The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-03-07 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edin a City Hall Coun cil Cham be rs Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will inv ite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of spea kers on the same issue in the interest of time a nd topic. Generally spea king, items that are elsewhere on tonight 's a genda may not be a ddressed during Community Comment. Indiv iduals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta ) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be ena cted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollca ll vote of majority of Council Members present to approv e.) A.Approve Minutes of February 22, 2017 Work Session and February 22, 2017 Regular Council Meeting B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 02/16/2017 TOTAL: $1,068,613.38 And Per Pre-List Dated 2/23/2017 TOTAL: $903,355.02 C.Request for Purchase: 2017 Western Star Plow Truck at Public Works D.Request for Purchase: 2016 Spaulding Asphalt Tra iler at Public Works E.Request for Purchase: Advertising & Marketing Plan for Parks & Recreation Programming F.Master Services Agreement for Professional Engineering Serv ices with AE2S G.Request for Purchase: E ngineering Services for Wa ter Treatment Plant 5 H.On-Sale Intoxicating, Club On-Sale, Sunday Sa le, W ine and Beer Liquor License Renewa ls I.Ordinance No. 2017-01: Amending Edina City Code Concerning Boards & Commissions J.Resolution No. 2017-20: Approv ing MN Burea u of Criminal Apprehension Joint Powers Agreements K.Resolution 2017-21: Approving No-Rise CertiEcate for Nine Mile Creek Edina Streambank Stabilization Project L.Resolution No. 2017-23: Support for GreenCorps Host Site Application M.Resolution No. 2017-25: MnDOT Limited Use Permit for Valley View Road Sidewa lk N.Resolution No. 2017-26: Authorizing Use of Fa csimile Signatures By Public OHcials O.Resolution No. 2017-27: Authorizing Investment Agreement P.Appoint Council Member Brindle Edina's Representative to the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Noise Ov ersight Committee (NOC) Q.Purchasing Policy Upda te VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations VII.Reports/Recommendations: (Fav orable vote of ma jority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Advisory Communica tion: Community Health Commission, Tobacco Regulation B.Resolution No. 2017-22: Accepting Various Grants & Donations C.Resolution No. 2017-24 Approving Temporary On-Sa le Dispensary VIII.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Minutes C.Advisory Communica tion 1.Advisory Communication: Human Rights & Relations Commission Februa ry 2017 IX.Av ia tion Noise Update X.Ma y or and Council Comments A.Parkwood Knoll Tra Hc XI.Ma nager 's Comments XII.Schedule of Meetings, Events & Dates as of March 7, 2017 XIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortabl e bei ng part of the publi c proc ess . If you need as s is tanc e i n the way of heari ng am pli Ec ation, an interpreter, large-print doc um ents or s om ethi ng els e, pleas e c al l 952-927-8861 72 ho urs in advance of the m eeting. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Minutes From:Deb ra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Ap p ro ve Minutes o f F eb ruary 22, 2017 Work S es s io n and F eb ruary 22, 2017 Regular C o unc il Meeting CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes February 22, 2017 Work Ses s ion Draft Minutes February 22, 2017 Regular Meeting MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 22, 2017 6:24 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 6:24 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was: Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communication & Technology Services Director; Kelly Dumais, City Manager Fellow; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS Manager Neal noted that Member Fischer had mapped out the proposed Comprehensive Plan Process with a couple of updates. Member Fischer presented to the City Council his proposed additions to the Comprehensive Plan process, noting the desire to make the process a bridge from Edina’s Strategic Vision to the updated Comprehensive Plan. The proposed process would include “Big Idea” workshops at the beginning of the process, incorporate an Edina VISION workshop that would bring the consultant team, the Comprehensive Plan Leaders, the Chamber, the School District, and the City Council at the midpoint and result in a better Comprehensive Plan. Staff and Council discussed the proposal and the Council indicated their consensus to incorporate Member Fischer’s ideas into the process. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 7, 2017. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 22, 2017 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item V.E., Ordinance No. 2017-01; Amending City Code Concerning Boards and Commissions. V.A. Approve minutes of February 6, 2017, work session, February 7, 2017 and February 7, 2017, regular meeting minutes V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated February 2, 2017, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $258,080.40; Police Special Revenue $136.23; Working Capital Fund $2,022.84; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,635.80; Art Center Fund $1,060.71; Golf Dome Fund $10,965.15; Aquatic Center Fund $1,654.85; Golf Course Fund $12,405.59; Ice Arena Fund $8,551.80; Sports Dome Fund $2,017.00; Edinborough Park Fund $16,623.54; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,281.65; Liquor Fund $216,416.57; Utility Fund $78,130.32; Storm Sewer Fund $1,553.00; Risk Mgmt Fund $228.27; PSTF Agency Fund $5,095.31; Centennial TIF District $1,275.52; Grandview TIF District $18,357.08; Payroll Fund $62,883.85; TOTAL $641,375.48; credit card transactions dated October 25, 2016 – November 25, 2016 consisting of 8 pages; TOTAL $50,676.24; pre-list dated February 9, 2017 consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $221,193.31; Police Special Revenue $3,729.70; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $306.24; Arts and Culture Fund $796.95; General Debt Service Fund $1,000.00; Working Capital Fund $98,911.98; Art Center Fund $3,181.54; Golf Dome Fund $3,310.92; Aquatic Center Fund $3,525.00; Golf Course Fund $3,724.39; Ice Arena Fund $47,683.84; Sports Dome Fund $17,993.03; Edinborough Park Fund $7,678.83; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $566.52; Liquor Fund $180,146.41; Utility Fund $500,976.63; Storm Sewer Fund $57,558.09; Risk Mgmt ISF $64.90; PSTF Agency Fund $8,111.37; MN Task Force 1 Fund $66,994.73; Payroll Fund $11,216.13; TOTAL $1,238,670.51.43; and credit card transactions dated November 26, 2016 – Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 2 December 25, 2016 consisting of 23 pages; General Fund $409,007.68; Police Special Revenue $1,335.45; Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety $116.25; Working Capital Fund $128,706.54; PIR Construction Fund $4,164.14; Equipment Replacement Fund $6,949.20; Art Center Fund $6,111.34; Golf Dome Fund $1,095.20; Aquatic Center Fund $800.00; Golf Course Fund $4,132.56; Ice Arena Fund $5,783.80; Sports Dome Fund $180.73; Edinborough Park Fund $38,149.19; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,692.94; Liquor Fund $167,393.55; Utility Fund $98,801.86; Storm Sewer Fund $17,915.13; Risk Mgmt ISF $288,986.74; PSTF Agency Fund $403.40; MN Task Force 1 Fund; $11,695.13; TOTAL $73,318.18. V.C. Set Saturday, April 8, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. to Noon for Town Hall Meeting V.D. Set March 21, 2017, Public Hearing Date for Street Name Change V.E. Ordinance 2017-01: Amending City Code Concerning Boards and Commissions V.F. Approve Request for Purchase: Minnesota Task Force 1 Administrator Vehicle; Ranger GM $36,254.20 V.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-18: Supporting Application for Hennepin County 2017 Sidewalk Participation Program V.H. Approve Request for Purchase: 2017 GMC Sierra WT; Nelson Auto Center Fleet Department $25,041.77 V.I. Approve Traffic Safety Report of January 4, 2017 V.J. Approve FCC Request for Comments on Small Cell Installations Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA V.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01; AMENDING CITY CODE CONCERNING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – FIRST READING GRANTED The Council requested review of the proposed ordinance, stating the school district and park staff work together on a variety of tasks and were requesting to no longer have a liaison to the Park Board. The Council referred to some minor amendments for Second Reading and noted this version was in agreement from what was discussed prior to First Reading. Manager Scott Neal noted while some Park Board members wished to have the liaison removed, the Council had shared concerns as it wanted some level of Board connection. He said discussions on this topic were held in January and this ordinance was part of the omnibus changes in the entire ordinance. The Council agreed there were valid reasons to have a liaison on the Park Board but an elected official does not need to be on the Park Board and suggested a staff level representative instead. The Council agreed with the suggestion of Mr. Neal to include language indicating: “an ex-officio, non-voting member who shall not be an elected member of the school board” prior to Second Reading. Member Stewart made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2017-01 Amending City Code Concerning Boards and Commissions and direct staff to make the language revisions as discussed prior to Second Reading. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 3 Rollcall: Ayes: Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Nays: Brindle Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. SPEAK UP, EDINA: NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS – PRESENTED Senior Communications Coordinator Kaylin Eidsness outlined the public engagement process used to gather information on neighborhood parks. Ms. Eidsness presented a summary of comments, requests, and suggestions received regarding neighborhood parks. The Council indicated it was pleased with this lively discussion and agreed parks and trails were a top priority for residents so finding a way to fund park maintenance needed to be taken seriously. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS VII.A. PROPOSED USE OF 2017 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS – APPROVED, RESOLUTION 2017-15 – ADOPTED Senior Planner Joyce Repya said the CDBG program was a federal entitlement program administered by HUD who in turn, charges Hennepin County to oversee the distribution of the funds to its communities. As a recipient of HUD funds, each community must affirmatively further fair housing by being proactive in addressing impediments to fair housing choices. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Public Testimony Benjamin Fribley, Grant Manager for Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH), addressed the Council. Jon Burkhow, Senior Community Services HOME Program, addressed the Council. Janet Lindbo, West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT), addressed the Council. Mike Vraa, Managing Attorney for HOME Line, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2017-15, Approving Proposed Use of 2017 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds and Authorizing Execution of Sub-Recipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 4 Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT WITH VARIANCES AT 6124 EWING AVENUE – APPROVED, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-16 – ADOPTED Community Development Director Cary Teague said the applicant, Jacob Steen, on behalf of the property owner of 6124 Ewing, LLC, proposed to subdivide the property at 6124 Ewing Avenue into two lots. The existing home and detached garage on the lot would be torn down and two new homes built on the new parcels with both lots gaining access directly off Ewing. The Council requested clarification on lot widths being more than the typical 75 feet. Mr. Teague said minimum lot widths were 75 feet and 9,000 square feet but in larger neighborhoods, lot width was determined by the median. Proponent Presentation Jacob Steen, Larkin Hoffman and representing the property owner, shared additional information regarding the proposed plat, stating the lot was wider and deeper than the standard lot by 12 feet. The house was 18 feet from the rear property line, non-conforming and inconsistent with the other homes on the block. Mr. Steen stated run-off from the site would be handled completely on site and the buildings would be moved to comply with current zoning codes. The Council inquired about dimensions of surrounding properties and the effect on immediate neighborhood. Mr. Steen said he believed the lots were more in line with the 75-foot requirement. The Council noted the property needed redevelopment as it no longer fit the neighborhood and there appeared to be no intent to subdivide in the past. Attorney Roger Knutson referred to a legal case Myron vs. City of Plymouth that determined the hardship requirement for variances does not apply if it was a self-created hardship. Lance Elliot, Elliot Design, outlined plans to address run-off and stormwater management for this property. The Council inquired how they would prevent stormwater going north and south and instead direct it to the street. Mr. Elliott said they intend to utilize a rainwater garden to properly direct stormwater. The Council inquired about soils and the amount of clay and if the rainwater gardens would work well. They also inquired about possible alternatives if the new property owner elects to not utilize rainwater gardens. Mr. Elliott said the locations have enough sand to allow for proper stormwater management and clarified other management alternatives were available if necessary. Todd Fronek, 5408 Dundee Road and property owner, described his plans for the property. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 5 Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-16; Approving a Preliminary and Final Plat with Variances at 6124 Ewing Avenue. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted). VIII.A. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO OUTLOT A PURCHASE NEGOTIATIONS - GRANTED Engineer Chad Millner explained that staff was requesting authorization to begin negotiations with property owner to purchase Outlot A, which was adjacent to W. 77th Street between Parklawn Avenue and Minnesota Drive. It was noted that good faith discussions with the property owner had been unsuccessful in acquiring sidewalk and utility easements. Mr. Neal noted at this stage staff does not have much information but as negotiations continue, they would meet with the Council in closed session if necessary. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant staff authority to enter into Outlot A purchase negotiations. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. HIGHWAY 169 PROJECT – LOCAL IMPACT UPDATE - PRESENTED Engineer Chad Millner provided an update on what had occurred thus far and the options available going forward regarding local impact from the Highway 169 project. He reviewed traffic counts, traffic calming measures used, and effects on neighboring areas. Mr. Millner shared videos of traffic impacts and concerns surrounding the morning and evening rush hours. He also presented proposed future traffic calming options and shared a letter from a neighboring assisted living facility whose employees have been unable to exit their facility since the construction as well as other neighborhood concerns and outlined options. The Council commented on poor driver behavior and shared safety concerns for school-aged children trying to access buses. Mr. Millner explained some action should help cut activity in half. Beginning Monday, February 27, drivers on the north end would only be allowed out from 7-9 a.m. and on the south end, Lincoln Drive drivers cannot enter that neighborhood from 4-6 p.m. with the exception of buses. The Council inquired if the route could be removed from Google maps to help alleviate traffic. Mr. Millner replied MnDOT was attempting to accomplish this request. The Council suggested permanent closure of Dovre Drive until construction was complete as a better alternative since it might be less confusing and create better safety measures. Mr. Millner noted that might be difficult to enforce and asked if the proposed incremental steps could be considered first. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 6 The Council suggested lowering the speed limit to 25 mph. Mr. Millner said the City Attorney’s opinion was that this need does not meet Statute as speed was not the issue due to the number of cars but the number of cars was the concern. Police Chief Dave Nelson noted citations issued in this area were primarily for stop sign violations. The Council inquired about traffic counts and the need for better signage. Mr. Millner said if we could decrease the volume to 2,000-3000 cars and reduce aggressive driving, the situation should improve. The Council discussed other options, including closing Dovre Drive permanently on the south end in the morning and allowing exit only on the north end and removing all choke-out devices. The Council expressed concerns about residents having to deal with this construction project, the need to balance safety with function of the neighborhood, and suggested incremental changes that would be defensible if additional changes were necessary. Mr. Neal noted 90-100 households were impacted now but many more would be impacted with a hard closure on both ends. He said it was important to recognize these as temporary counter measures that could be removed by the City, if necessary. Mr. Millner estimated the exit only option would result in a reduction of 2,600 cars while complete closure would result in 2,000 cars. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, to close Dovre Drive and allow exit only at Malibu Drive on the north end. Motion and second were withdrawn. The Council directed staff to proceed as planned and update the Council within one week of the results of the exit only strategy and go to the closure if necessary within one week. Mr. Millner shared comments regarding the demolition and noise concerns. He stated staff was trying to get construction activities more in alignment with hours; however, MnDOT construction activities were exempt. VIII.C. RESOLUTION 2017-19 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS - ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-19 accepting various grants and donations. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - APPROVED Mr. Neal reported the City accepted applications for candidates to fill vacancies to advisory boards and commissions through January 31, 2017. The Council conducted interviews on January 30, February 8, and February 9, new member orientation would be held on February 27, and all appointments would start March 1, 2017. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve Board and Commission appointments as follows: Arts and Culture: Anne Miller, Douglas Hegley, Susan Chandler, Alternates Heather Isaacs, Alison Kane; Board of Appeal and Equalization: Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 7 Andrew Ayers, Phillip Buckvold, Alternates Wayne Wenger, Tim Braun; Community Health Commission: Steve Sarles, Andrew Johnson-Cowley, Greg Wright, Alternates Christine Tompkins, Bradley Sundick; Construction Board of Appeals: Alternate Mike Guimond; Energy and Environment: Howard Hoffman, Ramesh Shanmugavel, Alternates Jeff Lundgren, Sunil Rajpurohit; Heritage Preservation Board: Peter Sussman, Karen Kelly, John Ellingson, Laurie Blake, Alternates Rachel Mondry, Eric Gustafson; Human Rights and Relations: Kristina Martin; Robert Rivera, Alternates Janet Kitui, Deborah Chadwick; Park Board: Alternates Patrick Willette, Jack Mennan; Planning Commission None; Transportation Commission: Mindy Ahler, Bocar Kane, Erik Ruthruff, Alternates Sara Kaufman, Marcella McIntyre, Josh Ahlberg. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES 1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JANUARY 12, 2017 2. PARK BOARD, JANUARY 10, 2017 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received Mr. Neal referred to last evening’s meeting regarding the Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail project. He said 16 residents, 3 Councilmembers, and 7 staff members attended that meeting and shared a history of the project. Mr. Neal reviewed resident concerns relating to aesthetics surrounding the materials and height of the boardwalk, procedure as they were unaware of the project, financial impact that the trail would reduce property values, and politics due to the lack of an advocate. He outlined boardwalk elevation concerns and asked if the Council would support the process required to obtain a variance to lower the boardwalk below the floodplain. He discussed the consequences surrounding such a variance request from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, stating the Three Rivers Park District would likely request the City bear the cost of delay, storage of materials, and preparation of a variance application. Mr. Neal noted the probability of receiving a variance was very low. The Council recognized the neighborhood’s frustrations with how different the project was from originally planned and asked if there was a way to build the boardwalk lower than planned. The Council commented on the Watershed District’s process, the possibility of compensatory storage, potential dredging, rerouting the boardwalk, and need for easements. Mr. Neal reviewed history of the current boardwalk location and how the Council had reached the decision. The Council commented on how the original elevation was lower than shown today. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 22, 2017 Page 8 Jonathan Vleming, Three Rivers Park District, said there was not an original location and height was a product of regulatory requirements to get it as low as possible within Watershed District regulations. He said if the Council wished to pursue a variance, the District would work with the City to do so but noted it could delay construction and jeopardize funding. He said he respected the partnership with the City and noted the potential cost of delay could range between $60,000 and $100,000. Mr. Vleming outlined the variance request would include the sketch plan, construction documents with the boardwalk four feet lower, and how compensatory storage would be addressed. Mr. Millner outlined necessary requirements from the Wetland Conservation Act and other agencies to review and determine new grade and design. Mr. Vleming outlined the current construction schedule. The Council consensus was to continue with the Nine Mile Creek Trail as proposed, not begin any variance process, and direct staff to contact the Watershed District for further possible alternatives. XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF FEBRUARY 22, 2017 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 7, 2017. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 22, 2017, meeting available. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Financ e Director Item Activity: Subject:Rec eive P ayment o f Claims As P er: P re-Lis t Dated 02/16/2017 T OTAL: $1,068,613.38 And Per Pre-Lis t Dated 2/23/2017 T OTAL: $903,355.02 Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims. INTRODUCTION: Claims list is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 02/16/2017 TOTAL: $1,068,613.38 Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 2/23/2017 TOTAL: $903,355.02 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4386 2/16/2017 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 158,70 423990 151821 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 158,70 4387 2/16/2017 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 136.25 COFFEE SUPPLY 423988 1264693 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 136.25 4388 2/16/2017 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 686.00 EMPLOYMENT LAW ASST 424260 168850 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 686.00 4389 2/16/2017 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 312.95 WHITE BOARD - CHIEF 2 423888 126609 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 96.01 PW COPIER MAINTENANCE 424292 126668 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 408.96 4390 2/16/2017 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 38.95 SWITCH ASSY 2017 423877 1123224 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.10 LIGHT KNOB 2017 423878 1123976 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.71 LAMP ASSY 2016 424104 1124326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.71 LAMP ASSY 2017 424179 1124326X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.16 REMAN KIT, OIL BATH 2017 424180 1124389 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 279.63 4391 2/16/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 243.00 424163 14-2/08/17 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,400.00 424164 4-2/8/17 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,643.00 4392 2/16/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 55.43 PENS/PADS 424033 OE-440740-1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 278.36 SUPPLIES 423880 WO-264138-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 333.79 4393 2/16/2017 100677 CARGILL INC. 5,533.88 REG. ROAD SALT 423969 2903244060 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 5,533.88 4394 2/16/2017 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 25,000.00 SQUAD LAPTOP PROJECT 424044 GRD1789 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE R55CKR2 LOGISIOI CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4394 2/16/2017 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. Continued... 4,774.88 SQUAD LAPTOP PROJECT 424044 GRD1789 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 15,916.38 SQUAD LAPTOP PROJECT 424050 GSR4283 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 241,08 MOBILE PRINTER SUSSMAN'S VAN 423965 GST6334 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45,932.34 4395 2/16/2017 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 410.44 423967 6696 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 410.44 4396 2/16/2017 104020 DALCO 424.67 PW CLEANING TOOL 424291 3134769 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 424.67 4397 2/16/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 552.14 424250 456378 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 552.14 424250 456378 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 552.15 424250 456378 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 368.10 424249 646567 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 368.10 424249 646567 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 368.10 424249 646567 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 2,760.73 4398 2/16/2017 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,014.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 423881 16154 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 321.00 SOUTH SNOW MELT REPAIR 423882 53846 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,335.00 4399 2/16/2017 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 18,835.00 GEAR DRYER 423889 233801 4623.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Protective Gear Dryer 18,835.00 4400 2/16/2017 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 2,025.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE - Q3 424234 JJ5809 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,250.00 EDINET MAINTENACE - Q4 424233 JJ5882 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,275.00 4401 2/1 6/2017 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 845.75 PASSWARE SOFTWARE 424280 106956344 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.53 MICRO SD CARD 424021 LINDMAND02/03/2 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 017 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4401 4402 2/16/2017 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 100858 LOGIS Continued... 2/16/2017 868.28 663.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,664.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1554.6160 DATA PROCES SING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,648.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 3,319.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,332.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,803.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 6,703.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 6,882.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,719.00 APPLICATION SUPPORT 424276 42980 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 738.06 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,937.94 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,652.26 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,382.77 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,686.75 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 6,447.22 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 424277 43044 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,946.00 LOGIS NETWORK WELLNESS CHARGE 424045 43070 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 63,524.00 4403 2/16/2017 101483 MENARDS 47.31 DRILL BIT AND HARDWARE 423873 33573 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50.74 DROP CLOTHS 423872 33600 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 32.82 LOCATE MARKING PAINT 424274 34192 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 5.19 SCREWS 424261 34204 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.67 WATER FILTER FOR COFFEE 424264 34287 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 204.73 4404 2/16/2017 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 780.00 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 424246 71546 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 780.00 4405 2/16/2017 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 308.00 ACCESS CARD MALFUNCTION 423930 78704 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 7,777.71 ADDITONAL MASTER PANELS 423929 78904 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 8,085.71 4406 2/16/2017 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 868.12 CITY HALL PLUMBING 424226 70235 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/16/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4406 2/16/2017 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS Continued... 4407 2/16/2017 868.12 48.50 SIEMS BUSINESS CARDS 423887 93934 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.50 BUSINESS CARDS-DEREKN 424295 94029 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 122.00 4408 2/16/2017 104672 SPRINT 16.76 424303 873184124-1/17 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.76 424303 873184124-1/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.34 424303 873184124-1/17 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50.28 424303 873184124-1/17 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.50 424303 873184124-1/17 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 117.32 424303 873184124-1/17 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 127.39 424303 873184124-1/17 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.79 424303 873184124-1/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 61.10 424303 873184124-1/17 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.76 424303 873184124-1/17 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 519.00 4409 2/16/2017 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 26.71 METER INSTALLATION MATERIALS 424203 53382528.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 35.78_ SUMP PUMP PIPING REPAIRS 424204 S3382570.001 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 62.49 4410 2/16/2017 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 261.75 WELDING FORMS 424205 29908 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 261.75 4411 2/16/2017 101015 STREICHERS 219.99- UNIFORM EQUIP. 422956 011244921 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 219.99 UNIFORM EQUIP. 422957 11245804 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 169.67 ERT EQUIPMENT 424265 11248668 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 169.67 4412 2/16/2017 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 109.02 BELT KIT 2017 424105 228216 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.60 PIPE 2017 424106 228904 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.43 GASKET 2017 424101 22907 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.05 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/16 /2 017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4412 2/16/2017 4413 2/16/2017 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 135312 SUSSMAN, MIKE Continued... 125.94 CLOTHING REIMBURSE 424273 02142017 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.94 4414 2/16/2017 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 45.28 FITTING 2017 424177 8938760 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.28 4415 2/16/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 123.93 HUB ASSY 2017 423999 EI99540 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.93 4416 2/16/2017 119454 VINOCOPIA 93.50 423995 173190 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 370.50 424049 173201 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 464.00 4417 2/16/2017 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 11.19- 423874 47745023 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 718.02 424142 47770438 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 706.83 4418 2/16/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 889.97 423906 27882 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 917.55 423954 27896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 713.95 424097 27899 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 480.00 424115 28080 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,001.47 411905 2/16/2017 100612 A.M. LEONARD 46.62 ORANGE VESTS 423936 829945 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 46.62 411906 2/16/2017 129458 ACME TOOLS 75.00 424209 4740530 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 497.00 424210 4741414 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 572.00 411907 2/16/2017 116726 ALLISON, SHARON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2 017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411907 2/16/2017 116726 ALLISON, SHARON Continued... 55.64 MILEAGE (104M) 424286 02-13-2017 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 55.64 411908 2/1 6/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 244.47 424135 1003709223 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 244.47 411909 2/16/2017 140059 ARAIN, MUSTAFA 31.51 REFUND 424235 150747001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.51 411910 2/16/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2,725.90 423908 3155912 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,761.20 424026 3157450 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,632.00 424073 3157451 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,632.00 424048 3157452 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,662.40 424074 3157453 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,802.40 424046 3157454 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 29.40- 424195 373447 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 29.40- 423956 373448 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,157.10 411911 2/16/2017 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 12.95 BATTERY 424182 018-427732 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 12.95 411912 2/16/2017 134025 BAUER BUILT TIRE 1,032.55 TIRES RIMS 2017 424186 180206104 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,032.55 411913 2/16/2017 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 860.00 SNOW REMOVAL CONTRACT 423933 147794 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 860.00 411914 2/1 6/2 017 125139 BERNICK'S 735.38 424078 343147 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 272.40 424039 343151 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,007.78 411915 2/16/2017 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411915 2/16/2017 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 369.50 424136 434447 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 133.30 PW COFFEE 424290 435135 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 368.36 424139 435238 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 871.16 411916 2/16/2017 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL 423926 FEB2017-2 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 411917 2/16/2017 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 85.24 DOME EXIT SIGN 424165 912546867 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 273.48 EXTERIOR POLE LIGHT COVERS 424275 912573235 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 358.72 411918 2/16/2017 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 47.76 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 424183 82400782 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 17.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 424184 82400783 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 65.06 411919 2/16/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 49.50 424200 139504 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 944.00 423953 139505 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 368.62 424119 139538 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,362.12 411920 2/16/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 91.11 423945 1080592748 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,853.50 424098 1080592749 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'VERNON SELLING 1,256.55 423946 1080592750 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'VERNON SELLING 449.49 423973 1080592751 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 40.24 423972 1080592752 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 904.35 423938 1080592753 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 501E ST SELLING 569.82 423939 1080592804 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 193.70 423940 1080592805 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.73 423941 1080592806 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,124.14 423943 1080592807 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40.24 423942 1080592808 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 833.01 423948 1080592809 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.00- 424244 2080166823 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.00- 424245 2080166825 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411920 2/16/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 13,304.88 411921 2/16/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 6,012.60 423944 1090669478 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 123.00 423947 1090669479 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,512.65 423900 1090670324 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,546.25 424081 1090672140 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.60 424082 1090672171 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 753.50 424063 1090672172 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 304.65 424080 1090672173 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,301.25 411922 2/16/2017 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 1,232.04 MEETING EXPENSE (CONFERENCE) 424036 020817 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 1,232.04 411923 2/16/2017 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 70.40 MERCHANDISE 424153 926496876 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 162.68 MERCHANDISE 424155 927419785 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 375.08 MERCHANDISE 424154 927428303 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 608.16 411924 2/16/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 666.75 423959 1131670 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15.75- 423891 1131871 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,364.90 423892 1137252 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 122.15 423890 254-113 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,138.05 411925 2/16/2017 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 181.11 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17 572.93 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 17 959.60 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17 1,660.59 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 17 4,018.41 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411925 2/16/2017 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 1,301.50 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 17 468.08 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 17 2,123.07 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 17 9,376.12 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 17 2,070.35 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 17 208.83 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 17 405.70 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 17 586.62 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 17 843.71 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 17 1,549.78 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 17 2,889.31 423916 8000014561-7-1/ 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 17 . 29,215.71 411926 2/16/2017 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING CO. 1,260.00 EAST ROOF REPAIR 424212 16572 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,260.00 411927 2/16/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.25 423920 0146-1/17 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 174.45 423920 0146-1/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 176.61 423920 0146-1/17 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 314.99 423920 0146-1/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 306.40 423920 0146-1/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 59.54 423920 0146-1/17 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 39.04 423920 0146-1/17 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 590.03 424257 0426-2/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 92.49 423918 1019-1/17 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 61.36 424301 1161-2/17 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 61.18 423917 1410-1/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411927 2/16/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 216.79 424302 6661-2/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 590.03 424256 6797-2/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 115.71 423919 7398-1/17 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 2,861.87 41 928 2/16/2017 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 169.99 SAFETY BOOTS 2017 423970 S14929 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 327.98 SAFETY BOOTS 2017 423970 514929 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 497.97 411929 2/16/2017 132519 CHIP JONES PHOTOGRAPHY 1,105.00 PHOTOS FOR WEBSITE 424051 108 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,105.00 411930 2/16/2017 135786 CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT LLC 14.17 REFUND 424220 290137500 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 14.17 411931 2/16/2017 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 TELEPHONE/NETWORK 424161 COM-1123 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 411932 2/16/2 017 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 316.26 423968 3653201191 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 316.26 411933 2/16/2017 120433 COMCAST 28.91 CABLE 424306 220686-2/17 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 28.91 411934 2/16/2017 139995 CONNELLY, WILL 117.70 MILEAGE 424127 021017 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 117.70 411935 2/16/2017 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 840.12 CRAFT SUPPLIES - CLAY 424168 INV000114248 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 840.12 411936 2/1 6/2017 140057 CRAFT HOMES LLC 2,500.00 5724 ZENITH DEMO ESCROW 424305 144662 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2 017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411936 2/16/2017 140057 CRAFT HOMES LLC Continued... 2,500.00 5724 ZENITH AVE NEW HOME ESCRO 424304 144663 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 411937 2/16/2017 102332 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF THE TWIN CITIES 330.55 VAL DOOR REPAIR 424065 24528 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 330.55 411938 2/16/2017 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 96.00 DECEMBER CASH WASHES 424014 458327 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.00 411939 2/16/2017 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 119.47 WATER COOLER 423989 01/31/2017 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 14.32 BOTTLED WATER 424151 114X60992001 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 133.79 411940 2/16/2017 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 202.48 SHORT PAID ORIGINAL 424067 46555 BAL DUE 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 202.48 411941 2/16/2017 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 740.00 SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER 424213 309824 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 740.00 411942 2/16/2017 134475 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 6021 ZENITH AVE DEMO ESCROW 424058 152975 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 411943 2/16/2017 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 11.96 JIFFYTITE DISCON 2017 424173 156762 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.96 411944 2/16/2017 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 32.13 PORTABLE BA1 IERY FOR MICS 424052 020717 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 32.13 411945 2/16/2017 136484 DIESEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 596.00 1/26-2/8/17 424150 020917 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 596.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411946 2/16/2017 124438 DONNAY HOMES Continued... 2,500.00 5401 DREW ESCROW REFUND 424130 137062 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,485.00 3947 49TH SEWER &REC REFUND 424219 150264 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 1,000.00 3947 49TH SEWER &REC REFUND 424219 150264 5901.4646 SEWER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 2,000.00 3947 49TH SEWER &REC REFUND 424219 150264 5901.4645 WATER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 7,985.00 411947 2/16/2017 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S. 1,730.00 AD SALES COMMISSION ACTIVITIES 424232 013117 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 AD SALES COMMISSION BTB 424231 020217 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,830.00 411948 2/1 6/2017 139928 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT 10,016.83 MN-TF1 REIMBURSEMENT 424268 021317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 10,016.83 411949 2/16/2017 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 55.41 424170 98431 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 55.41 411950 2/16/2017 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 3,204.63 CHECK VALVE 424207 0059657-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,204.63 411951 2/16/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 453.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424272 1884689 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 453.10 411952 2/16/2017 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 48.00 LUBRICANTS 2017 423998 1-5177186 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 248.95 FUEL INJECTOR, GASKET 2017 424175 1-5177895 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 204.73 BATTERIES 2017 423876 1-Z10029 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.66 BATTERY 2017 424005 69-256001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 334.44 TENSIONERS, BELTS 2017 424107 69-256725 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.04 WIPER 2017 424000 69-256793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.20 LUBRICANT 2017 424100 69-256824 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.88 PIPE ASSY 2017 424099 74-149803 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,006.90 411953 2/16/2017 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 576.00 1/26-2/8/17 424147 020917 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO 6 2/16/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411953 2/16/2017 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 140058 FANDREY, JOHN Continued... 411954 2/16/2017 576.00 158.40 INTRO TO HANDGUNS REFUND 424230 021317 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 158.40 411955 2/16/2017 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 5.20 BOLTS 424114 MNTC2142806 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 5.20 411956 2/16/2017 140051 FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS CORP 108.00 3905 69TH APP FEE/CANCELLED 424133 153310 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 108.00 411957 2/16/2017 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 66.50 424196 32504 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 66.50 411958 2/16/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES 44.80 RUGS 423883 1006324711 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 190.65 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 423893 1006327100 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 2017 423896 1006327101 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 108.78 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 423894 1006327102 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 14.46 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 423895 1006327103 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 301.24 RENATL UNIFORM 2017 423897 1006327104 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.00 SHOP RAGS 424294 1006335966 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 711.19 411959 2/16/2017 101662 GCSAA 240.00 GCSAA BRYAN 424224 591662 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 240.00 411960 2/16/2017 101103. GRAINGER 34.47 FOUNTAIN SUPPLIES 424214 9353246292 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 45.47 FACIAL TISSUES 2017 424103 9354114606 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 79.94 411961 2/16/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 411.25 423949 MN00016752 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 569.50 424090 MN00016756 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411961 2/16/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 100785 GREUPNER, JOE Continued... 411962 2/16/2017 980.75 472.00 1/26-2/8/17 424144 020917 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 472.00 411963 2/16/2017 100008 GRUBE, MICHAEL 48.00 1/26-2/8/17 424148 020917 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 48.00 411964 2/16/2017 100788 H&L MESABI 1,192.00 POLY BLADES 2017 424187 97895 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,192.00 411965 2/16/2017 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 547.37 CONTROL CABINET HEATERS 424185 171217-1 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 547.37 411966 2/16/2017 103725 HAMER, STEVE 45.98 UNIFORM PANTS SOCKS 2017 424111 020917 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 45.98 411967 2/16/2017 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,174.96 424188 4023445 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,174.96 411968 2/16/2017 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 206.09 UNIFORM PANTS, SOCKS 2017 424283 020917 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 206.09 411969 2/16/2017 139485 HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY 35.00 INVOICE FOR ROOM RESERVATION 424038 020817 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 35.00 411970 2/16/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,024.10 JANUARY BOOKINGS 423964 1000087289 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 1,024.10 411971 2/16/2 017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,543.86 JAN. RADIO FEES - FIRE DEPT. 424034 1000087150 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411971 2/16/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Continued... 411972 2/16/2017 1,543.86 3,094.38 JAN. RADIO FEES - POLICE DEPT. 424035 1000087151 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,094.38 411973 2/16/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 169.00 HENN CO INFO TECH 424134 1000087010 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 169.00 411974 2/16/2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 100.07 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424269 37723270 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 107.60 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424270 38151100 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.58 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424271 38241415 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 296.25 411975 2/16/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 669.00 423958 875935 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,560.50 424037 875936 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,743.50 423907 876061 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,973.00 411976 2/16/2017 140061 HOWELLS, KAREN 16.04 REFUND 424240 152764005 . 