we recycle more, travel more efficiently and conserve our resources. All of these mayoral -led efforts are making our cities more efficient, less polluting and more resilient. We revised our original Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement with this record in mind, crafting a new mayoral commitment to guide our efforts for the next decade and beyond. By becoming a signatory, you and other mayors will continue to lead the nation in reducing carbon emissions and adapting our cities to a changing climate. For your convenience, you can sign up electronically at: usmayors.org/climateagreement. If you need more information, please contact us at 202 - 293 -7330. We look forward to you joining your mayoral colleagues in this important endeavor. Sincerely, Kevin Johnson Mayor of Sacramento President �I1�a7 LO� Tom Cochran CEO and Executive Director I. NATIONAL ACTION As leaders of the nation's cities, we continue to urge the federal and state governments to enact bipartisan legislation, policies and programs to assist mayors in their efforts to lead the nation toward energy independence, create American jobs that can't be shipped overseas, and protect our environment, eliminate waste, and fight climate change. Such efforts will help achieve the national target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the range of 17 percent by 202o and urge the United States to adopt an ambitious post 2020 target. We urge congress to enact policies and programs that: a. Promote greater energy independence and reduce the United States' dependence on fossil fuels; b. Accelerate energy efficiency and the development of clean, economical and renewable energy technologies such as cogeneration, LED /other energy - efficient lighting, methane recovery for energy generation, waste to energy, wind and solar energy, fuel cells, efficient motor vehicles, and biofuels; and c. Adapt city buildings, homes, facilities and infrastructures to address changing climatic conditions. We urge the federal government to reduce carbon pollution through existing authorities such as the Clean Air Act, Appliance Efficiency Standards, Federal Transportation Investments, and Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency loan and grant programs, including refunding of energy block grant program, and by proposing new legislative initiatives. II. LOCAL ACTION a. Mitigation: We will strive to establish and meet or exceed locally - established targets for reducing energy use, especially fossil fuels, by taking actions in our own operations and throughout our communities, placing particular emphasis on engaging the community — citizens, businesses, schools and organizations — in a concerted campaign to set and achieve such targets through actions such as: i. Develop an energy plan that addresses and includes water, wastewater and stormwater runoff, heat island effects, preservation of open space and an inventory of emissions from fossil fuels for city operations and for the community using established metrics, set reduction targets and adopt elements that address how to harden and adapt city systems and infrastructures to climatic events; ii. Adopt and enforce land -use policies that reduce sprawl, preserve open space, and create compact, walkable urban communities; iii. Promote transportation options such as bicycle trails, commute trip reduction programs, incentives for car pooling and public transit; iv. Increase the use of clean, alternative energy by supporting the development of renewable energy resources, building the renewable energy technology manufacturing capacity of cities, recovering landfill methane for energy production, and supporting the use of waste to energy technology; v. Make energy efficiency and resilience a priority through building code improvements, retrofitting city facilities with energy efficient lighting, urging employees to conserve energy and save money and other actions to maximize the performance of the city buildings; vi. Increase the average fuel efficiency of municipal fleet vehicles, reduce the number of vehicles, launch an employee education program including anti - idling messages, and convert diesel vehicles to bio- diesel; vii. Evaluate opportunities to increase energy efficiency in water and wastewater systems, recover wastewater treatment methane for energy production, and harden these systems to respond to sea level rise and other climatic events threatening the delivery of these services; viii. Increase recycling rates in city operations and in the community; ix. Maintain healthy urban forests; promote tree planting to increase shading and to absorb CO2; and x. Help educate the public, schools, other jurisdictions, professional associations, business and industry about the importance of energy efficiency and renewable energy development in reducing carbon and actions necessary to adapt buildings, systems, and infrastructures to respond to changing climate conditions. b. Resilience: We support investment in climate preparedness strategies that implement the use of green infrastructure to increase resilience of city water systems, encourage preparedness policies that take into account a city's most vulnerable populations and disproportionately affected citizens, and work with state and federal officials to have disaster response systems in place to deal with acute stresses to a city or region. We pledge further to increase community preparedness by assessing and addressing projected impacts such as sea level rise, increased storm surge, extreme heat, drought, floods, and wildfires. III. ADVOCACY We pledge to support a grassroots movement, engaging young people especially, in support of conservation initiatives, such as Arbor Day, Earth Day, community events, locally- established conservation corps and other activities, and to recognize "conservationists" in our city as part of a systematic campaign over time to renew and reaffirm public commitments to long- established conservation values in our city, state and nation. We further pledge to work as global ambassadors to share best practices with mayors everywhere. To join as a signatory, go to: usmayors.org /climateagreement GP ~� CON THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS rl"" co -f ft1- 1 Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director 1620 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 Tel: 202.293.7330 Fax: 202.293.2352 usmayors.org Heather Branigin From: Jennifer Hoff <jdixsonhoff @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 6:35 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; superintendent @edinaschools.org Subject: 169 north detour through Edina onto major school bus route Dear Mr. Mayor, City Council Members, Police Chief Nelson, and Superintendent Dressen - Good Evening. My name is Jennifer Hoff and I live at the intersection of Samuel Road and McCauley Trail in Edina. Tonight, when driving home from work, I realized that MNDOT has placed signs along McCauley trail indicating it is the detour for when 169 North is closed. I am asking for your help in finding an immediate solution for an alternate option, as I believe this change to be happening soon. McCauley trail runs along a residential neighborhood in Indian Hills. This summer, even without McCauley being marked as a detour for the 169 south work, speeds on this road, in my estimate, run closer to highway speeds than the 30 mph posted rate. What is concerning is that Edina Public Schools uses this route as a major stopping point for school buses picking up children, all the way from Valley View to Gleason Road. The road somewhat winds and at times there are not clear visuals if a car /bus would be stopped ahead. This is therefore extremely unsafe given 1) the amount of traffic on the road with the detour 2) kids standing on the road waiting to be picked up (at several times of the day) 3) numerous buses frequently stopping to pick up /drop off children and 4) the excessive speeds at which cars are now currently traveling and I predict would be traveling if it is the official posted detour. I realize the MN DOT project and the school calendar may overlap for only a short period of time, but also please consider that this is a residential road with foot traffic and lots of bike traffic. I am wondering why HWY 100 isn't being utilized as a detour for the northbound closure, given that while the southbound lanes have been closed that is the posted detour. I find this to be a very troubling choice and wonder if you can assist in alternate solutions being explored? I believe you too would agree, re- routing highway traffic to a residential neighborhood is not an ideal situation, especially when it involves significant school bus implications as well. I am asking for an immediate response if possible. I am sorry I was not alerted to this issue until I saw the signs tonight, and therefore did not have prior notice of this situation. Very Best Regards, Jennifer Hoff 6725 Samuel Road Edina, MN 55439 952 - 943 -8811 cell 612 - 747 -5284 Heather Branigin From: Bev Luttio <luttior @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 201411:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: I fully support a youth going bldg in Edina. The community needs to step up to the plate on this dreadful problem! Sent from my Whone Heather: Branigin From: Tricia Budke <tricia.budke @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:49 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Edina Concerns I've lived in Edina for over 20 years and recent issues have caused me great concern as a resident. First, the hasty decision to close the Fred Richards golf course without any consideration as to how to make it a more financially viable course or have a plan in place for something that brings in more revenue than the current golf course. Second, I heard the city is considering allowing another apartment complex -to be built on or near France Avenue. Apparently, none of you drive on France Avenue or York Avenue.to know that the level of traffic is already high. With the addition of the apartment complexes near <Byerlys ,and Southdale`it is bound to get much worse. I amcompletelyagainst another housing complex being'built'anywhere on France or York Avenue between Hwy 62 and 494. I appreciate your service to the Edina community and realize you have very tough decisions to make. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Tricia Budke 404 Coventry Lane Edina 1 Richard C. Johnson 5700 Tucker Lane Edina, MN 55436 July 29, 2014 James B. Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear James, Now that we are a bicycle city with lots of bikes using our streets it seems to me to be timely for the City to provide our residents with information with respect to the rights and obligations of car drivers and bikers, as well as how to drive on streets with lanes that are designated for bicycles. As to the latter, are those lanes exclusively for the use of bikes, or can a car driver encroach upon such a lane if there are no visible bicycles using the lane? Those questions and more should be addressed in the information provided, perhaps in an article in the About Town. Sincerely, *"0 Cam- � Richard . Johnson To: EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Re: TEXT'FOR CITY - COUNCIL MEETING August 4, 2014 YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL RESIDENT ASSOCIATION OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL APARTMENTS 7151 York Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 July 30, 2014 1 RESPONSE TO PLANNING COMMISSIONG STAFF REPORT Dated - 7/9/14 Information /Background Project Description • Continental Gardens — Does not deliver affordable housing. 10%, or 10 units for residents at 50 % below median income: Median income of Minnesota household per year, 2008 to 2012 = $59,162. (Census Bureau) Federal Poverty Guideline, $11,670 per year. (Minnesota Department of Health) • Truck deliveries, early morning and day -long for high maintenance residents of Continental Gardens will all be delivered underneath windows of Yorktown Continental Residents on North side of existing building, disturbing sleep, rest, peaceful and pleasant living conditions that they enjoy now. ➢ With prevailing Northwest winds, fumes and odors will blow into windows of Yorktown Continental residents over parking ramp for Continental Gardens. • Garbage and recyclable trucks will not go down ramp unless heated; cannot enter building unless there is a 13'6" height door. • Parking lot for existing building is not 123 surface stalls but 157- resulting in a decrease of 17 stalls, from 140 in current plan. Count of cars on existing lot averages 148. REGARDING PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL REVIEWS FROM 2013 - 2014 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS — A34 -A41, April 24, 2013 A. Sketch Plan Review - Continental Gardens Assisted living, 7151 York Ave. S. Planner Presentation • Addition was 76 moderately priced units on larger open space on East side with sky way attaching buildings. Current addition on West side is larger building in much smaller space. • Continental Gardens units are at market price and density now is increased to 64 units per acre on entire property. Applicant Presentation • As of the date of this text, it is unknown whether Yorktown Properties has secured final HUD financing or approval for its rehab. Documentation supplied to support long delays and conflicting communication about financing this much needed rehabilitation. • There are no interior connections between buildings to facilitate shared activities as of the July 9 meeting. Direct path between buildings is screened off by shrubs and trees. • Placing the new building on the west side will have negative impact on existing building. 2 Discussion • Most if not all current Yorktown Continental residents will :not be able to afford to move to market rate building. • Current building will need heated canopies and walks between buildings to prevent ice build -up and dangerous walking conditions for elderly residents. Parking ramp will have to be heated. This will Not lead to energy savings. • Current plan does nothing to improve walkability but actually inhibits residents from both buildings gaining direct access to the street. Without door on York Ave. and parking ramp on the North, residents would have to walk further.around building to get to street, store or bus. ➢ Placing the new building on the York side would place 30 memory care residents close to a busy street. With door on York Ave., extra staff would have to watch residents constantly • Current plan seems to have done very little study on existing Yorktown Continental building. • Berm in front of existing building with established trees serves as buffer and lessens the scale of building now. • CVS as a store close to the street does not have resident balconies overlooking a dusty noisy street. ➢ The streetscape along the current York Ave. corridor is pleasant now with tree lined sidewalks and setbacks allowing separation from a busy suburban street'and people's homes. Response to Minutes /Edina City Council /May 7, 2013 • Independent elderly and assisted living requires large demand for services, home health care workers, taxis, food service, etc. ➢ EMT has visited Yorktown Continental 200 times in the past year from July, 2013 — 2014; there are always 1 or police cars in attendance with each incident. Proponent Presentation • Do they have County Elderly Waiver: Units for tenants of Continental Gardens? There is no current connection between buildings. • Yorktown Continental is not connected to street and requires residents to walk farther to get to street. Response to Minutes /Edina City Council /May. 2014 • Density ➢ Current development is already over code and in a high density area. Development Address Units Unit's - Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 6500 France, Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 LennarMickes Site 6725 York 240 52 • Porte - cochere at end of building requires fragile elderly and disabled residents to walk farther to carry groceries, leaving and entering on winding paths in winter and heat of summer. Pedestrian connections around the perimeter of the site also require residents from both buildings to walk farther to get to the street. Elderly Yorktown residents already have trouble going the distance to Target and back. ➢ Porte -cochere is not covered in plans. • Current plan is eliminating most of green space now available and enjoyed by residents. • There is no direct connection between the two buildings, and after the landscaping our current front door would be screened off by shrubs and trees, creating an enclosed environment without a view. ➢ Sidewalk connection between buildings exits existing building through nonexistent door in office. Again, Mesaba Capital seems to have done very little study on existing Yorktown Continental building. • If parking variance is allowed it would leave Yorktown Continental with 137 surface stalls and 4 less handicap spaces which are all in use. Parking in current plan of 157 spaces is already inadequate for current residents. Existing parking for Yorktown Continental is close to building on all sides. New plan would have residents (70 with walkers) traveling farther to get to cars. With the snow removal we saw last year and the number of resident falls, this does not portend well. • The existing building now has 8 enclosed parking spaces which are sorely envied. Covered parking would be practical for senior residents. ➢ Would underground parking at Continental Gardens be available to residents of Yorktown Continental? How much would the spaces cost? • The site plan33 proposed as the sketch plan is not viable as proof of parking. Need to show parking plan in scale on site plan A100 with 223 surface stalls. • Loading and trash zones are not shown on plans or room given for it. Is it screened from residents in existing Yorktown Continental building? • Will Mechanical equipment on new building be screened from residents in existing building for noise control? 4 • How long will residents of Yorktown Continental be without power in heat of summer? Will -they have to be without gas or water while the utility Easement is moved? Response.to Variances addressed at July 9`h Edina Planning Commission Building Setback 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. New building would create practical difficulties in existing building. Creating access to only one door would cause congestion; no loading, unloading zone, Garbage trucks, EMT, etc. Yorktown Continental houses nearly 300 elderly and disabled residents who need a lot of assistance. New building would remove berm with close to 30 mature trees that bloom in spring screening residents from dust and noise from busy street. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created. The location of the existing building is not unique, the buildings to the North and South are also I locatedin °the middle of the property. 3) Will the variance alter the. essential character of the neighborhood? The new building would be the only one along this corridor of York Ave. that would be brought up to the street. The existing buildings are set back with mature trees lining the street, creating a safe and enjoyable pedestrian experience. MAJOR' CONCERNS OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL RESIDENTS • Congestion with only one door: Garbage, EMT, Delivery trucks all sharing one door could have serious consequences. • If Yorktown Continental is not funded for remodeling our new front door will be over whelmed with every service required to maintain a 300 resident independent senior living facility. • Mature trees, flower beds and gardens will be sacrificed to parking lot. • A single larger parking lot located further from the current building would be hazardous and present mobility issues. ➢ Fewer parking stalls and 4 less handicapped spaces as well as elimination of garages would necessitate our finding parking elsewhere. Home healthcare workers have to park in office lot next door now. Will our building be remodeled? • We have been told this ever since Premier took over management of Yorktown Continental in 2012. (See Attachments) Status of Current Vehicle Congestion 7151 York Ave S. at vehicle entrances front and back Daily or M -F Cabs 4 per day M- Sun. ay. 5 minutes Metro Mobility 6 per day M -F ay. 10 minutes VEAP 2 per day M- F ay. 5 min Fed Ex 1 per day M -F 15 minutes Walgreens M -F ay. 15 minutes CVS M -F ay. 15 minutes Resident Visitors / pickups for appts. ay. 3 day M- S(including Holidays) (front and back) ay. '10 Minutes Home Health Aides /cleaning aides ay. 3 day (M -Sun) ay. 60 min Social workers ay. 2 per day M -F ay. 60 min Physical Therapy - ay. 2 per day M -F ay. 60 min Postman (M -Sat) ay. 30 min. to one hour VOA lunches, (delivery truck, plus 1 -2 volunteers per day) ay. 30 min. for truck, 2 hours for volunteers. Waste Management — 6 dumpsters / pick up once a week 10 to 15 minutes. Garbage pickup — three times a week, 10 minutes Mom's meals (M -F) ay. 30 min. Meals on Wheels -(M -F) ay. 30 min Lancers Foods M -F, ay. 15 min. 5 f January 20, 2012 Dear Yorktown Resident: At yesterdays Board Meeting, Residents and Board Members were presented with a plan to refurbish the Yorktown building. The building is coming up on its 40'' birthday and will require extensive refurbishment to maintain its excellent reputation as we move into the future. While no decisions have yet been reached by the Board, we are requesting that each resident assist in this process by noting their comments, concerns and ideas for Yorktown's refurbishment on the enclosed questionnaire. _We are working with Ms. Terri Cermak of Cermak and Rhoades Architects, to design and plan the necessary improvements to the building. Ms. Cermak has extensive experience in the rehabilitation and refurbishment of affordable senior housing and comes highly recommended. Many of the planned renovations will serve all residents here at Yorktown. Items such as the replacement of all windows with new energy efficient windows, new roof; energy improvements to the heating and ventilating systems are already in the improvement plan. Refurbishment to the individual apartments would include such items as replacement of appliances, kitchen and bath cabinets and fixtures, countertops, closet doors and floor finishes. We would appreciate your assistance in this process. We have included a resident questionnaire for your suggestions and comments and ask that you take the time to let us know what improvements you think should be included in the refurbishment, especially improvements to your individual apartment. The attached questionnaire is by no means all inclusive; please feel free to add to the questionnaire anything you feel needs to be addressed. Please return the questionnaire to the management office by February P. Some residents at yesterday's meeting were concerned about the impact this plan would have on their individual situation and rent. We do know, after discussions with HUD, that: 1) Section 8 Rents will not increase, 2) Section 236 and Market residents who qualify will have access to Section 8 vouchers, and 3) No resident will be required to move due to the refurbishment. Thank you for your assistance; we will be having additional resident meetings in the future to update every . e on our progress and to answer resident questions and concerns. R e ly, . 'e Givens Patrick Lamb 7151 York Avenue South � -i,egacy Edina, Minnesota 55435 t: 9528311448 f: 952 8312461 Management & Development Corporation www.legacVmn.com January 20, 2012 Dear Yorktown Resident: At yesterdays Board Meeting, Residents and Board Members were presented with a plan to refurbish the Yorktown building. The building is coming up on its 40'' birthday and will require extensive refurbishment to maintain its excellent reputation as we move into the future. While no decisions have yet been reached by the Board, we are requesting that each resident assist in this process by noting their comments, concerns and ideas for Yorktown's refurbishment on the enclosed questionnaire. _We are working with Ms. Terri Cermak of Cermak and Rhoades Architects, to design and plan the necessary improvements to the building. Ms. Cermak has extensive experience in the rehabilitation and refurbishment of affordable senior housing and comes highly recommended. Many of the planned renovations will serve all residents here at Yorktown. Items such as the replacement of all windows with new energy efficient windows, new roof; energy improvements to the heating and ventilating systems are already in the improvement plan. Refurbishment to the individual apartments would include such items as replacement of appliances, kitchen and bath cabinets and fixtures, countertops, closet doors and floor finishes. We would appreciate your assistance in this process. We have included a resident questionnaire for your suggestions and comments and ask that you take the time to let us know what improvements you think should be included in the refurbishment, especially improvements to your individual apartment. The attached questionnaire is by no means all inclusive; please feel free to add to the questionnaire anything you feel needs to be addressed. Please return the questionnaire to the management office by February P. Some residents at yesterday's meeting were concerned about the impact this plan would have on their individual situation and rent. We do know, after discussions with HUD, that: 1) Section 8 Rents will not increase, 2) Section 236 and Market residents who qualify will have access to Section 8 vouchers, and 3) No resident will be required to move due to the refurbishment. Thank you for your assistance; we will be having additional resident meetings in the future to update every . e on our progress and to answer resident questions and concerns. R e ly, . 'e Givens Patrick Lamb ti 5 Inj Premier October 16, 2013 Dear Resident: Yorktown Continental Apartment 7151 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 P: 952 - 831 -1446/ F: 831 -5418 The Department of Housing and Urban Development subsidizes the rent of your apartment through the project -based Section 8 program. Federal law requires that owners provide tenants with a one -year notification before the expiration of a Section 8 contract. The Section 8 contract that pays the government's share of your apartment rent at Edina Yorktown Towers expires on September 30", 2014. While there will be no immediate change in your rental assistance, we are required to inform you of our intended actions when the contract expires one year from now. This letter is to notify you that we intend to renew the current Section 8 contract when it expires September 30, 2014. If Congress makes funds available, which it has in the past and is expected to in the future, we will renew the Section 8 contract. However, in the unlikely circumstances that we cannot renew our contract, it Is our understanding that, subject to the availability of funds, HUD will provide all eligible tenants currently residing in a Section 8 project -based assisted unit with a tenant based assistance. If you have any questions or would like information on the Section 8 Program, the following sources may be of assistance: Contract Administrator Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101 (651) 284 -3179 HUD Field Office Department of Housing and Urban Development 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 370 -3051 HUD Web http: / /hud.gov- Click on "rental help" IAA z i lforCiG'b�--- i- ir-p-,a= October 31, 2013 fL r A RE: 150 -Day Notification Letter to Tenants When Owner Prepays Mortgage �oh Preservation Eligible Project - A r P, Dear Resident: As you are aware, we are in the process of refinancing Yorktown Continental so we can do a substantial rehabilitation. We are arranging for a new FHA - insured loan through HUD to pay off (prepay) the old FHA- insured loan. The attached scope of work lists the improvements we will be able to provide. Yorktown is 40 years old and has never had a substantial rehabilitation. This refinance will allow us to do improvement work that is necessary to make sure Yorktown Continental will continue to provide excellent affordable housing for another 40 years. Yorktown Housing Group, Inc., the owner of Yorktown Continental, has decided to pay off (prepay) the mortgage for this property which provided assistance from the Federal Government. Section 219 (a) (1) (b) (3) of the HUD Fiscal Year 1999 Appropriations Act requires that owners provide at least a 150 -day, but no more than 270 -day, notice to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the local government having jurisdiction over the property, and to each tenant of the owner's intent to pay off (prepay) the mortgage. This letter meets that requirement by notifying you that we intend to pay off (prepay) the mortgage insured by HUD. For tenants who do not receive Section 8 rental assistance, paying off the mortgage (prepayment) could result in an increase in the rent for your unit. It does not necessarily mean that your portion of the rent will increase. If you are living In your unit on the date we prepay and you are income eligible, you may be eligible to receive an enhanced rental voucher. An enhanced rental voucher would enable you to continue living here paying the amount currently charged for your unit or, In most cases, 305 of your monthly adjusted income for rent. The enhanced voucher will pay the difference between your contribution to rent and the total rent we charge for your unit In addition, you may use the housing voucher to move to another eligible unit of your choice. If you decide to move to another property, the voucher becomes a regular housing choice voucher without the enhanced assistance, and you may end up paying more rent. In order to stay in your current unit with enhanced voucher assistance, the Metro HRA must determine that 1) the rent for the unit is reasonable in relation to rents charged for comparable unassisted units in the area; 2) you meet all eligibility requirements for receiving Section 8 assistance; and 3) the unit is safe and sanitary, meeting the housing quality standards established for the housing voucher program. Enhanced rental vouchers will allow us to do more rehabilitation of Yorktown Continental. We have notified HUD of our intent to pay off (prepay) the mortgage. If you have questions, you may contact Tiffany Mielke at the Minneapolis HUD office, 612- 370- 3051 (ext. 2244). Sincerely, C5se L. Ho m erg, Pr yI Affordable Homes for A -'P Sole Voting Member of Yorktown Housing Group, Inc. I ;v v NOTICE TO TENANTS OF INTENTION TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO MHFA FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE RENTS Date of Notice: 5/14/14 Take notice that on 6/2/14 we plan to submit a request for approval of an increase in the maximum permissible rents for Yorktown Continental to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). The proposed increase is needed for the following reasons: 1. Finance comprehensive rehab of the property The rent increases for which we have requested approval are: A copy of the materials that we are submitting to MHFA in support of our request will be available during normal business hours at 7151 York Ave South, Edina, MN 55435 For a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice for inspection and copying by the Tenants of Yorktown Continental and, if the tenants wish, by legal or other representatives acting for them individually or as a group. During a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice, tenants of Yorktown Continental may shat written comments on the proposed rent increase to us at 7151 York Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. Tenant representatives may assist tenants in preparing those comments. (If, at MHFA's request or otherwise, we make any material change during the comment period in the materials available for inspection and copying, we will notify the tenants of the change or changes, and the tenants will have a period of 15 days from the date of service of this additional notice (or the remainder of any applicable comment period, if longer) in which to inspect and copy the materials as changed and to submit comments on the proposed rent increase). These comments will be s u b miffed t o MHFA, along with our evaluation of them and our request for the increase. You may also send a copy of your comments directly to MHFA at the following address: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Attention: Krista Turner, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101, and Re: 09244135; Yorktown Continental. MHFA will approve, adjust upward or downward, or disapprove the proposed rent increase upon reviewing the request and comments. When MHFA advises us in wrimlg of its decision on our request, you will be notified. If the request is approved, any allowable illcrease will be put into effect only after a period of at least 30 days from the date you are served with that notice and in accordance with the terms of existhlg leases. Note: There is no change to the resident payment portion for all Section 8 residents and there will he vouchers provided for all 236 units. Residents will still pay 30% of income. Present Rent Proposed Increase Proposed Rent Bedroom's Basic Market Basic Market Basic Market 1 BR Small 493 560 382 355 875 915 1 BRLarge 515 585 382 355 897 940 2 BR236 582 661 94 609 1,076 1,270 1 BRSm236 493 560 307 355 800 915 1 BRLg 236 515 1582 285 1358 1800 1940 A copy of the materials that we are submitting to MHFA in support of our request will be available during normal business hours at 7151 York Ave South, Edina, MN 55435 For a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice for inspection and copying by the Tenants of Yorktown Continental and, if the tenants wish, by legal or other representatives acting for them individually or as a group. During a period of 30 days from the date of service of this notice, tenants of Yorktown Continental may shat written comments on the proposed rent increase to us at 7151 York Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. Tenant representatives may assist tenants in preparing those comments. (If, at MHFA's request or otherwise, we make any material change during the comment period in the materials available for inspection and copying, we will notify the tenants of the change or changes, and the tenants will have a period of 15 days from the date of service of this additional notice (or the remainder of any applicable comment period, if longer) in which to inspect and copy the materials as changed and to submit comments on the proposed rent increase). These comments will be s u b miffed t o MHFA, along with our evaluation of them and our request for the increase. You may also send a copy of your comments directly to MHFA at the following address: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Attention: Krista Turner, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101, and Re: 09244135; Yorktown Continental. MHFA will approve, adjust upward or downward, or disapprove the proposed rent increase upon reviewing the request and comments. When MHFA advises us in wrimlg of its decision on our request, you will be notified. If the request is approved, any allowable illcrease will be put into effect only after a period of at least 30 days from the date you are served with that notice and in accordance with the terms of existhlg leases. Note: There is no change to the resident payment portion for all Section 8 residents and there will he vouchers provided for all 236 units. Residents will still pay 30% of income. -� �`- P07 You, as a resident (tenant), have rights and responsibil- -.- ities that help make your HUD - assisted housing a bet- ter home for you and your family. his brochure is being distributed to you because the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, which has ultimate jurisdiction over the project in which you live, has provided some form of assistance or subsidy for this apartment building. As part of its dedication to maintaining the best possible living environ- ment for all residents, your HUD field office encourages and supports the following: • Management agents and property owners communicate with residents on any and all issues. • Owners and managers give prompt consideration to all valid resident complaints and resolve them as quickly as possible. Residents' right to organize and participate in the decisions regarding the well-being of the project and their home. Along with your owner /management agent, you play an important role in malting your place of residence —the unit (apartment), the grounds, and other common areas —a better place to live and in creating a com- munity you can be proud of. This brochure briefly lists some of your most important rights and responsibilities to help you get the most out of your home. Residents in HUD - assisted multifamily housing can play an important role in decisions that affect their project. Different HUD programs provide for spe- cific resi&e_ rights. You have the right to know under which HUD program your building is assisted. To find out if your apartment building is covered under any of the following categories, contact your management agent. If your building was funded under Section 236,221 (d)(3)/BNE R, Rent Supplement Program, Section 202 Direct Loan Program, Section 202/811 Capital Advance Programs, or is assisted under any applicable project -based Section 8 programs, and prior HUD approval is required before the owner can prepay, you have the right to participate in or be noti- fied of, and comment on, the following: • An increase in the maximum permissible rent. • Conversion of a project from project -paid utilities to tenant -paid utilities or a reduction in tenant utility allowance. • Conversion of residential units in a multifamily housing project to a nonresidential use or to condominiums, or the transfer of the project to a cooperative housing mortgagor corporation or association. • Partial release .of mortgage security. • Capital improvements that represent a substantial addition to the project. • Nonrenewal of a project -based Section 8 contract. Any other action which could ultimately lead to involuntary temporary or permanent relocation of residents. Prepayment of mortgage. Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city o£ Edina can help young people-find -stabled, housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, ;4 Name Address 1 &=>7 � 6bi►o- 21JUL2014 i~'1471 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 �j11111,.1tI111,tll,II- 0111,1011111, 111111111'li1i,,,1111i111-.1 IL-16 Name: 2-1 3URL-29-464 � k Address: (o /DD ✓� 'l P-M 4-L i i Congregation: ✓Al�� . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,�n., -.�� US POSTAGE $ 00.48 First -Class Mailed From 55436 07/18/2014 032A 0061808712 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ` &W-soj r— � � 1111111, 1,11111 Name: 'e Address: 6-t Congregation: d" r- yy(-�/ Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young eople find stable ho�u�sing and end homelessnesj, fpf5 �F��Y. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerel MMMEA AGa.IS N04 . 21; JUL 201.-1 'R4.6 I USA I fOr— USA I forever Edina City Council YOXI ; 4801 West 50th Street I Edina, MN 55424 VIII► rI►; ��► J. 1► I►,►„ t► II►>>: Iilliitl ,tl ►uu,,,l ► ►,ji, ►i ►i►I,i ►p MENNEAPOLL-53, CAN,; 554' Name: 1/l elr. 4,J 21 3moL .2-ta 4 Mp 111 9 Address: 5- ri A ,-e_ Congregation: "') 1� J y g 3 6 L ` C Ks Dear �dina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 IL1. 1. 1, H. 11. 1J., 1) 11.. 1. 11 .JM.1.,1111....1111.1.11.11b,u Name:14^I' Wd4 Address: Sr a 1,A,) Congregation:9- SIIIJ �° Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. P5 ^41 G40 On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, i t"i NNE-91 POLIS i~ NI "ISISS 21 X.ii_ 2014 PM.3 L USA I forever USA I forever �/�,' Edina City Council - emu` TOP" 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Name: Address: ! S . 1L S �[ Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, :sue Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address S-5:424 IS GS4SS Name7-�c7 ry\ ":'I�% e Address: `� ** k '�J ✓� Congregation: 5-+A e0-S Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, —<7� 1 S-42-1 i3-94914-Z MINNEAPOLIS M Edina City Council - 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 H 55.E Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 WMIM Rff4dea.Jark Name:'�� Ms. M. L. Brehm 1 Orchard Ln. -r . Edina, MN 554361343' Address: Congregation: %J"✓a -� � P�y1s 1 s. nc M. L B� rehm Edina, MN 554361343 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, lak e� . ir1�ll�iti� SHENEHON COMPANY BUSINESS & REAL ESTATE VALUATIONS Jim Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 July 30, 2014 RE: Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Dear Jim, I am writing as a citizen of Edina and as an owner of the remodeled Southdale Medical Arts Building at 3625 W. 65th Street, Edina, MN. I fully support the proposed Beacon Housing project. I am acutely aware of the affordable housing needs for young adults since I have in the past and presently serve on similar non - profit boards. However, the proposed request to change the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan is not prudent. The "Comp Plan" for the area near the hospital is sensible and reflects smart planning. Furthermore, the land available around the Southdale Hospital should support high density uses that enhance the hospital activities and improvements. In contrast, a two story housing development fronting on 66th Street is a significant under utilization of the land and not the intention of the "Comp Plan" designation. I suggest that the Beacon project be moved to property that is appropriately zoned in the lower density neighborhood north of the TCF site. The City may consider the idea of the Edina HRA buying an older property and leasing it for 99 years to Beacon. I know how to accomplish something along this line and will gladly volunteer my time to the City to scout out such an idea. In summary, this is a great project for Edina to welcome and would be best situated on land that has been appropriately zoned for a low density housing project. Thank you for your great leadership at the City of Edina. Let me know if you would like my help with finding an alternate site. Best Re rds, Robert 1 Strachota RJS:ch 88 SOUTH TENTH STREET I SUITE 400 I MINNEAPOLIS I MINNESOTA 1 55403 1 612/333-6533 I FAX: 612/344 -1635 WWW.SHENEHON.COM I E -MAIL: VALUE @SHENEHON.COM MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN BUSINESS APPRAISERS NETWORK To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 4, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. w91 A,1� C, e 0) •'�CORPORP��O • X888 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council. Members. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ^ 1, Ile ip yon IN, �oe VV cl ou ca 71 Age ct-_- k 45 VIN CFr INVOLVED!!! Cars are racing &, us, 62nd Street residents don't like it - with or without kids. So, to prevent them to NOT get faster - especially with Edina soccer -, we could all team up & have those little green SLOW! People /figures (from Menards & Home Depot) in our yards - meaning 12 homes -, they'd wonder what happened, a showing of people - kids too- live here so SLOW DOWN! I do understand each sign is not free, but it might help to make our road more safe. There ARE homes on this street (& kids toys that every now & then go in the road that quite honestly don't need to be crushed by cars...) & I want this street to be safe & welcoming for guests & families who live here. From: Emma Brenner, Age 9 4104 West 62nd Street From: KDahlheimer @comcast.net Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2014 7:01 PM. To: Mary Brindle Subject: Meeting August 4th Hi Mary ... I was looking at the agenda for Monday and noted a sketch plan review for 4121 West 50th St. I saw the same before the planning commission. I am very familiar with this property ... go by almost daily on my bike (front and back) and it is obvious that the entire second floor is already being used for office... unless apartments /condos are now using florescent lights? The building is completely dark at night and before I saw that meeting really wondered what was going on in there. I often pass by about 5pm and you can see a number of business men with briefcases going to their cars in the parking lot and street. They do not live there. It seems that the council should use this opportunity to deal with the owner who has been running a business out of a building zoned residential. It seems that business tax rate would be more. I believe this same person( who does not come in person but sends "Mr Duffy ") was a no show at the last meeting. I seriously doubt that the neighbors would be okay with that building becoming a commercial office which is the intention here ... and probably would appreciate enforcement of city code here. You just can't run a business out of a residential building without some city involvement or why zone it residential. Please feel free to forward this to the council. It was Arlene Forrest at the planning commission that really told it like it is about the building very close to her home and in fact filed a complaint in the past on the use of the building. Thanks Mary ..... Kathy Heather Branigin From: PMG <pmg@SisyphusCafe.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 1:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Letter in Support of 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor Hovland and Council-Members Bennett; Brindle, Sprague, and.Swenson As' a resident of Edina, I am writing in support of the 66 West Apartments proposed: for the area north of Southdale. Since 1998, the Edina Community Foundation's. Connecting with Kids initiative has made significant strides that involve: residents, civic organisations, neighborhoods, religious, groups,schools and the City in bolstering the lives.ofour children. Extending this vision to "children from outside our city boundaries is a natural extension. The perils that homeless children face are. enormous -- ,,risk of human traffi cking, physical and emotional abuse, substance abuse, and more. 66 West Apartments.,give Edina the opportunity to make a real difference in-the life of these. children and young adults. Pm unable to attend the August 14 hearing on this project, but urge you to move the 66 West Apartments forward. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Paulette Hastings 4420 Dunham Drive, Edina, 55435 952 -564 -8388 1 Heather Branigin From: Schleck Family <dschleck @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:01 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please forward to Mayor Hovland Attachments: photo 1.JPG; photo 2.JPG, photo 3.JPG Dear Mayor Hovland, I have attached 3 sample pictures of our grass after the hydro seeding from the Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction. The hydro seeding has been a consistent problem and has !not worked as you can see in the sample pictures. We have a sprinkler system, and late summer /fall 2013 we watered very consistently during the dry spell to give the new grass the best chance to grow. In fact, the part of our lawn not removed by the reconstruction looked fantastic during the dry spell because of all the regular watering. This spring the vendor; re- applied the hydro seed and once again it didn't work. l would 1ike'to`ir vite you to walk the neighborhood to see how badly the quality of lawn restoration was, and how the vendor has not met their obligations regarding restoring the neighborhoods lawns. Thank you, -Laura Schleck 7408 Kellogg Ave. J 1 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Dear Mayor Hovland, Schleck Family <dschleck @comcast.net> Thursday, July 31, 201411:01 AM Edina Mail Please forward to Mayor Hovland photo 1.JPG; photo 2.JPG; photo 3.JPG I have attached 3 sample pictures of our grass after the hydro seeding from the Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction. The hydro seeding has been a consistent problem and has not worked as you can see in the sample pictures. We have a sprinkler system, and, late summer /fall 2013 we watered very consistently during the dry spell to give the new grass the best chance to grow. In fact, the part of our lawn not removed by the reconstruction looked fantastic during the dry spell because of all the regular watering. This spring the vendor re- applied the hydro seed and once again it didn't work. I would like to invite you to walk the neighborhood to see how badly the quality of lawn restoration was, and how the vendor has not met their obligations regarding restoring the neighborhoods lawns. Thank you, Laura Schleck 7408 Kellogg Ave. Heather Branigin From: Schleck Family < dschleck@comcast. net> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 201411:01 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please forward to Mayor Hovland Attachments: photo 1.JPG; photo 2.JPG; photo 3.JPG Dear Mayor Hovland, I have attached 3 sample pictures of our grass after the hydro seeding from the Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction. The hydro seeding has been a consistent problem and has not worked as you can see in the sample pictures. We have a sprinkler system, and late summer /fall 2013 we watered very consistently during the dry spell to give the new grass the best chance to grow. In fact, the part of our lawn not removed by the reconstruction looked fantastic during the dry spell because of all the regular watering. This spring the vendor re- applied the hydro seed and once again it didn't work. I would like to invite you to walk the neighborhood to see how badly the quality of lawn restoration was, and how the vendor has not met their obligations regarding restoring the neighborhoods lawns. Thank you, Laura Schleck 7408 Kellogg Ave. Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Dear Mayor Hovland, Schleck Family <dschleck @comcast.net> Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:01 AM Edina Mail Please forward to Mayor Hovland photo 1.JPG; photo 2.JPG; photo 3.JPG I have attached 3 sample pictures of our grass after the hydro seeding from the Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction. The hydro seeding has been a consistent problem and has not worked as you can see in the sample pictures. We have a sprinkler system, and late summer /fall 2013 we watered very consistently during the dry spell to give the new grass the best chance to grow. In fact, the part of our lawn not removed by the reconstruction looked fantastic during the dry spell because of all the regular watering. This spring the vendor re- applied the hydro seed and once again it didn't work. I would like to invite you to walk the neighborhood to see how badly the quality of lawn restoration was, and how the vendor has not met their obligations regarding restoring the neighborhoods lawns. Thank you, Laura Schleck 7408 Kellogg Ave. Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Marilyn David <madavid98 @aol.com> Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:03 AM Edina Mail DBonlender @beaconintefaith.org 66 West Affordable Housing Dear Mayor Jim Hovland and Edina City Council, I am writing in support of the 66 West Affordable Housing for Young Adults in Edina. My name is Marilyn David and I live at 8549 Irwin Rd. in Bloomington. However,_I worship at Edina Community Lutheran Church. I also go to Doctors, shop, and spend many hours in the Southdale area. When the need arises, I plan to move to 7500 York Cooperative in Edina. Edina, like Bloomington is a great place to live. It is convenient to public transportation. services and activities. . Therefore, it is an ideal location for an affordable housing project for young people. Because this area is quite affluent, we tend to forget the people who serve this community. This project.will give these young people an opportunity to live where they work, go to school, and be productive members of our community. In addition, it will help.,the City of Edina, to meet affordable housing goals. I have toured Nicollet Square, the Beacon project for homeless youth, located at 37th and Nicollet. ' I was impressed with the facilities, and the way that the building and the residents have been incorporated into the neighborhood. I nderstand that at first there was some objection to the project, but now it has full support of the Neighborhood Association. As a parent, grandparent, and as a person of faith, I believe that all people should have the opportunity to live in a safe, clean, stable environment. I urge'you to support this project. Marilyn A David, 8549 Irwin Rd. #338, Bloomington, MN 55437, 952- 841 -0809 (madavid98@aol.com) 1 John and Kelly Wheaton 5109 Arden Avenue Eden, MN 55424 July 31, 2014. VIA EMAIL Chad Millner Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction/Arden Park D Neighborhood Dear Chad: I am writing in reference to the Arden Park D Neighborhood project. My wife Kelly and I have lived at 5109 Arden Avenue for more .than 20 years. I know that you have scheduled a project informational meeting for this evening, July 31. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend, and wanted to provide you with input in writing. I begin by emphasizing that Kelly and I are strong sup_ porters of the project. Our street is in decline, and the constant patching we have seen is no substitute for the replacement that the City has planned. I am, however, concerned about the City's (apparent) plan to install sidewalks along Arden Avenue without getting serious input from the residents, and offer the following observations: 1. Sidewalks Are Unnecessary. The. Arden Avenue neighborhood is. a very walkable community; without sidewalks. It has been walkable for 70 years. Many of us prefer our .neighborhood without sidewalks. 2. Living Streets Shouldn't Mean Dead Trees. I was disappointed by the rudimentary questionnaire that the engineering department distributed in June. The June 10, 2014, letter accompanying the questionnaire simply states that sidewalks are required on at least one side of the street, referring to the City's (draft) Living Streets Policy. The questionnaire did not even bother to ask residents whether they were interested in having sidewalks installed. Installation of a sidewalk on either side of Arden Avenue will result in the removal of trees, and will likely harm other trees that may lead to their removal. Chad Millner July 31, 2014 Page. 2 The City's very own Living Streets Policy states: "Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its neighborhood,; adjacent land uses, natural features; street design, users, and modes. - To:accommodate these differences, the City will: • Seek input from stakeholders; • Be mindful ofpreserving and protecting.natural features, such as.... trees, slopes, and ravines; • Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character. " Killing trees without asking residents in an established neighborhood is not in keeping with the City's Living Streets Policy. 3. The Residents Need to be Asked, Not Told. To distribute a questionnaire to residents that treats the installation of sidewalks as a foregone conclusion is not what we expect of our City. If the City is serious about considering sidewalks for the area, the City needs to go door to door to understand whether the residents would welcome sidewalks, or view them. as an imposition. To get an informed response from the residents, the City should identify the precise location of any proposed sidewalks, and identify the trees that would need to be removed (or that may be harmed) in order to accommodate that installation. 4. And Let's Not Propose a Lousy Design Instead. Engineering staff may suggest that sidewalks might fit if they are, in certain locations to avoid trees, installed at back-of- curb. That is a poor solution on multiple grounds: Back -of -curb sidewalks look awful, and always look as though they were an afterthought, not part of a thoughtful, integrated design. • Sidewalks at the back -of -curb receive the brunt of the snow removed from adjacent roadways (like the end of every driveway) and quickly ice over, making them very difficult to keep clear in winter. • Back -of- -.curb sidewalks do not comply with the City's own street diagrams and design guidelines. Thanks for spearheading this project. As I said at the outset,. we are big supporters of the roadway improvements.. But please don't undermine the character of our neighborhood. Many of us have chosen to live in this neighborhood precisely because of its character, including the absence of sidewalks. Chad Millner July 31, 2014 Page 3 I am sorry I cannot attend the meeting this evening to discuss this topic in greater detail. I'd be happy to visit with you in the days to come as planning progresses. Very truly yours, G John R. Wheaton cc: Mayor James Hovland . Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Josh Sprague Council Member Ann Swenson US.54609996.01 Heather Branigin From: Gary Moses <garymari @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 3330 W. 66th Street, proposed Apartment for Young Adults I live in the Colony of Edina and I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS PROPOSED APARTMENT. J I bought a property in this complex because it was safe. This proposed Apartment will bring in young people from all walks and it is right across the street from Southdale. How convenient for. shoplifting, grabbing purses, etc. They say the apartment will have Security Service, what about us? We don't have security service!! The people that propose this building are NOT from my neighborhood. It they want an apartment building for young adults let them put it on the church grounds. "Edina Community Lutheran Church" at 4113 W. 54th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55424 Marilyn Peters Heather Branigin From: Sara Swenson < sswenson @iphouse.com> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:10 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Claude Sigmund Subject: Support for 66 West Hi Mayor Hovland, Just a quick email to lend support for the 66 West Apartments and the proposed program for this space. My husband Claude Sigmund and I are both teachers for Edina Schools and know firsthand of the importance of helping young people, especially those who find themselves without housing and family support. Also, our son attends school at Step By Step Montessori, which is near 66 West and I wanted you to know that we have no concerns about the location of this program near our son's school. How exciting to be able to help an under served population of people, especially those who have youth on their side- - allowing them time to get an education and gain job skills! Sincerely, Sara Swenson 5721 James Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55419 PS: If my name sounds familiar it is because we share Stillwater connections. Don was a longtime colleague and friend of my father, a fellow principal in Stillwater Schools. He also hired Liz to teach at SHS! Plus, Brad is a year ahead of me in school. Please greet them for me. Sara Swenson sswenson @iphouse.com Heather Branigin From: tpaulson @1992ventures.com Sent: Friday, August 01, 201412:02 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmaiLcom Subject: Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Attachments: supplemental sidewalk questionnaire.pdf Mr. Nolan, At a spirited Open House last night regarding the proposed Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project, the residents of Indianola Avenue, Juanita Avenue, and W 51st Street let the Engineering Department know, in no uncertain terms,.tlat we don't want sidewalks on these streets. Everyone has their reasons for not wanting sidewalks, but I can say with confidence that we believe: 1) sidewalks would destroy the existing character of the neighborhood, 2) the approximately $200,000 for these sidewalks could be better spent elsewhere in the City, and 3) adding sidewalks 'to these, streets would be governing against the "will of the people." I have attached a "supplemental sidewalk questionnaire" for your review. We consider the questionnaire to be an add - on to the questionnaire the City conducted in June 2014, but failed to collect resident input on sidewalks. As you will See, the residents are nearly unanimous in our opposition to sidewalks. Please forward this email, along with the attachment, to the Edina Transportation Commission members ASAP. I, along with my neighbors, would like to meet with you and the ETC members, either individually or as a group, to begin the process of removing these three streets from the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Plan as presented in the draft Living Streets Plan. " Please;provide some dates and times that you are available to meet. I look forward to our meeting(s). Sincerely, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue 612 - 770 -4022 Arden Park 0 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Proposed Sidewalk questionnaire (conducted between 6/17/14 and 7/29/14)(2) Households an Indianola Avenue, Juanita Avenue, and w 51st street Do you favor adding sidewalks Don't Know/ No Total to [the street]? Yes Na Don't Care Response(!) Households All Households 1 49 2 4 56 All Households 1.896 87.5% 3.6% 71% 100.o% A11 Responses 1 49 2 -� 52 All Responses' 1.996 94.1% 3.896 -•p - 100096 Do you think adding sidewalks Don't Know/ No Total to [the street) would enhance the Yes No Don't Know/ No Total character of the neighborhood? neighborhood? Si 1 Don't Care Resp onse(!) Household All Households 1 s0 1 4 56 All Responses. 1.8% 89.3% 1.8%. 7.1%. 100.0% All Responses' 1 50 1 -- S2 1.9% 96.296. 1:995 .-- 100.0% Do you feel safe walking and /or: Don't Know/ No Total biking on [the street)? Yes NO Don't Care Response(!) Households All Households Si 1 D 4 56 91A% 1.8% 0.0% 7.1% 100.0%' All Responses. 51 1 0 - -- 52 98.1% 1.9% 0.0% 100.0% (1) Two homes are under construction and hvo homes are for sale and vacant. (2) Conducted by Troy Paulson (5116 Juanita Ave) and Dave Posthumus (5100 Indianola Ave). Page 16 1 Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Juanita Avenue Residents Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire Name Address Do you favor adding sidewalks to Juanita Ave? Do you t ink adding sidewalks to Juanita Ave would enhance the character of the neighborhood? . Do you feet safe walking and /or biking on Juanita Ave? nature Date Erich Sche.11has 5028 Juanita Ave QYes jr.. OJ Wt Care Owes N4 ODon't Care es ❑No ODon't Care y 7/e I Aline Sthelihas 5028 Juanita Ave OYesAo QDon't Care QYes ODont Cate . Yes ONo ODon't care Lisa Bjerken 5032 Juanita Ave xLs ONO OOon'tcare Mfes ONo ODon't Care Jiitwes ONo ODon`t Care Dana Wfdstrom 5032.1uanita Ave Yes ONo ODon't Care QYes ONO tDon t Care I*es ONO ODon't Care • Richard Ausman 5036Juanita Ave Ores I' G ODon't Care Owes PWu ODon't Care JOYes ONo ODon't Care /a Sara Ausman 5035Juanita,Ave QYes Ou OOon'tCare Owes *o ODnn'tCare %Yes ONO ODon`tcare .ri0a }tsCF 6�24(t Dan Blersdarf. 5040JuanitaAve Owes Wo ,OUvn'tCare Owes o ODon'aCare es ONO 130061 care —AIL ./ Patricia 8ietsdorl 5040 Juanita Ave Owes a ODOn't Care Owes O ODon'tCare Yes ONO ❑Don't Care Andle:Schieffcrt 5044 Juanita Ave QYes o ODon't Care Owes imo ODon't Care es ON* ODOn't Care Z1p Todd Schieffert 50" Juanita Ave Owes ODon't Care QYes *a 013ari t Care Wn. ONo QDran't Cate 4 Anne 8ildsten 5100 Juanita Ave. Ores QNo OmWt care Owes 040 QDoret care Ityes ONo ODon't care Roger Bildsten 5100 Juanita Ave Owes 0o ODon'tCare Owes %No ODon't Care IQYes ONO QOon'tCare y. r< . e�r...i 6 L4 Dan Katan 5101 Juanita Ave Owes o ODon't Care ETwesVNo ODon't Care okes ONO Oour"'teare' Megan McBumey, 5101 Juanita Ave Owes jio ODon't Care Oyes A& Otiowt Care ,1#jres CINo Oftn't Care Paul Matthew Kline 51041uanita Ave: Owes ONO �on t Gsw QYes E No %DonY Eere Yes Oft ODOn't Care yj w *,,0, �� t tit r/ t,( Anna Kline . 5.104 Juanita Ave Wes 1po [i0on't Care QYes *o QDOn'tCare es ONo ODon't Cate Astkp t e S' i Mary Anne Eaton 5105 Juanita Ave Owes o ODon "t Care Owes W o ODon't Care Yes ONo ODon't care Jeremy Eaton 5105 Juanita Ave Owes XNo ODon't Care Owes No ODon't Care 'Ares ONo ODOWtCare °f f3l'tvia Mastry 5108 Juanita Ave.. Owes )00 UDon't Care Uyes Vo ODon't Gave X6 ONo Ooan't Carr Mike Miller 5108 Juanita Ave OYesyNa QDon't Care Owes,'iJ�o ODon't Care /'"QYes ONO Coon't Carc Paul Hammond 5109 Juanita Ave Owes to ODon't Care QYes o OMW.t ire es ONo ODon't Care ) . Suzanne Rand 5109 Juanita Ave Oyes Qbon'e Care OYe5 O ODon t Cmre ex ON. ODon't Care J 2- ►1ssu X05 Pagel of Z �( d Arden Park.D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Juanita Avenue Resident Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire Name Address Do you favor adding sidewalks to Juanita Ave? Do you think adding sidewalks to Juanita Ave would enhance the characterafthe . nei hborhood? Do you feel safe walking and/or biking on Juanita Ave? Si, atoms. Date Katherine Hawes 511.2 Juanita Ave Dyes o DDan`t Cam, Dyes o ODon't Cars Yes DNa []Don't fare �.. �. ? .� Ot ,t . Seberson 5112 Juanita Ave Dyes o ODan't Care Dyes No ODon't Care i* DNo DDon't Care Kerry Koch 5113 Juanita Ave. E7Ye; KNo gpvntiCare Dyes t�lo ODon'tCare es C3No ODon "t Care vi�R ¢eA..; 4 3461 Larry Koch 5113 Juanita Ave Oyes Wo.Dbon'tCare Dyas'.gslo Mon! Care, lZes Oft Meet cam Linda Paulson 51.16 Juanita Ave Oyes. kmo Mon's care Dyes wno DDon`t Care es Me ❑Don't Care 4j ' Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Ave OYvs ftNo C]Don't Care ,Yes Pa DDon't tare O(Yes Mo. ❑Dan`s Care Kim Kallevig::.. 5117 Juanita Ave Cayes No DDo"Icare Dyes qla Mor t Care es ONa ODon't Cara T KurtHaalva 5120 Juanita Ave OYes o DDon'tCare Dyes QDon'tCare:. ONo DDan`tCare Uzabeth Habra .5 120 Juanita Ave ayes p,DDon'tCerO DYeso ODon'tCare es GJNo DDon'tCare Margo Kosmas 5121 Juanita Ave Dyes- a Mark Care Fires o ODnn'tCare es ONu Mun't Cate Larry Swandby : -5124 Juanita Ave ❑Yes ONp DDon'tcaie Dyes into Obon'tcarp ilpfes ONo L7Dan't Care Shelia Guzik 5125 Juanita Ave Oyes Olbia,Don't Care Dyes *a ODan't fare JoYea Onto DDon't Care w 1 ♦I�� Tom.GuYik. 5125 Juanita Ave' Dyes n DDan't care Dyes DDOn'L Care: es. CiNo C]Don't Cara . f Nancy,Tarbox 5128JuanitaAve 13ye5i6ka Ooor'tcam Oyes Q&o Mon'tCare DNo 00on'trare - G Ann Wierner 5129 Juanita Ave Dyes Zo .Mont Care DYes: Wf4o Ooon't Care WGs ONo DOon'tCare WIk Marlin- Wiemer 5129.1uanita Ave OYes p,o DDan'tCam Dyes Crlivo CiDen't Care Me% ONo ClDon't Care Mary Sando 5133 Juanita Ave Mes. 106.13Doni Care DYes Q11fo Mont Care es ONo DDon'tfare Stephen Sando 5133 Juanita Ave . OYes : a [Mani Care Dyes Qua Ooon't Care es No ODOn't Care Tarsi Davidson 5137 Juanita Ave Dyes' o. []Don't tare I Dyes o ODon't Care s ONo ODon't Care Page 2 of 2 2 r1� r s . . . .f .._6 —: Arden Park D Neighborhood. Roadway Reconstruction .1ndlanola Avenue Residents. Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire " Name- Address Do you favor adding sidewalks to Indianola Ave? Qo you think adding sidewalks to Indianola Ave would enhance the character of the neighborhood?. ' Do you feel safe walking and /or hiking on Indianola Ave? A Signature Date Gregory Dakin S020 Indianola Ave Dyes 00 00an t care Oyes PAO ODaret Care 906 ONO ODon't care, Carl Qaktn 5020 Indianola Ave Dyes o ODon`t Care Oyes *o ODnn't care , . )kcs ONO QDon'I. Cafe Heather Stevenson 5021 Indianola Ave Dyes ON 13DOn't Car e Dyes ONO DDan'tCare Oyes ONO Ooon'tcare Claus Blerre 5021 Indianola Ave OYes 0 ODon'tCare Oyes ONO ODon'tCa e Dyes ONO ODOM Care Jennifer Service 5024 Indianola Ave Dyes Po. Opan t Care Oves tttjflo 00on'r Care awes. ONO Doon't Cafe Mike Rohifsen 502S Indianola Ave Oyes ONO filD='t Care Oyes VQO ODOWt Cafe, Oyes* Ooon'tCare . Mimi Rohtfsen 5025 Indianola Ave Dyes ONO °t care OYWOfiD ODan'tCare Oyes o ODaretcara Cliff. Anderson .:5029 Indianola Ave Oyes. o ODon'tCare OYec*PilNo DDgntCare VYes;ONO ODon't.Gve Ginnie Anderson . 5029 Indianola Ave Dyes *OODon't Care DYea o Goon t Carr ONo 0 Care Robert Griffiths owl M 5033 Indianola Ave Dyes 9ko ODon't Care Dyes a f7Don't Care Oyes *a. ODOn'ktue DYcs�1, WICI)on t Care %yes ONO ODon't Cam ilk ONO (0on't Care �r David Posthumus 5100 Indianola Ave Gayle Posthurnus 5100Iridianola Ave Dyes )4p ODon'tCare OYdr o Won't Care �s ONo ODon'tCare. Candyce Fox 5101 Indianola Ave Oyu o E30*wt care Dyes 1(NO ODant Care Ayes -ONO 0Don'tCaue ,- Stephen Fox 5101 Indianola Ave Oy Onor `t care OymI*. ODon't Care Acs Otto, DDon't+care ZZ; z, ' Jeff Busch. .5104 Indianola Ave 17Yes X#q ODon't Care Oves o ODan't Care yea ONO OtbwtCarc . �j.2!• (C,L Gina Donahue. 5105 Indianola Ave OYes o 13 "t Care Dyes o ODun'tCare ,(Yes ONO ODan'tCare Erin Stastny 5108 Indianola Ave Oyes Goan t Care Dyes o Onon'ECare ves No ODon't care Steve Stastny 510E Indianola Ave Dyes YNo ODan t Care OYes O ODnn't Care ON, ODarA Care Beth klemmensen 5109 Indianola Ave C]ye{ Pit[rf CZDan't Care OYes a pDon't Care Xea ONO DDan't Cara +- ToddKlemmensen 5109 Indianola Ave. DyesXo ODon`t Car a Oyes j%o ODanYCare idles, ONO CIDon'tCare under Construction S11i7ndianotaAve Oyft ONO Ooon'tstire Orel LINO ODen'ttwe' bve,'O" Oxon "t.tare v4 I n7 -W1111 O S It 510 1NWA► I u K a 1.1 Jai [_x .M to ", Page 1 of 2 jj C� V � "'A -f Arden Park D Neighborhood RoWway Reconstruction Indianola Avenue Residents Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire Name Address Do you favor adding sidewalks to Indianola Ave? Do you think adding sidewalks to Indianola Ave would enhance the character of the neighborhood? Do. you feel safe walking and/or biking on Indianola Ave? Signature ... ... . .... 06w- 1 Caryn Pleasants 5113 Indianola Ave. Ayes ,)%o CDo0t Care 0*572W DDon't Care *es.1dN* 00on't Care Stephen Pleasants S113! Indianola Ave Oyes Wto dDoM Care Mes ONO MD601 Cale ASFes UNo CDonx Care John Ralchert 5116 Indianola Ave ElYes )(No 13DW't Care, Dyes a Otwril Care gv6s OuoCDOWtCate Daniel Young 5117 Indianola Ave Ores Oftn't Care Oyes C aDon't Care X-s 014o. ElDont Cate (0/1 IPY Ann Marie Hirsch 5120 Indianola Ave Over '*o 01)cml C4re 0 i1fW. Yes FQ I Don't Care es. ONo Own't Care U0 0"Oe'rCohilruigork Snl lfv&a"OUAVe nift'nNo po co' CW;46ie oils atii Oti Steve London 5124 Indianola Ave. Ores a ODon't Care OYez *0 00on't care -)if" ono 130on't Care Trisha London 5124. Indianola Ave Mr.-No OoonlCara a. pzim-t Cam *es ODoWt Cam Jade Anderson 5125 Indianola Ave OYei :ONo OWn't Cam Cives ONo GD*Wt Care Oves ONa Cowt care Andrea McElligott SM Indianola Ave: 13 1 Yes Cua Cuowt cam: Oven I ON* Coon 1 1 care Ores ONo CDon't Care. ..4 Ingo Schylti 51.291 Indianola Aye es o 096ii't Cam -0 j " o Ot .)6n't Cam eslKo CDoWt %moo] X& Sachin Mehta 5129 Indianola Ave Ores 144 bDowt cam Dyes tp ODOnttaro 'kas Oft 00on't Care Kelly Mehta 5129 Indianola Ave 01fes"'00 ODon't Cam.. OYes%qko Coan't Cate %9yes Ctto Doont Care Lawrence Anderson 5132 Indianola Ave OYes Ono n't tare, Oyes. No CID�'Wtc",' --,Kvei ONo Onon't Coe YW" 16A� Melissa Seeley, 5136 Indianola Ave Oyes o ODon't Care oiras;Ao anowt Cate es two moon't Cale Tim Seeley 5136 Indianola Ave I . . �m OYes *0 Coot''* -A D Lla" Page 2 of 2. oy't S Arden Park 0 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Indianola Avenue Residents Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire Name Address Do you favor adding sidewalks to Indianola Ave? Oyes kYa Coan't care 0MYLn O.Dontcare Do you thlnkadVin—g sidewalks to Indianola Ave would enhance the character of the neighborhood?. OYn PSo OD00t Care OYes: tA 13OWt care Do you fee[ safe walking and/or biking on Indianola Ave? ;Wes ONo QW0 Care -es Me Mcn-tCare Signatur nature Date tWA* S1201ndianola Ave diamola Ave � -!ndWnola Ave a Manl Core Oy ODon't care 13N* Opon't Care ndlanola Ave OYes 0. ODon't Care Oyes Cho ODan'tCare Ores. ONo Doont Cato. Met Me Obaret Care OYes ON6 130ontcare OYei ONo ElDoWt Care Cites ONo OWOCare Oyes es ONoODon7tca MesT Oftn't Care OYes ONo Mon'tcare Dyes ONo 130owt care OYes ONo 006n:4 Care. Met MNo.Own,% care Pres OMo ODaril Care.' OYes Me QMWtCare MYes ONo Mon'tCare es ONooDontfire OYes ONo ❑Dan'trare Wes C30o Man'tCam. OYes QN.o. 06661 care OYes END Man't Care OYes Oko ODon't Care Oyes Me 3DO n L't Care Wes Oft Mont rare I d Indianola Ave Indianola Ave- Indianola Ave Indianola Ave Indianola Ave Indianola Ave. Indianota:Ave Indianola Ave Oves Oft Mont tare OYes ON6 MoWtCatt- Cy" ON* cwan.,tcare Indianola Ave OYes Oft 130on't Cite Dyes ONO OWWtCare OYes Ol a Olwr?tCare . . .......... I Indianola.Ave OYes Me Oftn't Care I Oyes Me Oban't Care I I Mes Otio� Doch t c are I 3 Y, Paa- , ov Arden park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction 5ist Street West Residents. Proposed Sidewalk Questionnaire NSmez z Address. Do you favor adding Sidewalks to 51st Street West? . Do you t in a dine sidewalks to S1st Street West would enhance the character of the, nei hborhood? - Do you feel safe walking and /or biking on 51st Street West? S nature Date Rachel Ellingson 5019 Arden Ave Mes o ODan't Care OYes o l7nw -t Care . Yes. ONO Mont Care Burke :Ellingson 5010 Arden. Ave OY#s . W*;1100"It. care Cites o Gpon't Care yes. ONo Onon`t care lames_ Tyson 5101 Arden Ave Oyes *o mdon't care. Gives FNo G]Dora't tare es ONo Mont care M Jan Tyson 5101 Arden Ave Oyes ION* Qaon'tC.am QYes 0*0 OUontGue ptYes ONo Onon't care v : R. E Ian /� ►' '�� 1') f J Andie Schieffert SW Juanita Ave Ores o Mani care Oyes 04o Mon'ttare *es Mo Man't Care Todd Schieffert 5044 uahita Ave Mes 04o b6o.n't care OYes Sao Mont Care $Oes ONo. Mont Care Anne Bildsten 5100)uanitaAve Mes Po Obon'tCare Oyes g&o`Mon'tCare jC 6 ONO Ooon'tcare Roger.Bliiisten SIOO Juanita Ave OYes *o b0on't care Oyes o DDon't Care Mes 13N* Mont Care l Cary Schilling 5036 Halifax Ave GJYes 00 Own't Care. Oyes Ao ODor't Care Wes Ciao Obont care Cary Schilling 5100 Halifax Ave Oyes Pbo OD*nt Care. OYM 4Na Ginon't Care jVes ONo ODan't Care 0.: : C � � 11 CandyceFox: 5101 Indianola Ave OYes)6q :00on't Care. Oyes Qmo Mon'irate IgYes.Md Mont Care t► ;�•r.1a rrt�i 4lft: E Stephen Fox 5101. Indianola Ave Oyes. f�No :OUon't Care,, C]Yes OYo Mont Care Ijilies ONo Mani care riw iw �ati.+t1 �, 4.j tt r 5037 Indianola Ave I*e.s �uo. O.DoWt Care . OYes ONO Odon't Care $Yc3 Me Opunt Care irs 4 jr;d: at•��,C rt kok I+ Page I of 1 Heather Branigin From: Brian Rochel <brochel01 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 201410:09 PM To: sean.broom @mail.house.gov; johnpauI.yates @maiI.house.gov; rep.paul.thissen @house.mn; rep.frank.hornstein @house.mn; sen.scott.dibble @senate.mn; sen.melisa.franzen @senate.mn; betsy.hodges @minneapolismn.gov, Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO: U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long -term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Brian Rochel broche101@email.com 2550 39th Ave S Minneapolis, MN Heather Branigin From: Matthew Wiandt < matthew wandt@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 201412:45 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ging Wiandt Subject: Please vote in support of 66 West Apartments Mayor Hovland and City Council, My wife and I are writing to enthusiastically endorse the 66 West Apartments project. We live in the South Cornelia neighborhood and would welcome this residential development in our community. We are members of the Plymouth Congregational Church in Minneapolis which helps fund the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. We are familiar with Beacon's track record as a responsible and qualified steward of its residential properties and strong supporter of its residents. Other Beacon communities have found Beacon properties strengthen their communities. Many communities raised concerns when a Beacon project was initially proposed in their neighborhood. In practice, these communities have found that Beacon residents are good neighbors. Beacon understands that a safe place to live is only part of the equation and actively provides the support network these youths need. This cause has a personal connection for me. As a child, my mother was unable to provide housing for my sister and I. Fortunately, my grandparents were able to provide safe and stable housing for us. Many teens do not have this support. As community members, we have a responsibility to help our youth learn and grow in a safe environment. 66 West can provide this environment for our homeless youth. Please vote in support of this important project. It will change lives! Matthew & Virginia Wiandt 4404 Gifford Drive Edina Heather Branigin From: Schleck Family <dschleck @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 04,2014 11:16 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Lake Edina Park as part of the Fred Richards redevelopment Plan and Urban Agriculture Please forward to the City Council and Scott Neal I live at 7408 Kellogg and I am writing to strongly object to the City's consideration of urban agriculture for the Lake Edina Park as part of the Conceptual Vision Master Plan for many reasons. For the City to even consider this as a concept throws out the Comprehensive Plan for the City and demonstrates the City's complete disregard for peoples reasonable expectation that the Edina will follow its Comprehensive Plan. Lake Edina Park is used as a mini park for many passive uses. My children are school aged and use the park for everything from playing tag, to just about any game that involves a ball. When they were little the neighborhood organized a Saturday baseball in the park for the kids. Just this weekend I saw a family I didn't know on the northeast end of Lake Edina Park playing with a soccer ball and a portable net. It's common to see families out with Frisbees, kites, small electronic planes and many other passive uses in the park. In 2008, Edina spent a great deal of time, money and hired an outside consultant to come up with a plan for development, environmental stewardship and parks and recreation within the City that would carry us well into the next decades. The mere thought of urban agriculture on the Lake Edina Park site, crumples up and throws away this plan on several levels. First, the Comprehensive Plan contained a specific section on Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources that was intended to guide the Council, staff and their respective consultants on creating "Community through People, Parks and Programs" which form the boundaries and plans for all Edina Parks in the future.0 As part of this effort at visioning, the Park and Recreation Department of the City set up a classification system for the City based mostly on the size of parks. This included a classification for what is called "Mini- Parks." These small parks are: "characterized by a size of approximately 2 acres or less and is designed to serve primarily the needs of pre- school age children, although it may provide facilities to serve the needs of other age groups. Edina's Mini - Parks typically do not have scheduled athletic facilities. Mini -Parks are typically used to address limited isolated recreational needs. Service Area — % mile. "(?l Lake Edina Park is listed as a Mini Park in the Comprehensive Plan and the Council must not ignore the guidance from the Comp Plan as it relates to Mini - Parks. Nowhere in the Comprehensive Plan does it refer to "Urban Agriculture" as a component of Edina's Mini Parks and the very idea goes directly against the agreed elements of the plan. Urban Agriculture does not serve the recreational needs of the pre - school age - children. Urban agriculture is intended to provide self sufficient food production at its highest and best use. Before this plan goes any further the need for Edina residents for urban agriculture needs to be clarified. Second, Urban Agriculture is not an isolated recreational need as also dictated by the Comprehensive plan. Farming and gardening are not the types of recreation contemplated in the plan. Regardless of the vision for adjoining property like Fred Richards golf course, this is an urban parcel. There are many new family's that border this parcel who need a recreational area for children to run, play games and generally enjoy open passive use space and the Consultant has failed to recognize this need in its study as shown by the current proposal using the space that is Lake Edina Park. Lastly, from an environmental standpoint, there is a good chance that this parcel is an undocumented seasonal wetland as defined by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Many neighbors' report long periods of standing water on the Lake Edina Park parcel during the spring and other times during the year. While not delineated at this time, in order for the City to abide by one of its primary goals of protecting existing natural resources, it must investigate this possibility before making any further investigation of an urban agriculture. Wetland issues may prevent any such redevelopment in the future because of restrictions pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act, Section 404. Furthermore, Lake Edina Park was never studied under any environmental review for any of the other surrounding projects and we think that the City as the Responsible Governmental Unit needs to undertake an Environmental Review as required by the Minnesota Environmental Review Act before undertaking any further action on this project. Together these elements demonstrate the folly in pursuing urban agriculture at Lake Edina Park. If the City proceeds it would be as if the Comprehensive Plan means nothing and no resident should be able to reasonably rely on this document in the future. It would be the same as rejecting any input from the Planning Commission or Parks and Recreational Commission or the Energy and Environment Commission. In addition, we oppose any parking lot or street development on the green space of Fred Richards and the extension or use of Kellogg Ave to aid in parking or transportation needs in the Fred Richards redevelopment. Thank you, Laura Schleck L11 Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - Chapter 9 Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources u Id. at 9 -6 Heather Branigin From: jell Spartz <jspartz @minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Monday, August 04, 201412:22 PM To: m @landschute.com; tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; PaulSkrede @mchsi.com; Edina Mail; mgaylord @ci.excelsior.mn.us; sharris @goidenvalleymn.gov; dkind100 @gmail.com; emax33721 @aol.com; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; thultmann @longlakemn.gov; jeff.pederson @ci.medina.mn.us; betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov; tschneider @eminnetonka.com; ahunt @ci.minnetrista.mn.us; Imcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov; dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; Scott Zerby (szerby @ci.shorewood.mn.us); sreinhardt @ci .spring- park.mn.us; jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; gerryd @terradek.com; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us; cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; kenwillcox @wayzata.org; jdoak.woodiand @hotmail.com; Sherry White; Brian Shekleton; Richard Miller; Jeff Casale; James Calkins; Pamela Blixt; Bill Olson; Bill Bushnell; Peter Rechelbacher (prechelbacher @msn.com); Gerald Ciardelli; Lee Keeley; Tom Baltutis; prisbue6 @gmail.com; Sylvia Carlson; Tom Casey, kingslynn25 @yahoo.com; Chris Dovolis; kgothberg @msn.com; Nina Holiday- Lynch; h20,johnson @hotmail.com; mkjol @kjolhaugenv.com; jlofgren @cahillswift.com; richardmanser @icloud.com; Steve Mohn; dmoltmans @comcast.net, Mike Osterholm; Marc Rosenberg; Neil Weber, mike.opat @hennepin.us; linda.higgins @hennepin.us; marion.greene @hennepin.us; commissioner.mclaughlin @hennepin.us; randy Johnson @hennepin.us; jan.callison @hennepin.us; jeff.rjohnson @hennepin.us; citizeninfo @hennepin.us; sheriff@ co. hennepin.mn.us; Bill Bushnell; Peter Rechelbacher (prechelbacher @msn.com); Gerald Ciardelli; Lee Keeley, Tom Baltutis; prisbue6 @gmail.com; Sylvia Carlson; Tom Casey, kingslynn25 @yahoo.com; Chris Dovolis; kgothberg @msn.com; Nina Holiday - Lynch; h20,johnson @hotmail.com; mkjol @kjolhaugenv.com; jlofgren @cahillswift.com; richardmanser @icloud.com; Steve Mohn; dmoltmans @comcast.net; Mike Osterholm; Marc Rosenberg; Neil Weber Subject: Manager Casale's Response Attachments: Jeff Casale Letter To Jon Monson 7- 31- 2014.pdf I understand you were sent an email or contact from Mr. Jon Monson who raised concerns about the July 17, 2014 meeting of the MCWD Board of Managers and an exchange between he and MCWD manager Jeff Casale. Upon personal reflection, Manager Casale issued an apology to Mr. Monson and read the attached letter into the record at the MCWD meeting this past Thursday evening. While the controversy related to the former Administrator was emotional on both sides, district staff continues to do a great job of serving the public and the Board is moving ahead with the process to recruit and hire a new Administrator. During my brief time as Interim Administrator, I have come to really appreciate the role and important work of the MCWD. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jeff Spartz July 31, 2014 Mr. Jon Monson The Landschute Group 202 Water Street #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Monson, I want to take this opportunity to respond to your July 21, 2014 email raising concerns about my comments and our exchange at the July 17, 2014 Board meeting of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). You and I have known each other for many years, even before I came to serve on the MCWD Board of Managers. Clearly you and some other members of the public hold strong views that the former Administrator, Eric Evenson - Marden, should not have been terminated by the Board, and that the Board's decision lacked reasons or notice to Mr. Evenson - Marden. As you know, Mr. Evenson - Marden was an at -will employee, serving at the pleasure of the Board. The Board provided Mr. Evenson - Marden six months advance notice of termination, and he is still employed by the District. Upon formal termination, he will further receive an additional six months' severance with benefits. This is fair notice and a very generous severance package. The issues that I have been concerned about and that led to my support of his termination in 2014 were issues that I extensively discussed with the Board and Mr. Evenson - Marden in 2010. 1 have recently learned that in fact many of these same issues were also discussed more than ten years ago. I would invite you and any other interested persons to listen to a tape of the Board's evaluation of Mr. Evenson - Marden in a meeting on August 9, 2010 (a meeting that was allowed to be public at Mr. Evenson - Marden's request). This past April, a majority of the MCWD Board of Managers concluded that the District needed new leadership to help move the organization to a heightened level of effectiveness in future years. Having said that, this issue has been very difficult and emotional for all of us who value the work of the MCWD. The District operates with a lean staff and both Managers and members of the public who interface with our office get the opportunity to work closely with staff members. Personnel decisions become even more difficult under these circumstances, yet, we as Managers have a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of the District and the important public mission we are sworn to uphold. As I reflect on what was said at the July 17th meeting, both in the formal meeting and outside, I believe it is fair to say we both made some comments in an emotional exchange that were inappropriate. I'll concede I was probably the more egregious offender as I did not allow you the opportunity to fully communicate your points in the Board meeting. I want to apologize for interrupting you in the Board meeting and for anything I said in our hallway exchange. The emotions of this issue, coupled with Page 1 of 2 July 31, 2014 Jon Monson Page 2 of 2 contentious meetings, resulted in behavior that is not consistent with who I am and how I should conduct myself as a public official. This is not an excuse, but perhaps an explanation. Again, I apologize to you and anyone who was offended by our exchange. Finally, I would like to note that in my opinion some people appear to be arriving at conclusions related to Mr. Evenson - Marden without the benefit of all the information, a situation that is frustrating to those of us who support a change in leadership. State laws restrict what we can release to the public in light of the fact that personnel matters are sensitive... The District has a legal and ethical responsibility to protect employment and performance data, unless the employee has expressly authorized the MCWD, in . writing, to release protected information. The attached memo from Acting Administrator Jeff Spartz, was intended to be distributed last week and was referred to at the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting; unfortunately, it was inadvertently not distributed at the meeting and has been since electronically distributed to members of the CAC. I have worked with my colleagues on the MCWD Board of Managers for the past-nine years, and other than this personnel' matter, our discussions have been marked_by a general consensus about the mission and policy direction of the District. Thank you for your past support of the MCWD and I hope we can all move past this current'situation to further advance the important work we share in protecting one of'the most valuable urban watersheds in the country. Sincerely, I(ley Jeff Casale RFIMAX Results (0) 952 - 949 -1485 (F) 952 - 949 -1489 XasaleCa�JNlinnesotahomes -com Voted "Super Real Estate Agent" by Mpls /St Paul and TwinCitfes Business magazines MINNEHAHA CREEK) QUALITY OF WATER , TO: MCWD Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) FROM: Jeff Spartz, MCWD Interim Administrator DATE: July 22, 2014 RE: Eric Evenson - Marden iWATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF LIFE Questions have been raised by the MCWD Citizens Advisory Committee with respect to the termination of the former administrator Eric Evenson - Marden. As you know, issues related to personnel matters and an employee's job performance are highly sensitive. State and federal laws provide protections to employees as it relates to the disclosure of data on individuals including job performance, employee evaluations and various other employment information. The MCWD has both a legal and ethical duty to protect an individual employee's employment data. Having said that, we are aware of the fact that at the June 25, 2014 meeting of the CAC it was reported that Mr. Evenson - Marden had released his personnel file to some or all members of the CAC. Based on that action, it appears that some members of the CAC have concluded that there were insufficient grounds for the termination of Mr. Evenson - Marden. It's important to note that Mr. Evenson - Marden was an at -will employee and the Board dismissed him without cause. As the Interim Administrator of the MCWD, I was not a parry to any of the prior proceedings nor will I be a candidate for the new Administrator position. But as someone with years of experience serving in local government and managing sensitive employment matters, I would urge the CAC to be aware of some key facts prior to reaching any conclusions in this matter. Specifically, I would note the following: 1. As part of his duties, Mr. Evenson - Marden was charged with maintaining a complete personnel file regarding all staff including himself. The personnel file provided to you by Mr. Evenson- Marden and represented as a complete personnel file was in fact not complete. MCWD legal counsel reviewed the "personnel file" provided to you by Mr. Evenson - Marden and identified several substantive documents including performance evaluations that were not included that would normally go into a personnel file. In a July 17, 2014 meeting of the MCWD Board of Managers, which Mr. Evenson - Marden requested be open, Mr. Evenson - Marden reviewed and agreed to adding most of the documents to his personnel file. Mr. Evenson - Marden did not have a response for why he had placed certain personnel evaluations in his file but not others. 2. Due to data privacy laws, the MCWD Board of Managers is legally prohibited from disclosing or discussing the contents of Mr. Evenson - Marden's complete personnel file without the written authorization of Mr. Evenson - Marden. On July 9, 2014, District legal counsel met with Mr. Evenson - Marden and his attorney to review the contents of his personnel file, the documents which the MCWD thought would normally be in a personnel file and the draft release form which would allow the MCWD Board of Managers to openly discuss its decision with the CAC without violating federal or state laws or being open to legal action. At the July 17 Board meeting, Mr. Evenson - Marden stated he was advised not to sign the document. When asked what changes he wanted made, he referred the Board to his attorney. Although MCWD counsel has reached out to Mr. Evenson - Marden's counsel both in writing and by phone, this matter remains unresolved. We are happy to provide you a copy of the draft release form. While we are legally prohibited from releasing the complete personnel file to you without Mr. Evenson - Marden's written release, there is a recording of an August 9, 2010 meeting of the MCWD Board of Managers, made public by Mr. Evenson - Marden, conducting a detailed performance review of the former Administrator. A copy of the audio recording of that meeting is available to you upon request and we are also preparing a written transcription of that meeting, which will be available soon. Five of the seven current Board members were on the Board at that time. 4. In addition, anyone who did not attend the July 17, 2014 meeting of the Board of Managers may listen to the recording of that meeting. At that meeting the 2010 personnel evaluation and its relationship to present issues was discussed. As mentioned, it was also an open meeting at the request of Mr. Evenson - Marden. We would respectfully request that the CAC not rush to conclusions with incomplete information. In addition, from a governance perspective, the responsibility for personnel issues and performance related to the District Administrator is vested with the Board of Managers — both to protect the privacy and employment rights of the Administrator as well as ensure there is only one line of accountability (vs. forcing the Administrator to report to multiple authorities). The Board of Managers is working to complete the outstanding issues with Mr. Evenson - Marden both for his benefit as well as to ensure that this matter does not distract us from the important work of the District. The Board is now actively moving ahead with the search for a new full -time administrator and will be seeking the input of many stakeholders during this process, including input from the CAC. No doubt there will be several outstanding candidates who can help lead this organization to even greater levels of effectiveness in meeting its critical public mission. As I have become more informed and engaged in the work of the MCWD, I have found an energized and talented staff that is committed to the important mission of protecting one of the most sensitive urban watersheds in the country. We need and value the input of the CAC in this important work and we hope we can count on your continued guidance on these pressing water quality issues. Please let me know if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Heather Branigin From: tpaulson @1992ventures.com Sent: Monday, August 04,2014 1:44 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Chad Millner Subject: Living Streets Plan Mr. Nolan, I write today in regards to the proposed Living Streets Plan for the City of Edina. In an April 1, 2014 Report to City Council you concluded that Living Streets will require being "broadly supported by the local neighborhood" and the trajectory of the change from existing streets will depend on "the resulting acceptance of the local neighborhoods." On July 31, 2014, the Edina Engineering Department held an Open House to unveil the initial designs of your Living Streets Plan for the Arden Park D Neighborhood. As Engineering Director Millner can confirm, there were more than 100 residents in attendance and, not only was there no broad support or acceptance, the opposition to your plan was nearly unanimous! Please tell me how the lack of neighborhood support and lack of neighborhood acceptance will affect the content of the proposed Living Streets Plan. Thank you, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Ave To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Item No. IX. B. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Edina Transportation Commission Date: July 1, 2014 ,r U • ,�,�-1'1li H)ItAT��� • INH�! Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Edina Taxicab Code and Transportation Options Attachments: 1. Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII 2. Letter to ETC from Arlene Forrest 3. Requested Amendment to Edina City Code 4. Information about ITNTwinCities Action Requested: City Council direct City staff to conduct a thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code. Situation: A variety of transportation options are needed in the community to ensure that residents of all ages, income levels and abilities can participate in the normal activities of daily living that require transportation without undue inconvenience or prohibitive expense. Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII regulates taxicabs and taxicab drivers that pick up passengers in the city. This section of Code includes outdated references; would appear to regulate transportation services not intended to be regulated by this section of Code; and may inhibit providers of transportation services from serving Edina residents. Background: "Taxicab" Definition Sec. 12- 315(1) of Edina City Code defines "taxicab" as "any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. 169.011, engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, and. whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire." In discussion at the June 2014 ETC meeting, it was noted that the broad definition of "taxicab" could apply to a variety of for - profit and non - profit transportation services, including: • Metro Transit buses, Transit Link, and Metro Mobility; • Private and non - profit para- transit services. • Paid driver ride services, such as Uber and Lyft; • Volunteer driver ride services for which the driver either does not or does receive some form of compensation (donation, credit toward services, mileage, etc.); and w 7�; Page 2 O i v � • �'��- nrrrurin'r�'� • �aea • Non - emergency medical transportation (NEMT) for people who have Medicaid, Home Health providers (some offer transportation in cars as part of their services), VA transportation services, etc. There was further discussion about the phrase "for hire" and whether it applies when a driver receives: • Monetary compensation for providing a ride and the fee is set and obligatory; • Monetary compensation for providing a ride, but the fee is suggested and voluntary; • Non - monetary compensation for providing a ride, such as credits to use toward services; And /or whether it applies when a rider pays the driver or a business or non - profit entity: • A set and obligatory fee for a ride; • A suggested and voluntary fee for a ride; or • For ride services through an association fee or membership. The definition of "taxicab" in City Code does not include "motor vehicles subject to control and regulation, by the state public service commission, motor vehicles regularly used by undertakers in carrying on their businesses, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis." An internet search for the term "public service commission" did not produce results for Minnesota. It is therefore not known what vehicles are excluded from this definition. Licensing Edina City Code Sec. 12 -316 requires that taxicabs operating with the city must display a valid taxicab license decal issued by the City of Bloomington, City of St. Louis Park, or the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). A driver of a taxicab must be licensed by Bloomington, St. Louis Park, Richfield, or the MAC. A search of the St. Louis Park city website for taxicab licensing did not produce results. Taxicabs that carry passengers to Edina but who do not solicit business or pick up passengers within the city are exempted from this licensing requirement. The definitions of "taxicab" differ between cities. Whereas Edina's definition of taxicab includes all motor vehicles engaged in carrying passengers for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, Bloomington includes vehicles with seating capacity for up to seven people and not operating on a fixed route. Richfield includes vehicles with seating capacity for up to eight people and not operating on a fixed route. Analysis: w9t� +,1� Page 3 O v � IHHu The definition of "taxicab" in Edina City Code casts a wide net and includes transportation services that are not commonly thought of as taxicabs. It is unknown whether there is actually an expectation that all of these services be licensed as required in the Article. This lack of clarity creates two issues: I. Service providers may unknowingly be operating in violation of the licensing requirements; 2. New service providers may be inhibited from operating in Edina because of the licensing requirements; in some cases, these requirements may not apply to the service provider, but that fact is not clear. There is a growing need for transportation options in Edina, whether for seniors who no longer drive, people with disabilities that prevent them from driving, single car families, people who choose not to drive, or people who cannot afford their own car. Both nonprofit and for - profit organizations are responding to these needs by providing a variety of transportation options. These options do not fit neatly into the City's "taxicab" Code, creating the potential for issues with compliance and difficulties for transportation providers to serve Edina residents. In addition, City Code Article 12, Section VII appears to contain at least two outdated references. ITN (Independent Transportation Network) Twin Cities is a non - profit volunteer driver /paid ride service that would like to operate in Edina beginning in August. The ETC was approached by Edina resident Arlene Forrest, a board member of ITN Twin Cities, with a request that we recommend a change in City Code. The recommended change would have provided an exemption from the licensing requirements for ITN and similar services. Upon discussion, the ETC consensus was to recommend a more thorough legal review and modification of the code. Recommendation: A thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code that takes into consideration the range of non - profit and for - profit transportation services now serving and potentially serving Edina. Due to an interest from ITN Twin Cities to begin operating in Edina in August, the ETC recommends that this review and modification be completed as soon as possible. Prepared by: Jennifer Janovy Reviewed by: Emily Boettge and Courtney Whited Date: July 19, 2014 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM\Advisory Communications\2014 \Item VIII. x. ETC Advisory Communication.dooc Municode Page 1 of 2 Edina, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances >> Subpart A - CODE OF ORDINANCES >> Chapter 12 - BUSINESSES >> ARTICLE VII. TAXICABS AND TAXICAB DRIVERS » ARTICLE VII. TAXICABS AND TAXICAB DRIVERS Sec. 12 -315. Definitions. Sec. 12 -316. License required. Sec. 12 -317. Driver's license required. Sec. 12 -318. Designation signs posted and visible on the exterior vehicle. Sec. 12 -319. Exemption. Secs. 12- 320-12 -341. Reserved. Sec. 12 -315. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: city. Street means any street, alley, avenue, court, bridge, lane or public place or highway in the Taxicab. (1) The term "taxicab" means any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. § 169.011, engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, and whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire. (2) The term "taxicab" does not include motor vehicles subject to control and regulation by the state public service commission, motor vehicles regularly used by undertakers in carrying on their business, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis. Taxicab driver means any person who drives a taxicab. (Code 1970, Code 1992, § 1330.01; Ord. No. 1432, Ord. No. 1432 -A1; Ord. No. 1331; Ord. No. 1331 -A1; Ord. No. 1331 -A2; Ord. No. 1331 -A3) Sec. 12 -316. License required. No person shall operate a taxicab within the city without displaying a valid taxicab license decal duly issued by the City of Bloomington, the City of St., Louis Park or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. (Code 1970, Code 1992, § 1330.02, Ord. No. 1432; Ord. No. 1432 -Ai; Ord. No. 1331; Ord. No. 1331 A1; Ord. No. 1331 -A2, Ord. No. 1331 -A3) Sec. 12 -317. Driver's license required. httnc• / /lihrary miinionrla r.nm /print acnx7h= Rrr.liPntTT) =1 51 57R TJTMRPnitPet= httnc %ia %7 7 /)R / ?()14 Municode Page 2 of 2 No person shall drive a taxicab within the city without possessing a valid taxicab driver's license duly issued by the City of Bloomington, City of Richfield, City of St. Louis Park or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. (Code 1970, Code 1992 § 1330.03, Ord. No. 1432; Ord. No. 1432 A1; Ord. No. 1331; Ord. No. 1331 -A1; Ord. No. 1331 -A2, Ord. No. 1331-A3) Sec. 12 -318. Designation signs posted and visible on the exterior vehicle. Each taxicab required to be licensed by this article shall bear signs identifying the vehicle as a taxicab. Such signs shall be on the exterior of the vehicle and shall be visible from each side of the vehicle. (Cod-9 1970, Code 1992, § 1330.04; Ord. No. 1432, Ord. No. 1432 -A1; Ord. No. 1331; Ord. No. 1331 -A1; Ord. No. 1331 -A2; Ord. No. 1331-A3) Sec. 12 -319. Exemption. Any taxicab or taxicab driver licensed to operate in another city may carry passengers from the city where licensed to any place or point within the city and may freely travel upon the streets without being licensed in accordance with this article, provided that the taxicab driver shall not be permitted to solicit business or pick up passengers within the city unless the taxicab and the taxicab driver are licensed as required by this article. (Code 1970, Code 1992, § 1330.05, Ord. No. 1432, Ord. No. 1432 -A1; Ord. No. 1331; Ord. No. 1331 A1; Ord. No. 1331-A2,- Ord. No. 1331 -A3) Secs. 12- 320 -12 -341. Reserved. httnc• / /lihrnry miinin.ndp. rnm /print ncnv9h= 9rr.liPntTT) =1 51 57RrT4TAARPrniPet= hitnQo /.,2a0/7 7 /7R /')OIA To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: June 19, 2014 O e r t>-4, O • �}�bnrrnin�19 • reen Agenda Item #: VI. C. Subject: ITNTwinCities: Requested Modifications to Edina Taxicab Ordinance Action Requested: Action ❑ Discussion Information ❑ Consider requested modifications to Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code for the purpose of creating a new category of licensed vehicle called a "Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicle," and provide input and /or recommendations for Council consideration. Information / Background: On March 3, 2014 Arlene Forrest, board member of ITNTwinCities, submitted a letter to City Council outlining her organization's goals to provide a new senior transportation option to Edina. According to Ms. Forrest, in order for ITNTwinCities to provide this service in Edina a modification to the City Code is necessary. Given the efforts of the former ETC Working Group and more recent discussions regarding transportation options, City Manager Scott Neal requested that the ETC consider the requested service and ordinance modification. Ms. Forrest and other ITNTwinCities representatives will be present to discuss this matter with ETC members and to answer any questions Commissioners may have. Attachments: Letter to ETC from Arlene Forrest Requested Amendment to Edina City Ordinance Information about ITNTwinCities G: \Engineering \lnfrostruclure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Agendas & RR's \2014 R&R\20140619\ltem 1A.C. Requested Morfiticollons to Taxicab Ordnance.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th 5t. • Edina, MN 55424 June 11, 2014 To: Edina Transportation Commission Re: Amending Edina's taxicab ordinance Access to affordable and reliable transportation for an aging population is a concern for many communities. While they want to remain active, many older adults find themselves homebound for lack of transportation. Only 1.2 percent of seniors use public transportation on a daily basis, while the vast majority rely on friends and family for rides. On average, women live an extra 10 years between the time they stop driving and pass away; for men it's 6 years. I've been working with people from a number of social services organizations and other professions to bring a new senior transportation option to the area. This grassroots group has been meeting for over two years, evaluating the existing services in order to select a viable model to address currently unmet needs. As a result, we've established ITNTwinCities, a Minnesota nonprofit affiliated with ITNAmerica, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to providing dignified transportation for older adults and those with impaired vision. Our mission is to provide. a volunteer - based, quality transportation service that is consumer- oriented, community supported and economically sustainable. There are currently 25 affiliates in 20 states. More information about the organization and the community benefits of having a local affiliate can be found at itnamerica.org. The ITN model replicates the freedom, flexibility and independence of driving. We will offer rides in private automobiles, not marked vans, 24 hours a day with door - through -door, arm- through -arm service. ITN member riders will pay an annual membership fee and will pay for rides out of their prepaid account based upon the trip distance. There is no income restriction and members can schedule rides for any purpose and as often as they wish. ITN primarily uses unpaid volunteer drivers; paid drivers will only supplement as demand requires. All drivers will have background checks and training to safely assist our riders. Because of the way ITN is structured, the ITN service falls under some municipal taxicab ordinances, including Edina's. We are working to address this matter in those communities in our identified service area in Hennepin County. I'm attaching a proposed change to Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII that is modeled after language adopted in other cities as proposed by their local ITN affiliates. We plan to begin offering rides in late summer of 2014 so we thank you for your timely consideration of this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Arlene Forrest Board Member, ITNTwinCities 952- 285 -2795 atforrest @gmail.com Edina City Ordinance Requested Amendment Modifying the provisions of Chapter 12, Article VII of the Edina City Code for the purpose of creating a new category of licensed vehicle called a "Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicle," WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has an interest in ensuring that residents in Edina have affordable and convenient transportation options, including "door through door" assistance where necessary, WHEREAS, non - profit organizations can offer transportation and related services at an affordable rate because they may use volunteer drivers and receive donations; and WHEREAS, current public vehicle licensing requirements complicate the ability of non - profit organizations to use volunteer drivers in order to keep the cost of their transportation services low; and WHEREAS, Council wishes to ensure the safety of those who use these services by imposing certain restrictions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Edina, State of Minnesota: That Chapter 12, Article VII. Taxicabs and Taxicab Drivers of the Edina City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12 -315. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Charitable Non - profit Transportation Vehicle means any vehicle for hire or other public motor vehicle that is used by or on behalf of a non - profit charitable organization as defined by Section 501(c)(3). United States Internal Revenue Code, Non - Profit Organizations. The Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicle may be owned and driven by a volunteer driver or an employee of the non - profit charitable organization who is not directly paid by riders. Street means any street, alley, avenue, court, bridge, lane or public place or highway in the city. Taxicab. (1) The term "taxicab" means any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. § 169.011, engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or (2) not, and whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire. The term "taxicab" does not include motor vehicles subject to control and regulation by the state public service commission, motor vehicles regularly used by undertakers in carrying on their business, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis. Taxicab driver means any person who drives a taxicab. Sec. 12 -316. License required. No person shall operate a taxicab within the city without displaying a valid taxicab license decal duly issued by the City of Bloomington, the City of St. Louis Park or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Sec. 12 -317. Driver's license required. No person shall drive a taxicab within the city without possessing a valid taxicab driver's license duly issued by the City of Bloomington, City of Richfield, City of St. Louis Park or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Sec. 12 -319. Designation signs posted and visible on the exterior vehicle. Each taxicab required to be licensed by this article shall bear signs identifying the vehicle as a taxicab. Such signs shall be on the exterior of the vehicle and shall be visible from each side of the vehicle. Sec. 12 -319. Exephm. Exeanptions. Any taxicab or taxicab driver licensed to operate in another city may carry passengers from the city where licensed to any place or point within the city and may freely travel upon the streets without being licensed in accordance with this article, provided that the taxicab driver shall not be permitted to solicit business or pick up passengers within the city unless the taxicab and the taxicab driver are licensed as required by this article. A Charitable Non - profit Transportation Vehicle is exempt from the regulations set forth in this ordinance upon presentation to the city [insert department or staff position] documentation establishing the Section 501(c)(3) status of the entity. ITN TlwinCities ITN TwinCities grew from a group of concerned citizens and professionals who began meeting in Edina to discuss ways to address the lack of transportation options for older adults, especially those who are transitioning from driving to not driving. After exploring a number of different models for providing senior transportation, the group decided to focus on the Independent Transportation Network, a proven model developed by the national non - profit, ITNAmerica (ITNAmerica.org). With the Edina Community Foundation acting as fiscal sponsor, in October of 2012 the group was able to raise the funds to become Friends of ITN TwinCities, a pre - affiliate of ITNAmerica. ITN TwinCities was incorporated as a Minnesota non -profit in March of 2013 and has applied for federal 501(c)(3) status. In November of 2013 ITN TwinCities completed the research, fundraising and organizational objectives necessary to become a full affiliate of ITNAmerica. We are currently building capacity to begin operating our transportation service in the fall of 2014. Mission The mission of ITN TwinCities is to provide a volunteer- based, quality transportation service for older adults and those with visual impairments, that is consumer - oriented, community supported and economically viable. We strive to enhance the independence of older and visually impaired adults through innovative mobility services and transportation partnerships in their communities. Need The population in the Twin Cities is aging. This trend is particularly evident in communities like Edina where the percentage of residents over age 65 increased by almost 15 percent between 1990 and 2000. National statistics show that, on average, men will outlive their ability to drive by 7 years and women by 10 years. Many older adults continue to drive even when it is unsafe because nothing else offers the same degree of independence and convenience. Lack of adequate transportation alternatives forces those who do not drive to give up many of their daily activities, often leading to social isolation and negative health consequences. The need for safe, affordable, convenient transportation for seniors and the visually impaired is great and growing. Many of our board members got involved with this initiative because of personal experience with the transportation struggles of friends or family members. As part of our planning for this project, ITN TwinCities conducted a number of focus groups and community conversations with potential users. The results of these conversations demonstrated a significant need and desire for transportation that was more flexible, supportive and dignified than the options currently available. While some transportation options exist for those who are unable to drive, most are limited by eligibility requirements, destination restrictions and hours of operation. Other options fail to provide the assistance that older or visually impaired riders may require. ITN TwinCities seeks to address barriers and fill the gaps in available transportation options for older or visually impaired adults, by providing a flexible, 24/7, door - through -door ride service, with trained drivers to assist riders as needed. Convenient, safe and dignified transportation is essential to support older adults hoping to age in place in their homes and communities. No single solution will adequately meet the transportation needs of the growing number of older people in our communities. Recognizing this, throughout the planning process we have met with senior service and transportation providers to learn about their programs and explore ways that we can work together. Representatives of VEAP, PRISM, DARTS, JFCS, Ebenezer Society, Catholic ElderCare and the Alzheimer's Society, among others, have generously shared their time and knowledge with us. ITN TwinCities continues to work on building partnerships that will support a range of transportation options in our communities. Service As an affiliate of ITNAmerica, ITN TwinG eswill replicate a proven model for sustainable, senior transportation. ITN has 25 affiliates around the country and almost 20 years of experience in meeting the needs of seniors and visually impaired riders. ITN TwinCities will serve adults 60 years and older, and those with visual impairments. We will provide 24/7, door - through -door transportation directly to a specified destination with no restrictions on trip length or purpose. Rides typically are scheduled at least a day in advance, but may be provided on the same day (at a slightly higher rate). Rides will be provided primarily by screened and trained volunteers, using their own automobiles. Riders will join the organization as members and establish personal transportation accounts. The cost of rides is debited from the transportation account — no money exchanges hands in the vehicle. ITN TwinCities service is dignified, convenient and secure and keeps the rider in control. Volunteer drivers for ITN TwinCities have the opportunity to earn transportation credits. These credits can be banked for their own future transportation needs, or donated to a scholarship fund or to a rider in any ITN in the country. Riders may also earn transportation credits for their accounts by donating a vehicle to ITN TwinCities Relationship with other organizations ITN TwinCities is an affiliate of a national nonprofit, ITNAmerica. The Edina Community Foundation serves as our fiscal sponsor. We have received financial or other support from Commonl3ond Communities, the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging and AAA Minneapolis. Board, staff and volunteers ITN TwinCities currently has six board members with expertise in transportation, senior services, nonprofit management, law and finance. Volunteers will be the backbone of ITN TwinCities We will begin operations with at least 12 -15 volunteer drivers and hope to double that number by the end of our first year of operations. We will also have volunteer opportunities in operations, communications and fundraising events. i Dignified transportation for seniors Every day seniors and visually impaired adults face the reality that the Twin Cities is a great place to live - if you drive. When you cannot drive, how do you buy groceries, have lunch with a friend, or get to a doctor? Older adults want to remain independent, living in their home and active in the community they love. How do they maintain their freedom, stay safe, and give their loved ones peace of mind? Moving from the driver's seat to the passenger seat is much easier when you are driven by a volunteer who cares and provides so much more than a ride. ITNTwinGties (Independent Transportation Network) is here to help by providing a safe dignified transportation solution. 7f09,_:0W8W,, Who ive are... ITNTwinGties is an affiliate of ITNAmerica, the first and only national non - profit transportation system for older and visually impaired adults. ITN's network of volunteer drivers offers rides in private cars with door - through -door, arm - through -arm service to enhance safety, freedom and peace of mind for all of us. "ITN is a lifesaver for me. It gets ure where I want to go, and 1 doii'l have to biu•deir friends aurl family. It's wacdeiful to have this service. I'd be staclr iii the house otherwise." Katherine Freund founded ITNAmerica after an 84- year -old driver caused an accident that injured her young son. She realized that crashes caused by older people resulted from a transportation system that wasn't meeting the needs of older adults. She was determined to change that. In 1995, she founded the Independent Transportation Network. There are now 27 affiliated communities in 21 states, providing flexible, affordable transportation to thousands of riders. Learii more al wiv►v.itntrvincities.org Contact us: Debra Burton, Executive Director debra.burton @itntwincities.org Tel: (612) 260 -5949 Email: info @ITNTwinCities.org Supplemental Information: Senior Transportation Services Now To Calculate Senior Friendliness The 5 A's of Senior Friendliness (below) reflect the views of seniors who have driven an automobile for 50 years or more and often are the criteria by which older adults judge the effectiveness of a community - based transportation option. The 5 A's may be one reason senior passengers often view public and paratransit services, and even volunteer driver programs somewhat harshly. To calculate the Senior Friendliness, check each factor that is consistent with its operations. Each check equals 1 point. Your total score will tell you where a transportation service is on the "road to senior friendliness ". Availability. The Transportation Service.... provides transportation to seniors is able to recruit and retain sufficient number of drivers can provide transportation anytime (days, evenings, weekends) provides unlimited numbers of rides to seniors maintains organizational relationships with human & transit services Acceptability: The Transportation Service.... uses automobiles to provide majority of transportation does not require advance scheduling involves riders to determine appropriate wait time conveys guidelines to ensure vehicles are clean and well maintained provides driver "sensitivity to seniors" training Accessibility: The Transportation Service.... can accommodate needs of majority of elders in the community can take riders to destinations beyond city & county boundaries provides "door -to- door" transportation provides training to riders on how to access services can provide services to essential and non essential activities Adaptability: The Transportation Service.... can accommodate riders who need or want to make multiple stops makes an effort to link riders with other services when appropriate can access vehicles to accommodate wheelchairs and walkers provides "door -thru- door" transportation when needed will provide transportation escorts when needed Affordability: The Transportation Service.... provides insurance coverage for volunteer drivers charges reduced fees to seniors for transportation services accepts passenger donations for transportation services covers the driver's deductible in the event of a crash is willing to reimburse drivers for mileage or costs Total The following description of "door- through- door" service is excerpted from How to Establish and Maintain Door - through -door Transportation Services for Seniors, by Jon E. Burkhardt and Helen Kerschner, published by WESTAT in conjunction with The Beverly Foundation, September 29, 2005. Basic knowledge needed to understand door - through -door transportation services includes the following information: ❑ Most seniors have sufficient health and other resources to independently fulfill all their transportation needs. ❑ Some seniors (often the eldest) are so frail or infirm that they need personal, hands -on assistance in making a trip. ❑ Persons with such needs often could not make that trip without personal, intensive support because their physical or mental limitations make them unable to access or use other public or specialized transportation services. ❑ Seniors may receive help entering or exiting their homes, the destinations of their trips, or the vehicles used for their trips. Some seniors with serious frailties or disabilities may also require personal assistance while traveling on vehicles. Such travel assistance is often called "door- through -door transportation;" it is also sometimes known as "assisted transportation," "supported (or supportive) transportation," or "escorted transportation." This type of assistance is not commonly available on public transit systems and is often not offered by taxi operators. Door - through -door transportation services respond to special personal needs. These services support the mission of the Administration on Aging (AoA) to promote the dignity and independence of older people by providing the mobility needed to help frail and infirm seniors continue to live independently in their own homes. Independent living is by far the most cost - effective solution for seniors, their families, the aging network, and the country as a whole: comments from providers across the country indicate that many older persons served by door - through -door transportation would require assisted living or nursing home services if they did not have personal assistance with their transportation. The vast majority of seniors also prefer to stay in their own homes. These services provide more freedom and independence for seniors who use them and lessen the burden for their caregivers as well. The mobility provided through door - through -door transportation is thus a key component of independent living: consumers who are living in the community but have serious mobility limitations need door - through -door services to fulfill their basic mobility needs. Members of the aging and human service networks who provide door- through- door transportation — including organizations such as interfaith groups, senior centers, Area Agencies on Aging, human service agencies, hospitals, and volunteers programs — are offering services not commonly available through other agencies. Doorthrough- door transportation services will become even more important in the future as the number of "old -old" persons (85 and older) — many of whom have serious mobility limitations — increases dramatically. The growth of the senior population in the United States is one of the most significant trends affecting our country. Comparing U. S. populations in 2000 and 2030, Census Bureau projections indicate that, by 2030, there may be twice as many persons 65 years and older as there were in 2000 and almost 2.5 times as many 85 and older. Americans are generally living longer and are healthier than in past generations. But research shows that, for most Americans, life expectancy now exceeds driving expectancy by 7 to 10 years, meaning that many former drivers will need to find new means of travel. Also, population projections indicate that, compared to today there may be greater numbers of older persons in the future who have health, mobility, or income limitations. These persons will face special challenges to independent living. Such trends will make'services like door - through -door transportation even more important to seniors in the future. ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF DOOR- THROUGH- DOOR SERVICES Case study data show that door - through -door transportation may require considerable personal hands -on assistance through several doors. For example, round trip transportation may require help ❑ Out of the door at a senior's home, ❑ Into a vehicle and out again, and ❑ Through the door at the destination. For the trip back to a person's home, this sequence of doors is reversed. Certainly, not all seniors need personal assistance through one or all the doors. However, seniors who do need such help depend strongly on transportation programs that can provide door - through -door service, often as a last resort in meeting their travel needs. While "opening doors" is certainly a key feature of door - through -door transportation, it is the personal, hands -on support for riders that distinguishes this service from other transportation programs. The "door- through -door realm" includes several possible steps or levels of assistance. On a continuum of increasing levels of assistance, each of which usually includes the previous steps, they can be called: ❑ Gentle support: Opening doors and providing verbal guidance. ❑ Physical support: Providing physical support for the rider to assist with balance, assist in climbing steps, or performing similar functions. This support may include delivering the rider to an attendant at the destination who then takes over the task of personal support and assistance. This "handoff' function is sometimes called "hand -to -hand" or "chair -to- chair" service. ❑ Activity support: The driver or escort stays with the rider and helps with the activity at the destination. For example, the driver or escort may assist the rider inside a grocery store, help the rider understand a doctor's instructions or diagnosis, or serve as an advocate for the rider's travel needs. ❑ Personal support: The driver or escort may help the rider put on coats, shoes, or boots and help by putting away groceries in the rider's home. Some drivers or escorts are or become fi-iends of the rider and offer emotional or other personal support. . Many door - though -door transportation programs provide some, but not all, of these levels of assistance, but any one program may provide a variety of services: some seniors may need different levels of assistance on different days or for different destinations. For those who require even greater levels of care and assistance, more intensive services are generally provided by homemakers, home health aides, or chore services, rather than door - through -door transportation services. More intensive care could include dressing or lifting the senior or providing assistance in other activities of daily living.) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION June 24, 2014 7:00 PM City Hall - Community Room CALL TO ORDER Chair Seidman called the meeting to order at 6:58pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arseneault, Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kennedy, Sanders, Chair Seidman, and Winnick. Staff present: MJ Lamon, Staff Liaison, Annie Coyle, City Management Fellow, and Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the Regular meeting agenda of June 24, 2014. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bigbee. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF May 27, 2014 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Commissioners suggested to change Section B of the Regular Meeting Minutes to add have "...that have their official dates." Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 27, 2014; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bigbee. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Bias Offense Response & Prevention Plan ( Winnick) Commissioners reviewed the revised Bias Offense Response & Prevention Plan. Commissioner Winnick requested to adopt the document that was revised by Commissioner Sanders. The Commissioners reviewed the revisions made to the Plan beginning on page 3 land the resolutions on page 37. Commissioner Cashmore made a motion to table the plan until the July meeting. There was no second to the motion. A response was noted that this topic was already tabled to this month and should be moved forward. Commissioner Bigbee motioned to approve the document, Kennedy second. Commissioners requested Commissioner Sanders to share the revisions that have been made. Commissioner Davis arrived at 7:19pm. Questions were raised by Commissioners if the Informed Consent to Release Private Information is clear enough for residents. Commissioner Kennedy would like to change the Edina Chamber of Commerce contact person to the position title instead of the contact person's name. Staff will make this revision. The MN HRRC should be added to the Community Resources Network (Appendix B). The Plan and resolutions will be on the July I st City Council meeting agenda. The sub - committee will present the amended report to them. Cashmore abstained. Motion carried to adopt the plan and the following resolutions: Resolutions of the Edina HRRC Re: Bias Offenses Response Plan RESOLVED, That the 2014 Amended Bias Offense and Response Plan be adopted by the Human Rights and Relations Commission and be transmitted to the City Council; and together with the Recommendation that it be adopted by the Council as the City's Plan and Procedural Process should Bias Offenses under Minnesota Law occur within the City or upon public property owned, leased or used by other public bodies located within the City. Re: Reporting of Bias by City Departments RESOLVED, That the City Manager, subject if necessary to City Council approval, establish Periodic Reporting Procedures, including written formats tailored to each City Department, regarding the reporting of incidents of bias under Minnesota Law occurring within City Departments or observed by City employees while interacting with the public in the course of performing their duties. RESOLVED FURTHER, That Reporting Forms substantially similar to those developed by the Parks & Recreation Department be utilized by each City Department; and that an annual tabulation of bias incidents occurring within each Department or observed in interactions with the public be provided to the City Manager for transmission to the HRRC, Mayor and City Council on a regular basis. B. Community Conversations (Bigbee/Davis) Commissioners gave an update about Community Conversations. An invitation by press release is being sent out to ask for more volunteers to participate on the Community Conversation working group. There have already been two responses to the invitation. Commissioner Bigbee met Chris Bremer and passed out her informal biography. The MN Advocates for Human Rights will hopefully be here again to have a training session in late- August or early- September. Commissioners discussed that a budget can be discussed for treats such as water and cookies for this meeting. Commissioners moved and seconded to approve Chris Bremer for Community Conversations. Motion passed. C. Discuss 2014 end of year projects/Work Plan (All) i. Identify project champions and next steps 1. Community Conversations Possibly Commissioners Davis and Bigbee would be in the working group. 2. Tom Oye Commissioners Davis and Winnick are champions. 3. Days of Remembrance Commissioners Cashmore, Davis and Chair Seidman would like to continue working on this. Two proclamations were passed out by staff members to the commissioners. Staff Liaison, MJ Lamon, will follow up with Scott Denfeld about the two Holocaust survivor videos. Commissioners asked about current and past budget. Staff Liaison, MJ Lamon, will follow up on this item and put it on the July agenda. D. Special Needs (Sanders) The 25th anniversary of ADA is July 26th, 2015. The Arts and Culture Commission is having a film festival in November 2014 and maybe HRRC could partner with them in lieu of or an addition to an independent event. Cashmore made a motion for Sanders to come back in July with a suggestion for a sub - committee /working group on this project L to put on the 2015 work plan, Seidman seconded. Davis and Sanders abstained. Motion 'passed. Sanders suggested obtaining permission from TPT to show their special needs documentary at the November film festival or else where. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Bigbee brought up the local support for human rights implementation and monitoring letter from the Advocates for Human Rights. Kennedy informed the Commissioners about various conventions that the United States has not ratified. Bigbee motioned to adopt a resolution for the' City Council to sign the letter, Davis seconded the motion with a suggestion to correct the spelling of 'fulfill' in the last paragraph of the letter. Sanders opposed. Motion passed. VIII. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND. STUDENT COMMENTS Kennedy has started researching, cities that have looked at the Human Rights City Designation.,and:would like to report back in July Bigbee attended an immigration meeting and has resource material if anyone would like to look at it. The City of Bloomington recently had 'a meeting about different indigenous populations and offered resources if anyone would like to see. Seidman noted that we haven't had a guest speaker in a while and we would like to invite Police Chief Nelson. MJ said he may designate another person to speak, Commissioners are ok with that. Community Conversations, budget, and the work session with Council will be put on the next agenda. Chair Seidman will not be at the July meeting. IX. STAFF COMMENTS MJ brought up that Susan Brott from the Edina Public Schools will speak at our October meeting. Annie shared the HRRC mission and beliefs. She shared the updated Contact Information and Roster. She then introduced Lindy, the new City Management Fellow. She shared this is her last meeting because her term with the city is up and thanked the Commissioners for their hard work and time spent with her. X. ADJOURNMENT Adjournment at 8: 57pm. Respectfully submitted, MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison Minutes approved by HRRC July 22, 2014 Jan Seidman, HRRC Chair HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION NAME TERM I J I F I M1 A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session tr of Mtgs.1 Attendance % MeetingslWork Sessions 1 11 11 11 1 11 1 1 6 8/4/2014 Arseneault, Patrice 2/1 12015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Bigbee, Annie 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Cashmore, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Carter, Derek 2/1/2017 1 1 1 3 75 °/u Davis, Laura 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Kennedy, Ellen Seidman, Jan 2/1/2017 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 3 6 75% 100% Sanders, Tiffany 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 100% Winnick, Steve 2/112016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Haeg, Molly student 1 1 1 1 1 1 61 1000 Harrington, Paige student 1 1 21 33% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held ION MEETINGS' LINE! Attendance Recorded ION MEMBER'S LINEI Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. 'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice Is given, the previously - scheduled meeting Is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. . f MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM . Thursday June 12, 2014 . 7:03 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:03p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Bale, Glahn, Gubrud, Howard, Kostuch, Latham, Sokol, Thompson, and Chair Heer. Late Arrival: Rudnicki, Sierks, Waddick, Zarrin Staff Present: Ross Bintner. and Rebecca Foster 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Member Zarrin arrived at 7:04p.m. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA. A. Minutes B. Attendance report . and roster µ , C. Workgroup list and minutes Member'Waddick arrived at 7:07p.m. Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No'Comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee (Bill Sierks / Tim Barnes). Member Sierks gave an update saying the subcommittee will meet a company that's familiar with architecture and financing to possibly create a proposal to do deeper energy audits on city facilities. B. Local Food Working Group:` Member Latham recapped what was discussed at the Council Work Session. The bees will change from a 10' to 20' setback. The appeal period of 30 days will be deleted, but you have to live within 200' of hive. A registration can be revoked due to means of nuisance or a honey bee anaphylaxis note from a doctor. A resident can't sell honey from their home. Member Latham will add the state's pesticide regulations.. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to accept report as amended with addition of pesticides. Motion carried unanimously. i �l VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. Community Solar — Email. Mr. Bintner, Commissioners Thompson, Glahn, and'Gubrud will research how the city -will organize a contract around community "solar. Commissioners Thompson and Howard will have conflict of interests due to Cool Planet. a: B. Pepin Plastic Bags — Email. Commissioner Gubrud said that there'were 15 attendees at the movie, "Bag It ". Member Latham said that.plastic bags can be recycled, the reusable bags are becoming unsanitary, and the negativity produced against -the people promoting the cause of banning plastic bags. It's also not apart of the Green Step Program. Member Zarrin suggested education-is needed on recycling plastic bags: Motion made. by Member Latham and seconded by Chair Heer to table banning plastic.bags until the EEC does their 2015 work plan, and then if a commissioner wishes to put this forward as part of the work plan, it would be voted on and prioritized along with anything else we can possibly do. Motion carried unanimously. Member Rudnicki arrived at 7:28p.m. Member Sierks arrived at 7:31p.m. C. SHERCO — Email. A letter from the Sierra Club said the Xcel Energy.SHERCO coal fire power plant in Becker needs to be shut down, but Xcel wants to keep running them, and the email is looking for cities to support it due to.the state clean power plant. The EEC will,wait to make a consideration.. D. - lyer Solar— Email. Information only. E. Plunkett Latham Green Step Cities — Email. Member Latham is asking each Commissioner to review their Green Steps and to look for new ones to add to our work plan. Also, the commission needs to keep the report updated especially when the city receives awards. May 1St is the deadline for updates to be entered. Mr. Bintner will add this to the March agenda for review. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. June 3 CC /EEC Meeting, Discussion. Chair Heer said the Bee and Chicken ordinance was a good discussion. The Chapter 10 Green House Gas discussion didn't send a clear direction of outcome for the Commissioners. The Business Recycling was a good discussion. The Commissioners discussed the possibility of meeting.twice a year with the Council and give a brief overview and then discuss one specific topic. B. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Discussed earlier. C. Business Recycling Working Group. No Comment. D. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. Member Kostuch gave an update on.the change 7request form for the 2015/19 CIP. The form will help when making, capital requests for,city employees to think about the environment when they make their purchases. Commissioner Kostuch will follow up with Mr. Roggeman in the late Fall to see how -the new environmental section of,the "CIP was utilized. E. Community Solar Subcommittee. Member Thompson said they visited,the Public Works roof to possibly install solar panels of 150,kilowatt to 300 kilowatt. The roof is nice, flat and less than 5yrs old.,.,Member Sierks said the city'could do nothing, make their roof available for residents to purchase panels or purchase up to 40% for themselves. The next step is to review the legal requirements for the City to enter a 25 -30yr lease, what kind of bid needed and what the City's responsibility will be. The EEC will write an Advisory Communication and will review "it,in July. F. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Gubrud gave an update on the July 4th parade planning. The Working Group will postpone their summer movie due to low attendance. The Forum topic for next year could be the Colony Collapse Disorder from U of M. G. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud reported that all subsidized enhance home energy installs have been completed. Members Sierks excused himself from the meeting at 8:57p.m. . H. 'Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. No Report. I. Student Subcommittee. No Report. - I Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick said the group is ready to stencil the storm drains and are doing a teston June 23rd. While the group is stenciling, they are going to educate the residents, if they are.outside. She also suggested showing a Watershed movie. K. 2014 EEC Summary and Schedule. The Bee & Chicken ordinance and Second Community Garden will be added to the summary. 5, IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. June 3 advisory communications. Mr. Bintner said the Council reviewed them, -but didn't take any action. B. 2014 Great Plain .s City Energy Competitiveness Group. Mr. Bintner would like to bring in a guest speaker for-the EEC and Planning Commission to educate on more energy efficiency. C. Sports Dome. Mr. Bintner said they will be buying some energy efficiencies for the Dome. D. Speak Up Edina. Scott Neal the City Manager decides on the monthly topics. E. EEC Budget Summary. Mr. Bintner gave an update on the Budget. $10,197 was spent in 2013 over which included staff personal; commodities (ads, print, food) and Contractual Services (Home Energy Squad, Regional Indicators). There's $945 left of the 2014 budget. F. Residential Building Permit Review. Mr. Bintner is fixing the building permit review,process and it will include better water quality standards. G. Edina To Go.. Mr. Bintner' announced the new mobile report a problem application. There being no further business on the.Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 9:18p.m. Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectf Ily submitted, Rebecca roster , GIS Administrator ate, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT Regular Meeting w/o Quorum COMMISSION Type "1" under the month for each attending member. NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 Glahn, William 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 // 6 3 2014 1 n r e to date ( ) 6 100% Gubrud, Bob 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Heer, John 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Howard, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Kostuch, Keith 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Latham, Dianne Plunkett 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Rudnicki, Tim 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Sierks, Bill 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Thompson, Paul 2/1/20161 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Waddick, Louise 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Zarrin, Sarah 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Bale, Sarah student 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Sokol, Elana student 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. 'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE 19, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering -Toll call were members Bass, Boettge, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Olson, Spanhake, and Whited. ABSENT Members Sierks, Van Dyke. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Janovy to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye.` Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 15, 2014 — Approved as corrected. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Boettge to approve the amended minutes of May 15, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT— None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Final Alignment Update Mr. Eric Nelson and Mr: Jonathan Vlaming from Three Rivers Park District sought approval for Edina's segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail final alignment. Mr. Nelson said the alignment is the `same as was presented on Apr. 17 with more definitive details worked out along the.route as follow: • The trail will be a sidewalk on Smetana until it is reconstructed and a bike lane will be added; • They are in discussion with the County on the Gleason Rd segment where -the County has a designated 5 -ft shoulder for a bike lane; they are proposing,a multi -.use trail on the east side of Gleason; • In Bredesen,Park, the existing trail will be widened to 10 -ft and become a two -way, currently a one -way trail; • The school board approved the alignment that runs on district property after changes were made so the ski trail would not be impacted; •.. They are in discussion with City staff about ways to make the intersectiomat Tracy Ave and Valley View Rd . safer; • At 70th St by the railroad crossing, they are going to have an underpass under 70th because of flooding concerns and are,.in discussion with City staff regarding use of a piece of City -owned land; • They.are in discussion with MNDOT staff to put the trail in their right -of -way on the,eastside of TH -100; • From MNDOT's right -of -way, the trail meanders behind Burgundy Place (working with owners for an easement) and along the edge of Fred Richards Golf Course to Parklawn (in 2016 Parklawn is scheduled to be reconstructed similar to Gallagher Dr); • 77 property owners along the trail were surveyed regarding screening and to date, 32 responded and they've selected all the options available from no screening; vegetation, chain link or wood fence; no single option was selected more than another. 1 W During discussion, they were asked how property values are affected by a nearby trail and Mr. Warning said studies show that property values are not reduced and realtors will often refer to the nearby trail as a selling point. Regarding parking, they said they are going to wait and address this based on needs, same as they did with the Dakota Rail Trail. Approvals to date include Park Board (6/10) and School Board (6/16) and they plan to present to City Council on 7/1. Preliminary design will begin in the fall with final design completed in the winter. Construction on the east half is expected to begin in 2015 and the entire trail completed by 2017. Total project cost is $20M and secured funds to date include a $6.2M grant, plus Three Rivers District's contribution of $8M. They are confident that they will be approved for federal funds for the rest of the project when application opens this fall. Mr. Vlaming said the board will decide later on if the project is built in stages or if they'll need to pledge money to build it all at once. Contact for the project is Jason McGrew King, 763 - 559 -6779 or JMcGrew- Kinp,@threeriversparkdistrict.ore. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Janovy to approve the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail alignment with the understanding that it could change as the property that is now Fred Richards Golf Course is redeveloped. All voted aye. Motion carried. Discussion with Edina Public Works Director Mr. Brian Olson described the public works department as multi- faceted with divisions that include electric, HVAC, facilities, utilities, asphalt and concrete streets, parks maintenance, etc. He said the streets division crew is responsible for doing mill and overlays, pothole repairs, concrete street repairs and also assist with bike lane striping. He said all employees plow snow and their biggest challenge was this past winter where they saw two distinct winters. He said their goal is to have the streets plowed within 6 -8 hours of a snow fall but sidewalks can take up to two days. In addition to street maintenance, they also maintain approximately 40 athletic fields, lift stations, sanitary and storm sewers, water mains, etc. Mr. Olson said public works work closely with the engineering department on things like mill and overlay, bike lane striping, and they recently drafted a new crosswalk standard; he thanked the ETC for their input on the crosswalk standard. Mr. Olson was asked how public works respond to residents questions and concerns and he said questions or concerns can come to the department via the website's'Report A Problem' or the new'Edina To Go' mobile application. He said these are tied directly to their work order system. There is also an FAQ online. He said everything they do is about quality public service and he welcomes feedback and input. Mr. Olson was asked how they decide when to repair or not to repair a pothole. He said this is a delicate balance because in the winter months the asphalt mixes does not stay very long which means multiple applications. Chair Bass said with the Living Streets Policy they are trying to meet the needs of all residents, including non - drivers, and the Active Routes to School plan was just approved by City Council. She asked if sidewalk plowing is prioritized and Mr. Olson said they are not because they only plow County and State Aid streets. He said the France Ave sidewalk, for example, has to be plowed multiple times because the City plows and the County puts the snow back when they plow the street. He said because of this, they prefer boulevard style sidewalks where they have some separation. He said they have four 5 -ft wide sidewalk plows ($110,000 per plow). Member Nelson asked if they will be responsible for plowing the new Nine Mile Creek Trail and Mr. Olson said this has not been discussed. He said the City of Hopkins is in a trial phase and Three Rivers provide funding but he is not sure what will happen in Edina. Member Janovy asked how the ETC could advocate for facility and maintenance funding. Mr. Olson sa6he could put together a recommendation of costs. He said Living Streets is great but it present challenges, for example, last Winter they did not have anywhere to put-the snow and streets became narrow. He saidd.too that'median landscaping is expensive to maintain. He said including-maintenance with, infrastructure changes would. be great. Member, lyer . asked why not restrict parking during the winter and Mr. Olson said it would be expensive to install the necessary no parking signs. Member Janovy asked about the 1 a.m. parking restriction and if it could be move to 2 a.m. or 3 a.m. and Mr. Olson said 1 a.m. is ideal because it gives staff, more time to plow and be.done by 6 a.m. Chair Bass thanked Mr. Olson for taking time to meet with them. ITNTwinCities: Edina Taxicab Ordinance Modifications Ms.-Arlene Forrest,, board member.and Edina resident, 4400 W. 50th St., and Ms. Debra Burton, executive director, and White Bear Lake resident, requested support from the ETC to recommend to the City Council modifications to Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code for the purpose of creating a new category of licensed vehicle called a "Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicle." 1 Ms. Forrest explained;that ITNTwinCities, a Minnesota no affiliated with ITNAmerica, was established in Edina to provide dignified transportation.for older adults and those with impaired vision; however, based on current taxicab ordinance in Edina, it is illegal for them to operate. They are seeking support to modify Chapter 12; Article VII similar to language adopted in other cities. They plan to begin offering rides by late summer 2014. After discussion, motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to write an advisory communication to the City Council recommending that Chapter 12, Article VII of the Edina City Code be modified. The advisory will provide guidance and recommendation to staff but will not define how the Code should be modified. All voted,aye. Motion carried. Member Janovy will write the advisory.communication and will be assisted by chair Bass and members Boettge.and Whited. It was recommended that the City's legal counsel review the ETC's recommendation. Educational Public Safety Campaign Goals Chair Bass said Educational Public Safety Campaign is in the ETC's 2014 Work Plan and asked for feedback regarding_ who the participants should be in the working group. She said it is a joint planning campaign with the school district. Planner -Nolan suggested the police and communications departments and said they are already teaming up to work on a similar effort. He said SHIP money is available and probably some PACS Fund money. Other suggestions were the Chamber of Commerce, Bloomington Public Health, 501h .& France Business Association, Commuter Services; and additional City departments suggested were Park & Recreations, Engineering, and Senior Center. Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4, 2014 D -2: Planner Nolan was asked if a comprehensive neighborhood study could be done because of recurrent complaints in the area so that they can identify the problem(s) and find solution(s). Member Spanhake said this would probably be an ideal capstone project for an engineering student. She will check on this and report back. B -1: The issue was referred to the TSC by Cindy Larson, residential redevelopment coordinator. B -2: The attachment was not included in the report. Planner Nolan will rewrite the recommendation for better clarity. C -1: Chair Bass said it is important that they are being careful to balance the level of service for pedestrians and motor vehicles. Motion was made by member Janovy'and seconded by member Whited to forward the June 4, 2014, report with the attachment and edits for B -2 to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members -None Bike Edina Working Group — Minutes of May 8, 2014 Member Janovy said planner Nolan attended `their last meeting. She said they discussed infrastructure and ordinance changes, and one outstanding issue with the sidewalk ordinance change is that a violation would be a misdemeanor.. She recommended that they review the code to'see where they can make changes: She said she. could distribute what she's put together so far. Living Streets Working Group Planner Nolan said they reviewed the updated cross sections or network of Living Streets and discussed topics and goals for the.July 1 City Council work session. He said they also talked about identifying people that they can feature to champion Living Streets similar to Hometown HeroesJor example, engineering.are aware`of a couple residents who were against a'sidewalk and now they enjoy using it. Planner Nolan was asked if anyone is working on the green streets piece of the Living Streets Policy and he said environmental engineer Ross Bintner is working on it. Communications Committee Member LaForce said they discussed: • The new boards and commissions blog to determine if they would participate and he said they agreed that they would use it for more in -depth issues; • 'Getting the message out about biking on sidewalks; e How they can better coordinate with other departments, for example, the' police's recent bike campaign; • Pedestrian Facilities Map is really a Sidewalk Map and therefore should be called Sidewalk Map; • Forwarding website recommendations to planner Nolan that was suggested last year. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Whited said the letter to Ms. Arbelig was completed and ready to be mailed. Member Olson noted that City Council approved the Olinger Boulevard bike striping,based on the original design plan. Planner Nolan said they were given staffs original plan plus the ETC's recommendation. He asked if,sidewalks were prioritized for 2015 and planner Nolan said majority of the sidewalks will be in conjunction with neighborhood reconstruction' projects. Chair Bass said she presented the Active Routes to School plan to the school board recently and they were very receptive, and also to the City Council, and they approved the plan. She said the City Council advertised recently for youth boards and commissions' members and they received 60 applicants for 16 spots and because they do not want to turn anyone away they are planning on including them in working groups. STAFF COMMENTS 2014 Project Update: • Bredesen Park D Neighborhood Reconstruction — delayed 3 -4 weeks due to discovery of rusted watermain 4 bolts; • Countryside F Neighborhood Reconstruction —ready to be paved; • Strachauer Park B Neighborhood Reconstruction — partially paved; • Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction — delayed be the same contractor is working on Bredesen Park D; • Morningside B Neighborhood Reconstruction —June to early July start, except the sidewalks outside of the main project area will begin earlier; • Todd Park F Neighborhood Reconstruction — mid -July start date; • Olinger Boulevard — City Council approved staff's recommended design; State Aid variance was approved; • France Avenue Pedestrian Intersection Enhancement —stage 1 is completed; • Hazelton Road — closed until Jun. 30; • Xerxes Avenue — on schedule; letter will be mailed this week to residents regarding the bumpouts. Other: • Boards and Commissions Blog — a guideline is being written and it may be that staff liaisons will write the blogs. Planner Nolan will forward information to member La Force. • Bloomington Public Health is looking for a volunteer to train to do bike counts in Edina. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION:COMMISSION ATTEND'ANCE:- ,2014___. -_, NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D SM 2127 S M 0 S # of 3/18 ` Mtgs Attendance Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 7 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 Boett e, Emil 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7_ 1000%.__ _ I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1,00°/x, Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7_ 10,0% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7- 100 % Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5:• 100 % Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3, 430/6 S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 4:- -, 800/6 Van Dyke, Jackson student 1 1 2 29 %, , Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 F, 1 fl H -5, 71,e/a__. -�anueueu uue to weamer bmitted, r Secretary 5 2/27 Feb's rescheduled meeting; 3/10 Urban Design meeting #4; 3/18 City Council Work Session; MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 18, 2014 12:34 A.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 12:34 a.m. June 18, 2014. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett, approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 3, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -03 AWARDING THE SALE OF PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 Manager Neal called upon Mark Ruff, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., to present the results of the Public Project Revenue Bond Sale, Series 2014. Mr. Ruff reviewed the proposed bonds, noting the purpose was to provide financing for the construction of a sports dome, and certain park and ice arena improvements. He reported three bids were received with Piper Jaffray & Company of Minneapolis being the low bidder with a rate of 3.3142 %. Mr. Ruff stated the size of the bond issue changed from the projected amount to a reduction in bond proceeds needed for capitalized interest, a premium bid, a reduction in underwriter's discount and a decrease in costs of issuance resulting in a final bond amount of $16,155,000. Mr. Ruff concluded stating the term of the bond would be twenty years as an annual appropriation beginning with 2016 payable. Motion of Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague adopting Resolution 2014 -03 awarding the sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $16,155,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations). Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Bennett Motion carried. Page I Minutes /HRA/June 17, 2014 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE - AWARD OF BID, CONTRACT 3, IMPROVEMENT P -23, SOTH & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING & WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Neal stated the proposed contract was part of the Parking and Wayfinding Improvement P -23 in the 50`' & France Business District. The City Council had awarded the other construction projects, but this portion of the improvement would be funded by the HRA. Motion of Commissioner Sprague seconded by Commissioner Brindle awarding the contract for Bid Package 3, the Parking Structure Lighting Replace to the low bidder, Bloomington Electric Company in the amount of $387,900.00. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Page 2 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 4, 2014 o e Nov �y • •�roRPOPA�EO • 1898 Agenda Item #: HRA V The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Award of Bid — Contract ENG 14 -14 France Avenue and Hazelton Road Landscaping Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: July 24, 2014 Company: Hoffman & McNamara Co. Urban Companies LLC Recommended Quote or Bid: Hoffman & McNamara Co. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: September 24, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $579,979.00 $738,133.00 $579,979.00 Please recall we are currently completing the France Ave Pedestrian Enhancements Project. Stage 1 and 2 are nearly completed. This project includes upgrading the intersections of 66th St, 70th St, and 76th Stand France Ave along with providing sidewalk facilities along the easterly side of France Ave where they do not exist today. WSB and LHB prepared landscaping and lighting plans for the urban design portion of this project. The landscaping bid included both France Avenue and Hazelton Road. The engineers estimate for this project was $597,460.00. By having both road segments on one contract it allows us to manage one contractor with the same requirements for maintenance and replacement. This project has a 3 -year maintenance and establishment period that the contractor is responsible for. It is anticipated the all the landscaping will be installed in 2014. Hoffman & McNamara Co. was the low bidder on the Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction landscaping work along Normandale Road near the TH100 sound wall. We have been pleased with their work and maintenance operations associated with this project. The bid opening for the lighting portion of the urban design will be held on August 12. We are anticipating the cost for both the landscaping and lighting to be between $700 and $900K. These project costs are funded with Centennial Lakes Tax - Increment Financing District funds. Staff recommends awarding the project to Hoffman & McNamara Co. G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROIECrS \CONTRACTS \2014 \ENG 14 -14 France Ave_Haxelton Rd Landscape\ADMIN_A- 259 \MISC\HRA Item V. ENG 14 -14 RFP.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424