HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-18_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 18, 1990
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 1990
II. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PRESENTATION OF RECYCLING REBATE - Commissioner John Keefe
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk (k)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 21, 1990
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Final Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District
4916 France Avenue South - Walgreen's by Semper Holdings
B. Reconsideration of Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval
R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District
Shadow Hill - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway 62 and East of
Highway 169 - Schaefer Development
C. Final Plat Approval - Cunningham Addition - Lot 5, Block 1, Muir Woods
Addition -_ Located at 7120 Valley View Road
D. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 824 - Requiring Licenses and Establishing Standards for
Restricted Access Parking Lots
2. Ordinance No. 171 -A33 - To Add Fee for Licensing of Restricted Access
Parking Lots
IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE First Reading: Requires offering of
Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all
members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. Ordinance No. 1322 - An Ordinance Licensing'and Regulating.the Sale of
Cigarettes, Imposing a Penalty and Repealing Ordinance No. 1321
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Storm Sever Improvements Nos. STS -204, STS -205, and STS -206 (Contd from
6/4/90)
* B. Golf Balls for Driving Range - Braemar Golf Course
* C. Sodding of Braemar Soccer/Football Field
Agenda
Edina City Council
June 18, 1990
Page 2
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 12, 1990
B. Feasibility Report - Storm Sewer Improvement
C. Update - Storm Water Utility
D. Vine License Renevals
E. Wine License Renewal - The Pantry ti
F. Park Board Recommendation - Outlot B, Lake Pamela
G. Discussion - Country Club District Curb Cuts /Driveways
H. Update - I -494 EIS
I. Preliminary Schedule - 1991 Budget Hearings
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
A. AMM Proposal
B. SHHSC -Paul Gens Letter
iX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XI. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims per Check Register dated 06/18/90: Total $2,177,267.07
and for confirmation of payment of Claims per Check Register dated
05/31/90: Total $615,731.64
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon July 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED City Hall Closed
Mon July 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Mon Aug 6 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Aug 20 Joint Meeting - Council /Building Construction
:_Appeals Board
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 p.m. Council Room
6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm
7:00 p.m. Council Room
MINUTES OF THE JOINT`MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
MAY 21, 1990
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the
City Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Feasibility Report - 50th &
France Commercial District Improvement. Action was taken by the HRA and Council
as recorded.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice,
Smith,'Richards.
FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED FOR 50TH & FRANCE RENOVATIONS AND PARKING RAMP
PROJECT NORTH OF WEST 49 1/2 STREET: HEARING DATE SET FOR 6/4/90 HRA Executive
Director Gordon Hughes reported that the HRA staff and City staff have reviewed a
proposed total renovation of the 50th & France Business Area with the 50th &
France Business Association. Additionally, the staff has reviewed a potential
addition of a parking ramp on the surface lot north of West 49 1/2 Street. The
estimated costs-of the two projects are:
50th & France Renovation $2,134,400.00
West 49 1/2 Street Ramp (P -4) 924,000.00
Staff believes these projects are feasible and are consistent with the overall
development goals of the City. A public hearing on these project on June 4, 1990
is recommended. '
Commissioner/Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
WEST 49 1/2 STREET PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -4
AND 50TH & FRANCE RENOVATION
1. The HRA Executive Director and the City Engineer, having submitted to the HRA
and the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed parking
ramp and renovation described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below,
and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved
and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The HRA and Council shall meet on Monday, June 4, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested
in said improvements.
3. The HRA Executive Director and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in
the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which
publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and
to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
WEST 49 1/2 STREET PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -4
50TH & FRANCE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENT NO. HRA
The Edina City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (HRA) will
meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, June 4, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the
following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are
estimated by the City and HRA as set forth below:
W 49 112 STREET PARKING RAMP ESTIMATED COST
IMPROVEMENT P -4 $ 924,000.00
50TH & FRANCE RENOVATION ESTIMATED COST
IMPROVEMENT HRA $2,134,400.00
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvements includes the 50th b France Business District.
Gordon L. Hughes
Executive Director (HRA)
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner /Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
Motion vas made by Commissioner Kelly and vas.seconded by Commissioner Paulus for
adjournment of the HRA. Motion carried unanimously.
HRA Executive Director
City Clerk
q
Of
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Date: JUNE 18, 1990
Subject: Z 90 -3, PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
PCD -4, TO PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
PCD -2, 4916 FRANCE AVE.,
SEMPER HOLDINGS.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item .# III. A.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA'
FE
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission has recommended Final Rezoning approval subject to an
assessment for public parking.
INFO /BACKGROUND
At the May 21, 1990, Council meeting preliminary approval was granted with the
understanding that additional information on design, materials, and parking would
be provided. The proponents have made some design refinements to the plan and
will present those to the Council on Monday. It is my understanding that they
will present material samples at the Council meeting.
Concern was expressed that we may set a precedent by granting the requested parking
variance. Staff feels we would not. Section 8.B. of the Zoning Ordinance specifically
allows the use of public parking facilities within redevelopment project areas. This
provision applies only to 50th and France and Grandview. The proposed plan also
conforms to a 1978 policy amendment to the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. The
policy allowed expansions up to a FAR of 1.0 to rely totally on public parking.
The proposed development is consistent with this policy.
Council members also questioned the amount of the public parking assessment. Attached
is a memo from Gordon Hughes suggesting an alternative method for calculating the
assessment.
A.
o e tt
Wd
0
�� ay
. � •'NRiRppAA��O/
+aee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Date: JUNE 18, 1990
Subject:
FINAL REZONING APPROVAL
OF WALGREEN'S BY
SEMPER HOLDINGS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # III I. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
7
To Councii
Action ®
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Require payment of $20,056.85, as a condition of the parking variance for
Walgreen's at 49 1/2 Street and France Avenue.
Info /Background:
At the May 21, 1990, public hearing, staff presented the attached
memorandum concerning the $2.15 /sq. ft. assessment for parking purposes at
50th & France. The Council asked staff to investigate the possibility of
adding an interest factor to the amount now charged to Walgreen's, in that
15 years have elapsed since the original assessment was levied. In my
opinion, the most appropriate factor to use would be the interest rate that
the City paid on the 1975, 50th & France Improvement Bonds. The net
interest rate of these bonds was 5.977 %. If this rate were applied to the
$9,430.00 assessment on a compounded basis, the amount now due would be
$20,056.85.
1 'A
o e
Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: Gordon L. Hughes
Assistant City.Manager
Date: May 21, 1990
Subject:
Walgreen's by Semper
Holdings, Inc.
Recommendation:
Info /Background
Agenda Item # IV.D.
Consent
❑
Information Only
F7x
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
Resoiution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
At the April 16, 1990, public hearing concerning the Walgreen's proposal, a
question arose concerning the $2.15 /sq. ft. assessment for parking
purposes. The purpose of this memo is to explain the history of this
proposed assessment.
In 1975, the City and HRA undertook the 50th & France commercial area
redevelopment project. This project included the provision of off - street
parking, landscaping, sidewalk improvements and a variety of utility
improvements. 20% of the cost of this project was paid through special .
assessments against commercial area properties. The amount of this
assessment was $2.15 /sq. ft. of floor area. Properties that were assessed
included not only existing buildings, but also proposed expansions and new
buildings, such as the Carillon Building, Edina Five -0, and the Doctor's
Building at 3939 West 50th Street.
Report /Recommendation, Walgreen's by Semper Holdings, Inc.
May 21, 1990
Page Two
Since 1975, some building expansions have occurred that were not envisioned
by the 50th and France redevelopment plan. The second floor addition to
the Edina Realty building and the proposed Walgreen's development are
examples of such expansions. In the late 1970's, the HRA agreed to permit
such expansions (assuming that they met with City approval), provided that
the City receive a $2'.15 /sq. ft. payment for the expanded area. The
purpose of this payment was to put such new and expanded buildings on the
same footing, from an assessment standpoint, as the original buildings at
50th and France. This payment does not bear a direct relationship to the
cost of future public parking that may be required at 50th and France.
Presumably, the cost of such future parking would be borne by the
benefitted properties, including those that have expanded. The $2.15
payment should be viewed much like a connection charge which the City
requires for hooking -up to a sanitary sewer or water main which had been
built and previously assessed to other properties.
The Council could consider the fact that 15 years have elapsed since
the original assessment. As such, the Council could increase the $2.15 /sq.
ft. charge by some interest factor. This has not been done, however, in
prior cases such as Edina Realty. We would be glad to supply more
information concerning this issue at your request.
DRAFT OF THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD ON.MAY 30, 1990
Z -90 -3 Final Rezoning, Planned Commercial District, PCD -4,
to Planned Commercial District, PCD -2, Semper Holdings,
4916 France Avenue South
Commissioner Runyan asked the Chair to please note that he will not participate
in any the discussion concerning Z -90 -3, nor will he vote on Z -90 -3.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proposed rezoning of the site to develop a
Walgreens store received preliminary approval from the City Council on May 21,
1990. Mr. Larsen explained the plan that was given preliminary approval differs
from the plan reviewed by you in March.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note that the building has been rotated 90
degrees placing the long axis along France Avenue, the building has been reduced
from 110 to 105 feet to meet the setback requirements, the parking lot has been
re- located -to -the west side of the building, circulation has been changed from a
one -way system to a two -way system, parking has increased from 16 to 17 spaces
and the display windows are not located on the 49 1/2 Street side of the
building. Mr. Larsen pointed out the changes to the plan are a result of
comments and criticisms by the City Council and the 50th and France Avenue
Association building.
Mr. Larsen concluded that staff recommends approval subject to public parking
assessment.
Mr. Howard Bergerud, Semper Holdings was present and Mr. John Kohler of the
Runyan, Vogel group was present representing Semper Holdings, Inc.
Mr. Bergerud briefly explained to the Commission the revisions that occurred as
a result of Council's and the 50th and France Business Associations input. He
pointed out the changes to the location of the building, parking, traffic
circulation from a one -way to a two -way, window placement, and the breaking of
the mass of the building from all brick to brick with a border of lighter
colored brick.
Commissioner McClelland asked if the delivery schedule remains the same as
previously indicated. Mr. Larsen said the delivery schedule is the same, once
per week, in the morning, for two or three hours.
Chairman Johnson pointed out that patrons will still have to walk all the way
around the building to enter. Mt.-Larsen affirmed.that is correct.
Commissioner Faust questioned if the sidewalk pattern would be continued at this
location in the same manner that is now found throughout the 50th and France
Avenue shopping district. Mr. Larsen said at this time he is unsure if the
sidewalk pattern will be continued to include the Walgreens.
Commissioner Faust questioned the number of staff that would be employed by
Walgreens at one time. Mr. Bergerud said at full staff there are 6 employees
which includes the Pharmacist.
Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the proposed parking spaces are
standard size. Mr. Larsen said the parking spaces are standard size.
A.brief discussion ensued with the Commission in agreement that the changes to
the proposed Walgreens are favorable indicating the revised traffic circulation
should work with more efficiency then the previous proposal.
Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Final Rezoning approval subject to
the staff conditions. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. Ayes; Faust.
Hale, L. Johnson, McClelland, Palmer, Shaw, Workinger, Byron, Ingwalson, G.
Johnson. Abstained, D. Runyan. Motion carried.
- "yEXWNG,APT BUILDM �
ea
c
I
EXISTNG BUILDNG ] • -- .
� I O
a W w
a Im D
t Z
I!k LL
_EX6TNGBURDNG� '� MI6 Z
. PROPOSED WALGREENS BUILDING w
LL
Carr
I
ix�r rs�rrw
I
7,
' e. xa l = mrrr•o crtv '
49 1/2 STREET WEST
O
':SITE PLAN
O
N
PROJECT INFORMATION
EXISTING ZONNG - - PCU
ZONING REQUESTED— PC2
SITE AREA - 18,917 SF
.434 ACRES
I BUILDING SIZE -
FIRST FLOOR - 8.200 SF
BASEMENT - 3,000 SF
PARKNG PROVIDED - 17 CARS
BUILDING SETBACK -
NORTN PROPERTY LINE - 3T
DRIVING LANE SETBACK
NORTH PROPERTY LINE - 10'
I
i
NORTH
s
A. a m :•!
Styµ w rat
" M.K
.NCHnCTS..oFLA1849M
u Rm
sur f. me
PROPOSED. BUILDING
FOR
WALGREENS
EDNA, MINNESOTA
.SITE PLAN
�
,
`
`
------�0�9
��
~ ULIM FRAME
MI -rt4RA
EAST ELEVATION
�
-
-'-----'------------
99ri"m
SOUTH ELEVATION
PREFNSHED
CAP FLASHt
FACE BRICK
- ^
Lov_--
RAU N MY NORTH ELEVATION
-_------___�--_-_--__- .
-' __--___--__-_------ �
-'
WEST ELEVATION
�����
PROPOSED BUUDNG
FOR
ELEVATIONS
Q0
I'
O
.17)
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
III.
B.
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
JUNE 18, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Z -90 -4, SCHAEFER
a
To Council
DEVELOPMENT, R -2, DOUBLE
DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT
Action
❑
Motion
TO PRD -2, .PLANNED
RESIDENCE DISTRICT,
❑
Resolution
VERNON COURT.
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
INFO /BACKGROUND
Jim Van Valkenburg, attorney for the property owner, has requested a hearing
to ask reconsideration of the Council action of April 16, 1990. Council
minutes and original staff report are attached.
TxoMSEv
rtxaECK
JOHNSON
BOUQUET
VANALffiNBUEG
OHNSGD &
3A71TH, BA.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
GLENN G. NYBECK
MARSH J. HALBERG
OF COUNSEL:
GORDON V. JOHNSON
WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM
JACK W. CARLSON
JOHN K. BOUQUET
THOMAS R. KELLEY
RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
DENNIS M. PATRICK
- HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK G. OHNSTAD
PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD D. SMITH
DAVID J. MCGEE
Mr. Craig Larsen
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
May 31, 1990
RE: Schaefer Development
Dear Craig:
Please put this matter back on the Council agenda for
June 18, 1990.
Your ttnilY, / - - --
am' s Van Valkernb6rg
JVV:jd
cc: Robert Hanson
Steve Wilson
PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PRD -2 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SHADOW HILL APPROVED
' Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen presented the request for preliminary rezoning to PRD -2 Planned Residence
District and preliminary plat approval for Shadow Hill, noting that the subject
property is located on the north side of the improved street known as Vernon
Court. The subject property is zoned R -2 and
is platted with five double bungalow
lots. Prior to the current zoning, the Planning Commission and Council approved a
PRD -2 zoning for 15 townhouse units. Both of these concepts failed in the
marketplace.
A rezoning petition has been received for a PRD -2 zoning to allow for the
construction of 12 "detached" townhomes, a new concept to Edina. It combines
elements of single family detached housing with elements of townhouse design and
management. Each unit will have an individual private lot, making it work like
many small lot single family neighborhoods in the City. However, the units will
have common design and materials with a townhouse type association for
maintenance.
The units are planned as one -story units with all living spaces on one floor
measuring approximately 1,600 square feet. Each unit has an attached two -car
garage and exterior materials would be wood siding with brick accents.
As proposed, the development would comply with all ordinance requirements except
for the sideyard setback on Lot 12. A 10 -foot setback is provided where a 20 -foot
setback is required. Thus, a 10 -foot sideyard setback variance is requested.
Planner Larsen mentioned that this is a very difficult site to develop. The
combination of the hill on the,north side and freeway to the south is very
limiting. The two prior development concepts failed; however, this proposal may
have a better chance to succeed because the offering price would be lower to
acknowledge the site limitations. Staff believes the proposal has merit and would
recommend preliminary approval, subject to: 1) final rezoning, 2) final plat, 3)
subdivision dedication, and 4) engineering specifications for retaining wall. The
proposal was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its
meeting of March 28, 1990 and approval was recommended.
As part of the development the proponent has requested a reallocation of special
assessments levied against the property. Currently, approximately $245,000 is
levied against a single parcel. The reallocation would equally divide the. total
into 12 assessments against the proposed individual lots. The assessments would
be satisfied as the lots are developed. The proponent has proposed that the
reassessment be for a five year period with interest remaining at the current
11.5 %. The initial assessment was for 10 years with three years remaining; the
request would result in a two year extention of the assessment. If the Council
approves the reallocation, conditions to the assessment agreement would be: 1)
County approval, 2) 100% petition by the developer with waiver of right to appeal,
3) Recording of new specials and release of the existing specials on the property.
Steve Wilson of Schaefer Development, proponent, spoke to the special assessments
on the property. The existing specials have been levied as a single lump sum on
the property and the request is to divide those on the 12 individual lots. The
request is only for the amount contributable to the special assessments and would
include the principal as well as the interest that has been accruing at the rate
of 11.5% with a 4% penalty. The request does not constitute a subsidy but is a
different way to make payment. The City has the same assurance of payment with
the specials placed on the 12 lots as it would if the specials were left on the
single parcel. The reallocation of the special assessments will allow for the
construction of a housing development which will be marketable, thus enabling the
City to collect in full for the unpaid specials, with interest and penalty.
Member Kelly asked what type of building materials would be used for the project.
Mr. Wilson said they would be cedar siding and brick. The street scape would be
varied by changing the roof lines and the entrances from the front of the garage
to the side of the garage to break up the monotony.
Tom Benson, 6707 Vernon Avenue, said he represented the Vernon Woods Homeowners
Association who are not objecting to the development but have some reservations.
He presented a listing of those concerns which included density, wooded area,
sound barrier; lighting, retaining wall, taxes and special assessment, and
completion.
In response to the concerns of Vernon Woods residents, Mr. Wilson observed that
the proposal initially approved was for 15 two -story units which would be more
massive. That would also apply to the 10 unit project proposed previously. He
argued that the townhomes would protect against sound from the crosstown highway
better than the trees. The wooded area will receive particular attention so that
as many trees will be saved as can be and the proposed grade will be the same as
the existing grade. The light standard on the crosstown is similar to the one
behind the Clark development to the east and has been no problem. The retaining
wall will be engineered for safety and durability. Lots 1 and 2 do not make the
density more than the site can handle and a buffer will be left.
Mayor Richards asked about the density on the Clark development to the east.
Planner Larsen said that was double bungalows and was approximately 4.5 units per
acre compared to the subject proposal at 3.5 per acre.
Member Smith asked if there was a way to facilitate the cash flow and accommodate
the developer and yet maintain leverage on the whole development. Attorney
Erickson stated that the present statute allows the City to allocate on a per lot
basis if it makes the determination that the recovery of the special assessment
ultimately is not jeopardized. The City could ask for security such as a letter
of credit.
Mayor Richards commented that if the Council approves the project the City should
look to payment of the specials as a whole and not put the City at risk by
segregating and placing the specials on each lot. As to density, he indicated
support for a total of 10 units instead of 12 as proposed.
Member Smith moved preliminary rezoning to PRD -2 Planned Residence District and
preliminary plat approval, subject to: 1) Maximum of 10 units, 2) Surety bond for
payment of special assessments, 3) Waiver of right to appeal special assessments,
4) Final rezoning, 5) Final plat approval, 6) Subdivision dedication, and 7)
Engineering specifications for retaining walls, with First Reading of the
ordinance and adoption of the resolution as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A35
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PRD -2 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT
FROM R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (PRD -2) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6,
Township 116 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described
as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Northeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 709.1 feet more or less to a
point which is distant 814.5 feet North of the Southwest corner of said
Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence Easterly on a deflection
angle to the left of 87 degrees 40 minutes a distance of 676.3 feet; thence
North parallel with the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter to the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
thence West along said North line to the point of beginning, which lies
Northeasterly of the Northerly line of County Road No. 62.
The extent of the R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District is reduced by removing
the property described above from the R -2 District."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR SHADOW HILLS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "SHADOW HILLS ", platted by Robert E. Hanson and Suzanne F.
Hanson, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council
of April 16, 1990, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for First Reading of the ordinance and adoption of the resolution was
seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted; resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR BUILDING EXPANSION - OPUS CORPORATION/WESTERN
NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE (5350 WEST 78TH ST & 5309 INDUSTRIAL BLVD) Affidavits
of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
presented the request for Final Development Plan approval for building expansion
for Opus Corporation and Western National Mutual Insurance generally located at
Bush Lake Road and Edina Industrial Boulevard, north of 78th Street.
Western National Mutual Insurance currently occupies the 32,400 square foot office
building at 5350 West 78th Street. East of Western National at 5309 Edina
Industrial Boulevard is a 25,725 square foot multi- tenant office /warehouse
building. Both parcels are zoned Planned Industrial District, PID. Together the
parcels measure 4.069 acres in area.
The proponents are requesting approval of a plan to remove the multi- tenant
building and add approximately 38,000 square feet of office to the existing
Western National building. The addition would be two stories with some parking
under a portion of the second floor on the north side similar to the existing
building. Currently, at the Western National building parking is approximately
20 stalls below the ordinance requirement. Employees often park along the drive
aisle adjacent to Edina Industrial Boulevard.
Recently, Edina Industrial Boulevard was widened and approximately a quarter of an
acre measuring 21 feet at the widest point was taken by Hennepin County for
expansion. The taking reduced the parking setback and eliminated area for parking
expansion. There are other non - conforming features which would be addressed by
the following elements of the proposed plan:
1) Reconfiguration of the parking lot to add 172 parking stalls to comply
with ordinance requirements;
2) Provision of a loading area out of the drive aisles and screened from
right of way lines;
3) Upgrading of landscaping;
4) Relocation of the southwest curb cut east to an appropriate distance from
the intersection;
5) Removal of asphalt and building and replacement with additional
greenspace and building at a conforming setback.
$chaefer
VELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, LTD.
2581 Co. Rd. 74 (Old Hwy. 15)
St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301
(612) 252.7345
April 11, 1990
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Ridgeview Hills Detached Townhomes
Dear City Council Members:
Schaefer Development is proposing to develop twelve detached
townhomes on the property located north of Vernon Court and East
of Vernon Avenue. The home will be thirty two feet wide
containing approximately 1600 square feet on lots typically
having 54 feet of roadway frontage.
The design of the home will be one story, offering a living
room, dining room, kitchen, formal dining area, master bedroom
suite, master bath, bedroom /den, guest bathroom and laundry room
on one level. The interior will feature ten foot walls,
vaulted /volume ceilings, skylights and fireplace. The exterior
will be built with a combination of brick and cedar siding. The
streetscape will vary through the use of both hip and gable end
roof types, detail changes in the elevations and garage doors
able to be placed on either the front or side of the home. The
base price of the home will be approximately $175,000.00
The property has had two other proposals previously approved
by the City. The first one consisted of 15 townhomes in four
buildings. Each two story townhome was 32 feet wide with 20 feet
between buildings. The second proposal was designed for 5 two
story twin homes with 20 feet between each of these buildings.
Schaefer Development's proposal improves upon the previously
approved plans by reducing the mass of the buildings through the
use of one story buildings instead of two story units. Also, by
separating each unit, there becomes a landscaped greenspace
between each uni -t, providing for a larger number and more
frequent visual breaks through the development.
In addition to the issues of rezoning and subdivision I also
wish for you to consider the method of allocation and payment of
Page 2
special assessments which have been levied against the property.
Hennepin County currently shows approximately $205,000.00 in
special assessments, interest and penalties on this property from
previous years. The County, at the.request of the City of Edina,
will remove this amount from the property tax statement. The
amount. of $205,000.00 plus the future payments for special
assessments in the amount of approximately $40,000.00 for a total
of approximately $245,000.00 can then be divided equally over the
twelve proposed- lots. The responsibility for collection of this
special assessment on each lot can be returned to the County,
with payments made over a five year term and interest continuing
to accrue at an 11 1/2 % annual rate.
This plan provides no less security for the City of Edina in
the collection of the amount owed to the City for the
installation of the public improvements on Vernon Court. It does
provide what seems to be a fair and equitable way for each lot to
assume responsibility for improvements to each.
Thank you for your favorable consideration.
Sincerely,
Steve Wilson
Real Estate Development Officer
SW:smr
LOCATION MAP
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER Z -90 -4 and 5 -90 -2
L O C A TI O N Vernon Court (north side of Vernon Court)
REQUEST Construct a 12 Unit Detached Townhouse Development
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MARCH 28, 1990
Z -90 -4 R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2,
Planned Residence District.. Schaefer Development
0
S -90 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval. Shadow Hill. Schaefer
Development
The subject property is zoned R -2 and is .platted with five double bungalow lots.
Prior to the current zoning the Commission and Council approved a PRD -2 zoning
for 15 townhouse units. Both of these concepts failed'in the marketplace.
A rezoning petition has been received for a PRD -2 zoning to allow for the
construction of 12 "detached" townhomes. The development concept is new to
Edina. It combines elements of single family detached housing with elements of
townhouse design and management. Each unit will have an individual private lot,
making it work like many small lot single family neighborhoods in the City. The
units, however, will have common design and materials with a townhouse type
association for maintenance.
The units are planned as one -story units with all living spaces on one floor
measuring approximately 1600 square feet. Each unit has an attached two -car
garage. Exterior materials would be wood siding with brick accents.
The proposed development complies with 'all ordinance requirements except, for the
side yard setback on Lot 12. A 10 foot setback is provided where a 20 foot
setback is required. Thus, a 10 foot sideyard setback variance is requested.
Recommendation
This is a very difficult site to develop. The combination of the hill on the
north side and freeway to the south are very limiting. In the last couple years
two different development concepts have failed. This proposal may have a better
chance to succeed than the previous proposals. Primarily because the offering
price will be lower, acknowledging the sites limitations. We believe the
proposal has merit and should receive preliminary approval subject to the
following conditions.
1. Final Rezoning
2. Final Plat
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Engineering Specifications for Retaining Wall
SHADOW HILL PRELIMINARY. PLAT
�I:° .�. °I�w.�M ,01,1.. ;t:t..1,. °I =Kt,e... rer:,.•.e
v::.1.. ee �:loea•: °:`uw�:el. o e li.`::
. v.t.�aue..�a,e vo•.1 i:.e�� . Lw
a::t.eetil:.5 n.e was e1 eM 9wrn...e ee et .ua :e :.�° : a:
t 1 /.: cMne. 4aalr e M I.2t let II
:�oe9 t...e .e • °:.�:• .oa:::.K:teeel sl:�sw::.e�C.o.: I. i... °:
tle.1.e9. .n.er`° 11•• w.cn.o...0 oe eM w.cM .r I.e. e1 eM eewer
-----------7-------------
I f_
I
I
I
1 I Lf
I
I
Sad' '
1I N 2ND .VENUE
aNONE 16121251495
.r.�.4°.cr au.e1 �^orc M•F.a.�e
SHADOW HILL PRELIMINARY PLAT
T•[ � rs o [M n r[ et [M Nor w•[ 1/t a! Lstlen f, tom•nap
1pllw• "n••elmlM]lM /D! rM f[nr•r lnce D•l IYrlel «, «l /f' t t
vf� ` le�ae�.iow� ns`I.« oe ue`ip a u[ of
b [ v`.'ais•nc• oe ) «.1 i «e'er r 1•« [ . pe�l�net.nlrn 1•
auu s`ili.l en[ br[e pe t pf «le brtWUt of et
• [«[a e.t I II«uan •bU [e « 1•!t pt tl
G•erN `[0 •lnu[••, 41•s•np o! f)f[I f«tI sMnc• rum iq brte «r•ll•1
er[M•«`l /[ • el•[•b• a!
f1•�f `!••1['" r l••• r n 11« e! ulC t «tl« { [e•ne• w
npn ua 'un• eai� •M.` ee u•.f a «[ : 1... [
D«ueminD. wltnn 11•. Per[n...ur +r oe sM breMrlr +��• ee [« tepw`q
bW.
_____— __— _T-------------
l)
I
It/
lj
U
U
9
no `0tl`0tl
J�OCIIII`'`
1/ N MD .VENUE
PN ER12I2 "
ra' PRIVACY FENCE
REfAWWG WALL C1= VARIABLE I-EIGHf
_ .'�" ROCK GARDEN WITH VARCUS
1 !� � % ° Z' RFD MAPLE / Z- GALLON PL.AAJfs
PATIO
r „im_
(.'PRIVACY FENCE
v
0
OO LUNG 59H
' � O
DOG WccD 0
OKIrCtEN i N. DEJ
VEST.
DWWG 12 B
RY ' ! PRIVETS I -12 GALLCN
PRCPERIY LWE
• Z" CXABAPPEL
GARAGE SET BACK LWE
----------- ".------ - - - - =: ---------------------------------
ill Z -12 GAL. SPREADWG
DRIVEWAY YEWS FPCYERIY LINE
4' GREEN RE LINDEN
Z CCLCQADO SPRUCE
8' TALL
° FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1 /! ve• • 1'-0• b
�chaefer
VELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, LTD.
2581 Co. Rd. 74 (Old Hwy. 15)
St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301
(612) 252.7345
March 16, 1990
Edina Planning Commission
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Ridgeview Hills Detached Townhomes
Dear Commissioners:
Schaefer Development is proposing to develop twelve detached
townhomes on the property located north of Vernon court and East
of Vernon Avenue. The homes will be thirty two feet wide
containing approximately 1600 square feet on lots typically
having 54 feet of roadway frontage.
The design of the home will be one story, offering a living
room, dining room, kitchen, informal dining area, master bedroom
suite, master bath, bedroom /den, guest bathroom and laundry room
on one level. The interior will feature ten foot walls,
vaulted /volume ceilings, skylights and fireplace. The exterior
will be built with a combination of brick and cedar siding. The
streetscape will vary through the use of both hip and gable end
roof types, detail changes in the elevations and garage doors
Page 2
able to be placed on either the front or side of the home. The
base price of the home will be approximately $175,000.00.
The property has had two other proposals previously approved
by the City. The first one consisted of 15 townhomes in four
buildings. Each two story townhome was 32 feet wide with 20 feet
between buildings— The second proposal was designed for 5 two
story twin homes with 20 feet between each of these buildings.
Schaefer Development's proposal improves upon the previously
approved plans by reducing the mass of the buildings through the
use of one story buildings instead of two story units. Also, by
separating each unit, there becomes a landscaped greenspace
between each unit, providing for a larger number and more
frequent visual breaks through the development.
I look forward to discussing the proposal with you and
receipt of your favorable consideration.
Sincerely,
Steve Wilson
Real Estate Development Officer
SW:smr
THE
NYBECB
JOHNSON
BOUQUET
VAN VALBENBUBG
OHNS°TAD &
SNWM P.A.
Agenda Item III.B
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY. MINNEAPOLIS (EmNA), MINNESOTA 55435
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
GLENN G. NYBECK
MARSH J. HALBERD -
OF COUNSEL,
GORDON V. JOHNSON
WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM
JACK W. CAR' N
JOHN K. BOUQUET
THOMAS R. KELLEY
RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
DENNIS M. PATRICK
HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK G. OHNSTAD
PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD D. SMITH
DAVID J. Mr-GEE
June.15, 1990
The Honorable Frederick Richards
City of Edina -
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Schaefer Development
Dear Mayor Richards and Members
of the Edina City Council
This matter is back before you with three requests:.
1. Preliminary Plat approval.
2. Zoning to permit the construction of 12 units
of detached townhomes.
3. For a Resolution cancelling the current,special
assessment and re- assessing the same equally over
the 12 lots.
This matter was before the Planninq Commission and the recommend-
ation of the Planning Staff was that approval should be granted upon the
following conditions.
1. Final rezoning.
2. Final Plat.
3. Subdivision dedication.
4. Engineering specifications for retaining wall.
`i
-2-
We accept all of those conditions.
As you will recall, this matter has. been before the Edina City
Council and Planning Commission numerous times over the last number of
years. In more recent times this matter has been approved for as many as
15 units and we are asking for 12.
It -is- the intention of Schaefer Development to build on this
property as they have represented to you. They would start construction on
the first unit within 90 days and it is their hope and expectation that the
entire project would be completed within 18 months.
I refer you to the following:
1. Staff report of March 28, 1990.
2. Letter from Schaefer to the Planning Commission
of March 16, 1990.
3. Copy of the Preliminary.Plat of Shadow Hill.
4. A diagram of one of the units of Ridgeview Hills Town-
houses which would be built upon the project.
Recently you heard this matter and indicated that you would
approve 10 units. We are asking for 12 as 10 is not economic.
As you are aware this is a difficult parcel to develop because of
the hill to the north and the Crosstown Highway to the south. We ask for
your approval'of 12 units.
ments.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
As to the taxes, I am enclosing copies of the following docu-
1. 1990 tax statement. You will notice there that it
refers to delinquent taxes and that means the special
assessments.
h
j.
-3-
2. Letter from the County to Edina Assessor's office
showing the balance due on these special assessments as
of January 8, 1990 of $205,000.
3. Letter of May 11, 1990 from the County to Mr. Hoke, the
- attorney for Mr. Hanson, indicating that they have
already received $31,653 which is being held. That
represents $17,800 for general tax pursuant to Purchase
Agreement and $13,800 for.1989 general taxes.
4. "County Auditor's Receipt" which in fact is an agreement
to sell the property back to Mr. Hanson (Bradley
Investment) for a total price of $238,000. That
encompasses the special assessments and some of the
regular tax. We have paid on that approximately $74,000
and that is the reason for the balance of some $205,000
shown in the January letter from the County.
I should point out that in the Purchase Agreement between Mr.
Hanson and Schaefer Development, that the contemplation is that the special
assessment taxes be divided and spread out evenly over the 12 lots. That
agreement further provides that as each lot is taken down from the Purchase
Agreement that the proportionate amount of special assessments would be
paid by Schaefer Development. We ask that these be spread over five years
rather than the current obligation of four years.,
There is another provision in the contract that if Schaefer
Development only develops a part of the subdivision and then decides not to
proceed, that all plans, drawings, models, sketches and architectural
drawings as well as engineering data will be turned over to Mr. Hanson so
that he or another developer he would employ would then proceed to complete
the project.
The point I make is that two people here are interested in making
certain that these taxes are paid.
It is my understanding that the normal practice in Edina is that
when a development plat is approved that the specials that have been
assessed for the entire plat are then automatically divided among the lots
in that subdivision. Here we ask for your approval to that concept.
-4-
My impression, after conferring with the representatives of
Schaefer Development and of Mr. Hanson, and of seeing the financial
statements of Schaefer Development, that this project will go forward and
that the specials will be paid.
To me this is a procedure to assure that the project can be
developed economically and that the specials and regular taxes will in fact
be paid.
I might further state that it is my understanding that all of the
current real estate taxes have been paid and that the only delinquency is
in the special assessments. As I indicated $31,000 plus is already in
escrow. The balance would be reassessed and spread over five (5) years.
Certainly if there are any questions I would appreciate hearing
from you.
Mr. Hoke is the attorney for Mr. Hanson, and he verifies the
correctness of the tax figures.
JVV:jd
cc: Tom Erickson
Ken Rosland
Craig Larsen
Scott Hoke
Yours truly;
.tames Van Valken�Urg
r
1{
O ei
O
t4 �yl
• ��R}rf11/.. r� •
�BBO
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Date: JUNE 18, 1990
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 824,
REQUIRING A LICENSE FOR
RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKIN
LOTS.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A33,
ADDING LICENSE FEE FOR
RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING
LOTS.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #_1U. D. 1.2.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
7
To Cou
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolut
7
Ordinan
❑
Discuss
ncil
ion
ce
ion
Second reading of Ordinance No. 824, to include suggested revisions to Section
17 and 18. Second reading of Ordinance No. 171 -A33, establishing,a license fee for
restricted access parking lots.
INFO /BACKGROUND
Attached is the proposed ordinance as revised and approved by the Council on
June 14, 1990.and Ordinance No. 171 -A33 adding a license fee for restricted access lots.
Also attached is a suggested change to the Ordinance provisions addressing access
to buildings without the need to take a claim check or encounter a pay booth.
The revision would requi-re all lots to provide such access. In cases where such
access is not feasible, the Ordinance provides.for a variance process. Variance
applications would be heard by the City Council. Staff recommends adoption of
the Ordinance with the suggested changes to Sections 17 and 18.
Proposed Revised
Sections 17 and 18
of
Ordinance No. 824
(Restricted Access Parking Lot)
Sec. 17. Access to Building. Each restricted access parking lot shall
provide at least one driveway through the parking lot (which may be one -way)
giving clear access to the building or buildings served by the parking lot, with an
entrance to and exit from the driveway directly to a public street, so that persons can
be dropped off and picked up at such building or buildings, at any time, without a
claim check and without going through a motor vehicle reservoir area.
Sec. 18. Variances. Any restricted access parking lot licensee, and any
person applying for a restricted access parking lot license, who or which desires a
variance or variances from any of the requirements of this ordinance may file. a
petition for such variance or variances with the Director. The petition shall be, on
forms provided by the Director. The petition shall be accompanied by plans which
clearly illustrate, to the satisfaction of the Director, the changes from the plot plan or
from the requirements of this ordinance which will result if the variance or
variances are granted. The petition together with said plans, and the report of the
Director, shall be submitted to the Council within thirty (30) days after it is
submitted to the Director. Provided, however, if the variance petition is by a person
applying for a restricted access parking lot license, then the Director shall not submit
such variance petition, plans and reports to the Council until the Director has first
determined that the application for a license is complete and all requirements of this
ordinance have been complied with, except for the requirements described in and to
be varied by the variance petition, but the petition shall be submitted to the Council
within thirty (30) days after such determination is made. The Council shall hear
and decide such petition within sixty (60) days after submission of the petition to the
Council. The Council may grant the variances if it finds that the strict enforcement
of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to
the petitioner's property and not created by the petitioner, and that the grant of the
variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The act of
creating a restricted access parking lot, by itself, shall not be deemed a circumstance
created by the petitioner so as to disallow the grant of the requested variance or
variances. The Council, in granting a variance, may impose conditions to insure
compliance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and to protect adjacent
properties.
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202)857 -0700
3 ORACECEURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01-929-3334
36, RUE THONCHET
75009 PARIS, FRANCE
01- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG HONG - --
852- 5-8612555
Mr. Craig Larsen
City Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55420
DORSEY & WHITIgEY
A PssTNHBSHIP INCLUDING PaGP63SIONLL CO@P09ATIONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
FAX (612) 340 -2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
June 7, 1990
Re: Ordinance No. 824 - Restricted Access Parking Lots
Dear Craig:
340 FIRST NATIONAL HANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55900
(5071288 -3136
315 FIRST NATIONAL HANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475-0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
ORSAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406) 721 -6025
On further reflection after the council meeting discussion on June 4,
and based on our discussions, I have prepared the enclosed revisions of Sections 17
and 18 of Ordinance No. 824. Those sections now require, in Section 17, that the
licensee provide access to the building for dropping off and picking up passengers
without going through a reservoir area or using a claim check. It also provides, in
the revised Section 18, that if a licensee or proposed licensee desires to vary from
any of the terms and requirements of the Ordinance, that a variance petition be filed
together.with a plan and that then be reported to the council for its action. The
council action would be based upon the same bases as variances in the zoning
ordinance (i.e., undue hardship and unique conditions), and the council could
impose conditions.
It seems to me proposed revisions are preferable to the existing
Sections 17 and 18 for the following reasons:
1. It provides a mechanism for varying the ordinance requirements
which is familiar by virtue of its use in the zoning ordinance;
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Craig Larsen
June 7, 1990
Page 2
2. It establishes standards which are more definite than the existing
one in Section 17 relative to whether or not the required drop -off and pick -up lane
is "feasible ";
3. It removes from the Director the difficult task of deciding whether
or not a clear driveway should be required or the 15 minute grace period allowed,
and places it more appropriately with the council;
4. It allows for more flexibility in determining exactly how the access to
the building requirement, or other requirements of the ordinance, may be met;
5. The variance procedure would apply to all requirements of the
ordinance and not just to the drop -off and pick -up drive aisle; and
6. The combination of the "undue hardship" provision and the
allowance of conditions to be imposed, should allow the City to comply with the
balancing test required by the courts to make an ordinance effective retroactively.
If the proposed revision of Sections 17 and 18 meet with your approval,
I assume they can be delivered to the council for its review and action in connection
with the second reading of the ordinance.
I also enclose herewith a clean copy of the ordinance as approved at the
first reading on June 4, together with a copy of that same ordinance with the changes
made at the June 4 meeting blacklined for your and the council's convenience.
Would you please deliver these over to Marc Daehn for her use.
Of course, if you have any questions relative to the proposed revised
Sections 17 and 18, please call me.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:kks
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
Marcella . Daehn, City Clerk
nevi.sC.d ca-7-110
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING LICENSES AND
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED
ACCESS PARKING LOTS, AND IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions.
"City" means the City of Edina, Minnesota.
"Council" means the City Council of the City.
"Director" means the Director of Public Works and Engineering of the
City of Edina, or his designated representative.
"Free parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is unrestricted.
"Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not
deriving its power from overhead wires.
"Motor vehicle reservoir area" means the area at the entrance of a
restricted access parking lot between the public street right -of -way line and the point
at which access to the parking lot is restricted.
"Parking lot" means any area with ten (10) or more parking spaces used
for the parking or storing of motor vehicles, including, without limitation, parking
ramps as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, which is operated for the benefit of
persons such as, but not limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons, clients
or visitors.
"Restricted access parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is
restricted by mechanical or other means.
"Zoning Ordinance" means the Ordinance No. 825 of the City as it may
now or hereafter be amended, revised or supplemented and including any successor
ordinance to said Ordinance No. 825.
Sec. 2. License Required. No person shall own or operate, or in any
way offer to operate, a restricted access parking lot without a license for that parking
lot first being obtained pursuant to this ordinance.
Sec. 3. License Procedure and Enforcement Penalty. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of
such licenses.
Sec. 4. Application for License. Any person desiring a license to own
or operate a restricted access parking lot shall file an application with the City Clerk
on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall contain, in addition to the
information required by Ordinance No. 141 of the City, a plot plan, the name of the
owner of the parking lot and the name of the manager or operator of the parking lot
if different from the owner. The plot plan shall show such information as is
required by the Zoning Ordinance for the parking lot to be licensed, and by other
applicable codes, ordinances or regulations of the City, including, without
limitation, all entrances and exits, the location of motor vehicle reservoir areas, the
interior circulation system of the parking lot, the dimensions and grade of the
parking lot and of all entrances and exits, drainage from the parking lot, the location
and design of attendant buildings, the location of emergency vehicle access, the
location and size of self- service ticket vendors, landscaping or screening as required
by the Zoning Ordinance, the location, size and shape of all signs, the location,
height and kind of outdoor lights, and the location of the free access driveway as and
if required by Section 17(a) hereof. No application shall be considered complete
unless the plot plan for the parking lot has been determined by the Director to
comply with all requirements and standards of this ordinance and other applicable
ordinances, codes and regulations of the City.
Sec. 5. Procedure; Approval by Director. Prior to the issuance of a
license, the Director shall determine if the parking lot complies with all the
provisions and standards of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances, codes
and regulations of the City, including, without limitation, the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance. If all such provisions are met, and proper application has been
made, the City may grant the license.
Sec. 6. License Fee. A license fee shall be paid with the application and
otherwise as provided in Ordinance No. 171 of the City. A
Sec. 7. Expiration Date. All licenses issued under this ordinance shall
expire on the 31st day of December following its date of issuance.
Sec. 8. Insurance Required. Each licensee under this ordinance at all
times shall keep in full force and effect a public liability insurance policy written by
an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota, in the following
minimum amounts: fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) property damage; one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000) for injury or death of one person; and five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) for injuries or death from each occurrence. A certificate
of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk with the al2Flication.
2
Sec. 9. Revocation, Suspension, Denial of License. A license granted
under this ordinance may be revoked, suspended or denied pursuant to the
provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City. Violations of any of the terms of this
ordinance shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a license.
Sec. 10. Inspection Required; Notice, Correction of Violations. At such
times as deemed necessary by the City, the Director shall cause every restricted access
parking lot located within the City to be inspected. In the event a restricted access
parking lot is -found not in compliance with any of the provisions of this ordinance
or of any other applicable ordinance, code or regulation of the City, the City may
proceed to enforce this ordinance pursuant to the procedures set out in this
ordinance, or Ordinance No. 141 of the City or pursuant to the procedures set out in
the ordinance, code or regulation which is not being complied with.
Sec. 11. Motor Vehicle Reservoir. A restricted access parking lot shall
have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each entrance from a public right -of -way.
The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot shall have at least
four (4) eight and one half (8 1/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces. The motor vehicle
reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint and shall not be
used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles or for any other use which
hinders, restricts or prevents use of such area as a motor vehicle reservoir.
Sec. 12. Placement of Motor Vehicles. No motor vehicle shall be
parked in a manner that would prevent reclamation of any motor vehicle upon
request. If claim checks are used to restrict access to the restricted access parking lot,
then at no time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the
opportunity to obtain his motor vehicle, provided the driver has paid accumulated
parking charges.
Sec. 13. Emergency Vehicle Access. Each restricted access parking lot
shall be designed or operated in a manner approved by the Director so as to allow
emergency vehicles to access the building or buildings served by the restricted access
parking lot at any time without a claim check and without going through a motor
vehicle reservoir area. Such emergency vehicle access at all times shall be kept free
of motor vehicles, snow, ice, fill, rubbish, or any other material or thing which will
or may block such access.
Sec. 14. Claim Check. When a motor vehicle is left for parking in a
restricted access parking lot, the driver will be furnished with a claim check on
which shall be printed the full name of the operator, the address of the parking lot,
the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and.the date and time
of issuance of the claim check.
3
Sec. 15. Attendant Buildings. Attendant buildings shall be located only
at exits to restricted, access parking lots and shall be located no closer than twenty (20)
feet from the street right -of -way. Minimum standards for the materials and general
design of attendant buildings shall be as follows:
(a) Attendant buildings shall have a minimum floor area
sufficient to accommodate the normal complement of
parking lot operating personnel. The building shall be
- enclosed and weather tight. It shall be equipped with an
operable and lockable door and window. It shall be set on
a curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6) inches
above the adjacent lot paving. Service connections shall
be in accordance with applicable codes and ordinances of
the City.
(b) Exterior wall finishes shall be one, or a combination of,
the following: face brick, natural stone, glass or
prefinished metal panels.
(c) All building plans for attendant buildings shall be
submitted to the Building Official of the City to determine
compliance with this ordinance and all other applicable
codes, ordinances and regulations of the City.
(d) Attendant buildings shall be kept clean and in good
condition and state of repair at all times.
Sec. 16. Signs; Charges Limited To Those on Sign.
(a) Every restricted access parking lot licensee shall maintain
information signs in the parking lot as required by this section.
(b) There shall be a sign at each entrance to the parking lot,
located not further into the parking lot than the point at which access
to the parking lot is restricted. Each such sign shall show the name and
telephone number of the licensee, the license. number under which the
parking lot is operating, and if charges are made, the rates charged for
parking or storing motor vehicles on said parking lot. Such signs shall
state the minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12 hours and the
maximum rate for 24 hours, and if there are no maximum rates, the
sign shall so state. Such signs shall also state all special rates, including
any weekly or monthly rates. No change in the posted rates shall be
effective until notice of such change has been given not less than 24
4
hours prior to the effective time of the change by posting the same on
the parking lot entrance signs using letters and numbers at least equal
in size to they other letters and numbers on such sign. Such signs shall
not exceed two feet by three feet, shall be permanently mounted with a
minimum distance to the bottom of the sign of three feet, and a
maximum distance to the bottom of the sign of five feet, and shall
conform to all City codes, ordinances and regulations regarding
erection and construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be approved by
the Director including color, size of lettering, placement of information
and identification symbols. In no case shall any letters or numerals be
less than two inches in height.
(c) No sign graphics of any type shall-be attached to or displayed
on any attendant building except that a sign may be attached or
incorporated into the building design which specifies the hours of
attendant duty, the location of keys after attendant hours, the name,
phone number and license number of the licensee, and any other
information essential to the normal operation of the lot.
(d) All restricted access parking lots which engage in towing of
unauthorized motor vehicles shall post such practice on a sign at each
lot entrance. In addition, each such sign shall include the name and
telephone number of the tower used. Letters on such signs shall be a
least one (1) inch in height. Such signs shall not exceed one foot by two
feet, and shall be located on the same support or supports as the
entrance sign required by subsection (b) of this section, but below such
entrance sign.
(e) No restricted access parking lot licensee shall charge, or allow
to be charged, any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle than is
stated on the entrance signs.
(f) All signs shall be kept in good condition and state of repair at
all times.
Sec. 17. Access to Building. it
(a) Each restricted access parking lot shall provide at least one
driveway through the parking lot (which may be one -way) giving cl_�
access to the building or buildings served by the parking lot, with an
entrance to and exit from the driveway directly to a public street, so that
persons can be dropped off and picked up at such building or buildings,
at any time, without a claim check and without going through a motor
vehicle reservoir area. However, if, in the opinion of the Director,
5'
such a driveway is not feasible, or will be unsafe and therefore is not
provided for in the parking lot, then the provisions of subsection (b) of
this section- shall apply.
(b) No licensee shall charge, or allow to be charged, any parking
or other fee for any motor vehicle which leaves the restricted access
parking lot within fifteen (15) minutes of the time of entry of such
vehicle into such parking lot as shown on the claim check issued to
such vehicle.
Sec. 18. Alterations. No restricted access parking lot licensee shall
make, or allow to be made, any alterations or modifications in the parking lot which
varies from the plot plans approved by the Director pursuant to this ordinance for
that restricted access parking lot, without prior written approval of the Director.
Sec. 19: Unauthorized Use of Vehicles. No personnel of a restricted
access parking lot shall use or permit the use, for any purpose whatsoever, of any
motor vehicles left in such lot for parking unless authorized in writing by the
owner or person in charge of such ' vehicle.
Sec. 20. Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot. No restricted access
parking lot personnel shall transfer any motor vehicle to another parking lot
without the consent of the owner or person in charge . of said vehicle unless such
vehicle is in such lot without permission or payment.
Sec. 21. Prohibited Acts. The licensee of a restricted access parking lot
shall not permit the repairing (except in an emergency), dismantling or wrecking of
any motor vehicle, or the storage of any inoperable vehicles (as defined in
Ordinance No. 1031 of the City) on the parking lot.
Sec. 22. Retroactive Effect. It is intended that this ordinance be
effective retroactively. Therefore, any parking lot which is a restricted access parking
lot on the effective date of this ordinance, within 120 days of the effective date of this
ordinance, shall obtain a license under this ordinance for such parking lot, or cease
operation as a restricted access parking lot.
Sec. 23. Penal. Any person violating this ordinance shall be subject
to the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to penalties allowed by this ordinance.
,:l
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
7
Mayor
Phi Flew 2.3125rurtb8i.ii);, trvet
!litttteutt0 /is. 'tl.`• "ri i
H"Spitai surd lleaifbtar t, Nert Rr :c
(d2- i'1 /i i(t(r
felcx /1 9105 -6 1 iu; Fatt riot'
/iir b1_'- Cl-ii iri i
r 00m]
Mi L
130
-- IRE: Ordinance No. 824
E X11 aP EDINAL
We have reviewed a copy of the ordinance mailed to Bud Klein at
Fairview Southdale. The following are our ccmTients.
Section 5. This provision appears to us to be vague as to the
Director's power to approve or deny an application. We are concerned that
the ordinance does not delineate the requirements necessary to obtain a
license. The city's ability to refuse an application should be limited by
specific enumerated reasons.
Section 8. The city has chosen to single out restricted parking
lots. Non- restrictive lots do not fall under the ordinance's jurisdiction.
We concur that all public lots should be required to verify certain minimum
insurance levels, but we do not feel that only restricted lots should be
singled out. Unless there is a logical reason to regulate only restricted
lots, these regulations should either apply to every lot, or none at all.
Section 9. This section presents us with the most concerns. As it
reads, the section appears to grant the city the right to arbitrarily revoke
a license or deny an application.. This raises several potential problems
for lot owners. It appears an owner is faced with the prospect that the
city may pull a license for any violation without having a grace period to
remedy the violation. If the revocation, suspension or refusal to renew is
subject to Section 16 of Ordinance 141, our ocnfort level would be higher.
We would appreciate clarification on this point.
Section 16 (b). This section states that "such signs shall also
state all special rates, including any weekly or monthly rates ". We feel
that it is only necessary to publish public parking rates. We would like to
see this provision removed.
A further concern deals with the ordinance's effect on financing the
Medical Office Building on the Southdale campus. The ordinance, in the form
presented, may jeopardize the ability to complete the permanent financing
package.
There are several other issues raised by the proposed ordinance.
However, due to short notice, we are unable to discuss fully our concerns
and comments on these matters. We would appreciate your reviewing our
concerns prior to final consideration of the ordinance.
Sin
L`�' Zf Director,
Management and Development
a
ALL:men
Y
r�
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A33
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD LICENSE FEE FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the
following thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
AMOUNT
FEE NO.
824 6 Restricted Access Parking
Lot License
$500.00
28a -1
Renewals:
0 -50 parking spaces
$100.00
28a -2
51 -100 parking spaces
150.00
28a -3
101 -200 parking spaces
250.00
28a -4
Over 200 parking spaces
400.00
28a -5
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be
in full force and effect
immediately
upon
its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City clerk
Mayor
Fairview 2312 South Sixth Street
Hospital and Healthcare Services Minneapolis, MN 55454
612- 371 -6300
Telex 119105 7 615 05 Fairview Mps
Fax 612- 371 -6303
rm, 0
Lam] C= Cr ]OUR
RE: Ordinance No. 824
We have reviewed a copy of the ordinance mailed to Bud Klein at
Fairview Southdale. The following are our ccmTents.
Section 5. This provision appears to us to be vague as to the
Director's power to approve or deny an application. We are concerned that
the ordinance does not delineate the requirements necessary to obtain a
license. The city's ability to refuse an application should be limited by
specific enumerated reasons.
Section 8. The city has chosen to single out restricted parking
lots. Non- restrictive lots do not fall under the ordinance's jurisdiction.
We concur that all public lots should be required to verify certain minimum
insurance levels, but we do not feel that only restricted lots should be
singled out. Unless there is a logical reason to regulate only restricted
lots, these regulations should either apply to every lot, or none at all.
Section 9. This section presents us with the most concerns. As it
reads, the section appears to grant the city the right to arbitrarily revoke
a license or deny an application. This raises several potential problems
for lot owners. It appears an owner is faced with the prospect that the
city may pull a license for any violation without having a grace period to
remedy the violation. If the revocation, suspension or refusal to renew is
subject to Section 16 of Ordinance 141, our ccmfort level would be higher.
We would appreciate clarification on this point.
Section 16 (b). This section states that "such signs shall also
state all special rates, including any weekly or monthly rates ". We feel
that it is only necessary to publish public parking rates. We would like to
see this provision removed.
A further concern deals with the ordinance's effect on financing the
Medical office Building on the Southdale campus. The ordinance, in the form
presented, may jeopardize the ability to complete the pern-anent financing
package.
There are several other issues raised by the proposed ordinance.
However, due to short notice, we are unable to discuss fully our concerns
and cents on these matters. We would appreciate your reviewing our
concerns prior to final consideration of the ordinance.
Sin Zfan�
Director, Property 7
Management and Development
ALL:men
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: DAVID A. VELDE
Date: JUNE 18, 1990
Subject: AN ORDINANCE LICENSING
AND REGULATING THE SALE
OF CIGARETTES, IMPOSING
A PENALTY AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 1321.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #1V.
A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
El
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt proposed Ordinance No. 1322 as recommended by the Edina Community Health
Services Advisory Committee at their April 12, 1990, meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 1322
.AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE
SALE OF CIGARETTES, TERMINATING LICENSES FOR
EXISTING CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINES, IMPOSING
A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1321
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MRJNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Sec. 1. License Required. No person shall keep cigarettes for retail sale
in the City of Edina or sell cigarettes at retail in the City of Edina unless such person
shall have in effect a valid license to do so obtained from the City of Edina.
Sec. 2. License Procedure and Control; Penalties. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of
such licenses.
Sec. 3. Applications. The applicant shall state the following in the
application for a license in addition to the information required by Ordinance
No. 141:
(a) The applicant's name and business address;
(b) The telephone number at the business in the City of Edina
where cigarettes are to be sold; and
(c) The location or locations in the City of Edina where the sale
of cigarettes is proposed to be conducted.
Sec. 4. License Fee. The license fee shall be as provided in Ordinance
No. 171 of the City.
Sec. 5. Rules and Regulations.
(a) No license shall be issued for the sale of cigarettes at a
movable place of business.
(b) No person shall sell any cigarette to any person under the age
of 18 years.
(c) No person shall sell or keep for sale any cigarette containing
any controlled substance as defined in Ordinance No. 1014 of the City of
Edina, except nicotine or tobacco.
r
(d) No person shall be granted a license for, or permit, any
vending machine to be used to sell cigarettes to any person.
Sec. 6. Termination of Existing Licenses for Vending Machines. All
licenses previously issued by the City for vending machines to sell cigarettes in the
City of Edina are revoked as of July 1, 1990. License fees paid for such revoked
licenses shall be refunded pro rata based on the then remaining term of the license,
upon application made by the licensee for such refund.
Sec. 7. Violation to be Reported. The Chief of Police or his /her deputy
shall notify the City Manager or his /her designated representative of any violation
of any of the provisions of this ordinance.
Sec. 8. Pe_ nalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be subject to
the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to suspension or revocation of license as provided in
Ordinance No. 141, or impounding of a vending machine or machines.
Sec. 9. Repealer. Ordinance No. 1321 is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Sec. 10. Effective Date.This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
Mayor
Agenda Item IV.A
Coalition For Responsible Vending Sales
Mayor Frederick Richards
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Peggy Kelly
City.of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Jane Paulus
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
5101 Vernon Avenue South
Suite 400
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436
(612) 927 -8855
June 14, 1990
Council Member Jack Rice
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Glenn Smith
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Proposed Cigarette Vending Machine Ordinance
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
Please recall that I wrote to-you recently regarding the
cigarette vending machine ordinance to be heard by the city
council on June 18, 1990. This letter is to provide you with
additional information regarding the sale of cigarettes.
For your information, I am enclosing copies of the following
documents:
1. Letter from Minter - Weisman Co.
2. Cigarette tax data report.
3. Sign for cigarette vending machines.
Questions have been raised as to whether cigarette sales have
decreased since some municipalities have adopted restrictions on
cigarette vending machines. We have researched this issue and
obtained information from The Tobacco Institute on cigarette sales
as well as information from the largest cigarette wholesale
distributor in the State of Minnesota. According to both of these
sources of information, cigarette sales have not declined, but
rather remained steady or even increased.
Member Organizations
• Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council Minnesota Operators of Music & Amusement
• Minnesota Candy & Tobacco Distributors Association • Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association, Inc.
• Greater Minneapolis Hospitality Council
June 14, 1990
Page 2
Also, as I stated in my previous letter to you, the Coalition
for Responsible Vending Sales urges you to adopt the state law
recently signed by Governor Perpich. This law should be effective
in significantly restricting the sale of cigarettes to minors.
This new law becomes effective August 1, 1990. As a part of the
implementation of the law, the enclosed sign is being placed on
cigarette vending machines to inform a customer that the machine
will not dispense cigarettes unless an employee activates the
electronic locking device to allow the machine to dispense
cigarettes.
I thank you for your consideration of this information.
Very truly yours,
SNELLING, CBRISTENSEN & BRIANT, P.A.
Thomas A. Briant
Attorney at Law
TAB /dm
Enclosures
cc: Coalition for Responsible Vending Sales
0
MINTER - WEISMAN CO.
1035 NATHAN LANE NORTH. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA55441.612/545 -3706. WHOLESALERS SINCE 1932
May 17, 1990
To Whom It May Concern:
Minter - Weisman Company, the Largest Cigarette Distributor in
the State of Minnesota, has been asked to make a study on
the effect of the recently past Local and State Restrictive
Vending Machine Laws.
We have found through the study that no decrease in
Cigarette Sales have occurred, since the inactment of these
Laws.
MINTER- WEISMAN COMPANY
Leroy Kieffer,
VICE PRESIDENT SALES
64 ... - .
DISTRIBUTORS OF FINE CANDIES, TOBACCOS. CIGARETTES. CIGMi )- SUNDRIES
THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE MONTHLY STATE CIMRETTE TAX REPORT - CALENDAR
WASHINGTON DC ---- •--- •........__ _ __-
__
FES 1990
EXCIS -P1 GE5 TAx;DINGRCIE � PECENT 1/90--� -pPAACKAGES TAXED PcRHANCE EST. SS
ST RATE TAX * (ADD 000) (ADD 000) CHANGE (ADD 000)
-• ��-- .... - -- ......... .. ......_ (ADD
AK 29.0 = 5,707,317 34, % - --•• -- •-- •• -•• - -- -- •- • - -• - -- - -••••-
964 929 2 22, 24 -,3 77,4 ,gyp 16 S 1,694,910
45 890 AR 0 • 16. 47.07 49i -17: N /A
CA5 :0 .5; 8;79 1; 19' 49 22
7 149, 19 �;15 3 ,,'l ,7 0,618
2�,� ,x.20 ,�;��
CO 100:0 4:11f ; 109 � 2 ; 97 ; 1 •3:67 4 ; 12; -S; 2,428,151
CT 44 Q 9 . 50 147 4. N A
dQ p t6 346 oio
FL 34. 24,3 %; 101; 1 112, 0 •t0 :00a 2 ;017 229;119 . -2 :66 8,538 ;684
GA 12.0 1 11 156 35 760 64 753 -44. 76; 1fo, 925 :tq.9 1, 56,240
HI 38 :0 j'' j' pp S. 20 4 ;004 to 39 g f IL ' 57 :40 12, , 2 4:9 5
IN �:g �; � ; ; -1:� 183; -1: 2 - x- 5
KKIYA 1.$0 5,512 p4�333 1 16 581 7. 44 pjff LA '1 3 I;�7�0;4p413 �f 6• ��q75 •6.64 79;58 10:21 1,g18'gAO1
HE 31.0 3,111,241 106 ;770 •12.72 208906 21,030 -16. 8 1;420;380
,6 '3 A 722,592
NO 13.0 4, P71 ,160 33,632 31,671 $.19 67,56? 66,68 1. N/A
MA 26.0 10 S18 41 590 4 MN 25,0 199; ;y149 2799 :11509 X�739 ;4 - 0.44g00g 1�; 1 1 ;279 -745 1 MS 8. ; ;760 19;667 19 ;918 -'1:Z6 41.5g 66 4 .yg 2�yg9��;
,766 -0.69 1,475,025
NO 133.0 6,705855,192 4 ;6,743 454,11992 S. 944 g 95 5589 - 0.4886 2 337,150
NY 35.0 3 ;855;3600 11;466 18 ;262 6.gj 21gg 11;223 _16.04 ,517,888
NH 25.0 2,738,524 10,954 12,118 -9.61 25 ;239 24 ;719 2.10 963 N /A
NJ 27.0 14,861,424 55,264 53,1j$7 2.56 116 16,3 2T 111, 54 4.38 /
NT 33.0 40;015 ;3 1211,99g2�4 1y2$0 ;186 10.071 Z3 � 1466,475 -0,031 1 56033,4700
NC 2.0 ,,1 07 1120 1 53 523 3;574 -: 1 7;389 2 6;857 6� 64;221 ND 30.0 105 , ,
ON 18,0 16,276,325 90,424 89,7626 g0. T4 1 ,69463 141:348 4.S 5,425,440
OR 18:8 6 ;, 4;bba x;151 89;70;' 11.00 `' ; , 1,6782 7: 6,673/N/3A
R1 37.0 13 ;161 ;339 8 ;544 89 ;047 -S :S6 118,231 ;A57 4.43 1�M /A
SC 227.0 1'22686 25;38 26,0 0. 62, 53,678 16.09 1,4
63, �8
TTH i3 :0 5� 4 :250 44� 5 43 ;350 '2.02 q9' 2 3.84 74,T16
Tx 26 28,p9 ,820 1 1 ,�gp b9 24 ;13 2 4:19.991 96 �4: 99 8;7 ;y150
UT 23 :0 1,711890 7 7443 :pOa 29 ;376 6.38 511,567
VT �-D:0 J26, 6,460 4,862 4'64 4.60 724 1 33 11.
YI 30.0 8 ;712 ;930 31;0 26;?31 20.86 Tt346 63;835 13.30 f:1?1,2:824
'187,507
VT 12.0 432,780 3,607 4,510 -20.02 8,352 8,880 -5.95 ,N /A
TOTAL $398,648,107 1,762,448 1,761,727 0.04 3,774,923 3,682,639 2.51 $106,860,470
STATES SHOWING DECREASE IN VOLUME LlUME FOR MONTH FRC444 PREVIOUS TEAR: 17 INCREASE ECRE FOR CALENDAR YEAR: 19
* REPRESENTS FACE VALUE OF INDICIA SOLD OR TAXES ASSESSABLE WITHIN MONTH EXCEPT FOR STATES THAT
OPERAT102SDFORtTHEI14ONTH ALASKA ATHTHISIkEIEASEICHIN SEVERALISATESSTHENCIGARETTE
TAX IS RETURNED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO POLI11CAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE.
e Subject to change.
� ATTENTION
THIS VENDING MACHINE DOES NOT
DISPENSE CIGARETTES ON A SELF -
SERVICE BASIS. AN EMPLOYEE MUST
VERIFY THAT A PERSON DESIRING TO
PURCHASE CIGARETTES FROM THIS
VENDING MACHINE IS OF LEGAL AGE.
UPON VERIFICATION OF LEGAL AGE, AN
EMPLOYEE WILL ACTIVATE AN ELEC-
TRONIC SWITCH WHICH WILL ALLOW
THIS VENDING MACHINE TO DISPENSE
CIGARETTES.
THANK YOU,
THE MANAGEMENT
Agenda Item IV.A
Coalition For Responsible Vending Sales
Mayor Frederick Richards
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Peggy Kelly
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Jane Paulus
City of Edina
4801.West 50th Street
Edina,.Minnesota 55424
5101 Vernon Avenue South
Suite 400
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436
(612) 927 -8855
June 7, 1990
Council Member Jack Rice
City "of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Council Member Glenn Smith
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Proposed Cigarette Vending Machine Ordinance
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
The undersigned represents the Coalition for Responsible
Vending Sales. The Coalition consists of five state trade
associations that have a business interest in the vending industry
in Minnesota. Several individual members of the Coalition are
local vending companies operating in Edina.
It is my understanding that an ordinance is being considered
by the Edina City Council regarding cigarette vending machines.
For your information, Governor Rudy Perpich signed a bill into law
on April 9, 1990 that will regulate cigarette vending machines on
a statewide basis. This law will apply to each city that has not
yet adopted an ordinance regulating cigarette vending machines.
The law does not prevent cities from taking more restrictive
action regarding the regulation of cigarette vending machines.
However, the law does adopt reasonable restrictions-on
cigarette vending machines to restrict the access of children to
tobacco products. According to the law, machines are allowed in
the following areas:
Member Organizations
• Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council • Minnesota Operators of Music & Amusement
• Minnesota Candy & Tobacco Distributors Association • Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association, Inc.
• Greater Minneapolis Hospitality Council
June 7, 1990
Page 2
1. Areas within a factory, business, office or other
workplace not open to the general public.
2. On -sale liquor establishments and off -sale liquor
stores provided the machines are located in the plain
view of a responsible employee.
3. Other public locations (e.g. hotels, restaurants)
provided that the vending machine is in the plain view
of a responsible employee and the vending machine is
retrofitted with either an electronic locking device or
a token acceptor.
A copy of the new law is enclosed for your information.
Generally, children are restricted from and do not frequent bars,
taverns, liquor stores and establishments that sell alcoholic
beverages. Also, children generally do not enter commercial
business locations such as factories and office buildings.
Moreover, the new law requires that those vending machines in
other public locations be located in the plain view of a
responsible employee and be retrofitted with either an electronic
device or a token acceptor.
By retrofitting a cigarette vending machine with the
electronic locking device, the sale of cigarettes from that
machine becomes the same as an over - the - counter sale. This is the
case because an employee must operate a remote switch from behind
the counter to allow the cigarette vending machine to unlock and
dispense a pack of cigarettes. The remote device would be
activated only after the employee verified the age of the customer
desiring to purchase cigarettes from the machine.
Since the Governor signed the law, a number of cities have
taken affirmative action to adopt or allow the state law to take
effect. Those cities include Hopkins, Mounds View, North
St. Paul, Rochester, Marshall and Austin.
Also, I am enclosing a copy of a summary of a national study
which was conducted during the summer of 1989 regarding the
cigarette purchasing behavior of children. As you read this
summary, please note that the vast majority of children who smoke
cigarettes purchase cigarettes from over - the - counter locations
rather than through vending machines. The findings in this study
demonstrate that access to cigarettes by children can be
restricted by putting reasonable controls on cigarette vending
machines.
Finally, the vending companies which I represent have a
strong desire to work with the Edina City Council to restrict the
access of children to cigarettes. We firmly believe that the new
law signed by Governor Perpich will reach that goal.
r
June 7, 1990
Page 3
Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,.
SNELLING, CHRISTENSEN & BRIANT, P.A.
Thomas A. Briant
Attorney at Law
TAB /dm
Enclosures
cc: Coalition for Responsible Vending Sales
r
1
AN ACT
CHAPTER No. 421
H.F. No. 2042
2 relating to consumer protection; limiting the
3 locations in which sales of tobacco by vending machine
4 may be made; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
5 Statutes, chapter 325E.
6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
7 Section 1. [325E.075] [SALE OF TOBACCO BY VENDING
8 MACHINE.]
9 Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.) For purposes of this section,
10 "tobacco" has the meaning given the term in section 609.685.
11 Subd. 2. (PROHIBITION.] Tobacco may be offered for sale or
12 sold in this state by or from a vending machine or appliance or
13 any other medium, device, or obiect designated or used for
14 vending purposes only at the following locations:
15 (1) in an area within a factory, business, office, or other
16 place not open to the general public or to which persons under
17 18 years of age are not generally permitted access;
18 (2) in an on -sale alcoholic beverage establishment or an
19 off -sale liquor store, if:
20 (i) the tobacco vending machine is located within the
21 immediate vicinity, plain view, and control of a responsible
22 employee, so that all tobacco purchases will be readily
23 observable by that employee;
24 (ii) the tobacco vending machine is not located in a
25 coatroom, restroom, unmonitored hallway, outer waiting area, or
1
CHAPTER No. 421
H.F. No. 2042
1 similar unmonitored area; and
2 (iii) the tobacco vending machine is inaccessible to the
3 public when the establishment is closed; and
4 (3) in other establishments, upon the following conditions•
5 (i) it must be located within the immediate vicinity, plain
6 view and control of a responsible employee, so that all tobacco
7 purchases will be readily observable by that employee; it must
8 not be located in a coatroom, restroom, unmonitored hallway,
9 outer waiting area, or similar unmonitored area; and it must be
10 inaccessible to the public when the establishment is closed; and
11 (ii) it must be operable only by activation of an
12 electronic switch operated by an employee of the establishment
13 before each sale, or by insertion of tokens provided by an
14 employee of the establishment before each sale
15 Subd. 3. [LOCAL REGULATION.] The governing body of a local
16 unit of government may adopt rules or ordinances relating to
17 vending machine sales of tobacco that are more restrictive than
18 the restrictions imposed by this section
2
CHAPTER No. 431
H.F. No. 3042
This enactment of the House of Representatives and Senate is properly enrolled.
�+� X Vn AUI—NUL-
Robert V anasek erome 1. Hughes
Speaaer ,,f the House of Representatives. Pres nt o/ the Senate.
Passed the House of Representatives on March 30 r 1990.
Passed the Senate on March 28 r 1990.
Presented to the Governor on 1990.
Approved on
ward A. Burdick
Chief Clerk. House of Representattoes.
Patrick E. Flahaven
Secretory of the Senate.
Steven C. Cross
Revisor of statutes.
1990, at • / _ , hL
Rudolph rpich
Go rnor of the State o . innesota.
Filed on C(/l.c -f 1990.
/^
Jo /an Anderson Growe
Secretary of State.
3
RESPONSE RESEARCH STUDY
of
TEENAGE CIGARE'T'TE SMOKING AND PURCHASING
BEHAVIOR
The 1980's have witnessed a substantial change in the American Public's
attitude toward smoking cigarettes. Along with this attitude switch have
come new laws regulating smoking. This has had, an impact on the
companies and organizations which are associated with the selling of
cigarettes. N, A M A, which is the national trade association of the
merchandise vending machine industry, is one such organization which has
been affected by this attitude change. It is specifically concerned about
proposals to ban the sale of cigarettes through .vending machines. The
rationale for such a ban is the allegation that many teenagers purchase
cigarettes from vending machines. As a result, N A M A commissioned
Response Research, an outside, independent marketing firm located at 500
North Michigan. Avenue in .Chicago, Illinois 60611, to conduct a survey to
determine how and where teenagers ages 13 through 17 who smoke
currently obtain cigarettes. The study also makes findings about what
influences teenagers to begin smoking.
It is hoped that the findings presented here will assist interested
organizations and lawmakers in getting factual and current data regarding
the involvement of vending machines in the smoking habits of teenagers.
FINDINGS
STUDY OF TEENAGE CIGARETTE SMOKING AND
PURCHASING BEHAVIOR
June /July 1989
Introduction
This study was conducted to determine how and where teenagers who smoke
currently obtain their cigarettes. More specifically, this study was done to
measure the following:
the extent to which teenagers obtain cigarettes by purchasing them, and
the_ portion of the cigarette purchasing that is done through vending
machines.
Methodology
This was a mall intercept study which surveyed 1015 males and females between
the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke cigarettes. The number of teens interviewed
from each age group mirrored the 1987 Census Data of the teenage population.
Additionally, half of the interviews were conducted with females and half were
conducted with males.
In order to
obtain
a geographically dispersed sample of
teens, the study was
conducted in
twenty
cities throughout the U.S. Two different mall locations were
used in each
city.
One mall was located in an average to
above average income
area and the
other was in an average to below average area.
This was done to get
the best possible representation of different socioeconomic
areas.
Overall Findings
This study found that vending machines are not a primary source of cigarettes for
teenagers. When teens first start smoking, they rely heavily on their friends for
cigarettes. After this initial phase, the main source of cigarettes for teens is an
over - the - counter location.
Detailed Findings
Initial Smoking . Behavior
• On average, the teens included in this study started smoking at the age of
thirteen. There was not a lot of difference between the males and females
as to when they started smoking.
• The teens were asked to express in their own words the reasons why they
started smoking. They indicated that the primary motivator was knowing
someone else who smoked (58 %). This other person was usually a friend
(42 %). Social pressure also played a role in the teens' trial of cigarettes
(30 %).
• Friends who smoked were both the main reasons why others started and
the main source of cigarettes for these new initiates. Almost three in five of
the teens (57 %) said that their main source of cigarettes when they first
started smoking was their friends. Unlike the others, the teens who started
smoking before they were ten years old were equally likely to rely on their
friends and on family members for cigarettes.
• Most of the teens who primarily got their cigarettes by purchasing them
when they first started smoking bought them over - the - counter (84 %) and
not from a vending machine (only 16 %).
Current Cigarette Consumption
• The teens were asked about their daily and' weekly cigarette consumption.
On average, these teens smoked half a pack of cigarettes the day before the
interview. Additionally, the average male smoked more (11 cigarettes)
than the average female (9 cigarettes).
• As can be expected, the younger teens smoked less than the older teens. In
fact, the 17 year olds smoked twice as many cigarettes as the 13 year olds
(14 cigarettes vs. 7 cigarettes on average).
• The number of cigarettes that the teens reported smoking 'in the week
before the interview was slightly less than seven times their reported daily
consumption. On average, the males smoked just over 3 and a half packs
(73 cigarettes) and the females had smoked just over two and a half packs
(56 cigarettes); while the youngest teens smoked about half as much as the
oldest teens (13 year olds -45 cigarettes and 17 year olds - -88 cigarettes).
ft
2
Current Source Of Cigarettes
• While friends were initially the primary source of cigarettes, this is not the
case beyond the first phase of smoking. The most frequently used source of
cigarettes is to purchase them. Nearly three- quarters of the teens (72 %)
reported that they bought cigarettes more often than they used other
methods of obtaining cigarettes. Furthermore, there was little variation on
this measure between males and females. However, the older teens were
more likely than the younger ones to buy cigarettes frequently (60% of 13
year olds vs. 85% of 17 year olds). And, very few of the 17 year olds (5 %)
.never buy cigarettes.
• While. friends are not the primarily source of cigarettes once teens have
established their smoking habit, they are an important secondary source.
Almost half of the teens (45 %) rely on friends occasionally for cigarettes.
Friends are of particular importance to the younger teens. Almost four out
of five 13 year olds (79 %) go to their friends often or occasionally for
cigarettes.
• Family members are not a significant source of cigarettes for teens
regardless of their age.
Cigarette Purchasing Behavior
• Frequent Purchasers, those who buy cigarettes often or occasionally, rely
much more on over - the - counter sources than on vending machines.' Almost
two - thirds of the Frequent Purchasers (64 %) buy over -the- counter often
whereas only one in eleven (9 %) buys from a vending machine often.
• Over -the- counter sources are used more by the older teens than by the
younger teens. Over three- quarters of the 17 year olds (78 %) buy over -
the- counter frequently whereas only half (46 %) of the 13 year olds do.
• Those who purchase over -the- counter often or occasionally cited four
locations as the ones they go to most frequently: convenience stores (43 %),
gas stations (29 %), grocery stores (11 %) and drug stores (6 %).
• As mentioned, less than one in eleven Frequent Purchaser uses a vending
machine often. In fact, over three- quarters of the Frequent Purchasers
(78 %) seldom or never buy from a vending machine. Of course, this varies
by age. The 13 year olds are the most likely to use vending machines (22%
do so often) and the 17 year olds are the least likely (2% do so often).
• The primary location of the vending machines used by teens is a restaurant
or other eating establishment. Almost half (47 %) of those who buy from a
3
vending machine often or occasionally go to a restaurant most often.
Bowling alleys (11 %) and gas stations (11 %) are also popular locations.
• Those who use over - the - counter locations often or occasionally gave their
reasons for this usage. There were three main reasons:
they are convenient (31 %),
they will sell them to the teens (18 %), and
they prefer these locations because they dislike vending machines.
• Those who seldom or never bought over - the - counter did not buy from this
source more frequently primarily because they were underage and felt
they would be asked for an ID or hassled in some other way (59 %).
• Teens who bought from vending machines often or occasionally found this
source to be attractive because no one will stop them from buying cigarettes
this way (56 %).
• The teens who seldom or never bought from vending machines did not buy
there because they felt that these machines were not conveniently located
(48 %) and cigarettes in machines were more expensive than those sold in
stores (35 %).
Difficulties Encountered When Trying To Buy Cigarettes
• The teens who buy cigarettes (often, occasionally or seldom) were asked if
they had ever been prevented from buying cigarettes. Three in five of
them had, with more 13 year olds having been refused (71%) than 17 year
olds (50 %).
• Those who had been refused were asked if they had been refused when
buying over -the- counter and /or from a vending machine. Virtually all of
these teens (98 %) had been refused when buying over -the- counter, while
about one in nine (11 %) had been prevented from buying from a vending
machine for a reason other than that the vending machine was broken.
Teen Awareness Of Cigarette Purchasing Laws
• Three- quarters of the teens (76 %) were aware of a state law which
prohibited certain kinds of people from buying cigarettes. When , asked
what the law said almost everyone (95 %) indicated that it required the
residents to be a certain age in order to buy cigarettes.
El
Parental Awareness and Approval Of Their Teenager's Smoking
• The teens were asked who else in their family smoked. Only 15% said that
no one else did. Almost half of the teens had a father and /or mother who
smoked (49% and 45 %, respectively).
• As a way of determining whether or not their parents were aware of their
smoking and approved of it, the teens were asked if they were permitted to
smoke at, home. Almost two in five teens (38 %) were allowed to. The
portion of teens who could smoke at home varied by age. Less than a
quarter of the 13 year olds (22 %) were able to while over half of the 17
year olds (54 %) could.
• Additionally, almost half (45 %)' of the teens were permitted by their parents
to purchase cigarettes. This too, varied by the age of the teen. Almost two-
thirds (64 %) of the 17 year olds were permitted to while only a quarter of
the youngest teens could.
• When asked where they got the money for their cigarettes, three main
sources came up: a job (63 %), from parents /mom /dad (26 %), and from
one's allowance (26 %). Since the older teens are the most likely to hold jobs,
this was their primary source of cigarette money, wheras the younger teens
relied more on their allowance. and their parents.
The complete study including the questionnaire and methodology used and . a
description of the pretest is available upon request at a price of $20 from the
National Automatic Merchandising Association, 20 North Wacker Drive,, Chicago,
Illinois 60606.
5
Agenda Item IV.A
a O minnesota department of health
717 s.e. delaware st. p.o. box 9441 minnespoiis 55440
(612) 623.5000
June 18, 1990
The Honorable Frederick Richards
Mayor, City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mayor Richards:
I understand the Edina City Council will be considering this evening an
ordinance regulating the sale of cigarettes through vending machines. I am
writing to commend your city for taking up this issue and to lend my support
to your consideration of a total ban on the sale of tobacco products through
vending machines.
Medical research over the past few years clearly documents the tremendously
harmful effects of tobacco use on health. We also know that the younger a
person is when he or she starts to smoke, the more likely it is that he or
she will become a heavy smoker and will have more difficulty quitting. And
the risk of smoking - related illness and death increases for smokers who begin
at an early age.
While the sale of tobacco products to minors is illegal in Minnesota, the
fact of the ready availability of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products
to minors through vending machines is known to us all. Because of this easy
access, children, especially those under 15, find it very easy to begin a
lifetime habit of tobacco use -- a lifetime which may very well result in
debilitating disease and early death.
It is my hope that your City Council
of all Edina youth by passing a tota
machines. Not only does a total ban
recognizes and provides a message to
and addictive drug, not a product to
candy bar or a can of pop.
Sincerely yours,
--Sister Mary ;,Madonna Ashton
Commissioner of Health
SMMA:JCH
cc: Edina City Council Members
will express.its concern for the health
ban on tobacco sales through vending
offer ease of enforcement, it properly
young people that tobacco is a dangerous
be.considered in the same league as a
an equal opportunity employer MINNESOTA
im
° '� �. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
V -S"
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director.of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 18 June, 1990
AGENDA ITEM yI I. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Storm Sewer Improvements STS -204, STS -205 & STS -206
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1 -
CCS Contracting
1.
$
28,176.40
2•
H.R.S. Construction, Inc.
2•
$
28,233.50
3.
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.
3,
$
35,441.00
4•
G.L. Contracting
4,
$
45,393.90
5•
Penn Contracting, Inc.
5,
$
47,269.10
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
CCS Contracting
GENERAL INFORMATION:
These are stormwater projects
additional backyard drainage.
utility. The projects are:
STS -204: Easement Line
$ 28,176.40
involving replacement of lines and adding
These projects are .funded by the stormwater
Between Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Parkwood
Knolls 3rd Addition
STS -205: Easement Line in Back Yard of 5537 Dundee Road
STS -206: Easement Line in Lots 2 & 13, Block 1, Sunnyslope
Section Country Club District
i
Si natur
The Recommended bid is
Public Works - Utilities
within budget not within d
Ke " th Roslan
Finance Director
Manager
°U
-e;- REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
vj
Ff v ,
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Ifembers
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000
DATE: June 11, 1990
AGENDA ITEM Vz . B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Golf Balls for driving range (1500 dz. )
Company Amount of Quote or ENd
1. Spalding
1,$ 8,250.00
2. Wittek Golf Supply 2, 9,000.00
3. Werre Betzen 3. 9,750.00
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Spalding at $5.50 /dz or $3,250.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1500 dozen range balls with Btaemar Golf Course logo on them.
ISign ure Department
The Recommended bid is_=
within budget not withiRbu *t; q Wallin, finance Director
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
° N' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: June 12, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI.0
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sodding of Braemar Soccer /Football field
Amount of Quote or Bid
Perkins Landscape Contractors 1. $14,739.00
Sunram Landscaping 2. ,$14,995.00
Kokesh Landscape 3. $15,750.00
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Perkins Landscape Contractors $14,739.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Fine Grade and sod soccer field as per plans and specs, to include
playing field, light poles to west, north and south.
(Edina Soccer Association will reimburse $7,000.00 of this at the end
of the soccer season, in August. $5,000.00 has already been reimbursed.)
Sign ure Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within budabi
Kenneth Roslarid. City
r
Director
VII. (A)
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JUNE 12, 1990
8:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Alison Fuhr
Craig Swanson
Bob Sherman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Hughes
OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Debbie Hogan, 5808 Johnson Drive
Mr. Allan Bohannon, Lund's, 3945 West 50th Street
Mr. Don Sather, Patio Village, 3918 West 49 -1/2 Street
Ms. Lota Werth, 50th & France Business and Professional Assn.
Mr. and Mrs. John Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue South
Ms. Allison Gaasedelen, 6208 Schaefer Circle
Ms. Marilyn Hartig, 6204 Schaefer Circle
Ms. and Mrs. Paul Danielson, 5813 Johnson Drive
Mr. Jeff Cauble, 5700 Lois Lane
Mr. Charles Lawrence, 5701 McGuire Road
Mr. Art Dickey, 4930 France Avenue South
Ms. Pat Corcoran, 4109 Monterey Avenue
Captain Len Kleven, Edina Police Department
Officer Brandon Deshler, TEU, Edina Police Department
Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department
SECTION A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
(1) Request to upgrade the intersection of Johnson Drive and Grove Street
from a 2 -way to a 4 -way "STOP ".
Continued from May, 1990 meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman stated that at the last meeting the Committee had agreed to
conduct a traffic count and also complete a radar survey. The results
of those studies were that 310 vehicles per day was the average traffic
count, and that after four surveys the 85 percentile speed of traffic
was 31 m.p.h. for southbound traffic and 32 m.p.h.' for northbound.
Captain Kleven reviewed the accident history from the last meeting, which
showed one accident in the past 3 -1/2 years.
Mr. Hoffman was also of the opinion that traffic in the area did not, in
fact, use this route to bypass Tracy Avenue as had been mentioned in the
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 12, 1990
Page 2
previous meeting. He, in addition, stated that he felt there were no
clearview violations in the area.
Mrs. Fuhr asked what the progress of the State had been in reducing resi-
dential speeds to 25 m.p.h. Mr. Hoffman stated that he knew of no plans
for the immediate future to change the residential speed limit.
Mrs. Fuhr opened discussion on the installation of a 25 m.p.h. speed and
pedestrian advisory signing. Both members of the Committee, as well as
neighborhood residents, seemed to favor this idea.
Mrs. Fuhr moved to install a 25 m.p.h. advisory speed and pedestrian sign
for each direction of travel on Johnson Drive. Mr. Sherman seconded the
motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(2) Request for "BLIND INTERSECTION AHEAD" sign on Schaefer Road at Schaefer
Circle.
Requested by Marilyn Hartig, 6204 Schaefer Circle.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mrs. Hartig, a resident of the area, began by stating that her concerns
were both speed and volumes on Schaefer Road, as well as difficulty in
accessing Schaefer Road from Schaefer Circle.
Captain Kleven reviewed the accident history for the past 3 -1/2 years and
stated that there had been no reported accidents at this intersection. He
also stated, however, that he felt that a tree on the northwest corner of
the intersection was a violation of the clearview ordinance and the Police
Department was presently working with the property owner to rectify the
situation.
Mr. Hoffman stated that although there were some relatively short site
distances, they were still in fact adequate for drivers. He discussed
with the Committee what other viable options there might be to alert
traffic to the situation.
Mr. Swanson moved to install the universal "T" intersection sign on north-
bound Schaefer Road and also to encourage clearview compliance in the area.
Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(3) Request for "LEFT TURN ARROWS" northbound France Avenue at West 49 -1/2
Street and southbound France Avenue at West 50th Street. Request for
"NO PARKING" signs on the east side of France Avenue between West 49th
and West 50th Streets.
Request received from 50th and France Business and Professional Association.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reviewed the resolution and motion approved by the 50th and
France Business and Professional Association. They are asking.the
Committee to recommend approval of (1) a "LEFT TURN ARROW" on northbound
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 12, 1990
Page 3
France at West 49 -1/2 Street, and (2) a "LEFT TURN ARROW" on southbound
France at West 50th Street.
Mr. Hoffman explained to the business owners present that in order to
accommodate their request there would most probably have to be removal
of some parking places on both the Minneapolis and Edina sides of France
Avenue to allow passing lanes for those not turning. Also, France Avenue
is a County Road and the proposed changes would also involve the Minnea-
polis border. Therefore, nothing could be done without approval from
those two agencies. The business owners present felt that the smoother
traffic flow and reduced backups would outweigh the loss of a few parking
spaces on the Edina side.
Mr. Swanson moved to pass on to the Cir
of the recommendations to (1) install a
France at West 49 -1/2 Street. and (2) a
France at West 50th Street, and further
approval of Hennepin County and the Cir
Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motioi
V Council the Committee's approval
"LEFT TURN ARROW" on northbound
"LEFT TURN ARROW" on southbound
that the Council solicit the
if of Minneapolis in these efforts.
z carried 3 -0.
(NOTE: Mrs. Fuhr called out of meeting to previous commitment, thus the
reduction of total Committee vote.)
(4) Request for traffic control device, at the intersection of Dakota Trail and
Indian Hills Road.
Requested by Dr. Steve Richards, 6804 Dakota Trail.
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven advised the Committee that Dr. Richards had been called out
of town and would, therefore, not be in attendance. He continued that
this item had been brought before the Committee last summer, at which time
the request had been to conduct surveys and also'to install a "STOP" sign.
At the time, the motion had been approved to (1) paint a yellow center
stripe on Dakota Trail, (2) place appropriate speed advisory signs, and
(3) review with the Park Department for minimal foliage trimming in the
blind areas. The request was now to consider placement of a "YIELD" sign.
Mr. Swanson moved to install a "YIELD" sign on westbound Indian Hills Road
at Dakota Trail. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
(5) Request for center line striping in the area of Dundee Road and Northwood
Drive.
Request received from G. Craig Christensen, 5812 Hidden Lane.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman was of the opinion that minimally striping the triangular
portion of the Northwood Drive /Dundee Road intersection would better define
the intersection.
Mr. Swanson moved to minimally stripe the triangle intersection of North-
wood Drive and Dundee Road. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion
carried 3 -0.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 12, 1990
Page .4
(6) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 42nd Street from France Avenue to
the west City limits.
Referred to Traffic Safety Committee by the Edina City Council.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman presented the Council's recommendation that West 42nd Street
be readdressed to determine if there were any additional measures that
might be taken with regard to safety.
Mr. Hoffman reviewed that, at present, West 42nd Street is one of the
more controlled roadways in Edina. The traffic counts show approximately
1,000 cars per day and there are three "STOP" signs already in place,
one at Monterey Avenue, one at Grimes Avenue and one at Alden Drive.
Quite frankly, he could not see how this street could be improved upon,
other than the possibility of sidewalk installation on one side in order
to get to the park area.
Captain Kleven presented the accident history which showed two accidents
in the past 3 -1/2 years, one being in the 3900 block, which was a hit and
run of a parked car and one in the 4100 block, which was a minor property
damage accident. He also stated that the Traffic Enforcement Unit had
been assigned to West 42nd Street since the last meeting. Five traffic
citations were issued, all for "STOP" sign violations, and all at the
intersection of West 42nd Street and Monterey. Also, all violators were
local residents living within 1/4 mile of the intersection.
Ms. Corcoran, representing some residents of West 42nd Street, stated that
she felt a sidewalk from possibly Grimes Avenue to the west City limits
was still a consideration for many residents of the area.
Mr..Swanson stated that there did not appear to be any warrants for addi-
tional traffic control signs or controls.
Mr. Swanson moved that no additional traffic control devices be installed
on West 42nd Street and also moved the recommendation of the Committee
that sidewalks be reconsidered. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion
carried 3 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Tracy Avenue between West 70th Street
and Valley View Road.
Request received from six local residents.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 12, 1990
Page 5
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven reviewed the accident statistics for the last 3 -1/2 years
on Tracy Avenue from Valley View Road to West 70th Street. There had
been three reportable accidents, one in the 6600 block, one in the 6700
block and one at the intersection of McGuire Road. Five speed surveys
had been completed in May and this area has also been identified as a
speed enforcement area. The Traffic Enforcement Unit is also actively
working the area for violations.
Mr. Hoffman stated that the speed survey showed that the 85 percentile
speed on Tracy Avenue was 33 m.p.h. for both directions of travel.
Mr. Swanson asked what Tracy Avenue was classified as. Mr. Hoffman replied
that although not classified as. a collector roadway, he felt most drivers
perceive it as a collector and use it accordingly. Actually, with the
volume of traffic which comes off County Road 62, he stated it is an
intermediate or resident/collector-street.
Residents of the neighborhood had several requests. They wanted to
request "STOP" signs on Tracy Avenue, installation of speed limit signs,
installation of 25 m.p.h. advisory speed limit signs, and instruction
of "NO THRU TRUCK TRAFFIC ". Concerns seemed to be mainly speed issues
and .large delivery and construction trucks which use the residential
street. They also asked if the City would ever change a street classifi-
cation, thereby hopefully reducing volumes.
Mr. Hoffman stated that the City Council has done only a handful of traffic
diversions. In all cases to date, these were later rescinded due mostly
to the impact on the surrounding residential areas. He also said that
his assumption was when County Road 62 backs up during rush hours, several
drivers will exit-and change course to go through Edina. However, Tracy
Avenue is not a State aid street and, therefore, the problem of truck
traffic could probably be addressed. Mr. Hoffman further stated that,
with the Traffic Enforcement Unit already assigned to the area, speed did
not appear a priority issue. He summarized that the concerns aired were
(1) truck traffic, (2) traffic bypass (which the Committee may not be
able to solve) and lastly (3) speed. He felt that more review was needed.
Mr. Swanson felt that warrants for a "STOP" sign would not be met at this .
time.
Mr. Swanson moved to defer this item until July vending (1) a study of
truck traffic in the area with regard to identification and volumes (2)
a survey of pedestrian patterns in the area. and (3) notification of
businesses regarding commercial truck usage and advice on alternate routes.
Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
� 11,
Oi
CD
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 18 June, 1990
Subject: Storm Sewer Projects
STS -207 Galleria to
Centennial Lakes via
Park Strip & STS -208
France Avenue to Back-
yards of 5701/5705
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #VII - B -
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
E2
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve Storm Sewer Improvement Projects STS -207 and STS -208 subject to
appropriate easements and developer's agreement.
Info/Background-
The two projects which are listed below have been reviewed, are feasible and
consistent with the overall development plans for the City of Edina.
IMPROVEMENT ESTIMATED COST
Storm Sewer Project No. STS -207 $ 180,000.00
Storm Sewer Project No. STS -208 $ 4,799.76
Project No. STS -207 is a storm sewer pipe running from the new Galleria
expansion to Centennial Lakes via our City park strip which will also serve
as our Southdale transitway in future years. This project will be funded by
special assessment and HRA funding as it relates to the future transitway
improvements on the Galleria site. This project will provide new stormsewer
to service the Galleries expansion. This project approval should be approved
subject to appropriate easements and developer's agreement which waives the
right to any special assessment notice and appeal.
r'
Report /Recommendation
Storm Sewer Projects
STS -207 Galleria to Centennial
Lakes via Park Strip &
STS -208 France Avenue to
Backyards of 5701/5705
18 June, 1990
Page Two
The second project is a small pipe to be connected to the France Avenue
stormsewer which will improve drainage for the backyard areas east of France
Avenue and south of West 57th Street. This project is similar to a couple
of other small projects which provided additional drainage to prevent
localized flooding and property damage which did occur during the frozen
ground rainfall event on March. 11, 1990. This project will be funded by the
stormwater utility subject to appropriate easements being granted.
A.
o e
Cn
• ~�bHPOM,b9 •
1eee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 18 June, 1990
Subject :Stormwater Utility
Update - Comprehensive
Plan
Recommendation:
Review general goal of the City.
Info/Background-
Agenda Item * VII. c.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Attached is a copy of the material contained in the City Comprehensive
Plan. The plan needs an update dependent on the outcome of the approval of
the 509 plans that have been prepared by the Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha
Creek Watershed Districts. These plans have not received full approval of
the Board of Water Resources.
The staff has been reviewing projects in the past two years based on needed
reconstruction due to pipe systems age, adding small amount of piping to
reduce localized flooding problems, and /or changed systems to lower the
overall flood potential with cooperation of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District.
The major emphasis during the 1990's will be attempting to implement (where
possible) nationwide urban runoff program (NURP) retrofits. The essence of
this type of change is to improve water quality thru development of ponding
Stormwater Utility
Update - Comprehensive
Plan
18 June, 1990
Page Two
areas that have water depths of four to ten feet deep to collect sediment
and settling -to-- prevent further pollution of the natural creek areas of Nine
Mile and Minnehaha Creeks.
A'classic example of a NURP. type project is Centennial Lakes which will be
utilized to provide a system to service much of the greater Southdale area.
Additionally, a goal is to analyze existing systems.with the objective of
lowering flood potential. A tremendous amount of phone calls have occurred
since the Federal flood disaster of 1987 over the issue of home values and
quality of life issues. There is a clear need to review all systems from
that point of view, even though we are not attempting to provide protection
from the 1987 type of rainfall event.
The other issue that needs to be addressed is the ultimate need to dredge
existing ponding areas with the special benefit issue that involves
homeowners abutting water bodies. Currently, homeowners at Indianhead Lake
and the Millpond provide funding for special projects on those water bodies.
The staff will go thru a graphics presentation on Monday depicting the areas
which have received some work recently and those areas that will be under
review for additional work in the near future.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Community Facilities Element
Page 8
III. Storm Water Drainage System
Goal: It is the goal of the City of Edina to provide a storm water drainage
system which is sufficient to prevent localized flooding,- property damaqe, and
pollution of ground and surface water supplies associated with excess storm
water runoff from existing and anticipated land uses.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Community Facilities Element
Page 9
An effective system for holding, and removing excess stormwater run-
off increases in importance as development intensifies in urban areas. As
Edina nears full development, developers will look to redevelopment, intensi-
fication of existing developments, and the development of marginal areas for
building sites. In order to avoid potential flooding and associated environ-
mental damage that may result from increased stormwater run -off, the City
must carefully consider the impact of all new development and redevelopment
on the City stormwater drainage system.
Edina's existing stormwater drainage system consists of approximately
70 ponds, natural drainageways, and 71.86 miles of storm sewer. Stormwater
is channeled through Edina's storm sewer system to discharge points into the
City's two major watersheds. Ainnehaha Creek receives stormwater run -off
from northern and eastern Edina, and the Nine Mile Creek drains the western
and southern portions of the City. The existing ponding network major and
minor watershed divisions and general directions of drainage are depicted on
the storm drainage map included in. this section.
A. floodplain and Protected Areas
In order to assure adequate storm water storage, protect water quality,
-id reduce the risk of property damage that may rua.,:: :. cm stormwa:c.; u
off, the City has established ordinances and other official controls to protect
water courses, water bodies and stormwater storage areas. Floodplains have
been delineated for Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek based upon the 100
year frequencey occurence. Easements and dedications are tools used by the
City to preserve and protect water bodies, ponds, and other stormwater holding
and drainage. areas.
In conformance with standards established by the Federal Insurance
Administration, Edina has developed a floodplain ordinance that is intended to
protect watercourses up to the elevation of the 100 year frequency occurence.
The City, in cooperation with Minnehaha and Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts,
regulates all uses within the 100 year floodplain areas to preserve the carrying
capacity of creeks. The City seeks, through dedication and /or easement, to
protect land upland of the creek beds as they run through the City. Most
areas adjacent to the course way of the Nine Mile Creek as it flows through Edina
are under direct City control with only minor areas yet to be acquired.
However, most land adjacent to the course way of Minnehaha Creek remains
privately held. The developed status of lands adjacent to Minnehaha Creek
will make protection of these lands by the City difficult.
Wetlands that comprise component parts of the stormwater retention
and detention system and that exceed 2 1/2 acres in size are protected by DNR
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Community Facilities Element
Page 10
classification that comprise the City retention and detention system. Open
space is protected surrounding these waterbodies to assure adequate storage
capacity. _
B. Water Quality
Storm water runoff is a primary source of pollution of waterbodies and
water courses in the City and the region. Pollutants, including road salts,
sediments, debris, inorganic and organic nutrients, increase as the amount
of hard surface increases. In Edina the effects of pollutants carried by
storm water runoff are most apparent on the City lakes and ponds receiving
large amounts of runoff. Pollutants carried by storm water runoff produce
waterbodies that are highly eutrophic.
Where possible the City has acquired by easement or dedication buffer
areas surrounding or adjacent to waterbodies and .water courses to allow a
filtering of stormwater before it enters the system. The reliance on a holding
pond system that captures runoff and eventually drains into the creeks contributes
to improved water quality in down stream waters. Although water quality
in holding ponds is generally poor, the settling of pollutants during the
retention period in lanfei;r1ci areas impro',1 -1Z Th- ritintiTw .,* 1.1 ? ter reaching h1innehaha
and Nine Mile Creeks. Any improvement in the water quality of the lakes and
ponds that are a part of Edina's storm water system will be accomplished only
by reducing the pollutants contained in runoff or by diverting storm water
directly to the storm sewer system. Efforts to reduce pollutants should be
made, but it should be recognized that the water quality in the City's
ponds and lakes will not be significantly improved during the planning period.
C. System Improvements and Expansion
Edina's stormwater drainage system is substantially complete at this
time. The challenge of the 1980's will be to insure the ability of the system
to handle anticipated development in the City. The protection of adequate
amounts of open space, and the protection of flood plain areas will be
primary goals of the City stormwater management system.
Objective: Prevent localized flooding and surface water pollution associated
with excess storm water runoff.
Policies: Developers should be encouraged to minimize hard surface coverage.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Community Facilities Element
Page II
Natural stormwater drainage ways and temporary storm water
holding areas should be preserved.
Erodible slopes should be protected from development, especially
those impacting the water quality of Minnehaha and Nine Mile Creek.
Potential storm water consequences should be assessed for all
development and redevelopment proposals.
The comprehensive storm water management plan for the City
should recognize ultimate land use according to the City's General Land Use
Map.
Land use within the 100 year flood elevation of Nine Mile Creek
and Minnehaha Creek should be limited to uses that do not adversely alter the
hydraulic efficiency of the creek.
The City of Edina should cooperate with the Watershed Districts
in efforts to reduce the introduction of pollutants into Minnehaha Creek and
Nine Mile Creek resulting from surface water runoff.
The City of Edina should cooperate with the Department of Natural
Resources ; ^ "!"' =- -_ _"__��ts to protect a'nd improve the quality of water
in floodplain areas, shorelands, and wetlands.
Density bonuses should be given for developers who reduce the
hard surface coverage in new developments or re- developments and preserve
storm water retention and detention basins.
H m.v • q
• el�
,
0 or
DID
1 �� � Q I �•y m
1 j c�
ps }i7• 1 O
� 1 o
� ° 1
I
o ,
1
♦c 1
� 1
11 i i o 1
\•n .v1- Ic. ... 11 �
i
E
CITY OF EDIDA
h empin cow# o
miNNesota
r3 a2
a o
o po
0
d � -
D
O
C O
Y
= 2
e -
FLOOD PLAID!
DENOTES FLOOD PLAN AREA
oe' "14
.�l
� in,�Re�wtdV •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
VII.D
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: JUNE 14, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: WINE LICENSE RENEWALS
®
To Council
i
Action
',x
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
i
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approval of wine license renewals for Dayton's Boundary Waters Restaurant,
Bravo! Ristorante Italiano, Vie de France Restaurant and the Good Earth.
Info /Background:
Attached are copies of the reports for the above wine license renewals from
the Police Department indicating that renewal is recommended.
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
June 12, 1990
Boundary Waters Restaurant was inspected for the purpose of compliance
with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their wine license. This
inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No criminal convictions that would affect management of the license
were found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service did not indicate
any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.,
An unannounced inspection on June 12, 1990 at approximately 1200
hours revealed the following: The restaurant was in compliance
with all appropriate ordinances.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:sbm
4
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
June 11, 1990
The Bravo! Ristorante Italiano was inspected for the purpose of
compliance with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their
wine license. This inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No criminal convictions that would affect management of
the license were found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service did not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on June 9, 1990, at
approximately 1800 hrs. revealed the following: The
restaurant was in compliance with all appropriate
ordinances except one: the wine license was not properly
displayed. The manager was notified and he said he will
take remedial action. A recheck will be made within the
next 30 days.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
CGS:nah
CRAIG
SWANSON .
CHIEF F
POLICE
CGS:nah
i.
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
June 12, 1990
The Vie de France Bakery and Cafe was inspected for the purpose of
compliance with the wine license-ordinance and renewal of their wine
license. The inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No criminal convictions were found that would affect management
of the license.
2. Review of complaints and.police response.
A review of police response to calls for service did not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on June 8, 1990 at approximately
1830 hours revealed the following: The restaurant was in
compliance with all appropriate ordinances.
Based on the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
�� (' j 'I',
CRAIG /G. SWANSON
CHIE OF POLICE
CGS:sbm
4
f
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
June 11, 1990
The Good Earth Restaurant was inspected for the purpose of compliance
with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their wine license. This
inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No criminal convictions that would affect management ofthe license
were found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service did not indicate
any irregularities in :regard to licensing.
3. An unannounced inspection on June 4, 1990 at approximately 1915 hours
revealed the following: The restaurant was in compliance with all
appropriate ordinances except two: the wine license was not properly
displayed and there was not a licensed manager on duty. The unlicensed
manager was notified of these violations.
A follow -up inspection was made on June 12, 1990 at approximately
1200 hours. At this time the restaurant was in full compliance with
the appropriate ordinances.
Another follow -up inspection will be made within the next 30 days.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
CRAI10�F'POLICE
SWANSON
CHIE
CGS : sbm
hell
G A Cn
O
gag.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: JUNE 14, 1990 '
Subject: WINE LICENSE RENEWAL -
THE PANTRY RESTAURANT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
11TT .E
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
T
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of the wine license renewal for The Pantry Restaurant.
Info /Background:
Attached is a copy of the Police Department report regarding renewal of the
wine license for The Pantry Restaurant, 5101 Arcadia Avenue. The report
indicated that a licensed manager was not present on the premises on several
occasions when inspections were made. However, approval is recommended.
In addition, the restaurant will be inspected on a monthly basis until full
complaince is established. The Council will be advised if the same condition
is found.
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
June 14, 1990
The Pantry Restaurant was inspected for the purpose of compliance
with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their wine
license. This inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No criminal convictions that would affect management of
the license were found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service did not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing. .
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on May 20, 1990, at
approximately 1745 hrs. revealed the following: a
licensed manager was not present on the premises when wine
was being served. This condition existed during previous
inspections. Several more inspections were made during
the application period and licensed managers were not
always found on the premises. It is apparent that due to
turnover of employees, the currently licensed managers (2)
are insufficient in number. The Pantry Restaurant
responded immediately to the inspector's suggestion of
additional licensed managers and has made appropriate
applications which will be acted upon expeditiously. The
licensed manager requirement is a local ordinance
requirement.
I therefore recommend that the Pantry Restaurant license be
renewed. Additionally, the restaurant should be inspected on a
monthly basis until full compliance is established. Should the
same condition exist, the City Council will be advised and some
sanction(s) will be recommended.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
l a
V
4 e
0
r� -
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Richards and City Counci:
From: Bob Kojetin, Director
Date: May 18, 1990 e
Subject: Pamela Outl of B
Agenda Item # VII . F
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Recommendation: I OTION FRO,I PARK BOARD
:LOVED TO ACCEPT THE GIFT OF OUTLOT B IN LAKE PAMELA. MOTION CARRIED TO
RECOAq- IEI-ID THE GIFT OF LAND TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
Info /Background:
AIr. Duane Bakken, 6016 Halifax Avenue, owner of Outlot 13 in Lake Pamela, would
like to donate Outlot B in Pamela Park to the Citv of Edina.
Air. Kojetin showed a piece of property at Pamela Park Lake where a resident
owns an outlot that he would like to donate to the City of Edina. Mr. Kojetin
indicated that all of the outlot is under water and none of the property of the
outlet at the present time is above water. The taxes in 1989 were $205.00. There
are no special assessments on the niece of property at the present time. Mr.
Kojetin recommended that the Board accent this piece of property at this time and
recommend it to the City Council. Chip Sour tIOVED TO ACCEPT THE GIFT OF OUTLOT B
IN LAKE PAMELA. Jean Rydell SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Hont,gomery questioned what
would happen if the Park Board did not accept the property? Mr. Kojetin indicated
that it would probably be a piece of property tht would ad tax forfeited and
eventually would be brought to the City to accept as a tax forfeited property
at which time the Board would probably recommend to accent it. MOTION CARRIED TO
RECOIPIEND THE GIFT OF LAND TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
20 .S 20 I S' �, - l�\ ' t �•�� g (P c
4.0 , 6 �. 4Cj,° 17 __
b Z ' } I 5 j, 101 45
1L 08• _ 0 3 t' , 1Z4 l
1 , , y y .. 1 c
34.Of�- IT 13 llru 1 2 04
17 134.0 b r r..fi� r 1A, 8lv 2S 9 rl �I M `0.•
Is l
16
134 AA 1 , 16 1 1 � • :F L'i ♦ .�. I � .N �� .02 oo.c s.•.
15 40
0 4.0 134 •I
o. 11 141 11 W I:<114 IJO `•
134.01 I i 1:417.s 4
13 l /
5
�
12 13 12 I %� o ��� hq3 ^ o 6
wil, 114
6� - -- C —��— t
24.136 154 I 0 17 \1' P A o 1'
2 ° D 12 1!44
n 23 0 •• o 22• 133 •°n N 1e(ti1 X 6 O. l V G, ba ;� 100,4
22 3 2 6J tc °I 11 NO
- B� 80
21 �� 2i , 4 19(51•., 0 60 f h ST 4
- S .?0
cJ 5
3'I IT�1 I I r. 2 34 3 3 is
17 10 b 17 0 it S3G 6G
w 4'1.b4 : •B 10 ~, r ( `
16 9 Ib 9. 22:c -
`U)
�
Is K% t IS 10 0Gr ,� -`�. �_ i sc�a, �• ,;? 41 J 8 24
�1 ca' . t
/2 13 12� i ,' 4 M 5 3°
$T W 3 sat`ooao E t: 7(r,3)
21 : j �I 1 024;t �O
p I 4� ~ +_ • s `. e 2 23 M
A
h
t9 0 3` Z2 3 �2 3 S521 s40 � j �~ �5i1 :����
X25 1450 C
W. �� �1; 1 I 1 4 sa •s� ,v 4"111
1 w 0 '
0 �; 33 �(�q): /,rJ► 21 s s
W ls� 14 1 z I�p�!�3 ° 13 �1) 2° 1
Y 1? 6 11Il a
1D 13�'T_ 39 OVTIOT .
� '
.� 16a �il Y �l 1e �
1G _. Q 1( 17 b o (l g
0 IDD 1 ; 1 b ` o `'1 ' de , is 's 1
V _ ���� ll 16 9
• 0 14 4 19 t E•1/1) �4t133 4 19 1:10 1 14 ' 133.14
4' r no
OD
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD
STREET ADDRESS '; % ► 6,J /'v An l ! f �.,
ASSESSMENT DIST. SCHOOL DIST. NO.
LOT OUTLOT B. BLOCK . LAKE PAMELA
ADD. -- - -- -- - - - - --
_ _ BUILDING PERMIT_ RECORD _
Date Number Amount Purpose
URBAN LOT_ RECORD Porcels covered by
TOPOGRAPHY IMPROVEMENTS STREETS some homestead
Level
Sidewalks
- -- High - -
-
Curb 6 Gutter
- -Low
LAND VALUE COMPUTATIONS
-
Sonitary Sewer
_
Storm Sewer
Good - Fair - Poor
Frontage
Hot' 1 Gas _
LOCATION
Unit
ZON
Corner_Lot
Top. Infl.
Residential
_
Inside Lot
_
Bung.
entered on nest line. Ind-colt year and outhorily — Assessor, Final
Edualieed, Abatement, etc.
Multi-Family
ulti- Fomily _
,,,)List parcel numbers.
11 olV ]y Alt/ ooS-
p
PLAT NO. %6V1L1 PARCEL NO. - _8000
6014 /,I q t I r- A K 4-v c s° - -4 S' ~
I
✓'i
Contract for Deed held by: I
LAND VALUE COMPUTATIONS
ASSESSMENT' SUMMARY
Frontage
Average
Unit
Unit
Front. Ft.
Top. Infl.
Total
Valuation
changes to be
entered on nest line. Ind-colt year and outhorily — Assessor, Final
Edualieed, Abatement, etc.
Figured
Depth
Percent
Price
ASSESSED VALUES
MARKET
MARKET
TOTAL
FULL VALUE
FULL VALUE
TOTAL VALUE
- OF LANG
HOME-
STEAD
—
— - --
--
- --
YEAR
VALUE OF
VALUE OF
MARKET
OF LAND
OF
AND
HOMESTEAD
REMAINDER
TOTI
LAND
STRUCTURES I
VALUE
STRUCTURES
STRUCTURES
ayes No
25%
lit) e0%
98
O O
SALES
NF RMATION
1 1!S
Soo
Date
Consideration
Kind of Inst.
Remarks
G
DO
yS -°o
- SR
Contract for Deed held by: I
I`
o e
>
ch
4�� .�0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
• �NCbHPOM��O •
iBnB
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
VII.G.
From:
Francis Hoffman -/y
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date:
18 June, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Country Club District
To Council
Curb /Driveways
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Consider a posture that maintains current status that permits only one curb
opening per property and that the only material usable from property line to
street is standard concrete.
Info /Background:
Requests have been made to staff requesting that different driveway materi-
als and an additional driveway be allowed on a lot in the Country Club
District. Our present staff position on the issue is that only one driveway
opening should be used in the Country Club District due to size of lots and
the general scenario to provide a general streetscape appearance that is the
same.
The only allowable materials for the public sidewalk, outwalks and driveway
is standard concrete. The proposal submitted to staff is to allow paver
brick in lieu of plain concrete. Currently, in the Country Club District,
many materials have been used on the property owners side of the public
sidewalk for both driveways and walkways.
Staff would ask Council direction on this issue in fight of the overall
massing issue which is currently under discussion. Attached is a memorandum
from the staff person assigned to the Heritage Preservation Board.
f
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner._
SUBJECT: 4500 Drexel Avenue Proposal /
DATE: June 14, 1990
Addressing the proposal.you received from residents at 4500 Drexel Avenue South
to replace the City sidewalk and driveway apron with brick, from the perspective
of the Heritage Preservation Board, I could not support such a change.
As you know, the Country Club District is listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. The City is proud of this designation, as we believe it to be
the only district in the state to be designated for its planning and design
elements. In the early 1920's, prior to a single lot being sold, the streets
and sidewalks were in place. The flowing streetscape is an important element
contributing to the unique charm of the District. To allow property owners to
make changes to the city sidewalk or driveway aprons would detract from some of
the very elements for which the National Register designation was made.
rO
Di
I
J Cn
!-91
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Jane Paulus, 1494 PMT
Francis Hoffman, 1494 PMT
Date: 18 June, 1990
Subject: I -494 EIS Update
Recommendation:
Discussion.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
VII.H.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The members of the I -494 Project Management Team were informed by Mn /DOT
that the EIS work would be suspended on July 13th. The reason for the
suspension was a decision by Mn /DOT personnel that Hennepin County is a key
partner in the EIS and their withdrawal from the study is inappropriate and
damaging to a key partnership which involves state, county, five cities, the
private sector, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, and
Regional Transit Board.
Mn /DOT personnel requested that the 494 PMT support their decision to
suspend the project until Hennepin County returns to the team both with
staff and financial participation. The PMT did not support the Mn /DOT
decision and basically asked Metropolitan Council members and staff at the
meeting to mediate the dispute between Hennepin County and Mn /DOT.
The PMT is extremely concerned that the private sector participation will be
lost if this dispute leads to suspension of the project.
V
Report /Recommendation
I- 494.EIS Update
18 June, 1990
Page Two
Metropolitan Councils' Systems Committee will take the issue up at Monday
afternoon's meeting and hopefully, Dottie Rietow can report the results back
to us in time for Monday night's Council meeting.
Other than this major issue, the EIS is moving along with alternative
analysis for the whole system and apparently not running into major design
difficulties at this point.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
230 EAST FIFTH STREET, MEARS PARK CENTRE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA $5101
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
1.404 PROJECT MANAGGMIINT TEAM
June 13, 1000
PRESENT: D. Rletow, F. Tenzer, C. Robinson, A. Perry, L Laukka, B. Senness, 0. Ulrich, C.
Shallbetter, J. Paulus, F. Holtman, T. Heppelmann, D. Hanson, M. Ryan, L Palsk, R.
Rue, 0. Ingraham, L Lee, C. Kozlak, D. Fondrick, D. Jacobson, Lols Sarantakle
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:10 by Len Palsk.
II. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of May 9, 1990 were approved as mailed.
III. Statue of Hennepin County Participation
C. Robinson repeated the history of the Hennepin County participation and reported that the top staff
at Mn/DOT has decided to stop the study unless the county comes back Into the study. Mn/DOT
feels that unless the partemship Is Intact the study will not succeed. A. Perry moved, J. Paulus
seconded, that the PMT support the Mn/DOT position.
C. Shailbetter asked what's In this for the county to come back In.' L Lee stated that Improvement of
the road benefits county's citizens including the 13 county roads and 113 of the county's tax base, F.
Hoffman opened reservations about snuffing this study down just for the county's withdrawal. He
mentioned that this Issue has affected other city county relationships especially an other road
prow".
L Laukka said Mn/DOT also has an obligation to legally enforce the contract.
C. Robinson said the implications of shutting down the project are unknown at this time.
Vote on motion failed. A. Perry asked why the cities won't support this since previously the cities
worked hard to retain the county's participation . Most people said because of the study suspension.
L Laukka sald the membom symphathize with Mn/DOT and would probably support this political move
it the legal opW Is still on the table.
There was further discussion and L Lee asked If the Metro Council could mediate. Q. Ulrich said the
Council can discuss this Monday at their work session and maybe lobby the county commissioners.
L Laukka said I we get publicity on this there would be a public uproar. C. Kozlak asked If Mn/DOT
was Ilkely to Issue a press release. C. Robinson said it was doubtful. Laukka emphasized again that
the PMT members cannot go back to their constituents, even though there is sympathy for the
Mn/DOT poSkIM union Mn/DOT Is willing to exercise the legal option.
C. Robinson said Mn/DOT will send the county a letter with July 13 as a deadline. BRW will be given
a 30 day notbe to stop work July %
N. Conceptual Layouts
T. Heppelmann presented the conceptual layout from the river to 35W. In further developing the
concept for this area during the last 2 months changes were made In the TH 77 area. The new
°ultimate' TH 77 design has only 3 levels ((by eliminating the 4th level ramp from west bound 494 to c-
d ramp for Megamall access). $casing back the We of the mall results in lower trip generation.
EUmhlthV this ramp will also lower impact on runway 4/22 clear zone. The 4 -0 under construction
now can be retained under the'ukimate' plan, The new design also requires less ROW adjacent to I-
494 on the south side between TH 77 and 12th Ave,
He also updated the. group on the TH 100 area layouts. Two designs were previously reported. Since
then discussions with the city have resulted In an acceptable design for an 84th/Normandale
Interchange. The second akemative Is similar to the I-M Interchange proposal. The disadvantage
of this alternative is driver understanding while the advantage is less dght•of -way and lose Impact on
local street.
The last concept presented was TH 159/212. Two concepts will be carried Into study layouts. The
two system interchanges are only 1 1/2 miles apart so trying to provide land access In between is
dlfflm&
V. Reports
A. JPO - B. Bering= repotted for J. Paulus that the JPO Is preparing an RFP to hire saslstance In
preparing a TOM ordinance. The JPO met this morning at 9:00 am,
g, MM - Area 3 surrey$ will be completed In the next few weeks.
VIII. Other Business
None
uG Adjournment
The meting adjourned at noon.
R"Weduliy submitted,
Connie Kcalah
o� e �.� . t
0
A
• ,�RPOR1` '��
Sb
1888
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: June 18, 1990
Subject: Preliminary Schedule
1991 Budget Hearings
Agenda Item #
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Preliminary approval of hearing date for 1991 Budget.
Info/Background-
If approved the attached Budget Calendar will be given to all
Department Heads on June 19. The proposed meeting dates that
directly involve the Council are July 16 for the presentation
of budget assumptions, and August 21, August 23, August 28
for the Council's hearings with the Department Heads and
Boards and Commissions. The Truth in Taxation Hearing dates
will be determined after the County and the School Districts
have selected their dates. According to the Department of
Revenue's.calendar the City will be notified on or before
August 20 of the dates on which the County and School
Districts will be holding their Truth in Taxation Hearings.
The Council will then be able to choose the hearing dates for
the City.
CITY OF EDINA
TO ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS
SUBJECT: 1991 BUDGET
DATE: June 18, 1990
WE MUST ALL ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING BUDGET CALENDAR
June 19 Departments will receive BUDGET CALENDAR
June 29 Department requests will be turned in to
the Finance Director
July 9 Department Heads meeting - Budget assumptions
9:00 am to 11:00 am in the Council Chambers
July 10
to Department conferences with Manager and
July 13 Finance Director
July 15 Present budget assumptions to Council - 5:00 pm
July 17
to
Aug 7 Preparation of budget document and duplicating
Aug 8 Proposed budget ready for submission to
Council
Aug 21 Budget Hearings and resolution approving proposed
23 budget - 5:00 pm
28
Sept 1 Certify a proposed budget and Truth in Taxation
hearing dates to County Auditor
Nov 15 Hold Truth in Taxation hearings. The County and
to School Districts receive first picks of dates. The
Dec 20 City's hearing date cannot be determined until
after August 15
Dec 28 Certify final adopted levy
It is your job to propose all reasonable requests for your
department. It is our job to present a reasonable request to
the Mayor and the Council for all Departments. The final
determination as to the budget amounts rest in the hands of
the Mayor and Council.
JOHN WALLIN
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Agenda Item VIII.A
June 4, 1990
Dear Chief Administrative Official:
I NEED YOUR HELP NOW! 'The AMM must become more proactive, more
collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the
only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropolitan area to
express in a united voice this important perspective of local
government.'
The above quote, perhaps more than any other statement, capsulizes
the major conclusion of the 12 member AMM Mission and Membership
Services Task Force which just completed a year long evaluation and
assesment of the AMM's mission, focus and general operations. The
Task Force, in its final report, concluded that the AMM has been a very
effective 'voice' and provides many benefits for the cities in the 7-
county metropolitan area. However, the Task Force feels that we (The
AMM) are at a crossroads and must not rest on our laurels as the
problems and challenges facing us in the 90's are likely to be even
more complex and difficult than the problems of the last decade.
The enclosed Task Force report contains a 'blueprint for action' which
if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a reliable and relevant
tool for member.cities as we enter the 901s. The bottom line,
however, is that to follow this 'blueprint' we must hire an additional
staff member which could result in a dues increase of 20 to 25 %. The
current three member staff does an outstanding job but the work load
has increased so dramatically in recent years that to maintain current
programs and increase our effectiveness at the Legislature and to
become more proactive at the metropolitan level as recommended in the
report, an additional staff member is mandatory.
The Board would like to implement the Task Force recommendations and
have the additional person on board by early 1991 but will not do so
unless there is strong membership support for such action. Here is how
your help is needed as asked for in the opening sentence of this
letter:
1. Please provide copies of this letter and report to your Mayors and
Councilmembers.
-1-
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008
2. Please place the report on your Council's Agenda for discussion
and action prior to August 1, 1990. (If you would like an AMM
board member to attend your council meeting when this item is
discussed, please contact an AMM staff member to make the
arrangements.)
3. Please inform the AMM Office by no later than August 15th. as to
whether your city supports or opposes adding a staff member and
the resultant dues increase. (You will be notified as to the
exact amount of such increase by no.later than July 6th.)
4. Please have a representative from your city attend the special AMM
Membership Meeting pre- scheduled for Thursday evening, September
20th. to consider and vote on this matter.
I thank you in advance for your help and thoughtful consideration of
this proposal.
Sincerely,
Larry(.Bakken, President
Golden Valley.Councilmember.
-2-
as ociation of
metropolitan
municipalities
p
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE
TASK FORCE MEMBERS
Kevin Frazell, City Administrator, Cottage Grove, Task Force Chair
Mentor "Duke" Addicks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis
Bob Benke, Mayor, New Brighton
Gary Jackson, City Manager, Coon Rapids
James D. Prosser, City Manager, Richfield
Marilyn Corcoran, Mayor, Dayton
Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley
Tom Spies, Councilmember, Bloomington
Katherine Trumner, Mayor, South St. Paul
Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley
Bob Long, Councilmember,. St. Paul
Lu Stoffel, Mayor, Hastings
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008
INTRODUCTION
The League of Metropolitan Municipalities (LMM) was originally created in 1967,
as a subsection and affiliate organization of the League of Minnesota Cities
(LMC). The impetus for forming the LMM was the creation of the Metropolitan
Council, and the growth in importance and power of the regional operating agen-
cies. It was felt that the cities of the seven - county metropolitan area needed
an organization, separate from but complementary to the LMC, to interact with
those agencies. In 1974, the LMM merged with the Suburban League of Municipali-
ties to become the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM).
As the needs of AMM member cities have changed over the years, the Board of
Directors has strived to keep the organization relevant. During the late 1970's
and throughout the 1980's, the Association's focus has broadened from strictly
"metropolitan" affairs, to protecting the interests of member cities in state-
wide issues with unique impacts for the metropolitan area. The most prominent
recent example is the distribution of state aids to local governments.
In 1984, the Association convened its -first Mission and Membership Services Task
Force to do an in depth study of the AMM and recommend needed changes. The
major concern of that Task Force was the proliferation of splinter municipal
lobbying groups within the metropolitan area. The 1984 Task Force was concerned
that the AMM could lose its viability as an umbrella organization for all metro-
politan cities in the face of a growing number of smaller groups with differ-
ences of opinion on the allocation of state aid resources. The group made 13
recommendations, all of which have since been implemented, with the exception of
expanding the staff. The final recommendation of the 1984 report was that the
Mission and Membership Services review process should be revisited every five
years.
Fortunately, predictions of any demise of the Association were ill- founded.
Since the 1984 report was issued, five additional communities (West St. Paul,
South St. Paul, Arden Hills, Blaine and Shoreview) have joined AMM. The Member-
ship now includes 68 metropolitan cities, covering over 90 percent of the popu-
lation in the seven - county area. This is an all -time high for the Association.
Ironically, one of the splinter groups which existed in 1984, the Municipal
Caucus, has since gone out of existence after concluding that its aims and
purposes were not that different from those of AMM.
The meetings of this year's Mission and Membership Services Task Force, however,
have taken place within the context of an increasing split between the metropo-
litan area and Greater Minnesota over taxation, local government aid, and other
state fiscal policies. The Task Force has studied carefully how the AMM might
be a more effective and united voice at the legislature on behalf of all cities
in the seven - county metropolitan area. The Task Force has also considered the
Association's relationship to the League of Minnesota Cities, and how it might.
help strengthen that organization in serving the interests of all cities
throughout Minnesota.
At the same time, the Task Force has not neglected the original focus of AMM,
which was to monitor and work with the metropolitan agencies. Of particular
MW
concern is the observation that as AMM has become involved in more and more
statewide issues, the staff has had -a very noticeable decrease in the amount of
time available to be spent in the area of metropolitan affairs. The Task Force
feels strongly that the AMM should not only correct its decreased activity'in
metropolitan oversight, but should actually become proactive in helping set the
regional agenda.
Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser and Golden Valley Councilmember Larry Bakken
have drafted a revised "PURPOSES" Statement for incorporation in the Association
bylaws. This document, attached as Appendix A, has been adopted by the Task
Force as a recommended mission statement for the Association. In a nutshell,
the recommended mission is well - summarized in the first item of that Purposes
Statement:
To'serve as the exclusive and rip •mary representative of the collec-
tive interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan -wine ana
statewide issues with unique metropolitan significance.
To further that goal, the Task Force has made several observations and numerous
recommendations for specific actions to enhance the success and performance of
the Association. Those are set forth by topical area as follows, and prefaced
by brief background material.
During its deliberations the Task Force received input and advice from a number
of resource persons. They are listed -in Appendix B. The Task Force wishes to
express its gratitude for their time and counsel.
- 2 -
RELATIONSHIP TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
As indicated in the introduction, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
was originally created as a subsection of the League of Minnesota Cities and
remains in that status today. As .such, we are the only organization entitled to
an ex officio (with voting privileges) seat on the League Board of Directors.
We are considered an "affiliate organization" of the League for the purposes of
adopting legislative policy. The Association offices are located on the first
floor of the LMC building. Cities in the seven - county metropolitan area
comprise approximately 15 percent of the LMC membership, but because of their
size pay about one -half of the LMC dues.
The Task Force met with LMC President Millie McCloud, as well as Executive
Director Don Slater. A member of the Task Force, New Brighton Mayor Bob Benke,
currently serves as vice president of the League.
The Task Force observations are that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have maintained a very positive
working relationship. Despite the split in the LMC membership over local
government aid policies, the AMM has never taken a legislative position in
direct opposition to any adopted policy of the League. In fact, LMC and AMM
lobbying staffs work cooperatively in many areas of policy agreement (such as
pay equity, labor relations law and tax increment financing).
Officials from Greater Minnesota have raised concerns about the relationship
between the League and AMM. Specifically, it has been questioned whether the
AMM should have the ex officio seat on the Board, and whether the relationship
between the staffs of the two organizations has been compromisingly close. Due
to these concerns, as well as our own concerns about the effectiveness of AMM as
a subsection of the League, the Task Force considered carefully whether the AMM
should be incorporated.as a separate entity.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Because of division in its membership, the LMC has been neutralized from
effective lobbying on some critical issues like local government aid. This
means that the AMM must become more vocal and assertive on behalf of its
member cities in these policy areas.
At the same time, we wish to support the efforts of LMC to bring together
its membership on divisive issues, and recommend that the LMC develop
effective consensus building and dispute resolution procedures that enable
it to adopt policy positions that have credibility with the legislature.
We encourage AMM member city officials to become more actively involved in
the LMC, creating a metropolitan constituency group and perspective within
the LMC.
2. We recommend that the Association not be incorporated as a legal entity
separate from the League of Minnesota Cities. We wish to be supportive of
the LMC, and to encourage AMM member city officials to become more active
in the League. We feel that this goal can be best accomplished in our
current status as subsection of the League.
- 3 -
3. We recommend that the AMM reject any requests that it give up the ex officio
seat on the LMC.Board. The Task Force feels strongly that we have lived up
to the guidelines and spirit under which we are an affiliate organization
(i.e. not taking contrary lobbying positions).
4. We recommend that, as long as possible, the AMM offices remain in the LMC
building. We feel that to move from the building would undermine much of
the cooperative working relationship that exists between the staffs of the
two organizations. It would also be expensive for the AMM to acquire the
overhead and support services that it currently purchases from LMC.
However, expansion of the AMM staff may make a move from the existing LMC
building unavoidable.
5. We recommend-that the AMM Board and Membership focus its agenda by refer-
ring more of the non - divisive statewide issues to the LMC for lobbying
on behalf of all member cities, both metropolitan and Greater Minnesota.
- 4 -
LOBBYING
Legislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the
Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed
in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies.
Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has
adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition,
several ad hoc study committees for specialized topics (i.e. land use legisla-
tion, metropolitan significance rules, group homes) have been formed in the past
few years.
Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in
recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably
the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli-
cies that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area.
Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more
at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources.
Legislators with whom the Task Force met described our lobbying staff as com-
petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the
aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying
groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agendas. In
response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists
during the 1990 session.
Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city
lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same
time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was
also suggested that having a better data base for lobbying would be helpful in
pressing the AMM position.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and
credibility to speak• on behalf of all cities in the seven - county metropoli-
tan area.
2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is
lobbying, and needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues:
a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i.e. interaction
with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509
Watershed Management Organizations, etc.
b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan
area - i.e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc.
c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area
may be different than, and at times even contrary to, those in the
remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas
Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items
to these topics are included in the section on committees and the policy
adoption process.
- 5 -
3. The AMM's lobbying efforts in the property tax area have been hindered by
lack of immediate access to a computerized property tax model. The Task
Force recommends that the AMM Board of Directors closely monitor the
progress of the League of Minnesota Cities in developing a property tax
model that is useable and immediately accessible to all cities. If this
proves inadequate to meet our needs, the AMM membership should be prepared
to bear the expense of developing its own property tax modeling system.
4. The AMM should be proactive, and not just reactive in its legislative posi-
tions. For example, the AMM has never produced its own recommended formula
for distribution of local government aids, and should consider doing so.
5. At the same time.we become more proactive, we should also stay on the high
road, adopting positions that reflect responsible pub -lic policy for the
entire State of Minnesota.
6. AMM member city officials should become more active and involved in the
League of Minnesota Cities and its policy study committees. In some cases,
we may find ourselves lobbying the LMC, rather than the State legislature,
to pursue particular policy positions that are of common interest to all
cities in the metroplitan area.
7. The AMM should increase the amount of time it spends one -on -one with
legislators explaining AMM positions. We should also hold metropolitan
legislators more accountable to.the AMM agenda by developing and publish-
ing a "scorecard" following each legislative session.
8. In pursuing our legislative agenda, we should "pace.ourselves ", realizing -
that lobbying is an ongoing process. Policy positions should be pursued
not only for immediate gains, but for maintaining a long -term positive
relationship with the State government and with the League of Minnesota
Cities.
COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND POLICY ADOPTION PROCESS
The Association currently follows a procedure whereby potential legislative
policies are brought forth and considered for adoption in the five standing
policy committees (revenues, metropolitan agencies, .transportation, housing and
economic development, general legislation). As indicated earlier, the Associ-
ation currently has over 100 adopted legislative policies. The policies have
been divided into categories as to level of effort in lobbying.
The AMM now finds itself actively involved in issues that are not limited in
interest to the metropolitan area, even where our positions are similar to those
of cities in Greater Minnesota. The best recent example is pay equity, where
the AMM position is almost identical to that of the League of Minnesota Cities.
Yet because of the high visibility and strong feelings surrounding this issue,
many member cities expected the AMM staff to be active in lobbying on this issue.
There is also the dilemma of issues that are of interest to a single city, or a
limited number of cities. The AMM Board and staff have attempted to be respon-
sive to the needs of each member city, but a question is raised as to whether it
is fair to take time and resources away from issues that are of more importance
to the broader membership.
The Task Force discussed at length what to do about issues that are divisive
among our own members, for example fiscal disparities or funding for combined
sewer overflow abatement. A majority of the committee concluded that the AMM
should not avoid taking definitive positions on these issues, as it would be
left neutralized on issues of high importance to a large number of city offi-
cials and thereby foster the growth of still more splinter groups.
Finally, the Task Force examined the five standing policy committees, concluding
that they are working well and that none should be eliminated. In fact, it was
speculated "that as new social and legislative problems appear (i.e. the drug
crisis) there will likely be a need for additional standing or ad hoc committees.
The Task Force further suggests that there may be utility in having a broad -
based "futures" committee to simply help the organization anticipate and be
prepared for pending issues.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1: The Association needs to focus most of its resources and effort on the few
issues of very highest priority to the entire membership. At the same
time, the AMM should not narrow its agenda to the point that it loses the
interest and support of its broad base of cities.
2. In order to accommodate the legitimate interests of all member cities, we
recommend that AMM create an "endorsed" category of policies. These would
be policies of interest to a limited number of cities, or those where the
League of Minnesota Cities or some other group might reasonably be expected
to adequately represent the interests of metropolitan cities. With the AMM
"endorsement ", the AMM would be officially on record as supporting these
policies,/ but not actively involved in lobbying or initiating legislation.
- 7 -
3. The existing Legislative Coordinating Committee (LCC) should be the
"screening and dividing" group for determining lobbying priorities and
deciding which policies will be "endorsed" and referred to other groups
(i.e. LMC) for lobbying.
4. We recommend that the Association strive to achieve real consensus on
divisive issues, and not merely concurrence through a majority vote.
Committee chairs as well as Board members might benefit from professional
training in dispute resolution.
The AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on issues that are
controversial among its own membership. While such avoidance may "buy
peace" in the short term, in the long term it neutralizes the effec-
tiveness of the organization, undermining its credibility with legislators
and causing the proliferation of splinter groups surrounding special
issues. The AMM should make use of dispute resolution services, such as
the Office of Dispute Resolution in the State Planning Agency and the
Mediation Center, a private non - profit community mediation service based
in St. Paul.
5. The two - thirds majority vote requirement for adoption of legislative
policies should be retained.
OEM
OTHER METROPOLITAN LOBBYING GROUPS
The Task Force met with Minnetonka City Manager Jim Miller, regarding the Muni-
cipal Legislative Commission, and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkramer repre-
senting the Northern Mayors' Association. The Task Force observation is that
the AMM has been able to form effective and cooperative relationships with these
specialized groups, and that they should not be seen as a threat to'the AMM.
As indicated in the introduction, an additional splinter group which existed in
1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. We recommend that the AMM strive to be the organization seen as the legiti-
mate:voice to speak on behalf of all cities in the seven - county metropoli-
tan area, while recognizing the legitimate need of some breakoff groups for
special purposes.
2. The AMM should not perceive existing specialized groups as a threat, but
attempt to maintain a cooperative and mutually supportive relationship.
3. We recommend that the AMM maintain its openness to all cities in the seven -
county metropolitan area, resisting any impetus to limit membership to a
more limited group (i.e. suburban caucus).
RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND OPERATING AGENCIES
As indicated in the Introduction, monitoring and oversight of the Metropolitan
Council and regional operating agencies was the original focus of the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Yet in recent years, involvement
with the Council and agencies -has suffered appreciably as the AMM staff has had
to spend more and more time supporting the work of its own committees and
lobbying on statewide issues. In fact, the staff indicated that it now has
almost no time for any involvement with the Metropolitan Council during the
legislative session.
The AMM currently nominates to the Metropolitan Council eight names for appoint-
ment to the Transportation Advisory Board. -_ The Association actually appoints
ten to the Transportation Advisory Committee. That system seems to be working
well. In contrast, the AMM, along with several other metropolitan area asso-
ciations, was recently given legislative responsibility for suggesting appoin-
tees to the Regional Transit Board. That process did not go well. The Board of
Directors did not limit the number of people recommended for appointment to the
vacant seats, and the Metropolitan Council heeded very few of its recommen-
dations in making their selections.
During its background work, the Task Force discussed the Metropolitan Council at
some length with several legislators,, as well as the current Chair of the
Metropolitan Council and a former executive director. of the Citizens League. -
There was a general feeling 'among the legislators that.the Council has not been
effective in performing its functions well. At the same time, it was suggested
that the Councilmembers are frustrated due to their lack of a "real clout" and
constant legislative undercutting of their authority to accomplish the work for
which they are responsible.
With no consensus in the legislature or in the metropolitan area as to the
appropriate 'amount of authority that should be vested in the Council, many
metropolitan regional issues get resolved vis -a -vis the political process of the
legislature. The shortcoming of this approach is that the metropolitan area is
giving up some of the authority to set its own agenda. There is also some con-
fusion and ambiguity over the relationship of the Council to the Governor, who
is responsible by law for appointing its members. It was suggested that the AMM
could very definitely be of help in defining the proper role for the Council and
the operating agencies, and in mustering legislative support to enact needed
changes.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The AMM should become more proactive in helping set the metropolitan agenda.
Historically we have placed ourselves in somewhat of a watchdog or adver-
sarial role with the Council and operating agencies, merely reacting to the
proposals put forward. 'We should become more positive in identifying areas
of legitimate regional involvement, and help to set the goals and objec-
tives to be pursued by regional government, as well as the parameters
within which that work will be carried out.
2. We need to "be there ". It is estimated that an AMM staff member should be
at the Metropolitan Council and agencies from eight to sixteen hours per
- 10 -
week, interacting with the Councilmembers and the staff, and keeping
affected cities informed and up -to -date as to what is happening in
regional government. Other responsibilities have kept the staff from a
full commitment to this vital role, and this shortcoming should be
corrected expeditiously.
3. The appointment of members to the Transportation Advisory Board and
Technical Advisory Committee seems to be functioning well, and.should
continue as present.
4. The AMM should continue to support its legislative responsibility to nomi-
nate persons for appointment to the Regional Transit Board. The AMM Board
of Directors should do a better job of screening the applications which are
received, so as to indicate to the Metropolitan Council those people that
it truly wants appointed to the RTB.
5. The Task Force recommends that the AMM pursue the possibility of the
creation of a metropolitan appointments review committee for the merit
review of persons being considered for appointment to the metropolitan
Council and other regional agencies. The selection board would include
representatives appointed by the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities, the Metropolitan Intercounty Association, the Citizens
League, the League of Women Voters, etc.
6. Finally, the Task Force recommends that the AMM be the impetus for creation
of a blue ribbon committee to study and better define the mission, role and
purposes of the Council and regional agencies. While AMM would be the
host, it would be important to involve other government associations and
°good government" groups._ Also, the the task should be approached in a
spirit of cooperation with the Metropolitan Council members. The study of
the blue ribbon committee should include alternatives for the selection and
appointment of Metropolitan Council members.
- 11 -
PUBLIC RELATIONS
If, as suggested in the revised Purposes statement, the AMM is to be the
exclusive representative of the collective interests of'the metropolitan cities,
then it is important that the Association increase its visibility in the eyes of
the legislature and the general public. The Task Force reviewed and endorsed
the work.of the AMM's Legislative Coordinating Committee Public Relations
Subcommittee to establish a public relations system to inform the public,
including media, legislators, and AMM legislative contacts about metropolitan
city issues..
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Media contacts should be identified in each AMM- member city vis -a -vis a
legislative contact response form. Legislative contacts in each city
should be responsible for interaction with local newspapers, radio, city
newsletters, cable television, etc.
2. The AMM staff should identify and establish relationships with contacts
within the major metropolitan area media, both print and electronic.
3. A delegation of the AMM staff and Legislative Coordinating Committee should
meet with major newspaper staffs early in legislative sessions to discuss
AMM priorities and positions. Media contacts, both local and metropolitan
wide, should be invited and encouraged to attend our legislative breakfasts.
4. During legislative sessions, we should issue specific press releases on AMM
priori-ties, and response to important issues (i.e. tax policy) as changes
are proposed.
5. At the conclusion of each legislative session, we should issue press
releases on the AMM's legislative agenda, and how well we believe the
legislature met the needs of metropolitan area municipalities.
6. We recommend that AMM develop a "report card" of priority issues with
ratings for each legislator. These should be distributed to member cities
with suggestions for potential local use.
7. We need to.identify potential allies on important issues, i.e. Chambers of
Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc.
- 12 -
COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBER CITY OFFICIALS
The Task Force feels that the AMM needs to develop a metropolitan "conscious-
ness" among member city officials, so that they will buy into and promote the
AMM's agenda. Unfortunately, Councilmember time is scarce, making it difficult
to insure that each and every member city official is well - informed and aware
of AMM activities, policies and priorities.
The first recommendation of the 1984 Task Force report was that the AMM should
expand its effort to communicate directly with all elected officials in member
cities, as opposed to only mayors and city managers. Since that time, the AMM
has had differing distribution lists for different types of,communications.
Apparently, this is causing a great deal of confusion, and may actually be
causing a decrease in consistent communications.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The AMM should strive to publish a short executive summary of legislative
positions that could be quickly read by member city officials who don't
want the "full shot ".
2. An AMM contact person, preferably the City Manager /Administrator, should be
developed in each city. All communications should be sent to that one con-
tact person, plus the Mayor, with the contact person taking responsibility
for seeing that the material is duplicated and sent to all members of the
governing body. The AMM contact person will also be responsible for
reporting on AMM activities at the Council meeting. AMM should work
with the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) to enlist the
support of Managers /Administrators for reproduction and distribution of
these communications.
3. Member cities should be encouraged to place discussion of AMM policies and
issues on regular City Council agendas to ensure that all elected officials
are kept aware of AMM activities, as well as to increase the Association's
visibility with local media.
4. Each member of the AMM Board of Directors should commit to make a brief
presentation at four or five surrounding City Council meetings once each
year on AMM policies and activities.-
- 13 -
WORKLOAD AND STAFFING
When originally formed, the AMM had four full -time staff members. Shortly
thereafter, in response to a financial shortfall, the staff was cut to three and
has remained at that number since.
During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to
over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The
Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit
survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey.
With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for
committees, there has been a decided time shift away from interaction with the
Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the AMM is the only organiza-
tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are
usually the only commentor on the Metropolitan Council's annual work program and
budget.
The AMM Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not
only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment
financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1984
Mission and Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that
the Board of Directors seek ways to-add a staff member. Yet this is the only
one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that
report, "the present staff simply cannot adequately cover all the critical
issues, agencies, committees and the legislature." The present Task Force
report, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, will
only serve to increase the workload significantly.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff
person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in:
a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative
contact system
b. public relations, including media contacts
c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees
d. some monitoring of Metropolitan.Council and agency activities,
particularly during the legislative session.
2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol, the Task Force observes that this
effort will fluctuate from time to time. .Therefore, it is recommended that
increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract
lobbyists.
- 14 -
DUES
The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of .a
member's dues for the League of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set
in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of
30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of 4 cents for Minneapolis.. The dues
for an average sized city of 30,000.population are $5,100, or about 11 cents per
capita.
Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AMM is a bargain! For
example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40 cents
per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for
"special projects ". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi-
mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum of $12,500.
If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recommendation
to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation is inevi-
table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model,
if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require
ongoing personnel and data gathering costs.
RECOMMENDATION
1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM
Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues
increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The
Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to
three year period.
2. The Board and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup-
port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if
the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the
lobbying needs of the AMM.
- 15 -
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During
its relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi
culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning
Act and the more recent debates over local government aid.
Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like
the Association, the AMM is now at an all -time high of 68 member cities, repre-
senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven - county metropolitan area.
The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value
for their membership dollars.
However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years
Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time
to rest on our laurels. We face challenges from other city lobbying groups
whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a
generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same
time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri-
cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to
effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities.
The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the AMM
must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive.
The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli-
tan area to express in a united voice-the important perspective of local govern-
ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field
and leave all the important decisions to others.
The Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter
groups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to
realize that the things they did have in common were far more than those that
divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less than those that
faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an
effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan
area, and to pass that test will require two things:
1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com-
mittees and 19- member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on
the critical issues that face us.
2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the
policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the
Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies.
The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations
set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just
that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action.
- 16 -
APPENDIX A
PURPOSES
The purpose of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall
be to:
1. Serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the
collective interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan
wide issues and state wide issues with unique metropolitan
significance.
2. Promote collaborative problem solving efforts between and among
cities, the State, the Legislature, private interests and other
public interests.
3. Effectively express in a unified voice, policies concerning the
structure, powers and other matters relating to municipal
government for the municipalities in the metropolitan area to
the Legislature, Metropolitan Council and agencies, LMC, media and
cities.
4. Serve as a forum through which all municipalities or groups of
municipalities may develop and propose policies and positions on
matters on concern to the metropolitan municipalities and develop
strategies for advocating those policies and positions.
5. Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information
among municipalities in the metropolitan area and to foster
intermunicipal cooperation.
6. Assist member cities resolve disputes with other cities and
agencies.
7. Develop and provide, either alone or in concert with League of
Minnesota Cities or other organizations or agencies, programs of
technical assistance to member municipalities.
S. Establish specific prioritized agenda, including Legislative
proposals to address member community needs.
9. Foster, generate and promote information and data concerning the
problems and issues and proposed solutions affecting municipal
government in the metropolitan area to the State Legislature, in
particular, and to the public at large.
10. Enhance the effectiveness of municipal government in the
metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering
pertinent research projects.
11. Coordinate the efforts of AMM members to promote their interests
within the League of Minnesota Cities.
12. Enhance the quality of life.in the metropolitan area and its
cities by promoting efficient and progressive service delivery
systems for our residents.
GPDFNnTY R
List of resource persons who consulted with the Task Forcer
Vern Peterson, Executive Director, Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities
Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities
Donald Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities
Jim Miller, Minnetonka City Manager and Representative of Municipal
Legislative Commission
Jim Krautkramer, Brooklyn Park Mayor, President of Northern Mayors'
Association
Millie McCloud, President, League of Minnesota Cities
State Representative Phil Carruthers (DFL -47B), Chair of Metro Affairs
Subcommittee of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee
State Representative Alice Johnson (DFL -51A), Vice Chair of House Local
Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee
Al Loehr, Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Bob Schmitz
(DFL -36), Chair of Senate Local and Urban Affairs Committee
Steve Keefe, Chair, Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities
Ted Kolderie, Former Executive Director, Citizens League of the Twin
Cities
Agenda Item VIII.B
May 30, 1990
Edina City Council
City of Edina
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Att: Mayor Fred Richards
Please accept my resignation /leave of absence from the Board of Directors of
South Henn. Human Services Council effective June 1, 1990..I wash to be re -app-
ointed to the council after July 8, 1990.
This request is made in order that I may assume the temporary duties as Board Liaison
overseeing the.day to day.operation.of South Hennepin until a permanent director
is in place.
Thank you
Since
A. Gens
1
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18
-90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
169702
06/04/90
62.49
SEARS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
7920
62.49
*
169703
06/06/90
7,966.22
WH CATES CONSTRUCTN
ARNESON ADDITION
60 -1300- 015 -20
7,966.22
*
169704
06/06/90
300.00
ASSN FOR RETARDED
REFUND
30- 3567- 000 -00
300.00
*
169705
06/06/90
78.67
CONWAY CENTRAL EXP
DELIVERY
50- 4516- 860 -86
7034
78.67
*
169706
06/06/90
30.00
WINE SPECTATOR
WIRE SPECTATOR
50- 4632 - 862 -86
30.00
169707
06/06/90
183.00-
ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO
BRACKETE
10- 4500 - 520 -52
81023
6707
169707
06/06/90
183.00
ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO
BRACKETE
10- 4500 - 520 -52
81023
6707
169707
06/06/90
183.00
ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO
BRACKET
10- 4504 - 520 -52
81023
6707
183.00
169708'
06/06/90
85.87
ADEMCO
TAPE
40- 4540 - 802 -80
6845
169708
06/06/90
10.97
ADEMCO
DRIVE BELT
40- 4540 - 802 -80
6845
96.84
169.709
06/06/90
36.77 - ai.92
METRO APPLIANCE SER
BLOWER
10- 4540 - 520 -52
93531
7592
36.77^ ai.92 *
169710
06/06/90
125.00
RUSSELL JOHNSON
MOTOR
50- 4540 - 821 -82
54.435
125.00
*
169711
06/06/90
437.50
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
STOP SIGNS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
26956
7467
437.50
*
169712
06/06/90
102.11
NATL SAFETY COUNCIL
VIDEO
10- 4504 - 301 -30
7864
102.11
*
169713
06/06/90
39.50
PORTER CABLE
REPAIR /SAW
40- 4248 - 801 -80
7453
169713
06/06/90
84.10
PORTER CABLE
REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
7453
123.60
*
169714
06/06/90
286.77
CARLSON LAKE STATE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
P67904
7593
169714
06/06/90
94.18
CARLSON LAKE STATE
SPACER /BELT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
P68016
7654
380.95
*
169715
06/06/90
34..25.
MOPED WORLD
GRASS BAG
10- 4540 - 560 -56
80127
7651
34.25
*
169716
06/06/90
18.00
FRANK DURAND
REFUND
10- 1145 - 000 -00
18.00
*
169717'
06/06/90
13.70
ED MCDEVITT CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
73129
7651
13.70
*
169718
06/06/90
230.57
UNITED SEAL COMP
COPPER
40- 4504 - 807 -80
A32877
7260
230.57
*
1
1990 CITY
1
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169719
06/0,6/90
79.40
SILVER LAKE
REPAIR PARTS
169719
06/06/90
121.90
SILVER LAKE
REPAIR PARTS
201.30
*
169720
06/06/90
136.50
BUD LARSONS SALES
WHISK BROOMS
136.50
*
169721
06/06/90
136.90
DIESEL COMPONENTS
ALARMSTAT
136.90
*
169722
06/06/90
40.00
PAUL REARDON
VALVE GRINDING
40.00
*
169723
06/06/90
330.00
GOLF CARS LTD
RENTAL
330.00
*
169724
06/06/90
40.00
MARY ELLEN PINKHAM
AMBULANCE REFUND
40.00
*
169725
06/06/90
20.00
HARVEY DOW
REIMBURSEMENT
20.00
*
169726
06/06/90
17.00
L -J RUBBER STAMP CO
STAMP
17.00
*
169727
06/06/90
225.00
HENNEPIN FACULTY
SEMINAR
225.00
*
169728
06/06/90
175.00
ENVIRONMENTS
CONTRACT REPAIRS
175.00
*
169729
06/06/90
15.00
STATE TREASURER
LICENSE
15.00
*
169730
06/06/90
1,600.00
MIKE ALM CONSTR
RETAINING WALL
1,600.00
*
169731
06/06/90
175.00
GARZA & ASSOC
TRAINING
175.00
*
169732
06/06/90
95.68
BETSY FLATEN
REIMBURSEMENT
95.68
*
169733
06/06/90
163.80
TRIAD COMMUNICATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
163.80
*
169734
06/06/90
32.43
KUSTOM ELEC
EQUIP MAINT
32.43
*
169735
06/06/90
43.70
BRIGADE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
43.70
*
169736
06/06/90
332.40
AM LINEN
TOWELS
332.40
*
06 -18 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 4128 5305
10- 4540 - 560 -56 4125 5305
10- 4580 - 301 -30 8103 7861
10- 4540 - 560 -56 45700 7597
27- 4248 - 664 -66 7919
27- 4276 - 665 -66 1144 7925
10- 3180 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 318 -30
10- 4516 - 440 -44 26704
10- 4202-440 -44 3902 6066
30- 4248 - 782 -78 8023
40- 4202 - 809 -80
27- 4306 - 664 -66 7069
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4280 - 504 -50
10- 4504 - 460 -46
10- 4274 - 420 -42 137435
10- 4266 - 420 -42 4901
27- 4504 - 663 -66 7970
2
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRC'ELECT
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
TC DICTATION SER
RECORDING EQUIP
169737
06/06/90
719.00 698-98
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PAT BENSON
CLEANING
PAT BENSON
CLEANING
719.00* 609.09
STAKES
MARY WALTER /ASSO
169738
06/12/90
640.00
FW DOW
REFUND
169738
06/12/90
500.00
POSTAGE
169738
06/06/90
350.00
1,490.00
*
169739
06/06/90
35.00
35.00
*
169740
06/06/90
90.00
169740
06/12/90
90.00
180.00
*
169741
06/06/90
940.00
940.00
*
169742
06/06/90
750.00
750.00
*
169743
06/06/90
189.60
189.60
*
169744
06/06/90
45.00
45.00
*
169745
06/06/90
100.00
100.00
*
169746
06/06/90
27.00
27.00
*
* * * * **
169748
06/06/90
1,871.25
1,871.25
*
169749
06/06/90
331.99
331.99
*
169750
06/06/90
168.88
168.88
*
169751
06/06/90
259.27
259.27
*
169752
06/06/90
102.00
102.00
*
169753
06/06/90
260.09
260.09
*
169754
06/06/90
35.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRC'ELECT
PRINTING
TC DICTATION SER
RECORDING EQUIP
TC DICTATION SER
RECORDING EQUIP
TC DICTATION SER
EQUIP REPLACE
TC JOHNSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PAT BENSON
CLEANING
PAT BENSON
CLEANING
CWDC INDUSTRIES
STAKES
MARY WALTER /ASSO
CONSULTATION
SHARON McKISSON
ART COMM /MAY
FW DOW
REFUND
PAT GREER
MAY EXHIBT FEE
ACTION MESSENGER
POSTAGE
METRO ELECTRIC CONST
DANIEL SMITH
AXNER CO INC
SUSAN FRAME
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTINCTIVE LAUNDRY
CITIZENS LEAGUE
REPAIRS
COST /GOODS SOLD
COST /GOODS SOLD
COST /GOODS SOLD
FUTURES EVENT
LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS
DUES
06- 18 -90. PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4600 - 184 -18
10- 4504 - 436 -42 14862
10- 4504 - 436 -42 14887
10- 4901 - 420 -42 14886 7855
10- 4504- 420 -42
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30576 4915
27- 4201- 662 -66 30577 4916
10- 4504 - 260 -26 5898
10- 4256 - 510 -51
30- 3501- 000 -00
30- 3505 - 000 -00
30- 3501 - 000 -00
30- 4290 - 781 -78 91453 7993
40- 4248 - 801 -80 12289 7644
23- 4624 - 613 -61 6904
23- 4624 - 613 -61 4008 7986
23- 4624 - 613 -61 7350 7988
10- 4206 - 500 -50 352782 8001
30- 4262- 782 -78 8000
10- 4204 - 140 -14 7999
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
169755
169756
169757
169758
169759
169761
169762
169762
169763
169764
169765
169766
169767
* * * * **
169770
169771
169772
169773
169773
169773
06/06/90
06/06/90
06/06/90
06/06/90
06/06/90
06'/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
AMOUNT
7998
35.00
*
185.64
7623
185.64
*
435.00
7598
435.00
*
1,349.00
1,349.00
*
255.00
352.00
255.00
*
288.00
PAINT /FIELDS
288.00
*
223.66
223.66 *
190.40
332.36
522.76 *
225.00
225.00 *
105.00
105.00 *
1,572.20
1,572.20 *
40.00
40.00 *
24.11
24.11 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
FIRESTONE STORES
JACKSON
BECKER & ASSOC
VICTOR RUSSELL
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT CT
CONNEY SAFETY PROD
AM LEONARD INC
AM LEONARD INC
EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL
SEMINARS INTERN
ST HILAIRE SUPPLY CO
DEPT OF
POKORNY COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BLACK DIRT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AMBULANCE REFUND
SCHRUBS /FLOWERS
SPRAY /MISC
SLEEVE ASSY
FIBERGLASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WORKSHOP
REPAIR PARTS
CERTIFICATE
IRRIGATION PARTS
06 -18 -90 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504 - 782 -78
7998
27- 4562 - 664 -66 1101
7515
30- 4504 - 782 -78 12234
7623
10- 3180 - 000 -00
16279
27- 4604 - 664 -66
7598
10- 4504 - 301 -30 444736 6476
40- 4580 - 801 -80 90584. 7820
40- 4580 - 801 -80 90538 7730
10 -4504- 390 -30
30- 4202 - 781 -78
10- 4540 - 540 -54 15198 6851
30- 4204 - 781 -78
10- 4540 - 643 -64 11326 7612
06/11/90
53.04
CAMPION
CATERING
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 140 -14
16279
53.04
*
06/11/90
352.00
HOFFERS
INC
PAINT /FIELDS
10- 4563 - 642 -64
408139 7900
352.00
*
06/11/90
4,041.25
INDECO
ENGINEERING FEE
26 -1300- 001 -00
4,041.25
*
06/11/90
1,365.00
PERKINS
LSCAPE CONTR
REPAIRS
10- 4201- 643 -64
8022
06/11/90
1,461.00
PERKINS
LSCAPE CONTR
CONSTRUCTION
28- 1300 - 000 -00
7130
06/11/90
4,028.00
PERKINS
LSCAPE CONTR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 016 -20
7134
* * *-CKS
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
169773
06/11/90
2,392.39
PERKINS LSCAPE CONTR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 016 -20
6962
9,246.39
*
169774
06/11/90
84.45
CHRIS OMODT
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4266 - 420 -42
84.45
*
169775
06/11/90
4.50
SUSAN WOHLRABE
MAUMA MEETING
10- 4206 - 140 -14
4.50
*
169776
06/11/90
2,475.00
ROADWAY TAPING CO
PAVEMENT MARKING
60- 1300 - 289 -04
2,475.00
*
169777
06/11/90
1,415.00
GRAFIX SHOPPE
SQUAD DECALS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2845
7589
1,415.00
*
169778
06/11/90
5,750.
"00
SW SUBURBAN
PROGRAMMING
12- 4224 - 434 -43
169778
06/11/90
4,736.00
SW SUBURBAN
SWSCC OPERATING
12- 4224 - 434 -43
10,486.00
*
169779
06/11/90
12,102.00
RATHERT CHEV
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901- 470 -47
50582
6375
12,102.00
*
169780
06/11/90
97.20
MIDWEST VENDING WSLE
FOOD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8066
97.20
*
169781
06/11/90
56.00
METRO APPLIANCE SERV
REPAIR FRYER
27- 4248 - 663 -66
28074
7778
56.00
*
169782
06/11/90
233.75
WCCO TV INC
ADVERTISING
27- 4214 - 667 -66
7484
233.75
*
169783
06/11/90
233.00
BING PLUMBING
PLBG WORK
27- 4288- 667 -66
7699
8074
233.00
*
169784
06/11/90
2,254.02
MN STATE TREASURER
BLDG REPORT
10- 3095 - 490 -49
169784
06/11/90
284.82
MN STATE TREASURER
BLDG REPORT
10- 3113- 490 -49
2,538.84
*
169785
06/11/90
389.00
BUSINESS MACHINE
TYPEWRITER
10- 4504 - 507 -50
389.00
.169786
06/11/90
45,997.54
DAVE PERKINS
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
90 -6
45,997.54
169787
06/11/90
135,764.14
ALBER CONSTRUCTION
PAYMENT
60- 2040- 000 -00
90 -5
135,764.14
169788
06/11/90
72,325.40
RICHMAR
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -00
90 -1
72,325.40
169789
06/11/90
24,543.25
VICTPR CARLSON
PAYMENT
60- 2040- 000 -00
89 -15
24,543.25
169790
06/11/90
2,347.41
0 & P CONTRACTING
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -14
2,347.41
5
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
CHECK REGISTER
89 -12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169791
06/11/90
16,412.55
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION
PAYMENT
10- 3500- 000 -00
16,412.55
*
169792
06/11/90
1,614.26
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
PAYMENT
10- 4250 - 644 -64
1,614.26
8076
*
3426
169793
06/11/90
9,367.38
8076
G L CONTRACTING
PAYMENT
10- 4202 - 640 -64
9,367.38
*
169794
06/11/90
125,260.26
8103
PROGRESSIVE
PAYMENT
8097
30- 4224 - 781 -78
125,260.26
*
169795
06/11/90
3.00
JANE MUTHER
REFUND
3.00
*
169796
06/11/90
25.00
KAREN GRAFF
REFUND
25.00
*
169797
06/11/90
25.00
CAROLYN BORCHARDT
REFUND
25.00
*
169798
06/11/90
25.00
GERRY SJOBLOM
REFUND
25.00
*
169799
06/11/90
20.00
RUTHIE BISHOP
REFUND
20.00
*
169800
06/11/90
75.00
LINDENFELSER
DUMPING
169800
06/11/90
75.00
LINDENFELSER
DUMPING
169800
06/11/90
87.00
LINDENFELSER
DUMPING
169800
06/12/90
150.00
LINDENFELSER
DUMPING
387.00
*
169801
06/11/90
295.00
NATL REC /PARK ASSN
SCHOOL
295.00
*
169802
06/11/90
185.00
BOB PRESTRUD
REIMBURSEMENT
185.00
169803
06/11/90
45.00
PR NEWSWIRE
ADVERTISING
45.001*
169804
06/11/90
78.66
EVERHOT MANUF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
78.66
*
169805
06/11/90
50.00
SUE BLUMBERG
PERFORMANCE06 /12/90
50.00
*
169806
06/11/90
35.00
SHIRLEY OLSON
PERFORMANCE 7/21/90
35.00
*
169807
06/11/90
75.00
STEVE BUDAS
PERFORMANCE 8/2/90
75.00
*
169808
06/11/90
100.00
BONNIE KOREK
PERFORMANCE 8/9/90
6
06 -18 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -12
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -11
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -10
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -13
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500- 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 4250 - 644 -64
3529
8076
10- 4250 - 644 -64
3426
8076
10- 4250 - 644 -64
3497
8076
27- 4250 - 664 -66
3515
10- 4202 - 640 -64
10- 4202 - 640 -64
30- 4214 - 781 -78
293310
8103
30- 4504'- 782 -78
90671
8097
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
6
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
100.00
169809
06/11/90
50.00
EMILY DENNISON
PERFORMANCE 8/25/90
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50.00
*
169810
06/11/90
75.00
MICKEY RICH
PERFORMANCE 6/19/90
30- 4224 - 781 -78
75.00
*
169811
06/11/90
78.00
EMILY HADDAD
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
78.00
*
169812
06/11/90
63.00
LAVONNE NYGREN
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
63.00
*
169813
06/11/90
63.00
JANE MANICK
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
63.00
*
169814
06/12/90
4.74
SUSAN RUPLIN
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 000 -00
169814
06/12/90
4.74-
SUSAN RUPLIN
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 000 -00
169814
06/12/90
9.50
SUSAN RUPLIN
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 800 -80
169814
06/12/90
4.74
SUSAN RUPLIN
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 800 -80
14.24
*
169815
06/12/90
70.00
TC PHOTOCOPY INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
1210 8007
70.00
*
169816
06/12/90
136.65
INDUSTRIAL RUBBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 702 -70
24347 7972
136.65
*
169817
06/12/90
23.26
SECRETARY OF STATE
LABELS
10- 4600 - 180 -18
23.26
*
169818
06/12/90
17.00
M R LUNDGREN
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
17.00
*
169819
06/12/90
10.00
PAM MCMURRY
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10.00
*
169820
06/12/90
44.07
POLLY PFEIFER
POOL SUPPLIES
26- 4516 - 681 -68
44.07
*
169821
06/12/90
.97.52
NORTHEAST LOCK
KEYS /LOCKEROOMS
30- 4204 - 782 -78
97.52
*
169822
06/12/90
265.50
VINCE COCKRIEL
CONFERENCE /AIRFARE
10- 4202 - 640 -64
265.50
*
169823
06/12/90
190.08
BRAYTON CHEMICALS
FERTILIZER
27- 4558 - 664 -66
131299 5930
190.08
*
169824
06/12/90
93.81
MPLS AREA ASSOC
SOLD REPORTS MLS
10- 4504 - 200 -20
93.81
*
169825
06/12/90
385.00
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 803 -80
1949 8040
385.00
*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169826
06/12/90
50.85
CAN -DLE MAKERS
BEER COOLERS
169826
06/12/90
50.85
CAN -DLE MAKERS
BEER COOLERS
169826
06/12/90
50.86
CAN -DLE MAKERS
BEER COOLERS
152.56
*
169827
06/12/90
25.49
BARBARA PETT
ART WORK SOLD
25.49
*
169828
06/12/90
70.00
KAY SHARKEY
ART WORK SOLD
70.00
*
169829
06/12/90
30.10
BETTY THOMPSON
ART WORK SOLD
30.10
*
169830
06/12/90
30.42
ANN WIDERSTROM
ART WORK SOLD
30.42
*
169831
06/12/90
21.00
DRU AARESTAD
ART WORK SOLD
21.00
*
169832
06/12/90
68.60
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
ART WORK SOLD
68.60
*
169833
06/12/90
41.20
TOBIE DICKER
ART WORK SOLD
41.20
*
169834
06/12/90
110.60
JEAN HAEFELE
ART WORK SOLD
110.60
*
169835
06/12/90
28.00
NORMA HANLON
ART WORK SOLD
28.00
*
169836
06/12/90
150.50
PHYLLIS HAYWA
ART WORK SOLD
150.50
*
169837
06/12/90
219.11
BETTY BELL PEDDIE
ART WORK SOLD
219.11
*
169838
06/12/90
250.00
KAY S SCHLOSS_ER
AC INSTRUCTOR
250.00
*
169839
06/12/90
210.00
ADRIENNE WEINBERGER
AC INSTRUCTOR
210.00
*
169840
06/12/90
53.00
MARGARET MCDOWELL
AC INSTRUCTOR
53.00
*
169841
06/12/90
42.00
TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
42.00
*
169842
06/12/90
90.00
BETSY BRYANT
PT MAINT AC
90.00
*
169843
06/12/90
90.00
MONICA RUDQUIST
PT MAINT AC
06 -18 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4632 - 822 -82 8031
50- 4632 - 842 -84 8031
50- 4632 - 862 -86 8031
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23 -3625- 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61 .
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
8
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
169843
06/12/90
169843
06/12/90
169844
06/12/90
169844'
06/12/90
169845
06/12/90
169846
06/12/90
169847
06/12/90
169848
06/12/90
169849
06/12/90
169850
06/12/90
kxkxxx
169A07
06/11/90
169A07
06/12/90
xxxxxx
169A09
06/11/90
xxxxxx
169AII
06/04/90
x x k k k k
169A29
06/12/90
169A29
06/04/90
xxxkkx
169A31
06/04/90
169A31
06/04/90
169A31
06/04/90
169A31
06/04/90
169A31
06/04/90
320.80* - 328-68 *
06 -18 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4120 - 613 -61
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6942 .
10- 4248 - 520 -52 2105 8140
10- 4204 - 440 -44
27 -1300- 005 -00 8139
27- 4624 - 663 -66 8067
10- 3180- 000 -00
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
751.62
CHECK REGISTER
REGISTRATION FEES
AMOUNT
751.62
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
200.00
MONICA RUDQUIST
PT MAINT AC
90.00-
ACE SUPPLY
MONICA RUDQUIST
PT MAINT AC
200.00
*
157.89
MOLLIE PAULSON
ART WORK SOLD
141.84
ALBINSON
MOLLIE PAULSON
PERSONAL SERVICE
299.73
*
ALBINSON
378.55
PRINT SUPPLYS
JOANNA L FOOTE
TEMP EMPL
378.55
*
975.00
52.00
PRO CARPET
CARPET CLEANING
975.00
*
10- 4226 - 420 -42
12.50
19.00
AIRSIGNAL
THE CODE REPORTER
SUBSCRIPTION
19.00
*
AIRSIGNAL
695.00
SERVICE
CURT KRIENS CONSTR
PARKING LOT
695.00
*
PAGER
SERVICE
199.11
6.50
DENNYS 5TH AVE
ROLLS /DONUTS
199.11
SERVICE
12- 4248 - 434 -43
245.00
RICHARD C AXEL
AMBULANCE REFUND
245.00
160..60
ALL -AMER BOTTLING
MIX
160.20 i66 --66-
ALL -AMER BOTTLING
MIX
320.80* - 328-68 *
06 -18 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4120 - 613 -61
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6942 .
10- 4248 - 520 -52 2105 8140
10- 4204 - 440 -44
27 -1300- 005 -00 8139
27- 4624 - 663 -66 8067
10- 3180- 000 -00
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
751.62
AAA
REGISTRATION FEES
10- 4310- 560 -56
751.62
31.39
ACE SUPPLY
PIPE
50- 4540 - 861 -86 118134 7507
31.39
63.33
ALBINSON
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26 654899 5352
198.02
ALBINSON
BLUE
PRINT SUPPLYS
10- 4570 - 260 -26 651210 5352
261.35
52.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
SERVICE
10- 4226 - 420 -42
12.50
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
SERVICE
10- 4248 - 540 -54
6.50
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
SERVICE
12- 4248 - 434 -34
6.50-
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
SERVICE
12- 4248 - 434 -34
6.50
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER
SERVICE
12- 4248 - 434 -43
9
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169A31
06/04/90
32.00
AIRSIGNAL
PAGER SERVICE
103.00
* * * * **
169A34
06/04/90
220.80
ALLIED PLASTICS
CLEAR PLEX
220.80
169A39
06/04/90
62.42
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
169A39
06/04/90
48.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
COIL SET
169A39
06/04/90
7.25
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
SHAFT ADAPTOR
117.67
*
* * * * **
169A41
06/11/90
70.20
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
FOOD
169A41
06/11/90
183.99
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
254.19
*
* * * * **
169A43
06/11/90
40.00
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40.00
* * * * **
169A49
06/07/90
277.25
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
9.90
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
109.20
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
227.21
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
56.73
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
53.76
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
169A49
06/07/90
64.42
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
798.47
* * * * **
169A54
06/06/90
35.00
AAGARD
RECYCLING
169A54
06/06/90
35.00
AAGARD
RECYCLING
169A54
06/06/90
35.00
AAGARD
RECYCLING
* * * * **
105.00
169A67
06/07/90
40.12
AQUA ENGINEERING
RISER
40.12
*
169A80
06/07/90
28.50
ASTLEFORD INTL
GASKET
28.50
*
06 -18 -90 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4248 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 13996 7650
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 7021 7813
10- 4540 - 560 -56 14986 7769
40- 4580- 801 -80 7020 7803
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5506
27- 4624- 663 -66 5506
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 65417 8101
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 440 -44
10- 4262 - 482 -48
10- 4262 - 520 -52
30- 4262 - 782 -78
50- 4262 - 821 -82
50- 4262 - 841 -84
50- 4262- 861 -86
* ** -CKS
50- 4250 - 821 -82
50- 4250 - 841 -84
50- 4250 - 861 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30 25198 7932
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7931
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
169602
06/11/90
65.75
* * * * **
65.75
169B05
06/04/90
4.99
169B05
06/04/90
9.01
169.605
06/04/90
55.23
69.23
169606
06/11/90
20.60
169806
06/12/90
470.25
490.85
169607
06/12/90
2,152.90
.169607
06/06/90
4,328.40
169607
06/06/90
1,889.72
169607
06/06/90
594.90
* * * * **
8,965.92
169610
06/04/90
18.00
169BIO
06/04/90
68.13 66
. iB
169610
06/04/90
18.00
104. 13* - 102-i3-
169617
06/12/90
182.40
169617
06/12/90
33,348.15
33,530.55
169818
06/07/90
220:56-
169618
06/07/90
285•.57
* * * * **
65.01
169622
06/12/90
733.00
169B22
06/11/90
1,126.20
169622
06/07/90
1,177.00
169622
06/11/90
1,697.35
* * * * **
4,733.55
169625
06/06/90
100.00
* * * * **
100.00
169B30
06/11/90
9.99
169830
06/06/90
3.96
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BFI PORTABLE SERV PORTABLE
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACHMANS
BACHMANS
BADGER METER INC
BADGER METER INC
BADGER METER INC
BADGER METER INC
BALDWIN SUPPLY CO
BALDWIN SUPPLY CO
BALDWIN SUPPLY CO
BFI RECYCLING SYS
BFI RECYCLING SYS
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER WHOLESALERS
BENNETT -WAYNE
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PLANTING SUPPLIES
FLOWERS
FERTILIZER
WATER METERS
WATER METERS
WATER METER
METER PARTS
HEATERS
HEATERS
HEATER
RECYCLING CONTRACT
RECYCLING CONTRACT
CREDIT
BATTERY
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
POLICE SERVICES
FAX MEMO /TRAY
ACOCUNTING PAD
06 -18 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4250 - 664 -66
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4516 - 782 -78.
30- 4560 - 782 -78
27- 4560 - 664 -66 8065
30 =4550- 782 -78 7620
40- 1220 - 000 -00 630183 5189
40 -1220- 000 -00 628627 5198
40- 1220 - 000 -00 628945 5189
40- 4540 - 807 -80 628847 5189
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
40- 4540- 801 -80 283177 7279
40- 4540 - 801 -80 282774 7009
40- 4540- 801 -80 782439.7009
* ** -CKS
10- 4226- 501 -50
10- 4226 - 507 -50
10- 4540 - 560 -56 20749
10- 4540 - 560 -56 20995 7667
27- 4630 - 663 -66 5505
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
10- 4100 - 430 -42
10- 4504 - 140 -14 574897
10- 4504 - 160 -16 573444
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
06 -18 -90 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
169630
06/11/90
45.41
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
DISKETTES
10- 4504 - 160 -16
574897
169630
06/06/90
5.95
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
CALENDAR
10- 4504 - 260 -26
573622
169630
06/04/90
24.40
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
MARKERS /PUNCH
10- 4504 - 420 -42
571399
169B30
06/06/90
31.34
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
569982
169630
06/06/90
17.00
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
57344
169630
06/06/90
154.36
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
573348
169630
06/06/90
98.06
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
LEGAL /SCRATCH PAD
10- 4504 - 510 -51
573445
169630
06/04/90
11.76
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
BINDER CLIPS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
571399
169630
06/11/90
126.26
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
574897
169630
06/06/90
43.97
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
573444
169630
06/11/90
138.89
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 440 -44
573414
7231
169630
06/11/90
6.70
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
PUSH PINS
27- 4504 - 661 -66
574897
169630
06/11/90
.29.04
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
ASH TRAYS
27- 4504 - 662 -66
569795
7707
169630
06/04/90
12.16
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
ERASERS /PUNCHES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
571399
169630
06/07/90
25.60
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
573906
8056
k k * *
784.85
k
169632
06/04/90
99.50
BEST LOCK
OF MPLS
SWITCH
10- 4540 - 646 -64
003070
6791
169632
06/04/90
138.00
BEST LOCK
OF MPLS
CORES
10- 4540 - 646 -64
3787
6987
169632
06/06/90
101.60
'BEST LOCK
OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
4913
7907
k * k k
339.10
169642
06/11/90
27.67-
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
143791
8099
169642
06/11/90
27.97
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
143791
8099
169642
06/11/90
27.67
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
143791
8099
27.97
* * k * k k
169650
06/12/90
319.97
BEST BUY SUPERSTORE-
OFFICE SUPPLIES
12- 4504 - 434 -43
* k * k * k
319.97
169659
06/04/90
626.78
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 301 -30
169B59
06/04/90
156.70
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 440 -44
169859
06/04/90
156.70
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250- 520 -52
169659
06/04/90
626.79
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 540 -54
169859
06/04/90
205.57
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
169659
06/04/90
104.46
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
169659
06/04/90
417.85
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
169659
06/04/90
52.24
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
23- 4250 - 612 -61
169659
06/04/90
313.40
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
26- 4250 - 682 -68
169659
06/04/90
470.09
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
27- 4250 - 662 -66
169659
06/04/90
104.46
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
27- 4250 - 664 -66
169659
06/04/90
6.03
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
27- 4250- 667 -66
169659
06/04/90
313.39
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
28- 4250 - 702 -70
169659
06/04/90
1,253.57
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
30- 4250- 782 -78
169659
06/04/90
26.12
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
50- 4250 - 841 -84
169B59
06/04/90
26.12
BFI OF MN
INC
GARBAGE
50- 4250 - 861 -86
4;860.27
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
xxxxxx
169882
06/11/90
169B82
06/11/90
169B82
06/11/90
169B83
06/11/90
xxxxxx
169C01
06/06/90
169CO2
06/04/90
xxxxxx
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/06/90
169C04
06/04/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
169C05
06/12/90
xxxx *x
169C16
06/04/90
169C17
06/07/90
169C18
06/06/90
AMOUNT
258.50
355.70
79.19
693.39 *
181.80
181.80 *
201.91
201.91 *
56.08
56.08 *
96.00
216.00
240.00
72.00
72.00
576.00
96.00
1,368.00
39.83
18.66
24.03
27.63
24.06
3.10
46.98
184.29
119.00
119.00 *
96.92
96.92 *
23.00
23.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COUNTS MED EQUIP
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CATCO
CDP
CEDAR LAKE FLORAL
xxxxxx
169C23 06/11/90 54.00 CORE RESTORE
54.00
xx.xxxx
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BALLFIELD LIME
COST /GOODS SOLD
MEDICAL BAG
STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF SHIRTS
TROPHIES
TELEPHONES
SW COMM NEWS
MEETING EXPENSES
MEETING EXPENSES
GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
BATTERY
OFFICE FURNITURE
06 -18 -90 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 260 -26 080629 5353
10- 4504 - 260 -26 080613 5353
10- 4504 - 260 -26 080607 5353
10- 4522 - 642 -64 6709
23- 4624- 613 -61 106114 7709
10- 4510 - 440 -44 120807 7225
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 450.4- 623 -62
10- 4504 - 624 -62
10- 4504= 624 -62
10- 4504 - 645 -64
26- 4262 - 682 -68
27- 4504 - 667 -66
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4504 - 434 -43
12- 4508 - 434 -43
12- 4902 - 434 -43
1087
1087
1087
1087
1087
1087
21603
7632
7632
7632
7632
7632
7632
7485
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* * * ;CKS
PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7738
RENTAL 10- 4504 - 540 -54
COMM EXPENSES 10- 4280 - 504 -50 528302
* ** -CKS
CARTRIGE INK 27- 4600 - 661 -66 7710 7969
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO.'INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
169C25
06/04/90
262.20
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
112998
169C25
06/04/90
110.20
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
112996.
169C25
06/04/90
95.00 -4?.59-
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
113365
419.99 *
467.40
-
* * * * **
-
* ** -CKS
169C30
06/11/90
78.45
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
169C30
06/07/90
210.00
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
169C30
06/11/90
116.00
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
404.45
* * * * **
*AA-CKS
169C32
06/07/90
155.55
FRAN CALLAHAN
MILEAGE /MAY
10- 4208 - 480 -48
155.55
Ik lk *
* * * -CKS
169C34
06/11/90
153.16
CITY OF RICHFIELD
LIGHT /POWER
41- 4252- 900 -90
73034
153.16
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169C36
06/12/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 821 -82
10405
169C36
06/12/90
12.25.
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 841 -84
10406
169C36
06/12/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 861 -86
10407
36.75
169C37
06/11/90
11.18
CLANCY DRUG INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169C37
06/11/90
27.97
CLANCY DRUG INC.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 627 -62
39.15
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169C39
06/12/90
90.50
CLEAN -FLO LAB
LAKE TREATMENT
10- 4201 - 358 -30
5336 6831
90.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169C44
06/12/90
328.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
27- 4524- 663 -66
5507
169C44
06/12/90
328.00-
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
27- 4524 - 663 -66
5507
169C44
06/12/90
328.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5507
169C44
06/07/90
312.17
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
169C44
06/07/90
894.54
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
169C44
06/07/90
1,279.27
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
2,813.98
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169C64
06/12/90
355.10
SYSCO MINNESOTA
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
5510
169C64
06/11/90
86.30
SYSCO MINNESOTA
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
5510
169C64
06/11/90
61.59
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CLEANING
27- 4512 - 663 -66
5510
169C64
06/12/90
187.57
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CLEANING
27- 4512 - 663 -66
5510
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
5510
169C64
06/11/90
85.09
169C64
06/12/90
20.58
27- 4624 - 663 -66
169C64
06/11/90
1,588.54
169C64
06/12/90
3,464.763 - 692-29
5,849.53*
*
* * * * **
169C89
06/06/90
289.06
7319 6857
* * * * **
289.06
* ** -CKS
169D19
06/06/90
359.10
* ** -CKS
359.10
169D21
06/04/90
255.00
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
255.00
10- 4208 - 600 -60
169D27
06/11/90
266.02
* * * * **
12- 4902 - 434 -43
266.02
169D29
06/07/90
52.70
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* * * * **
52.70
169D33
06/12/90
320.25
169D33
06/12/90
65.28
385.53
169D39
06/07/90
69.95
* * * * **
69.95
*
169D61
06/06/90
100.00
* * * * **
100.00
*
169D79
06/12/90
1,680.79
169D79
06/06/90
8,194.51
9,875.30
*
* * * * **
169D87
06/06/90
44.40
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SYSCO MINNESOTA CLEANING
SYSCO MINNESOTA BAGS /SUPPLIES
SYSCO MINNESOTA FOODS
SYSCO MINNESOTA FOOD
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS
DANS REGISTER SERV. CASH REGISTER
DANNYS CONSTR. CO. CRANE RENTAL
DAVE S FOOD WAGON MILK /DAIRY
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER
DAVIS- EUGENE WEED INSPECTION
DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE
DAYTONS EQUIP /NEW
DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES
DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL SERVICES
DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL
DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 1139- 000 -00 370196
10- 4218- 220 -22 374781
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 34191
06 -18 -90
PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. #
MESSAGE
27- 4512 - 664 -66
5510
27- 4540 - 666 -66
5510
27- 4624 - 663 -66,
5510
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5510
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
43595 7781
* ** -CKS
26- 1340 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 460 -46
7319 6857
* ** -CKS
27- 4624- 663 -66
5508
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 842 -84
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60
* ** -CKS
12- 4902 - 434 -43
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 1139- 000 -00 370196
10- 4218- 220 -22 374781
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 34191
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90
PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
44.40
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169E14
06/07/90
255.99
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGN
10- 4542 - 325 -30
96965
7933
169E14
06/04/90
2,569.00
EARL F. ANDERSON
BENCHES
60- 1300 - 005 -20
96666
6753
2,824.99
*
A*****
* ** -CKS
169E17
06/06/90
5,471.65
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
169E17
06/07/90
10,562.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
169E17
06/07/90
9,773.16
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
25,807.11
*
* k R
* ** -CKS
169E33
06/06/90
42.00
EDINA CHAM OF COM
MEETING
10- 4206 - 140 -14
42.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169E60
06/04/90
96.76
ELECTRIC MOTOR REP.
MOTOR
40- 4540 - 801 -80
7175
96.76
*
* * * * **
* *� -CKS
169E63
06/04/90
74.26
ELECTRONIC CENTER
ELECTRIC PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
1510
7109
74.26
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169E71
06/07/90
78.65
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
SAFETY GLASS
40- 4642 - 803 -80
7879
78.65
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169E75
06/06/90
500.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
CATERING
10- 4500 - 500 -50
500.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169E84
06/12/90
3,270.40
ENGLAND PRESS INC.
SCORE CARDS
27- 4600 - 661 -66
50219
7796
3,270.40
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169F05
06/12/90
252.00
FADDEN PUMP
PUMP SEAL
40- 4540 - 801 -80
59685
7901
252.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169F11
06/06/90
441.53
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHLORINE
26- 4564 - 682 -68
140052
7774
169F11
06/06/90
795.00
FEED RITE CONTROL
SCALE
40- 4540 - 805 -80
139672
7836
169F11
06/06/90
1,837.14
FEED RITE CONTROL
H2O CHEMICALS
40- 4622 - 805 -80
139674
7342
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 17
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
3,073.67
** * * **
* ** -CKS
169F19
06/06/90
577,325.03'
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
10- 1145- 000 -00
169F19
06/06/90
503,925.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
10- 1145- 000 -00
169F19
06/06/90
74,757.50
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
27- 4300 - 661 -66
169F19
06/06/90
42,750.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
27- 4300 - 661 -66
169F19
06/06/90
20,512.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
27- 4300 - 661 -66
169F19
06/06/90
67,600.50
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
28- 4300 - 701 -70
169F19
06/06/90
50,925.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
66- 4300 - 000 -00
1,337,795.03
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169F59
06/04/90
383.00
FRANK J. ZAMBONI
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
5894 7775
383.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169GO1
06/07/90
613.26
G.& K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 301 -30
169G01
06/07/90
223.35
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 560 -56
169G01
06/07/90
201.68
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64
169G01
06/07/90
241.01
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 540 -54
169G01
06/07/90
-87.76
G & K.SERVICES
LAUNDRY
28- 4262 - 702 -70
169G01
06/07/90
16.08
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
30- 4262- 782 -78
169G01
06/07/90
273.45
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40- 4262 - 801 -80
1,656.59
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169GO9
06/12/90
69.00
GOVT TRAIN SERV
CONFERENCE REG
12- 4202 - 434 -43
7920
69.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169G24
06/11/90
40.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REMOVAL
10- 4248 - 440 -44
66538 5051
169G24
06/04/90
280.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO INSTALLATION
10- 4248 - 440 -44
65897 7230
169G24
06/07/90
286.25
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
MAINT CONTRACT
10- 4294 - 560 -56
33652
606.25
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169G30
06/04/90
119.80
GENERAL SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 627 -62
31759
119.80
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169G32
06/11/90
169.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
SERVICES
10- 4318- 280 -28
169G32
06/11/90
169.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
SERVICES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
169G32
06/11/90
507.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
SERVICES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
845.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169G38
06/06/90
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90
PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
100.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169G68
06/04/90
153.55
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
10- 4504 - 460 -46
215019
7152
169G68
06/04/90
159.36
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
10 =4504- 460 -46
215023
7153
169G68
06/04/90
159.36
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
10- 4504 - 466 -46
215023
7153
169068
06/04/90
159.36-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TELEPHONE
10- 4504 - 466 -46
215023
7153
169G68
06/04/90
67.00
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
NOISE SUPRESSORS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
206669
6934
169G68
06/04/90
127.83
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
ELECTRIC PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
221342
6934
169G68
06/04/90
77.89
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
SPRING
10- 4540 - 560 -56
204077
6350
169G68
06/04/90
145.97
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
ELECTRIC PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
221806
7354
169G68
06/04/90
235.00
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
FUSE /WIRE
40- 4540 - 801 -80
763100
7646
966.60
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H09
06/04/90
58.00
HALLMAN
OIL
10- 4616 - 560 -56
53119
7533
169H09
06/11/90
.915.00
HALLMAN
OIL
10- 4618 - 560 -56
53360
7770
973.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H22
06/06/90
100.00
HAROLD SWANSON
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H28
06/07/90
450.00
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE
40- 4504 - 801 -80
35142
7758
169H28
06/07/90
450.00
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE ASSY
40- 4580- 801 -80
34072
6662
169H28
06/07/90
450.00
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE
40- 4580 - 802 -80
35143
7760
1,350.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H31
06/12/90
79.65
HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
3405
8131
79.65
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H38
06/12/90
89.41
HEDBERG AGGREGATES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
58238
7790
89.41
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H42
06/11/90
91.22
HERMAN MILLER INC.
FLIPPER DOOR
10- 4901- 510 -51
450452
7067
91.22
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169H65
06/06/90
100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169I05
06/12/90
20.95
I C M A
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
INDELCO CORP
IRRIGATION PARTS
INTERIOR COM SYS.
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
JERRYS FOODS
BLEACH /SOAP
* * * * * R
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS FOODS
20.95
*
169I09
06/06/90
LUMBER
95.00
PAINT /LUMBER
* * * * **
PAINT /LUMBER
JANET CANTON
95.00
*
169I23
06/11/90
OAK PLYWOOD
246.46
RUNNER
* * * * **
246.46
*
.169159
06 /04/90
43.10
96.99
86.89
* * * * **
43.10*
169J23
.06/06/90
282.00
8
282.00*
7 4 A A A R
******
169J27
06/04/90
22.58
169J27
06/06/90
26.13
169J27
06/06/90
26.46
75.17
1'69J35
06/04/90
287.00
* * * * **
287.00
169J74
06/11/90
59.88
169J74
06/11/90
60.50
169J74
.06/11/90
42.73
* * R R * R
163.11
169J99
06/12/90
40.00
40.00
* * * * **
169K09
06/07/90
17.32
R * R * * *
17.32
169K35
- 06/07/90
99.43
169K35
06/04/90
17.38
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
IAAO
DUES
INDELCO CORP
IRRIGATION PARTS
INTERIOR COM SYS.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JR JOHNSON SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS FOODS
BLEACH /SOAP
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS PRINTING
SALES TAGS
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
PAINT /LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
PAINT /LUMBER
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE 5/30 -6/12
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
OIL SEED
KNOX COMM CREDIT
OAK PLYWOOD
KNOX COMM CREDIT
RUNNER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4204 - 200 -20
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 643 -64 51613 7452
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 27361 7975
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 77714 7794
* ** -CKS
10- 4512 - 440 -44
23- 4504 - 611 -61
23- 4504- 611 -61
* ** -CKS
50- 4516 - 860 -86 2589 7416
* ** -CKS
10- 4604 - 646 -64 49546 2530
30- 4544- 782 -78 38685 7628
30- 4544 - 782 -78 38238 7570
* ** -CKS
10- 4208 - 160 -16
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7745
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 - 52.606009 7799
10- 4540 - 560 -56 606076 7817
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
151.37
LAWSON
CHECK REGISTER
ELECTRIC SUPPLY
10- 4504- 322 -30
06 -18 -90
PAGE 20
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
LAWSON
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
169K35
06/11/90
16.49
LAWSON
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
605385
7981
434.84
169K35
06/11/90
10.17
GENERAL SUPPLIES
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 682 -62
606028
7771
LAWSON
169K35
06/11/90
48.56
7465
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 682 -68
606171
7895
TIRE STRAPS
169K35
06/12/90
66.99
06/04/90
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
LUMBER
27- 4604 - 662 -66
606160
8002
7539
169K35
06/04/90
157.59
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
SPLIT RAIL FENCE
27- 4604 - 664 -66
606020
7839
06/04/90
169K35
06/12/90
42.35
PRODUCTS
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
LUMBER
27- 4604- 664 -66
604970
7924
169K35
06/12/90
39.84
10- 4620 - 560 -56
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
LUMBER
27- 4604- 664 -66
581773
8059
PRODUCTS
169K35
06/06/90
57.55
169L28
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
605113
7927
10- 4620 - 560 -56
169K35
06/06/90
31.49
373.91
KNOX COMM
CREDIT
SAWBLADES
40- 4540 - 801 -80
584160
7617
169L28
06/04/90
297.60
587.84
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
7580
169L28
06/04/90
244.53
* * * * **
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PUMP BOLTS
40- 4540- 803 -80
7540
4,528.60
* ** -CKS
169K57
06/11/90
3,027.00
KUETHER DIST. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
169K57
06/07/90
5,822.45
KUETHER DIST. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
8,849.45
*
* ** -CKS
169L01
06/06/90
875.00
LINDA KOZAK
SERVICES 6/6- 6/19/90
30- 4201 - 781 -78
875.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169L04
06/11/90
103.11
LAHASS
DIVIDER
10- 4504 - 560 -56
9615
7518
169L04
06/11/90
43.11-
LAHASS
DIVIDER
10- 4504 - 560 -56
9615
7518
169L04
06/11/90
43.11
LAHASS
DIVIDER
10- 4504 - 560 -56
9615
7518
169L04
06/11/90
60.00-
LAHASS
CREDIT
10- 4504 - 560 -56
900257
169L04
06/11/90
4,548.00
LAHASS
DUMP BODY
10- 4901 - 650 -64
9607
6024
4,591.11
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169L22
06/06/90
700.00
LANDSCAPE
& TURF
SEED
27- 4562 - 664 -66
7914
700.00
*
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
169L28
06/04/90
151.37
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
ELECTRIC SUPPLY
10- 4504- 322 -30
7578
169L28
06/04/90
182.27
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7577
169L28
06/04/90
381.64
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7639
169L28
06/04/90
434.84
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
7463
169L28
06/11/90
631.19
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BITS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
7465
169L28
06/04/90
77.27
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TIRE STRAPS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
7466
169L28
06/04/90
391.08
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
7539
169L28
06/11/90
519.24
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
7462
169L28
06/04/90
77.38
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
7641
169L28
06/04/90
176.95
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BOLTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7579
169L28
06/04/90
248.76
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7464
169L28
06/04/90
340.57
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BIT /FASTENERS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7461
169L28
06/07/90
373.91
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7640
169L28
06/04/90
297.60
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
7580
169L28
06/04/90
244.53
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PUMP BOLTS
40- 4540- 803 -80
7540
4,528.60
* *R * *R * ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
169L32
06/06/90
169L38
06/12/90
* * * * **
169L42
06/06/90
169L44
06/11/90
169L46
06/11/90
169L56
06/11/90
169L56
06/12/90
169L70
06/06/90
* * * * k *
169L82
06/11/90
169L97
06/06/90
302.05
169M02
06/07/90
169M02
06/04/90
169M07
06/11/90
169M07
06/07/90
06 -18 -90 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4502 - 140 -14 8557
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 126571 7765
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 830565
* ** -CKS
10- 4248- 440 -44 89068
* ** -CKS
27- 4201- 663 -66 5512
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 440 -44 171265
10- 4508- 600 -60 171917
. * ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30575 4914
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 328222 8099
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4310 - 310 -30 5428 7669
10- 4534 - 310 -30 51.70 7584
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
16.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
LMC
16.00
271.00
LEITNER COMPANY
TOPDRESSING
271.00
*
302.05
LESCO
SUPPLIES
302.05
*
30.00
LEAANNS SEW /DECO
GEAR. REPAIRS
30.00
*
196.75
LIEN INFECTION CON
SANITATION
196.75
*
10.75
LINHOFF
PHOTO FINISHING
14.57
LINHOFF,
PHOTO PROCESSING
25.32
*
90.00
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
90.00
*
50.37
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50.37
*
100.00
MERFELD -BERT
POLICE SERVICES
100.00
496.00
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
BROOM
492.00
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
BROOM FOR SWEEPER
988.00
4,930.60
MARK VII SALES
BEER
10,402.95
MARK VII.SALES
BEER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4502 - 140 -14 8557
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 126571 7765
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 830565
* ** -CKS
10- 4248- 440 -44 89068
* ** -CKS
27- 4201- 663 -66 5512
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 440 -44 171265
10- 4508- 600 -60 171917
. * ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30575 4914
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 328222 8099
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4310 - 310 -30 5428 7669
10- 4534 - 310 -30 51.70 7584
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
SUPPLY
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
169M07
06/07/90
7,714.75
* * * * **
SUPPLY
23,048.30
169M16
06/04/90
123.75
EQUIP PARTS
MCGUIRE
123.75
169M18
06/06/90
213.55
213.55
169M19
06/07/90
2,966.25
169M19
06/07/90
45.49
169M19
06/07/90
23.63
169M19
06/11/90
121.37
169M19
06/07/90
54.70
* * * * **
3,211.44
169M22
06/04/90
309.04
169M22
06/07/90
163.67 -
169M22
06/04/90
442.92
169M22
06/04/90
57.83 -
169M22
06/04/90
57.83
588.29
169M25
06/04/90
464.50
* * * * **
169M27
06/07/90
493.50
169M27
06/04/90
327.25
169M27
06/04/90
485.34
169M27
06/06/90
480.30
169M27
.06/04/90
462.00
169M27
06/06/90
406.45
3, 119.3 4*-2- -6�$ --e 4-
169M30
06/06/90
12,128.52
12,128.52
* * * * **
169M32
06/12/90
117.90
117.90
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MARK VII SALES BEER
MCCAREN DESIGNS PROF SERVICES
MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE
MCGUIRE
AUTO
SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
MCGUIRE
AUTO
SUPPLY
TOOLS
MCGUIRE
AUTO
SUPPLY
PARTS
MCGUIRE
AUTO
SUPPLY
EQUIP PARTS
MCGUIRE
AUTO
SUPPLY
REPAIRS
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MERIT SUPPLY
046D OXYGEN & EQUIP
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
METRO REFUSE
M AMUNDSON
06 -18 -90 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4630 - 862 -86
30- 4201 - 782 -78 2989
27- 4624 - 663 -66 320610 7184
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4580 - 560 -56
10- 4620 - 560 -56
27- 4540 - 664 -66 7677
28- 4248 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
ALUM SHEET
10- 4504 - 325 -30
68062
7538
CREDIT
10- 4504 - 335 -30
866465
7538
ALUM SHEET
10- 4504 - 335 -30
66465
7538
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
966465
7538
STEEL
10- 4540- 560 -56
68061
7538
* ** -CKS
POLYLINERS 10- 4504 - 645 -64 24392 7834
STERILANT
TRUCK WASH
PARTS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
REFUSE
CIGARETTES
10- 4504 - 365 -30
10- 4620 - 560 -56
10- 4620- 560 -56
28- 4512- 702 -70
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4512 - 782 -78
24312 7670
24306 7665
24305 7663
24398 7911
24365 7849
24401 7923
10- 4201 - 395 -30 110900
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 23
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
169M35
06/11/90
1,782.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BLDG REPORTS
10- 3095 - 490 -49
1,782.00
169M36
06/04/90
93.18
MINVALCO
CONTROL
50- 4540 - 841 -84
40199
6909
93.18* i86.96-
-*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M42
06/06/90
360.22
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
169M42
06/06/90
491.14
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
169M42
06/11/90
1,683.95
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 301 -30
5615
169M42
06/11/90
7,020.97
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
5615
169M42
06/06/90
11,120.51
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
169M42
06/06/90
4,935.09
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
169M42
06/06/90
420.20
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 45-24- 803 -80
169M42
06/06/90
114.62
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524- 803 -80
26,146.70
* ** -CKS
169M46
06/11/90
97.28
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
169M46
06/06/90
184.94
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
282.22
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M63
06/11/90
178.08
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
169M63
06/07/90
319.50
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
169M63
06/11/90
411.04
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
908.62
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M70
06/06/90
80.00
MN. CONWAY
CLEANING
29- 4512- 722 - 72.15668
8003
80.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M73
06/11/90
89.30
MN. ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
50399
8102
89.30
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M76
06/04/90
186.07
MN. GLOVE
GLOVES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
43438
7668
186.07
*
169M80
06/04/90
1,700.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PRINTING
30-- 4600-781 -78
* ** -CKS
169M80
06/04/90
43.67
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BID
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87744
169M80
06/07/90
46.39
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PUBLIC HRG NOTICE
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87813
169M80
06/07/90
88.31
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87814
169M80
06/12/90
8.85
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87907
169M80
06/12/90
10.03'
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87908
1,897.25*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06-18 -90
PAGE 24
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
169M81
06/11/90
fig;
98.08
. 226
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
10- 4540- 642 -64
120164
7818
169M81
06/11/90
333.39
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
10- 4540 - 643 -64
121683
7874
169M81
06/11/90
7,545.00
MN. TORO INC.
GREENSMOWER
27- 1340 - 000 -00
122038
7136
169M81
06/12/90
47.57
MN. TORO INC._
IRRIGATION PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
123945
8011
169M81
06/11/90
183.60
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
119970
7846
169M81
i6�9?48i
06/12/90
66¢11, 98
140.43
3,7^^
^^
MN. TORO IN/C+.
MN. TQRQ0! NG.
IRRIGATION PARTS
PR !NT PIG
27- 4540 - 664 -66
.39 690 981 78
123825
7994
8,348.07
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M85
06/11/90
70.00
MN. WANNER
HAND SPRAYERS
10- 4580 - 643 -64
75424
70.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M90
06/04/90
290.77
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 314 -30
86511
7098
169M90
06/04/90
290.77-
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 314 -30
86511
7098
169M90
06/04/90
290.88
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 314 -30
86511
7098
169M90
06/04/90
220.75
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
40- 4528 - 803 -80
86144
2235
511.63
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169M92
06/12/90
137.45
MONARCH MARKETING
REPAIRS
50- 4516 - 840 -84
465787
169M92
06/12/90
16.45
MONARCH MARKETING
SUPPLIES
50- 4516- 860 -86
467621
153.90
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169NO3
06/06/90
960.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
21039
7812
169NO3
06/12/90
840.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 803 -80
21044
7946
1,800.00
*
* ** -CKS
169N07
06/06/90
75.00
MTS NW SOUND
RENTAL SHOW
28- 4504 - 702 -70
83187
7193
169N07
06/11/90
300.00
MTS NW SOUND_
MACHINE /EQUIP
30- 1340 - 782 -78
83547
8100
375.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N09
06/07/90
284.87
MUNICILITE CO.
'MOUNTING BRACKET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2207
7897
284.87
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169NII
06/06/90
192.50
MURRAY.SANDLER SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
05361
7845
192.50
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N21
06/07/90
27.76
NAPA AUTO PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
716316
7872
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90
PAGE 25
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.-# P.O. #
MESSAGE
169N21
06/04/90
8.57
NAPA AUTO PARTS
GASKET
SET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
714797
7756
169N21
06/07/90
9.49
NAPA AUTO PARTS
HANDLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
715906
7868
169N21
06/07/90
12.98
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
715873
7826
'58.80
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N24
06/04/90
124.24
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
POWER
SUPPLY
40- 4540- 804 -80
904141
7177
124.24
* * ***
* ** -CKS
169N31
06/11/90
446.85
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
023134
7070
446.85
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N36
06/04/90
108.96
NORTHERN
REPAIR
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
372304
7498
108.96
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N48
06/04/90
222.09
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
232540
7795
222.09
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N50
06/07/90
458.10
NO STAR WATERWORKS
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
35448
7737
169N50
06/04/90
420.00
NO STAR WATERWORKS
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
35447
7736
878.10 *
* ** -CKS
169N54
06/11/90
62.00
NORTHERN AIRE
PAINT
26- 4544 - 682 -68
1847
7963
62.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N56
06/07/90
35.45
NORTHERN POWER PROD.
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
244476
7885
35.45
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N68
06/06/90
149.58
NORTHSTAR ICE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
169N68
06/07/90
281.34
NORTHSTAR ICE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
169N68
06/07/90
340.20
NORTHSTAR ICE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
771.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169N76
06/04/90
450.00
NTCC
FREON
10- 4540 - 520 -52
061383
7438
169N76
06/04/90
58.83
NTCC
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
61261
7028
169N76
06/04/90
424.00
NTCC
FREON
50- 4540 - 861 -86
C61384
7375
932.83
*. * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169N82
06/06/90
85.55
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS,SOLD
85.55
*
k k k k* k
169N96
06/12/90
67.00
MINN COMM PAGING
SERVICE CONTRACT
k k k k k k
67.00
*
169N99
06/11/90
16.80
NAOMI JOHNSON
DUES
169N99
06/11/90
19.10
NAOMI JOHNSON
PRINTING
169N99
06/11/90
19.92
NAOMI JOHNSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
169N99
06/11/90
90.55
NAOMI JOHNSON
CRAFT SUPPLIES
146.37
*
169027
06/11/90
990.00
OLD DOMINION BRUSH
BROOMSTOCK
* k k k * k
990.00
*
169030
06/11/90
254.14
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CHIPS /PRETZELS
254.14
169050
06/12/90
533.63
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE CONTRACT
169050
06/12/90
533.63
-
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE CONTRACT
169050
06/12/90
533.63
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERVICE CONTRACT
533.63
k k k k k k
169P11
06/07/90
24.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
SHOTS
169P11
06107/90
83.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
k * k * * k
107.00
169P24
06/07/90
318.75
PBE
TRIANGLE KIT
318.75
k k * * * k
169P30
06/11/90
1,036.35
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI
169P30
06/11/90
436.78
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
169P30
06/07/90
198.73
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
169P30
06/11/90'
297.86
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
1,969.72
*
169P31
06/04/90
500.00
PETER COTTON
TRAINING
500.00
*
06 -18 -90 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4624 - 613 -61 172785 7713
* ** -CKS
30- 4280 - 782 -78 8132
* ** -CKS
23- 4204 - 611 -61
23- 4214 - 611 -61
23- 4504 - 612 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4534 - 310 -30 4051 7503
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5514
* ** -CKS
30- 4280 - 782 -78 47329 8084
30- 4280 - 782 -78 47329 8084
30- 4288 - 782 -78 47329 8084
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 440 -44
10- 4212 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 -7865
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5513
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
10-4201-440-44
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
32980
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169P46
06/04/90
40.08
* ** -CKS
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
CLAMPS
7980
40.08
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
169P48
06/06/90
88.09,
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
* * k k * k
* ** -CKS
88.09
19169
7815
169P56
06/11/90
97.50
PLASTIC BAGMART
PLASTIC BAGS
97.50
169P58
06/06/90
28.50
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* k * k * *
28.50
*
169P74
06/12/90
61.00
PRECISION BUS SYSTEM
REPAIRS
61.00
*
169P78
06/12/90
39.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
BLADES SHARPENED
39.00
* * * * **
169P80
06/11/90
599.48
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
599.48
169P84
06/11/90
190.17
PRO INSTANT PRINT
EGA FLYERS
169P84
06/12/90
125.50
PRO INSTANT PRINT
PRINTING
* k k k k k
315.67
*
169Q09
06/06/90
145.00
QUALITY REFRIG
MAINT CONTRT
145.00
*
169801
06/12/90_
1,400.00
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
REPAIRS
1,400.00.*
169R12
06/04/90
87.73
RADIO SHACK
ANTENNA
06 -18 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7474
* ** -CKS
30- 4600- 781 -78 7256 7854
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 507 -50 5430 7971
* ** -CKS
28- 45014- 702 -70 113590
I
* ** -CKS
10- 4808- 140 -14 073995
* ** -CKS
28 -4274- 704 -70 50806
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 624 -62
7573
28- 4600 - 000 -00
32980
8094
* ** -CKS
27- 4288 - 663 -66
106436
7980
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 704 -70
13192
7847
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
19169
7815
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
50- 4630 - 862 -86
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
5469 8147
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
87.73
*
* ** -CKS
169R13
06/11/90
132.00
RADIO INSTALLS
RADIO RENTALS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
* * * * **
132.00
*
10- 4260 - 510 -51
169R21
06/11/90
140.20
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY
EQUIP
169R21
06/11/90
84.95
40- 4540- 801 -80
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY
EQUIP
169R21
06/11/90
96.00
173750 7754
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY
EQUIP
321.15
*
169822
06/04/90
179.40
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
179.40
*
* * * * **
169R33
06/11/90
6,073.59
REX DISTR.
BEER
169R33
06/12/90
5,533.45
REX DISTR.
BEER
* * * * **
11,607.04
169R35
06/12/90
399.50
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
REPAIRS
* * * * **
399.50
169R37
06/04/90
130.00
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD.
RELAY
130.00
*
169R47
06/04/90
118.54
ROAD MACHINERY
SHOES
* * * * **
118.54
*
169R49
06/04/90
259.81
ROAD RESCUE
CO2 DETECTORS
259.81
*
* * * * **
169R79
06/11/90
986.12
RTW INC.
FEE FOR
SERVICE
169R79
06/11/90
1,197:58
RTW INC.
FEE FOR
SERVICE
169R79
06/11/90
212.50
RTW INC.
FEE FOR
SERVICE
* *
2,396.20
* * **
169519
06/07/90
195.39
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR
PARTS
169519
06/04/90
143.89
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR
PARTS
169519
06/07/90
125.41
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR
PARTS
169519
06/07/90
62.59
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR
PARTS
527.28
06 -18 -90 PAGE 28
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4226 - 440 -44 17469 5057
* ** -CKS
10- 4642 - 301 -30
10- 4642 - 560 -56
40- 4642 - 801 -80
30- 4504 - 782 -78 01129 7973
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 663 -66
5469 8147
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
900480 7274
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7647
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
050248 7229
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
40- 4540- 801 -80
173427 7672
40- 4540 - 801 -80
172565 7535
40- 4540 - 801 -80
173750 7754
40- 4540 - 802 -80
173415 7747
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
.CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
06 -18 -90 PAGE 29
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
155.29
169S34
06/07/90
169534
06/07/90
169S34
06/07/90
169S34
06/07/90
169S35
06/12/90
169S36
06/07/90
169S36
06/07/90
169S36
06/07/90
kkk
169544
06/04/90
* * k k * *
SWITCH
169550
06/06/90
169S50
06/06/90
169S50
06/06/90
169S72
06/04/90
kkk * * *
169S77
06/06/90
169S77
06/06/90
169S77
06/06/90
169S77
06/07/90
169S77
06/06/90
169S77
06/07/90
169S77
06/07/90
169S78
06/04/90
169S78
06/04/90
169S78
06/04/90
169S78
06/04/90
169578
06/11/90
169578
06/11/90
169S78
06/11/90
169S78
06/04/90
169578
06/04/90
169S78
06/07/90
.CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
06 -18 -90 PAGE 29
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
155.29
SOUTHDALE FORD
HUB
10- 4540 - 560 -56
240422
43.67
SOUTHDALE FORD
FAN ASSY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
239822
41.22
SOUTHDALE FORD
FAN BLADE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
239598
35.31
SOUTHDALE FORD
SWITCH
10- 4540 - 560 -56
240521
275.49
*
31.00
SOUTHERN VACUUM
VACUUM REPAIR
50- 4236- 841 -84
4989
31.00
*
5,532.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
13,211.25
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
367.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50- 4630- 862 -86
19,111.70
*
47.89
SNAP -ON -TOOLS
TOOL
10- 4580- 560 -56
7837
47.89
100.00
JOHN SHEPARD
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100- 430 -42
100.00-
"JOHN SHEPARD
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100- 430 -42
100.00
JOHN SHEPARD
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
51.09
STREICHERS
GASKET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
100691 7863
51.09
*
225.90
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CYLINDER /KEY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
126344
41.40
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
WIRE ASSM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125996
2.79
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
BRAKE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
126176
128.01
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
103217
350.40
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
102523
11.70
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
MOUNT ASM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
126526
290.34
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CAP HUB
10- 4540 - 560 -56
126650
1,050.54
51.65
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
6978
397.39
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
7526
14.32
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
6978
257.26
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
7037
172.36
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
7947
10.00-
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 646 -64
7771
52.67
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
7771
127.64
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
TORCH HEAD
10- 4580- 301 -30
7755
172.92
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
7585
7.96
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
7735
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4504- 318 -30 56469 7369
CHECK
REGISTER
10- 4566 - 643 -64 57800 7884
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
10- 4201 - 644 -64
VENDOR
10- 4201 - 980 -98
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169S78
06/04/90
108.65
* ** -CKS
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
REPAIR PARTS
169S78
06/07/90
2.41
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
REPAIR PARTS
169S78
06/04/90
112.01
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
REPAIR PARTS
169S78
06/04/90
103.05
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
REPAIR PARTS
xxxxxx
1,570.29
*
169S83
06/04/90
24.03
SUPERAMERICA
GASOLINE
xxxxxx
24.03
*
169T05
06/06/90
121.00
THE PRINT SHOP
FUTURES EXPENSES
169T05
06/06/90
438.50
THE PRINT SHOP
NEWSLETTER
xxxxxx
559.50
169T08
06/07/90
71.88
TARGET
SUPPLIES
169T08
06/07/90
157.28
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
169T08
06/07/90
72.95
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
169T08
06/07/90
40.97
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
xxxxxx
343.08
169T11
06/07/90
104.00
TESSMAN SEED &
CHEM.
SEED
169T11'
06/07/90
182.00
TESSMAN SEED &
CHEM.
WEED KILLER
169T11
06/11/90
81.50
TESSMAN SEED &
CHEM.
WEED SPRAY
367.50
xxxxxx
169T13
06/07/90
885.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY WORK
169T13
06/07/90
60.00
TOM HORWATH
ASSESSING
169T13
06/07/90
93.84
TOM HORWATH.
MILEAGE
xxxxxx
1,038.84
169T19
06/12/90
1,254.50
THE PIRKL ASSOC.
CONSTRUCTION
xxxxxx
1,254.50
169T29
06/11/90
11,866.94
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROSECUTING
11,866.94
169T30
06/07/90
13,634.25
THORPE DISTR.
BEER
xxxxxx
13,634.25
169T38
06/11/90
1,506.00
TOIVONEN PAINTING
PAINTING
06 -18 -90 PAGE 30
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4540 - 801 -80 7671
40- 4540- 801 -80 7752
40- 4540 - 801 -80 7534
40- 4540 - 801 -80 7664
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
10- 4206 - 500 -50 92206 7981
10- 4504 - 628 -62 13742 7091
* ** -CKS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 140 -14
28- 4504 - 702 -70
30- 4504 - 783 -78
* ** -CKS
26- 4544 - 682 -68 7690
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 318 -30 56469 7369
10- 4566 - 643 -64 57223 7824
10- 4566 - 643 -64 57800 7884
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -98
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 003 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4201- 220 -22
* ** -CKS
26- 4544 - 682 -68 7690
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90
PAGE 31
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
1,506.00
k k k
* ** -CKS
169T42
06/06/90
27.75
TOOLS BY OLSEN
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
26080
7908
27.75
k k k * * k
* ** -CKS
169T66
06/11/90
2,012.57
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 624 -62
380003
7052
2,012..57
k * * k k *
-
* ** -CKS
169T72
06/12/90
285.60
TROPICAL SNO
SOFT SERVE
26- 4624 - 683 -68
10321
285.60
*
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
169T82
06/11/90
61.43
TWIN CITY ELEVATOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT
10- 4248 - 520 -52
13122
61.43
*
k k
kk*-CKS
169T86
06/04/90
327.29
TWIN CITY FILTER
FILTERS
10 -4504- 520 -52
T8058
7324
327.29
* * k * * k
* ** -CKS
169T88
06/07/90
36.24
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
36.24
* * k k k k
* ** -CKS
169U08
06/11/90
1,692.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
169U08
06/11/90
19.35
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266 - 430 -42
1,711.35
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
169U14
06/04/90
227.52
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
ELECTRIC PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
6849
169U14
06/04/90
92.05
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
FIXTURES
10- 4540 - 520 -52
7473
169U14
06/12/90
28.74
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
8452
169U14
06/04/90
102.66
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
ELECTRIC PARTS'
40- 4540 - 802 -80
7657
169U14
06/04/90
469.48
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
ELECTRIC PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
7089
920.45
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
169U25
06/11/90
32.00
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
2970
7226
169U25
06/04/90
47.98
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
OXYGEN
10- 4510 - 440 -44
759700
5805
169U25
06/11/90
180.00
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
7226
259.98
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
169U30
06/11/90
21.00
US WEST PAGING
PAGER RENTAL
* * * * **
21.00
*
169V10
06/12/90
198.49
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
LP FUEL
* * * * **
198.49
*
169V15
06/04/90
4.60
VAN PAPER CO.
4oz CONE CUPS
* * * * **
4.60
169V48
06/12/90
59.55
VOTER REG /ELEC SECT
POSTAGE
59.55
* * * * **
169V80
06/04/90
398.31
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
169V80
06/04/90
230.50
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
BALLAST
169V80
06/04/90
13.80
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
* * * * **
642.61
169W08
06/04/90
302.40
W.W. GRAINGER
MICROWAVE
169W08
06/04/90
45.43
W.W. GRAINGER
FILTER /PARTS
169W08
06/04/90
8.76
W.W. GRAINGER
GASKETS
169W08
06/04/90
97.02
W.W. GRAINGER
RELAY
* * * * **
453.61
169W11
06/12/90
399.24
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
169W11
06/12/90
499.05
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
169W11
06/11/90
496.76
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
1,395.05
* * * * **
169W15
06/06/90
100.00
WALTER JOHNSON
POLICE SERVICES
100,00
169W28
06/07/90
42.60
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
* * * * **
42.60
169W52
06/06/90
100.00
WM WALSH
POLICE SERVICES
100.00
06 -18 -90 PAGE 32
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4256 - 640 -64 8023
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4514 - 520 -52 310959 7844
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 540 -54 277983 7501
10- 4504 - 520 -52 267164 7355
10- 4540 - 520 -52 267134 6195
* ** -CKS
10- 4540- 520 -52 7638
10- 4540 - 540 -54 7739
10- 4540 - 540 -54 7739
10- 4540 - 646 -64 7088
* ** -CKS
27- 4612 - 664 -66 41194 7719
27- 4612- 664 -66 41195 7718
27- 4612 - 665 -66 41314 7982
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 129848 7821
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -18 -90 PAGE 33
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* k * k
* ** -CKS
169W66
06/07/90
46.68
WILLIAMS STEEL
FUEL CYLINDER
10- 4504 - 301 -30
169W66
06/06/90
41.19
WILLIAMS STEEL
HARD HAT SPRAY
10- 4620 - 560 -56
169W66
06/06/90
21.61
WILLIAMS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
109.48
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
169W76
06/12/90
32'.34
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
CLUBS
27- 4504- 665 -66
32776 6474
169W76
06/12/90
2,453.00
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
BALL PICKER
27- 4504 - 665 -66
32863 6683
169W76
06/12/90
200.53
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
CLUBS
27- 4504- 665 -66
32703 7246
169W76
06/12/90
12.09
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
CLUBS
27- 4504 - 665 -66
32775 6830
2,697.96
*
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
169W79
06/12/90
440.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
TRANSPLANT TREES
10- 4560 - 644 -64
1550 8025
440.00
*
k
* ** -CKS
169W92
06/06/90
100.00
WROBLESKI -HENRY
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
169X05
06/04/90
48.13
XEROX CORP.
AUDIT COVERS
10- 4504- 510 -51
7396
48.13
k k* k k k
* ** -CKS
169Z05
06/11/90
211.55
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
8075
211.55
k * k k * k
* ** -CKS
1,254,166.85
i,254,825.5-&-
FUND 10 TOTAL
_
GENERAL FUND
11,514.26
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
3,442.55
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
8,124.36
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
- 172,904.42
173,871.95
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
72,527.60
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
80.00
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
11,695.00
}} -685-90
-
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
24,805.89
24,883.09
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
113,865.18
i�3153.16
113,958.i6
FUND FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
453,062.80
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
50,925.00
FUND 66 TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2
2,177,267.07*
2,17',7-
TOTAL
s.
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
124717 06/01/90
k k k rt x k
124E33 06/01/90
k * * k * k
124M14 06/01/90
k x k k* k
128763 06/01/90
128764 06/01/90
kkxkxk
128E11
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128E11
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128E11
06/07/90
128E11
06/07/90
128E11
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128E11.
06/07/90
128E11
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128EII
06/07/90
128E11
06/01/90
128E11
06/01/90
128E11
06/01/90
*kkkk k
* ** -CKS
128E26
06/07/90
128E26
06/07/90
128E26
06/07/90
128E26
06/07/90
128E26
06/07/90
128E26
06/07/90,
128E26
06/07/90
AMOUNT
MANUAL
135.00
MANUAL
135.00
*
48.00
MANUAL
48.00
*
15.00
MANUAL
15.00
*
2,137.36
MANUAL
2,137.36
*
84.00
MANUAL
84.00
*
1.30 -
9.09-
.92-
1.30-
18.67-
.92-
1.38-
20.84-
5.77 -.
454.51
64.89
45.99
69.00
45.99
933.66
64.89
288.54
1,042.09
39.12
123.10
45.75
3,157.34
5.00 -
19.51-
34.49- `
4.30 -
50.77-
975.82
1,724.77
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MAAO SEMINAR
EDINA CHAM COMM
MAUMA
US POSTAL SERVICE
MN D.N.R.
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE,
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE.
EAGLE WINE.
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
CHAMBER MEETING
SEMINAR
BULK MAIL
PERMIT
MIX
MIX
MIX
05 -31 -90 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4202 - 200 -20 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 140 -14 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
12- 4215- 434 -43 MANUAL
10- 4201 - 358 -30 MANUAL
** *-CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 862 -86.
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
128E26
06/07/90
2,538.99
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
215.31
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
562.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
678.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
42.90-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
548.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
613.96
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
233.35
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
878.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
575.51
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
143.45
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
128E26
06/07/90
470.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
128E26
06/01/90
75.75
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128E26
06/01/90
85.35
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
10,165.04
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
128G82
06/07/90
2.24-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
23.30-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
42.44-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
55.10-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
62.90
-•
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
12.22-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
7.96-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
12.22-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
11.88-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
12.22-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
65.02-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
47.05-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
109.57-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
611.10
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
3,145.18
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
398.05
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/9.0
593.96
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
611.10
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128682
06/07/90
5,478.50
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128682
06/07/90
611.10
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
2,352.33
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
3,250.98
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128G82
06/07%90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
24.06-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
16,564.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
128J62
06/07/90
16.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
26.88-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
2.16-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4.19-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
.57-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
i
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
128J62
06/07/90
8.86-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
14.76-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
86.79-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
5.22-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
2.13-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
1.76-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
46.25-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL,
128J62
06/07/90
5.02-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
91.45-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
3.79-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
8.82
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
10.74-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
1,344.83
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
2.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4,339.91
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
261.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
26.95
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
190.24-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
2,312.38
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4,572.71
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
9.80
JOHNSON WINE-
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90.
29.89
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
5.39
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
419.53
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
216.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
23.26-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
57.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
1.96
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
213.86
JOHNSON WINE
50 =4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
17.15
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
1,478.51
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
18.62
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
885.51
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
12.65-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
5.88
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
4.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
7.84
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
175.76
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
503.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128J62
06/07/90
381.23
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
16,758.43
* * * -CKS
128P82
06/07/90
4.31-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
16.51-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
1.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
.75-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
5.20-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
215.73
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
73.00
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
825.31
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
128P82
06/07/90
260.23
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128P82
06/07/90
37.25
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
128P82
06/01/90
100.01
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1,483.30
* ** -CKS
128Q16
06/07/90
8.66-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
7.67-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
9.95-
QUALITY
WINE
50-3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
44.75-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
6.21-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
57.81-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
11.10-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
13.44-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
.65-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
71.83-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
497.82
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
432.99
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
2,890.98
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
554.92
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
2,240.86
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
3,591.93
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
764.85
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
619.70
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
1,339.65
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
128Q16
06/07/90
65.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12,766.63
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
130N16
06/01/90
32.51
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 301 -30
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
84.22
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 321 -30
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
25,362.19
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 322 -30
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
3,193.06
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 330 -30
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
2,502.29
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 375 -30
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
734.23
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 440 -44
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
47.18
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 460 -46
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
1,217.95
NSP
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 520 -52
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
2,211.31
NSP_
POWER /LITES
10- 4252 - 540 -54
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
1,971.71
NSP
POWER/LITES
10- 4252 - 646 -64
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
1,149.53
NSP
POWER /LITES
23- 4252 - 612 -61
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
43.41
NSP
POWER /LITES
26- 4252- 682 -68
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
1,800.04
NSP
POWER /LITES
27- 4252 - 662 -66
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
218.43
NSP
POWER /LITES
27- 4252 - 664 -66
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
922.47
NSP
POWER /LITES
27- 4252 - 667 -66
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
6,667.75
NSP
POWER /LITES
28- 4252 - 702 -70
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
349.14
NSP
POWER /LITES
29- 4252 - 722 -72
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
5,800.44
NSP
POWER /LITES
30- 4252 - 782 -78
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
2,121.15
NSP
POWER /LITES
40- 4252 - 801 -80
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
18,124.42
NSP
POWER /LITES
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
342.54
NSP
POWER /LITES
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
131.49
NSP
POWER /LITES
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
518.54
NSP
POWER /LITES
50- 4252 - 821 -82
MANUAL
130N16
06/01/90
739.87
NSP
POWER /LITES
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
- 1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4256 - 682 -62
MANUAL
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
13ON16
06/01/90
435.31
NSP
* ** -CKS
POWER /LITES
w* w w k w
50- 1010 - 000 -00
76,721.18
* ** -CKS
10- 1145 - 000 -00
131A82
06/01/90
6.73
AT &T
MANUAL
PHONE
131A82
06/01/90
3.00
AT &T
MANUAL
PHONE
131A82
06/01/90
8.56
AT &T
MANUAL
PHONE
131A82
06/01/90
.63
AT &T
MANUAL
PHONE
MANUAL
40- 4256- 803 -80
18.92 *
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4256- 841 -84
131A83
06/01/90
96.29
AT &T
* ** -CKS
PHONE
131A83
06/01/90
57.49
AT &T
MANUAL
PHONE
153.78 *
131A84
06/01/90
16.95
AT &T
PHONE
16.95 *
wwwwww
131C33
06/01/90
25,000.00-
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
131C33
06/01/90
25,000.00
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
wwwwww
.00
131H83
06/01/90
60,000.00
HRA
TRANSFER
wwwwww
60,000.00
131U27
06/01/90
3,528.48
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
268.34
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
187.01
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
223.76
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
24.89
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
518.20
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
66.08
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
182.20
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
44.31
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131027
06/01/90
50.77
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
87.54
US WEST.COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
570.46
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
16.06
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
32.12
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
131U27
06/01/90
183.82
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
5,984.04
wwwwww
134801
06/01/90
774.00
COMM 88
CELLULAR PHONE
wwwwww
774.00
134F14
06/01/90
14,875.88
FIDELITY
BANK
FICA
05 -31 -90 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4252- 861 -86 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 682 -62
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
26- 4256- 682 -68
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 664 -66
MANUAL
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
29- 4256 - 722 -72
MANUAL
30- 4256- 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4256- 803 -80
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4256- 841 -84
MANUAL
50- 4256- 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4159 - 510 -51
MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV
134F14 06/01/90 608.73 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51
15,484.61 *
* * * * **
135700 06/01/90 248.00 LMC HOUSING LODGING DEPOSIT 10- 4202 - 140 -14
248.00 *
* * * * **
135E11
06/07/90
5.58-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
135E11
06/07/90
.51-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135EII
06/07/90
4.57-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135EII
06/07/90
6.49-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135EII
06/07/90
11.66-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135EII
06/07/90
4.71-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862-86
135EII
06/07/90
279.20
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135E11
06/07/90
25.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135EII
06/07/90
228.48
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
135EII
06/07/90
324.31
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
135EII
06/07/90
235.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135EII
06/07/90
583.08
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135E11
06/01/90
18.50
EAGLE WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
135E11
06/01/90
41.52
EAGLE WINE MIX
50- 4632- 842 -84
1,702.57
* * * * **
135E26
06/07/90
2.62 -
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135E26
06/07/90
5.28-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
9.15-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
.135E26
06/07/90
1.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
1.20-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
135.97 igG.B?
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
135E26
06/07/90
457.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
264.26
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
60.04
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
68..57
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
461.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135E26
06/07/90
477.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135E26
06/07/90
139.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135E26
06/07/90
1,486.38
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
1,939.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
516.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
135E26
06/07/90
1,128.05
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
62.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
855.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135E26
06/07/90
691.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135E26 _
06/01/90
64.00
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
8,724.83
* * * * **
135G82
06/07/90
8.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
135G82
06/07/90
16.98-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
05 -31 -90 PAGE 6
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL.
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
135G82
06/07/90
59.62-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
27.69-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
55.92-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135682
06/07/90
9.12-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
3.09-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
4.75-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
38.40-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 822 782
MANUAL
135682
06/07/90
4.75-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
139.60-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
7.45-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135682
06/07/90
5.27-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
85.41-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
15.47-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
4.75-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135682
06/07/90
237.65
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
1,919.86
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
372.44
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
263.60
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
6,977.29
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
4,270.73
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
237.65
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
237.65
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
773.48
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
135682
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
14,804.08
axxxxx
* * * -CKS
135J62
06/07/90
11.88-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
23.76-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
1.82-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
46.63-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
3.60-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
7.05-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
66.60-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
11.32-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
46.20-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
10.83-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
8.81-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
17.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
2.50-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
8.94-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
2,331.24
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
10.54
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
180.12
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
1.47
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
16.25
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
16.42
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
3,331.07
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
3.00
PAUSTIS
CHECK REGISTER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
05 -31 -90 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
135J62
06/07/90
2,310.04
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
5.39
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
3.43
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
447.43
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
861.12
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
5.39
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
706.64
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
.00
JOHNSON.WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
10.29
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
.95-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
181.74
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
.95-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
17.15
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
1,083.56
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
1,131.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
24.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
20.63-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
14.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
251.04
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
880.12
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135J62
06/07/90
7.84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * **
13,539.21*
* ** -CKS
135L32
06/01/90
465.00
LEAGUE /MN CITY. REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 140 -14
MANUAL
465.00 *
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
135P20
06/07/90
3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135P20
06/07/90
139.95
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135P20
06/07/90
6.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135P20
06/07/90
296.70
PAUSTIS
& SONS
5'0- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135P20
06/01/90
43.95
PAUSTIS
& SONS MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
PRIOR
WINE
490.00
MANUAL
135P82
06/07/90
9.32-
* * * * **
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135P82
* ** -CKS
135P32
06/01/90
25,524.24
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145- 510 -51
MANUAL
06/07/90
84.34
25,524.24
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
* * * * ** ** *-CKS
135P70
06/01/90
185.00
POSTMASTER POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
185.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
135P82
06/07/90
2.09-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135P82
06/07/90
14.69-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135P82
06/07/90
9.32-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135P82
06/01/90
19.95
PRIOR
WINE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135P82
06/07/90
84.34
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
135P82
06/07/90
734.37
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
135P82
06/07/90
465.75
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
k k * k * k
1,278.31
135Q16
06/07/90
2.53-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
.61
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
.33-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
4.21-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
15.26-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
38.62-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
1.28
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
.98-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
11.89-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
2.53-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
6.17-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
5.05-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
.61
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
10.91-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
.98-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
126.29
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
762.59
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
126.29
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
1,930.33
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
64.17-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
252.58
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
135016
06/07/90
308.90
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
60.50-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
419.30
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82.
135Q16
06/07/90
32.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
135Q16
06/07/90
1,183.20
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
97.50'
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
135Q16
06/07/90
60.50-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
1,087.80
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
135Q16
06/07/90
97.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
6,142.90
137701
06/01/90
5.00
CITY OF
HOPKINS
MEETING
10- 4206 - 140 -14
5.00
137702
06/01/90
245.00
COMM OF
REV
STATE BD ASSESSORS
10- 4201- 200 -20
*
245.00
*
* * * **
138727
06/01/90
230.00
MN CLE
SEMINAR
10- 4202 - 140 -14
k * * * k k
-
230.00
138B73
06/01/90
12.00
GC PETTY
CASH
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 000 -00
138673
06/01/90
50.00
GC PETTY
CASH
RENTAL
27- 3230 - 000 -00
05 -31 -90 PAGE 9
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
283.93
COMM
OF REV
SALES
CHECK
REGISTER
138C51
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
OF REV
SALES
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
138B73
06/01/90
140.75
OF REV
GC
PETTY
CASH
SALARIES.
27- 4120 - 666 -66
138673
06/01/90
76.25
SALES
GC
PETTY
CASH
SCHOOL
27- 4202 - 661 -66
138B73
06/01/90
5.00
TAX
GC
PETTY
CASH
DUES
27- 4204 - 661 -66
138873
06/01/90 0
32.48
30- 3357 - 000 -00
GC
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
27- 4208 - 661 -66
138873
06/01/90
43.50
138C51
GC
PETTY
CASH
REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
138873
06/01/90
5.19
06/01/90
GC
PETTY
CASH
LAUNDRY
27- 4262 - 663 -66
138B73
06/01/90
21.15
11,444.67
GC
PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
138873
06/01/90
8.47
GC
PETTY
CASH
CLEAN SUPPLYS
27- 4512 - 662 -66
138873
06/01/90
75.00
GC
PETTY
CASH
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
138B73
06/01/90
10.50
PHONE
GC
PETTY
CASH
TREES /PLANTINGS
27- 4560 - 664 -66
138973
06/01/90
57.67
GC
PETTY
CASH
TOOLS
27- 4580 - 664 -66
138873
06/01/90
21.00
40- 4256- 803 -80
GC
PETTY
CASH
PRINTING
27- 4600 - 661 -66
138873
06/01/90.
100.00
141H83
GC
PETTY
CASH
RANGE BALLS
27 -4636- 667 -66
10- 1145 - 000 -00
k * * * k k
658.96
35,000.00 *
* * k k k k
138C51
06/01/90
283.93
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
337.34
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
6,502.57
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
27- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
282.30
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
28- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
83.56
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
'29- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
313.42
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
417.08
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
40- 3357= 000 -00
138C51
06/01/90
6,585.60
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 001 -00
138C51
06/01/90
12,625.15
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
138C51
06/01/90
11,444.67
COMM
OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 003 -00
38,875.62
* * * * k *
141A82
06/01/90
5.56
AT &T
PHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
141A82
06/01/90
45.16
AT &T
PHONE
27- 4256- 662 -66
141A82
06/01/90
22.97
AT &T
PHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
141A82
06/01/90
3.15
AT &T
PHONE
40- 4256- 803 -80
76.84 *
141H83
06/01/90
35,000.00
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
k * * * k k
35,000.00 *
142E11
06/07/90
5.57-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142EII
06/07/90
1.02-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142E11
06/07/90
11.99-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142EII
06/07/90
.92-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
142E11
06/07/90
13.07-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
142EII
06/07/90
6.17-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
142E11
06/07/90
14.20-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
142EII
06/07/90
3.24-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
142EII
06/07/90
599.55
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
142EII
06/07/90
51.00
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
142E11
06/07/90
278.54
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
142EII
06/07/90
45.99
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
142E11
06/07/90
653.40
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
05 -31 -90 PAGE 10
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
142EII
06/07/90
308.45
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
142E11
06/07/90
162.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
142E11
06/07/90
710.20
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
142EII
06/01/90
90.28
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
142EII
06/01/90
259.91
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
142EII
06/01/90
325.61
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
xkxxxx
3,428.75
142E26
06/07/90
2.64-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
5.20-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
19.72-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
10.50-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
142E26
06/07/90
260.24
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
132.04
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
986.41
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
525..34
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
142E26
06/07/90
408.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
420.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
1,165.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
142E26
06/07/90
463.35
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
216.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
700.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
71.86
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
142E26
06/07/90
762.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
142E26
06/07/90
1,892.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
142E26
06/07/90
34.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
142E26
06/01/90
175.50
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
142E26
06/01/90
60.00
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
x x k xx k
8,237.08
142G82
06/07/90
9.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
142G82
06/07/90
71.02-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142G82
06/07/90
71.02
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142G82
06/07/90
71.02-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
142G82'
06/07/90
81.78-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
142G82
06/07/90
121.29-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
142G82
06/07/90
3,550.87
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
142G82
06/07/90
3,550.87
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
142G82
06/07/90 -
3,550.87-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
142G82
06/07/90
4,088.90
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
142G82
06/07/90
6,064.55
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
142G82
06/01/90
75.04
GRIGGS COOPER
LIQUOR
50- 4626- 862 -86
142G82
06/07/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
142G82
06/01/90
134.71
GRIGGS COOPER
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
142G82
06/01/90
345.77
GRIGGS COOPER
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
142G82
06/01/90
92.81
GRIGGS COOPER
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
xxkx.�
14,069.56
142J62
06/07/90
9.69-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
05 -31 -90 PAGE 11
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL'
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
142J62
06/07/90
42.12-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
3.46-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
8.82-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
5.24-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
77.10-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
5.29-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
16.58-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
5.32-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
51.40-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
51.41-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
10.45-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
9.60-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
4.53-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
2,105.95
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
3.92
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
441.32
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
12.51
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
21.81
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
828.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
6.37
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
3,854.88
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
479.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
44.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
522.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
4.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
4,057.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
12.74
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
347.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
7.35
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
969.55
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
12.74
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
528.13
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
534.53
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
523.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
14.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
35.98-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
6.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
1,670.17
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
453.29
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142J62
06/07/90
11.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
17,142.67
* * * * k
* ** -CKS
142P82
06/07/90
7.11-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
4.19-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
6.37-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862-86
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
355.33
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
209.32
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
39.29
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142P82
06/07/90
318.69
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
904.17
* * * * k
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
US
CHECK REGISTER
G00404
P"GNE
05 -31 -90 PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
142Q16
06/07/90
22.60-
QUALITY
WINE
115.36
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
.33-
QUALITY
WINE
06/01/90
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
6.84-
QUALITY
WINE
143U27
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142016
06/07/90
.33-
QUALITY
WINE
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
11.65-
QUALITY
WINE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
11.10-
QUALITY
WINE
PHONE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
51.11-
QUALITY
WINE
COMM
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
6.70-
QUALITY
WINE
WEST
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
73.04-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
17.32-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
1,130.40
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
2,554.99
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
554.92
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
3,654.01
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
865.98
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
32.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
32.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
680.35
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
1,161.15
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
142Q16
06/07/90
668.05
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
142Q16
06/01/90
16.78
QUALITY
WINE
MIX
50- 4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
11,150.86
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
142W89
06/01/90
184.00
WORLD CLASS
WINE
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
143753
06/01/90
184.27
PD PETTY
CASH
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
MANUAL
143753
06/01/90
23.98
PD PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 420 -42
MANUAL
143753
06/01/90
32.10
PD PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 430 -42
MANUAL
143753
06/01/90
42.25
PD PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 420 -42
MANUAL
143753
06/01/90
130.03
PD PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
MANUAL
143753
06/01/90
23.12
PD PETTY
CASH
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 420 -42
MANUAL
435.75 *
143754
06/01/90
175.00
CROW WING
CTY
WARRANT MONIES
10- 4268 - 420 -42
MANUAL
175.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
148H27
US
WEST
G00404
P"GNE
1$ 4256 5tO 5i
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
347.97
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256_ 510 -51
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
115.36
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
21.67
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
29.29
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
87.20
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
175.47
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 667 -66
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
99.00
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
143U27
06/01/90
322.78
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
1,198.74*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
145728 06/01/90
* * * * **
145C33 06/01/90
145C33 06/01/90
* * * * **
145F14
145F14
* * * * **
149E11
149EII
149E11
149EII
149EII
149E11
149E11
149E11
149E11
149E11
149E11
149EII
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
149E26
06/01/90
06/01/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/07/90
06/01/90
06/01/90
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR
732.60 J FOOTE
732.60 *-
142,000.00 CITY /EDINA
142,000.00- CITY /EDINA
.00
17,027.05 FIDELITY BANK
640.07 FIDELITY BANK
17,667.12
12.59-
EAGLE WINE
1.53-
EAGLE WINE
2.73-
EAGLE WINE
6.61-
EAGLE WINE
20.93-
EAGLE WINE
7.49-
EAGLE WINE
76.50
EAGLE WINE
629.60
EAGLE WINE
330.37
EAGLE WINE
136.50
EAGLE WINE
1,046.35
EAGLE WINE
374.49
EAGLE WINE
2,541.93
.10
ED PHILLIPS
6.29-
ED PHILLIPS
15.55-
ED PHILLIPS
40.24-
ED PHILLIPS
1.69-
ED PHILLIPS
37.17-
ED PHILLIPS
777.66
ED PHILLIPS
314.87
ED PHILLIPS
2,012.49
ED PHILLIPS.
84.79
ED PHILLIPS
1,858.88
ED PHILLIPS
342.95
ED PHILLIPS
801.00
ED PHILLIPS
291.00
ED PHILLIPS
559.85
ED PHILLIPS
1,093.85
ED PHILLIPS
481.45
ED PHILLIPS
1,423.60
ED PHILLIPS
981.40
ED PHILLIPS
388.95
ED PHILLIPS
31.00
ED PHILLIPS
31.00
ED PHILLIPS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
TEMP EMPLOYEE
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PAYROLL TRANSFER
FICA
MEDICARE
BEER
BEER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
12- 4120 - 434 -43
50 -1010- 000 -00
50- 1010 - 000 -00
10- 4159 - 510 -51
10- 4162 - 510 -51
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628- 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4626- 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50 -4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628- 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL-
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 15
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
11,373.90*
,- a .80
* ** -CKS
149G82
06/07/90
37.06-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL'
149G82
06/07/90
60.91-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149G82
06/07/90
124.23-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149G82
06/07/90
1,852.94
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149G82
06/07/90
3,045.33
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149G82
06/07/90
6,211.63
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
10,887.70 *
* * * * **
•
* ** -CKS
149G86
06/01/90
14,105.91
GROUP HEALTH
INSURANCE
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
14,105.91 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
149J62
06/07/90
5.22-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62 _
06/07/90
1.64-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
37.48-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
1.06-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
10.38-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
9.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
7.11-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
27.41-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -,84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
7.52-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
55.62-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
5.36-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
60-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
67.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
14.12-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
22.46-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
6.53-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
9.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62.
06/07/90
261.20
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
1,874.37
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
2,781.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
1,370.26
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
12.25
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
15.68
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
15.69
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
3,392.76
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL.
149J62
06/07/90
1,122.80
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
9.80
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
11.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
3.92
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
164.34
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
1,039.76
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
106.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
17.15
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
985.01
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
149J62
06/07/90
8.82
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
751.71
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
711.95
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
16.66
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
12.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
59.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
1,412.94
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
655.08
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
15.68
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
15.19
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
3.87-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149J62
06/07/90
535.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
17,110.02
* ** -CKS
149M24
06/01/90
16,239.40
MEDCENTER
INSURNACE
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
16,239.40
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
149N12
06/01/90
2,318.88
MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
INSURANCE
10- 4158 - 510 -51
MANUAL
2,318.88
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
149P20
06/07/90
134.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P20
06/07/90
4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P20
06/07/90
266.65
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149P20
06/07/90
5.60
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149P20
06/01/90
25.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P20
06/01/90
50.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149P20
06/01/90
50.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
535.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
149P42
06/01/90
21,628.00
PHP
INSURANCE
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
21,628.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
149P82
06/07/90
1.68-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
4.45-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
11.92-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
2.50-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
2.80-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
2.80-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
6.26-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
84.00
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
39.38_
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
149P82
06/07/90
222.53
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
149P82
06/07/90
596.16
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
149P82
06/07/90
39.29
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
149P82
06/07/90
124.90
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
149P82
06/07/90
140.00
PRIOR WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
149P82
06/07/90
312.88
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
149P82
06/07/90
140.00
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
149P82
06/01/90
73.30
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
149P82
06/01/90
116.18
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1,854.63 *'
*
'
149Q16
06/07/90
4.28-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
149Q16
06/07/90
22.00-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
149Q16
06/07/90
.98-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84'
149Q16
06/07/90
61.79-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
149Q16
06/07/90
8.92-
-QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
149Q16
06/07/90
.65-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
149Q16
06/07/90
13.44-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
149Q16
06/07/90
62.73-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
149Q16
06/07/90
1,100.49
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
149Q16
06/07/90
3,089.56
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
149Q16
06/07/90
3,136.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
149Q16
06/07/90
426.25
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
149Q16
06/07/90
97.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
149Q16
06/07/90
885.80
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
149Q16
06/07/90
1,338.81
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
149Q16
06/07/90
65.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
149Q16
06/01/90
60.88
QUALITY WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
* * * * **
10,025.50
151700
06/06/90
1,774.00
KAY S SCHLOSSER
PRO SERV
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* * * * **
1,774.00
151P32
06/01/90
27,506.99
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145- 510 -51
* *
27,506.99
* * **
156E11
06/07/90
8.96-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
156EII
06/07/90.
1.33-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710. 842 -84
156EII
06/07/90
8.19-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
156EII
06/07/90
1.53-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
156EII
06/07/90
18.31-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
156EII
06/07/90
448.19
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
156E11
06/07/90
409.69
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
156EII
06/07/90
66.65
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
156EII
06/07/90
76.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
156EII
06/07/90
915.72
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
* * * * **
1,878.43
05 -31 -90 PAGE 17
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS'
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
156E26
06/07/90
20.52-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
1.29-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
4.63-
ED PHILLIPS
50 =3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
3.67-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
1,026.12
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
64.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
231.97
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
183.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
434.55
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
806.65
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
916.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
36.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
287.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
585.93
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/07/90
655.80
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
156E26
06/06/90
16.95
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
5,215.86
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
156G82
06/07/90
28.31-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
50.23-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
5.27-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
64.13-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
1,415.34
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
2,511.64
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
263.60
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90.
3,206.73
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
156G82
06/07/90
4.33-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156682
06/06/90
68.13
GRIGGS COOPER
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156G82
06/06/90
34.06
GRIGGS COOPER
MIX
50- 4632- 862 -86
MANUAL
7,347.23
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
156J62
06/07/90
10.00-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
18.00-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1.72-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
24.42-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
10.44-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
.83-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1.85-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1.43-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
71.94-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
4.08-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
4.27-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
6.65-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
72.44-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
3.26-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156362
06/07/90
7.12
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1,221.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
3,596.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
22.54
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
3,622.64
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
C*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
156J62
06/07/90
22.05
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
84.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1,044.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
2.94
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
10.78
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
4.41
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
172.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
8.02-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
4.41
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
12.74
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
185.26
JOHNSON
WINE'
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
408.66
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
142.34
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
1.96
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
7.60
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
326.36
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
428.07
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
664.68
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156J62
06/07/90
9.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
11,771.61
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
156P20
06/07/90
2.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156P20
06/07/90
69.25
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
71.25
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
156P82
06/07/90
9.16-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156P82
06/07/90
4.06-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86-
MANUAL
156P82
06/07/90
438.03
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
156P82
06/06/90
19.95
PRIOR WINE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156P82
06/07/90
203.06
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
647.82
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
156Q16
06/07/90
29.91-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
.79-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
.33-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710: 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
10.55-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
25.58-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
8.98-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
1.31-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
.41
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
1,494.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
1,278.71
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
78.85
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
32.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
1,051.60
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
41.25-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
z�
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -90 PAGE 20
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
156Q16
06/07/90
130.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL
156Q16
06/07/90
894.90
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL
4,843.27
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
25
66�911 99
347.97
3
PHGN`
10 4256 519 51 MANUAL
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
280,787.13
FUND
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
2,869.96
FUND
12
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
3,550.68
FUND
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
68.30
FUND
26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
11,017.55
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
7,231.25
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
477.01
FUND
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
6,487.41
FUND
30
TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
21,323.80
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
474.03
FUND
41
TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
281,444.52
28191-95-
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
615,731.64*
. ""."'
TOTAL