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.04 411977 2/16/2017 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 85.00 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 424113 HUBBARD 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REIMBURSEMENT 85.00 411978 2/16/2017 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 159.95 UNIFORM PANTS 2017 424112 020917 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 159.95 411979 2/16/2017 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 81.90 FILTERS 2017 424162 038093007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.90 411980 2/16/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411980 2/16/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued... 260.00 424129 47792 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 398.00 423909 47880 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 658,00 411981 2/16/2017 140046 IWASZKO, CATHERINE 1,833.00 AMBULANCE REFUND 424042 020917 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,833.00 411982 2/16/2017 140047 JEREMY HOEHN CONSULTING 2,500.00 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT 424279 0000003 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,500.00 411983 2/16/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 193.55 424077 2615179 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,808.16 424060 2630332 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,909.35 423957 2630351 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,506.79 423923 2630352 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 164.99 423922 2630353 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.80 423960 2630354 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,362.50 423921 2630355 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,654.95 424022 2630359 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13.82- 424023 2635002 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 28,628.27 411984 2/1 6/2017 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 1,000.00 6308 WARREN REC REFUNDS 424223 0150949 5901.4646 SEWER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 2,000.00 6308 WARREN REC REFUNDS 424223 0150949 5901.4645 WATER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 2,485.00 SAC REIMBUSMENT 6308 WARREN 424056 150949 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 5,485.00 411985 2/16/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 11,502.76 424062 5645574 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 108.40 424194 5650901 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 785.62 424193 5651913 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.32 424020 5651914 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 97.16 424017 5651915 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 141.80 424016 5651916 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 11,104.37 424247 5651917 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 122.66 424158 5651918 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,063.02 424192 5651919 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411985 2/16/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 664.48 424191 5651920 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 167.49 424123 5651921 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .49 424146 5651922 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12,089.93 424248 5651923 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 223.82 423993 5651924 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 867.90 424018 5651925 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,691.34 424071 5651927 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 728.65 424145 5651928 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,067.06 424159 5651929 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,246.10 424076 5651930 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,218.31 424157 5651931 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 129.16 424075 5651932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,519.91 424122 5651935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 234.00 423992 5651936 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 604.82 424124 5651937 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 868.27 423991 5651938 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,901.38 423996 5651939 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 744.63 424109 5653033 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 284.16 424110 5653034 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.16- 423905 594490 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 24.46- 423904 600435 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 62,226.39 411986 2/16/2017 131434 JOHNSON, ALEC 384.99 MILEAGE 424284 021017 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 384.99 411987 2/16/2017 140050 JP & CO 10,000.00 6124 OAKLAWN ESCROW REFUND 424131 145329 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 411988 2/16/2017 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL REIMBURSEMENT 424253 021317C 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 411989 2/16/2017 117723 KAPALA, ELISSA 30.00 EMT REIMBURSEMENT 424216 EMT02012017 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 411990 2/16/2017 140052 KELLOGG, SHELBY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411990 2/16/2017 140052 KELLOGG, SHELBY Continued... 88.34 MILEAGE 424128 021017 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 88.34 411991 2/16/2017 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 8.00 MEETING PARKING FEE 423925 PTYCSH2 5760.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 45.00 TREE PLANT DISEASE DIAGNOSIS 423925 PTYCSH2 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 63.88 JUICE, CHEESE STICKS, YOGART 423925 PTYCSH2 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 82.08 GENERAL SUPPLIES 423925 PTYCSH2 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 198.96 411992 2/16/2017 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH 220.00 1/26-2/8/17 424149 020917 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 220.00 411993 2/16/2017 113832 KOESTER, LORI 24.54 REFUND 424236 203604000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 24.54 411994 2/1 6/2017 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 150.00 IMPOUND FEE 423963 77192 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 175.00 IMPOUND FEE 423962 77200 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 150.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 2017 424002 78268 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 475.00 411995 2/16/2017 135267 LDK BUILDERS INC. 7,500.00 5841 BEARD AVE ESCROW REFUND 424132 146919 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 411996 2/16/2017 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,468.60 JANUARY ATTORNEY FEES 423966 013117 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,468.60 411997 2/16/2017 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 225.00 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 424085 249000 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 225.00 411998 2/16/2017 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 5,861.91 WORK COMP - JAN DEDUCTIBLE 424215 0200120002 - 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 2/1/17 5,861.91 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount 2/16/2017 -- Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 411998 2/16/2017 411999 2/16/2017 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 135867 LIBATION PROJECT Continued... 387.12 424096 7232 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 387.12 412000 2/16/2017 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 3,368.57 911 LOGGER SERVICE CONTRACT 2A 424287 2447217 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 3,368.57 412001 2/16/2017 133185 LOGAN, PATRICK 51.18 CLEANING SUPPLIES 423924 020717 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 51.18 412002 2/16/2017 140053 LONERGAN, MICHAEL 25.48- REFUND 424217 342547006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.48- REFUND 424217 342547006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.48 REFUND 424217 342547006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.48 REFUND 424217 342547006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.48 REFUND 424217 342547006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.48 412003 2/16/2017 140055 MALETTA, BARBARA 52.37 REFUND 424221 341958028 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 52.37 412004 2/16/2017 104650 MICRO CENTER 53.98 423898 6455345 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 89.99 423899 6459389 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 143.97 412005 2/16/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 4,335.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 424206 35389 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,335.00 412006 2/16/2017 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT 144,013.53 MN-TF1 REIMBURSEMENT 424267 021317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF I ADMINISTRATION 144,013.53 412007 2/16/2017 105716 MINNESOTA AWWA 775.00 METRO WATER SCHOOL 424227 021317D 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412007 2/16/2017 105716 MINNESOTA AWWA Continued... 775.00 412008 2/16/2017 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTYATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 99.00 VEH FORFEITURE FORMS 424252 200002483 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 99.00 412009 2/16/2017 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 188.00 EXAM & RECERT FEES 424228 021317A 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 188.00 412010 2/16/2017 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 2,760.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 424262 021317B 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,760.00 412011 2/16/2017 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 1,150.00 MRWA WATER SCHOOL 424263 021317E 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,150.00 412012 2/16/2017 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 24.47 424208 0117826-EV 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.47 412013 2/16/2017 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 36.00 POSTERS 424066 21743 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 72.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 424083 21869 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 27.58 GALLERY - GENERAL SUPPLIES 424167 22085 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 135.58 412014 2/16/2017 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 30.00 424086 ABR01588611 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION 100,00 424225 ALR0069436I 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 130.00 412015 2/16/2017 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1.97 SPARK PLUG 2017 424003 400007001164625 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9 16.83 DRAIN PLUG 2017 424102 400007001166634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3 18.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412016 2/16/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Continued... 243.00 424095 1177/8 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.00 412017 2/16/2017 104350 NIKE USA INC. 37.05 LOGO SET UP FEE 424152 993323723 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37.05 412018 2/16/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 156.60 LIGHTS 2017 424001 43065 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 757.25 SIREN 2017 423997 43076 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 913.85 412019 2/16/2017 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 387.57 LIFTING SLING 424202 594512 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 387.57 412020 2/16/2017 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 414.00 424125 17031 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 414.00 412021 2/1 6/2 017 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,963.26 423952 8579280 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 406.20 423901 8579301-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,411.18 424091 8579304 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,780.64 412022 2/16/2017 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 UTILITY FEES 424087 57822686 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 412023 2/16/2017 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 1,491.16 424138 28496801 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,491.16 412024 2/16/2017 131339 PETROVIC, FRANK 96.30 MILEAGE 424259 021317 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 96.30 412025 2/1 6/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,103.51 424015 2117982 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412025 2/16/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 766.15 424199 2117983 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 82,16 424019 2117984 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MLX 50TH ST SELLING 155.32 424198 2117985 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,873.64 424143 2117987 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,004.44 424072 2117988 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,824.21 423994 2117991 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,421.43 424121 2117992 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.00- 424160 256779 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,218.86 412026 2/16/2017 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 220.00 424211 279529 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 220.00 412027 2/16/2017 137070 PURVES, JUSTIN 35.55 REIMBURSEMENT 424285 02102017 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 35.55 412028 2/16/2017 140062 RAYMOND, DENISE 17.27 REFUND 424242 162447009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 17.27 412029 2/16/2017 134496 REFINED LLC 132.60 REFUND 424237 120219003 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.31 REFUND 424238 120243003 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 207.91 412030 2/16/2017 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 38,181.96 RECYCLING 423927 894-004283588 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 38,181.96 412031 2/16/2017 133200 RIDGE CREEK CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 5908 WOODDALE AVE DEMO ESCROW 424055 137978 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 5808 FAIRFAX AVE DEMO ESCROW 424054 139659 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 412032 2/16/2017 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 405.00 AD SALES COMMISSION DASHERBOAR 423931 117151-8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 405.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 2/16/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412033 2/16/2017 139999 ROBEY CONSTRUCTION Continued... 10,000.00 5808 CRESCENT TERTEMP CO 424057 145661 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 412034 2/16/2017 101830 ROC INC. 500.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICE 423935 62410 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 500.00 412035 2/16/2017 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 124.21 PARTS WASHER CLEANOUT 2017 423875 8002338681 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.21 412036 2/16/2017 100995 SEH 1,246.40 ARDEN PARK D 424025 327715 04407.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION 6,100.21 PARKLAWN AVE 424047 327716 01444.1705.20 15126 CONSULTING DESIGN Parklawn Ave 2,105.38 424029 327718 01422.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 1,403.59 424029 327718 01438.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 2016 Recon White Oaks C 3,545.15 424030 327719 01430.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 4,409.94 PARKLAWN AVE 424031 327723 01444.1705.20 15126 CONSULTING DESIGN Parklawn Ave 18,810.67 412037 2/16/2017 140056 SHANNON, DAVE 121.95 REFUND 424222 0159090504 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 121.95 412038 2/16/2017 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 708.00 VEEAM RENEWAL 423961 B06037668 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 708.00 412039 2/16/2017 120784 SIGN PRO 27.01 INFO STICKER 424241 11421 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.01 412040 2/16/2017 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 59.39 423879 302889 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 188.65 424140 303281 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 248.04 412041 2/16/2017 140044 SLADE, JANE 600.00 REFUND/CANCELLATION 423928 020717 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 600.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412041 412042 2/16/2017 2/16/2017 140044 SLADE, JANE 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL Continued... 1,481.04 WRENCH SET 2017 423971 00201076263 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 716.39 SOCKET SET 2017 424004 ARV/31545518 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,197.43 412043 2/16/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 12,037.60 424061 1504131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287.36 423974 1506552 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 247.16 423975 1506553 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50Th ST SELLING 434.40 423902 1506554 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,902.00 423903 1506555 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.20 423950 1506556 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,644.40 424070 1506557 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .40 424068 1506558 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.40 424069 1506559 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.93 424079 1506560 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 63.32 423955 1506561 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 867.60 423951 1506562 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .80 424093 1506563 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.27 423912 1506564 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,810.87 423911 1506565 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,383.05 423910 1506566 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,858.40 424094 1506567 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,441.97 424116 1506568 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.20 424092 1506569 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36,237.33 412044 2/16/2017 134700 SPOK INC. 189.00 PAGERS 424251 A0319246N 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 189.00 412045 2/16/2017 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 5,446.79 50-FR TRAFFIC OVERVIEW 424059 10228.00-1 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,446.79 412046 2/16/2017 140060 SRFC SOUTHDALE SQ LLC 178.79 REFUND 424239 112240140 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 178.79 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16 /2 017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412047 2/16/2017 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC Continued... 1,753.85 TRASH LIDS 424126 19199 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 5,362.75 TRASH RECEPTACLE 424108 19200 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 7,116.60 412048 2/16/2017 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 634.36 TIRES 2017 424178 10144854 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 634.36 412049 2/16/2017 121681 SUMMIT 320.00 PAMELA PARK SPRINKELER 424229 2113769 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 320.00 412050 2/16/2017 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 143.00 MOVIE RENTAL 423932 RG2293689 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 143.00 412051 2/16/2017 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 311.96 CONCESSION PRODUCT 424190 147097359 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 311.96 412052 2/16/2017 138281 TARRAF CONSTRUCTION INC. 130,131.44 CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 424298 APPL NO. 8 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 85,507.17 CONTRACTOR PAYMENT #9 424299 APPL NO. 9 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 215,638.61 412053 2/16/2017 140022 THINK DIGITAL SIGNS 213.39 OVER PAYMENT ON PERMIT 424053 153433 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 213.39 412054 2/16/2017 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,171.65 424041 1213548 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 20.45 424040 1215862 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,192.10 412055 2/16/2017 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 186.40 424117 6140 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 186.40 412056 2/16/2017 136589 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. 370.03 GENERATOR BATTERY 424293 170206-009 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16 /2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412056 2/16/2017 136589 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. Continued... 370.03 412057 2/16/2017 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 196.12 424189 10174673 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 196.12 412058 2/16/2017 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 223.37 424169 66398018 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 223.37 412059 2/16/2017 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 1,063.48 EAST AMONIA LEAK REPAIR 424166 17860 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,063.48 412060 2/1 6/2 017 123649 TOWMASTER 22.01 GREASE 2017 423976 388969 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.22 HUB DRUM ASSY 2017 424172 388992 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.56 LIGHT BOX 2017 424171 388997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 461.79 412061 2/16/2017 140054 TRIDGELL, DAVID 160.00- REFUND 424218 330819002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 REFUND 424218 330819002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 REFUND 424218 330819002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 412062 2/16/2017 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2,751.26 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED MONTHLY INV 424024 013117 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 173.95 CLASS A - NORDWIG 423886 40011-2 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,925.21 412063 2/16/2017 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 263.08 424201 414910-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 493.53 424043 414914-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 83.62 424028 414915-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 703.45 TP, CAN LINERS, HAND SOAP 424156 415037-00 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 1,543.68 412064 2/16/2017 140048 VECTOR SOLUTIONS 4,222.00 TRAINING SOFTWARE 424278 INV00000017101 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No by No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412064 2/16/2017 140048 VECTOR SOLUTIONS Continued... 4,222.00 412065 2/16/2017 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 825.00 AR&LE SPRING/SUMMER 424181 MV2017-01 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 825.00 412066 2/16/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 116.40 BREAKERS 424281 S000121449.001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 22.81 424282 5000121469.001 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 166.60 OUTLETS 423884 S000128713.001 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 101.74- MOTION SENSORS SUP OFFICE 424027 V14355 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 204.07 412067 2/16/2017 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 75.00 SAFETY GLASSES 2017 423885 3099952 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 74.04 SAFETY GLASSES 2017 423885 3099952 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 149.04 412068 2/16/2017 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION 122.80 AWARD 424084 127811 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 122.80 412069 2/16/2017 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 172.74 424137 96752 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 172.74 412070 2/1 6/2017 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 77.22 FS#2 424296 0024181-2808-4 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 182.12 SENIOR CTR 424296 0024181-2808-4 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 193.95 FS#1 424296 0024181-2808-4 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 293.43 CITY HALL 424296 0024181-2808-4 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 592.81 PW 424296 0024181-2808-4 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 592.81 PW 424296 0024181-2808-4 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 77.81 ART CENTER 424296 0024181-2808-4 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 90.39 BRAEMAR DOME 424296 0024181-2808-4 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 64.29 CLUB HOUSE 424296 0024181-2808-4 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 109.82 BRAEMAR MAINT 424296 0024181-2808-4 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,406.92 ARENA2 424296 0024181-2808-4 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,552.80 EDINBOU 424296 0024181-2808-4 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 93.65 GV LIQUOR 424296 0024181-2808-4 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY R55 CKR2 LOGIS 101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/16/2017 -- 2/16/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412070 2/16/2017 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN Continued... 147.34 YORK LIQUOR 424296 0024181-2808-4 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 5,475.36 412071 2/16/2017 130574 WATSON COMPANY 156.56 424141 873490 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 156.56 412072 2/16/2017 140063 WELLENS, CHRISTINE 5.28 REFUND 424243 305723009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 5.28 412073 2/16/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 463.88 424120 7120021 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 878.32 424088 7120023 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,170.63 424118 7120024 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.16 424197 7120201 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,593.99 412074 2/16/2017 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 61.58 SENIOR CTR OUTER LIGHTS 424289 14183802 1653.6530 REPAIR PARTS SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 10.06 1G SS BLANKS 424266 14206300 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 71.64 412075 2/16/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 28.00 FRANCE & HAZELTON LANDSCAPING 424032 01686-610-8 01259.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 11,750.50 TRAFFIC STUDY- SOUTHDALE 424064 01686-780-1 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 274.00 424297 2-01686-760 07129.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT S129 CORNELIA DR SIDEWALK 12,052.50 412076 2/16/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY 278.43 423913 52638465 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34.77 423984 532531966 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 31,844.86 424006 532587074 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 970.87 423985 532587518 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 36.22 51-8102668-0 423915 532629651 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 21.22 423977 532633437 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 936.11 423978 532633715 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 273.81 423986 532644423 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 17.28 423981 532659517 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 41.27 423987 532662707 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:39 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/16/2017 -- Inv No 2/16/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412076 2/16/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 17.28 423980 532667559 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 20.72 423983 532668401 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 39.86 423979 532669987 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 82.02 423982 532677681 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRO 15.81 423914 532679754 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 244.43 424009 532782010 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,002.74 424007 532819628 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 280.31 424008 532819757 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 982.21 424010 532953354 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 2,739.42 424013 533140781 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 218.97 424011 533157228 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.77 424254 533262757 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,210.08 424255 533348850 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,631.31 424255 533348850 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,997.53 424255 533348850 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 635.05 424012 533361431 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 6,241.16 424300 534026854 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,398.08 424258 534048327 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 57,250.59 412077 2/16/2017 124997 XTREME INTEGRATON INC. 270.00 SECURITY SCREEN MOUNTING 423934 16-7309 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 270.00 412078 2/16/2017 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO. 150.80 PLYWOOD 423937 00001376-001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.80 412079 2/1 6/2 017 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 106.50 424089 17747 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 106.50 1,068,613.38 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 904,388.74 164,224.64 1,068,613.38 01000 GENERAL FUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 05950 RECYCLING FUND 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 234,541.22 28,693.57 274.00 36,650.03 11,913.74 20,691.26 2,247.01 552.87 970.87 12,537.75 20,019.25 784.87 2,197.56 4,098.67 214,827.78 44,821.56 2,794.88 38,181.96 5,861.91 226,475.47 154,030.36 5,446.79 Report Totals 1,068,613.38 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/15/2017 11:25:45 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 2/16/2017 - 2/16/2017 Company Amount We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and proc: r' es date ( e Director lariv ag-op n ger R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4419 2/23/2017 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 312.68 DOOR 10 PW BLDG 424884 21702101 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 771.31 SOUTH RAMP DOOR 424883 21702142 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,083.99 4420 2/23/2017 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 44.80 424505 2089873 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44.80 4421 2/23/2017 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 78.52 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 424722 152005 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 78.52 4422 2/23/2017 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 961.42 424646 1006531 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 961.42 4423 2/23/2017 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 72.19 424545 57619600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 400.65 424529 57619700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,165.85 424496 57619800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 865.65 424538 57620200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.92 424409 95376100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 313.10 424657 95376200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,856.36 4424 2/23/2017 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 92.96 LABELING TAPE 424520 126843 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 92.96 4425 2/23/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 210.00 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 424697 15-2/15/17 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 210.00 4426 2/23/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 76.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 424677 OE-441453-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 92.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 424662 OE-441469-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 106.64 GENERAL SUPPLIES 424374 WO-266498-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 4.69 GENERAL SUPPLIES 424373 WO-266588-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 39.20 GENERAL SUPPLIES 424510 WO-267386-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 29.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 424684 WO-267392-1 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4426 2/23/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Continued... 4427 2/23/2017 349.02 9,526.01 KNUTSON BILL 424482 013117 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 9,526.01 4428 2/23/2017 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 345.42 ACER 27" MONITOR FOR JEFF SIEM 424726 GVC7570 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.42 4429 2/23/2017 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 332.00 424353 67-1432 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 362.00 424503 67-1452 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 694.00 4430 2/23/2017 104020 DALCO 834.60 424417 3121722 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 776.40 GENERAL SUPPLIES - CLEANING 424687 3138699 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,611.00 4431 2/23/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 105.75 2017 CDBG PH NOTICE 424431 457936 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 114.00 PUBLISH ORD 2016-12 424430 457937 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 219.75 4432 2/23/2017 101956 EMERGENCYAPPARATUS MAINTENANCE 710.08 T-90 REPAIRS 424514 91610 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 710.08 4433 2/23/2017 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 1,392.75 WEST COMPRESSOR REPAIR 424377 53953 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 325.00 #1 BRINE PUMP REPAIR 424378 53954 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,717.75 4434 2/23/2017 129508 IMPACT 3,361.83 424698 121700 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,361.83 4435 2/23/2017 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 102.00 424735 675023 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGISIOI CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4435 2/23/2017 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 101792 LUBE-TECH Continued... 4436 2/23/2017 102.00 248.39 GREASE 2017 424647 897036 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 248.39 4437 2/23/2017 101483 MENARDS 18.97 DRAWER ORGANIZER 2017 424434 34187 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.98 LADDER 424492 34196 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 22.08 424658 34275 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.35 MAPLE BOARD 424736 34585 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.80 METAL SAWHORSE 424737 34686 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 12.45 DRILL BIT 424738 34701 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 97.29 424643 34703 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3.99 DRIVER BIT 424739 34720 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.35 424645 34783 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 352.26 4438 2/23/2017 100898 MINVALCO 163.51 BOILER PART, ST. 1 424519 071965 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 163.51 4439 2/23/2017 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 586.00 FURNACE REPAIR 424477 71658 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAN1 586.00 4440 2/23/2017 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 676.01 KLEENEX, PAPER TOWELS 424361 11599 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,484.02 BDAY CUTLERY„ PLATES 424363 11601 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 239.06 CONCESSION SANITIZER 424362 11639 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 505.89 BATHROOM SUPPLIES 424381 11655 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 772.74 GLOVES, LINERS, TISSUE 424372 11663 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,677.72 4441 2/23/2017 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 257.46 ALARM SERVICE 424478 78297 7411.6250 ALARM SERVICE PSTF OCCUPANCY 22,000.00 424424 79039 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 22,257.46 4442 2/23/2017 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4442 2/23/2017 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING Continued... 11,453.32 424748 1778 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 11,453.32 4443 2/23/2017 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 277.81 PLUGS, SEAL,FCASE 2017 424457 22946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 277.81 4444 2/23/2017 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 29.76 COUPLER 424479 8956955 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 29.76 4445 2/23/2017 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,507.89 424376 47844470 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,507.89 4446 2/23/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,635.40 424323 28455 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,982.27 424560 28459 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 488.40 424654 28739 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,106.07 412080 2/23/2017 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 450.00 SMART DRIVING CLASS 424728 021617 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 450.00 412081 2/23/2017 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 435.00 424341 E-2211 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 290.00 424389 E-2215 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 725.00 412082 2/23/2017 137506 ABOOD, JOSEPH 13.00 GOLF SHOW ADMISSION TICKET 424898 GOLF SHOW 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 7.00 GOLF SHOW PARKING 424897 PARKING 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 20.00 412083 2/23/2017 140101 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1,739.00 AMB BILLED IN ERROR - KOGLE 424760 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,739.00 412084 2/23/2017 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412084 2/23/2017 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 156.10 CARIBOU COFFEE 424367 52641 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 156.10 412085 2/23/2017 103160 AL'S VACUUM & JANITORIAL 12.71 424470 28180 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 12.71 412086 2/23/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 176.88 LAUNDRY 424517 1003712437 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 136.69 LAUNDRY 424518 1003714816 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.36 424425 1003714822 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 131.51 424675 1003717137 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 139.52 LAUNDRY 424721 1003719033 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 724.96 412087 2/23/2017 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 857.00 424474 66778 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 857.00 412088 2/23/2017 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 10,546.00 2016 FIRE CIP RADIO REPLACEMEN 424307 66133 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 10,546.00 412089 2/23/2017 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE 18,000.00 GR GREEN PRELIM STUDY - STEP 2 424648 201701 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18,000.00 412090 2/23/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,080.10 424540 3158977 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,213.75 424412 3158978 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,215.00 424396 3158979 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 52.06- 424531 373755 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 23.52- 424388 373934 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,433.27 412091 2/23/2017 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 4,722.00 PLOW KIT 2016 424633 10171771 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,722.00 412092 2/23/2017 118758 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412092 2/23/2017 118758 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL Continued... 17,328.34 2017 424460 RO# C300348 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17,328.34 412093 2/23/2017 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 12.95 BATTERY 424636 018-428334 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 12.95 412094 2/23/2017 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 9.00 ART WORK SOLD 424663 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.00 412095 2/23/2017 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 424368 4675141 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 288.00 412096 2/23/2017 125139 BERNICK'S 171.60 424397 344347 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 992.20 424343 344348 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 272.20 424393 344351 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 579.15 424351 344352 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,015.15 412097 2/23/2017 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 393.25 CRAFT SUPPLIES 424453 7272270 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 393.25 412098 2/23/2017 102852 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHEILD OF MN 1,374.40 AMB OVERPAYMENT - JASON EVANS 424842 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,374.40 412099 2/23/2 017 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,787.01 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424743 82408878 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,787.01 412100 2/23/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 594.00 424340 139656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,104.50 424570 139677 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,698.50 412101 2/23/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO ?l/ Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412101 2/23/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 3,509.35 424337 1080595876 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,157.01 424558 1080595877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,504.89 424347 1080595878 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 296.90 424356 1080595879 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,486.18 424326 1080595880 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,744.84 424400 1080595881 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 481.56 424401 1080595882 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,059.45 424402 1080595883 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,923.59 424319 1080595914 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.00- 424332 2080166821 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.00- 424568 2080166877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21,023.77 412102 2/23/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 2,816.60 424314 1090672848 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 261.75 424315 1090672849 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 715.05 424539 1090674900 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,021.93 424549 1090674981 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,815.33 412103 2/23/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,269.60 424354 1137451 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,571.40 424313 1137452 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 125.60- 424312 1142937 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2.20- 424311 1142943 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,713.20 412104 2/23/2017 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 424664 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 412105 2/23/2017 135781 CATT, KRISSY 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 424665 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 412106 2/23/2017 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE 18.80 NAME BADGE 424473 V435033 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 18.80 412107 2/23/2017 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount 2/23/2017 -- Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412107 2/23/2017 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. Continued... 8,312.89 424701 3400722 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,312.89 412108 2/23/2017 101815 CENTRAIRE INC. 424.60 REFUND PERMIT/DUPLICATE 424507 153691 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 424.60 412109 2/23/2017 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 2,117.00 ACLS RECERTIFICATION 424513 00638193 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,117.00 412110 2/23/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.91 RICHFIELD 911 424480 0056-2/17 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 104.90 EDINA 911 424481 0652-2/17 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 162.64 424851 2951-2/17 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 366.45 412111 2/23/2017 100683 CHEMSEARCH 663.01 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGR 424380 2610931 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 663.01 412112 2/23/2017 122317 CITY OF EDINA- COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 IT DEPT. 424421 COM-1147 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 412113 2/23/2017 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 547.16 WATER-RICHARDS GC 424318 335037016-2/17 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 460.97 WATER - ST 1 424678 342163045-2/17 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,008.13 412114 2/23/2017 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 350.00 424386 3600201863 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 350.00 412115 2/23/2017 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 911.13 424695 M424-002073-3/1 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 7 911.13 412116 2/23/2017 120433 COMCAST R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412116 2/23/2017 120433 COMCAST Continued... 49.72 CABLE TV 424464 23973-2/17 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 85.99 RAMP INTERNET 424886 540232-2/17 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 135.71 412117 2/23/2017 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,145.32 424463 9630-2/17 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,145.32 424463 9630-2/17 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,145.32 424463 9630-2/17 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 12.50 TV AD BALANCE 424369 CW28320 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,096.62 COMCAST - DOME ADVERTISING 424462 CW28390 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 4,545.08 412118 2/23/2017 135711 CONFLUENCE 13,017.58 FRED RICHARDS MASTER PLAN 424345 13845 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 13,017.58 412119 2/23/2017 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING INC. 4,480.00 CONCRETE FLOOR REPLACEMENT 424360 121416 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 4,480.00 412120 2/23/2017 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 2.60 ART WORK SOLD 424666 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.60 412121 2/23/2017 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 88.39 SENSOR 2017 424423 100-53288 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.39 412122 2/23/2017 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 75.59 424472 93662639 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 75.59 412123 2/23/2017 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 20.80 ART WORK SOLD 424667 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 20.80 412124 2/23/2017 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 740.00 CONTRACTED LABOR TREES 424685 910892646 1644.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TREES & MAINTENANCE 740.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412125 2/23/2017 140090 DDA HUMAN RESOURCES INC. Continued... 8,400.00 2016 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 424489 00003594 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 8,400.00 412126 2/23/2017 140103 DELLIS, JAMES 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424762 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 412127 2/23/2017 140102 DORNFELD, DAVID 1,011.30 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424761 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,011.30 412128 2/23/2017 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 157.00 424660 3332786 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 157.00 412129 2/23/2017 139768 DOUVILLE, CELESTE 2.60 ART WORK SOLD 424668 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.60 412130 2/23/2017 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S. 180.00 AD SALES COMMISSION THE TIMES 424700 2017TIMES 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 180.00 412131 2/23/2017 140091 DUMAIS, KELLY 132.79 MILEAGE LOG 424359 021617 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 132.79 412132 2/23/2017 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS 225.36 DOME RANGE BUCKETS 424444 0092765-IN 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 225.36 412133 2/23/2017 103594 EDINALARM INC. 380.71 ALARM REPAIR-MAINT. SHOP 424471 112855 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 380.71 412134 2/23/2017 137586 EGAN, WENDY 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 424669 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.60 412135 2/23/2017 125415 EHMILLER, DAVID R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412135 2/23/2017 125415 EHMILLER, DAVID Continued... 323.55 EMS SUPPLY ROOM STORAGE 424706 021717 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 323.55 412136 2/23/2017 102758 ELDER-JONES BLDG PERMIT SERIVCE INC 44.16 80% PERMIT REFUND 424506 153036 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 44.16 412137 2/23/2017 139788 ELVERUM, JOAN A 1,649.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424844 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,649.00 412138 2/23/2017 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 2,162.37 LIGHTBAR FOR NEW SQUAD 424490 AW010317-6 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 2,162.37 412139 2/23/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 50.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424741 1886436 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,328.85 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424724 1887490 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,378.90 412140 2/23/2017 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 2,666.00 EXPLORER CONFERENCE 424640 EXP POST 925 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 2,666.00 412141 2/23/2017 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 68.75 ARM ASSY 2017 424441 1-5178140 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.00 WIRE KIT, DISTR. CAP 2017 424436 1-5178506 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.44 BELT TENSIONER 2017 424456 1-5179829 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.08- CREDIT MEMO 2017 424746 1-5181865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 204.73 BAI1ERIES 2017 424458 1-Z10095 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.41 MANIFOLD SET, PLUGS 2017 424437 69-257037 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.01- CREDIT MEMO 2017 424442 69-257065 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.52 GASKET 2017 424485 69-257401 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.33 LINK KIT 2017 424733 69-257797 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 302.09 412142 2/23/2017 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 477.00 424403 33471 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 477.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412143 2/23/2017 103039 FREY, MICHAEL Continued... 49.35 REIMBURSEMENT- MUSIC IN EDINA 424719 021717 2611.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUSIC IN EDINA 32.11 REIMBURSEMENT- GALLERY 424719 021717 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 81.46 412144 2/23/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES 87.15 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424448 1006338363 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 2017 424449 1006338364 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.23 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424450 1006338365 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 14.46 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424451 1006338366 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.74 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424452 1006338367 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.51 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424907 1006349734 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 2017 424906 1006349735 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.73 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424905 1006349736 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 14.46 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424904 1006349737 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.74 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 424903 1006349738 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 370.54 412145 2/23/2017 136953 GENESIS REMODELING LLC 10,000.00 5512 DONCASTER TCO REFUND 424508 147088 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 412146 2/23/2017 101103 GRAINGER 16.73 2017 SAFETY GLASSES 424382 9355326001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.94 2017 SAFETY GLASSES 424382 9355326001 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.76 2017 SAFETY GLASSES 424382 9355326001 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 29.55 DRAWER LINER 2017 424433 9355326019 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.80 LABELER 2017 424435 9355326027 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.70 PLASTIC KNIVES 2017 424429 9356690009 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 26.51 DIE 2017 424455 9359322121 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.30 424642 9361594345 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 28.22 424644 9362231954 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 294.51 412147 2/23/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 811.25 424329 MN00017063 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 629.75 424324 MN00017064 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,441.00 412148 2/23/2017 100155 GRITTON, KAY 27.30 ART WORK SOLD 424670 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412148 412149 2/23/2017 100155 GRITTON, KAY 138723 HALLORAN, LIZ Continued... 2/23/2017 27.30 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 424671 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 412150 2/23/2017 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC. 16,719.92 LIB SITE - PRELIM PLANNING 424649 175044 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 16,719.92 412151 2/23/2017 139501 HCT 33.00 TABS FOR 3 UNMARKED SQUADS 424673 021717 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.00 412152 2/23/2 017 140099 HEACOX, DIANE 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424763 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 412153 2/23/2017 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 19,521.22 MARCH HP INVOICE-COBRA 424414 71131995 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 256,802.92 MARCH HP INVOICE 424413 71133677 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 276,324.14 412154 2/23/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,200.78 424749 1000087204 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,200.78 412155 2/23/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,617.00 JANUARY ROOM & BOARD 424908 1000087711 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,617.00 412156 2/23 /2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 618.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424720 38104509 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 444.69 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 424742 38399494 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,062.69 412157 2/23/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,591.50 424391 877250 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,244.50 424358 877251 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,425.25 424342 877397 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412157 2/23/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 4,261.25 412158 2/23/2017 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 12.84 ART WORK SOLD 424672 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.84 412159 2/23/2017 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 13.65 FILTER 2017 424438 038093173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.07 FILTER 2017 424486 038093208 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.48 FILTERS 2017 424731 038093795 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.33 FILTER 2017 424732 038093839 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 108.53 412160 2/23/2017 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 11.82- 424740 1/17-LIQ 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 8.79 424740 1/17-LIQ 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 33.02 424740 1/17-LIQ 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 29.99 412161 2/23/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,812.25 424352 2630375 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,097.33 424395 2630376 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.30 424390 2630377 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,650.67 424385 2630381 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 109.50 424383 2630382 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 96.00 424384 2630383 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 38.46- 424392 2635001 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10,782.59 412162 2/23/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.16 424548 5627060 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,908.85 424502 5627072 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,690.93 424405 5657030 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 268.34 424543 5657031 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,290.54 424528 5657032 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 260.77 424542 5657033 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 59.66 424556 5657034 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 924.95 424404 5657035 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,213.66 424541 5657036 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,687.32 424411 5657037 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS 101 CITY OF EDINA 2 /22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412162 2/23/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 3.48 424525 5657038 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48 424553 5657039 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 122.77 424546 5657040 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 787.68 424498 5657042 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 25.16 424499 5657043 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,788.21 424527 5657044 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,364.05 424495 5657045 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,961.41 424523 5657046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 551.61 424500 5657047 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,735.49 424524 5657048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101.16 424501 5657049 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,098.87 424555 5657052 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 278.92 424532 5657053 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,533.63 424557 5657054 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,580.34 424534 5657055 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 209.35 424536 5657056 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,078.79 424554 5657057 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 122.54 424535 5657058 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 155.40 424681 5657307 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 198.96 424576 5658191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.19- 424350 613840 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.92- 424349 613841 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.00- 424565 614046 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39.45- 424564 614047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37,928.92 412163 2/23/2017 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 168.21 BOILER GAS VALVE, ST. 1 424515 1086066 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 44.11 BOILER PART, ST. 1 424516 1086347 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 515.00 HEATER 424849 1086729 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 727.32 412164 2/23/2017 102603 JONAS, LENORE 113.83 GALLERY - REIMBURSEMENT 424461 021517 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 113.83 412165 2/23/2017 136347 KARMIC CIRCLE PROMOTIONALS 230.98 BEANIES PER ANN 424419 256 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 305.20 WELLNESS CHALLENGE SUNGLASSES 424418 257 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 536.18 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412165 2/23 /2 017 412166 2/23/2017 136347 KARMIC CIRCLE PROMOTIONALS 111018 KEEPRS INC. Continued... 2,172.00 FIREARMS FOR SMTF 424475 335271 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 2,172.00 412167 2/23/2017 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 29.75 424641 SI039484 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.75 412168 2/23/2017 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 638.93 SCREWS, BITS, CONNECTORS 2017 424465 9304712780 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 638.93 412169 2/23/2017 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 79,991.55 WC - HOME INS 4TH Q INVOICE 424339 020817 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 79,991.55 412170 2/23/2017 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 2017 LMC SAFETY & LOSS CONTROL 424432 249912 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 20.00 412171 2/23/2017 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 4,680.00 PATROL ONLINE 2017 424727 250084 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 4,680.00 412172 2/23/2017 111388 LEAIR, DEB 146.25 ART WORK SOLD 424718 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 146.25 412173 2/23/2017 140104 LEE, DENISE 200.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424758 022017 1470.4329 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL AMBULANCE FEES 200.00 412174 2/23/2017 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY INC. 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 6,541.00 ART CENTER PORTION 424635 19815 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412174 2/23/2017 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY INC. Continued... 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,477.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 424635 19815 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 16,880.00 412175 2/23/2017 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 964.00 BLINDS FOR OFFICE 424420 7525 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 964.00 412176 2/23/2017 133185 LOGAN, PATRICK 44.86 CLEANING SUPPLIES 424422 021517 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 44.86 412177 2/23/2017 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 67.58 WASHERS SEALS 2017 424484 P04082 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.25 POLYLUBE, WASHERS 2017 424468 P04092 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.12 SEAL 2017 424730 P04162 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 307.95 412178 2/23/2017 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 14,169.59 UNLEADED FUEL 2017 424634 131467 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14,169.59 412179 2/23/2017 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT/BOECICH LLC 634.20 VALUATION BOOK 424426 87360-2017 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 634.20 412180 2/23/2017 123847 MEDICA INSURANCE CO. 63.21 AMB OVERPAYMENT - SORENSON 424845 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63.21 412181 2/23/2017 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,516.00 SENIOR CENTER TRIP 424676 021617 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,516.00 412182 2/23/2017 137195 MELBY, MELISSA 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 424703 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 412183 2/23/2017 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 131.33 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 424317 02/14/2017 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO 9 Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412183 2/23/2017 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Continued... 412184 2/23/2017 131.33 7,380.45 SAC FEE FOR JAN 2017 424650 012017 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 7,380.45 412185 2/23/2017 100279 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1,636.25 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT - HAYNE 424715 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,636.25 412186 2/23/2017 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 44.00 RUG RENTAL 424483 55564 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00 412187 2/23/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,805.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 424639 35390 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,550.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 424638 35393 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,105.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 424637 35394 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 6,460.00 412188 2/23/2017 127061 MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD 550.00 WRESTLING PROGRAM MPLS 424850 R020517 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 550.00 412189 2/23/2017 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 192.00 EXAM FEES 424674 02172017B 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 192.00 412190 2/23/2017 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,206.00 CONNECTION FEE 424699 02152017 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,206.00 412191 2/23/2017 139776 MINNESOTA HONEY 4.79 ART WORK SOLD 424704 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.79 412192 2/23/2017 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 110.00 EXAM FEES 424679 02172017A 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 110.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412193 2/23/2017 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC Continued... 39.00 AGM REGISTRATION 424651 021717 1628.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SENIOR CITIZENS 39.00 412194 2/23/2017 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 88.50 PARTS 424686 0117825-IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 88.50 412195 2/23/2017 103198 MINNESOTA WOMENS PRESS INC 388.00 ADVERTISING 424454 00066188 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 388.00 412196 2/23/2017 140092 MOUA, AE 88.99 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 424847 02162017 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 88.99 412197 2/23/2017 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,802.70 PRINT AD 424900 2017-68314 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,802.70 412198 2/23/2017 114343 MULLEN, JANET 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 424705 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 412199 2/23/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 358.00 424331 117941 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 284.50 424322 117942 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 404.50 424559 117943 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,047.00 412200 2/23/2017 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 104.86 JAN 2017 MILEAGE 1130 424652 021617 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 63.67 MILEAGE 424493 021717 1132.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CABLE COMMISSION 168.53 412201 2/23/2017 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 900.00 PARTS FOR OUTSIDE LIGHTS 424885 100830 1653.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 900.00 412202 2/23/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 43.19 BULB 2017 424440 43097 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412202 2/23/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Continued... 43.19 412203 2/23/2017 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 27.50 424694 W17010666 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.50 424694 W17010666 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 55.00 424694 W17010666 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 82.50 424694 W17010666 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 82.70 424694 W17010666 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 192.50 424694 W17010666 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 302.50 424694 W17010666 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 55.00 424694 W17010666 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 27.50 424694 W17010666 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 110.00 424694 W17010666 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 123.75 424694 WI7010666 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 123.75 424694 WI7010666 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 55.00 424694 W17010666 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 82.50 424694 W17010666 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 82.50 424694 W17010666 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 55.00 424694 W17010666 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 290.48 424696 W17010671 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,775.68 412204 2/23/2017 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 26.65 ART WORK SOLD 424708 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.65 412205 2/23/2017 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 549.56 424416 595268 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 78.42 424415 595295 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 627.98 412206 2/23/2017 123786 OLSON, VICKI 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 424709 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 412207 2/23/2017 136189 P&W GOLF SUPPLY LLC 818.91 PUTTERS 424725 INV17450 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 818.91 412208 2/23/2017 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412208 2/23/2017 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Continued... 384.00 424569 16230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 384.00 412209 2/23/2017 102440 PASS, GRACE 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 424843 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.25 412210 2/23/2017 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING 43.38 CATERED FOOD 424364 10860 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 15.50 CATERED FOOD 424365 10861 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 58.88 412211 2/23/2017 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 15.83- 424566 8579624 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 147.70 424325 8580037-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,958.96 424320 8580038 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,011.59 424571 8580048 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,102.42 412212 2/23/2017 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 290.70 424577 58828514 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 290.70 412213 2/23/2017 140098 PETERSON, CARL ROY 99.79 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424714 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 99.79 412214 2/23/2017 116626 PETERSON, HARRIETTE 7.31 ART WORK SOLD 424710 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.31 412215 2/23/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1.16 424357 2114472 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 311.16 424537 2121492 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .58 424550 2121493 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .58 424407 2121494 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .58 424522 2121495 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 525.20 424544 2121496 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,996.67 424406 2121497 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,741.70 424497 2121499 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412215 2/23/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 2,950.97 424530 2121500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 152.48 424533 2121503 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,143.03 424552 2121504 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.16 424551 2121505 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 479.45 424655 2122272 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 34.67- 424574 258087 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.67- 424573 258091 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.33- 424575 258092 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,312.05 412216 2/23/2017 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 424509 341273 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 412217 2/23/2017 139778 PLATT-NELSON, JUDY 25.35 ART WORK SOLD 424711 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.35 412218 2/23/2017 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 39.14 WATER 424427 622833-01-17 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 39.14 412219 2/23/2017 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 343.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 2016 424745 77049 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.00 412220 2/23/2017 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 223.21 424333 17-11524 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 223.21 412221 2/23/2017 139439 RUE 38 LLC 85.50 424653 1323 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.50 412222 2/23/2017 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 14.30 ART WORK SOLD 424712 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.30 412223 2/23/2 017 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 102.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 424491 2383-1 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 2/23/2017 -- Doc No Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412223 2/23/2017 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 139712 SIEBENALER, LAUREN Continued... 412224 2/23/2017 102.03 29.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 424346 012417 ' 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 29.16 412225 2/23/2017 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 52.70 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 424370 13080107 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 52.70 412226 2/23/2017 125991 SLETTERDAHL, WINSTON 175.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 424846 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 412227 2/23/2017 132195 SMALL LOT MN 270.03 424680 12303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 270.03 412228 2/23/2017 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 58.35 WRENCH ORGANIZERS, SOCKETS 201 424466 3Y2522653 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.72 SOCKET DRIVER 2017 424734 3Y2528193 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.07 412229 2/23/2017 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY 240.47 424659 1441C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 240.47 412230 2/23/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1.20 424547 1506551 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 644.00 424328 1509007 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,377.02 424348 1509008 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,375.33 424327 1509009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 930.57 424399 1509010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,902.83 424398 1509011 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,336.91 424521 1509012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,402.83 424321 1509013 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,535.17 424572 1509014 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,626.94 424336 1509015 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.66 424334 1509016 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,634.40 424567 1509017 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412230 2/23/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 807.40 424656 1510311 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 879.48 424335 5019667 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 22,516.74 412231 2/23/2017 110977 SOW, ADA1VIA 35.10 ART WORK SOLD 424713 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.10 412232 2/23/2017 100495 STATE FIRE MARSHALL DIVISION 290.00 FIRE MARSHAL CONF; #48 & #76 424723 17024-25 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 290.00 412233 2/23/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 320.00 424316 14540 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 190.00 424355 14541 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 510.00 412234 2/23/2017 139326 STOCKDALE, SHELDON 13.16 ART WORK SOLD 424716 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.16 412235 2/23/2017 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2,387.00 1ST HALF ANNUAL DUES 424338 2017 1506.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2,387.00 412236 2/23/2017 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 95.66 TIRES 2017 424467 10144913 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.66 412237 2/23/2017 140100 SWALCHICIC, LYNNE 98.34 AMBUALANCE OVERPAYMENT 424759 022017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.34 412238 2/23/2017 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 373.01 CONCESSION PRODUCT 424371 147102095 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 79.69 PITCHERS 424511 147103715 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 792.25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 424512 147109640 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,244.95 412239 2/23/2017 138281 TARRAF CONSTRUCTION INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412239 2/23/2017 138281 TARRAF CONSTRUCTION INC. Continued... 29,109.05 PAYM #10 CONTRACTOR 424494 APPL 10 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 29,109.05 412240 2/23/2017 105006 TASER INTERNATIONAL 304.86 TASER BATTERIES 424707 SI1468490 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 304.86 412241 2/23/2017 100505 TELLER, DEE 18.85 ART WORK SOLD 424717 021717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.85 412242 2/23/2017 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 680.00 JANUARY CHARGES 424375 835556512 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 680.00 412243 2/23/2017 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,493.25 424394 1216854 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 40.90 424387 1219182 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,534.15 412244 2/23/2017 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 275.00 424661 M22694 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 275.00 412245 2/23/2017 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 558.00 424504 6197 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 558.00 412246 2/23/2017 128347 TKO WINES INC. 288.00 424408 5259 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 288.00 412247 2/23/2017 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 24.97 WELDING ADAPTER 2017 424443 10175022 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.97 412248 2/23/2017 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 2,554.00 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGR 424379 PM3129 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,554.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/23/2017 -- 2/23/2017 Check 0 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 8 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412249 2/23/2017 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC Continued... 2,775.00 TARP SYSTEM 2017 424750 LC00042392 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,775.00 412250 2/23/2017 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 603.83 424682 415733-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 85.75 424683 415735-00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 689.58 412251 2/23/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 1,378.00 ELECTRICAL PANEL REPLACE 424366 S000143621.001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,378.00 412252 2/23/2017 101932 VOTH, BART 169.94 UNIFORM JEANS BELT 2017 424632 021517 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 169.94 412253 2/23/2017 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 589.23 424459 7414 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 589.23 412254 2/23/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,172.36 424330 7120069 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,443.08 424561 7120919 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 260.06 424410 7120920 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,325.38 424526 7120922 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,073.36 424562 7120923 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 313.16- 424563 712344 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,961.08 412255 2/23/2017 102228 WOOLDRIDGE, MARY 13.00 MTG EXPENSE 424899 021717 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13.00 412256 2/23/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 145.83 GIS 424309 11-01686-700 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 145.84 GIS 424309 11-01686-700 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 145.83 GIS 424309 11-01686-700 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 5,034.66 DATALINK IMPLEMENTATION 424344 2-01686-770 4614.1705 15173 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asset Mont Software and Equip 2,517.34 DATALINK IMPLEMENTATION 424344 2-01686-770 4615.1705 15173 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 1,812.50 TRACY AVE 424308 21-01686-640 01399.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 2016 RECON TRACY AVE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/23/2017 -- Inv No 2/23/2017 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 412256 2/23/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 685.00 66TH & YORK DESIGN 424310 4-01686-720 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 10,487.00 412257 2/23/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY 70.13 424688 533884140 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,972.04 424689 534038796 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 822.57 424690 534190525 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 620.89 424691 534204450 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,835.74 424692 534207979 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 23,397.27 424702 534758442 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 2,034.98 424693 534769443 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 34,753.62 412258 2/23/2017 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 100.00 DOOR 2017 424439 16218 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 412259 2/23/2017 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 895.00 CONV. BELT 2017 424747 0163422-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 895.00 412260 2/23/2017 101091 ZIEGLER INC 318.91 GENERATOR SERVICE CALL 424469 SW050271106 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 318.91 903,355.02 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 833,729.92 69,625.10 903,355.02 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/22/2017 8:58:43 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 2/23/2017 - 2/23/2017 Company 01000 GENERAL FUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT Amount 140,256.77 4,883.81 49.35 2,669.80 12,708.37 8,996.69 3,768.25 2,935.20 2,396.54 8,597.14 1,477.00 17,197.89 8,934.64 183,076.49 78,376.79 2,663.17 356,315.69 32,646.51 35,404.92 Report Totals 903,355.02 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and proced s date 2-- 72- Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.C . To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Reques t For Purchas e From:Gunnar Kaas a, Equip ment Operations S upervis o r Item Activity: Subject:Req ues t for Purchas e: 2017 Wes tern Star P lo w Truck at P ublic Works Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: P urchase a 2017 Western Star truck with plow to replace Vehicle 25-334, 2003 Sterling truck with plow with 132,457 miles. INTRODUCTION: We recommend replacing Vehicle 25-334 with the new 2017 Western Start Truck with plow. Vehicle 25-334 has outlived its useful life. See attached Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Reques t For Purchas e: 2017 Wes tern Star Plow truck at Public Works Purchas e Evaluation Form: 2017 Wes tern Star Plow truck at Public Works City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 7, 2017 Mayor and Council ☒ ☐ Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Request For Purchase – 2017 Western Star Tandem Truck with Plow February 13, 2017 May 15, 2017 Boyer Truck (State Contract No. 77960) TBEI (State Contract No. 100779) $98,000.00 $121,876.00 $219,876 Recommended Quote or Bid: Boyer Truck (State Contract No. 77960) TBEI (State Contract No. 100779) Information/Background: This is a replacement for Vehicle 25-334, a 2003 Tandem axle plow truck with 132,457 miles. It has outlived its useful life and needs replacement. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment has a score of 38. Whenever we replace a vehicle we analyze the impact to our fuel usage. Replacing this single axle truck with a larger tandem axle truck will allow us to transport two times more product then a single axle truck while utilizing similar fuel efficiency. Purchase Evaluation Date: Vendor Purchase Order Number: Purchase Description: Purchaser: Purchase Level: Budget Impact: Environmental Impact: Community Impact: March 7, 2017 Boyer Truck, Jcraft Equipment 5206 Gunnar Kaasa 2017 Tandem Axle truck with box and plows Funding for the new plow truck would come from the Public Works equipment replacement fund and was included into the 2017 C.I.P. The truck that the City of Edina will be replacing is a 2003 that has no emission standards. The new truck has a tier 4 engine with advanced engine technology and aftertreatment (catalytic converter) that reduces emissions by 50-96 percent and increases fuel efficiency. The large swing in the emission percentage is dependent on how the truck is used. When the truck idling it has a 50% reduction in emission and when the truck is driving down the road it has a 96% reduction in emission. Edina is a first rate city and we will be replacing an older truck with a more fuel efficient and cleaner burning vehicle. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Reques t For Purchas e From:Gunnar Kaas a, Equip ment Operations S upervis o r Item Activity: Subject:Req ues t for Purchas e: 2016 Spaulding As p halt Trailer at P ublic Works Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Request approval of a Spaulding Model 4-T RS asphalt trailer from ABM Equipment for $26,474.00, Minnesota State Contract # 116249. INTRODUCTION: T he purchase will have a long term impact on the efficiency of Edina's pothole patching capabilities. T he speed and quality of fixing the roadways in the pothole season will be impacted greatly with this purchase. See attached report and recommendation for detail. ATTACHMENTS: Description Reques t For Purchas e: 2016 Spaulding As phalt Trailer at Public Works 2016 Spaulding As phalt trailer: Purchas e Evaluation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 7, 2017 Mayor and Council ☒ ☐ Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Request For Purchase – 2016 Spaulding Asphalt Trailer - PW February 6, 2017 April 6, 2017 ABM Equipment (State Contract No. 116249) $26,474 Recommended Quote or Bid: ABM Equipment (State Contract No. 116249) Information/Background: This is a new trailer that will increase our service level and efficiency. Our intention is to pave more mileage during the summer months and this trailer will allow us to recycle the remaining ashpalt from the previous paving season. We will have hot mix available during the winter months and thereby improve our efficiency in the early Spring. Purchase Evaluation Date: Vendor Purchase Order Number: Purchase Description: Purchaser: Purchase Level: Budget Impact: Environmental Impact: Community Impact: 3/7/17 1327 Brian Olson 2016Spaulding Model 4-TRS Trailer State Contract No. 116249 Our goal is to internally rehabilitate more miles of residential and commercial roadway this year based upon the City Council's increase in our annual budget. This piece of equipment will provide more efficiency in the Spring and will allow us to get an early start when the weather provides us the opportunity thereby giving us a longer paving season. This asphalt patching/recycling trailer allows us to reuse asphalt in a patching operation at a later date. It will allow us to take left over asphalt from summer paving operations and use that excess mix in the winter, when you can't get hot asphalt. It is also a heated trailer allowing us to patch more efficiently and with greater production. The excess asphalt can now be recycled in our city and reused on our streets in late winter and early spring when it is very hard to get hot mix. With this machine we will be able to patch potholes in early spring that need attention faster and more efficiently, while using the excess asphalt from the last paving season. Allowing us to use all of the product purchased for the hot mix on the city streets. Since cold mix is only a temporary repair, it will cut down on the number of trips necessary for the same pothole over the winter months. This purchase will have a long term impact on the efficiency of our pothole patching capabilities. It will allow us to repair roadways before the usual time frame for Minnesota winters. Therefore the safety of the public will be serviced in a manner that we were not able to do before. The speed and quality of fixing the roadways in the pothole season will be impacted greatly with this purchase. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Reques t For Purchas e From:Jennifer Bennerotte, Co mmunications & Technology Servic es Directo r Item Activity: Subject:Req ues t for Purchas e: Ad vertis ing & Marketing P lan for Parks & Recreatio n Programming Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a $26,000 agreement with Hot Dish Advertising for an advertising and marketing plan for P arks & Recreation programming. INTRODUCTION: See attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Reques t for Purchas e: Advertis ing & Marketing Plan for Parks & Recreation Programming Agreement Propos al and Project Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 7, 2017 City Council ☒ ☐ CTS Director Jennifer Bennerotte and Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus Advertising and Marketing Plan for Parks & Recreation Programming Dec. 23, 2016-Jan. 18, 2017 N/A Creative Arcade Hot Dish Advertising Ingenuity Marketing Group JesseJames Creative Risdall $27,500 $26,000 $17,000 $25,000 $22,500 Recommended Quote or Bid: Hot Dish Advertising, $26,000 Information/Background: The City of Edina’s Parks & Recreation Department recently completed a strategic plan for its parks, trails and open spaces. One of the key findings of the plan is to improve marketing and communication delivery. Specifically, the goal is to “create a marketing and communication plan to improve marketing effectiveness, cross-marketing of services and efficiency. Park-wide branding, program communication delivery and media format should be explored and evaluated for greatest cost effectiveness.” A project to design new signs for the City’s parks is under way and we are focused on better cross- marketing the Parks & Recreation Department’s enterprise facilities (Art Center, Aquatic Center, Braemar Arena & Field, Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park and Edinborough Park). Now, we are interested in developing a marketing and communication plan for the Parks & Recreation Department’s various programs and activities, largely planned by the City’s three Recreation Supervisors. We would like a plan that:  creates a unified brand message with vision and position,  establishes a solid marketing objective, and  identifies a target audience with recommendations to reach those people. As part of the project, we would also like a vendor to create a new Parks & Recreation advertising campaign with three concepts that can be resized by the City’s Graphic Designer for web and/or print use. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Proposals were solicited from advertising, marketing and public relations firms in December. Five were received. A team of staff from the Parks & Recreation and Communications & Technology Services Department interviewed respondents in January and prefers Hot Dish for the project based on its comprehensive approach, creativity and previous experience with the City. (Hot Dish completed a similar project for Edina Liquor a little more than three years ago.) Doc. #172278v.1 RNK: 9/5/2013 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ________ day of ___________________, 2017, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and HOT DISH ADVERTISING, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company ("Hot Dish"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Hot Dish will provide City with the advertising, marketing, merchandising, branding and/or other services (collectively “Services”) set forth in the Project Plan(s). The Initial Project Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” and consists of the Request for proposals for marketing plan and advertising concepts dated December 9, 2016 and the Hot Dish Proposal. Additional Project Plans may be mutually agreed to by the Parties and shall be deemed incorporated herein. 2. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay Hot Dish and Hot Dish shall accept as payment $26,000.00 inclusive of taxes and expenses. The fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded, as long as the scope of work has not expanded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed. 3. OWNERSHIP. All reports, documents, plans and the like generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. Any final materials or copy (“Deliverables”) provided to and fully paid for by City are provided as “work-made-for-hire” specially ordered by City for use by City or otherwise, pursuant to Sections 101 and 201 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and all similar laws of jurisdiction. If the Deliverables created under this Agreement are ever deemed to be something other than a work-made-for-hire, Hot Dish hereby grants, transfers and assigns to City, as of the date of full payment by City of the applicable invoices, all rights, title and interest in and to the results and proceeds of the Deliverables. If Hot Dish utilizes any third parties to produce Deliverables hereunder, Hot Dish will undertake the responsibility to have the applicable third party assign, transfer or otherwise grant the relevant copyrights and other intellectual property rights to City as of City’s full payment of the applicable invoices. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, City understands and agrees that Hot Dish will further develop its general knowledge, skills and experience in carrying out the Services and creating any Deliverables for City (“Residual Knowledge”). City acknowledges and agrees that Hot Dish may use such Residual Knowledge for any purpose whatsoever for any other person or entity. Nothing herein shall assign any Hot Dish intellectual property that is or has been developed outside the scope of this Agreement. 4. EXCLUSIVITY AND COMPETITORS. During the term of an applicable Project Plan, Hot Dish will not accept any new advertising assignments for other company’s products or services that Hot Dish reasonably believes to be directly competitive with those Doc. #172278v.1 RNK: 9/5/2013 2 products or services of City that are the subject of the applicable Project Plan within the same geographical area as City sells those products or services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City acknowledges that Hot Dish may have current advertising assignments for such direct competition companies, products or services, and Hot Dish agrees to disclose, in the applicable Project Plan, whether Hot Dish commercially reasonably believes it currently has such advertising assignments, as applicable. City agrees that it will not contract, directly or indirectly, with Hot Dish’s contractors without Hot Dish’s prior written consent and that Hot Dish is City’s exclusive provider of the Services set forth herein and in the applicable Project Plan. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Hot Dish shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 6. STANDARD OF CARE. Hot Dish shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Hot Dish under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Hot Dish’s services. 7. INDEMNIFICATION. Hot Dish shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided for herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 8. INSURANCE. Hot Dish shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Hot Dish from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work Hot Dish shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Hot Dish as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Hot Dish is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Hot Dish shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Hot Dish shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Hot Dish’s performance under this Agreement. City and Hot Dish agree that Hot Dish shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Hot Dish or any of Hot Dish's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Hot Dish shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Hot Dish’s own FICA Doc. #172278v.1 RNK: 9/5/2013 3 payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 10. SUBCONTRACTORS. Hot Dish shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Hot Dish shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Hot Dish must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Hot Dish’s receipt of payment from City. Hot Dish must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 11. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County 12. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Hot Dish must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Hot Dish pursuant to this Agreement. Hot Dish is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Hot Dish receives a request to release data, Hot Dish must immediately notify City. City will give Hot Dish instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Hot Dish agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Hot Dish’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 13. COPYRIGHT. Hot Dish shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 14. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or Hot Dish desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, Hot Dish shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, Hot Dish shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. Doc. #172278v.1 RNK: 9/5/2013 4 15. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 16. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. Dated: __________________, 2017. CITY OF EDINA BY: _______________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor BY: ______________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Dated:___________________, 2017. HOT DISH ADVERTISING, L.L.C. BY:_______________________________________ Its _______________ Doc. #172278v.1 RNK: 9/5/2013 5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Communications & Technology Services Department Phone 952-826-0359 • Fax 952-826-0389 • EdinaMN.gov Date: Dec. 9, 2016 To: Interested Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising Firms cc: Parks & Recreation Director Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus From: Communications & Technology Services Director Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Request for Proposals for Marketing Plan and Advertising Concepts The City of Edina’s Parks & Recreation Department recently completed a strategic plan for its parks, trails and open spaces. One of the key findings of the plan is to improve marketing and communication delivery. Specifically, the goal is to “create a marketing and communication plan to improve marketing effectiveness, cross-marketing of services and efficiency. Park-wide branding, program communication delivery and media format should be explored and evaluated for greatest cost effectiveness.” A project to design new signs for the City’s parks is under way and we are focused on better cross- marketing the Parks & Recreation Department’s enterprise facilities (Art Center, Aquatic Center, Braemar Arena & Field, Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park and Edinborough Park). Now, we are interested in developing a marketing and communication plan for the Parks & Recreation Department’s various programs and activities, largely planned by the City’s three Recreation Supervisors. We would like a plan that: • creates a unified brand message with vision and position, • establishes a solid marketing objective, and • identifies a target audience with recommendations to reach those people. As part of the project, we would also like a vendor to create a new Parks & Recreation advertising campaign with three concepts that can be resized by the City’s Graphic Designer for web and print use. If you are interested in creating the Parks & Recreation Marketing Plan and Advertising Concepts, please prepare a proposal and send it to be before 4:30 p.m. Friday, Dec. 30. Please contact me if you have any questions as you prepare your response. Thank you! WE AREHOT DISH ADVERTISING An agency that’s franfocused SM and brandfocused. ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 1 > Founded in 1999 > Full-service ad agency > Account service, strategic planning, art directors, copywriters, traditional, digital and social media planning/buying > Business niche is branding expertise in both consumer and lead generation > Our experience helps us go beyond advertising to a more consultative role HOT DISH BACKGROUND ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 2 17+ YEARS OF EXPERIENCE/ 250+ BRANDS ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 3 > We help brands grow! - Budget Blinds – from 300 to 1,000 locations • National agency of record for 13+ years • Helped launch and grow 3 sister brands • Franchise development - Edible Arrangements – from 30 to over 1,000 locations • National agency of record for 8 years • Co-op markets agency of record • Franchise development EXPERIENCE ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 4 > Rebranding/logo development > Marketing strategy and planning > Local marketing tactics > Promotional plans > Media planning and buying > Fully integrated advertising campaigns - Print, direct mail, brochures, van wraps, broadcast, trade shows, website development, retail signage, package design, social media, email marketing, etc. > Website development and ongoing optimization CAPABILITIES ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC OUR EXPERIENCE ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 6 > We’ve had tremendous success in helping clients brand and re-brand their business which allows them to grow their business. Here's how we do it: BRAND. NEW. IDEAS. Communicate your plan Develop a plan 1 2 Obtain buy-in 3 Stick to your plan 4 ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 7 > Differentiate your brand from competitors > Creates credibility for an emerging brand - Perception vs. reality - Deliver on all communication touch points > Establish brand awareness - Once the target audience and the positioning is determined, you need to let people know what you have to offer. • Reach • Frequency • Consistency DEVELOPING A STRONG BRAND ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC BRAND DEVELOPMENT ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 9 > Key is developing a strong brand identity and personality > Own your category ACHIEVING BRAND POWER ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 10 HOT LIST/ OUR CREATIVE BLUEPRINT MARKETING OBJECTIVE TARGET AUDIENCE BRAND VISION BRAND PERSONALITY BRAND VALUES BRAND ESSENCE BRAND POSITION What’s the primary outcome we hope to achieve? What are the demographics, psychographics, and motivations? Who do we want to be?If the brand were a person, what would they be like? What is the emotional connection with the brand? What is the unique selling proposition? All touchpoints with the brand experience are the same voice. ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 11 BUILDING THE BRAND/ CONNECTING THROUGH EMOTION INNER CORE: Why we do what we do, emotional OUTER RING: What we do, rational SECOND TIER: How we do what we do ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC PROPOSAL ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 13 > Create a unified brand message for the Edina Parks and Recreation Department > Set forth a strategic objective and plan for marketing > Determine the core target audience and develop an effective plan to reach those individuals and further engage with the Park and Recreation department opportunities OBJECTIVE ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 14 > We recommend a strategic planning meeting to kick things off. - Planning meeting • All key stakeholders should be present to set direction - Overview of client goals and objectives • What would success look like? - SWOT session • Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats - Consumer prospect profiling • What does your customer look like? • Who are your opportunity customers? • Where can we get more market share? DISCOVERY & POSITIONING ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 15 - Review of business results • What is currently driving business today? - Brand Circle • How are consumers emotionally connected to the brand? - Brand Positioning • How do we stand out in a sea of choices? - Competitive assessment • How are competitors positioning themselves? DISCOVERY & POSITIONING ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 16 > SWOT overview updated > Brand Circle updated > Positioning Reports – “Hot List” document updated INVESTMENT: 40 hours at $200/hr. = $8,000 DISCOVERY & POSITIONING DELIVERABLES ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 17 CREATIVE CONCEPTING > Hot Dish Advertising will develop the brand personality and the communication platform for the brand that effectively communicates the selling points of your brand. The campaign concepting investment includes a presentation of three different creative ideas for consideration. The process to arrive at a campaign entails the following steps: - Utilizing the work from the strategic planning and discovery process, we will begin work on a campaign to drive traffic and loyalty to your stores. - Hot Dish will develop three campaign concepts for the brand, using a brand circle, Hot List and creative blueprint documents that will be approved by the client for direction. - Hot Dish to present three campaign concepts to the client. The different concepts are illustrated as sample ads or other elements to show how it may come to life. - Client to review the concepts and determine which option best represents the brand direction they want to take. Client to provide feedback on the options they choose and revised layouts will be presented. - Upon final concept approval from client, Hot Dish will use the layouts and colors, etc., as direction for the development of all future marketing materials. ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 18 CREATIVE CONCEPTING DELIVERABLES > Creative brief > Three campaign concepts but finalize only one concept > Two fully executed advertising pieces for the brand – These pieces are to be determined and mutually agreed upon, however, not to exceed 30 hours of work. INVESTMENT: 80 hours at $150/hr. = $12,000 ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 19 MARKETING & MEDIA PLAN DEVELOPMENT > Based upon the outcome of the positioning exercise, Hot Dish Advertising will develop a marketing and media plan to drive traffic. The marketing plan will serve as a “road map” for the year to drive traffic and encourage repeat business. The plan will include: - Media research • Where is your target consuming media and where should we reach them? - Robust strategy and tactic recommendations to reach your target audience - Media timing recommendations • Based on client budget • Refinement and ongoing plan execution • How can social media drive sales? ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 20 MARKETING & MEDIA PLAN DEVELOPMENT DELIVERABLES > Marketing plan document - Promotional calendar - Robust listing of strategies and tactics • Local market/guerilla tactics • Loyalty • New customer acquisition - Recommendation of elements needed to execute plan with associated costs > Once marketing plan is approved, we’ll roll out the 12-month media flowchart to show marketing activity to be executed. - Budget allocations to be outlined INVESTMENT: 40 hours at $150/hr. = $6,000 ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC www.hotdishad.com | 612.341.3100 21 INVESTMENT BREAKDOWN TACTIC HOURS COST PLANNING DISCOVERY & POSITIONING 40 $8,000 CREATIVE CONCEPTING 80 $12,000 MARKETING & MEDIA PLAN 40 $6,000 TOTAL 150 $26,000 > Creative development for materials to support the plan will be estimated separately and upon approval items will be developed. (i.e. banner ads or print ads to support the media buy) > Agency project rate is $165/hr. or $150/hr. for a retainer. Retainers are based on the length of time needed to complete the work and the amount of work needed to complete the plan. For example, if we think a $30,000 list of projects will take 4 months, the monthly retainer will be $7,500 per month for 4 months. > Hard costs, if applicable, will be billed separately. ©2016 Hot Dish Advertising, LLC LET'S GET STARTED! Page 1 of 3 ***Confidential*** PROJECT PLAN EPR-17-500 (BRANDING FOR EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT) This Project Plan EPR-17-500, dated __________________, 20___ (“Project Plan Effective Date”), is entered into pursuant to the Services Agreement dated __________________, 20___, by and between Hot Dish Advertising, L.L.C. (“Hot Dish”) and Edina Parks and Recreation Department (“Client”), all of the terms of which are hereby incorporated herein. 1. PROJECT NAME. Branding for Edina Parks and Recreation Department 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. a. As directed by Client, Hot Dish will create a unified brand message for Client, set forth a strategic objective and plan for marketing, and determine the core target audience and develop an effective plan to reach those individuals to enable them to further engage with Client’s opportunities. Discovery & Positioning Hot Dish will perform discovery and positioning, which will include: • 1-day planning meeting • Overview of Client’s goals and objectives • SWOT session • Consumer prospect profiling • Review of business results • Brand Circle • Brand positioning • Competitive assessment Creative Concepting Hot Dish will develop the brand personality and the communication platform for the brand that effectively communicates the selling points of Client’s brand. The campaign concepting investment includes a presentation of three different creative ideas for consideration. The process to arrive at a campaign entails the following steps: • Utilizing the work from the strategic planning and discovery process, Hot Dish will begin work on a campaign to drive traffic and loyalty and encourage repeat business. • Hot Dish will develop three campaign concepts for the brand using a Brand Circle, Hot List, and creative blueprint documents that will be approved by Client for direction. • Hot Dish will present three campaign concepts to Client. The different concepts are illustrated as sample ads or other elements to show Client how it might come to life. • Client will review the concepts and determine which option best represents the brand direction they want to take. Client will provide feedback on the options they choose, and revised layouts will be presented. • Upon final concept approval from Client, Hot Dish will use the layouts and colors, etc., as direction for the development of all future marketing materials. Marketing and Media Plan Development Based upon the outcome of the positioning exercise, Hot Dish will develop a marketing and media plan to drive traffic. The marketing and media plan will serve as a “road map” for 2017 to drive traffic and encourage repeat business. The plan will include: • Media research • Robust strategy and tactic recommendations to reach your target audience • Media timing recommendations  Based on Client’s budget Page 2 of 3 ***Confidential***  Refinement and ongoing plan execution  How can social media drive sales? b. As directed by Client, Hot Dish will provide the following Deliverables: Discovery & Positioning • SWOT overview updated • Brand Circle updated • Positioning reports – “Hot List” document updated Creative Concepting • Creative brief • Three campaign concepts (with finalization of one concept) • The electronic files for two fully executed advertising pieces for the brand – pieces TBD and to be mutually agreed upon (not to exceed 30 hours of Hot Dish’s time) Marketing and Media Plan Development • Electronic file for a marketing plan document  Promotional calendar  Robust listing of strategies and tactics o Local market/guerilla tactics o Loyalty o New customer acquisition  Recommendation of elements needed to execute plan with associated costs • Once marketing plan is approved, Hot Dish will roll out the 12-month media flowchart to show marketing activity to be executed.  Budget allocations to be outlined Deliverables shall be subject to the use rights in the Services Agreement, Project Plan, Estimates and applicable releases, if any. 3. CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES/ASSUMPTIONS. a. Client Responsibilities: Hot Dish’s delivery of the Services to Client is dependent on Client successfully completing the following: • Adhere to timeline and overall direction and scope of projects. • Provide feedback and approvals in a timely manner. • Provide Hot Dish with Client’s brand assets (logo, colors, fonts, etc.). • Provide Hot Dish with access to Client’s customer list. • Pay Hot Dish for its services as provided herein. b. Assumptions: The fees set forth in Section 5. below and the terms of this Project Plan are premised on the following assumptions. • There will be up to two routes of revisions and final file release. • Any approved hard costs will be billed separately from this Project Plan. 4. PERFORMANCE PERIOD. The projected term of this Project Plan is for the 3-month period of 3/1/17- 5/31/17. 5. FEES, EXPENSES AND BILLING. a. Fees for Services: Hot Dish will charge Client for actual hours spent in performance of Services pursuant to this Project Plan. The parties estimate that the Services set forth in this Project Plan can be completed for an Page 3 of 3 ***Confidential*** estimated fee of $26,000.00, excluding travel, expenses and third party fees and costs, but acknowledge and agree that Client will pay Hot Dish for the actual hours it performs in providing the Services. Hot Dish’s estimate is premised on the scope of work set forth in this Project Plan and the associated estimated hours set forth in Table A below: Table A. Fee Assumptions Project Total Fee Discovery and Positioning $8,000 Creative Concepting $12,000 Marketing and Media Plan Development $6,000 Total $26,000 b. Hot Dish will bill Client as each of the three projects listed above is completed. c. All fees, expenses and billing will be handled in accordance with the Services Agreement, including its exhibits and this Project Plan. 6. HOT DISH PROJECT MANAGER. Jennifer Campbell 7. CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER. Jennifer Bennerotte 8. ADDITIONAL TERMS. Project Process and Approvals. The parties understand and acknowledge that the nature of the Services provided by Hot Dish to Client under this Agreement require ongoing communication and approvals from Client to Hot Dish for iterations of the Services set forth in the applicable Project Plan (“Iterative Approvals”). Iterative Approvals may be provided by Client to Hot Dish in e-mail by an employee or other authorized representative of Client (e.g., a Project Manager in an applicable Project Plan) or through approval of a written estimate or otherwise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Project Plan to be executed by their authorized representatives as of the Project Plan Effective Date set forth above. AGREED: HOT DISH: CLIENT: ________________________________ ________________________________ Authorized Signature Authorized Signature ________________________________ ________________________________ Name (printed) Name (printed) ________________________________ ________________________________ Title Title ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Date Date Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Ro s s Bintner P E, Engineering Servic es Manager Item Activity: Subject:Mas ter S ervic es Agreement for P ro fes s io nal Engineering Services with AE2S Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached Master Agreement for P rofessional Engineering Services. INTRODUCTION: As we begin the first phase of design work on Water Treatment P lant #5, there is the potential for subsequent contracts. It’s typically recommended to enter into a Master Agreement for P rofessional Engineering Services. T his provides a clear understanding of contract requirements and the ability to add additional supplemental agreements easier. ATTACHMENTS: Description Mas ter Services Agreement for Profes s ional Engineering Services with AE2S MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT made between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "OWNER", and Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc (AE2S)., hereinafter called the "ENGINEER". OWNER intends to secure professional ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement. I. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OWNER intends to secure professional consulting engineering, architectural, planning and/or land survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the terms of this agreement. OWNER and ENGINEER shall enter into project specific supplemental agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental Agreements unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If there is a conflict between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the terms of the Master Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that despite the conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply. 2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER 2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE / FEASIBILITY REPORT 2.1.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project, review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from others data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities. 2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 2.1.5. Provide a general economic analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to various alternatives. 2.1.6. The ENGINEER shall conduct and prepare preliminary studies, layouts, sketches, preliminary field work, preliminary cost estimates, estimates of assessment rates, and shall assist the OWNER in obtaining required subsurface investigations as required for the preparation of the Feasibility Reports. The Feasibility Reports shall conform to the requirements of Minn. Stat. Doc, #170480v.1 1 RNK: 5/23/2013 Chapter 429 if the cost of the project may be assessed in whole or part. The report shall contain schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction as aforesaid) and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth ENGINEERS findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by ENGINEERS opinion of probable costs for the Project, including the following which will be separately itemized: construction cost and indirect cost consisting of engineering costs and contingencies, and (on the basis of information furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of all other professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for or damages to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be provided by others for OWNER. The total of all construction and indirect costs are hereinafter called "Total Project Costs". 2.1.7. Furnish five (5) printed copies of the Study and Report documents and one (1) electronic file and review them in person with OWNER. 2.1.8. The ENGINEER shall assist with presenting the Feasibility Reports to the proper reviewing agencies and to the City Council. The ENGINEER shall appear at the public hearing to present the information. 2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE 2.2.1. In consultation with OWNER and on the basis of the accepted Study and Report documents, determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project; attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.2.2. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project. 2.2.3. Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.2.4. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design documents, submit a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs. 2.2.5. Furnish preliminary legal descriptions and exhibits for all permanent and temporary easements anticipated to construct the Project. 2.2.6. Furnish three (3) copies of the above Preliminary Design documents and one (1) electronic copy and present and review them in person with OWNER 2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE 2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents, the City's design standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Plans") and Specifications. Doc. #170480v.1 2 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in consultations with appropriate authorities. The ENGINEER shall submit all applications and permit support data to the appropriate agencies and submit copies to the OWNER. 2.3.3. Based on property information received from Owner in accordance with Paragraph 4.4, provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property surveys or related engineering services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with their work. 2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based on the Plans and Specifications. 2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. 2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.3.7. Furnish three (3) copies of the listed Final Design documents, including the Plans and Specifications, and present and review them in person with OWNER. 2.3.8. The ENGINEER shall furnish one copy of all design calculations when requested by OWNER. 2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE 2.4.1. The ENGINEER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall supply up to thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for general review. The ENGINEER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been issued, attend pre-bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents. 2.4.2. Prepare Contract Documents. 2.4.3. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents. 2.4.4. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor and subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s) (herein called "Contractor(s)") for the portions of the work where acceptability is required by the Bidding Documents. Doc. #170480v.1 3 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.4.5. Consult with and advise OWNER concerning and determining the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents. 2.4.6. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in evaluating bidder qualifications and recommendations on bids, and in assembling and awarding contracts for construction, materials, equipment and services. 2.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with and advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative. All of OWNER'S instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner to the extent provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. The General Conditions shall not be modified without the written agreement of the OWNER. 2.5.2. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of the work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress: 2.5.2.1. ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various aspects of Contractor(s) work. In addition, if requested by OWNER, ENGINEER shall provide the services of a Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at the site to assist ENGINEER and to provide more continuous observation of such work. Based on information obtained during such visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work. 2.5.2.2. The Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be ENGINEER'S agent or employee and under ENGINEER'S supervision. 2.5.2.3. The purpose of the ENGINEER'S visits to and representation by the Resident Project Representative (and assistants, if any) at the site will be to enable ENGINEER to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by ENGINEER during the Construction Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of ENGINEER'S efforts as an experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand, ENGINEER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such Doc. #170480v.1 4 RNK: 5/23/2013 observations of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct, or have control over Contractor(s)' work, nor shall ENGINEER have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for the Contractor(s)' means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly, ENGINEER can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume responsibility for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.5.2.4. If ENGINEER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or deficiencies in the work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents, ENGINEER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER. 2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation, ENGINEER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders as required for OWNER'S approval. 2.5.5. Shop Drawings. ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 2.5.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. ENGINEER shall have authority, as OWNER'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work by Contractor, and shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents). ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on the results of such tests. 2.5.8. ENGINEER shall respond to all written claims submitted by Contractor in a timely fashion. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. Doc. #170480v.1 5 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.5.9. Applications for Payment. Based on ENGINEERS on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules: 2.5.9.1. ENGINEER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts and the OWNER shall verify the amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of ENGINEER'S knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In the case of unit price work, ENGINEER'S recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents). 2.5.9.2. By recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER'S review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payment will not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s)' compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the money paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance, tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the Doc. #170480v.1 6 RNK: 5/23/2013 requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with written comments. 2.5.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is substantially complete and a final inspection to deteiniine if the completed work is acceptable so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 2.5.5. 2.5.12 Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2.5.12 inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents. 2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE 2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the Project. 2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or system. 2.6.3. Assist OWNER in training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project. Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement. 2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation and maintenance of and record keeping for the Project. 2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based on the marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to ENGINEER and which ENGINEER considered significant. ENGINEER will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in the record drawings and record documents. Final payment will be made only after record drawings are received by the OWNER. 2.6.6. In company with OWNER, visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the completed construction, assist OWNER in consultations and discussions with Contractor(s) concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations as to replacement or correction of defective work. Doc. #170480v.1 7 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.6.7. Assist OWNER in preparation of assessment roll for City improvement projects, and attend assessment hearings. 3. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER 3.1 SERVICES REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. If authorized in writing by OWNER, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in paragraphs 3.1.1 through 3.1.12, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement or Work Order and will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 6. 3.1.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in connection with the Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements; review and evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the Project. 3.1.2. Field Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished to OWNER by others, including surveys to verify location or improve accuracy of record information provided by Contractor under Paragraph 2.6.5. 3.1.3. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond ENGINEER'S control. 3.1.4. Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use. 3.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)' work which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work. 3.1.6. Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value engineering during the course of design; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; assistance in obtaining financing for the Project; evaluating processes available for licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material, equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed by OWNER. 3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data Doc. #170480v.1 8 RNK: 5/23/2013 or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs ENGINEER to provide such data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4. 3.1.8. Services during out-of-town travel required of ENGINEER other than visits to the site or OWNER'S office. 3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to complete services called for in paragraph 2.4. 3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic Services under paragraph 2.5.10. 3.1.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the ENGINEER is a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services. 3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER'S control, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others, as circumstances require during construction and without waiting for specific authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement. ENGINEER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER. 3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not commensurate with the additional services rendered. 3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the award to each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor. 3.2.3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages. 3.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or neglected work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor. Doc. #170480v.1 9 RNK: 5/23/2013 3.2.5. Services (other than Basic Services during the Operational Phase) in connection with any partial use of any part of the Project by OWNER prior to Substantial Completion. 4. OWNER'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES. OWNER shall do the following: 4.1 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement, such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect to ENGINEER'S services for the Project. 4.2 Provide criteria and information as to OWNER'S requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of design and construction standards OWNER will require to be included in the Plans and Specifications. 4.3 Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER'S disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. 4.4 Furnish to ENGINEER as required for performance of ENGINEER'S Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached amendment, the following: 4.4.1. Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, borings, and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment; 4.4.2. Appropriate professional interpretations of all the foregoing; 4.4.3. Environmental assessment and impact statements, if needed; 4.4.4. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys; 4.4.5. Property descriptions; and 4.4.6. Zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; All of which ENGINEER may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement. 4.5 Provide engineering surveys or authorize ENGINEER to establish reference points for construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work. 4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement. 4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other Doc. #170480v.1 10 RNK: 5/23/2013 consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER. 4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project. 4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. 4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not ENGINEER or ENGINEER'S agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER and the Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement. 4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors. 4.12 Furnish to ENGINEER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for services to be provided by others for OWNER so that ENGINEER may make the necessary findings to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs. 4.13 Attend the pre-bid meeting, bid opening, pre-construction meetings, construction progress and other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections. 4.14 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER'S services, or any defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor. 4.15 Furnish, or direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement or other services as required. 4.16 Require all Private Utilities with facilities in the OWNER'S right of way to: (a) Locate and mark said utilities upon request; (b) Relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate the proposed Work; (c) Submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the OWNER for review. Doc. #170480v,1 11 RNK: 5/23/2013 4.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 4. 5. PERIODS OF PROJECT SERVICE 5.1 The provisions of Section 6 and the various rates of compensation for ENGINEERS services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase. ENGINEER'S obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a period which may reasonably be required for the design, award of contracts, construction and initial operation of the Project including extra work and required extensions thereto. 5.2 The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be completed and the Report submitted within the agreed period after written authorization to proceed with that phase of services which will be given by OWNER. 5.3 After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary design documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the agreed period. 5.4 After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase documents and revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Final Design Phase; and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the agreed period. 5.5 ENGINEER'S services under the Study and Report Phase, Preliminary Design Phase, and Final Design Phase, shall each be considered complete when the submissions for that phase have been accepted by OWNER. 5.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the ENGINEER'S Drawings, Specifications and other Final Design Phase documentation including the most recent opinion of probable Total Project Costs and upon written authorization to proceed, ENGINEER shall proceed with performance of the services called for in the Bidding or Negotiating phase. This Phase shall terminate and the services to be rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon commencement of the Construction Phase or upon cessation of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s). 5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed. Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts if the Project involves more than one prime contract. Doc. #170480v.1 12 RNK: 5/23/2013 5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate upon the last of the following events: (1) one year after the date of Substantial Completion, as defined in the Contract Documents, if the last prime contract for construction, materials and equipment on which substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s); (3) after all known issues have been satisfactorily resolved. 5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time of performance of ENGINEER'S services shall be adjusted equitably. 5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or not proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase. 5.11 In the event that the work designed or specified by ENGINEER is to be furnished or performed under more than one prime contract, or if ENGINEER'S services are to be separately sequenced with the work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast-tracking), OWNER and ENGINEER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a schedule for performance of ENGINEER'S services during the Final Design, Bidding or Negotiating and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable to the work under such separate contracts. 6. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER 6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, ENGINEER will be paid in accordance with the Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project. 6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS. 6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within thirty five (35) days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement therefor, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of one-half percent (1/2%) per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. 6.2.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER will be paid for services actually and necessarily rendered during that phase by ENGINEER'S principals and employees engaged directly on the Project, on the basis of ENGINEER'S Hourly Costs based upon the fee schedule on file with the City. In the event of any such termination, ENGINEER also will be reimbursed for the reasonable charges of independent professional associates and consultants employed by ENGINEER to render Basic Services, and paid for all unpaid Additional Services and unpaid reimbursables. Doc. #170480v.1 13 RNK: 5/23/2013 6.2.3. Records of ENGINEER'S time pertinent to ENGINEER'S compensation under this Agreement will be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Copies will be made available to OWNER at cost on request prior to final payment for ENGINEER'S services. 6.2.4. ENGINEER shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. ENGINEER must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten (10) days of ENGINEER'S receipt of payment from OWNER. ENGINEER must pay interest of one and five- tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100) or more is Ten Dollars ($10). 7. CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST 7.1 CONSTRUCTION COST. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include indirect costs such as ENGINEER'S compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to, properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting, insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant to paragraph 4. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising Total Project Cost which is defined in paragraph 2.2.6). 7.2 OPINIONS OF COST. Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER'S opinions of probable Total Project Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by ENGINEER. 8. GENERAL 8.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's performance under this Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. Doc. #170480v.1 14 RNK: 5/23/2013 8.2'TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any Supplemental Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the OWNER terminates the Agreement because the ENGINEER has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the ENGINEER, and the OWNER may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in the Contract Documents. If as a result, the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed amount specified in the Contract Documents, if any, then the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. 8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by ENGINEER (and ENGINEER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be provided with information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER'S sole risk. If the OWNER or ENGINEER terminates this Agreement, copies of all files, records, and drawings in ENGINEER'S possession relating to service perfoimance for OWNER shall be turned over to OWNER without cost to OWNER. 8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The ENGINEER must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement. The ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the ENGINEER receives a request to release data, the ENGINEER must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the ENGINEER instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released and the ENGINEER will be reimbursed as Additional Public Improvement Services by OWNER under Paragraph 3.1for ENGINEER'S reasonable costs in complying with a request to release data. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 8.5 INSURANCE 8.5.1. ENGINEER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect ENGINEER from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Doc. #170480v.1 15 RNK: 5/23/2013 Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The OWNER shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies on a primary and non-contributory basis. That part of the Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance limit in excess of the required Excess/Umbrella coverage may be utilized to supplement and meet the required limits for Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. 8.5.2. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the OWNER, in the insured's capacity as ENGINEER, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $100,000 unless the OWNER agrees to a high deductible. 8.5.3. Before commencing work the ENGINEER shall provide the OWNER a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to OWNER. The certificate shall provide that such insurance will not be canceled, materially changed, or renewal refused until at least 10 days prior written notice has been given to ENGINEER and OWNER in the case of cancellation due to non-payment of premium and at least 30 days prior written notice for any other reason, or such longer notification periods as may be required by statute. Within three days of receipt of such written notice, ENGINEER shall provide a copy of the notice to OWNER. 8.6 INDEMNIFICATION. The ENGINEER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by ENGINEER' s negligent acts, errors, or omissions in the performance of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her subcontractors or anyone for whom the ENGINEER is liable. 8.7 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. ENGINEER shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional engineer under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. ENGINEER shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, and regulations and the OWNER' s mandated standards that OWNER has provided ENGINEER in writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of ENGINEER'S services. 8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARI FS. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER. Doc. #170480v.1 16 RNK: 5/23/2013 8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County District Court. 8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 8.10.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound to the other party, to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and obligations of this Agreement. 8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent professional associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party. 8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 11/2 percent per month or any part of the month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 8.12 COPYRIGHT/PA'IENT INFRINGEMENT. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, Drawings or Specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the OWNER from loss or damage resulting there from. 8.13 NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. Doc. #170480v.1 17 RNK: 5/23/2013 ENGINEER: AES2, INC t 8.14 SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason. 8.15 SEVERABILITY. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and ENGINEER, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 8.16 WAIVER. A party's non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 9. PRIOR AGREEMENT This Agreement supersedes all prior written and oral contracts and agreements except for the following: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: CITY OF EDINA BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Manager 18 ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: Grant Meyer, PE Client Program Leader AE2S, Inc 6901 East Fish Lake Rd, Suite 184 Maple Grove, MN 5539-5457 Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.G . To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Reques t For Purchas e From:Ro s s Bintner P E, Engineering Servic es Manager Item Activity: Subject:Req ues t for Purchas e: Engineering S ervic es for Water Treatment Plant 5 Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase. INTRODUCTION: See attached report and recommendation for detail. ATTACHMENTS: Description Reques t for Purchas e: Engineering Services for Water Treatment Plant 5 Supplemental Letter Agreement Propos al Scope Amendment City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 7, 2017 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Ross Bintner PE, Engineering Services Manager Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Water Treatment Plant 5 January 30, 2017 N/A Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc (AE2S) Pilot Study Scope Amendment Total Professional Services $67,000 $8,000 $75,000 Recommended Quote or Bid: AE2S Information/Background: The City of Edina operates 4 water treatment plants ranging from 2000-4000gpm with peak filtered production capacity of 13.75 MGD, providing filtration for 10 of its 18 wells. Peak summer demand met by untreated wells results in unfiltered water spikes exceeding recommended secondary limits for iron and manganese resulting in taste and odor complaints. Siting and planning for Water Treatment Plant 5 (WTP 5) began over a decade ago. Since that time Edina built Water Treatment Plant 6 (Grandview) and has taken Water Treatment Plant 1(Utley Park) offline. The City has secured easements for WTP 5 adjacent to the Southdale water tower and partially extended raw water pipes to ultimately connect the planned facility with its source wells. The easements for WTP 5 development require architectural review from project partners. WTP 5 will range from 2000-3000gpm, and will treat water from Edina wells 5 and 18, and a potential third future well. The project will collect and acquire data on the source wells, analyze system storage options and sizing options, analyze economic development and environmental sustainability options, analyze source water, investigate and report on cost and feasibility, and provide recommendation for the construction of WTP 5. The funding source for this purchase is the Water Utility Fund. The purchase is part of CIP 15-162, and is associated with CIP 15-163 Storage, 15-164 Well 21 and raw water line, and 15-103 Well 18 rehab. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Consultant Selection Process A Request for Proposals for the Study was published on December 23, 2016. On January 30, 2016 staff received proposals from the following consultants: AE2S, Bolton and Menk, SEH, TKDA, and WSB. Proposals were evaluated and select consultants were interviewed by a selection committee made up of staff from the engineering and public works departments. Staff then worked with AE2S to further refine the scope of services. Staff recommends approving the proposal with AE2S. Copies of the proposal and scope amendment are attached and serve as a basis for the supplemental letter agreement. Attachments Supplemental Letter Agreement Proposal Scope Amendment REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 3 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 G:\ENG\CONST\IMPRS\WM564 WTP #5\ADMIN\170307 AE2S Professional Service.docx February 27, 2017 Mr. Ross T. Bintner, PE Engineering Services Manager City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 RE: Supplemental Letter Agreement Water Treatment Plant 5 – Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report City of Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bintner: Thank you for the opportunity to provide this professional services proposal for services related to the Water Treatment Plant 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report for the City of Edina. The following letter provides a general overview of our understanding of the project and the proposed scope of services, anticipated timeline, and estimate of associated professional fees. Project Understanding The City of Edina is committed to advancing plans for the future design and construction of Water Treatment Plant 5. This Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report project will provide for comprehensive evaluation of available alternatives to guide the best long-term decisions for the City of Edina. The project will include, but not be limited to:  Source Water Quality Evaluation;  Development of Treatment Target Goals;  Evaluation of Alternative Water Treatment Technologies;  Review and Confirm WTP 5 Treatment Capacity and Potential Storage Requirements;  Evaluation of Potential Alternative Locations; o Economic Development Potential and Shared-Use Functions o Architectural Considerations and Sustainability/Resiliency  Awareness of Environmental Impact;  Addressing Long-Term Performance Optimization and Sustainability; and  Financial Evaluation of Capital, Operations, and Life-Cycle Cost Considerations. The primary objective is to develop a defendable, practical, and financially responsible Water Treatment Plant 5 Preliminary Design Report that address’s the City’s near-term goals and long- term vision, and provides direction for the responsible design and construction of WTP 5. Mr. Ross T. Bintner, PE Engineering Services Manager RE: Supplemental Letter Agreement Water Treatment Plant 5 – Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report City of Edina, Minnesota February 27, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Scope of Services The Scope of Services (including detailed scope/hours worksheet) is defined by the following two (2) documents, both of which are attached to this Supplemental Letter Agreement: 1. AE2S Proposal for Water Treatment Plant 5 Preliminary Design, dated January 30, 2017. 2. Amendment to Proposal – AE2S letter to Ross Bintner, PE, dated February 21, 2017. Proposed Professional Fees AE2S proposes to provide the professional services consistent with the Scope of Services outlined above on an estimated hourly (plus expenses) basis in amount of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000). Water Treatment Plant No. 5 – Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report Professional Fees WTP 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report (Proposal dated January 30, 2017 ) $67,000 Pilot Test Study Services (Letter Amendment dated February 21, 2017) $8,000 Total Professional Services = $75,000 Compensation shall not exceed $75,000 without written authorization from the OWNER. AE2S proposes to provide the above professional engineering services in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services between the City of Edina and Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (AE2S), dated March 7, 2017. Anticipated Project Schedule AE2S proposes to complete of the proposed Scope of Services in accordance with the following proposed schedule:  Project Initiation - March 2017  Pilot Testing Operation - June 2017  Final Completion and Presentation August 2017 Mr. Ross T. Bintner, PE Engineering Services Manager RE: Supplemental Letter Agreement Water Treatment Plant 5 – Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report City of Edina, Minnesota February 27, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Acceptance Should this proposal satisfactorily establish the scope of services desired by the City of Edina and you approve the fees/terms/conditions/schedule, please sign and date both copies of this letter proposal in the space provided. Please retain one (1) copy for your records and return the other to AE2S. Acceptance of this proposal will serve as our Notice to Proceed. AE2S truly appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this important project for the City of Edina. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal for professional services or the project in general, please feel free to contact me. Submitted in Service, Accepted this _____ day of_______, 20___ AE2S City of Edina By: ________________________________ Grant L. Meyer, P.E. Client Program Leader Title: _______________________________ Aaron Vollmer, P.E. Operations Manager Attachments: 1. AE2S Proposal for Water Treatment Plant 5 Preliminary Design, dated January 30, 2017. 2. Amendment to Proposal – AE2S letter to Ross Bintner, PE, dated February 21, 2017. PROPOSAL FORWATER TREATMENT PLANT 5PRELIMINARY DESIGN CITY OF EDINA, MN 1.30.2017 MAXIMIZED VALUE KNOW THE WHY BEST LONG-TERM DECISIONS January 30, 2017 Ross T. Bintner, PE Engineering Services Manager City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Re: Delivering Maximum Value through a Defendable and Financially Responsible Water Treatment Plant Preliminary Design and Report Dear Mr. Bintner: The City of Edina is committed to continuing to provide a reliable supply of high quality water to its residents. Several years ago the City began a proactive planning process to maximize the use of the existing wells and increase system capacity by building a fifth water treatment plant. The City is looking to fulfill that vision through evaluation of potential locations, process treatment alternatives, and optimization opportunities that will ultimately result in the design and construction of the new WTP 5. By selecting the AE2S team, you will realize the following benefits: • Maximized Value through Comprehensive Analysis and Focused Expertise. Making technically and financially responsible decisions involves understanding and analyzing many factors and the benefits and implications of each. AE2S was founded on “water treatment” and we have maintained that intense focus. Our team is comprised of experienced engineers to assess treatment and optimization options, an architectural partner (Oertel Architects) that is experienced with the City municipal infrastructure and sustainable design philosophies, as well as, a construction advisor (MBI) to provide specialized support in the areas of constructability and cost associated with design concepts and site alternatives. • Understanding of the ‘Why’ to Ensure Defendable Solutions. Nobody knows your water system, challenges, and goals better than you. AE2S will employ a collaborative project approach, working side by side with you and your team to share our combined experience and expertise to determine the best possible solutions to accomplish your goals. We will work closely with City staff to comprehensively evaluate all possible alternatives and thoroughly discuss advantages and disadvantages, making sure the entire team is confident that every decision is responsible and defendable for now and into the future. • Best Decisions to Achieve Near-Term Objectives and Long-Term Goals. The selected alternatives will have technical, financial, and aesthetic impacts on the Water Utility and City for many years into the future. The decisions made throughout this project will represent a comprehensive understanding of not only initial benefits but take into account best possible long-term, sustainable solutions for the City of Edina. AE2S is confident that our team will exceed expectations for both the near-term objectives and your long-term vision for your system. We are truly excited to work with you on this project! Should you have any additional questions, please contact me at 763-463-5036 or on my cell phone at 763-567-3206. Submitted in Service, AE2S Grant L. Meyer, PE Project Manager INSIDE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We will provide you with a defendable, practical, and financially responsible water treatment plant preliminary design & report. 5. SCHEDULE & FEE This section contains a schedule of the proj- ect and a detailed breakdown of each Task with the cost associated with it. 3. PROJECT APPROACH Learn how we plan to accomplish your goals through an outline of key objectives and analyses. A. APPENDIX - RESUMES/EXPERIENCE This section contains detailed descriptions of similar past project successes as well as resumes for our team. 4. PROJECT TEAM/EXPERIENCE We will utilize our experience to help you maximize your value and make the right decisions for long-term success. 2. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Our understanding of the project and how we plan to meet your objectives. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAXIMUM VALUE THROUGH DELIVERY OF A DEFENDABLE AND FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND REPORT Our goal is to work closely with you and your team to develop a preliminary design and report that comprehensively analyzes each alternative giving you the confidence that you’ve made the right decisions for the long-term sustainability of the City of Edina’s water supply. DEFENDABLE SOLUTION Our goal is to work closely with you and your staff to evaluate all possible alternatives and thoroughly discuss advantages and disadvantages = CONFIDENCE IN EVERY DECISION EACH ALTERNATIVE HAS SHORT-TERM & LONG-TERM TECHNICAL, FINANCIAL, AND AESTHETIC IMPACTS A comprehensive analysis of these impacts and benefits will provide the City with the best long-term solutions for sustainable, high quality water for its residents. MOVE FORWARD KNOWING YOU ARE MAKING THE RIGHT DECISIONS OPTIMIZED LOCATION Site selection offers opportunities to improve water system performance, explore shared-use or alternative use of available sites, evaluate benefits and cost implications of alternative sites, and to incorporate an architectural asset into the community. QUALITY + FLEXIBLE TREATMENT WTP 5 will meet near-term water quality objectives and also provide the treatment flexibility to address changes in water quality and potential future regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY WTP 5 will be an environmentally responsible asset for the City, addressing water resources, site design, water/energy efficiency, and building design. MAXIMIZED VALUE KNOW THE WHY BEST LONG-TERM DECISIONS 2PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 2.1 2 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING This is an exciting time as the City of Edina takes steps to provide additional treated drinking water to all residents of the City. This project offers opportunities to achieve water quality goals, provide a positive contribution to the commercial neighborhood, customize facility design and operations and maintenance considerations, and responsibly evaluate the financial impacts of multiple project alternatives. AE2S is excited about the opportunity to work closely with the City of Edina team to not only exceed near- term objectives, but also to implement the best long-term solutions for the City. No one knows the existing Edina Water System better than you and your operations team. You have responsibly and successfully operated your existing system for years, and have begun to develop a vision for Water Treatment Plant (WTP) 5. We intend to work closely with Edina representatives to ensure that this project is a true collaboration of our project teams. We are dedicated to understanding your issues and vision for your Water Utility, combining our shared experiences and expertise to develop efficient and effective solutions, and implementing the best possible WTP. Providing an Interactive and Collaborative Project Process – This process will help answer the ‘why’ for each element of your new WTP from location to building materials and process. We are committed to working closely with you every step of the way to analyze the alternatives and develop a solution that you are confident is the best solution for the City. Review Water Treatment Target Goals – Iron, manganese, and radium removal are the primary treatment target goals for the future WTP. However, groundwater contaminants have recently been one of the most prominent topics for the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The AE2S team will collect samples and analyze source water data of well 5 and 18, and the potential future well, to make a comprehensive treatment plan that addresses all identified contaminants, ensure regulatory compliance, and delivers high quality finished water to system customers Evaluate Alternative Water Treatment Technologies – Oxidation and filtration treatment will likely be the most appropriate treatment strategy for the City of Edina. AE2S will review the process alternatives with the City of Edina team, critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the available technologies, provide education and facility tours as appropriate, and develop recommendations that best achieve technical, operational, and financial goals. Within these technologies there are a number of significant alternatives: • Physical vs. chemical oxidation strategies • Gravity filtration vs. pressure filtration process • Concrete vs. steel construction • Aeration & Detention • Alternative chemical feed & backwash recovery systems Review and confirm WTP 5 treatment capacity and potential storage requirements – It is critical that this WTP is sized correctly to adequately meet the City’s needs far into the future. AE2S will utilize historical population data, water use data, projected community growth, and Edina’s existing water distribution model to predict future treatment needs, verify the capacity of WTP 5, and evaluate finished water storage requirements. Maximizing the Benefits of the Future Project Site – The potential sites for this WTP provide opportunities to deliver an exceptional architectural design that integrates with the commercial environment and provides an efficient operational layout for Edina’s staff. Simon Properties will be a key member in all aspects of building locations, use, and appearance. As part of this design AE2S and Oertel Architects will conduct an in-depth evaluation of potential options to provide a sustainable design and work with local businesses to explore potential economic development options. All four alternatives will be evaluated. • Preferred site - standalone building • Preferred site - integrated into larger multiuse development • Alternative site - median of 69th Street • Alternative site - Yorktown Park Address Complete Long-term Performance Optimization of the Future Water Treatment Plant – Beyond selection of the best water treatment technology, AE2S is committed to ensuring the treatment processes are adjusted to optimize chemical feed rates, maximize filter run times, reduce required backwash frequency, and achieve optimum performance of the WTP. Design and optimization decisions that reduce on-going O&M can dramatically reduce operator requirements and long-term operating expenses. Development of a Progressive and Financially Responsible Preliminary Design Report – The primary objective is to deliver a defendable, practical, and financially responsible Water Treatment Plant Preliminary Design and Report that has earned the support of our combined project team. A constant recognition of the total project cost (including design, construction, and long-term O&M) will insure that the City of Edina receives the Best Value. WTP 5 will be a significant investment for the City of Edina. Each major decision will be made with a comprehensive understanding of the advantages, disadvantages, and financial implications. In order to ensure best value AE2S will provide: • Understanding of the why based on defendable, practical, and financially responsible solutions • Maximized value through comprehensive analysis • Best long-term decisions to ensure optimization sustainability of both your property and WTP 5 • Confidence to move forward knowing you made the right decisions WATER TREATMENT PLANT OBJECTIVES 3PROJECT APPROACH AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 3.1 3 PROJECT APPROACH Interactive and Collaborative Project Process We are committed to providing a planning process that is collaborative, interactive, and involves all stakeholders. This will be a piece of your system, so it is important you and your team understand the solutions that were made and why. In addition to working closely with you and your team, we also have a history of close communications and collaboration with regulatory agencies in the planning and design processes, allowing us to provide you with an opportunity to include the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in specific meetings, so that this consensus based approach extends throughout the City and includes State Agency stakeholders. We are also committed to working with neighboring stakeholders (Simon Properties) and other City departments to develop complete support for the project. Review Water Treatment Target Goals The removal of iron and manganese is the primary objective of the future WTP. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has established Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels (SMCLs) for many contaminants. SMCLs are not federally enforceable, but represent reasonable goals for non-health threatening contaminants. The SMCLs for iron and manganese are 0.3 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. Based on the analysis completed as part of the 2007 Feasibility Study, Manganese is already below the established SMCL for most of the raw water sources. However, iron is consistently above the SMCL and is resulting in “discolored water” and staining. In addition to iron and manganese removal radium removal will also be recommended. The MCL for combined radium is set at 5 pCi/L and 15 pCi/L for gross alpha. Wells 5 and 18 have approximately 4.1 pCi/L of radium. Although not technically ‘required,’ implementing radium removal technology is likely in the best long-term interest of the City. Removal of both iron and manganese is facilitated by oxidation processes (either through physical or chemical methods) to transform the target contaminants from “soluble” to “insoluble” form(s). Once the iron and manganese contaminants are in “insoluble” form, they can be removed through filtration. AE2S has reviewed the previous study related to WTP 5. It appears that the conclusions were developed with the assumption that pressure filtration was the preferred method of filtration. While pressure filtration is a feasible option, gravity filtration will also be evaluated. Selection of the preferred filtration method will be reviewed during the project and will likely be a function of performance, operator preference, integration with building structure, and financial factors. Additional Containments Two (2) analytes that did not appear to be tested during previous studies include Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and ammonia. TOC can influence the size of the insoluble particles developed during oxidation and therefore influence “filterability” of the particulates. Ammonia can result in increased chlorine demand and formation of chloraminated by-products. Based primarily on the water quality parameters of other wells in the Jordan aquifer, it is likely that TOC will not be a concern and that ammonia can be managed through responsible chlorination practices. To verify this conclusion, AE2S will perform bench top testing and analysis prior to detailed design. Further evaluation, if determined to be appropriate, would include detailed technical and financial analysis of advanced filtration options, potentially followed by additional pilot testing. Future Regulations In addition to achieving all Primary Drinking Water Standards and evaluating compliance with Secondary Drinking Water Standards, planning should include consideration of future regulations that may ultimately impact the WTP. Future design considerations should reevaluate other “contaminants of concern” and specifically address the presence of radium. “Delvin Deboer (AE2S) assisted us with operational testing at our water treatment plant to improve our chlorination process. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) had been working with us and they were very happy to hear that we had reached out to Delvin and the AE2S team. They expressed their admiration of Delvin’s expertise in the area of water treatment.” Ismail Eddihi Utilities Superintendent City of Hopkins “ * * City of Edina Contamination Concentration WELL # 5 WELL # 18 Radium 226 Radium 228 GROSS Radium 226 Radium 228 GROSS 1.6 + 2.5 = 4.1 pCi/L 2.1 + 1.9 = 4.0pCi/L 3PROJECT APPROACH AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 3.2 OXIDATION PHYSICAL !pH AERATION: Introduction of oxygen into water supply to promote iron and/or manganese oxidation, as well as the removal of hydrogen sulfide & volatile organic carbons (VOCs). CHLORINE Most common oxidant used in water treatment. INFLUENCES: TEMPERATURE INTERFERING SUBSTANCES OXIDANT DOSAGE REACTION TIME PH LEVELS Edina could consider physical aeration of iron to reduce required chlorine dose. CHEMICAL Evaluate Alternative Water Treatment Technologies With new construction, there are almost limitless treatment alternatives available to the City of Edina. Based on our understanding of the treatment target goals for Edina, treatment process evaluation will be focused on oxidation and filtration processes for the removal of iron, manganese, and radium. However, even with a strategic focus, there are multiple alternatives to be considered. Oxidation Removal of dissolved iron and manganese is primarily achieved by oxidation and filtration. Oxidation processes can occur by reaction with a chemical oxidant that is dosed to the water such as oxygen, chlorine, and permanganate or a physical oxidation process through the use of a gravity aeration process. Chlorine and permanganate are typically dosed to the water via a chemical feed system. The chemicals evaluated will include chlorine, potassium permanganate, and sodium permanganate. These chemicals will be evaluated and compared regarding treatment goals, as well as the ability to effectively meet disinfection requirements. Aeration is typically used to remove dissolved gases (i.e. hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide), to remove radon and VOCs, and to introduce oxygen to assist in iron removal. Aeration also releases carbon dioxide from the water, raising its pH, thereby making the water less corrosive. Radium removal Various technologies such as lime softening, ion exchange softening, and reverse osmosis have the ability to remove radium but the use of these technologies are likely to be cost prohibitive. Hydrous Manganese Oxide (HMO) has been identified by the USEPA as an acceptable technology for radium removal in groundwater supplies. HMO addition requires a controlled injection of a pre-formed manganese oxide solution to raw water prior to filtration. Radium is adsorbed on the surface of the added HMO particles, which are captured in the filtration process. HMO is then backwashed out of the filter media which eliminates potential radium accumulation. * PERMANGANATE Used widely in the water treatment industry for precipitation of iron and manganese. CHLORINE ALTERNATIVES PERMANGANATE ALTERNATIVES GASEOUS CHLORINE POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION ON-SITE HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION SYSTEMS (OSHGS) SODIUM PERMANGANATE •Currently used at well locations •Powdered chemical •Mixed on-site •Reduced space requirements •More frequent chemical deliveries •Relatively safer chemical alternative •Increasing number of installations •Safest alternative •Most complex to operate and maintain •Liquid Chemical •Reduced operator requirements •Greater space/storage requirements 3PROJECT APPROACH AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 3.3 FILTRATION An important concept in designing and optimizing a filtration system is Unit Filter Run Volume (UFRV). UFRV is a measurement of the volume of water though one square foot on filter media between backwash cycles. Maximizing Backwash Recycle Either gravity or pressure filtration systems will require periodic backwashing to clean the filter media and remove the accumulated iron and manganese material. Although it may be possible to discharge the backwash wastewater directly to the sanitary sewer, an alternative for consideration will be the implementation of a traditional or inclined plate backwash recovery system. Responsible use of area groundwater resources is becoming an increasingly important topic. The Minnesota DNR encourages Water Treatment Plants to recover and reuse backwash water to the greatest extent possible. When considering future issues with the DNR and ongoing service charges for volumetric discharge, backwash recovery systems will be an important consideration for the future Edina WTP. UFRV will extend filter run-times and reduce backwash frequency, thereby reducing backwash wastewater and operational time on backwash support systems. UFRV can be optimized through the strategic selection of oxidation alternatives (i.e., different oxidants ADDRESS COMPLETE OPTIMIZATION OF THE FUTURE WTP Dr. Delvin DeBoer will be an integral team member throughout the project. First, supporting evaluation of the source water and selection of preferred treatment technologies, and then ensuring complete optimization of the new WTP. Dr. will create different size floc particles, influencing filterability) and filter media (i.e., strategic selection of effective media size will help promote filtration throughout the media depth). DeBoer has spent his career advancing the water industry and the study of all different types of water chemistry. His knowledge will allow the City of Edina to have confidence that the treatment system that they ultimately employ will protect them far into the future even as treatment requirements change. FULLY-CONTAINED FILTRATION SYSTEM • Lower initial capital cost for the treatment equipment. ALTERNATIVE “HIGH RATE” FILTER MEDIA • Desired design capacity in a reduced footprint. “IN-LINE” FILTERS • Single pump system can supply the filters and residual pressure is sufficient to provide for distribution system pressure. GRAVITY PRESSURE FILTRATION VS REDUCED OVERALL FOOTPRINT OF WTP • Filter walls can serve as a component of the structural exterior walls of the WTP and the interior walls between multiple filter cells can be “common” between adjacent cells. • Utilizing high-rate gravity filtration could further reduce the WTP footprint. OPEN WATER SURFACE • Operators can visually observe raw water influent & backwash. • Hands-on operation and accessible future maintenance of the system. $ VI R T U A L R E A L I T Y AE2S utilizes Computer Aided Drafting and Design 3D Modeling Software as the design/drafting tool for nearly all new facilities. Three dimensional (3D) design allows for a digital model of the future WTP to be created entirely in virtual space. The model creation assists throughout the design process by identifying conflicts and reducing field changes. The model also allows for the design team to virtually “walk-through” the facility to get a feel for space, layout, and appearance of the planned WTP. The 3D tool can also be extended outside the facility to demonstrate virtual “fly-over” videos of the planned WTP for communication to the project team and public stakeholders. For an example of our 3D tool’s potential capabilities, click the link below or go to: www.ae2s.com/3D-renderings * 3PROJECT APPROACH AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 3.4 Maximizing the Benefits of the Future Project Site One of the most challenging and exciting opportunities for this project is the strategic use of the project site. We are confident that the selected site will be an efficient and effective location for the future WTP, but responsible planning and design will require an extremely customized design, unique to the project site and the adjacent infrastructure. Construction of the new WTP will provide the City with the opportunity to explore unique cooperative ventures and evaluate shared use alternatives to best optimize use of the selected site for the community. The most effective use of the planned project site will balance the available new construction space with existing infrastructure, and the adjacent commercial shopping area. In addition to accomplishing the technical treatment objectives, the future WTP should be accommodating to operation staff, secure, and an aesthetic asset to the surrounding area. SUSTAINABILITY We regard sustainable or “green” design and environmental analysis to be essential elements to any built project, not only as a means of preserving the natural environment but also in the interest of energy and expense conservation. The new water treatment plant will analyze multiple sustainable options and the initial cost compared to value and cost/energy recovery numbers. In addition to process treatment equipment optimization, the following systems and items will be addressed to maximize short-term and long-term sustainability: • Stormwater management • Water recycling • High efficency pumping systems • LED or high efficiency lighting fixtures • Lighting controls • Effective daylighting • Radiant heat • Orientation of the building to the sun with its back to the prevailing winter air • Orientation of doors and vision areas to work with the microclimate • Overall design of the building and spaces to limit the number of overhead doors • Energy recovery units in combination with HVAC systems • VFD (variable frequency drive) type motors • Low E and tinted glass • Increased insulation where practical Development of a Progressive and Financially Responsible Preliminary Design Every WTP is unique. There is no one-size-fits-all solution to developing a WTP Preliminary Design Report. Based on specific raw water quality, treatment target goals, and treatment technology preferences, we will evaluate the proposed technologies in terms of constructability, site considerations, project phasing, integration into existing infrastructure, capital cost opinions, and project life-cycle costs. Additional WTP requirements, such as instrumentation and controls (I&C), electrical and mechanical systems, structural needs, access, security, chemical delivery, administrative and employee spaces, maintenance features, and other similar needs will also be discussed throughout the project and incorporated into the Preliminary Design Report. Throughout the project AE2S will be diligent about communicating cost implications to the Edina project team. We will work together to ensure understanding of both the technical and financial impacts of planning and design decisions, to ensure that the project meets all technical, operational, and budget expectations. Our project team is committed to our proven strategy of constant communication; collaboration, and solid working relationships with the Edina project team to ensure the successful completion of every aspect of the Edina WTP project. We pledge to be accessible, responsive, and deeply committed to meeting your expectations for service and quality. DRAFT PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND REPORT ALL DELIVERABLES WILL BE ASSEMBLED IN THE • Treatment Goals - Source Water Evaluation • Planning Horizon & Water Demand Projection • Treatment Process Technical Evaluation • Process Integration & Operational Evaluation • Preliminary Site Plans and Building Floor Plans • Architectural Evaluation • Sustainability Evaluation • Constructability Review • Opinions of Probable Total Project Cost • Life-Cycle Cost Evaluation • Anticipated Project Schedule • Recommendations & Arrangements for Implementation 4PROJECT TEAM AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 4.1 4 PROJECT TEAM STRONG LEADERSHIP & PUBLIC RELATIONS COMPLETE PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION EXPERIENCE WITH EDINA INFRASTRUCTURE AND CITY STANDARDS EDINA ARCHITECTURAL EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN SUSTAINABILITY Grant Meyer, PE will serve as your Project Manager. Grant has provided strong leadership in helping numerous clients successfully take water treatment projects from conceptual design, through thorough evaluation on alternatives, and ultimately to technical design and implementation. Grant also excels at communication not only between team members but also with the City and its residents. Given that the WTP will be located in a commercial area, Grant is committed to ensuring effective public relations with the community. Dr. Delvin DeBoer will be an integral team member throughout critical points during the project. He will support evaluation and selection of preferred treatment technologies, serve as Technical Advisor and Design Team Member, and ensure complete optimization of the new WTP. Del has a special energy and passion for maximizing the performance of WTPs and employing a very hands-on approach of working side-by- side with WTP Operators. The continued involvement of Dr. DeBoer will provide absolute assurance that the new WTP is designed and operated to achieve peak performance, and that WTP operators have another valuable resource to support them. Thomas Stromsodt, AIA has extensive architectural design experience with the City of Edina as well as many other metro communities. Thomas was the lead architect working with the City during the conceptual design process in 2008 and he is excited to resume work helping the City to realize their vision for this project. His previous work with Edina and his approach to common sense sustainable design will help craft a facility that the City of Edina and its residents can be proud of well into the future. Chris McKenzie is a Civil Engineer with over ten years of civil, municipal, and utility engineering experience. Chris has extensive experience with project engineering for water distribution systems, sanitary sewer collection systems, grading and drainage, site development, parking lots, streets, roadways, and trails. In addition, Chris has previously worked on projects for the City of Edina as part of the Southdale first addition and Woodhill neighborhood reconstruct project. His knowledge of Edina City standards as well as his detailed design capabilities will result in a seamless site design for the new Water Treatment Plant. CITY OF EDINA STAFF JASON BENSON, PE QA/QC KEY TEAM MEMBERS DELVIN DEBOER, PE, PHD Optimization/Treatment Review THOMAS STROMSODT, AIA Architect CHARLES HAUPERT, PE Electrical Engineer ANTHONY PITTMAN Instrumentation & Controls Engineer JUSTIN KLABO, PE Water Resources Engineer AARON VOLLMER, PE Assistant Project Manager ABBY BOWEN Project Engineer SAM WILKE Structural Engineer CHRIS SLUITER Construction Feasibility Review CHRIS MCKENZIE, PE Civil Engineer UNIQUE LOCATION ALTERNATIVES = SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT Some of the most critical challenges will be to responsibly plan for the location of the WTP as well as the surrounding site constraints. Both site alternatives are located in compact and high traffic areas. This constraint will limit the placement of job trailers, on-site storage of construction material, and parking for construction personnel. AE2S has teamed with Municipal Builders (MBI) to provide preliminary assistance in the evaluation of site constraints and evaluation of potential cost implications for various site alternatives. AE2S and MBI have recently completed the construction of the Shoreview WTP which similarly had significant site constraints. Chris and his team will provide a Contractors perspective on construction methods, unique considerations, and cost implications of each site to provide the City the best overall analysis of the alternatives. SEAMLESS, SUSTAINABLE EXTERIOR DESIGN AE2S and Oertel Architects have teamed on this project to provide exceptional architectural guidance to the City of Edina and its stakeholders. Oertel’s background on previous Edina projects, their previous renderings for this specific project, and their approach to common sense sustainable design will be a valuable tool in the decision making process. Each of the site alternatives is located in a high profile spot. Effectively designing the exterior of the new Water Treatment Plant will be essential to meeting the objectives of the project. We are committed to helping the City design a sustainable plant that maximizes beneficial use of the property and is viewed as an architectural asset for the City. In selecting a consultant for this project, you are looking for a project team that has the right combination of expertise and experience to enable the team to jump right in and get to work. They must have the ability to evaluate a multitude of treatment and facility locations and design options and provide the City of Edina with the information so that the project stakeholders are confident they are moving forward with the best solution. The selected consultant must have experience with iron and manganese removal, execute sound technical and financial judgment, and demonstrate the proven ability to facilitate a collaborative planning and design process across a range of various interests to deliver a successful project. This is a proven team whose members have worked together successfully on numerous past projects. This team has committed the time and availability to help you make the best long-term decision for your water system. GRANT MEYER, PE Project Manager Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Regardless of the location or treatment technologies selected for implementation, I&C systems will be invaluable in the operation, control, and monitoring of the future Edina WTP. The I&C systems will need to efficiently integrate the raw water supply wells, treatment and pumping systems, and water towers into a single cohesive water utility control system. AE2S has a team of internal I&C Engineers and Technicians who work hand-in-hand with the design team throughout project planning, design, and construction to ensure the system operates exactly as intended. Our I&C team remains dedicated to the ongoing success and customization of your control system from system start-up through the life of the WTP. 4PROJECT TEAM/EXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 4.2 REFERENCES A good client/consultant relationship is often described by words such as trust, responsiveness, quality, and loyalty. We strive to develop exceptional client/consultant relationships which go beyond the norm by adding the value of knowing that your consultants are an extension of your staff, devoted to the success of your utilities as a whole. We believe that exceptional relationships are the true measure of client satisfaction. We have highlighted specific references and invite you to contact them to learn more about the value of working with AE2S. Extreme Client Service Produces Lasting Relationships “The design team at AE2S has been great. They are very knowledgeable, good at communicating with staff to determine needs, thorough, and responsive. We are very impressed with AE2S.” “I appreciate AE2S’ commitment to the complete success of all aspects of our water system and their willingness to operate as a dedicated extension of our City staff.” “AE2S is multi-dimensional and very good at customer service and very good at different types of client services. Many times when people start a project or come into a facility, they have a predetermined idea of what they want the facility to look like in the end. AE2S does a very nice job of asking the client what they envision the facility should look like. They are very good at listening.” “Our partnership with AE2S is a positive experience we’ll gladly share with other utilities in need of professional services. Reasonable and practical solutions that begin with a common- sense look at our needs. AE2S doesn’t first offer a grandiose engineering solution when a low-cost, simple operational change would accomplish the same objective.” “ I worked with AE2S for over 6 years on the City’s new water treatment plant and have since hired AE2S to complete a model of the City’s entire water distribution system. The staff at AE2S is extremely knowledgeable in all aspects of water treatment, storage, and distribution. They coordinate and communicate well with all members of the design and construction team. Throughout design and construction they provide a thorough review of all options and evaluate multiple scenarios at each point in the process. I am very impressed with their organization and have been pleased with the work they have completed in the City of Fairmont.” TOM WESOLOWSKI, PE, City Engineer City of Shoreview, MN twesolowski@ci.shoreview.mn.us 651-490-4600 JIM MALONE, Water & Sewer Utilities Manager City of Minnetonka, MN jmalone@eminnetonka.com 952-988-8400 LISA VOLLBRECHT, Assistant Director of Public Works City of St. Cloud, MN lisa.vollbrecht@cistcloud.mn.us 320-255-7225 RICK WAHLEN, Public Works Director City of Eden Prairie, MN rwahlen@edenprairie.org 952-294-5908 TROY NEMMERS, Public Works Director City of Fairmont, MN tnemmers@fairmont.org 507-238-9469 SERVICES RENDERED Planning | Transmission | Treatment | Distribution | I&C SERVICES RENDERED Planning | Treatment | I&C | Financial SERVICES RENDERED Planning | Treatment | Financial | Distribution SERVICES RENDERED Supply | Distribution | Treatment | I&C | Financial SERVICES RENDERED Planning | Supply | Treatment | Distribution | I&C | Financial 4PROJECT TEAM/EXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 4.3 EXPERIENCE AE2S has been a specialized firm since the very beginning and developed a full service engineering business in support of our main spotlight, water. By focusing on this essential resource, we have proven to provide expert knowledge and an overall understanding of our clients’ needs. We have successfully completed numerous projects similar to yours and are excited to bring our specialized experience to your project and help you maximize the value of your new plant. Listed below is an experience matrix representing a sampling of projects with elements similar to yours that AE2S has successfully completed. Additionally, in the Appendix you will find projects with more specific details of our related experience. CLIENT PLANNING WATER SUPPLY TRANSMISSION LINE WATER TREATMENT WATER DIST. & STORAGE I&C FINANCIAL Alexandria Light & Power, MN X X X X X X City of Baxter, MN X X X X X X X City of Bismarck, ND X X X X X X X City of Bloomington, MN X X City of Breckenridge, MN X X X X X X City of Burnsville, MN X X X City of Chanhassen, MN X City of Claremont, MN X X X City of Devils Lake, ND X X X X X X City of Eagle Lake, MN X X City of East Grand Forks, MN X X X X City of Eden Prairie, MN X X X X City of Fairmont, MN X X X X X X City of Fargo, ND X X X X X X X City of Grafton, ND X X X X X X City of Grand Forks, ND X X X X X X X City of Hillsboro, ND X X X X X X X City of Lake Elmo, MN X X X City of Langdon, ND X X X X X X X City of Larimore, ND X X X X X X X City of Mandan, ND X X X X X X X City of Minneapolis, MN X X City of Minnetonka, MN X X X X X City of Minto, ND X X X X X X X City of Moorhead, MN X X X X X City of Neche, ND X X X X X X X City of Park River, ND X X X X X X X City of Parshall, ND X X X X X X X City of Riverdale, ND X X X X X City of Rugby, ND X X X X X X City of Shoreview, MN X X X X X City of St. Cloud, MN X X X X X City of Sioux Falls, SD X X X X X X City of Thief River Falls, MN X X X City of Walhalla, ND X X X X X X City of Washburn, ND X X X X X X City of Williston, ND X X X X X X X 5SCHEDULE & FEE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 5.1 5 SCHEDULE & FEE Based on recent meetings with Edina representatives, review of available information, and our experience with similar projects throughout the region, we developed a customized scope tailored to meet your specific objectives for the Water Treatment Plant 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design and Report. The final design and report will provide the City of Edina with a defendable, practical, and financially responsible water treatment plant. A detailed breakdown of each task and associated Professional Hours/Fees is presented on the following pages. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL FEES AE2S FEE Water Treatment Plant 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design & Report Total Professional Fee $67,000 Should the City of Edina desire a level of service that differs from the proposed scope, AE2S would welcome the opportunity to negotiate a revised scope that aligns with the City’s expectations. MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Kick-Off Meeting Source Water Evaluation Water Demand Projections Preliminary Evaluation of Alternative Sites Milestone Meeting #1 - Initial Stakeholder Meeting Treatment Alternative Evaluation Refined Site Evaluations Development of Conceptual Renderings Milestone Meeting #2 - Follow-up Stakeholder Meetings Develop Preferred Alternative Milestone Meeting #3 - Final Stakeholder Meeting Preparation of Preliminary Design & Report Submittal of Draft Preliminary Report FINAL COMPLETION & PRESENTATION PROPOSED SCHEDULE Throughout the entire process, AE2S will be constantly engaged with City’s project team to discuss alternatives, review recommendations, meet with stakeholders, and present design concepts & architectural renderings to City officials. AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 5.2 WTP 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report MBI City of Edina Meyer Vollmer DeBoer, PhD McKenzie Klabo Wilke Haupert Pittman Browen Seibert Oertel Stromsodt Support Sluiter Subtotal Labor Expenses Total PM Process, PE Process, PE CIV, PE Water Rec., PE STR, PE ELEC, PE I&C Process, EIT Process, TECH AIA AIA Arch, Tech Const. Hours 2017 Billing Rate 220$ 168$ 200$ 148$ 168$ 168$ 168$ 168$ 124$ 143$ 160$ 120$ 80$ 50$ Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report 42 63 40 14 10 6 6 8 76 22 21 93 52 12 465 66,786 214 67,000 Kick-off Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 20 $3,288 $0 $3,288 Source Water Evaluation 0 0 12 0 0 000 8 0 000020$3,392 $0 $3,392 Sample Collection 2 2 4 $648 $648 Jar Testing / Treatment Analysis 6 6 12 $1,944 $1,944 Review of Water Quality Data 4 4 $800 $800 Water Demand Projections 0 0 0 0 0 000 8 0 00008$992 $0 $992 Data Collection 4 4 $496 $496 Review and Processign of Data 4 4 $496 $496 Preliminary Evaluation of Alternative Sites 2 6 0 4 2 020 2 0 480636$4,860 $0 $4,860 Site Visits 22 2 2 2 4 2 16 $2,220 $2,220 Review of Site Constraints and Potential Economic Development Alternatives 4 2 2 4 12 $1,504 $1,504 Review and Development of Sustanability Options 2 2 4 $1,136 $1,136 Milestone Meeting No. 1 - Initial Stakehold Meetings 8 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 24 0 75 $9,736 $38 $9,774 Prep For Meetings 22 1 4 4 13 $1,736 $1,736 Development of Preliminary Architectural Renderings for Initial Stakeholder Meetings 2 2 16 20 40 $4,176 $38 $4,214 Neighborhood Meeting 22 2 6 $1,016 $1,016 Site Tours and Treatment Alternative Discussions with Operational Team 2 2 2 2 8 $1,496 $1,496 Stakeholder Meeting (Edina, Simon, MDH) 2 2 2 2 8 $1,312 $1,312 Treatment Alternative Evaluations 0 4 6 0 0 000 5 12 000027$4,208 $0 $4,208 Review of Potential Processes 6 6 $1,200 $1,200 Preliminary Sizing and Layouts 4 12 16 $2,388 $2,388 Cost Estimates 5 5 $620 $620 Refined Site Evaluations 410 0 2 4 000 4 0 280034$5,304 $0 $5,304 Review of Site Constraints and Potential Treatment Process Layouts 2 4 2 4 12 $2,080 $2,080 Review of Detailed Economic Development Alternatives 2 4 6 $1,112 $1,112 Review and Development of Sustanability Options 2 8 10 $1,280 $1,280 Preliminary Costs Considerations 2 4 6 $832 $832 Development of Conceptual Architectural Renderings 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 20 4 38 $3,856 $0 $3,856 Milestone Meeting No. 2 - Follow up Stakeholder Meeting 8 7 2 0 0 000 0 0 050022$3,936 $50 $3,986 Prep For Meetings 21 1 4 $728 $50 $778 Neighborhood Meeting 22 2 6 $1,016 $1,016 Treatment Alternative Discussions with Operational Team 2 2 2 6 $1,176 $1,176 Stakeholder Meeting (Edina, Simon, MDH) 2 2 2 6 $1,016 $1,016 Development of Prefered Alternative 2 4 4 2 2 000 8 0 058035$4,776 $0 $4,776 Preliminary Treatment System Analysis 2 2 4 8 $1,576 $1,576 Confirmation of Site Specific Details 22 4 $632 $632 Revised Architectural Renderings 5 8 $1,240 $1,240 Capital and Life Cycle Cost Analysis 2 8 $1,328 $1,328 Milestone Meeting No. 3 - Final Stakeholder Meeting 6 5 0 0 0 000 0 0 050016$2,760 $50 $2,810 Prep For Meetings 21 1 4 $728 $728 Neighborhood Meeting 22 2 6 $1,016 $1,016 Stakeholder Meeting (Edina, Simon, MDH) 2 2 2 6 $1,016 $50 $1,066 Preperation of Preliminary Design and Report 3 13 12 2 0 6 2 6 31 10 6 24 0 2 117 $17,106 $0 $17,106 Overview of Existing System 0 0 0 0 0 004 4 0 00008$1,168 $0 $1,168 City of Edina Overview 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Historical Population Growth 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Historical Water Demand 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Existing Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution System Overview 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Existing Water Supply Wells 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Distribution System and Storage Capacity 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Back-Up Power 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Instrumentation and Control System Overview 4 4 $672 $672 Previous Study Efforts 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Oertel ArchitectsAE2S AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL 5.3 WTP 5 Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report MBI City of Edina Meyer Vollmer DeBoer, PhD McKenzie Klabo Wilke Haupert Pittman Browen Seibert Oertel Stromsodt Support Sluiter Subtotal Labor Expenses Total PM Process, PE Process, PE CIV, PE Water Rec., PE STR, PE ELEC, PE I&C Process, EIT Process, TECH AIA AIA Arch, Tech Const. Hours 2017 Billing Rate 220$ 168$ 200$ 148$ 168$ 168$ 168$ 168$ 124$ 143$ 160$ 120$ 80$ 50$ Oertel ArchitectsAE2S Planning Horizon and Water Demand Projections 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 00004$540 $0 $540 Planning Horizon 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Discussion of Water Users 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Water Demand Projections 1 1 2 $292 $292 Comparison of Existing Capacity to Projected Future Demands 1 1 $124 $124 Treatment Process Objectives 0 1 6 0 0 000 3 0 000010$1,740 $0 $1,740 Standard Engineering Design Criteria 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 MDH Standards (Ten State Standards) 0.25 0.25 0.5 $73 $73 Standard Industry Practices and Professional Judgment 0.25 0.25 0.5 $73 $73 Security and Redundancy 0.25 0.25 $31 $31 Drinking Water Regulations 0.25 0.25 0.5 $73 $73 Primary Drinking Water Standards 1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Lead/Copper 1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Secondary Drinking Water Standards 1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Other Water Quality Standards (Radon / Radium)1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Treatment Target Goals 1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Radon Removal 1 0.25 1.25 $231 $231 Iron Removal 0.25 0.25 $31 $31 Manganese Removal 0.25 0.25 $31 $31 Development of Alternative Evaluation Criteria 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 00006$940 $0 $940 Treatment Performance 2 2 $400 $400 Security 0.5 0.5 $84 $84 Constructability 0.5 0.5 $84 $84 Financial – Life Cycle Cost Analysis 3 3 $372 $372 Treatment Process Technology Evaluation 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 000011$1,756 $0 $1,756 Pre-Oxidation Processes 0.25 0.5 1 1.75 $266 $266 Filtration Processes 0.25 0.5 1 1.75 $266 $266 Disinfection 0.25 1 1 2.25 $366 $366 Backwash Recovery/Recycle Processes 0.25 1 1 2.25 $366 $366 Recommended Processes Technology(s) 11 1 3 $492 $492 Process Integration and Operational Evaluation 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 3 10 000225$3,646 $0 $3,646 Integration with Existing Infrastructure 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 Well Pump Availability / Requirements 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 Location of Existing/Future Chemical Feed Systems 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 Connection of Well No. 5 and 18 2 2 $296 $296 Operational Considerations / Process Complexity / Amount of Chemicals 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 Backwash Frequency and Recycle System 0.25 0.25 $42 $42 Level of Automation and SCADA System Integration 11 2 $336 $336 Safety and Security 0.25 11 2.25 $378 $378 Site Constructability 0.25 2 2.25 $142 $142 Conceptual Building Floorplans 2 0.25 1 10 13.25 $2,036 $2,036 Financial Considerations 2 2 $248 $248 Architectural Selection Process 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 24 0 0 38 $5,184 $0 $5,184 Review of Architectural Options 0.5 2 2 8 12.5 $1,700 $1,700 Material Considerations 0.5 2 2 8 12.5 $1,700 $1,700 Sustainability Alternative Analysis 1 2 2 8 13 $1,784 $1,784 Alternative Selection Process 1 2 0 0 0 000 6 0 00009$1,300 $0 $1,300 Alternative Selection Process 11 2 4 $636 $636 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 1 4 5 $664 $664 Selection of Preffered Alternative 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 00006$832 $0 $832 Identification of Preferred Alternative(s)0.5 1 1.5 $208 $208 Summary of Alternative Selection Process 0.5 1 1.5 $208 $208 Technical Evaluation 0.5 1 1.5 $208 $208 Process Integration and Operational Evaluation 0.5 0.5 1 $146 $146 Financial Considerations 0.5 0.5 $62 $62 Submittal of Draft Preliminary Design and Report 4 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 04008$1,360 $0 $1,360 Technical QA/QC Review 4 4 8 $1,360 $1,360 Final Completion and Presentation 1 0 0 0 0 000 8 0 00009$1,212 $76 $1,288 42 63 40 14 10 6 6 8 76 22 21 93 52 12 465.00 9,240$ 10,584$ 8,000$ 2,072$ 1,680$ 1,008$ 1,008$ 1,344$ 9,424$ 3,146$ 3,360$ 11,160$ 4,160$ 600$ $66,786 $214 $67,000 Meyer Vollmer DeBoer, PhD McKenzie Klabo Wilke Haupert Pittman Browen Seibert Oertel Stromsodt Support Sluiter $67,000Source Water Analysis and Preliminary Design Report ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.1 A APPENDIX - RESUMES ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.2 WHY GRANT? Grant has served as Project Manager for numerous successful Water System Improvements projects from conceptual planning through start-up. Grant provides excellent leadership and excels at team communication and public relations. Grant Meyer, PE Project Manager EDUCATION Master of Engineering, Civil Engineering with Environmental Emphasis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin CONTACT Grant.Meyer@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 763-567-3206 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Water Treatment Plant Design and Construction, Shoreview, MN - Project Manager. Design and construction services for a new 8MG water treatment plant. Design considerations include iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, ammonia removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by-product control. The project included a pilot study to evaluate greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. • Water Treatment Plant Design, Fairmont, MN - Project Manager. Project included the design and construction of a 5.4 MGD surface water treatment facility including the following treatment processes: raw water aeration, conventional lime and soda ash softening, a filter press solids handling process, conventional sand filtration, GAC filtration, onsite generation of sodium hypochlorite for chlorine disinfection, and eight additional chemical feed systems. • Filter and Clarifier Rehabilitation, St. Cloud, MN - Project Manager. Project included the comprehensive improvements to the SCWTF first stage treatment and filtration processes. The project included removal of existing flocculation/clarification equipment and replacement with variable speed propeller mixers, inclined plate settling systems, and vacuum/track solids collection systems. The project also included the complete reconstruction of the North filters, including removal of all existing equipment and replacement with dual parallel lateral underdrains, media retaining troughs, new control valves and actuators, and implementation of an automated filter control system. • WTF Master Plan, City of St. Cloud, MN - Project Manager. Comprehensive evaluation of optimization improvements and expansion (from 16 to 25 MGD) alternatives for the existing WTF. • Minnetonka Water System Optimization, Minnetonka, MN - Project Manager. Study which included the systematic evaluation of all eight of the City’s water treatment facilities and associated water supply wells, targeted at improving the operational efficiency and performance of existing system infrastructure. • Marshall Municipal Utilities WTP Optimization, Marshall, MN - Project Engineer. Project that removed lime solids pumps and replaced them with robust pumps that required minimal maintenance, as well as the relocation of the compressed air system to an enclosed room. The improvements have resulted in process run times being reduced by 30 minutes per cycle, while producing an even higher quality finished product. • Water Treatment Facility Design, City of Baxter, MN - Project Manager. New 5 MGD (expandable to 10 MGD) groundwater facility which utilizes manganese greensand filtration for iron and manganese removal. The facility includes two forced draft aerators, an 80,000 gallon detention basin, four manganese greensand filter cells, three vertical turbine high service pumps, and a dedicated filter backwash and backwash reclamation system. Chemical systems include fluoride, phosphate, potassium permanganate, and Minnesota’s first municipal on-site sodium hypochlorite generation system. Mr. Meyer has 18 years of experience in a variety of water system infrastructure planning, design, and construction projects. He has seen numerous projects from master planning through design and implementation of the completed project. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.3 WHY AARON? Aaron’s extensive water treatment design and construction experience gives him a depth of knowledge of all disciplines. His ability to lead the process design while providing detailed coordination with Civil, Electrical, Structural, Architectural, and Mechanical teams makes him a critical piece to an effective team. Aaron Vollmer, PE Assistant Project Manager EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering North Dakota State University REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota CONTACT Aaron.Vollmer@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 612-719-5015 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Water Treatment Plant Design and Construction, Shoreview, MN - Project Engineer. Design and construction services for a new water treatment plant. Design considerations include iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, ammonia removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by-product control. The project included a pilot study to evaluate greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. • St. Cloud Flow Train III Equipment Installation, St. Cloud, MN - Project Engineer. Design, bidding, and construction phases of a retrofit water treatment plant design that added a third 8 MGD treatment train to the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility, providing a total 24 MGD capacity within the plant. Newly installed process components include solids pumps and piping, chemical feed systems for carbon dioxide, alum, powder activated carbon and lime, inclined plate settlers, flocculation and rapid mixers, a solids contact clarifier, and process gates. • Water Supply and Treatment System Capital Sustainability and Optimization Study, Minnetonka, MN - Project Engineer. Study that included the systematic evaluation of all eight of the City’s water treatment facilities and associated water supply wells, targeted at improving the operational efficiency and performance of existing system infrastructure. The Optimization Study was developed so it provided a valuable tool for addressing near- term objectives, while also responsibly planning for the long-term sustainability of the City of Minnetonka’s Water Utility. • Water Treatment Plant Expansion, Watertown Municipal Utilities, Watertown, SD - Project Engineer. Construction of a new 6.8 MGD water treatment plant (WTP) which involved the use of traditional lime softening, and a new ion exchange process designed to remove dissolved organic carbon from the water. The project also included the design and construction of a new wellfield with nine wells and a 7-mile 24-inch ductile iron raw water transmission pipeline to increase system capacity and provide better water to their existing WTP. • Water Infrastructure Review, Mounds View, MN - Project Manager. Development of a Water System Needs Assessment that evaluates the process, mechanical, electrical, and controls portions of the City of Mounds View’s water infrastructure. The report included three (3) pressure filter water treatment plants, one (1) booster station, and two (2) well houses. Based on the comprehensive evaluation and condition assessment a technical and financial plan to rehabilitate each facility was developed. • Breakpoint Chlorination Study, Hopkins, MN - Project Manager. Review of the existing chlorination process throughout the WTP and development of a breakpoint chlorination curve. Following the jar testing a plan was developed to modify the chlorination process to achieve a flow paced chemical feed system to assist in producing a more effective oxidation and disinfection residual. Mr. Vollmer has extensive design and construction experience in all aspects of public water supply, including wells, raw water supply, water treatment facilities, water towers, booster stations, transmission and distribution pipelines, and lime solids lagoons. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.4 Del DeBoer, PhD, PE Optimization/Treatment Review EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering South Dakota State University; Master of Science, Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State University; Doctorate of Philosophy, Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: South Dakota CONTACT Delvin.DeBoer@ae2s.com T: 605-275-5620 C: 605-430-7082 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Water Treatment Plant Design and Construction, Shoreview, MN - Project Engineer. Design and construction services for a new water treatment plant. Design considerations include iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, ammonia removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by-product control. The project included a pilot study to evaluate greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. • Water Treatment Optimization Study, St. Cloud, MN - Project Engineer. Project consisted of a study focusing on physical and chemical treatment improvements to the existing St. Cloud WTF processes. Goals of the study included improving water quality to downstream process and increasing efficiency (reducing chemical usage, strategic backwash volumes, etc.). • Water Treatment Plant Optimization, Eden Prairie, MN - Project Engineer. Eden Prairie operates a ground water treatment facility that provides softening, filtration and disinfection. AE2S personnel worked alongside operations personnel to develop effective operational tools and approaches to optimize operations of the wells, lime softening system, filters, residuals disposal and recycle and disinfection system. Potential outcomes include improved process efficiency, energy efficiency, process stability and production capacity. Optimization approaches are documented in written operations procedures and presented in a workshop setting. • Marshall MU Softening System, Marshall, MN - Project Engineer. Preparation of a technical memorandum evaluating the technical feasibility of modifying the existing treatment process to achieve additional softening. • Membrane Water Treatment Plant and Improvements, Fargo, ND - Project Engineer. Project consisted of preliminary design for a new membrane WTP and improvements to the existing WTP. The membrane filtration consists of microfiltration or ultrafiltration for removal of particulates and pathogen removal. Reverse Osmosis is used to soften and reduce sulfate concentrations. Disinfection utilizes chlorine in a chlorine contact basin for primary disinfection, with chloramines for secondary disinfection. • WTP Operations Evaluations, Jamestown, ND - Project Engineer. Project consisted of an evaluation of water treatment plant operations for potential improvements to operational procedures. • Williston WTP Operation Services, Williston, ND - Project Manager. Emergency operations services to assist WTP staff with operational challenges and staff shortages. Dr. DeBoer’s experience includes education and research focused on water treatment processes, water quality analysis, and water quality changes in distribution systems. His work has included studies of disinfection by-product formation and control, corrosion in customer plumbing, disinfectant decay in water distribution systems, optimizing treatment for iron and manganese removal, taste and odor removal, TOC removal, enhanced coagulation and softening, optimizing granular media filtration for turbidity removal, membrane system optimization, and the fate of nutrients in water treatment and distribution systems. WHY DEL? Del is an expert in the optimization of WTP processes and has spent his career advancing the water industry. He will provide a strategic role in water chemistry analysis and treatment alternative evaluation making sure you start out on the right path. Del will also be invaluable during startup, performance optimization, training, and as a resource to WTP operations. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.5 WHY THOMAS? Thomas has experience working with the City of Edina including assisting during the Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study. Thomas understands the importance of architectural design to this particular project and potential locations. EDUCATION Bachelor of Architecture, North Dakota State University Bachelor of Science in Environmental Design, North Dakota State University CONTACT tstromsodt@oertelarchitects.com T: 651.696.5186 Oertel Architects (September 2000 – Present) Mr. Stromsodt serves as Project Architect with experience in municipal infrastructure, including Public Works facilities, pump buildings, and well house. He is also experienced with the commercial and retail architecture, which will be valuable in working with adjacent property owners. His responsibilities include schematic design, master planning, project coordination, client / public contact, construction documents, and construction administration. PUBLIC WORKS & RELATED FACILITIES: • City of Edina Water Treatment Study • City of Edina Public Works Study • City of Edina Pump House #3 • City of Edina Pump House #9 • City of Edina Pump House #20 • City of Edina Public Works Facility Study • City of Edina Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance Facility • MnDOT Plymouth Truck Station • City of Eagan Booster Station • City of Hugo Well House #6 • City of Vadnais Heights North Service Center • City of White Bear Lake Public Works • City of Chanhassen Public Works Facility • City of Mahtomedi Public Works Facility • City of Waconia Public Works Facility • City of Rockford Public Works Facility • City of Brooklyn Center Salt/Sand Facility • Wright County Satellite Maintenance Facility • City of Otsego Public Works Facility • City of Maplewood Public Works Facility • City of Shakopee Public Works Facility • City of Waconia Public Works Facility • City of Woodbury Public Works Facility • City of St. Anthony Public Works Facility • City of Minnetonka Operations & Maintenance Facility • University of Minnesota Gas Island Canopy • Dakota County Transportation Facility – Empire Township, MN • Support Staff on multiple projects THOMAS STROMSODT, AIA Architectural ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.6 WHY CHRIS? Chris has previously worked on projects for the City of Edina and has knowledge of the City’s standards. This knowledge combined with his detailed design capabilities will provide the City with a seamless site design for the new WTP. Chris McKenzie, PE Civil Engineer SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Southdale First Addition and Woodhill Neighborhoods Street Reconstruction, Edina, MN - Project Engineer. Chris participated in open houses and neighborhood meetings, prepared plans and specifications, and cost estimate. He provided bid assistance, construction observation, and staking during construction. The project included spot repairs and slip lining of sanitary sewer; water main and storm sewer extensions; storm water runoff treatment manholes; horizontal directional drilling; and drain tile improvements; street sections consisting of both conventional and recycled aggregate bases; bituminous paving; construction of new curb and gutter and rehabilitation of existing curb and gutter; sidewalks; street signing and striping. • Sanitary Manhole Infrastructure Inventory, Edina, MN - Project Engineer. Participated in the inspection of all Edina’s sanitary manholes. The project included a report on the physical condition, photos, and any inflow/infiltration concerns with each manhole. • 2016 Water System Improvements, Minnetrista, MN - Project Manager. Water system improvement project that involved multiple water treatment plants, a water tower and over 2 miles of new watermain to connect existing systems. Project included preparation of plans, cost estimates, specifications, permits, and public involvement. The project had unique challenges such as almost exclusively horizontal directional drilling construction methods, very high water table, coordinating with residents for temporary and permanent easements, and addressing challenging constructability and permitting issues with very close proximity to Lake Minnetonka and its tributaries. • MN TH 13 and 150th Street Intersection Reconstruction, Savage & Prior Lake, MN - Project Engineer. The project was a Cooperative Agreement for the intersection improvement of TH 13 and 150th Street, adding a signal system and improving the roadway geometrics to reduce accidents and improve on site water quality with storm water ponds. • 2014 / 2015 Street Improvement Projects, Northfield, MN - Project Manager. Set of five projects involving mill and overlays, state aid, full street reconstruction, concrete paving, State Highway pedestrian intersection improvements and extending a roadway through and existing gravel pit. The Riverview Dr Area project won the Minnesota Concrete Council’s “Pavements” award for using concrete paving instead of traditional bituminous pavement. Other project design features included coordination with MnDOT for Trunk Highway pedestrian improvements with Rapid Flashing Beacons for advanced warning of the pedestrian curb ramp. Portions of the street reconstruction included full sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer improvements. Mr. McKenzie has over ten years of civil, municipal, utility and transportation engineering experience. Chris’s highway and local infrastructure project responsibilities include preliminary and final design; construction administration, observation, and staking. He works on project engineering for sanitary sewer collection systems, water distribution systems, grading and drainage, site development, parking lots, streets, roadways, and trails. EDUCATION Bachlor of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota CONTACT Chris.McKenzie@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 612-518-2618 ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.7 WHY JUSTIN? Justin is passionate about the sustainability of water as a vital resource. He understands the objectives of this project and is excited to advance the environmental goals of the project team. Justin Klabo, PE, CFM Water Resources Engineer EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of North Dakota REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) CONTACT Justin.Klabo@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 218-791-3157 Mr. Klabo has extensive design and construction experience in a range of water resources projects. Mr. Klabo’s experience includes serving as the project manager, project engineer, and in construction oversight roles for projects including stream restoration, ravine stabilization, lift stations, piping systems, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, stormwater best management practices, regulatory permitting, site design and erosion, and sediment control. SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Urban Plains “Lazy River”, Fargo, ND – Project Manager. The Urban Plains complex was constructed in 2008 and created a network of surface water features for recreational activities (e.g. kayaking and paddle boarding). To maintain water quality the system includes a recirculation system, 2 pretreatment forebays and a large regional filtration basin to treat stormwater runoff prior to entering into the main ponds (over 12 acres in size). Due to groundwater issues, AE2S has been hired by the City to re- design the facility to create a “Lazy River” through the two main ponds. Specific tasks on the project include developing a concept plan to reconstruct the main ponds into a meandering stream with wetland habitat and upland areas. Design elements integrated into the concept plan include rock riffles, stream toe protection, a new recirculation lift station, and native vegetation. • Begin Golf Course Development – Plymouth, MN – Project Engineer. The 70 acre development is located within two watershed management commissions, Elm Creek and Shingle Creek. A stormwater design utilizing water reuse, biofiltration, NURP ponds and vegetated buffers was developed to meet the stormwater requirements. The water reuse system irrigated over 10 acres of the development, enabling the project to meet the abstraction requirements. Overall AE2S developed the stormwater design, developed the surface water management plan for the development and obtained permits for the project. • The Pines at Blesi Farms LOMR – Dayton, MN – Project Engineer. The developer was proposing a 250+ acre development along a FEMA designated Zone A floodplain. AE2S was hired by the developer to prepare a detailed floodplain study to determine the base flood elevation. An XP-SWMM analysis was completed based on the watershed characteristics with large regional wetland facilities present throughout the contributing watershed. The project was able to utilize XP-SWMM and the storage because local regulations were in place to maintain the storage volume in the event any filling would occur within the watershed. The project proposed to fill within FEMA designated special flood hazard area, Zone A. The base flood elevation was approved by the DNR and FEMA. A watershed management permit and FEMA LOMR-F were obtained for the project. • TH 101 Reconstruction – Chanhassen, MN – Lead Drainage Engineer. Justin was responsible for developing a stormwater management plan to meet City, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District and MPCA stormwater requirements for the proposed roadway expansion. The roadway reconstruction extended from south of Lyman Boulevard to Pioneer Trail. The design included wet sedimentation basins, filtration benches, culvert design and storm sewer sizing. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.8 WHY ABBIE? Abbie is a detail-oriented design engineer with strong communication skills. Her comprehensive ‘water’ focused background will provide support across all aspects of your project. Abbie Browen, EIT Project Engineer EDUCATION Master of Engineering, Civil Engineering with Water Resources Emphasis, University of North Dakota; Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of North Dakota REGISTRATIONS Engineer Intern CONTACT Abbie.Browen@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • St. Cloud AOP Pilot Study, St. Cloud, MN - Engineer-in-Training. Pilot study analyzed advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for drinking water including addition of ozone, ozone and hydrogen peroxide (peroxone), and UV and hydrogen peroxide post- recarbonation. This study was completed to ensure the long-term ability to provide an abundant supply of safe, high quality water to St. Cloud, specifically addressing taste and odor, DBP mitigation, organics removal, and pathogen inactivation. Mrs. Browen was responsible for the daily operation, maintenance, and control of the pilot system, providing 24-hour on-call emergency response services to plant staff as needed. She also assisted with writing the pilot study report, which analyzed the data of all investigated alternatives and provided a final recommendation for future system design. • Water Treatment Plant Design and Construction, Shoreview, MN - Engineer- in-Training. Design and construction services for a new 8MG water treatment plant. Design considerations include iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, ammonia removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by-product control. The project included a pilot study to evaluate greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. • St. Cloud Flow Train III Equipment Installation, St. Cloud, MN - Engineer- in-Training. Mrs. Browen was involved with the design, bidding, and construction phases of this retrofit water treatment plant design that added a third 8 MGD treatment train to the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility, providing a total 24 MGD capacity within the plant. Newly installed process components include solids pumps and piping, chemical feed systems for carbon dioxide, alum, powder activated carbon and lime, inclined plate settlers, flocculation and rapid mixers, a solids contact clarifier, and process gates. • Minnetonka Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Minnetonka, MN - Engineer-in-Training. Feasibility study for the replacement and/or rehabilitation of utilities near Twelve Oaks Center Drive from Parkers Lake Road to Wayzata Boulevard. The study looked at options to either abandon and relocate existing water and sewer mains or rehabilitate and replace them in the same location by either open-cut, CIPP lining, or pipe bursting methods. The feasibility study provided probable costs, life cycle considerations, and conclusions for each option. • Fargo Park District Urban Plain Park, Fargo, ND - Engineer-in- Training. The Urban Plains complex was constructed in 2008 and created a network of surface water features for recreational activities (e.g., kayaking and paddle boarding). To maintain water quality the system includes a recirculation system, two pretreatment forebays and a large regional filtration basin to treat stormwater runoff prior to entering into the main ponds (over 12 acres in size). Mrs. Browen has experience in the design and construction of water treatment and distribution projects that include both new and retrofitted water treatment plants, completion of an extensive Advanced Oxidation Process pilot study at the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility, and writing of technical reports related to utility replacement, water tower mixing, and water infrastructure needs assessment. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.9 WHY CHARLES? Charles has extensive knowledge of water treatment electrical systems. His ability to seamlessly integrate with the design team will provide a robust, well thought out WTP design with a focus on energy efficency and sustainability. Charles Haupert, PE Electrical Engineer EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical & Computer Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Montana CONTACT Charles.Haupert@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 763-442-0292 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Water Treatment Plant, Shoreview, MN – Electrical Engineer. A new 8 MGD filter plant adjacent to the existing booster station. The existing booster station chlorine room was modified into a new electrical room with back-up diesel generation. This new service provided power for both the booster station and new filter treatment plant. Booster station pumps were upgraded from soft starters to low harmonic variable frequency drives for added system control. Significant electrical systems in the new filter plant include advanced SCADA and automated motor controls, complete access control and security systems, a fire alarm system, and advanced LED lighting. • Water Treatment Plants 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 Electrical Rehabilitations, Minnetonka, MN - Electrical Engineer. Five separate projects consisting of complete replacement of each Water Treatment Plant’s aging electrical system in their entirety. These methods were used to optimize the treatment process and reduce overall chemical usage and energy costs. New instrumentation and new control systems were installed to further optimize treatment. Arc Flash Hazard Analysis and coordination studies were performed to facilitate circuit breaker setting recommendations for ideal electrical reliability and safety. • Water System Improvements, Eden Prairie, MN - Electrical Engineer. System improvements included upgrades to the pneumatic filter consoles with new controls and touch screen displays, filter gallery equipment controls with modulating electrically actuated valves and new filter instrumentation, rehabilitation of the chemical rooms to flow paced chemical feed systems, chlorine leak detection rehabilitation and annunciation electrical systems, replacement of the 600HP high service pump on a low harmonic 18 pulse variable frequency drive, and rehabilitation of Wells 3 and 4 to install new controls, VFDs, LED energy efficient lighting, and emergency back-up generation. Project also included an Arc Flash Hazard analysis and operator training at the water treatment plant. • WAWSA Williston WTP Expansion, Williston, ND - Electrical Engineer. Expansion of the water treatment plant from 10 MGD to 14 MGD with the addition of a 1 MG clearwell and six dual media filters. • Wataer Treatment Plant Improvements, St. Cloud, MN - Electrical Engineer. Improvements included installation of two new main-tie-mains (MCCs)to feed the new plate settler and RDP systems, upgrades to the controls and pumps for three separate chemical feed systems, installation of new lighting using energy efficient LEDs, and replacement and start-up of a 500HP medium voltage variable frequency drive. Mr. Haupert has experience in the design of power distribution, power generation, real-time process controls and instrumentation for municipalities, regional water systems, utilities, and industry. System designs have included wastewater treatment and collection facilities, water treatment and distribution facilities, wastewater treatment and distribution facilities, and standby power systems. Plant experience includes standby emergency generation, protective coordination studies, arc flash studies, power distribution, control panel layout and design, motor control, and lighting and general power design. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.10 WHY SAM? Sam has experience working on a variety of structural projects but has found a passion in providing successful designs to municipal clients. Sam Wilke, PE, SE Structural Engineer EDUCATION Master of Science, Engineering, University of Wisconsin; Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer: Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Iowa CONTACT Sam.Wilke@ae2s.com T: 701-364-9111 C: 701-630-4919 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Water Treatment Plant Design and Construction, Shoreview, MN - Structural Engineer. Design and construction services for a new water treatment plant. Design considerations included iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, ammonia removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by- product control. The project included a pilot study to evaluate greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. • Regional Water Treatment Plant, Grand Forks, ND - Structural Engineer. Design and bidding of a new Water Treatment Facility to address aging infrastructure, regulatory/water treatment, capacity, and location issues. The 20 MGD WTP will incorporate a hybrid approach with parallel treatment trains consisting of a UF/RO train and an Ozone/BAC filtration train with a 2 MGD RO bypass stream. • Membrane Water Treatment Plant and Improvements, Fargo, ND - Structural Engineer. Preliminary design for a new membrane WTP and improvements to the existing WTP. The membrane filtration will consist of microfiltration or ultrafiltration for removal of particulates and pathogen removal. Reverse Osmosis will be used to soften and reduce sulfate concentrations. Disinfection will utilize chlorine in a chlorine contact basin for primary disinfection, with chloramines for secondary disinfection. • Water Treatment Plant Expansion, New Town, ND - Structural Engineer. Building addition which doubled the plant size and provided room for two additional treatment trains in order to increase plant capacity. • WTP Pre-Value Engineering, Rocky Boy’s Reservation, MT - Structural Engineer. Preliminary design of a new 34.5 million gallon per day conventional treatment process WTP to provide water to residents of the Chippewa Cree Tribe and North Central Montana. The preliminary design also includes design of two (2) on-site three- million gallon concrete storage reservoirs, and a 1.35 million gallon concrete disinfection contact basin/clearwell. The preliminary design also includes tasks such as layouts, hydraulics, pump design, cost estimating, design code reviews, geotechnical evaluation, constructability reviews, phasing strategies, and operations and maintenance estimates for anticipation of a future Value Engineering Study with the Bureau of Reclamation. • Southeast Water Users District Reservoir D Expansion, Mantador, ND - Structural Engineer. New 100,000 gallon reservoir to alleviate pressure issues during peak demand periods. Mr. Wilke serves as the AE2S Structural Division Manager and has nearly 10 years of engineering, project management, and forensic experience. During this time, he has performed on numerous projects involving schematic layout, design, and construction administration. Sam is knowledgeable in a variety of construction methods and materials including steel, concrete, masonry, aluminum, and wood. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.11 WHY ANTHONY? Anthony knows the working of a water system down to every detail. He excels at working closely with Operators to provide customized control systems. His experience will maximize efficency and operational flexibility of your new WTP. Anthony Pittman Instrumentation & Controls Engineer EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, Michigan Technical University CONTACT Anthony.Pittman@ae2s.com T: 763-463-5036 C: 612-308-9469 SPECIFIC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • SCADA Improvements, Chanhassen, MN - Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Engineer. Complete upgrade to lift station, water tower, and well control system. Installation of PLC and OIT replacement and startup, along with implementing a new redundant SCADA architecture with mobile connectivity. Performed upgrades while maintaining existing proprietary controls in the Water Treatment Plant (to be upgraded at a later date) and minimized system downtime by integrating existing controls with new controls during process. Continue to provide on-call service and support for SCADA and instrumentation. • SCADA Upgrades Design, Woodbury, MN - I&C Engineer. Designed a complete SCADA and controls upgrade for a 40 site system – lift stations, wells, and water storage. Includes replacing PLC’s, OIT’s, telemetry, high speed wireless backhaul, redundant network communications, and water tower surveillance incorporation. Included advanced SCADA architecture with redundant server, mobile connectivity, and redundant master PLC design. • Multiple Instrumentation & Controls Improvements, Eden Prairie, MN - I&C Engineer. Provided SCADA design, PLC upgrades, programming, radio telemetry, and control panel startups for multiple lift stations, wells, and water treatment plant. Provide controls support and service as needed. • WTF SCADA Design and Upgrades, St. Cloud, MN - I&C Engineer. Replaced all PLCs, SCADA servers, and communications for the water treatment facility (WTF). Provided programming for new PLCs and SCADA application and used 3D CAD files to program 3D SCADA graphics in order to minimize screen count and provide realistic operations. Created several customized control processes to meet needs of facility operation. Provide on-call service and support for SCADA and instrumentation. • SCADA Upgrades, Roseville, MN - I&C Engineer. Functional SCADA software and server upgrade for system to run on current operating system. Provided configuration/programming of new auto reporting application, backup software and smartphone alarming, and remote access for operator laptops. Provide on-call service and support for SCADA system needs. • New WTP SCADA System, Fairmont, MN - I&C Engineer. As part of the design and construction management that AE2S provided for the City of Fairmont’s WTP, AE2S also provided the PLC and SCADA programming. Provided SCADA server configuration and installation, including software- based overhead alarming. Replaced the telemetry polling master PLC and radio communications system. Provide on-call services for support as needed. Mr. Pittman has over eleven years experience integrating automation controls and telemetry equipment for various municipalities and water districts. Working side-by-side with the project team throughout design, construction, and startup, Mr. Pittman ensures that your project operates exactly as intended. He frequently works closely with system operators to develop efficient, customized process control systems. He is experienced with many different PLCs and SCADA software, SQL databases, reporting software, server and workstation platforms, and communications systems. ARESUMES AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.12 WHY CHRIS? Chris has extensive experience working with the City of Edina. His knowledge of constructability and materials selection will be critical to ensuring the best solution. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Construction Management, South Dakota State University CONTACT chris.mbi@comcast.net T: 763-421-8790 C: 612-232-7872 EDINA PROJECTS • 2012 WTP No. 6, Edina, MN - Project Manager. Installation of two pressure filters, four air strippers (to aid in the removal of vinyl chloride), three cast-in-place concrete tanks, three high service pumps, standby generator, chemical feed and a laboratory. All within the lower level of an existing parking garage. • 2005 Wellhouse Improvements , Edina, MN - Project Manager. Process piping, chem feed changes, new doors. • 2004 Wellhouse Improvements, Edina, MN - Project Manager. Process piping, chem feed changes, new doors. • 2003 Wellhouse Improvements, Edina, MN - Project Manager. Process piping, chem feed changes, new doors. OTHER MAJOR WTP PROJECTS • Shoreview Water Treatment Plant, Shoreview, MN - Project Manager. Construction of 8MGD gravity filter water plant. Including twin 215,000 Gallon Reclaim Tanks, a 100,000 gallon reservoir, chlorine gas feed system, tank washdown, a laboratory and standby generator. This project also included re-purposing some space within the booster station building for electrical controls. • Water Treatment Plant Ammonia Building, Minneapolis, MN - Project Manager. Construction of an ammonia feed building, completely separate from the main filter plant for safety reasons, to treat 130 MGD from the Mississippi River. The project included all stainless steel piping and a stripping tower in case of emergency. • Water Treatment Plant No. 2, Champlain, MN - Project Manager. Construction of a new 1.8 MGD water treatment plant / picnic shelter including a reclaim tank, chemical feed and storage for a portable generator. • Water Treatment Plant No. 2, Wayzata, MN - Project Manager. Construction of a new 2.9 MGD gravity filter water plant complete with clearwell, reclaim tank, chemical feed, natural gas generator and laboratory. • Water Treatment Plant No. 3, Blaine, MN - Project Manager. New 2.9 MGD pressure filter facility complete with backwash tank, chem feed, generator and office. • Water Treatment Plant No. 1, Blaine, MN - Project Manager. New 2.9 MGD pressure filter facilty complete with backwash tank, chem feed, office and stripping tower for the removal of volatile organic compounds. • Water Treatment Plant No. 2, Blaine, MN - Project Manager. New 7.9 MGD pressure filter facility complete with backwash tank, chem feed, generator and office. Chris has nearly 20 years of experience in construction management across the twin cities metro area. He specializes in municipal construction and has extensive experience in the construction of Water Treatment Plants. In addition, Chris was the project manager for Water Treatment Plant 6 in Edina that includes many unique construction challenges. His knowledge of constructibility and material costs will be critical in the analysis of best solutions for your project. CHRIS SLUITER Construction Financial Review AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.1 A EXPERIENCE AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.2 KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS • Existing Ground Water Supply • Iron, Manganese, and Radon Removal • Aeration • Gravity Filtration • Filter Technology Evaluation WATER TREATMENT PLANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIONShoreview, Minnesota Concerns Lead to New WTP The City of Shoreview provides an average of approximately 3 MGD of potable water to its 26,000 local residents, as well as to customers within the Cities of North Oaks, Arden Hills, and Vadnais Heights. The City experienced significant growth in the 1970s and 1980s, but focus has shifted from new development to infill and redevelopment. The City currently operates a water supply system that consists of six wells, raw water transmission piping, a storage reservoir, chemical feed systems, and a booster pump station (but no treatment/filtration facility). The existing water system has served the City well for decades, but increasing color-related concerns and aging infrastructure spurred the City to enlist AE2S to design and construct a water treatment plant (WTP). Treatment Objectives Drive Technology Selection The treatment objectives established for the new WTP included ammonia removal, iron and manganese removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, radon removal, fluoridation, disinfection and maintaining a protective disinfectant residual in the distribution system, and disinfectant by-product control. Several alternative technologies were evaluated to accomplish these treatment objectives for the proposed water treatment facility. Analysis included a pilot study evaluating greensand filtration and alternative oxidation processes. Solution Meets Treatment Financial Objectives Ultimately, aeration, with gravity filtration, gas chlorine, and traditional backwash reclamation basins were selected as the alternative that best met the City’s needs, both in terms of accomplishing treatment objectives and financial considerations. Final design and bidding were completed in May 2015. The WTP became operational December 2016. CLIENT City of Shoreview DATE 2014 CLIENT CONTACT Tom Wesolowski City Engineer 651-490-4652 AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.3 WTF SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Defining the Issues With nearly 12 years of service since the last expansion, the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility (SCWTF) was approaching a crossroads. Although the surface water plant was relatively “new,” the condition of equipment was on the decline, regulatory requirements were increasingly strict with critical deadlines rapidly approaching, and consistent community growth was challenging treatment capacity of the facility. In 2006, AE2S worked closely with St. Cloud staff to develop a comprehensive Facility Master Plan to address specific near-term objectives and define the long-term vision for the SCWTF. Strategic Execution AE2S worked closely with the SCWTF staff, since 2006, to implement a series of capital improvements projects prioritized based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing and projected WTF needs, operation and maintenance objectives, regulatory objectives, treatment objectives, and financial considerations. In an effort to first optimize the existing facility the project team designed and implemented a series of improvements to address aging infrastructure, improve First Stage clarification, reconstruct 25 MGD of filtration capacity from granular media filter, refurbish/replace select chemical feed systems, integrate a 2,000 kW generator into the electrical systems, and provide a comprehensive update of the SCWTF I&C system. AE2S is currently working with the City on the Flow Train III Improvements project to add another 8 MGD of treatment capacity to the SCWTF to meet increasing water demands and provide improvement of operational flexibility. We are also working together on the Advanced Treatment Pilot Project to evaluate the performance of disinfection alternatives and advanced treatment processes, to provide improved safety and better prepare the SCWTF for anticipated future regulatory requirements. St. Cloud, MN Successful Implementation Over the past nine (9) years, SCWTF staff and AE2S have worked successfully together on more than $20 million in planning, design, and construction projects. All of which were completed on time and within budget. Our projects have been successful in effectively mitigating concerns related to deteriorated infrastructure and system reliability, enhancing operability, and reducing operation and maintenance (O&M) required to maintain the existing infrastructure. Because of the projects we have completed together, the SCWTF has more reliable treatment processes, achieves improved water quality from many of the process, and is better prepared than ever before for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS • Filter Reconstruction • Treatment Flexibility & Redundancy • Future Regulations • Optimization of Multiple Processes • Complete I&C Upgrade • All Construction Projects Completed with Magney Construction CLIENT CONTACT Lisa Vollbrecht Assistant Director of Public Utilities 320-255-7225 CLIENT City of St. Cloud, MN DATE 2005 - Present AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.4 KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS • Technology Evaluation • Future Regulations • Detailed Cost Analysis of Process Alternatives • Blending Water Qualities • Sensitive Site in Residential Neighborhood FARGO MEMBRANE WTP AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Source Water Quality Challenges The Fargo Water Treatment Plant (WTP) uses a combination of water from both the Red River and Sheyenne River, with the Sheyenne River being used nearly 40 percent of the time. Unfortunately, changing water quality in the Sheyenne River is challenging the City’s ability to utilize this important water source. The flooding in the Devils Lake region is forcing the State of North Dakota to discharge water from Devils Lake into the Sheyenne River. Devils Lake water contains high salt concentrations, which pose a significant treatment challenge to the Fargo WTP. Project Planning and Preliminary Design In 2010, the City of Fargo retained AE2S in association with Black and Veatch (B&V) to complete a Facility Plan to study treatment options and to conduct an extensive Pilot Testing Program, which began in 2011. Following recommendations from the Facility Plan and the results of the Pilot Testing Program, AE2S and B&V were retained to prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) for the Fargo Membrane WTP project. Drafted in November 2012, the PER provided detailed descriptions and design criteria for the anticipated pretreatment, membrane filtration, reverse osmosis (RO), ozone and granular activated carbon (GAC) taste and odor control, and chlorine contact basin systems. The PER also covered criteria for site design, chemical feed design, structural design, architectural design, mechanical design, electrical design, and instrumentation and control (I&C) design for the project. Design criteria for improvements to the existing WTP were also included in the report and covered additional bulk chemical storage, additional ozone generator capacity, filter-to-waste piping, and standby power generator improvements. Final design of the project commenced in 2013 with the Membrane WTP scheduled to be operational in late 2018. The PER was submitted to the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) as part of the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund (SRLF). The City of Fargo received $30 million in grant funding, along with approximately $66 million in SRLF loan funds, to help fund this project. Fargo Membrane WTP Description This project includes the construction of a new Membrane WTP along with various improvements to the existing WTP. The Membrane WTP will be capable of treating raw water from Fargo, ND either of the City’s source waters with a treatment capacity of 15 million gallons per day (MGD). Raw water will be treated through pretreatment utilizing plate settlers to remove large suspended solids and provide the necessary pretreatment for the membrane system. The membrane filtration consists of ultrafiltration (UF) and will remove particulates and provide pathogen removal. RO will be used to soften and reduce the sulfate concentrations; and disinfection utilizing chlorine in a chlorine contact basin will be used for primary disinfection with chloramines for secondary disinfection. A portion of the UF filtrate flow will bypass the RO system and will be treated for taste and odor utilizing ozone and GAC. Finished water from the Membrane WTP will blend with the finished water from the existing WTP before entering the clearwell and distribution system. A second standby generator will be installed to allow the WTP to provide capacity for demands up to 25 MGD. CLIENT City of Fargo DATE 2010 - Present CLIENT CONTACT Bruce Grubb Enterprise Director 701-241-1469 AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.5 FAIRMONT WATER SYSTEM PLANNING AND NEW WTPFairmont, Minnesota KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS • High Service Pumping Station • Chlorine Contact Basin • Partially Funded by Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loans and Green Project Reserve • On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation • Ground Water Source • Filter Alternatives • New 5.4 MGD WTP System Facing Multiple Challenges The Fairmont Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was experiencing treatment capacity limitations as well as challenges related to aging infrastructure, including operational difficulties related to deteriorating and outdated treatment processes. Proposed drinking water regulations would likely require improvements or advanced treatment processes to be implemented in the future at the WTP. To address these challenges, the City retained AE2S to complete a Facility Master Plan, designed to include population and water demand projections, evaluation of current and future drinking water regulations, establishment of treatment target goals, completion of a source water evaluation, a WTP condition assessment and risk analysis, a treatment technology evaluation, and development of preferred project alternatives for evaluation. Rehabilitation or Replacement? Rehabilitation of the existing facility, as well as total replacement, were evaluated. Due to the significant capital investment for renewal or replacement of the existing WTP, thorough consideration of potential reuse of in-place infrastructure was a high priority. Thus, a major component of master planning involved completion of in-depth facility and equipment condition assessment, and subsequent completion of a risk analysis. Each project option considered was evaluated with respect to capital and life cycle costs, treatment effectiveness, process redundancy, operation and maintenance requirements, and constructability. Based on these factors, decommissioning of the existing facility and construction of a new WTP was recommended. Confirmation of Recommendations Following completion of the Master Plan, AE2S initiated an on-site pilot treatment operation that was designed specifically to comparatively analyze the Taste and Odor (T&O) mitigation performance of Ultraviolet light (UV) and Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), ozone, and Granular Activated Carbon (GAC). Analysis included “spiking” pilot water with increased concentrations of T&O compounds to evaluate performance under worst case conditions. In addition to analytical evaluation, performance of the alternative technologies was evaluated by an “Odor Panel” consisting of WTP staff, City officials, residents, and engineers. Participation not only assisted in process selection, but also improved public support for the project. The project also arranged and facilitated an on-site pilot test for Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) technology for improved algae removal. Ultimately, DAF was excluded from final design, as the costs outweighed the benefits. Full Speed Ahead Following a collaborative design process, construction of the new WTP began in July 2011. The WTP began operations in August 2013. The 5.4 million gallon per day (MGD) facility includes the following treatment processes: raw water aeration, conventional lime and soda ash softening, a filter press solids handling process, conventional sand filtration, GAC filtration, on-site generation of sodium hypochlorite for chlorine disinfection, and eight additional chemical feed systems. Interesting project components include demolishing an existing school to make way for the new facility location, rehabilitating and reusing the existing raw water intake station, intermediate pumping station, high service pumping station, and demolishing the existing facility and restoring the adjacent lake shoreline. CLIENT City of Fairmont, MN DATE 2007 - 2013 CLIENT CONTACT Troy Nemmers City Engineer 507-238-9461 AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.6 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY STUDY PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY In 2008, the City of Edina hired Oertel Architects to do a feasibility study for a water treatment facility on a site adjacent to the Southdale shopping center. The intent of the study was to explore the potential operation, equipment, footprint, and scale of the facility to determine project scope, planning, cost, Edina has limited real estate available for large projects, however, through creative thinking an existing large operations building with a reasonably cohesive site layout became a unique option for the new Public Works building. Because tearing the existing building down, only to build a similar block building in its place, would be less than environmental, our team worked with the City to convert an old popcorn factory into a new public works facility for the City. The 138,000 square foot facility includes renovation to an existing building and additions to the former popcorn factory. The facility is not LEED certified, as city council could not justify the expense, but LEED principles were followed. Numerous energy conservation strategies were studied and implemented and feasibility. As part of the study, multiple architectural renderings were produced to illustrate possible material choices, massing, and potential design opportunities and constraints to City staff and adjacent land owners and developers. Edina, MN Edina, MN into the building and site, including a geo- thermal system. The project also used an innovative site storm water treatment technique of installing two 300-foot by 4-foot by 3-foot rock infiltration treatment trenches, which took up a small foot print while still meeting water quality requirements for the site. The system was installed around the newly constructed geothermal field system and piping network within the parking lots. Our team also designed a small storm water treatment pond which provides additional infiltration, sediment removals and storm water runoff rate control. The pond was contoured to preserve mature pine trees and other existing landscape features on site. AEXPERIENCE AE2S CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5 PROPOSAL A.7 PUMPHOUSE #3 WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 Pumphouse #3 is located in a prominent neighborhood in Edina, as a result, a community task force was asked to participate in the design process. A thoughtful and sensitive approach was taken in regards to the context and scale of the design. Extra attention was paid to the exterior finishes, landscaping and paving so that it could seamlessly blend with the residential neighborhood. Edina, MN Champlin, MN Prior Lake, MN The City of Champlin Water Treatment Plant #2 is located adjacent to a baseball field and playground. In an effort to add value to the surroundings, our team developed a design that incorporated a picnic shelter for the public to utilize. The park, located in a residential area, required that the new facility blend well within the Pumphouse #4 is surrounded by single family housing. The City and the community considered the existing pumphouse building to be somewhat of an eyesore. The new shell of the building was built around the existing portion for several reasons: • Retention of original insulation • Secure place to store tools and con- struction equipment fabric of the neighborhood, but have a more durable construction than a typical residential structure and fit into the City’s building formula. To fit the City’s building aesthetic, similar materials and color palette were used to seamlessly match the City’s brand. • Ability to retain the existing electrical hook-ups • Continuous operation during con- struction • Secure the well during demolition In addition, the glass block window was added not only for natural light but to help make the building seem less imposing. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Deb ra Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:On-Sale Into xic ating, Club On-Sale, S und ay Sale, Wine and Beer Liq uor Lic ense R enewals Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Council motion to approve the Club On-Sale, On-Sale Intoxicating, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License renewals as presented for the period beginning April 1, 2017 and ending March 31, 2018. INTRODUCTION: T he 2017-2018 liquor license renewals are completed and presented for the Council's consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: 2017 Liquor Renewals 2017 Police Department Recommendation March 7, 2017 Mayor and City Council Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk On-Sale Intoxicating, Club On-Sale, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License Renewals Information / Background: Applications for renewal of On-Sale Intoxicating, Club On-Sale, Sunday On-Sale, Wine On-Sale, Beer On-Sale and Beer Off-Sale Liquor Licenses were received in February for the establishments listed below. All applications have been reviewed by the Edina Police Department and renewals are recommended per the attached memo from Lt. Conboy. The applicants have submitted all necessary paperwork in accordance with the City’s liquor ordinance and State Statutes, and have paid their license fees. In the case of the applicants for both wine and beer licenses, statute allows the establishments to also sell strong beer in their restaurants. Cook’s of Crocus Hill has decided to not renew the liquor license at the cooking school operated in Edina. Chuck E. Cheese originally submitted renewal documentation without signatures. Staff returned the incomplete application and is recommending Chuck E. Cheese’s license is contingent upon the successful completion of the Police Department annual background check. Edina’s renewal date is April 1, 2017. Once the Council approves the renewals, staff will forward all necessary documentation to the Minnesota Liquor Control for state approval. Following are the licenses submitted for the Council’s consideration for renewal. On-Sale Intoxicating & Sunday Sale Big Bowl Buffalo Wild Wings Cocina Del Barrio Crave Restaurant Dave & Buster’s Edina Grill Restaurant Lake Shore Grill Lou Nanne’s Steakhouse McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant Mozza Mia Nakomori Japanese Bistro P.F. Chang’s China Bistro STAFF REPORT Page 2 Pinstripes, Inc. Pittsburgh Blue Raku Inc. Japanese Restaurant Rojo Mexican Grill Ruby Tuesday Salut Bar Americain Tavern On France The Cheesecake Factory The Hilltop (former Eden Avenue Grill) Westin Edina Galleria On-Sale Wine and On-Sale 3.2 Beer Barnes & Noble Café LLC Beaujo’s Byerly’s Edina Chipotle Mexican Grill Coconut Thai Davanni’s Pizza and Hot Hoagies D’Amico & Sons Good Earth Restaurant Hello Pizza Marriott Residence Inn Noodles & Company People’s Organic Coffee/Wine Galleria Café Pizza Rev Red Savoy Pizza Smashburger The Tin Fish TJ’s of Edina Restaurant On-Sale 3.2 Licenses: Chuck E. Cheese’s Off-Sale 3.2 Licenses: Cub Foods Edina Market & Deli Holiday Stationstore #217 Jerry’s Foods SuperAmerica LLC #4047 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Police Department Phone 952-826-1610 • Fax 952-826-1607 • www.EdinaMN.gov Date: 02/28/2017 To: Chief Dave Nelson cc: From: Lt. Dan Conboy Subject: Liquor License Renewals Background checks have been completed for the 2017-2018 licensing period. The review was conducted for the following liquor licenses: On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer On-Sale, 3.2 Beer On-Sale, 3.2 Off-Sale and Club On-Sale and Sunday Sale. The below listed restaurants, stores and country clubs comply with Edina City Code. An unqualified recommendation for approval of these renewal applications is warranted. ON-SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE • Big Bowl • Buffalo Wild Wings • Cocina Del Barrio • CRAVE • Dave & Buster’s • Edina Grill Restaurant • Lake Shore Grill • Lou Nanne’s • McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurant • Mozza Mia • Nakamori Japanese Bistro • P.F. Chang’s China Bistro • Pinstripes • Pittsburgh Blue • Raku Japanese Restaurant • Rojo Mexican Grill • Ruby Tuesday • Salut Bar Americain • Tavern on France • The Cheesecake Factory • The Hill Top Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • Westin Edina Galleria WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON –SALE • Barnes and Noble • Beaujo’s Wine Bar & Bistro • Byerly’s Edina • Chipotle Mexican Grill • Coconut Thai • Davanni’s Pizza and Hot Hoagies • D’Amico & Sons • Good Earth Restaurant • Hello Pizza • Marriott Residence Inn • Noodles & Company • Peoples Organic Coffee and Wine Café • Pizza Rev • Red’s Savoy Pizza • Smash Burger • TJ’s of Edina • The Tin Fish BEER 3.2 ON-SALE BEER 3.2 OFF-SALE • Cub Foods • Edina Market and Deli • Holiday Station #217 • Jerry’s Foods • Superamerica LLC CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY SALE • Edina Country Club • Interlachen Country Club As of February 28th 2017, Chuck E. Cheese’s (On-Sale 3.2 Beer license) has not submitted the necessary paperwork for their liquor license renewal. This may result in a delay of processing their license renewal. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:MJ Lamo n, P ro ject Co o rd inato r Item Activity: Subject:Ordinanc e No . 2017-01: Amending Edina City Co d e Co nc erning Bo ard s & Co mmis s ions Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to grant Second Reading, to Ordinance No. 2017-01 adopting changes to City Code concerning commissions. INTRODUCTION: At the February 22 City Council meeting, City Council granted first reading to the ordinance with some technical changes that needed to be completed. All changes have been included in the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2017-01: Amending Edina City Code Concerning Boards & Commis s ions 190927v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 2-81 (a) of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Regular members. Commission members shall be appointed by majority vote of the Council. Members of Arts and Culture Commission, Edina Community Health Commission, Energy and Environment Commission, Construction Board of Appeals, Heritage Preservation Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission, Park Commission, Transportation Commission, and Board of Appeal and Equalization are eligible to serve two, three-year terms. Members of the Planning Commission are eligible to serve three, three-year terms. A member in good standing shall serve until a successor has been appointed. SECTION 2. Section 2-83 (b) of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Chairperson and vice-chairperson. Each board or commission annually shall elect from its members a chairperson and vice-chairperson to serve a term of one year. No person shall serve more than three consecutive one-year terms as chairperson of a particular board or commission. A chairperson elected to fill a vacancy shall be eligible to serve three full terms in addition to the remainder of the vacated term. There are no term limits for the position of vice-chairperson. SECTION 3. Section 2-86 (b)(2) of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: The member, regular or student, fails to attend at least 75 percent of the regular scheduled meetings in any calendar year, not including the joint work sessions with the Council. For a member, regular or student, whose term begins during a calendar year, attendance in that calendar year is measured as at least 75 percent of the scheduled meetings following the beginning of the member's term. SECTION 4. Chapter 2, Division 5 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: DIVISION 5. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Sec. 2-184. - Policy and establishment. The Council finds that historically significant buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts represent scarce, nonrenewable heritage resources that are critical assets for community development; that heritage preservation is an important public service and a legitimate responsibility of city government; and that the preservation, protection and Ordinance No. 2017-01 Page 2 190927v1 enhancement of significant heritage resources for the benefit of present and future citizens is a public necessity. Therefore, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.193, the Council continues the Heritage Preservation Board as the City's Heritage Preservation Commission. Sec. 2-185. - Purpose. The commission shall assist and advise the Council, manager, and other city commissions on all matters relating to heritage resource preservation, protection and enhancement. The commission shall safeguard the significant heritage resources of the city by identifying significant heritage resources and nominating them for designation by the Council as city heritage landmarks; by developing and maintaining a comprehensive preservation plan; by reviewing applications for city permits in relation to properties designated as city heritage landmarks; and by encouraging the preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction of significant heritage resources through public education. Sec. 2-186. - Definitions. Unless otherwise stated, or unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning, the words or phrases in the following list of definitions shall, for the purposes of this division, have the meanings indicated: Certificate of appropriateness means a certificate issued by the city planner and attached to a city permit evidencing compliance with the city's comprehensive heritage preservation plan. City planner means city staff member responsible for zoning administration. Comprehensive heritage preservation plan means the official guide plan for implementing the city's heritage resource preservation policies, adopted by the Council, which establishes goals and priorities and integrates heritage preservation with other planning data. Edina Heritage Landmark or city heritage landmark means any heritage resource so designated by the Council that is significant in history, architecture, archeology or culture and therefore worthy of preservation and consideration in city planning. Evaluation means the process of determining whether identified heritage resources meet defined criteria of historical, architectural, archeological or cultural significance. Heritage preservation commission means the heritage preservation advisory commission appointed by the Council. Ordinance No. 2017-01 Page 3 190927v1 Heritage resource means any prehistoric or historic building, site, structure, object or district that has historical, architectural, archeological or cultural value to the citizens of the city, the state or the United States. Preservation means the act or process of applying measures to sustain the existing form, structure, integrity, and material of a heritage resource. Reconstruction means the act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure or object as it appeared during a specific period of time. Rehabilitation means the act or process of returning a heritage resource to a state of utility through repair or alteration that makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historical, architectural, archeological or cultural values. Restoration means the act or process of accurately recovering the form and details of a heritage resource and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of removal of later work or by the replacement of missing historic features. Significance means the heritage preservation value of buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts that are linked to important historical events or persons, or that represent notable expressions of architecture or engineering, or that have yielded important information about prehistory or history. Survey means the physical search for and recording of heritage resources that result in an inventory of buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts worthy of consideration in city planning. Sec. 2-187. - Duties and responsibilities. The commission shall: (1) Advise the Council, manager, and other city commissions and provide leadership for implementing the heritage preservation regulations. (2) Develop and maintain a comprehensive plan for heritage resource preservation to ensure that community development policies and decisions respect the city's heritage and promote stewardship of heritage resources. (3) Conduct an ongoing survey of historic buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts and maintain an inventory of the heritage resources in the city. (4) Conduct evaluations to determine the eligibility of heritage resources for designation as city heritage landmarks. (5) Nominate heritage resources for designation as city heritage landmarks by the City Council. Ordinance No. 2017-01 Page 4 190927v1 (6) Review city permit applications in relation to city heritage landmarks and make recommendations to the city planner with respect to issuance of certificates of appropriateness. (7) Review and make recommendations to the planning commission on development projects that affect properties designated heritage landmarks or determined eligible for designation as heritage landmarks. (8) Inform and educate citizens about the city's heritage and the benefits of preservation. (9) Develop regulatory and incentive programs that facilitate heritage preservation. (10) Adopt rules of procedure, subject to Council approval, to guide the commission's deliberations. (11) Prepare an annual report to the Council, describing the commission's accomplishments during the past year and presenting goals and objectives for the coming year. Sec. 2-188. - Membership. (a) Commission membership. The commission shall consist of nine regular and two student members. Members shall have a demonstrated interest, knowledge, ability or expertise in heritage preservation. At least one member shall be a qualified professional historian, architect, architectural historian, archeologist, planner or the owner of a heritage landmark property. (b) City Historical Society membership. A member of the commission shall be a member of the city historical society. (c) County Historical Society membership. A member of the commission shall be a member of the County Historical Society. Sec. 2-189. - Professional staff. The manager shall provide the commission with professional staff with expertise in heritage preservation. SECTION 5. Chapter 2, Division 7 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: DIVISION 7. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Sec. 2-255. - Establishment. To provide for a City park and open space system and a City recreation program a Parks and Recreation Commission is established. Sec. 2-256. - Duties. Ordinance No. 2017-01 Page 5 190927v1 The Parks and Recreation Commission shall develop and review plans and advise the Council on the acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities, and plan and make recommendations to the Council concerning park activities and recreation programs. The park commission shall advise the Council on natural resource, wildlife management, and natural area preservation issues. The park commission shall make and furnish studies, reports and recommendations as the Council may request. 2-257. - Membership. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall consist of nine regular and two student members and one commission position that will be an ex officio, non-voting member that is nominated by the Edina School Board and confirmed by the City Council. With the exception of voting, the position will be charged with all the same rights, privileges and responsibilities as the other members of the commission. The School District’s nominee will comply with the City’s rules regarding advisory commission members, except that the nominee need not be a resident of the City. The term of this position is subject to nomination and confirmation on an annual basis. SECTION 6. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: February 22, 2017 Second Reading: March 7, 2017 Published: March 16, 2017 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.J. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:David Nels on, Polic e Chief Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-20: Ap p roving MN Bureau o f Criminal Ap p rehens io n Joint Powers Agreements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-20 approving two Joint P owers Agreement between the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), and the City of Edina on behalf of its P olice Department and P rosecuting Attorney. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Resolution No. 2017-20 Approving MN Joint Powers Agreements Res olution No. 2017-20 Joint Powers Agreement March 7, 2017 Mayor and City Council Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Resolution No. 2017-20 Approve MN Joint Powers Agreements Information / Background: Our current Master Joint Powers Agreements (JPA) allow the City of Edina on behalf of the Police Department and its Prosecuting Attorney to access the Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to use systems and tools available over the State’s criminal justice data communications network for which the City is eligible. Resolution No. 2017-20 approves the renewal of both contracts. These are five year renewal contracts. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-20 RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF EDINA ON BEHALF OF ITS CITY ATTORNEY AND POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department desires to enter into Joint Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to use systems and tools available over the State’s criminal justice data communications network for which the City is eligible. The Joint Powers Agreements further provide the City with the ability to add, modify and delete connectivity, systems and tools over the five year life of the agreement and obligates the City to pay the costs for the network connection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements No. 120733 and 120734 by and between the State of Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the City of Edina on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department, are hereby approved. 2. That the Chief of Police, David Nelson, or his or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Police Department. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City’s connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement, Chief David Nelson is appointed as the Authorized Representative’s designee. 3. That Patrick Leach, or his or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Prosecuting Attorney. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City’s connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement, Chief David Nelson appointed as the Authorized Representative’s designee. 4. That James Hovland, the Mayor for the City of Edina, and Scott Neal, the City Manager, are authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements. Passed and Adopted by the Council on this 7th day of March, 2017. Dated: March 7 2017 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.K. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Jes s ic a V. Wils o n, Water Res o urc es Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n 2017-21: Approving No-R is e Certific ate for Nine Mile Creek Ed ina Streambank Stab ilization Pro jec t Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approving Resolution No. 2017-21, T he 'No-Rise Certificate' for the Nine Mile Creek Edina Streambank Stabilization P roject. INTRODUCTION: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is finalizing the design for a stream stabilization project on several reaches throughout Edina. Staff has asked them to provide a 'No-Rise Certificate' signed by a licensed engineer to certify that the project will not result in any rise in the 1% annual chance flood elevation. T his resolution serves as a formal and public acceptance of the certificate and supporting data. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution No. 2017-21: Adopt No-Ris e Certificate for Nine Mile Creek Edina Streambank Stabilization Project 191487v1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-21 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING NO-RISE CERTIFICATE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapters 103F and 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. WHEREAS, on February 18, 2009, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers conditionally accepted the petition of the City of Edina for the Edina Water Quality Improvements Project, which identified removal of sediment deposits, deadfalls and other debris from the bed of Nine Mile Creek, pond restorations, maintenance of past water-management projects such as in Bredesen Park, addition of trails along the creek and construction of ponds or proprietary storm sewer devices to enhance treatment of stormwater before it enters the creek; and WHEREAS, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has furnished data to support a “No-Rise Certificate” indicating the project would result in a 0.00 foot increase in the 1% annual chance FEMA floodplain base flood elevation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that: 1. The City of Edina accepts the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District No-Rise Certificate and supporting data. ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 7th day of March, 2017. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. 191487v1 WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _________ day of ________________, 2017. _____________________________________ City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.L. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Other From:Tara Brown, S ustainability Coord inato r Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-23: Sup p ort for GreenCo rp s Ho s t Site Applic ation Ac tio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2017-23, a resolution in support of the City's application for a grant from GreenCorps. INTRODUCTION: T he GreenCorps' grant application requires a resolution of support from the City Council. If successful, Edina would host a GreenCorp employee for approximately 11 months, starting in September 2017. T his employee would be hired and paid by the Minnesota P ollution Control Agency, and would work in coordination with City staff to perform projects related to our GHG emission reduction goals. Attached is a proposed resolution of support. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution No. 2017-23: Support for GreenCorps Hos t Site Application RESOLUTION NO. 2017-23 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR GREENCORPS HOST SITE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied to host an AmeriCorps member from the Minnesota GreenCorps, a program of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), under its FY17-18 Environmental Assistance Grant Program; and WHEREAS, if the MPCA selects the City of Edina, the organization is committed to implementing the proposed project as described in the host site application, and in accordance with the pre-scoped position description; and WHEREAS, the MPCA requires that the City of Edina enter into a host site agreement with the MPCA that identifies the terms, conditions, roles and responsibilities; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, hereby agrees to enter into and sign a host site agreement with the MPCA to carry out the member activities specified therein and to comply with all of the terms, conditions, and matching provisions of the host site agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 2017 Attest:________________________________ ________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7 day of March, 2017. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.M. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Carter A. Sc hulze, PE, As s is tant C ity Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-25: MnDOT Limited Us e P ermit for Valley View Ro ad S id ewalk Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Resolution No. 2017-25 for a Limited Use P ermit with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (MnDOT ), for a pedestrian trail in the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 62 at Valley View Road. INTRODUCTION: On December 6, 2016, the Council held a public hearing and ordered the Birchcrest A & Countryside B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction which included sidewalk improvements to Valley View Road. P ortions of Valley View Road lie within MnDOT right-of-way of Trunk Highway 62. In order to construct, operate and maintain a pedestrian facility on MnDOT 's right-of-way, the City is required to approve the attached resolution for a Limited Use P ermit. A copy of the Limited Use P ermit is attached. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2017-25 and the Limited Use P ermit. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution No. 2017-25: MnDOT Limited Us e Permit for Valley View Road Sidewalk Limited Us e Permit Valley View Rd Sidewalk RESOLUTION NO. 2017-25 CITY OF EDINA LIMITED USE PERMIT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AT VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND TRACY AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a political subdivision, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has approved a plan to construct a pedestrian trail in the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 62 to close a gap between in-place facilities; and, WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation requires a Limited Use Permit for the construction and utilization of said pedestrian trail; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby enters into a Limited Use Permit with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To construct, operate and maintain a pedestrian trail within the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 62 C.S. 2763(TH62=005) of the State of Minnesota. The City of Edina shall construct, operate and maintain said trail in accordance with the Limited Use Permit granted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Limited Use Permit and any amendments to the Permit. Dated: March 7, 2017 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 1 of 5 LU1001 3/1/2017 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT C.S. 2763 T.H.62 (62=005) County of Hennepin LUP # 2763-0180 Permittee: City of Edina Terminates: 02/22/2027 In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434, the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation, (“MnDOT”), hereby grants a Limited Use Permit (the “LUP”) to City of Edina, (“Permittee”), to use the area within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 62 as shown in red on Exhibit "A", (the “Area”) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This Limited Use Permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to resolution, a certified copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Non-Motorized Recreational Trail The Permittee's use of the Area is limited to only the constructing, maintaining and operating a nonmotorized recreational trail ("Facility") and the use thereof may be further limited by 23 C.F.R. 652 also published as the Federal-Aid Policy Guide. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. TERM. This LUP terminates at 11:59PM on 02/22/2027 (“Expiration Date”) subject to the right of cancellation by MnDOT, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee ninety (90) days written notice of such cancellation. This LUP will not be renewed except as provided below. Provided this LUP has not expired or terminated, MnDOT may renew this LUP for a period of up to ten (10) years, provided Permittee delivers to MnDOT, not later than ninety (90) days prior to the Expiration Date, a written request to extend the term. Any extension of the LUP term will be under the same terms and conditions in this LUP, provided: (a) At the time of renewal, MnDOT will review the Facility and Area to ensure the Facility and Area are compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway and the Facility and Area are in good condition and repair. If, in MnDOT’s sole determination, LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 2 of 5 LU1001 3/1/2017 modifications and repairs to the Facility and Area are needed, Permittee will perform such work as outlined in writing in an amendment of this LUP; and (b) Permittee will provide to MnDOT a certified copy of the resolution from the applicable governmental body authorizing the Permittee’s use of the Facility and Area for the additional term. If Permittee’s written request to extend the term is not timely given, the LUP will expire on the Expiration Date. 2. REMOVAL. Upon the Expiration Date or earlier termination, at the Permittee’s sole cost and expense Permittee will: (a) Remove the Facility and restore the Area to a condition satisfactory to the MnDOT District Engineer; and (b) Surrender possession of the Area to MnDOT. If, without MnDOT’s written consent, Permittee continues to occupy the Area after the Expiration Date or earlier termination, Permittee will remain subject to all conditions, provisions, and obligations of this LUP, and further, Permittee will pay all costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, in any action brought by MnDOT to remove the Facility and the Permittee from the Area. 3. CONSTRUCTION. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the Facility shall be at no cost or expense to MnDOT. Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by the MnDOT's District Engineer. Approval in writing from MnDOT District Engineer shall be required for any changes from the approved plan. The Permittee will construct the Facility at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and in accordance with MnDOT-approved plans and specifications. Further, Permittee will construct the Facility using construction procedures compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway. Upon completion of the construction of the Facility, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are perpetuated. The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this LUP at no expense to MnDOT and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation. Any crossings of the Facility over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance. LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 3 of 5 LU1001 3/1/2017 4. MAINTENANCE. Any and all maintenance of the Facility shall be provided by the Permittee at its sole cost and expense, including, but not limited to, plowing and removal of snow and installation and removal of regulatory signs. No signs shall be placed on any MnDOT or other governmental agency sign post within the Area. MnDOT will not mark obstacles for users on trunk highway right of way. 5. USE. Other than as identified and approved by MnDOT, no permanent structures or no advertising devices in any manner, form or size shall be allowed on the Area. No commercial activities shall be allowed to operate upon the Area. Any use permitted by this LUP shall remain subordinate to the right of MnDOT to use the property for highway and transportation purposes. This LUP does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge Facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of l968, nor does this permit establish a Bikeway or Pedestrian way which would require replacement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 160.264. No rights to relocation benefits are established by this LUP. This LUP is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy the Area. 6. APPLICABLE LAWS. This LUP does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by the Permittee. 7. CIVIL RIGHTS. The Permittee, for itself, its successors, and assigns, agrees to abide by the provisions of Title VI Appendix C of the Civil Rights Act of l964, which provides in part that no person in the United States, shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from, or denied use of any Facility. 8. SAFETY. MnDOT shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict any activity, including the parking of vehicles and assemblage of Facility users, on the highway right of way over which this LUP is granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and Facility users. 9. ASSIGNMENT. No assignment of this LUP is allowed. 10. IN WRITING. Except for those which are set forth in this LUP, no representations, warranties, or agreements have been made by MnDOT or Permittee to one another with respect to this LUP. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 4 of 5 LU1001 3/1/2017 container on the State’s right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Permittee shall notify in writing MnDOT’s District Engineer and shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee. 12. MECHANIC’S LIENS. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto. 13. NOTICES. All notices which may be given, by either party to the other, will be deemed to have been fully given when served personally on MnDOT or Permittee or when made in writing addressed as follows: to Permittee at: and to MnDOT at: Mayor State of Minnesota Edina City Hall Department of Transportation 4801 West 50th Street Metro District Right of Way Edina, MN 55424 1500 W. County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 The address to which notices are mailed may be changed by written notice given by either party to the other. 14. INDEMNITY. Permittee shall defend, indemnify, hold harmless and release the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns, from and against: (a) all claims, demands, and causes of action for injury to or death of persons or loss of or damage to property (including Permittee's property) occurring on the Facility or connected with Permittee's use and occupancy of the Area, regardless of whether such injury, death, loss or damage is caused in part by the negligence of State of Minnesota or is deemed to be the responsibility of State of Minnesota because of its failure to supervise, inspect or control the operations of Permittee or otherwise discover or prevent actions or operations of Permittee giving rise to liability to any person. (b) claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of Facility user rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this LUP is granted; (c) claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in flood damages; (d) any laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever filed or maintained for or on account of any work done or materials furnished; and (e) any damages, testing costs and clean-up costs arising from spillage of regulated materials attributable to the construction, maintenance or operation of the Facility. LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 5 of 5 LU1001 3/1/2017 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL CITY OF EDINA By____________________________ Its Mayor And___________________________ Its City Manager By:____________________________ District Engineer Date___________________________ APPROVED BY: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION By:_______________________________ Acting Director, Office of Land Management Date______________________________ The Commissioner of Transportation by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.N. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Eric Roggeman, Financ e Director Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-26: Authorizing Us e of Fac s imile Signatures By P ublic Offic ials Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution appointing a new Treasurer. INTRODUCTION: T his resolution will transfer authority to conduct banking transactions and sign checks to a new Treasurer. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution 2017-26: Authorizing Us e of Facs imile Signatures By Public Officials RESOLUTION NO. 2017-26 AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: JAMES B. HOVLAND - Mayor KYLE SAWYER - Treasurer SCOTT H. NEAL - City Manager on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant-checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in Bremer Bank, Crown Bank, Eagle Crest Capital Bank, Fidelity Bank, Fifth Third Bank, First Minnesota Bank, BMO Harris Bank N.A., Merrick Bank North American Banking Company, TCF National Bank, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo Bank and Western Bank be and hereby are approved, and that each of said persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective March 15, 2017 and continue in full force and effect, until revoked or modified by the Edina City Council. Dated: March 7, 2017. Attest:________________________________ _______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. ________________________________________ City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.O. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Eric Roggeman, Financ e Director Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-27: Authorizing Inves tment Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached resolution authorizing a new Treasurer to conduct banking and investment business. INTRODUCTION: T his resolution will transfer authority to conduct banking and investment transactions to a new Treasurer. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution 2017-27: Authorizing Inves tment Agreement RESOLUTION 2017-27 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED, that Scott H. Neal and/or Kyle Sawyer who is/are Officers of the City of Edina, is/are authorized to enter into agreements or commitments to open, maintain and close accounts with banks, brokers and other financial institutions with which it does business, and are authorized to sign on individual bank and broker accounts and such Officers are further authorized to cancel such authority, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kyle Sawyer is authorized to purchase or sell any and all securities as authorized by the City of Edina’s Investment Policy, and that the Officer is authorized on behalf of the City of Edina to sign any necessary documentation: to give written or oral instructions with respect to said transactions: to obligate the City for the carrying out of any contract, agreement, or transaction; to pay by check or wire; and to take any and all such actions in the name of and on behalf of said City that would be considered desirable and necessary with respect to said transaction; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bank, broker or other financial institution may rely upon the actions of the Officer as the City of Edina representative that any and all securities purchased are legal and authorized investments under the City’s applicable policies and/or statutory requirements. The City of Edina represents that it will provide these applicable policies and/or statutory requirements, and that it will notify the bank, broker or other financial institution of any changes made; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the City of Edina is authorized and directed to certify, under the seal of the City of Edina, to you a true copy of these resolutions and specimen signatures of each and every person empowered by these resolutions; and I FURTHER CERTIFY that said resolution shall be effective March 15, 2017 and continue in full force and effect, until revoked or modified by the Edina City Council and written notice is received by the bank, broker or other financial institution, such notice setting forth a resolution adopted to effect said revocation or modification and authorizing the new signatory and/or person authorized to obligate the City of Edina securities transaction. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 7th day of March, 2017. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Ma yor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.P. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Sc ott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Ap p o int C o uncil Memb er Brindle Edina's Rep res entative to the Metropolitan Airports Co mmis s io n’s Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint City Council Member Mary Brindle to represent the City of Edina to the at-large community seat on the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) effective June 26, 2017 and until June 25, 2019. INTRODUCTION: T he Council must take an official action to appoint Member Brindle as the City of Edina's representative on the Metropolitan Airports Commission's NOC. ATTACHMENTS: Description Letter: Metropolitan Airports Commis s ion Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.Q. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Lis a S c haefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Purc has ing Polic y Update Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve revisions to the City's P urchasing P olicy. INTRODUCTION: On January 4, 2017 the City Council approved an updated City P urchasing P olicy to clarify internal procedures and prepare for the implementation of an electronic accounts payable system. After the first couple of months of using the new system and policy, staff have evaluated the process and made minor revisions to increase efficiency. T he proposed revisions consolidate the internal forms to eliminate redundancy. T he City Council will not see any changes other than the Request For P urchase form now contains more information including an evaluation of the budget, environmental, and community impacts. All purchases of $20,000 or more will continue to go to council for approval. T he proposed revisions are attached in addition to the revised form the council will see for new purchases. ATTACHMENTS: Description Propos ed Revisions : Purchas ing Policy Revis ed Request for Purchas e Form ☒City Council Approved: 1/4/2017 ☐City-Wide Revised: Click here to enter a date. ☐Department City of Edina Policy EDINA PURCHASING POLICY I. Purpose: The Edina Purchasing Policy aims to better guide service to Edina residents through consistent and sustainable purchasing in City operations. This Purchasing Policy will be used for all purchases made by the City of Edina. All expenditures by the City of Edina must serve a public purpose per the Edina Public Purpose Expenditure Policy. The Purchasing Policy also serves to develop data regarding the use of City funds which can be used to better manage public resources and promote transparency in our operations. Purchases required by emergencies that impair the City’s ability to deliver services are outside the scope of this policy and should be handled as appropriate in the circumstances. I. Background The City of Edina has a decentralized purchasing process. Individual departments are generally responsible for making their own purchases in order to support flexibility and discretion of purchasing and project management with the aid of expertise at the department level. The City Council approves a biennial budget that allocates funds for projects and operations throughout the City. The City Manager and Department Directors are responsible for ensuring that projects and operations remain within the Budget. Purchases not within budget should be approved by the Department Director or in the case of a purchase exceeding a department budget, by the City Manager II. Process The purchasing process is comprised of four phases: identification, evaluation, authorization, and payment. Purchasing should flow through these phases chronologically so as to maintain legal compliance and promote transparency in our process as well as to ensure that City resources are being used responsibly. Identification Evaluation Authorization Payment Page | 2 Identification Phase Once purchasers identify what kind of purchase they would like to make, they must identify what type of process is required for that purchase. Correctly identifying the type of process required for a purchase is critical to ensuring that the appropriate legal requirements are met. There are multiple spending thresholds that trigger both statutory and policy requirements. These are referred to as Purchase Levels. Table 1 below outlines the necessary process and documentation for the different Purchase Levels, including what purchasers should do if a purchase uses federal dollars. Purchasers should acquire all of the documentation and authorization indicated for the applicable Purchase Level. The majority of purchases made by the City will be a Purchase Level 1-4. However, if federal dollars are used for a purchase, Purchase Level 5, the federal regulations preempt city policy and purchasers should refer to the federal regulations for direction in the use of those funds. These funds may become available through different mechanisms, such as Community Development Block Grants. Purchasers must be confident in their funding source to ensure that they are following the correct purchasing procedure. The Finance Department is available as a resource to help identify what federal regulations apply to a purchase. Table 1: Purchase Level Value of Purchase Quotations Needed Required Internal Documents Authorization Workflow PL-1 Less than $10,000 Departmental Discretion *Purchase EvaluationRequest for Purchase form recommended, but not required Authorized Purchaser PL-2 $10,000 - $19,999 Two Written Quotes Purchase Evaluation Purchase Order AuthorizationRequest for Purchase form Authorized Purchaser Department Director PL-3 $20,000 - $99,999 Two Written Quotes, Bids or RFPs Purchase Evaluation Purchase Order Authorization Request for Purchase/ Change OrdeRequest for Authorized Purchaser Department Director City Manager City Council Page | 3 Purchase form r PL-4 Greater than $100,000 Sealed Bids Purchase Evaluation Purchase Order Authorization Request for Purchase/ Change OrderRequest for Purchase form Authorized Purchaser Department Director City Manager City Council PL-5 Any Federal Dollars Purchaser must consult federal regulations for purchasing procedure Departments are responsible for retaining a record of their quotations, bids and RFPs according to the City’s retention schedule. Service Contracts that exceed $20,000 in costs are subject to the requirements for Purchase Level-3. Whenever possible, purchasers should explore purchasing through a national association purchasing alliance or a state, county or other cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that the City of Edina is a part of. The City may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials or equipment through one of these mechanisms without regard to the competitive bidding requirements. However, these purchases should still follow the rest of the purchasing process. The cooperative purchasing guidelines are outlined in more detail in Minnesota Statutes 412.311 and 471.345. If the City Council approves a project contract that provides for flexibility to address change orders that may become necessary through the course of the project, then the project manager may approve change order in excess of $20,000 without requiring additional council approval. However, if the change order materially changes the terms of a contract so as to create a new contract, then the purchase should be presented to City Council for approval. Evaluation Phase Page | 4 Each purchase the City makes must include a rigorous evaluation that meets statutory requirements as well as organizational goals. Purchases at Purchase Level 2+ are required to follow various bidding and quotation processes to identify which purchase is most advantageous for the City. Bid/Quote information that is statutorily required for purchases should be included as a part of the Request for Purchase form in addition to an assessment of the impact of the purchase on the budget, environment and community. The City of Edina is committed to pursuing sustainable purchasing, meaning that we evaluate our purchases based upon a triple-bottom line framework that includes an assessment of the budgetary, environmental, and community impact of purchases The Evaluation Phase is grounded in the need to make purchasing decisions that are sustainable. This means considering the holistic impact of a purchase on City operations as well as the impact on the Edina community in general. The Edina Purchase Evaluation echoes a triple bottom line framework to reflect the three components of sustainable purchasing: budget impact, environmental impact and community impact. . Individually, these considerations address specific organizational priorities of the City of Edina and holistically, they represent a strategy that will ensures that the allocation of public resources by the City will be sustainable over time. This evaluation is a part of the Request for Purchase which is required for all purchases that exceed $10,000. This form will also be used by the City Council when reviewing purchases that exceed $20,000. While required for all purchases over $10,000, purchasers are encouraged to consider all three aspects of sustainable purchasing in every purchase made for the City. The City will use the Purchase Evaluation to better manage public resources. The Purchase Evaluation Page | 5 form records staff considerations about purchasing decisions over $10,000, however these considerations should be a part of all purchasing decisions regardless of cost even when the form itself is not required for the purchase. a. Budget Impact Sustainable purchasing means that the City must be able to sufficiently fund all expenditures. Planning for payment prior to purchase ensures that we do not deplete City resources beyond our budgeted capacity. Budget impact considerations should indicate the intended funding source for a purchase. The funding source could be the City Budget, it could be a grant, it could be a donation, or something else. Upon receipt of a purchase, the purchaser will assign a payment code for the purchase that correlates to a budgetary line item. If the line item that the purchase will be attributed to has insufficient funds, the alternative funding source should also be recorded on the Request for Purchase forme Evaluation form.. Purchases not within budget should be coded accurately within a department’s budget, but the adjustments necessary to absorb that cost should also be described under Budget Impact in the Purchase EvaluationRequest for Purchase form. Recording the Budget Impact on the purchase evaluation hRequest for Purchase form helps to document these instances as well as facilitate better budget management throughout the City. Possible Considerations for the Budget Impact of a purchase are: • What is the funding source for this purchase? b. Environmental Impact Consideration for the environmental impact of City purchases translates to a safer, more sustainable, and healthier environment for Edina residents as well as for people and animals in our larger community, region, and world. All purchases have an impact on the environment; our goal is to manage that impact by mitigating negative impacts and creating positive ones. Staff should consider the lifecycle impact for their purchases. Life cycle impacts include the sourcing, manufacturing, distribution, use and disposal of a product and represent the environmental resources consumed, emitted, or impacted by a product. In addition, the Environmental Impact of a purchase could identify how a purchase affects the City’s use of resources such as carbon, energy, water and waste. • Is this a replacement or a new product/service? • What are the costs related to managing and disposing of this product? Page | 6 Product life-cycle: Environmental considerations can vary based on the type of purchase being considered. Staff are encouraged to partner with the Edina Sustainability Coordinator in the Administration Department to inform what considerations are appropriate for their purchases. Possible Considerations for the Environmental Impact of a purchase are: • Energy - Does this purchase and its use utilize more energy, same amount of energy, or reduce energy? How much energy consumption or savings? • Water – Does this purchase and its use utilize more water, same amount of water, or a reduction of water? How much water consumption or savings (in gallon or acre-feet)? • Material Waste – Does this purchase and its use create more, same amount or a reduction of waste? When we are done using it, where will this product/material go? • Natural Resources – Is there an impact to other natural resources (wildlife habitat, trees, soil, and/or air quality)? • Carbon – Is there a carbon footprint estimation for this item? • Certification(s) – Does this product have a certification from the approved list in the environmental purchasing policy? What certification? c. Community Impact The ultimate purpose of all City purchasing is to benefit the Edina community. The Community Impact of a purchase can reflect the impact that filling an organizational need will have on the community, how a purchase impacts a specific demographic within the Edina community or how the purchase affects the Edina community over time. The City has a vested interested in allocating funding to equitably serve residents in the Edina community. All expenditures of public funds are tied to a public purpose; the Community Impact section on the PurchasRequest for Purchase form e Evaluation is a space for staff to articulate how a purchase meets that purpose. Manufacturing Distribution Use Disposal Sourcing Raw Materials Manufacturi ng Distributio n Use Disposal Water Energy Carbon Material Waste Page | 7 Possible Considerations for the Community Impact of a purchase are: • What are the human resources needed to manage and dispose of this purchase? • Does this purchase support a particular demographic in the community? • Does this purchase have a long term or short term impact on Edina residents? Authorization Phase The Authorization Phase is the final phase before purchase. The purchase authorization workflow is outlined in Table 1. The City Manager acts as the City’s chief purchasing agent and has the unilateral power to authorize or delegate authorization for purchases under $20,000. Purchases under $10,000 may be made with a purchasing card (p-card) or invoice. Purchases over $10,000 require a Department Director’s signature on the Request for Purchase form. both a Purchase Order Authorization and a Purchase Evaluation form. The City Manager grants authority to Department Directors to manage department budget including documentation for purchases that are included in the approved City Budget and to assign department spending thresholds. Purchases over $20,000 must be approved by City Council according to Minnesota Statute 412.691. The mayor must sign ordinances, contracts authorized by the council, and written orders for payment of claims that have been audited and allowed by the council. These are ministerial duties, and the mayor may not refuse to sign if the purpose, approval, and form are legally correct and complete per Minnesota Statutes 412.191 and 412.201. The Request for Purchase form should be submitted to City Council for authorization on purchases that exceed $20,000. The Purchase Order Authorization form should advance through the authorization workflow. Department Directors, in partnership with the Finance Department, set spending thresholds for purchasers within their departments. By doing so, Department Directors may delegate authority to authorize purchases up to the set amount to employees. Purchasers are only allowed to authorize funds from within their own department’s budget. In the instance of the need for funds outside of one’s department Page | 8 budget, the purchaser should partner with an approved purchasing agent from the necessary department/fund. Once the final authorization has been granted, the purchaser should submit one copy of the Purchase Order Authorization to the vendor for processing and retain a copy for attachment to the invoice when it is returned to the purchaser. Payment Phase The Payment Phase reflects the purchasing process. Invoicing for purchases follows the workflow defined by departments for their particular needs. Requests to alter invoicing workflow should be directed to the Finance Department. All payments for purchases and services must be made within 35 days according to Minnesota Statute 471.425. All public work contracts over $100,000 require the City to obtain both a payment bond and a performance bond per Minnesota Statute 574.26. Payment and performance bonds protect the City as well as subcontractors and persons providing labor and materials. When a contract for public work is let, the amount of the bonds needs to be equal to the contract price. If the contract price increases due to change orders, unforeseen conditions, cost overruns or any other reason after the contract is signed, the City has the option of increasing the amount of the contractor’s bond. Consideration may be given for the percentage of the contract that is complete in relation to the contractor’s bond and the increase in the contract price. When assigning payment codes, purchasers should code according to the most accurate line item associated with the purchase. In the instance of a particular line item exceeding the budgeted amount, Department Directors are responsible for managing the allocation of funding to other department line items to ensure that purchases do not put the department as a whole over budget. When an invoice over $10,000 is returned to the purchaser for coding, the purchaser will upload the Request for Purchase form Purchase Evaluation and Purchase Order Authorization forms completed for that purchase along with the invoice. Page | 9 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: To: From: Subject: Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☐Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact Environmental Impact Community Impact - Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Ad vis ory Co mmunicatio n, Report / Recommend atio n From:Jeff Brown, Co mmunity Health Ad minis trator Item Activity: Subject:Ad vis ory Co mmunicatio n: Community Health Co mmis s io n, To b acc o Regulatio n Actio n, Info rmatio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Accept Advisory Communication from Community Health Commission (CHC) in reference to 2017 CHC work plan item regarding tobacco regulation. INTRODUCTION: Dr. Caleb Schultz, who drafted the Advisory Communication on behalf of the Community Health Commission, will provide a brief overview of the issue and supporting documentation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Community Health Commis s ion, Tobacco Regulation CHC Advisory Communication: Tobacco Regulation March 7, 2017 Mayor and Council Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Community Health Commission Advisory Communication Regarding Tobacco Information / Background: The Community Health Commission (CHC) work plan for 2017 includes the evaluation of current tobacco regulations in Edina and recommendations for ordinance language to reduce tobacco use. This staff report, advisory communication, and additional information provide those recommendations. At the February 13, 2017 CHC meeting, a motion was passed to recommend raising the age requirement to purchase tobacco products in Edina to age 21, as is described in the advisory communication. Members of the CHC have also collaborated with Clearway Minnesota and attorneys at the Public Health Law Center to provide the attached recommended ordinance language, including commentary regarding the edits. As the Community Health Administrator for the Edina Community Health Board, I strongly agree with this recommendation. The City Council, acting in its capacity as the Edina Community Health Board, has a statutory responsibility (145A.04, subd. 1a) to identify local public health priorities and implement activities to address these priorities. Increasing the purchasing age for tobacco products in the City will improve the health of young people in Edina, will show that the City prioritizes the health of residents, and will provide an example for communities throughout Minnesota that local action can impact public health. While there are other municipalities in Minnesota considering this action, Edina will be the first jurisdiction in Minnesota to reach implementation. Minnesota Statute 461.19 requires notification of licensed establishments a minimum of 30 days before local ordinances are adopted or substantially amended in regard to tobacco and tobacco-related devices. Staff will complete mailed notification to all 18 of the City licensed tobacco establishments to meet this requirement. Date: March 7, 2017 To: City of Edina Mayor and City Council From: Caleb Schulz, MD, MPH Edina Community Health Commission Subject: Community Health Commission Recommendations on the City of Edina Tobacco Regulations Attachments: 1.Draft Ordinance Changes to Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VI 2.Raising the Minimum Legal Sale Age for Tobacco to 21. Raymond Boyle, PhD, John Kingsbury, PhD, Michael Parks, PhD. Minnesota Medicine. January/February 2017 3.Minnesotans for a Smoke-Free Generation Tobacco 21 Fact Sheet Action Requested: The Edina Community Health Commission requests that the City Council consider revising Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VI, to reduce youth tobacco use in the city by raising the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco to 21. Situation: Tobacco use is still the leading cause of preventable death and disease in Minnesota. If used as intended, cigarettes will kill more than half their users.i ii More than 6,000 Minnesotans die each year from tobacco use and smoking costs Minnesota more than $3 billion annually in excess health care costs.iii The U.S. Surgeon General has identified the tobacco industry as the root cause of the smoking epidemic through its promotion of tobacco products to youth.iv Raising the tobacco age to 21 will prevent youth tobacco use and save lives. The tobacco industry heavily targets young adults ages 16-21 in order to recruit new tobacco users and guarantee profits. Approximately 95 percent of current adult smokers started before they were 21.v Increasing the age gap between young people and those who can legally buy tobacco will reduce youth access to tobacco. Keeping tobacco out of high schools will reduce the number of youth under 18 who become addicted to smoking. Many youth get tobacco from other 18-19-year olds. In fact, 59 percent of 18-19-year-olds have been asked to buy cigarettes for someone younger.vi High school students are less likely to be around a 21-year-old than they would be an 18-20-year-old in a setting where they would ask for tobacco.vii Tobacco executives are fully aware of the importance of young smokers to tobacco company profits. For example, one Phillip Morris executive said in 1986, "Raising the legal minimum age for cigarette purchaser to 21 could gut our key young adult market (17-20)..."viii The industry is constantly looking to replace smokers who die from diseases related to tobacco use. An RJ Reynolds executive stated in 1982, "If a man has never smoked by age 18, the odds are three-to-one he never will. By age 24, the odds are twenty-to-one."ix Page 2 Ages 18-21 are a critical time when young people move from intermittent smoking to daily use. Four out of five experimental smokers becomes daily smokers by age 21.x The tobacco industry markets to youth in a variety of ways. For example, they sell cheap, colorful and flavored tobacco products. In July and August of 2016, an assessment of all sixteen tobacco vendors in the city of Edina found flavored cigars and electronic cigarette juice for sale in flavors such as strawberry, chocolate and fruit punch. These products are cheap and appealing to youth. For example, flavored cigars can be purchased in Edina for as little as $1.69 for a two-pack, and seven stores sell flavored electronic cigarette liquid.xi Despite overall tobacco rates declining, tobacco use is a still a problem among Edina youth. In 2013, 12.8 percent of Edina 11th graders reported using tobacco in the last 30 days. Tobacco Use in the Past 30 Days Among Edina High School Students – 2013* MN Student Survey 11th Grade Male 11th Grade Female Smoke a cigarette 8% 6% Smoke cigars, cigarillos or little cigars 13% 3% Use chewing tobacco, snuff or dip 9% 0% *Edina 11th graders did not take the Minnesota Student Survey in 2016; therefore 2013 is the most recent data available for 11th graders. Background: Nicotine is particularly harmful to the development of the adolescent brain. The addictive properties of nicotine can lead adolescents to heavier daily tobacco use and a difficult time quitting later in life.xii Evidence suggests that nicotine interferes with brain maturation and can have a long-term effect on cognitive development and mental health.xiii The lasting effect of nicotine on the adolescent brain is a serious public health concern.xiv In 2015, the Institute of Medicine (now known as the National Academy of Medicine) published a report that found increasing the tobacco age to 21 would decrease smoking initiation among 15-17 year olds by 25 percent.xv A survey in the City of Needham, Mass., a city that raised the tobacco age to 21 in 2005, found that within five years, tobacco use among high school students decreased by nearly half.xvi A national consensus is growing to protect young people from a lifetime of addiction and health problems caused by tobacco by raising the tobacco age. A 2014 national survey shows that 75 percent of adults favor increasing the tobacco age to 21. In addition, 70 percent of current smokers and 65 percent of young adults ages18-24 support raising the minimum legal age.xvii California, Hawaii and a growing list of more than 210 cities in the United States including Chicago, Kansas City and Cleveland have raised the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21. With full support from the Community Health Commission, the City of Edina is well positioned to be the first city in the state of Minnesota to pass this kind of policy. Page 3 Assessment: A recent study published in Minnesota Medicine predicted the long-term impact of raising the tobacco age to 21. The study found that raising the tobacco age to 21 in Minnesota would result in 25 percent fewer 15-year-olds starting smoking by the time they turn 18; and 15 percent fewer 18-year-olds starting smoking by the time they turn 21. This translates to 30,000 Minnesota young people not becoming smokers over the next 15 years.xviii Recommendation: A revision to the Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VI, to reduce youth tobacco use in the city by raising the tobacco age to 21. There is national momentum around this issue and numerous community health benefits. The Community Health Commission recommends that a review of the ordinance and public hearing occur as soon as possible. i Prabhat Jha, M.D., Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige, M.Sc., Victoria Landsman, Ph.D., et al 21st-Century Hazards of Smoking and Benefits of Cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013;368:341-50. ii Banks E, Joshy G, Weber MF, et al. Tobacco smoking and all-cause mortality in a large Australian cohort study: findings from a mature epidemic with current low smoking prevalence. BMC Medicine. 2015; 13:38. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0281-z. iii Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. Health Care Costs and Smoking in Minnesota. January 2017. iv U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2014. v U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration - Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality; September 2014. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-DetTabs2014/NSDUH- DetTabs2014.pdf. vi Ribisl, K. M., Norman, G. J., Howard-Pitney, B., & Howard, K. A. (1999). Which adults do underaged youth ask for cigarettes? Am J Public Health, 89(10), 1561-1564. vii Ahmad, S. (2005). Closing the youth access gap: the projected health benefits and cost savings of a national policy to raise the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States. Health Policy, 75(1), 74-84. viii Philip Morris Discussion Draft of Sociopolitical Strategy. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/aba84e00/pdf. ix RJ Reynolds Estimated Change in Industry Trend Following Federal Excise Tax Increase. https://www.industrydocumentslibrary.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=nnnw0084. x Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Increasing the Sale Age for Tobacco Products to 21. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/what_we_do/state_local/sales_21. xi Survey conducted by Association for Nonsmokers-Minnesota in July and August 2016. xii Nelson, D. et al. Long-term trends in adolescent and young adult smoking in the United States: metapatterns and implications. Am J Public Health. 2008. xiii U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2014. xiv Abreu-Villaca, Y et al. Short-term adolescent nicotine exposure has immediate and persistent effects on cholinergic systems: critical periods, patterns of exposure, dose thresholds. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003. xv National Academy of Medicine (formerly Institute of Medicine). Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. National Academy Press. 2015. Page 4 xvi Kessed Schneider S et al. Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21. Tob Control. 2015. xvii King BA et al. Attitudes Toward Raising the Minimum Age of Sale for Tobacco Among U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015 xviii Boyle, R., Kingsbury, J. & Parks, M. Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age for Tobacco to 21. Minnesota Medicine. 2017. EDINA CODE OF ORDINANCES ARTICLE VI. - SALE OF TOBACCO; LICENSING DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 12-189. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Child-resistant packaging means packaging that meets the definition set forth in Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.15(b), as in effect on January 1, 2015, and was tested in accordance with the method described in Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.20, as in effect on January 1, 2015. Compliance checks means the system the city uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco or tobacco-related products, and tobacco-related devices are following and complying with the requirements of this article. The term "compliance checks" also means the use of persons under 21 years of ageminors who attempt to purchase tobacco or tobacco-related products, or tobacco-related devices, for education, research and training purposes as authorized by state and federal laws. Compliance checks may also be conducted by other units of government for the purpose of enforcing appropriate federal, state or local laws and regulations relating to tobacco or tobacco-related products, and tobacco-related devices. Electronic delivery device and e-cigarette mean any product containing or delivering nicotine, lobelia, or any other substance intended for human consumption that can be used by a person to simulate smoking in the delivery of nicotine or any other substance through inhalation of vapor from the product. Electronic delivery device includes any component part of a product, whether or not marketed or sold separately. Electronic delivery device does not include any product that has been approved or certified by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco-cessation product, as a tobacco-dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is marketed and sold for such an approved purpose. Minor means any natural person who has not yet reached the age of 18 years. Movable place of business means any form of business operated out of a truck, van, automobile or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed address storefront or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales transactions. Nicotine or lobelia delivery product means any product containing or delivering nicotine or lobelia intended for human consumption, or any part of such a product, that is not tobacco or an electronic delivery device as defined in this section. Nicotine or lobelia delivery product does not include any product that has been approved or certified by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco-cessation product, as a tobacco-dependence product, Comment [PHLC1]: At some point, age- related findings may be needed. They can be incorporated into the adopted ordinance, or separately submitted onto the record. We can help with that assistance when needed as well. Comment [PHLC2]: Why would this be added? Beginning January 1, 2015, liquids (“e-liquids” or “e-juice”) that are sold for use in electronic delivery devices (more commonly referred to as “electronic cigarettes” or “e-cigarettes”) must be in child-resistant packaging. The child-resistant packaging requirement is – like most of our state tobacco licensing laws – enforced locally by the cities and counties. It is practically difficult – if not impossible – for a local official to know whether any bottle (vial, etc.) of e-liquid was 1) designed and 2) tested to be child-resistant. With a little ordinance language, cities and counties can make their enforcement responsibilities a little less burdensome. They can require their licensees to provide written documentation of their compliance. That language could or would be added to “Division III – Rules and Regulations.” The term “child-resistant packaging” has a critical – and specific – meaning in the regulations that follow. Defining all critical terms is considered a better or best practice. Comment [PHLC3]: Why would this be changed? Under current law – state and/or local – minors (18 and under) cannot purchase tobacco and related devices and products. Minnesota law requires at least one “youth access” compliance check per year to monitor retailer compliance with the age restrictions. Minors – under law enforcement supervision – attempt to buy tobacco (and related devices and products). When the minimum sales age is raised to 21, the city will want monitor whether retailers are selling to anyone under 21. To do so, 18, 19, and 20 year olds should also be used in some compliance checks. ... Page 1 or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose. Retail sale means any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter or other consideration. Self-service merchandising means the open displays of tobacco or tobacco-related products, or tobacco-related devices in any manner where any person shall have access to the tobacco or tobacco-related products, or tobacco-related devices, without the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee. Smoking lounge means a location licensed to sell tobacco products where: (1) Except for a bona fide sale of a smoking device, provided or otherwise made available for use by a customer, potential customer, or any other person a smoking device for the purpose of smoking any tobacco product; (2) It is provided in exchange for a fee or any other consideration seating within or access to the indoor area of a tobacco products shop; or (3) It is permitted within the indoor area the sampling of any tobacco product which was not furnished by the tobacco products shop on the date and at the time the sampling occurs. Tobacco or tobacco-related product means cigarettes and any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed or ingested by any other means, or any component, part or accessory of a tobacco product; cigars; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco. The term "tobacco" excludes any tobacco product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose. Tobacco-related device means any tobacco product as well as a pipe, rolling papers or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking, or the inhalation of vapors of tobacco or tobacco-related products. The term "tobacco-related device" includes electronic delivery devices and nicotine or lobelia delivery products. Vapor lounge means a location that sells electronic delivery devices where: (1) Except for a bona fide sale of electronic delivery devices, provided or otherwise made available for use by a customer, potential customer, or any other person a device or product for the purpose of using an electronic delivery device product; (2) It is provided in exchange for a fee or any other consideration seating within or access to the indoor area of a shop that sells electronic delivery devices; or Comment [PHLC4]: Why would this be added? Minnesota law requires a local license – city or county – to sell four types of products. • Tobacco (cigarettes, cigars and other products made, containing, or derived from tobacco). • Tobacco-related devices (pipes, rolling papers and the like). • Electronic delivery devices (e-cigarettes and other devices that simulate smoking). And • Nicotine or lobelia delivery products (a product that contains/delivers nicotine or lobelia that isn’t 1) tobacco or 2) an electronic delivery device). . The first three are specifically covered by the current ordinance (or code section), the fourth isn’t. Nicotine and lobelia delivery products aren’t a big concern today. But the term would cover synthetics and other derivate – something that could become a bigger issue in the future. Formatted: Font: Not Bold Comment [PHLC5]: Why would this be added/changed? Consistency and/or uniformity with state law. Inhalation of vapors was added to the “tobacco-related device” definition we find in state law. Comment [PHLC6]: Why would this be added? Most efficient way to add “nicotine or lobelia delivery products.” Wherever “tobacco- related device” is found all throughout the regulations, nicotine or lobelia delivery products will be covered as well. Note: While the most efficient way to add a new term, it’s not necessarily the most ideal way to do it. If there is broader interest in Page 2 (3) It is permitted within the indoor area of a shop that sells electronic delivery devices the sampling of any electronic delivery device product which was not furnished by the shop on the date and time the sampling occurs Vending machine means any mechanical, electric or electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco or tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices upon the insertion of money, tokens or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related devices. Secs. 12-190—12-216. - Reserved. DIVISION 2. - LICENSE Sec. 12-217. - Required. No person shall keep tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices for retail sale or sell tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices at retail in the city without first obtaining a license from the city. No license shall be issued for the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices at a movable place of business or from a vending machine. Sec. 12-218. - License procedure. The provisions of article II of this chapter shall apply to all licenses required by this article and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses shall be issued or denied by the sanitarian. The applications for a license shall be on forms provided by the sanitarian and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in section 2-724. Sec. 12-219. - Term of license. Each license issued pursuant to this article shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. Secs. 12-220—12-246. - Reserved. Page 3 DIVISION 3. - RULES AND REGULATIONS Sec. 12-247. - Legal age. No person shall sell any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device to any person under the age of 21 and no person shall purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a person under the age of 21minor. (1) Age Verification. Licensees shall verify by means of government-issued photographic identification that the purchaser is at least 21 years of age. Verification is not required for a person over the age of 30. That the person appeared to be 30 years of age or older shall not constitute a defense to a violation of this subsection. (2) Signage. Notice of the legal sales age and the age verification requirement shall be posted at each location where tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices are offered for sale. The required signage, which will be provided to the licensee by the city, shall be posted in a manner so that it is clearly visible to anyone who is considering or making a purchase. Sec. 12-248. - Controlled substances. No person shall sell or keep for sale any tobacco containing any controlled substance as defined in article VI of chapter 22, except nicotine or tobacco. Sec. 12-249. - Vending machine and movable place of business. No person shall sell any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device from a vending machine or from a movable place of business. Sec. 12-250. - Self-service merchandising. No person shall sell any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device by means whereby the customer may have access to such items without having to request assistance from an employee of the licensed premises. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device between the customer and the licensee or employee. All tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices shall be stored or displayed behind a sales counter or in Comment [PHLC7]: Why would this be added/changed? In order to raise the minimum sales age to 21, and to prohibit people from purchasing tobacco on an underage person’s behalf. Note: These two restrictions are found in the city’s current code, with only the minimum age changed from 18 to 21. While it would apply to any sale, the restrictions are as a whole retail-retailer focused. Unlike some other city ordinances, “gifting” or “furnishing” aren’t specifically covered by these restrictions. They can be added. But if they are broadly added (covering all gifting/furnishing that happens anywhere in the city), you could create some of the “interactions” you are hoping to avoid. They could be added more narrowly and only really apply to retailers. But, the expanded free sampling prohibition found in the FDA deeming regulation may make that change pretty unnecessary. Comment [PHLC8]: Why would this be added? In order to require retailers to check identification, as well as to provide a consequence under these regulations for those retailers who don’t. Federal law requires age verification for those under 27. This would raise the age commensurate with the higher minimum. Comment [PHLC9]: Why would this be added? To require licensees to post notice of the higher age and ID verification requirements. Written so that the city will create the signage and the license will be required to use what is provided. Page 4 other rooms or display areas which are not freely accessible to customers. Provided, however, the requirements of this section shall not apply to establishments which: (1) Prohibit minors persons under 21 years of age from entering the establishment at all times unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian; (2) Post notice advising of the prohibition is conspicuously displayed at all entrances to the establishment; and (3) DEither derive at least 90 percent of their revenues from the sale of tobacco and tobacco-related products or limit self-service merchandising to cigars and cigar-related products. Sec. 12-251. - Illegal possession. No minor shall have in his possession any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco- related device. This section shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks. Sec. 12-252. - Illegal use. No minor shall smoke, chew, sniff or otherwise use any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device. Sec. 12-253. - Illegal procurement. No minor shall purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise obtain any tobacco, tobacco- related product or tobacco-related device, and no person shall purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a minor. No person shall coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to illegally purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco, tobacco-related product or tobacco-related device. This section shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks. Sec. 12-254. - Use of false identification. No person under the age of 21minor shall attempt to disguise his or her true age by the use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is that of another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an age older than the actual age of the person. Sec. 12-255. - Compliance checks and inspections. Comment [PHLC10]: Why would this be added/changed? While self-service or open displays are generally prohibited, state law provides an exception for certain “adult-only” facilities. Under state law, that would be 18 and over. If the minimum sales age is raised to 21, the minimum age to enter a tobacco-only shop in Edina could be raised as well. If an 18, 19, or 20 year old isn’t allowed to purchase tobacco (and related devices and products), there’s no real reason why they should be inside the store. ... Comment [PHLC11]: Why would this be added/changed? Because it is a typo. I guess it doesn’t have to be changed, but they might want to fix it. Comment [PHLC12]: Why would this be added/changed? To align with state law. ... Comment [PHLC13]: Why would this be deleted? In order to remove the local-city age-based restriction. Comment [PHLC14]: Why would this be deleted? In order to remove the local-city age-based restriction. Comment [PHLC15]: In order to remove the local-city age-based restriction. Note: - The “procurement on behalf of a minor” content was retained, moved to the “legal age” section. Comment [PHLC16]: Why would this be added/changed? To cover any/all underage persons who might use false identification in order to attempt to ... Comment [PHLC17]: Why would this be changed? Gender equity. ... Page 5 (a) All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by the city or other authorized official during regular business hours. (b) From time to time, but at least once per year, the city shall conduct compliance checks by engaging, with the written consent of their parents or guardians, minors persons over 15 years but less than 218 years, to enter the licensed premises to attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices. (1) Prior written consent is required for any minor who participates in a compliance check. (2) MinorsPersons used for the purpose of compliance checks shall be supervised by designated law enforcement officers or other designated city personnel. (32) PersonsMinors used for compliance checks shall not be guilty of the unlawful purchase or attempted purchase, nor unlawful possession of tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices when such items are obtained or attempted to be obtained as a part of the compliance check. (43) No personminor used in the compliance checks shall attempt to use a false identification misrepresenting the person’sminor's age, and all personsminors lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall answer all questions about the person’s minor's age for which he or she is asked. (c) Nothing in this article shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by state or federal laws for educational, research or training purposes, or required for the enforcement of a particular state or federal law. Sec. 12-256. - Smoking and vapor lounges. Smoking lounges and vapor lounges are prohibited. Sec. 12 - 2__ Liquid Packaging. No person shall sell or offer to sell any liquid, whether or not such liquid contain nicotine, which is intended for human consumption and use in an electronic delivery device, in packaging that is not child-resistant. Upon request, a licensee shall provide a copy of the certificate of compliance or full laboratory testing report for the packaging used. Secs. 12-257—12-273. - Reserved. Comment [PHLC18]: Why would this be added/changed? State law requires written parental/guardian consent for minors involved in compliance checks. Consent would not be required for 18, 19, and 20 years-olds who act as “decoys.” Written consent is still relevant, but its placement within the subsection could or should be altered. Comment [PHLC19]: Why would this be changed? So 18, 19, and 20 year olds can participate in compliance checks in order to monitor retailer compliance regarding all underage individuals. Comment [PHLC20]: Why would this be added? State law requires written parental/guardian consent for minors involved in compliance checks. Consent would not be required for 18, 19, and 20 years-olds. As such, this requirement could or should be moved to a different location in this subsection Comment [PHLC21]: Why would this be changed? If the minimum sales age is raised, “non- minors” will be used in these compliance checks as well. Use of “persons” is more accurate. Comment [PHLC22]: Why would these changes be made? If the minimum sales age is raised, “non- minors” will be used in these compliance ... Comment [PHLC23]: Why would this be changed? Gender equity. ... Comment [PHLC24]: City can determine the appropriate section for this new regulation. Comment [PHLC25]: Why would this be added? Beginning January 1, 2015, liquids (“e-liquids” or “e-juice”) that are sold for use in electronic delivery devices (more commonly referred to ... Page 6 DIVISION 4. - ENFORCEMENT; PENALTIES Sec. 12-274. - Violations. The notification and hearing process set forth in this division will apply to violations of this article. Sec. 12-275. - Notice. Upon discovery of a suspected violation, the alleged violator shall be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets forth the alleged violations and which shall inform the alleged violator of his rights to be heard on the accusation. Sec. 12-276. - Hearings. If a person accused of violating this division so requests, a hearing shall be scheduled, the time and place of which shall be published and provided to the accused violator. Sec. 12-277. - Hearing officer. The city council shall serve as the hearing officer until such time a hearing officer is appointed by the city council. Sec. 12-278. - Decision. If the hearing officer determines that a violation of this article did occur, that decision along with the reasons for finding a violation and the penalty to be imposed under section 12- 282, shall be recorded in writing, a copy of which shall be provided to the accused violator. Likewise, if the hearing finds that no violation occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any penalty, such findings shall be recorded and a copy provided to the acquitted accused violator. Sec. 12-279. - Appeals. Appeals of any decision made by the hearing officer shall be filed in the county district court. Page 7 Sec. 12-280. - Misdemeanor prosecution. Nothing in the article shall prohibit the city from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of this article. If the city elects to seek misdemeanor prosecution, an administrative penalty may also be imposed. Sec. 12-281. - Continued violation. Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense. Sec. 12-282. - Penalties. The following administrative penalties will be applied as set forth in this section: (1) Licensees. Any licensee found to have violated this article, or whose employee shall have violated this article, shall be charged an administrative fine of: a. $75.00 for the first violation of this article; b. $200.00 for the second offense at the same licensed premises within a 24-month period; c. $250.00 for a third offense at the same location within a 24-month period and the license shall be suspended for not less than seven days; and d. $500.00 for a fourth offense at the same location within a 24-month period. In addition, after the fourth offense, the license shall be revoked. (2) Other individuals. Other individuals, other than personsminors regulated by subsection (3) of this section, found to be in violation of this article shall be charged an administrative fee of $50.00. (3) Underage personsMinors. Persons under 21 years of age Minors who use or are found in unlawful possession of, or who unlawfully purchase or attempt to use false identification to purchase, tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices may be subject to tobacco-related education classes, shall be charged an administrative fee of $75.00 per offense or a minimum fee of $25.00 and satisfactory completion of a diversion programs, community service, or other penalty that acceptable to the city believes will be appropriate or effective. Comment [PHLC26]: Why would this be changed? Because some adults will also be covered by the penalty provided in subsection 3 – not just minors any more. Formatted: Font: Bold Comment [PHLC27]: Why would this be changed? The prohibited activities (possession, use, and purchase) have been stripped out of the section, leaving only false identification. Administrative fine removed, with alternative consequences prioritized. Page 8 (4) Misdemeanor. Nothing in this article shall prohibit the city from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any violation of this article. Sec. 12-283. - Exceptions and dDefenses. Nothing in this article shall prevent the providing of tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices to a minor as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this article for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by state law. Secs. 12-284—12-314. - Reserved. Comment [PHLC28]: Why would this be changed? The “use” and “possession” restrictions have been stripped out of these regulations. As such, it is not necessary to specifically provide an exception that would allow minors (or 21 and under) from using tobacco during these types of ceremonies. Page 9 Clinical AND Health Affairs JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | 35 Raising the Minimum Legal Sale Age for Tobacco to 21 The Estimated Effect for Minnesota BY RAYMOND G. BOYLE, PHD, JOHN H. KINGSBURY, PHD, AND MICHAEL J. PARKS, PHD A campaign to raise the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products from 18 to 21 years known as Tobacco 21 is having a nationwide impact, with at least 200 localities in 14 states having already implemented a Tobacco 21 policy. A 2015 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimated the effects of such policy on cigarette use at the national level; however, little is known about the expected effects for individual states. The purpose of this study was to consider the effect on smoking initiation in Minnesota if the minimum sale age were 21 in 2015. Estimates from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort and Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey were used to calculate the uptake of smoking in a hypothetical cohort of Minnesota adolescents 15 to 20 years of age. Expected reductions in initiation in the IOM report were used to calculate the effects of Tobacco 21 policy on smoking uptake in this cohort. Results revealed that raising the sale age to 21 in 2015 would prevent 3,355 young Minnesotans from starting to smoke. Minnesota addresses tobacco use through a comprehensive ap- proach that includes coordinating smoke-free policies, promoting norma- tive changes in the social acceptability of tobacco use, establishing and expanding the reach of cessation programs, keeping the price of tobacco high and preventing young people from initiating tobacco use. The overall effect of these actions has been a 35% reduction in cigarette smoking in Minnesota since 1999;1 however, tobacco use remains popular among young adults in Minnesota and nationally.1,2 The persistence of tobacco use among young adults, coupled with an evolving marketplace that includes new flavored products (eg, flavored cigars and cigaril- los) and new delivery methods (eg, elec- tronic cigarettes), has led to a desire for increased regulation of tobacco. In 2009 the U.S. Congress granted authority to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to regulate the manufacture, distribution and marketing of tobacco products.3 Although this law prohibited the FDA from increasing beyond age 18 the na- tional minimum sale age for tobacco prod- ucts, state and local governments are able to raise the minimum sale age for tobacco. In addition, the law required a study of the health implications of a higher minimum age of legal access. The Institute of Medi- cine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, conducted the study using national data to consider the effects of dif- ferent minimum purchase ages (19, 21 or 25 years) and examine multiple outcomes, including preventing young people from starting and encouraging current smokers to quit smoking, and the health benefits from reduced smoking because of an in- creased purchase age. Nationally, increas- ing the purchase age to 21 would result in approximately 223,000 fewer premature deaths and 50,000 fewer deaths from lung cancer.4 Adolescents younger than age 18 fre- quently obtain tobacco from social sources who are older than 18 but younger than 21.5 If tobacco could not be sold to 18- to 20-year-olds, they would be far less likely to provide tobacco to younger teens. By age 21, young adults are likely to have friends older than high-school age and, therefore, less likely to provide tobacco to minors. The IOM’s 2015 report is particularly important because it provides scientific guidance for state and local governments as they seek to protect public health. Al- though the report provided novel informa- tion on the expected effects of Tobacco 21 policy on a national level, it provided little Clinical AND Health Affairs 36 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 in other places. For example, in New York City, compliance has fallen over time after Tobacco 21 policy was implemented.10 Calculation: In this analysis, we began with a cohort of Minnesota 15-year-olds in 2015–approximately 72,000. We esti- mated the smoking initiation rate in two periods: during high school (ages 15 to 17 years) and after high school (ages 18 to 20 years). Next, the reduction in smoking was calculated for each period if the sale age for tobacco were raised to 21 in 2015. We assumed that the smoking uptake in high school and after high school would not change in future years. The difference is reported as the number of young people 15 to 20 years of age who would not have started smoking. Results In 2015, the Minnesota population of those 15-year-olds was approximately 72,000. Of these, an estimated 7,200 will start smoking during their high school years. If the minimum legal sale age in 2015 were 21, an estimated 1,800 would not start smoking in high school. tion, the expected reduction in smoking initiation is thought to vary by age. The ef- fect is expected to be larger among youth 15 to 17 years of age, with an expected re- duction in the uptake of smoking of 25%. Among those 18 to 20 years of age, the expected reduction is 15%.4 Variation by demographic variables: Smoking rates vary substantially by popu- lation groups in Minnesota. For example, in 2014 the overall adult smoking rate was about 14%,1 but within the urban Ameri- can Indian population the smoking rate was 59%.8 There is a lack of literature on how smoking initiation would be affected in population groups with higher smoking rates if the sale age were increased. Thus, the estimate here is not adjusted by gender or other demographic variables (eg, race/ ethnicity, income). Enforcement: States are required to enact and enforce laws prohibiting the sale or distribution of tobacco products to in- dividuals younger than 18 years of age. A major assumption of Tobacco 21 policy is that the same level of current enforcement and retailer compliance would remain in effect. Although Minnesota has a high rate of retailer compliance with current law,9 retailer cooperation has been lower information about the expected effects at a state level. The purpose of this study was to con- sider the effects on smoking initiation in Minnesota if the legal minimum sale age for tobacco products were 21. The specific goal was to calculate how many young people ages 15 to 20 years would not start smoking if the assumptions from the IOM report were applied to Minnesota. Methods and Assumptions Age groups: The 2015 IOM report exam- ined effects among specific age groups: under 15 years, 15- to 17-year-olds and 18- to 20-year-olds. In this analysis, we limited the consideration to ages 15 and older. Initiation rate: Cohort studies that fol- low participants over time provide the best estimates of smoking initiation. The Min- nesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) study was a population-based study of Minnesota youth ages 12 to 16 in 2000 who were followed until 2008. In 2003, approximately 19% of the cohort reported smoking in the previous month.6 Smoking among Minnesota high school students has fallen to about 10% since 2003. Therefore, in this analysis we used 10% as the estimate of smoking initiation among youth 15 to 17 years of age. In a later analysis of the MACC data, 16% of the cohort who did not start smoking in high school took up smoking (smoked in the past month) between the ages of 18 and 21.7 This estimate of smok- ing uptake is consistent with the preva- lence of smoking among young adults in the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey. For this analysis we used 16% as the estimate of 18- to 20-year-olds who would initiate smoking. Estimated effects of Tobacco 21 policy: An increase in the minimum sale age is expected to apply to all commercial to- bacco products; however, for the purpose of estimating effects similar to those in the IOM report, the scope of this study was restricted to cigarette smoking. In addi- COHORT AGE (YEARS) NUMBER WHO HAVE NOT SMOKED PROPORTION WHO START SMOKING NUMBER SMOKING NUMBER NOT SMOKING IF POLICY WERE IN EFFECT 15 72,000 16 to 17 64,800 10% 7,200 1,800 18 to 20 54,432 16% 10,368 1,555 FIGURE Estimated Reduction in Youth Smokers with Implementation of Tobacco 21 Policy NU M B E R O F Y O U T H Ages 15 to 17 years WITHOUT TOBACCO 21 POLICY WITH TOBACCO 21 POLICY Ages 18 to 20 years 7,200 17,568 5,400 8,813 14,213 Combined Total AGE GROUPS AFFECTED BY TOBACCO 21 POLICY TOTAL: 3,355Note: The cohort size is 1/5 of the census estimate of Minnesota 15- to 19-year-olds in 2015. 10,368 Clinical AND Health Affairs JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | 37 3. Mitka M. FDA exercises new authority to regulate tobacco products, but some limits remain. JAMA. 2009;302(19):2078, 2080-1. 4. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. 5. Lenk KM, Toomey TL, Shi Q, Erickson D, Forester JL. Do sources of cigarettes among adolescents vary by age over time? J Child and Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2014;23(2):137-143. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 1992, and changes in the definition of current cigarette smoking. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(19):342–6. 7. Bernat DH, Klein EG, Forester JL. Smoking initia- tion during young adulthood: A longitudinal study of a population-based cohort. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(5):497-502. 8. Forster J, Poupart J, Rhodes K, et al. Cigarette smoking among urban American Indian adults — Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(21):534–7. 9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Tobacco sales to youth. Available at: http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SYNAR-14/ SYNAR-14.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2016. 10. Silver D, Macinko J, Giorgio M, Bae JY, Jimenez G. Retailer compliance with tobacco control laws in New York City before and after raising the minimum legal purchase age to 21. Tob Control. 2015 Nov 19. pii: tobaccocontrol-2015-052547. [Epub ahead of print] 11. Increasing the Sale Age for Tobacco Products to 21. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Available at: www.tobaccofreekids.org/what_we_do/state_local/ sales_21. Accessed October 1, 2016. 12. Farley SM, Coady MH, Mandel-Ricci J, et al. Public opinions on tax and retail-based tobacco control strat- egies. Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e10-3. 13. Winickoff JP, McMillen R, Tanski S, Wilson K, Gottlieb M, Crane R. Public support for raising the age of sale for tobacco to 21 in the United States. Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):284-8. 14. King BA, Jama AO, Marynak KL, Promoff GR. Attitudes toward raising the minimum age of sale for tobacco among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(4):583-8. 15. Vuolo M, Kelly BC, Kadowaki J. Independent and interactive effects of smoking bans and tobacco taxes on a cohort of US young adults. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(2):374–80. 16. Gielen AC, Green LW. The impact of policy, envi- ronmental, and educational interventions: a synthesis of the evidence from two public health success sto- ries. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1S):20S-34S. strongly to smoking bans than to other types of tobacco control15 in part because a ban is an unambiguous anti-tobacco message that indirectly influences social norms, creating a social environment that discourages health-risk behavior.16 Put differently, the effects of Tobacco 21 policy would extend into the future as new cohorts of young people do not start using tobacco. Our analysis considered only cigarette smoking; but a Tobacco 21 policy would apply to all tobacco products. Whether the effects of raising the purchasing age to 21 would be similar across all demographic and racial/ethnic groups is not known. Similar to the IOM, we did not adjust the Minnesota estimate for any variation by demographics other than age. This ques- tion should be examined when there is sufficient data on communities that have implemented the policy. Conclusion Raising the minimum sale age for tobacco to 21 would prevent the uptake of smoking among youth and young adults, subse- quently reducing smoking prevalence over time. Applying national estimates from the 2015 IOM report to Minnesota, we found that implementing a Tobacco 21 policy could have a marked impact on smok- ing initiation among Minnesota’s young people. Tobacco 21 should be considered an effective strategy for reducing smok- ing initiation. Preventing smoking among youth remains a primary focus for reduc- ing morbidity and mortality as well as pro- moting health across the lifespan. MM Raymond Boyle is director of research programs for ClearWay Minnesota. John Kingsbury and Michael Parks are research scientists for the Minnesota Department of Health. REFERENCES 1. Boyle RG, Amato MS, Rode P, Kinney AM, St. Claire AW, Taylor K. Tobacco use among Minnesota adults, 2014. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(5):674-9. 2. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2015: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. 2016. Available at: www.monitoringthefu- ture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2015.pdf. Accessed September 3, 2016. Of those who finished high school with- out initiating smoking, 10,368 will begin smoking between ages 18 and 21. Under a Tobacco 21 policy, 1,555 fewer young peo- ple would start smoking after high school. Overall, 3,355 fewer young people would start smoking in this cohort of youth if a Tobacco 21 policy were in effect (see Fig- ure). In other words, increasing the sale age to 21 would increase the proportion of nonsmokers in a cohort of 15-year-olds from 76% to 80%. Discussion Increasing the sale age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21 would have a posi- tive effect on Minnesota, where tobacco use remains popular among young adults.1 Given that almost 95% of smokers start smoking by age 21, raising the age of sale to 21 years would prevent the vast majority of young people from becoming addicted to the nicotine in tobacco. At least 200 localities in 14 states have raised the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21 years.11 Notably, Hawaii was the first state (2015) followed by California (2016), and New York City (2013) is the largest city to adopt a To- bacco 21 policy. This policy has broad support and is viewed positively by both smokers and nonsmokers. In New York City, 60% of smokers and 69% of non- smokers have supported the age increase.12 In a national sample of adults, 70.5% sup- ported the increase.13 And in an online survey, 77.5% of never smokers and 70% of current smokers either strongly favored or somewhat favored raising the legal pur- chasing age to 21.14 We acknowledge that some young people will begin using tobacco at a later age. The amount is unknown; but even if 5% eventually take up smoking, this would not diminish the overall effect of Tobacco 21 policy. In addition, while we have highlighted how Tobacco 21 would inhibit more than 3,300 youth from initiating smoking, it is important to note the policy could have additional and more indirect benefits. Youth tend to respond more 3-1-16 Increasing the tobacco purchase age to 21 Raising the purchase age to 21 will prevent youth tobacco use and save lives. THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE THE HARM OF TOBACCO IS TO PREVENT KIDS FROM STARTING • Almost 90 percent of addicted adult smokers started smoking by age 18.2 • Increasing the age gap between kids and those who can legally buy tobacco will help remove access to tobacco products from the high-school environment. Minnesotans agree that kids shouldn’t use tobacco products – and more can and should be done to make sure they don’t. A national consensus is growing to prevent addictions and future health problems by raising the minimum age to purchase tobacco products to 21. Minnesotans for a Smoke-Free Generation supports this movement. According to a 2015 report from the Institute of Medicine, increasing the legal age to purchase tobacco will mean fewer teenagers starting to smoke. For example, research predicts a 25 percent reduction in smoking initiation among 15-17-year-olds alone following such an increase.1 Adults support raising the tobacco purchase age to 21. • A 2014 national survey shows that 75 percent of adults favor increasing the minimum purchase age for tobacco to 21.4 • Even 70 percent of smokers are in support of raising the minimum legal age.4 Big Tobacco actively recruits replacement smokers to guarantee profits. • The tobacco industry heavily targets 18-to-21-year olds with menthol and candy flavoring, magazine advertisements, product design and packaging, and event sponsorships and promotions.3 1 Institute of Medicine. Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. National Academy Press. 2015. 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2012. 3 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Increasing the minimum legal sale age for tobacco products to 21. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0376.pdf. 4 King BA et al. Attitudes toward raising the minimum age of sale for tobacco among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015. 5 Kessel Schneider S et al. Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21. Tob Control. 2015. 6 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2014. 7 Abreu-Villaca Y et al. Short-term adolescent nicotine exposure has immediate and persistent effects on cholinergic systems: Critical periods, patterns of exposure, dose thresholds. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003. 8 Slikker W Jr. et al. Mode of action: Disruption of brain cell replication, second messenger and neurotransmitter systems during development leading to cognitive dysfunction – development neurotoxicity of nicotine. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005. State and local governments are taking action to increase the minimum legal age and protect youth. Nicotine may harm adolescent brain development. • The state of Hawaii and at least 125 localities in the United States have raised the age to purchase tobacco to 21, including New York City, Boston and Kansas City. • One city in Massachusetts found that tobacco use among high-school students fell by nearly half after raising the age to 21.5 • Nicotine is addictive, and adolescents are especially vulnerable to the health impacts of tobacco use.6 • The adolescent brain is negatively impacted by nicotine, and its long-term effects are a significant public health concern.7,8 Minnesotans for a Smoke-Free Generation is a coalition of Minnesota’s leading health and other interested organizations. We share a common goal of saving Minnesota youth from a lifetime of addiction to tobacco. Each year in Minnesota tobacco use is responsible for more than 5,100 deaths and almost $3 billion in preventable health care costs and 90 percent of adult smokers started before the age of 18. Minnesotans for a Smoke-Free Generation supports policies that reduce youth smoking and help end the death and disease associated with tobacco use. must be21 to purchase Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Deb ra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-22: Acc epting Vario us Grants & Do natio ns Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion adopting Resolution No. 2017-22. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution No. 2017-22 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2017-22 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Administration Energy & Environment Commission: Grandview Tire & Auto $300.00 EEC Sponsored Film Series Costs Jerry’s Grocery $300.00 EEC Sponsored Film Series Costs Edina Garbage Man $300.00 EEC Sponsored Film Series Costs Suburban Waste Services $300.00 EEC Sponsored Film Series Costs Vierkant $300.00 EEC Sponsored Film Series Costs Citizens’ Climate Lobby $300.00 Licensing Fee One Movies & Refreshments Parks & Recreation – Art Center Harold Thies 18 Canvasses Art Supplies Dated: March 7 2017 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:Lis a S c haefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Res o lutio n No. 2017-24 Ap p ro ving Temp o rary On- Sale Dis p ens ary Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-24 approving a temporary on-sale dispensary for Edina Liquor at the Edina Art Fair. INTRODUCTION: T he attached resolution would allow Edina Liquor to sell beer and wine during the Edina Art Fair on an annual basis. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res olution No. 2017-24 2017 Draft Art Fair Layout RESOLUTION 2017-24 ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY ON-SALE MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY FOR EDINA LIQUOR DURING THE EDINA ART FAIR IN THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Section 24-254 of the City Code, permits the establishment of municipal dispensaries of liquor within the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes a temporary on-sale dispensary allowing Edina Liquor to participate in the Edina Art Fair held June 2, 3 and 4, 2017. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Edina Liquor shall have an on-sale dispensary annually during the Edina Art Fair. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on-sale shall be limited to strong beer and wine. Passed and adopted this 7th day of March 2017. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of March 7, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ______________, 2017. _______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Ad visory Co mmunication From:Deb ra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Co rres p o ndence CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached is the correspondence received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2017-02-24noon Corres pondence 2017-03-02noon Corres pondence 2017-03-07noon Corres pondence From:Ben Johnson To:Edina Mail Subject:Raising Awareness Date:Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:12:49 AM Dear Edina Council, Currently I am trying to raise awareness of the importance of using food as medicine. I have been doing a year long project on this topic for school. I became passionate about food as medicine and how it can benefit your physical and mental health. So far I've only just begun with trying to make a difference by having a twitter. I'm hoping that with your help here in Edina we can make a difference by educating people about using food in a healthy way! I've learned so much and expanded my knowledge on this topic, seeing this word spread would be huge and great if it could spread out past just Edina and into all of Minnesota! Through my studies I have read about decreasing obesity and becoming stronger and more fit but something that stuck out to me was heart attacks. When eating healthy food it helps decrease your chance of having a heart attack. With the healthy food, it causes less plaque to go into your arteries which cause heart diseases. Mentally, people can built up stress and become angry or cranky. Studies have shown that using your food as medicine can help you physically and mentally. Hopefully you can help me raise awareness of the benefits of food as medicine. Thanks, Ben Johnson From:Fronek, Todd R. To:Edina Mail Cc:Steen, Jacob W. Subject:Thank you. Date:Thursday, February 23, 2017 9:21:15 AM Dear Council Members, Thank you for the thoughtful consideration given to our subdivision at 6124 Ewing Avenue last night. I apologize for my tardiness as I was attending to a family matter. Your attention to detail, concern for storm water drainage and conformance of the property to the neighborhood are duly noted and greatly appreciated. Should you have questions or concerns moving forward, please do not hesitate to reach out. Kind Regards, Todd Todd R. Fronek Attorney direct | 952-896-3295 fax | 952-842-1715 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060 www.larkinhoffman.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. This message may be an Attorney-Client communication from the law firm of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, or an agent responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the message, and return any hard copy print-outs. No legal advice is being provided or implied via this communication unless you are (1) a client of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and (2) an intended recipient of this message. From:amburatti@aol.com To:Edina Mail Cc:Ann Kattreh; Eric Boettcher Subject:Re: Fred Richards Development Date:Monday, February 27, 2017 2:13:30 PM Attachments:ESC ESA Letter - Fred Richards Development.pdf Hello- Please forward the attached letter on to Mayor Hovland and the entire City Council. It is regarding the Fred Richards development from both Edina Soccer Club and Edina Soccer Association. Thank you! °°° Ann Buratti Administrator/Registrar Edina Soccer Club From:Anne J Hinrichs To:Edina Mail Subject:Caring for our youth! Date:Monday, March 06, 2017 3:16:23 PM Hello City Council members, My name is Anne Hinrichs and I am very much in favor of increasing the tobacco sales age in Edina from 18 to 21. I heard that the Edina Community Health Commission will be presenting this issue to the city council tomorrow. My husband Todd and I live in Morningside and have two teenage daughters. I am one of the Nordic coaches at Edina High School and have a true passion for working with teens in our community. I had the joy of working with 160 young skiers this past season. Their health and well- being is extremely important to me. I know that adults in Edina have opportunities every single day to show our youth that they are important to us and that they are a valuable part of our community. And trust me, the big tobacco companies are likewise working hard daily to connect with our youth – they are actively marketing specifically to our youth to sell tobacco. How? With menthol and candy flavoring, magazine advertisements, product design and packaging as well as event sponsorships and promotions. They know that the younger someone is when they start smoking, the more likely they are to be addicted. It’s about profit for the tobacco companies, plain and simple. Without a doubt, we can discourage tobacco use by making it harder to buy tobacco in Edina. Two states (California and Hawaii) have changed the tobacco sale age to 21. Several cities around the country are doing the same. One school in Massachusetts saw tobacco use fall by half after the purchase age was increased to 21. I’d like to see Edina take a stance on tobacco use and shift to age 21 as well. We could be the FIRST city in Minnesota to make this shift. I for one would be proud and happy to see that Edina is #1 – the very first! The high school sports teams work hard to be #1 in the State – let’s do the same on their behalf!! “Stop the Start” is a campaign by ClearWay Minnesota – try to prevent kids from starting smoking. It’s a proven way to reduce lifelong tobacco use. Let’s do it! We can stop the start by making it harder for our young people to buy until they are 21. The Edina Community Health Commission will be presenting to the city council tomorrow. Can I count on your support? Please reply. Thanks! Anne Jasper Hinrichs 4112 West 44th Street, Edina, MN 55424 From:Jane Lonnquist To:Edina Mail Subject:note for city council Date:Monday, March 06, 2017 4:34:38 PM Hello, I understand that the Edina Community Health Commission will be asking the city council on Tuesday to consider pushing the legal age to purchase tobacco from 18 to 21. That makes sense to me, since it is a habit with no social upside and huge health downsides. Since the drinking age is 21, shouldn't the smoking age be the same? As a parent and teacher, I support this measure. Thanks for considering this last-minute note. Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avene, Edina, 55424 From:daniel and cheryl dulas To:Edina Mail Subject:Increasing the Tobacco Sales Age from 18 to 21 Date:Monday, March 06, 2017 4:53:04 PM Dear Edina City Council, As residents of Edina with two children, my wife and I support increasing the tobacco sales age in Edina from 18 to 21 years old. As a cardiologist, I see the negative effects of tobacco smoking on a daily basis. Smoking is the number one preventable cause of death, with the following diseases or conditions attributable to smoking or second-hand smoke, including heart disease, lung cancer and other cancers, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), asthma, and stroke. By making it harder to purchase tobacco products by delaying the sales age for an additional 3 years, we may prevent our city's youth from starting up a smoking habit, and reduce the future health complications associated with tobacco use. Thank you for your time and consideration on this important community health issue. Sincerely, Daniel Dulas, MD 4609 Bruce Avenue, Edina, MN From:Neal Blanchett To:Edina Mail Subject:In Favor of Raising Tobacco Age to 21 Date:Monday, March 06, 2017 5:29:03 PM Dear Mayor and Council Members, My wife Mia and I live in the Cornelia neighborhood. We have three children, ages 19, 16 and 12, all in Edina schools. I'm in favor of Minnesota's longstanding policies to lead the way in deterring and helping quit tobacco use. Mia and I grew up with parents who smoked, in each case they got started in their teens and smoked for decades, finally quitting near retirement age. It's hard to quit, and for all those years, smoking is hard on family and friends. For our parents, the day they finally quit for good was one of the best days of their lives. Our policy should be to discourage and deter starting, especially for young people whose bodies, brains, and lifestyles are still developing. This is particularly true for tobacco use, proven dangerous and addictive to the user and harmful to anyone exposed to smoke. For these reasons we support raising the age of tobacco sales to 21. Thank you, Neal Blanchett 4737 Hibiscus Avenue Edina, 55435 Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Ad visory Co mmunication From:MJ Lamo n, P ro ject Co o rd inato r Item Activity: Subject:Ad vis ory Co mmunicatio n: Human R ights & Relatio ns Co mmis s io n February 2017 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: At its February meeting, the Human Rights & Relations Commission approved the attached Advisory Communication for City Council consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Advis ory Communication: Human Rights & Relations Commis s ion February 2017 Date: March 7, 2017 To: Mayor and City Council From: Human Rights and Relations Commission Subject: Advisory Communication Background: Over the past several months, there have been many incidents of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in schools, organizations, and neighborhoods throughout Minnesota. Immigrant and refugee youth in the schools are traumatized by bullying that targets their status. Edina High School had a particularly horrific example last fall of a student who disseminated hate messaging while wearing attire deliberately designed to look like that worn by members of the Ku Klux Klan. In response, Edina High School asked teachers to address the issue in classrooms; held an assembly; and created a ‘creed,’ or statement, of inclusion. We applaud these important steps. Situation: However, xenophobia is increasing, according to data reported by the FBI, the Jewish Community Relations Council, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, all of which have documented very troubling spikes in these incidents. It is likely that xenophobia will become even worse because of the federal government’s continued advocacy to prohibit all Muslims from entering the United States. The rhetoric and efforts at action incite and support hate speech and hate crimes, particularly directed at Muslims but also spilling over against other minority groups. The recent discussion by the federal government to change the language of the program titled “Countering Violent Extremism” to focus exclusively on radical Islamic extremism, for example, provides additional license for anti-Muslim action, and this is particularly likely to occur in Minnesota, one of the main sites for the CVE nation-wide program. Recommendation: As a Human Rights City, the City of Edina has a responsibility and an obligation to be proactive in efforts to prevent hate speech and discrimination. Our city must not engage with programs or with Page 2 individuals that demonize, or denigrate, anyone based on race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin, and indeed, must publicly decry these actions. Furthermore, the line between free speech and hate speech is a difficult one, and we recommend that the City of Edina encourage the administration at Edina High School to conduct programs to raise awareness about incitement, hate speech, and hate Assessment Our youth are the most important asset that we have. They are also the most vulnerable, both those who are targeted and those who are easily incited to hate by parents, by the media, and by those who are unwilling to accept the increasing plurality of our neighborhoods, our state, and our nation. Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: R ep o rt / Rec o mmendation From:James B. Ho vland , Mayor Item Activity: Subject:Parkwo o d Knoll Traffic Dis cus s ion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description TH 169 Map Date: Marc h 7, 2017 Agenda Item #: XII. To:Mayo r and City Co uncil Item Type: Other From:Deb ra A. Mangen, Item Activity: Subject:Sc hed ule o f Meetings , Events & Dates as o f Marc h 7, 2017 Info rmatio n CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Meetings , Events & Dates as of March 7, 2017 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF MARCH 7, 2017 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues Mar 7 Work Session – Greater Southdale Working Group 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 2018-2019 Budget Process & Vision Edina Work Plan Themes 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 21 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – City Manager Performance Review (Closed Session) 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Apr 3 2017 Board Commission Annual Meeting 5:30 – 7:30 P.M. BRAEMAR GOLF CLUBHOUSE Tues Apr 4 Work Session – Fred Richards Master Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting With Park Board 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat Apr 8 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. TO 12:00 noon BRAEMAR GOLF CLUBHOUSE Tues Apr 18 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – Business Meeting 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 25 38th Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:30 – 7:30 P.M. BRAEMAR GOLF CLUBHOUSE Tues May 2 Facilities Asset Management 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting with Transportation Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 14 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – State of the Infrastructure 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon May 29 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed