Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-08-18 City Council MeetingAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2015 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of August 5, 2015 B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 08/6/2015 TOTAL: $608,673.56 And Per Pre -List Dated 08/13/2015 TOTAL: $1,040,435.95 and Credit Card Transactions Dated 5/26/15 — 6/25/15 TOTAL: $49,926.60 C. Request For Purchase — 2016 Ford F350 Pickup, Fire Department D. Request For Purchase — Authorize Non -Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services E. Authorize Professional Services, Bolton & Menk, Inc. — Presidents' Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Design & Construction Services F. Traffic Safety Committee Reports June 3, and July 1, 2015 G. Resolution No. 2015-79 Requesting Variance From Standards For State Aid Operation For Tracy Avenue H. Resolution No. 2015-80 Requesting Variance From Standards For State Aid Operation For Parklawn Avenue I. Resolution No. 2015-81 Authorizing Joint Powers Agreements With Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force J. Site Plan Approval I -year Extension For Vernon Avenue Housing, 5109-5125 West 49th Street, Robert Kimmel & Jerry O'Brien V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Speak Up, Edina Discussion On Transportation Options B. 2015 Images OF Edina Photo Contest Winners Agenda August 18, 2015 Page 2 V1. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Land Exchange (Lot Line Adjustment) 6629 West Shore Drive, Liz and Tony Burger (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING —Appeal Decision Of Planning Commission Denying Wall Sign Variance, 7301 Ohms Lane, SunOpta, Resolution No. 2015- 82 VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Proposed Franchise Agreement With Xcel Energy, Ordinance No. 2015-12 and Memorandum of Understanding (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Board And Commission Bylaw Changes C. Proposed Pickleball Court Donation — Rosland Park D. Sketch Plan, Walgreen's 4916 France Avenue E. Resolution No. 2015-83 Accepting Donations & Grants IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes: Park Board, July 14, 2015 2. Planning Commission, July 8, 2015 3. Heritage Preservation Board, July 14, 2015 • • 0 Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Wed Wed Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Wed Wed Tues Tues Thur n es es Tues Tues Thur Fri Agenda August 18, 2015 Page 3 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS A. Weber Woods XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Aug 18 Work Session — Weber Woods 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Budget Discussion 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Plan Update 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep I Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep I Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sep 7 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sep 16 Work Session — Edina Community Health Commission 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Arts & Culture Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 6 Work Session — Boards & Commission Annual Work Plans 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 20 Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan Updates 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 3 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Nov 4 Work Session — 2016-17 Budget/Finalize 2016 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov I I VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 17 Work Session — 2016-17 Human Services Funding 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 26 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec I Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec I Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 15 Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec 24 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OSBERVED — City Hall Closed • • • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 5, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda as revised to add Item V.A. Beyond the Yellow Ribbon and to table Item VIII.A. Proposed Franchise Agreement with Xcel Energy, Ordinance No. 2015-12 to the August 18, 2015, City Council Meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of July 21, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 23, 2015, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $428,963.48; Police Special Revenue $1,830.45; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $79,546.26; Arts and Culture Fund $82.00; Working Capital Fund $1,367,694.48; Equipment Replacement Fund $13,493.36; Art Center Fund $1,995.02; Golf Dome Fund $9,750.00; Aquatic Center Fund $2,558.29; Golf Course Fund $12,542.88; Ice Arena Fund $15,630.48; Sports Dome Fund $142.75; Edinborough Park Fund $1,716.28; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $11,360.60; Liquor Fund $178,432.41; Utility Fund $1,028,392.94,; Storm Sewer Fund $962,583.29; PSTF Agency Fund $22,140.91; Centennial TIF District $56,939.77; TOTAL $4,195,795.65 and for receipt of payment of claims dated July 30, 2015, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $ 195,045.20; Police Special Revenue $313.76; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $519.84; Working Capital Fund $579,317.21; Equipment Replacement Fund $63,854.05; Cando Fund $4,266.25; Art Center Fund $6,696.16; Golf Dome Fund $64.00; Aquatic Center Fund $17,494.35; Golf Course Fund $69,610.93; Ice Arena Fund $71,753.12; Sports Dome Fund $59,247.63; Edinborough Park Fund $22,740.90; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,440.63; Liquor Fund $187,459.56; Utility Fund $67,482.91; Storm Sewer Fund $19,852.77; PSTF Agency Fund $5,327.74; Payroll Fund $2,118.90; TOTAL $1,375.605.91 IV.C. Request for Purchase, Council Chambers A/V System Upgrade, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Alpha Video at $142,316.38 IV.D. Request for Purchase, South Ramp Garbage Screening, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Blackstone Contractors LLC at $44,850.00 IV.E. Set December 8, 2015 Date for Public Improvement Hearings Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. BEYOND THE YELLOW RIBBON — PRESENTED Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August S. 2015 Member Brindle introduced Jason Gad, Hopkins City Council member and Beyond the Yellow Ribbon member. • Mr. Hopkins updated the Council on current events for Beyond the Yellow Ribbon and noted a concert fundraiser being held on September 3, 2015, at the Hopkins Arts Center. V.B. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS LONG TERM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, NEIL RALSTON, MAC — PRESENTED Neil Ralston, Airport Planner Metropolitan Airports Commission, provided a progress update about the 2035 long-term comprehensive plan including an overview; planning process including aviation activity forecast; facility requirements analysis and development alternative; stakeholder engagement; and, timeline. Dana Nelson, Environment Department Metropolitan Airports Commission, presented a noise analysis. Ms. Nelson answered a question of the Council relating to flights occurring later in the p.m. and earlier in the a.m. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, CAHILL REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, 7260 OHMS LANE — RESOLUTION NO. 2015-71 ADOPTED Engineer Bintner presented a request to vacate the existing 60 -foot roadway easement from Cahill Real Estate Holdings, LLC because a portion of their lot was in the easement. Mr. Bintner described the location and public and private utilities in the area. Staff recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 2015-71. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Public Testimony • Lucas Frasz, 5101 Vernon Avenue South, addressed the Council. Andrew Will, 7235 Ohms Lane, addressed the Council. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-71, Vacating Roadway Easement. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. ADDING EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK OVERLAY ZONING DESIGNATION TO THE R-1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT, 6901 DAKOTA TRAIL, MARRI OSKAM — RESOLUTION NO. 2015-76 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2015-13 ADOPTED City Planner Presentation Senior Planner Repya presented the request to approve the Edina Heritage Landmark District overlay zoning designation to the home at 6901 Dakota Trail. The home was an International style constructed in 1963 situated on the west bank of Indianhead Lake. The home was built for owners Hendrik and Marri Oskam by renowned architect Elizabeth Close, who with her husband started the architectural firm Close & Close in 1939. There have been no additions to the home and it had been meticulously maintained. Ms. Repya presented pictures of the home and noted that the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. • Proponent Presentation Marri Oskam, 6901 Dakota Trail, thanked the Council for its consideration. She explained that she had lived in the home for fifty years and wanted to preserve the history and aesthetic and functional design. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/August S. 2015 • Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Public Testimony Jane Hession, 4243 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-76, Adding the Edina Heritage Landmark District (EHLD) Overlay Zoning Designation to the R- I Single Dwelling Unit District Designation to the Oskam House, 6901 Dakota Trail. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015-13, Adding the EHLD, Edina Heritage Landmark District Overlay Zoning Designation to the R -I, Single Dwelling Unit District Zoning Designation to the Oskam House, 6901 Dakota Trail. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, EDINA • COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH, 413 WEST 54TH STREET— RESOLUTION NO. 2015- 77 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague shared that Edina Community Lutheran Church was proposing to build a sanctuary, a kitchen addition, and new parking lot on the east side of the existing church located at 4113 West 54th Street. The site was zoned R- I where a church was conditionally permitted use. The applicant submitted a request in 2013 for a conditional use permit, but did not move forward with the request after concerns were raised in regard to the proposed architecture, impact to mature trees, and stormwater ponding. The applicant had hired a new architect and engineer to address the concerns. Mr. Teague presented pictures of proposed changes. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. Proponent Presentation Eileen Supple, Edina Community Member Liaison, shared that the church was grateful for sixty-seven years on the site and detailed some of the proposed changes. Randy Moe, Architect, presented the site plan and drawings and explained that the existing air conditioner units were not adequate and the roof was not able to support new units. Mr. Moe proposed to install a single chiller unit near the new mechanical space, which would be more efficient and would be screened. Mr. Moe described the new lighting that would be downward facing where the source would not be seen. Tom Whitlock, Landscape Architect, presented highlights of the landscape plan and noted the primary concern was the preservation of the slope and woodland. • Rhonda Pierce, Civil Engineer, discussed the existing grade conditions and changes. It was noted the project met the Watershed District requirements concerning stormwater management. The Council asked questions relating to the number and location of tree removal, the location of the air conditioner unit, the parking lot grading and elevation, and lighting. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2015 Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. • Public Testimony Kristine Donatelle, 5427 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Council. Mary D. Hicks, 13 Paddock Road, addressed the Council. Edward Ross, 4015 54th Street West, addressed the Council. John Crabtree, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland noted that he was a member of Edina Community Lutheran Church. Attorney Knutson responded that being a member of a church was not a conflict when an application from the church was being considered by a city. The Council discussed additional conditions and agreed to disallow snowplowing from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., to require social events to be held at the West parking lot, and to install the air conditioner unit on the West side of the building. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-77, Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Front Street Setback Variance from 50 Feet to 23 Feet for the Edina Community Lutheran Church at 4113 West 54th Street, as modified above and subject • to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 25, 2015 • Grading plan date stamped June 25, 2015 • Landscaping plan date stamped August 4, 2015 • Building elevations date stamped June 25, 2015 • Lighting plan date stamped June 25, 2015 • Utility plan date stamped June 25, 2015 • Building materials board as presented to the Planning Commission and City Council meeting August 5, 2015 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. All trash enclosures shall be screened to meet City Code. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. S. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering's memo dated July 14, 2015. 6. Submittal of a Construction Management Plan. 7. The construction driveway shall be moved to the west away from the single-family home. 8. The chiller shall be located on the west side of the building and screened per City Code 9. There shall be no snow plowing before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. within either parking lot 10. Social events shall be held in the west parking lot only. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 • Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2015 VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Floyd Grabiel, 4817 Wilford Way, expressed concern over the donation made by the Edina Crime Prevention Fund to purchase a Mobile Pro Defender camera system. Mr. Grabiel believed that ordinary citizens should not be monitored or recorded by the police and that proper guidelines and restrictions should be put in place for the device. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIIIA. PROPOSED FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH XCEL ENERGY — ORDINANCE NO. 2015- 12 TABLED This item was tabled to the August 18, 2015, City Council meeting. VIII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-11 AMENDING CODE CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 111 REGARDING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — ADOPTED Manager Neal explained that the recommended changes to the City Code were a result of normal assessment and clean-up and discussed the four proposed changes. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015-11, Amending Chapter 2 of the Edina City Code Concerning Boards and Commissions. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-78 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be • adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-78 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA PLANNING, STAGE 2 WORK PLAN PROPOSAL — APPROVED Robb Gruman, Greater Southdale Area Planning Work Group member, presented the Stage Two Work Plan proposal and key elements including: framing a process for outreach activities aimed at broadening engagement in the planning process; identifying the primary goals of Stage Two work; highlighting the key deliverables of Stage Two; defining needs for anticipated consultant assistance; and, laying out an initial schedule for the work. The Work Group did not see a need for expansion of its membership, but if desired by the Council it would identify types of additions that would be beneficial. The Work Plan assumed hiring a third party consultant for a fee not to exceed $30,000.00 that would bring actionable deliverables. Manager Neal addressed the expenditure of public funds and requested that the consultant be answerable to staff and not only a volunteer team. He supported involving group members in the selection process. The Council thanked that team for its high-quality work and discussed the importance of the Work Group being part of the selection process and expanding the group from twelve to fifteen. The Council expressed concern over proceeding to Stage Two or whether the planning should be referred to the • Planning Commission at this point. Staff noted that the Planning Commission was pleased with the process and thankful for the help. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/August S. 201 S The Council noted the importance of check -ins and work session with both the Planning Commission and the City Council and agreed to expand the group by three members. The Council encouraged the work group to look at residents along the middle of the Southdale area as candidates. 0 Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Greater Southdale Area Planning Stage 2 Work Plan and the addition of three new members. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION SOLAR ENERGY PROJECT PROPOSAL — REFERRED TO STAFF Mr. Bintner presented the proposal from the Energy and Environment Commission to develop a Request for Proposal to create a Community Solar Garden on the roof of the Public Works building. The Energy and Environment Commission believed that the proposed project provided the following benefits: demonstrated leadership in a unique application of Community Solar Gardens; promoted renewable energy; reduced greenhouse gas; educated residents on sustainability; helped residents save money; put the Public Work's roof to productive use; and, engaged solar supporters. Staff reviewed the proposal, spoke with solar developers, interviewed staff at the Metropolitan Council and peer local governments, and gathered preliminary information about means and methods to procure solar facilities. At this time, staff recommended no action and believed that staffs and the Energy and Environment Commission's time was better spent on existing priorities. Bill Sierks, Energy and Environment Commission, clarified that the Council was not being asked to issue a Request for Purchase, but to direct staff to dedicate resources to develop a Request for Proposal. Mr. Sierks believed that the opportunity was there for solar advocates to go forward with providing solar power to residents and that risks could be addressed in a carefully drafted Request for Purchase. Manager Neal addressed the requirement for staff time noting that it was the height of their busiest time of year and suggested that the Energy and Environment Commission draft the Request for Proposal. At that time, it could present the Proposal to staff and the City Attorney for review. Mr. Sierks explained that the Energy and Environment Commission was seeking help with the Request for Proposal because it did not feel that it had the expertise. The Council discussed the proposal and offered informal opinions. Trevor Drake, Great Plains Institute, answered a question of the Council relating to available funding from the State Department of Commerce and other funding opportunities. The Council directed staff to further research drafting a Request for Proposal and available funding sources and for Council consideration at a future meeting. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS, MARCH 6, 2015 2. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, MAY 21, 2015 3. ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, JUNE 25, 2015 4. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, JUNE 23, 2015 Informational; no action required. • IX.C. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION, HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Informational; no action required. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/August S. 2015 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received 0 XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received • X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII.A. CREATION OF PARTNERS IN ENERGY COMMUNITY PLANNING TEAM X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 18, 2015. Video Copy of the August 5, 2015, meeting available. Page 7 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 0 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register and Summary 6/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1768 8/6/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 67.20 378666 1910535 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 85.60 378667 1914370 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 90.30 376668 1914365 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 88.40 376814 1915756 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 33.20 378948 1915757 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 129.20 378949 1915754 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 66.40 379017 1916162 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 560.30 1769 8/6/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 376.12 COFFEE 378509 433501 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 376.12 1770 8/6/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 91.55 378669 49301200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 217.10 376670 49297200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 224.90 376671 92409000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 683.05 378953 49413100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 450.58 378954 49412900 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 109.47 378955 92446400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 73.10 378956 49413000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 120.39 378957 92132000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 121.55 379018 49413200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 247.26 379019 6570300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 123.44 379020 92446500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 28.00 379020 92446500 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,490.39 1771 8/6/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 326.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 378871 WO-133595-1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 326.31 1772 8/6/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 332.16 UPS BACKUP FOR LED CONTROL 00001397 378514 110165 08061.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES FRANCEAVE LIGHTINGBCONDUIT 17.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 378610 110123 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 349.50 1773 8/6/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 238.59 BELT, TIGHTENING, GASKET 00005467 378872 979669 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.49 FANASSEMBLY 00005467 378873 979669X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1773 8/6/2015 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 368.08 1774 8/6/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 104.54 OCE MAINTENANCE 378611 988499430 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 104.54 1776 8/6/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 271.67 MOUNTING KIT TILT & SWIVEL 00004352 378612 WR61913 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 597.00 SURFACE PROS 00004361 378613 WV91241 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 549.58 SURFACE PROS 00004361 378613 WV91241 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,418.25 1776 8/6/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 666.42 XCEL BILLING FOR LIFT STATION 00001406 378520 6239 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 666.42 1777 8/6/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 454.97 378819 198941 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 454.97 1778 8/6/2015 104020 DALCO 309.50 CLEANING SUPPLIES 378880 2912942 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.50 1779 8/6/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,116.11 378677 813202 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 261.60 378678 813201 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 67.60 378820 613246 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,445.31 1780 8/6/2015 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 3,300.00 MANHOLE LIDS 00005286 378531 UU4519 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,307.00 CASTINGS 00005286 378768 UU4825 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,607.00 1781 8/6/2015 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 393.70 MAIL JULY LATE NOTICES 378628 104457 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 393.70 1782 8/6/20 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 -- 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1782 8/6/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. Continued... 581.10 FITTINGS, PIPE 00001373 378546 931670 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS 130.16 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001452 376769 933335 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 711.26 1783 8/6/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 27.62 TOILET RENTAL 378547 91375 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 59.50 TOILET RENTAL 378631 91570 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 201.00 TOILET RENTAL 378905 91664 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 286.12 1784 8/6/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,108.63 378694 199943 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,108.63 1785 8/6/2015 101483 MENARDS 122.35 POWERLOCK TAPES, KNIVES 378553 91811 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 53.84 PRUNERS 00001448 378636 91826 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 128.50 CONCRETE SUPPLIES 00001461 378637 92121 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 18.03 POSTS 00006385 378744 90993 5422.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 322.72 1786 8/6/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 322.76 TIRES 00006390 378745 1025008-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 33.76 VALVES 00006390 378746 1025008-01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,025.85 TINES 00006393 378747 1026517-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 647.66 PULL FRAMES 00006392 378748 1025282-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 542.01 PUSH BROOM BRUSH 00002042 378918 1026200-00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 96.29 IRRIGATION PARTS 376919 1026311-00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,668.33 1787 8/6/2015 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 201.58 BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES 378920 351486 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 125.28- CREDIT 378921 5576 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 76.30 1788 8/6/2015 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 187.30 AC REPAIR 00002043 378639 63377 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 187.30 1789 8/6/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1789 8/6/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. Continued... 408.75 TIRES 00005552 378930 210185301 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 408.75 1790 8/6/2016 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 337.98 FENDER, GASKETS, MOUNTING KIT00005517 378931 4085 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 337.98 1791 8/6/2015 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 139.46 ALARM RESPONSE CARDS 378753 068252 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 419.00 CRIME VICTIM CARDS 378754 068248 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 558.46 1792 8/6/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 692.30 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00002045 378641 8182 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 606.43 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002045 378642 8005 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 106.51 CUPS, LIDS 378932 8199 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 186.63 LINERS, TISSUE 378932 8199 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 192.98 NAPKINS, COLD CUPS 378933 8183 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 136.30 TISSUE 378933 6183 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,921.15 1793 8/6/2015 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 82.00 STAKES 000D1441 378562 41319741 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 82.00 1794 8/6/2015 104672 SPRINT 109.97 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 99.72 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.95 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 294.98 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 318.38 ACCT 873184124 376759 152 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 5.54 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 33.24 ACCT 873184124 376759 152 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.94 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 16.62 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1552.6168 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 49.12 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 21.62 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 16.62 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 457.94 ACCT 873184124 378759 152 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) • 16.62 'ACCT 873184124 378759 152 • 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTFOCCUPA9 • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1794 8/6/2015 104672 SPRINT Continued... 396038 8/6/2015 100612 A.M. LEONARD GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS AMMUNITION CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS • 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page- 5 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,762.26 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1795 8/6/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 366.61 PLUMBING PARTS 00001389 378564 S3116059.001 5913.6406 22.25 PLUMBING PARTS 00001385 378647 S3115549.001 1646.6530 388.86 1796 8/6/2015 101015 STREICHERS 803.25 AMMO 00003175 378760 11162124 1400.6551 803.25 1797 8/6/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 2,347.15 VEHICLE REPAIRS 378566 678305 1553.6180 161.58 MOUNTS 00005586 378940 93984 1553.6530 89.87 HANDLE 00005497 378941 94472 1553.6530 2,598.60 1798 8/6/2015 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 3,054.36 BRIDGE REPAIRS 376774 002015002016 1346.6180 3,054.36 1799 8/6/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 65.51 U -BOLTS 00005544 378573 0137067 1553.6530 11.76 BUSHINGS 00005455 378574 S139562 1553.6530 77.27 1800 8/6/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 1,050.75 378709 0129270 -IN 5822.5512 158.00 378850 0129831 -IN 5842.5515 356.05 378851 0129832 -IN 5842.5512 1,564.80 1801 8/6/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 392.25 376710 399940-00 5822.5513 1,871.17 378711 399943-00 5862.5513 400.25 378852 399796-00 5842.5513 22.00- 378853 399009-00 5842.5513 2,641.67 396038 8/6/2015 100612 A.M. LEONARD GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS AMMUNITION CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS • 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page- 5 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register and Summary \ 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396038 8/6/2015 100612 A.M. LEONARD Continued... 1,038.64 HORTICULTURE SUPPLIES 00002046 378861 CI15116967 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,038.64 396039 8/6/2015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 44.88 HEATER PARTS 00001395 378978 406899 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 44.88 396040 8/6/2015 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 308.83 CO2 378862 32296142 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 308.83 396041 8/6/2015 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 155.00 COFFEE 378863 41938 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 155.00 396042 8/6/2015 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 778.68 COPIER PAPER 378864 10443369-00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 778.68 396043 8/6/2015 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 495.00 INTERFACE NEW PHONE E911 378733 54193 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 495.00 396044 8/6/2015 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 1,630.11 MAIN POOL PIPE REPAIR 378865 43870 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,630.11 396045 8/6/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,800.00 378815 3045536 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14.84- 378816 319586 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 799.75 378950 3045535 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,596.75 378951 3045537 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 192.00 378952 3045534 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,373.66 396046 8/6/2015 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 465.97 WASTE DISPOSAL 378510 070115 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 465.97 396047 8/6/20jo 100266 AT&T MOBILITY • 0 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396047 8/6/2015 100256 AT&T MOBILITY Continued... 1.17 WIRELESS PHONE 379073 072515 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1.17 396048 8/6/2015 120995 AVR INC. 902.50 CONCRETE CURB 378511 113538 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,400.50 CURB REPLACEMENT 378512 113337 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 704.00 CURB REPLACEMENT 378513 113232 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,007.00 396049 8/6/2015 134025 BAUER BUILT TIRE 1,169.94 TIRES 378866 180169091 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,169.94 396050 8/6/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 343.00 378817 2766 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 343.00 396051 8/6/2015 126996 BCA - CJTE 75.00 DMT RECERT- BOOSALIS 378734 26354 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 75.00 396052 8/6/2015 136847 BEDFORD TECHNOLOGY LLC 5,378.47 PICNIC TABLE BOARDS 00001257 378608 49861 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,378.47 396063 8/6/2015 136851 BENSON, MIKE 2.50 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 378730 REFUND 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARKADMIN. GENERAL 2.50 396054 8/6/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 432.00 PIZZA 378867 D2813569 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 360.00 PIZZA 378868 D2813565 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 288.00 PIZZA 378869 D2813583 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 504.00 PIZZA 378870 D2813573 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,584.00 396055 8/6/2016 126139 BERNICK'S 297.95 378672 235714 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 297.95 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 -- 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396056 8/6/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 167.30 COFFEE 378609 T80453 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 167.30 396057 8/6/2015 136855 BOBER, SARAH C. 53.98 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 376778 073015 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 53.98 396058 8/6/2015 102648 BOOSALIS, DAVID 484.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 379074 072915 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 484.48 396059 8/6/2015 136864 BOUCHIER, REBECCA 10D.00 FARMERS MARKET BOOTH REFUND 378994 073115 5751.4558 OTHER RENTAL CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 100.00 396060 8/6/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 305.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003522 378515 81839132 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.00 00003615 378516 81843125 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 321.98 396061 8/6/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 121.50 378673 128015 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 50TH ST SELLING 659.76 378674 127938 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 662.50 378818 128012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 523.20 379021 128047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,966.96 396062 8/6/2015 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/18/15 378976 080115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 396063 8/6/2015 122074 BUIE, BARB 115.87 378979 072915 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 115.87 396064 8/6/2015 123615 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC. 4,542.00 GEESE REMOVAL 378735 201515 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,542.00 396065 8/6/200 130316 CANNON VALLEY SPECIALTIES • • • i R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 6/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396065 8/6/2015 130315 CANNON VALLEY SPECIALTIES Continued... 11.50 EMBROIDERY 378874 #3 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 157.00 T-SHIRTS 378875 4 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 31.50 LOGO ON JACKET 378876 5 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 396066 8/6/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 48.05 376675 00010988 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,810.10 376676 647452 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 657.42 379022 646601 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,515.57 396067 6/6/2015 129923 CAWLEY 11.85 NAME BADGE 378877 V308688 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 11.85 396068 8/6/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 88.06 10437426-9 378614 10437426-7/15 5553.6166 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 518.67 9724639-1 378615 9724639-7/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 265.18 5546504-1 378616 5546504-7/15 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,410.32 5591458-4 378617 5591458-7/15 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 20.72 5596524-8 378618 5596524-7/15 1646.6166 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 89.74 5563827-4 378619 5563827-7/15 5210.6166 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 31.09 10089900-4 378620 10089900-5/17 1646.6166 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.60 9546705-6 378621 9546705-7/15 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 216.23 5584304-9 376779 5584304-7/15 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 35.94 5590919-6 378780 5590919-7/15 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 17.90 5584310-6 378781 5584310-7/15 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 2,713.45 396069 8/6/2015 123698 CENTURYLINK 58.82 952 920-1586 378517 1586-7/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 76.55 952 922-2444 378518 2444-7/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 125.12 952 831-0024 378519 0024-7/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 58.82 952 920-8632 378622 8632-7/15 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 82.45 952 922-9246 378782 9246-7/15 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.10 952 920-9996 379075 9996-7/15 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 535.86 396070 8/6/2015 136865 CHERUBINI, JANET L 158.25 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 378980 5541 70TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv -No. Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396070 8/6/2016 136865 CHERUBIN[, JANET L Continued... 158.25 396071 8/6/2015 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 37.80 UNIBIND BOOKLETS 378981 COM -0636 1120.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS ADMINISTRATION 37.80 396072 8/6/2015 136850 CLAPP, TERRI 120.00 ART CAMP REFUND 378731 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 120.00 396073 8/6/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 50,825.97 HOT MIX 378767 071515 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 50,825.97 396074 8/6/2015 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 352.00 MORTAR 00001371 378521 0129114 -IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 546.20 CONCRETE SUPPLIES 00001392 378522 0129273 -IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 43.80 MORTAR 00001460 376878 0129646 -IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 942.00 396075 8/6/2015 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 289.39 HOSE, FITTINGS 00005456 378523 79958 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.27 HOSE, ASSEMBLY, FITTINGS 00005461 378524 79973 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.27 FITTINGS, HOSE 00005463 378525 60005 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 567.93 396076 8/6/2016 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,634.07 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 378879 3056772 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,634.07 396077 8/6/2015 136866 DAVE & BUSTERS 1,465.23 DEPOSIT REFUND 378982 080515 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,465.23 396078 8/6/2015 134058 DEHNE, JIM 5,525.00 3 DANCING SAND HILL CRANES 378783 073015ART 01251.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE 5,525.00 396079 8/6/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 0 123.06 TORCH, STYLUS 00005545 378526 22280 . 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENTOPSION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396079 8/6/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 37.40 BULBS 00005532 378881 23112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.10 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005494 378882 23510 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 187.56 396080 8/6/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 99.00 651972955 378883 651972955-7/15 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 99.00 396081 8/6/2015 121096 DIAMOND MOWERS INC. 252.21 BLADES 00006295 378736 0100235 -IN 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 252.21 396082 8/6/2015 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 4,807.00 ROAD STRIPING PAINT 00001387 378527 802161626 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4,807.00 396083 8/6/2015 136484 DIEBEL, MIKE 45.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 378784 072915 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 45.00 396084 8/6/2015 104174 DUO -SAFETY LADDER CORP. 84.53 HEAT SENSOR LABELS 00003640 378528 451877-00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.53 396085 8/6/2015 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 1,860.00 TRAFFIC CONES 00001346 378530 0108373 -IN 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1, 860.00 396086 8/6/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 128.78 PUBLISH NOTICE 378623 240674 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS , 55.85 PUBLISH NOTICE 378624 240675 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 184.63 396087 8/6/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WIN LECTRIC CO. 32.69 ANCHOR HARDWARE 00001384 378625 12150000 47094.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BREDESEN PARK COMFORT STATION 32.69 396088 8/6/2016 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 378529 072815 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 175.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 136297 ERICKSON, TESS CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.00 ART CLASS REFUND 378786 Council Check Register by GL 126.00 Council Check Register and Summary 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 TPMS SENSOR KIT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396088 816/2015 115.03 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 378534 Continued... 396089 8/6/2015 BATTERIES 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1-Z05001 84.44 718.24 DWI CAR BUILD 378737 TB0072A 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 986.71 335.08 DWI CAR BUILD 378785 TB0072B 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,053.32 1,539.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 396090 8/6/2015 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 6/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 12 Business Unit POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 221.40 378679 4191 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 396091 8/6/2016 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 136297 ERICKSON, TESS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.00 ART CLASS REFUND 378786 14740 126.00 396092 8/6/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 51.03 TPMS SENSOR KIT 378532 69-186898 306.18 TPMS SENSOR KITS 378533 1-4750535 115.03 BATTERY 378534 1-4752360 430.03 BATTERIES 378535 1-Z05001 84.44 BCA REAR AXLE KIT 378884 1-4753352 986.71 396093 8/6/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,539.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 378787 072915 1,539.00 396094 8/6/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 668.04 HYDRANT PARTS 00001411 378536 0149405 4,044.48 METERS 00001410 378537 0151708 423.78 METER REGISTERS 00001415 378885 0148513 5,136.30 396095 8/6/2015 114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 50.88 PERMIT REFUND 378886 ED140731 50.88 396096 8/6/2015 131188 FIRST -SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 378738 155736 21.80 378739 153212 • 43.60 5101.4607 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5401.4602 5913.6406 5917.6530 5917.6530 1495.4115 1400.6406 1400.6406 • CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LESSONS GOLF REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS MECHANICAL PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 6/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier-/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396096 8/6/2015 131188 FIRST-SHRED Continued... 396097 8/6/2015 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,250.00 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 378887 2315-11052 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,250.00 396098 8/6/2015 104270 FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 140.00 AC REPAIRS 378983 55255 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 140.00 396099 8/6/2015 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 79.19 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 378538 072215 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 26.80 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 378538 072215 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 8.34 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 378538 072215 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 114.33 396100 8/6/2015 136858 FULLSWING CONSTRUCTION 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 378888 6417 RYAN AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 396101 8/6/2015 133742 FUN21RAISE MARKETING AND EVENTS 150.00 SCHOOL DIST CALENDAR AD 00002041 378626 2842 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 396102 8/6/2015 132389 GAZICH, KATHLEEN 16.57 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 378984 072715 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 16.57 396103 8/6/2015 133954 GEMPLER, JUDITH 66.75 GULL LAKE TRIP 378790 REFUND 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 66.75 396104 8/6/2015 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 10.47 LAMP 00002150 376889 1497460 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 10.47 396105 8/6/2016 101361 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC 1,767.54 PLUNGE POOL EXHAUST MOTOR 378890 137200 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,767.54 396106 8/6/2015 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396106 8/6/2015 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES Continued... 106.00 REMOVE GRAFFITI 378539 961 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 106.00 396107 8/6/2015 101103 GRAINGER 509.03 PAPER PLATES, UTENSILS 00005562 378540 9797507762 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.80 BATTERIES 00005561 378541 9796056387 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.10 CHAIN, SHOP TOWELS 00001382 378542 9795322081 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 103.98 HOSE 00006364 378740 9795453134 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 18.45 KNEE PADS, BATTERIES 00001440 378891 9798395456 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.60 FASTENER HOOKS 00002150 378892 9792911910 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 3.61 BARRICADE TAPE 00002150 378893 9790715107 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 3.61 BARRICADE TAPE 00002150 378894 9790715115 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 194.20 HALIDE LAMPS, FANS 00002245 378895 9792911928 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,126.38 396106 8/6/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 491.25 379023 184934 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,738.25 379024 184929 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,738.25 379025 184930 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 242.25 379026 184933 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,210.00 396109 8/6/2015 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 32,607.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 378788 072915 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 32,607.00 396110 8/6/2015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,755.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 378789 072915 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,755.00 396111 8/6/2015 136862 HALE, LADONNA 70.93 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 378985 6348 FALCON CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 70.93 396112 8/6/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 75.00 POWER SUPPLY 00001376 378543 145267-1 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 75.00 396113 8/6/2015 136859 HAMPTON EXTERIORS LLC 0 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378896 6417 RYAN AVE• 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396113 8/6/2015 136859 HAMPTON EXTERIORS LLC Continued... 2,500.00 396114 8/6/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 906.54 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDROXIDE 378897 3751588 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,652.51 378898 3755701 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 2,559.05 396115 8/6/2015 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPARTMENT 38,529.39 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 378544 R-05-04 2101.4205 FEDERALAID CDBG REVENUES 38,529.39 396116 8/6/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,595.00 JUNE 2015 ROOM AND BOARD 378791 1000063095 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,595.00 396117 8/6/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,167.72 POWER HARNESSES 378545 569004 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,167.72 396118 8/6/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 191.06 MACHINE HOSE 00002244 378899 601703391 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 191.06 396119 8/6/2015 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/18/15 378975 080115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 125.00 396120 8/6/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 959.50 378680 775389 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,590.63 378681 773830 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,197.00 378821 774996 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,584.25 379027 774997 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,331.38 396121 8/6/2015 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 161.07 6035 3225 4098 2158 378627 071315 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 64.27 6035 3225 4098 2158 378627 071315 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 22.46 6035 3225 4098 2158 378627 071315 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 247.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date 396122 8/6/2015 396123 8/6/2015 396124 8/6/2015 396125 8/6/2015 396126 8/6/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 260.25 378682 31045 684.00 378822 31253 944.25 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 875.00 SAFETY AUDIT ROUND 3 378903 20073361 875.00 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 14.31 72.90 153.44 381.92 82.73 100.55 2.23 661.53 954.63 686.62 168.38 46.99 205.17 274.17 3,805.57 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,876.35 34.20- 1,604.15 90.00 56.35 5,614.40 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378629 CITY OF EDINA 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378629 Council Check Register by GL 378630 7/15 -FACILITIES Council Check Register and Summary 7/15 -FACILITIES 378770 7/15-ELEC 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7/15 -PARKS 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 7/15 -PARKS 469.23 CHEMICALS FOR POOL 00002242 378900 150713042 5311.6545 124.49 ACID MASK, CARTRIDGES 00002233 378901 150630003 5720.6406 150.00 TROUBLESHOOT VACUUM 378902 SV150706072 5720.6160 743.72 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 260.25 378682 31045 684.00 378822 31253 944.25 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 875.00 SAFETY AUDIT ROUND 3 378903 20073361 875.00 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 14.31 72.90 153.44 381.92 82.73 100.55 2.23 661.53 954.63 686.62 168.38 46.99 205.17 274.17 3,805.57 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,876.35 34.20- 1,604.15 90.00 56.35 5,614.40 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378629 7/15 -STREETS 378630 7/15 -FACILITIES 378630 7/15 -FACILITIES 378770 7/15-ELEC 378771 7/15 -PARKS 378771 7/15 -PARKS 378771 7/15 -PARKS 378771 7/15 -PARKS 378792 7/15 -POLICE 378904 7/15 -EQUIP 378904 7/15 -EQUIP 5862.5514 5842.5514 5310.6103 1301.6406 1325.6406 1314.6406 4090.6406 1552.6406 1643.6406 1322.6406 1641.6556 1644.6556 1646.6406 5311.6406 1400.6406 1553.6406 4091.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... CHEMICALS GENERALSUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 16 Business Unit POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET NAME SIGNS STREET RENOVATION 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL TURF CARE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL MOWING TREES & MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 378683 2382353 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 378684 2371927 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 378823 2382393 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 378824 2382391 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 378825 2382394 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 378958 2382387 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 379028 2382388 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 14,190.60 0 0 • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 396126 8/6/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 0 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... • 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 17 Business Unit 396127 8/6/2015 123661 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378906 5036 HANKERSON 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378907 6129 WESTRIDGE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378908 6443 MCCAULEY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378909 5297 63RD ST W 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 378910 6133 BROOKVIEW 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378911 5801 TRACY AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 15,000.00 396128 8/6/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 230.36 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00005465 378548 72750308 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 321.44 FUNGICIDE 00001364 378632 72596055 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 998.56 FUNGICIDE 00001364 378633 72597550 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 81.99 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001368 378634 72602425 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 80.87 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00001391 378635 72689976 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 205.94 COUPLERS 00006364 378741 72662937 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,919.16 396129 8/6/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 129.99 378685 5189279 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 944.00 378686 5216927 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,347.73 378687 5216559 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.83 378688 5216568 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 157.57 378689 5216567 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 112.94 378690 5216560 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 931.01 378691 5216558 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 908.76 378692 5218005 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 40.00- 378693 534717 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,981.48 378826 5222076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,329.42 378827 5222071 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,673.76 378828 5222074 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,435.57 378829 5222069 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 561.48 378830 5222072 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,191.33 378831 5222077 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.41 378832 5222076 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3.41- 378833 534715 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.41 378959 5222087 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 273.62 378960 5222055 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,039.47 378961 5222085 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register and Summary 6/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396129 8/6/2016 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1.16 378962 5222061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,136.54 378963 5222080 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.99 378964 5222081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,597.09 378965 5222083 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,379.58 378966 5222056 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 81.16 378967 5222067 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 173.42 378968 5222060 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 494.41 379029 5222065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.99 379030 5222063 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,812.88 379031 5222082 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,086.50 379032 5222086 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,610.52 379033 5222079 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 500.48 379034 5222084 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 434.59 379035 5222066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 245.48 379036 5222064 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 906.44 379037 5222059 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 369.80 379038 5222058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 87.83- 379039 534718 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30.00- 379040 534719 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.58- 379041 535762 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.13- 379042 535661 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.10- 379043 535411 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33,752.76 396130 8/6/2015 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 370.09 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR 00001393 378549 1009529 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 370.09 396131 8/6/2015 136849 KARASOV, PATRICIA 120.00 ART CAMP REFUND 378732 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 120.00 396132 8/6/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 10,690.00 50TH/FRANCE CONSTRUCTION 378858 6869440 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 10,690.00 396133 8/6/2015 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 1,143.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 378793 072915 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,143.00 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396134 8/6/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 23.36 MIRROR 00005490 378550 9303434574 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 719.96 DISCS, TERMINALS, BULBS 00005490 378551 9303426138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 836.14 FITTINGS, WASHERS, BULBS 00005462 378552 9303436744 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,579.46 396135 8/6/2015 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 17,871.58 HOME INS WORKER'S COMP 378742 2ND QTR -2015 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 17,871.58 396136 8/6/2015 136213 LIMBECK, ANNA 72.98 HOTEL FOR DRIVING SCHOOL 376743 072715 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 72.98 396137 8/6/2015 112094 LINDHOLM, ANGELA 150.11 BIRTHDAY CAKES 378986 073115 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 150.11 396138 8/6/2015 101455 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 2,760.00 STEVE WEIERS 378987 TRAINING 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,760.00 396139 8/6/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 97.90 WIPER BLADES 378912 2154373 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.88- CREDIT 00005024 378913 10010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.02 396140 8/6/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11,350.04 DIESEL FUEL 00005542 378859 657590 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,842.04 UNLEADED FUEL 378860 666209 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20,192.08 396141 8/6/2015 103720 MEDTECH 3,005.47 WRISTBANDS 378914 IN000459864 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,005.47 396142 8/6/2015 101987 MENARDS .49 HEX NUT 00004074 378915 74578 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION .49 396143 8/6/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396143 8/6/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER Continued... 12.99 DVDS 00001341 378638 5656098 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 12.99 396144 8/6/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,140.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001417 378916 35016 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,140.00 396145 8/6/2015 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 623.56 TACK OIL 378554 72694 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 623.56 396146 8/6/2015 102169 MOONLIGHT SERENADERS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/19/15 378977 080115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 396147 8/6/2015 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,150.00 WEDDING MAGAZINEAD 00002049 378917 2015-47667 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1,150.00 396148 8/6/2015 130266 MUNICODE 1,297.51 PUBLISH CODE SUPPLEMENT #3 378988 00258576 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,297.51 396149 8/6/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 167.00 378834 101989 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 169.50 379044 101988 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 336.50 396150 8/6/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 1,372.00 LED LIGHTS FOR POOL 378922 90233 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,372.00 396151 8/6/2015 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC 79.00 TEST KIT SUPPLIES 00002150 378923 AQUATIC CTR 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 79.00 396152 8/6/2015 133567 NORTHGATE BREWING 400.00 378695 2336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 400.00 396157 8/6/2015 101659 ORKIN 14.30 PEST CONTROL 378991 12079684- 1646.6406 20.00 PEST CONTROL 378992 12557635-7/15 1375.6103 20.00 PEST CONTROL 378993 12557616-7/15 1375.6103 • 54.30 POLICE EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES • 396158 • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 136848 ORTON, JENNA CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 378750 072315 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 396159 8/6/2015 Council Check Register and Summary 383.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 378995 073015 8/6/2015 -- 8/6/2015 383.52 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396153 8/6/2015 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA WINDOWTINTING 378751 Continued... 75.00 25.00 APA MEETING 378989 5936078 1170.6106 MEETING EXPENSE HUMAN RESOURCES 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 25.00 171.00 LEAD TESTING 378798 396154 8/6/2015 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 250.00 FALL CONFERENCE 378990 5935253 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 250.00 396155 8/6/2015 102557 NTOA 150.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 378749 34109 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 396156 8/6/2015 105612 OFFICE TEAM 513.00 TEMP 378794 43378895 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 216.00 378795 43437743 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 162.00 378796 43478987 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 405.00 378797 43529772 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 396157 8/6/2015 101659 ORKIN 14.30 PEST CONTROL 378991 12079684- 1646.6406 20.00 PEST CONTROL 378992 12557635-7/15 1375.6103 20.00 PEST CONTROL 378993 12557616-7/15 1375.6103 1600.6107 1644.6107 421400.6710 7411.6103 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 54.30 POLICE EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 396158 8/6/2015 136848 ORTON, JENNA 166.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 378750 072315 166.75 396159 8/6/2015 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 383.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 378995 073015 383.52 396160 8/6/2015 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 75.00 WINDOWTINTING 378751 274065 75.00 396161 8/6/2015 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 171.00 LEAD TESTING 378798 1500581 171.00 1600.6107 1644.6107 421400.6710 7411.6103 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396162 8/6/2016 136863 PAULSON, AMY Continued... 185.00 SEASON PASSES 378996 REFUND 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 13.47 SEASON PASSES 378996 REFUND 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 198.47 396163 8/6/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,807.64 378696 8508901-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.25 378697 8508908-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 170.25 378835 8509143-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,584.64 378836 8508889-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 292.20 379045 8508911-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 100.00- 379046 8508749-CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,790.98 396164 8/6/2016 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 UTILITY FEES 378997 42782211 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 396165 8/6/2015 136867 PDW INVESTMENTS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378924 3934 49TH ST W 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 378925 3932 49TH ST W 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 396166 8/6/2015 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 684.46 378640 43278927 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 520.30 378837 50762671 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 310.10 378926 50197048 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 99.00 378927 50197110 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 499.14 378928 50197069 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 500.05 378929 50197066 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 213.66 378998 50197059 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 395.33 378999 43278846 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 3,222.04 396167 8/6/2015 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 378555 072215-1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 396168 8/6/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 286.83 378698 2823787 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING • 7.86- 378699 216828 is 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELL • i • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396168 8/6/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 17.66- 378700 216829 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,083.87 378838 2827459 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.62 378839 2827461 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 315.48 378840 2827451 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 496.85 378841 2827456 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 543.51 378842 2827456 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .38 378843 2827450 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,460.45 378844 2827457 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.10- 378845 217357 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 652.63 378969 2827448 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 71.81 378970 2827454 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 219.48 378971 2827462 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .38 378972 2827452 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 127.82 378973 2827460 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 259.94 379047 2827449 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 480.62 379048 2827447 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,019.60 379049 2827453 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 8,101.65 . 396169 8/6/2015 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 294.40 378701 24889 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 294.40 396170 8/6/2015 133052 POLSTER, ALLISON 500.00 JULY CAMP PAINTING 378799 9 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 396171 8/6/2016 136862 POST, ROGER 159.66 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 378752 6102 HABITAT CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 159.66 396172 8/6/2015 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,400.00 DIRECTORY POSTAGE 378800 073115 1600.6235 POSTAGE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 4,400.00 396173 8/6/2015 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 138.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 378556 072715 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 138.95 396174 8/6/2015 105419 PSC ALLIANCE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396174 6/6/2015 105419 PSC ALLIANCE INC. Continued... 3,047.00 IMPLEMENT VESTA 911 SYSTEM 378755 20009740 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 3,047.00 396175 8/6/2015 136189 PW GOLF SUPPLY LLC 321.62 GOLF BALLS 00002047 378934 400646 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 321.62 396176 8/6/2016 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 11.05 TINES 00006393 378756 CD1928937 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 11.05 396177 8/6/2015 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 378757 073015 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 396176 8/6/2015 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 896.50 CRS2 378557 5012 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 896.50 396179 8/6/2015 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 353.58 POOL HOSE 00002246 378935 288521 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 353.58 396180 8/612016 126936 REINDERS INC. 965.32 FERTILIZER 00002044 378643 3032790-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 739.80 FERTILIZER 00001377 378644 3032960-00 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 1,705.12 396181 816/2015 102407 RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION 2,633.24 TRANSMISSION REPAIRS 378558 010655 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,633.24 396182 8/6/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 136.80 SOFTENER SALT 378559 00318813 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 173.10 SOFTENER SALT 00001332 378936 00318391 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 309.90 396183 8/6/2015 131055 SABATINI, DEBRA 37.33 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379000 7305 LANHAM LA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET • 37.33 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396183 8/6/2015 131055 SABATINI, DEBRA Continued... 396184 8/6/2015 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 1,790.00 TRAINING / FORKLIFT 378560 072215 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,790.00 TRAINING/ SCISSOR LIFT 378561 072315 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,790.00 SCISSOR LIFTS/FORKLIFTS 378937 TRAINING 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 5,370.00 396185 8/6/2015 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 273.95 FILTERS 00001366 378645 132406 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 158.42 GASKETS 378802 132477 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 432.37 396186 8/6/2015 136854 SCIANDRA, KATHERINE 162.00 MODEL 378801 073015 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 162.00 396187 8/6/2015 132070 SEAL, KAREN 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 378758 16902 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 396188 8/6/2016 122039 SELECT MECHANICAL SERVICES 48.80 PERMIT REFUND 378938 ED140908 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 48.80 396189 8/6/2015 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 95.00 SIGN MATERIAL 378563 45615 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 95.00 396190 8/6/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANING 378773 52040 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,650.00 396191 8/6/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 1,827.00 MS LICENSES FOR NEW PCS 378646 B03678067 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,827.00 396192 8/6/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 63.35 HOT DOG BUNS 379001 268945 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 63.35 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396193 8/6/2015 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL Continued... 42.09 WRENCH 00001416 378939 ARV/26323563 5921.6556 TOOLS 42.09 396194 8/6/2015 136580 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 26 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 250.00 378846 1164 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 250.00 396195 8/6/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 124.50 378702 1309558 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3.00 378703 131067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,342.98 378704 1310679 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,084.96 378705 1310675 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 500.00- 378706 9061898 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,325.00- 378707 9061900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 586.95 379050 1310673 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,327.25 379051 1310674 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .75 379052 1281704 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 819.16 379053 1310678 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 396196 8/6/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 205.75 378847 6033 5842.5514 205.75 396197 8/6/2016 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 378565 072715 1301.6610 175.00 396198 8/6/2015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,172.21 FERTILIZER 378761 11522 5422.6540 1,172.21 396199 8/6/2015 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 550.00 MOVIE RENTAL 378942 DB2074911 5760.6136 550.00 396200 8/6/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT FERTILIZER GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOLCONCIONS 865.02 CONCESSION PRODUCT 379002 507220110 5320.5510 35.74 379003 507230258 5320.5510 • 840.55 379004 507240568 0 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT FERTILIZER GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOLCONCIONS • 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 27 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS STREET NAME SIGNS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 900.00 378708 1754 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 900.00 0 • 396206 8/6/2015 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 SUPPLY CITY OF EDINA 316.90 FOOT CONTROL, COOLANT 00005529 378568 10090092 1553.6580 Council Check Register by GL 491.48 CART 00005528 378569 10090294 Council Check Register and Summary COOLMATE 00005527 378570 10090293 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 DYNASTY AUTO LINE 00005525 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396200 8/6/2015 GENERALSUPPLIES 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA Continued... 1,034.96 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL 379005 507270002 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 851.20 850.59 00001196 379006 507290072 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 851.20 35.74 CONCESSION PRODUCT 379007 507240002 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 570.29 379008 507310599 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 442.37 379009 507310600 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,675.26 396201 8/6/2015 106673 TAPCO 1,090.00 ROAD DELINEATORS 00001315 378567 1495877 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 1,090.00 396202 8/6/2015 136861 THOMAS, DANIEL 135.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379010 5708 CODE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 135.00 396203 8/6/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 90.75 378848 909395 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6,305.10 378849 909396 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6,395.85 396204 8/612015 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 800.00 WEDDING MAGAZINE AD 00002048 378943 2015-136069 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 800.00 396205 8/6/2015 128347 TKO WINES INC. • 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 27 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS STREET NAME SIGNS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 900.00 378708 1754 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 900.00 396206 8/6/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 316.90 FOOT CONTROL, COOLANT 00005529 378568 10090092 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 491.48 CART 00005528 378569 10090294 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 589.30 COOLMATE 00005527 378570 10090293 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 4,841.74 DYNASTY AUTO LINE 00005525 378571 10090291 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 98.69 OXYGEN 00006387 378762 10090152 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 6,338.11 396207 8/6/2015 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 851.20 OPTICOM SENSORS 00001196 378775 85125 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS 851.20 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396208 8/6/2015 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC Continued... 52.87 HINGE PIN WELDMENT 00005458 378572 LC00031855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.87 396209 8/6/2015 131793 U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 3,489.00 CONFERENCES - JAME B. HOVLAND 378763 MEMBERSHIP 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 3,489.00 396210 8/6/2015 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 28 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY COUNCIL 4,012.79 UNIFORMS 379076 063015 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.95 UNIFORMS 379076 063015 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 112.48 UNIFORMS 379076 063015 1430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE BIKE PATROL 4,161.22 396211 8/6/2015 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 63.96 TAG WAFFLE BASES 00001380 378648 1501-003815 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 249.99 BOLCO BASE SET 00001459 378649 1501-003845 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 313.95 396212 8/6/2015 134785 UPROOTER 843.00 REMOVE WOODY PLANTS 00001322 378575 12059 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 843.00 396213 8/6/2015 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 12.10 SHIPPING FEE 379011 TRAN: 6455 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.10 396214 8/6/2015 136867 VACHANI, LEAH 64.00 SPORTS OF ALL SORTS 379077 REFUND 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 80.00 NATURE NUTS 379077 REFUND 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS 144.00 396215 8/6/2015 121037 VAN ALTVORST, JAY 118.66 TRAINING EXPENSES 378764 072715 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 118.66 396216 8/6/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PARKADMIN. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL TRAINING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLIJ& 329.03 LIQUOR BAGS 378576 354198-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 21.67 LIQUOR BAGS 378577 354198-01 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 414.27 LIQUOR BAGS 379012 355098-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES • 122.58 LINERS, SOAP, BOX CUTTERS 379012 355098-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PARKADMIN. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL TRAINING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLIJ& 396223 8/6/2015 120513 WHITE, AARON 245.99 UNIFORM R55CKR2 LOGIS100 073015 1400.6203 40.25 CITY OF EDINA PURCHASE 379079 073115 1400.6203 286.24 Council Check Register by GL 396224 8/6/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Council Check Register and Summary 79.00 378712 7037915 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 593.12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396216 8/6/2015 5842.5513 101058 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 887.55 396217 8/6/2015 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 2,830.00 JUNE 2015 SERVICE 379013 38447 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,830.00 AUG 2015 SERVICE 379014 39679 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,660.00 396218 8/6/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 68.32 TIMER FOR LIGHTS 00001375 378650 9513321 47094.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 115.38 8' STEP LADDER 00001383 378776 9518747 1301.6556 TOOLS 189.34 2014 CODE BOOK 00001398 378777 9530370 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 68.32 TIMER 00001450 378944 9538427 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 441.36 396219 8/6/2016 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 300.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 379015 215025 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 396220 8/6/2016 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 644.85 LOCATE LEAKS 00001975 378945 6163 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 644.85 396221 8/6/2015 104681 WEBB, DONNA 15.00 BALLROOM DANCING CLASS 378803 REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 15.00 396222 8/6/2015 136856 WETTERBERG, NICOLE 216.42 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 378804 6500 RIDGEVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND DR 396223 8/6/2015 120513 WHITE, AARON 245.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 379078 073015 1400.6203 40.25 UNIFORM PURCHASE 379079 073115 1400.6203 286.24 396224 8/6/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 79.00 378712 7037915 5842.5515 593.12 378854 7040627 5842.5513 109.16 378855 7040622 5842.5513 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 0 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page- 29 Business Unit ARENAADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION BREDESEN PARK COMFORT STATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS BUILDING MAINTENANCE PLANNING DISTRIBUTION SENIOR CITIZENS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 396224 8/6/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 100.54 378713 1080353458 547.64 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 378856 7040629 5862.5513 20.91 1080353457 378974 7040625 5822.5515 147.16 241.64 378715 379054 7040624 5822.5513 161.16 50TH ST SELLING 379055 7040706 5862.5513 217.00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 379056 7040708 5862.5513 87.83 1080353460 379057 7040623 5862.5513 1,565.80 3,190.75 378718 379058 7040630 5862.5513 151.83- VERNON SELLING 379059 703649 5862.5513 3,376.95 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.00- 396225 8/6/2015 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,861.94 FUNGICIDE 00006389 378765 60322382 5422.6545 416.81 REGULATOR 00006296 378766 60329792 5422.6545 4,278.75 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 215.58- Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CHEMICALS CHEMICALS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 396226 8/6/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 100.54 378713 1080353458 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .12 378714 1080353457 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 241.64 378715 1080353454 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 187.84 378716 1080353461 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,035.63 378717 1080353460 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,190.75 378718 1080353379 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 56.73- 378719 2080098875 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.00- 378720 2080096537 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 46.29- 378721 2080096542 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 45.16- 378722 2080096543 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 215.58- 378723 2080096576 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 898.08 376857 1080353463 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,406.68 379060 1080353382 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,671.54 379061 1080353383 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,186.87 379062 1080353380 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 708.55 379063 1080353381 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 976.80 379064 1080353456 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,795.84 379065 1080353455 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22,015.12 396227 8/6/2016 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,919.55 378724 1090442496 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 46.20 378725 1090442497 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 432.00 378726 1090441403 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLIO • i • R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Check # Date 396227 8/6/2016 396228 8/6/2015 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Page - 31 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 246.00 378727 1090441676 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 378728 1090441674 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,235.54 378729 1090441675 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,005.55 379066 1090444961 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 432.00 379067 1090444962 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,400.84 101726 XCEL ENERGY 80.93 51-0010838463-7 378594 465469954 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 100.92 51-0193479-4 378595 465311721 5934.61 B5 LIGHT& POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 164.70 51-9608462-5 378596 465440352 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,445.95 51-9011854-4 378597 465427010 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 1,132.30 51-0010060454-7 378598 465443374 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 7,380.10 51-9603061-0 378599 465433935 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,719.96 51-5107681-4 378600 465378493 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 490.42 51-6229265-9 378601 465308286 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,311.14 51-5547446-1 378602 465388045 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 41.36 51-0010573384-9 378603 465297253 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50.11 51-4420190-3 378604 464886633 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY, HALL GENERAL 14.89 51-0010619811-5 378605 465117154 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.53 51-0160483-1 378606 465131898 1330.6185 LIGHT& POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 25.06 51-0223133-2 378607 465132121 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 86.83 51-6692497-0 378651 465241021 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 35.20 51-8976004-9 378652 465427716 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 22.25 51-9770163-0 378653 465279953 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.32 51-6541084-2 378654 465233163 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.36 51-0010619810-4 378655 465455319 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.36 51-0010619788-5 378656 465455332 1321.6185 LIGHT& POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 40.36 51-0010103585-7 378657 465447947 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 164.23 51-8987646-8 378658 465426889 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 21.57 51-0010573502-3 378659 465294726 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 19.92 51-0010573385-0 378660 465300052 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 158.63 51-0010166207-2 378661 465284097 1646.6185 LIGHT& POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.29 51-0010118404-0 378662 465278666 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 80.23 51-9770164-7 378663 465272118 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.37 51-0010777228-2 378664 465301902 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 42.12 51-0010619455-3 378665 465304528 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,574.64 51-4159265-8 378805 465038689 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 640.98 51-9251919-0 378807 465614034 5765.6185 LIGHT& POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 31.27 51-4151897-0 378808 465549005 1646.6185 LIGHT& POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 8/6/2015 — 8/6/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 396228 8/6/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 29,390.00 51-4621797-2 378809 465550802 1321.6185 10,225.86 51-4827232-6 378810 465551601 5311.6185 26.98 51-0010504853-2 378811 465635529 1321.6185 30.67 51-7567037-0 378812 465589935 1321.6185 33.37 51-610266M 378813 465594848 1321.6185 76.14 51-5938955-6 378946 465574692 5937.6185 12,104.57 51-0837548-4 378947 465488023 5915.6185 10,320.24 51-6955679-8 379016 465758036 1551.6185 82,184.13 396229 8/6/2015 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 186.09 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 186.09 608,673.56 Grand Total 378806 54061830 7411.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER GENERALSUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Checks 571,241.10 A/PACH Payment 37,432.46 Total Payments 608,673.56 8/4/2015 12:55:11 Page - 32 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING REGULAR POOL OPERATION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR WATER TREATMENT CITY HALL GENERAL I*31910I6141119.1011101 0 0 0 i 0 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary CDBG FUND 8/6/2015 - 8/6/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 256,860.09 02100 CDBG FUND 38,529.39 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 3,824.08 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 18,806.24 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,128.32 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,754.27 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,262.40 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 24,998.98 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 45,259.89 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,433.78 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 88.06 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,047.57 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,715.27 05800 LIQUOR FUND 147,754.04 05900 UTILITY FUND 27,438.16 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,634.21 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,138.81 Report Totals 608,673.56 9 8/4/2015 13:01:42 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and propedufes to t i ce DiriaNCtOIr ager t R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1802 8/13/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 203.80 LEADER HOSE 00001425 379415 0144552 -IN 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 203.80 1803 8/13/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 133.00 379229 1916157 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 124.80 379505 1917914 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 144.00 379504 1917916 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 40.80 379502 1917916 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 90.80 379503 1916557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 74.40 379506 1918562 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 607.80 1804 8/13/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 110.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 379424 139329 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110.00 1805 8/13/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 497.23 COFFEE 379590 1189370 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 497.23 1806 8/13/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 358.20 379235 49412700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 312.05 379234 49412800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 269.43 379510 49444800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 126.65 379513 49520300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 193.55 379512 49520600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 217.06 379514 6575300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 333.50 379515 92487200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 125.45 379511 92487500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,935.89 1807 8/13/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 19.70 INDEX SYSTEM 379086 WO -133595-2 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 19.70 1808 8/13/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 154.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003641 379167 110269 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 154.65 1809 8/13/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1809 8/13/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. Continued... 1,798.00 SEWER LINING MGMT 379429 0180185 03485.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,798.00 1810 8/13/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 133.00 BRACE 00005499 379089 981764 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 78.90 COOLANT 00005591 379090 982112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 211.90 1811 8/13/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 4,092.50 MATERIALS TESTING 379430 B033059 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,454.50 MATERIALS TESTING 379432 B033336 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,930.00 MATERIALS TESTING 379433 B034121 01410.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 737.10 MATERIALS TESTING 379434 B034231 01414.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 900.90 MATERIALS TESTING 379434 8034231 01415.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,656.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 379436 8034556 01420.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,963.75 MATERIALS TESTING 379431 81502542 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,975.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 379437 81504563 01399.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,482.50 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 379435 81504565 01421.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 22,192.25 1812 8/13/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 99.74 SP3 WARRANTY 379169 WW69277 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 99.74 SP3 WARRANTY 379169 WW69277 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 99.74 SP3 WARRANTY 00004361 379170 WX27920 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 900.62 WIFI FOR PAMELA PARK 379092 WX74214 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,432.08 TOUGHPADS 00004361 379171 XB76062 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2,716.04 TOUGHPAD 00004361 379171 XB76062 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 9,347.96 1813 8/13/2015 105693 CITYSPRINT 25.42 COURIER SERVICE 379387 34879 1263.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.42 1814 8/13/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 225.00 379242 200508 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 225.00 1815 6/13/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 160.91 CLEANING 379443 7070215607 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES • 3,180.00 CLEANING SERVICES 379105 7070216366 • 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8111/2015 11:30:22 Page- 2 Business Unit TRUNK SS LINING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON HOLLANDS NHOOD RECON HYDE PARK NHOOD RECON 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON TRACY AVE 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADM INISTRATION CITY WIFI PROJECT Asset Mgmt Software and Equip Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm ENVIRONMENT YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PWVING • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1815 8/13/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. Continued... 3,340.91 1816 8/13/2016 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,019.75 379243 813245 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,176.70 379246 814363 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 92.20 379247 814364 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,069.65 379244 814365 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 129.20 379245 814366 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,487.50 1817 8/13/2015 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 379449 2466816 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 1818 8/13/2015 124641 GEYEN GROUP 160.31 CLEANING 379451 24819 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 160.31 1819 8/13/2015 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 134.56 THERMAL ROLLS 00007516 379123 135721 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 134.56 1820 8/13/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 110.84 FITTINGS 00001373 379125 933899 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 110.84 1821 8/13/2015 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 165.00 LETTERHEAD 379394 669557 155D.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,199.00 AR&LE FALL NEWSLETTER 379393 669649 1629.61 D3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,364.00 1822 8/13/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 TOILET RENTAL-4TH OF JULY 379395 90547 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIALACTIVITIES 90.00 379396 90548 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 141.50 379397 90549 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 193.00 379398 90550 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 154.50 379399 90551 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 59.50 TOILET RENTAL 379126 92015 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 690.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1823 8/13/2016 112577 M.AMUNDSON LLP Continued... 823.60 379545 200822 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1824 8/13/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 101483 MENARDS 97.41 COPPER PIPE, UNIONS, FLOWERS 00008054 379464 92208 5511.6406 13.76 SPRINKLER REPAIR PARTS 00001476 379128 92363 1301.6406 116.80 MULCH 00001514 379465 92814 4091.6406 229.97 1825 8/13/2015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 543.68 STATION SUPPLIES 00003645 379187 36655 1470.6406 543.68 1826 8/13/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 424.33 SOAP, DISPENSERS, TOWELS 379478 8254 5511.6511 424.33 1827 8/13/2015 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 684.00 IMAGEABLE ID CARDS 379403 70513 1554.6406 684.00 1828 8/13/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 188.50 BUSINESS CARDS 379225 87211 1550.6406 188.50 1829 8/13/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 68.58 BEARING 00005589 379139 95081 1553.6530 68.58 1830 8/13/2015 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 4,710.61 BRIDGE REPAIRS 379489 002015002140 1346.6180 4,710.61 1831 8/13/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 14.44 BOLTS 379227 0137082 1301.6406 14.44 1832 8/13/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 286.00 379319 0129833 -IN 5862.5512 121.75 379320 0130290 -IN 5842.5512 • 0 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page- 4 Business Unit VEKNON SELLING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING • • . • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1832 8/13/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued... 98.50 379563 0130292-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.00 379562 0130295-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 569.00 379318 0130296-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,204.25 1833 8/13/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,026.89 CONCESSION PRODUCT 379150 43127589 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 528.21 CONCESSION PRODUCT 379494 43152170 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,555.10 1834 8/13/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 292.40 379564 400359-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 689.56 379323 400361-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,011.00 379322 400554-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,992.96 396230 8/13/2015 100612 A.M. LEONARD 34.10 SPRAYER 00002046 379382 C115119269 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 34.10 396231 8/13/2015 135278 AAS, ANN 62.40 ART WORK SOLD 379349 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 62.40 396232 8/13/2015 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 2,836.62 JANITORIAL SERVICES 379080 8361996 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,836.62 396233 8/13/2015 136911 ACCOLADE USA INC. 1,564.11 379417 190155 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,410.00 APPAREL 379416 190156 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,122.00 379418 190157 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,116.11 396234 8/13/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,092.00- CREDIT 379423 300025573 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 886.85 GOLF GLOVES 379421 900980094 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 503.28 GOLF BALLS 379420 901108182 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 457.54 GOLF BALLS 379422 901114629 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.85 SHOES 379419 901153023 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 8/13/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/26/15 379586 081115 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 150.00 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396234 8/13/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY Continued... 352.00 861.52 379230 3045533 396235 8/13/2015 136873 ADVANCED SANDJACKING INC. 256.00 379232 3046874 1,136.00 REPAIR LOADING DOCK RAMP 379166 15-0340 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 384.00 1,136.00 379508 3046875 5862.5514 396236 8/13/2016 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 379507 3046876 7.48 ART WORK SOLD 379350 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 7.48 3046877 5842.5514 396237 8/13/2015 993.50 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 379509 3046878 5862.5514 226.88 379081 073115 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 316.42 379081 073115 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 8/13/2015 662.08 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 379081 073115 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 97.67 379081 073115 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 379591 080115 141.21 7411.6182 379081 073115 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 279.36 221.38 379081 073115 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 396238 8/13/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 102012 ARMENIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/26/15 379586 081115 5760.6136 150.00 396239 8/13/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 352.00 379230 3045533 5842.5514 256.00 379232 3046874 5842.5514 384.00 379508 3046875 5862.5514 1,197.50 379507 3046876 5822.5514 1,338.50 379231 3046877 5842.5514 993.50 379509 3046878 5862.5514 4,521.50 396240 8/13/2015 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 279.36 379591 080115 7411.6182 279.36 396241 8/13/2015 102673 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAGERS 20.00 MEMBERSHIP-SOLVEI WILMOT 379383 2015 5952.6105 20.00 • • 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 6 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING RUBBISH REMOVAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY RECYCLING • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396242 8/13/2015 100212 AT&T Continued... 80.13 053 418 7324 001 379082 072415 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.13 396243 8/13/2015 120995 AVR INC. 1,078.00 HANDCURB 379083 113767 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 487.75 HANDCURB 379084 114003 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,565.75 396244 8/13/2015 133821 BAEUMLER, CHRISTINE 315.50 PROMENADE PHASE 379425 506 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 315.50 396245 8/13/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 199.00 379233 2842 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 199.00 396246 8/13/2015 102346 BEARCOM 135.00 4TH OF JULY SERVICE 379384 4399244 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 135.00 396247 8/13/2015 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 944.37 LAWN CARE 379592 145145 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 944.37 396248 8/13/2016 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 154.70 ART WORK SOLD 379351 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 154.70 396249 8/13/2015 136904 BERG, LAURA 40.13 POND CHEMICALS 379426 REIMBURSE 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.13 396250 8/13/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 379427 D2813592 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 288.00 396251 8/13/2015 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/20/15 379580 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396252 8/13/2016 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 114.40 379428 237303 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 20.00 379236 237308 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 208.50 379237 237309 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 259.00 379516 237310 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 601.90 396263 8/13/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 168.50 COFFEE 379085 T120891 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 168.50 396254 8/13/2016 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 59.34 ART SUPPLIES 00009420 379087 170865 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 122.25 00009429 379088 4723481 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 181.59 396255 8/13/2016 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL -AUG 379593 AUG2015-2 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 396256 8/13/2015 115358 BOHN, KENDALL 29.74 ART WORK SOLD 379352 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.74 396257 8/13/2016 136898 BONE ADVENTURE 107.25 ART WORK SOLD 379353 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 107.25 396258 8/13/2015 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 119.99 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003616 379168 81861582 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.99 396259 8/13/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 589.00 379239 128151 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 419.50 379238 128165 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,008.50 396260 8/13/2015 136896 BRAUNSCHWEIG, MICHAEL 32.21 JUNE 4, 2016 RENTAL REFUND 379385 080515 5700.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 442.79 JUNE 4, 2016 RENTAL REFUND 379385 080515 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 • • 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396260 8/13/2015 136896 BRAUNSCHWEIG, MICHAEL Continued... 396261 8/13/2015 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 1,034.16 GEO TEXTILE 00001407 379091 12570868-00 5932.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,034.16 396262 8/13/2015 121518 BUSHNELL INC. 184.98 PINSEEKER 379438 869175 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 184.98 396263 8/13/2015 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 379354 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 396264 8/13/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 48.05 379241 00010990 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 434.25 379518 652703 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,198.44 379240 653576 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 542.10 379517 664181 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,222.84 396265 6/13/2015 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. 217.00 FARMERS MARKET POSTCARDS 00002051 379386 00103459 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 217.00 396266 8/13/2015 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 20.80 ART WORK SOLD 379355 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 20.80 396267 8/13/2015 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 17.90 379172 072915 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.01 379172 072915 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 88.05 379172 D72915 1626.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 111.57 379172 072915 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 360.64 379172 072915 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 301.12 379172 072915 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 33.33 379172 072915 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 306.18 379172 072915 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 2,584.99 379172 072915 5511.6166 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 122.51 379172 072915 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 30.00 379172 072915 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396267 8/13/2015 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 31.10 379172 072915 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 33.89 379172 072915 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 113.56 379172 072915 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 140.82 379172 072915 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 685.58 379172 072915 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 5,006.25 396268 8/13/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 179.13 8034001-1 379093 8034001-7/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 179.13 396269 8/13/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 62.53 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 172.21 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 174.43 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 328.09 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 302.80 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 56.82 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 38.30 612 Z28-0146 379594 0146-7/15 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 56.60 952 929-0297 379097 0297-7/15 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 91.05 952 941-1019 379095 1019-7/15 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 60.44 952 941-1410 379096 1410-7/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 114.27 952 826-7398 379094 7398-7/15 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 447.06 952 927-8861 379098 8861-7/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,906.60 396270 8/13/2015 123941 CLAY, CAROL 4.55 ART WORK SOLD 379356 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.55 396271 8/13/2015 103141 CMI INC. 126.78 MOUTHPIECES 379099 813049 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 126.78 396272 8/13/2015 120433 COMCAST 9.01 8772 10 614 0161120 379439 161120-7/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 83.84 8772 10 614 0540232 379100 540232-7/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 92.85 396273 8/13/2 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. • 0 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 11 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET FIELD MAINTENANCE • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/13/2015 — B/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396273 8/13/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Continued... 2,671.37 HOT MIX 379440 073115 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 2,671.37 396274 8/13/2015 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 244.72 MATERIALS TESTING 379441 P00004564 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 244.72 396275 8/13/2015 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 298.92 CONCRETE TOOLS 00001477 379442 0130066 -IN 1301.6556 TOOLS 298.92 396276 8/13/2015 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 1,007.77 CONCRETE SUPPLIES 00001449 379101 558417 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,007.77 396277 8/13/2015 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 616.54 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009419 379102 INV000100369 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 487.08 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009423 379103 INV000100658 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 772.85 CLAY 00009425 379104 INV000100880 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 1,876.47 396278 8/13/2015 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 216.00 MODEL 379595 080715 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.00 396279 8/13/2015 136899 CORRIGAN, KAT 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 379357 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 61.75 396280 8/13/2016 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 392.28 GIFT CERTIFICATES 379444 00074588 5410.6575 PRINTING 392.28 396281 8/13/2015 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 3,840.37 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 379106 43419 5550.1705 CONSTR.IN PROGRESS 171.89 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 379107 43421 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4,012.26 396282 8/13/2015 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 45.80 CLUTCH ARM BUSHING 00001386 379108 166223 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 11 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 8/13/2015 124357 DELANEY, ALICE CITY OF EDINA 23.40 ART WORK SOLD Council Check Register by GL 080715 5101.4413 23.40 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 396287 8/13/2015 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396282 8/13/2015 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. REFUSE 379598 Continued... 4095.6103 45.80 7,907.94 396283 8/1312015 8/13/2015 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 439.19 HOSE 00005596 379109 60075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5822.5513 439.19 348.00 396284 6/13/2015 8/13/2015 132642 DAUGHTON, JIM 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S. 9.72 ART WORK SOLD 379358 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1130.6103 9.72 244.00 AD SALES COMMISSION 379388 073015 396285 8/13/2015 136912 DEERBROOKE HOMES AD SALES COMMISSION 379388 073015 1600.6103 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 379596 5905 WOODDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 396286 8/13/2015 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 379359 080715 5101.4413 23.40 396287 8/13/2015 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 6,428.08 REFUSE 379597 DT0001176500 4095.6103 1,479.86 REFUSE 379598 DT0001176501 4095.6103 7,907.94 396288 8/13/2015 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 348.00 379519 9917 5822.5513 348.00 396289 8/13/2015 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S. 50.00 AD SALES COMMISSION 379388 073015 1130.6103 244.00 AD SALES COMMISSION 379388 073015 1628.6103 1,505.00 AD SALES COMMISSION 379388 073015 1600.6103 1,799.00 396290 8/13/2015 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS 98.00 SEED BOTTLES 379445 971693 5410.6406 98.00 396291 8/13/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 327.50 STREET SMARTS AD 379213 241554 2501.6103 • ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 0 0 150.00 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 396293 8/13/2015 Council Check Register by GL 396298 8/13/2015 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 97.48 8/13/2015 -- 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396291 8/13/2015 1600.4390.29 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. Continued... 379446 2,45D.55 EDITION EDINA 379212 243711 1130.6575 PRINTING 2,778.05 201.24 396299 8/13/2015 396292 8/13/2015 100178 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT 0 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 13 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 NOZZLE FORWARD TRAINING 379173 AUG 6-7 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 217.60 AW072215-5 WAS PAID 8/06/15 379599 TB0072B 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 217.80 396297 8/13/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 221.40 150.00 4256 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 221.40 396293 8/13/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 396298 8/13/2015 136874 ERLIN, TIM 97.48 UNDERGROUND WIRING 00005574 379174 12200400 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS REFUND 1600.4390.29 103.76 LIGHTING CONTROLS 00001491 379446 12202000 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES 201.24 396299 8/13/2015 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 396294 8/13/2015 348.80 103594 EDINALARM INC. 379176 024414 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 348.80 343.07 ED001224 MONITORING 379448 98487 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE 396300 8/13/2015 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC, 192.00 RIU1272 MONITORING 379447 98525 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 379248 535.07 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 174.50 396295 8/13/2015 5842.5515 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR YORK SELLING 805.70 RECLAIM PUMP REPAIR 00001488 379214 423011 5914.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 805.70 396296 8/13/2015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. TRAFFIC SIGNALS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 217.60 AW072215-5 WAS PAID 8/06/15 379599 TB0072B 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 217.80 396297 8/13/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 221.40 379520 4256 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 221.40 396298 8/13/2015 136874 ERLIN, TIM 22.00 CREATIVE KIDS PROGRAM 379175 REFUND 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 22.00 396299 8/13/2015 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 348.80 CATCH BASINS 00001396 379176 024414 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 348.80 396300 8/13/2015 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC, 34.90 379248 268-1110 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 174.50 379249 W-1239404 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396300 8/13/2016 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. Continued... 209.40 396301 8/13/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 115.03 BATTERY 00005572 379112 1-Z05066 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 11.49 HALOGEN BEAM 379110 69-187953 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 34.20 OIL 379111 69-188265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 160.72 396302 8/13/2015 122649 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 521.34 CONCESSION PRODUCT 379113 4148784 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 521.34 396303 8/13/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 2.89 NUTS FOR PED LIGHTS 00001505 379215 MNTC2131832 1325.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 2.89 396304 8/13/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 5,148.00 SOFTWARE, HAND HELD READER 00001402 379177 0152760 5917.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 613.02 CORPS 00001199 379114 0152915 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 2,700.70 FLANGE KIT, REGISTERS 00001419 379115 0153125 5917.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 8,461.72 396305 8/13/2015 126909 FETTE PRODUCTIONS 2,350.00 4TH OF JULY SERVICES 379389 EDINA4TH15 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,350.00 396306 8/13/2015 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 101.15 REEL DRIVE CHAIN 00001422 379178 18941 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 589.60 CABLE REPAIR 00001420 379116 18962 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS 690.75 396307 8/13/2015 136914 FREY MANUFACTURING CORP. 1,769.26 CROSSWALK PEDESTAL EQUIPT 379600 CE -15011N 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,769.26 396308 8/13/2016 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 6,448.00 GPS UNIT, SOFTWARE 00001405 379117 140058 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3,000.00 GPS UNIT, SOFTWARE 00001405 379117 140058 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 9,448.00 6 6 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS STREET NAME SIGNS METER REPAIR DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR SPECIAL ACTIVITIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS SEWER CLEANING PACS IS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396309 8/13/2015 136688 FUN EXPRESS LLC Continued... 162.68 FAM JAM SUPPLIES 379390 672552752-01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 162.68 396310 8/13/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 19.94 379118 072515 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.16 379118 072515 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 107.00 379118 072515 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 134.13 379118 072515 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.24 379118 072515 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 27.55 379118 072515 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 83.85 379118 072515 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 63.66 ACCT 0039263 379450 1013226187 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 650.53 396311 8/13/2015 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 238.55 PRUNING SAWS 00001468 379119 S101791032 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 238.55 396312 8/13/2015 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 14.30 ART WORK SOLD 379360 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.30 396313 8/13/2015 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 3,440.00 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 379452 3027 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3,440.00 396314 8/13/2015 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,991.30 JULY 2015 TICKETS 00001421 379120 139053 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,991.30 396315 8/13/2015 133258 GORDON, KIM 55.87 ART WORK SOLD 379361 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.87 396316 8/13/2015 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 159.00 REMOVE GRAFFITI 379121 963 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 212.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 379453 965 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 371.00 396317 8/13/2015 101103 GRAINGER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 396317 8/13/2015 101103 GRAINGER 550.40 NITRILE GLOVES 145.60 BOOT CLEANERS 157.44 EAR PLUGS 110.54 NITRILE GLOVES 206.80 BATTERIES 311.11 REPAIR PART 1,481.89 396318 8/13/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 546.75 54675 379250 185253 5862.5513 379521 185255 5822.5513 379251 185257 5842.5513 396319 8/13/2015 CITY OF EDINA 121256 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING Council Check Register by GL 302.00 DOOR HANGERS 00001427 379454 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 302.00 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 396320 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,000.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND Continued... 00005565 379216 9799331468 1552.6406 3,000.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00001453 379122 9799745568 1552.6406 8/13/2015 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00005566 379217 9800953250 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 00005568 379218 9803430363 1552.6406 5760.6136 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00003643 379179 9804399971 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 396322 379601 9808820634 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS 379250 185253 5862.5513 379521 185255 5822.5513 379251 185257 5842.5513 396319 8/13/2015 121256 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 302.00 DOOR HANGERS 00001427 379454 4319 5913.6103 302.00 396320 8/13/2015 136897 GUNTHER, ADAM 3,000.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379391 4629 TOWER ST 5900.2015 3,000.00 396321 8/13/2015 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/20/15 379581 081115 5760.6136 250.00 396322 8/13/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 5,375.07 CHEMICALS 00005285 379124 3758326 5915.6586 9,071.86 CHEMICALS 00005285 379455 3760484 5915.6586 14,446.93 396323 8/13/2015 126917 HAYES, SUSAN 91.00 ART WORK SOLD 379362 080715 5101.4413 91.00 396324 8/13/2015 136916 HELGESON, BRAD 555.00 BUILD GLASS STORAGE SYSTEM 379602 BRAEMAR ARENA 5511.6180 555.00 396325 8/13/20 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE • COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 16 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396325 8/13/2015 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Continued... 444.71 30% OF FORFEITURE 379180 2013-0155 2340.4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND DWI FORFEITURE 444.71 396326 8/13/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 379219 40623 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 396327 8/13/2015 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 165.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 379392 1000063288 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 165.00 396328 8/13/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 659.75 379252 775390 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,465.01 379253 776298 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 560.00 379523 776335 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 113.00 379522 776490 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,391.12 379255 776735 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 379254 776820 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,246.88 396329 8/13/2015 136900 HOLMQUIST, CHRIS & SUE 104.00 ART WORK SOLD 379363 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.00 396330 8/13/2015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 414.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 379456 080515 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 414.00 396331 8/13/2015 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 10.01 ART WORK SOLD 379364 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10.01 396332 8/13/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 465.00 379256 31273 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 533.25 379257 31455 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 339.00 379524 31480 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,337.25 396333 8/13/2015 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 446.00 MOUND CLAY 00001359 379457 16750 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396333 8/13/2016 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC Continued... 446.00 396334 8/13/2015 123036 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/30/15 379588 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 396335 8/13/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 396336 8/13/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 568.40 977.60 5,264.87 3,173.05 1,539.50 95.40 8,548.51 119.05 183.25 - 379181 7/15 -FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 379459 2376304 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 379528 2378864 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 379259 2382392 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 379525 2396823 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 379527 2396825 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 379526 2396826 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 379260 2396829 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 379283 2396830 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 379258 2400811 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 379460 2405241 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 396337 8/13/2016 103364 JOHN DEERE COMPANY 58,610.23 UTILITY TRACTOR 00005179 379220 114759209 421650.6710 58,610.23 396338 8/13/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 130.08 TURF MARKING PAINT 00001462 379458 72777344 1642.6544 _ 130.08 396339 8/13/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.16 379269 5222057 5842.5512 1,059.45 379281 5222062 5842.5513 2,644.81 379270 522207D 5842.5512 1,812.88 379260 5222073 5842.5513 3,510.17 379268 5222075 5842.5512 .38 379279 5227752 5862.5512 711.34 379532 5227753 5822.5512 • 9,275.54 379273 5227754 • 5862.5513 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LINE MARKING POWDER PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLIIO • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF INA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 396339 8/13/2016 50TH ST SELLING 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4.64 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379277 5227755 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,753.24 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379536 5227756 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2.32 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379265 5227757 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,430.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 379267 5227758 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 199.23 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379537 5227759 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 101.11 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379531 5227760 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 3.48 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 379261 5227761 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 955.49 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 379539 5227762 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 112.27 379530 5227763 5822.5512 49.16 379529 5227764 5822.5515 1.16 379538 5227765 5822.5513 2,533.74 379264 5227768 5842.5512 1,757.21 379266 5227769 5842.5513 2,066.03 379262 5227770 5842.5512 62.82 379263 5227771 5842.5515 1,673.42 379533 5227772 5842.5513 577.67 379535 5227773 5842.5512 4,174.15 379278 5227774 5862.5512 2,202.16 379271 5227775 5862.5513 1,298.41 379274 5227776 5862.5512 62.82 379275 5227777 5862.5512 1,158.33 379272 5227778 5862.5513 822.31 379276 5227779 5862.5512 372.00 379541 5228123 5862.5513 102.78 379534 5228124 5842.5512 299.60 379540 5229270 5862.5513 1.40- 379282 535660 5842.5512 109.60- 379542 536630 5862.5513 75.28- 379543 536631 5862.5512 44,605.98 396340 8/13/2015 118814 JOHNSON, LINNEA 5.20 ART WORK SOLD 379365 080715 5101.4413 5.20 396341 8/13/2015 130789 KATZ, DAVID 355.00 HOMETOWN HEROES 379221 601 1130.6124 355.00 396342 8/13/2016 111018 KEEPRS INC. • 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396342 8/13/2016 111018 KEEPRS INC. Continued... 106.18 UNIFORMS 00003598 379182 280564-03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 266.76 00003642 379183 283660 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 372.94 396343 8/13/2015 124730 KEITH, BARBARA 68,87 ART WORK SOLD 379366 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.87 396344 8/13/2015 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 385.00 KEYS 00001470 379127 S1021742 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 385.00 396346 8/13/2015 134675 KOSKINEN, MATTHEW 113.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 379400 080715 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 113.85 396346 8/13/2015 106646 KRUEGER, DOROTHY 46.69 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379184 080515 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.69 396347 8/13/2015 130215 KUEHL, RHONDA 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 379367 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 396348 8/13/2015 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 128.74 IMPOUND FEE 379604 73316 234D.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 128.74 396349 8/13/2015 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 2,563.16 LAKE TREATMENT 379462 133639 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 1,878.16 LAKE TREATMENT 379461 133840 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 4,441.32 396350 8/13/2015 136231 LARSON, DEB 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 379185 073115 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 379185 073115 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 379185 073115 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,100.00 396351 8/13/20 121162 LEA, STEVE 0 • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 -- 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396351 8/13/2015 121152 LEA, STEVE Continued... 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/23/15 379582 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 396352 8/13/2015 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 468.50 379544 1455 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 468.50 396353 8/13/2015 136916 LICK, KIKI 83.00 ART CLASS REFUND 379603 16914 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 83.00 396354 8/13/2015 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 281.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 379401 080615 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 281.84 396355 8/13/2015 136846 LUCAS, CLAUDETTE 33.98 BEVERAGE CART PORDUCTS 379463 REIMBURSE 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 33.98 396356 8/13/2015 131581 MARCO INC. 11,070.86 QTRLY PRINTER AGREEMENT 379186 INV2739523 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 11, 070.86 396357 8/13/2015 110795 MASON -CUTTERS 425.00 CONCRETE CUTTING FOR POST 379605 M-30316 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 425.00 396358 8/13/2015 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 385,231.33 WASTE WATER SERV - SEPT 379606 0001047488 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 385,231.33 396359 8/13/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 639.96 PC 379129 5681818 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 639.96 396360 8/13/2015 118464 MIDWEST TESTING 215.00 DISPUTED METER TEST 00001423 379222 3559 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 215.00 396361 8/13/2015 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396361 8/13/2016 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT Continued... 30,435.30 JULY WATER USAGE 379607 431-0005.300-7/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 15 30,435.30 396362 8/13/2016 136876 MINNEAPOLIS PARK BOARD 42.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379191 AQUATIC CENTER 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 42.00 396363 8/13/2015 127062 MINN EHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 379190 928041347 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 379189 928041348 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5.36 WINDOW CLEANING 379188 928041760 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 42.83 396364 8/13/2015 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 325.40 GLAZE 00009426 379130 84380 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 325.40 396365 8/13/2016 100906 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 198.00 379469 45-0150-13-7/15 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 1,430.00 HANDICAP 379466 45-0150-16-7/15 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 5.00 379468 45-0150-20-7/15 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 15.00 379467 45-0150-21-7/15 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 1,648.00 396366 8/13/2015 136881 MOEHRL, MELISSA 2.91 AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSION 379192 REFUND 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 40.00 AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSION 379192 REFUND 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 42.91 396367 8/13/2015 136910 MONAHAN, KATIE 91.68 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 379402 073015 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 91.68 396368 8/13/2015 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 391.88 MN GOLFER ONLINE AD 379470 2015-41331 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 391.88 396369 8/13/2016 134024 NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING INC. 700.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 379471 22746 01410.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION • • 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page- 22 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES GOLFREVENUES GOLF REVENUES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLOVER LAKE NJjQOD RECON • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 6/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396369 8/13/2015 134024 NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING INC. Continued... 700.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 379471 22746 01409.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 700.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 379471 22746 01408.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WARDEN AVE 700.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 379471 22746 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 1,400.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 379471 22746 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 4,200.00 396370 8/13/2015 121125 NEMER, KAREN 4.71 ART WORK SOLD 379368 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.71 396371 8/13/2015 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 251.90 LAMPS 00001394 379193 90357 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 251.90 396372 8/13/2016 136879 NOR -SON 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 379194 4613 W 56TH ST ' 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 379195 4613 W 56TH ST 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 396373 8/13/2015 136492 NORSTOG, SOLVEIG 15.25 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379196 080551 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 15.25 396374 8/13/2015 103578 OFFICE DEPOT - 147.80 PAPER, BINDERS 379472 781335917001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 147.80 396375 8/13/2015 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 28.60 ART WORK SOLD 379369 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.60 396376 8/13/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 74.34 LIFTING STRAP 00005567 379223 564644 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 74.34 396377 8/13/2015 123786 OLSON, VICKI 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 379370 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.50 396378 8/13/2015 130333 O'MALLEY, MARYANNE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 41136114 5862.5515 CITY OF EDINA 379474 50197062 5421.5510 379405 Council Check Register by GL 5761.5510 379476 50197133 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 379475 50197134 5421.5510 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 • Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396378 8/13/2015 130333 O'MALLEY, MARYANNE Continued... 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 379371 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 7.80 396379 8/13/2015 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 100.49 DISPLAY RACKS 379473 354002 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.49 396380 8/13/2015 129470 PALMER PRINTING 861.00 GOLF SCORECARDS 00002052 379404 151807-01 5760.6575 PRINTING 861.00 396381 8/13/2015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 12.68 ART WORK SOLD 379372 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 12.68 396382 8/13/2015 102440 PASS, GRACE 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 379373 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 19.50 396383 8/13/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,431.25 379546 8509623 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,152.50 379285 8509624 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,179.25 379287 8509625 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,796.81 379288 8509722 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 654.68 379547 8509726 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,431.25 379548 8509788 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 594.65 379284 8509789 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 89.25 379286 8510008 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 396384 8/13/2015 124366 PEARSON JACK 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/25/15 250.00 396385 8/13/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 337.40 649.16 673.37 1,229.04 618.07 • 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 24 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 379584 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 379549 41136114 5862.5515 379474 50197062 5421.5510 379405 50197131 5761.5510 379476 50197133 5520.5510 379475 50197134 5421.5510 • COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD VERNON SELLING GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ARENA CONCESSIONS GRILL • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396385 8/13/2016 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 3,507.04 396386 8/13/2015 135849 PETSMART #2412 56.99 K9 FOOD 00003182 379197 T-0469 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 56.99 396387 8/13/2015 136877 PHILLIP I MURPHY IRREVOCABLE 10.22 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379198 4311 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET MORNINGSIDE 10.22 396388 8/13/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 126.90 379298 2827712 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 32.00 379289 2627713 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .58 379292 2831169 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 218.04 379551 2831170 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NNE 50TH ST SELLING 4.06 379552 2831171 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.16 379297 2831172 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.06 379348 2831173 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 254.96 379550 2831174 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 568.99 379295 2831176 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,253.20 379553 2831177 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,277.64 379296 2831178 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,115.91 379290 2831179 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.16 379291 2831180 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,972.23 379293 2831181 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,651.49 379294 2831182 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,546.38 396389 8/13/2015 100963 PHYSIO -CONTROL INC. 4,767.84 LIFEPAK MAINT AGREEMENT 00003644 379199 416018616 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,767.84 396390 8/13/2016 100119 PING 92.97 GOLF CLUB 379477 12914009 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 92.97 396391 8/13/2015 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PESTCONTROL 379608 4934195 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 44.89 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA B/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396391 8/13/2015 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL Continued... 396392 8/13/2015 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 654.50 CRS2 379479 5027 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 654.50 396393 8/13/2015 136913 RCP SHELTERS INC. 1,500.00 SHELTER SHOE BASES 00001192 379609 10602 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,500.00 396394 8/13/2015 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 36,187.38 JULY RECYCLING SERVICE 379610 0894-003874518 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 36,187.38 396395 8/13/2015 136917 RETHERFORD, JOHN 4,359.77 YARD REPAIRS 379611 REIMBURSE 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,359.77 396396 8/13/2015 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 27.97 TRAILER PLUG 379131 1927670865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.97 396397 8/13/2015 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 19.00 CLASS A LICENSE 379224 REIMBURSE 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 19.00 396398 8/13/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 936.00 SOFTENER SALT 379132 00318952 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 936.00 396399 8/13/2016 113372 RONNING, TED 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/31/15 379589 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 396400 8/13/2015 136895 ROSE, JOSHUA 448.61 TECH STIPEND 379406 080615 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 448.61 396401 8/13/2015 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 730.00 OAK WILT INSPECTION 379480 909218240 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 730.00 0 0 0 • 0 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396401 8/13/2015 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS Continued... 396402 8/13/2015 136901 SACK, TOM 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 379374 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 396403 8/13/2015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 175.44 BRAKE CLEANER 379134 67471800 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.18 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 379133 R002197911 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 292.62 396404 8/13/2016 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 379375 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25 396405 8/13/2015 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 379376 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.25 396406 8/13/2015 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 786.30 QUARTERLY BILLING 379135 8104066161 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 786.30 396407 8/13/2015 136854 SCIANDRA, KATHERINE 54.00 MODEL 379612 080715 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 54.00 396408 8/13/2015 132294 SCIENCE EXPLORERS INC. 150.00 MYTH BUSTING 101 379407 3370 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 150.00 396409 8/13/2015 136902 SECOND HAND HOUNDS 54.60 ART WORK SOLD 379377 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 54.60 396410 8/13/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 CLEANING RAMP TRASH ROOMS 379136 52130 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 396411 8/13/2015 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/25/15 379585 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396411 8/13/2016 103249 SHANNON, JIM Continued... 150.00 396412 8/13/2016 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 50.70 ART WORK SOLD 379378 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.70 396413 8/13/2015 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 685.30 NEW 0365 LICENSES 379137 803704857 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 685.30 396414 8/13/2016 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 153.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 379200 073115 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 153.30 396415 8/13/2015 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 30.52 ART WORK SOLD 379379 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 30.52 396416 8/13/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD 379226 9335 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 270.20 PARK SIGNS 00001471 379138 9369 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 384.50 BRAEMAR FIELD SIGNS 379481 9394 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 839.70 396417 8/13/2016 103458 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 111.57 SIGNAGE 379482 7299647 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.57 396418 8/13/2015 136878 SILVER HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 379201 5605 GROVE ST 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 396419 8/13/2015 136875 SKOOG, EVELYN 425.20 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 379202 080515 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 425.20 396420 8/13/2016 132196 SMALL LOT MN 258.15 379554 3585 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 258.15 0 0 0 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 396421 8/13/2016 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 6.19 524.50 524.50 1,933.25 1,081.69 124.50 1,003.00 1,268.13 243.00 4,119.70 1,677.00 288.62 3,603.13 249.00 683.16 337.50 434.25 2,877.75 1,888.34 22,867.21 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE i 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 396422 8/13/2015 101007 STAR TRIBUNE is CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 073115 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 379308 1305933 5842.5512 379560 1311974 5842:5513 379309 1311975 5862.5513 379555 1313089 5822.5513 379307 1313090 5822.5512 379306 1313091 5822.5515 379305 1313092 5842.5513 379301 1313094 5862.5512 379299 1313095 5862.5513 379300 1313096 5862.5513 379304 1313098 5842.5513 379557 1313659 5842.5515 379558 1313660 5842.5512 379302 1313661 5862.5512 379303 1313662 5862.5512 379556 1314351 5822.5513 379559 1314352 5842.5513 379310 5011728 5842.5513 379311 5011729 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE i 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 396422 8/13/2015 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 729.32 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 379203 073115 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 729.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 379203 073115 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 729.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 379203 073115 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,188.00 396423 8/13/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 121.75 379313 6032 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 121.75 379561 6086 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.75 379312 6087. 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 449.25 396424 8/13/2015 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/27/15 379587 081115 5760.6136 200.00 396425 6/13/2015 136906 STUMM, MIKE 1,440.00 BOARD GAMES 00006455 379483 0675 541D.6406 1,44D.00 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396425 8/13/2015 136906 STUMM, MIKE Continued... 396426 8/13/2015 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2,000.00 2ND HALF DUE 379613 080715 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBURBAN RATEAUTHORITY 2,000.00 396427 8/13/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 112.00 TIRE 00005437 379140 10133451 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.00 396428 8/13/2016 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 379408 DB2077916 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 500.00 396429 8/13/2015 136880 SWANSON HOMES 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 379204 5137 JUANITA 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 396430 8/13/2015 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 379380 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.50 396431 8/13/2015 102063 SWENSON, THOMAS 48.41 SPRINKLERS 379484 080515 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 48.41 396432 6/13/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA 426.91 FOOD 379485 507240640 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 426.91 396433 8/13/2016 105006 TASER INTERNATIONAL 230.96 BATTERY PACKS 379206 S11407151 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 230.96 396434 8/13/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE 102.74 RENTAL CLUBS 379486 31024770 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 102.74 396435 8/13/2015 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC. 106.00 AUTOMATIC DOOR MAINTENANCE 379141 24663 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GEN 0 • 0 B/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 31 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396435 8/13/2015 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC. Continued... 108.00 396436 8/13/2015 136903 THEISEN, BRIDGETTE 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 379361 080715 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 97.50 396437 8/13/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 51.20 379314 909437 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 43.00 379315 909695 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 205.15 379487 910306 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,803.55 379317 910876 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 66.10 379316 910877 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,169.00 396438 8/13/2015 132557 THYNE, CADI 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 379614 16884 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 78.00 396439 8/1312015 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 379207 2015-134815 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 379207 2015-134815 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 379207 2015-134815 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,200.00 BRAEMAR GC AD 379488 2015-142197 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,190.00 396440 8/13/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 199.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 379142 M21493 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 265.00 7/21/15 COUNCIL MEETING 379143 M21494 1185.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 133.00 ART/CULTURE COMMISSION MEETING 379144 M21495 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 597.00 396441 8/13/2015 120595 T -MOBILE 16.88 477067848 379205 072715 1261.6188 TELEPHONE 16.88 396442 8/13/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 74.05 WELDING GAS 00005457 379145 10091364 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 159.64 WELDING GAS 00005457 379146 10091588 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 233.69 0 B/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 31 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 -- 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396443 8/13/2015 123649 TOWMASTER Continued... 4,200.00 TRAILER REPAIRS 00005517 379147 371596 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,200.00 396444 8/13/2015 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 112.00 JULY 2015 USAGE 379148 269634-8/15 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.00 396445 8/13/2015 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 160.00 GRASS SEED 00001475 379208 35693 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,260.00 GRASS SEED 00001478 379490 35696 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,420.00 396446 8/13/2015 103048 U.S. BANK 966.75 HSAADMIN FEES 379209 9421134 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 968.75 396447 8/13/2015 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 3,582.21 DEHUMIDIFIER 00001446 379149 706432 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 3,582.21 396448 8/13/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 414.17 TISSUE, TOWELS, SOAP, LINERS 379491 356353-00 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 414.17 396449 8/13/2015 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 625.00 FALL CATALOG DESIGN 379409 2015-2 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 625.00 396450 8/13/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 282.66 GOLF CART REPAIRS 00002053 379410 710150002 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 282.66 396451 8/13/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 280.43 WIRING, PARTS 00001171 379411 9415152 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 69.17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001447 379493 9538833 2501.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PACS IS 59.27 CAHILL MONUMENT LIGHTS 00001466 379492 9548292 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 122.56 BREAKER 00001469 379412 9551911 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 531.43 396462 8/13/20 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 9 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396462 8/13/2016 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. Continued... 432.75 379321 63204 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 432.75 396453 8/13/2015 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 33.18 BRATS 379495 88462 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 33.18 396454 8/13/2015 133515 WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT ADMIN 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 379210 115022180 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 285.00 396455 8/13/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 39.46 379228 7192812 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 39.46 396456 8/13/2016 136905 WESTLING, ADAM 50.00 CLUB REPAIR WORK 379496 1000 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 50.00 396457 8/13/2015 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 340.00 PARK & REC PROGRAMS 379413 288 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 340.00 396458 8/13/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 658.44 379327 7040628 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 717.38 379325 7041582 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,186.21 379568 7041583 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,220.92 379566 7041585 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.82 379326 7041586 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,364.88 379324 7041587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 728.12 379565 7041649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 417.16 379567 7041650 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10,334.93 396459 8/13/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 525.75 379569 1080353378 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,465.88 379336 1080353459 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,125.65 379337 1080353462 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,750.60 379335 1080354906 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 26.66 379329 1080356572 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396469 8/13/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 2,037.20 379328 1080356573 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 96.15 379331 1080356594 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,526.65 379330 1080356595 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,479.07 379340 1080356596 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 131.15 379338 1080356597 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,399.03 379570 1080356598 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.15 379571 1080356599 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 167.34 379339 1080356600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.15 379334 1080356601 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,141.71 379333 1080356602 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,239.09 379332 1080356603 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 366.30 379572 1080357965 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.00- 379574 2080096534 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 93.00- 379341 2080099324 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.00- 379575 2080100413 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.00- 379573 2080100417 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 27,385.53 396460 8/13/2016 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 477.80 379497 1090441407 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,320.00 379344 1090444909 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 186.60 379345 1090444910 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,133.00 379342 1090444963 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 214.50 379343 1090444964 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 380.60 379498 1090444965 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,159.75 379346 1090446029 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,266.00 379347 1090446030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,117.80 379576 1090448762 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,039.63 379577 1090448763 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 46.20 379578 1090448764 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,148.85 379579 1090448765 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 25,510.73 396461 8/13/2015 102228 WOOLDRIDGE, MARY 58.77 GRAND OPENING SUPPLIES 379499 080715 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 58.77 396462 8/13/2015 105740 WSB &ASSOCIATES INC. 603.00 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 379501 1-01686-650 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS • 2,792.25 FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPING 379500 3-01686-610 • 01259.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE LJfCAPE PLAN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Council Check Register by GL Page - 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396462 8/13/2016 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Continued... 306.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 379414 3-01686-630 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 3,701.25 396463 8/13/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,338.11 51-5634814-2 379159 465736252 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 410.16 51-6046826-0 379155 465742879 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 544.17 51-6229265-9 379158 465747670 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,803.63 51-6229265-9 379158 465747670 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.05 51-9337452-8 379156 465789331 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 36.45 51-0194596-8 379154 465837744 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,432.71 51-6979948-4 379157 465938857 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,829.93 51-6979948-4 379157 465938857 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,390.59 51-6979948-4 379157 465938857 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 372.00 51-9422326-6 379153 465966051 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,089.72 51-4966303-6 379160 466076332 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 30,338.90 51-4888627-1 379151 466077452 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 884.76 51-4888627-1 379151 466077452 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 129.20 51-6137136-8 379152 466093900 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,808.92 51-6824328-7 379616 466621065 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 3,669.42 51-6840050-6 379615 466675972 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 57,238.72 396464 8/13/2015 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 53.44 K9 BOARDING 379211 072615 4607.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 53.44 396465 8/13/2015 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,536.25 ROBOTICS, GAME DESIGN 379165 4725 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,536.25 396466 8/13/2015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 127.72 SHIMS, PADS 00005555 379163 PCO01687640 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.72 HOSE ASSEMBLY 00005587 379164 PCO01688165 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.58 SEALS 00005587 379161 PCO01688726 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.10 CATERPILLAR REPAIR 379162 SW100164640 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 294.12 396467 8/13/2015 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/24/15 379583 081115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/13/2015 — 8/13/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396467 8/13/2015 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND Continued... 1,040,435.95 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 978,953.21 1,040,435.95 8/11/2015 11:30:22 Page - 36 Business Unit 7 • 0 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 8/13/2015 - 8/13/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 95,443.05 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 700.23 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 2,768.93 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 40,944.61 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 58,828.03 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,104.48 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 365.34 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 26,001.83 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 39,619.75 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 5,281.52 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 32.21 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,109.29 05800 LIQUOR FUND 233,744.27 05900 UTILITY FUND 467,917.23 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 18,842.25 05950 RECYCLING FUND 36,207.38 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,210.05 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 315.50 Report Totals 1,040,435.95 • 8/11/2015 11:30:30 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date ice Iparectrn-°'G'—ii ---- Z' 37an ger v, LI 9 9 • CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT*TER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description . Vendor City State Account **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/06/09 $130.00 Advertisement TWIN CITIES HUMAN RESOURC 651-3666081 MN 1556.6121 **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/06/16 $73.27 IQS Training -Refreshments CUB FOODS BLOOMINGT BLOOMINGTON MN 1556.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/05/26 $30.21 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/05/27 $34.91 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/05/28 $31.75 Food EDEN AVENUE GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/01 $890.20 Airfare DELTA AIR 0062311926252 DELTA.COM CA 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/01 $29.00 Airfare DELTA AIR 0060151943122 DELTA.COM CA 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/01 $67.82 Food PF CHANG'S #9700 EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/08 $242.18 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/10 $171.48 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/13 $94.69 Cellular SPRINT *WIRELESS 800-639-6111 KS 1120.6188 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/15 $128.87 Food MCCRADY'S CHARLESTON SC 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/06/16 $60.00 Other Travel ABSOLUTE CHARLESTON AIRPO CHARLESTON SC 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/05/27 $48.00 Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS INC 616-456-5388 MI 1120.6105 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/02 $31.80 Ice Cream and Hershey Kisses TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1120.6406 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/02 $210.96 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/08 $36.34 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/09 $655.00 Registration ICMA INTERNET 800-745-8780 DC 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/17 $238.10 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/06/23 $169.00 Case for IPad Air CLAMCASE, LLC 800-939-0335 CA 1120.6406 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/06/02 $18.25 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/06/02 $19.95 Transaction fee -UB PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 5902.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/06/02 $19.95 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/06/04 $790.04 Lodging-GFOA Conference HILTON GARDEN INN PHILADELPHIA PA 1160.6104 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/06/03 $34.15 Taxi VTS PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASTORIA NY 1160.6104 **0143 DEB MANGEN 2015/06/10 $195.00 Registration EB 2015 MCFOA ADVANCE 888-810-2063 CA 1180.6104 **0143 DEB MANGEN 2015/06/10 $195.00 Registration EB 2015 MCFOA ADVANCE 888-810-2063 CA 1180.6104 **0143 DEB MANGEN 2015/06/17 $50.00 Registration SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612-7207667 MN 1100.6104 '**0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/04 $117.00 MLS Access Fee REALTOR ASSOCIATION/MLS 312-329-8245 IL 1190.6105 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/09 $79.00 IAAO Webinar INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION 816-7018100 MO 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/11 $645.00 ASA Dues AMERICAN SOCIETY OF APPR 703-478-2228 VA 1190.6105 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/11 $249.00 Subscription FINANCE AND COMMERCE INC 866-8028214 MN 1190.6105 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/12 $8.00 Mpls. Assessor Mtg. GATEWAY RAMP MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190.6106 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/06/17 $200.00 Case Study Workshop MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **2522 BRIAN OLSON 2015/06/24 $785.00 Conference AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS -816-472-6100 MO 1280.6104 **2522 BRIAN OLSON 2015/06/23 $51.47 Propane for Thermal Plastic SUPERAMERICA4047 EDINA MN 1335.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/05/26 $49.99 Logitech MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1261.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/05/29 $24.50 Stamps USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01412.1705.31 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/05/29 $24.50 Stamps USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01410.1705.31 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/06/01 $53.91 Batteries THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1260.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/06/08 $60.26 Food ROJO MEXICAN GRILL EDINA MN 1261.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/06/23 $395.00 Registration U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612-625-4259 MN 1260.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/05/26 $499.95 Wheels NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT BURNSVILLE MN 1301.6518 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/05/28 $243.64 Plants BACHMAN'S NURSERY FARMINGTON MN 1301.6406 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/06/03 $500.00 Training EB MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 888-810-2063 CA 1281.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/06/12 $565.00 Plants BACHMANS HRDSCPES-MINN250 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5761.6620 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/06/15 $207.04 Plants BACHMAN'S NURSERY FARMINGTON MN 4091.6406 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/06/23 $829.10 Shrubs BACHMAN'S NURSERY FARMINGTON MN 1551.6180 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/06/15 $40.00 Electrical Permit DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651-2845528 MN 5311.6180 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/06/19 $40.00 Electrical Permit DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651-2845528 MN 1646.6406 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/06/23 $337.84 Pool Pump Switch AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5311.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/05/26 $434.33 Tools and Supplies ACME TOOLS #220 PLYMOUTH MN 5913.6556 • CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/05/28 $380.44 Tools and Supplies SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5913.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/06/17 $2,923.89 Hydrant Meters &Tube Rounder USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5917.6406 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/05/28 $51.47 Propane SUPERAMERICA4047 EDINA MN 1335.6406 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/05/29 $20.00 Training MNSCU 877-4666728 MN 1301.6027 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/03 $125.35 FrogLube L A POLICE GEAR INC LAPOLICEGEAR. CA 1400.6610 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/04 $38.00 Leather Holster ECOLLAR 260-357-0051 IN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/05 ($25.00) Dog Collar Return ECOLLARTECH 8553265527 IN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/10 $27.37 Conference EB WEST METRO SAFE HA 888-810-2063 CA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/12 ($119.85) Baton Holder Return GALLS 859-266-7227 KY 1400.6104 - **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/11 $1,995.00 CCPA Online PAYPAL *CELLEBRITE 402-935-7733 NJ 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/16 $233.10 Lodging RADISSON PAPER VALLEY HOT APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/16 $233.10 Lodging RADISSON PAPER VALLEY HOT APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/16 $100.88 Lodging BLACK BEAR HOTEL CARLTON MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/16 $135.08 Lodging BLACK BEAR HOTEL CARLTON MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/06/19 $201.00 OTHER PAYPAL *K9STORMINC 402-935-7733 CA 1400.6104 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/05/26 $28.58 Food DOMINO'S 1927 EDINA MN 1400.6406 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/06/09 $2,317.70 Protech Intruder G2 Shield GT DISTRIBUTORS INC 800-7555996 TX 1401.6203 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/06/11 $59.99 Bike Pump PENN CYCLE MINNETONKA MINNETONKA MN 1430.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/01 $47.80 Rapid Dual Charger AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1400.6160 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/10 $92.81 Shipping THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1400.6235 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/16 $12.65 Shipping USPS266314750050442029 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1400.6235 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/16 $27.93 Food D2 SPORTS PUB APPLETON APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/03/18 ($107.05) Disputed Charge from March ROOT ROOST 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/03/18 ($153.00) Disputed Charge from March WWW.OVH.COM MONTREAL 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/03/23 ($49.00) Disputed Charge from March OVH.COM 8556845463 QC 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/03/19 ($48.00) Disputed Charge from March WWW.OVH.COM MONTREAL 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/19 $39.18 Fuel MARATHON PETRO138131 APPLETON WI 1400.6107 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/19 $23.69 Food RADISSON PAPER VALLEY HOT APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/17 $24.51 Food RADISSON PAPER VALLEY HOT APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/06/18 $82.48 Food RADISSON PAPER VALLEY HOT APPLETON WI 1400.6104 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/06/03 $414.95 Vacuum -Station 1 JOHNSTONS SALES AND SERVI 612-8617515 MN 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/06/02 $267.12 Rescue Training Kit JONES&BARTLETT LEARNING 978-443-5000 MA 1470.6579 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/06/04 $95.21 Textbook BARN ES&NOBLE*COM 800-843-2665 NY 1470.6405 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/05/26 $20.00 Date Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/06/07 $80.00 Date Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/06/20 $20.00 Date Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/06/24 $20.00 Date Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/06/08 $42.89 Cobalt Drill Bits JERRY'S HARDWARE 5 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1470.6406 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/06/23 $158.62 Totes CONTAIN ERSTOREMI N N ESOT EDINA MN 1470.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/05/27 $11.50 Pool Testing Supplies IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS 201-3438004 NJ 1490.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/06/01 $13.11 Pool Testing Supplies TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES INC 410-4724340 MD 1490.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/06/18 $31.00 Pool Supplies IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS 201-3438004 NJ 1490.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/05/26 $238.58 OCE Service Fee CANON SOLUTIONS AMERIC 773-714-8500 IL 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/05/28 $130.00 Conference ACT*10KLAKES 877-551-5560 CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/05/28 $528.97 Safety Equipment WW GRAINGER 877-2022594 PA 1495.6558 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/05/28 $109.00 Lodging THE LODGE AT SUGAR LAKE I COHASSET MN 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/06/03 $1,240.72 Books INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888-422-7233 IL 1495.6405 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/06/09 $154.35 Scanning from OCE CANON SOLUTIONS AMERIC 773-714-8500 IL 1495.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/05/26 $1,399.24 Differential ROCK AUTO 608-661-1376 WI 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/05/26 $64.26 Phone Holster Case PAYPAL *OTTERBOX 402-935-7733 CA 1553.6406 **1996 **1996 GUNN SA 2015/05/26 $321.35 Trailer Assist Gorillas Axle Shaft NORTH OOLEQUIPMNT ROCK BURNSVILLE 608-661-1376 MN WI 1553.6530 1553.6530 GUNN SA 2015/05/28 $171.66 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT TER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/09 ($425.83) Part Return ROCK AUTO MADISON WI 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/09 $146.33 Mirrors US AUTO PARTS NETWORK 800-913-6127 CA 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/10 $31.92 Custom Spray Painting Stencil PAYPAL *LAZERDESIGN 402-935-7733 CA 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/12 $85.83 Gaskets, Air Filters, O -Rings IBUY STORES, INC. 845-6105093 NY 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/16 $30.00 Personalized Lazer Design PAYPAL *LAZERDESIGN 402-935-7733 CA 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/06/23 $44.50 Decals VCN**MNSTATEPATROL 866-255-1857 MN 1553.6530 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/11 $33.08 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS STLSPK 001695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/11 $1,350.56 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS ST LS PK 001695 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/11 $42.28 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS SOUTH DALE 152693 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/11 $1,725.74 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS SOUTHDALE 152 693 EDINA MN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/15 $0.39 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVSRIDGEDALE15369FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/15 $16.00 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS RIDGEDALE 153 693 MINNETONKA MN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/19 $15.00 Recycling Disposal Fee S HENN REC DROP OFF CTZN BLOOMINGTON MN 1552.6271 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/23 $1,419.18 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS ST LS PK 001695 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1552.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/06/23 $34.76 Titles, Tabs, Transfers MN DVS STLSPK 001695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1552.6260 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/06/11 $14.99 Video Cable AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5410.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/06/11 $39.00 Trackball-Siems AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1470.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/06/20 $260.75 Watch Directory -PD BMT*GDPSOFTWARE.COM 910-792-9100 NC 1554.6160 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/06/24 $32.99 Flash'Drives-PD AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1400.6104 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/06/03 $45.26 Socks VISR WWW.VISR.NET NC 5720.5510 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/06/05 $177.41 Diapers, Sunscreen, Cleaning TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5320.5510 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/06/19 $20.00 Date Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/06/23 $10.00 Parking MARTEN MINNEAPOLIS MN 1600.6406 **7279 DONNATILSNER 2015/05/27 $23.59 Blue Rhino SUPERAMERICA4047 EDINA MN 1628.6406 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/06/10 $48.50 TV Wall Mount AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1628.6406 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/06/15 $32.17 HDMI to VGA Adapter MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1628.6413 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/05/29 $90.08 Supplies SPORTS AUTHORI00007021 MINNETONKA MN 1623.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/04 $5.99 Tennis Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 1621.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/05 $79.98 Tennis Supplies UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC EDINA MN 1623.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/09 $1,924.47 Storage Containers AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1621.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/11 $235.96 Tennis Supplies SPORTS AUTHOR100007070 MAPLE GROVE MN 1623.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/15 $23.57 Materials DAVIS LOCK & SAFE SAINT PAUL MN 1621.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/17 $117.98 Tennis Supplies SPORTS AUTHOR100007096 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1623.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/18 $116.88 Tennis Supplies GOPHER SPORT 877-699-7927 ' MN 1623.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/06/23 $200.00 Program Deposit BROADWAY RENTAL 763-5331680 MN 1624.6103 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/05/29 $107.98 VV Flags -Parade PAR AIDE PRODUCTS CO 651-4294513 MN 1642.6406 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/06/16 $119.00 Membership MINNESOTA NURSERY AND LAN 651-633-4987 MN 1643.6103 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/06/18 $180.14 ICWC Meeting SAVOY PIZZA - EDINA MINNEAPOLIS MN 1644.6103 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/06/19 $171.62 Waders -Tree Crew GANDER MOUNTAIN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1644.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/05/25 $20.00 Data Plan -Jennifer VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/05/25 $193.10 Coffee -Veterans Memorial Ded. STARBUCKS #02592 EDINA MN EDINA MN 1600.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/05/27 $399.00 Archiving Platform ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM 919-275-0252 NC 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/05/28 $176.70 Treats -Veterans Memorial Ded. PATISSERIE MARGO EXCELSIOR MN 47073.6710 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/05/31 $10.54 Edina Liquor Facebook Ad FACEBOOK W232J7N532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/01 $14.50 Edina Liquor Facebook Ad FACEBOOK W4ZWJ7W532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/02 $340.00 Savvy Award Entries PAYPAL *3CMA 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6104 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/02 $100.00 Google Search GOOGLE *GOOGLE INC GOOGLE.COM/CH CA 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/02 $11.96 Subscription THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT 612-6734343 MN 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/03 $210.00 MACTA Conference MACTA 651-2906262 MN 1132.6104 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/03 $10.72 Photoshop Lightroom Bundle ADOBE *PHOTOGPHY PLAN 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/05 $120.73 Senior Center Equipment AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1628.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/04 $31.84 AV Supplies B&H PHOTO, 800-606-6969 800-2215743 NY 1130.6410 • CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/04 $19.00 Camera Slider Parts SP * REVOLVE CAMERA REVOLVECAMERA CA 1130.6410 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/05 $53.63 Creative Cloud -Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/06 $53.63 Creative Cloud -Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA. 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/05 $20.00 Data Plan-Kaylin VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/06 $20.00 Data Plan -Jordan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130,6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/07 $1,627.08 Senior Center Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1628.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/10 $136.00 Subscription MAILCHIMP MAILCHIMP.COM GA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/11 $20.00 Data Plan -Scott VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/11 $15.09 Equipment Rental CINEQUIPT MINNEAPOLIS MN 1130.6410 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/12 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Kaylin ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/13 $32.17 Creative Cloud -Jennifer ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/15 $50.00 Membership -Matt PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/15 $50.00 Membership -Scott PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/15 $50.00 Membership -Jennifer PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/15 $50.00 Membership -Nathalie PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/16 $107.00 Senior Center AV Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1628.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/16 $32.17 Creative Cloud -Jordan ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/18 $29.95 Freshbooks Online Invoicing 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS 416-481-6946 ON 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/18 $5.00 Spam Blocker AKSMT.COM 87.7-273-3049 CA 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/18 $385.00 Emmy Entries PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/18 $110.00 Emmy Entries PAYPAL *NATASUMW 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/21 $23.66 Edina Liquor Facebook Ad FACEBOOK WVZNP7A532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/22 $20.00 Data Plan -Ann Swenson VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1100.6188 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/22 $86.79 Favicards JAKPRINTS, INC. 216-622-6360 OH 1130.6575 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/22 $86.79 Favicards JAKPRINTS, INC. 216-622-6360 OH 1130.6575 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/23 $26.34 Edina Liquor Facebook Ad FACEBOOK URQSM7W532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/23 ($9.89) Favicards JAKPRINTS, INC. CLEVELAND OH 1130.6575 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/23 ($9.89) Favicards JAKPRINTS, INC. CLEVELAND OH 1130.6575 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/06/23 $465.20 Airfare DELTA AIR 0067633602021 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1130.6104 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/06/04 $43.32 Lysol Wipes, Lighter, Key Blank JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5410.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/06/04 $49.00 Stamps JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 5410.6235 **5821 AMYSMITH 2015/06/03 $13.13 Batteries OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5410.6406 **5821 AMYSMITH 2015/06/11 $17.66 Grocery -COGS CUB FOODS#3124 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5421.5510 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/06/17 $53.53 Service JOHNSTONS SALES AND SERVI RICHFIELD MN 5420.6511 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/05/25 $5.35 Office Supples STAPLES 00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 5410.6610 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/05/26 $598.65 General Supplies THE GLOW STORE VICTORIA BC 5424.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/05/28 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 5410,6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/03 $46.47, Office Supples OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5410.6513 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/10 $8.57 Grips -COGS GOLFSMITH GOLF CTR #68 RICHFIELD MN 5440.5511 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/12 $321.92 Parts, Blades, Nail Brush JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5422.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/13 $51.52 Supplies LITIN EVERYTHING PARTY & MINNEAPOLIS MN 5410.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/20 $31.16 Chips, Popcorn CUB FOODS EDEN PRAI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5410.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/06/23 $90.67 Glow Sticks and Glow Golf Balls THE GLOW STORE VICTORIA BC 5424.6406 **2892 TOM SWENSON .2015/05/28 $40.20 Gloves, Mailbox THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5422.6406 **2892 TOM SWENSON 2015/06/05 $174.32 UPS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5422.6611 **5811 JOSEPH ABOOD 2015/05/09 ($2,082.62) Disputed Charges -Reported SEGSMHI LE LIDO 4793521 75PARIS 8 5410.6406 **5811 JOSEPH ABOOD 2015/05/09 ($381.32) Disputed Charges -Reported SPORT 2000 PICOT 54TOMBLAINE 5410.6406 **5811 JOSEPH ABOOD 2015/05/12 ($10.38) Disputed Charges -Reported GAUMONT OPERA 14542469 75PARIS 8 5410.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/06/01 $27.87 First Aid Supplies CVS/PHARMACY #05788 EDINA MN 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/06/09 $34.50 General Supplies MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 **7010 **7010 AMAN LLE 2015/05/28 $92.00 Play Date with Mom KIDCRE UDIO VALLEY EDEN PRAIRIE GOLDEN VALLEY MN MN 1600.4390.52 1624.6406 • AMAN LLE 2015/06/01 $70.15 Edible Playground Plants MENAIWLDEN CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT TER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/04 $130.00 Staff Training CHEETAH PIZZA EDINA MN 1600.4390.02 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/06 $90.00 Tennis -Eric USTA LRC 561-445-2540 NY 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/10 $147.98 Cryla MICHAELS STORES 3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/14 $22.86 Grocery TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/14 $27.04 Corn Starch CUB FOODS #1559 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/12 $49.33 All Purpose Play Sand THE HOME DEPOT 2808 PLYMOUTH MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/15 $41.94 Grocery and Foil JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/15 $78.36 Supplies WM SUPERCENTER #1855 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/16 $41.31 Grocery and Home TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/16 $25.69 Cilantro, Basil, Chive Plants BACHMAN'S INC#0007 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/18 $24.18 Electronics, Home, Grocery TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/18 $85.11 Craft Supplies MICHAELS STORES 3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/19 $3.35 WHOLESALE TRADE TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/22 $27.45 Tissue, Plates, Cups JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/06/23 ($46.73) All Purpose Play Sand THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/05/28 $16.62 Branch Tailpiece JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/05/29 ($22.46) TallPiece, Coupling -Return THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/05/28 $22.46 TallPiece, Coupling THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/05/30 $16.96 Building General Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/06/10 $109.59 Admin Conference PARK PLAZA HOTEL BLMNGTN BLOOMINGTON MN 5110.6104 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/06/16 $18.76 Valve Kit JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/06/17 $26.81 Badge OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 2610.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/06/22 $185.10 Advertising SQ *DERUYTER-NELSON PUBLI MAPLE GROVE MN 5110.6122 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/06/23 $50.10 Building General Supplies HIRSHFIELDS/SOUTHDALE EDINA MN 5111.6406 **9665 SUSAN FAUS 2015/06/02 $30.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/05/28 $35.00 MRPA Workshop MN RECREATION AND PARK A 763-571-1305 MN 5710.6104 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/01 $569.28 Whistles, Hats, Lanyards THE LIFEGUARD STORE IN 309-451-5858 IL 5311.6201 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/03 $27.49 Meter Rental PITNEY BOWES* 800-228-1071 CT 5710.6235 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/05 $121.48 Microwave, Totes, Singer TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5311.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/06 $30.00 Moving Tape, Markers TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5311.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/08 $46.85 Guard/Week Supplies THE LIFEGUARD STORE IN 309-451-5858 IL 5311.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/05 $140.97 Disputed Charges -Reported CAPRUGGERS SAITAMA 5720.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/08 $1,987.00 LG License -New IN *JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIAT 800-7428720 TX 5310.6104 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/08 $2,000.00 LG License -New IN *JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIAT 800-7428720 TX 5310.6104 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/09 ($108.80) Disputed Charges -Reversed ACT*ETEAMZ.COM -AUTH BG@ETEAMZ.COM CA 5720.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/09 ($108.80) Disputed Charges -Reversed ACT*ETEAMZ.COM - AUTH BG@ETEAMZ.COM CA 5720.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/10 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800-468-8454 CT 5710.6235 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/11 $266.50 CPO-AleX Nelson HORIZON POOL SUPPLY 651-917-3075 MN 5310.6104 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/06/23 $108.80 Disputed Charges -Reported ACT*ETEAMZ.COM - AUTH BG@ETEAMZ.COM CA 5720.6406 **5746 RICHARD JOHNS 2015/06/01 $10.00 Hlllyard Conference HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS 800-365-1555 MN 5710.6104 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/26 $448.68 Tents and Frames APRES PARTY & TENT RENTAL EDINA MN 47073.6710 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/27 $134.33 Cedar, Wood Glue, Deck Materials MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/28 $29.95 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1550.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/28 $55.34 Food CUB FOODS #6690 BLOOMINGTON MN 1550.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/29 $29.47 Outdoor Rug, Bolt, Gloss MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.606 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/05/31 $20.00 Advertising FACEBOOK 54ER382DN2 650-6187714 CA 5760.6122 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/01 $2,156.96 Planting BLUEBIRD NURSERY 402-8923457 NE 5761.6620 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/01 $124.69 Tempered Glass Blocks BESSER GLASS AND MIRROR C BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6180 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/03 $24.26 Nut, Union, Sleeve, Tape, Tubin MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/03 $4.50 Plumbing/Heating JOHNSON HARDWARE BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/04 $41.10 First Aid Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/04 $19.28 Nipples JOHNSON HARDWARE BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6530 ,7 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/06 $129.95 Wireless Microphone System AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/05 $91.94 Utility Pump, Batteries, Ratchetx MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/05 $246.67 Haws Valve Repair Kit KULLY SUPPLY 800-518-5388 MN 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/09 ($16.41) Sales Tax Refund KULLY SUPPLY BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/16 $37.60 E -Z -GO Battery Wiring Kit AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/16 $50.39 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/17 ($3.95) Sales Tax Refund SHERWIN WILLIAMS #3147 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/16 $72.46 Haws Valve Repair Kit PRODRINKINGFOUNTAINS 888-5037937 MI 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/17 $29.00 Office Supplies WHENIWORK.COM 651-330-4482 MN 5760.6105 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/17 $58.24 Paint SHERWIN WILLIAMS #3147 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/17 $39.88 Paint and Brushes MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/19 $182.36 Upright Vacuum TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/22 $289.57 Paint and Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/24 $89.31 Stain and Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/24 $136.72 Yard Signs VISTAGO PRINT LLC 888-2555541 TX 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/06/24 $282.89 Sandwich Boards VISTAGO PRINT LLC 888-2555541 TX 5761.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/05/26 $17.16 White Index Stock OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5822.6512 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/05/26 $17.16 White Index Stock OFF]CEMAX/OFFICE DEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5842.6512 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/05/26 $17.14 White Index Stock OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5862.6512 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/01 $32.48 Pencil Sharpener, Tough St 60 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5841.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/01 $26.77 Supplies - 10HNSTONS SALES AND SERVI RICHFIELD MN 5821.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/01 $26.76 Supplies JOHNSTONS SALES AND SERVI RICHFIELD MN 5841.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/03 $31.50 Supplies STAPLS7137559980000001 877-8267755 MI 5820.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/03 $56.34 Supplies STAPLS7137559980000001 877-8267755 MI 5840.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/03 $75.08 Parking Permits CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIONIS EDINA MN 5820.6260 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/04 $26.45 Storage Units TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5821.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/05 $30.00 Servier Training MLBA 651-772-0910 MN 5822.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/05 $30.00 Servier Training MLBA 651-772-0910 MN 5842.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/05 $30.00 Servier Training MLBA 651-772-0910 MN 5862.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/05 $75.08 Parking Permits CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIONIS EDINA MN 5820.6260 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/10 $11.19 Supplies CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 5841.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/10 $30.00 Gift Cards EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5822.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/10 $30.00 Gift Cards EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5842.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/12 $158.34 Advertising THE STAR TRIBUNE MERCHAND 612-6734072 MN 5822.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/12 $158.34 Advertising THE STAR TRIBUNE MERCHAND 612-6734072 MN 5842.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/12 $158.32 Advertising THE STAR TRIBUNE MERCHAND 612-6734072 MN 5862.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/18 $54.26 Duck HP2260Antimicrobial Tape Gu STAPLS7138382696000001 877-8267755 MI 5841.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/19 $20.97 Facebook Promotion EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5842.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/06/23 $107.26 Supplies OFFICE MAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5821.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/05/27 $142.27 Batteries BATTERIES PLUS #18 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 7411.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/05/28 $11.96 Field Sobriety Testing EDINA MARKET AND D EDINA MN 7410.6218 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/05/28 $118.97 Plywood THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/06/04 $129.83 Studs, Screws THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/06/17 $61.28 Plate NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL 612-522-6626 MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/06/17 $99.75 Pipe Red 6" NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL 612-522-6626 MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/06/23 $24.97 Bolts, Washers, Nuts MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/05/29 $7.96 Design Committee Meeting HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0025 MINNEAPOLIS MN 7410.6106 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/06/01 $86.01 Email service EMA*EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800-5954401 TN 7410.6122 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/06/02 $139.32 Design Committee Meeting AUTH NET MINNEAPOLIS MN 7410.6106 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/06/05 $187.72 Field Sobriety Testing EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 7410.6218 **9956 **9956 DEB FI DEB FI 2015/06/09 2015/06/09 $22.47 MILO Scenario Production $6.76 MILO Scenario Production STARBU 02599 EDEN PRA STARBl 02599 EDEN PRA EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN MN 7410.6218 7410.6218 • Account • Name Date CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENATER 05/26/15-06/25/15 Amount Description Vendor City State Account • **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/06/10 $30.82 MILO Scenario Production CUB FOODS #3124 MINNEAPOLIS MN 7410.6218 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/05/26 $48.44 Field Sobriety Testing CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 7410.6218 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/05/27 $20.32 Field Sobriety Testing CUB FOODS EDEN PRAI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7410.6218 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/02 $10.17 Clorox Toilet Tabs MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/05 $35.95 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/05 $48.27 Dowel THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/16 $14.75 Rubber Shoe Holder ROBERT BROOKE & ASSOCIAT 800-642-2403 MI 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/16 $296.15 Targets LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS 800-7790182 MN 7412.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/18 $23.24 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/06/24 $27.29 Supplies MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $52,627.27 Rebate ($2,700.67) $49,926.60 we confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date _ 813 31 - • • To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief w91/�`�l'�r o le f y v � • ',� nHF'OH ri\ ti� 1806 Agenda Item #: IV. C. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Request for Purchase — 2016 Ford F350 Pickup Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: August 4, 2015 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Minnesota State Bid, Contract #74463 $39,515.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Minnesota State Bid — Midway Ford Commercial Fleet and Government Sales General Information: The purchase will replace a 2003 GMC Sierra pickup per equipment and replacement schedule. This vehicle is three years past its replacement schedule. We reassigned this vehicle a couple years ago to gain additional service time but now we need to reassign another pickup thus necessitating this purchase. The purchase is through the Minnesota State Bid Contract. Staff recommends the approval to purchase. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 18, 2015 tz eCIO .� 18BB Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Authorize Non -Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 5, 2015 Company: Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH), Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $37,619.00 $37,619.00 In an effort to maximize our limited financial resources, improve our decision making process and utilize proven testing methods for infrastructure improvements, we support non-invasive water main testing prior to our street reconstruction projects. Last year Echologics completed 5.6 miles of watermain assessment in Edina. In addition, you may recall this testing method saved our utility fund approximately $500,000 in the Arden Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project that is currently underway. We believe non-invasive watermain testing provides us with more data about the condition of our watermain system similar to the closed circuit televising we complete for the sanitary sewer trunk pipes. Coupling this with water main break data proves to be a powerful tool. The proposal includes assessment of approximately 7,000 linear feet of watermain in our anticipated 2017 Birchcrest A street reconstruction neighborhood. SEH is coordinating Echologics workload between multiple municipalities in the area. This provides a savings to the City in mobilization costs. They will also coordinate data setup and analysis, GIS base mapping, traffic control, and on-site coordination during testing. These services will be funded by the utility fund and are tentatively scheduled for Fall/Winter 2015. Staff recommends hiring SEH in conjunction with Echologics to complete the non-invasive watermain pipe condition assessment in the anticipated 2017 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project. Attachments: • Engineering Proposal \\Ed-fsI \engpubwks$\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTMIMPR NOMBA425 Birchcrest A(2017)\ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. D. RFP WM Pipe Cond_Assess.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 i � SEH Building a Better World for All of Us' SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT August 5, 2015 RE: City of Edina 2015 Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment SEH No. EDINA P-133639 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Thank you for again expressing interest in SEH's professional services to non -invasively assess the • condition of the City's water main pipes (pipes). SEH teams with Echologics, a division of Mueller Company, to use their Echo Shore tool (tool) to complete the City's assessment. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. SUMMARY The City wants to assess the condition of 6,976 linear feet of pipe in its Birchcrest A Neighborhood. The Birchcrest A Neighborhood is scheduled for reconstruction during 2017. Enclosed Exhibit 1 summarizes this amount of pipe needing assessment. During this trip to Minnesota, the tool will assess the condition of pipes in two other Minnesota Cities. Working in more than one City per trip allows us to spread the tool's mobilization cost among multiple Cities. This reduces the cost that any one City will pay for an assessment of its pipes. BENEFITS Please recall from past year's projects that choosing to apply this tool to the City's pipes provides the following immediate benefits. 1. Reduce the amount of money the City spends to create potable water. 2. Reduce the amount of electricity the City uses to distribute potable water. 3. Reduce the cost the City might spend to excavate and restore the area around a leak by catching the leak in its earliest stages. 4. Allow the City to better coordinate pipe rehabilitation with capital improvement plans for other infrastructure occupying the right-of-way or easement. Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Chad Millner August 5, 2015 Page 2 • 5. Allow the City to better understand how much of its pipe network may need rehabilitation. DELIVERABLES Below is a list of deliverables we will provide to the City at the conclusion of the assessment. We will submit a draft report to the City within 6 weeks of completing field work. Field work is anticipated to occur in August or September depending on schedules of all cities participating. An update to the City GIS shape file or geodatabase (geodatabase) for each reach of pipe. We define a reach of pipe as between fire hydrants or main line valves. The update will add the following attributes to the shape file or geodatabase. A. An estimate how much pipe wall has been lost to date. B. An estimate of the pipe's corrosion rate. C. An estimate of the pipe's remaining wall thickness. 2. A written report summarizing the results of the condition assessment and leak detection containing the following information. A. Introduction. B. A discussion of the purpose of leak detection and condition assessment. C. A discussion of the background of leak detection and condition assessment. D. A discussion of the methodology of leak detection and condition assessment. E. A description of the instrumentation used to complete the work. F. Tabulation of condition assessment results. G. Description of deficiencies the crew found in the field along the pipe network. H. An appendix showing the measured results for each reach of pipe. I. An appendix containing a summary tabulation of condition assessment ranked from worst to best. ESTIMATED COSTS We will complete our work for an estimated not -to -exceed fee of $37,619. This cost includes reimbursable expenses. We will invoice the City for our work on a lump sum basis. We understand that the City Council will consider this Supplemental Letter Agreement at its August 18 meeting. Exhibit 2 enclosed with this letter is Echologics Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints. Exhibit 2 outlines the work we assume will be undertaken by City forces at their own expense. Asking us to accomplish work in Exhibit 2 will cause an additional expense. Also, we cannot guarantee that the other two Minnesota Cities will proceed with their projects. If they choose not to proceed, the City would need to pay the entire Mobilization charge. This Supplemental Letter Agreement and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. 40 Chad Millner August 5, 2015 • Page 3 As always, we look forward to serving the City and applying our expertise assessing the condition of the City's water main pipes. Please contact me with questions and comments at 952.912.2611 or ppasko sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Elf Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager pj p3 Enclosures c: Carter Schulze, City of Edina Mike Ostendorf, SEH Toby Muse, SEH Brian Turner, Echologics p:\ae\e\edina\133639\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\O8 05 15 chad millner proposal Itr for pca.docx Accepted on this _day of , 2015 City of Edina, Minnesota M 1�1 Name �i U 0 City of Edina 2015 Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Exhibit 1 August 5, 2015 Revised: P:\AE\E\Edina\133639\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\[Exhibit 1.xlsx]Norma ndale Pk D 2017 Projects WM Existing Birchcrest A Street Size (inch) Type Length (feet) Age (years old) Asbuilt # Doron Dr 11/2" C.P 283 38 5-16-77 Valley View Rd - Valley 12" C. I. P 498 57 15-5-59 Ln to Doron Ln Limerick Dr - Creek Dr 6" D.I.P 1,016 36 5-16A-73 to Cul -De -Sac Limerick Dr - Creek Dr From 6" C.I.P 1,229 Approx. 50 to Limerick Ln Asbuilt.dwg From Limerick Dr Cul -De -Sac 2" C.I.P 166 Approx. 50 Asbuilt.dwg Limerick Ln - Valley Ln From 6" C.I.P 754 Approx. 50 to Limerick Dr Asbuilt.dwg From Limerick Ln Cul -De -Sac 2" C.I.P 99 Approx. 50 Asbuilt.dwg From Doron Ln 6" C.I.P 547 Approx. 50 Asbuilt.dwg From Creek Dr 6" C.I.P 833 Approx. 50 Asbuilt.dwg From Valley Ln 8" C.I.P 1,551 Approx. 50 Asbuilt.dwg Total 6,976 Page 1 of 1 echolo ics EXHIBIT 2 7. Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints 7.1. Operational Requirements 7.1.1. Owner shall supply an experienced crew for operation of all Owner owned apparatus. The size of the crew depends on the details of the job. Echologics is not responsible for any operation or modification of Owner owned apparatus. 7.1.2. All fittings must be cleaned, exercised and in safe working condition prior to survey. Closed valves or other appurtenances must not be passing water. Hydrants must not be leaking. If cleaning cannot be performed prior to site - work, on site cleaning must be arranged by Client on request. 7.1.3. Client shall provide traffic management (including man power and equipment) as and when required. Echologics is not responsible for any traffic control requirements, unless explicitly included in this proposal. It is expected that the client will be proficient in all local laws and regulations. 7.1.4. If indicated as a requirement during the Project Planning phase, Echologics shall supply one crew member trained as a confined space entrant. All other • aspects of confined space entry shall be of the responsibility of Client, unless explicitly included in this proposal. 7.1.5. Fall protection, including supply of fall prevention equipment and harnesses, shall be of the responsibility of Client. 7.1.6. Echologics shall follow any Lock out Tag and Tag out procedures specified by Client. Client is responsible for informing Echologics of any such procedures in effect at the work sites applicable for this project. 7.1.7. All required information regarding the pipes to be tested must be provided in advance to Echologics. The information must be up to date and in a form that can be easily interpreted. This includes as -built drawings, repair history, nominal pipe information, GIS information, pressure and flow information, locations of PRVs, pumps, reservoirs, cross -connections, reducers, tie-ins, valves, services, backflow preventers, hydrants, corp valves, and any other possible noise producing apparatus. 7.1.8. If De -chlorination / Chlorination and/or backflow preventers are required, these shall be the responsibility of Client. • 7.2. General Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.2.1. Fluid temperature must be between 330 and 100° F (0.50 and 38° C) ¢choloi c s • 7.2.2. Liquid flow velocities above 5 ft/s (1.5 m/s) may result in turbulence in the line, introducing noise which can reduce the sensitivity of leak detection, and prevent collection of pipe integrity testing data. Echologics recommends that Client take steps to ensure velocities are below these levels, but will conduct testing nonetheless if Client elects to leave them at higher levels. 7.2.3. Operating pressure must be between 15 and 150psi (100 to 1000 kpa). Pressures outside of this range will require special consideration. 7.2.4. Large air pockets cannot be present in the pipe. Purging of all air may be required. 7.2.5. Significant amounts of dispersed air (milky water) can skew results. Purging of dispersed air may be required. 7.2.6. All forms of non-destructive testing involve an inherent and unavoidable level of uncertainty. The results provided by Echologics are not guaranteed. The methods used for leak detection and condition assessment are highly dependent on input parameters therefore it is not possible to certify the results. Echologics is not responsible any actions taken or recommendations made by Client based on the results of the report. • 7.3. Leak Detection Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.3.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement, Reinforced or Bar -wrapped Concrete, PVC, PE and other Plastics 7.3.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor -to -sensor spacing of 1000ft (300m) 7.3.3. Longer sensor -to -sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.3.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5" NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.3.3.2. The maximum sensor -to -sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 2500ft (750m) 7.3.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. ¢choloics • 7.3.5. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.3.6. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.3.7. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. 7.3.8. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.3.9. Diameters may range from 1" to 120" (25mm to 3050mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.3.10. Leaks location accuracies depend on sensor spacing, pipe material consistency, and other factors, but are generally within 10 ft (3 m) of its actual position when accurate information for pipe type and diameter is provided. 7.3.11. Sensitivity to small leaks varies depending on pipe diameter and material, as well as sensor spacing and the presence of noise inside the pipe. Leaks • as small as 2.5 GPM (9.5 I/m) can consistently be located, and leaks as small as 0.5 GPM (2 1/m) can be located under good conditions. 7.4. Condition Assessment Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.4.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement and Reinforced or Bar -wrapped Concrete 7.4.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor -to -sensor spacing of 500ft (150m) 7.4.3. Longer sensor -to -sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.4.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5" NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.4.3.2. The maximum sensor -to -sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 1500ft (450m) • 7.4.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. echolo ics • 7.4.5. For every location, there must be a local fitting where liquid temperature and pressure can be measured. Fittings include fire hydrants, pitot taps, sampling stations and other similar appurtenances. 7.4.6. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.4.7. Diameters may range from 1" to 60" (25mm to 1525mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.4.8. Concrete, Mortar and Bitumen linings are acceptable if the thickness is specified 7.4.9. PVC, PE and other plastic mains are not suitable for acoustic condition assessment. 7.4.10. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.4.11. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. • 7.4.12. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.4.13. Accuracy of average pipe wall thickness calculations varies depending on many factors, including the consistency of the pipe materials, accuracy of the design information provided, accuracy of the pipe alignment information provided, consistency of the fluid's bulk modulus, and consistency of the water's temperature. In most cases, accuracies shall fall within the following ranges: 7.4.13.1. For metallic mains, average minimum pipe wall thickness will be provided within 0.15" (3.8mm). For metallic mains with lining, this will be provided as an equivalent structural thickness. 7.4.13.2. For asbestos cement mains, the average minimum structural wall thickness will be provided within 0.15" (3.8mm) 7.4.13.3. For Reinforced and Bar -wrapped concrete mains, the average minimum structural stiffness will be provided within 7200 kpsi or 50Gpa • 7.4.14. For liquids other than potable or raw water, a bulk modulus calibration must be performed when needed. Normally at the outset of testing and any other ¢cholo ics times during the testing when the bulk modulus may change (during a rain event for sewer force mains) • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL w93� ,l'� o e 0 • ,1CORPORPT�O 1888 Agenda Item M IV. E. From: Ross Bintner P.E., Environmental Engineer Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: August 18, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Professional Services, Bolton & Menk, Inc. — Presidents' Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Design & Construction Services Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to sign professional services proposal with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for Presidents' Area sanitary sewer rehabilitation design and construction services. Information / Background: The project serves the purpose of repairing aging infrastructure, reducing infiltration and inflow of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and rehabilitating a sanitary system that is troubled with backups. This project is described in CIP item 15-148 and the attached technical memorandum from Barr Engineering. This project is eligible for a small amount of grant reimbursement from grant funding secured though the Metropolitan Council as part of its 2014 State Bond fund 1/1 grant. The attached proposal from Bolton and Menk Inc, proposes to develop plans and specifications for project area 3, and increase the scope of the project if possible to include part of project area I, rehabilitating as much of the system as possible under the budget described in the CIP. The proposed schedule would include design in fall and winter 2015, and construction winter and spring of 2016. Project and funding source summaries follow: Project funding summary: ITEM COST / ESTIMATE SCHEDULE Project area I and 3 Design $73,500 (not to exceed) Fall 2015 Project area I and 3 project management $70,000 (estimate) Winter 2015/2016 Project area I and 3 construction $884,200 (estimate) Winter 2015/2016 TOTAL $1,027,700 (estimate) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • Funding Sources summary: Page 2 ITEM AMOUNT CITY COUNCIL DATE 2015 C I P # 15-148 $1,000,000 2014 Met Council 1/1 abatement grant $27,700 8/18/2015 TOTAL $1,027,700 Attachments: Supplemental Letter Agreement — Bolton and Menk Met Council 2014 Municipal Grant Program Letter of Intent Technical Memorandum — Barr Engineering G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\SS493 Presidents Area Sanitary Rehabilitation\ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. E. Presidents Area Sewer Rehab.docx 40 . BOL_'T"ON & M r -=N K , I NCo •0 Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 12224 Nicollet Avenue • Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone (952) 890-0509.- Fax (952) 890-8065 www.bolton-menk.com August 7, 2015 Mr. Ross Bintner, P.E., Environmental Engineer City of Edina — Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation City of Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bintner, Bolton & Menk, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal to you for professional engineering services in support of its Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation. As a part of this proposal, we describe our understanding of the project, detail our proposed scope of work, and provide our fees for service. This proposal is being offered as a Supplemental Agreement to our June 18, 2013 Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Edina. • PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Edina recently completed an analysis of the sanitary sewer in the Presidents Area, downstream of Water Treatment Plant (WTP) #4, in the northwest part of the City. This analysis was documented in a February 27, 2015 memorandum by Barr Engineering. The area begins at WTP #4 and continues south/southeast toward Blake Road/hiterlachen Boulevard. The alignment of the sanitary sewer in this area is primarily located in backyards, wooded areas, next to small lakes, and in some cases under homes. According to the analysis, this area has reported back-ups into area homes and a number of the lines have been identified as under -capacity. The analysis concluded three (3) areas that need improvement. Area 1 includes approximately 1,2001f of sanitary sewer immediately downstream of WTP #4, Area 2 includes approximately 800 if in the middle of the study area, and Area 3 includes approximately 1,200 if running east from the Arthur Street/Waterman Avenue intersection southeast ending in Interlachen Boulevard. Earlier this year, the City secured grant monies from the Metropolitan Council in support of rehabilitating these sewer areas. At this time, the City is interested in proceeding with a grant -eligible project to improve as much of the sanitary sewer in the areas noted above. Area 3 has been identified as the most critical segment, followed by Area 1 and finally Area 2. As mentioned above, Area 3 includes approximately 1,2001f of sanitary sewer beginning at the Arthur Street/Waterman Avenue intersection, running east/southeast along the north side of the Mirror Lake south of Blake Road/Interlachen Boulevard, and ending in Interlachen Boulevard. The sanitary sewer alignment runs adjacent to the lake, and in residential backyards. City records indicate that this section of sewer is 9 -inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) that has been slip -lined with a 6 -inch HDPE pipe. While no sewer backups are known to have occurred along this line, there is evidence of surcharging in the area. The analysis completed by Barr Engineering states the line should be replaced with a 10" diameter pipe via open -cut construction methods. DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer BOLTON & MENK, INC. • The City of Edina has requested this proposal from Bolton & Menk to complete final design, bidding, and construction observation and administration services in support of Area 3 improvements. Understanding that the City has funding from Met Council for a $1 million dollar project, as design progresses, an engineer's estimate will be completed, and it will be determined if design and construction of additional areas could be included in the project budget, at which time this agreement could be amended. Bolton & Menk will evaluate a variety of construction options for the sanitary sewer line: directional drilling, pipe -bursting, and open -cut, along with possible alternative alignments if feasible. To facilitate these evaluations, we recommend the City have the sanitary sewer line in area 3 televised prior to beginning final design so we know what services and laterals exist along the line to help determine if alternative alignments are options. SCOPE OF WORK Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the following services: Final Design and Bidding 1. Review Televising Log 2. Topographic survey of Area 3, or alternative alignment, depending on desired replacement options 3. Field confirmation of existing ground cover conditions and sewer manhole locations, conditions and accessibility. 4. Evaluate Design Alternatives 5. Prepare technical construction plans (plan and profile view from topographic survey) and specifications for sanitary sewer construction for Area 3, as identified by Barr Engineering in • their 2/27/15 memorandum. 6. Resident Communications a. Informational mailing to affected residents. b. Follow up phone calls to residents to discuss specific project issues and concerns. c. Up to eight (8) meetings to discuss specific project issues and concerps, and to negotiate temporary access to the sanitary sewer system for construction purposes. d. Conduct a neighborhood open house to discuss the final project plans and expectations during construction. 7. Identify temporary sewer bypassing needs and establish parameters for inclusion in bidding documents. 8. Complete and submit required construction permit applications (fees to be paid by City). 9. Prepare project cost estimates. 10. Prepare bidding documents. 11. Advertise project according to standard City practices. 12. Address contractor questions during the bidding period and distribute any necessary addenda. 13. Conduct bid opening, evaluate bids, and make recommendation for project award. 14. City progress meetings (up to 3 meetings). • Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation City of Edina, Minnesota Page 2 BOLTON & MENK, INC. • Construction Services 1. Facilitate execution of construction contract between City and contractor. 2. Conduct preconstruction meeting. 3. Review construction material submittals and shop drawings. 4. Conduct preconstruction neighborhood open house. 5. Provide construction staking services of mainline sanitary sewer. 6. Provide full time construction observation and administration services including, but not limited to, conducting weekly construction meetings, serve as a liaison between the City, its residents and the contractor, review of the work for general conformance with construction documents, review of material test results, maintenance of construction documentation, preparation of pay estimates and any necessary change orders. 7. Completion of record drawings. • Bolton & Menk is prepared to provide full-time construction observation, if the City desires to utilize its own staff for construction services Bolton & Menk will provide assistance as desired during construction. Therefore we are prepared to adjust our levels of construction services in accordance with the City's requests and requirements. The City will provide Bolton & Menk with survey benchmarks, GIS files to assist in building our base map along with available easement documentation for the utility easement along the sanitary sewer line. PROPOSED FEES Estimated fees for the final design and bidding services as described above are summarized as follows: Evaluate Design Alternatives / Review Televising Logs Topographic Survey Field Confirmation Technical Construction Plans & Specifications Communication with Affected Residents Design Phase Open House Permit Applications Project Cost Estimates Bidding Documents Bidding Assistance City Progress Meetings TOTAL $ 3,600 $ 14,300 $ 2,800 $ 33,700 $ 4,600 $ 1,500 $ 1,300 $ 3,150 $ 2,600 $ 3,500 2,450 $ 73,500 The costs for these individual work tasks are estimates. Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the final design and bidding services for a not -to -exceed fixed fee of $73,500. Additional easement description or acquisition services, if required and/or identified as a part of final design, are not included in the above work. Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation City of Edina, Minnesota Page 3 • 0 BOLTON & MENK, INC. Because the consultant does not have direct control over the construction contractor's operations or schedule, our construction observation and administration services are provided on an hourly basis. Personnelrates for anticipated staffing are as follows: Principal Engineer: $174 per hour Project/Survey Manager: $125 per hour Project Surveyor: $112 per hour Construction Observer: $114 per hour Engineering Technician: $98 per hour If you find this proposal satisfactory, your signature of this proposal will constitute acceptance of the terms outlined and your authority for us to proceed. Please call if you wish to discuss this proposal. We look forward to providing these professional engineering services to you on this project and appreciate your consideration of Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Marcus A. Thomas, P.E. Sarah E. Rippke, P.E. Principal Engineer Project Manager Signed Printed Name Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation City of Edina, Minnesota Page 4 N Date • DATE: October 10, 2014 TO: Edina Ross Bintner - Environmental Engineer 7450 Metro Blvd Edina MN, 55439 FROM: Matt Gsellmeier, MCES I&I Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2014 Municipal Grant Program Letter of Intent Thank you for applying to the 2014 State Bond Funded Municipal I&I Grant Program. This non-binding letter of intent confirms receipt of your city's application and approval to participate per the Metropolitan Council's approved program design and guidelines. The program design and guideline details, along with the draft agreement that must be entered into with the Metropolitan Council, can be found at the following link: http-//www metrocouncil ora6Ostewater-Water/Funding-Finance/Rates-Charges/MCES-Inflow-and- Infiltiation-(l-0-Program. aspx Based upon your application's preliminary project description and projected cost estimates, your estimated Preliminary Minimum Allocation (PMA) is $25,000.00. Enclosed is a listing of all participating cities identifying both PMA and the estimated Final Reimbursement Amount (FRA) for each. • Please be advised that these are preliminary non-binding estimates and that each participant's final FRA depends upon the actual and eligible project work submitted per approved guidelines. PMA and FRA will be calculated simultaneously for all participants upon receipt of documentation verifying a project costs. Should a city not complete a project with I&I eligible work, or complete with insufficient eligible work, PMA and FRA will be adjusted accordingly. Contingent upon availability of funding, cities may be eligible for additional funding should they complete a project(s) with more I&I eligible work than described in their application. 0 Imaortant Dates to Remember MCES provide cities Letter of Intent, PMA & estimated FRA October 10, 2014 Cities provide descriptions and pay claims for completed projects October 30, 2016 FRA determination, grant agreements distributed November 15, 2016 MCES will process reimbursement upon receipt of signed agreement and commits to sending semi- annual grant notices to all participants beginning April 2015. These notices will serve as both reminders of participation and solicitations for changes in participant contact, projects, or other relevant information. MCES 20141&1 Pre -Grant Application Summary 10/10/2014 • Total Project Amt Eligible for Est. Part 1 Remaining Est. Part 2 Estimated city Work: Funding: PMA Balance: Funding FRA Arden Hills $ 652,500.00 $ 168,750.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 143,750.00 $ 12,295.31 $ 37,295.31 Bloomington $ 257,100,00 $ 87,750.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 62,750.00 $ 5,367.17 $ 30,367.17 Brooklyn Center $ 1,684,093.60 $ 437,793.40 $ 25,000.00 $ 412,793.40 $ 35,307.28 $ 60,307.28 Chanhassen $ 400,000.00 $ 181,250.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 156,250.00 $ 13,364.46 $ 38,364.46 Columbia Heights $ 879,800.00 $ 260,275.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 235,275,00 $ 20,123.68 $ 45,123.68 Deephaven $ 94,280.00 $ 47,140.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 22,140.00 $ 1,893.69 $ 26,893.69 Eagan $ 702,412.00 $ 187,059.25 $ 25,000.00 $ 162,059.25 $ 13,861.35 $ 38,861.35 Eden Prarie $ 878,350.00 $ 439,175.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 414,175.00 $ 35,425.45 $ 60,425.45 Edina $ 7,465,000.00 $ 1,895,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 1,870,000.00 $ 159,945.92 $ 184,945.92 Excelsior $ 163,045.00 $ 44,278.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 19,278.50 $ 1,648.94 $ 26,648.94 Forest Lake $ 940,000.00 $ 260,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 235,000.00 $ 20,100.16 $ 45,100.16 Fridley $ 645,000.00 $ 161,250.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 136,250.00 $ 11,653.81 $ 36,653.81 Golden Valley $ 1,620,895.00 $ 439,467.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 414,467.50 $ 35,450.47 $ 60,450.47 Greenwood $ 42,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ - $ - $ 21,000.00 Hopkins $ 425,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 8,125.59 $ 33,125.59 Lakeville $ 259,676.00 $ 82,606.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 57,606.00 $ 4,927.19 $ 29,927.19 Lilydale $ 450,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 5,559.62 $ 30,559.62 Lino Lakes $ 226,000.00 $ 74,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 49,500.00 $ 4,233.86 $ 29,233.86 Little Canada $ 72,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 85.53 $ 25,085.53 Long Lake $ 667,000.00 $ 181,750.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 156,750.00 $ 13,407.23 $ 38,407,23 Maple Grove $ 2,290,000.00 $ 582,500,00 $ 25,000.00 $ 557,500.00 $ 47,684.41 $ 72,684.41 Maplewood $ 112,770.00 $ 28,192.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 3,192.50 $ 273.06 $ 25,273.06 Medina $ 223,075.00 $ 58,243.75 $ 25,000.00 $ 33,243.75 $ 2,843.42 $ 27,843.42 Mendota Heights $ 180,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000,00 $ 25,000.00 $ 2,138.31 $ 27,138.31 Minneapolis $ 5,098,821.00 $ 1,274,705.25 $ 25,000.00 $ 1,249,705.25 $ 106,890.51 $ 131,890.51 Minnetonka $ 204,970.00 $ 58,922.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 33,922.50 $ 2,901.48 $ 27,901,48 Minnetonka Beach $ 11,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ - $ - $ 5,000.00 Mound • $ 293,895.00 $ 73,473.75 $ 25,000.00 $ 48,473.75 $ 4,146.08 $ 29,146,08 Mounds View $ 1,009,000.00 $ 255,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 230,500.00 $ 19,715.26 $ 44,715.26 New Hope $ 427,900,00 $ 144,975,00 $ 25,000.00 $ 119,975.00 $ 10,261.77 $ 35,261.77 Newport $ 698,635,00 $ 271,938.75 $ 25,000.00 $ 246,938.75 $ 21,121.31 $ 46,121.31 North St. Paul $ 1,551,000.00 $ 392,750.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 367,750.00 $ 31,454.60 $ 56,454,60 Oakdale $ 140,000.00 $ 43,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 1,582.35 $ 26,582.35 Prior Lake $ 351,000.00 $ 87,750,00 $ 25,000.00 $ 62,750.00 $ 5,367.17 $ 30,367.17 Ramsey $ 63,000.00 $ 25,250.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 250.00 $ 21.38 $ 25,021.38 Roseville $ 4,050,000.00 $ 822,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 797,500.00 $ 68,212.23 $ 93,212.23 Saint Paul $ 1,079,646.30 $ 407,411.58 $ 25,000.00 $ 382,411,58 $ 32,708.65 $ 57,708.65 Savage $ 118,200.00 $ 43,425.00 $ 25,000,00 $ 18,425.00 $ 1,575.94 $ 26,575.94 Shorewood $ 210,000.00 $ 56,250.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 31,250.00 $ 2,672.89 $ 27,672.89 St Anthony Village $ 750,000.00 $ 194,225.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 169,225.00 $ 14,474.25 $ 39,474.25 St. Paul Park $ 396,957.00 $ 99,239.25 $ 25,000.00 $ 74,239.25 $ 6,349.87 $ 31,349,87 Tonka Bay $ 130,000.00 $ 32,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 641.49 $ 25,641.49 Vadnais Heights $ 160,000.00 $ 41,250.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 16,250.00 $ 1,389.90 $ 26,389.90 Waconia $ 1,141,000,00 $ 295,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 270,500.00 $ 23,136,56 $ 48,136.56 Wayzata $ 415,800.00 $ 103,950.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 78,950.00 $ 6,752.80 $ 31,752.80 West St, Paul $ 1,191,083,00 $ 304,295,75 $ 25,000.00 $ 279,295.75 $ 23,888.88 $ 48,888.88 Woodbury $ 292,900.00 $ 118,750.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 93,750.00 $ 8,018.68 $ 33,018.68 Total Amt Eligible for Funding: $ 41,114,803.90 $ 11,077,042.73 $ 1,151,000.00 $ 9,926,042.73 $ 849,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Calculations: Acronyms: Total Grant Funding $ 2,000,000,00 Est. - Estimated - Part 1 Funding: $ 1,151,000.00 PMA- Preliminary Minilal Allocation = Remaining for Part 2: $ 849,000.00 FRA - Estimated Final Reimbursement Amount Total Amt Eligible for Funding: $ 11,077,042.73 - Part 1 Funding: $ 1,151,000.00 • = Remaining Amt Eligible $ 9,926,042.73 Allocation for Part 2 (A)/(B) 8.6% C resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants Technical Memorandum To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Project: 23/27-1331 c: Background Over the past 10 years, one of the sanitary sewers in the northwest part of the City down stream of Water Treatment Plant #4 (WTP #4) has backed up into some homes in the area on several occasions. Backups have been reported at 300, 301, 302, and 305 Harrison Ave S and 6655 2nd Ave S. The limits of this study along with the location of the sewer experiencing the backups and the homes affected are shown on Figure #1. These backups are all in an area downstream from WTP #4, which is located in the northwest corner of Edina, near the intersection of 2nd Street and Van Buren, in Alden Park. • WTP #4 includes a filter backwash system that feeds into a recycle basin. Backwash water is pumped to the basin where solids are allowed to settle. Two pumps are installed in the recycle basin, one that pumps clear water from a floating intake back to the treatment plant for reuse and one for pumping of settled sludge and solids from the bottom of the tank to waste. The sludge pumped from the recycle tank is discharged to an air gap manhole. From this point it is pumped from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer. • Downstream of the pipe that receives sludge from WTP #4 is another area of concern. The City has noted that there is a section of 9 -inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sanitary sewer that runs along the north side of Mirror Lake (north of Interlachen Blvd and west of Blake Rd S) that has reduced capacity due to being lined with a smaller 6 -inch high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. No specific backup locations were identified in this area, but the City is concerned about the potential for backups due to the reduced size of the pipe and the intermittent high flows introduced by the sludge pumping from WTP #4. The objective of this memorandum is to identify the primary factors contributing to the sanitary sewer backups identified earlier and then, in the context of the other data available for this section of pipe, identify improvements that will reduce the likelihood of future backups. To do this the memorandum includes: • A summary of a field investigation of the WTP #4 discharge to the sewer completed in 2009 • Estimates of flows to the sanitary sewer in this area using the City's sanitary sewer model Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 452.832.2600 www,borr.com To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon • Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 2 • An evaluation of the remaining sewer capacity, and • Options and cost estimates of infrastructure improvements to reduce the risk of future backups. Summary of Previous Work In February 2009 Barr completed a brief review WTP #4 infrastructure and sanitary sewer downstream of the WTP #4 backwash recycle sludge discharge. The area studied is shown in Figure 2. As noted earlier, part of the WTP #4 infrastructure includes a backwash recycle basin. Backwash water is pumped to the recycle basin and allowed to settle. Two pumps are installed in the recycle basin, one which pumps clear water from a floating intake back to the treatment plant for reuse and one for pumping of settled sludge and solids from the bottom of the tank. The sludge and solids are pumped from the recycle tank to an air gap manhole. The sludge is then pumped from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer. The WTP #4 air gap manhole pump discharges into sanitary sewer manhole 1325. The sanitary sewer then flows by gravity to the east for approximately 500 -ft to MH 1327. These pipes are 9 -inch VCP, were installed in 1950s and are in poor condition based on televising reports provided by the City (Attachment 1). Numerous sags, blockages, and cracked joints were noted. These two sections of pipe are also located • near, or possibly underneath homes on the south side of 2"d Ave S, not in the street ROW as indicated by City records. This is not a desirable location for the pipes. Any repairs work would require access to pipe on the private yards and near the existing residential structures. The sanitary sewer then heads south to MH 1315. The existing pipes are again 9 -in VCP, were installed in 1950s and are in poor condition. MH 1325 was the furthest downstream portion of the system reviewed as a part of the investigation. Note that both sections of pipe noted above included areas that were laid with minimal slope. In addition to this, numerous root intrusions were also noted. As -built plans and information on the recycle basins at WTP #4 were also reviewed (Attachment 2). The plans and specifications call for a 50-gpm pump to convey water from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer MH 1325.On February 26, 2009 the City initiated a back wash tank recycle which resulted in discharge from the recycle tank to the sanitary sewer. Barr staff were onsite for portions of the discharge to monitor pumping from the air gap manhole and visually observe the flow in the sanitary sewer manholes downstream of the WTP #4 discharge. The backwash recycle process lasted approximately 26 hours. During that time, surcharging was observed in all manholes in the study area. MHs 1325 and 1314 surcharged above the crown of the pipes. The pumping rate from the air gap manhole was estimated by measuring the change in elevation in the tank over the time of discharge. Flow rates from the air gap manhole pump were estimated to be 120-150 gpm, significantly higher than the flowrate called for in the specifications. No backups of the sanitary sewer were reported during the backwash cycle. Samples of the discharge from the air gap manhole • To: Mr. Ross Binfner From: Dan Nesler and Brian Letson Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: • February 27, 2015 Paqe: 3 • :7 pump were also taken. At the beginning of the test, water was clear with little to no solids. By the end of the test discharge water was very turbid and contained a significant amount of solids. Discharge samples are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 - Samples from early and late in the backwash recycle discharge collected from air gap manhole Based on the investigation, it was concluded that due to the poor condition of and low slopes in the existing pipe, the sanitary sewer downstream of WTP #4 had an actual capacity somewhere near 150- gpm. With the air gap manhole pump discharging 150-gpm, plus additional base flow from the residences, normal flows could exceed the capacity of the sewer and lead to backups. The thick sludge observed during the end of the discharge cycle is also likely contributing to the reduced capacity of the sewer. At that time three options for improvements were given to the City: • Installing a VFD on the air gap manhole pump to reduce pump speed, and in turn reduce the discharge rate to the sanitary sewer, • Install a valve to throttle the pump discharge to a lower rate • Consider directing the discharge from the air gap manhole to a different sanitary sewer manhole where pipe capacity is greater. To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Paae: 4 Sanitary Sewer Modeling Previous work related to the City's sanitary sewer included the development of a computer-based sanitary sewer system model. The City's sanitary sewer model was created in 2006 as a part of an effort to analyze system capacity under various development scenarios and to help prioritize projects to reduce inflow and infiltration to the sanitary sewer. In 2013, the model was recalibrated based on historic sanitary sewer flows from 2006-2012 (Sanitary Sewer Mode( Recalibration, Barr Nov. 2013). For the current analysis, the recalibrated model was used to identify existing pipe capacity for each pipe segment within the study area. Results for the modeling are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. The existing conditions model run assumed that WTP #4 is discharging 150 gpm from the air gap manhole. Model results indicate that all of the existing 6 -inch diameter pipe near Mirror Lake is predicted to surcharge, and some pipes near the discharge of WTP #4 are nearing capacity. The model does not include reduced capacity to account for the sags, roots, and other flow impediments present in the actual system, thus it is not predicting the surcharging that was been observed in the field in 2009. For use in evaluating improvements options, an additional model run was completed. In this model run pipe segments G-1782, 1783, 1784, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1290, and 1291 • (Improvement areas 1 and 3) were all assumed to have been replaced and increased in size to 10 -inch diameter PVC pipe. Results for this model run are shown in Figure 5 and Table 1. Model results indicate that all capacity and surcharge problems have been resolved and all pipes have greater than 50% of their theoretical capacity remaining even with the WTP #4 discharge at 150 gpm. Sewer Televising Over the course of the past few years, the City has televised most of the sanitary sewer in the study area. The City provided Barr with copies of the televising reports that were available. The reports were reviewed to determine the condition of the pipes and to aid in deciding if sections of pipe in the study area should be replaced. The videos were reviewed for general overall condition of the pipe. If significant (greater than 3") sags, roots, offset joints or cracks were observed a pipe was labeled as deteriorated. If no major issues were observed, a pipe was labeled as adequate. For pipes where no televising report was available, it was assumed the pipe was in poor condition and needed replacement. A summary of the pipe condition in the study area is shown in Figure 6. The original sewer televising reports are included in Attachment 1. Conceptual Improvement Options and Costs Based on the televising reports, modeling of the existing sanitary sewer, and field observed conditions, three portions of the study area were identified for needing improvements: C, To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 5 • Area 1 - MH 1325 to MH1315 (near the WTP #4 discharge) • Area 2 — MH 1319 to MH 1376 (green space between Tyler Ct. and Arthur St.) • Area 3 — MH 1364 to MH 1759 (near Mirror Lake) Area 1 In Area 1, surcharging and back-ups have been reported, the televising reports showed the pipe is in a deteriorated condition, and the sanitary sewer model is showing some pipes nearing capacity. In addition to this some sections of pipe are actually located beneath homes in the area which is highly undesirable. Area 1 is shown in Figure 7. Two options were identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 1. Option 1A is to replace the existing 9 -inch VCP pipe with a 10 -inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. Currently the existing pipe is located underneath the homes along 2nd Ave S. The new pipe would be located in the right of way of 2nd Ave S and the existing pipe would be abandoned in place. The new pipe would allow for increased capacity in the area over the current pipe and greatly reduce the likelihood of backups from the WTP #4 discharge. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 1A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3 Option 113 is to line the existing 9 -inch VCP pipe with a cast in place pipe (CIPP) and install a new forcemain from the air gap manhole south from WTP #4 to a different area of the sanitary sewer. Lining of the existing pipe downstream of WTP #4 and redirecting the flow to a different area would reduce the chances for backups near WTP #4. However lining of the existing pipe will not correct the low slopes/sags in the pipe and the pipe will still be located underneath the homes on the south side of 2nd Ave S. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 16 is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Area 2 In Area 2 no sanitary sewer backups are known to have occurred. The pipes in this area were unable to be televised by the City and their condition is unknown. As such, to be conservative, their condition has been assumed to be deteriorated and in need up repair. Two options were identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 2. Area 2 is shown in Figure 7. Option 2A is to replace the existing 9 -inch VCP pipe with a 10 -inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. Currently the existing pipe is located in the yards of homes between Tyler Ct and Arthur St. The new pipe would be installed along the same alignment. The new pipe would be an improvement over the possibly deteriorated condition of the current pipe and decrease the likelihood of future backups from in the area. 0 To: Mr. Ross Bintner • From: Subject: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 6 A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 2A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Option 2B is to line the existing 9 -inch VCP pipe with CIPP. Lining of the existing pipe would reduce any inflow and infiltration into the pipe and improve the flow characteristics of the pipe. However lining of the existing pipe will not correct any low slopes or sags that may exist in the pipe. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 2B is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Area 3 In Area 3, no sewer backups are known to have occurred. However, when inspecting the sewers in the area debris was observed all the way up to the rim of the manhole. This debris indicates surcharging has occurred in the area. City records indicate that this section of sewer is 9 -inch VCP. However it was confirmed during the field visit that the sewer between MH 1364 and 1759 has been slip lined with a 6 - inch HDPE pipe (Figure 6). It was also noted that the manholes in Area 3 near Mirror Lake are close to the water edge. A review of the City's storm water model indicated that the predicted 100 -yr storm elevation of Mirror Lake in this area is 912.1. This elevation is close to the rim elevation of the existing manholes and well above the invert elevation of the sewer. Area 3 is shown in Figure 7. Figure 8 - 6 -inch HDPE Liner Replacement was the only option identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 3. Based on the modeling completed, the existing 6 -inch pipe will not handle the predicted flows so CIPP is not an option for this area. Pipe bursting was considered, but based on conversations with local contractors, it is not believed to be feasible to burst both the 6 -inch HDPE and the 9 -inch VCP to install a larger pipe. Replacement of the existing pipe was assumed to be with a 10 -inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. • To: Mr. Ross Bintner • From: Subject: Dan Nesler and Brian Letson WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 7 Currently the existing pipe is located in the backyards of homes and land owned by the City. The new pipe would be installed along the same alignment. The new pipe would be an improvement over the undersized pipe currently in place and decrease the likelihood of backups from in the area. Reconstruction of the sewer in this area would also allow for manhole rims to be raised and sealed, to minimize the risk of inflow from Mirror Lake to the sanitary sewer. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 3A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Summary and Recommendations The sections of pipe reviewed were all installed in the mid 1950's to 1960's. All are VCP which is susceptible to cracking and brittle failure in poor soil conditions. Numerous sections of the pipe that were inspected and televised showed signs of deterioration, had significant sags, were installed at low slopes and had numerous root intrusions. Discharge from WTP #4 will occur into the future and will continue to pose a threat of additional sanitary backups if pipes are left in their current condition or flowrates are not reduced. Options exist to repair and replace segments of the pipe that are in the worst condition or that are significant contributing factors to the sanitary backups. If the City undertakes options to repair and replace the deteriorated pipe the risk of future sanitary backups will be significantly reduced. Based on discussions with the City, the City plans to complete the improvements over a period of time. It is recommended that the City prioritize improvements in Area 3 first, Area 1 second, and Area 2 third. While Area 1 is closer to WTP #4 and the previous sewer back-ups, if improvements are made here first, they may exacerbate problems in Area 3. Area 2 is prioritized last as it has no current indication of back- ups. In the short term, it is recommended that the City look into reducing the flowrate from the air gap manhole pump. This could be accomplished by any of the below options: • Reducing the flowrate of the existing pump by partially closing an existing valve, if one is currently installed • Installing a valve to throttle the existing pump discharge if a valve is not currently installed • Installation of a VFD to reduce the speed of the existing pump, and thereby reducing the flowrate • Installation of a smaller pump It is also recommended that the City consider further efforts to televise improvement Area 2. Local contractors (Infratech — Infrastructure Technologies, Inc.) may have smaller cameras that are able to access these pipes. If these pipes are televised and found to be in good condition they could be removed from the list of improvement areas. 0 • 0 e.1— G-1769 O tit G1771 J O, v • WTP Discharge Location ® Pipe Evaluated in Study • Location of Sewer Backup G-1786 G-1785 -1775 G-1961 1777e G-1776. G-1962 U G 196 Ga96e G 1771 �"+ G 1,-, G 1772 G 1959 G-1960 G 1978 G-1985 G-1� G-1975 C7 G -193A G-1939 v G-2003 R U c7 G-1994 G 1951 a F (, DeLorme, NAVTIE0 USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, ;ri (Ttail�ndl. fomTorg, 2013 1 Feet 0 200 400 600 1 inch = 400 feet BARR Figure 1 Project Study Area City of Edina, MN • • � o�x nw.�m �w iau c� aerx i0a O.aw.,n.r. vm ent�pnWa. �.wxwv�3vxyM\ CL[{ m VI 3i10Yf130 ; n N N d� aNnU39 n got 1 w � j _^ w_ IG�~' __--302 ,gVlp mpmimz 3� Z MAO -049 EL INW Ld w MOSG4YX N[I M No �� js P77 �e Ln ZO 1 1 L 0 f .urw � o�x nw.�m �w iau c� aerx i0a O.aw.,n.r. vm ent�pnWa. �.wxwv�3vxyM\ • • • pan .rq d Pah Pipe Capacity (%) -0-10 60-70 - 10-20 70-80 ^--^ 20-30 - 80-90 -30-40 - 90-100 40-s0+ AOO s0-60 WTP Discharge Location Municipal Boundary L 159 G-1960 G-1918 1 G-19497 Sourc's: Esri, HERE, DeLorm j USGS, Intermap, ihcrerrent P Corp., NR�AN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China Hong Kong), Esrl ThaiI d), TomTom, Mapmylndla, 0OpenStreet ap o49trjb pan,,. th GIS UserC mmunity:r 0 Feet 0 200 400 600 1 inch= 400 feet BARR Figure 4 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Edina, MN � 1j O G-1769 C7 O vri G1771 � '" U ENm � C1 C) C7 C7 G-1935 G-1786 G1785 G-7775 w+. G1777wa-.n G 1776 7 J fG-1969 wwa � C7 G1771 C) G-1980 c i riz G1978 G-1985 ;'. C G-1975 pan .rq d Pah Pipe Capacity (%) -0-10 60-70 - 10-20 70-80 ^--^ 20-30 - 80-90 -30-40 - 90-100 40-s0+ AOO s0-60 WTP Discharge Location Municipal Boundary L 159 G-1960 G-1918 1 G-19497 Sourc's: Esri, HERE, DeLorm j USGS, Intermap, ihcrerrent P Corp., NR�AN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China Hong Kong), Esrl ThaiI d), TomTom, Mapmylndla, 0OpenStreet ap o49trjb pan,,. th GIS UserC mmunity:r 0 Feet 0 200 400 600 1 inch= 400 feet BARR Figure 4 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Edina, MN • wruu r� vR'aA • rj O 7 G-1769 C7 6r G7777 � C3 C5 __�,G-1777 G-1 Tib m G-1 962 7 0 G 1969 j G-1966 a G-1771 G -t980 _ �G1772 G-1959 G1960 G -1978G-1985 G-1958 G-1918 G G 1975 w a G-1949 95t g c7 3 —3 g h q � X m rnet��h�n 9ivC SourcGI : Esn. HERE. De--- USiT nc--I P Corp NR I - EsriJapan. METI, ,sh China (Hong Kong). Es ri and), T=Tom, Mapmylndia. ®Opens aP epntriDuW*-and 1 GIS User munity O Feet 0 200 400 600 1 inch = 400 feet m BARR Figure 5 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS UPSIZE UNDER CAPACITY LINES City of Edina, MN Pipe Capacity (%) —0-10 60-70 —10-20 •,. 70-60 — 20.30 — 80-90 --- 30-40 - 90-100 _...... ... 40-5041aYfNM>100 50-60 ■ WTP Discharge Location Municipal Boundary __�,G-1777 G-1 Tib m G-1 962 7 0 G 1969 j G-1966 a G-1771 G -t980 _ �G1772 G-1959 G1960 G -1978G-1985 G-1958 G-1918 G G 1975 w a G-1949 95t g c7 3 —3 g h q � X m rnet��h�n 9ivC SourcGI : Esn. HERE. De--- USiT nc--I P Corp NR I - EsriJapan. METI, ,sh China (Hong Kong). Es ri and), T=Tom, Mapmylndia. ®Opens aP epntriDuW*-and 1 GIS User munity O Feet 0 200 400 600 1 inch = 400 feet m BARR Figure 5 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS UPSIZE UNDER CAPACITY LINES City of Edina, MN • • j V G-1769 ',..�. G- 1771 0 o 7 WTP Discharge Location ® Pipe in Adequate Condition Pipe in Deteriorated Condition Pipe not Televised U. c� G-2003 P C7 G-1994 Es DeL:y,. NAVTEO. USGS, Intermap- VPC. NRCAN. Es. J� n.!1+�ETl„Esri.Ct na :ri (Thndi. TomTom, 2013 1 Feet 0 200 400 600 TTSiiiia 1 inch = 400 feet 2ARR Figure 6 Sanitary Sewer Televising City of Edina, MN O (7 (7 G-1785 a er x+= G-1961 7xa G-1776 G-1962 C7 V G-1964 G-1980 G-1771 G-1965 G 1967 G-1772 G-1959 G-1960 1 G-1978 0-1985 c7 G 1975 w,1.�•..,. G 1949 O G-795+ a c� G-2003 P C7 G-1994 Es DeL:y,. NAVTEO. USGS, Intermap- VPC. NRCAN. Es. J� n.!1+�ETl„Esri.Ct na :ri (Thndi. TomTom, 2013 1 Feet 0 200 400 600 TTSiiiia 1 inch = 400 feet 2ARR Figure 6 Sanitary Sewer Televising City of Edina, MN • • rr. rm .wccrs to.t. mtsas-ts 19m r� r zrzrctr sic •wrr.E.. iso rmm user. mem Area 1 CJ O 69 O G-1 71 0 Area . 7 Area 3 � 7 c 7 G-1935 G-1786 G-1785 G-1961 G-1776 G-1962 7 C7 G-1964 C7 (`,.1980 771 c7 G_1965 G-1967 < G-1 72 9 G1978 G-198 - G 1975 G '94 c ° D a 71 G-1940 Y' G - G-1937< ^ yG-1938 GA939 -19x1 G-1955 E0 .. c� 0 t7 N$ p G-2021 ID g a R C7 G-2003 tib ti G-1994 G1 C7 Sour �s, Esn. DeLorme NAVTIEG, USGS, Isle—p, RC. NRCAN, Esn J n.,MEll Esri China ( org Kong), sn {Thail ndi, To To . 2013 © - BARR WTP Discharge Location Feet 0 200 400 600 Figure 7 1 inch = 400 feet Improvement Areas City of Edina, MN Pecent Capacity • • Modeled Flow & Infiltration G-2348 9.2 9.2 G-2346 9.5 9.5 G-2345 0.4 0.4 G-2344 0.4 0.4 G-2343 0.4 0.4 G-2342 0.6 0.6 G-2341 0.4 0.4 G-2340 0.2 0.2 G-2339 0.6 0.6 G-2338 1.4 1.4 G-2337 1.1 1.1 G-2336 0.8 0.8 G-2335 0.4 0.4 G-2334 0.7 0.7 G-2333 0.1 0.1 G-2347 8.5 8.5 G-1309 7.7 7.7 G-1308 7.5 7.5 G-1307 3.5 3.5 G-1306 3.4 3.4 G-1305 4.3 4.3 G-1304 4.0 4.0 G-1303 5.5 5.5 G-1302 4.1 4.1 G-1301 4.4 4.4 G-1300 3.7 3.7 G-1299 2.1 2.1 G-1298 3.1 3.1 G-1297 2.7 2.7 G-1296 2.0 2.0 G-1295 1.8 1.8 G-1294 1.3 1.3 G-1293 0.9 0.9 G-1292 0.3 0.3 G-1291 130.3 33.9 G-1288 53.7 54.5 G-1287 8.1 8.1 G-1286 9.7 9.7 G-1285 29.2 29.2 G-2030 12.3 12.3 G-2029 3.4 3.4 G-2028 10.8 10.8 G-2027 10.8 10.8 G-2026 15.5 15.5 G-2024 0.5 0.5 Pecent Capacity ' Modeled Flow & Infiltration G-2023 0.5 0.5 G-2022 0.4 0.4 G-2025 13.8 13.8 G-2021 9.6 9.6 G-2016 0.3 0.3 G-2020 11.9 11.9 G-2014 7.6 7.6 G-2015 7.6 7.6 G-2010 0.4 0.4 G-2009 0.9 0.9 G-2008 0.7 0.7 G-2007 0.6 0.6 G-2006 0.2 0.2 G-2005 0.2 0.2 G-2004 0.1 0.1 G-2003 0.1 0.1 G-2013 6.4 6.4 G-2002 8.9 8.9 G-2001 6.8 6.8 G-1999 0.3 0.3 G-1998 0.7 0.7 G-1997 0.5 0.5 G-1996 0.6 0.6 G-1995 0.2 0.2 G-1994 0.6 0.6 G-1993 0.4 0.4 G-1992 0.3 0.3 G-1991 0.1 0.1 G-2000 5.1 5.1 G-1990 3.7 3.7 G-1989 1.0 1.0 G-1988 1.4 1.4 G-1987 0.5 0.5 G-1986 0.1 0.1 G-1984 0.1 0.1 G-1985 0.4 0.4 G-1983 0.3 0.3 G-1982 0.4 0.4 G-1981 0.3 0.3 G-1980 0.6 0.6 G-1979 0.7 0.7 G-1978 0.1 0.1 G-1976 1.4 1.4 G-1975 1.5 1.5 G-1974 0.2 0.2 • CapacityPecent Modeled Flow & Infiltration G-1973 0.4 0.4 G-1970 49.5 52.1 G-1969 43.7 46.1 G-1967 0.1 0.1 G-1966 0.5 0.5 G-1965 0.5 0.5 G-1964 0.5 0.5 G-1963 0.8 0.8 G-1962 0.4 0.4 G-1961 0.1 0.1 G-1960 0.7 0.7 G-1959 25.3 26.7 G-1977 46.1 48.6 G-1958 18.0 19.0 G-1957 0.2 0.2 G-1956 0.1 0.1 G-1955 0.4 0.4 G-1954 0.4 0.4 G-1953 0.2 0.2 G-1952 0.1 0.1 . G-1290 129.2 33.6 G-1951 117.5 30.5 G-1950 112.8 29.3 G-1949 132.0 34.3 G-1948 50.4 34.0 G-1947 7.4 7.4 G-1946 7.4 7.4 G-1945 1.3 1.3 G-1944 1.1 1.1 G-1943 1.4 1.4 G-1942 3.5 3.5 G-1941 1.9 1.9 G-1940 0.5 0.5 G-1939 0.6 0.6 G-1938 1.7 1.7 G-1937 0.5 0.5 G-1936 0.3 0.3 G-1935 1.1 1.1 G-1934 0.8 0.8 G-1933 0.3 0.3 G-1931 0.3 0.3 G-1932 0.1 0.1 • G-1793 0.4 0.4 G-1792 0.3 0.3 G-1790 0.3 0.3 Pecent Capz •� Modeled Flow & Infiltration G-1789 0.1 0.1 G-1791 0.1 0.1 G-1788 0.4 0.4 G-1787 0.1 0.1 G-1786 2.1 2.1 G-1785 0.8 0.8 G-1784 31.2 32.9 G-1783 43.3 45.7 G-1782 40.5 42.8 G-1781 0.2 0.2 G-1780 0.2 0.2 G-1779 0.2 0.2 G-1778 0.2 0.2 G-1968 43.6 45.9 G-1777 43.4 45.8 G-1776 38.9 41.0 G-1775 43.3 45.6 G-1774 39.0 41.1 G-1773 38.9 41.0 G-1772 53.2 56.1 • G-1771 0.5 0.5 G-1770 0.3 0.3 G-1769 0.4 0.4 G-1768 0.8 0.8 G-1767 0.3 0.3 G-1766 0.3 0.3 G-1764 0.5 0.5 G-1763 0.5 0.5 G-1762 0.2 0.2 G-1761 0.1 0.1 G-1760 0.8 0.8 G-1759 0.2 0.2 G-1765 4.2 4.2 G-1758 0.9 0.9 G-1757 7.3 7.3 G-1756 0.1 0.1 G-1755 0.2 0.2 G-1754 0.1 0.1 G-1753 0.6 0.6 G-1752 0.3 0.3 G-1751 0.6 0.6 G-1750 0.3 0.3 • G-1749 2.6 2.6 G-1748 1.0 1.0 G-1747 1.2 1.2 • CapacityPecent • Modeled Flow & infiltration G-1746 0.3 0.3 G-1745 19.4 19.4 G-1744 15.2 15.2 G-1743 14.9 14.9 G-1742 14.3 14.3 G-1741 14.4 14.4 G-1740 11.2 11.2 G-1739 9.8 9.8 G-1736 5.4 5.4 G-1735 0.4 0.4 G-1734 0.3 0.3 G-1733 0.8 0.8 G-1732 0.3 0.3 G-1737 9.7 9.7 G-1731 2.9 2.9 G-1730 2.6 2.6 G-1729 1.5 1.5 G-1728 1.1 1.1 G-1727 1.0 1.0 G-1726 0.3 0.3 r� U 0 0 0 Table 2. Conceptual Level Cost Estimates WTP #4 Sewer Analysis - City of Edina, MN Option # Estimated Cost 1A $ 720,000 1B $ 920,000 2A $ 410,000 2B $ 440,000 3A $ 690,000 Notes: " Conceptual level cost estimates - +100/-50% • Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements and access agreements acquired by City of Edina * Includes 25% construction contingency and 20% for engineering and administration * Option 1A - Replacement/relocation of sewer from MH 1325 to 1315 • Option 1B - Rlining of sewer from MH 1325 to 1315 and new forcemain • Option 2A - Replacement of sewer from MH 1319 to 1376 " Option 2B - Lining of sewer from MH 1319 to 1376 • Option 3A - Replacement of sewer from MH 1364 to 1759 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13\WorkFiles\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP Analysis\092514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost Estimates.xls (aluo rlaala) ffulslnalal aaMaS I •oAI luau Y3vYV • • 0 0 Attachment No. 2 WTP #4 Plans 0 0 0 0 DRAWINGS FOR RECYCLE BASINS AT WATER TREATMENT PLANTS No. 2, No. 3, & No. 4 EDINA, MINNESOTA INDEX NO. GE-11cm x � V !• 'J !" r f 1�' ! {ti ( 1 n +J.aR, P\IMT 4 WILL t h P NA'1,�y CaL r,;.•a � �� ��at��„ •!,y"'I A 4 ! CV 4 TWIN- -P - ,lf yf i �' C' •rr La w t",4N'i }�,.s., "�. i !S� k PP)AL>p AV9rr f t I 4. T f..�v_...� �.�!-W✓(;r--1': 1 (l yI 0 M. ` L�PG 1� 1 �"R' I ¢P(�hNT\t10Z Lam. .•�� n:. f �... / ](A,. 2"ij�..�/)y� f' ,� S mA �-i ..'� � t1�� ��. St^ �•P,.r 'PFLa.W. A✓ ,/ _. l -�4, b �' atltrr.l, ..t+s E � �f —B'p 1 I TRF tt r P Y _ NGrx•.� 1+i� rtN.h r r3,� � "'�! " � • � � � � ^� � . �` � I1t��� � � � � � � �,$7/' I SITE LOCATION NO SCALE (002) &1-0317 Ne A k9PA4oam GT 02 SITE LOCATION A DRAWING INDEX NTP 2 - STE PLAN 03 WTP 2- CONNECTIONS AT PLANT 64 05 WTP 2 - RECYCLE BA PLAN WTPWTP 2 - RECYCLE BASIN SECTIONS SITE LAN ONS CIVIL/PROCESS o'7 WWIP 3 = CONN1Nc AT PANT 0B WTP 3 - RECYCLE BASIN PLAN PROGRESSIVE OP DtD WTP 3 - RECYCLE BASIN SECTIONS A - SITE PUN CONSULTING t�4+M+-Nu 017 WWrP TP 4 - CONNECTIONS AT PLANT ENCINEER5 INC. FAP.fNa)MYb)M 012 WTP A - RECYCLE BASPIAN cls WTP a _ RECYCLE BASIN sEcnoNS C4 EXCAVATION PLAN GTS DETAILS ARCHITECT GIB DETAILS CTT nmAL 1H ADKINS ASSOCIATION W Al E$LTS. DEMOLITION AND FLOOR PLANS I.JIvC,LI..T_E T 9 42 ROOF PLAN AND DETAILS A as a..1. A3 AA BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND WALL SECTION BULLRING SECTION AND WALL SECTION AND INTERIOR EUTAILS S AND DETAILS IRI 9AM1 Paul NN 6.- YAPb (bbI) TAS rax AS AS ENLARGED DETAILS AND SCHEDULES FAY :tA AST A7 ENLARGED DETAkS Sr STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES S T R U C R A L S2 WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO 2- FOUNCATION PLAN —TU S3 WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO 2 - ROOF FRAMING PIAN S4 WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO 3 - FOUNDATION Pt.AN 45 WATER TREATMENT PUNT NO. 3 - ROOF fRAMINC PLAN Structural S6 WATER TREATMENT ZANT NO. 4 - FOUNDATION PLAN Design 57 WATER TREATMENT PUNT NO. A - ROCIF FRAMING PLAN ROOF REINFORCING PLAN A DETAILS ",p , 'n ..... Hoe Inc.B ul Associates, e+ rA .a + SB SECTIONS TIONS WALTER SIT TREATMENT PLANT NO.4 - CHEMICAL ROOM ADDITION MI WATER TREATMENTPLANT 04 -CHEMICAL ROOM ADDITION M2 WATER TREAIMCNT PLANT %A-CHENICM ROOM ADDITION MECHANICAL Tr EL 4GAi WMtx ASKKIb1W4, Me Et E2 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS A ABBREVIATIONS WATER TREATMENT PLANT t2 ELECTRICAL PLAN 73D0 S Tram AVAwe dIIA, $r�1A SSG 730D E3 WATER TREATMENT PANT /3 ELECTRICAL PLAN pMH Mmn 55434 EA WATER TREATMENT PLANT t4 ELECTRICAL PLAN 952 -BS' -1150 E5 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 12 MCC ONE -UM DIAGRAM AND ELTVAtIGN EB WATER TREATMENT PLANT t3 MCC ONE -LINE NAORAM AND ELEVATION E2 WATER TREATMENT PLANT t4 MCC ONE -UNE DIAGRAM AND ELEVATION ELECTRICAL EB WATER TREATMENT PLANT 02 CONTROL PANEL SCHEMATIC (PARTIAL) •PARTIAL)) E9 WATER MIA TMENT PLANT t3 CONTROL PANEL SCHEMATIC WATER TREATMENT PLANT to CONTROL PANEL SCHEMATM lPARTM) Koeding and Associates, Inc. ETO ETt WATER TREATMENT PLANT P4 CNEMICM'DOW AODITION "GO PlaW a AWWrWR BPM91 tE„t.330 A9t91'9po4•. mom*otA SSA.% (002) &1-0317 Ne A k9PA4oam • C b g fit, ysa�g 0► oa i 0 r c £ Y a� .W aoEm ra�E"o:�$ �NNVdJ Nin iVO �p W W W W W WWW W u yn j 3.3E i G� e a$ U� oz. NFd Z¢OZR ll V W i z W O Z o O o W 2 i j0 � W � Z 6W U 1 u: a -;oma -i g U $ N! o J i i W$ S r i 0 r c £ Y a� .W aoEm ra�E"o:�$ �NNVdJ Nin iVO �p W W W W W WWW W u yn j 3.3E i G� e a$ U� oz. NFd Z¢OZR ll V W i i r `I TOP OF CASING AT 926.80 A r r 0i -I { F 1 "77,77- ,. .....: t`. . 4 ....:i 4 I • I ��1 I( � I ILi \ `�� ^,........�...._ . :I �`�'= t '�' ' ^""�:"_' --- . ""..,..,�=.':_ .._ ..`moi`=":'- L ; , =�•- a \ �" fiiT _11 (WolT AND REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB AS '' M} xESSARY TO ALLOW EXCAVATION FOR "' I.I. V 1.. • �(,T.� scut N FEET ACCMENT OF PIPE. PROTECT ALL EOUIPM T DUST AND DAMAGE DURING C)NSTRUCAON[ _ �,., �... �� 1 �'_�J'• O S 18 ,V4 !OTECT EXISTING SLAB FROM UNDERMINING, H CF ..._.., _ .._ ..._,. . ., ..F. _..... _�. .. /' EMfO NECESSARY BY ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR 't"'"""""""«"`---""'"" LY BE REOURRED TO INJECT GROUT BENEATH THE •X, �_ AB TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT, COST FOR GROUT -{ ' I� (i p ♦f a (: ' JECTON WALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT, PLACE AND COMPACT EXCAVATED MATERIALS ATA fir' INCRETE SLAB, i -. • 01CUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW EXCAVATION ''^� R AND PLACEMENT OF PIPE AND $UMP. PROTECT ALL EQUIPMENT FROM DUST _ • '• "' ID DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROTECT EXISTING SLAB FROM_- 1 IDERMINING, IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY ENGINEER, CONTRACTOR MAY BE -i CURED TO INJECT GROUT BENEATH THE SLAB TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT. , IST FOR GROUT IN [C TION N,LL Bf INCL NTAL TO THE PROJECT, REPLACE iSYING PIPE WORK NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. T I NI i CURB L -LI 'A /4 BARS 12' O.C.-\ EACH WAY 1, �. FFE-93411 L' CORE DRILL FOOTING FOR PLACEMEN' OF PIPE ED VERIFY LOCATION OF 4' RISER AND CUT IN POINT TO EXISTING SYSTEM ��TE VALVE rH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OTECT FOOTING FROM UNDERMINING DURING PLACEMENT OF CASING. 11[pI T OFF EXISTING DISCHARGE LINES 1 FOOT ABOVE PROPOSED CURB ON SUMP. ; �� Mf7ER 1 MO'VE AND REPLACE ADDITIONAL PIPING TO ALLOW PLACEMENT ! I -•• ^-+ �+•' -`" �'-�Y� = NEW SUMP. PLUG AND GROUT FILL THOSE PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING I Z•' •—• I MER[DY cERuiY MAT IMS RAN, SPEOIICATION, OR REPo", WAS AS PRVARED aY NC OR UNDER MY "ECT SUPER.&ON MIO I AN A Duly uCCNSCD PROrESSONAL ENDIEER UNDER THE LAMS Or T C STATE OF MC�NESOTA / S ATURE: d4.�•� HANE'. kANC[ C. NDNI DAIY VW< REO N. 10Ia2 DESIWNED- LN D ;CHARGE UNES THAT REMAIN BELOW THE FOOTINGS. TWO DISCHARGE LINES .Not NO ISDUE 03034 A A ' rDR II/"". LhTP 4 - CONNECTIONS AT PLANT DRAWING N0. G ISS�.0 POR DVMNTM AT OF NEALTK AIVRW DATIMD ST, ONE RUNS TO THE EXISTING RECYCLE TANK AND ONE RUNS TO THE STING IT SEWER. i ` ''�Tl-E+ -{ ' I� (i p ♦f a (: ' RE AND JACK 12DIAMETER STEEL CASING FOR INSTALLATION OF RECYCLE TURN LINE. ALL PIPE JOINTS IN CASING SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. E SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON MANUFACTURED CASINO SPACERS. BLOW CASING I 1 WITH SILICA SAND. EXTEND CASING A MINIMUM OF S' BEYOND CONCRETE , LB. I :...�..1 STING TANK DR NS ARE PIPED TO THE EXISTINO FLOOR DRAIN. CUT THEM :1( AND INCORPORATE THEM INTO NEW SUMP, A -A seI vlN SCALE 1'•5, I® rSTAINLESS STEEL WELDED I RECTANGULAR BAR GRATING 2 1/2'X2 1/2'X3/8' STAINLESS STEEL ANGLE FASTEN WITH 1/2-X3'STAINLESS Sit( EXPANSION BOLTS Tp WALL C lb" O.C. ALL 41�11 SIDES OF SUMP, TING GRADE -933 +- c IMP 0 TAIy NOT TO SCALE 18' DIP DOWEL INTO EXISTING FO,')TING BARS 12' OC. ,11 WAY PROTECT EXISTING FLOOR AND FOOTING FROM UNDERMINING SAWCUT *REMOVAL LIMITS ' THIS UNE IS DNE INCH WHEN DRAWING IS NLL 512E. IF NOT ONE INCH, SCALE ACCORDINGLY, PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING P11Mb-NM ENGINEERS INC. rAcpElRwwul nn aAE IRwiw RA uNAaAPeNs. ,NN. r.w •—• I MER[DY cERuiY MAT IMS RAN, SPEOIICATION, OR REPo", WAS AS PRVARED aY NC OR UNDER MY "ECT SUPER.&ON MIO I AN A Duly uCCNSCD PROrESSONAL ENDIEER UNDER THE LAMS Or T C STATE OF MC�NESOTA / S ATURE: d4.�•� HANE'. kANC[ C. NDNI DAIY VW< REO N. 10Ia2 DESIWNED- LN D Cit of EdMo. MN Y .Not NO ISDUE 03034 A A ' rDR II/"". LhTP 4 - CONNECTIONS AT PLANT DRAWING N0. G ISS�.0 POR DVMNTM AT OF NEALTK AIVRW DATIMD N Lr' mm DCSCRlTK" DATE SITE PLAN ION v wXh;+4jpEp (SEE DETAIL). ,1PECYCLE PUMP. F OF IMPELLER O 013.5. &$WDOE PUMP AND RAILS. LOUIPMENT HATCH .(SEE DETAIL). ,&4'X4' BASIN ACCESS HATCH (SEE DETAIL). ,&fLOATNO INTAKE (SEE DETAIL). ®j,�X,2, CONCRETEB� A E PUMP. HEIGHT AS NECESSARY TO Pump A. RROYIDE WALL COLLARS AT ALL TANK WALL PENETRATIONS. TOP • Y MW. A• a 0. YAWS _SECTION A -A __ MCYOLE REMN z -� WwE73ET AT TALAR. Ir RACKWAFN M- UNI NIY.11I8.00 AT rrNN. A' aKCK YALYE EL S11.T8 Ww) - SECnON D-0 PROGRESSIVE ilxS UNE IS ONE INCH WHEN CONSULTING n m-. NIAMNO IS FULL SIZE. IF NOT �� E.--aGINEERS INC. IAY+IIANHR-RSSE 7NE NCH, SCALE ACCOROINOLY. ,NMEMSIM. w. MNw 1 l ii II D I II li i� 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 II I �1 I I I, I 1 � 1 I i 1 � ix rnm 1 11 �I ,I I I I i l i ,I II I 1 I 1 I I 1 Ir RACKWAFN M- UNI NIY.11I8.00 AT rrNN. A D A .............. VENT (SEE DETAL) r--------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----- -- -------_-___------ -- ------ ____________________________________.___-__ I ri B s I i --nZA'7t i e G. YA ws MvRvamo 1 AT TANK. I 1 l ii II D I II li i� 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 II I �1 I I I, I 1 � 1 I i 1 � ix rnm 1 11 �I ,I I I I i l i ,I II I 1 I 1 I I 1 i MMT (SEE OETAQ .............. I i Jll 1 I I I I SCALE IN RFT X7190 --___- 4ti.50 x _____-_..------------------------------- m_�- 1 0 5 10 I TD• _ AW Na. iRSA I MMOM FLRTrY THAT TNIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION'OR R"T WAR PREPAREo M ME 0 u.m NY WfCT IDIPERM>Aom AND TMT I AM A OUv LICENSED PROFESS" EN M, MNaR M UWS V 6TAtt a SOTA /y1F' Sa11ATMRE: ` •� NAME: lAMI E NEWAN DATE: DESONED: � so City of Edina, MN WTP 4 -RECYCLE BASIN PLAN 03034 A DRAVANG NO. )E FOR RID yAS/09 X /at OEPMTMCMt OF HEALTH REV[W 0i9/� OESCMP1gN OAi h i � .b V�W Z py�j 2� rc�zo nuWc • Attachment No. 3 Conceptual Cost Estimates 0 0 • WTP #4 Analysis Feasibility Level Cost Estimate Area 1 Option A -Rebuild Sanitary Sewer from MH 1325 to 1315 Barr Project #23/27-1331 11/15/2014 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre -Construction Mobilization 1 LS $ 43,000 $ 43,000 10 % of work items Sewer By-pass 28 Das $ 5,000 $ 140,000 Assumes 24 hrs of attend pumping Demolition Remove Bituminous Pavement and Curb 650 SY $ 6 $ 3,673 Sawcut, remove bituminous, and dispose Abandon Existing Pipe and Manholes 1170 LF $ 10 $ 11,700 Fill existing pipes and manholes with flowable fill Utility Work 10" PVC Gravity Sewer 1170 LF $ 75 $ 87,750 F&I pipe, assume 8-10' deep, backfill and compaction 48" Standard Manhole 6 EA $ 12,000 $ 72,000 F&I Manhole and pipe connections Resolve Utility Conflicts 1 LS 1 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Allowance Service Connections 6 Ea $ 5,000 $ 30,000 Allowance Restoration Curb and Gutter 500 LF $ 29 $ 14,690 Standard curb and gutter Site Restoration, Seed and Mulch 50 SY $ 20 $ 1,000 Allowance Bituminous Pavement 650 SY $ 90 $ 58,500 Base course, bituminous surface, class 5 Construction Subtotal $ 477,313 Construction Contingency 25 % $ 119,328 25 % of const. subtotal Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 597,000 Engineering and Administration 20 % $ 119,400 20% of estimate capital cost Capital Total $ 720,000 Qualifications: Feasilbility level estimate, plus 100%/minus 50% Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina P \Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13\Work Files\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP AnalysisW92514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost Estimates.xls • • • WTP #4 Analysis Feasibility Level Cost Estimate Area 1 Option B -Line Existing Sewer and install new forcemain Barr Project #23/27-1331 11/15/2014 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre -Construction Mobilization 1 LS $ 49,000 $ 49,000 10 % of work items Sewer By-pass 14 Das $ 5,000 $ 70,000 Assumes 8 hrs of attend pumping Utility Work Line 9 -inch VCP CIPP 1830 LF $ 220 $ 402,600 F&I CIPP liner 4" HDPE Forcemain (directional drill) 750 LF $ 110 $ 82,500 F&I pipe and install by trenchless methods Resolve Utility Conflicts 1 LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Allowance Restoration Site Restoration, Seed and Mulch 100 SY $ 20 $ 2,000 Allowance Construction Subtotal $ 611,100 Construction Contingency 25 % $ 152,775 25 % of const. subtotal Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 764,000 Engineering and Administration 20 % $ 152,800 20% of estimate capital cost Capital Total $ 920,000 Qualifications: Feasilbility level estimate, plus 100%/minus 50% Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13\WorkFiles\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP Analysis\092514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost EstimatesAs 0 0 0 WTP #4 Analysis Feasibility Level Cost Estimate Area 2 Option A -Rebuild Sanitary Sewer from MH 1319 to 1376 Barr Project #23/27-1331 11/15/2014 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre -Construction Mobilization 1 LS $ 15,000 $ 15,000 10 % of work items Sewer By-pass 21 Das $ 5,000 $ 105,000 Assumes 8 hrs of attend pumping Demolition Abandon Existing Pipe and Manholes 780 LF $ 10 $ 7,800 Fill existing pipes and manholes with flowable fill Utility Work 10" PVC Gravity Sewer 780 LF $ 75 $ 58,500 F&I pipe, assume 8-10' deep, backfill and compaction 48" Standard Manhole 5 EA $ 12,000 $ 60,000 F&I Manhole and pipe connections Resolve Utility Conflicts 2 LS $ 5,000 $ 10,000 Allowance Service Connections 1 Ea $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Allowance Restoration Site Restoration, Seed and Mulch 433 SY $ 20 $ 8,667 Allowance Construction Subtotal $ 269,967 Construction Contingency 25 % $ 67,492 25 % of const. subtotal Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 337,000 Engineering and Administration 20 % $ 70,000 20% of estimate capital cost Capital Total $ 410,000 Qualifications: Feasilbility level estimate, plus 100%/minus 50% Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina P:\Mpls\23 MM27\2327G13\Work Files\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP Analysis\092514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost Estimates.As 0 0 0 WTP #4 Analysis Feasibility Level Cost Estimate Area 2 Option B -Line Existing Sewer from MH 1319 to 1376 Barr Project #23/27-1331 11/15/2014 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre -Construction Mobilization 1 LS $ 17,000 $ 17,000 10 % of work items Sewer By-pass 21 Das $ 5,000 $ 105,000 Assumes 8 hrs of attend pumping Utility Work Line 9 -inch VCP CIPP 780 LF $ 210 $ 163,800 F&I CIPP liner Resolve Utility Conflicts 1 LS $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Allowance Restoration Site Restoration, Seed and Mulch 100 SY $ 20 $ 2,000 Allowance Construction Subtotal $ 292,800 Construction Contingency 25 % $ 73,200 25 % of const. subtotal Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 366,000 Engineering and Administration 20 % $ 73,200 20% of estimate capital cost Capital Total $ 440,000 Qualifications: Feasilbility level estimate, plus 100%/minus 50% Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13\WorkFiles\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP Analysis\092514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost Estimates.xis 0 WTP #4 Analysis Feasibility Level Cost Estimate Area 3 Option A -Rebuild Sanitary Sewer from MH 1364 to 1759 Barr Project #23/27-1331 11/15/2014 Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extension Notes Pre -Construction Mobilization 1 LS $ 42,000 $ 42,000 10 % of work items Sewer By-pass 28 Das $ 5,000 $ 140,000 Assumes 8 hrs of attend pumping Demolition Remove Bituminous Pavement and Curb 7 SY $ 6 $ 42 Sawcut, remove bituminous, and dispose Abandon Existing Pipe and Manholes 1300 LF $ 10 $ 13,000 Remove existing pipes and manholes Utility Work 10" PVC Gravity Sewer 1300 LF $ 75 $ 97,500 F&I pipe, assume 8-10' deep, backfill and compaction 48" Standard Manhole 9 EA $ 12,000 $ 108,000 F&I Manhole and pipe connections Resolve Utility Conflicts 4 LS $ 5,000 $ 20,000 Allowance Service Connections 4 Ea $ 5,000 $ 20,000 Allowance Restoration Curb and Gutter 200 LF $ 29 $ 5,876 base course, B612 curb Site Restoration, Seed and Mulch 722 SY $ 20 $ 14,444 Bituminous Pavement 10 SY $ 90 $ 900 base course, bituminous surface Construction Subtotal $ 461,762 Construction Contingency 25 % $ 115,441 25 % of const. subtotal Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 577,000 Engineering and Administration 20 % $ 115,400 20% of estimate capital cost Capital Total I $ 690,000 Qualifications: Feasilbility level estimate, plus 100%/minus 50% Assuming good soil conditions Necessary easements acquired by City of Edina PWpls\23 MM27\2327G13\WorkFiles\SAC Availability\SAC availability Data\WTP Analysis\092514 WTP Update\Updated\Cost Estimates.As To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Reports of June 3 and July 1, 2015 w9�,1� ole • ,�C�RPORA"tFO � IBAB Agenda Item M, IV. F. Action 0 Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Reports of June 3 and July I, 2015. Information I Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the June 3 and July 1, 2015 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their July 16 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 • Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2015 G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\TRANSPORTATION DIV\Traffic Safety Committee\City Council Reports\2015\Item IV. F. Traffic Safety Reports of Jun 3 and Jul 1, 2015.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • Traffic Safety Report Wednesday, June 03, 2015 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 01. The Public Works Director, City Engineer, Police Lieutenant, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these can be included on the July 16 Edina Transportation Commission and the August 18 City Council agenda. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action AI.Request for replacing a Yield sign with a Stop sign at the exit of the parking garage in the 50th and France district This request comes from a resident who noted that the middle ramp in the 50th and France district has a yield sign located at its exit, however this is inconsistent with state statute 169.31. This statute states that "The driver of a vehicle within a business or residence district emerging from an alley, driveway, or building shall stop such vehicle immediately prior to driving onto a sidewalk or into the sidewalk are and shall yield the right-of- way to any pedestrian and all other traffic on the Photo : sidewalk." All other city -owned parking structures and lots have stop signs at their exit, but other driveways in the area have no control at their exit. No other yield signs were observed in the district's driveways. Exit from the Center Ramp Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 Page 1 of 5 • After review, staff recommends approving this item, and signing the, exit with a Stop sign. This is done for consistency with other city owned parking areas, as well as compliance with the Minnesota State Statute. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends denial B I . Request for yellow painted curb, between 5105 and 5107 Wooddale Avenue driveways This request comes from a resident on Wooddale Avenue who has a driveway close to the neighbor's, and notes that vehicles park between the two. The end of radius of these driveways is 9 feet apart, with the edge of pavements being 16 feet apart behind the sidewalk. Edina Statue Ordinance Code 26-35(2) does not allow parking within 5 feet of any driveway. Using the larger measurement, there is 6 feet of space between the driveways available for parking, but a SmartForTwoTM is 8 feet long, and would be unable to fit into the space. Residents of both properties were supportive of a measure to deal with the issue. The adjoining neighbor seconded the request. • After review, staff recommends denial of this request. This decision was made considering that both of these properties have secondary access, and that yellow curb painting is rare in the city, and only used for specific circumstances. B2.lncreased safety along Creek Valley Road from Nordic Circle through Scandia Lane, specifically Crosswalks across Creek Valley Road This request came from a parent of a Creek Valley Elementary student, who believed that the previous action of asking parents not to park in a no parking zone on Gleason Road (item A2 in the February 4th, 2015 Traffic Safety Report) created a dangerous situation on Creek Valley Road, as walkers and bikers from the school now had to navigate several parked vehicles picking up children. A camera was placed in this location for three school days. The vehicle queue did not reach the intersection of Nordic Circle. Safety was seen as a possible concern • with the number of drivers using the intersection of Nordic Circle and Creek Valley Road to execute U - Map : 51051510 7 Wooddole Avenue Photo : Straight curb between driveways Map : Proposed improvements along Creek Valley Road Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 5 • turns or three -point -turns, where all children were crossing Nordic Circle. This action will be restricted with the new island being placed in this location (pending City Council approval). While in excess of twenty pedestrians crossed Creek Valley Road in this segment, no strong concentration of a specific crossing point was seen. Pedestrians and bicyclists also used all areas of the street and drivers were cautious, slowed down, and yielded right-of-way to the children during school release. After review, staff recommends denial of this request., This decision is based on the small number of issues observed, the lack of concentration for crossings, a lack of sidewalks on the south side of the street, and standards for how to walk in the roadway indicating different crossing points for pedestrians walking in opposite directions. In addition, an island being painted and having flexible plastic posts will soon be tested in the area, and will mitigate some conflicts. C Items : Items to be considered for more review C I .Request for a Crosswalk across 66th Street at Warren Avenue This request came from several neighbors in the Brookview Heights neighborhood, who noted that high speeds on 66th Street and the lack of pedestrian infrastructure made the area unwelcoming to pedestrians, and made getting to the park an unwanted experience. Video was gathered of the area • on May 8th -May loth of 2015 and was evaluated. A maximum of 15 people crossed in the maximum two- hour period, which does not meet warrants. The weather was mixed, with temperatures in the sixties, and rain on Sunday, May loth. There are no sidewalks currently in the area, but one along 66th Street is planned. Crosswalk warrants are attached in Appendix A. After review, staff recommended denial of this request due to not meeting crosswalk volume warrants. The Edina Transportation Commission asked for a second review of the engineering judgement of the crossing, as the location is adjacent to a public park. D Items: Other items handled by Traffic Safety Map: 66" St and Warran Ave Photo: A group of pedestrians, as seen from the video camera D 1. A resident called about the intersection of Trunk Highway 62 and France Avenue, noting the danger present in the intersection. The comment was noted, and requestor was informed that the City of Edina is working with MnDOT and Hennepin County to improve the intersection. D2. A staff person at a local senior apartment complex called for information relating to unsigned lane- 40 drops and merges at the exit of the complex's parking area. The requestor also asked if the Traffic Safety Coordinator would be willing to look at the intersection in person and speak to residents. The Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 Page 3 of 5 • site was reviewed and found to be awkward, but on private property, questions were taken at the center with management present. Management has been made aware of the issue several times in the past, and has not taken action to rectify the situation. Recommendations on how to properly mark or sign the exit to clarify the situation were provided. D3. A resident noted that a large tree blocked sightlines and was within the clear zone of 56th Street and Beard Avenue. The site was investigated and the tree was found to be largely in the clear view triangle at the intersection, a letter has been sent to the property owner, and if no action has been taken within ten days, the City Forester will take action. D4. A resident called to inform engineering that Arcadia Avenue was impassable due to the Starbucks queue. This was forwarded to the City Engineer who is currently in talks with the business. D5. A resident and staff person were confused on the right of way rules at the intersection of Merritt Circle and Doncaster Way. General T -intersection right-of-way rules and reasons for why these would not apply were identified, and discussed. D6. A resident of Minneapolis wanted to discuss the City of Edina's experiences with flashing beacon pedestrian signals. D7. The Traffic Safety Coordinator noticed that there was insufficient pedestrian time at the intersection of 77th and Trunk Highway 100, on the west side of the freeway. New timings were sent to MnDOT with a request for change. • D8. A resident called to ask about traffic light timings at the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Vernon Avenue, the questions and concerns were forwarded to Hennepin County, which controls the signal. • D9. A resident called, concerned about the Southdale Mall exits. In discussion it was found that this exit was not a typical mall exit, but an emergency exit. A quick review of the situation was undertaken to confirm and the exit was clearly not intended for everyday use. The caller was also informed that Southdale is private property and therefore the City of Edina cannot place traffic signs on the property without Southdale's consent. The caller was told that this request was more appropriate for Southdale Mall itself, and not the City of Edina. D.10 Two residents were concerned with sight distances at the corner of Scott Terrace and Morningside Road, due to construction crews in the area. A radar study was performed (for 2 hours and 20 minutes) indicating an 85th percentile speed of approximately 27 miles per hour. Rain likely lowered speeds slightly, thus staff used 30 miles per hour as the design speed of the roadway. This and other sight distance information was then forwarded to the Redevelopment Coordinator. Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 Page 4 of 5 • Appendix A: Crosswalk Warrants A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has 20 or more pedestrian crossings in a two-hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: a. More than five gaps — pavement marking and signage only. b. Less than five gaps — add actuated pedestrian signals. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: a. Routes to schools b. Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. c. Locations adjacent to public parks. d. Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. e. Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. • F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. • Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 3, 2015 Page 5 of 5 • Traffic Safety Report • • Wednesday, July 01, 2015 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 01. The Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these can be included on the July 16 Edina Transportation Commission and the August 18 City Council agenda. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action No Items Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B 1. Request for controlling the intersection of Grove Street and Merold Drive This request was forwarded from residents, by staff on the reconstruction of the Countyside H neighborhood this summer. This intersection was measured for sight -distance, with an uncontrolled intersection requiring 115 feet on each approach for 25 mph design speed (from the AASHTO "Green Book", A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets), and this intersection was found to not be able to meet those required safe sight -distances. This was due to significant grade changes and small setbacks blocking sight distances. In 2014 Grove Street south of the intersection had an ADT of 363 and an 85th -Percentile speed of 25.5 mph, a count was conducted on Grove Street, east of Map :Grove Street and Merold Drive the intersection which had an ADT of 348 and an 85th -Percentile speed of 20.7 mph. Due to road conditions, Grove Street, east of the intersection was counted close to the intersection and the speeds were likely lower than further from the intersection. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 1 of 7 • There have been no reported accidents, correctable by traffic control, in this location in the past 5 years. After review, staff recommends denial of the request. With no history of accidents, it is unlikely that placing a stop sign would increase safety at this intersection. Additionally, the low speeds observed indicate that drivers are slowing as they approach the intersection, likely to gain proper sight distances. B2. Request for alley speed bumps on the block bounded by 55th Street, 54th Street, Xerxes Avenue and York Avenue This request comes from a resident who has concerns that a recent alley paving project increased speeds in the alley, such that it is no longer safe for anything but use by vehicles. A traffic counter was placed in the alley and drivers were found to be in excess of the 10 mph speed limit slightly less than half the time, however, the 85th -percentile speed was 14.5 mph. The policy on alley speed bumps is attached in Appendix A. Another homeowner on the block expressed concern that the speed bumps were a ploy to gain control of the alley. Photo: Neighbors are using small plastic men and flags in an attempt to slow drivers After review, staff does not recommend • placing the alley speed bumps. This is based off of low speeds in the alley as it currently exists. A cost estimate has been prepared and has been sent to residents should they wish to circulate a petition. B3. Request for traffic controls and reduced speeds on 64th Street and Wilryan Road This request comes from a resident who is concerned that the intersection of 64th Street and Wilryan Road is dangerous, and that Wilryan Road has too much traffic in excess of the speed limit. A counter was placed and found that Wilryan had an ADT of 676 vehicles per day and 85th -percentile speeds of 29.4 mph. 64th Street was counted last year and has an ADT of 500 vehicles per day. No accidents in the last five years have been reported as related to the intersection. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. The 85th -Percentile of drivers' speeds was below the speed limit, and warrants for controlling the intersection were not met. Discussion of staff also determined that this route was likely receiving higher use than Map: Wilryan Avenue from W. 66`h St. to W. 64`h St. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 2 of 7 • typical due to construction north of the area, but the data collected this year did not meet warrants, even with the additional vehicle traffic. B4. Request for "Not a Thru Street" sign on Cornelia Drive and Glouchester Road This request comes from a resident who is concerned with the volume of traffic circling the block of Cornelia Drive, Glouchester Road and 72nd Street looking for an access to Interstate 494. A counter was placed at the far southern end of the circular roadway, and it was found that fewer than 100 vehicles per day use the segment, and the 85th percentile speed is 22 mph. There have been no reported accidents due to this condition in the last five years. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. The low speeds and low volumes found indicate that this action of circling the block is infrequent, and likely is due to residents from nearby properties using the segment to access their property. • B5. Request for traffic calming on Code Avenue near Windsor Avenue • This request comes from a resident who is concerned with vehicle speeds on Code Avenue near Windsor Avenue. A counter was placed in this location, and the 85th -percentile speed was observed as 28.5 mph, and an ADT of 262 vehicles per day was also observed. There have been no reported accidents due to this condition in the last five years. Photo: Southern end of Cornelia/Glouchester Photo: Code Avenue, looking north towards Windsor Map: Code Avenue at Windsor Avenue Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 3 of 7 • After review, staff recommends denial of this request, based on 85th -percentile speeds below the speed limit. The area has been referred to the police department for placement of the speed trailer. Section C: Items which are assigned for more review C I .Request for mitigation of drive-thru queue on Arcadia, from Starbucks This issue was a C item on the November 05, 2014 report, and after further investigation, staff is prepared to make a recommendation on the issue. From the November 05 report; the requestor states that the Starbucks' drive-thru queue consistently is long enough for cars to be stopped on city streets, both Arcadia and Gus Young Lane. The requestor feels that this is an issue because the road is not wide enough for queued cars to be passed on their side of the centerline, and this leads to drivers crossing a double yellow line, violating expectations from drivers. In site visits queues were present in both directions, with both left -turning (northbound) • and right -turning (southbound) queues appearing on their respective right hand sides of the roadway. In discussions with property • management and Starbucks management, it was made clear that they were aware of the issue and had exhausted all their possibilities in dealing with the situation. Arcadia has 1 186 ADT just north of this location, and Gus Young Lane has 4275 ADT in this location, with 85th -percentile speeds of 20 and 22 mph respectively. Arcadia in this location is 29.5 feet wide. New information from a video study of the site shows that on the two days recorded, the morning rush (from 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM) had over 200 left hand turns, which caused most of Map :Queues on Arcadia for Starbucks the issues in the location. While only fifteen times over the two day period did the back-up from the Starbucks cause delays, block, or otherwise impede other traffic. Fourteen of the fifteen issues observed occurred within the hours of 7:30 AM and 9:30 AM, while 107 drivers turned left into the parking lot and drive through during this time. Delays may have lasted a few minutes as drivers waited for a space in the drive-thru line and included delays behind vehicles, as well as delays from the roadway acting as a single lane roadway for a short distance between the two queues out of the parking lot. Map: Queuing along Arcadia Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 4 of 7 After review, staff recommends no action on this item, as even at the highest concentrations of issues, less than ten percent of drivers caused delays to others. Additional reasons for denial include safety concerns being minimal, and inconvenience being seen as the main factor in the requests, as well as the redevelopment planning and transportation study of the Public Works site, Arcadia Avenue may be redesigned in the future to accommodate changing land uses. The Edina Transportation Commission, in their review noted that state statute still prohibits obstructing traffic by statute 169.15. Section D: Other items handled by traffic safety D 1. A resident requested restrictions on truck traffic on Blake Road. The requestor noted that the intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen was congested, that high speeds were present as people are trying to go faster than US Highway 169 on Blake Road, and that a manhole was clanging outside his home. The resident was informed that the City of Edina does not restrict traffic from using roadways, a counter was placed at the location and speed data was forwarded to the police department. In site visits, the manholes did not seem to be moving, this has been forwarded to public works. D2. Residents on Interlachen are doing construction work on their home, and have a retaining wall across most of their frontage with Interlachen. Where they do not have a retaining wall there is a No Parking sign. They requested that the sign be relocated so that work can continue, this was forwarded to the sign shop. D3. A resident was concerned with high speeds on Benton Avenue, as well as the lack of bicycle and pedestrian amenities along the road and the time needed before a reconstruction would be able to . address these issues. A counter was placed along Benton Avenue and the speed data has been forwarded to the police department. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 5 of 7 • Appendix A: Edina Alley Speed Bump Policy 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Traffic analysis, engineering, and property use facts and data shall be reviewed when considering on placement of alley speed bumps. 3. The City of Edina will consider the installation or citizen removal of the speed bumps upon receipt of a petition signed by greater than 75% of all adjacent residents/property owners. 4. A minimum of two speed bumps should be used for each alley block. The City of Edina will determine their locations. 5. Speed bumps shall be installed on concrete or bituminous surfaced alleyways only. • 6. The affected block is responsible for installation costs. Price per speed bump location will be noted on the petition. These costs must be collected and submitted to staff before installation of the speed bump. The special assessment procedure will not apply to any alley speed bumps requests. • 7. The City of Edina will remove the speed bumps by November 1St and reinstall after April 15th each year. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 6 of 7 • Appendix B: Stop Sign Warrants When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (R1-1) sign shall be used. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs. The use of STOP signs on the minor -street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users from the minor street failing to yield the right- of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that: a1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. 0 Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 1, 2015 Page 7 of 7 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS July 16, 2015, 2015 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Iyer, Janovy, La Force, Loeffelholz, Nelson, Olson, and Spanhake. ABSENT Rummel APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES2:, REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 21, 2015 Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to approve the amended minutes of May 21, 2015. All voted aye. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Reports of June 3 and July 1, 2015 June 3 Report B.1. Member Janovy asked if the City has a policy on painting no parking on curbs and planner Nolan said they do not have a policy and it is not something they normally do. She said one of the reasons for the denial doesn't seem relevant while the urden is placed on the residents who are not violating the law. She suggested enforcement or a non-commercial parking ign. s`'` `` B.3. Member Nelson said it seems like there should be a marked path to theparkand requested that this be reviewed again. Member Loffelholz said speed and volume should be considered coming down the hill on W. 66th Street. Member Boettge said there was a lot of conversation on Next Door about this street. She said even though warrants are not met they need to be flexible. Member Janovy concurred and said she does not believe the denial is consistent with the Living Streets and Crosswalk policies. Member Iyer asked about the cost but planner Nolan did not know the cost because it depends on the type of application. He also asked how many parks have crosswalks and planner Nolan did not know this either; however, planner Nolan said he has been in conversation with Park and Recreation director Kattreh about this and councilmember Brindle has also expressed interest. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to move Item B.3. to Section C and forward the June 3, 2015, TSC report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 18, 2015 w91�-,j� • ,�C�RPOAf'�FO • )Safi Agenda Item*. IV. G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015-79 Requesting Variance From Standards for State Aid Operation for Tracy Avenue Action Requested: Approve the attached resolution authorizing staff to pursue a variance from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Variance Committee for a variance on the minimum horizontal curve on Tracy Avenue at Arbour Lane and Ridgeway Road. Information / Background: Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to TH 62 is scheduled for reconstruction in 2016. In preparation for the public improvement hearing later this year, staff will seek a variance for the horizontal curves at Arbour Lane and Ridgeway Road. The horizontal curves will not meet the MSA minimum design speed of 30 mph without major impacts. It currently meets 20 mph design standards. With minimal impacts, we can design the curves to meet 25 mph design standards. We shared the 25 mph design with the neighborhood and received supportive comments from them. We will be requesting a variance from MSA to allow for 25 mph horizontal curves. The next MSA Variance Committee meeting is scheduled for September. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2015-79 authorizing staff to pursue a variance from MSA rules. Attachment: • Resolution No. 2015-79 • Variance Area Map G \PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DRAPROJECTS\IMPR NOS\BA399 Tracy Ave—Crosstown to Benton\ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. G. Req Variance Tracy.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 • RESOLUTION NO. 2015-79 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS TRACY AVENUE (AT ARBOUR LANE AND HIGHLAND ROAD) WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is hereby authorized to request a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.3300 and 8820.9941, as they apply to the proposed horizontal curve associated with the reconstruction of Tracy Avenue from TH 62 to Benton Avenue, State Aid Project 120-152-015, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 require a minimum 30 miles per hour design speed for horizontal curvature and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 as applicable to the proposed horizontal curve on Tracy Avenue at Highland Road to meet 30 miles per hour design speed create an undue burden; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 as applicable to the proposed horizontal curve on Tracy Avenue at Arbour Lane to meet 30 miles per hour design speed create an undue burden; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.9941, Minimum Design Standards: On -Road Bicycle Facility for Urban; New or • Reconstruction Projects to allow a horizontal curve that achieves a 25 mile per hour design speed in lieu of the 30 mile per hour minimum design speed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and its agents and employees of and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason the use of a 25 mile per hour design speed horizontal curve on Tracy Avenue at Highland Road and Arbour Lane in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820.9941. The Council further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense, any action of proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim arising as a result of the granting of this variance. Dated: August 18, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 • City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov - 952-826-0371 - Fax 952-826-0392 • • • r e jo TRACY AVENUE PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS Curve Variance Area CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA August 11, 2015 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL 49�11� o le • I�CORPOR ATEA • Daae Agenda Item M IV. H. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 18, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015-80 Requesting Variance From Standards for State Aid Operation for Parklawn Avenue Action Requested: Approve the attached resolution authorizing staff to pursue a variance from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Variance Committee for a variance from minimum design speeds and their associated horizontal curves on Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to West 76th Street. Information / Background: Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to West 76th Street is scheduled for reconstruction in 2016. In preparation for the public improvement hearing later this year, staff will seek a variance for two separate existing horizontal curves. The horizontal curves will not meet the MSA minimum design speed of 30 mph without major impacts. The attached letter summarizes the impacts associated with designing the street to the minimum 30 mph design standard. The first horizontal curve near Parklawn Court currently meets 22 mph design standards. The second horizontal curve near 4350/4380 Parklawn Avenue currently meets 27 mph design standards. We will be requesting a variance from MSA to continue to allow the 22 mph and 27 mph design speeds. The next MSA Variance Committee meeting is scheduled for September. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2015-80 authorizing staff to pursue a variance from MSA rules. Attachment: • Resolution No. 2015-80 • Aug. 10 Supplemental Letter to Variance G.\PMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\BA429 Parklawn_France-76th\ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. H. Req Variance.dou City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • RESOLUTION NO. 2015-80 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS PARKLAWN AVENUE — WEST 76TH STREET TO FRANCE AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Edina Director of Engineering is hereby authorized to request variances from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.3300 and 8820.9936, as they apply to the proposed horizontal curves associated with reconstruction of Parklawn Avenue from West 76'" Street to France Avenue, State Aid Project 120-170-001, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9936 require a minimum 30 mile per hour design speed for horizontal curvature; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9936 as applicable to the proposed horizontal curves associated with the reconstruction of Parklawn Avenue to meet a 30 mile per hour design speed creates undue hardships; and WHEREAS, said hardships are further explained in the attached supplementary letter dated August 10, 2015 to the Director of Engineering; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests variances from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid • Operations Rules Chapter 8820.9936, Minimum Design Standards, Urban; New or Reconstruction Projects to allow the following in lieu of the 30 mile per hour minimum design speed: 1. An horizontal curve that achieves a 22 mile per hour design speed at Parklawn Court; 2. An horizontal curve that achieves a 27 mile per hour design speed at 4350/4380 Parklawn Avenue NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and its agents and employees of and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason of the granting of the variances in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820.9936 and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense, any action of proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim arising as a result of the granting of these variances. Dated: August 18, 2015 Attest: 0 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) •COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk • • 0 -A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us" August 10, 2015 Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: RE: City of Edina Parklawn Avenue Street Reconstruction Supplemental Letter to Variance Resolution S.A.P. 120-170-001 SEH No. EDINA 133115 14.00 • As requested, this supplemental letter outlines hardships the City of Edina (City) will experience if Parklawn Avenue is improved to the Municipal State Aid (MSA) standard of 30 mile per hour design speeds for two (2) separate horizontal curves. The existing Horizontal Curves (H.C.) are labeled H.C. No. 1 and H.C. No 2 as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively enclosed with this letter. Also shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 are proposed horizontal curves that meet a 30 mile per hour design speed; labeled H.C. No. 1A and H.C. No. 2A 0 Prior to describing the hardships, the following pertinent facts should be presented. 1. A speed limit of 30 miles per hour is posted today along Parklawn Avenue between West 76th Street and France Avenue. 2. Parking on both sides of Parklawn Avenue is generally allowed with the exceptions of near intersections and several Metro -Transit bus stops. 3. Parklawn Avenue's existing H.C. No. 1 near Parklawn Court has a centerline radius of 162 feet resulting in a 22 mile per hour design speed. 4. Parklawn Avenue's existing H.C. No. 2 near 4350/4380 Parklawn Avenue has a centerline radius of 242 feet resulting in a 27 mile per hour design speed. 5. MSA standards require a minimum horizontal curve centerline radius of 300 feet for a 30 mile per hour design speed. 6. Three Rivers Park District and the City are under agreement that Parklawn Avenue between 4350 Parklawn Avenue and Gallagher Drive is the corridor for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (trail) as shown in Figure 3. The trail will be constructed as part of the reconstruction of Parklawn Avenue in 2016. 7. The trail master plan identified the west and north sides of Parklawn Avenue as the best fit for the trail due to fewer points of conflict for users. Points of conflict were identified as driveways, light poles, landscaping, bus stops, etc. Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Chad Millner, PE • August 10, 2015 Page 2 8. For pedestrian safety reasons, the City prefers a minimum 5 -foot vegetated buffer between sidewalks and the back of curb, where feasible. This project presents an opportunity to use this configuration adjacent to either H.C. No. 1 or H.C. No. 1A on the west side of Parklawn Avenue from the trail south to West 76"' Street. The proposed typical section in this area is also shown in Figure 4. 9. Adding the trail to the west and north sides of Parklawn Avenue adjacent to either H.C. No. 2 or H.C. No. 2A results in the proposed typical section shown in Figure 4. 10. As part of the reconstruction of Parklawn Avenue, the City will maintain one (1) parking lane on Parklawn Avenue. Figure 1 shows the hardships caused by constructing a 300 -foot horizontal curve to achieve a 30 mile per hour design speed; labeled H.C. No. 1A. The item numbers below correspond to the numbered keyed notes shown in Figure 1. 1. Over 1,650 square feet of property acquisition is necessary from 4440 Parklawn Avenue. 2. A minimum of three (3) trees will be removed and several storm sewer and private utility relocations will be required. Figure 2 shows the hardships caused by constructing a 300 -foot horizontal curve to achieve a 30 mile per hour design speed; labeled H.C. No. 2A. The item numbers below correspond to the numbered keyed notes in Figure 2. 1. Parklawn Avenue is in conflict with the existing apartment building at 4351 Parklawn Avenue. • 2. The proposed right-of-way line and subsequent building set -back requirement is in conflict with the existing apartment building's northwest corner at 4401 Parklawn Avenue. 3. The City will need to acquire 4351 and 4401 Parklawn Avenue and demolish the existing buildings, currently both apartment buildings with several hundred tenants in each building. 4. Landscaping will be destroyed. This includes private light poles and sidewalks, approximately 17 trees, and numerous shrubs and bushes. Please contact me with questions or comments at 952.912.2616 or tmuse@sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. WWQ—, TJMuPE Pger KM Enclosures c: Eric Nelson, Three Rivers Park District p:\ae\e\edina\133115\1-genl\14-conlsuppl Itr variance res 081015.docx 0 • 0 co co z O U = _ d N N 0 0 0 T .map s rerthw a k,Ry —e ,d map nor a survey nap and is not intended to be used as ore. This map lsa compilation of records. iMwm w a M data gathered hom..dous sources ksted on thw map and is to be used br rckrence puryoses oNy. SEH does not wart.. Mat the Geographc lnfottnadon Sy -,(GIS) Dab used b prepare this map are enor ft- N SEH does rot re present that the GIS Data can be used fw navigational, tracking, orany other purpose requirirq exacting mea --of distancewdirection or preckbn in the depiction of geographic IeaNrec. the user of thisnapackmwledges[hatSEH shall not be Ilabk fw any tlamagec whichariseott of Me usefsaccess wuseofdata provided. rl a • �C3 -. Z S Ir cul NOI13V3N aano U) z O F- C) rwn Z U n LU D z LU Q z J ry wlzl n� 1..� ry D V To: Mayor and City Council From: David Nelson, Chief of Police Date: August 18, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV. I. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015-81. Authorizing joint Powers Agreement With The State of Minnesota - Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force Action Requested: Adopt resolution authorizing JPA agreement with the State of Minnesota — Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Edina Police Department first partnered with the MNFCTF in 2001. The JPA with the MNFCTF partners Edina officers with local, county, state, and federal law enforcement personnel. Many financial cases involving identity theft and organized criminal groups cross jurisdictional borders. This JPA allows the Edina Police Department to work these local, regional, and national cases and get financial investigative training funded by the State of Minnesota and Federal Government. The State of Minnesota is the administrator of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force (MNFCTF). ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2015-81 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ch • RESOLUTION NO. 2015-81 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department has been a member of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force (MNFCTF) since 2001 and worked to investigate and combat financial crimes locally, regionally, and nationally. WHEREAS, this partnership with the State of Minnesota allows the Edina Police Department to work with State and Federal authorities. WHEREAS, as a requirement to continue in this program, the City of Edina must authorize a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Edina and the State of Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Joint Powers Agreement will be in effect through June 30, 2016. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council is now hereby authorizing the City of Edina • Mayor, City Manager, and Chief of Police to execute this Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of the Edina Police Department. Adopted this 18th day of August 2015. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18' day of August 2015 City Clerk • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director A A Le��r • ,n COR • B Agenda Item #: IV.J. Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 18, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Site Plan approval I -year extension for Vernon Avenue Housing. 5109-5125 West 49th Street, Robert Kimmel and Jerry O'Brien. Action Requested: Approve a one-year extension of the approved site plan from August 20, 2013. Information / Background: The property owners, Robert Kimmel and Jerry O'Brien are requesting a one-year extension to their site plan approval for the Vernon Avenue Housing Project. The City Council approved the project on August 20, 2013. The site plan appproval expires after two years, if no work has started. The property owners are still trying to put the development together to be constructed, but will need another year to get it going. The property was rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The zoning of the property remains PUD. The approved project includes the construction of 16 -unit attached townhomes. (See attached development plans.) Sec. 36-132 of the City Code allows the City Council to extend a site plan approval for no more than one year upon finding that: There is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and 2. The facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. The previous developer of the Vernon Avenue Housing Project ran into some financial difficulty and were unable to build the project. Soctt Roe of White Birch Properties and Development Group, LLC would like to build the project as originally proposed, however will need another year to get the project started. ATTACHMENTS: • Approved Site and Development Plans • Requests for extension letters City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • July 29, 2015 Mr. Cary K. Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: One Year Extension of Approval for Vernon Avenue Townhome Project / 5109-5125 West 48"' Street, Edina, MN Dear Cary We are requesting a one year extension of the above captioned. The project had run into some financing issues and we are working to resolve those issues and move the project along. There are new financing partners looking at this project and we • will need the additional time to analyze the project and hopefully secure the funding and move forward. 0 Thank you -- - --------------- Robert Kimmel — Owner 14 1 ?� / .� rum --v Jerry O'Brien — Owner CC: Scott D. Roe, White Birch Properties and Development Group, LLC 0 July 22, 2015 • Mr. Cary K. Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4800 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: One Year Extension of Approval for Vernon Avenue Housing 5109-5125 West 49th Street, Edina, Minnesota Dear Cary Please extend the approval as we discussed today. The approval was for the redevelopment of three lots and building a 16 unit housing development. I would appreciate something in writing from you acknowledging this request. Sincerely Scott D. Roe White Birch Properties and Development Group, LLC 5128 Bryant Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55419 0 612-840-0809 c • • 0 City of Edina anrlsrli o -- Lag°nd 4901 5109 sins 5201 4101 House Number Labatt st—Uiem0 Labor$ $121 117 117 1095105'4600 .s 4105 ./ Cib/Limi. 4sos Ico9 crca9a 4309 41 it take 11—a IDtO G1 5120 till 1133706 5101 4817 n �O = T tatea 5211 -1711 4013 {1qt94 p tool $ Parka lath $Y 1121 4u1IL•4DPL Pal:alc 4816 1911 1875 42;0 4375 5171 9117 s1I7�_48]7AOIUDMA09 c �feel 4572 ant {Iz4 silo 11,511251" lair 4x9 e" 4a2a 4872 <b8 IEIo "'a 4345 .. - 24 9 1970ST1Y i 4911 24 l`o 4300 tot h SH lay los �S° 125 5117 4916 X007 21 'sena) � 5200 �1 � 4010 E070 �tp 5000 tFla 05 s09h o} � sTIY 510° SYMMLA 5017 5101 $075 sets $ y Ii � � � a4 i 17 5146 � $146 St01 5116 24 rla.i r U9cn+1]�^Atit•C�4'i1CIr003a5L3 0�]r:0 PID: 2811721310040Jill AA _ �) Ll Y�It " �I 511549thStW Edina, MN 55436 ,R �•% -� ... :t •. t � s ��� •� r� i't�, i An' -'y � \ ) !#§§: z 0 § § $S k �` ! "Mill - A \ \07 it! f Co I is J1 flII I i 0 MOO ran "Mill ))`��/ !§� a ]- MOO ran ARCADLA AVE KEYNOTES Qr c�.w rex. u i am ��w, n• •wxxr. nm .w..na ro nes aa[ror�w, aaxr [w¢ m ,m.msa w,. a.m .wx.,.xm,•. m. o¢ m¢, .,.n Q xm<• uxuv mm. . Qrmxami ruxnxcv m. r<[ l,m uon O•� u[w mcg rm, Qu,�i•.n[.aniauw � sx e[<aurrt QaY oc wa r.« w•u ORunarw n.xme.. 1-¢ gun t,an 0 me rw,mrn m. ©Mrw .oxmr. m. Oi nrm wn[ .m .¢aup[ a..w r.num, rm ON rwnx Vmwirf fp ©f n[C.amL f.0-lmarn © .omr[ e,u nx .¢war[ rme2 p[m„wa x,m BKVO G R O U P Ardhbmre Interior Design Iand=pc Ar hitectum En j—ring Boorman Kroos Vogel GIDW Inc 222 North Second Street ttin—p.4 MN 55901 Tdophanc 612-339-3752 Pammiho 612-339-6212 v bkvgroup.o- NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Subm'1tu Vemon Avenue Townhomes ®nurnrwn rti.a.u�.ro.«rr.,e•� �ara�.n✓w.��r Pnwim lns nw'�0 C' mm LI00 o sail cn yxr<[oe • RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PRD -2, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PUD -5, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -5, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & FINAL PLAT AT 5109-5125 WEST 49TH STREET FOR HUNT ASSOCIATES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Miuuiesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Hunt Associates is requesting redevelopment of three lots, 5109-5125 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existirig two apartments and single family home on the site (10 units total) and guild a new 16 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: • See attached Legal Descriptions 1.03 On July 24, 2013, the Plaiuiing Commission unanimously recorrnnended approval of the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan for the site. 2. The proposal is consistent wi tb the Comprehensive Plan, which contemplates medium density housing for the site. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan tions and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of tTn'o- story townhomes. 5. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue. 6. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 4911, to Vernon, that would connect, not only this - �lnpneni; butthe-vn-►ti�n a area to theiTorft-tcrthe GjandView Distlict. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55 424 A%iv%v.F.dinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fix 952-826-0389 • RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 Page Two 7. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to PUD -5, Planned Unit Development -5, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Utility plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one-year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. The park dedication fees are due prior to release of the final plat. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated July 19, 2013. • 9. Compliance with the fire marshal recommendation in his email dated July 12, 2013. 10. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. • RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 Page Two 11. The Park Dedication fee of $35,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. 12. There shall be no rooftop decks. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 20, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) • CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk 0 • Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Commitment for Title Insurance issued.by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, File No. 152183, dated October 31, 2011. and File No. 153093, dated October 5, 2012) ' I Lot 3, 4, 5 and 6, and all that part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 lying North of State Highway No. 5, Block 4, "Tingdale Bros.' Brookside", Except that part of Lot 12 which lies Southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 12 distant 35 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence run Southwesterly to the Southwest comer of the above described Lot 12 and there terminating Together with: A 25.00 foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Torrens Property, Certificate Number. 577550 • And: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Tingdale Bros' Brookside, Except that part of said Lot 8 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East boundary of said Lot 8 distant 28 feet North of the Southeast comer thereof; thence South along said East boundary 28 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said Lot, 50 feet; thence North along the West boundary of said Lot, 12 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, including any part or portion of any street or alley adjacent to said premises vacated or to be vacated, Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract i • ORDINANCE NO. 2013-8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 5109-5125 WEST 49th STREET (Vernon Townhomes) The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -5 (PUD -5) — 5109-5125 West 49'h Street (Vernon Townhomes) is A. Legal Description: See attached B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on June 24, 2013, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013-64, on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2013-005.13a. C. Principal Uses: Residential buildings containing six or fewer units. D. Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District Signs allowed per the Planned Residential District. E. Conditional Uses: None • Existing text — XXXX Stricken text—XXXX Added text —XXXX • F. Development Standards. Development standards per the PRD -2 Zoning District, except the following: Buildina Setbacks Front - 49`h Street 35 feet - structure 18 feet - stair/deck/patio Front - Vernon 7 feet Side - East 15 & 42 feet Rear - South 15 feet Building Height 2-1/2 stories or 35.5 feet Building Coverage 26% Parking Stalls (Residential) 2 enclosed stalls per unit Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: • Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: . Send two affidavits of publication. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text—X44 Added text —XXXX 2 • Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk • • Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text—XXXX 0 Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Commitment for Title Insurance issued.by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, File No. 152183, dated October 31, 2011. and File No. 153093, dated Octobers, 2012) Lot 3, 4, ,5 and 6, and all that part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 lying North of State Highway No. 5, Block 4, �ngdale Bros.' Brookside", Except that part of Lot 12 which lies Southeasterly of the following described line.- Beginning ine:Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 12 distant 35 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence run Southwesterly to the Southwest comer of the above described Lot 12 and there terminating Tog ether with_ A 25.00 foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad between' West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Torrens Property, Certificate Number. 577550 And; Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Tingdale Bros' Brookside, Except that part of said Lot 8 described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East boundary of said Lot 8 distant 28 feet North of the Southeast comer thereof; thence South along said East boundary 28 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said . Lot, 50 feet; thence North along the West boundary of said Lot, 12 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, including any part or portion of any street or alley adjacent to said premises vacated or to be vacated, Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract J • • To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: Aug. 18, 2015 Subject: "Speak Up, Edina" Report Agenda Item #: V. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information M Action Requested: Receive report on July 2015 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about transportation options. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014-2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUpEdina.org. In July 2015, the discussion topic centered on transportation options in the City. The City of Edina's transportation network continues to evolve for all types of users as sidewalks are built as part of the sidewalk facilities map, more bike facilities are added and streets are reconstructed and improved. Several bus transit lines also cross the city. In this discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Do you think there are enough transportation options around the City? Why or Why not? Where could it be improved? • What transportation options besides driving do you use, and for what purpose? How often do you partake? • What is your favorite part about the City's transportation network? The discussion was open for comments between July 6 and Aug. 6. During that time, 69 comments were made. Additionally, 714 users visited the site 714 times, garnering 6,622 page views. All but one commenters in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments for the discussion. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina City of Edina • Home Discussions • Forums Sight as • Meetings • Surveys Email email Address.:.-� Pas wor or, Sigyih: Connect Sign Up FSgn In Tweet Shan Page 1 of 15 okmak Up, Edina.*ll •at ,,c�• ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN ti:e discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Transportation Options The City of Edina's transportation network continues to evolve for all types of users as sidewalks are built as part of the sidewalk facilities man_ more bike facilities are added and streets are reconstructed and improved. Several bus transit lines also cross the city. The City is intersted in what you think about transportation options in Edina. 3 Topics 69 AnswersI Closed 2015-08-06 V icw Discussion Topic: Enough Options Do you think there are enough transportation options around the City? Why or Why not? Where could it be improved? 42 Responses 42 Responses ki Joel Steener, Community volunteer about I month ago Edina really has excellent roads compared to many other metro cities. If you drive, it is very easy to get around and leave the city. If you want to take a walk on a path for recreation, the city also has great options - and now with the Braemar Dome up in the winter, you have other good options for winter walking (Southdale and the Galleria are also excellent). However, if you are talking about walking, biking or using transit, systems are very underdeveloped. For walkers, most of the city does not have sidewalks. Where there are not sidewalks, I believe people have a right to walk in the grassy right of way (on people's lawns) rather than in the street, but few do, and few (homeowners and walkers alike) know this is permitted. In fact, many homeowners have done plantings or walls that make walking on the right of way impossible - and pretty clearly the city doesn't consider that to be an issue. • The city should really look at this and education people about their rights and responsibilities. If it isn't willing to do this, it is creating a dangerous • situation. In my area (Barrie Road) with no sidewalk and heavy traffic, among the few pedestrians brave enough to walk, I have seen people in wheelchairs, walkers, strollers and holding hands of small children out in the street. Drivers exceed the speed limit in the area, people use it as a http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 • City of Edina Page 2 of 15 cut through to Southdale Hospital off of Xerxes and even the bus stops are not connected to sidewalks. He have very high densities with lots of elderly people and others with limited income, where safe walking is important - but it just isn't available. I have never seen a traffic stop in the area or any police presence, unless there is a call. From my point of view, it needs sidewalks now, but when might that happen, if ever? Not clear. In the interim, if the city is not going to deal with the walking in the right of way issue, then at least paint lines three feet from each curb to reminder people that bikes and pedestrians are present. The situation I'm describing is present in large portions of the city. As for transit, I know that the city produces a map, and maybe I've just missed this detail, but it would be handy to have a local Edina map that shows our bus routes. I really detect no effort from the city to promote transit - and simply educate our citizens on how to use transit in Edina would be helpful. Marking the routes and bus stops on a map would be helpful and having this content in a printed form and on the city website. Maybe the city thinks this is Metro Transit's responsiblity, but they are busy enough with other issues. Let Edina visibly support transit. Edina recently won a Bronze level recognition for its biking program, which definitely is improving. However, one really cannot consider biking a viable substitute for the car within the city, as the focus has been put on recreation rather than transportation. A city with a Gold Level program (bronze would actually be "third rate") would have highly visible bike commuters with secure bike storage where they live (a problem for those living in multi -unit housing), safe routes and safe places to secure their bikes at their destination. The city has established a voluntary program to get more bike racks into the community, but if it really wants to encourage use of bikes for getting to work, shopping and other activities, it needs to have the same kinds of requirements in place it has for auto parking - so many spaces per rider. And it might also want to consider advanced things like lockers and showers at key locations - 50th and France, Southdale and perhaps even the Braemar complex. Even a city where golfers can bike to the golf course, pull their clubs out of a locker and do a round. Then there is advanced transit. It is unfortunate that Edina in the past actively avoided being on transit lines, not wanting trains going through people's backyards. Let me throw out an idea that if the city were to start working on it now, maybe it would be in place in 10-15 years. It would be great to build a connector between the SW and Hiawatha light rail line either long 62 or 494, possibly continuing it along West 7th into Downtown St. Paul. That would provide quick access to the airport and state government offices without driving. It will be very difficult to increase the capacity of 62 and 494 East of Edina, which means that in the future, today's traffic jams will be even worse. A light rail system with quick connections not just to downtown but to other locations would be a huge asset for Edina and other western suburban communities like Richfield and Western Bloomington distant from light rail lines. 6 Supports comment ... Reply to Joel Stegner David Frenkel 23 days ago I have numerous times over the years asked why the Wooddale bridge over Highway 62/Crosstown has not been made ADA compliant which would take out the stairs and make it easier to bike and walk over the highway. For whatever reason the city has chosen to ignore the fact the pedestrian bridge is not ADA compliant yet we spend money on fancy lighting on France Ave. If the city is so concerned about alternative forms of transpiration why aren't there marked crosswalks around city hall especially between city hall and Perkins? I have asked about this several times and I was told it was put into a committee for review. Only a couple of crosswalk markings were redone this summer at SouthView middle school, several others were left faded out. Who makes the decision which crosswalks get repainted? 2 Supports comment ... Reply to David Frenkel Arnold Biebee 23 days ago I agree with much of what Joel S has shared about sidewalks and biking. Regarding transit options, Edina does not currently earn a passing grade. Those without access to a personal auto (this would include many who want to work and/or live in Edina) are not able to move about easily on public transit. The Met Transit Authority has tried to provide transit options and should be commended. However, ifyou want to get to a job with varying hours and shifts, including weekends, you will need to endure many challenges. If Edina wants to welcome workforce members to our community, especially for those who find affordable housing options in Edina nearly non- existent, we have some work to do. 2 Supports http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina comment.. . Reply to Arnold Bigbee Arnold Bigbee 23 days ago Page 3 of 15 I agree with much of what Joel S has shared about sidewalks and biking. Regarding transit options, Edina does not currently earn a passing grade. Those without access to a personal auto (this would include many who want to work and/or live in Edina) are not able to move about easily on public transit. The Met Transit Authority has tried to provide transit options and should be commended. However, if you want to get to a job with varying hours and shifts, including weekends, you will need to endure many challenges. If Edina wants to welcome workforce members to our community, especially for those who find affordable housing options in Edina nearly non- existent, we have some work to do. 0 Supports comment ... n V Arnold Bigbee 23 days ago Reply to Amold Bigbee I agree with much of what Joel S has shared about sidewalks and biking. Regarding transit options, Edina does not currently earn a passing grade. Those without access to a personal auto (this would include many who want to work and/or live in Edina) are not able to move about easily on public transit. The Met Transit Authority has tried to provide transit options and should be commended. However, if you want to get to a job with varying hours and shifts, including weekends, you will need to endure many challenges. If Edina wants to welcome workforce members to our community, especially for those who find affordable housing options in Edina nearly non- existent, we have some work to do. 0 Supports comment ... A Reply to Arnold Bigbee Arnold Bigbee 23 days ago I agree with much of what Joel S has shared about sidewalks and biking. Regarding transit options, Edina does not currently earn a passing grade. Those without access to a personal auto (this would include many who want to work and/or live in Edina) are not able to move about easily on public transit. The Met Transit Authority has tried to provide transit options and should be commended. However, if you want to get to a job with varying hours and shifts, including weekends, you will need to endure many challenges. If Edina wants to welcome workforce members to our community, especially for those who find affordable housing options in Edina nearly non- existent, we have some work to do. 0 Supports • • comment ... Reply to Arnold Bigbee „r: • http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina • Sean Hayford Oleary 23 days ago Page 4 of 15 The #I I think Edina is missing (and the region is missing) is a bicycle or bus option that parallels Highway 100. I used to work at the Cafe Inc coworking space, and I liked to go work out at Lifetime Fitness in St. Louis Park near 394. Driving a car, it was like a 6 -minute drive, straight shot there. By bike, it was a winding, tedious journey, requiring constant consultations with a map and a total distance at least 50% farther than driving. This is extremely bad compared to other metro freeways. Along 494, there are alternative routes on both sides (American Blvd and 77th/76th). 35W has Park and Portland Ave in Minneapolis/Richfield/Bloomington. 394 has Wayzata Blvd frontage roads. Highway 100 is a central north -south spine through Edina -- bicyclists need a way to follow that general route, too! 2 Supports comment... Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Andrew Brown 23 days ago As someone who has lived in Edina for 30 years graduated from it High School in 1994 & commuted to and from work and school for the last 20 years, Edina is a disaster went it comes to transportation. If you don't have a car, you can't get anywhere in a timely manner and even then the traffic backup between Hwy 62, 494, & 100 is an unmitigated disaster. Sorry to the bike lobby but this is MN & it snows & my employer doesn't have public showers. Dear Met Transit the 587 Bus line up and down 100 uses the same lane as all the vehicles stuck in traffic and Dear MNDOT when will 3 lanes on Hwy 62 ever become a bleeping priority because what you like looking at bumper to bumper traffic on your camera feeds?? Edina had a much better transportation system when our grandparents were alive. There was passenger service rail service running in Edina on the Dan Patch all the way between Northfield and Downtown Minneapolis and the street car system ran from 56th & France to 44th and then over to Uptown & downtown. Until Edina and its politicians get serious about the Dan Patch Corridor, install a circular street car that connects southdale to Grandview to the Mall of America then you can bet the farm your gonna need a good car to get anywhere from Edina. 1 Support comment... ^ V Danielle A 23 days ago Reply to Andrew Brown There are not enough sidewalks in Edina, considering how much traffic there is. We live literally three blocks from my children's school and there is no safe way to walk there for the kids, even though they are old enough to walk there if there were a safe route. So they have to take the bus, which is silly. 8 Supports Andrew Brown 23 days ago Danielle, The school district needs to be involved in this as well. They have money, $120M in new capital, they could afford to put some cement in. 0 Supports r� Tom Koon 23 days ago http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 5 of 15 I agree that there needs to be more sidewalks especially within a mile of any school. Sidewalks would provide good exercise, less need for buses and kids being driven to and from school. 4 Supports omment ... P Reply to Andrew Brow David Frenkel 23 days ago as someone with similar concerns we need more police enforcing speed limits and pedestrian crossing laws around our schools. I seldom see the police at or near schools. 1 Support :omment ... Reply to David Frenkel tiReply to Danielle A Joel Acker 23 days ago Removing sidewalks along France Ave rather than making them ADA compliant was a huge mistake. Please spend the money to restore the sidewalks that were removed. It's dangerous not having them because pedestrians still cross where the sidewalks used to exist. And if they want to follow the sidewalks many pedestrians are required to cross the road 3 times instead of once. This puts the pedestrians at risk of being hit by an inattentive driver since now they're forced to cross more streets. 3 Supports :omment... 01 Reply to Joel Acke l Joel Acker 23 days ago Removing crosswalks along France Ave rather than making them ADA compliant was a huge mistake. Please spend the money to restore the crosswalks that were removed. It's dangerous not having them because pedestrians still cross where the crosswalks used to exist. And if they want to follow the crosswalks many pedestrians are required to cross the road 3 times instead of once. This puts the pedestrians at risk of being hit by an inattentive driver since now they're forced to cross more streets. 1 Support s Scam Ilavford Oleary 23 days ago http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 • • City of Edina Page 6 of 15 • I agree. It's especially ironic because even the ones they did upgrade weren't upgraded to full ADA -compliant Accessible Pedestrian Signals. So we both removed crosswalks that were inconvenient/expensive for the project (like Parklawn & France), AND failed to upgrade the remaining ones properly. • 2 Supports comment... Reply to Sean Hayford Olea� t... Elizabeth x 23 days ago Edina's transportation choices are so unacceptable as to be one of the many reasons we are considering moving. The only choice is automobile. Walking? There is no safe sidewalk between the Community Center and Countryside Elementary School along Benton Ave. I see groups of high school football fans, children, dog walkers and cyclists navigate the narrow train overpass bridge and find that highly trafficked commuter route an accident waiting to happen. So walking in Edina: Not so much. Oh -you'd like to take a bus into the city? Sure. There are 3 options in the morning and 3 in the evening. Oh - thafs not convenient for you? Well: tough. And God forbid you should want to actually go to St Paul. Light rail? Here's an idea: Move to Eden Prairie. 7 Supports comment... �y Reply to Elizabeth 7x Tom Koon 23 days ago Add more official park and rides, allow use of public parking lots/ ramps up to 12 hours during week days, and options for parking on the street for up to 12 hours near bus stops served by express buses for those who wish to use commuter buses downtown along 50th street and along Highway 100. 1 Support comment... .i Donna Callender 23 days ago Reply to Tom Koon Now that we've paid for bike lanes, could someone teach our arrogant bicyclists to STAY IN THE BIKE LANE?? I was behind a spandex - bedecked, Lance -Armstrong wannabe who ran a stop sign and rode in the car lane, when a lovely bike lane was there for his enjoyment. Then he gave me the finger as I passed him. I would love to see more of a police presence to spot-check bike lane usage; let's see "Lance" give THEM the finger! 1 Support http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina rl-Ir Sean Hayford Oleary 22 days ago Page 7 of 15 There is no requirement under MN law for a bike to use a bike lane, and the police can't legally cite a cyclists for not using it. The "car" lane is a shared travel lane intended for all vehicles, while the bike lane is technically just a marked part of the shoulder. As a matter of practice, 99% of bicyclists voluntarily use bike lanes -- except when there are hazards, like potholes or parked cars too close. I suspect your "Lance Armstrong wannabe" had a reason to be avoiding it. 1 Support F.1 Donna Callender 22 days ago Then why install bike lanes in the first place, if they are not used? The lane in question was in the same condition as the road, totally clear and clean. I did not say there was a law. There is, however, a set of road rules: Stop for a stop sign; Do not indulge in road rage; and, as cyclists are fond of saying, Share the road. Face it, Lance, sometimes our cyclists are just selfish and obnoxious. 1 Support Sean Hayford Oleary 22 days ago • Sorry, I guess I read that as asking police to pull over cyclists or demand they use the bike lane. Police (or Public Works) simply recording who • uses the bike lane or not is probably a perfectly good idea. Why install them? Because the vast majority of cyclists DO use them, and especially for new riders, it makes them more comfortable and thus more likely to ride predictably. Improved safety, less stress for motorists, and fewer crashes all around. 3 Supports mus,, Andrew Brown 21 days ago Sean- Respect on the road is earned. And quite frankly I am at 54th & Wooddale everyday multiple times a day and not one, not one bicyclist has stopped at that stop sign and if I hit them, its my fault as the driver and its my conscience that suffers. So now I wait at that intersection if I see a cyclist anywhere within 200 yards because I know they are not stopping!!!! 1 Support Donna Callender 17 days ago Let me clarify: Cyclists who drift into other lanes unexpectedly and obstruct the other traffic in those lanes, run stop signs or stop lights, exhibit road rage, and break other traffic rules, ought to be pulled over and cited, just as any other driver would. Cyclists want to be treated as legitimate traffic, so let them, along WITH the consequences other vehicles face when doing the above. Does that help? 1 Support • http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 0 1� u • City of Edina comment.. . Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary comment ... Reply to Donna Callender [Ad Don Krebs 23 days ago Page 8 of 15 comments... 1) I have heard/read that the City of Edina has a standing resolution that it will not participate in the discussion, planning or implementation of light rail in the City. Does not appear that the City is very open to change or options. How about rescinding that resolution if it really exists. 2) We live close to 66th Street West of Hwy 100. There is a small park near us that is used by lots of kids summer and winter. We like to walk. Not having sidewalks along 66th Street West of Hwy 100 is an accident waiting to happen. This is especially true since 66th is used as a bypass to Hwy 62 when it backs up and an exit byway for Edina High School. I would encourage you to take a walk up/down 66th Street any Summer weekday between 5:30 and 6:00 PM. It can be a real act of Faith..... 2 Supports comment... Reply to Don Krebs Shelley Ch 23 days ago In response to the city's comment, "The City is intersted in what you think about transportation options in Edina in the July discussion." that was in the e-mail the city sent out about this forum, I would like to say that I am a driver in the city, and I don't like 25 mph limits on main throughways. To me, it is either a ploy to gamer more income for the city through driving citations (greedy and destructive), or it is someone's attempt to exert power over the populace (evil). There is no benefit to 25 mph over 30 mph on main throughways. For me, this is worth leaving the city over, and I am making my way toward doing just that. 1 Support comment.. . Reply to Shelley Ch Emily Boettee 22 days ago I think that despite the upgrades to crosswalks trying to get across the street is still really inconvenient and dangerous for pedestrians in Edina. A crosswalk by itself doesn't make walking safer if drivers don't make a full stop at stop lights/signs, roll through the crosswalks and not stop at all for right turns on red lights. When pedestrian activation buttons are far away (e.g. northeast side of Wooddale), don't tum on or take up to 5 minutes to activate (e.g. 70th), walking becomes difficult at best and truly dangerous at worst. I think these types of inconveniences are especially problematic near schools and parks because kids are more unpredictable, less familiar with the rules and harder to see. It would be great if crosswalks could be planned/designed with pedestrians as a higher priority. Especially near schools and parks, it would be great if the ped signals (at intersections with traffic lights) came on automatically. There are intersections near 50th and France that have an automatic ped light and it is much more convenient and much safer. 2 Supports Andrew Brown 21 days ago http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 9 of 15 Emily with all due respect, with everything I have to do in a day to support my family & stay in Edina, there is no other way to get around Edina then by car. There is no Dan Patch passenger rail service to downtown Minneapolis, the 587 Bus line uses the same lanes as the vehicle traffic. There is no circular bus service for me to hop on to in order to get a medical appointment at Southdale, the little bus Edina has running to Mall of America has very limited hours and service. It took Edina 40 years to get a proper transit station at Southdale & the best bus shelter Edina has sits outside City Hall!! If you want people out of their cars then you have to offer a massive upgrade to public transport and that's not just a City leadership issue, that's an issue for our State Representative Ron E & Senator Melissa F. Heck Hwy 62 is still 2 lanes. 1 Support El Emily Boettee 21 days ago I'm not saying you shouldn't get around by car. I'm just pointing out that it is hard to cross the street, for those who like to walk. 2 Supports comment ... comment ... �l X�w Ben Pence 21 days ago Reply to Andrew Brown Reply to Emily Boettge Regarding sidewalks in NW Edina- It's frustrating that we went to the expense of building sidewalks (and as a walker I'm glad that we built them!) but still left all these little gaps at blind curves and busy intersections that render much of the work useless and which isolate the area. Examples: Dovre Dr and Lincoln Dr.; Blake Rd. and Interlachen; Lincoln Dr. and Malibu... I'm glad to see the Sidewalk Plan addresses many of these gaps but 20-30 years is a long wait. Also, I know I'm not the first person to request a crosswalk on Vernon at Garden Park. This was the site of a traffic fatality not too many years ago, during evening rush hour the park is packed with families attending soccer games, Vernon itself is badly congested these days ... it's just a mess. 5 Supports V11 Replyto Ben Pence KB Montgomery 21 days ago Edina has a Walk Score of 34 out of a 100. Its best zip code for walking has a score of 52 and poorest a score of 17. Residents at both ends of the age spectrum value walkability in making long-term decisions regarding where they choose to live. Young people want to live in cities with exceptional mass transit, bike -ability and walk -ability. Active seniors want the same. And families with children want to be able to safely send their children to a nearby park or school or cross the street with their strollers. Edina has made some progress recently with a Living Streets Policy. Further, the Park Board has outlined a goal of connecting Edina's parks via bikeways (embodied in a draft of the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan). Each of these plans is commendable and necessary to attract and retain residents now and in the future. Edina is far behind in terms of mass transit. My two children, one in the Bay Area and the other in Hawaii, rely on biking, walking and mass transit as each has chosen to be car -free. Most of their friends (all in their 20's) have chosen the same. When my daughter comes home for the summer her mass transit options in Edina are very limited. Other nearby cities, realizing the importance of mass transit to their long-term viability and sustainability have chosen to make substantial investments in mass transit infrastructure. The City of Minnetonka, realizing the long-term benefit of nearby mass transit, recently agreed to commit $2 million to the Southwest Light Rail even though the nearest station will be in Hopkins. If Edina is to attract and retain residents, it must make multi -modal transportation a reality, not just theory. A recent example is Grandview. Even though the 7 Guiding Principles call to improve movement throughout the District through multiple modes of transportation, the city is 5 years into the Grandview planning http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 10 of 15 • process without a transportation plan for the area (no walk -ability plan, no mass transit plan and no bike trail connecting the Grandview area with the rest of the city.) There is a plan to create dense housing on the former public works site along with some public spaces but no mention of how to handle the increased car traffic. While the Grandview process is just one example, it is a significant one due to the multi-year investment in volunteer hours and staff as well as consultant dollars. It is commendable to put transportation goals on paper. If Edina aspires to be a premiere city of the future, it must find a way to realize those goals. 6 Supports comment.. . Reply to K.B. Montgomery Ilan Hortensius at August 05, 2015 at 1:26pm CDT I wish there were more bus options. There should be more public transportation. And I wish the light rail option had been considered instead of just refusing to consider having it go through Edina. Good public transportation is important and unfortunately is severely lacking. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Lian Hortensius Hooe Melton at August 05, 2015 at 1:27pm CDT • I lived many years in Stockholm and have spent much time in Holland as well. Cities in Europe, even relatively modem ones, were built with high densities to afford maximum use of public transportation, bikes, sidewalks, and also to preserve urban open space. Most of Edina was developed around a car -centered life so it's expensive and difficult to change that basic infrastructure pattern. But persist we must. Live 12 years in Sweden, raised two children, worked full time and never had to own a car. We could easily access the countryside and smaller towns as well by train. Probably the biggest impact of providing more sidewalks and bike lanes will be on our health and longevity. 4 Supports z Louise Weaver at August 05, 2015 at 6:33pm CDT We need more comprehensive planning. Doing this one project at a time is not good planning. Why not use Europe as a source of planning ideas? 0 Supports Reply to Louise Weaver 11 Reply to Hope Melton Melissa Madison at August 05, 2015 at 1:31pm CDT • http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 11 of 15 Edina is a member of the I-494 Corridor Commission which offers free commuting resources including bicycle maps, route recommendations, tips on biking with traffic as well as custom transit itineraries with two free transit passes and assistance finding someone to carpool with. The free resources are found at: www.494corridor.org 0 Supports Reply to Melissa Madison Joshua Ahlbere at August 05, 2015 at 1:36pm CDT I've voiced this opinion several times in the 'speak up' polis process, but the issue remains. I wanted to once again underscore the absolute need to build a sidewalk on Valley View Rd between Gleason and Bello. In past city meetings we discussed how these projects were assessed, and the criterion by which they are measured to determine their level of priority for the community. This stretch of Valley View hit on several of these priority triggers, which I believe merits funding it as an immediate (relatively speaking) ad- hoe/one-off project for the city. Unfortunately this sidewalk project is still not mapped out for the near term (neither 2015, or 2016). These triggers are: It's an'Active School Route': Valley View Rd is used heavily by school age children walking to and from school. For students within walking distance of the school (which I believe was .7 miles), they have no choice but to walk to class. The south/western/south western portion of this radius clearly identifies a perilous walk for these students. Students walking from this area have no real choice but to either risk the danger of walking Valley View Rd., or take a longer route to school to walk safely due to the lack of sidewalk on Valley View Rd. Traffic Count: Traffic counts exceeding 500 cars per hour are considered priority. Valley View Rd., according to readouts I was shown on past city boards was 400-500% that number. Average Traffic Speed: In previous meetings spoke about when more than 85% of the traffic exceeds the speed limit, this also merits priority. The average speed on Valley View Rd. is 33 MPH+ (30 MPH limit). Valley View Rd. will be a broken link with the new sidewalks being installed on the south end of Valley View Rd, and therefore (according to the city council) important to the city to complete. Valley View Rd. serves as a through road. During heavy congestion times — rush hours, when children are heading to and from school — traffic backs up significantly and adds to the danger to pedestrians. This fact is exacerbated by cars parking on the odd side of the street, squeezing pedestrian traffic into the woods to avoid danger. Additionally, when summer projects on the major highways, motorists choose to take VV as a way around traffic -- and do so with little regard for citizens who live there. Lighting is a serious issue. This is an ancillary need, but lacking any real lighting in this stretch of road makes it even more treacherous for pedestrian traffic — including children walking to and from school. During the winter months this is particularly worrisome with sunset happening very early in the evening when children are still leaving school. Aside from these factors, there are a number of other factors that also add to the danger of that particular route -- but I won't go into more detail. I know that there are a number of projects you are considering as you approach next year, but I ask for your partnership to make this particular project a priority. It's a clear shortcoming in the sidewalk infrastructure, and poses a threat to the citizens in the area. In my opinion, and that of many of my peers in the public meetings I attended, it should be prioritized over other projects I would consider renovation or enhancement. Basic public safety should always come as the highest priority, and citizens like myself on Valley View Rd. do not have that safety at present. The last thing I will say is that I believe the lack of sidewalks is also creating some of the traffic problem. Parents feeling pressured to pick up and drop off their children use Valley View as a route to get to and from their schools. While I do not have any empirical evidence to support this argument, I do feel as though adding a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. would ease the minds of some parents, which would in turn increase their children's ability to walk to and from school. It was mentioned several times in past sessions that it is a strategic priority of the city to ease automobile traffic. I believe adding in a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. ladders up to that strategic initiative and would help. Thank you for your support. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Joshua A irg http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 �J • City of Edina • Andrea Pienho at August 05, 2015 at 1:51pm CDT is • Page 12 of 15 My top priority would be to add bike paths through the city. The long-term plans have a north/south path that connects to the Greenway and an east/west path that would connect the rest of the city. I have never heard of an actual plan and timeline to implement these plans. I am also a supporter of mass transit. I currently commute on the 587 to downtown (when I don't bike). However, with the current rail plans, adding rail through Edina in order to connect to the SW LRT would actually make me transfer and take longer than the current bus service. I also worry that upgrading the rail to support LRT would also increase freight rail service through Edina, which I do not support. Even though I like the idea of rail, I do not actually think it is the best mass transit solution for Edina. 3 Supports Louise Weaver at August 05, 2015 at 6:29pm CDT I don't think they have plans for the LRT to go through Edina. We will need busing to connect with it. 0 Supports 11 Reply to Louise Weaver comment ... Reply to Andrea Piepho Bruce I.anet'ord at August 05, 2015 at 2:16pm CDT I am an avid cyclist, age 64, and I find it very difficult to find safe bike routes within Edina. I just picked up a Hennepin County bike map from the library showing all the bikeways. If you look at Edina, it is almost blank. Except for a section on Vernon ave., Inerlachen, and 70th street, (none of which connect to anything), there is no place to ride in our town. Not something one would expect from a community like ours. There are a number of streets wide enough to be striped for bike lanes, I vote for at least starting there. 3 Supports comment ... A V Fran Fabrizio at August 05, 2015 at 2:56pm CDT Reply to Bruce Langford On the topic of whether we have enough options, I'll share the following observations. I live north of Hwy 62 and east of Hwy 100, so this feedback pertains to that part of town (which I sense actually has the best set of options of any part of Edina). Bus - I work at the U. I would take the bus to work more regularly if the express bus had a later departure in the morning or even if the service along Wooddale was more frequent. By the time I get my child to school it's usually too late for reasonable bus options from this part of town. Bike - I do bike commute about once per week, using Wooddale and Sunnyside/44th corridors. I also bike all over town for recreation. One of the reasons I live in the NE quadrant of Edina is that it's the most reasonable part of town from which to bike commute towards the city. Hwy 62 is a major barrier to biking - the Wooddale pedestrian bridge should be upgraded to support biking (and wheelchairs, for that matter) - the pedestrian bridges by the Community Center are excellent examples of effective pedestrian/bike bridges. I wish it were more comfortable to bike to Southdale Mall / France Ave area, but the bike lane on Valley View ends abruptly at Hwy 62, which makes it much more challenging to travel that way. Hwy 100 is less of a bike barrier, and the Vernon bike lanes are decent, but the rest of the western part of Edina is very challenging. The other day I went 2-3 miles out of my way because I was at the Hopkins Depot on the bike trail and there's no good way to get from there to the Community Center area on a bike (Blake / Interlachen not bike friendly). I ended up going through SLP and then back down the Wooddale corridor instead. I've biked down to the Normandale Lake area too - Cahill Road good for biking, getting over there is kind of an adventure, though. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina 2 Supports 'comment... p v Reply to Fran Fabrizio Page 13 of 15 Isaac Brobere at August 05, 2015 at 5:26pm CDT I live on France north of hwy 62. We've tried biking to Centennial Lakes, Southdale, Edina water park, etc. Just like the solitary bike lanes along 70th there is half size, elevated sidewalks and no room to ride a bike much less walk safely. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Isaac Broberg Louise Weaver at August 05, 2015 at 6:22pm CDT I live in Grandview and do not drive. The east -west 46th bus line runs every half hour to go anywhere out of Grandview. There are rush hour express buses also. That is not so bad, but to go north or south toward Southdale or South France, etc. takes another bus or two, as most lines end at Southdale. Often the transfer buses will take off just as my bus arrives and there is another 15 - 30 minute wait for the next bus. So I found that going to the YMCA or the community garden took three buses and one hour of travel time plus walking time from the bus. It is a cold or hot wait in seasonal weather at the Southdale bus shelters. Perhaps incoming buses could have a stop at the front of the bus loop, so riders can make their connection. I'd like to be able to bus to Bredesen Park and back during the day or directly to Southdale or South France over Vernon, or some more direct way. I'd also like to bus directly to St. Louis Park or Hopkins etc. without having to bus to Uptown via France and then back out of Uptown, requiring three buses. When the Southwest Lite rail goes in we will need a bus that meets up with it without busing back into Minneapolis. I heard that there was a route tried before to St. Louis Park, but there was not good ridership. Perhaps the proposed routes can be presented on a map for riders to vote on; and also advertised well so there is better communication between planners and riders. Transit improvements could use its own website and maybe Facebook page. I still haven't figured out how to use the Green Line without busing all the way into Minneapolis, otherwise I'd love to take it to St. Paul. I am very much in favor of completing the Lite Rail Transit Plan. Future transit in Edina will serve the increased growth and needs to mesh well with the regional plan. Good planning will attract ridership. It amazes me that there has been so many planning problems with the Southwest Lite Rail. St. Louis Park probably would have been the best route for it; and would have been more affordable if there hadn't been so much delay with people objecting to it. Why go ahead with seeking approval and funding when the plan has not been completely vetted? The same thing happened with the Stadium project and birds. It was obvious that the Stadium would be a bird killer, but it wasn't deemed important to consider. I used to bike a lot, but I am older and don't bike as I am afraid of being hit by a car. Just walking is risky with so many cell phone engaged drivers. I have proposed a cross walk at Vernon and Jerry's/WellsFargo Bank, as it is difficult for pedestrians with the fast heavy traffic there. I'm very pleased to hear of plans for more biking, side walks, trails, and the over all planning for improvements. Clearly we can no longer rely completely on Fossil Fuels for the future of transit or our environment. 0 Supports Reply to Louise Weaver NAM Katie Iwanin at August 06, 2015 at 10:39am CDT Please consider the common themes that many raised in this comment thread, they are quite clear: http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 • • City of Edina Page 14 of 15 • 1. More sidewalks -- (I live on west 58th and I've seen too many close calls for people and bicycles, its not safe --please put a sidewalk there soon so my kids can walk to school!) 2. More bus routes 3. Continued improvement of the bike system: paths, compliant bridges, safety, etc. 4. Reconsider lightrail on Dan Patch corridor -- it will modernize our city. If you don't commit now, we'll soon be behind every other major city in the area and have to play catch-up Thank you for your consideration. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Katie Iwanin Sign Up Connect email address.. -signup http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/enough-options 8/12/2015 City of Edina City of Edina • Home ElDiscussions • Forams Sigh :as • Meetinis • Surveys Email email ddress... Passwor, or, Sig lr: Connect Sign Ue Sign In Uke o Tweet Shan Page I of 8 J S eak Up, Edina. 'm ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Transportation Options The City of Edina's transportation network continues to evolve for all types of users as sidewalks are built as part of the sidewalk facilities man, more bike facilities are added and streets are reconstructed and improved. Several bus transit lines also cross the city. The City is intersted in what you think about transportation options in Edina. 3 Topics 69 Answers Closed 2015-08-06 View Discussion Topic: Your Use What transportation options besides driving do you use, and for what purpose? How often do you partake? 16 Responses 16 Responses 16 Joel Steiner, Community volunteer about t month ago I'm retired, so I don't have the daily commute to work. Living in the Colony just east of Fairview Southdale, when I need medical care, I'm able to walk to appointments, although of course, most of the route from my home doesn't have sidewalks. The situation is even worse currently with all the construction on the south side of Southdale, with sidewalks blocked and no clearly marked cross walks. The foot traffic between Southdale Medical Building and Southdale Hospital is probably the most risky pedestrian situation I am aware of in the city and not having sidewalks within a block of a hospital to me seems close to absurd. In terms of shopping, much of it I do in businesses along Xerxes/York, with the occasional excursions over to Penn Ave. (via 64th) and France. The area is not at all bike or pedestrian friendly, although things are slowly improving. 4-5 days a week I work out at the Y. It is a little too far to walk, particularly because with construction, sidewalks are often blocked, and because there aren't a lot of bunches to sit down and take a break. Riding a bike would be extremely dangerous, with traffic speeds I'd say as much as 10 miles an hour above the limit, the lanes not terribly wide and drivers making lot of turns and lane changes (many times unsignaled). I have looked and one could take the ride on a side street just east of York, including driving through a park), but there is evidence that few do this - because when the parking lot is full, there may be 2-3 bikes in the Y's bike racks. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 • • City of Edina Page 2 of 8 • So the message is because of Edina's limited facilities for getting around the city by bike or walking, I do a lot less of both than I'd like to do. As you get older, you develop more common sense about exposing yourself to heavy car traffic, because if you get hit by a car, your life is over or greatly changed. The lack of pedestrian and bike accidents isn't because we have wonderfully safe options - but that they are so obviously hazardous, that people don't take the risk. Of course, one call comfortably walk or bike for recreation in the city's parks and paths, but when you have to drive to get there, that is just less satisfying, and that doesn't help you if you want to get your exercise doing your daily errands. 2 Supports comment ... Reply to Joel Stegner Steffan Richardson 27 days ago Walking is great exercise. 3 Supports comment ... Reply to Steffan Richardson Arnold Bi -bee 23 days ago • My wife and I live in the Village Homes of Edinborough. It is easy to walk or bike to Centennial Lakes, Edinborough Park, Southdale, Southdale Library and more. Our neighborhood includes excellent retail, medical, grocery and restaurant options within one mile in Edina (and Bloomington). Because there are affordable housing options in our neighborhood, there are a few access points to public transit. (The transit options do not make it easy to get to all of the Central, West or Northern portions of Edina without transfers, long waits and limited hours/days of access. I often take the express (4578) to downtown Mpls for Chamber of Commerce meetings. 0 Supports ply to Arnold Bigbee Andrew Brown 23 days ago I commute daily to and from Edina to get to work and it is horrible. Edina is a transportation land locked island with no Passenger Rail service on the Dan Patch, no street cars or circular bus system. I will have to have a car for the rest of my life if I want to continue to live here as there is no leadership from a local or regional perspective regarding transportation 1 Support Reply to Andrew Brown 0 10-113 it, 23 days ago http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 3 of 8 Edina has been a wonderful community for me and for my kids. I really support its celebration of walking and biking; I think these daily events • contribute to a healthy and connected citizenry. One of the serious conflicts for walkers and bikers is the saturation of waste haulers on trash day. Between the yard waste pick-up, recycling, and trash we can have as many as 20 heavy truck trips down our street in a single day. The pneumatic container pick-ups require the drivers to drive down both sides of the street for trash, recycling, and lawn waste and that's an accident just waiting to happen. Bloomington has proven that single vendor waste haulers save money, are more energy efficient, and save wear and tear on the streets... and it would certainly make the pedestrian/bike rider experience more pleasant, less smelly, quieter, and safer on trash day! 1 Support comment ... Reply to John Hamilton Elizabeth x 23 days ago We park downtown and take light rail to a number of restaurants and tap rooms (oh - yeah: Edina. There are these things called tap rooms in ...oh I don't know - the rest of the metro? Maybe you should see what life is like since the 1990's.) as well as the airport to avoid high parking rates at the airport. Here in Edina there are options to ride a bike - which we do regularly. That is fine. But it is entirely a LEISURELY activity. Let's face it: there are not a lot of Edinans commuting to work on those bike paths from Blake Ave to 50th & France. 4 Supports ... ^ (comment "11 Reply to Elizabeth x L� • Don Krebs 23 days ago comment... We like to walk and do so about 3/4 times per week. this is the first community we have lived in (others have been Lincoln. NE; Omaha, NE; Grand Rapids, MI) where sidewalks are noticeably lacking. We live West of Hwy 100 and South of Hwy 62 just off of 66th Street. We have a great park nearby that is heavily used by kids around the area. Not having sidewalks on 66th Street West of Hwy 100 is an accident waiting to happen. Sixty-sixth is a thru-fare for exiting from Edina High School and a by-pass for Hwy 62 when backups occur (always in the evening rush hour or two). I invite you to take a walk up or down 66th Street during that rush hour to experience the rush..... PS: Sidewalks stop just West of Hwy 100 but extend East all the way to Penn Avenue and beyond. Go figure.... thanks for your consideration. 3 Supports Jcomment... Reply to Don Krebs A+ s' ;z Emily Boettee 22 days ago We try to walk/run everyday. Either for fitness, transportation (school in particular), to see neighbors and for our dogs. Weather is usually not an obstacle, so we get out pretty much daily all year; but we do not always feel safe walking in Edina—especially in the colder, darker months it can be dangerous. 2 Supports Andrew Brown 21 days ago • http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 4 of 8 • Emily- I'm glad your family stays healthy but for some of us we are not that fortunate. My grandmother died at 87 from Parkinson's she drove until she was 80 because at 80 it wasn't too practical to be walking in the snow to get to Park Nicollet or Fairview Southdale for Doctor's appointments and my sister, my mom, my Aunt and I all have to work. My Mom is a breast cancer survivor and is now nearing retirement, she would love to take a circular bus and even walk a short distance to get to it because moving to an apartment or condo at Southdale is way way way more expensive than living in a home she owns and I can help look after the house (snow plow/ mow yard) because I live close by. The population is ageing dramatically with the baby boom and we as a nation have to get serious about transportation and by serious transportation, I mean rails and buses and heated bus shelters. Not everyone can afford to move to a retirement community, a lot of us will die in our own homes because we can't afford the care or the cost to move, I know I will eventually be one of them 0 Supports comment... AI Reply to Andrew Brown • • comment ... V Emily Boettee 21 days ago Reply to Emily Boettge I definitely don't think walking should be the only option and I don't expect seniors to walk to doctor's appointments in the snow. But every family has challenges and they might be slightly different depending on individual circumstances. For example, walking home from school might be the best option for some kids. Yes, walking can be healthy and that is great and we are fortunate on that count. However, walking isn't always a luxury—sometimes it is a necessity. 0 Supports comment ... n V KB Montoomery 21 days ago Reply to Emily Boettge With our kids mostly out of the house, my husband and I spend more time biking and walking. We use the two-mile loop at Bredesen often. We are also grateful for the Chain of Lakes biking and walking paths (what would Minneapolis be without them?) and recent improvements along the river downtown; thanks to Minneapolis' early planners for their foresight in keeping them public! While we love to bike, biking in Edina can be a challenge. There is no safe east -west route through the center of the city and no easy or safe way to connect with the Greenway. We would welcome more protected bike paths throughout the city as a way to both cut down on car trips and stay healthy. We would also welcome light rail both to downtown Minneapolis and MSP. We would love to be able to hop the light rail and enjoy the amazing performing and visual arts offerings downtown as well as renowned restaurants. No more traffic jams or parking problems! If residents could make the commute in 20 minutes via hassle -free light rail, they wouldn't be as likely to move to a downtown apartment or condo. Aging baby boomers as well as Gen Vers and Millennials have far different lifestyles and expectations than those of generations past. Edina's transportation plans (and actions) will need to keep pace or risk losing active and engaged residents. 1 Support kerry kirvida at August 05, 2015 at 1:20pm CDT I take the bus to work in downtown Minneapolis. Yes, I do wish there were more bus options through Edina so I wouldn't have to drive to the nearest bus stop http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 5 of 8 2. In the summer I bike to work via Blake road to Midtown Greenway. Yes, I do wish that Blake road was wider and smoother so I didn't feel like I was taking my life in my hands to bike to work! 3. My husband and I walk/run/bike and we have 3 kids under 6 years old that we take on the road. I don't think we need sidewalks necessarily but YES drivers need to STOP at STOP signs. We live in Parkwood Knolls (NW Edina) and Stop signs appear to be a "suggestion." 1 Support Mary Wiley at August 05, 2015 at 1:56pm CDT We like to walk several days a week in our neighborhood. Most of the street we walk do not have sidewalks but we try to stay on low traffic streets. What we have noticed is the deplorable condition of many streets and intersections. Check out 66th & Valley View sometime. And the new concrete on McGuire just east of Tracy is already disintegrating. Shouldn't the contractor who installed that crap be responsible for repairing/replacing it? And yes, we are aging boomers who do not appreciate the gouging up of our streets to add bike lanes that are used by very few. 0 Supports comment.. . Reply to Mary Wiley Fran Fabrizio at August 05, 2015 at 3:02pm CDT Bike - I bike to work (at the U) about lx per week. I bike for fun 1-3x per week besides that. The most important bike facilities for me are the Wooddale bike lanes (please keep the country club shrub wall trimmed, they often grow into the bike lane meaning I have the choice of swerving into traffic or getting smacked in the face with a branch) and the Wooddale/Sunnyside/44th route. It mostly works fine (save for the shrub problem). Need more bike lane connections to the France/Southdale area - the termination of the Valley View bike lane at Hwy 62 is unfortunate. The Wooddale pedestrian bridge over Hwy 62 needs to be more bike friendly (the wheel guide rails don't count). I like biking over to Bredesen or down to Normandale Lake area. Connections to the latter area are a little disconnected, though Cahill bike lane is appreciated. Bus - I take it occasionally. The express route along NormandaleBenton/Vernon is great but needs a later run in the morning. Bus service along Wooddale is too infrequent to be a good choice. Walk - Walk recreationally daily. I feel that there are sidewalks where they need to be for the most part. I feel safe walking with my child around town. 0 Supports V11 Reply to Fran Fabrizio Fran Fabrizio at August 05, 2015 at 3:05pm CDT Also, as I work at the U, I do use light rail often. If/when it comes through SLP, I anticipate biking to the line and then train in for events downtown or maybe as a way to get in a partial bike ride on the way to work. 0 Supports comment ... n Reply to Fran Fabrizio http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 • • City of Edina Mindy Ahler at August 06, 2015 at 12:02am CDT Page 6 of 8 I would have liked to comment that I use my bike as my primary means of transport in all seasons. When it gets icy I try to take the bus, but that is a very limited option in Edina unless I want to go downtown or to Southdale. More bike options to get to the High School and other schools safely would also be appreciated. We have some work to do in Edina to raise awareness that bikes are traffic just like cars - I get some cars that are very rude to me on my bike when I need to get somewhere that requires I travel on a busier street - for example getting to City Hall requires going on 50th which is quite unfriendly to bikes. City Hall should be the most accessible location in the city for all transportation options! 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Mindy Ahler Sign Up Connect email address Sign Up Participants • Ik http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/your-use 8/12/2015 City of Edina City of Edina � • Home I T Discussions • Forums SighWFas • Meetings • Surveys Email email Vddress. Pas wor are In or, Sag!ll: Connect Sign Up Sign In Like o _E:7T Shan Page 1 of 6 4I9 fV alp U dla ! r ` P5 ' µ ,,� • ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! > JOIN .c discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Transportation Options The City of Edina's transportation network continues to evolve for all types of users as sidewalks are built as part of the sidewalk facilities lnan, more bike facilities are added and streets are reconstructed and improved. Several bus transit lines also cross the city. The City is intersted in what you think about transportation options in Edina. 3 Topics 69 AnswersI Closed 2015-08-06 View Discussion Topic: Favorite Part What is your favorite part about the City's transportation network? 11 Responses 11 Responses a, Joel Stegner, Community volunteer about I month ago As I've said the roads are great - and the city is great about plowing them during the winter. However, for a first class city, that simply meets my expectations. I have already discussed the short comings of transition, biking and walking in the city. Thinking broadly, the best transportation feature of the city is a private solution created by Fairview Southdale - the skyway from its west parking ramp to the main hospital building. The organization was willing to make a major investment to keep people walking from the ramp to the hospital safe. Can you imagine all those people walking across France? What a mess that would be. I like that because the hospital acknowledged and responded to a problem. They knew that they needed more parking, being landlocked, but dealt with a dangerous situation with a well tested solution, created originally in downtown Minneapolis. In contrast, there is a tunnel connection between Southdale Medical Building (which just underwent a major expansion) and the hospital. That works well for people who know about it, but is invisible, so you have constant foot traffic across 65th. This probably is true because two entities are involved and cooperation puts in an extra barrier to putting in a skyway from that building into the hospital as well. Southdale felt ownership over the problem and found a solution, albeit one that wasn't inexpensive. I really don't know to what degree the city feels ownership of the limited support it offers for walkers, bikers and transit users. Even the Living Streets concept is focus on the streets and the private motor vehicles, rather than on other transportation options. One thing that creates inertia and resistance to making the needed efforts to modernize a city is the inabiity to get from Point A to Point B - not just for the people who drive, even if it is only a block, but for everyone else. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/favorite-part 8/12/2015 • • City of Edina Page 2 of 6 • The millennial generation isn't as tied to owning and driving a car as other generations. They are more inclined to take transit or rent a car when they need it. While this may change when they have children at home, that is only one phase of their lives and we need transportation options for all generations and lifestyles. You only have options is they are all relatively safe and easy to use. 0 Supports comment.. . Reply to Joel Stegner Sean Hayford Oleary 23 days ago The neighborhood streets in the Country Club area! I wish more Edina streets were designed like that (narrow street, sidewalks on both sides, beautiful boulevard trees). 2 Supports comment ... Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Arnold Bi¢bee 23 days ago So far, the best thing is the added attention to sidewalks and biking. Every so often, I will encounter a sidewalk that needs attention and let City Hall know about it. (Such as the west side of York Ave between the YMCA and 66th St. It is old and in need of replacement in many places. Not so bad if it weren't the main pedestrian thoroughfare for many senior citizens in the high rises on York near the Promenade, many of whom use wheelchairs or walkers to get to Target, Cub, CVS, Lunds and Byerlys and Walgreens for food and prescriptions. Promenade construction has made sidewalk access between York and France less attractive at times.) 2 Supports V11 ReplytoArnold Bigbee Andrew Brown 23 days ago There is nothing good about the transportation system in Edina, the cyclists I see blow stop signs in this city is hilarious, 54th & Wooddale I just stop and stay there in my car so they can blow on through. I go by everyday and not a one has stopped. I was wondering does a white border around a stop sign mean its only a guideline or suggestion? Oh sidewalks, even better especially in East Edina, everybody walks in the street anyway, why am I paying for those again and at $114K a snow plow, thanks for nothing. I'm glad I have my car cause passenger rail or street cars or a bus circular will never happen in my lifetime 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Andrew Brown 13 Sharon G 23 days ago http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/favorite-part 8/12/2015 City of Edina Page 3 of 6 I like that the bike lanes near Valley View Road & Wooddale are colored green so they are very visible for drivers. I like that some roads (not enough) have large & frequent "bike symbols" to remind drivers there may be bikes in the road. Thats really all there is to like. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Sharon G F Elizabeth x 23 days ago What I like best about the City's transportation options are that I do not have to worry about stopping my gas guzzling car to wait for a train ... ever. There are none of those noisy buses on our pristine streets. No sir. Our husbands arrive from their office jobs and we women have plenty of daylight driving hours to get our hair and nails done and get dinner on the table before our 2.3 children arrive from their top ranked public schooling off those adorable yellow school buses. (the only ones that I know are OK in my neighborhood.) Thank goodness we don't have smelly public transportation here in Edina. No indeed - I put on my Northface jacket, Lululemon yoga pants and jump into my Escalade to grab an iced coffee at Starbucks and wait for my little darlings to finish skating at Braemar. Certainly, there is no reason to have public transportation options to go to that sports complex that we have invested millions of dollars in to get kids and adults to exercise, right? 2 Supports comment ... Don Krebs 23 days ago V11 Reply toElizabeth x comment... We originally picked this location because it is central to downtown (for work) and the Airport (work related travel). We now love it for the same reasons (and many others). Easy access and great central location. We are however, getting tired of airplane noise. Especially that flight that goes over at about 5:45AM on weekdays and the flight formation that takes of between 7:00 AM and 8:30 AM and returns landing in the early evenings. I'm actually beginning to like those SW winds...... which sends them over someone else's home. Too bad Arnie cancelled to "new airport" sight years ago. Ever been to Denver's Airport?.... 0 Supports V11 Reply to Don Krebs Emily Boettee 22 days ago I think the sidewalk facilities plan is a step in the right direction and I am grateful that Edina is making an effort to put sidewalks in high -needs areas; but it is going to take a long time (20-30 years) and even when it is finally implemented the vast majority of Edina will never have sidewalks. In the meantime, I think it would be great if we could make other efforts to improve safety for pedestrians, like education, outreach, enforcement and tolerance. 0 Supports Andrew Brown 21 days ago Emily- While I appreciate the council's effort's to establish a master sidewalk plan, sidewalks & bike paths never helped A: My 80 year old grandmother get to her Parkinson's appointments B: My 65 year old mom make it to work on time C: My 18 year old cousins get to University D: http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/favorite-part 8/12/2015 • • • • • 11 City of Edina Page 4 of 6 Make it to work on my daily commute on time Until a reliable street car or circular bus system combined with Dan Patch Passenger Rail & Connections to things like the airport & the Mall of America are implemented, then I will still be driving my car 0 Supports Emily Boettge 21 days ago I still primarily drive my car too and wasn't implying that people shouldn't drive. I just think for those people who like to walk, sidewalks are important for safety. I completely agree with you about bus, rail, and other transit options. The question asks what is your favorite feature. I wasn't commenting on driving or suggesting that people shouldn't drive. For those who like to walk, especially kids walking to school, having safe routes is important. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Andrew Brown comment ... Reply to Emily Boettge Fran Fabrizio at August 05, 2015 at 3:11pm CDT The city does a good job with the roads, especially in snow I appreciate the ease of driving in Edina vs. Minneapolis (or, the worst, St. Paul). I appreciate the increased attention to bikes and that it is at least feasible to bike into the city from my part of Edina. There's a lot of work to be done, but I see the progress (and I've noticed the recent posters talking about mutual awareness on the part of bikers and drivers). I agree too many bikers don't follow the rules of the road, and plenty of drivers don't either. It's going to take a lot of education, and the more mainstream biking becomes the more everyone will get used to it and learn how to interoperate with each other. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Fran Fabrizio Sign Up Connect email address... F Sign Up Participants http://speakupedina.org/discussions/transportation-options/topics/favorite-part 8/12/2015 • is To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: Aug. 18, 2015 Subject: 2015 Images of Edina Photo Contest Presentation Action Requested: Present the 2015 Images of Edina photo contest awards. o Le `-.� � ,2 o �exn Agenda Item #: V. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Information / Background: The City established the Images of Edina photo contest in 2004 to recognize and collect photographs that capture Edina as a preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Each year, residents and employees who work in Edina are called to submit their favorite "Edina" photos taken over the past year. The photos are judged on subject matter, composition, clarity, depth of field, lighting, quality of color or black and white, artistry and drama, degree of difficulty, Edina relevance and overall impact. Photos were judged and selected by City of Edina and Edina Magazine staff. From the submitted photos, judges chose the winning photographs in five categories: Living, Learning, Raising Families and Doing Business. Once submissions were finished, the photos were published on Edina Magazine's website for readers to vote, selecting the Readers' Choice Award Winner. The winners of the 2015 Images of Edina Contest are: • Living: People — "Sunset at Braemar" by Bryan Singer • Living: Plants & Wildlife — "Centennial Lakes Babies" by Becky Parkin • Learning — "Hope and Happiness" by Julie Prior -Miller • Raising Families — "Wheeee!" by David Murphy • Doing Business — "Say Cheese!" by Lisa Hafey • Readers' Choice — "What an Edina Kid Does in the Winter While Waiting for the School Bus" by Ryan Gordon Of the category winners, one photo was chosen as the overall winner, and will be announced at the City Council meeting. Mayor Jim Hovland will present awards to all the winners. All but one award winners will be in attendance and will pose for a photo with the mayor. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The photos will be framed and hung in the Finance Department at Edina City Hall, along with the winners of the 2013 contest. The photos will also be printed in Edina Magazine and may be used in the City's publications, such as About Town. The Communications & Technology Services Department would like to extend a "Thank You" to everyone who submitted a photo to the photo contest, to the judges who volunteered their time and to Edina Magazine for partnering to make this another successful year. The 12th -Annual Images of Edina photo contest will accept entries April through mid-June 2015. Photo submissions can be made on EdinaMag.com. Additional information can be found at www.EdinaMN.gov. L' r 1 40 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Date: August 18, 2015 CORPORf'� 1008 Agenda Item #: VLA. Action 0 Discussion 0 Information ❑ Subject• PUBLIC HEARING — Land Exchange (Lot Line Adjustment) 6629 West Shore Drive. Liz and Tony Burger Action Requested: Liz and Tony Burger are requesting approval of a lot line adjustment. Information / Background: The City Council requested that the Planning Commission and Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange (lot line adjustment) between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. (See property location on pages A I -A3 of the Planning Commission staff report.) Minutes from both the Planning Commission and Park Board are also attached. Background The Burgers purchased the home at 6629 West Shore Drive in June of 2004. The Burgers state that at the time of purchase they were aware that there was a city park between their property and Lake Cornelia. They state, however, that they were not aware that the park property is a just four feet from the Northwest corner the house. When the Burgers purchased the house, they had three reconstruction goals for the home: 1. Remove the existing pool 2. Redo the existing basement and main level of the house 3. Expand upward via a second story and create a walkout towards the lake The first two phases of construction are complete and the owners wish to complete phase three. In 2008, the Burgers received a variance to build the addition. However, the economy took a down turn, and the never built the addition, therefore, the variance expired. The house is non -conforming and with the current property line, the owners have no way of moving forward without a variance or land exchange. Even with a variance, the construction would require encroachment into the park land. When the house was built in 1961 there was a large amount of dirt that was brought in to support the foundation containing the indoor swimming pool. This hill rests on both city park land and private property. Without removal of the hill, the owners cannot do a walk out from the basement, without encroaching into the park land. All of the other eight properties that border the park have a walkout toward City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 • the lake. The homeowners state that they are simply asking for the same right as the neighbors. The hill is unnatural and unnecessary since the pool has been removed. The homeowners also want to expand their deck. Eight out of the nine houses on the park have large decks that provide views of the lake. The Burgers are the only exception. Although the owners did not add the second story addition that received the variance, they did complete work on the main level of the house which reduced the number of bedrooms and added structures to support the future 2nd story. The house does not work for their family but have no way to expand it due to the location of the park lot line. The applicant is therefore requesting a land trade, so that they may build the addition without the need for variance or encroachment into the park. This would potentially allow the property owner to complete the project and not diminish or reduce the total acreage for the Edina public park land. The homeowners have worked with a surveyor who has provided a possible solution. In this proposal, the City and property owner would exchange the same square footage of property and allow the desired home renovation project. Planning Commission Consideration: On August 12, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the request. (See attached minutes.) Parks Commission Consideration: On July 14, 2015, the Park Board considered the request. (See attached minutes.) There was no clear consensus from the Park Board or the Planning Commission in regard to the lot split, a sale of land to the Burgers, or a setback variance for the addition. The Park Board seemed to favor a variance process; however, the several members of the Planning Commission were reluctant to grant a variance. In regard to the sale of property, some believed a sale to be reasonable; however, there was some reservation in regard to setting a precedent for similar requests. Both the Planning Commission and Park Board wanted to see the existing structures that are located on city property removed under any scenario. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the July 22, 2015 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Minutes from the July 14, 2015 Park Board meeting • Planning Commission Memo, July 22, 2015 • Park Board memo dated July 14, 2015 • Proposed Land Purchase Area submitted by the applicant. 0 • sports. She notes she has a concern on this location as it does not have restrooms or water and requested staff re rches other areas. A, Chair Gieseke stated tSt. Cloud courts look very nice and asked if we uld have wind screens like St. Cloud has around the Xurts. Ms. Kattreh replied that is something #rat would be included in the quotations and discuss withXe donor. Member McCormick noted the Ntrooms are a distance away d asked about porta-potties. Ms. Kattreh stated that will be discusse Member Jones stated the board is very a reciative of stype of donation as they are financing the construction 100% and it fits well within th S/ ' Ian. The senior citizens have been requesting amenities and these courts will fit well for th . Kattreh added she will make sure budgets will include maintenance. VI.B. Park Board Retreat — Tuesday ug. I S:30 — 9:30 p.m. at Centennial Lakes Park Member McCormick informed the Par bard that air Gieseke and herself have been planning the Park Board retreat which will replac F e regular Aug. I Park Board meeting. This retreat will take place at the Hughes Pavilion at Ce ennial Lakes Park. It scheduled to run from 5:30 to 9:30 p.m. and dinner will be provided. She ad to dress casually becau they will be playing bocce at the croquet and lawn games area at Cent ial Lakes Park. Membe/Gro—Jacobson, ked ' he pre -work needs to be completed 'or to the retreat. Member McCorre-work is for member preparation only a will not be collected. The Med to be on the following groups: cobson, Nelson, Strother nes, Good, Chowdhury reene, Cella, Colwell ChoGieseke stated he would like a picture taken at the retreat. i), , 1,_ A "� , � VI.C. Proposed Land Exchange — 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina 'J�� Ms. Kattreh indicated the City Council has requested that the Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. The Planning Commission will also be reviewing this proposal at the July 22 Planning Commission meeting. Tony and Liz Burger were present at the meeting. Ms. Kattreh explained the situation to the Park Board. Ed Hayward, 6625 W. Shore Dr., indicated he is the neighbor to the north and stated they are not happy about the proposed public access running along the side of his property. It seems like a strange configuration for a land swap and he would rather see a variance. He added there is another access to the park that can be used. He pointed out he is not opposed to the concept of the land exchange. Member Good asked Mr. Hayward if there is a lot of activity in the park behind the houses and Mr. Hayward stated there generally is not much activity except for the Fourth of July fireworks. Member Jones asked if the access was not right on property line and moved onto the Burger property would that be better. Mr. Hayward stated that does not seem very feasible and noted mowing would be a concern and awkward. • Ms. Kattreh stated the Burgers do have the option of applying for a variance with the Planning Commission. Member Good asked if there was an option of having the city sell a piece of land to the Burgers instead of a swap. Ms. Kattreh stated it has not been a popular option historically with the Park Board or with the City Council as they do not want to sell parkland. Chair Gieseke stated in this case the city may benefit from selling some of the park land as it would be a win for the city. Member Nelson asked if there is another area that could be considered in the swap. Ms. Kattreh stated this portion was brought to staff by the Burgers. She noted they could start over and look at all options again. Mr. Burger indicated the surveyor came up with the line drawing and noted they wanted to keep the park continuous. He commented it is not a highly used park except for the Fourth of July. Member Greene asked Mr. Burger if he would be interested in purchasing a piece of park land to which Mr. Burger replied he would. Member Greene suggested the discussion end right now and staff goes back to determine a fair selling price and have Mr. Burger come back with a revised plan. Member Jones asked how many times a request has been made to purchase park land and Ms. Kattreh stated it's happened approximately four times in four years. Member Jones asked if a precedent would be set and Ms. Kattreh stated she has heard from council and the city does not have a strong interest • in selling park property. Other neighbors may want the same thing; a little more park land to add to their property. Member Strother suggested a variance may be more suitable to eliminate people walking very closely to the homes when entering the park. Ms. Burger stated that piece of land is called a breezeway. It's not supposed to be a stopping place for people entering the park. Mr. Burger stated since he has lived there approximately six to seven people have walked through that area. Member Jones asked if the property floods and Mr. Burger stated they have had some flooding in the garage; the park land does not flood. Member Jones asked if there is a path along the lake to which it was noted there is an open area off of 66th Street. Mr. Burger informed the Park Board they mow and irrigate the area and that the city stops mowing at the Hayward's property line. Member Jones asked if this would be an appropriate place for a nature path. Ms. Kattreh stated she is not aware that that option has ever been explored and added she does not want a misaligned lot line. Member McCormick asked if Mr. Burger if he was ok with the repositioning of the play structure. Mr. Burger stated the play structure is already on park property and he would have no problem moving it. Ms. Kattreh stated staffs recommendation was difficult due to precedence, gaining access for the city, • and the way the property line is configured it is challenging. It is neither hurting the city nor providing a benefit. Ms. Kattreh pointed out she needs to report back to the Planning Commission and would like to get a consensus from the Park Board. 0 Member Nelson indicated she would prefer going with the variance. Member Jones indicated she can appreciate the situation but does not want to set a precedent and is against selling park land. She does not agree with the proposed swap with creating a jagged lot line to the east and that connectivity to West Shore Drive would be her preference. She would like to refer to a guiding principle and if a variance is given a pathway should be created from Laguna Drive to 66th Street either by land swap or a variance. Member Jacobson indicated this is a grey area whether itis a park or not because if it is truly parkland the residents should have access. She does not care for the land swap and would prefer a sale but she does not feel it is up to the Park Board to decide that. She would favor selling the land to the Burgers and create access from Laguna Drive. She added the variance process would serve well. Member Greene indicated he is in favor of the variance. Chair Gieseke indicated he is in favor of the variance and is not in favor of a land swap as there are many issues with it; the neighbors would not appreciate it and it would set a precedent. He noted a minimal land sale would be an option and would make the access at Laguna better. Member Cella indicated this isn't really something the Park Board should approve. She is in favor of making all park land accessible to residents and stated this is more a Planning Commission matter to decide if a variance is to be granted. Member Strother indicated she has concerns with a variance and is concerned this park with a lake is • not accessible to residents. She does not think a variance would benefit the city. She stated she does not know the history of swaps and/or sales in the past but if the money from the sale could be used to improve access she would be in favor of that. Member McCormick indicated this is a unique situation and does not make a lot of sense. She feels the Burgers should determine how much park land would be needed to make their plan a reality and have the city look at a possible sale. She would be in favor of a variance or make the swap without the jagged lines. Member Good indicated if the Burgers have an interest in pursuing a variance they should do so and it is not the expertise of the Park Board. He would not be in favor of the swap as it is proposed. He would be in favor of a sale. Student Member Colwell indicated Student Member Asef and himself would be in favor of selling the park land. He believes a trail could be put in without infringing on the homeowner's property and that a partial swap might be possible. Student Member Chowdhury indicated he does not see what the park land would be used for in the future and does not think a precedent would be set. Chair Gieseke stated he likes the idea of a much smaller land swap because it is less obtrusive with compensation for the city. VII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENT • Member Jones stated she would like to comment on what is going on with Grandview. She indicated the latest round of proposals have a fairly large community area bringing the senior center and art center facilities at Grandview. The city will work on the design of that building. She commented after • Acting -chair Carr noted that a number of residents expre 'ed concerns with lighting, noise pollution, sc eening, landscaping and drainage and 'ked the applicant(s) to address those concerns. Ms. McCloud with gray ics explained the grade of t# parking areas, landscaping plans and screening. Ms. McCI d did note the site is r er shady; however, the vegetation proposed should thrive in t environment. The discussion ensued with Com issioners a ressing support for the revised plans; noting the importance of landscapin • especi y along the east boundary line (this landscaping should minimize impact o he rking lot from the next door neighbor). Commissioners suggested that the chur nd neighbor to the east work together on the buffering. Commissioners also note ey believe the construction driveway should be moved and that during construction he urch should comply with aspects of the R- I residential construction maintena ce plan. s Motion ,\ Commissioner Olsen move to recommend Co �litional Use Permit approval with Variances b ed on staff findings an subject to staff conditions with the additional follow g conditions: a) Constr tion must follow the Residential Constructio Maintenance Plan; and b) Relocate temporary • construction driveway. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Lot Division. Liz and Tony Burger. 6629 West Shored Drive, Edina, MN /\X Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Burgers purchased the home at 6629 West Shore Drive in June of 2004. The Burgers state that at the time of purchase they were aware that there was a city park between their property and Lake Cornelia. They state, however, that they were not aware that the park property is a just four feet from the Northwest corner the house. When the Burgers purchased the house, they had three reconstruction goals for the home: remove the existing pool, redo the existing basement and main level of the house; and expand upward via a second story and create a walkout towards the lake Teague noted the first two phases of construction are complete and the owners wish to complete phase three. In 2008, the Burgers received a variance to build the addition. 7 However, The economy took a down turn, and the never built the addition, therefore, the variance expired. The house is non -conforming and with the current property line, the owners have no way of moving forward without a variance or land exchange. Even with a variance, the construction would require encroachment into the park land. Teague explained that when the house was built in 1961 there was a large amount of dirt that was brought in to support the foundation containing the indoor swimming pool. This hill rests on both city park land and private property. Without removal of the hill, the owners cannot do a walk out from the basement, without encroaching into the park land. All of the other eight properties that border the park have a walkout toward the lake. The homeowners state that they are simply asking for the same right as the neighbors. The hill is unnatural and unnecessary since the pool has been removed. The homeowners also want to expand their deck. Eight out of the nine houses on the park have large decks that provide views of the lake. The Burgers are the only exception. Although the owners did not add the second story addition that received the variance, they did complete work on the main level of the house which reduced the number of bedrooms and added structures to support the future 2nd story. The house does not work for their family but have no way to expand it due to the location of the park lot line. • The applicant is therefore requesting a land trade, so that they may build the addition without the need for variance or encroachment into the park. This would potentially allow the property owner to complete the project and not diminish or reduce the total acreage for the Edina public park land. The homeowners have worked with a surveyor who has provided a possible solution. In this proposal, the City and property owner would exchange the same square footage of property and allow the desired home renovation project. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Line Adjustment at 6629 West Shore Drive subject to the following findings: I . The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The existing and proposed structure would meet building setback requirements. 3. Current encroachments into City property would be removed. Approval is also subject to the following condition: I. All existing structures must be removed from the city property and the area seeded prior to staff filing the resolution for lot line adjustment that legally creates the new lots. 0 iTeague asked Commissioners to note that before them is a new proposal from the applicants to purchase land from the City. Teague said at this time the lot division is before them; however, the Commission can discuss other options. Appearing for the Applicant Liz and Tony Burger, applicants and property owners. Discussion Acting -Chair Carr questioned if the Commission approves the requested "lot line adjustment" would approval prohibit City access to the lake. Planner Teague responded if the lot line adjustment was approved the City would continue to be able to access the lake. Commissioner Hobbs noted that in his opinion one way or another the City should get this issued cleared up. He said in appears to him the house is very close or over the line already. Teague agreed this needs to be cleared up; however, the house is on the subject lot, but very close. Commissioner Strauss pointed out the Burger's also requested an option to buy the property; adding if the Commission and Council would entertain a land sale he could • not support that. Continuing, Strauss pointed out if the Burgers were to purchase City park property what would prevent other property owners along the lake from requesting the same. Planner Teague stated he agrees the City typically does not sell park land or any City land; however the Council wanted the Commissions opinion on the "land swap". Teague noted purchasing the land was a recent request. 0 Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion with the land swap the City does not come out ahead. She added the play structure should be removed regardless, and that her preference would be purchase of the property; reiterating the land swap in her opinion does not benefit the City. Commissioner Nemerov said he agrees with Commissioner Hobbs; this needs to be cleared up as soon as possible. The land sale raises complicated issues of valuation. With the "swap" the configuration is very awkward, and as mentioned by Commissioner Strauss with the sale; what would prevent other land owners around the lake from requesting the same. Concluding, Nemerov said he also agrees that regardless of what the Council decides the play area needs to be removed. Commissioner Thorsen stated in his opinion the land swap works best. He added it may look messy but he doesn't want the City to get into the habit of selling off pieces of parkland. 9 Acting -Chair Carr said in her opinion there are disadvantages in both the "land swap" and purchase. Carr pointed out there is another option available to the Burger's and that would be to go through the variance process. Carr stated she favors that option. A discussion ensued on the three options presented to the Commission. 1) lot line adjustment (as submitted); 2) land sale (as suggested by the Burgers); and 3) variance. Commissioners indicated the following: Acting -Chair Carr — stated she supports the variance option first, then sale and lastly lot line adjustment. Commissioner Forrest; indicated she cannot support the variance option or swap. Commissioner Hobbs; stated he cannot support the variance option and cannot support the lot line adjustment because in his opinion the rearrangement is awkward. Hobbs stated he could support sale of the land. Commissioner Strauss reiterated he was against the sale of park land. Commissioner Olsen indicated she could support the sale of the land; however, she said she can't support a variance. Commissioner Nemerov stated he leans to the City selling the piece of land. Nemerov reiterated the land swap creates an awkward configuration. The discussion continued with Commissioners indicating that the Council is the body Is that needs to make the decision on the land sale presented by the Burgers. Acting -Chair Carr thanked the Burgers, adding it appears the Commission is split on how to proceed with the request, adding the Commission comments would be forwarded to the City Council for their review and action. V111. CORRESPO ENCE AND PETITIONS Acting Chair Carr ackno dged back of packet mate�ls. IX. CHAIR AND COMMIS ON COMMEI�S J Commissioner Olsen indicated that <eet�Wbefore the City Council is scheduled for August 5`h to approve continuation of tce Southdale Work Group process Stage 2. She indicated if the Council grants head" the "Group" will attempt to meet the following Monday at the Cham` Commissioner Nemerov inforp&d CommissionerisSkke toured the new emergency facility at Fairview Southdale ospital and said the sig' ackage approved worked great. X. STAFF COMME Planner Teague reported that Bank of America took the feedbacfrom the Commission and will return with a four sided building when they return for formal application. 10 • 91r1A,117I ores • tYCOReoPA�Eo • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 22, 2015 VII.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description The City Council has requested that the Planning Commission provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange (lot line adjustment) between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. (See property location on pages Al -A3.) Background The Burgers purchased the home at 6629 West Shore Drive in June of 2004. The Burgers state that at the time of purchase they were aware that there was a city park between their property and Lake Cornelia. They state, however, that they were not aware that the park property is a just four feet from the Northwest corner the house. When the Burgers purchased the house, they had three reconstruction goals for the home: 1. Remove the existing pool 2. Redo the existing basement and main level of the house 3. Expand upward via a second story and create a walkout towards the lake The first two phases of construction are complete and the owners wish to complete phase three. In 2008, the Burgers received a variance to build the addition. However, The economy took a down turn, and the never built the addition, therefore, the variance expired. The house is non -conforming and with the current property line, the owners have no way of moving forward without a variance or land exchange. Even with a variance, the construction would require encroachment into the park land. When the house was built in 1961 there was a large amount of dirt that was brought in to support the foundation containing the indoor swimming pool. This hill rests on both city park land and private property. Without removal of the hill, the owners cannot do a • walk out from the basement, without encroaching into the park land. All of the other eight properties that border the park have a walkout toward the lake. The homeowners state that they are simply asking for the same right as the neighbors. The hill is unnatural and unnecessary since the pool has been removed. The homeowners also want to expand their deck. Eight out of the nine houses on the park have large decks that provide views of the lake. The Burgers are the only exception. Although the owners did not add the second story addition that received the variance, they did complete work on the main level of the house which reduced the number of bedrooms and added structures to support the future 2nd story. The house does not work for their family but have no way to expand it due to the location of the park lot line. The applicant is therefore requesting a land trade, so that they may build the addition without the need for variance or encroachment into the park. This would potentially allow the property owner to complete the project and not diminish or reduce the total acreage for the Edina public park land. The homeowners have worked with a surveyor who has provided a possible solution. In this proposal, the City and property owner would exchange the same square footage of property and allow the desired home renovation project. • Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Primary Issue Low-density residential R-1, Single-family residential • Is the proposed lot line adjustment reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. The division is an even swap of land between the City and the applicant. As demonstrated in the attached pages A2 -A3, there is an existing play structure area that that currently encroaches on City property. With the lot line adjustment it would encroach even further. As a condition of approval, the structures should be removed and the area seeded with grass. The Council also requested that the Edina Park Board provide review and comment. The Park Board reviewed the request on July 14th and provided some of the following comments: Consider a smaller swap of land. 2 • ➢ Consider simply selling a portion of the City property. Money's could then be invested into improvements in the land. ➢ Consider a variance. ➢ Removal of the play structure from City property. ➢ Consideration was given to requiring a public access to West Shore Drive, however, ultimately there was not support by the Board, the applicant or the closest neighbor. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Line Adjustment at 6629 West Shore Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The existing and proposed structure would meet building setback requirements. 3. Current encroachments into City property would be removed. • Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. All existing structures must be removed from the city property and the area seeded prior to staff filing the resolution for lot line adjustment that legally creates the new lots. 3 • • Parcel 30-028-24-31-0044 ID: ATB: Owner A Burger & E Burger Name: Parcel 6629 West Shore Dr Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Residential Lake Shore Type: Tax Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 0.88 acres Area: 38,491 sq ft Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N ATB: Print Date: 7/7/2015 Market ww Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Sale representation or warranty expressed or Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Sale Code: COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A ThinkGreert! 0 k /I� 452: W Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. N Print Date: 7/7/2015 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 sA Think,Grecn! Pa__ Parcel 30-028-24-31-0044 A -T -B: ID: Owner Market A Burger & E Burger Name: Total: Parcel 6629 West Shore Dr Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Residential Lake Shore Type: Price: I Home- Sale Homestead • I i stead: Date: Parcel 0.88 acres Sale 1 Area: 38,491 sq ft Code: /I� 452: W Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. N Print Date: 7/7/2015 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 sA Think,Grecn! • LAN D • A� • LAP IP Y RADE • 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET ,00 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. 998.0) = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION = DIRECTION SURFACE DRAINAGE DH = CANTILEVERED OVERHANG HL = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE =E = GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION ` E = TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION FE = LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION XISTING goUSE 1 � � i i } s �t t , V ryQX 2352 SF- At.E#6 -1, k *41 ousre(c c VIA vol ,\\NG F dT T W b t�36' D $ii E/ EXIST. CON0 STAIR N79047'20 �o S>o- se\- ss l x660 a \6s j 189 0 � S 6�ay3 TGH z of 15.4 `� 0 aE LFE=865.7 ., GFE=866.0 ^' N EXISTING f HOUSE °e N' i iB.a X F R..` O T RETAINNG 2pFFE=875.3 ; .W L a i (867.5) 16 ro; 8095 — SIE S8L STRUCTURE HARDCOVER EXISTING HOUSE = 3180 SF DECK = 300 SF —ALHC —150 SF TOTAL = 3330 SF / 8.67 PROPOSED N 870021231, W 98.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, DALSIN 1ST ADDITION, HENNEPIN CO., MN. ADDRESS — 6629 WEST SHORE OF PID#30-028-24-31-0044 LOT AREA = 38600 SF/ 0.89 AC X 257 = 9650 SF HC ALLOWED • • To: Park Board From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: July 14, 2015 Subject: Proposed Land Exchange — 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina Agenda Item #: VI.C. Action ❑ Discussion lZ Information ❑ Action Requested: Provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange at 6629 West Shore Drive. Information / Background: The City Council has requested that the Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. The Planning Commission will also be reviewing this proposal at the July 22 Planning Commission meeting. The Burgers purchased the home at 6629 West Shore Drive in June of 2004. The Burgers state that at the time of purchase they were aware that there was a city park between their property and Lake Cornelia. They state, however, that they were not aware that the park property is just four feet from the northwest corner the house. When the Burgers purchased the house, they had three reconstruction goals for the home: I. Remove the existing pool 2. Redo the existing basement and main level of the house 3. Expand upward via a second story and create a walkout towards the lake The first two phases of construction are complete and the owners wish to complete phase three. In 2008 the owners applied for and were granted variances to build the addition. The economy went into a financial crisis and home loans were unavailable for the work they wanted to do. Because the applicant never picked up a building permit to build the addition, the variance expired. The house is already non -conforming and with the current property line, the owners have no way of moving forward without a variance or land exchange, When the house was built in 1961 there was a large amount of dirt that was brought in to support the foundation containing the indoor swimming pool. This hill rests on both city park land and private property. Without removal of the hill, the owners cannot do a walk out from the basement, without encroaching into the park land. All of the other eight properties that border the park have a walkout toward the lake. The homeowners state that they are simply asking for the same right as the neighbors The hill is unnatural and unnecessary since the pool has been removed City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The homeowners also want to expand their deck. Eight out of the nine houses on the park have large decks that provide views of the lake. The Burgers are the only exception. When the permit and variance were granted in 2008, although the owners couldn't afford to add the second story, they completed work on the main level of the house which reduced the number of bedrooms and added structures to support the future second story. The house does not work for their family, but they have no way to expand it. The applicant_is, therefore, requesting a land trade, so that they may build the addition without the need for variance or encroachment into the park. This would potentially allow the property owner to complete the project and not diminish or reduce Edina public park land. The homeowners have worked with a surveyor who has provided a possible solution. In this proposal, the city and property owner would exchange the same square footage of property and allow the desired home renovation project. If the Park Board is supportive of the land trade, staff would recommend that the existing play structure be removed from the park property and the area be seeded with grass (see the attached maps which show the play structure currently encroaches into city property). The Park Board is also asked to consider a requirement to obtain the park land in a strip of land down to West Shore Drive to provide public access into the publicly -owned land. Attachments: • A. Site Map B. Subject Property C. Land Exchange Site Map D. Land Survey C 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET q - EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION = DIRECTION SURFACE DRAINAGE COH = CANTILEVERED OVERHANG OHL OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE QG V — ' LAKE CORNEGLIA j' PROPOSED ADD/ -TIONS /MA TCFf`6YI$TING .� e } f FLOOR ELE.Vii'TIQNS .. _ CfitK W 1L, 7,9'47 28 19 " 233. GFE . GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION -� N ''1,, rs-'•±"`"' :+ ' a ,-os 1>� I 15.4+� TFE = TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION +O 'A�•• LFE = LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION G�,o+ OyTR 1 .I ...I.. -I._�� _ --r?' � —�-•- LFE=ft54' m is CH _21).0 -... ...._ +°� t Ii EXIS'T'ING IS.I r HOUSE I EXISTING.A• -.•-. o tow _.\-• '�\� •,ih 10- 0t t 'ATM -RETAWW WALL ._ --N 87"02.23" W 00, LEGALDESCRIPTION: ' \ LOT 1, BLOCK 1, DALSIN IST HARDCOVER ADDITION, HENNEPIN'CO., MN. STRUCTURE EXISTING ADDRESS — 6629 WEST SHORE DRIVE �� -_. `\\ `• /f HOUSE=- 33180 SF 00 SF PID#30-028-24-31-0044 DECi —ALHC —150 SF TOTAL - 3330 SF / 8.6% LOT AREA = 38600 SF/ 0.89 AC �PROPOSED X 25: t 9650 SF HC ALLOWED � - `fir 1 PORCH = 231 SF DECK= 300. SF DUE TO SNOW COVER SOME SURFACE _ -ALHC - 150 SF STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN APPROXIMATE TOTAL 531 SF / 1.49 T - ��` j°�,� •F - TOTAL EXISTING AND SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PER _ PROPOSED s 3711 SF / 9.69 TITLE OR EASEMENT INFORMATION CXSTING .(EXISTING DECK TO BE R£MOl/£D) VERIFY TALLONS WITH PIONS ANELEVAD PLANS 4 VERIFY ALL SETBACKS WITH CITY Jackie Hoogenakker Worn: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: To: Edina City Council Hayward, Edward J. <EHayward@oppenheimer.com> Thursday, August 13, 2015 10:57 AM Jackie Hoogenakker Ellie Hayward (ehayward43@msn.com) Council Hearing August 18, 2015 From: Ed and Ellie Hayward, 6625 West Shore Drive, Edina, MN 55435 Re: Council Hearing August 18, 2015 — Lot line adjustment between City and Burgers at 6629 West Shore Drive We are opposed to the proposed "land trade" to which the August 7, 2015 Notice refers. Our property would be the adjoining property most directly affected by the proposal, if implemented. However, we would have no objection to the City's granting the Burgers the variance we understand they requested, or to permitting the Burgers to purchase the portion of City land necessary for the proposed remodeling of their house. We believe that the land trade, as proposed, would have a negative impact on both the value and the privacy of our property, as the land traded to the City would extend the City property along a line toward West Shore Drive that is contiguous with the property line between our property and that of the Burgers. And, largely for reasons of privacy, we do not want to encourage public access to the lake shore along our property line. �e do not know exactly why the Burgers were denied what we understand to be, in essence, a reissuance of the variance that they were apparently issued in about 2007 or 2008, but we urge the Council to revisit that issue. We understand that it is no fault of the Burgers that the house they purchased was apparently built too close to, or encroaching on, City property. The line between City property and private property is not well-defined in that area, without the assistance of a surveyor. If a variance is not possible, we urge the Council to consider a sale to the Burgers of that portion of City property deemed necessary for the remodeling work they contemplate. We have heard that some persons have questioned what precedent may be set, if the Burgers were to be granted a variance or permitted to purchase a small portion of City property. We submit that the circumstances appear to be sufficiently unusual as to be unique, and not precedent -setting. It seems that the original owner (probably Bernie Dalsin) may have inadvertently encroached on City property when he originally built the home, likely more than fifty years ago. Apparently, no one noticed the issue until recently. While the passage of time may not give a private landowner rights of adverse possession against a governmental owner, the situation may at least qualify for a reasonable compromise — and not a compromise reached at the expense of the adjoining private property owners, who have lived there since 1979. Respectfully submitted, Ed and Ellie Hayward Telephone: 952 929-0393 C. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Walt <mcclurenw@hotmail.com> • Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:48 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: liz & tony burger, Ed and Ellie Hayward; Ed and Ellie Hayward Subject: Proposed Burger land trade To the City of Edina In re: pending City action regarding the property of Tony and Liz Burger at 6629 West Shore Dr., Edina MN 55435 The proposed action is a private for public land trade designed by the City Planning Dept. My wife and I are neighbors who live two doors from the Burgers. We write to strongly oppose the currently proposed land trade and to strongly support three alternatives. Preferred alternative: a variance for the Burgers. Before the economic crash, the Burgers sought a variance and the neighbors all signed on in support. The variance,was granted, but due the crash the Burgers could not carry out their plans. The variance was vacated after a year. There seems no reason not to go forward with the variance again at this time, and we strongly support it. We suspect our neighbors still do also. The variance should now also include removal of the present hill to allow an entranceway. This hill blocks a desirable feature of the Burger's remodeling plans. The City required the hill only because the previous,owner had an indoor swimming pool. As there is no longer this swimming pool, the hill is no longer needed. The City could remove the hill itself, or give the Burgers the right to remove it. Such a variance permitting the hill's removal is likely the preferred alternative of the Burgers themselves. Second alternative: sell a small parcel of adjacent public land to the Burgers. A small parcel of public land, no more than enough to both obviate the variance and remove the hill, could be sold to the Burgers. Since for years no one else uses this parcel so close to their house except the Burgers there is no loss to the public if such a parcel were sold to them. I believe neighbors would also support this alternative if there is some compelling reason (which we ourselves can't think of) to avoid a variance. We oppose the Planning Dept's currently proposed trade of a proposed private parcel of the Burgers property for a proposed public land parcel because the proposed new public parcel would abut our neighbors, the Haywards. We suspect this area so close to their house would also not be used by the public out of courtesy, just as the parcel by the Burger's house isn't used, so there seems little point to make this parcel public land. On the other hand, we understand the City has also expressed some interest in obtaining an easement or parcel from the Burgers adjacent to the Hayward's house to allow a new public access to the public land along the lake. We strongly oppose this. This land beside their house has been private for years, private when the Haywards bought it and ever since. It should remain so, and the Haywards have every right to expect it to remain so. *o suddenly now make it public land would violate the Hayward's privacy and significantly lower the value of heir home. In point of fact, the public who do use the public flat by Lake Cornelia are all neighbors in the area, especially kids, and owners by the lake freely allow them to access it through our yards. The public access on 66th St. is scarcely used by anyone except the City for area maintenance. Third alternative: We could support a different proposed public/private land trade if, and only if, the City can strike a deal with the Burgers to acquire a different parcel of their property for public land that does not abut the Haywards' home. For example, the Haywards' present lakeside property line could be extended further to encompass a parcel of the Burgers property equal in square footage but not shape to the Planning Dept.'s present proposal. If the new plan were satisfactory to all concerned -- the Burgers and Haywards as well as the City -- we would support it. We hope the City will take these points into serious consideration when it makes its decisions on this matter. Yours truly, Walter and Nancy McClure 6621 West Shore Drive, Edina MN 55435 tel: 952-927-9633 • 0 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director o e CORPOAA� 1008 Agenda Item #: VI -B. Action ❑x Discussion ❑x Date: August 18, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING —Appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission Denying a Wall Sign variance at 7301 Ohms Lane by SunOpta, Resolution No. 2015-82. Action Requested: Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the variance. Information / Background: John Ruelle on behalf of SunOpta is requesting an appeal of the Planning Commission decision to deny their request for a Variance to allow a wall sign that does not have frontage on a public street. (See attached appeal.) The applicant states in his appeal letter that two businesses in the area, Regis and International Dairy Queen, have similar signage as to the signage he is requesting. However, these two signs that he is referring to are legal, and conform to Edina's sign ordinance. These two buildings have frontage on a public roadway. Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6th story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. (See the attached Planning Commission Staff Report.) Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. Currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. Planning Commission Consideration: On July 8, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the request and denied the Variance. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: Appeal letter from SunOpta dated July 17, 2015 Minutes from the July 8, 2015 Planning Commission meeting Planning Commission Memo, July 8, 20I5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-82 RESOLUTION DENYING A WALL SIGN VARIANCE AT 7301 OHMS LANE FOR SUNOPTA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 SunOpta ("Applicant") at 7301 Ohms Lane is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign to be erected on the east face of the building that does not have street frontage. 1.02 The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6th story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. 1.03 Edina s sign code # 36 -1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the • total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. 1.04 Currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. 1.05 On July 8, 2015, the Planning Commission denied the variance. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays. 1.06 On August 18, 2015, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed variance. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 The proposed sign does not meet ordinance standards for a wall sign in the proposed location. 2.02 The variance standards have not been met: 1. The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. 2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings • in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-82 Page 2 • 3. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. There are several buildings within this area that are visible to Highway 100, but do not have street frontage facing toward Highway 100. • 40 Section 3. The proposed wall sign variance is denied. Adopted this 18th day of August, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2015. City Clerk u n bringing well-being to life City Council, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 July 17, 2015 Dear City Council, This letter is a request to appeal a decision made by the Planning Commission at the July 8, 2015 meeting not to grant Variance for a Sign Permit at 7301 Ohms Lane. Commissioner Platteter and Commissioner Nemerov both voted in favor of our variance request. Commissioner Nemerov disclosed he previously had an office located at 7301 Ohms Lane, in which he had signage in the same location we have requested. We believe based on the precedent that has been set with our Corporate neighbors (namely Regis Corporation and International Dairy Queen) that the request should be reconsidered. • We are trying to raise awareness of our existence in the community in order to allow us to compete for the areas scare high caliber talent. We have brought over 100 jobs to Edina in the last two years and would like to continue to grow here. • We respectfully request you reconsider our signage request. Sincerely, ` bin M. Ruelle � Chief Administrative Officer O `-D I Attached:` Full Submission to Planning Commission Star Tribune Article from July 12'4 Picture of Regis HQ Signage in Violation of Ordinance Picture of DQ HQ in Violation of Ordinance 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 600 Edina, MN USA 55439 T: (952) 820-2518 R (952) 939-8106 www.sunopta.com SunOpta, deeply rooted in Minnesota, is a big player in organic, non-GMO food - StarTri... Page 1 of 3 (hftp://stmedia.startribune.com/images/ows-14365679261895.jpg) LEILA NAVIDI • LEI LA.N AVID I®STARTRI BUN EXOM Rhett Peters sampled soy milk containers at a SunOpta plant in Alexandria. Minn. The company is based in Toronto, but its new (http://stmedia.startribune.com/images/ows 143656795( Top: John Mercado mixes the base for coconut milk at the SunOpta plant, which produces aseptic, shelf -stable beverages in Alexandria. http: //www. startribune. comisunopta-deeply-rooted-in-mimesota-is-a-big-player-in-organic... 7/16/2015 BUSINESS 4D SunOpta, deeply rooted in Minnesota, is a big player in organic, non-GMO food The organic food processor is the first to have the USDA verify that it uses non -modified ingredients By Mike Hughlett(http://www.startribune.com/mike-hughlett/89522247/)Star Tribune JULY 11, 2015—11:23AM The company's name, SunOpta, doesn't register much in a state that hosts such food industry giants as General Mills and Cargill. But the Toronto-based company, which has a deep presence in Minnesota, is ensconced in one of the hottest spots in the food business: organic and non-GMO. SunOpta supplies packaged food companies with ingredients from sunflower seeds to fruit, and makes its finished products — soymilk and orange juice, for instance — for major food retailers. It also is the nation's largest organic soybean processor. It's unique in the breadth of its organic offerings, and this spring became the first company to win federal approval for a label verifying its non-GMO sourcing process. The packaging label could give it a competitive advantage as consumers increasingly seek food free of genetically modified ingredients. "I don't think [the non-GMO label] will initially do much, but it has the potential to do a lot," said Eric Gottlieb, a stock analyst at D.A. Davidson. "It could potentially open the door to more sales. It's a very nice thing to have." Currently, the food industry relies on one significant packaging label — "Non-GMO Project Verified" —to indicate that a product is free of genetically modified ingredients. StmOpta's "Process Verified" label, which has the imprimatur of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, could become a competitor. But even if the new label proves a dud, the company still stands to post strong sales growth, Gottlieb said. "SunOpta is one of the few companies that can fully participate in the growing consumer trend for high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods," he wrote in a research note. The company's stock, after bottoming at less than $2 in 2009, rose to a range of $12 to $14 last fall as the organic market flourished. But the stock dropped to the $10 to $12 range after SunOpta fell short of near-term financial expectations. It closed Friday at $10.17. SunOpta Foods is rooted in Minnesota, and about 40 percent of its workforce — 550 employees — are employed in the state. SunOpta's corporate office in Edina, which includes a research and development center, employs 120, and its two plants in Alexandria together have about 200 workers. The rest are in other plants around the state. Last week, the company announced a new CEO effective Oct. 1, Rik Jacobs, who will be based in Edina, instead of Toronto as is the case with the current CEO. The company got its start in the food business in about 2000 when it bought soybean specialist Sunrich Inc (based in the southern Minnesota community of Hope) along with soy milk processing and packaging operations in Alexandria. Over the years, SunOpta bought several small food companies, and today the publicly traded company has about $1.2 billion in annual sales. It sources ingredients — including nuts and cocoa —from 65 countries and counts as customers such heavyweights as Costco, Target, Starbucks, General Mills and Kraft. Sales of organic foods are booming, hitting nearly $36 billion in 2014 and growing at an 11 percent pace in the past two years, according to the Organic Trade Association. Mintel, a market research company, said that last year, 10.7 percent of all new food and beverage products made organic claims, up from 6.4 percent in 2012. •"Phe demand is far outpacing our ability to add [organic] acreage in the U.S.," said John Ruelle, SunOpta's Edina -based chief administrative officer. "Our governor on growth is going to be access to supply." SunOpta's business is about evenly split between non-GMO and organic ingredients and (hftp://stmedia.startribune.com/images/ows-14365679261895.jpg) LEILA NAVIDI • LEI LA.N AVID I®STARTRI BUN EXOM Rhett Peters sampled soy milk containers at a SunOpta plant in Alexandria. Minn. The company is based in Toronto, but its new (http://stmedia.startribune.com/images/ows 143656795( Top: John Mercado mixes the base for coconut milk at the SunOpta plant, which produces aseptic, shelf -stable beverages in Alexandria. http: //www. startribune. comisunopta-deeply-rooted-in-mimesota-is-a-big-player-in-organic... 7/16/2015 SunOpta, deeply rooted in Minnesota, is a big player in organic, non-GMO food - StarTri... Page 2 of 3 products. Consumer demand for non-GMO products has popped in the past three years. • In 2014,10.2 percent of all new U.S. food and beverage products contained a "GMO-free" claim, according to Mintel, up from 6.5 percent in 2013 and only 2.8 percent in 2012. Complex sourcing SunOpta buys commodities directly from farmers, but converting from conventional to organic agriculture can be a risky venture. While organic crops can be more profitable, it usually takes farmers three years to meet the exacting standards of the USDA's organic program. Switching to non-GMO crops is an easier proposition, since the farmer primarily needs only to use seeds that haven't been genetically modified. (Organic crops use non-GMO seeds, too.) GMO-free has no federal regulatory definition, unlike organic Products that have been certified as organic by USDA -approved testers can display the USDA organic label. With non-GMO products, labeling has become a contentious issue. Makers of packaged foods have successfully fought legislative attempts to force labeling of products with GMO ingredients, a movement born of consumer skepticism about GMO safety. (Federal food safety regulators consider GMOs safe.) But food makers support voluntary GMO-free labeling as a method of marketing to GMO-wary consumers. They have been largely relying on the nonprofit Non-GMO Project. The Non-GMO Project bestows its label —which features a stylized butterfly — on products proven to be free of genetically engineered ingredients. The organization works with independent testing companies to do the research. Since its label launched in 2010, the Non-GMO Project has verified dose to 35,000 products, including about 10,000 so far this year. Several large makers of packaged foods use the label. About 200 products from Golden Valley -based General Mills —under brands such as Cascadian Farms, Annie's, Muir Glen and Larabar —sport the Non-GMO Project labeL • SunOpta's non-GMO label is a different animal, but could serve a similar purpose as the Non-GMO Project's seal. Dueling labels In May, the USDA allowed its Process Verified certification to be used by SunOpta for non-GMO food production — a first. The certification has been around for years, and has been used by many agriculture and food companies, including Minnetonka -based Cargill. The USDA has verified Cargill's processes for ensuring that some turkey products were raised by independent farmers who didn't use antibiotics to juice the birds' growth. SunOpta won the Process Verified certification for non-GMO production, specifically for its grain processing operation in Hope. "It's a validation of what we have been doing all along," said SunOpta's Ruelle. The company plans to get Process Verified status for its Alexandria operations and other plants, which would allow the USDA bug to be printed directly onto consumer products, not just ingredients headed for a food manufacturer. Almost 40 percent of SunOpta's 2014 sales and 48 percent of its profits came from consumer products such as soy milk, snacks and frozen fruit packed under private labels. SunOpta executives downplay any talk that the USDA Process Verifed label could become a competitor to the Non-GMO Project. So did Courtney Pineau -Bos, the Non- GMO Project's associate director, who said there's a "stark contrast" between the two labels. But some executives in the ingredient -supply business have a different take. "It's a competing certification," said Lynn Clarkson, president of Clarkson Grain, an Illinois -based organic and non-GMO grain supplier. "There is no one definition of non- GMO." Though SunOpta is a competitor, Clarkson tipped his hat to the firm's labeling efforts. "I is thought it was a good marketing move by SunOpta," he said. "I suspect more companies will do the same. I also suspect there will be 10 to 15 definitions of what non-GMO is." http: //www. startribune. com/sunopta-deeply-rooted-in-minnesota-is-a-big-player-in-organic... 7/16/2015 SunCpta- bringing well-being to life City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 June 19, 2015 Dear City of Edina, This letter is to request and substantiate the grant of a Variance for a Sign Permit at 7301 Ohms Lane. The Variance requested is for a sign placed on a non -street frontage wall on the East Elevation of the building. The request does not create any impact to commercial or residential property. As the U.S. Corporate Headquarters, it is vital that we have highway exposure. SunOpta is a leading global company specializing in the sourcing, processing and packaging of healthy, natural, and organic food products. • Since locating our U.S. Corporate Headquarters to Edina in May of 2012, SunOpta has brought over 75 new jobs to Edina and have staff here of over 100. Over 50% of our 1,800 employees, 22 plants and 5,000 suppliers/growers reside within 5 hours of Minneapolis. .7 Although we are one of the top 30 public companies in Minnesota with revenue of approximately $1.3 Billion, we are relatively unknown and would like to change our stature in the community. We are of similar stature as TCF Financial, Buffalo Wild Wings and Life Time Fitness and are attempting to bring awareness to our existence in the Community. We believe having signage on our building facing Highway 100 is an integral part of our awareness campaign. We respectfully request you reconsider our signage request. Sincerely, John M. Ruelle Chief Administrative Officer 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 600 Edina, MN USA 55439 T: (952) 820-2518 F: (952) 939-8106 www.sunopta.com • 2-16-15 SunOpta Exterior Sign Plan 35" 48" 0 176.25" (14'-101/4") Raceway Mount LED Illuminated Wall Mount Logo Letter Set EAST ELEVATION FACING HIGHWAY 100 Q �NGmESSIGNIMAGES•1NC. Ir t 11 �' 2B .:15g9 Kc A -- B C a 27.5" D E F Scale: 112"= 1'-0" Total Sign Area 58.75 Sq. Ft. WHITE FACES BLACK LETTER RETURNS SILVER EDGE TRIM ®ORANGE PMS# 151C GREEN PMS# 375C SunOmpta 7301 Ohms Lane Edina, MN 55439 Kristi Inveen Marketing Manager, SunOpta T:952-939-3949 A) WHITE Translucent Face Material I Translucent Color Applied In Logo B) 1" WHITE Edge Trim C) 12 Volt LED Power Supply D) Raceway Finished To match Building Bkg Color E) BLACK Aluminum Letter cabinets F) 12 Volt Bright WHITE LEDs G) Drain Holes * Letter Set To Carry Required U.L. Approvals * Sign Images to secure required City of Edina sign & electrical permits This is an orr'gqinel unpublished design, created by Twin Ckiea Sign Images, Ina It o submiked for your personal use In connection wish the project being planned for you by Twin Citlea Sign Images Inc. It not to be shown to anyone outside of= f your oryani agon, nor b k to be i"ed, reproduced, copied ar a' ibked In any rashers wMwut the wdtten permission of Twin Cibea Sign Images, Ina. All or any pert of this design (escept registered trademarks) remain the property of Twin Ci ies sign Images, Incorporated. An Artwork Design fee of $1,M.W wig be oharged M Ws Design k usetl without wridan p Imbn from 1Wn Cites Sign Images, Inc DESIGNERS oBUILDERS oINSTALLERS of interior&exterior sign systems—.--� 17420 113th Avenue North • Suite E • Maple Grove, MN 55369 a (Fax) 428-1597 • www.slgnimages.com A O t=l �y 0 LN owl 7888 VARIANCE APPLICATION C•TFiA\Lei Lyl1 :4 By_A0 FEE PAID City of Edina Planning Department * www.EdinaMN.gov 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826-0369 fax (952) 826-0389 FEE: RES - $350.00 NON -RES - $600.00 APPLICANT: NAME; SunOpta (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 600, Edina, MN 55439 PHONE: 952-838-3248 EMAIL: carissa.lund@sunopta.com PROPERTY OWNER: 19 NAME: Altus Group, Inc. (Signature required on back page) 930 W. 1st Street, Suite 303, Forth Worth, TX 76102 ADDRESS: PHONE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (written and electronic form): *'You must provide a full legal description. If more space is needed, please use a separate sheet. Note: The County may not accept the resolution approving your project if the legal description does not match their records. This may delay your project. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7301 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# 09-116-21-24-0025 EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: Install 58.75 Sq.Ft. LED Illuminated Letter Set in "SunOpta" Logo Style at Top of East Elevation at 7301 Ohms Lane. (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: NAME: Sign Images, Inc. PHONE: 763-428-1599 EMAIL; markr@signimages.com Mark R. Raiche / President SURVEYOR: NAME: SAME EMAIL: PHONE: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complyingX❑ ❑ with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood n U ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Detailed Application Requirements: Unless waived by the Planning Department, you must • complete all of the following items with this application. An incomplete application will not be accepted. — X Completed and signed application form. X Application fee (not refundable). Make check payable to "City of Edina." X One (1) Copy of drawings to scale. X Seventeen (17) 11x17 copies of drawings, including elevations and survey, photographs and other information to explain and support the application. NA A current survey is required. Please refer to "Exhibit A." X Variance requests require scale drawings to explain and document the proposal. The drawings are not required to be prepared by a professional, but must be neat, accurate and drawn to an acceptable scale. The drawings may vary with the proposal, but should include a site plan, floor plans and elevations of the sides of the building which are affected by the variance. X Elevation drawings of all new buildings or additions and enlargements to existing buildings including a description of existing and proposed exterior building materials. For single-family home projects, elevations drawings must include a rendering of the proposed home AND the existing homes on either side as seen from the street. • VARIANCE GUIDELINES AND APPLICATION INFORMATION The City of Edina Planning Department encourages healthy development within the city of Edina. Although this document is meant to serve as a guide for the application process for development through the Planning Department it is by no means comprehensive. The Planning Staff recommend that you schedule a meeting to answer any questions or to discuss issues that may accompany your project. It is much easier to tackle problems early on in the process. The office number for the Planning Staff is (952) 826-0465. Variance Information The Edina Planning Commission has been established to consider exceptions (variances) from the Land Use, Platting and Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 36), the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 34), the Sign Ordinance (Chapter 36) and the Parking and Storage of Vehicles and Equipment Ordinance (Chapter 26). The variance procedure is a "safety valve" to handle the unusual circumstances that could not be anticipated by these ordinances. The Commission is charged to only grant a petition for a variance if it finds: 1. That strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property 2. That the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. Would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. is "Practical Difficulties" means that: 1. The property in question cannot put to a reasonable use as allowed by the ordinance 2. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to his/her property which were • not created by the petitioner 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Application: Applications are submitted to the Planning Department. Offices are open Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 4:30 PM. Deadlines for Applications: Applications need to be submitted at least fifteen days before the meeting. This allows the City of Edina time to notify surrounding property owners of the date of the hearing and details of the variance. It is helpful to submit the application as soon as possible to secure an early hearing position. Notice of Public Hearing: Notice is mailed to all property owners (of record at City Hall) that are located within 200 feet of the site. Notice is mailed ten (10) days prior to the hearing. You are encouraged to contact adjacent or close owners and advise them of your proposal prior to the notice of the hearing. You may wish to provide statements of "no objection to the variance" from the nearby property owners. Meetings and Public Hearings: Meetings of the Planning Commission are scheduled on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month. The meetings are held at 7:00 pm in the Edina City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 West 50th Street. Each meeting is limited to five variance cases on a first come, first serve basis. Additional requests are delayed until subsequent • meetings. Meetings are formal public hearings with a staff report, comments from the proponent and comments from the audience. It is important the owner or a representative attend the meeting to answer questions. Staff Report: After review of the drawings submitted and a visit to the site staff prepares a report. This report, along with any supporting drawings and materials, are sent to the Zoning Board in advance of the meetings. Board members may visit the site before the meeting. All plans, emails and written information are public information, and may be used in the staff report and distributed to the public. Board Membership: The Planning Commission serves as the Zoning Board. Five members are required for a quorum. Decisions by the Planning Commission: The Planning Commission may approve, deny or amend the variance request and establish conditions to ensure compliance or protect surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission generally makes a decision at the scheduled hearing. Occasionally, however, a continuance to another meeting may be necessary. Appeals: Decisions of the Planning Commissionare final unless appealed to the City Council in writing within 10 days. The proponents, any owner receiving notice of the hearing or the staff may appeal decisions. Appeals are rare and they can be time consuming because a new hearing is required before the full City Council. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk. Legal Fee: It is the policy of the City to charge applicants for the actual cost billed by our attorneys for all legal work associated with the application. An itemized bill will be provided which is due and payable is within thirty (30) days. ** Filing an Approved Variance: The applicant is required to file an approved variance resolution with the County. Documents necessary for filing will be provided by the Planning Department. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT • This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this property have been paid. I further certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and, to the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. Applicant's Signature John M. Ruelle / Chief Administrative Officer Date OWNER'S STATEMENT I am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this application on behalf of the board of directors or partnership.) LSREF2 (OREO) DIRECT, LLC Jones Lang LaSalle Americans, Inc. as Agent 5/1415 Owner's Signature Date • Note. Both signatures are require.(itft di f frq0d11PtgAt plicant) before we Cpn nrnrncc fhn nnnlinnfiinn nfhar yi�t /���ng/�(3/g(�I ou=Group Manager, email=todd.balsiger@am.jlLcom, c=US Date: 2015.05.14 14:45:51 -05'00' 18 • @JLL City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 RE: Exterior Building Signage Deliverd via email to Tenant To Whom It May Concern: May 18, 2015 Pursuant to Article 9 of The Third Amendment to Lease dated February 2015, by and between LSREF2 OREO (DIRECT), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Landlord"), and SUNOPTA FOODS INC., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant") the Landlord hear by authorizes SunOpta Foods, Inc. to install exterior building • signage at One Corporate Center IV located at 7301 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN 55439. Per Article 9 of the Third Amendment to Lease the Tenant shall have the non-exclusive right, at its sole cost and expense, and with the prior written approval of Landlord (and subject to Landlord's rules, regulations and criteria with respect to signage, which shall not obligate Tenant to alter or remove signage previously approved by Landlord in writing unless such alteration or removal shall be required by applicable laws) and local governing authorities, to install one exterior building sign including Tenant's only name and logo on the exterior fagade of the Building (without removal or relocation of address numbers existing on the Building), with the exact location, dimensions, design, materials, colors and methods and materials for attachment to the Building to be determined by Landlord in its reasonable discretion (the "Building Sign"). If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at 952-228-2880. LSREF2 OREO (DIRECT), LLC Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., its Agent Todd R. Balsiger, CPM®, Cum Senior Vice President - Group Manager Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. Todd. Balsieger aQam.ill.com 400. 952-228-2880 C. 763-226-0654 • Parcel Data for Taxes Property ID: 09-116-21-24-0025 Address: 7301 OHMS LA Municipality: EDINA School Dist: 273 Watershed: 1 Sewer Dist: Owner Name: LSREF2 OREO LLC Taxpayer Name LSREF2 OREO LLC & Address: C/O ALTUS GROUP U.S. INC. 930 WEST 1 ST ST, SUITE 303 FORT WORTH TX 76102 0 2015 Construction year: 1981 Approx. Parcel Size: W 558X464X550X398 Tax Parcel Description The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for re Addition Name: Lot: Block: First Line Metes & Bounds: Full Metes & Bounds: Abstract or Torrens: Land Market Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status ONE CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 4 001 001 Note: To read full tax parcel description, click here. ABSTRACT Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2015 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2014 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2015 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2014 Values: Classifications: $3,798,800 COMMERCIAL PREFERRED NON -HOMESTEAD k4. Li T"i i Ing i•IMl i l l i _ _ - �_ -� _ ��. � .2 " .. .. y' , ,� .. .. ., ._ I ;i[. ... � a �4.�- • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 8, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Halva, Nemerov, Olsen, Platteter Absent: Carr, Forrest, Seeley III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Hobbs moved approval of the April 22, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: • None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. SunOpta. 7301 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Commission Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6`h story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. Repya explained that Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. Repya reported that currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms • Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. Page 1 of 9 • The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends denial of the requested variances based on the following findings: 1. The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: I. The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. 2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Appearing for the Applicant John Ruelle, SunOpta Discussion Chair Platteter asked Planner Repya what the zoning designations are for the properties surrounding the subject site. Repya responded that the surrounding properties are zoned • POD, Planned Office District. Applicant Presentation Mr. Ruelle told the Commission he questions the City's definition of street frontage. Ruelle presented to Commissioners photos of neighboring buildings with signage similar to the sign they are requesting. Continuing, Ruelle further pointed out that the subject site also includes an easement to Metro Boulevard and Highway 100; thereby accessing Highway 100. Continuing, Ruelle questioned why the sign ordinance wouldn't allow their sign to face Highway 100, adding its key for their business to "get their name out" so it becomes recognizable to not only residents of Edina but the general public. Concluding, Ruelle told Commissioners SunOpta has a long term lease with this building. Commissioner Nemerov commented that he assumes the applicant and their landlord are aligned. Brandon Aune, representing the sign owner responded in the affirmative. A discussion ensued on the photos Mr. Ruelle presented indicating similar signage on nearby buildings. It was noted that the majority of those buildings are in the City of Bloomington; with a different sign ordinance. Public Hearing • Chair Platteter asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Page 2 of 9 • Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Nemerov reported he worked in the subject building and at that time there was a sign on the building facing Highway 100. Nemerov said in his opinion allowing the sign makes sense. Commissioner Lee asked Planner Teague if the sign ordinance was re -written. Planner Teague responded the ordinance wasn't re -written; however, there are unpermitted signs in the City. Commissioner Thorsen said he does have a concern that similar buildings may also want additional signage if the Commission chooses to support this request. Planner Teague noted that the purpose of the requested sign variance is advertising; not way finding. ,which could be an issue. Commissioner Nemerov commented that in his opinion similar buildings should have the same value and should be treated the same with regard to signage. He added he doesn't believe it's unreasonable for a corporation/company to want to "broadcast" their business to the general public. Nemerov further stated that the City of Edina should want businesses to do well. • Commissioner Hobbs said that while he understands the applicant's point of view in wanting additional signage he pointed out the ordinance is clear; no street frontage, not sigh. Continuing, Hobbs suggested that the Commission should take another look at the sign code and amend it if needed. Commissioner Lee commented that personally she finds identifying logos helpful because it provides awareness; however, agrees with Commissioner Hobbs that the ordinance doesn't permit this type of signage. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved to recommend denial of the requested variance based on staff findings: • The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, • Olsen. Nays; Nemerov, Platteter. Motion to deny carried 5-2. Page 3of9 • wgista, �j� (�e ��IPNfi PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Recommended Action: Project Description Deny the variance requested. SunOpta at 7301 Ohms Lane is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign to be erected on the east face of the building that does not have street frontage. See attached supporting materials and sign plan — Figures. A-1 thru A-5 INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6th story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. Currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office Building • Easterly: Office Building Southerly: Office Building Westerly: Multi -Tenant Planned Industrial Building Originator Meeting Date Agenda # VI. A. Joyce Repya July 8, 2015 B-15-12 Senior Planner Recommended Action: Project Description Deny the variance requested. SunOpta at 7301 Ohms Lane is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign to be erected on the east face of the building that does not have street frontage. See attached supporting materials and sign plan — Figures. A-1 thru A-5 INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6th story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. Currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office Building • Easterly: Office Building Southerly: Office Building Westerly: Multi -Tenant Planned Industrial Building • • • Existing Site Features 7301 Ohms Lane zoned POD -2; Planned Office District is a 6 -story structure with street frontage to the west on Ohms Lane Planning Guide Plan designation: Office Zoning: POD -2, Planned Office District Compliance Table POD Maximum Sign Area Existing Signage Variance requested 1 wall sign and one 56 square foot 1 wall sign measuring 58.75 square freestanding sign per frontage monument sign abutting feet on the east elevation abutting an 120 square feet total Ohms Lane (west interior side yard. elevation) 80 square feet maximum for the first sign (buildings in excess of 4 stories) Additional sign allowed so total sign area for the building does not to exceed 120 square feet Primary Issues • Is the proposed sign reasonable for this site? No. Staff believes the proposal is not reasonable for following reasons: 1. A wall sign is allowed on the west elevation of the building abutting Ohms Lane. 2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other buildings lacking street frontage, but with visibility from major roadways. • Is the proposed variance justified? No. Staff believes the proposal is not justified for the following reasons: 1. The proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. 2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 2 • 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Staff believes the proposed variance will not relieve practical difficulties in complying with the code since they have the ability to erect the proposed sign on the west elevation of building. 2) There are circumstances that are extraordinary to the property, not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district? The circumstances are not unique for this site. This is one of many multi -story office buildings in Edina that are visible from a major roadway, but lack street frontage that would allow for wall sign abutting said roadway. 3) Will the variance be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the sign ordinance? No. The intent of the sign ordinance is to only allow signage in the Planned Office District on elevations of the building having street frontage. No signage is allowed on interior elevations lacking street frontage. 0 4) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The proposed sign will alter the essential character of the neighborhood. No other building in the neighborhood which has visibility from Highway 100 has signage erected on an elevation that does not have street frontage. Staff Recommendation Deny the requested variances based on the following findings: 1. The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because.- 3. ecause: 3. The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. 4. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Deadline for a city decision: August 19, 2015 0 TM un a bringing well-being to life City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50d' Street Edina, MN 55424 June 4, 2015 Dear City of Edina, This letter is to request and substantiate the grant of a Variance for a Sign Permit at 7301 Ohms Lane. The Variance requested is relatively minor, as shown in the attached. SunOpta is a leading global company specializing in the sourcing, processing and packaging of healthy, natural, and organic food products. Since locating our U.S. Corporate Headquarters to Edina in May of 2012, SunOpta has brought over 75 new jobs to Edina and wifl have staff here of over 100 by the end of 2015. " Over 50% of our 1,800 employees, 22 plants and 5,000 suppliers/growers reside within 5 hours of Minneapolis. Although we are one of the top 30 public companies in Minnesota with revenue of approximately $1.3 Billion, we are relatively unknown and would like to change our stature in the community. We are of similar stature as TCF Financial, Buffalo Wild Wings and Life Time Fitness and are attempting to bring awareness to our existence in the Community. We believe having signage on our building facing Highway 100 is an integral part of our awareness campaign. We have included examples of other buildings in the immediate area displaying the address number and company name signage on the same building wall, which is why we believe the request, was originally rejected. We respectfully request you reconsider our signage request. Sincerely, John M. Ruelle Chief Administrative Officer 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 600 Edina, MN USA 55439 T: (952) 820-2518 F: (952) 939-8106 www.sunopta.com • • • 7101 . r 7117 z r 5309 7125 l 7201 p 7200 7171 . tom` 4916 11K LANTANA 7225 I L.. _ _ '. , 1. 74 i 7220 4912 i i tj 24 5250 5230 72755200 24 j 7220 a' ' I `t t _73RD STREET tir'Y'EST - P 0 5201 r• I 7375 5241 7301 7300 7350 24 --.._._._. _ _,.._ _. _...... _... W 7385 5250 5200 7370 J_ 5108 ; 7400 T7399 i 74TH STREET WE _ST_ ~- 7401 5251 7450 7401 I Parcel 09-116-21-24-0025 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" 400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 6/26/2015 Owner Lsref2 Oreo Llc Market Name: Total: Parcel 7301 Ohms La Tax Address: Edina, MN 55439 Total: Property Sale Commercial -Preferred Type: Price: Sale Non -Homestead stead: Date. Parcel 5.41 acres Sale Area: 235,864 sq ft Code: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 @A Think'Green! 1 � I- /`ik ♦ 4 �y r ++...,.� i a _�# i� ':� 1. pw�} � %rte-. � sr..4 `�� •*•�, �i '! l' of �` � z,• u t .y; '.tel .�. �` �i _ �NY y } .,y �' ,r,. a•I� -_ i ',rod � 3:'t � � r� �Y.:k w :i&F• �;31'G"i �: I "! i 1 • r i x r f w �" �, c X_ ., • 1.:..� . J!, , • . I r i • I • ., 4 ��^�^•�t�11••„��1 tL�' �e a b:s��_:,.. ' , ;� � ! - '• r A T R .��I�I�Irs1�� _ ”' aA .'1�' ' t _ : tlr��� t� � : � 1 � • �# 4A" T Oil a t - I f Parcel 09-116-21-24-0025 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N ID. Print Date: 6/26/2015 j Owner Lsref2 Oreo Llc Market w Name: Total: Parcel 7301 Ohms La Tax Address: Edina, MN 55439 Total: I Property Sale Commercial -Preferred Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Non -Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular is purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 5.41 acres Sale Area: 235,864 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 E, Think -Green! U nCptafm • bringing well-being to life City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 June 19, 2015 Dear City of Edina, This letter is to request and substantiate the grant of a Variance for a Sign Permit at 7301 Ohms Lane. The Variance requested is for a si*a'-placed on a non -street frontage wall on the East Elevation of the building. The request does not create any impact to commercial or residential property. As the U.S. Corporate Headquarters, it is vital that we have highway exposure. SunOpta is a leading global company specializing in the sourcing, processing and packaging of healthy, natural, and organic food products. • Since locating our U.S. Corporate Headquarters to Edina in May of 2012, SunOpta has brought over 75 new jobs to Edina and employ staff here of over 100. Over 50% of our 1,800 employees, 22 plants and 5,000 suppliers/growers reside within 5 hours of Minneapolis. C Although we are one of the top 30 public companies in Minnesota with revenue of approximately $1.3 Billion, we are relatively unknown and would like to change our stature in the community. We are of similar stature as TCF Financial, Buffalo Wild Wings and Life Time Fitness and are attempting to bring awareness to our existence in the Community. We believe having signage on our building facing Highway 100 is an integral part of our awareness campaign. We respectfully request you reconsider our signage request. Sincerely, John M. Ruelle Chief Administrative Officer 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 600 Edina, MN USA 55439 T: (952) 820-2518 A-3 F: (952) 939-8106 www.sunopta.com Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general purposes • and intent of the zoning ordinance 40 Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood ❑` ❑ 0 ❑ 2-16-15 SunOpta Exterior Sign Plan 35" 48" 0 176.25" (14'-10 1/4") Raceway Mount LED Illuminated Wall Mount Logo Letter Set EAST ELEVATION FACING HIGHWAY 100 ,�NC{(IES SIGNIMPGES ING. I1�L� 5g9 r � rT A B C 27.5" o E F Scale: 1/2"= 1'-0" Total Sign Area 58.75 Sq. Ft. ❑ WHITE FACES BLACK LETTER RETURNS SILVER EDGE TRIM ORANGE PMS# 151C GREEN PMS# 375C Suncimpta 7301 Ohms Lane Edina, MN 55439 Kristi Inveen Marketing Manager, SunOpta T:952-939-3949 A) WHITE Translucent Face w Material I Translucent Color Applied In Logo B) 1" WHITE Edge Trim - C) 12 Volt LED Power Supply D) Raceway Finished To match Building Bkg Color E) BLACK Aluminum Letter cabinets F) 12 Volt Bright WHITE LEDs G) Drain Holes * Letter Set To Carry Required U.L. Approvals * Sign Images to secure required City of Edina sign & electrical permits This is an original unpuhllshad design, created by Twin Cities Sign Images, Inc. Itis submitted foryour personal use in connection with the project being planned for you by Twln Cities Slgn Images, Inc. It Is not to be shown to anyone outside of your organization, nor is It to be used, reproduced, copied or exhibitetl in any fashion without the written pe I Isslon of Twin Cities Sign Images, Inc. All or any P. rt of this design (except registered trademarks) remain the property of Twin Cities Sign Images, Incorporated. An Artwork Design fee of $1,000.00 will be charged for this Design if used without written permission from Twin Cities Sign Images, Inc. ?63) 428' les com DESIGNERS • BUILDERS • INSTALLERS of interior & exterior sign systems --® w•s`9��m17420 113th Avenue North o Suite E • Maple Grove, MN 55369 • (Fax) 428-1597 • www.signimages.com A-6- EAST -S WV Proposed Sign Plan 2-16-15 SunOpto Exterior Sign Plan e The CITY of .�y EDINA •!IL.Y�ItmIL T' Roof TIP 176.25" (14'-101/4") Alad 35" (C- Raceway Mount LED Illuminated Wall Mount Logo Letter Set EAST ELEVATION FACING HIGHWAY 100 aura'• DESIGNERS a S U 1 i_ D E R S e INSTALLERS o) interior & exterior sign systems --e \� 17420 113th Avenue North a Suite E e Moplo Grove, MN 65369 a (Fax) 425-1597 a www.signlmages.com A- a E 27.5" 13- E- Scale: 3Scale: 1121. 1'-0' Total Sig,? Arne 58.75 Sq.Ff. 7 G 6IJR VIEW A) WHITE Translucent Face [] WHII E FACES Material / Translucent Color . BLACK LETTER RETURNS Applied In Logo SILVER EDGE TRIM B) 1` WHITE Edge Trim - ORANGE PMSG/ 151 C C) 12Voll LED Power Supply EiGREEN PMS#375.Bullding D) Raceway Finished To match Bkg Color F-) BLACK Aluminum Letter rabinats F) 12 Volt Bright WHITE LEDs Su ` Drain Holes I7■ ODta Le Letter Sol To Carty Required U.L. Approvals 7301 Ohms lane . Sign Images to secure required City of Edina Edina, MN 55439 sign S electrical permits Krish Inveen Marketing Manager, SunOpta "„"",',���,„ a. 1a�rJ T: 952-939-3949.�' .Tmi °=i 1�.i o" v 'bn I�uoi i..rirn eaeo�mNn w.j• ��u'�ri n y �wny apt ni~v of i1.wo.ro nil e1,r"raJ it wW�i rmi,n iw�n rwuJ� ti�4pn u�ou oermeeien Imm ciUse nbn � .pa., gym. 0 0 0 2 West Elevation www.EdinaMN.gov .�r 4.9��LL o� e F I The CITY of �. �y EDINA 0 0 0 495/'1jp o� e { The CITY of Site Pian :�N EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov u Scott & Adrienne Beckett 5809 Zenith Ave S Edina MN 55410 August 12, 2015 Edina City Council Member Kevin Staunton Edina City I­Iall 4801 West 50th St. Edina MN 55424 Dear Councilman Staunton, I am writing to express my concern about a recent Planning Commission decision not to grant a variance regarding signage on my employer's building. For some time, we have been petitioning for the logo sign of our firm to be allowed to be installed facing Highway 100. I see this as a way to highlight our company, the city's support of prominent local businesses, and promote the Edina business base. Our petition has been denied, citing an ordinance allowing signage on only the side of the building facing the official street address. There must be allowances we can gain, as two other large companies - International Dairy Queen and Regis - have signs on building facings other than their street addresses. As both a resident and employee in the city of Edina, I urge you to reconsider this decision and overrule the Planning Commission. We are a thriving and growing company, and SunOpta has added over 100 jobs to the city in the last year. We should be afforded the same opportunity that other local businesses have enjoyed. Best Regards, Adrienne L. Beckett Vice President, Customer Logistics Services SunOpta, Inc. Edina MN L-1 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: August 18, 2015 �ZIA, o e 0 ,Ilk �CpR�e 'S Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action X Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Proposed Franchise Agreement With Excel Energy, Ordinance No. 2015-12 Action Requested: Adopt Proposed Ordinance 2015-012 Approving a new Franchise Agreement with Xcel Energy Background: On March 3, 2015, 1 presented the Council with a proposed process and engagement plan for renewal of the Xcel Energy franchise agreement. After seeking input from Council Members and City staff, I prepared a draft franchise agreement, which was considered by the Energy & Environment Commission on May 14. The comments from the EEC were incorporated into the franchise proposal, including the creation of a proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) called the Edina Clean Energy Partnership that is based on a similar MOU between Xcel Energy and the City of Minneapolis. I hosted a two hour public open house on June 25 to enable members of the public with ideas, suggestions or concerns to share them at an early stage in the drafting of the agreement. There were no participants at the open house. Following the open house, I reviewed the proposed franchise agreement with representatives from Xcel Energy on July 2 to seek their initial reactions to the draft franchise agreement. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the draft franchise agreement on July 21 to allow interested members of the public one final opportunity to influence Council Members concerning the proposed franchise agreement. One citizen testified. Following this public hearing, I requested final direction from Council Members on areas of material change in order for the final draft of the ordinance to be prepared for consideration at your August 5, 2105 meeting. The draft franchise agreement reviewed at the July 21 public hearing included five areas of material change compared to the current franchise: 1. 3.8.1 COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY WITH A COMMUNITY -WIDE NETWORK OF FULLY FUNCTIONING STREET LIGHTS. COMPANY SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO RESPOND AND REPAIR MALFUNCTIONING STREET LIGHTS WITHIN 48 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION BY CITY. 3.8.2 COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY THE LOCATION OF COMPANY OWNED STREET LIGHTS WITHIN THE CITY, TO BE UPDATED AT LEAST ANNUALLY. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 3. 3.8.3 COMPANY SHALL UPGRADE, AT COMPANY COST, CITY'S NETWORK OF STREET LIGHTS TO LED STREET LIGHTS ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018. 4. 3.9.1 COMPANY AGREES THAT THE APPEARANCE OF ITS GROUND AND POLE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WITHIN CITY PROPERTY, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO BECOME VISUALLY DISPLEASING. COMPANY AGREES TO REMEDY VISUALLY DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS, WEATHER PERMITTING, OF A REQUEST TO REMEDY FROM CITY. 9.2.1 ENERGY CONSERVATION FEE. COMPANY AGREES TO ASSESS A $0.50/MONTH CHARGE TO EACH CUSTOMER, REGARDLESS OF CUSTOMER CLASS, AND TO REMIT SUCH AMOUNT TO CITY AT THE SAME TIME AND METHOD AS THE FRANCHISE FEE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING CITY'S ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM. ECEP - In addition to the five areas of material change, the Energy & Environment Commission recommended the City enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy to create the "Edina Clean Energy Partnership". The Edina Clean Energy Partnership (ECEP) is based on a similar agreement that Xcel has with the City of Minneapolis called the Minneapolis Clean Energy Partnership. The ECEP is intended to address a number of supplementary energy issues that cannot be included in the franchise agreement itself. I have included a draft copy of the proposed ECEP with the Council packet materials. Xcel does not wish to have a Clean Energy Partnership with the City of Edina. Xcel believes the Partners In Energy (PIE) program will adequately address the energy issues in the ECEP. Information: Before I provide a review of the outstanding franchise issues, it is necessary to note a proposed structural change that has evolved in the discussion with Xcel Energy about the franchise agreement. The company has requested that City agree to consider the franchise agreement without the requested changes. The company's strong preference is to make their commitments to the City's requests, where applicable, through a side letter or MOU, and not to incorporate them into the franchise agreement itself. They prefer this method of commitment because they prefer to have the same franchise agreement components in all of their cities. I recommend the City Council accept this request from the company, provided the side letter or MOU is executed by someone at the company who is authorized to honor the company's future commitments to the City. As of the writing of this memorandum for the August 5 Council Packet, the status of the material changes under discussion is as follows: 3.8.1 COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY WITH A COMMUNITY -WIDE NETWORK OF FULLY FUNCTIONING STREET LIGHTS. COMPANY SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO RESPOND AND REPAIR MALFUNCTIONING STREET LIGHTS WITHIN 48 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION BY CITY. Xcel: The company requests this provision be modified to: Company shall provide City with a community -wide network of fully functioning street lights. Company shall make reasonable efforts to respond and repair malfunctioning street lights within two business days of notification by City. SHN: I recommend the Council approve the requested amendment. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 • 2. 3.8.2 COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE CITY THE LOCATION OF COMPANY OWNED STREET LIGHTS WITHIN THE CITY, TO BE UPDATED AT LEAST ANNUALLY. Xcel: The company requests this item be withdrawn from the agreement because they are already meeting this standard. SHN: I recommend the Council accept the company's request to withdraw this item. According to City staff, Xcel's performance in this area has been very good and dependable. 3. 3.8.3 COMPANY SHALL UPGRADE, AT COMPANY COST, CITY'S NETWORK OF STREET LIGHTS TO LED STREET LIGHTS ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2018. Xcel: The company does not agree to this request. SHN: I recommend the City continue to insist on a stronger commitment from the company on when the LED upgrade project will be completed. I have proposed the following alternative language to the company, which the company does not agree to: The company agrees to substantially complete an LED upgrade of the City's network of cobra head street lights, at the company's cost, on or before December 31, 2018, provided the company receives approval from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for the upgrade plan on or before March 31, 2016. If the PUC does not approve the company's plan on or before March 31, 2016, the company agrees to complete the LED street light upgrade project in Edina within 24 months of the • PUC's approval of the plan. The company's counter -proposal was: The company agrees to substantially complete an LED upgrade of the City's company-owned network of cobra head street lights, at the company's cost. The Company agrees to make every reasonable effort to complete the LED conversion of cobra head street lights on or before December 31, 2018, provided the company receives approval from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for the upgrade plan on or before March 31, 2016. The company agrees to inform the City of any delays that arise that may result in the LED upgrades taking place beyond December 31, 2018. 4. 3.9.1 COMPANY AGREES THAT THE APPEARANCE OF ITS GROUND AND POLE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WITHIN CITY PROPERTY, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO BECOME VISUALLY DISPLEASING. COMPANY AGREES TO REMEDY VISUALLY DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN 90 DAYS, WEATHER PERMITTING, OF A REQUEST TO REMEDY FROM CITY. SHN: The company has resisted this request from the start of our discussion. I have offered them the following alternative language: The company agrees to maintain its ground equipment in well maintained condition. The company agrees to make reasonable efforts to respond to the City's requests to repair and maintain the aesthetic appearance of its ground based equipment. The company agrees to record and log • complaints and repair information regarding its ground based equipment, and to provide the information and confer with the City regarding the company's quality and timeliness of the company's response. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Xcel: The company does not agree to this request and has countered with the following: • The company agrees to maintain its ground equipment in well maintained condition. The company agrees to make reasonable efforts to respond to the City's requests to repair and maintain the aesthetic appearance of its ground based equipment. 5. 9.2.1 ENERGY CONSERVATION FEE. COMPANY AGREES TO ASSESS A $0.50/MONTH CHARGE TO EACH CUSTOMER, REGARDLESS OF CUSTOMER CLASS, AND TO REMIT SUCH AMOUNT TO CITY AT THE SAME TIME AND METHOD AS THE FRANCHISE FEE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING CITY'S ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Xcel: The company agrees to this request to increase the franchise by $0.50/customer/month, but cannot agree, due to PUC regulations, to label the franchise fee increase as an "Energy Conservation Fee" on the customer bill. The company also requests that the same $0.50/customer/month franchise fee be applied to the customers of CenterPoint Energy. SHN: I recommend the City accept the company's agreement on this request, including the request to apply the franchise fee increase to CenterPoint Energy customers. If approved by Council, staff will prepare a separate franchise fee ordinance for both utilities for the consideration by the Council at your August 18 meeting. 6. The City proposed the creation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing the Edina • Clean Energy Partnership (ECEP). The company proposed an alternative called the Partners In Energy (PIE) program. The City and the company have executed an MOU to create the Edina Partners in Energy program, which negates the need for the proposed ECEP. I recommend the City Council withdraw the request to create the ECEP Attachment NOTE: As of press time for the Council Packet, the company and I are still engaged in active discussions about the outstanding issues. I expect to update this memorandum with new information prior to our August 5 Council meeting. • ORDINANCE NO. 2015-12 CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, D/B/A XCEL ENERGY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC GROUNDS AND PUBLIC WAYS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION I. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: 1.1 City. The City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. • 1.2 City Utility System. Facilities used for providing non -energy related public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sewer and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. 1.3 Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government, which preempts all, or part of the authority to regulate electric retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. 1.4 Company. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns. 1.5 Electric Facilities. Electric transmission and distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, anchors, conduits, fixtures, and necessary appurtenances owned or operated by Company for the purpose of providing electric energy for public use. 1.6 Notice. A written notice served by one party on the other party referencing one or more provisions of this Ordinance. Notice to Company shall be mailed to the General Counsel, 414 Nicollet Mall, 5th Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Notice to the City shall be mailed to the City Administrator, City Hall, 481 West 50`h Street, Edina, MN 55424. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. • 1.7 Public Ground. Land owned by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 2 1.8 Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right-of-way within the • City. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE. 2.1 Grant of Franchise. City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years from the date passed and approved by the City, the right to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Grounds and Public Ways of City, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. Company may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to such reasonable regulations as may be imposed by the City pursuant to ordinance and to the further provisions of this franchise agreement. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance. This franchise agreement shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City, by Council resolution, may revoke this franchise agreement if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service and Rates. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for electric service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The area • within the City in which Company may provide electric service is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 21613.40. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this Ordinance will be paid by City and reimbursed to City by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used, or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. SECTION 3. LOCATION, OTHER REGULATIONS. 3.1 Location of Facilities. Electric Facilities shall be located, constructed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public • Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Electric Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 3 • Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Electric Facilities shall be subject to permits if required by separate ordinance and to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Electric Facilities in place, provided at the City's request, Company will remove abandoned metal or concrete encased conduit interfering with a City improvement project, but only to the extent such conduit is uncovered by excavation as part of the City improvement project. 3.2 Field Locations. Company shall provide field locations for its underground Electric Facilities within City consistent with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 216D. 3.3 Street Openings. Company shall not open or disturb any Public Ground or Public Way for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by a separate ordinance, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb any Public Ground or Public Way without permission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Electric Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by telephone to the office designated by the City as soon as practicable. Not later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public • Ground or Public Way, Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, to as good a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any paved surface in good condition for one year thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground or Public Way in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City's permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way. 3.5 Avoid Damage to Electric Facilities. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any activity. 3.6 Notice of Improvements. The City must give Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Grounds or Public Ways where the City has reason to believe that Electric Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (i) the • nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Grounds and Public Ways upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public Ground or Public Way is involved, the Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 4 order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length . of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Electric Facilities. 3.7 Shared Use of Poles. Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water utility, police or other City facilities upon terms and conditions acceptable to Company whenever such use will not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television company or other form of communication company. In addition, the City shall pay for any added cost incurred by Company because of such use by City. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS. 4.1 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ways. If the City determines to vacate a Public Way for a City improvement project, or at City's cost to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way, or construct or reconstruct any City Utility System in any Public Way, it may order Company to relocate its Electric Facilities located therein if relocation is reasonably necessary to accomplish the City's proposed public improvement. Except as provided in Section 4.3, Company shall relocate its Electric Facilities at its own expense. The City shall give Company reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way or to construct or reconstruct any City Utility System. If a relocation is ordered within five years of a prior relocation of the same Electric Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse Company for non -betterment costs on a • time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Electric Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ground. City may require Company, at Company's expense, to relocate or remove its Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. 4.3 Projects with Federal Funding. City shall not order Company to remove or relocate its Electric Facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned for a right- of-way project or any other project which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable non -betterment costs of such relocation are first paid to Company. The City is obligated to pay Company only for those portions of its relocation costs for which City has received federal funding specifically allocated for relocation costs in the amount requested by the Company, which allocated funding the City shall specifically request. Relocation, removal or rearrangement of any Company Electric Facilities made necessary because of a federally -aided highway project shall be • governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the rights herein granted to Company are valuable rights. Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 5 4.4 No Waiver. The provisions of this franchise apply only to facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise from the City and shall not be construed to waive or modify any rights obtained by Company for installations within a Company right-of-way acquired by easement or prescriptive right before the applicable Public Ground or Public Way was established, or Company's rights under state or county permit. SECTION 5. TREE TRIMMING. Company may trim all trees and shrubs in the Public Grounds and Public Ways of City to the extent Company finds necessary to avoid interference with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that Company shall save the City harmless from any liability arising therefrom, and subject to permit or other reasonable regulation by the City. SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnity of City. Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in the Public Grounds and Public Ways. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection aof, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner, of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 6.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City, shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 7. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City improvement project, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electric Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve a right-of-way under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 6 SECTION 8. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. 0 Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 9. FRANCHISE FEE. 9.1 Fee Schedule. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, and in lieu of any permit or other fees being imposed on Company, the City may impose on Company a franchise fee set forth in a separate ordinance from each customer in the designated Company Customer Class. 9.2 Separate Ordinance. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective until the beginning of a Company billing month at least 90 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this Ordinance is effective. A separate ordinance which imposes a lesser • franchise fee on the residential class of customers than the maximum amount set forth in Section 9.1 above shall not be effective against Company unless the fee imposed on each other customer classification is reduced proportionately in the same or greater amount per class as the reduction represented by the lesser fee on the residential class. 9.3 Terms Defined. For the purpose of this Section 9, the following definitions apply: 9.3.1 "Customer Class" shall refer to the classes listed on the Fee Schedule and as defined or determined in Company's electric tariffs on file with the Commission. 9.3.2 "Fee Schedule" refers to the schedule in Section 9.1 setting forth the various customer classes from which a franchise fee would be collected if a separate ordinance were implemented immediately after the effective date of this franchise agreement. The Fee Schedule in the separate ordinance may include new Customer Class added by Company to its electric tariffs after the effective date of this franchise agreement. 9.4 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made by imposing a surcharge equal to the designated franchise fee for the applicable customer classification in all customer billings for electric service in each class. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 7 payment is made. The franchise fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and not occur more often than annually and no change shall require a collection from any customer for electric service in excess of the amounts specifically permitted by this Section 9. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Commission. No franchise fee shall be payable by Company if Company is legally unable to first collect an amount equal to the franchise fee from its customers in each applicable class of customers by imposing a surcharge in Company's applicable rates for electric service. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds and correction of erroneous billings. Company agrees to make its records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times provided that the City and its designated representative agree in writing not to disclose any information which would indicate the amount paid by any identifiable customer or customers or any other information regarding identified customers. 9.5 Equivalent Fee Requirement. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City monthly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater equivalent amount on the receipts from sales of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such a supplier, the City has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. The "same or greater equivalent amount" shall be measured, if practicable, by comparing amounts collected as a franchise fee from each similar customer, or by comparing, as to similar customers the percentage of the annual bill represented by the amount collected for franchise fee purposes. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any energy use related to heating, cooling or lighting, or to run machinery and appliances, but shall not apply to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. If the Company specifically consents in writing to a franchise or separate ordinance collecting or failing to collect a fee from another energy supplier in contravention of this Section 9.5, the foregoing conditions will be waived to the extent of such written consent. SECTION 10. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. 10.1 Severability. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separate from every other section, provision, or part and if any section, provision, or part shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. Where a provision of any other City ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. 10.2 Limitation on Applicability. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and Company as the only parties, and no provision of this franchise shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. SECTION 11. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE. • Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party will consider whether it agrees that Ordinance No. 2015-12 Page 8 the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the date of final passage by the City of the amendatory ordinance. SECTION 12. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED. This franchise supersedes any previous electric franchise granted to Company or its predecessor. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 9 • • • To: City Council From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Board and Commission Bylaw Amendments A, 4l� o Ce:. vt Cn Y>RYOIt!�TF� 1 HHti Agenda Item #: Vlll. B. Action M Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve recommended changes to Edina's Advisory Board and Commission's bylaws. Information / Background: The recommended bylaw changes primarily consist of minor edits and clarifications. There are two notable changes. I. Annual Meeting. In in Section 5, paragraph I. This paragraph reflects information about the Board and Commission's annual meeting. Staff recommends holding annual meetings in the same month (February) for all Boards and Commissions to create consistency and efficiency. This change also assists in closing the gap on the possibility of a Board and Commission operating without a chair in the case a chair's term ends prior to the annual meeting. 2. Process for bylaw changes. Added language to clarify City Council's ability to make changes to bylaws. If approved, changes would take effect throughout all ten Board and Commission's bylaws. Staff Liaisons were provided a memo outlining proposed bylaw changes and were asked to share proposed changes with board and commission members and submit feedback. We received feedback from 2 out of 101 board and commission members. One member was supportive of the changes. One member was concerned about changing the election of officers to February because exiting members, rather than new members, would have a say in electing a chair and vice chair. Attachment: Human Rights and Relations Bylaw Track Changes City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 i;3a..tt w9�1r1• 0 Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws Section 1: Introduction The bylaws outlined below are approved procedures for the Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC). Members should review and understand City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1 and Chapter 2, Article III, Division 2. In the event of a conflict between the City Code and the HRRC bylaws, the City Code will prevail. Some components of these bylaws are common across all City boards and commissions. From time to time the City Council may make changes to board and commission bylaws and will notify the board and commission of these changes. Boards and commissions should consult with their staff liaison if they want to propose a change to the bylaws. T#e-CA-y Staff Uaise;A sheula tie r bilte + PFieF to eensWeFiRg bylaw amendmeRts. Proposed bylaw amendments should be announced one meeting prior to voting on the proposed change. Bylaw amendments require the approval of a majority of the voting HRRC members and approval by the City Council. In addition to the City Code and these bylaws, the HRRC will be guided by those policies and procedural documents applicable to the HRRC or City advisory boards in general. Copies of these documents will be made available to members at the beginning of their service with the HRRC. Section 2: Mission and Business Address • Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1 and Chapter 2, Article III, Division 2, Section 2-117 for the HRRC mission. The business office for the HRRC is located at Edina City Hall; 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424-1394. Members of the public can also contact the HRRC at edinamail@c+edina-mn.govus. Section 3: Membership Membership Composition Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-78 and Chapter 2, Article III, Division 2, Section 2-119. Terms of Membership Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-81. Contact Information HRRC members are required to provide a mailing address and phone number and/or email address to the C Proiect Coordinator. This contact information is available to City staff and members of the public. Responsibilities HRRC members are expected to be present and adequately prepared for all meetings and to actively participate in meeting discussions. Members who are unable to complete assigned tasks should notify the Chairperson as soon as possible. • 1 1 P a g e Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws w.,a Attendance Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-86. If a member cannot attend a regular meeting, he or she should notify the Staff Liaison as soon as possible and ideally no later than two hours prior to the start of the meeting. Cancelled meetings will be counted as meetings held and attended for purpose of calculating attendance percentages. Resignation or Removal Refer to City Code section Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-81. The HRRC may ask the City Council to review a member's appointment based on the member's failure to perform the responsibilities outlined above. Section 4: Meetings Meeting Notice Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. All board and commission meetings are open to the public. To comply with legal requirements and ensure accessibility to the public, the G Staff Liaison gives official notice of all HRRC meetings on the City's website and at City Hall. •Regular Meetings Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. Regular meetings of the HRRC are held at Edina City Hall or another officially noticed location on the fourth Tuesday of every month at 7:00 p.m. A regular meeting may be rescheduled by the HRRC at a prior meeting. Annual Meeting In February the HRRC will hold an annual meeting to: • Elect officers for the upcoming year, • Review and update bylaws as necessary, and Affirm the regular meeting schedule for the upcoming year. Special Meetings Special meetings of the HRRC may be called by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the HRRC voting members. Members will be notified of the special meeting by written or email communication at least three calendar days in advance of the meeting. To comply with the open meeting law and to ensure accessibility to the public, the Gity CI Staff Liaison posts official notice of all special meetings. A quorum is not required for special meetings; however, members cannot take action on a motion unless a quorum is present. Cancelling Meetings Meetings of the HRRC can be cancelled by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the HRRC voting members. Meetings may be cancelled for insufficient business, lack of quorum, conflict with a holiday, inclement weather or in the event of a community emergency. Quorum • Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. 2 1 P a g e o e In 0 • Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws Meeting Agendas Meeting agendas will be prepared by the Chairperson in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. Members may request that items be added to the agenda; however, the addition of such items is subject to approval by a majority of the voting members. The meeting agenda and related materials will be sent electronically the Thursday prior to the scheduled regular meeting. Meeting Proceedings During regular meetings, business will be conducted in the order listed below. The order of business may be changed with the support of a majority of the voting members. • Call to order • Roll call • Approval of agenda • Approval of minutes from preceding meeting • Public hearings • Community comment • Reports and recommendations • Correspondence • Commission comments • • Staff comments • Adjournment Meetings will be conducted according to the latest edition of Roberts Rules of Order. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda that is relevant to the HRRC. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. Chair has the right to limit the number of speakers making similar statements and to limit comments related to matters previously discussed. The HRRC is not required to respond to the comments. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, disruptive behavior such as the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing is not allowed. Motions and Voting A simple majority of voting members present and voting will decide all motions before the HRRC. At the request of a member, a roll call vote will be taken when there is a divided vote on any item. A tie vote on any motion will result in a failure to pass. Student members are not eligible to vote. Meeting Minutes Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-85. City staff will prepare minutes for HRRC meetings. The minutes will include which members were present and absent, a summary of each item discussed and any motions proposed, and the votes on those motions. If a member of City staff is not present to record minutes, the HRRC will appoint a secretary to prepare the minutes. The secretary will prepare draft minutes within two weeks of the meeting • 3 1 P a g e O Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws '• «.,,..,N. �' date and forward the draft to the Chair and City Staff Liaison. Approved minutes will be posted on the City's website and forwarded to the City Clerk for distribution to the City Council by the City Staff Liaison. Section 5: Officers Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-83. The HRRC will hold elections for the officer positions of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson at the annual meeting in February. The Chairperson may make and second motions and vote on all motions. The duties of the Chairperson include but are not limited to: • Prepare the agenda in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Invoke a reasonable time limit for speakers during public testimony. • Ensure that the bylaws are followed and actions are properly taken. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Extend meetings or schedule special meetings as necessary. • Cancel meetings, in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Facilitate the development of the annual work plan. • Develop annual calendar of anticipated agenda items for each month. • Consult with members regarding attendance issues. • • Encourage active participation by HRRC members and members of the public. The Vice Chairperson performs the duties of the Chairperson in his/her absence. If both the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson are absent, an acting chairperson may be assigned in advance by either officer or at the meeting by a majority vote of the members. Section 6: City Staff Liaison Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-79. The HRRC has a City Staff Liaison appointed by the City Manager. The City Staff Liaison is expected to work cooperatively with HRRC members. Members may not direct City staff but can request assistance through the City Staff Liaison to carry out the HRRC mission. The duties of the City Staff Liaison include but are not limited to: • Work with Chairperson to prepare and distribute meeting agendas. • Reserve meeting rooms and other needed meeting equipment. • Record and prepare meeting minutes (or delegate the responsibility to another City staff member). • Provide technical expertise and access to City resources. • Work with Chairperson to ensure bylaws are followed and annual work plans are submitted. • Relay information or directives from City Council meetings or work sessions relevant to the HRRC. • Respond to HRRC inquiries in a timely manner. • Forward information to and between HRRC members. • Record meeting attendance, include the current attendance record with each packet and consult with the Chairperson and C designated staff regarding attendance issues. • Provide orientation materials to new members and eChairperson. • • Handle funds allocated to the HRRC in accordance with its directives, City policies and legal requirements. 4 1 P a g e Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws • Serve as the custodian of HRRC records. • Work with City Clerk to serve all notices required by law or these bylaws. E r `Y y0 'J .L Concerns with the performance of the City Staff Liaison should be directed to the Assistant City Manager. Section 7: Committees and Working Groups Introduction Committees or Working Groups may be established by a majority vote of the HRRC to study issues in greater depth and report findings. Committees or Working Groups present their analysis to the HRRC for discussion and recommendations. The HRRC has the sole authority to make final recommendations on all matters on which a Committee or Working Group has given guidance. The HRRC defines the scope and the duration of the Committee or Working Group's mission. In no case may the Committee or Working Group exceed the authority granted by the HRRC. Committee and Working Group participants may not include enough voting HRRC members to constitute a quorum for the HRRC. Committees or Working Groups may be designated as standing (ongoing) or temporary in nature. Definitions Committees and Working Groups may be comprised of two or more people, one of whom is the chair appointed by the . HRRC. A Committee is comprised of current HRRC members only. A Working Group is led by a HRRC member, but will also include members of the public. Working Group Announcement nNotice will be given to the public of the formation of any Working Group, including a press release from the City to local media outlets. Individuals will have a minimum of 14 days after the public notice to express interest in joining before members are selected. Public Access Based on the potential public interest in the topic, some Committee and Working Group meetings may be designated as public meetings by the HRRC or the City Council. If a Committee or Working Group's meetings are designated as public meetings, official meeting notices, written agendas and written minutes are required. Refer to Section 4 of these bylaws for additional information on meeting notices. Appointments and Chair Assignments Committees: The HRRC Chairperson will ask for Committee volunteers from the HRRC membership. A majority vote may approve the Committee appointments once sufficient volunteers are established. A temporary Committee Chair will be appointed by the HRRC at the time of Committee formation. The Committee will elect its own chair and notify the HRRC Chairperson. Working Groups: The HRRC Chairperson will ask for volunteers from the HRRC to serve as the Working Group Chair. The Working Group Chair is approved by a majority of the HRRC members. The Working Group Chair will recommend other Working Group members. By definition, those members will include individuals outside of the HRRC. The Chair may also • 5 1 P a g e Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws nominate a co-chair who is not a HRRC member. Working Group appointments will be made by a majority vote of HRRC members. The duties of the Committee or Working Group Chair(s) include but are not limited to: • Set the meeting schedule and, if required, notify the City Staff Liaison for public notification. • Prepare and distribute a written meeting agenda, if required. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Ensure that this section of the bylaws and HRRC directives are followed. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Recommend members and notify HRRC of changes in membership (Working Group only). • Report on the Committee or Working Group's activities at each regular HRRC meeting. • Communicate to the Committee or Working Group any directives, questions or input from the HRRC. Resignation or Removal A Committee or Working Group member may voluntarily resign by submitting his or her written resignation to the Chair of the Committee or Working Group. A Committee or Working Group member may be removed by a majority vote of the HRRC. • Disbanding A Committee or Working Group may be disbanded at any regular meeting of the HRRC by a majority vote of the members. Committees or Working Groups will automatically be disbanded if no member of the HRRC is available to serve or appropriate volunteer membership cannot be established. Section 8: Communication Applicability This section applies to all types of media and communication methods including face-to-face, telephone, email and social media. Communication Between Members Outside of Meetings HRRC-related communication between members when a quorum of voting members is present constitutes a violation of open meeting laws if it takes place outside of publicly -noticed meetings. Members are prohibited from discussing HRRC business in such a situation. Since email communication is common outside of meetings, the following email protocol is adopted: • Any email communication intended for a majority of HRRC members should go through the City Staff Liaison so that an appropriate record can be established. • Members should not respond "reply all" to group messages. • Members should not blind copy (bcc) other members. Members must not engage in a serial discussion of HRRC business. A serial discussion occurs when members discuss official business with a majority of voting members through successive communications. Serial communication can occur • through a combination of communication methods such as face-to-face, email, telephone or on a social media site. 6 1 P a g e Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws Communication with the Public Outside of Meetings HRRC members are encouraged to share their work with members of the public within the guidelines noted in the paragraph below. When communicating HRRC business with the public, members should understand and convey the following: • The deliberations and decisions of the HRRC will be based solely on information contained in the public record presented to all HRRC members participating in the deliberation or action. • The member's comments do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of other commissioners or the HRRC as a whole. Members should exercise care not to communicate how they intend to vote on any pending matter or give the appearance any matter has been pre -decided. Public Announcements and Press Releases The City's Communications and Technology Services Department will approve and coordinate any public announcements, press releases or other media contact desired by the HRRC. Section 9: Financial Transactions • All financial expenditures by the HRRC must relate to the HRRC mission and be covered under the HRRC budget. All expenditures must be approved in advance by a majority of the voting members. The City Staff Liaison is responsible for ensuring that all approved expenditures or reimbursements meet the criteria above as well as other City financial policies. Expenditures that do not meet the criteria above will not be reimbursed. The HRRC does not have the authority to execute contracts or to otherwise financially obligate the City of Edina. Any contract related to HRRC business will be managed by the City Staff Liaison and may be subject to City Council approval. Section 10: Ethical and Respectful Conduct Conflict of Interest Members may not use their position on the HRRC for personal benefit. The interests of the HRRC must be the first priority in all decisions and actions. Any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any HRRC action or decision must disclose this fact as a conflict of interest. A member who has disclosed a conflict of interest should abstain from discussion and voting on the matter. G ifts HRRC members may not receive personal gifts from any "interested person" in conjunction with their board aad or commission duties. An "interested person" is a person, or representative of a person or an association, who has a direct financial interest in a recommendation under the HRRC's purview. This section does not apply to lawful campaign contributions. The HRRC may recommend acceptance of general gifts or donations through the City's donation policy. Respectful Behavior • 7 1 P a g e • �i tai F. r O Human Rights and Relations Commission Bylaws The City of Edina is committed to providing a work environment free from violence for all elected and appointed officials, employees and visitors. The City does not tolerate any form of violence in the workplace including threats or intimidating actions by or against any of the groups cited above. Violence and threats may include, but are not limited to: • Any act which is a physical assault • Any threat, behavior or action which is interpreted by a reasonable person to carry the potential to harm or endanger the safety of others, or result in an act of aggression, or destroy or damage City property. The Chairperson and City Staff Liaison have the right to call for the immediate removal of anyone who threatens or commits an act of violence on City property. Respectful behavior also includes how HRRC members relate to each other, City staff and members of the public. Members share a joint responsibility in modeling, monitoring and addressing behavior within the group. During HRRC interactions, members should strive to: • Treat people with courtesy, politeness and kindness • Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas • Listen to what others have to say • • Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes • Recognize cultural differences • Members should avoid: Speaking over or cutting off another individual's comments Insulting, disparaging or putting down people or their ideas Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments. How to Report Members can report cases of unethical conduct to the City Staff Liaison, Assistant City Manager, City Manager or City Attorney. 8 1 P a g e To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Proposed Pickleball Court Donation - Rosland Park Agenda Item #: VIII.C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve the concept of adding pickleball courts and related amenities at Rosland Park utilizing donor funding. Information / Background: Edina resident Bruce Mooty has approached the city to potentially donate funds to the City of Edina to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The proposed donation is in honor of his late father John Mooty, who passed away earlier this year. This location is recommended by Parks & Recreation administrative staff and Park Maintenance staff. The Park Board provided review and comment on this proposal at the July Park Board meeting. The board had some concerns about the distance from restroom facilities and lack of a dedicated parking lot, but otherwise members generally supported the project. The approved July Park Board minutes are attached. Several sites were reviewed, including Lewis Park, Yorktown Park and Cornelia School Park. This site was chosen due to the size of parcel available, proximity to a tennis facility, distance from residential impact and on -street parking available. If approved, the donor is interested in funding the project for construction this fall. This project would include five pickleball courts. One or two shade structures and court lighting are also being considered. The site was explored for the potential of adding a restroom and picnic shelter facility similar to Wooddale Park, but the lack of proximity to sewer and water connections made this option not financially viable. The initial survey was completed last week and Gopher State One Call locates were completed. Four or five courts could fit on this site. There is a large oak tree in this area, but the courts could be located so as to not impact this tree. What is Pickleball? Pickleball is a sport in which two, three, or four players use solid paddles made of wood or composite materials to hit a whiffle ball over a net. The sport shares features of other racquet sports, the dimensions and layout of a badminton court, and a net and rules similar to tennis, with a few modifications Pickleball City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 was invented in the mid-1960s and has quickly become popular among adults as a fun game for players of all levels across the country. Why is pickleball becoming so popular? Players say it's easy to learn and easy on the knees and elbows, making it a great alternative to tennis, which can lead to injuries in these sensitive areas. Because the pickleball court is shorter than a tennis court, there's less running involved. The rules are simple so the game is easy to learn and master in a short time. While pickleball has the strongest following among the senior demographic, part of the appeal is that it's really a multigenerational sport. Eight and nine year-olds can have fun playing with 80 year-olds. Kids are learning the game in school. The smaller court also creates a social atmosphere, and playing doubles and/or mixed doubles is promoted. Pickleball can generate an adequate heart rate to provide cardio -respiratory conditioning. Yet, at the same time, it is less taxing on the joints and muscles. The small court space reduces the speed required to reach the ball and the weight of the racquet and the weight of the ball reduce the ballistic forces transferred to the wrist, elbow and shoulder. Those who may no longer be able to play tennis, racquetball or other team sports gravitate to pickleball because it is competitive, active and enjoyable. It also is a sport that appeals to those who have never or have had limited involvement in sports. Pickleball was introduced to Edina in July of 2012. The tennis courts at Garden Park needed restriping and pickleball lines were included at that time. Two clinics were offered at Garden Park on the tennis courts with 40 participants in each clinic. An Edina resident volunteered to come to the courts on Mondays and Wednesdays from 9-1 1 a.m. to offer instruction and get players rotating. The city purchased four racquets and some wiffelballs and the group has been growing regularly. Two more clinics were offered in 2013. Today pickleball is played at Garden Park on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 9-11 a.m. on the two courts. The level of play at our location is beginner to intermediate play. Since 2012 the number of requests to the Parks & Recreation Department for information about both indoor and outdoor locations has increased. There are currently 25 — 30 players committed to playing weekly on the two courts at Garden Park. New players try the sport each week. If the Garden Park courts aren't being used by tennis players, they are available for pickleball, but the lack of dedicated pickleball courts definitely limits play in Edina. Dedicated pickleball courts would provide significantly more available time and give a tremendous opportunity to introduce the game to more players. Currently advanced players go to Eden Prairie to play. This would provide an opportunity for more residents to play in Edina. Time would also be dedicated for youth play, lessons and clinics as well as promoting times and/or activities for intergenerational play. Tournaments with all skill levels, ladder leagues, and pickleball get-togethers would make this facility a great addition to the community. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • Proposed Project Timeline July — Park Board provides review and comment July/August — Bolton and Menk are completing site evaluation and project designs August — Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval August/September — Solicit quotes for construction and donor acceptance August/September — City Council approval of project and donation September/October/Spring 2015 — Construction Page 3 If this project is approved in concept by the City Council, staff would continue to work to secure approval and a permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and solicit quotes for the project. If satisfactory results are achieved in permitting and pricing, the City Council will be asked to approve the donation in September 2015. Construction of the courts could begin this fall, but due to asphalt curing time and temperatures needed for paint, the painting and striping of the courts would not likely occur until the spring of 2016. Project Cost Estimate • Preliminary pricing was obtained for several pickleball court combinations. A battery of five pickleball courts side by side would cost approximately $140,000, not including engineering fees, project management or watershed district costs. Included in this price are site grading and prep, 2" of asphalt, color surface system, striping, nets, posts, fencing and gates. Mr. Mooty is also considering shade structures and court lighting. Proposals for these amenities are being prepared. Included in this packet is a photo of the new pickleball courts in St. Cloud showing an example of what a shade structure could look like. If lights are included, they would be the new Musco lights that have recently been installed at Braemar Field and Countryside Park. These lights are energy efficient and reduce the amount of light spill by at least 50%. According to the Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy that was approved by the City Council on Nov. 18, 2014, the donor would receive the following recognition: $100,000 or more (Platinum) • Letter of appreciation from Mayor • Donation listed in annual About Town Report • Listed as platinum sponsor on publicly displayed donor board at City Hall or appropriate city facility • Engraved plaque of appreciation presented by Mayor, City Manager or other city official at an appropriate event (ribbon cutting ceremony, facility or event opening or City Council meeting). • Public Sector Professionals has been hired to act as a project manager for this project due to the current workload in the Parks & Recreation Department and the interest of the donor in getting this project completed as quickly as possible. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • Attachments: Approved July 14, 2015 Park Board Minutes Grading and Layout Plan Kare11 Story on Pickleball from Maple Grove Photos —Cavalry Hill Pickleball Courts in St. Cloud Rosland Park Site Diagram Public Sector Professionals Update • 0 Page 4 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 14, 2015 7 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. It. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good Student Members present: Chowdhury, Colwell. Absent: Member Segreto 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Good made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Strother, approving the consent • agenda as follows: W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, June 9, 2015 Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood, commented on the Strategic Plan. She feels Edina falls behind national norms as far as having indoor recreational space. She is concerned about equity as far as locations of parks. She requested the community center recommendation stay in the final report. She feels the council should consider the resident's requests. A copy of her statement will be included in Park Board correspondence. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Proposed Pickleball Court Donation Ms. Kattreh indicated the Park Board has been asked to review and comment on a potential donation of Pickleball courts and related amenities at Rosland Park. Edina resident Bruce Mooty has approached the city to donate funds to the City of Edina to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The proposed donation is in honor of his late father John Mooty, who passed away earlier this year. This location is recommended by Parks & Recreation Administrative staff and Park Maintenance staff. Several sites were reviewed, including Lewis Park, Yorktown Park and Cornelia School Park. This site was chosen due to the size of parcel available, proximity to a tennis facility, distance from residential impact and on -street parking available. If approved, the donor is interested in funding the project for construction this fall. This project would include four to six pickleball courts, • one or two shade structures and potentially court lighting. There would also be benches and trash receptacles. The site was explored for the potential of adding a restroom and picnic shelter facility similar to Wooddale Park, but the lack of proximity to sewer and water connections made this option not financially viable (over $100,000). Ms. Kattreh noted four to six courts could fit on this site and • pointed out there is a large oak tree in this area, but the courts could be located so as to not impact this tree. Ms. Kattreh gave a brief Pickleball explanation. The proposed project timeline is as follows: July — Park Board provides review and comment July — Bolton and Menk are completing site evaluation and project designs August — Solicit quotes for construction and donor acceptance August/September — City Council approval August — Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Approval September/October — Construction Ms. Kattreh indicated a battery of four Pickleball courts side by side would cost approximately $70,000. A battery of four courts with two courts over two courts would cost approximately $75,000. A battery of just two courts would cost approximately $39,000. Included in this price are a 6" limestone base, 2" of asphalt, color surface system, striping, nets, posts, fencing and gates. Site preparation grading and watershed accommodations will be required at an additional cost. Mr. Mooty is also considering shade structures and court lighting. According to the Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy that was approved by the City Council on Nov. 18, 2014, the donor would receive one of the following recognitions, depending upon the total project cost: $50,000 - $99,000 (Gold) $100,000 or more (Platinum) is Chair Gieseke asked if there would be benches to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes. Ms. Kattreh commented that the nearest restrooms would be just past the playground and added the Art Center could also be an option. Chair Gieseke asked if the lights could also light the tennis courts. Ms. Kattreh stated they will get quotes on various lighting options. Member Cella asked if the Pickleball courts at Garden Park would remain to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes and added they are well used. She also noted Pickleball is very popular in Edina and they may even need more courts in the future. Member Cella asked if Pickleball courts were in the plan for the future without this donor. Ms. Kattreh replied from a cost perspective there could be some funds in operational budgets to restripe. Member Good stated it seems the courts are needed. Ms. Kattreh pointed out Pickleball has a multi- generational appeal and noted this could be programmed significantly in the Parks & Recreation Department. She added that ongoing maintenance of these new courts would come out of the parks maintenance department. Member McCormick asked if courts are scheduled. Ms. Kattreh responded it would be a combination of scheduled and open courts as well as the parking lot would be available along with on -street parking. Member Jones asked if Pickleball courts can be used for other sports. Ms. Kattreh stated they could be converted to tennis or basketball courts. The donation would cover 100% of the construction costs. • Member Jones asked what the maintenance costs would be and Ms. Kattreh stated she did not know but could research estimates. Member Jones asked what the lifespan of the courts would be because her concern is when adding things to parks she would like to see the development of community sports. She noted she has a concern on this location as it does not have restrooms or water and • requested staff researches other areas. Chair Gieseke stated the St. Cloud courts look very nice and asked if we would have wind screens like St. Cloud has around the courts. Ms. Kattreh replied that is something that would be included in the quotations and discuss with the donor. Member McCormick noted the restrooms are a distance away and asked about porta-potties. Ms. Kattreh stated that will be discussed. Member Jones stated the board is very appreciative of this type of donation as they are financing the construction 100% and it fits well within the Strategic Plan. The senior citizens have been requesting amenities and these courts will fit well for them. Ms. Kattreh added she will make sure budgets will include maintenance. VI.B. Park Board Retreat — Tuesday, Aug. 11, 5:30 — 9:30 p.m. at Centennial Lakes Park Member McCormick informed the Park Board that Chair Gieseke and herself have been planning the Park Board retreat which will replace the regular Aug. I I Park Board meeting. This retreat will take place at the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park. It is scheduled to run from 5:30 to 9:30 p.m. and dinner will be provided. She added to dress casually because they will be playing bocce at the croquet and lawn games area at Centennial Lakes Park. Member Strother asked if the pre -work needs to be completed prior to the retreat. Member McCormick stated the pre -work is for member preparation only and will not be collected. • The Members offered to be on the following groups: Group I —Jacobson, Nelson, Strother Group 2 —Jones, Good, Chowdhury Group 3 — Greene, Cella, Colwell Chair Gieseke stated he would like a picture taken at the retreat. VI.C. Proposed Land Exchange — 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina Ms. Kattreh indicated the City Council has requested that the Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. The Planning Commission will also be reviewing this proposal at the July 22 Planning Commission meeting. Tony and Liz Burger were present at the meeting. Ms. Kattreh explained the situation to the Park Board. Ed Hayward, 6625 W. Shore Dr., indicated he is the neighbor to the north and stated they are not happy about the proposed public access running along the side of his property. It seems like a strange configuration for a land swap and he would rather see a variance. He added there is another access to the park that can be used. He pointed out he is not opposed to the concept of the land exchange. Member Good asked Mr. Hayward if there is a lot of activity in the park behind the houses and Mr. Hayward stated there generally is not much activity except for the Fourth of July fireworks. is Member Jones asked if the access was not right on property line and moved onto the Burger property would that be better. Mr. Hayward stated that does not seem very feasible and noted mowing would be a concern and awkward. Ms. Kattreh stated the Burgers do have the option of applying for a variance with the Planning Commission. Member Good asked if there was an option of having the city sell a piece of land to the Burgers instead of a swap. Ms. Kattreh stated it has not been a popular option historically with the Park Board or with the City Council as they do not want to sell parkland. Chair Gieseke stated in this case the city may benefit from selling some of the park land as it would be a win for the city. Member Nelson asked if there is another area that could be considered in the swap. Ms. Kattreh stated this portion was brought to staff by the Burgers. She noted they could start over and look at all options again. Mr. Burger indicated the surveyor came up with the line drawing and noted they wanted to keep the park continuous. He commented it is not a highly used park except for the Fourth of July. Member Greene asked Mr. Burger if he would be interested in purchasing a piece of park land to which Mr. Burger replied he would. Member Greene suggested the discussion end right now and staff goes back to determine a fair selling price and have Mr. Burger come back with a revised plan. Member Jones asked how many times a request has been made to purchase park land and Ms. Kattreh stated it's happened approximately four times in four years. Member Jones asked if a precedent would be set and Ms. Kattreh stated she has heard from council and the city does not have a strong interest • in selling park property. Other neighbors may want the same thing; a little more park land to add to their property. Member Strother suggested a variance may be more suitable to eliminate people walking very closely to the homes when entering the park. Ms. Burger stated that piece of land is called a breezeway. It's not supposed to be a stopping place for people entering the park. Mr. Burger stated since he has lived there approximately six to seven people have walked through that area. Member Jones asked if the property floods and Mr. Burger stated they have had some flooding in the garage; the park land does not flood. Member Jones asked if there is a path along the lake to which it was noted there is an open area off of 66th Street. Mr. Burger informed the Park Board they mow and irrigate the area and that the city stops mowing at the Hayward's property line. Member Jones asked if this would be an appropriate place for a nature path. Ms. Kattreh stated she is not aware that that option has ever been explored and added she does not want a misaligned lot line. Member McCormick asked if Mr. Burger if he was ok with the repositioning of the play structure. Mr. Burger stated the play structure is already on park property and he would have no problem moving it. Ms. Kattreh stated staffs recommendation was difficult due to precedence, gaining access for the city, and the way the property line is configured it is challenging. It is neither hurting the city nor providing a benefit. Ms. Kattreh pointed out she needs to report back to the Planning Commission and would like to get a consensus from the Park Board. • Member Nelson indicated she would prefer going with the variance. Member Jones indicated she can appreciate the situation but does not want to set a precedent and is against selling park land. She does not agree with the proposed swap with creating a jagged lot line to the east and that connectivity to West Shore Drive would be her preference. She would like to refer to a guiding principle and if a variance is given a pathway should be created from Laguna Drive to 66th Street either by land swap or a variance. Member Jacobson indicated this is a grey area whether it is a park or not because if it is truly parkland the residents should have access. She does not care for the land swap and would prefer a sale but she does not feel it is up to the Park Board to decide that. She would favor selling the land to the Burgers and create access from Laguna Drive. She added the variance process would serve well. Member Greene indicated he is in favor of the variance. Chair Gieseke indicated he is in favor of the variance and is not in favor of a land swap as there are many issues with it; the neighbors would not appreciate it and it would set a precedent. He noted a minimal land sale would be an option and would make the access at Laguna better. Member Cella indicated this isn't really something the Park Board should approve. She is in favor of making all park land accessible to residents and stated this is more a Planning Commission matter to decide if a variance is to be granted. Member Strother indicated she has concerns with a variance and is concerned this park with a lake is • not accessible to residents. She does not think a variance would benefit the city. She stated she does not know the history of swaps and/or sales in the past but if the money from the sale could be used to improve access she would be in favor of that. Member McCormick indicated this is a unique situation and does not make a lot of sense. She feels the Burgers should determine how much park land would be needed to make their plan a reality and have the city look at a possible sale. She would be in favor of a variance or make the swap without the jagged lines. Member Good indicated if the Burgers have an interest in pursuing a variance they should do so and it is not the expertise of the Park Board. He would not be in favor of the swap as it is proposed. He would be in favor of a sale. Student Member Colwell indicated Student Member Asef and himself would be in favor of selling the park land. He believes a trail could be put in without infringing on the homeowner's property and that a partial swap might be possible. Student Member Chowdhury indicated he does not see what the park land would be used for in the future and' does not think a precedent would be set. Chair Gieseke stated he likes the idea of a much smaller land swap because it is less obtrusive with compensation for the city. VII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENT • Member Jones stated she would like to comment on what is going on with Grandview. She indicated the latest round of proposals have a fairly large community area bringing the senior center and art center facilities at Grandview. The city will work on the design of that building. She commented after creating the Strategic Plan she is concerned about how that space is going to be used so that it fits with the Strategic Plan which includes the senior center and the art center. She is concerned about what is edited out of the Strategic Plan. The City Council will be deciding something on this in August. Ms. Kattreh stated at the June 17, 2015 City Council meeting a presentation was made on the Strategic Plan; however, the council did not have sufficient time to review the plan in detail and is concerned about the length of the document. She stated the document will be reviewed by the council and they will notify her when they are ready to provide feedback. Member Good stated that is his understanding. The Park Board is a recommending group rather than an approving board on items such as Grandview. He also noted the executive summary for the Strategic Plan should be on the website rather than the 400 page document. Member Nelson stated an important thing to consider is the maintenance of the existing parks and structures. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh provided the following staff updates: • The Braemar Driving Range and Par Three groundbreaking was held today; the project should be completed by the end of September. • The backyard construction at Braemar Arena should be done this week. • The Edina Soccer Club has invited the Park Board to their event on Friday. • The Pamela Park building is up. Member Good asked about a new sign for Braemar Golf Course. Ms. Kattreh stated the sign has been ordered and requires six weeks for production. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Greene, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. 11 • • • � O m Ar R m ° ys�8 n v F 52i�i � i goo'? WSW m o u�C g PH WHRt; 6 !21 inn ojo�o� aPR O G � a as �� GG' o G ssa<aW.<sss EIEJ I 1 I I I Ij I II I I 1 1 7 e .1 1 .r i oo® k I �I O Z W I 1 r U CL 1 .r i oo® k F to O Z W U CL Q U tl o - s .r i z Q a a O z -1 0y z 5 2'..s z i z v � o w o III w oo® k F to O z Q a a O z -1 0y z 5 2'..s z i z v � o w o III w oo® k z Q a a O z -1 0y z 5 2'..s z i z v � o w o III w • Karel 1 June 24, 2015 MAPLE GROVE, Minn. — The oddly named sport of "Pickleball" has become America's and Minnesota's newest passion. The activity appeals to people of all ages. The sport began 50 years ago near Seattle, Washington. Three men are credited with creating the sport to combat the boredom of their children. A story is that the dog of one of them kept chasing the ball. Since the dog's name was "Pickle", Pickleball was born. "The pickleball has a little bit slower play to it," said Patty Anderson, Maple Grove Parks and Recreation Administrative Supervisor. "I think that is what is the interest of the seniors, but we also are seeing, throughout the Park and Recreation industry, that this is a sport that all levels are getting interested in, children and adults." Maple Grove converted two tennis courts into six pickleball courts and is adding 4 more in late summer. Other courts are up and working in Woodbury, Plymouth, Roseville, New Brighton, Bloomington, Apple Valley, Richfield and Burnsville. St. Cloud just opened six courts of their own. • The sport is played with a solid racquet (paddle) and a whiffle ball. There is a net, a couple of inches lower than a tennis net, that divides the court into two sides. It has been compared to ping-pong and involves the strategy and skill of the net play in tennis. The action is close and relatively fast. All serves are underhand and the ball must be struck with the racquet below the waist. The formal rules of the game are set by the United States Pickleball Association (USAPA). The appeal of the sport is that it is an accessible activity and very social. "Oh, it is phenomenal," said Mike Kline, Plymouth resident. "I know we have met at least 120 people in the three years, we have played. I mean that is by name. Where else do you get that kind of social life with something other than you know holidays or parties or something like that or work." Kline played racquet ball when younger. His wife, Jean, who is retired, never played tennis, but did play ping-pong in her youth. "I started playing cards at a senior center and not very active and then I saw a flyer for pickleball and I was curious," said Jean Kline. "I just came and tried it and fell in love with • it." • "I think the hook is that you can get somewhat proficient right away," said Mike Kline. "In other words, It is not like tennis where you will hit the ball way out of bounds every time." Kline said he has played with people in their 80s and with teenagers. " Around the holidays when they're home from college, or when their parents bring them in, MEA week or something like that, they are all over the place," grinned Kline. "They humiliate us and they leave." The enthusiasm of the players is contagious. They were anxious to praise the fun of the sport. "I love pickleball because it is a great way to meet people, get a lot of exercise, and be competitive," said Rosemary Mueller. " And you can play men against women." The sport has no age or gender barriers. It is regarded as the fastest growing sport in North America. Check out this story on karell.com: http://www.karell.com/story/life/2015/06/24/pickleball- anderson-mueller-kline-maple-grove/29235913/ • 0 iii '+� ;G •� i Y`_ .JL4 'r •, �'� +:��Ia � �- Ar �. �? � L•� z ` . � � �f :�� . :z .. ;2.�� . � «/§ / : , ^ � °'® ¥ « «2 /©�«Z:a =�� !\:\� � a �' �:� ~� �� 2^ 4�\\ � �< : �z ,,� d. », 4.. y� � �y «� . ƒ �� �� �\� �^ \ / � �� �/} ���- . . . � �: �\�� ��\�`�.i�. \� �� � .i � . �.� . �y�i��\ .. �,�. .2. . .y� . :a: . � \ � , , .��� �~�� ` _ »� 10 - 06...t-..44 _., is • Edina Parks and Recreation Edina Parks and Recreation Edina Parks and Recreation Page 1 of 2 DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Microsoft, USDA FSA )( = Rro�oscd locc44-lior\ http://edinagis.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html 7/8/2015 i EPSP 7&0—"6C Sertoli JPA,0AAAiona(A August 11, 2015 TO: Ann Kattreh, Edina Parks Director FROM: Matt Hylen, President RE: Pickleball Court Update The Rosland Park Pickleball Court Project has been moving along at a very well this summer. Currently, I have been coordinating quotes for the construction of the new • courts. Regular communication has been occurring with the donor to ensure satisfaction with the quality of this project. Site Layout Attached is a sketch which maximizes the number of pickleball courts in the space identified. This plan has been submitted to the donor and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to have both of their approvals to proceed forward on this project. As you can see, this layout allows for the least impact to the established trees in this area of Rosland Park. Consideration was given to keep the most established trees in place. Bolton & Menk, project engineer, calculated the "drip -line" of the oak tree to keep work, including grading, out of that area. Watershed Application Application to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District was completed on July 15 for appropriate approvals needed for this project. Discussions continue to occur between Bolton & Menk and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to ensure this meets their strict requirements due to the projects proximity to Lake Cornelia. The pickleball courts add approximately 10,000 square feet of impervious surface, 5,000 sf more than allowed by the watershed district without taking into account stormwater management. At the advisement of the watershed district's engineer, Bolton & Menk is looking into the option of dedicating adjacent park land that would remain pervious surface (no development) into the future to eliminate the need for a storm water retention basin. The challenge with this is the existing soils within the park, the • normal water level of Lake Cornelia and the available park land. We hope to have a resolution before the City dedicating land for no future development to meet the watershed district's requirements in the near future. 14400 Minnehaha Place, Wayzata, MN 55391 Tel: 763-238-3366 Email : mhylen(a1ps-professionals.com Construction Timeline Pending approvals from both the City Council and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, this project is anticipated to begin construction in September. The majority of the Construction can be finished this fall, however the type of painted surface for pickleball courts requires several days and nights with temperatures staying above 50 degrees. In addition, once the asphalt has been placed on the courts, it needs to "cure" for 30 days before painting can occur. Therefore, a spring 2016 painted surface will occur with an open house/dedication to be scheduled once a definitive completion date has been established. Final Issues The only two issues that may negatively impact the timing or completion of this project are: the approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, the receipt of final quotes that are in line, or better, than the current estimates for construction. As always, please contact me with any additional questions. • 9 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: August 18, 2015 �91A, roRPOAA� j 7ad8 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. Subject: Sketch Plan Review— Walgreen's 4916 France & 3918 49-1/2 Street Action Requested: Provide non-binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Action ❑ Discussion ❑x Information ❑ Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the .64 acre parcel at 4916 France Avenue and 3918 49-1/2 Street West. The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing Walgreens store on France and retail building on 49-1/2 Street, and redevelop it with a new Walgreens store on the first level and 4 levels of residential above. The building would be five stories tall and have two levels of underground parking (64 stalls) for residents and an enclosed surface level parking lot (20 stalls) for Walgreens. (See plans and narrative on pages A4 --A 17 in the Planning Commission Memo.) Details of the project include: ➢ 64 units — 100 units per acre ➢ FAR of 3.03 ➢ Parking ratio of I/ I for the residential units ➢ 14,265 square foot new Walgreens store with a drive-thru ➢ Amenities in the apartments include: second story outdoor terrace; fitness room, club room, roof terrace. The pedestrian entrance to the new Walgreens would be on the corner of France and 49-1/2 Street, in the same location as today. Walgreens would have automobile entrances on France and 49-1/2 Street. The drive-through entrance would be off France Avenue. There is no detail yet provided on the drive-through. It appears there would be adequate space to provide 4 stacking spaces behind the drive-through window. Width of the drive -aisle and stacking lane need to be verified. (See page ASa.) The pedestrian entrance to the residential units would be off 49-1/2 Street, and the automobile entrance off of France Avenue. (See page A 15.) The automobile access to France would be subject to approval of Hennepin County. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet tall to 5 stories and 65 feet tall. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 100. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.5 to 3.03. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2- 0 • Because the proposal so far exceeds the density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan the City Council is specifically asked to provide feedback on the proposed density. A rezoning of the two properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A 18.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. The France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the principles with any formal application. (See principles on pages A20 -A22.) Planning Commission Consideration: On August 12, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) • ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the August 12, 2015 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, August 12, 2015 • City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: August 12, 2015 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — Walgreen's 4916 France Avenue MEMO The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the .64 acre parcel at 4916 France Avenue and 3918 49-1/2 Street West. (See property location on pages Al—A3.) The . applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing Walgreens store on France and retail building on 49-1/2 Street, and redevelop it with a new Walgreens store on the first level and 4 levels of residential above. The building would be five stories tall and have two levels of underground parking (64 stalls) for residents and an enclosed surface level parking lot (20 stalls) for Walgreens. (See plans and narrative on pages A4 --A17.) Details of the project include: ➢ 64 units — 100 units per acre ➢ FAR of 3.03 ➢ Parking ratio of 1/1 for the residential units ➢ 14,265 square foot new Walgreens store with a drive-thru ➢ Amenities in the apartments include: second story outdoor terrace; fitness room, club room, roof terrace. The pedestrian entrance to the new Walgreens would be on the corner of France and 49-1/2 Street, in the same location as today. Walgreens would have automobile entrances on France and 49-1/2 Street. The drive-through entrance would be off France Avenue. There is no detail yet provided on the drive- through. It appears there would be adequate space to provide 4 stacking spaces behind the drive- through window. Width of the drive -aisle and stacking lane need to be verified. (See page Ma.) The pedestrian entrance to the residential units would be off 49-1/2 Street, and the automobile entrance off of France Avenue. (See page A15.) The automobile access to France would be subject to approval of Hennepin County. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet tall to 5 stories and 65 feet tall. ➢ Housing Density —from 30 units per acre to 100. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.5 to 3.03. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO Because the proposal so far exceeds the density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan the Commission is specifically asked to provide feedback on the proposed density. A rezoning of the two properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page Al 8.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. The Planning Commission is asked to make recommendation of the need for a Small Area Plan. The France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the principles with any formal application. (See principles on pages A20 -A22.) The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of PCD -2, Planned Commercial District - 2: * Variance or would require change to PUD City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (PCD -2) Proposed Buildinq Setbacks Front — France Avenue 5 feet 0 feet* Front — 49-1i2 Street 0 feet 0-5 feet Side — West 65 feet 0 feet* Rear — South 65 feet 0 feet* Building Height Four stories and Five stories & 65 feet* 48 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio 1.5% 3.03%* (FAR) Parking Stalls May rely on parking ramps — 20 exposed stalls proposed retail 64 stalls enclosed 64 enclosed (residential) Council may require surface stalls if deemed necessary. Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Drive-through stacking 4 spaces No detail provided, but it appears there would be adequate area * Variance or would require change to PUD City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the sites. However, the proposed density is significant, and triples the density allowed on site per the Comprehensive Plan. The FAR is double required by Code; however the FAR is not a good measure for residential development. The following table represents densities in other Edina multi -family residential developments: High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300-50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France — Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 7200 France Project— Proposed 7200 France 995 50 Walgreens Site 4916 France 64 900 Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City's Comprehensive Plans Since the density of this project will be the main issue under consideration, below is information on residential density ranges used by our surrounding cities. Please note that in general, these density ranges are much higher than Edina. The City of Minnetonka does not have a residential density range established for its Mixed Use area. A summary is on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO wglN/�1l'r� o e f 'g �o t£ . City Range — Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5-10 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0-83 Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield Medium Density Residential 7-12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6-30 High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4-12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions See page A18.) Minneapolis Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50 High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ TRAFFIC/SITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. Access is proposed off both France and 49-1/2 Street. The automobile access to France would be subject to approval of Hennepin County. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The applicant is not proposing any affordable housing as part of this project. Given housing policy under consideration by the City Council; this project should be required to provide affordable housing consistent with the policy or 20% of the units designated for affordable housing. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO k,9iN�11� o W SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The applicant has not indicated any sustainable design principles. As part of any formal application sustainable design should be included. COMMPREHENSIVE PLAN This property is located in the MXC, Mixed Use Center. Maximum density in the MXC is 12-30 units per acre. The only residential development in this district in the 50th and France area is the 5000 France project which is 29 units per acre. These are condos, with larger unit sizes than the proposed apartments. Development Guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan for this area reads as follows: "Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities; encourage or require structured parking. Buildings "step down" in height from intersections." Primary uses are retail, office and multifamily residential. 1B The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposed project would incorporate some of the items noted above. However, as mentioned earlier there is no mention of affordable housing or sustainable design. Elements that are included would be high quality building design, mixed use, podium height, and pedestrian oriented design. STAFF CONCERNS Staff concerns include density, height and lack of affordable housing. The proposed density triples what is allowed in the Comprehensive Plan; consideration must be given to allowing that high of a density not only at 50th and France, but Grandview and the Promenade/Centennial Lakes Area which are also guided MXC. (See page A19.) Given the request for this high of a density, 20% of the units should be provided for affordable housing. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 12, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Platteter Absent: Olsen, Seeley 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the August 12, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ',Oe IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the July 8`h and July 22"d meeting minutes. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS �. A. Sketch Plan Review. Walgreens. 4916 France Avenue and 3918 49 % St., \� Edina, MN 1 Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the .64 acre parcel at 4916 France Avenue and 3918 49-1/2 Street West. The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing Walgreens store on France and retail building on 49-1/2 Street, and redevelop it with a new Walgreens store on the first level and 4 levels of residential above. The building would be five stories tall and have two levels of underground parking (64 stalls) for residents and an enclosed surface level parking lot (20 stalls) for Walgreens. • Continuing, Teague pointed out details of the project would include; Page 11 • ➢ 64 units — 100 units per acre ➢ FAR of 3.03 ➢ Parking ratio of 1/1 for the residential units ➢ 14,265 square foot new Walgreens store with a drive-thru ➢ Amenities in the apartments include: second story outdoor terrace; fitness room, club room, roof terrace. Teague explained that the pedestrian entrance to the new Walgreens would be on the corner of France and 49-1/2 Street, in the same location as today. Walgreens would have automobile entrances on France and 49-1/2 Street. The drive-through entrance would be off France Avenue. Teague stated at this time there is no detail yet provided on the drive-through. It appears there would be adequate space to provide 4 stacking spaces behind the drive-through window. Width of the drive -aisle and stacking lane need to be verified. (See page ASa.) The pedestrian entrance to the residential units would be off 49-1/2 Street, and the automobile entrance off of France Avenue. The automobile access to France would be subject to approval of Hennepin County. Teague said to accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required as follows: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet tall to 5 stories and 65 feet tall. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 100. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.5 to 3.03. Continuing, Teague explained a rezoning of the two properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested Teague concluded that staff concerns include density, height and lack of affordable housing. The proposed density triples what is allowed in the Comprehensive Plan; consideration must be given to allowing that high of a density not only at 50`h and France, but Grandview and the Promenade/Centennial Lakes Area which are also guided MXC. Given the request for this high of a density, 20% of the units should be provided for affordable housing. Appearing for the Applicant Gretchen Camp and Scott Olson, BKV Group Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague to give a brief summary of what a Sketch Plan Review encompasses. Teague responded that the Sketch Plan Review process provides the applicant the ability to briefly explain their vision with nonbinding comments from the Commission/Council. The applicant would process the "feedback" and if desired is submit a formal application. Page 12 • Commissioner Nemerov asked Planner Teague when neighbors or other interested parties are invited to speak to the issue. Teague explained if/when a formal application is made the City requires the applicant to 1) post a sign on the site informing the public of the proposal, 2) publish notice in the Sun Current; and 3) provide a mailed notice to property owners within 1000 -feet highlighting the project. Commissioner Halva suggested if the applicant proceeds with a formal application a shadow study be a submittal requirement. Planner Teague responded that's a terrific suggestion, and asked the applicants to note Commissioner Halva's suggestion. Applicant Presentation Ms. Camp delivered a presentation and submitted to Commissioners the following: 1) Sustainable design strategies; 2) Preliminary Concept Review; and 3) Responses to the Working Principles and Supporting Questions. Continuing, Camp explained the project is a 5 -story podium style mixed use development with 64 rental units and 14,265 square feet of retail on the first floor. This proposal is 100 units per acre with a floor area ratio (FAR) of 3.03. The site also contains 20 surface covered parking stalls to support the retail element of the project, and 64 underground parking spaces to accommodate the housing. Camp said as mentioned by Planner Teague a rezoning is requested along with amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Camp further reported that the development team is meeting with the County to discuss access and traffic flow. Camp • concluded in their opinion the proposal is a great mixed use that brings people into the area to live and work. Mr. Olsen with graphics pointed out the architectural features of the proposed building including the podium concept, terraces with green elements, recessed balconies and common courtyard. He told the Commission to pay close attention to the 5th floor because it is recessed farther and is difficult to see. Continuing, Olsen explained the exterior building materials would primarily be brick to complement the district; however, the building would have its own character. Olsen further noted that the sidewalks along both West 49`h %2 Street and France Avenue would be widened to accommodate street trees, pedestrian lighting, and street furnishings (benches). Olsen said that all plans are preliminary. Discussion Chair Platteter asked the development team to explain what the "give to get" is with this development. Ms. Camp responded this redevelopment infill optimizes the use of the infrastructure and introduces into the neighborhood 100 new residents that will live, shop, bike and generally support the established 50`h and France Avenue district. Camp said they believe Walgreen's is also an amenity not only for the future residents of the building • but for the entire 50`h and France Avenue neighborhood. Camp explained the corner will be enhanced; adding this corner is really a "gateway" into the district. The location Page 13 • of the building close to amenities and public transportation should reduce the need for vehicles to "come and go". Camp said a traffic study is in the works, adding initial feedback is that the proposed development shouldn't be a dramatic impact on the area. Camp reiterated the street scape will be improved and the site will be attractive to a number of different people to include seniors. Concluding, Camp noted the increase in the public tax base and the sustainable designs including urban reuse of the infrastructure is a huge benefit to the community. Commissioner Thorsen asked if a price point has been established for the project. Ms. Camp responded that she sees rent pricing at $2.00 + per foot, adding per square foot is usually higher for smaller units. Commissioner Carr said in her opinion it's a lovely design and questioned the materials used on the north elevation and the purpose of the white block elements on the north facade. Mr. Olsen responded those elements encase the stairwell and the brick will extend to the rear. Continuing Carr asked the development team if they ever considered reducing the amount of one bedroom units to provide more 2+ bedroom units. Mr. Olsen responded that the market analysis indicates a larger demand for one bedroom units. Ms. Camp explained that people are also single longer and this site will o be attractive to seniors with grown children. Camp further reported that in Minneapolis when unit count per acre exceeds code requirements a variance is requested. Commissioner Carr told the development team to note that Edina is a • different market and larger units may be preferred. Commissioner Nemerov asked what the density ratios are in the Metro Area. Ms. Camp responded that in Minneapolis and St. Paul they see densities upwards of 120 units per acre. She further noted that the density can go higher if density bonuses are added. Camp reiterated 120 units per acre is common; however, she acknowledged Edina's ratio is much less. Nemerov further asked the development team if they ever drove this stretch of France Avenue going north. He stated it's difficult at best. Concluding, Nemerov asked if the City's ramp would be impacted by this proposal. Planner Teague responded if a formal application is made the City would order a traffic study that will look at the impact of this project on the City ramps, immediate neighborhood and the greater area at large; present and future. Chair Platteter stated in his opinion the proposed building is too large for this area; it's not Minneapolis, reiterating 5 -stories are too much. Platteter said he can't envision support for such a high density development. He acknowledged 30 units per acre may be too low; however, 100, in his opinion is way over. Continuing, Platteter asked about affordability, noting the goal for the City is to provide affordable housing, adding it should be reconsidered here. Concluding, Platteter asked the development team if they spoke to the City about the abutting City parcels and the feasibility of working together on redevelopment. Ms. Camp responded they spoke with the City about adjacent parcels. Planner Teague suggested that the Commission request that the City Council • consider discussing redevelopment options with the applicant. Page 14 • Commissioner Forrest stated in her opinion the height of the building and the lack of affordable housing is a problem. She also noted that access is very tricky and agreed with Commissioner Nemerov that traffic gets pretty messy in this area. Continuing, Forrest said the wider sidewalks area a benefit; however, in her opinion aren't wide enough to accommodate seating. Forrest further suggested that the entrance into Walgreens be covered and that the window glazing be rethought — Forrest said that what Edina wants to see along street frontages is human activity and the windows depicted doesn't provide that human scale and movement. Forrest said she appreciates the improvements along West 49 '/2 `h Street. She further suggested that the development team consider noise pollution from condensers and if/when they return with a formal application indicate measureable sustainable elements. Concluding, Forrest stated traffic is also a concern at this corner. Commissioner Thorsen reported that he loves the plan; however, is concerned with density. He noted affordable housing units is a bonus to achieve higher density, adding he a could consider higher density with affordable housing. Continuing, Thorsen said as mentioned previously traffic in a big concern and traffic flow, access etc. should be carefully considered. It's not easy on France Avenue at this corner. Commissioner Hobbs stated he agrees with previous comments from Commissioners. Hobbs further asked the development team to articulate how this proposal will improve the health and welfare of the residents and general public it serves. • Commissioner Lee stated if the development team wants an increase in density there needs to be incentives. Lee stated this location offers many opportunities to do something great, something nice, adding this corner can become the anchor. Lee asked the development team if Walgreens would own or lease the site. The development team responded that Walgreen's would lease the tenant space. Lee further stated that in her opinion the proposal does a great job on the housing; however, street level is lacking in detail. Lee said in her opinion much could be done to enhance the facade at street level. She said as depicted it's just a straight wall; there is no relief or architectural features added to soften its mass. She also suggested that in the design they consider what would happen if Walgreen's doesn't work out; adding they should consider smaller retail spaces. Concluding, Lee stated at formal application she would like to see a shadow study, more attention paid to the first floor architectural to create a more interesting space. She said the proposed "wedding cake" design has merit; however, more could be done to make this look more like 50`h and France. She stressed that the development team needs to pay close attention to the corner, anchor it, and create a gateway. Lee further added she hopes to see affordable units added to the building. • Chair Platteter thanked the development team for their input adding he looks forward to formal submittal; however, this development places a lot on this spot. Page 15 C :7 • _ 1 s ..7 M1iQRhJING :Irfltat\D! i iii w' c .I4rt II E+r_'VE J Ic Z THSTPFLi LNI •t IH ,IPEET VE.•I �aYFtSr I., 4a Si-� EET \V E5T r` Z-1 J {1F. 11-L- 1_ a U P Ji ,.�tSTsrfiFel 7 . wiz d t...I �++. :, 77 y 2 RST WEET YY7 Ll _ �1T am �r .y "- vnnsFr \yFsr zziqZ­711 Ej 7. � w fA — --; - o ITH sir•LFr w6!i. ; LL_ Yr c+IflFlear sh u !L+'ILN LRI:'r V .�,i ..T 44 E5 ❑I L _ s. _ Sr.l ..Z ORNE LE.`nitJ.�rO int .;,kFllt �I' - r _ C:111 STRUT V. I STfH, �_ kY c -9 to : = t Y:EF. STREET ;TH IE.tj LA r7C - - - — _ - n 71_I _ TFISTRECTtil 1 57D S7RFP7 1ES PHI LIS, - LAi1C _• Parcel 18-028-24-14-0016 q_T_g; Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N I Print Date: 8/6/2015 Ownee r Market Name: Total: Parcel f�iii' FT PC . — T W L L4=3Z — #i tu 1Ii Total: y • Property Sale Type: u Price: ^ -�•A c �t 7 v tea_ .h( 4 sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- L _ 1 s ..7 M1iQRhJING :Irfltat\D! i iii w' c .I4rt II E+r_'VE J Ic Z THSTPFLi LNI •t IH ,IPEET VE.•I �aYFtSr I., 4a Si-� EET \V E5T r` Z-1 J {1F. 11-L- 1_ a U P Ji ,.�tSTsrfiFel 7 . wiz d t...I �++. :, 77 y 2 RST WEET YY7 Ll _ �1T am �r .y "- vnnsFr \yFsr zziqZ­711 Ej 7. � w fA — --; - o ITH sir•LFr w6!i. ; LL_ Yr c+IflFlear sh u !L+'ILN LRI:'r V .�,i ..T 44 E5 ❑I L _ s. _ Sr.l ..Z ORNE LE.`nitJ.�rO int .;,kFllt �I' - r _ C:111 STRUT V. I STfH, �_ kY c -9 to : = t Y:EF. STREET ;TH IE.tj LA r7C - - - — _ - n 71_I _ TFISTRECTtil 1 57D S7RFP7 1ES PHI LIS, - LAi1C _• Parcel 18-028-24-14-0016 q_T_g; Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N I Print Date: 8/6/2015 Ownee r Market Name: Total: Parcel 4916 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina, MN 55410 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.44 acres Area: 19,026 Sq ft COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A Think -Green' if • �49TI1 STREET k,%, EST r _ r;l 491 a_ I I, 71 LR 48111; 6 4'a 112 5TREET %kES7 Rolf. OW 92 S ye —� 1.24 2424 7p2S�j 1• i J LILT :4 4-'-� 50THISMEE7'vVE T -71 1 24; _ 1j, Parcel ID: 18-028-24-14-0016 A -T -B: Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 4916 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina, MN 55410 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: I Parcel 0.44 acres Sale Area: 19,026 sq ft Code: i« = z } 1 FA �i tj 7 14 �A� r11111: �• �1 1 J': K. _ 57..1 + Ill Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 8/6/2015 A.s" This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 1 hinkGreen! • • 1 �l 13927 T ,. 39P•3 ::, , � � � y _A� - � li 4' 1 3 � 1 rS 41 `, , - l 1, i' T 4916 K I {� - niz. 4111 U114 Illillibi- - Y ` r f 4924_^.F. iTREET WEST 13 • �14. r r ' 24 r' Wit, �7 pc, _; 6.147 ; f r Parcel 18-028-24-14-0016 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. N ID. Print Date: 8/6/2015 Owner William C Knapp Market Name: Total: Parcel 4916 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina, MN 55410 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.44 acres Sale Area: 19,026 sq ft ! Code: A3 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A ThirrkGreen'. • • U w f 4916 France Avenue Development Project Description � of 0 NLD Edina LLC proposes a mixed-use development with 64 rental units and 14,265 sq ft of retail space on the parcel of land located at the northwest corner of 49'/ Street and France Avenue South in Edina. The parcel totals 27,888 square feet (.64 acres) in size and is currently zoned PCD -2. The proposed building will be 5 stories or approximately 65 feet tall with 64 parking spaces for the 64 rental units and surface parking containing 20 stalls for the retail space. The building amenities include an on-site management office, a second story outdoor terrace, a fitness room, club room, roof terrace and lower level storage areas. The development proposes 100 units per acre and a floor area ratio (FAR) of 3.03. We are seeking a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a PUD (or any other variance alternatives that may be required) for the site. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty -nesters alike. It offers an option for those empty nesters who want to stay in Edina, downsize their homes but remain closer to shops, restaurants and activity while also attracting those young professionals who enjoy low maintenance living while keeping all their lifestyle needs within walking distance. Currently, the property contains two (2) free standing buildings with surface lot parking while the proposed redevelopment works to meet the City of Edina's goals of increasing density, matching the design and, architecture of the building to the rest of the neighborhood while providing a warm and welcoming pedestrian experience. The creation of housing desirable to many market segments, improving the under-utilized site with a high- quality building design and streetscape amenities is an excellent public value as well as a great benefit for the neighborhood's restaurants, retail shops and the like. With its location along France Avenue, the development allows easy vehicular access for those who have cars; however, the site also sits along Route 6 of the Metro Transit bus with a stop located at 50th Street and France Avenue for those who prefer public transit. One of the key elements of the proposed site plan is improving the pedestrian experience at the sidewalk and creating an active streetscape environment. Twenty (20) parking stalls for the retail space will be covered and located at -grade while residential parking will be located below -grade. All trash for the property will be enclosed and out of view of pedestrians. The retail entry will be welcoming at the corner of France Avenue and 49 '/ Street with vision glass proposed as opposed to commonly used spandrel glass. Public seating and bike racks will be located adjacent to the main housing entrance on 49 '/ Street to encourage pedestrian and bicycle transit. These elements along with boulevard landscaping will improve the overall atmosphere of this intersection. It is important that the proposed building fit the character of the area. Drawing from the existing 50th and France context, the building's materials, scale and articulation of elements work to reinforce a sense of neighborhood place. As a mixed use building, the development has a responsibility to enhance the retail activity of the street, while creating a livable, engaged residential community above. The materials of the building will consist of a combination of brick, metal panel, cement fiberboard lap siding, wood composite panel and glass. These materials are consistent with those found in the 50th and France neighborhood. Although the proposed development is 5 stories, the scale of the building will respect the street by stepping back from the principal facades along France Avenue and 49th '/ Street at the second, fourth and fifth levels. This stepping will effectively reduce the perceived height of the building, allowing the development to blend more readily into the surroundings. Additionally, the building features articulation that adds elements of interest to the overall project The primary facades along France Avenue and 49th '/ Street feature recessed and semi -recessed balconies that offer privacy while allowing the building elevations to be animated in light and shadow. The setback terraces employ a series of trellis elements, sunshades and landscaping that adds interest to the most publicly viewable portions of the fagades. The rear courtyard facades feature a simple system of hung balconies that allow residents to take advantage of outdoor space. The proposed project would meet the following city goals and policies: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto -oriented development sites, encourage placement of linier buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. c. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e.. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) f. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. g. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. h. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. i. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. j. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity -generating uses. I. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed-use destinations and transit stops. \.MO It0\, AT PRO[ SITE PLAN I"=30' -O" PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT B K V G R O U P 07.30.15 E • • PERSPECTIVE AT CORNER OF FRANCE AVENUE AND 49TH 112 STREET N.T.S. 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 2 9 2015 CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 0 0 0 BIRDSEYE PERSPECTIVE AT CORNER N.T S. 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT NNN/NG SEP ARS yFM' J04 Z 9 2015 C/7-yOFtrol 4 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 0 0 0 PERSPECTIVE AT CORNER OF FRANCE AVENUE AND 49TH 1/2 STREET N.T.S. 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT JUS 29 2415 c/7-yop �Nd PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 C7 • A -G1 3: LO W_ N LU r O d w U Z O O U � M Q ■ ■ .0 Z J w n z a J � z m w o LU r o O w w o z p w w =D z C) w LU U) Q LU LU w w U LU z WQ CO ry o of w mz C-0 rn • • A46 ?�: Lo O \/O WE J w d w w z -' w LU Q n O o� J cn z w rn w 0 w z w O Q w w U -' z LU Q LL o� cn z rn d- 0 • w w w U z 0 U Q Z_ J LU crn r N r O O W O At( z 0 w J w I— U W z z w 75 n 0 1 w w 0 w z w Q w U Q ry LL r 0 0 0 WEST ELEVATION N.T.S. 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 0 9 0 NORTH ELEVATION N.T.S. 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT A oFA 12x9 �F�r PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 ter` 0 0 0 Project Data Summary: 4916 France Ave Development Unit Mix Stalls First Floor 20 Basement 64 Floor Unit Type 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total % Studio (540 SF) 1 1 1 0 3 5% 1 -Bedroom (725 SF) 14 15 9 0 38 59% 1 -Bedroom + Den (840 SF) 0 0 0 1 1 2% 2 -Bedroom (975 -1,455 SF) 4 4 7 7 22 34% Total 101 191 201 171 81 641 100% Building Square Footage Summary Stalls First Floor 20 Basement 64 Floor Gross Bldg Area (SF) Hsg Net Rent SF Common SF Retail Parking Eff. Basement 27,838 460 27,378 First 26,800 570 13,700 12,530 Second 19,200 14,850 4,350 77.34% Third 19,200 15,681 3,519 81.67% Fourth 17,840 14,069 3,771 78.86% Fifth 12,255 8,965 3,290 73.15% Total 123,133 53,565 15,960 13,700 39,908 Parking Stalls First Floor 20 Basement 64 Total 84 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 F 11 STREETLEVEL FLOOR PLANS zu u , PARKING STALLS a G,= DRIVE-THRU 49TH 1/2 STREET 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT 1"=30'-0" RETAIL ENTRANCE A 5 _ 64 PARKING STALLS a s v4 9 3 vll 12 z a RESIDENTIAL a 7 => PARKING -> 004MI�IMI■IE LOWER LEVEL PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 2 9 2015 CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 LEVELS 2 FLOOR PLANS 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT 1 "=30'-0" LEVELS 3 PLANNING DEPARNENT JUL 2 9 2015 CITY OF F01ALA PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 s • s FWI 1-BED IF 1-BED 735 sf 2-BED 735 sf 2-BED 1020 sf 1020 sf 1-BED 1-BED 2-BED 735 sf STUDIO 2-BED 735 sf STUDIO 1020 sf 540 sf 1020 sf 540 sf 1-BED2 1-BED 1-BED 720E 1-BED 1-BED f 674 sf 602 sf 674 sf 602 sf 1-BED 1-BED 720 sf 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED 720 sf 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED LEASING/SUPRT 714 sf 653 sf 720 sf 1-BED 714 sf 653 sf 720 sf 852 sf 852 sf 1-BED 1-BED 720 sf 720 sf 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED 2-BED 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED 1-BED 2-BED 726 sf 726 sf 726 sf 726 sf 1349 sf 726 sf 726 sf 726 sf 726 sf 1349 sf 2-BED 2-BED 1020 sf Q 1020 sf LEVELS 2 FLOOR PLANS 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT 1 "=30'-0" LEVELS 3 PLANNING DEPARNENT JUL 2 9 2015 CITY OF F01ALA PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 07.27.15 1-BED 735 sf 2-BED 2-BED 1020 sf sf 1268 s 1268 975 sf 1-BED 2-BED 735 sf STUDIO 1020 sf 540 sf 1275 s 1275 sf 1-BED sf 1-BED 602 sf 2-BED 2-BED 1-BED 960 sf 2-BED 1-BED+D 984 sf 720 sf 1-BED 1-BED f 1-BED FITNESS ROOM 1061 sf 840 sf 653 sf 714 sf 653 sf 1-BED 720 sf CLUB 2-BED 2-BED ROOM 1254 sf 1280 sf 2-BED 2-BED 972 sf 972 sf 2-BED 1349 sf .-� 2-BED ROOF _ ( 1020 sf TERRACE LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLANS JQ4 CONCEPT REVIEW 2 9PRELIMINARY ?015 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT C/7�,�F BKV 1"=30'-0" " ob/ G R O U P 07.27.15 ,_ e ( • ...for for living, learning, raising families & doing business] 2008 Comprehensive Plan — E % AlO 1. Legend: Potential Areas of Change ! 0$ F VJ 39th St 11: a I North France Avenue 2 :Neighborhood Commercial Nodes i 3 -CommunityCommercial Nodes > 4-SouthdaleArea . . . . S-Crm—J — onrciaYOffice Conidors t4i! 4 I E , tam P A111 x a, V 1"zz 7i < SM Win 91 —ism 212 ILI; GSIh St —T 0; 7E t All 0 a, IV W 75th St W 7111th it W 801h-51 Figure 4.4 City of Edina Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Potential Areas of Change Date ofAefiaf Photography: August 2006 F-L-F-L—F-I 0 ®o os mfles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 AfT Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-33 • ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business • 2008 Comprehensive Plan Figure 4.3 e 1'` Cit of Edina Iy Y Future Land Use Plan �:�, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update • Data Source: URS f--LFZJF—I Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 (� Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design ` 4-25 • • France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions (June 16, 2015) Element Working Principle and Supporting Questions Give -to -Get; Plan & Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with Process the district principles. 1 How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district? 2 How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? 3 What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own? 4 What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others? 5 What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district? Edina Cultural Preferences; Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings Identity and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. 1 Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district. 2 What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? 3 Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways? 4 In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district? 5 How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the district? District Function Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. 1 Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and resources. 2 What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site infrastructure? 3 What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites? FMA • 4 Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices. 5 How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance? Comprehensive Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating Connections; Movement movement of people within and to the district. 1 What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district? 2 What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site? 3 Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations. 4 What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site? 5 ... Site Design; Transitions Encourage parcel -appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without "leftover" spaces on sites. 1 How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors? • 2 How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings? 3 How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? 4 Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites. 5 ... Health Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. 1 How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air, water, noise, habitat)? 2 How does proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site? 3 How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the current condition? 4 Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal. 5 ... Innovation Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. 1 Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal • responds? 2 Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal. NA • 3 For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become "best practices" for the district. 4 Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions. 5 Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed. Land Use; Live -able Promote well-balanced aggregations of "come to" and "stay at" Precincts places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. 1 How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? 2 Describe the proposal in terms of "come to" and/or "stay at" places. 3 What adjacent or nearby "come to" or "stay at" places does the proposal rely on for vitality? 4 Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day. 5 In what ways does the proposal interact with surrounding sites to encourage an engaging public realm? Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. 1 Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the • district. 2 How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites? 3 What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized? 4 Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality? 5 How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place? • • France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions (August 10, 2015) Element Working Principle and Supporting Questions Give -to -Get; Plan & Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with Process the district principles. How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district? The proposed project creates a mixed-use development that combines retail, residential and density which contributes to the principles of the district. It provides opportunity for residents to walk, bike or bus to nearby shopping and entertainment areas within the community which are all important aspects of the district principles. How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? • The building can contribute to the aesthetic quality of the 50`~ & France district. Beyond the multiple uses, the project will have a handsome exterior and will make individuals feel welcome and improve their experience in the district. The mixed use offers a way for people to reduce their environmental footprint that will beneficial for both the district and the residents for years to come. What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own? The project will support lifestyles that are less auto -oriented, but needs a community full of similar projects to make this an area that is walkable, bike friendly and sustainable. What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others? The multi family housing balances the abundance of single family homes in the district. The proposal offers an alternative housing choice to those seeking to live in the district. What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district? 0 • A new stand-alone Walgreen's store was contemplated for the site. After much study and consideration, a mixed-use development was proposed, as this type of development would support many of the city's goals and policies. Edina Cultural Preferences; Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings Identity and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district. The building will be a wood framed structure and exterior materials will consist of mostly brick with a combination of metal panel, cement fiberboard lap siding, wood composite panel and glass. A tremendous amount of thought and research of the existing buildings and future goals of the City were considered before selecting the exterior materials to complement the existing buildings in the 50th and France neighborhood. • The project will likely be a foreground building in the district, as it will be the first mixed-use development that visitors from the north will encounter as they enter the 50`h & France area. What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? There are limited housing choices in the core of the 50`h & France neighborhood for those looking for alternatives to single family living. This project will provide opportunities for people to live in the same district where they work and play. Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways? The building will be located to visually define the street edges and screen the at -grade parking. The retail entry will be welcoming at the corner of France Avenue and 49 % Street with vision glass proposed as opposed to commonly used spandrel glass. Public seating and bike racks will be located adjacent to the main housing entrance on 49 '2 Street. The primary facades along France Avenue and 49th % Street feature recessed and semi -recessed balconies that offer privacy while allowing the activity of residents to be present form the street. The setback terraces employ a series of trellis C] elements, sunshades and landscaping that adds interest to the most publicly viewable portions of the fagades. The rear courtyard facades feature a simple system of hung balconies that allow residents to take advantage of outdoor space. In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district? The project will create an additional tax base for the community and the increased number of nearby residents will expand sales for the existing services in the neighborhood. How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the district? The project addresses the changing aspirations of people who desire to live closer to services in an urban environment which provides for a more convenient style of living while simultaneously decreasing ones environmental footprint. District Function Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. • Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and resources. Reducing the distance between homes, shops and offices reduces the cost of public infrastructure. The site is currently served by utilities in both France Avenue and 49 'Z Street; thereby making infrastructure connections efficient. We will coordinate new service locations with existing utility lines. The already established nearby public transit stops create opportunity for residents to leave their carat home for travel outside of the neighborhood and work commutes. What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site infrastructure? Currently there are two buildings on the proposed development site that utilize existing infrastructure. The new development will add 64 dwelling units while the retail impact will be very similar to its current impact. What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites? Adjacent sidewalk conditions will be improved, thus supporting nearby sites and encouraging area residents to walk to for their 0 shopping and entertainment needs. Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices. Adding resident dwelling units at this location naturally creates a more inviting corner as more people will be walking and biking to and from the site which creates an energetic, safe and people friendly hub in place of the existing retail and surface lot that exists today. Adding density at this site creates a more efficient use of existing infrastructure in the area. How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance? In order to function properly, both the residential and retail use will rely heavily on the existing public streets and sidewalks and the public transit offerings in the area. Both uses will also utilize the water, gas, and electric. It is the intent of the development to control the quality and quantity of the storm water discharged into the public system as well. 40 Comprehensive Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating Connections; Movement movement of people within and to the district. What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district? One of the key elements of the proposed site plan is improving the pedestrian experience at the sidewalk and creating an active streetscape environment. Twenty (20) parking stalls for the retail space will be covered and located at -grade while residential parking will be located below -grade. All trash for the property will be enclosed and out of view of pedestrians. The retail entry will be welcoming at the corner of France Avenue and 49'2 Street with vision glass proposed as opposed to commonly used spandrel glass. Public seating and bike racks will be located adjacent to the main housing entrance on 49 % Street to encourage pedestrian and bicycle transit. These elements along with boulevard landscaping will improve the overall atmosphere of this intersection. What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site? The building features articulation that adds elements of interest to is the overall project The primary facades along France Avenue and • 49th % Street feature recessed and semi -recessed balconies that offer privacy while allowing the building elevations to be animated in light and shadow. The setback terraces employ a series of trellis elements, sunshades and landscaping that adds interest to the most publicly viewable portions of the fagades. The rear courtyard facades feature a simple system of hung balconies that allow residents to take advantage of outdoor space. Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations. The project will increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, improving transportation infrastructure and reducing dependence on the car. The primary destinations for walkers and bikers in the area will be the Minnehaha Trail and the Lake Harriet Parkway. What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site? The project will provide pedestrian amenities such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings • (benches, trash receptacles, etc.). Site Design; Transitions Encourage parcel -appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without "leftover" spaces on sites. How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to its neighbors? It is important that the proposed building fit the character of the area. Drawing from the existing 50th and France context, the building's materials, scale and articulation of elements work to reinforce a sense of neighborhood place. As a mixed use building, the development has a responsibility to enhance the retail activity of the street, while creating a livable, engaged residential community above. How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings? The proposed project makes full use of the site physically by building additional stories in place of the single story uses that currently exist there today. Density has been added while maintaining the on-site parking to the zoning minimum. In the little area that is not occupied 40 by the building footprint, we intend to landscape to beautify the • corner and place bike racks and other pedestrian friendly resources. How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? Although the proposed development is S stories, the scale of the building will respect the street by stepping back from the principal facades along France Avenue and 49th ': Street at the second, fourth and fifth levels. This stepping will effectively reduce the perceived height of the building, allowing the development to blend more readily into the surroundings. The project when completed will be lower in height than the apartment building directly to the north. The building materials were inspired by the existing buildings in the neighborhood. Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites. The project will provide pedestrian amenities such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.). Health Advance human and environmental health as the public and private • realms evolves. How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air, water, noise, habitat)? Continuing a pattern of low density sprawling developments is unsustainable, financially and environmentally. Dense, urban housing utilizes less land area and resources to house residents, as opposed to single family or other low density housing options. This style of housing provides an opportunity for residents to reduce their environmental footprint simply by downsizing from their single family and moving closer to the neighborhood resources they utilize. How does the proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site? This infill redevelopment will utilize existing city infrastructure and complement the neighborhood context and character. Mixed-use developments help to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. Storm water will be managed on site; therefore, water will be rate -controlled before entering the city's system. 0 How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the • current condition? A mixed-use development with housing units will support alternative modes of transportation. With the variety of adjacent services for resident, walking and biking will be highly encouraged. The project will improve the walkability of this location that will foster an active public life. Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal. Providing housing choices immediately adjacent to commercial and retail uses encourages walking and discourages the use of single occupancy vehicular trips. Increasing pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods will reduce dependence on the car. Innovation Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal • responds? Edina has an older population. Over 23% of Edina residents are age 65 or older. Older residents do not want to rely on cars to get to services and entertainment. Seniors can take advantage of this proposal to live near a number of services in the heart of the 50`' & France district. Traffic congestion is anticipated to increase. Supporting a walkable, transit -oriented community is a must. This proposal does that. Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal. Resident demographics and transportation habits can be monitored and documented. For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become "best practices" for the district. Solutions were created by open and thoughtful exchanges with the City staff. The project can serve as a great example of a mixed-use development and encourage similar developments within the community. • Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions. We are not exactly sure what this question is asking but we can say that careful consideration of the surrounding aesthetics was taken into account as we engineered the building. Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed. Though on a much larger scale, Uptown and the North Loop in Minneapolis are good examples of neighborhoods with mixed-use developments that support transit use and sustainable lifestyles. The West End project in St. Louis Park is continuing to add housing to their district, in order to have an area where people can truly live, work, play and shop. The smaller scale of our proposed development preserves the neighborhoods exclusivity while still providing the innovative design that has been successful in those other areas. Land Use; Live -able Promote well-balanced aggregations of "come to" and "stay at" Precincts places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. . How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? The project will add residents to the heart of the 501h & France district, thus supporting the local businesses and balancing the existing land uses. Describe the proposal in terms of "come to" and/or "stay at" places. The building will include a Walgreen's store which will attract people to "come to" the site from both near and far. The project offers 64 dwelling units for residents to "stay at" this location. What adjacent or nearby "come to" or "stay at" places does the proposal rely on for vitality? The project will rely on the vibrant retail stores and restaurants as well as the nearby public transit options in the 50`h & France area to attract residents to live at this location. It will be these same area amenities that will encourage residents to stay at this building for many years. Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day. • Working residents will be most active in the morning and evening • when coming to and from the site. On weekends, resident activity, both pedestrian and vehicular, will be evenly spread throughout the day. The retail use will provide on-site activity each day and throughout the entire day. In what ways does the proposal interact with surrounding sites to encourage an engaging public realm? The setback terraces employ a series of trellis elements, sunshades and landscaping that adds interest to the most publicly viewable portions of the facades. The rear courtyard facades feature a simple system of hung balconies that allow residents to take advantage of outdoor space. Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the district. The project will create a larger tax base for the district and the • increased density will infuse the local economy with additional spending by local residents. The Walgreens will continue to operate and serve its customers in an updated store format. How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites? The project will dramatically improve the current site conditions. Currently, the property contains two free standing buildings with surface lot parking while the proposed redevelopment works to meet the City of Edina's goals of increasing density, matching the design and architecture of the building to the rest of the neighborhood while providing a warm and welcoming pedestrian experience. There isn't a lot of developable area around the site but any type of housing density bodes well for future commercial business development. What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized? The proposed height of the project exceeds the allowable height in the district. Without a text amendment, a project like this would not be possible. Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the • perspective of economic vitality? • Edina residents have been coming to shop at this Walgreen's store for over 20 years. They know this location and will keep coming back to this site when the new development is completed. How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place? The project will be aesthetically attractive and bring a mix of uses to this neighborhood. The pedestrian realm will be improved and "eyes on the street" from residents will improve area safety. • • 0 0 0 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE Vu RETAIL PARKING 11 BUILDING WALL �111270 ARKING a�DRIVEJHRU q�-�-� « STALLS® ® ® t� LSU C,=� �I PROPERTY LINE RAMP DOWN I 2 H RETAIL 9 PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE LINE 49TH 1/2 STREET SITE PLAN 1"=30'-O" 4916 FRANCE AVENUE DEVELOPMENT RETAIL ENTRANCE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 08.12.15 U) w z LU Q w U z I L.L RETAIL ENTRANCE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEW BKV G R O U P 08.12.15 10 BKV Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 www.bkvgroup.com G R O U P Enriching Lives and Strengthening Communities C • Memorandum TO: Edina Planning Commission COPY: Cary Teague, Community Development Director FROM: BKV Group CLIENT NAME: NLD Edina LLC PROJECT: 4916 France Avenue COMM. NO: 2051.01 DATE: August 12, 2015 RE: Sustainable design strategies The development team is committed to creating a responsibly -designed and sustainable building. The project will strive to conserve energy and resources as follows: • Urban, infill site. Not building on farmland, wetlands, or previously undeveloped site • High-density project with 100 units per acre. Surrounded by community services that support resident needs • Public transportation — located along major bus routes on France Avenue • Alternative transportation — improved streetscapes for walking and enclosed bicycle storage provided for residents • Stormwater management plan to capture and infiltrate stormwater on site • High -efficiency HVAC systems with individual controls for residents • Increased efficiency hot water systems • Water conserving plumbing fixtures to obtain at least 20% water savings • High-performance windows with Low E glazing • Increased wall and roof insulation levels • Energy Star appliances for all residential units • Construction waste reduction: goal of 80% demo and construction waste recycling • Building -wide recycling program • Exterior building materials chosen for both aesthetic appeal as well as for long-term durability • Indoor air quality — low -emitting paints, sealants, adhesives and coatings to meet VOC limits • Non-smoking building • Controllability of systems for residents — lighting and thermal comfort END OF MEMO 0 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 18, 2015 less Agenda Item #: VIII. E. Subject: Resolution No. 2015-83 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Action x❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by • four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015-83 • City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-83 • ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center Lisa Diehl Art Books For Art Center Library Park & Recreation: Kelodale Garden Club Noxious Weed Abatement at Lake Cornelia Edina Garden Council Noxious Weed Abatement at Bredesen Park Late Boomers Garden Club Noxious Weed Abatement at Bredesen Park Normandale Garden Club Noxious Weed Abatement at Bredesen Park Dated: August 18, 2015 Attest: • Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk 0 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • August 3, 2015 Dear Resident: Hennepin County 'ublic Works ransportation Departrnesit Imes N. Grube P.E., County Highway Engineer 600 Prairie Drive edina, Minnesota 55340 612-596-0300, Phone 612-321-3410, Fax www. hennepin. us/transportai ion As a resident of the 5400 through 6100 blocks of Xerxes Avenue you have observed the recent installation of bumpouts along the street and observed how well they've worked in keeping vehicles away from the curbside along the blocks. While the burnpouts have been largely successful in keeping vehicles away from the curbside, they are not very appealing to the eye. At the suggestion of interested neighbors a meeting was held on May 27, 2015 to discuss possible ways the bumpouts could be improved in appearance. After the meeting, two area residents expressed willingness to work with county staff to consider ways to improve the aesthetics of the bumpouts. When considering options, the work group agreed to examine the aesthetic appeal of decorative bollards placed at the head and tail of the bumpouts and remove the intermediate delineators. In response to the work group four bollards have been installed on the bumpouts located at approximately 5716 Xerxes Avenue. In addition, the intermediate delineators have been removed from the same two bumpouts plus other bumpouts in the 5600/5700 blocks. Thus there are three different bumpout treatments to review: original treatment only lead and tail delineators only lead and tail decorative bollards I invite you to look at the differing treatments over the next few days and then attend a neighborhood meeting at the time and place noted below to offer your opinion on the aesthetics of the two approaches in place along the 5600/2700 blocks. I look forward to getting together to consider what we can do with Xerxes Avenue bumpouts. Sincerely: James N. Grube County Highway Engineer Enclosure cc: Mayor Jim Hovland, City of Edina Council Member Joni Bennett, City of Edina Council Member Linea Palmisano, City of Minneapolis Jan Callison, Hennepin County Commissioner Mark Nolan, City of Edina Chad Milner, City of Edina Jon Wertjes, City of Minneapolis Steve Mosing, City of Minneapolis REMEMBER What: Meeting to discuss potential bumpouts along Xerxes Avenue between 61" and 54" Streets When: August 18, 2015 Time: 5:30 — 6:30 Where: Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113—S4 th Street Fellowship Room Heather Branigin From: Jason Gadd <jgadd@HOPKINSmn.com> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:48 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Mary Brindle Subject: Thank you Mayor Hovland, Thank you for the opportunity to present to Edina Council last night. I look forward to seeing you at the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Benefit on Sept 3rd.. Thanks Jason Gadd, City Council Member City of Hopkins www.HopkinsMN.com 612-839-7030 iAadd@hopkinsmn.com "Inspire, Educate, Involve, Communicate" • 17� • • 0 Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:30-3:00PP>J *Lunch will be served until2:OOPM *Special guest speakers at 1:30PM Location: Brookview Park M� 200 Brookvic:w Pkwy N Golden Valley, MN 55426 RSVP to Christine Hart by Adigust 24, 2015 via email at chart@copsh.org or phone bt (952) 697-1364. Please indicate if you have any dietary restrictions, t Z t Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) is celebrating its 30th year serving suburban Hennepin County residents. Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:30-3:00PP>J *Lunch will be served until2:OOPM *Special guest speakers at 1:30PM Location: Brookview Park M� 200 Brookvic:w Pkwy N Golden Valley, MN 55426 RSVP to Christine Hart by Adigust 24, 2015 via email at chart@copsh.org or phone bt (952) 697-1364. Please indicate if you have any dietary restrictions, Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:02 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - residental construction soil compaction killing trees Attachments: 4633 56th Street Edina jpg Every residential constriction site in Edina that has significant soil compaction from heavy construction vehicles being driven on the roots of any existing trees. Any arborist will tell you soil compaction kills trees. Attached is a photo taken yesterday of a dead mature oak at 4633 56th St. This tree died 2 years after the new house was built. A few weeks ago a dead birch clump was removed from the front yard of the new house being built at 5608 Lakeview Drive Last year a mature tree was removed a year after a new home was completed at 4511 Golf Terrace David Frenkel • C i be I 3 = V4 "CiA C,tr tocoac 0 � ® 4n rroJ � % 1(4ms - �O fi�12- �,I�7- �j jtijLCs , mVeOt�o ; �3��� served US vey tad sace-I� Ot\a ef-icie��� l��d�ieSclut� n►��i-F � .J�ly 2°I c�vr�2�� �'�r� uj y �,3� W . S� Stream k �00 -Cod �Ovf exr-elleni, qO,C ctoorki�°vv 9()©CV GoMP,tJ►IItcrto.,) A ,vor obt)oojs 6oAC-'(',1, Cor all eG U,ov&� , ill -A% ouf WNC)O6j 6c- �ea-i V�dc� c�����re�� W�{�a�t_go, �Ouf Work Was OCJs�4JI4'q C4/1J PfeueAfQd a 10i ( Ot e- c%t4je. V�z(y kL,,kC l for Yo,r .ik"11 N t �e an J IG,l �6,a t, 0 0 �7TrWls�lsv® UryeArt .� Taco 65 /is l,�- '4;' vl� 4-t-,coee , �Dn codi� all( Jafil �M i r Linda Slocum • �ixtxteso#�t Pause of �IZepresexc#tt#if�es �pQb in � �$ ras DEFINING EXCELLENCE August 7, 2015 Mayor Jim Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: New Teachers Lunch, August 18 All -District Staff Kick Off, August 25 Dear Jim: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 • (952) 848-3900 www.edina.k12.mn.uS We are hoping you are available to attend Edina Public Schools' annual New Teachers Lunch at noon on Tuesday, August 18, in the Norma ndale/Ed ina Community Center auditorium. If so, we would appreciate it if you would say a few words to our newest teachers at that time. In addition, we would be pleased if you could participate in the All District Staff Gathering on Tuesday, August 25, in Fick Auditorium at Edina High School. Doors open at 7:30 a.m., and the program begins promptly at 8:00 a.m. with the Edina High School Marching Band. You would be asked to say a few words at this event as well. Please let my assistant, Sarah Schandle(sarah.schandle(a�,edinaschools.orq; 952-848-4000), know if you will be able to attend these two events or if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued dedication to the District! Sinkerely, Dr ssen, Ed. D. per' tendent • 0 MICHAEL R. UN Secretary -General's Special Envoy BLOOMBERG for Cities and Climate Change August 3, 2015 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424-1330 Dear Mayor James Hovland: As a former Mayor of New York City and the UN Secretary -General's Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change, I am writing to share with you details on a new opportunity to showcase your city's climate action, and to ask you to commit to the Compact of Mayors, a global platform where cities. can publicly register current or new climate commitments using one common standard. I launched the Compact of Mayors at the UN Climate Summit last September in partnership with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki -moon and Mayors Eduardo Paes of Rio de Janeiro, Anne Hidalgo of Paris, and Park Won -soon of Seoul. Although many cities have already made ambitious commitments, sometimes even publicly through other international, regional, and national platforms, the global com_munity__is-still unaware of the full power of city action. We created the Compact of Mayors to solve this problem. Nearly 1.4 million residents are added to urban areas each week, and by 2030, around 60% of the global population will live in cities. As population grows in your city, so do opportunities to efficiently and economically address climate change. Mayors have significant and direct power to reduce emissions and adapt to climate risks. Research shows that the potential of cities globally to take action in three core sectors — buildings, transportation, and waste — could reduce climate impact by more than the total 40 emissions of the United States and the 28 member states of the European Union combined. The Compact of Mayors aims to make these city contributions more visible and their impact quantifiable through common, internationally recognized standards. The Compact serves as a single platform to collect the individual achievements and commitments you have already made, as well as new ones you'd like to make public now. Specifically, the Compact of Mayors exists in tandem with the US National Mayors Climate Action Agenda - announced at the USCM meeting in San Francisco, as well as Resilient Communities for America (RC4A). While the US Action Agenda and RC4A are focused domestically, the Compact aims to take_ these_ commitments to a global audience. As the global community works towards a climate treaty at the end of this year in Paris, during the UNFCCC's COP21, now is a critical time to share your city's climate commitment and showcase your actions on an international stage through the Compact of Mayors. It is through this voluntary action and transparent reporting that cities will be finally recognized as legitimate partners in a global climate solution. I am asking you today to take the first step by submitting a letter to indicate your city's commitment to the Compact of Mayors through either the carbonn Climate Registry, CDP Cities, or by directly sending a letter to info@compactofmayors.org. Please visit www.compactofmayors.org or email us for more information about the Compact of Mayors and details on how to participate. I hope you will join me in this critical effort and thank you for your continued commitment to global sustainability. Sincerely, Michael R. Bloomberg Heather Branigin From: Jim Stromberg <js8778@gmai1.com> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 1:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposal for 49 1/2 and France Mayor, and members of the Council: My name is Jim Stromberg, and I live at 3930 W. 49th St. It has recently come to my attention that you will soon be considering a proposal for a re -build on the Walgreen's site very soon. I'm guessing that the proposal will mean asking for variances, and I'd like to 'speak' to the possible variance on the height of the building. My understanding is that the proposal will ask for a 5 -story building. I am hopeful that you will deny that request. Five stories this close to the residential neighborhood just to the north is simply too high. Edina has height requirements for a reason. If you allow a tall building there, I'm guessing that soon someone else nearby will ask for a 6 -story building, and then a 7 -story building. At what point do we say, "no"? I believe that developers ask for these variances because there is money to be made in going "up". So let's get someone in that asks for 100 stories and let them make even more millions, and the heck with the neighbors. 10 Please, please ... think this proposal through very carefully, thinking not only about the added business opportunities at this .prime site, but also what a huge burden this will also bring to this site. I urge you all to come and spend an hour at this intersection some day and watch the traffic flow. And then tell me that it can accommodate an additional building that houses 64 - yes, 64 - residential units. I am NOT opposed to redeveloping the site. But I DO urge our city government to carefully consider the size of this proposal. Just say "no" to the 5 -story concept, and request the developer to consider a much more reasonable plan when moving forward. Thank you for taking the time to read this - I appreciate the work you all do in keeping Edina the great place it is! jim 9 • Heather Branigin From: Elizabeth Burger <elizabethburger2@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Tony Burger Subject: Meeting at 6629 West Shore Dr. Hello Council Members, As you know, my husband, Tony Burger and I, have a house project that we would like to do on our residence at 6629 West Shore Drive. We have been to 2 City Council meetings, a Park Board meeting and a Planning Commission meeting this summer. We are on the agenda for the August 18th City Council meeting as well. We would like to invite you to our property on Monday, August 17 at 5:30 pm. It may help you to see our unique situation before making your decision at the City Council meeting the following evening. When you have a chance, please respond to either myself or Tony to let us knovr if you are able to make it. We are flexible with the time and are happy to change that to a time that may work better for you all. Thank you for your understanding and time, and we look forward to seeing you. • Liz and Tony Burger is Heather Branigin From: Caitlin Williams <caitlinmariewilliams@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:56 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Re: Bike Lanes Thank you so much for your prompt reply. I'm happy to learn that bike and pedestrian safety are part of the planning process for updating Edina roads. I look forward to seeing more bike paths in the future. - Caitlin Williams On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:45 PM, James Hovland <JHovland@edinamn.gov> wrote: Caitlin, I agree that we as a community are behind in bike lanes. We formed a task force about seven years ago to help us with routes. We now have a plan and funding (though not a huge amount) each year to do sidewalks and bike lanes. We have applied for grants (wood dale bike lanes south of 50th ), and the Three Rivers Park starts a bike trail from the northwest to the southeast this fall. That trail will build two bridges, one over 62 and one over 100. As we replace our roads we add lanes that are in our current bike plan. Part of the problem you have going from morning side to southdale area is that we have two major highways bisecting our city. We have no control over the rebuild for instance of the France ave / 62 bridge. That is M1NDOT and the county. It is not in any future plan. If it gets on a schedule we will work to include safer bike and pedestrian crossing. The promenade that runs from southdale south through centennial lakes has a bike trail that connects to the Richfie,6 trail and it will connect to the new three rivers park trail. It all seems like baby steps but there is a plan. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my iPad From: Caitlin Williams[ma iIto: caitlinmariewilIiams(aD-gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 1:36 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bike Lanes City Council Members: 0 I am an Edina resident that enjoys being outdoors in our city a great deal. I often use my bike to run errands or for exercise when the snow isn't too deep. I live off 44th street, so I'm able to connect to Minneapolis' bike • paths pretty easily, but there are often times I avoid travel in Edina due to the lack of bike lanes. Without bike lanes, Edina drivers aren't in the habit of looking for bicyclists and I've seen close calls in the past. Recently, the Hennepin County libraries have been giving out bike maps and they confirm my suspicion - Edina lags significantly behind adjoining cities in this respect. All the cities around us put us to shame with bike safety. Additionally, two of the few routes identified as bike friendly were laughable; Interlachen and Vernon have small shoulder with stripes painted but such heavy and fast traffic that turning or crossing the streets is hazardous. I've included a link to a 2013 bike map for your consideration: http://www.hennepin.us/—/niedialhennepuluslresidentsltransportatiolildocuments/2013-hennepin-coup . -bike- map pdf • Please consider adding lanes to Edina streets to make cyclists safer and increase, bike usage in the city. I'd love to be able to bike to Southdale or to the Edina library without feeling unsafe. Thank you for your time and attention, Caitlin Williams 0 Heather Branigin From: Scott H. Neal Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 1:39 PM To: 'Common Sense Edina'; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle Subject: RE: Common Sense for Edina - Bloomberg Philanthropies Name First'What Works Cities' for Data Improvement Initiatives This is a great program, and we should keep our eyes on it for the future. Unfortunately, Edina was not eligible during this particular round of funding. Bloomberg's eligibility population parameters for "mid-size cities" were 100,000 to 1,000,000. There is some discussion at Bloomberg of creating a similar program for small cities, under 100,000. We will keep track of that discussion. -, Scott Neal, City Manager tt- ' 952-826-0401 1 Fax 952-826-0390 s nealQ Edina MN.gov Iwww. Edina MN.gov The City of Edina was named one of the Star 1 ribune's Top Workplaces in 2015! TOP WORK ,PLACES From: Common Sense Edina [ mai Ito: corn monsenseforedinaCc�gmai1.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 8:31 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmaii.com; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Bloomberg Philanthropies Name First'What Works Cities' for Data Improvement Initiatives Edina needs to enter the 21 st Century with the use of technology to drive the future and not get bogged down in speculative land development. http://www.routefifty.com/2015/08/bloomberg_philanthropies-what-works-cities/118968/?oref=rf-toda�nl Eight mid-sized cities will be getting expert support and peer-to-peer learning opportunities. BY MICHAEL GRASS AUGUST 07, 2015 1 SEATTLE — The use of data underpins essentially everything in municipal governance and management. Some cities use their data better than others. And even the cities doing a good job can improve the ways they leverage their amassed data. The Bloomberg Philanthropies want to help mid-sized cities through its data -driven What Works Cities initiative and have selected eight municipalities which will benefit from "expert on -the -ground support and peer-to-peer learning opportunities," according to an announcement. Those cities are Chattanooga, Tennessee; Jackson, Mississippi; Kansas City, Missouri; Louisville, Kentucky; Mesa, Arizona; New Orleans, Louisiana; New Orleans, Louisiana; and Seattle, Washington. The What Works Cities initiative launched in April 2015 and within six weeks, 112 U.S'. cities in 41 states had applied; loo cities will be admitted to the program in stages through • 2017. David Frenkel Heather Branigin From: clawson@umn.edu on behalf of Brian Herman <herman@umn.edu> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 1;40 PM To: caren.dewar@uli.org; James Hovland; mstephens@ci.woodbury.mn.us Cc: Carissa Schively Slotterback Subject: New U of M Research Initiatives Focus on Building Partnerships and Advancing Innovation Attachments: Report_Aging.pdf, Repo rt_SmartCitiesandInfrastructure.pdf Dear Caren, Mayor Giuliani Stevens, and Mayor Hovland, As a follow up to our earlier conversation, I'm pleased to share information on a key initiative that we are advancing in the U of M's Office of the Vice President for Research. Aligned with our Research Strategic Plan — Five Years Forward and its focus on "bringing people to together in new ways, fostering discoveries and making our world a better place, we have initiated a new event series called Convergence Colloquia. I believe that this initiative will be of great interest to you, ULI and the Regional Council of Mayors. Our intent with the Convergence Colloquia series is to bring together multi -disciplinary and multi -sector expertise to • advance cutting-edge research to develop innovative solutions and build long term partnerships that improve our world. Partnerships are essential in this work and thus the colloquium events bring together U of M researchers with experts from the public, private and nonprofit sectors to identify strategic collaboration opportunities. The colloquia serve as action -oriented think tanks that focus on critical issues for our communities, including smart cities, renewable energy and water supply. We have convened two highly successful colloquia thus far on the topics of aging and smart cities and infrastructure. I have attached reports on these recent events, which highlight priority areas for collaborative research and identify important assets that can help move this work forward. We have also funded a number of collaborative research projects that have come out the colloquia through our new Serendipity Grant program. The grants are awarded to new collaborative teams that bring together participants from across disciplines and draw on expertise from the public, private and nonprofit sectors. The list of projects and grantees are available at the links included above. We are looking forward to four additional colloquia in fall 2015 focused on health equity (September 25), renewable energy (October 9), water scarcity (November 20) and sustainable food systems (December 11). Each of these topics is of critical interest to communities and we hope that you will consider attending. • In addition, we would welcome the opportunity to visit with the Regional Council of Mayors to share information about the Colloquia series and additional initiatives that we are pursuing in our office. Your insights are essential as we set our agenda. Consistent with the priority that we place on engagement, I have invited Dr. Carissa Slotterback to join our office in a new Director of Research Engagement position. She has • played a central role in designing the Colloquia series and initiating other engagement initiatives. She can be a valuable contact for you in exploring intersections with the university. We look forward to working with you in identifying opportunities for future collaboration. Thank you and warm regards, Dr. Brian Herman Vice President, Research office 612-624-5054 e-mail herman@umn.edu fax 612-626-7431 University of Minnesota Office of the Vice President for Research 420 Johnston Hall 101 Pleasant St. SE • Minneapolis, NIN 55455 @UMNresearch F;xpiiKC, UTIIvc;:VM� r(-seilroh on Inquiry. 0 • CONVERGENCE COLLOQUIA Cultivating Serendipity for Action May 19, 2015 Aft. 0 mg—fe. Vice President for Research UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Driven to Discover. • Convergence Colloquia: Cultivating Serendipity for Action The Convergence Colloquia are a new series of multi -disciplinary gatherings that advance cutting-edge research to develop innovative solutions and build long term partnerships that improve our world. The University of Minnesota's Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) selected the topic of aging for its second colloquium, held on May 19, 2015. The colloquia serve as action -oriented think thanks focusing on critical issues for our communities, from building smarter cities to exploring alternative energy sources to addressing water scarcity to securing our food supply, that bring together U of • M researchers with private, public and nonprofit stakeholders to identify strategic collaboration opportunities that can lead to significant impact at the local, state, national and global scales. • The colloquia grew out of recommendations from the U of M's research strategic plan, Five Years Forward, to promote a culture of serendipity that advances scientific discovery through collaborative thinking and action. Embedded in a strategic vision and action plan, the colloquia are grounded in a results -oriented approach that includes ongoing evaluation and reflection to ensure accountability and results. FIVEYEARS FORWARD -Vision and Cornerstones Agi ng I i 0 Each workshop is intended to engage approximately 50-100 participants from a variety of disciplines and fields. Through facilitated sessions and focused dialogue, participants work to identify a set of strategic research priorities and explore opportunities for collaboration. Serendipity Grants are available to support follow-on collaborative research efforts that engage U of M researchers, along with public, private and nonprofit participants. The aging colloquium engaged over 80 participants from the U of M and public, private and nonprofit organizations. Participants represented 11 colleges and the University of Minnesota Duluth, as well as university -wide and cross -college centers such as the Minnesota Population Center, Centerfor Integrative Leadership and the Hennepin - University Partnership in the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. Experts from outside of the U of M included staff from 19 different nonprofit organizations, three private companies and 16 public sector participants representing local, regional and state agencies. Notably, five state agencies were engaged, including the Department of • Administration, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Department of Human Services, Department of Public Safety, and Department of Transportation. A list of participants is included in Appendix A. Colloquium attendees explored opportunities for collaborative research associated with aging and the impacts and opportunities associated with changing demographics. The event offered an opportunity to explore key trends and focus on how communities can more effectively plan for facilities and services that support the vitality and engagement of aging residents. In addition, attendees.explored impacts on employers, considering emerging workforce development needs and prospects for creative opportunities to facilitate ongoing engagement of older workers. The event convened experts from across a variety of topic areas to explore new research collaborations that can offer insights for policy and practice. Converging on Aging The growing aging population in Minnesota and the U.S. has been widely discussed and there is widespread recognition that changing demographics will create new demands for individuals, communities, employers and our economy. At the same time, these changing demographics create opportunities to explore ways that we can evolve our workforce, engage seniors in new ways and consider ways that we can enhance accessibility and services to meet the needs of our aging community and the broader • population. 2 1 Convergence Colloquia • The Minnesota State Demographic Center offers key findings that highlight a number of important trends related to demographic changes': • The number of Minnesota residents turning 65 between 2010 and 2020 is projected to be greater than in the previous four decades combined. • By approximately 2020 and for the first time in Minnesota's history, the population over age 65 is anticipated to be larger than the K-12 population. • Between 2010 and 2030, the number of Minnesota residents over age 65 is expected to double, making more than one in five Minnesotans an older adult. • In general, suburban and Greater Minnesota communities have higher percentages of residents age 65 or older. The State Demographic Center offers additional insights related to labor force trends associated with the aging workforce. Its 2013 report "In the shadow of the Boomers: Minnesota's labor force outlook," predicts a slower rate of growth in the labor force in the coming decade, potentially reducing Minnesota's standard of living, slowing the rate • of growth of income tax revenues, and potentially limiting our ability to pay for growing public expenditures to meet the needs of the aging population. The report outlines efforts that can be pursued to ensure that the state maintains a robust, appropriately skilled and overall growing labor force.' • Colloquium participants discuss aging research opportunities. 'Minnesota State Demographic Center. 2015. Data by Topic: Aging. http://mn.gov/admin/demography/data-by-topic/aging/. 'Minnesota State Demographic Center. 2013. In the shadow of the boomers: Minnesota's labor force outlook. http://mn.gov/admin/ i mages/in-the-shadow-of-the-boomers-labor-force-outlook-ms dc-dec2013.pdf. Aging C Workforce impacts are on the agenda of the Minnesota Governor's Workforce Development Council, which is made up of leaders from business, education, labor, community organizations, state agencies and local governments. The Council's 2012 policy advisory report, "All Hands on Deck," outlines four recommendations focused on aging workers. First, the report emphasizes the importance of capacity building in Minnesota's workforce development system to address demographic and economic changes, including through the state's WorkForce Centers. Second, the report calls for developing a state plan to extend the work life of aging workers by addressing issues such as training for older workers, post-retirement work, paid volunteer opportunities and pension and retirement policies. A third recommendation is to establish Lifelong Learning Accounts to help aging workers finance continuous learning opportunities. Fourth, the report calls for support for entrepreneurship and small business development among aging workers by better coordinating federal, state and local business development resources.' Beyond impacts on the workforce, the growing aging population creates new • healthcare, transportation, housing, recreation and other demands in communities. Proactive approaches to meeting these demands offer opportunities to improve the quality of life for all community members. Approaches such as Communities for a Lifetime, advanced by the Minnesota Board on Aging in the Minnesota Department of Human Services, highlights the prospect of promoting "community features that foster healthy and successful aging across the lifespan."2 Dakota County was an early adopter of a local Communities for a Lifetime initiative. Its efforts have focused on a number of strategies, including transportation options to keep people mobile and independent, affordable housing options to meet changing needs, accessible and quality services to support older adults and caregivers in home and community settings, flexible and supportive employment and volunteer opportunities and technology to connect people and help with needs. The county supports city -level efforts to implement a Communities for a Lifetime approach. Local projects and work groups have been established in several cities in the county, including Apple Valley, Hastings, Lakeville, Mendota Heights and West St. Paul.' ACT on Alzheimer's is one more notable example, particularly because of its collaborative focus. ACT on Alzheimer's functions as a statewide collaborative with a focus on providing communities with resources that they can use in becoming 'Governor's Workforce Development Council. 2012. All Hands on Deck. http://www.gwdc.org/docs/publications/AII_Hands_on_ Deck df. • =MinnesotaesotaBoard on Aging, Minnesota Department of Human Services. 2015. Communities for a Lifetime. http://www. mnlifetimecommunities.org/. 3Dakota County, Minnesota. 2015. Communities for a Lifetime. https://vrww.co.dakata.mn.us/Government/PublicCDmmittees/CFL/Pages/ default.aspx. 'ACT on Alzheimer's. 2015. http://www.actonalz.org/. 4 1 Convergence Colloquia 0 • dementia friendly, supporting practitioners with tools that they can use in identifying and managing Alzheimer's disease, and advancing a health equity perspective that reduces costs, improves care, sustains caregivers and reduces stigma. The collaboration engages over 400 participants, including more than 60 organizations from across sectors (e.g. healthcare providers, consultants, professional associations, local governments, nonprofit service providers). U of M faculty from a variety of disciplines and centers are involved in the collaborative as well.3 Minnesota has a robust and well-established network of public, private and nonprofit organizations involved on aging issues. The organizations and initiatives noted above are just a few. In addition, at the U of M, expertise on aging issues is diverse and addresses a range of health, community, policy, economic, service and other aspects of the aging topic. The Center on Aging in the School of Public Health has played an important role in engaging researchers from multiple disciplines around aging research. The center has also been deeply engaged with practice, with its affiliated faculty playing key roles in networks addressing long-term care, community and workforce issues. The N. Bud Grossman Center for Memory Research and Care is just one of many additional resources at the U of M focused on aging. The center is focused on Alzheimer's disease and conducts research on prevention, care and support using a multidisciplinary approach that engages research and practice. A list of key U of M centers and programs with relevant expertise on aging is available in Appendix B. Participants share insights from small group discussions. Aging 1 5 • Directions in Aging Research Research funding on various aspects of aging has been available for decades. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been a key leader in advancing and supporting aging research. The NIA's 2007 report, titled "Living Long and Well in the 21st Century: Strategic Directions for Research on Aging," outlines a number of research goals that were developed with input from the National Advisory Council on Aging. The goals address issues related to improving our understanding of healthy aging, reducing disease and disability, improving health and quality of life of older adults, developing interventions to treat Alzheimer's disease and dementia, understanding the consequences of an aging society, and eliminating health inequities among older adults. Relative to these goals, the report outlines key objectives and research needs. For example, for the goal of understanding the consequences of an aging society, the report calls for research on: • The effects of education and other social and demographic factors on health and well- being at older ages, • The impact of changing family structures on health and caregiving, • Comparative evaluations of the impact of institutions on population and individual well- being, • The dynamic changes that occur across the life course (e.g. environmental, intellectual, social), • Bases for individual and societal attitudes toward older people, • Cross -national, comparative and historic research to understand the burden of disease and health disparities, • Gender differences in health and disease at older ages, informed by biodemographic, health system, social and economic perspectives, • Social insurance and health insurance systems in promoting health and well-being of the elderly, and • Models and measures of the economic risks of old age and the potential for interventions to reduce risk.' Funding for research on aging comes from a very wide range of agencies and organizations. In addition to funding from NIA and NIH more broadly, additional programs offer funding to address a range of aging topics (e.g. American Federation for Aging Research, John A. Hartford Foundation, Retirement Research Foundation). Funding for collaborative research that engages universities with community organizations, agencies and other partners opens up opportunities for additional sources of support. State and local agencies, nonprofit organizations, industry and foundations may provide resources that advance the joint interests of research and • practice. 'National Institute on Aging. 2007. Living long and well in the 21st century: Strategic directions for research on aging. https://www.nia.nih. gov/about/livi ng-long-wel I-21st-centu ry-strategic-d irections-research-aging. 6 1 Convergence Colloquia U Exploring Opportunities for Collaborative Research The primary focus in organizing the colloquium was to advance dialogue and networking among attendees. The discussion was informed by a series of "catalyst presentations" that highlighted big ideas and innovations related to aging. Presenters highlighted a range of aging topics, including workforce issues like midlife career transitions and retirement, as well as community and health issues including senior housing, family caregiving and telehealth. The presenters shared information on these and other topics and explored preliminary research needs and potential collaborators needed to move the work forward. The presentations are briefly summarized on the next two pages. Presenter bios are included in Appendix C. A large break-out group discussion focused on bridging aging research and practice. Aging 1 7 Catalyst Presentations Midlife SHIFT. Seeking Purpose and Passion in Life and Work David Alley, Executive Director, SHIFT Based on his work with SHIFT, a local nonprofit organization that focuses on midlife employment and personal transitions, Dr. Alley highlighted the need to guide and connect persons at midlife with resources to enhance their work life and overall well-being. He proposes Midternships as a way to help aging workers at midlife gain hands-on work experience in a new career field, giving them the opportunity to create and try out volunteer and employment opportunities to ensure an optimal fit. Senior Housing Options Marilyn Bruin, Professor, Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, University of Minnesota Home- and community-based services during the past 25 years have made it increasingly possible for older adults with disabilities to remain in their homes rather than move to a nursing home, however, the prospect of aging -in-place is often not available to persons with low or modest incomes. Dr. Bruin highlighted the racial, ethnic and economic diversity of aging adults, many of whom may face challenges as they face increasing health and housing costs. These challenges are amplified by a housing stock that lacks basic accessibility features, a lack of transportation and pedestrian infrastructure for those who do not drive and disconnects between housing and health care programs. Family Caregiving and Employers Joseph Gaugler, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota Acknowledging the family caregiving accounts for the bulk of caregiving, Dr. Gaugler proposed a new model for supporting employed family caregivers and their employers. Importantly, the impact of family caregiving activity results in significant impacts on employment, productivity and income. He calls for a collaborative approach that connects employees, employers and communities to develop supports and initiatives that advance shared interests. Transforming the Experience of Aging through Community Networks and Global Coordination Olivia Mastry, Founder, Collective Action Lab; Executive Lead, ACT on Alzheimer's Ms. Mastry highlighted the significance and impact of community networks to enhance global or systemic coordination of care, including skilled care, acute care, primary care, assisted living and home and community-based services. Additional types of care can also be coordinated including housing, transportation and community resources and engagement. Coordination can be facilitated by place -based hubs that are person -centered and facilitate integration and navigation. Rethinking Work, Careers, and Retirement for the 21st Century Phyllis Moen, Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota Dr. Moen acknowledged deep social and psychological expectations around workforce entry, duration and exit. As the population and labor force ages, it is increasingly important for employers, community leaders and public officials to address the growing mismatch between expectations and needs for work, careers and retirement. Adjustments to labor market policies, family care benefits, job routines, and job clocks and calendars, as well as greater efforts to address stereotypes and discrimination against older workers, are needed. Catalyst Presentations (continued) Quality of Life for Nursing Home Residents: Predictors, Disparities and Directions for the Future Tetyana Shippee, Assistant Professor, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota Drawing on her previous and ongoing research, Dr. Shippee highlighted the concerns related to quality of life among nursing home residents. Quality of life can be characterized by dignity, privacy, food quality and emotional connectedness, with measures of quality of life influenced by both resident and facility characteristics. Key factors associated with higher performance include more activity staff hours and more registered nurse hours per resident day. At the same time, there is a concern that quality of life for minority residents tends to be lower than for white residents. Home and Mobile Telehealth —A Paradigm Shift Diane Sprague, Director, Lifetime Home Project Ms. Sprague explored the quickly evolving realm of telehealth technologies, with a focus on new technologies that are person -centered, can be used at home, and are mobile. New technologies are becoming less expensive, more flexible, and offer key capabilities that can support aging -in-place such as medication management, vital signs monitoring, biosensing, emergency and fall management and communications. Minnesota's Aging, Shrinking Workforce Jeremy Hanson Willis, Deputy Commissioner of Workforce Development, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Between 2015-2030, Minnesota's workforce will decline by approximately 60,000 employees per year due to retirements. Mr. Willis emphasized that Minnesota's aging workforce should be a key consideration for the state and its employers since human talent amounts to currency and economic growth. He called on employers to prepare for the growing number of retirements by doing succession planning and knowledge transfer. He also highlighted emerging approaches that allow older workers the opportunity to remain in the workforce through flexible hours, retraining and skill building. r ,ti • Key Questions and Potential Collaborations Informed by two sets of catalyst presentations, participants were invited to participate in small group discussions. The discussions focused on a set of questions about aging that participants identified and expressed interest in exploring with others. A portion of the questions were identified at the meeting and others were identified from responses to a brief pre -survey completed when registering for the event. Participants had the opportunity to self-select to table discussions that interested them and could participate in two rounds of discussion. For their table question, they were asked to explore three issues: (1) new insights or information needed to answer the question; (2) key assets (e.g. data, technology, expertise) that can be drawn upon to answerthe question; and (3) new or existing collaborations that could be tapped to advance research on the question, including specific recommendations of stakeholders who should be involved. The table discussions were engaging and free-flowing. Key • insights from the table discussions are highlighted below. aHow can technology be designed for older users and how can it address community concerns? Participants noted a number of challenges in tailoring technology to older adult users, as It can be difficult to assess the particular needs of older adults at different ages, from the 50s and 60s to the 80s and beyond. There can be substantial variation in users across various age groups. Technology adoption and use by caregivers can allow older adults access to technology even with constraints on use. Potential research might address topics such as when an older adult should stop driving and what technology, testing and/or devices might be used to support identification of limits and facilitate continued driving. Another potential research topic is the need for technology that could be used to measure cognitive decline. ©What can we do to create safe communities for elders free of abuse, neglect and exploitation? In addressing this question, the participants first explored what "community" means, highlighting communities of identity, of elder adults and of neighborhoods as potential ways of thinking about community. The participants also explored the term "safety." For the group, safety extends beyond "no falls" and "freedom of mobility," to include physical needs being met and safety from exploitation, abuse and neglect. Broadening the understanding of safety to include freedom from bias, micro -aggression and other forms of oppression was also prioritized. To answer this question, participants emphasized the need to ask older people about their perceptions of the safety of their communities. Capturing varied demographic perspectives, including those from LGBT elders and persons of color (especially those living in majority white neighborhoods) is seen as essential. 10 1 Convergence Colloquia • © How do we prepare the existing housing stock for the aging population and how do we engage local communities in this effort? The discussion addressed a range of issues within this broad topic area, calling for more planning at a system scale and more collaboration to breakdown silos that may limit community's ability to address housing needs. Potential approaches include humanistic planning that engages residents in identifying needs and contributing to the planning process. The availability of demographic and needs data is an asset as we move forward in addressing this issue. Community -scale collaboration offers an important opportunity to advance research that jointly addresses housing, services, transportation and funding. QWhat do we really know about key home and community-based services (e.g. access -based transportation)? Participants noted that we have been successful on many home and community-based services, but pointed to key gaps. Latent demand for services is an issue, especially where there are needs but a lack of eligibility for key programs (e.g. waivers, Medicaid). Variations across cultures also require further understanding. Transportation was elevated as a key • issue, specifically how the transition from driving to transit occurs and how it aligns with user preferences. Future research collaborators including the existing MN Council on Transportation Access, U of M Extension, public health staff and researchers and Olmstead County, based on its recent programmatic efforts on this issue. © What policies are being considered for older adults who want or need to stay as full employees and how do we engage state, county and local governments in developing these policies? This discussion highlighted the need for person -centered policies that address the role of older adults in the workforce. Participants raised a concern about compliance checklists as standardized policies that are not person -centered. Research that seeks to understand the balance between older adults' person -centered decisions and their overall health and well- being is prioritized. OHow can we create a humane, affordable, accessible long-term care system for frail older people? The discussion participants prioritized the development of a broad and shared definition of "long-term care system' that integrates clinical and social factors. Strategies are needed that connect "community" at the local scale, including both formal and informal levels, to more effectively assess needs and respond across networks. In pursuing future research, a collaborative and collective impact approach was highlighted as critical. aHow can we address the disproportionate crash rate of older drivers and what are the impacts of driverless cars on transportation and where we live? The discussion focused primarily on driverless cars and highlighted the need to better • understand the user requirements for using them, and whether those requirements align with the capacities of older drivers. The participants noted the prospect of training seniors to use this technology and the need to address inequity of access to this technology based on socioeconomic status and place of residence (e.g. rural, suburban, urban). Aging 1 11 • aWhat changes are necessary for providing innovative services and supports to engage families where the caregiver is age 55 or over? Does our definition of family need to be more inclusive? The discussion revealed caregivers as a key issue and called for more "planful" measures to identify a range of caregivers and to build the caregiving relationship into our healthcare, service and other systems. Family meetings were one method identified as potentially successful in facilitating discussions about future caregiving needs and responsibilities. The move toward electronic medical records also offers an opportunity for incorporating family and caregiver information. As we move toward research on this question, relevant collaborators include faith -based organizations, health systems and employers. What are the challenges, opportunities and assumptions about aging -in-place? Participants began the discussion by noting two key issues relevant to research on aging -in-place. They noted that aging -in-place is not always the right approach and that complications may arise. It was acknowledged that the definition of "place" can vary and may exist at multiple scales — home, street, neighborhood and community. To better address aging -in-place, a variety of needs were identified, including new technologies, • more one -level housing, support systems at multiple levels capable of addressing multiple needs and supportive social environments. Key collaborators on future research were recommended, including ACT on Alzheimer's, the U of M's Center for Spirituality and Healing, municipal planners and decision makers and innovative developers. 0 How do we get a long-term care system that provides what we really want and how do we change the image of nursing homes rather than assuming that everyone does not want to go there? The discussion pointed to the need for a flexible system that provides for person -centered care based on choice, independence, dignity and compassion. Financing is an important barrier. More flexible, responsive financing mechanisms are needed to support ala carte purchasing options, more tailored to the care needs of individuals. In rural areas, community service hubs can meet care needs and support rural economic development. Research needs specific to nursing homes include flexible workforce models supported by new technology and separating out post -acute care from nursing homes. What policies, education strategies, workplace practices, investments, etc. can be applied to ensure a better match between the health care needs of our aging population and the declining health care practitioner workforce? The participants explored a number of ways to enhance the health care workforce. Related to education, the group highlighted the importance of integrating aging -related content into all disciplines to provide exposure to a broader array of students. In addition, partnerships between employers and colleges and universities can be used to better match education with needs and potentially advance apprenticeship opportunities that offer a path to employment. Participants also pointed to the need to make health care jobs more • attractive, redesigning them and broadening the range of professionals who are engaged in the health care workforce. A specific recommendation offered by the participants was to examine health support specialist roles that elevate the role of nursing assistants. 12 1 Convergence Colloquia • ®How do we create and lead a transportation system to meet statewide needs? The discussion highlighted a number of needs that are central to answering this question, including (1) matching the scale of transportation systems to the micro -travel needs of seniors, (2) understanding knowledge levels and training needs related to transportation mobility options, (3) linking private, nonprofit and public transportation service options, and (4) ensuring that land use and development decisions support aging in place (e.g. lifetime communities). Existing assets that can help advance efforts in this topic include recent efforts by Olmstead County around senior transportation and the growing availability of micro -transportation options (e.g. Uber). New regional coordinating councils are a promising avenue for better addressing senior transportation needs. Additional potential strategies include training taxi and Uber drivers for working with senior clientele and developing transportation cooperatives that serve small areas on a subscription basis. ®How can we address the disproportionate crash rate of older drivers and what are the impacts of driverless cars on transportation and where we live? The discussion focused primarily on driverless cars and highlighted the need to better • understand the requirements for using them, and whether those requirements align with the capacities of older drivers. The participants noted the prospect of training seniors to use this technology and the need to address inequity of access to this technology based on socioeconomic status and place of residence (e.g. rural, suburban, urban). How do we bring together community, state and federal government, as well as citizens, to get engaged and bring us to the future? This question addressed the broader issue of collaboration to move forward in advancing aging research and practice. At the core of the discussion was an emphasis on systems thinking and systemic change in education and policy structures. There is a need for a long- term view that accounts for multiple perspectives, including those from atypical partners. The discussion revealed optimism about the need for change and the importance of embracing that change, including broader changes in culture. ®How do we bridge from research questions to practice? How do we do this now when we do not have these answers? How do we find a balance between being inventive and learning from research already done? This three-part question addressed the broader issue of connecting research and practice, which relates to the overall focus of the Convergence Colloquium event. The discussion emphasized the need for a transdisciplinary movement that makes connections and builds networks across silos. Networks between academics and practitioners are important to building a cycle that includes two key steps. First, the cycle allows practitioners to identify the problem and inform research questions. Then, University research can address questions and also evaluate whether practitioners' solutions are working. A new leadership group that has access to research and practice is seen as central to ensuring a cross- pollination of ideas and to achieving a truly reciprocal relationship. • Aging 1 13 • Research Needs Reflecting on these questions and discussions, a number of common themes emerge including the need for systems approaches, greater collaboration and broader engagement. Considering the well-developed research programs, organizations and networks engaged on aging in Minnesota, these themes suggest the continued evolution of the aging field. This evolution is based in a broadening understanding of the diversity of the aging population in terms of demographics and health status and also changes in expectations among older adults relative to their work, home, community and healthcare. While discussions of workforce issues related to aging were somewhat limited relative to issues of healthcare and community, interests were raised relative to evolving the healthcare workforce. Key topics included declines in the healthcare workforce and the potential role of technology in supporting healthcare workers. In considering opportunities for future research, there was a further emphasis on . collaboration and the need for stronger, but also broader networks, that link research and practice. As emphasized in question 15 on the previous page, research should be informed by practitioners' questions and can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of practices that are already being employed. The breadth of Minnesota's public and nonprofit organizations working on aging is acknowledged as a significant asset. Further, the participants highlighted the diversity of disciplines and the presence of state and national leaders on aging research as key opportunities for future collaborative work. Priority research questions that emerged from the colloquium discussions and integrate across a number of the topics noted on the previous pages are listed below. 14 1 Convergence Colloquia • • Colloquium Outcomes and Next Steps The Aging Convergence Colloquium offered a valuable opportunity to build new networks and enhance existing connections among the range of researchers and practitioners working on aging issues. The event explored both community and workforce impacts and opportunities and spurred new collaborations that position Minnesota to meet the needs of its aging population. The interactions and conversations helped enhance existing networks and expanded the conversation about future priorities in aging research and practice. A post -event survey, completed by over 60 percent of the participants, revealed very favorable reactions to the colloquium. Over 95 percent of those who responded to the survey strongly agreed or agreed that the event provided opportunities to meet people outside of their discipline and 98 percent indicated that it allowed them to meet people from within and outside of the U of M. Nearly 70 percent noted that they met more than five new people at the event and an additional 20 percent met three to four new people. Nearly all of the respondents, 96 percent, agreed or strongly agree that the colloquium provided productive opportunities for interaction among participants and 72 percent noted that the event revealed new prospects for engaging U of M and external partners. Over 60 percent expect to collaborate in the future with one or more people that they met at the event. Finally, almost three-quarters of respondents indicated a definite interest in participating in a follow-up event. As noted earlier, attendees of each of the Convergence Colloquia are eligible to apply for Serendipity Grants to support the formation of and capacity building for new collaborative research teams. Qualifying research teams are required to engage diverse disciplinary perspectives and integrate U of M experts with those from the public, private and/or nonprofit sectors. Seven proposals, engaging 40 unique participants, were submitted following the Aging Convergence Colloquium. Proposal participants include faculty and researchers from at least nine disciplines and from five U of M Twin Cities colleges and one college at the U of M Duluth. Practitioners from 10 nonprofits, a number of public organizations at various governmental levels and a few private consultants were included. Proposals submitted for Serendipity Grants address a range of topics. Caregiving for older adults is a focus of several submissions,with proposals for collaborative research on family caregivers and their employers; care and service needs for transgender older • adults and integrative services for chronic care. Additional proposals address lifelong communities, in-home technology to address loneliness among older adults, race and quality of life among nursing home residents, and the development of an inventory of aging research. Funding decisions will be announced in late July 2015. Aging 115 Appendix A: List of Participants Last Name First Name UMN Department Employer David Alley SHIFT Karen Ashe Medical School University of Minnesota Cameran Bailey Office of Vice President for Research University of Minnesota Kristie Billiar MN Dept. of Transportation Katy Boone Carver County Anna Brailovsky College of Liberal Arts University of Minnesota Susan Brower MN State Demographic Center Marilyn Bruin Housing, Design, and Apparel University of Minnesota Cindy Cain School of Public Health University of Minnesota Ben Capistrant School of Public Health University of Minnesota Alanna Carter RSP Architects Alex Clark Collective Action Lab Julia Classen Aurora Consulting Kevin Coss Office of the Vice President for Research University of Minnesota Patti Cullen Care Providers of Minnesota Lois Cutler Long Term Care Resource Center University of Minnesota Heather Davila School of Nursing University of Minnesota Kathie Doty Hennepin- University Partnership, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota Maggie Dykes City of Apple Valley Andi Egbert MN State Demographic Center Jessica Finlay Department of Geography, Environment and Society University of Minnesota John Finnegan School of Public Health University of Minnesota Dylan Flunker Rainbow Health Initiative Kylie Funk College of Pharmacy, School of Nursing University of Minnesota Joe Gaugler School of Nursing University of Minnesota Kevin Gerdes Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota Leslie Grant School of Public Health University of Minnesota Jeremy Hanson Willis MN Dept. of Employment and Economic Development Rosemary Heins Extension Center for Family Development University of Minnesota Brittany Henderson Department of Sociology University of Minnesota Carrie Henning -Smith Minnesota Population Center University of Minnesota Brian Herman Office of the Vice President for Research University of Minnesota Pahoua Hoffman Citizens League Kate Houston Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging Skip Humphrey Humphrey Consulting Services Amelie Hyams SHIFT Yuhei Inoue School of Kinesiology University of Minnesota 6 1 Convergence Colloquia • • • • • • Last Name First Name UMN Department Employer Robert Kane Center on Aging, School of Public Health University of Minnesota Rosalie Kane School of Public Health University of Minnesota Maureen Kenney Wilder Foundation Emily Kerling Northfield Retirement Sean Kershaw Citizens League LaRhae Knatterud MN Dept, of Human Services Abel Knoche] Department of Social Work University of Minnesota, Duluth Vanessa Laird Center for Integrative Leadership University of Minnesota Linda Lorentzen Alzheimer's Association, MN/ND Chapter Jess Luce Dakota County Public Health Olivia Mastry Collective Action Lab, Act on Alzheimers Teresa McCarthy Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Minnesota Phyllis Moen Department of Sociology University of Minnesota Nichole Morris HumanFIRST Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Minnesota Lin Nelson-Mayson Goldstein Museum of Design University of Minnesota Bruce Nordquist City of Apple Valley John O'Leary O'Leary Marketing Associates LLC Al Onkka Aurora Consulting Susie Palmer Minnesota Dept. of Public Safety Carol Pankow State Services for the Blind Jane Pederson Stratis Health Marit Peterson Minnesota Elder Justice Center Shannon Reidt Medica] School University of Minnesota, Hennepin County Medical Center Bob Roepke Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging Monica Royston Ruckett Hennepin County Community Services Janet Salo Lutheran Social Services Jim Scheibel Hamline University Shellina Scheiner College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota Mary Jo Schifsky Store to Door Mary Ann Schoenberger Volunteers of America Pat Schommer Center on Aging, School of Public Health University of Minnesota Tetyana Shippee School of Public Health University of Minnesota Dawn Simonson Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging Mark Skeie Vital Aging Network Carissa Slotterback Office of the Vice President for Research University of Minnesota Amanda Smoot Department of Design, Housing and Apparel University of Minnesota Aging 1 17 Last Name First Name Diane Sprague Sandra Stevenson Paige Sumera Adam Suomala Joan Tronto Karen Vento Beth Virnig Lori Vrolson James Westcott Breanna Wheeler Kathleen Zahs UMN Department Osher Lifelong Learning Center Leading Age Minnesota Department of Political Science School of Public Health Humphrey School of Public Affairs Humphrey School of Public Affairs N. Bud Grossman Center for Memory Research and Care • Employer Lifetime Home Project University of Minnesota Keystone Community Services University of Minnesota St. Paul Advisory Cmte. on Aging University of Minnesota Central Minnesota Council on Aging University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Researchers and practitioners shared perspectives on key questions and research needs. 18 1 Convergence Colloquia • • 0 Appendix B: University of Minnesota Resources on Aging The list below offers a sampling of U of M programs and centers that have the potential to connect to research on aging. The list is not comprehensive, but offers valuable insights into the range of expertise and capacities for collaboration. Center on Aging http://www.coa.umn.edu/ The mission of the Center on Aging Is to facilitate the University of Minnesota's response to the many Issues of the aging population by fostering basic and applied research, as well as education of students and professionals to help explicate the aging process and inform public policy. The Center facilitates aging research at the local, national and international levels and serves as a • statewide resource center on health and welfare of older Minnesotans by providing information to students, professionals and the community. The Center on Aging is housed in the School of Public Health and engages faculty and staff from many colleges and schools across the University of Minnesota. Center faculty members direct numerous research studies on elder care subjects including quality of care, assessing quality of life and the relationship between acute and chronic care. Current projects address the health and long-term care of older persons, the relationship between long-term and acute care, and the quality of care. Flexible Work and Well -Being Center http://www.flexiblework.umn.edu/ The Flexible Work and Well -Being Center is part of the Work, Family and Health Network sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The center is focused on the challenges of managing work and family responsibilities in the U.S. and its impacts on the health and well-being of employees, their families and the workplace. The center's research offers insights relevant to issues of family caregiving and flexible workplace policies. HumanFIRST Laboratory http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ The HumanFIRST (Human Factors Interdisciplinary Research in Simulation and Transportation) Laboratory employs tools and methods of psychology and human factors in engineering to improve scientific understanding of driver performance and cognitive functions. Relative to aging, the HumanFIRST Laboratory conducts research related to at -risk road users, including elderly drivers. The laboratory's capacities include an advanced driving environment simulation system, driver data collection systems and instrumented roadways and vehicles. The laboratory is a facility of the U of M's Department of Mechanical Engineering and is affiliated with the • Roadway Safety Institute and the Region S University Transportation Center. Aging 119 0 Long -Term Care Resource Center http://www.hpm,umn.edu/itcresourcecenter/ The Long -Term Care (LTC) Resource Center focuses on advancing better quality of living for users of long-term care services and supports and improving the capacity of caring organizations and communities. The Center produces research, offers technical assistance, provides training and disseminates information to improve the long-term care services and supports for people with disabilities, particularly seniors. The center focuses on a range of issues including assisted living, building long-term service and support capacity, environment, ethics, quality, and nursing home transformation. Minnesota Area Geriatric Education Center www.coa.umn.edu/MAGEC/ The Minnesota Area Geriatric Education Center (MAGEC) is housed in the School of Public Health at the University of Minnesota and is part of the network of Geriatric Education Centers located around the US. The center is focused on creating dynamic partnerships between faculty, researchers, elder care professionals and other experts to provide better care for the aging population. Faculty engaged with MAGEC come from several U of M colleges, reflecting • the interdisciplinary nature of gerontology and geriatrics. The Health Resources and Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funds Geriatric Education Centers like this one. Minnesota Hartford Center of Gerontological Nursing Excellence http://www.nursing.umn.edu/hartford/ The Minnesota Hartford Center of Gerontological Nursing Excellence has as its mission to advance the care of older adults by preparing outstanding faculty from diverse backgrounds who can provide leadership in strengthening gerontological nursing at all levels of academic nursing programs. The center administers the Facilitated Learning to Advance Geriatrics Program, which advances professional development for new and existing faculty and provides participants with the latest classroom content and teaching strategies to engage prelicensure students in the care of older adults. Minnesota Scientists in Aging Research http://www.grad.umn.edu/groups/aging-research The Minnesota Scientists in Aging Research is an interdisciplinary group of scientists and students at the U of M and other institutions in Minnesota. The members conduct a broad range of aging research, from basic science to clinical and epidemiological studies. Among the groups goals are: (1) increasing communication among scientists in aging research at the U of M, Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Hennepin County Medical Center, Regions Hospital and Mayo Medical Center, and other research institutions; (2) facilitating collaborations and grant applications among members of the group; (3) increasing awareness of the breadth and depth of aging research in Minnesota and nationally; (4) providing a forum in which clinical researchers • on aging can explore possible collaboration with basic researchers in pursuit of translational research; (5) developing a Center for Excellence in Aging Research in the 21st Century; and (6) promoting interdisciplinary integration and training of graduate students into successful 20 1 Convergence Colloquia 0 N. Bud Grossman Center for Memory Research and Care http://www.memory.umn.edu/ The N. Bud Grossman Center for Memory Research and Care is focused on basic, translational and clinical research on memory disorder, with the goal of relieving the suffering caused by Alzheimer's disease. Center researchers focused on: (1) understanding the molecular basis of memory loss, (2) discovering the molecular markers for early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer's disease, and (3) delivering best practice care for memory health in the medical, psychological and social arenas. The center focuses on advancing safe and affordable prevention strategies and comprehensive care and support for people with memory problems and their families. The center brings together scientists, physicians and health care workers and draws from expertise in neurology, neuroscience and psychiatry. The center is part of the Institute for Translational Neuroscience, administered within the Medical School, which is part of the U of M's Academic Health Center. Osher Lifelong Learning Institute https://olli.umn.edu/ • The Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) at the U of M is focused on facilitating a vital community of older adults who are brought together by their intellectual curiosity and love of learning. OLLI is affiliated with the U of M's College of Continuing Education and offers a wide range of volunteer -led courses and activities. The institute's motto is "a health club for the mind" and it offers courses, social opportunities and programs outside of the classroom. OLLI is part of a national network of lifelong- learning institutes supported by the Bernard Osher Foundation. • Participants reported on the outcomes of small group discussions. Aging 121 0 Appendix C: Catalyst Presenter Biographies Midlife SHIFT: Seeking Purpose and Passion in Life and Work David Alley, Executive Director, SHIFT Since April 2013, David Alley has been executive director of SHIFT (www.shiftonline.org), an organization that supports people in mid-life transition who seek greater meaning in life and work, and serves Encore.org as one of 15 national Encore Innovation Fellows (2013-2015). Dr. Alley is CEO and chairman of Designs for Learning (www.designlearn.net), a consulting firm with 25 employees and 20 contractors serving MN Charter Schools, non -profits and small businesses since 1992, with a wide variety of services. He is a former vice-president for student affairs in a small church -related college. He has a doctorate in curriculum and instruction, with an emphasis in adult learning and higher education, and occasionally teaches Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) classes. Senior Housing Options Marilyn Bruin, Professor, Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, University of • Minnesota Marilyn J. Bruin, PhD, earned a doctorate in human development and family studies with minors in economics, housing, and political science at Iowa State University. As a professor in Housing Studies in the College of Design at the U of M her teaching, research and outreach interests focus on households at risk for maintaining independent, stable, adequate and affordable housing. She teaches a course titled Promoting Independence through Housing and Community, as well as graduate courses in research ethics, methods and grant -writing. She is director of graduate studies of the Graduate Design Program. In 2011, Dr. Bruin co-curated the Smart House, Livable Community, Your Future exhibition through the Goldstein Museum of Design and participated in the Aging Initiative at Hennepin County. She also co -advises the U of M's Habitat for Humanity student chapter. Family Caregiving and Employers Joseph Gaugler, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota Joseph E. Gaugler, PhD. is an Associate Professor and McKnight Presidential Fellow in the School of Nursing and Center on Aging at the U of M. Dr. Gaugler's research examines the sources and effectiveness of long-term care for chronically disabled older adults. A developmental psychologist with an interdisciplinary research focus, his interests include Alzheimer's disease and long-term care, the longitudinal ramifications of family care for disabled adults, and the effectiveness of community-based and psychosocial services for chronically ill adults and their caregiving families. Underpinning these substantive areas, Dr. Gaugler also has interests in longitudinal and mixed methods. 22 1 Convergence Colloquia • Transforming the Experience of Aging through Community Networks and Global Coordination Olivia Mastry, Founder, Collective Action Lab; Executive Lead, ACT on Alzheimer's Olivia Mastry is founding partner of The Collective Action Lab, a unique collaborative forum that fosters cross -sector, large scale systems change in the health, older adult service and disability arenas. Ms. Mastry combines her training and experience in law, health administration, public health, and conflict resolution to support a disciplined collaboration process that enables organizations to accomplish together what they cannot do alone. Example collaborations include: Pathways, a national, multi -stakeholder collaborative seeking to reform long-term services and supports financing at the federal and state levels. ACT on Alzheimer's, named one of five high - impact nonprofits in aging in 2015, ACT is a statewide collaboration involving over 60 public and private organizations addressing the personal, budgetary and societal impacts of Alzheimer's disease. She is guiding national replication of ACT through an initiative entitle Dementia Friendly America. Silos to Circles, a Minnesota collaborative working to foster integration across the continuum to support health at all life stages. • Rethinking Work, Careers, and Retirement for the 21st Century Phyllis Moen, Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota After 25 years at Cornell University, in 2003 Dr Moen accepted a McKnight Presidential Endowed Chair and a professorship in sociology at the U of M, where she had earned her PhD. Professor Moen studies the mismatch between outdated work -time and career/retirement scripts and 21st century workforce, demographic and economic realities. She also studies gender differences and disparities at all stages of the changing life course. With Erin Kelly and the Work, Family and Health Network, she investigates organizational work -time policies and practices, employee time strains, psychological and physical health outcomes; this includes the effects of an organizational - level innovation aimed at increasing supervisor support and employee control over where and when they work. Dr. Moen is incoming president of a large interdisciplinary and international association, the Work and Family Researchers' Network. In 2015, she received the Dean's Medal in the College of Liberal Arts, as well as the Sociology Department's Mentorship Award. Dr. Moen also received a fellowship at Stanford University's Center for Advanced Study of the Behavior Sciences for the 2015-16 academic year. She is completing a book on Boomers, to be published by Oxford University Press. Quality of Life for Nursing Home Residents: Predictors, Disparities and Directions for the Future Tetyana Shippee, Assistant Professor, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota Tetyana Shippee, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Health Policy and Management at the U of M. Her research focuses on quality of life and quality of care in long-term care settings and disparities in care utilization. Key concepts in her work include cumulative inequality theory and patient -centered measures, including quality of life and social engagement. As part of her work on quality of life in long-term care settings, Dr. Shippee lived in a Continuing Care Retirement Community for two years, using intensive qualitative methods to study transitions between levels of care and resident adjustment. Aging 123 0 Home and Mobile Telehealth — A Paradigm Shift Diane Sprague, Director, Lifetime Home Project Diane Sprague is the director of the Lifetime Home Project, which is based in Minneapolis. The project provides research, outreach, training and advocacy on: accessible/universal home design, innovative "encore" housing arrangements and home/mobile telehealth. Ms. Sprague also instructs in the online home accessibility remodeling certificate series offered by the National Resource Center on Supportive Housing and Home Modification at the University of Southern California. Minnesota's Aging, Shrinking Workforce Jeremy Hanson Willis, Deputy Commissioner of Workforce Development, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Jeremy Hanson Willis is Deputy Commissioner of Workforce Development for the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). As Deputy Commissioner, Jeremy is responsible for the strategic coordination of the department's varied workforce development efforts and aligning training and work readiness resources with the needs of • Minnesota business. Prior to joining DEED, Jeremy spent nine years in various roles with the City of Minneapolis, including as Chief of Staff to Mayor R.T. Rybak and as director of the City's economic development and planning agency. Mr. Hanson Willis's background also includes more than 10years of experience in public relations, coalition building, grassroots advocacy and legislative advocacy for various non-profit public affairs issues. L' 24 1 Convergence Colloquia For more information, visit: research.umn.edu/convergence Produced by the Office of the Vice President for Research. © 2015 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. CONVERGENCE COLLOQUIA Cultivating Serendipity for Action Smart Cities & Infrastructure February 28, 2015 ... Vice President for Research UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Drivers to Discover," C] Convergence Colloquia: Cultivating Serendipity for Action On February 28, 2015, the University of Minnesota's Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) convened the first colloquium on the topic of smart cities and infrastructure. The Convergence Colloquia are a new series of multi -disciplinary gatherings that advance cutting-edge research to develop innovative solutions and build long term partnerships that improve our world. The colloquia serve as action -oriented think tanks focusing on critical issues for our communities, from building smarter cities to exploring alternative energy sources to improving water quality to securing our food supply, that bring together U of M researchers with private, public and nonprofit stakeholders to identify strategic collaboration opportunities that can lead to significant impact at the local, state, national and global scales. The colloquia grew out of recommendations from the U of M's research strategic plan, Five Years Forward, to promote a culture of serendipity that advances scientific discovery through collaborative thinking and action. Embedded in a strategic vision and action plan, the colloquia are grounded in a results -oriented approach that includes ongoing evaluation and reflection to ensure accountability and results. FIVEYEARS FORWARD -Vision and Cornerstones Smart Cities & Infrastructure ( i 0 Each workshop is intended to engage approximately 50-100 participants from a variety of disciplines and fields. Through facilitated sessions and focused dialogue, participants work to identify a set of strategic research priorities and explore opportunities for collaboration. Serendipity Grants are available to support follow on collaborative research efforts that engage U of M researchers, along with public, private and nonprofit participants. The smart cities and infrastructure colloquium engaged over 80 participants from the U of M, and public, private and nonprofit organizations. Participants represented seven U of M colleges, as well as university -wide centers including the Center for Transportation Studies, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, Informatics Institute, Institute on the Environment and Minnesota Population Center. Experts from outside of the U of M included 10 representatives from nonprofit organizations, more than a dozen private companies including those working locally to internationally, and more than a dozen public sector participants working in cities, counties, regional government and at the state level in Minnesota. A list of participants is included in Appendix A. • Attendees explored opportunities for collaborative research connected to the growing availability of data and the deployment of technologies in cities and regions that facilitate smart urban decision making and integration of multiple infrastructure systems. The event offered an opportunity to consider how smarter cities connect people and information in new ways to enhance governance and social networks. In addition, the event engaged experts from across a variety of topic areas to explore smart approaches that can be applied across transportation, health, natural resources, energy, safety and other systems. Converging on Smart Cities and Infrastructure While there are many definitions of smart cities being advanced, the event was framed broadly with a definition noting that a city is smart when "investments in human and social capital and traditional (transport) and modern (ICT) communication infrastructure fuel sustainable economic growth and high quality of life, with a wise management of natural resources, through participatory governance.."1 In this definition ICT refers to information and communication technology. With this focus, participants were encouraged to explore notjust emerging data and technologies, but also the broader context and impacts. Participants considered how to connect their knowledge and resources to create communities that are not just more intelligent and efficient, but also • more livable. 'Caragliu, A., C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18(2): 6S-82. Convergence Colloquia 11 Smart cities and infrastructure offered a prime topic for the first colloquium. The topic has not been addressed in any direct way at the U of M, yet is an emerging topic in the US and even more established in European and Asian contexts. While U of M expertise on smart cities and infrastructure is extensive (e.g. big data, spatial science, social media analytics, visualization, mobile application development, wearable technologies, infrastructure system modeling, sensors, robotics, user interface design), it is has not been explicitly applied to this topic. A list of key U of M centers and programs with relevant expertise on smart cities and infrastructure is available in Appendix B. Further, Minnesota and the Twin Cities offer a history of innovation related to the development and application of technology, as well as the production and sharing of data. Illustrative of this innovation is the MetroGIS program, a voluntary collaboration of local and regional governments to promote and facilitate widespread sharing of geospatial data. In the private sector, the local MyMeter Company has built an interactive platform and tool for energy use visualization that provides residential and iscommercial customers with information on energy usage patterns and trends that link to temperature, occupancy, appliance use and other factors. The local nonprofit E-Democracy.org works nationally and internationally to advance online engagement tools that promote participation in public life and foster community. These serve only as samples of the relevant innovations. • Colloquium participants discuss smart cities and Infrastructure research opportunities. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 3 Directions in Smart Cities Research Research funding is emerging in support of smart cities and infrastructure focused scholarship. Recent funding programs from the National Science Foundation (NSF) include, but are not limited to, the Partnerships for Innovation: Building Innovation Capacity program supports academic -industry partnerships related to the integration of technologies into human -center smart service systems. Smart cities, smart infrastructure and on -demand transportation are noted as specific smart service applications that might be pursued under this program. NSF is also sponsoring a 2015 Early -Career Investigators Workshop on Cyber -Physical Systems in Smart Cities. This workshop will identify research opportunities related to topics such as smart technologies, social impacts of smart technologies, computing for sustainable and green urban living, human interfaces with smart city systems and urban analytics. NSF's recent Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes program is focused on interdisciplinary research focused on critical and interdependent infrastructure systems (e.g. electrical power grids, transportation services, emergency services). This program places particular emphasis on interactions among physical, cyber, and social, behavior and economic components of systems. In Europe, the European Union's Horizon 2020 program has provided funding for a number of years related to smart cities and infrastructure, with additional national level funding supporting innovation across various European countries. In 2015, the Horizon 2020 program issued a call for proposals for Smart Cities and Communities demonstration projects that integrate energy, transportation and information and communications technology. An additional call is focused on developing standards for smart cities components such as smart meters, smart grids and information and communications technology. Acknowledging the progress and diffusion of innovation that has already occurred in the European context around smart cities and infrastructure, this effort is intended promote connections among existing systems, ensuring open data access, and maintaining Europe's status as a leader on smart cities. Finally, a number of universities are positioning and highlighting their expertise on smart cities. For example, the University of Alabama at Birmingham's Smart Cities Research Center positions itself as promoting collaboration to develop smart technologies and information systems, improve transportation models and promote green construction and renewable energy. The University of California, Berkeley also has a Smart Cities Research Center initiated out of its Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, but draws on interdisciplinary expertise focused on quantitative modeling of urban systems. Key areas of expertise include urban data analytics, distributed control systems, smart transportation, computational social science and location -based social 4 1 Convergence Colloquia 0 F-1 • • networks. Columbia University's Data Science Institute includes a Smart Cities Center focused on developing and monitoring sustainable urban infrastructure and buildings. Additional areas of focus include smart grid, transportation system modeling and sensing devices in urban environments. The list above offers just a sampling of research centers, but university smart cities initiatives also include courses and degree programs that are positioning expertise on smart cities. Participants share insights from small group discussions. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 5 • Exploring Opportunities for Collaborative Research The primary focus in organizing the colloquium was to advance conversations and networking among attendees. The discussion was informed by a series of "catalyst presentations" that highlighted big ideas and new technologies related to smart cities and infrastructure. Each presenter also highlighted key needs and potential collaborators needed to move the work forward. The presentations are briefly summarized on the opposite page. Presenter bios are included in Appendix C. Convergence Colloquium participants network around shared interests in smart cities and infrastructure r L.J 6 1 Convergence Colloquia Catalyst Presentations Access across America: Measuring What Matters about Transportation Andrew Owen, Director, Accessibility Observatory, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota Drawing on work with the U of M's Accessibility Observatory, Mr. Owen explored the "Cumulative Opportunities of Accessibility." He highlighted an emerging approach to transportation data and modeling that quantifies the varying levels of access to "valued destinations" (e.g. jobs, healthcare, and education) by way of automobile, bus/rail and pedestrian modes within a certain radial range. Making the City Visible: Translating Use Data into Decision Making Jon Commers, Principal, Donjek, Inc.; Lead, Visible City Behavioral data, which integrates and layers physical, relational and behavioral data sets, is a product of the explosion of data collection, data decentralization and its visualization. Mr. Commers builds on the physical elements and relationships that make up a framework for the city to derive where the highest value contributions can be made for planning, investment and building resilience. Minneapolis Intelligent Operations Platform Otto Doll, Chief Information Officer, City of Minneapolis Mr. Doll aspires to establish an "Event Horizon Picture" by meshing historic, recent and real time data. Such a picture will be created by unifying data and analytics around all City of Minneapolis department permits and trends to create an 'Analyst Palette," which will allow officials and citizens to think and plan descriptively, diagnostically, predictively, and ultimately, prescriptively. The Human in the Smart City: Leveraging Wearable Technologies to Inform Infrastructure Lucy Dunne, Associate Professor, Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, University of Minnesota By developing capacity for ubiquitous computing between clothing data and infrastructure data, Dr. Dunne is advancing the potential to convert casual clothing into a data and knowledge source that is reflective of true human nature, movement and decisions. If the potential is fully realized she foresees the ability for personal information, portable environments and public services to interact fluidly. Smarter Buildings Creating Smarter Cities Ed Stogenson, General Manager, Siemens Building Technologies Mr. Stogenson posits that Smarter Cities start with Smarter Buildings, which move from a reactive service to a proactive one aligned with business goals. Through his work with Siemens, he seeks to leverage the latest technologies (e.g. IT/Building Convergence, Big Data, Data Analytics, Cloud Delivery, User Experience) to meet tenant and owner needs with better Monitoring Forecasts, Smart Building Products and Building Management Systems. Great Cities: A Traveling Exhibit about the Past, Present and Future of Cities Patrick Hamilton, Director of Global Change Initiatives, Science Museum of Minnesota Mr. Hamilton is developing an adaptive model of a "Great City" traveling exhibit at the Science Museum of Minnesota, which can act as a catalyst for change and possibility. In the end, this model would be able to adapt to the unique current and projected factors and constraints of each city it travels to. By doing so the model can reveal current trends and ways in which a city can alter its current course. Thinking Spatially — Tools for Smart Cities Len Kne, Associate Director, U -Spatial, University of Minnesota Through his work with U -Spatial, Mr. Kne is working to create a framework for "Collaborative Geodesign," which will consist of the people of the place in question, various design professions, the geographic sciences and information technologies. Within such a framework he foresees the ability to create and develop the new tools needed to realize Smarter Cities. Relevant tools include visualization, collaborative geodesign and spatial analysis. • Key Questions and Potential Collaborations Following the catalyst presentations, participants were invited to identify questions about smart cities and infrastructure that they would like to explore with others. Participants proposed questions, which were then used to organize two rounds of table discussions. Participants had the opportunity to self-select to table discussions that interested them. For their table question, they were asked to explore three issues: (1) information needed or desired to address the question; (2) relevant data, technology, areas of expertise, and/or capacities; and (3) prospects for collaboration among those at the colloquium, as well as additional stakeholders and organizations. Key insights from the table discussions are highlighted below: How do we merge data and existing infrastructure? Participants highlighted a need for methods to measure and monitor existing infrastructure conditions. They were also seeking mechanisms to anticipate and manage how different types of infrastructure affect each other, such as in situations where street reconstruction • has implications for water, energy and fiber optic infrastructure. Approaches to sharing data and the prospects for incentives to merge data across infrastructure systems were also prioritized. Participants encouraged the Identification and consideration of best practices from across the world. © How do we ensure equal utilization and distribution of technology for everyone? This discussion focused on the importance of equitable access and distribution of data and technology across people, communities and the state of Minnesota. Participants noted a need for informed decision making about data and technology investments and their impacts. The group identified the need for and inquired about the prospect of more open source tools and crowd -sourced data. As with the previous question, the participants considered what might be learned from other sectors, institutions, states and countries. © How do we use design to make technology accessible and usable for all people? Participants expressed a desire to facilitate a better match between technology and users expectations and needs. They emphasized the importance of achieving a balance between meeting needs and adding burden to others. The group highlighted expertise in technology/data usability, human factors and psychology as important to making technology accessible and usable. Approaches such as single sign -on and payment systems were noted as relevant technologies for enhancing access and usability. QHow do we be good stewards of data? The discussion pointed to the need for data to be more visible, more accessible and at the same time more secure. The participants noted that the sources of data are not always clear and that metadata (i.e. data about the data) are often lacking and not uniform. The group called for methods and protocols for anonomizing data to protect sensitive • information that still retain its utility. It was recommended that new opportunities for uniform data collection across the Twin Cities region be explored. 8 1 Convergence Colloquia How do we build trust in our models, data, and systems? Participants in the discussion noted a need for stakeholder engagement that includes diverse communities, is cognizant of cultural norms, and draws on the global community. It was emphasized that engagement be grounded in an understanding of what is needed to create trust and with attention to listening skills. Psychology, humanities, arts and human behavior expertise were all noted as critical capacities in this regard. Also noted was the importance of embracing failure, and acknowledging that those imperfect efforts are important for learning. Finally, data sharing policies were again noted as a potential barrier to expanding capacity. QWhat will drive implementation of smart cities, besides technology? Central to this discussion was an emphasis on the need for changes in legal and regulatory framework that will drive smart cities implementation. Participants noted a need for insights on how to change rules, regulations, and laws that they see as impeding the implementation of smart cities. The group called for a "transformational model" that motivates behavior change, uses relevant data to inform users, and uses financial incentives to drive investments in new technology. it was also noted the focus should shift • to performance rather the prescriptive metrics to more effectively drive implementation. How can we predict the technology that will transform smart cities? The group prioritized tracking trends at multiple levels. They noted a need to track efforts of the White Nouse office of Science and Technology Policy and those emerging from Silicon Valley, as well as trends in how various age groups are using technology. Millennials were specifically noted, with an emphasis on understanding how they do tasks and what they prioritize. Also important is the need to understand how previous technologies (e.g. smart phones, cloud computing, sensor networks, social computing) have impacted cities. Expertise is needed relative to transportation, land use, computer science, security, and data, as well as insights that come from both the public and private sectors (e.g. Google, Apple). QHow do we engage local leaders to lead the change process around smart cities and infrastructure? Discussion participants prioritized the need for financial data and mapping of infrastructure to inform local leaders. Even as the information becomes available, it is acknowledged that leadership and a new focus on competitiveness is needed. Additional considerations include the fact that elected officials and community staff are already stretched thin and that the solutions for small communities might be different than those for larger ones. In identifying and developing new data and information, it must be presented in a timely, succinct and digestible manner. Examples and successes from other communities are particularly useful. Potential collaborators on this question include the U of M, Metropolitan Council, large cities and the State Auditor's Office. The group prioritized building connections among academics, communities, and local leaders. Smart Cities & Infrastructure I 9 0 QHow does Minnesota import and improve on the best ideas (and use social media)? Participants acknowledged that it is not always necessary to start from scratch. Looking at efforts coming from other states and across the globe is essential, taking the best ideas and applying them to the Minnesota context. Key needs include a effectively facilitated knowledge exchange that would identify issues, collaborators and information. �i How do we measure the impact of smart cities and infrastructure on human well-being? Central to this discussion was an exploration of what well-being means, including considering how you feel, how you behave, how present you are, how absent you are and how healthy you are. Equity and public health were also highlighted as key concerns within well-being. Both individual and societal well-being were seen as important. Creating environments that are not work -centric were also emphasized. 0 How do we plan for the technology life cycle? In the discussion, the authoritativeness and actionability of data were questioned. The group explored the resilience of data and importance of identifying both durable and . transient data and figuring out how to use both. On the technology side, participants considered the ripeness of technology and the importance of ongoing evaluation and maintenance. ® What can we do to promote connectivity? The discussion started with a query as to whether Minnesota is competitively positioned in terms of Internet access and connectivity and how our efforts compare to those being pursued in other states. It was acknowledged that there might be barriers to investment and collaboration that should be more proactively identified. Planning and goal setting for connectivity were prioritized by participants, including recommending the development of a master plan that identifies where fiber optic cable is available and where there are gaps in the system. Planning for future connectivity should also include understanding the current and future needs of residents and businesses for level of service and speed. Competitiveness now and in the future was seen as essential and was used to justify participants' call for local and state, as well as private, funding to extend existing networks. Future collaborative research on this topic might engage the public, private and nonprofit sectors, as well as the Minnesota Task Force on Broadband Development and Minnesota Office of Broadband Development. ® How can we increase transportation resiliency? The participants identified resiliency through technology and resiliency through sharing as two key issues. Natural and technological disasters, as well as cybersecurity were noted as key threats. On the technology side, concerns were raised as to the use of systems that are traditionally guarded by personal choice. Relative to sharing, participants noted the importance of sharing Minnesota's knowledge about resiliency, such as how we address • snow. Sharing and the "teaching" that goes along with it was acknowledged as making us even more knowledgeable and resilient. 10 1 Convergence Colloquia • How do we think about systems in a systems way? This high-level discussion offed a conceptual discussion of the need to understand all of the pieces of key systems (e.g. data, infrastructure). Identifying both good and poor systems is seen as important for enhancing learning, as well as identifying system -scale fixes. Data can also be helpful in identifying things that are not working. A systems perspective also requires defining the problem in a unified manner that ensures that solutions do not precede the problem they are intended to solve. Further, it is essential to understand how systems intersect with fiscal, political and interpersonal relationships. Building trust among stakeholders and developing networks that reveal and promote reuse of previous work is also important. ®How can there be better collaboration between government and the university? While this topic is broader than the focus on smart cities and infrastructure, participants did note a potential role for the university in developing visual tools to support better decision making, offering support for data analytics, and providing capacity relative to Geographic Information Systems (GIS). More generally, the participants noted a need for a "one-stop shop' for information, which could better match available information to the • relevant context and facilitate collaboration to improve government projects. Multiple sources of data, technology and expertise were identified, including from a variety of colleges at the U of M and cities, counties and school districts. At the same time, data sharing policies were noted as a limitation, as well as concerns that the U of M has not consistently shared its high research and expertise. Colloquium participants discuss research needs Smart Cities & Infrastructure 111 • Research Needs Looking across these discussions, it is clear that best practices from relevant local, state, and international contexts are needed. Participants would like to see more examples from other communities and organizations, and at the same time participants highlight the prospect of sharing innovations emerging from Minnesota. It is acknowledged that future innovations must be responsive to changes in how people work, live, socialize, and travel in our communities and have an overall goal of improving quality of life. As we consider opportunities for future research, participants emphasized the need for more collaboration across levels of government and across the public, private and nonprofit sectors. Participants also prioritized collaboration with the U of M in pursuing research to address smart cities and infrastructure. Priority research questions that emerged from these colloquium discussions are listed below. Minnesota's unique characteristics and capacities were noted by participants as making the state and our communities poised to pursue research and innovation in smart cities and infrastructure. The Twin Cities' status as a major metropolitan area is seen as an asset, creating opportunities to serve as an urban lab. The U of M's capacities, with multiple disciplines and campuses across the state, offer relevant expertise and prospects for collaboration. 41 12 1 Convergence Colloquia • Colloquium Outcomes and Next Steps The colloquium provided a valuable opportunity for networking and sharing information, laying the groundwork for future collaboration across disciplines and across sectors. A post event survey, completed by about one-third of the participants, revealed highly favorable reactions to the Smart Cities and Infrastructure event. Over 95 percent of survey respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the Colloquium provided opportunities to meet people outside of their discipline and 100 percent meet people from both within and outside of the U of M. Over 65 percent of respondents noted that they met more than five new people at the event and an additional 35 percent met three to four new people. Over 93 percent agreed that the colloquium provided productive opportunities for interaction among participants and over 90 percent noted that the Colloquium revealed • new prospects for engaging U of M and external partners. Nearly three-quarters of survey respondents noted that they met one or more people at the event that they expect to collaborate with in the future. Almost 90 percent showed a definite interest in participating in a follow up event and about two-thirds expressed interest in engaging via an online group. As noted earlier, participants in each of the Convergence Colloquia are eligible to apply for Serendipity Grants to support the formation of and capacity building for new collaborative research teams. Teams are required to engage diverse disciplinary perspectives and integrate UMN experts with those from the public, private and nonprofit sectors. Seven proposals, engaging 46 participants, were submitted following the Smart Cities and Infrastructure Colloquium. Proposal participants represent five U of M -wide centers and six colleges, two private companies, two state agencies, one regional agency, one county, three local governments, and 10 nonprofits. Participating U of M researchers come from 15 different disciplines. Serendipity Grant proposals outlined needs for new data and databases, analytical and mapping tools, and visualization and interactive software to enhance decision making. The proposals engage with an array of topics including climate change, public infrastructure, mental health benefits of nature, housing access and policy, transportation accessibility and the intersection of human behavior and the built environment. Funding decisions will be announced in May 2015. • The convergence colloquium brought together a diverse group of participants and fostered networking that will advance future collaborative research and support a community of practice around smart cities and infrastructure. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 13 • Appendix A: List of Registered Participants Last Name First Name UMN Department Employer Anderson Ellen Energy Transition Lab University of Minnesota Beaulieu Michelle City of Saint Paul Borgen Janelle WSB & Associates, Inc. Brisk Debra Hennepin County Clift Steven E-Democracy.org Commers Jon Visible City Convertino Matteo Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health University of Minnesota Doll Otto City of Minneapolis Doll Jenifer Department of Educational Psychology University of Minnesota Donahue Marie Institute on the Environment University of Minnesota Douma Frank State and Local Policy Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota • Dunne Lucy Department of Design, Housing, and Apparel University of Minnesota Edwards Jenny Center for Energy and Environment Eftelioglu Emre Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota Eggum Tom TKDA Engel Sabine Office of University Economic Development University of Minnesota Erickson Thomas IBM T. J. Watson Research Center Falbo Dan ESRI Fan Yingling Urban and Regional Planning Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota Giannakis Georgios Digital Technology Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Minnesota Graham Todd Metropolitan Council Gulliver John Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering University of Minnesota Hamilton Patrick Science Museum of Minnesota Harvey Brian Zipcar Headlee Josh Accelerated Innovations Hecht Brent Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota Henry Bradford Technological Leadership Institute, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering University of Minnesota Herman Brian Office of the Vice President for Research University of Minnesota Hosmer Grant City of Minneapolis Office of Emergency Management Hourdos John Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering University of Minnesota Johnson Josh car2go Joselyn Bernadine Blandin Foundation • Keeler Bonnie Institute on the Environment University of Minnesota 14 1 Convergence Colloquia • • 0 Last Name Kne Konstan Kraikul Kristen Levin Levinson Li Linderman Lund Maas Malmquist Manore Manson Ma rtenson Martin Matzek McGeveran McGinnis Munnich First Name Len Joseph Evva Murray John David Yanhua Lauren Bob Geoffrey Jerome Michael Steven Dennis Pieter Kelli William Laurie Lee Nadav Amir Neuhauser Claudia Norman Ravi Otto Rebecca Owen Andrew Przybilla Paul Ramaswami Anu Reddy Abraham Riemenschneider Nora Risse William Ritchie Mark Schaffner Philip Schmit Matt Scott Brian Sheehy Lee Shekhar Shashi Smith Ken Stogenson Ed Stroebel Jay UMN Department U -Spatial, Minnesota Population Center Department of Computer Science and Engineering Center for Urban and Regional Affairs Accessibility Observatory, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering Facilities Management U -Spatial, Department of Geography University of Minnesota Press Law School Center for Transportation Studies State and Local Policy Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs Informatics Institute, Office of Vice President for Research Accessibility Observatory, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs School of Physics and Astronomy Department of Computer Science and Engineering Employer University of Minnesota University of Minnesota GLITCH University of Minnesota Metro Transit University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota THOR Construction, Inc. Metropolitan Council University of Minnesota MasterGraphics, Inc. University of Minnesota Independent Consultant University of Minnesot Washington County, University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Great Plains Institute University of Minnesota THOR Construction, Inc. Minnesota Office of the State Auditor University of Minnesota Hennepin County University of Minnesota University of Minnesota City of St. Paul Visible City Expo 2023 Minnesota Department of Transportation Minnesota State Senate SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The McKnight Foundation University of Minnesota Ever -Green Energy Siemens City of Minneapolis Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 15 Tang Xun VanMeerten Nicolaas Vars Mitch Wilson Elizabeth Xie Xiqun Yang KwangSoo Zhe Jiang 16 1 Convergence Colloquia Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department of Educational Psychology Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy Program, Humphrey School of Public Affairs Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Nice Ride Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota • • Appendix B: University of Minnesota Resources on Smart Cities and Infrastructure The list below offers a sampling of U of M programs and centers that have the potential to connect to research on smart cities and infrastructure. The list is not comprehensive, but offers valuable insights into the range of expertise and capacities for collaboration. Accessibility Observatory http://access.umn.edu/about/ The Accessibility Observatory is focused on the research and application of accessibility -based transportation system evaluation. The Observatory is guided by a threefold mission: 1. To advance the field of transportation system evaluation through research of new data sources and methods for accessibility evaluation 2. To develop standards and tools to facilitate the use and communication of accessibility -based • metrics in transportation planning, engineering, and evaluation 3. To apply our tools and expertise in support of continual improvements in the planning, design, engineering, and analysis of transportation systems The Accessibility Observatory is a program of the Center for Transportation Studies and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo -Engineering. The program builds on earlier work conducted at the U of M, including the Access to Destinations and first Access Across America series report. Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/stpp/about.htmI The Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy in the Humphrey School of Public Affairs transforms policy and action to address society's grand challenges at the intersection of science, technology, environment, and society through thought -leadership, systems thinking, and public discourse. Research in the Center Is focused on infrastructure for future cities, climate change, sustainable energy transitions, governance of emerging and/or disruptive technologies and food and water security. Current projects Include research on smart grids, sustainable electricity and sustainable infrastructure and cities. Center for Transportation Studies http://www.cts.umn.edu/ The Center for Transportation Studies solves old transportation problems in innovative new ways. It convenes diverse communities to brainstorm, debate, share, learn and act. CTS partners with local and global transportation professionals, stakeholders, businesses and leaders to move new ideas from research to reality. The Center engages faculty expertise from across the U of M and facilitates ongoing engagement with transportation agencies and other stakeholders. • Recent research projects focus on a variety of topics, including measuring accessibility, supporting statewide economic vitality, developing a "super hybrid" bus, warning drivers about safety hazards, spurring transit -oriented development and improving Minnesota's transportation system. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 17 • HumanFIRST Laboratory http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ The HumanFIRST (Human Factors Interdisciplinary Research in Simulation and Transportation) Laboratory employs tools and methods of psychology and human factors in engineering to improve scientific understanding of driver performance and cognitive functions. The Laboratory is a facility of the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is affiliated with the Roadway Safety Institute and the Region 5 University Transportation Center. Key capacities of HumanFIRST Laboratory include an advanced driving environment simulation system, driver data collection systems and instrumented roadways and vehicles. Informatics Institute http://www. research.0 mn.edu/u mii/#.VRHH_vnF98F The U of M's Informatics Institute is an institute in the Office of the Vice President for Research. UMII is responsive to the needs of the University community and shaped by the University community in partnership with public and private organizations. The UMII fosters and accelerates data -intensive research across the University system in agriculture, arts, design, engineering, environment, health, humanities and social sciences through informatics services, competitive • grants and consultation. UMII serves as the link to connect the research community to the services related to managing data across the data life cycle. Roadway Safety Institute http://www.roadwaysafety.umn.edu/about/ The Roadway Safety Institute is the US Region 5 University Transportation Center funded by the US Department of Transportation. The Institute conducts activities that further the mission of the UTC program of the USDOT—to advance U.S. technology and expertise in the many disciplines that make up transportation through education, research, and technology transfer activities at university -based centers of excellence. Driven by the goal of preventing crashes to reduce fatalities and life -changing injuries, the Institute's research is focused on user -centered transportation safety systems. The Institute, previously known as the Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, represents a consortium led by the U of M and including four other universities. Social Media & Business Analytics Collaborative http://sobaco.umn.edu/about Social Media and Business Analytics Collaborative builds on two decades of work in social computing. With top rated programs in computer science, engineering, management, and decision sciences, SOBACO combines these University strengths with the real-world business challenges, domain expertise, and unique data sets of our industry partners. The Collaborative sparks new thinking, creates a place for innovative ideas to incubate, and co -creates new knowledge and business value for today's data -rich, socially networked world. SOBACO is a University -wide research initiative, supported by the Carlson School of Management, the College of Science and Engineering, the President's Office, and Office of Academic Affairs and Provost. • 18 1 Convergence Colloquia 0 Spatial Computing Research Group http://www.spatial.cs.umn.edu/ The research group's work is focused on the storage, management and analysis of scientific and geographic data, information and knowledge. The research is motivated by and has been applied to application areas such as transportation, virtual environments, earth science, epidemiology, and cartography. Recent projects focus on data mining and spatial data analytics related to weather, climate change, transportation, and public safety. The Spatial Computing Research Group is a research laboratory in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. State and Local Policy Program http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/slp/ The State and Local Policy Program helps policy leaders and citizens understand how changes in the global economy, technology, and the workplace affect communities by: convening to increase discussion and awareness of policy issues; contributing to produce and integrate new information, ideas, and approaches; and changing to enhance and apply public policy that addresses community needs. SLPP undertakes projects in four major policy areas: (1) Transportation and the Community, (2) Economic Development & Human Capital, (3) Rural • Safety, and (4) Telecommunication. U -Spatial https:Huspatial.umn.edu/summary U -Spatial, a program of the U of M's Minnesota Population Center provides supportfor spatial research, helps to eliminate duplication and fragmentation of scientific resources, and provides a framework of data, equipment, expertise, and resources that benefits all researchers working with spatial related sciences and creative activities. U -Spatial is providing broad-based infrastructure across traditional disciplinary and college boundaries has come much more recently. It provides support via four Cores: 1. Central Core services include technical assistance, training, resource coordination, and development of the spatial science community 2. Imaging Core infrastructure focuses on data and analysis of aerial and satellite imagery of the earth 3. Data Core services include data archiving and discovery and development of shared computing infrastructure 4. Analysis Core infrastructure centers on spatiotemporal modeling, geodesign, and mapping Wearable Technology Lab http://faculty.design.umn.edu/dunne/about.html The Wearable Technology Lab (V\/TL) focuses on the intersection between apparel and new technology: for instance, in expanding garment functionality through dynamic aesthetics and new sensing functions; in improving the way we use, manage, and consume clothing; and in streamlining the design and manufacturing processes of smart clothing. Many projects deal with • translating technological potential into the real, everyday world: understanding human physical and emotional comfort and balancing these variables with tradeoffs of performance variables in a smart system design. The WTL is part of the Wearable Product Design Center in the U of M's College of Design. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 1 19 Appendix C: Catalyst Presenter Biographies Access across America: Measuring What Matters about Transportation Andrew Owen, Director, Accessibility Observatory, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota Andrew Owen is the director of the Accessibility Observatory and a research fellow in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geo- Engineering at the University of Minnesota. He leads the Observatory's development and maintenance of tools to calculate nationwide, multimodal accessibility to a variety of destination types. Owen holds master's degrees in civil engineering and in urban and regional planning, and he has joined the field of transportation research following a career in computer science and network security. Making the City Visible: Translating Use Data into Decision Making Jon Commers, Principal, Donjek, Inc.; Lead, Visible City Jon Commers is principal at Donjek, Inc., where he combines publicfinance, economics, planning and urban design concepts to provide effective project management and redevelopment • strategy. As lead of Visible City, Jon has been developing an approach to identify and harness data that documents patterns of urban experience, for decision making by public, private and philanthropic parties. In his civic work, Jon has represented Saint Paul on the Metropolitan Council since 2011, where he chairs the Land Use Advisory Committee and is a member of the Transportation and Community Development Committees. Previously, Jon served on the Saint Paul Planning Commission for six years, where he was elected chair. Jon is also a co-founder of Strong Towns, a virtual nonprofit organization focused on improving the fiscal health of communities through productive land use. Jon joined the University of Minnesota in 2014 as an adjunct instructor in Urban Studies. He lives in Saint Paul with his family. Minneapolis Intelligent Operations Platform Otto Doll, Chief Information Officer, City of Minneapolis Otto Doll was appointed the City of Minneapolis Chief Information Officer (CIO) in February 2011, responsible for all IT operations. Formally South Dakota's CIO for 15 years with responsibility for all state government computing, telecommunications, state radio and public broadcasting. Mr. Doll received his Bachelors in Computer Science from Virginia Tech and graduated from the Senior Executive Fellows program of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. He is a past President of NASCIO- a national organization of state CIOs. Mr. Doll was named to Government Technology's Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers. 20 1 Convergence Colloquia 0 The Human in the Smart City: Leveraging Wearable Technologies to Inform Infrastructure Lucy Dunne, Associate Professor, Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, University of Minnesota Lucy E. Dunne is an Associate Professor in the Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, and sits on the faculty of Apparel Design, Product Design and Human Factors and Ergonomics, as well as holding affiliate membership in the graduate faculties of Computer Science and Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the Institute for Health Informatics. She holds BS and MA degrees from Cornell University in Textiles and Apparel, an AAS in Electronic Technologyfrom Tompkins -Cortland Community College, and a PhD in Computer Science from University College Dublin. Her research is focused on wearability and textile -based wearable technology and explores new functionality in apparel, human -device interface, production and manufacture and human factors of wearable products. Dr. Dunne has received the National Science Foundation's CAREER award and the NASA Silver Achievement Medal for her work with functional clothing and wearable technology. Smarter Buildings Creating Smarter Cities Ed Stogenson, General Manager, Siemens Building Technologies Ed Stogenson is the General Manager for Siemens Building Technologies in Minnesota. He moved from Chicago to the Twin Cities about 8 years ago. He's been with Siemens for 18 years and has over 30 years of experience regarding construction infrastructure and facilities management. He has previously presented at the 7x24 International Conference regarding integration of building systems and at the University of Minnesota regarding sustainability. He is an active member of Winona State University Alumni and Friends, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, and was in the 2012 group of Leadership Twin Cities. Great Cities: A Traveling Exhibit about the Past, Present and Future of Cities Patrick Hamilton, Director of Global Change Initiatives, Science Museum of Minnesota As Director of Global Change Initiatives at the Science Museum of Minnesota, Patrick Hamilton develops projects that explore the challenges and opportunities of humanity as the dominant agent of global change. Patrick also is a Fellow of the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment, a Board Member of District Energy St. Paul, and a Co -PI with the University of Minnesota's Urban Heat Island Network. Away from the museum, Patrick and his wife J. like to kayak and grow organic, blue -ribbon -winning pears, peaches and plums in Saint Paul. Thinking Spatially — Tools for Smart Cities Len Kne, Associate Director, U -Spatial, University of Minnesota Len Kne, GISP, brings extensive experience with GIS and Information Technologies in higher education, construction, government and non-profit organizations to his work at U -Spatial, a center at the University of Minnesota providing support for spatial research. He is an alum of • the University of Minnesota with a BS in Recreation Resource Management (2005) and Master of Geographic Information Science (2009). He is on the faculty of the Master of Geographic Information Science program and teaches project management, spatial databases and a variety of graduate seminar classes focusing on the use of technology in GIS. He is looking forward to the day when everyone is thinking spatially. Smart Cities & Infrastructure 121 For more information, visit: research.umn.edu/convergence Produced by the Office of the Vice President for Research. 0 2015 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Heather Branigin *From: Sally Thomas <sallythomasyca@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 1:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Best Buy Site Dear Mayor and Members of the Planning Commission and City Council: I have owned my condo at 7200 York for six years. Over this time, the traffic in this area has more than doubled. It is certainly cause for concern with the Southdale, Byerly's and Borofka apartments still to add hundreds more residents to less than a mile of roadway. A bigger question is whether or not there is actually a market for yet another residential building. York Plaza is advertising vacancies. York Place has 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments available. According to their website, One Southdale Place, has 46 apartments currently for rent. They have 46 vacancies and they're building more units. Byerly's will open several more buildings in September. Building hasn't even begun on the Borofka site. It seems incredibly premature to permit another apartment building to go up in this corner of Edina where traffic, water quality, and infrastructure are already serious problems. On behalf of the 122 taxpayers at 7200 York, I wish to voice our concern and ask that halt further residential building in the Southdale area. Sincerely, Sally A. Thomas, President York Condo Association 052-934-1068 n U Heather Braniain From: Gayle Dreon <tbratcher=iret.com@mail 192.atl21.rsgsv.net> on behalf of Gayle Dreon is <tbratcher@ i ret.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:39 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Grand Opening Reminder! August 12th at 4:00 PM 6565 France Aveunue We are looking forward to seeing you at 6565 France Avenue South, View this email in your browser On Wednesday, Augusts 12th, at 4:00 PM! • • 19 6565France Avenue South at-, Southdaie Mle�dica. r-eriier Please Join Us Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Short Program at 4:30 p.m. Refreshments and Valet Parking Provided —.d2b.— HOSTED BY: IRETE SILVER OAK DEVELOPMENT P P, TIC.'S THE DAVIS GROUP Heather Braniain From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:38 AM To: 'Katherine Lin (katherine121926@isd273.org)' Subject: RE: Sidewalks on 62nd Street (between France Avenue and Valley View Road) Katherine, we are planning a side walk on 62nd street when we rebuild the street in a few years. That is why we built the walking trail into Pamela Park from 62nd street. I am glad you like sidewalks, so do I. Ann Swenson Sent from my Wad From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 2:57 PM To: 'Katherine Lin' Subject: RE: Sidewalks on 62nd Street (between France Avenue and Valley View Road) Dear Katherine, C] Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council Chambers. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov f' y ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Katherine Lin fmailto:katherinel21926@isd273.org] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 2:44 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Sidewalks on 62nd Street (between France Avenue and Valley View Road) 1k DSC_1184.JPG N DSC_1185.JPG 0 DSC 1186.JPG •� DSC 1187.JPG DSC_1188.JPG DSC_1189.JPG DSC_1190.JPG DSC_1191.JPG DSC 1192.JPG & DSC_1193.JPG • DSC 1194.JPG DSC 1195.JPG DSC_1196.JPG DSC 1197.JPG Council Chambers Edina City Hall 48oi W. 5oth St August 6, 2015 Dear Members of the Edina City Council, • My name is Katherine Lin and I am a 12 year old incoming 7th grader at South View Middle School. As a citizen here in Edina, I would very much appreciate if the suggestion I have to present to the council would be considered. 2 I live on Halifax Avenue South, near Peacedale Avenue. Both streets branch off of West 62nd street. I have prepared these photographs as an aid to location and current situation: • LI As you may know, West 62nd street is a very well used way to get from Valley View Road to France Avenue (and vice versa). Both are very busy streets all throughout the day. It is also situated very close to the Crosstown Highway, Southdale Mall and Fairview Southdale Hospital, all of which are very popular places. With such a high concentration of popularity in the area, it too becomes very crowded as well. On and around the busy West 62nd street, there are also many people who live in the area, my family included. Some people have children who they love and intend to keep safe, while others enjoy exercising. There is, though, a single towering hardship that they face. The picture to the right above was taken the fall of 2014 during one of the streets rare quiet moments. As I and many others have observed, the towering hardship that the people of the area face is safety. The street, being as full of commotion as it is, lacks the security of sidewalks. Both France Avenue and Valley View Road have very well maintained and safe sidewalks. • Recently, there was an addition to the sidewalk on France Avenue. If there are sidewalks on streets that are equally as dangerous and car infested as 62nd street, why let only the citizens in that particular area suffer the dangers and hazards others do not? There is no place that is completely free of the worry of safety. In a city that has a reputation such as Edina's, would people expect the need to put up signs, like the ones below, because the city •does not have sidewalks on the busy street that they live? 9 For people to have such unnecessary troubles in keeping their families safe produces holes in the reputation of Edina. Even with these cautions, the parents of children cannot let them in their front yards too often. A bike, run, or walk on 62nd street can turn from an enjoyable form of exercise, to a dangerous trip not worth taking. In a different scenario, with safe, well maintained sidewalks, things would be exactly opposite. The addition of sidewalks would not only lower levels danger drastically, but it would encourage people to come to such a safe area where they can have one less burden upon their shoulders. When neighboring areas find that the necessity of safety has arrived, citizens would be motivated to exercise, this time with the leisure that it brings. Sidewalks on 62nd street would not only affect positively upon the citizens in the area, but there would be new job opportunities for the people of Edina who are in need of work to support themselves and their families. Even with all of these positive effects, the positivity goes beyond the limits of Edina. Other •cities will be inspired by the progress that Edina will have made by creating sidewalks, and eventually, they will follow our example. Soon, city after city will see the good changes and follow the example set by our city. The great changes will at first start small as a stream, but will eventually open wide into a rushing river until it opens wide into a sea of peace. 4 After all of this change, who will be the one responsible for all of this greatness? The trend setter, the city of Edina, Minnesota, will be the victor of this prize. All of this can happen, just from a single sidewalk that was needed for the safety of the people of 62nd street. • With this email, I have enclosed the images of the petitions with which I have gathered support for the project. If you would so kindly review them, I and the people who have signed them, would greatly appreciate your help to our cause. I thank all of the city council of Edina for reviewing and considering what I have proposed, the building of a sidewalk on 62nd street. I greatly appreciate all of the time you have taken to see this and if you have any sort of feedback, I would be extremely delighted to read it. Once, again thank you very much and I hope you all have a very good day. Sincerely Grateful, Katherine Lin, Age 12 • is Heather Branigin *From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 1:03 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Have you registered for TransparencyCamp 2015? MISSION STATEMENT The Sunlight Foundation is a nonpartisan nonprofit that advocates for open government globally and uses technology to make government more accountable to all. View in browser I Join us SUNLIGHT FOUNDATION r 1 Hi david, My, how time flies! We just looked at the calendar and realized: TransparencyCamp 2015 is fast approaching! TCamp is the only gathering in the country that brings together journalists, global civic hackers, open data advocates and government officials — and allows the participants to run the show. As an unconference, the schedule for TCamp 2015 will be set by YOU, the attendees — and we're now accepting session ideas! So, have a good topic for a session at TCamp 2015? Head over to the brainstorm page and tell us about it (or simply vote on other sessions you're interested in). Your idea might just end up on the official schedule of TransparencyCamp — also known as "the Wall." Remember, spots are filling up fast: Register today to secure your spot in TransparencyCamp 2015! Thanks, as always, for being a part of the opengov community! Jenn, Scott and the #TCamp15 team P.S. Be sure to follow (a)-TCampDC for the latest updates! • MISSION STATEMENT • The Sunlight Foundation is a nonpartisan nonprofit that advocates for open government globally and uses technology to make government more accountable to all. Heather Branigin larom: Ross Plaetzer <ross@employersolutionsgroup.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 6:15 PM To: 'jhovland@krausehovland.com'; 'mail@Edi naMN.gov'; 'kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov'; 'rstewart@ Edina M N.gov'; 'mbrindle@comcast.net'; 'swensonannl@gmail.com' Cc: Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal; Ross Bintner; Eric Roggeman Subject: Franchise Fees in Xcel Franchise Agreement Attachments: Item VIII C and D Ordinance Nos 2012-15 and 2012-16 Franchise Ordinances for CenterPoint and Xcel.pdf; City of Minneapolis Utility Franchise Agreements 2012.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, and staff, In October of 2012, the Council passed an ordinance (attached) creating a Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund and assessing a monthly franchise fee of $1.90 for Xcel customers and $1.90 for CenterPoint customers to provide monies for the Fund. This amounted to an increase in the monthly bills for residential customers of 1.6%. According to a 2012 legal memorandum (attached) from counsel to the City of Minneapolis, this rate may be low. *Since all the funds from the current franchise fee go the to the Fund and are not directed to any costs associated with Xcel's use of Edina rights-of-way, it may be prudent to consider either using some of the current franchise fees for facilitating the conversion of overhead utilities to underground utilities, or imposing a modest increase in the Xcel franchise fee to be dedicated to a new fund directed to that purpose. This would take some of the financial pressure off of residential property owners who have to foot the bill for conversion of overhead utilities to underground utilities, especially in areas of Edina built in the early part of the 20th century when little consideration was given to safety or aesthetics in the placement of above ground electric facilities. Thank you for your consideration. • ROSS PLAETZER 14058 SUNNYSIDE ROAD I CELL: 612.991.8896 1 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: October 16, 2012 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. & D. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012-15 Franchise Ordinance CenterPoint Energy and Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012-16 Franchise Ordinance Xcel Action Requested: Adopt second readings of Ordinance 2012-15 and Ordinance 2012-16 creating franchise fees for the City's natural gas and electric utilities. Information / Background: At the Council's retreat meeting in February idea was introduced of implementing a modest franchise fee of the Edina customers of Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy to create a new revenue stream that would be specifically dedicated to funding new improvements sidewalk, trail and non -motorized transportation projects around the city. These projects are currently funded from the City's annual Capital Improvements Plan or from special assessments. The Council expressed interest in the franchise fee concept and asked staff to research the issue in more depth. At the Council's June 5 Work Session, in addition to conducting a review of the City's Special Assessment Policy, the Council also considered a more formal proposal to fund a new sidewalk, trail and non -motorized transportation improvement program through the adoption of utility franchise fees. The Council formally considered two new ordinances at the August 6 Council meeting and approved first reading to implement new utility franchise fees for the purpose of funding for new sidewalks, trails, lighting, street markings and related costs that will increase the safety of the City's pedestrian, cyclist and non -motorized transportation system. City of Edina - 4801 W. 50 h Sc. , Edina, MN 55424 • • If the two new ordinances are adopted by the City Council, the City will create a new fund called the • Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS Fund) to account for the new franchise fee revenues. The franchise fee revenues will be a dedicated revenue to the PACS Fund. The PACS Fund will be used to fund construction and maintenance activities, lighting, right-of-way acquisition, consulting and staff costs related to the expansion and improvement of the City's sidewalk, trail and non -motorized transportation system. The proposed franchise fee for a residential utility account is $1.45/month for both Xcel and CenterPoint customers for a total of $2.90/month. According to data supplied to the City by the two utilities, the average residential customer natural gas bill is $90.25/month and average residential electric bill is $89.17/month. The addition of the proposed franchise fees raises the monthly bill in each case by approximately 1.6%. There are higher monthly fees for commercial accounts that are described in detail in the ordinances. In all classes of customers, however, the new franchise fees are flat fees that do not vary with the consumption. Franchise fees are applied to each customer meter regardless of the property tax status of the customer. Non-profit organizations, schools, churches and government utility customers will be assessed franchise fees based on the type of meter/service status they have through their respective utility companies. If adopted by the Council, the proposed franchise fee structure in the new ordinances will create approximately $ 1.1 million each year in new revenue for the purpose of increasing the safety of the City's pedestrians, cyclists and drivers at a financial impact to our residents of $2.90/month. If the Council wishes to continue to proceed with the adoption of the franchise fees, the next step in • the process is to adopt second reading on the two ordinances (2012-15 and 2012-16) at the October 16, 2012 Council Meeting. Following adoption on first reading on August 6, 2012, the City provided an official 60 day notice to each utility of the City's impending action. During that 60 day period, the utilities were allowed to comment on the proposed ordinances. The 60 day time period has been completed and the Council may proceed with second reading of the ordinances. The Xcel Energy did not submit any changes to the proposed Ordinance. CenterPoint Energy sent a proposed change and the proposed Ordinance 2012-15 was changed to reflect the request to clarify that the surcharge can only be passed on to residents of the city, in this case residents of the City of Edina. The updated language is with added language underlined is: SECTION 8. SURCHARGE. The City of Edina recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt second reading on the two new franchise fee ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2012-15 Ordinance No. 2012-16 0 ORDINANCE NO. 2012-15 • AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A GAS ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS ("CENTERPOINT ENERGY") FOR PROVIDING GAS ENERGY SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) City means the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. (2) Company means CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ("CenterPoint Energy"), its successors and assigns. (3) Franchise Ordinance means Ordinance No. 2003-2. (4) Notice means a writing served by any party or parties on any other party or parties. Notice to Company shall be mailed to CenterPoint Energy, Minnesota Division Vice President, 800 LaSalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402. Notice to City shall be mailed to the • City Clerk at 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. SECTION 2. PURPOSE. The Edina City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide natural gas and electric services within the City. Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Company. SECTION 3. FRANCHISE FEE STATEMENT AND SCHEDULE. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Company commencing with the February, 2013 billing month, and in accordance with the following fee schedule: Customer Classification Residential Firm A Firm B Firm C Sm Vol, Dual Fuel A (SVDF A) Sm Vol, Dual Fuel B (SVDF B) Lg Vol, Dual Fuel (LVDF) Amount per Account per Month ($) $ 1.45 $ 2.90 $ 9.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 SECTION 4. ACCOUNT FEE. This fee is an account based fee and not a meter -based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this Ordinance has more than one meter, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. In the event any entities covered by this • • Ordinance have more than one account, each account shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any account, the highest possible fee amount shall apply. SECTION S. PAYMENT. Franchise fees are to be collected by the Company and submitted to the City as follows: January— March collections due by April 30. April —June collections due by July 31. July—September collections due by October 31. October — December collections due by January 31. SECTION 6. RECORD SUPPORT FOR PAYMENT. The Company shall make each payment when due and, if requested by the City, shall provide a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total made to account for any non -collectible accounts, refunds or error corrections. The Company shall permit the City, and its representatives, access to the Company's records for the purpose of verifying such statements. SECTION 7. PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS. Payment to the City will be adjusted where the Company is unable to collect the franchise fee. This includes non -collectible accounts. • SECTION 8. SURCHARGE. The City of Edina recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. SECTION 9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this ordinance or for such other relief permitted by law. SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FRANCHISE FEE. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after sending written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to Company by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. • SECTION 11. RELATION TO FRANCHISE ORDINANCE. This ordinance is enacted in compliance with the Franchise Ordinance and shall be interpreted as such. SECTION 12. PERMIT FEES. The Company will administer the collection and payment of franchise fees to the City in lieu of permit fees, or other fees that may otherwise be imposed on the Company in relation to its operations as a public utility in the City so long as the following requirements are met: 0 (1) The Company applies for any and all permits, licenses and similar documentation as though this provision did not exist. (2) The Company requests the fee to be waived at the time of application. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Edina on the 6 day of August, 2012, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16 day of October, 2012. First Reading: August 6, 2012 Second Reading: October 16, 2012 Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: • Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk • • ORDINANCE NO. 2012-16 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC SERVICE FRANCHISE FEE ON NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, D/B/A XCEL ENERGY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The City of Edina Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subdivision 1. Pur ose. The Edina City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of Edina. (a) Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 1995-4, an ordinance granting a Franchise to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 9 of the Northern States Power Company Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. • Subdivision 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, under its electric franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the Xcel Energy February, 2013 billing month. This fee is an account -based fee on each premise and not a meter -based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this Ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this Ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Subdivision 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9.3 of the Franchise. • Subdivision 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission allows the utility company to add a surcharge to customer rates to reimburse such utility company for the cost of the fee and that Xcel Energy will surcharge its customers in the City the amount of the fee. Subdivision 5. Record Support for Payment. Xcel Energy shall make each payment . when due and, if required by the City, shall provide at the time of each payment a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total surcharge billed in the period for which the payment is being made to account for any uncollectibles, refunds or error corrections. Subdivision 6. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this Ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subdivision 7. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to Xcel Energy by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading: August 6, 2012 Second Reading: October 16, 2012 Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish In the Edina Sun Current on: Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor • • • SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Electric Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Residential Sm C&I, Non -Dem Sm C&I, Demand Large C&I Amount Per Month $ 1.45 $ 2.90 $ 9.00 $40.00 Franchise fees are to be collected by the Utility at the rate listed below, and submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: iJanuary— March collections due by April 30. April —June collections due by July 31. July — September collections due by October 31. October— December collections due by January 31. 0 STOEL i - s RIVES MEMORANDUM LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 7, 2012 TO: PETER GINDER, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY COREY CONOVER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FROM: KEVIN JOHNSON SARAH JOHNSON PHILLIPS SARA BERGAN RE: City of Minneapolis Utility Franchise Agreements I. Summary • Utility Franchise Agreements. The City of Minneapolis (the "City") currently has electricity and gas utility franchise agreements with the operating subsidiaries of Xcel Energy ("Xcel") and CenterPoint Energy ("CenterPoint"), respectively. These agreements will both expire at the end of 2014, presenting an opportunity for the City to consider its options and priorities for negotiating new agreements. • Scope of the City's Authority. Under its utility franchise agreements, the City imposes a fee on a utility in exchange for the use of public rights-of-way. By statute, the City's authority to regulate electric and gas utilities is generally limited to imposing franchise fees and conditions related to the use of the right-of-way. However, the City has wide latitude to determine the amount, structure, and use of franchise fees. • Rate and Service Regulatory Authority Reserved to the State. Regulatory authority over public utility rates and services is reserved to the state via the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (the "Commission"). As a result, the City does not currently have authority to directly impose renewable energy or conservation targets because such action would be akin to regulating rates and services. New legislation would be required to broaden the scope of the City's authority to regulate utilities. • Use of Franchise Fees. The City has discretion to determine the amount charged and the formula for collecting franchise fees and how funds collected from such fees are used. Therefore, the City may increase or reformulate its utility franchise fees and/or designate some portion of the collected funds for new initiatives. Franchise fees are currently directed to the City's general fund, which means that any new programs would require either an increase in franchise fees or that funds be redirected from another part of the City's budget. • • Franchise Fees Passed Through to Ratepayers. The Commission will allow utilities to recover franchise fees from ratepayers without the scrutiny applied to changes in utility rates, to the extent such fees benefit a city. As a result, Minneapolis residents, businesses, and institutions ultimately bear the burden of paying franchise fees. • Municipalization. An alternative to negotiating franchise agreements with the incumbent utilities is municipalization, which would require a referendum, raising a large amount of money to buy out existing utility infrastructure, and, ultimately, ongoing operation of a municipal utility. This process would require substantial investment of time and resources and would be very controversial. II. General Background A. Minnesota Public Utilities Act of 1974. In the Minnesota Public Utilities Act of 1974, the Minnesota Legislature deemed it in the public interest to avoid the duplication of services by regulating and coordinating natural gas and electric service within the state.' Electric utilities are allowed to serve designated areas on an exclusive basis as regulated monopolies? It also reserved to the state the right to regulate the rates utilities charge.3 "Rate" is defined to include "every compensation, charge, fare, toll, tariff, rental, and classification, or any of them, demanded, observed, charged, or collected by any public utility for any service and any rules, practices, or contracts affecting any such compensation, charge, fare, toll, rental, tariff, or classification."4 The responsibility of the Commission is to ensure that the rates electric and gas utilities charge are just and reasonable.5 B. Municipal Authority. Two statutory provisions grant municipalities in Minnesota authority to require a fee from a public energy utility in exchange for the use of public lands within the municipality.6 The Minnesota Supreme Court recently affirmed that the plain language of these statutes authorizes municipalities to impose a franchise on a public utility.? Commission staff have also recognized that the statute "gives municipalities broad authority to assess franchise fees on utilities." 8 A city may require the utility to obtain a franchise, but the terms and requirements of a franchise may not frustrate the legislature's paramount authority to determine who has the right to serve an assigned area.9 The franchise fee "may include but is not limited to a sum of money based upon gross operating revenues or gross earnings from its operations in the municipality so long as the public utility shall continue to operate in the municipality."10 It also must be obtained "in accordance with the terms, conditions, and limitations of regulatory acts of the municipality."" Within these statutory constraints, franchise fees and other terms and conditions of the franchise are generally determined by mutual agreement. Existing agreements exhibit a fair amount of variety in fee structure. Franchise fees are often billed to customers in the form of a per meter charge, a variable rate determined by customer usage, or as a percentage of the bill. 12 C. Public Utilities Commission/Department of Commerce Oversight. Rate regulated utilities generally have to seek Commission approval in order to change rates or otherwise recover costs from their ratepayers. While the Commission has long recognized that it 2 does not have jurisdiction over whether a city may impose a fee 13 and franchise fees have generally not been considered rates by the Commission, 14 the Commission does have authority over how these fees are charged by utilities to ratepayers. For example, Minn. Stat. § 21613.05 requires public utilities to file with the Commission their schedules showing not only all rates, but also all tolls, tariffs, and charges that it has established.15 In other words, a city's imposition of a franchise fee involves two transactions: (1) the imposition of a fee over which the Commission has no authority and (2) the utility's recovery of the fee over which the Commission does have authority. 16 The Commission generally will not act on other aspects of the franchise agreement between a municipality and the utility, 17 but will review how the fees are passed on to ratepayers. Because of its limited role in reviewing franchise fees, the Commission has strufgled with its direction to utilities regarding filing information associated with franchise fees. s Until recently, fee changes were generally included in miscellaneous tariff filings 19 90 days prior to the imposition of the fee or change in fee 20 But the manner in which utilities filed notice of, and tariffed, the fees varied greatly.21 When a filing was made, the Department of Commerce's Division of Energy Resources (formerly the Office of Energy Security) reviewed utilities' requests to recover franchise fees through ratepayers by assessing: 1) the impact of the proposal on the company's revenues (ensuring that it all flows back to the municipality); 2) the sufficiency of notice to the customers; and 3) the potential for unreasonable preferential treatment for any customer. Franchise fee filings, however, are becoming more frequent as cities are increasingly using franchise fees to offset declines in other city revenue sources. Xcel, for example, administers at least 49 franchise fees and has argued that the filing should be streamlined to avoid an excessive administrative burden on both the utility and the Commission. 23 In two recent cases where a utility attempted to recoup its own costs of administering the franchise fee as part of the franchise fee line item on customer bills, the Commission determined the portion benefiting the utility was more akin to a rate than a franchise fee. 24 While the Commission does.not generally establish, authorize, or endorse a franchise fee, given its limited jurisdiction, the Commission will scrutinize and seek justification for anything that looks like a rate.25 The franchise fees are generally recoverable so long as they exclusively benefit the city and not the utility26 The Commission has jurisdiction over anything that would flow back to benefit the utility and would be particularly concerned about preventing double -recovery of utility costs charged directly to municipal residents through a franchise fee line item and all customers through general rates. [27] In response to the issues and concerns raised by these cases, the Commission sought input on how utilities deal with the franchise fees in their billing and publicly available tariffs.28 Seeing a need for greater uniformity and a more streamlined process, the Commission established a mechanism by which utilities can file to recover franchise fees without prior Commission approval .29 Today utilities give the Commission 60 days' notice prior to 3 • • implementing a franchise fee, include a customer notice on the first bill on which the new or modified fee is listed — consistent with that filed in its approved tariff ° — list the fee as a separate line item on customer bills, file .the relevant ordinance(s) with the Commission, and note in the tariff that 100% of the fees are remitted to the municipality. Utilities following these uniform requirements are then allowed to recoup franchise fees through customer bills without prior Commission approval .31 Just as the Commission does not have authority over fees imposed by the City, it does not have authority over what the City does with the revenue raised through the fees. The statute simply provides that utilities may be obligated to pay municipal fees "to raise revenue or defray increased municipal costs accruing as a result of utility operations, or both." 32 The City has wide latitude to use the recovered funds for purposes of its choosing. D. Current Agreements and Fee Structure Examples 1. CenterPoint a. Minneapolis Agreement with Minnegasco (CenterPoint), January 1, 1992 through December 31, 2014. The City's current franchise agreement grants Minnegasco a nonexclusive 23 -year franchise to construct, operate, repair, and maintain facilities and equipment for the transportation, distribution, manufacture, and sale of gas energy for public and private use and to use the public ground of the City for such purposes. The franchise fees vary from 3% to • 5% of gross revenue, depending on customer class. Percentages for residential buildings increase over the term of the agreement Currently, the largest industrial class of customer pays the lowest fee of 3%, while residential customers pay 4.5% and all other classes of customers pay 5%. b. Other Natural Gas Franchises. In other cities imposing natural gas franchise fees on CenterPoint, the amount and structure of the fees imposed varies considerably. Anoka, for example, imposes a flat fee graduated by customer class and ranging from $3.00 per meter for residential users to $981.80 per meter for the largest industrial user. 33 By contrast, Excelsior imposes a flat fee of $2.50 per meter for all customer classes. 34 Granite Falls includes a percentage -based fee with a cap that is the same for all customer classes, and Minneapolis currently imposes a percentage -based fee that differs by customer class. 3 Many cities also impose a volumetric fee 36 or a volumetric fee combined with a flat fee37 on their natural gas utility. 2. Xcel a. Minneapolis Agreement with Northern States Power (Xcel), January 1, 1994 through December 31, 2014. The City's current franchise agreement grants Northern States Power the right for 21 years to construct, install, enlarge, operate, repair, and maintain, in the City, its electric distribution system and electric transmission lines, for the furnishing of electricity to the City and its inhabitants, and others, and transmitting electricity from, into, and through the 4 City, and to use the streets, alleys, and public grounds of the City for such • purposes. Franchise fees vary from 3% to 5.75% of gross revenue, depending on customer class. Percentages decrease for each customer class over the course of the agreement. b. Other Electricity Franchises. In other cities imposing franchise fees for electric service on Xcel, there are a variety of structures. The Coon Rapids franchise agreement authorizes a fee of up to 5% of Xcel's gross operating revenue from Coon Rapids customers but currently imposes a fee of only 4% of gross earnings. Winsted imposes a flat per account fee that is the same across all customer classes. Hopkins imposes a flat monthly fee that is graduated by customer class, where residential customers pay $1.70 per month and large industrial customers pay $105.00 per month. New Brighton imposes a usage fee that is roughly three times higher for residential customers ($0.0023/kWh) than for large industrial customers ($0.0009/kWh). Sauk Rapids imposes a percentage -based fee that is also dramatically less for larger customers. St. Joseph imposes a graduated flat fee for all customer classes except large industrials, on which it imposes a percentage -based fee. c. St. Paul Agreements with Northern States Power (Xcel), August 31, 2006 through August 30, 2026. In the City of St. Paul's most recent gas and electric franchise renewal, St. Paul decided to impose a more complicated multi- part franchise fee that includes: 1) a per meter flat fee; 2) a monthly energy factor fee (charge per kWh); and 3) a monthly demand factor fee (charge per M). In all • cases, the fees generally vary by customer class and generally increase over the term of the agreement. III. Franchise Fee Options A. Increase Fees. The statute specifically grants the City the right to use the franchise fee to raise general revenue, and the City has long allocated franchise fee revenue to the City's general fund. While there are no statutory limits on how the City uses franchise fee revenue, existing budgetary uses of the current amount of fee revenue could be a constraint to redirecting it to new programs. The City is also free to negotiate higher fees through its franchise agreement and allocate additional monies raised to new programs or initiatives. The statute authorizes the City to impose franchise fees to "raise revenue or defray increased municipal costs accruing as a result of utility operations, or both. ,38 We are not aware of any upper -bound or Commission threshold for reasonable franchise fees, though the City would likely be constrained by other factors such as how much of an increase is reasonable to pass on to City residents and businesses. B. Change Fee Structures. Although the statute provides a percentage of gross operating revenue as one way to structure the fee, it clearly leaves open other possible fee structures. Fee structures vary considerably in existing franchise agreements as discussed in Section II.D above. • 5 • C. Other Contract Terms. The City may want to carefully consider many different aspects of a new franchise agreement. One provision that is getting increased attention is the term of the grant of franchise. Of the recently negotiated franchise agreements with Xcel, several were for 20 -year terms. 39 On the other hand, some negotiated much shorter terms or at least shorter terms for the imposed fee. Mound, for example, passed an ordinance in 2003 imposing a franchise fee for five years on Xcel with a sunset clause. It recently amended the sunset clause to provide for an extension of only one year 40 Likewise, Hopkins recently adjusted its fee and limited the term of the fee to two years "to ensure that there would be a review of the effect and need for these fees."41 IV. Other Options for the City That Require a Legislative Change Aside from increasing or changing the franchise fee structure, the City's ability to require changes to the services Xcel and CenterPoint provide is very limited. Although the issue has not been directly tested at the Commission or in court, the City does not appear to have authority to impose through the franchise agreement a city -based renewable energy standard, conservation goals, or greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. As a result, new legislation would likely be required for the City to regulate utilities in these areas, whether through a franchise agreement or through another mechanism. Other Jurisdictional Example: Ann Arbor, Michigan. When the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency conducted a survey of Midwest franchise agreements, Ann Arbor was the only city that included environmental targets as part of the agreement42 As part of its grant of • franchise, Ann Arbor requires the grantee to obtain certain percentages (escalating over the tenure of the contract) of the electricity supplied from renewable resources and establishes penalties for not meeting the requirements. 3 Ann Arbor also stipulates that the grant of franchise must not result in an increase in CO2 emissions. Notably, Michigan is a partially deregulated state and includes some direct access, and the franchise agreements were entered into before the state had a significant statewide renewable energy standard. However, Michigan law allows for more regulation of utilities by municipalities than does Minnesota law. 44 Because Minnesota law is different, the City does not have the same options available to it that Ann Arbor did. V. Municipal Utility Option As an alternative to negotiating franchise agreements, the City has the option of acquiring the existing utility property and creating its own municipal utility. This would considerably expand the City's authority over utility services. This option, however, is a dramatically more significant investment of human and financial resources than renegotiating agreements with CenterPoint and Xcel. The City would first need a resolution of the city council, ratified by a majority of the voters voting on the question during a special election held for that purpose. ' The City could then elect to either purchase the utility's property pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 21613.45 or acquire the utility's property by eminent domain pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.47. To the extent the • parties could not agree on a purchase price under the first option, the Commission would set a place and time for a public hearing and by order determine the just compensation for the property n to be purchased. The statute provides a list of factors that must be assessed in determining just • compensation, including: "the original cost of the property less depreciation, loss of revenue to the utility, expenses resulting from integration of facilities, and other appropriate factors."46 By statute, court ypointed commissioners in an eminent domain proceeding must also consider the same factors.4 These factors were recently determined by the Minnesota Court of Appeals to preclude a fair market value assessment of the property. 48 Furthermore, the court recognized that these factors were intended to create a higher valuation of the property acquired than that created using a fair market value assessment 49 Therefore, under current law, which is currently under review by the Minnesota Supreme Court,50 acquiring utility property will likely cost more than fair market value because loss of revenue, integration expenses, and other factors must be considered in the process. Other Jurisdictional Example: Boulder, Colorado. Boulder has recently been the subject of considerable attention because of the city council's and voters' recent decision to end the franchise agreement with Xcel and consider creating a municipal utility. After a long franchise negotiation broke down — partially over the language that would be included on the ballot — Boulder voters approved an effort to municipalize. Colorado law provides that the governing body of.each municipality has the power to acquire gas or electric light and power works and distribution systems or to authorize the ownership and maintenance of such systems by others. 51 Notably, even the granting of a franchise requires voter approval52 and must include an express condition that the municipality • has the right and power to purchase or condemn any such works or systems at their fair market value. 53 The November 1, 2011 decision by voters included two parts. The voters approved Ballot Issue No. 2b, which increased and extended Boulder's utility occupation tax, a voter -approved tax that replaced the franchise fee after Boulder's franchise agreement with Xcel expired at the end of 2010.54 Note that Minnesota law governing utility franchise agreements only provides for municipalities to impose an excise tax to replace franchise fees in the limited scenario in which an existing franchise was abrogated or impaired by the adoption of the Minnesota Public Utilities Act in 1974.55 The voters also elected to amend the city charter through the addition of a new Article XIII, "Light and Power Utility," which authorizes and sets the conditions under which the city could establish a municipal Utility. 56 Specifically, it requires that the city can establish a light and power utility only if it can demonstrate, verified by an independent third party, that the utility can acquire the electrical distribution system in Boulder and charge rates that do not exceed those rates charged by Xcel at the time of acquisition. It also requires that the utility demonstrate reliability comparable to Xcel and include a plan for reduced greenhouse gas emissions and increased use of renewable energy.57 Notably, the current cost estimates associated with acquiring Xcel's system in Boulder range from under $200 million to over $1 billion. 58 0 ill • Endnotes 'Minn. Stat. § 216B.01 2 Minn. Stat. §§ 216B.37-.43. 3 See, e.g., Minn. Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, Dep't of Pub. Serv., State of Minn., 523 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1975). 4 Minn. Stat. § 216B.02, subd 5. 'Minn. Stat. § 216B.03. 6 Minn. Stat. § 216B.36 ("Under the license, permit, right, or franchise, the utility may be obligated by any municipality to pay to the municipality fees to raise revenue or defray increased municipal costs accruing as a result of utility operations, or both. The fee may include but is not limited to a sum of money based upon gross operating revenues or gross earnings from its operations in the municipality so long as the public utility shall continue to operate in the municipality, unless upon request of the public utility it is expressly released from the obligation at any time by such municipality."); Minn. Stat. § 301B.01 ("A corporation may be organized to construct, acquire, maintain, or operate internal improvements, including railways, street railways, telegraph and telephone lines, canals, slackwater, or other navigation, dams to create or improve a water supply or to furnish power for public use, and any work for supplying the public, by whatever means, with water, light, heat, or power, including all requisite subways, pipes, and other conduits, and tunnels for transportation of pedestrians. No corporation formed for these purposes may construct, maintain, or operate a railway of any kind, or a subway, pipe line, or other conduit, or a tunnel for transportation of pedestrians in or upon a street, alley, or other public ground of a city, without first obtaining from the city a franchise conferring this right and compensating the city for it."). 7 City of Cohasset v. Minn. Power, 798 N.W.2d 50 (Minn. 2011) (holding that the statutes provide this right even if • the utility is not using the rights-of-way to provide services to the municipality and also holding that the right is not preempted by a state routing permit). s Staff Briefing Papers, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970, at 1 (Feb. 17, 2011). 9 City of Rochester, Relator v. Minn. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, No. CO -90-808, 1990 Minn. App. LEXIS 833 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 1990). 10 Minn Stat. § 216B.36 (emphasis added). n Minn Stat. § 216B.36 12 Order Establishing Franchise Fee Filing Requirements, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Mar. 23, 2011). 13 Order Approving New Gas and Electric Rate Books, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket M-97-985 (Feb. 3, 1998). See also Staff Briefing Papers, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Feb. 17, 2011) ("Thus, if a city chooses to impose a franchise fee on a utility, the utility presumably is obligated to pay it to the city on the date selected by the city through its ordinance. Staff is not aware of any instance in which the Commission would become involved in this piece of the transaction."). 14 Staff Briefing Papers, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Feb. 17, 2011). 1s Minn. Stat. § 216B.05, subd. 1. 16 Staff Bring Papers, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Feb. 17, 2011) ("[I]t appears that a city's imposition of a franchise fee involves two transactions: first, the city's right to impose a franchise fee on the utility; and second, the utility's ability to pass that franchise fee through to the customer. This first transaction, between the city and the utility, generally does not involve the Commission. Thus if a city chooses to impose a franchise fee on a utility, the utility presumably is obligated to pay it to the city on the date selected by the city through its ordinance. Staff is not aware of any instance in which the Commission would become involved in this piece of the transaction. • What the Commission has authority over is the utility's ability to collect the franchise fee from its customers, how it is displayed on the utility bill, and how it is otherwise communicated to customers. Staff therefore agrees with the SRA that a city has the authority to collect a franchise fee from the utility even if the Commission -filing process has not concluded."). E:3 C, 17 See, e.g., Comments of the Minn. Office of Energy Sec., Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-09-1422 (Feb. 10, 20 10) ("Moreover, as noted above, the Commission's actions in this proceeding pertain to the rates that MP charges its customers; the Commission is not acting on the franchise fee agreement between MP and the City of Staples. Thus, the OES concludes that the effective date ofthe franchise fee is a matter between the City of Staples and MP."). 18 Order Approving New Gas and Electric Rate Books, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket M-97-985 (Feb. 3, 1998) ("[T]he Commission notes that it does not have jurisdiction over whether a city may impose a fee or surcharge and finds as a practical matter that the burden on the Company to file a new Surcharge Rider 1 every time a city changes or implements a franchise fee or gross earnings fee outweighs the value of maintaining the Company's tariff as the publicly accessible central location for such information. Accordingly, the Commission will allow the Company to shed its previous practice of maintaining such information as part of its tariff."). 19 Minn. Rules, part 7829.1300. 20 See, e.g., Comments of the Minn. Office of Energy Sec., Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-09-1422 (Feb. 10, 2010) ("MP must seek and obtain the Commission's approval before the Company can recover the costs of the proposed franchise fee as a separate line item on the utility bills it sends to its customers"); see also Minn. Rules, part 7825.3200 (requiring that utilities serve notice to the Commission at least 90 days prior to the effective date of modified rates). 21 Order Establishing Franchise Fee Filing Requirements, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Mar. 23, 2011). 22 See, e.g., Order, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-10-1214 (Feb. 8, 2011). 23 Comments and Filing in Response to Notice Franchise Fees, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (July 6, 20 10) ("As the Commission recognized in its February 3, 1998 Order, Minn. Stat. §216B.36 gives municipalities the authority to impose fees on utilities. Since the Commission does not have authority over the fee • itself, the administrative burden of filing a new Rider each time a city changes or implements a fee could outweigh the benefit of maintaining the specific fee information in the tariff. We currently implement 49 franchise or other city fees on our electric customer bills and over 20 similar fees on our gas customer bills; many of these fees require updates or changes on an annual basis."). 24 See, e.g., Comments of the Minn. Office of Energy Sec., Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-09-1422 (Feb. 10, 20 10) ("The OES concludes that the Commission has thoroughly vetted this issue[sic], including the relevance of Minnesota Statutes, sections 216B.03 and 216B.07, and has concluded that an administrative fee associated with collecting a franchise fee is a rate and must be justified and approved as a rate prior to its imposition."). 25 Id 26 See, e.g., Order Barring Collections ofAdministrative Costs Through Franchise Fee and Requiring Compliance Filing, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-11-1105 (Dec. 30, 2011). 27 Reply Comments of the Minn. Office of Energy Sec. to the Reply Comments of Interstate Power and Light, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-08-200 (Apr. 18, 2008) ("Minnesota Statutes §216B.36 pertains only to the "Municipal Regulatory and Taxing Powers;" it does not pertain to the utility's ratemaking, as the responsibility for such ratemaking falls under the Commission's responsibility. It is important to make this distinction because it would not be reasonable for a municipality to require a utility to charge its customers for costs over and above the franchise fee, since such charges could lead to double -recovery of costs if those costs are recovered in rates charged to the citizens in the municipality and to all of the utility's customers (thus charging the citizens in the municipality twice for such costs). Such a result would violate Minnesota Statutes §216B.03 requiring just and reasonable rates."). 28 Notice Seeking Filings and Comments on Franchise Fees, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (June 7, 2010). 29 Order Establishing Franchise Fee Filing Requirements, Minn. Pub. Util Comm'n. Docket No. CI -09-970 (Mar. • 23, 2011). 0 U 30 See, e.g., Northern States Power Compliance Filing — Franchise Fee Compliance Filing, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No.CI-09-970 (Apr. 21, 2011) ("The Community of [City][adopts/collects] a [$x.xx/$x.xx per kWh/therm/x%][franchise/city] fee on Xcel Energy [electric/gas] accounts effective [date]. The line item appears on your bill as `City Fees.' We pass along 100% of this fee to the community imposing the fee."); see also Franchise Fee Rider in CenterPoint Energy's Informational Filing: Change Tariff to Update Franchise Fee in the City of Eden Prairie, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-12-750 (July 9, 2012) ("The MUNICIPALITY granted CenterPoint Energy a franchise to operate within the city Limits. A Gas franchise fee of x.x% of Gross Revenues/$x.xx per Meter/$x.xx per Therm will be collected from customers effective MM/DD/YYYY. The line item appears on your bill as `City Franchise Fee.' CenterPoint Energy remits 100% of this fee to the MUNICIPALITY."). 31 Order Establishing Franchise Fee Filing Requirements, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Mar. 23, 2011). 32 Minn. Stat. § 216B.36. 33 Informational Filing: Change Tari to Update Franchise Fee in the City of Eden Prairie, Minn. Pub. Util, Comm'n, Docket No. M-12-750 (July 9, 2012). 34 Id. 35 Id 36 Informational Filing: City of Ortonville Franchise Fee, Minn. Pub. Util. Comm'n, Docket No. M-12-68 (Jan. 19, 2012) (Roseau imposes a volumetric fee of $0.01122 per therm, and Nashwauk imposes a volumetric fee of $0.013 per therm on Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation). 37 Id. (Ortonville, for example, imposes a $1.50/month meter charge and a $0.013 charge for every 100 cf of gas • "transported, sold, furnished, or delivered by the Gas Company within the City limits"; Plainview imposes a flat fee of $0.50 plus a volumetric fee that is higher for residential than for industrial users). 36 Minn. Stat. § 21613.36. 39 Informational Filing: Franchise Fee — Winsted,, Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Feb. 13, 2012) (term of 20 years); Informational Filing: Franchise Fee — Clements, Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Apr. 6, 2012) (term of 20 years); Informational Filing: Franchise Fee — Henderson Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Jan. 17, 2012) (Henderson granted a 20 -year franchise to Xcel in August 2011 that at the time did not include an associated fee but provided the option for the city to impose a fee by separate ordinance in the future. By late December 2011, the city had already exercised its option to impose a fee); Informational Filing: Franchise Fee — Coon Rapids, Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Nov. 7, 2011) (term of 20 years). 40 See Informational Filing. Franchise Fee —Mound, Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (June 18, 2012) (amended the automatic sunset clause from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013). 41 See Informational Filing: Franchise Fee — Hopkins, Minnesota, Docket No. CI -09-970 (Oct. 18, 2011) (referencing City Ordinance 2011-1036). 42 Utility Franchise Agreements Summary Report: Research on Municipal Franchise Agreements Gas and Electric Utilities, submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (Dec. 21, 2009), available at http://www.ppa.gov/r5climatechangetpdfs/franchise-agreement-reporkpdf. 43 See, e.g., Ann Arbor Municipal Code § 2:623 (portfolio of renewable energy sources; option to purchase greater percentage of power from renewable energy sources; prohibition against degradation of quality of energy sources). as See Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.54. 45 Minn Stat. § 21613.46. 46 Minn. Stat. § 21613.45. • 47 Minn. Stat. § 21613.47. 48 City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Coop. Power Ass'n, 811 N. W.2d 151 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). 10 • 491d at 160 ("Red River contends that, because eminent -domain proceedings pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.47 are not traditional eminent -domain proceedings, damages are unique and appropriately higher than damages calculated under a fair -market -value analysis. Again, we agree with Red River. We acknowledge that fair market value is the typical method to calculate just compensation in eminent -domain proceedings, but the legislature can require a different method to calculate damages that results in higher -than -market -value damages in certain circumstances."). so City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Co-op, No. All -0705, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 175 (Minn. Apr. 17, 2012) (granting certiorari). 51 Colo. Rev. Stat. § 31-15-707. 52 Colo. Rev. Stat. § 31-15-707(1)(a)(I) (requiring the majority of registered electors voting upon the question in a special election to vote in favor of the provision); see also Boulder Revised Charter, art. VIII, § 108. 53 Colo. Rev. Stat. § 31-15-707(1)(a)(II)("All such works or systems authorized by any municipality to be erected by others or the franchise of which is extended or renewed shall be authorized, extended, or renewed upon the express condition that such municipality has the right and power to purchase or condemn any such works or systems at their fair market value at the time of purchasing or condemning such works or systems, excluding all value of the franchise or right-of-way through the streets ...."); see also Boulder Grant of Franchise to the Public Service Company of Colorado, art. 14 (Purchase Condemnation) (Ordinance No. PO -9302). 54 Boulder City Ordinance Nos. 7769 (20 10) and 7825 (2011). 55 Minn.Stat. § 216B.36. 56 Boulder City Charter, art. XIII, § 178. 57 Id. 58 See, e.g., Mark Jaffe, Boulder voters OK with municipal utility, tax to set it up, The Denver Post (Nov. 2, 2011); • see also Heath Urie, Xcel consultant: Cost of Boulder utility near $1.2B, Daily Camera (July 29, 2011), available at hitp://www.dailycamera.com/engM/ci 18581008. 71749997.10 11 • Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:14 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: FAA requires drones (UAS) to stay 2 nautical miles away from a heliport like the one at Southdale Fairview hospital This FAA regulation places much of Edina in a no fly zone for drones (UAS) and this could include Grandview. https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsld=82245 Under the new policy, the FAA will grant a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (CGA) for flights at or below 200 feet to any UAS operator with a Section 333 exemption for aircraft that weigh less tpan 55 pounds, operate during daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions, operate within visual line of sight (Vt_`)S) of the pilots, and stay certain distances away from airports or heliports: • 5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or • 3 NM from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an operational tower; or 02 NM from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower; or • 2 NM from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure • 1 Heather Branigin From: Ann Swenson <swensonannl@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:21 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Garbage Collection in Edina Wooj, we have done surveys, one informal one just recently on Speak Up Edina and statistically balanced ones too. What comes out is a split of our residents over free choice of companies and the option your neighborhood advocates. One way to get the ball rolling is to get everyone in your neighbor hood to contract with just one hauler. We have asked our energy and environment commission to look at a process for one hauler. The state legislature just passed a law to make it easier to make this switch. Bloomington is trying to do it by dividing their city into one hauler sections but having a different haulers in each section. Try looking on line at the Current paper for Bloomington and you will see the issues. Thanks for the email. Ann Swenson Sent from my iPad On Aug 12, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Edina Mail <mail(c�EdinaMN.gov> wrote: A, t Lynette Biunno, Receptionist t' t 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno(ccDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Woodrow "Wooj" Byun [mailto:woojbyun(a)gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:40 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Garbage Collection in Edina Dear Council Members: My name is Wooj. I am a resident of Edina. For whatever reason, our neighbors asked me to take the lead on this matter on their behalf. They would like to know: "Why the city can't designate just one company to collect all the garbage from all the Edir.a residents?" There may be some cons but I see more pros about doing this. 1. We will have less traffic on Tuesday morning. ( I live at 6836 Oaklawn and every Tues ay morning I see at least 3-5 trucks doing exactly the same.) 2. Less pollution. 3. Less gas burned (from a utilitarian viewpoint). 4. Citizens don't have to deal with marketing calls from competing companies every other month. 5. Citizens will have bargaining power. 1 understand small companies still want to have some market share but is it truly the best fer the citizens? I suggest the city conducts a survey, just to find out what they would like. I am sure you have more important items in your to-do list, but I would appreciate it greatly if you could respond to this • email. Thank you very much. Wooj Sincerely, • Woodrow "Wooj" Byun Woodrow Byun Law Office 7200 France Ave. South #230 Edina, MN 55435 952-926-0040 r. www.woodrowlaw.com "Be Positive. You can change bad news into good news." "Service is the rent you pay for living in this world." • L� Scott & Adrienne Beckett . 5809 Zenith Ave S Edina MN 55410 August 12, 2015 Edina Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th St. Edina MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to express my concern about a recent Planning Commission decision not to grant a variance regarding signage on my employer's building. For some time, we have been petitioning for the logo sign of our firm to be allowed to be installed facing Highway 100. I see this as a way to highlight our company, the city's support of prominent local businesses, and promote the Edina business base. Our petition has been denied, citing an ordinance allowing signage on only the side • of the building facing the official street address. There must be allowances we can gain, as two other large companies - International Dairy Queen and Regis - have signs on building facings other than their street addresses. As both a resident and employee in the city of Edina, l urge you to reconsider this decision and overrule the Planning Commission. We are a thriving and growing company, and SunOpta has added over 100 jobs to the city in the last year. We should be afforded the same opportunity that other local businesses have enjoyed. Best Regards, Adrienne L. Beckett Vice President, Customer Logistics Services SunOpta, Inc. Edina MN • Heather Branigin From: Lambert, Anna Mae <AnnaMaeLambert@edinarealty.com> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:15 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Mayor & City Council, Please know that I sincerely, whole heartedly support this project in Edina. We need to help our young & homeless citizens with support needed to obtain a stable start in life. Jobs, reasonable housing, etc. This project is only going to house strong young people with ambition, courage & good work ethic. Please, please keep this going! Anna Mae Lambert Sent from my iPad • 0 Heather Branigin From: Dawn Grant - IRET <DGrant@iret.com> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:13 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Paul Reinke; Gayle Dreon - IRET Subject: Thank you! Attachments: -MG-0455 425KBjpg; -MG-0455 425KB.jpg; IMG_0545 425KBjpg Mayor Hovland: Thank you so much for attending our event last evening and for speaking. It was a pleasure to meet you and be sure to take good care of your firm member from Cavalier! O I have attached a few photos from the event I thought you might enjoy. Dawn Dawn M. Grant, COM, CPM, RPA Director of Commercial Asset Management IRET Properties 10050 Crosstown Circle Suite 105 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952.401.4831 (phone) 1952.401.7058 (fax) dgrant@iret.com www.iret.com I NYSE Symbol: IRET a subsidiary of Investors Real Estate Trust 1 • 0 Heather Branigin *From: Elizabeth Burger <elizabethburger2@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 8:47 PM To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Tony Burger Subject: Re: Meeting at 6629 West Shore Dr. Hello Council Members, My apologies in thinking that the 5 of you would be able to stop by our property next Monday evening. Tony and I were not aware of the law that states no more than two city officials can attend outside meetings. Just wanted to inform you all that Jim Hovland will be stopping by tomorrow morning and Ann Swenson will be coming early evening next Monday. Please feel free to come either of those days, if possible, or contact us about another time. Thank you for your support, Liz and Tony ,On Monday, August 10, 2015, Elizabeth Burger <elizabethburger2ga,gmail.com> wrote: Hello Council Members, As you know, my husband, Tony Burger and I, have a house project that we would like to do on our residence at 6629 West Shore Drive. We have been to 2 City Council meetings, a Park Board meeting and a Planning Commission meeting this summer. We are on the agenda for the August 18th City Council meeting as well. We would like to invite you to our property on Monday, August 17 at 5:30 pm. It may help you to see our unique situation before making your decision at the City Council meeting the following evening. When you have a chance, please respond to either myself or Tony to let us know if you are able to make it. We are flexible with the time and are happy to change that to a time that may work better for you all. Thank you for your understanding and time, and we look forward to seeing you. Liz and Tony Burger 0 Heather Branigin From: Orthey, Chris <Christopher.S.Orthey@pjc.com> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:25 AM Subject: 6620 West Shore Drive project Hello, I am writing to give my support to the project at 6620 West Shore. I looked over the proposed land swap and I am very comfortable w/ the proposal. We live across the street on Laguna Drive and my family completely supports the Burgers and we feel it will be a benefit to the neighborhood. Our family would attend the August 18th meeting but we will taking our oldest daughter to college that day so unable to attend. Again, we completely support the Burgers project and proposed land swap by the city of Edina. Thank you, Chris and Alessandra Orthey Chris Orthey Institutional Equity Sales Trading Piper Jaffray & Co. (612)303-6835 AOL IM: corthey3pjc christopher.s. ortltey(ic ,Pic. com • This message is a product of the Piper Jaffray Institutional Sales and Trading group and should not be construed as impartial research or a research report. For disclosure information with respect to the companies mentioned in this message, please visit www.piperiaffray.com/researchdisclosures. The information regarding the subject companies is based on data obtained from sources deemed to be reliable; t is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. This message is solely for informational purposes and is not intended to be used as the primary basis of investment decisions. Piper Jaffray has not assessed the suitability of the subject companies for any person. Because of individual client requirements, it is not, and it should not be construed as, advice designed to meet the particular investment needs of any investor. This message is not an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or buy any security. Addiional information is available upon request. Piper Jaffray & Co. Since 1896, Member SIPC and NYSE. Lear more at www.piperlaffray.com. Piper Jaffray corporate headquarters is located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55402. Piper Jaffray outgoing and incoming e-mail is electronically archived and recorded and is subject to review, monitoring and/or disclosure to someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may be considered an advertisement or solicitation for purposes of regulation of commercial electronic mail messages. If you do not wish to receive commercial e-mail communications from Piper Jaflray, go to: www oioeriaffray.com/do not email to review the details and submit your request to be added to the Piper Jaffray "Do Not E-mail Registry." For additional disclosure information see www.piperiaillray.corn/disclosure 0 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 18, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin •From: Kauffman Foundation <updates@kauffman.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:26 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Attend the Mayors Conference and Compete in the Recipes for Growth City Challenge Attend the Mayors Conference on EntrepreneU!rship and Enter Contest to Win $25,000 for Your Cjty You are invited to attend the 2015 Mayors Conference on EntreL> eneurship in Albuquerque, NM, October 6-8, 2015, and to participate in the RDcipes for Growth City Challenge. • The challenge asks cities to propose a plan for how to achieve an entrepreneurship - oriented objective within their city. The objectives to choose from are: • Increase rates of firm formation and success in your city. • Increase connectivity between entrepreneurship support organizations and/or entrepreneurs in your city. • Improve or implement processes for collecting data to beiser understand and assess your city's entrepreneurship ecosystem. • Leverage entrepreneurship to increase economic opportunities for minorities and under -served populations in your city. A limited number of city proposals will be selected as finalists, and those mayors will be given the opportunity to pitch their city's idea in five minutes k,,efore a panel of expert judges and their colleagues at the Mayors Conference ornThursday morning, October 8, 2015. Judges will award a $25,000 planning grant frr€'n the Kauffman Foundation to the winning city to assist in the implementation of _'he proposal. Register today for the Mayors Conference, and enter the Recipf s for Growth Cit/ Challenge. The Kauffman Foundation will cover travel expenses, includingfirfare, hotel, meals, • and ground transportation while in Albuquerque. Conference registration deadline is Wednesday, September 9, ;015, and the Recipes for Growth City Challenge entry deadline is Friday, September 18, 2015. For questions, contact Mette Kramer at mkramerCcDkauffman.org or 816-932-1174. Follow the conversation on Twitter, #mayorsconf. t I .r i' Ewing Marion KAU FFMAN Foundation We re• xp&N your; igttt to privacy - view our Policy li {oU �i0iti(1 I!kE) ttl li�i(tatN so�.tr ¢FCf'`i1P, or a suf)x.nb . pleast3 viS$ `}le -fp ofle-u'pnter. .a 2ii? {i9ttf tfl!1 Ft:it'?dettor. Ali 1!!7t!(;; re;it'ry9t�. {8i i Si32-1000 48D 1 2uW:i1i Road. Kar6aa City. INIO C'41,1:.) 2 • is Heather Branigin 0-rom: Sent: To: Subject: CJ Gilda's Club Twin Cities <info@gildasclubtwincities.org> Thursday, August 13, 2015 2:20 PM James Hovland REMINDER You're Invited I Happy Hour at,Gilda's Club, Gilda's Club Twin Cities Spend your happy hour with us and unleash the power of telling your personal story. Long-time friends of Gilda's Club, John Capecci and Tim Cage, are launching their new edition of Living Proof. Telling Your Story to Make a Difference - and they want to share it with you. ' low W,ecai mer Dolan. "Smart, well -delivered and timely advice to help LivingD advocates and spokespersons tell the most effective stories." - Kirkus Reviews When? Wednesday, August 19 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. 6:15 p.m. Authors will share stories from the new edition and sign books. Where? Gilda's Club Twin Cities Clubhouse 10560 Wayzata Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55305 612.227.2147 Complimentary hors d'oeuvres and beverages. I Li O,imla On & Sages i�?oPBpAliS- Ai�nnelonka ,y Drawings for personal story coaching, books and more. Books will be available with all proceeds going to Gilda's Club Twin Cities, where no one faces cancer alone. RSVP We'd appreciate an RSVP to help with the planning. Please pass this invitation along or bring a friend. If you cannot attend, please consider making a py' contribution to Gilda's Club by visiting SAV c�� GiIdasClubTwinCities.org/Give.COD O We hope to see you August 19! � � tiw CANCEN SUPPORT CO TMUM-TY Gilda's Club Twin Cities 1 612.227.2147 1 www.GildasClubTwinCities.org STAY CONNECTED: Forward this email This email was sent to jhovland@edinamn.gov by infoCa gildasclubtwincities.org Update Profile/Email Address Rapid removal with SafeUnsubscribeT1 About our service provider. Gilda's Club Twin Cities 10560 Wayzata Blvd Minnetonka MN 55305 2 • U • • 0 i VIA K: OMMAT'Vel VA fflpf N 7bul, QTA ADVERTt5EMENT FOR BIDS INTERLACHEN B6U SIDEWALK= PHASE I BIDS tAUGU §T20,2015 SEALED BIDS W11*4 be received and ." edjq -�d, Edin Conferea Conference Ro6mA Blvd, 046lic Works ftkn and Pa,MtQ'patjqe:fa6I1Ity, 7450 Metro a a * t 2:00 p.- i rsdayAugtjstgR,Z81*0.Thq,E Ina. Cfty.:Cbuncil o4li mpel at 7:pq op �aso4y, Sep!:Larnlbor 1,'201I5'to consider said bids. The fol- -loWifig * dpproxlffiate rnaj6r.quantftI6e 4"CONCRETE WALK 8,279 Sp 1 6!'CONCRqp WALK - (HE -4,1964 r SS dONbRErE CURB AND GLM— .;213 LF . I? IAN B618 -, MND FORM 6. CONCRETE APRON. 246 $Y FURN18H-AND INSTALLp,.T A[1,41ING ALL ..,_ SAWING - PAVEMENT 8 4. '-LF COMMON EXCAVATION 0M- 7 7B TOPS RROW(M0'RJF-IE0)(IM SEED1,888 SY `Bids shall bein a 6eil4d r'., i0 ­p p w.�'h-. �atfttement thereon sh6WIng the work d5vtiea by the bid.'Bidt'shoUrdbe addressed to the City-Engf- neer, City of Edipa; 7450 Metro . Blvd, Edina, Mlbnescta 8509, and may be milled ors6bmitt6d Wstnally. Bids received by thetity Engineer, -eft i er throtigh the Tell prby bprsonji.Aupmlsil6n,'aftei the time set. for receiving them may be rei6&d u'hppenad,,' Digital plinsare available jqr.a nQr)-refundable:fq-6 of Uwjb 4-huPY/ AiwW.'city6fedifia.c6th/dbgirii(OHQ'urdet: Constructlon,-Prpjec#�'c ziit hffp-:/ q6L!stddri.ccifti::)=ht6P'46ldDdo #4049201. N6 olds will be comi"d Vn!00 sealed and accompanied, by. bid bond 'or 6,tm City bf. Edir-41 6!fktl"Aye cirfified Ohbdk 0-4yobl.o.:t. b aniount. 6f 61t 61 * b -d he.tjl' ht to or percent (5%) dr. . Wtipa all 'bids .pr.anypor-tIQh-thereof, % BY ORDER OF THE EDINA crfybOQN.Cjk�-% 0,abh aDebre & ng Oily Clerk -8A3/76; =11, 6ldli'li#4via4hen $Iq J.— Heather Branigin From: Pat Wertwijn <Pwertwijn@comcast.net> • Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 10:18 AM To: sean.broom@mail.house.gov; johnpaul.yates@mail.house.gov; rep.paul.thissen@house.mn; rep.frank. hornstein@house.mn; sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn; sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn; betsy.hodges@minneapolismn.gov; Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long-term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Pat Wertwijn Pwertwiin@comcast.net Edina, MN • • Heather Branigin Orom: Ralph Zickert <43llTwin0aks@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 5:07 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; SwensonAnnl @Gmail.com; Cary Teague Cc: Hayward, Ed Subject: Land Exchange (Lot Line Adjustment Attachments: Land Exchange 6629 Lake Shore Drive.pdf Good Evening, Both below and as an attached PDF are my thoughts on the Land Exchange up for discussion this Tuesday evening, August 18tH Regards, Ralph Zickert • August 15, 2015 To: Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, and Community Development Director - Cary Teague Subject: Land Exchange (Lot Line Adjustment) 6629 West Shore Drive. Liz and Tony Burger My name is Ralph Zickert, I am a 25 year Edina resident and a homeowner on Lake Cornelia for the past 3 years. I am opposed to all options as they are currently outlined before the Council, in particular the sale of City property. I do however believe there is an accommodation that can satisfy both the Burgers and the Council. Why the swap currently proposed is not appropriate: Most importantly, the proposed swap is opposed by the only neighbor directly affected, Ed and Ellie Hayward. Therefore approval would be to the benefit of one neighbor at the detriment of another with no benefit to the City. Also, as noted in the July14, 2015, Park Board minutes, no members supported the swap and three specifically noted the highly irregular configuration as the basis for their decision. Six members expressed a preference that the Burgers pursue a variance. Why a variance is currently not appropriate: The Planning Commission's minutes of July 22, 2015 noted: "Even with a variance, the construction would require encroachment into the park land." (italics and emphasis added) Two items that deserve an answer are: "Did the 2008 approved variance, which was allowed to expire, result in 'encroachment into the park land' and the Planning Commission failed to notice the encroachment or have the Burger's, changed their plans since 200$?" and 2) has the current addition been formalized. in plans that have been submitted to the City. I would hope both these questions could be answered • at the council meeting. Possible solution: Appendix A below is a hand sketched representation of a solution that addresses many of the expressed concerns. If such an option could be supported by Ed and Ellie Hayward, I too could support it in spite of there being no direct benefit to the City. I believe it could be supported by the Council as a good faith gesture to clear an open conflict with 1) the original development of the lot and 2) current building codes. Both of which would be key to moving forward with a highly unusual transaction. However, if any swap or sale option is approved, I strongly encourage the Council to include verbiage that the transaction 1) be contingent upon the Burger's building a second story on the existin house, 2) that similar to an unused variance, the swap would expire after two years and the land revert back to the City if the addition is not completed, and 3) no other variances be requested to accommodate the addition. I believe these are all reasonable conditions given the time and effort devoted to the issue by the City and the conditions under which approval was requested. And, if the Burgers are not in a position to make such a commitment, then the issue should be tabled until they can. Regards, R Cph Zickert 0 Appendix A For the area deeded to the City, extend the existing City lot line, that runs behind the six homes to is the left of the Burger's, along the same tangent a sufficient distance to create an area greater than or equal to the smallest area needed to accommodate the proposed addition. For the area deeded to the Burgers, as was noted in the July 22, 2015, Planning Commission Staff Report, provide relief where it is most needed at "the Northwest conger of the house". Therefore, utilizing the current comer marker for 6629 Lakeshore Drive (the Burgers) and 4520 Laguna Drive (the Tamtes), position the 'triangle' so the peak is to the Northwest providing the most relief to the original positioning of the house. This also helps preserve neighbor sight lines from the east. • rt3lFel. Vvir� i"�o • Neighborhob4} Straw ti ck 0 3 ; � F3. y `w 1p& Cao •� 6 4FOfl 0 Map C---7/Hybrid (43) W 2 K (46) bb 87 -201` H.. ,nep�n C: ..nil Heather Braniain From: Elizabeth McLaughlin <elizabeth.v.mclaughlin@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 8:02 PM To: sean.broom@mail.house.gov, johnpaul.yates@mail.house.gov; rep. paul.thissen@house.mn; rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn; sen.scott.dibble@senate. mn; sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn; betsy.hodges@minneapolismn.gov, Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO: U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long-term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Elizabeth McLaughlin elizabeth.v.mclaughlin@gmail.com Minneapolis, Minnesota • 0 Heather Branigin iFrom: Michael McLaughlin <mclaughlin.mj@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 8:03 PM To: sean.broom@mail.house.gov; johnpaul.yates@mail.house.gov; rep.paul.thissen@house.mn; rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn; sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn; sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn; betsy.hodges@minneapolismn.gov, Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long-term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Michael McLaughlin mclaughlin.mi@gmail.com Minneapolis, Minnesota C Heather Braniain From: Robert Stewart • Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 11:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Garbage Collection in Edina Dear Wooj, I think we will have this issue re -considered as the existing arrangement reaches the end of its term. One important aspect that you did not mention is the wear on our streets. Garbage trucks represent some of the heaviest loads that are regularly on our streets, reducing the number of trucks substantially will certainly extend the life of our street surfaces. I'm not sure if the current arrangement is by contract or without documentation. I will ask. Thank you for taking the time to let us know your perspective. - Bob Stewart From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:35 AM Subject: FW: Garbage Collection in Edina Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno(caEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ti ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Woodrow "Woof" Byun [mailto:woojbyun@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:40 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Garbage Collection in Edina Dear Council Members: My name is Wooj. I am a resident of Edina. For whatever reason, our neighbors asked me to take the lead on this matter on their behalf. They would like to know: "Why the city can't designate just one company to collect all the garbage from all the Edina residents?" There may be some cons but I see more pros about doing this. 1. We will have less traffic on Tuesday morning. ( I live at 6836 Oaklawn and every Tuesday morning I see at least 3-5 trucks doing exactly the same.) 2. Less pollution. 3. Less gas burned (from a utilitarian viewpoint). 4. Citizens don't have to deal with marketing calls from competing companies every other month. 5. Citizens will have bargaining power. I understand small companies still want to have some market share but is it truly the best for the citizens? I suggest the city conducts a survey, just to find out what they would like. I am sure you have more important items in your to-do list, but I would appreciate it greatly if you could respond to this email. Thank you very much. Wooj • Sincerely, Woodrow "Wooj" Byun Woodrow Byun Law Office 7200 France Ave. South #230 Edina, MN 55435 952-926-0040 www.woodrowlaw.com "Be Positive. You can change bad news into good news." "Service is the rent you pay for living in this world." is Heather Braniain From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> • Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:27 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Editorial : Police -community relations: Let's end our love affair with the traffic stop Edina needs to review its policy of excessive freeway speed enforcement. I drove to Fargo, ND this weekend and saw 3 MN State Patrol cars, no county or municipal law enforcement on the freeway in MN or ND. This editorial is by a Univ of CA law professor appeared in the Sunday Star Tribune. David Frenkel http://www. startribune. com/police-community-relations-let-s-end-our-love-affair-with-the-traffic- stop/321927221 / It's a veritable ritual in this country, and it's a recipe for trouble. By Christopher Kutz AUGUST 14, 2015 - 7:09PM TEXT SIZE 17 144 EMAIL PRINT 0 MORE In one video after another this year, we've seen police stops of African-American drivers go violently, terribly wrong. Think of Walter Scott, killed by a police officer in North Charleston, S.C., after a traffic stop for a broken taillight. Or Sandra Bland, pulled over for failure to signal a lane change, and after a confrontation with a Texas, state trooper, hauled off to jail, where she died. Or Samuel DuBose, fatally shot by a University of Cincinnati police officer after being pulled over for a missing license tag. They should never have been stopped by police at all. Nor should be the vast majority of Americans who are pulled over in our national ritual of the traffic stop. .In a unanimous but highly regrettable 1996 decision, Whren vs. United States, the Supreme Court held that any traffic infraction can justify a police stop, even if the officer's actual motive is "pretextual" — that is to say, the officer really wants to search for drugs and weapons in the car because of the "profile" of the driver. Given the countless violations all drivers commit daily — exceeding the speed limit, staying too long in the passing lane, following too closely — the effect of Whren is that police are almost completely shielded from legal review of their decision to stop a driver. But minor traffic violations, by definition, pose no significant immediate threat and represent only a marginal increase in risk to road safety. On the other hand, every stop brings a substantial danger to the law enforcement officer: Car and motorcycle accidents and being struck by vehicles are a leading cause of death in the line of duty. Stops also produce a significant risk of escalation and confrontation, with tragic outcomes. We do not need to accept the traffic stop as the price of public safety. I have driven many miles in other countries, and I have never seen a traffic stop of the sort that I witness nearly daily in California. While precise data are difficult to secure, Americans experience police traffic stops at a rate of about 9,90o per 100,000 citizens, according to a Justice Department survey. By contrast, government reports in England and Wales show traffic stops occur at a rate of only about 2,200 per 100,000; and in France, 2,76o per 100,000. My calculations for Spain, based on its raw number of citations, is about 3,000 per 100,000. The remarkable fact is that fewer traffic stops do not result in more fatal accidents, according to World Health •Organization data. The above-mentioned countries, which have aggressive driving cultures, have 40 percent to 6o percent of the U.S. fatal accident rate, despite traffic stops being made 20 percent to 30 percent as often. One reason for this divergence is that these countries, like many others, enforce their speeding laws primarily through radar systems that automatically generate tickets. Red-light cameras also account for a significant proportion of fines. The benefit of camera systems is not only that they permit more extensive enforcement of laws against genuinely dangerous driving behavior, but they do so without racial bias. No camera has ever Tased or shot an unarmed driver. Americans, both politically progressive and conservative, are coming to realize that aspects of our criminal - justice policies put us out of step with the developed nations we regard as peers, from our apparent tolerance of rampage shootings to our system of mass incarceration. Traffic stops, too, are more typically associated with countries with notoriously corrupt police forces, where they are the pretext for a shakedown. Indeed, the Department of Justice's report on the police department in Ferguson, Mo., made clear that traffic stops were used primarily as a means of milking minority drivers (who are less likely to contest their citations) for traffic fines. So no legitimate concern with road safety compels us to continue with the traffic stop, even if it is legally permissible. Any municipal police chief can simply undertake a quiet, and easily reversible, experiment: Reserve the traffic stop for objectively and imminently dangerous road behaviors, and observe the effects on crime rates •and traffic accidents. Local, state and federal government also could encourage the use of red-light and speed cameras, which would surely issue as many or more tickets as traffic patrol officers. Any purported benefit of frequent traffic stops — for example the slim chance of apprehending wanted criminals — has to be set off against the resentment they engender. Curtailing traffic stops wouldn't solve the problem of police violence against blacks and Latinos, but it would • reduce exposure to "driving while black" harassment and the collateral harms of the legal process. Police could concentrate their efforts on serious crime and immediate safety risks while traffic engineers implemented alternative ways to improve road safety. And all citizens could enjoy more freedom from overzealous and unproductive policing. Christopher Kutz is a professor of law in the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program at the University of California, Berkeley Law School. He wrote this article for the Los Angeles Times. • 0 Heather Branigin •From: robert lieving <rob@lieving.com> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:32 AM To: sean.broom@mail.house.gov, johnpaul.yates@mail.house.gov; rep.paul.thissen@house.mn; rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn; sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn; sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn; betsy.hodges@minneapolismn.gov, Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO: U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton • Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long-term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, robert lieving rob@lieving.com 3905 Washburn Ave S Minneapolis, MN • Heather Braniain From: ICLEI Secretary General's Office <secretary.general@iclei.org> • Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:26 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Karen M. Kurt Subject: Exclusive briefing to ICLEI Members on highlighted events for Local Governments at COP21 Attachments: ANNEX 1 - OVERVIEW OF EVENTS AT COP21.pdf, ANNEX 2 - CITIES AND REGIONS PAVILION DRAFT PROGRAM.pdf, ANNEX 3 - CLIMATE SUMMIT FOR LOCAL LEADERS 4 DECEMBER.pdf, ANNEX 4 - PROPOSALS AND CALENDAR TOWARDS COP21.pdf; ICLEI COP 21 briefing to members _City of Edina_20150817.pdf Dear James B. Hovland, It is my pleasure to share with you an exclusive briefing for ICLEI Members informing you of highlighted events for local governments at COP21, 30 November -11 December 2015 in Paris, France. Please find attached a letter and a number of annexes outlining the events and activities at COP21 which we would like to bring to your attention, along with the status of UNFCCC negotiations to date. Should you need advice on which dates you should come to the COP, as well as potential speaking opportunities at events in the Cities and Regions Pavilion, please contact COP21 Coordinator Marie -Sophie Beier through cop2l.pavilion@iclei.org I look forward to hearing from you in relation to your planned participation in Paris this December. Kind regards, Gino Van Begin, Secretary General ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability • ANNEX 3 0 SAVE THE DATE - 4 DECEMBER 2015 CLIMATE SUMMIT FOR LOCAL LEADERS z Paris climate action z Paris pour le climat Anne Hidalgo Maire de Paris • & Michael R. Bloomberg U.N. Secretary -General's Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change Invite you to SAVE THE DATE Forthe CLIMATE SUMMIT FOR LOCAL LEADERS SOMMET DES ELUS LOCAUX POUR LE CLIMAT December 4, 2015 Le 4 decembre 2015 Paris City Hall a I'Hotel de Ville de Paris For more information and to RSVP please visit: climatesummitlocalleaders.paris Pour plus d'information et confirmer votre presence, rendez-vows sur: eluslocauxpourleclimat.paris /^ U C Ll7 THE'CLIMATE GROUP ■■■■■ an a u�u CORE C �� United Cites and Local Governments - -- �� L'Europe ii FMDV Climate AMance energyettles locale & rEgionale • ,. LC ` Lr` E CI ,. ; ^.. . , Governments REGIONS Of 1 PIRTFORMR CLIMATE ACTION ��- ^"""'""� "'�'"^"' E E } WORLD L p "l, RESOURCES nr� &D r� 0���iii for Sustainability 1N STITUTE 'i Local Government 1 -L L L-1 Climate Roadmap Local rneiszors Recognize P Engage • Empower Governments co P21 -P11 for Sustainability ANNEX 4: EXCLUSIVE BRIEFING FOR ICLEI MEMBERS PROPOSALS OF LOCAL AND SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTSI 3 -PILLARS AND 10- ACTIONS TOWARDS PARIS20152 I. Advance global negotiations — An inclusive and ambitious Paris2015 Outcome We urge national governments to mandate their UNFCCC Negotiators to; 1. Include of the below paragraph in the negotiation text3 : "Recalling para.7 of Dec.11CP16 adopted at COP16 in Cancun in 2010 that recognizes local and subnational governments as „governmental stakeholders". and Further recalling para.5b of Dec.11CP19 adopted at COP19 in Warsaw in 2013 that recognizes role of cities and subnational authorities in raising pre2020 ambition, Parties to the UNFCCC should, as appropriate, seek to engage their local and subnational governments, as appropriate, to achieve the objectives of the Convention and the implementation of the Paris2015 Outcomes, by developing policy tools, guidelines and programmes, providing technical, financial, institutional assistance and/or guidance, as appropriate, to support their national contributions, plans, commitments and actions, in line with other relevant governance arrangements established by their national Governments" 2. Adopt a 10 -Year Work Programme for local and subnational governments, as an outcome of Technical Examination Process and Meetings (TEP/TEM) on Urban Environment,° that will set a framework within UNFCCC. 3. Strengthen dialogue and collaboration with national governments through the Friends of Cities. 4. Ensure synergies with other Post2015 development agenda negotiations, in particular on the Sustainable Development Goals, Financing for Development, Disaster Risk Reduction and HABITATIII Conference. II. Enhance vertical integration — Effective multilevel governance We urge national governments to mandate their agencies responsible for climate policies to; 5. Engage local and regional governments in the preparation and implementation of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPS), amongst others. 6. Upon submission of INDCs, continue to explore innovative formulations to raise and complement pre -2020 ambitions at the national and global level, through ambitious voluntary commitments of local and regional governments. III. Accelerate local and subnational climate action — Strengthened partnerships We invite local and regional governments, together with their networks and their partners; 7. Expressing their intent and ensure compliance with Compact of Mayors and Compact of States and Regions. s. Actively engage in the Lima -Paris -Action -Agenda LPAA). 9. Increase the number of entries and diversify the information visible at the Non -State Actors Zone for Climate Action Platform (NAZCA), through the carbonn Climate Registry, and others as appropriate. 1o. Actively contribute in the Transformative Actions Program TAP and Transformative Actions Pavilion at COP21/CMP11. I These proposals, as of July 2015, are presented by ICLEI— Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) in its capacity as the focal point of the Local Governments and Municipal Authorities (LGMA) Constituency to the UNFCCC and facilitator of the Local Government Climate Roadmapwith a View for further collaboration within the Constituency and the Roadmap as well as with the UNFCCC negotiators and partners at all levels. Z "Lima united countries for climate action, Paris must bring all actors on board. Without the full engagement of all actors, there is a high risk of failure, considering the existing huge gap between the currentnational mitigation pledges and the recommendations proposed by science." ICLEI Post -Lima Press Release, 17 December 2014. Overview of the Lima Outcomes for local and subnational governments (ppt). 3 A version of this text was contained in para 37a and 37b of a draft negotiation text of ADP Co -Chairs ahead of COP20/CMP10. Similar text was adopted by national governments in para19(f) of the Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 as a result of the 3rd World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR) held in March 2015: "While the enabling, guiding and coordinating role of national and federal State Governments remain essential, itis necessary to empower local authorities and local communities to reduce disaster risk, including through resources, incentives and decision, making responsibilities, as appropriate; " This Action Plan will primarily aim to implement policy options presented at the ADP 2014 Technical Paper para.156-164, by strengthening the good practices and removing the barriers as summarized in the Technical Paper Addendum. A 10 -Year "Plan of Action on Subnational Governments, Cities and Local Authorities for Biodiversity " was already adopted by the national governments at the 101h Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity as Dec.X/22 in Nagoya in 2010 and contained in para. 10 of the 2013 Nantes Declaration of Mayors and Subnational Leaders on Climate Change, adopted in September 2013. 0 Local Government I C L E I ",00 Climate Roadmap FAalSzots Recognize - Engage • Empower Local C-11 Governments for Sustainability 0 ANNEX 4: EXCLUSIVE BRIEFING FOR ICLEI MEMBERS (continued) CALENDAR OF KEY EVENTS RELATED TO LOCAL AND SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS in 2015 TOWARDS COP2I/CMP11 (subject to updates and revision) 1. 24 August, National Clean Energy Summit, Las Vegas, USA 2. 31 August — 4 September, UNFCCC ADP2.10, Bonn, Germany 3. 15-16 September, US -China Cities Climate Summit, Los Angeles, USA 4. 20-23 September, Bogota Climate Summit, Bogota, Colombia 5. 21-28 September, ClimateWeekNYC 2015, New York, USA 6. 24 September, ICLEI ClimateWeekNYC 2015 Event and SDSN-NYC SDG Event, New York, USA 7. 25-27 Sept, UN Post2015 Summit, New York, USA 0 8. 27 September, Global Task Force event on SDGs, New York, USA 9. 28 September, MultiStakeholder Meeting on Sustainable Urban Development, New York, USA 10. 1-31 October, Urban October, including 6 October World Habitat Day and 31 October Day 11. 1-2 October, International Conference on Climate Action, Hannover, Germany 12. 5-9 October, International Dialogues on Transport and Climate within the scope of 2nd World Ecomobility Festival, Johannesburg, South Africa 13. 15 October, Launch of European Covenant of Mayors 2030, Brussels, Belgium 14. 14-16 October, Local Climate Solutions for Africa (LOCS2015), Durban, South Africa 15. 16 October, 6th OECD Roundtable for Mayors and Ministers, Mexico City, Mexico 16. 19-23 October, UN FCCC ADP2.11, Bonn, Germany 17. 23-24 October, Bristol Debates -City Leaders Summit, 2015 European Green Capital is Programme, Bristol, UK James B. Hovland Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina 55424 MN United States Bonn/Germany, 17 August 2015 Exclusive briefing to ICLEI Members on highlighted events for Local Governments at COP21, 30 November -11 December 2015 in Paris -Le Bourget, France Dear James B. Hovland, This message is presented as an exclusive service to Members of ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability to provide an update on the current negotiations and support your preparations for the UN Paris Climate Change Conference (COP21/CMP11), taking place in Paris -Le Bourget, France, from 30 November -11 December 2015. ICLEI, in its capacity as the focal point of Local Governments and Municipal Authorities (LGMA) Constituency to the UNFCCC since 1995, and facilitator of the Local Government Climate Roadmap since 2007, has been leading the global advocacy of local and subnational governments in the climate negotiations. The ultimate goal in these efforts is to ensure recognition, engagement and empowerment of local and subnational governments as governmental stakeholders in an inclusive and ambitious global climate regime. Certain progress has been achieved in terms of recognition through decisions of the Conferences in 2010 and 2013. However, the current negotiation text as of July 2015 that will set the basis for the Paris Package as outcomes of COP21/CMP11 is far below the level of satisfaction for our ultimate goals. Prior to Paris, there will be two more rounds of talks in early September and late October in Bonn. Thus, it is still important to demonstrate the ambitions of local climate action. One important mechanism is expression of compliance to the Compact of Mayors, which ICLEI with partners launched at the UN Climate Summit in 2014. During COP21/CMP11, events related to local and subnational governments will be compiled under the Local Government Climate Roadmap — Paris Dialogues. This compilation builds on the experiences in Warsaw (COP19/CMP9, 2013), Lima (COP20/CMP10, 2014) and Bonn (2014 and 2015). The overall agenda consists of: 1. Climate Summit for Local Leaders on 4 December 2015 2. Cities and Regions Pavilion —TAP 2015, 30 November -11 December 2015 3. Special Events of the networks independent from the UNFCCC agenda 4. UNFCCC Blue Zone Activities 5. Other events convened by partners in the City of Paris 1C'LL1 Local Governments for Sustainability ICLEI's mission is to build and in serve a worldwide movement of local governments to achieve tangible improvements in global sustainability with special focus on environmental conditions through cumulative local actions. Secretary General ICLEI World Secretariat Kaiser-Friedrich-Str. 7 53113 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228/976299-11 Fax: +49-228/976299-01 Email: secretary.general@iclei.org Legally represented by ICLEI e.V., Bonn World Wide Web www.iclei.org n LJ The leading global network of 12 mega -cities, 100 super -cities and urban regions, 450 large cities, and 450 small and medium -sized cities and towns Follow the Secretary General on Please find attached a calendar overview of key events at COP21. (Annex 1) The Cities and Regions Pavilion — TAP2015 will be the advocacy base of local and subnational governments at the COP21 site in Paris located nearby to the UNFCCC Blue Zone at the Climate Generations Space. The Pavilion is co -hosted by Paris and Bristol, and is developed within the scope of the Transformative Action Program (TAP). It will offer a full program of debate, special thematic sessions, presentations, and exchanges across the wide range of themes relating to climate change for the entire duration of the Conference (See Annex2 for details). Below is a list of certain special events that are of particular importance for ICLEI: • 3 December 2015: TRI -GV: The Third Industrial Revolution Train ICLEI Member region Nord -Pas de Calais (France) invites ICLEI Members on a special journey into the heart of the "Third Industrial Revolution". This side event will offer delegates and other stakeholders a chance to visit Loos-en-Gohelle — a small town that has made exceptional progress on transformation and sustainability. • 4 December 2015: Climate Summit for Local Leaders -Paris City Hall The summit expects to attract 1000 mayors and other local leaders and is co-chaired by Mayor Anne Hidalgo, City of Paris, and Michael Bloomberg, the UN Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change. Outcomes will feed into the UNFCCC Action Day on 5 December 2015. (See Annex 3 for details) • 5 December 2015: UNFCCC High Level Meeting on Climate Action (Action Day) • 6 December 2015: ICLEI Global Executive Committee and Council Meeting (Closed) ICLEI's governance bodies will meet to discuss future strategy and activities in relation to COP21 outcomes. • 7 or 8 December 2015: UNFCCC Cities and Regions Day(s) - the This will be organized by the UNFCCC Secretariat and French Government, to be supported by numerous side events at the UNFCCC Blue Zone, which is limited to UNFCCC accredited participants. To indicate your interest in any of these events or receive further information on the program and related opportunities, please email us via cop2l.pavilion@iclei.org. Further information will be made available at the websites of the Local Government Climate Roadmap, www.iclei.org/climate-roadmap, and the Pavilion, tap- potentiaLorg/W2015-pavillion. Yours sincerely, ( r i,-.0 V. 34? Gino Van Begin Secretary General ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability Annexes: i1. Overview of events at COP21 2. Cities and Regions Pavilion—TAP 2015 Draft Program 3. Save the Date —4 December: Climate Summit for Local Leaders 4. Local Government Climate Roadmap— Proposals and Calendar ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability Heather Braniain From: Eve Stubbins <eve.stubbins@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:27 PM To: sean.broom@mail.house.gov; johnpaul.yates@mail.house.gov; rep. paul.thissen@house.mn; rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn; sen.scott.d i b ble@ senate. mn; sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn; betsy.hodges@minneapolismn.gov; Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO: U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton • Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long-term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Eve Stubbins eve.stubbins@gmail.com 5233 35th Ave S Minneapolis, MN • Heather Branigin • From: Bildsten Roger <rogerbildsten@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 3:11 PM To: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Edina Mail Subject: Re: Arden Park Road Reconstruction Hi Scott, For over a month we have not had the courtesy of a reply or update from you. Having lived in our home for 30+ years I would have expected better from the city of Edina. We remain disappointed in the city for not communicating with us in advance about this power box, and disappointed in the subsequent inaction since we brought it to your attention. The city should relocate the box to a more discrete location. Could you please let us know about the progress of your discussions with staff? Thank you. Roger Roger Bildsten ro g erb it dsteng gmail . c om .+1 612 308 9900 On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Scott H. Neal <sneal@Edina.MN.gov> wrote: .0:_ I'll check with my staff and get back to you. Scott Neal, City Manager <image003.png> 952-826-0401 1 Fax 952-826-0390 sneal(dEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov The City of Edina was named one of the Star Tribune's Top Workplaces in 2015! <image006.png> •______�...� _ _._-.--.------�--.-- _ __.._.�._ ._-____-- From Bildsten Roger [mailto:rog_erbildsten@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:45 AM To: Scott H. Neal Cc: James Hovland; Edina Mail Subject: Re: Arden Park Road Reconstruction Hi Scott, • Could you please provide us an update? We, and our neighbors, are confident that the city will act to improve this situation. Thank you! Roger Roger Bildsten rogerbildsten@wnail.com +1612 308 9900 On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Bildsten Roger <rogerbildsten@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you. Roger Bildsten ro gerbildstenkwmail. com +1612 308 9900 • On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Scott H. Neal <snealgEdinaMN.gov> wrote: Mr. Bildsten — I'll look into it. Scott H. Neal, City Manager <ima e004. n > 952-826-0401 1 Fax 952-826-0390 g 1� g snealC_EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Read my blog or follow me on Twitter. From: Bildsten Roger(mailto:rogerbildstenCabgmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 3:55 PM To: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Road Reconstruction I am writing to express disappointment with the City of Edina's • handling of the installation of a power box on 51 st Street between Arden and Juanita Avenues. The box was installed last week without advance consultation. It is highly visible from Arden Avenue, Juanita Avenue, and 51st Street (photo attached). The box is 5' tall (apparently so that Xcel's meter reader doesn't have to bend over to see it) on top of a concrete slab. It is an industrial eyesore in the middle of a residential street with considerable pedestrian traffic going to and from the 50th & France area. We have lived at 5100 Juanita Avenue for over 30 years. With a little effort and collaboration this box could have been placed more discreetly to the benefit of all concerned, even on our property. Why couldn't the city have communicated with us in advance and involved us? Wise urban planning should be a component of Edina's Living Streets plan. Communication with residents about important changes should be a part of good governing. I believe that Edina's handling of this power box reflects poorly on city government and should be remedied. Sincerely, Roger Bildsten • Roger Bildsten rogerbildsten@gmail.com +1612 308 9900 <image003 jpg> 3 Heather Branigin From: Mike Tamte <mike.tamte@evereve.com> Sent: Monday, August 17,201S 7:33 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 6629 West Shore Drive - land swap Hi Edina council members, First, let me thank you for your service to the community. You are all busy people so I will be brief. My wife and I live at 4520 Laguna Drive in Edina, MN. The lot next to ours belongs to Tony and Liz Burger at 6629 West Shore Drive. We received a letter last week from the city informing us of a possible land swap involving the Burger's property. We support the Burger's initiative to swap the land and their dream to remodel their house. Michael Tamte Executive Chairman EVEREVE 4388 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55410 P 952-460-5949 E mike.tamteCcDevereve.com evereve. com Q) E V ERREVE we're on a mission to inspire every morn to embrace her beauty and power. • Heather Branigin *From: anne.denato@gmail.com on behalf of Anne Denato <anne.denato@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:45 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart, swensonannl @gmail.com; swendonannl@gmail.com Subject: 8/18 public hearing support This note is in reference to the 8/18 public hearing regarding the lot line adjustment between the City of Edina and Tony and Liz Burger at 6629 West Shore Drive. I want to voice my support for the Burgers in their effort to come to agreement with the city regarding a lot line adjustment. Theirs is a unique case due to how their home is situated on the property. I understand that several years back, a variance was granted, and at some point expired or rescinded. While I don't understand why that solution was removed from the table, if it is no longer a possibility, then I believe that the current proposed solution with adjusted lot lines should be supported. I do understand there is some concern regarding public land abutting adjacent properties on an additional side, although I do not see how this could negatively affect property values (does it not ensure that the land will remain park and eliminate the chance that the Burgers or other homeowner will clear the land or build storage or similar structure there?) I also feel it is extraordinarily unlikely that the land will see any significant public use, given the limited access. .The Burgers have invested in their property and neighborhood and would like to stay in place and continue to do so. This is to the benefit of the neighborhood and city as a whole. I would like to see the city not begrudge this family the opportunity to do what so many residents have done. Thank you for your consideration, Anne Denato 6612 n U Heather Braniain From: Hayward, Edward J. <EHayward@oppenheimer.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:50 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: elizabethburger2@gmail.com; Ellie Hayward (ehayward43@msn.com) Subject: Land Exchange 6629 West Shore Drive I have submitted comments by email and spoken with two of the Council members regarding the above. We support the Burgers' desire to complete the remodeling of their home — as long as it is not to our detriment. We would support a variance or a purchase. We could also support an exchange or swap — provided, however, that it does not take the form previously proposed, which would run a portion of park land up alongside our property line toward West Shore Drive. Such a configuration would have a negative impact on our privacy and our home's value. Therefore, in the event that a swap appears to be the only alternative, we would agree with the proposal of Ralph Zickert to run the swapped parcel on a North-South line into the Burgers' property as an extension of our property line that borders the park land nearest the lake, but not to extending it toward West Shore Drive. I plan to attend the hearing this evening. Ed Hayward Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP Campbell MithunTower —Suite 2000 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-3338 T 612.607.7280 • C 952.484.6625 H 952.929.0393 This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you. 0 Heather Branigin • From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 12:06 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Broken or missing all weather electrical outlet covers at Braemar Field Attachments: Braemar Dome Aug 2015 020 jpg; Braemar Dome Aug 2015 021 jpg There are approximately 15 electrical outlets (fourteen 3 phase and 1 GFI) electrical outlets that have no outlet covers and are exposed to the elements including rain at Braemear Field (see attached photo). The electrical outlets are used when the dome is in place.. I am assuming the electricity was turned off to these outlets when the dome was removed because if the electricity is on the broken outlets violate state building code and are an electrical hazard. These electrical outlets have probably been exposed to the weather since the dome was taken down last spring. There are also 2 electrical boxes exposed to the weather that have switches to raise and lower an overhead door for the dome. The weatherproofing rubber for the switches is being broken down by UV and the rubber is cracking (see attached photo). These buttons should be protected by a metal box similar to what is done at the seasonal dome at the Eden Prairie High School dome. Below is a link to the National Electrical Manufacturing Assoc (NEMA) for evaluating water damaged •electrical equipment. NEMA sets national standards for electrical equipment. https://www. nema. org/Standards/Pages/Evaluating- W ater-Damaged-Electrical-Equipment.aWx These city owned facilities issues should be the type of things that should be discussed at the Edina employee safety meetings. It is troublesome to continue to see these safety issues at City of Edina facilities. David Frenkel 9 � i t ! ' � 4 � l I �x 7 § { x ff F � J� 0 0 Paolo a • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 14, 2015 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good Student Members present: Chowdhury, Colwell. Absent: Member Segreto 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Good made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Strother, approving the consent agenda as follows: • IV.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, June 9, 2015 Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood, commented on the Strategic Plan. She feels Edina falls behind national norms as far as having indoor recreational space. She is concerned about equity as far as locations of parks. She requested the community center recommendation stay in the final report. She feels the council should consider the resident's requests. A copy of her statement will be included in Park Board correspondence. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Proposed Pickleball Court Donation Ms. Kattreh indicated the Park Board has been asked to review and comment on a potential donation of Pickleball courts and related amenities at Rosland Park. Edina resident Bruce Mooty has approached the city to donate funds to the City of Edina to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The proposed donation is in honor of his late father John Mooty, who passed away earlier this year. This location is recommended by Parks & Recreation Administrative staff and Park Maintenance staff. Several sites were reviewed, including Lewis Park, Yorktown Park and Cornelia School Park. This site was chosen due to the size of parcel available, proximity to a tennis facility, distance from residential impact and on -street parking available. If approved, the donor is interested in funding the project for construction this fall. This project would include four to six pickleball courts, • one or two shade structures and potentially court lighting. There would also be benches and trash receptacles. The site was explored for the potential of adding a restroom and picnic shelter facility similar to Wooddale Park, but the lack of proximity to sewer and water connections made this option not financially viable (over $100,000). Ms. Kattreh noted four to six courts could fit on this site and pointed out there is a large oak tree in this area, but the courts could be located so as to not impact • this tree. Ms. Kattreh gave a brief Pickleball explanation. The proposed project timeline is as follows: July — Park Board provides review and comment July — Bolton and Menk are completing site evaluation and project designs August — Solicit quotes for construction and donor acceptance August/September — City Council approval August — Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Approval September/October — Construction Ms. Kattreh indicated a battery of four Pickleball courts side by side would cost approximately $70,000. A battery of four courts with two courts over two courts would cost approximately $75,000. A battery of just two courts would cost approximately $39,000. Included in this price are a 6" limestone base, 2" of asphalt, color surface system, striping, nets, posts, fencing and gates. Site preparation grading and watershed accommodations will be required at an additional cost. Mr. Mooty is also considering shade structures and court lighting. According to the Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy that was approved by the City Council on Nov. 18, 2014, the donor would receive one of the following recognitions, depending upon the total project cost: $50,000 - $99,000 (Gold) $100,000 or more (Platinum) Chair Gieseke asked if there would be benches to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes. Ms. Kattreh • commented that the nearest restrooms would be just past the playground and added the Art Center could also be an option. Chair Gieseke asked if the lights could also light the tennis courts. Ms. Kattreh stated they will get quotes on various lighting options. Member Cella asked if the Pickleball courts at Garden Park would remain to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes and added they are well used. She also noted Pickleball is very popular in Edina and they may even need more courts in the future. Member Cella asked if Pickleball courts were in the plan for the future without this donor. Ms. Kattreh replied from a cost perspective there could be some funds in operational budgets to restripe. Member Good stated it seems the courts are needed. Ms. Kattreh pointed out Pickleball has a multi- generational appeal and noted this could be programmed significantly in the Parks & Recreation Department. She added that ongoing maintenance of these new courts would come out of the parks maintenance department. Member McCormick asked if courts are scheduled. Ms. Kattreh responded it would be a combination of scheduled and open courts as well as the parking lot would be available along with on -street parking. Member Jones asked if Pickleball courts can be used for other sports. Ms. Kattreh stated they could be converted to tennis or basketball courts. The donation would cover 100% of the construction costs. Member Jones asked what the maintenance costs would be and Ms. Kattreh stated she did not know but could research estimates. Member Jones asked what the lifespan of the courts would be because • her concern is when adding things to parks she would like to see the development of community 2 sports. She noted she has a concern on this location as it does not have restrooms or water and • requested staff researches other areas. Chair Gieseke stated the St. Cloud courts look very nice and asked if we would have wind screens like St. Cloud has around the courts. Ms. Kattreh replied that is something that would be included in the quotations and discuss with the donor. Member McCormick noted the restrooms are a distance away and asked about porta-potties. Ms. Kattreh stated that will be discussed. Member Jones stated the board is very appreciative of this type of donation as they are financing the construction 100% and it fits well within the Strategic Plan. The senior citizens have been requesting amenities and these courts will fit well for them. Ms. Kattreh added she will make sure budgets will include maintenance. VI.B. Park Board Retreat — Tuesday, Aug. 11, 5:30 — 9:30 p.m. at Centennial Lakes Park Member McCormick informed the Park Board that Chair Gieseke and herself have been planning the Park Board retreat which will replace the regular Aug. I I Park Board meeting. This retreat will take place at the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park. It is scheduled to run from 5:30 to 9:30 p.m. and dinner will be provided. She added to dress casually because they will be playing bocce at the croquet and lawn games area at Centennial Lakes Park. Member Strother asked if the pre -work needs to be completed prior to the retreat. Member McCormick stated the pre -work is for member preparation only and will not be collected. The Members offered to be on the following groups: • Group I —Jacobson, Nelson, Strother Group 2 —Jones, Good, Chowdhury Group 3 — Greene, Cella, Colwell Chair Gieseke stated he would like a picture taken at the retreat. VI.C. Proposed Land Exchange — 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina Ms. Kattreh indicated the City Council has requested that the Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. The Planning Commission will also be reviewing this proposal at the July 22 Planning Commission meeting. Tony and Liz Burger were present at the meeting. Ms. Kattreh explained the situation to the Park Board. Ed Hayward, 6625 W. Shore Dr., indicated he is the neighbor to the north and stated they are not happy about the proposed public access running along the side of his property. It seems like a strange configuration for a land swap and he would rather see a variance. He added there is another access to the park that can be used. He pointed out he is not opposed to the concept of the land exchange. Member Good asked Mr. Hayward if there is a lot of activity in the park behind the houses and Mr. Hayward stated there generally is not much activity except for the Fourth of July fireworks. • Member Jones asked if the access was not right on property line and moved onto the Burger property would that be better. Mr. Hayward stated that does not seem very feasible and noted mowing would be a concern and awkward. Ms. Kattreh stated the Burgers do have the option of applying for a variance with the Planning • Commission. Member Good asked if there was an option of having the city sell a piece of land to the Burgers instead of a swap. Ms. Kattreh stated it has not been a popular option historically with the Park Board or with the City Council as they do not want to sell parkland. Chair Gieseke stated in this case the city may benefit from selling some of the park land as it would be a win for the city. Member Nelson asked if there is another area that could be considered in the swap. Ms. Kattreh stated this portion was brought to staff by the Burgers. She noted they could start over and look at all options again. Mr. Burger indicated the surveyor came up with the line drawing and noted they wanted to keep the park continuous. He commented it is not a highly used park except for the Fourth of July. Member Greene asked Mr. Burger if he would be interested in purchasing a piece of park land to which Mr. Burger replied he would. Member Greene suggested the discussion end right now and staff goes back to determine a fair selling price and have Mr. Burger come back with a revised plan. Member Jones asked how many times a request has been made to purchase park land and Ms. Kattreh stated it's happened approximately four times in four years. Member Jones asked if a precedent would be set and Ms. Kattreh stated she has heard from council and the city does not have a strong interest in selling park property. Other neighbors may want the same thing; a little more park land to add to their property. • Member Strother suggested a variance may be more suitable to eliminate people walking very closely to the homes when entering the park. Ms. Burger stated that piece of land is called a breezeway. It's not supposed to be a stopping place for people entering the park. Mr. Burger stated since he has lived there approximately six to seven people have walked through that area. Member Jones asked if the property floods and Mr. Burger stated they have had some flooding in the garage; the park land does not flood. Member Jones asked if there is a path along the lake to which it was noted there is an open area off of 66th Street. Mr. Burger informed the Park Board they mow and irrigate the area and that the city stops mowing at the Hayward's property line. Member Jones asked if this would be an appropriate place for a nature path. Ms. Kattreh stated she is not aware that that option has ever been explored and added she does not want a misaligned lot line. Member McCormick asked if Mr. Burger if he was ok with the repositioning of the play structure. Mr. Burger stated the play structure is already on park property and he would have no problem moving it. Ms. Kattreh stated staffs recommendation was difficult due to precedence, gaining access for the city, and the way the property line is configured it is challenging. It is neither hurting the city nor providing a benefit. Ms. Kattreh pointed out she needs to report back to the Planning Commission and would like • to get a consensus from the Park Board. • Member Nelson indicated she would prefer going with the variance. Member Jones indicated she can appreciate the situation but does not want to set a precedent and is against selling park land. She does not agree with the proposed swap with creating a jagged lot line to the east and that connectivity to West Shore Drive would be her preference. She would like to refer to a guiding principle and if a variance is given a pathway should be created from Laguna Drive to 66th Street either by land swap or a variance. Member Jacobson indicated this is a grey area whether it is a park or not because if it is truly parkland the residents should have access. She does not care for the land swap and would prefer a sale but she does not feel it is up to the Park Board to decide that. She would favor selling the land to the Burgers and create access from Laguna Drive. She added the variance process would serve well. Member Greene indicated he is in favor of the variance. Chair Gieseke indicated he is in favor of the variance and is not in favor of a land swap as there are many issues with it; the neighbors would not appreciate it and it would set a precedent. He noted a minimal land sale would be an option and would make the access at Laguna better. Member Cella indicated this isn't really something the Park Board should approve. She is in favor of making all park land accessible to residents and stated this is more a Planning Commission matter to decide if a variance is to be granted. Member Strother indicated she has concerns with a variance and is concerned this park with a lake is not accessible to residents. She does not think a variance would benefit the city. She stated she does • not know the history of swaps and/or sales in the past but if the money from the sale could be used to improve access she would be in favor of that. Member McCormick indicated this is a unique situation and does not make a lot of sense. She feels the Burgers should determine how much park land would be needed to make their plan a reality and have the city look at a possible sale. She would be in favor of a variance or make the swap without the jagged lines. Member Good indicated if the Burgers have an interest in pursuing a variance they should do so and it is not the expertise of the Park Board. He would not be in favor of the swap as it is proposed. He would be in favor of a sale. Student Member Colwell indicated Student Member Asef and himself would be in favor of selling the park land. He believes a trail could be put in without infringing on the homeowner's property and that a partial swap might be possible. Student Member Chowdhury indicated he does not see what the park land would be used for in the future and does not think a precedent would be set. Chair Gieseke stated he likes the idea of a much smaller land swap because it is less obtrusive with compensation for the city. VII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENT • Member Jones stated she would like to comment on what is going on with Grandview. She indicated the latest round of proposals have a fairly large community area bringing the senior center and art center facilities at Grandview. The city will work on the design of that building. She commented after creating the Strategic Plan she is concerned about how that space is going to be used so that it fits with the Strategic Plan which includes the senior center and the art center. She is concerned about what is • edited out of the Strategic Plan. The City Council will be deciding something on this in August. Ms. Kattreh stated at the June 17, 2015 City Council meeting a presentation was made on the Strategic Plan; however, the council did not have sufficient time to review the plan in detail and is concerned about the length of the document. She stated the document will be reviewed by the council and they will notify her when they are ready to provide feedback. Member Good stated that is his understanding. The Park Board is a recommending group rather than an approving board on items such as Grandview. He also noted the executive summary for the Strategic Plan should be on the website rather than the 400 page document. Member Nelson stated an important thing to consider is the maintenance of the existing parks and structures. Vlll. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh provided the following staff updates: • The Braemar Driving Range and Par Three groundbreaking was held today; the project should be completed by the end of September. • The backyard construction at Braemar Arena should be done this week. • The Edina Soccer Club has invited the Park Board to their event on Friday. • The Pamela Park building is up. Member Good asked about a new sign for Braemar Golf Course. Ms. Kattreh stated the sign has been ordered and requires six weeks for production. • IX. ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Greene, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. • • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 8, 2015 7:00 PM 0 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Halva, Nemerov, Olsen, Platteter Absent: Carr, Forrest, Seeley III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Hobbs moved approval of the April 22, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. SunOpta. 7301 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Commission Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6`h story) of the east elevation of their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane; the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant within this office building. Repya explained that Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area. Repya reported that currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification. The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west elevation. Page 1 of 9 Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends denial of the requested variances based on the following findings: I. The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because: The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. 2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Appearing for the Applicant John Ruelle, SunOpta Diccustinn Chair Platteter asked Planner Repya what the zoning designations are for the properties surrounding the subject site. Repya responded that the surrounding properties are zoned POD, Planned Office District. Ai)i)licant Presentation • Mr. Ruelle told the Commission he questions the City's definition of street frontage. Ruelle presented to Commissioners photos of neighboring buildings with signage similar to the sign they are requesting. Continuing, Ruelle further pointed out that the subject site also includes an easement to Metro Boulevard and Highway 100; thereby accessing Highway 100. Continuing, Ruelle questioned why the sign ordinance wouldn't allow their sign to face Highway 100, adding its key for their business to "get their name out" so it becomes recognizable to not only residents of Edina but the general public. Concluding, Ruelle told Commissioners SunOpta has a long term lease with this building. Commissioner Nemerov commented that he assumes the applicant and their landlord are aligned. Brandon Aune, representing the sign owner responded in the affirmative. A discussion ensued on the photos Mr. Ruelle presented indicating similar signage on nearby buildings. It was noted that the majority of those buildings are in the City of Bloomington; with a different sign ordinance. Public Hearing Chair Platteter asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Public hearing closed. Page 2of9 0 Discussion Commissioner Nemerov reported he worked in the subject building and at that time there was a sign on the building facing Highway 100. Nemerov said in his opinion allowing the sign makes sense. Commissioner Lee asked Planner Teague if the sign ordinance was re -written. Planner Teague responded the ordinance wasn't re -written; however, there are unpermitted signs in the City. Commissioner Thorsen said he does have a concern that similar buildings may also want additional signage if the Commission chooses to support this request. Planner Teague noted that the purpose of the requested sign variance is advertising; not way finding. . which could be an issue. Commissioner Nemerov commented that in his opinion similar buildings should have the same value and should be treated the same with regard to signage. He added he doesn't believe it's unreasonable for a corporation/company to want to "broadcast" their business to the general public. Nemerov further stated that the City of Edina should want businesses to do well. Commissioner Hobbs said that while he understands the applicant's point of view in wanting additional signage he pointed out the ordinance is clear; no street frontage, not sigh. Continuing, Hobbs suggested that the Commission should take another look at the sign code • and amend it if needed. Commissioner Lee commented that personally she finds identifying logos helpful because it provides awareness; however, agrees with Commissioner Hobbs that the ordinance doesn't permit this type of signage. • Mntinn Commissioner Thorsen moved to recommend denial of the requested variance based on staff findings: The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms Lane. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Olsen. Nays; Nemerov, Platteter. Motion to deny carried 5-2. Page 3 of 9 • VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Add Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning to the R -I Single Dwelling Unit District Designation. Oskam House. 6901 Dakota Trail, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Commission Mrs. Marri Oskam, 6901 Dakota Trail, is requesting to add her house and property to the Edina Heritage landmark Overlay Zoning Designation. The Heritage Preservation Board recommended that the Commission support this request. Repya reported the subject property is located on the east side of the 6900 block of Dakota Trail in the Indian Hills neighborhood. The existing single family home, an International style constructed in 1963, is situated on the west bank of Indianhead Lake, and has a 2 -car detached garage in front of the residence; connected by a roof -covered deck. This Contemporary home was designed by renowned, female architect, Elizabeth Close; who with her husband started the architectural firm of Close & Close in 1939. Repya explained the subject house is one of the first homes built on Indianhead Lake; the natural terrain remained untouched as the home nestled into the sloping hillside. There have been no additions to the homes since it was constructed, however it has been meticulously • maintained, and is as shining an example of Mid -Century Contemporary architecture today as it was when constructed in 1963. Fearing her home could be subject to a future tear -down, Mrs. Oskam approached the Heritage Preservation Board to determine whether her home could be a candidate for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) which would provide protection from demolition Continuing, Repya noted upon the direction of the Heritage Preservation Board (HPB), Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel conducted an evaluation of the Oskam property and provided the HPB with a "Determination of Eligibility" concluding that, "The Oskam House is historically significant in the area of architecture under Criterion "C" of the City Code (Sec. 36- 714. (1) c. with the following eligibility criteria :Embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style, design, period, type or method of construction; or that possess high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or Important archeological data or the potential to yield important archeological data. Repya said in addition to being a noteworthy example of Modern residential architecture, the house is one of a relatively small number of post war residences in Edina designed by a female architect. Elizabeth ("Lisle") Scheu Close (1912-201 1) was one of the first women to graduate from the architecture school at the University of Minnesota. In partnership with her husband, architect Winston A. Close (1906-1997), she designed many modernist homes and other • buildings and was an influential force in regional architecture. Her work is demonstrably important in women's history and architectural history." Page 4 of 9 • On September 9, 2014, the HPB voted to add 6901 Dakota Trail to the list of Edina properties eligible for Edina Heritage Landmark Designation, and instructed Consultant Vogel to prepare a nomination study identifying the significance of the home. Mr. Vogel and Planner Repya also worked with Mrs. Oskam to create a plan of treatment that would provide protection for the home she was seeking, as well as clear direction to future owners. Continuing, Planner Repya delivered a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the house and property. Repya concluded asking the Commission to provide support for the Heritage Preservation Board's recommendation to add the Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning designation to the R- I Single Dwelling Unit District for 6901 Dakota Trail. Appearing for the Applicant Mrs. Marri Oskam, property owner. Discussion/Questions Commissioner Nemerov commented that in his opinion the house is very interesting; however, he questioned if the Commission supports the requested designation if something "goes wrong" with the house (leaking roof) would the City be required to repair it. Planner Repya responded the City bares no responsibility, • Chair Platteter asked if the property is designated and the house slips into disrepair what happens. Planner Repya responded disrepair is a possibility with any property; and would be addressed accordingly. Repya further explained the Heritage Preservation Board encourages maintenance of our locally designated properties, adding to date the City has had no issues with any of the designated properties. Repya said she expects the same with this property. Platteter said he drove by the home and found it blended well in the environment and was a beautiful property on the lake. Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Repya who requests Heritage Landmark Designation. Planner Repya responded in this instance the property owner requested the designation; however, the Heritage Preservation Board has identified properties as preservation worthy but to date the City has received no requests for designation. Chair Platteter asked Planner Repya if the City received any response from residents regarding the Morningside Bungalow study. Repya responded the Heritage Preservation Board did an extensive study on Morningside Bungalows; inviting property owners to learn about their properties and the possibility of landmark designation; however to date the City hasn't received any input from those owners. Commissioner Hobbs personally thanked Mrs. Oskam and family for their meticulous care of the property. He added it's just beautiful. Chair Platteter and Commissioners agreed with Hobbs and also thanked Planner Repya for her presentation. Page 5 of 9 i Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved to support the designation of 6109 Dakota Trail as a Heritage Landmark. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Sketch Plan — Bank of America. 6868 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague explained to new Commission Members that the sketch plan review process is a process that provides the applicant an opportunity to come before the Commission to gather feedback on a future project. Teague explained all Commission comments during the sketch plan process are non-binding, however, are informative for the applicant as they proceed with the formal application. Continuing, Teague reported the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing 3,098 square -foot Think Bank, and construct a new LEED Certified, 7,190 square foot Bank of American with a drive -up ATM at 6868 France Avenue. Merrill Lunch would also be a tenant in the building. Teague said each use would have a separate entrance/exit into the building. Teague said the site is zoned POD -2, Planned Office District; therefore, the proposed uses are permitted. Teague asked the Commission to note the proposed building will be located on the existing 21.8 -acre parcel that houses an eight story building and the attached Tavern on France. Being part of that the site the parking and access would be shared with existing uses. The proposal also includes storm water ponding areas that are uncommon along France Avenue. Teague said staff would recommend in this situation if the ponding areas are developed the ponds are also turned into an amenity such as a water feature with a fountain. Teague noted the following would be required for a formal application: • Site Plan Review • Front Setback Variance from 35 -feet to 22 -feet for the building. • Front Yard Setback from 35 -feet to 20 -feet for the ATM drive through. • Variance to allow an ATM drive through to be located on a side of a building that faces property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Appearing for the Applicant Anita Thomas and Aaron Greene 0 Page 6 of 9 Teague introduced to the Commission the development team for the project, Anita Thomas and Aaron Green. Discussion Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if the applicant received the guiding principles from the France Southdale Working Group. Teague responded the guiding principles were not completed at the time of sketch plan application; however, the applicant would be provided the principles for formal application. Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if there is a "cap" on the number of buildings that can be on a building site. Teague responded that lot coverage limits the number of structures on a tract. Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague what the applicant is actually requesting. Teague responded when formal application is made the applicant will be requesting site plan approval with variances. Applicant Presentation Ms. Thomas informed Commissioners the development team met with the neighborhood and informed them they intend to buffer the residential neighborhood through landscaping and other measures. Thomas said all lighting would be LED on lower light standards, adding they will be very respectful of the residential component of the area. Continuing, Thomas explained the project will be a flagship financial center for Bank of America. She added the building will be divided between two tenants, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch. Each tenant would have their own entrance and exit from the building. The structure would also be LEED certified. With graphics the development team noted the project includes the demolition of the existing building and construction of a TI 90 square foot building with remote drive -up ATM. The development would include new sidewalks, parking spaces, utilities and a storm water management system that includes both surface retention ponds and an underground storm water storage system. Greene noted the remote drive -up ATM would be constructed within an existing parking field. Thomas asked the Commission to further note that their goal is to keep as many trees as possible along the perimeter of the property. Concluding, Thomas asked the Commission for their future support for the project including approval of the variances when formal application is made. Discussion Commissioner Thorsen asked the applicant how the residents responded to the plan. Ms. Thomas said for the most part it was rather positive, adding they stressed to the neighborhood their willingness to do everything possible to buffer the building. Page 7 of 9 • Commissioner Olsen said in reviewing the sketch plans she had some questions on if they intend to tie the sidewalk proposed along West 69`h Street to the sidewalk on France Avenue and if they propose a sidewalk along Valley View Road. Ms. Thomas responded the sidewalk (69`h St) will tie into the sidewalk along France Avenue; however, at this time there is no plan to extend the sidewalk along Valley View Road. Ms. Thomas said they want to retain as many of the existing trees as possible. Mr. Greene also asked Commissioners to note that the grade changes a bit as the corner is turned along Valley View Road. Commissioner Hobbs commented that he views the proposed rain gardens positively; however, encouraged planting more trees and proper grasses. Ms. Thomas responded they also felt the proposed rain gardens was positive, adding they will be working with an arborist on plantings and tree type. Thomas said a LEED certification also has specific landscaping requirements that need to be met. Commissioners further questioned the applicants on the need and justification for the two requested variances; further suggested shifting the building and ATM drive through. Mr. Green reported with regard to the setback variance for the building the corner of the building "gets clipped" for setback purposes due to the curve of the street. Commissioner Olsen further noted she finds no justification for the variances and was disappointed in the way the proposed building addresses France Avenue. Chair Platteter agreed. A discussion ensued on the proposed building, it's location, the location of the ATM, and how the building interacts with France Avenue and the newly formed principles for the France Southdale area. The following was noted and suggested: • Consider adding crosswalk to gain access to the other side of 69`h Street West/Valley View Road. • Reconfigure both the drive-through and building. Consider "flipping the building", shifting the building. Better presence on France Avenue. • The two rain gardens are "unique" water features in this area and close to the street. Consider creating fountains or some other feature to add interest/movement to the rain gardens. • Add more landscaping elements to the site including the interior parking lot area. • Engage the street. Consider ways to make this site better than the previous site. • Consider adding a "store front" on France Avenue. The Planning Commission has consistently supported new structures that "address" the street. • Consider multiple entrances. • Add more glass to the site; maybe through window placement. • Consider this tract in its entirety; not only this specific area of the tract. • Remove existing transformer. • Suggest four sided architecture; don't want a "back of building" look. • Suggest redesigning the building by implementing the guiding principles for the France • Southdale area. Page 8 of 9 • In response to the comments/suggestions from Commissioners Ms. Thomas and Mr. Green noted the following that in their opinion would create difficulty in addressing some of the suggestions: Although there appears flexibility in building and ATM placement they are required to maintain "lease lines" and building within the confines of the allotted lease lines. Because of the private nature and use as a bank and financial operation limited access is needed for safety. There needs to be a so called "back of building" to accommodate interior banking and financial needs. Multiple entrances would hinder safety and because of the location of the parking spaces there really isn't the opportunity to be flexible with entrance placement. People would not want to walk around the building to gain access to the site and lighting safety is needed for "walkups". Will review guiding principles established by the France Southdale Working Group for the formal application and will do everything possible to meet the principles where they can be met. Chair Platteter thanked the applicants for their presentation, adding the Commission looks forward to formal application. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. • IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS • Commissioner Olsen reported the France Southdale Work Group is scheduled to meet again and will focus on Stage 2 of the process. Chair Platteter asked the Commission to keep in the back of their mind the 2016 Work Plan, adding we need to finalize it prior to submitting to the City Council. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Thorsen moved meeting adjournment at 9:10 p.m. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. `�tl� ����I►ltl �t� r�.�� ectfully _ . s� ku Page 9 of 9 0 PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N I D I Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 NAME TERM »' ;`:`: °::.::.. ' _ (Enter Date) (Enter Date) _ Steve Hobbs 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1111 11111111111 1 12 86% Jo Ann Olsen 2/1/2017 1 111111111 1 11111111 1 11 1 1 1 13 93% Susan Lee 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 93% Michael Platteter 2/1/2016 1 111 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 13 93% Claudia Carr 2/1/2016 1 111 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 13 93% Arlene Forrest 2/1/2016 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 86% Nancy Nyrop Scherer Michael Schroeder 2/1/2015 2/1/2015 1 1 111 1 1 in 1 4 4 29% 29% Todd Thorsen 3/1/2018�: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Gerard Strauss 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Ian Nemerov 3/1/2018: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Taylor Halva 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 79% Madison Seeley 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 79% Note: A member who misses four consectutive regular meetings, or attends less than 75% of the scheduled meetings, shall be deemed to have resigned as a member of the planning commission. Liaisons: Include this report in the Planning Commission packet monthy. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "'I under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meetinq` Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meetinq Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type 1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. `A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. • MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Weber and Members, Moore, McLellan, Sussman, Christiaansen, O'Brien, Birdman, Kelly, Pearson and Student Members Otness and Druckman. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member O'Brien moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Pearson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES June 8, 2015 Member Kelly moved approval of the minutes from the June 8`h meeting. Member McLellan • seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. H-15-8 4902 Bruce Avenue - New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4900 block of Bruce Avenue. The existing home, a Colonial Revival style constructed in 1936, currently has a 2 -car attached garage, with a sun porch/deck above; accessed by a driveway on the south side of the property. The Certificate of Appropriateness request entails the construction of a new 528 square foot detached garage in the southwest corner of the rear yard, and converting the attached garage to living space. The footprint of the existing attached garage conversion will be reduced in order to accommodate the additional square footage of the new detached garage and stay within the square footage allowed by city code. Access into the garage will be obtained on the east elevation from the existing driveway. Ms. Repya pointed out that the design of the structure is proposed to compliment the Colonial Revival style of the home with Hardi Plank lap siding, and Timberland asphalt shingled roof. On the east elevation attention to detail is provided with 2 -paneled entry doors with dentil molding above. A service door and window are provided on the north elevation; and the rear west 10 elevation will have a window in the gable area to provide some architectural detailing. Shutters Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes • July 14, 2015 are provided alongside the 3 windows. She pointed out that no windows or architectural detailing has been provided for south side elevation since it abuts a privacy hedge. Furthermore, all dimensions proposed for the structure are consistent with the surrounding detached garages and new garages previously approved by the HPB through the Certificate of Appropriateness process. Ms. Repya also noted that plans for the conversion of the attached garage to living space at the rear of the home have been provided for the Board's information. The foot print of the conversion has been reduced by approximately 144 square feet to accommodate the proposed detached garage on the lot. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel evaluated the proposal and determined that detached garages are common in the Country Club neighborhood and the district plan of treatment recognizes construction of new garages as appropriate, provided the new garage is compatible in scale, size, massing, building materials, and texture with the historic house and other buildings in the neighborhood. The plans submitted indicate the new garage will match the Colonial Revival style of the house and will be architecturally compatible with other historic residences in the neighborhood. The south elevation is shown as an undecorated wall, which will be screened from the adjoining property by a hedge, thus not necessitating additional architectural detailing. The design also appears to be consistent with the height and scale of the garages on • adjacent properties. The essential character of the subject property and the district as a whole will be preserved intact. Ms. Repya concluded that Staff was in agreement with Consultant Vogel's evaluation, thus recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request. Findings supporting the recommendation include: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed projects. • The proposed detached garage will complement the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Conditions for approval: • Subject to the plans presented and • Placement of a year built plaque on the exterior of the new detached garage. Applicant/Owner: Gus & Michele Thompson, 4902 Bruce Avenue The Thompsons were present to address questions from the board - there were none. Board Member Comments: Member Kelly commented that she visited the site and found the proposed plan to be nice remediation for the hardship the homeowners' are experiencing with the current attached garage. 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes toJuly 14, 2015 Motion: Following a brief discussion, Member Birdman moved approval of the COA subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque to be installed on the exterior of the new garage. Member Kelly seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. B-15-9 4621 Browndale Avenue - Changes to Street Facing Fa4ade Planner Repya explained that the subject property, located on the east side of the 4600 block of Browndale Avenue consists of a Tudor Revival/English Cottage style home constructed in 1926. The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request includes reducing the width of the former single stall attached garage on the north side of the home to provide a wider driveway and access to the rear yard; window and door replacement; and removal of architectural elements that were not part of the original construction. An addition to the rear of the home is also proposed. She pointed out that the home has undergone many changes to the exterior over the years as evidenced in the photos that were provided from 1958, 1980, 1992, and current day. Ms. Repya introduced the proposed changes to the home which included: • Remove half-timbering on front elevation (not original to home) • Add divided light windows, decorative corbels and metal roof accents • Replace existing front and rear entry doors • • Add limestone window and door accents • Add cedar shake roofing; and • Rebuild the north side of the house to reduce the mass and enlarge the driveway to provide access to the rear yard. Additionally, the plans call for removal of the stone arch (south side) and stone around the front entry door which are not original to the home; as well as replacing the brick chimney with a larger chimney clad in the same stucco as the home. Ms. Repya pointed out that an addition is also proposed to the rear of the home to enlarge the kitchen/great room area on the main level and a bedroom/bathroom on the second story. While not subject to the COA review, plans for the addition to the home were provided for the board's information. As with all COA applications, Consultant Vogel provided an evaluation of the proposal where he pointed out that it is important to recognize that this particular house is not regarded as historic because of its Tudor/Cottage style design characteristics—its heritage resource value is primarily the product of its historical association with the development of the Country Club District as a planned suburban neighborhood. Like most houses in the district, it embodies some of the general characteristics of early 20`h century "period revival" aesthetic, but it is not an authentic expression of any particular academic style; in this case, the "Tudor" design elements are little more than skin-deep embellishments of a standardized suburban house. The • house has also been substantially altered from its original, as -built appearance. While removal of later work and replacement of missing architectural features may be technically feasible, as a 3 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes 0 July 14, 2015 matter of policy the city has determined that restoration (defined as the process of accurately recovering the original form and details of a property) is not required by the district plan of treatment. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the existing half-timbering which is proposed to be removed could be seen as evidence of the history of the house but should not be considered a distinguishing architectural feature (it seems to have been applied after the district's period of historical significance). Therefore, removal of the wood members would be appropriate. The faux half- timbering could be reintroduced in the future without damaging the essential form and integrity of the fa4ade. He added that the proposed divided light windows, decorative corbels, metal roof accents, decorative stonework, and cedar shake roofing are minor details that require relatively little alteration of the building. While they have little or no historical basis, no distinguishing, historic character defining architectural details will be lost or obscured as a result of their introduction, and the alterations themselves are reversible. From a technical standpoint, these alterations would be considered examples of contemporary design (which the standards for rehabilitation do not discourage) that do not compromise the property's historical integrity. • Mr. Vogel also observed that the applicant has provided information on the current condition of the existing windows and front/rear entry doors which provides justification for their replacement. The existing windows do not appear to be original, although the pattern of fenestration (the physical arrangement of the windows and doors) is more or less in -tact. The proposed replacement strategy will provide for a more energy efficient home and will not compromise the property's historical integrity. Mr. Vogel summarized his evaluation by noting that that the proposed changes to the home will be visually compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood, will not detract from the historic significance and integrity of the district as a whole, and appear to be compatible with the character of the home, thus approval of the COA was recommended. Planner Repya agreed with Consultant Vogel's evaluation, recommending approval of the COA subject to the plans presented. Findings supporting the recommendation included: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed projects. • The proposed changes to the front facade will not significantly alter the scale or detract from the historic character. • The new work has been designed so that the remodeled house will be compatible in size, scale, color, and texture with other Tudor/Cottage style homes in the district. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the •requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Ms. Repya also suggested that approval of the COA be subject to the plans presented. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes • July 14, 2015 Applicant/Owner Representative: Jon Linde, Refined Remodeling Inc. Mr. Linde responded to questions and comments from the board. Board Member Questions/Comments: Member Christiaansen questioned why the wall on the north side of the front elevation was flared at the bottom rather than having a clean/straight line. Mr. Linde responded that the flared wall mimics the existing wall on the rear of the home. Ms. Christiaansen also commented that since the subject home would not qualify for landmark status; the same way a single tree! contributes to a forest, the proposed changes to this home will contribute to its blending well with the surrounding homes. Member McLellan questioned the material proposed for the metal roofing in several areas above the windows, as well as the use of the limestone caps. Mr. Linde explained that the metal roofing will be aluminum painted a medium brown color. Also, the limestone caps will be one solid piece when possible, and of a consistent color. Mr. McLellan also observed that in the past, when reviewing COA's the issue of maintaining the historic facade of the home has been a sticking point. However, since this home has undergone so many changes over the years, the • fa4ade changes don't appear to alter the historic integrity of the home. Member Weber observed that the plans demonstrate that all of the windows will be replaced, and many of the window openings will be enlarged. Mr. Linde commented that the homeowner wishes to increase the amount of daylight flowing into the home, thus the enlarged window openings. That being said, Mr. Linde pointed out that the placement of the windows and doors remains consistent with the original home. He added that the windows proposed will be casement style which has the appearance of double hung divided light windows. Member Kelly pointed out that she has lived in the Country Club District for many years, and knows that the subject home has had a sad history with changes made that definitely compromised the historic integrity of the structure. She also commended the current owner for proposing a plan that attempts to correct prior mistakes. Member Pearson echoed Member Kelly's comments noting that she too resides in the Country Club District and finds that the proposed plan will enhance the historic integrity of the home. Member Sussman stated he would be in favor of approving the proposal, but wondered if in doing so, precedence could be set for future front facade change requests. He added that he did not think this proposal would be precedence setting due to the considerable changes the 5 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes July 14, 2015 home has undergone over time; considerable historic documentation was provided; and the fact that the essential character of the home will be maintained. Motion: Following a brief discussion, Member Birdman moved approval of the COA subject to the plans presented with the following findings: I . A thorough history of the home was provided documenting the evolution of numerous front facade changes which have occurred from 1958 to current day; 2. The proposed changes to the front facade will not significantly alter the scale or detract from the home's historic character; and 3. The new work has been designed so that the remodeled house will be compatible in size, scale, color, and texture with other Tudor/Cottage style homes in the district. Member Kelly seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Cahill School & Grange Hall - Painting & Door Replacement Planner Repya reported that currently, the Cahill School and Grange Hall are in the midst of a repainting of the exteriors as was planned last fall. Also, the main entry doors for both buildings are warped and in need of replacement. The city's park maintenance staff is in the midst of • evaluating vendors familiar with historic buildings to proceed with obtaining replacement estimates. Ms. Repya pointed out that typically, Edina's heritage landmark properties do not require HPB review of general maintenance (painting) and window/door replacement. However, because the Cahill School and Grange Hall are owned by the City of Edina, it has been standard practice to keep the HPB advised of maintenance issues as they arise. Ms. Repya concluded her explanation by commending HPB member Bob Moore who has been championing the maintenance of these buildings. Board members appreciated the update on the painting, and discussed the warped condition of the entry doors - questioning how changes to the entryway and threshold to accommodate the new doors would affect the accessibility to the buildings as required by the ADA. Planner Repya agreed to discuss the board's ADA concerns with Brian Olson, the City's public works director, and keep the board advised. B. Board & Commission Bylaw Changes Planner Repya provided the board with information from MJ Lamon the city's project coordinator, explaining that the city's board and commission bylaws are undergoing changes, • and the HPB will have until August 7, 2015 to provide feedback. Most of the changes are merely 5.1 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes • July 14, 2015 minor edits with the exception Section S. Paragraph I. This will require all boards and commissions to hold their annual meetings with board elections at the February meeting each year. The board briefly discussed the proposed changes, but had no feedback to provide. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS - None X. STAFF COMMENTS A. Oskam House, 6901 Dakota Trail - Proposed EHL Designation Update Planner Repya reported that since the last HPB meeting, Mrs. Oskam asked to include the protection of interior features of the home to the Plan of Treatment (POT) which has been provided for under item #1 under the POT. On July 8`h the Planning Commission considered the landmark designation of the property, and voted unanimously to support the landmark designation. The Council will hold the public hearing on August 5`h. Ms. Repya added that Mrs. Oskam is very pleased, and looking forward to the Council approving the proposed landmark designation. • B. HPB Report to Planning Commission - July 8, 2015 At the July 8`h Planning Commission meeting, Planner Repya provided the Planning Commission with a history of the HPB and shared with them some of the important issues the board has addressed in the past, as well as those identified for the future. She concluded that the HPB is looking forward to working with the Planning Commission on updating the heritage preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan, noting the heritage preservation is one of the important links in the land use element for the city. C. September 1, 2015 Work Session with City Council - Reminder Planner Repya reminded the board that the work session with the City Council to provide an update on the status of the 2015 Work Plan is scheduled for Tuesday, September I5i at 5:00 p.m. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE August 11, 2015 XII. ADJOURNMENT Member Birdman moved for adjournment at 8:05 p.m. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 0 Respectfully submitted, Joyc,el R epyal Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. J F M A M J J AlS1 01 NJ D I Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance Meetings/work Sessions I There is no number typed on the members' lines. 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I I I I I 1 7 100% NAME Weber, Ryan TERM 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Enter Date) 1 (Enter Date) 7 100% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 57% Christiaansen, Jennifer Mellom, Joyce Moore, Bob 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 7 86% 14% 100% Sussman, Peter 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Birdman, Michael 3/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 80% Kelly, Karen 3/1/2016 1 11 11 1 4 80% Pearson, Colleen 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Druckman, Joe 9/1/20151 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Otness, Peter 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 7 100% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting.