Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-10-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 1995 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA - Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence of the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of October 2, 1995 II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as pre -list dated 10/12/95 Total $390.90. Rollcall vote required. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL Recognition of retirement of Police Officers Jay Brask and Vince Bongaarts * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 2, 1995 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Readings require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planning District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Rezoning from R1, Single Dwelling District to POD -1 Planned Office District, Especially for Children, 5015 West 70th St, continued from September 18, 1995. B. Request to relocate cabin with conservation restriction, Lot 5, Mirror Oaks Addition. C. Preliminary Plat, Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering Company, 5200 Eden Circle and 5229 Eden Avenue. D. Final Development Plan, Kunz Oil, 5200 Eden Circle. E. Preliminary Plat, Tambornino Addition, 6608 Dakota Trail. F. Conditional Use Permit, Hennepin County, Southdale Library, 7001 York Avenue, Building Expansion. AGENDA/EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 1995 PAGE TWO III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Northwest Printing Company, 1996 Park and Recreation Activities Directory. B. Keller Fence Company, replace 7' and 4' fencing at Edina Aquatic Center IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Report of October 3, 1995. B. Herb Knox appeal house painting ordered by Health Department/Dave Velde. C. Wine license review. D. Metropolitan Livable Communities. E. Appoint Referendum Team and set date for referendum. F. Human Relations vacancies. G. Planning Commission Reorganization Discussion. V. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. AMM Policies Discussion. B. AMM Policy Adoption Meeting, November 2, 1995. VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. MANAGERS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS IX. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 10/12/95 TOTAL: $1,376,86.48 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 10/05/95 TOTAL $376,385.70. Rollcall vote required. Mon Oct 16 Mon Nov 6 Fri Nov 10 Mon Nov 20 Thu Nov 23 Fri Nov 24 Wed Nov 29 Mon Dec 4 Fri Dec 15 Tues Dec 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. VETERANS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. THANKSGIVING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Truth In Taxation Public Hearing 5:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Truth In Taxation Public Hearing Cont. Date 5:00 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 2, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. `MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold to approve the HRA Minutes of September 18, 1995. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Paulus made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 28, 1995, and consisting of one page totaling $21,296.23. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Vice -Chair Kelly declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director URGENT HOMEOWNER AGAINST THE ZONING CHANGE AT 5015 West 70th Street The Edina City Counc. i l wi 1 1 vote on the request by Steve Williams to cnange the zoning at 5015 West 70th Street (Evangelical Free Church) from R -1, residential, to Planned Office District, POD -1 at the October 16 Council meeting. Steve Williams has included a 20,000 square foot four story office building in his plans to convert and expand the church for use as a day care center. An office building is more profitable than a day care center and it wi 1 1 not be lung beic re t ha office touver zri l 1 be bul It in our ne i yiiLui i'iiJud. Realtors and appraisers have stated that the resale -value of our homes will be depressed by the visual impact of the office tower, the removal of large old trees and shrubs and the Increased traffic. A law firm specializing in fighting rezoning stated that it could cost as much as $50,000 for the neighborhood to seek professional help in attempting to defeat the rezoning. The firm, however, stated that the best method for fighting the change is for the residents to appear before the Council. in large numbers to show their objection. We hah a good showing at the September Council mek -Ing but we need all of the X00+ residents receiving this notice to be_ a.t the October 16, 7:00 P.M. meeting. if you cannot attend, please show your opposition by signing and returning the bottom portion of this notice to City Hall by Friday, October 13: TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at.501.5-West 70th Stre t. Comments • PAL= <��natur Address -' =`"rte, q- a Leet J • 4 e (/ Date: /0 - /s-- 4r : n c. i`.sne Ree,e, i w- COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:17 AM HR(B page 1A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12784 10/16/95 $18.00 DUDYCHA, JO PARKING PERMIT REFUND 092995 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $18.00* 12785 10/16/95 $372.90 NORWEST BANK N.A. GRANDVIEW REOPENING R 100395 GRANDVIEW MISC < *> $372.90* $390.90* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 2, 1995 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold to adopt the Council Consent Agenda as presented excepting Item V.E. Superior Ford, Inc. - 7 Full -Size Police Squad Cars. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: ASSESSMENTS LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as recorded on the following proposed assessments: 1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA- 293/BA -299 Location: Valley View Road from W. 65th Street to France Avenue and W. 66th Street from France Avenue to Southdale Road Member Maetzold stated his intention to abstain from discussion or vote on Street Improvement No- BA- 293/BA -299 due to a possible conflict of interest. Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA- 293/BA -299 showed total construction cost of $1,637,382.58 less state aid reimbursement of ($1,558,163.88), plus County charge of $2,580.00 for $81,798.70 total proposed to be assessed against 172 property owners at $20.00 per foot for single lots; $30.00 per foot for multiple lots and $40.00 per lot for commercial. Assessments to be spread for ten years. Currently 23 properties on Southdale Road do not have access to Valley View Road, yet according to policy, would be assessed between $600 and $800 using the City's one -third formula for calculating assessments. Engineer Hoffman recommended Council continue the hearing until November 6, 1995 so staff can review this special condition. Member Paulus moved and Member Smith seconded the continuation of Street Improvement No. BA -293 and BA -299 to the regular Council meeting of November 6, 1995, allowing staff time to review the assessment formula and directing that letters be sent to all affected properties. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Abstained: Maetzold Motion carried. 2. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -66 Location: Country Club District Analysis of assessment for Sidewalk Improvement No. S -66 showed total construction cost of $127,868.56 proposed to be assessed against 563 parcels at $227.12 per lot. Assessment to be spread over three years. In a letter dated September 24, 1995 Donald Geesaman, 4606 Drexel Avenue, requested relief from the assessment because he personally had his sidewalk repaired and believes he should not have to pay for his neighbors' repairs. Claudette and Robert .Debrey, 4502 Browndale Avenue, requested a $60.78 reduction for clean -up and restoration personally done. Frank Lederle, 4507 Browndale, stated he had no knowledge of this project and believes 90 percent of the work was unnecessary. The project was a lot of trouble, is a lot of money, and does not look good. JoAnne Farley, 4615 Bruce Avenue, voiced her objection to the assessment and stated her tax burden is already severe. Two homes on Bridge Street, west of Browndale do not have walks, one homeowner did their own sidewalk in 1992 and another homeowner did their own restoration. Staff recommends relief be given as noted. The assessment would change to $228.44 per lot if relief were granted for the above reasons. Assessment for Sidewalk Improvement No S -66 with exceptions approved by motion of Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 3. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. E -34 Location: 4114 through 4216 Sunnyside Road Analysis of assessment for Alley Improvement No. E -34 showed total construction cost of $28,492.10 proposed to be assessed against 13 lots at $2,176.70 per lot. Assessment to be spread over ten years. The proposed assessment is higher, due to poorer subsoil conditions encountered during construction plus a higher bid price for excavation. No oral objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Alley Improvement No. E -34 approved by motion of Member Smith and seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 4. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -95 Location: 50th and France Business District Analysis of assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -95 showed total maintenance cost at $73,653.74 proposed to be assessed against 324,294 assessable feet at $0.227 per foot. One year assessment payable in 1996. No oral objections were heard and no written objections were received prior hereto. Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -95 approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 5. TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -95 Various locations throughout the City Analysis of assessment for removal of dead or diseased trees showed total cost of $4,268.86 proposed to be assessed against five parcels. The amount and term per parcel are as follows: a. One year: assessments: 5009 Normandale Court, in the amount of $702.90 and 4912 Rolling Green Parking in the amount of $511.20 b. Three year assessments: 7713 Marth Court in the amount of $724.20, 4633 Casco Avenue in the amount of $1,246.06 c. Five year assessment: 6216 Maloney Avenue in the amount of $1,065,00. No oral objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Tree Removal No. M -95 approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 6. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -95 Location: Indianhead Lake Analysis of Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -95 for Indianhead Lake showed a total cost of $8,423.00 proposed to be assessed against 33 homes at $255.25 per home. One year assessment payable in 1996. Darrell Boyd, 6816 Cheyenne, voiced confusion with the letter he received about the assessment. Assistant Manager Hughes clarified Mr. Boyd's correct assessed amount would be $255.25. Location: Arrowhead Lake Analysis of Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -95 for Arrowhead Lake showed a total cost of $13,730.11 proposed to be assessed against 31 homes at $442.91 per home. One year assessment payable in 1996. $7,458.26 of the total assessment is a carry over amount from 1994, for the aeration system and fish stocking completed in 1994. Woody (Allan) Cater, 6316 Post Lane, stated the west end of Arrowhead Lake is a quagmire. The weed cutter is ineffective. He suggested killing the weeds on the west end via chemical treatment or do not assess those homeowners. Assistant Manager Hughes explained that aerators are located, as recommended, in the lake's deepest point. The aeration system's purpose is to allow fish to survive winter and not to control weed growth. He noted chemical treatment in Indianhead Lake has been on -going for 15-16 years but Arrowhead Lake has only been going on for two years. The Arrowhead Lake Improvement Association approved the work. Lee Heutmaker, 6429 Margarets Lane, stated weed cutting does not work and believes other options should be considered. Member Paulus noted on every property transfer, assessments and pending assessments are noted. Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -95 approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) Following the presentation of analysis of assessments and approval, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the improvements listed below: Sidewalk Improvement No. S -66 Alley Improvement - No. E -34 Maintenance Improvement - No. M -95 Tree Removal Project - No. TR -95 Aquatic Weeds Improvement - No. AQ -95 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 8.0 percent per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1996, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1996. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. INSTALLMENTS Sidewalk Improvement, No. S-66, Levy No. 13518 3 years Alley Improvement No. E -34, Levy No. 113519 10 years Maintenance Improvement No. M -95, Levy No. 13511 1 year Tree Removal Project No. TR -95, Levy No. 13515 1 year Tree Removal Project No. TR -95, Levy No. 13516 3 years Tree Removal Project No. TR -95, Levy No. 13517 5 years Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -95, Levy No. 13514 1 year 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 2nd day of October, 1995. Motion for adoption of the resolution seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT - LOT 2. BLOCK 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION (7032 WEXFORD ROADI Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman reported the subject property is located at 7032 Wexford Road , Lot 2, Block 1, Griffith Addition. Lee Chapman, the property owner plans an addition to his home. The roof overhang on the addition would extend over the City's utility and drainage easement which is why Mr. Chapman petitioned for a utility vacation. The addition also requires a variance from setback requirements. Engineer Hoffman stated that staff believes no vacation is necessary. Instead staff recommends granting Mr. Chapman air rights to allow the addition to overhang the easement. If Council grants the right to use the air rights over the City utility and drainage easement, Mr. Chapman will be required to provide the City a document which states the City allows him use of "air rights" over the easement. Mr. Chapman would also appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals for his variance request. Engineer Hoffman further stated that NSP, Minnegasco, US WEST and Paragon Cable do not object to the proposal as presented. Council Comments Member Smith inquired whether the City would obtain a hold - harmless agreement. Attorney Gilligan responded that the vacation would contain an indemnification from the homeowner against any damage to our facilities and also allowing the City to take any necessary steps to repair utilities in the easement. Member Maetzold asked what reasonable circumstance would make it necessary to use the easement. Engineer Hoffman said that currently the easement contains a sanitary sewer line. He also stated that methods are available to repair sewer line by relining them. Member Smith asked would air rights still be granted if the variance does not receive approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Attorney Gilligan responded that approval of air rights could be conditioned upon the variance. being approved. Engineer Hoffman noted if the Zoning Board of Appeals does not grant the variance, that issue could also come before the Council. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly called for resident comments or concerns. No comments were received. Proponent Comment Lee Chapman, 7032 Wexford Drive, indicated after talking with Engineer Hoffman several times the issue as presented is the only option he has for expansion of his home. Member Smith made a motion granting air rights allowing the roof overhang to extend over the existing easement conditioned upon Mr. Chapman supplying an agreement indemnifying the City and acquiring the necessary variance. Motion seconded by Member Maetzold. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried FINAL PLAT APPROVED - MIRROR OAKS ADDITION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is located at 5000 Blake Road and comprises two lots with total land area of 10.1 acres. Existing improvements include a single dwelling, a log cabin and a storage building. Most of the site is gently rolling; however, there are areas of steep slopes along Blake Road and near the ponds in the south and southwest portions of the property. The proposed subdivision would create eleven single dwelling lots and would be served by a new street coming off Blake Road. Lots range in size from 30,010 to 71,078 square feet in area. Preliminary plat approval was granted at the June 19, 1995, Council meeting subject to final plat approval, subdivision dedication, developer's agreement stating the City has no responsibility for pond maintenance, a watershed district grading permit and review of private deed restrictions at the time of final plat approval. Planner Larsen informed the Council that since the value of the land was set, the developer has agreed to dedicate to the City, Outlot A, located north and east of Blake Road. This is land that is riparian to and part of Mirror Lake. Therefore, staff now recommends that parkland dedication be reduced from eight percent to six percent. Planner Larsen also discussed the conservation restriction modification request from Mr. Frey. Mr. Frey purchased Lot 5 and wants to move the existing log cabin into the conservation restriction on Lot 5. Planner Larsen stated he inspected the site and is recommending Council allow the cabin be moved to the proposed location. Staff recommends final plat approval subject to: 1) six percent subdivision dedication based on an unimproved land value of $2,500,000 and an 2) executed conservation restriction covering the land upland from the pond located on the southerly portion of the property as amended Planner Larsen introduced George Stickney to the Council and invited questions. Council Comment Mayor Pro Tem Kelly asked if the modification to the conservation restriction would be in the form of a variance. Planner Larsen replied that Council need only grant approval of the request to locate the log cabin in the conservation restriction. The approval can be made part of the agreement. Member Smith asked what the intended use is of the cabin? Planner Larsen stated he believes the cabin will be used as just a spot to go sit, that its a curiosity. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly asked if the cabin had historic significance? Proponent George Stickney replied that the cabin was in the movie "Heartbreak Kid." Member Smith indicated his concern with previous instances where Council was quite restrictive as opposed to now allowing a log cabin. He would like to keep a balance in this process. Planner Larsen acknowledged this is a policy judgement on the part of the Council. In this particular case, the log cabin is historically connected to the property and the surrounding neighbors as well as the proponent want to see the cabin stay a part of the property. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly asked if Mr. Frey had purchased both Lots 4 and 5? Mr. Stickney replied that yes this was correct. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly questioned whether the parcel of land is larger than normal. Planner Larsen replied that Lot 5 is a large lot. Member Maetzold asked how far from the pond the log cabin is proposed to be located. Planner Larsen replied that there is no formal site plan, but in his estimation the cabin would 50 -75 feet from the pond. Member Maetzold also questioned the maintenance issue of a structure this old. Planner Larsen informed him that Edina's Code would cover maintenance. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly asked if staff requested the dedication of Outlot A to which Planner Larsen responded that it is in the interest of the City to own property adjacent to lakeshore. Member Paulus questioned whether a stipulation not allowing electricity or running water to the cabin would also be added to the conservation restriction? Planner Larsen replied that no such stipulation had been proposed. He did not believe the cabin is equipped to have water, however, electricity could be brought down to it. Mr. Stickney stated that the cabin has electricity. Member Paulus stated her concern with granting this modification to the conservation restriction when previously Council denied a Rainbow play set's construction. This log cabin structure is greater than a simple gazebo and the potential for future uses causes concern. At this point there has been no assurance that this land will not be further subdivided in the future and allowing the log cabin be located in the conservation restriction may complicate issues at that point. Planner Larsen responded that the City would have zoning control, which could limit the utilization of the building and also the conservation restriction could spell out further limitations to the allowable uses of the building. Mayor Pro Tem asked for clarification of the stipulation that the cabin not be used as a dwelling unit. Planner Larsen stated that this stipulation would be made a part of the conservation restriction so the City would have this document of record filed. Member Maetzold questioned whether a sunset clause could be looked at for this particular property. Concern is that the cabin will not remain the primitive building it currently is. Planner Larsen suggested that an action could be taken calling for periodic review of the property use. Attorney Gilligan informed Council that a sunset provision would probably be difficult to enforce in five or ten years. Member Smith stated his concerns with combining the conservation restriction with the final plat action. He also asked whether or not Outlot A is a buildable lot and questioned whether or not the City really wants this lot: He suggested that he would not be able to support the proposal without further information. Planner Larsen pointed out that typically it is in the City's best interest to control lakeshore which is why he recommends acceptance of Outlot A as parkland dedication and also Mr. Frey the proponent requesting to move the log cabin was not able to attend the Council meeting. Member Paulus suggested that the request for locating the log cabin within the conservation easement on Lot 5 be separated from the final plat approval. This would allow for review by Council when Mr. Frey could be in attendance to answer questions regarding his proposed use of the cabin. Member Paulus moved tabling action on modifying the conservation restriction to accommodate the log cabin to October 16, 1995 to allow more material be brought to Council regarding the questions raised. Member Smith seconded the motion. George Stickney, stated that although he could not speak for Mr. Frey, he personally has met with many neighbors in the area who were pleased with preserving the cabin on this property. Member Maetzold stated he would probably allow the cabin to remain on the property because he would hate to loose a historical structure, but at the same time he also wants more information about the structure. Member Smith asked that staff research previous exceptions to conservation restrictions. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus and Smith Nays: Kelly Motion carried three to one. Member Paulus requested clarification of City's benefit from the dedication of Outlot A. Planner Larsen replied that typically parkland dedication is discounted for value the public receives which in this case is not only outlot A, but also the path connecting this property to the Scriver Road cul de sac, and the willingness of the developer to go off his property and complete the temporary cul de sac on Scriver Road into a permanent one. Member Paulus questioned whether the credit for land and. improvements was a common practice. If not she has a real problem with setting precedent in this manner. Manager Rosland stated that past city practice has been to accept dedication of any land adjacent to lakeshore and urged that this practice be maintained. Member Smith stated his concern with reducing the parkland dedication to six percent. He stated concern with the development overall and asked for more details from staff. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly stated that Edina has in the past accepted land in lieu of cash for parkland dedication. Member Maetzold stated that he believes the outlot dedication is appropriate, however, he has concern with reducing the percentage for the remaining parkland dedication from eight percent to six percent. He asked for clarification as to the appropriateness of this reduction. Manager Rosland briefly explained the process used to arrive at parkland figures and overall land value. This development is unique in that the land values involved are high, therefore parkland dedication fees per lot are higher than has been seen previously. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly asked if delaying action on this property would cause the developer problems. Mr. Richard Bloom, representing Stickney Groves, Limited Liability Company, replied that a two week delay could mean that the developer looses the chance to begin construction until next spring. Member Smith moved final approval of the plat based upon acceptance of Outlot A and seven percent cash contribution for parkland dedication on a land value of $2,500,000. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Richard Bloom stated the developer's position relative to the parkland dedication and land value for the Mirror Oaks subdivision. He reiterated the developer's willingness to work with the city. Member Paulus stated her preference for reducing the land value used to calculate the parkland dedication and keeping the parkland dedication fee at eight percent. Member Paulus stated concern with setting precedent in reducing the percentage. Member Smith stated his concern with changing the value already set for Mirror Oaks Plat. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly stated her feeling that staff acted rightly in keeping with the tradition of the City recommending acceptance of the outlot and setting the value at $2,500,000. Ayes: Smith Nays: Maetzold, Paulus and Kelly. Motion failed Member Paulus asked the Planner if the City had ever previously lowered the parkland dedication percentage. Planner Larsen replied that he could not cite a time when the percentage had been lowered. He stated the value has always been the negotiable component of calculating parkland dedication. Member Paulus asked if Council could change the value at this juncture and questioned Attorney Gilligan whether changing the percentage would be precedent setting. Attorney Gilligan replied that our code states that the parkland dedication should be reasonable, and therefore, each development should stand on their own, but changing the percentage could be precedent setting. Member Paulus reiterated her concern with any reduction of the parkland dedication percentage. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly recommended a five minute recess allowing staff to review the value of the Mirror Oaks subdivision to be used for calculation of parkland dedication at 8:55 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Kelly reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution granting approval of the Mirror Oaks Final Plat conditioned upon parkland dedication of eight percent based on a land value of $2,000,000, dedication of Outlot A to the City of Edina, and execution of conservation restriction. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MIRROR OAKS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that that certain plat entitled `MIRROR OAKS," platted by Richard Bloom, Groves Stickney Limited Liability Company, and presented at the regular City Council meeting of October 2, 1995, be and is hereby granted final plat approval with the following two conditions: 1. Payment of parkland dedication fees in the amount of eight percent based upon a land value of $2,000,000 as well as dedication of Outlot A to the City of Edina for public use; and 2. The execution of a conservation easement. Member Smith questioned what the purchase price of the undeveloped land was and how that will compare to the retail value of the developed lots. Mr. Stickney responded that the purchase price of the undeveloped land was approximately $2,750,000 and that the developed lots would be sold beginning at $390,000 each. Planner Larsen explained that the land value used to calculate parkland dedication has the cost of improvements and the cul de sac deducted. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. 60 DAY EXTENSION GRANTED FOR DEADLINE FOR ACTION - ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN AND KUNZ OIL COMPANY Attorney Gilligan reviewed the reason for granting an extension for council action on the requests of Especially for Children and Kunz Oil Company. Attorney Gilligan informed Council a new law MS 15.99, effective July 1, 1995, requires cities to approve or deny requests related to zoning within sixty days of the receipt of the request. The failure to deny the request within sixty days is deemed to be approval of the request under this new law. Therefore, in the both the aforementioned cases the City is protecting itself by granting an extension for action from approving the requests via default of not taking action within sixty days. Extenuating conditions in both cases preclude taking action within the sixty day time frame. Member Paulus moved granting a sixty day extension for action from October 17, 1995 until December 17, 1995 in the request for rezoning from R1, single dwelling district to POD -1 Planned Office District, Especially for Children. The reasons for the extension are to allow review of the traffic on West 70th Street and staff review of an ordinance amendment allowing a day care facility in an R1, single dwelling district. Member Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Member Maetzold abstained Motion Carried. Motion by Member Smith, seconded by Member Maetzold to grant a sixty day extension for action from October 17, 1995 until December 17, 1995 to Kunz Oil Company Final Development Plan due 'to the Lewis /Kunz subdivision which is still pending Council action. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried "LOT DIVISION - LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 1. NINE MILE SECOND ADDITION - 6806 AND 6808 DOVRE DRIVE APPROVED Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for adoption of the following resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Lot 1, and the westerly 55.00 feet of Lot, 2, Block 1, NINE MILE NORTH 2ND ADDITION presently is a single tract of land; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into new separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, NINE MILE NORTH 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the south line of said Lot 1 distant 20.08 feet west of the southeast comer of said Lot 1 to a point on the north line of said Lot 1 distant 11.43 feet west of the northeast comer of said Lot 1. PARCEL B: The westerly 55.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, NINE MILE NORTH 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota and that part of Lot 1 said Block 1 lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the south line of said Lot 1 distant 20.08 feet west of the southeast comer of said Lot 1 to a point on the north line of said Lot 1 distant 11.43 feet west of the northeast comer of said Lot 1. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Edina Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Adopted this 2nd day of October, 1995. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER. Motion by Member Smith, second by Member Maetzold to set the public hearing for the Preliminary Plat of Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering Company, 5200 Eden Circle and 5229 Eden Avenue for October 16, 1995. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly. Motion carried HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER Member Maetzold moved to set the public hearing for the Kunz Oil Company Final Development Plan, 5200 Eden Circle for October 16, 1995. Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly. Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER. Motion made by Member Paulus and second by Member Maetzold setting October 16, 1995 as the hearing date for the preliminary plat of Tambomino Addition, 6608 Dakota Trail. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER Motion made by Member Paulus and second by Member Maetzold setting October 16, 1995 as the hearing date for consideration of the conditional use permit request of Hennepin County, Southdale Library Building Expansion, 7001 York Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PARK DEPARTMENT 60 IN TOPDRESSER Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for park department's purchase of a 60 inch topdresser to recommended low bidder, North Star Turf at $6,975.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PREPARATION AND STAINING FOR ARNESON ACRES GAZEBO Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for the preparation and staining of the Arneson Acres gazebo to recommended low bidder, Graham Nunn Painting at $5,638.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS REPLACEMENT FLOOR HOIST Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for public works replacement floor hoist to recommended low bidder, Westside Equipment Co., at $11,826.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FOR FIRE STATION Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for electrical equipment replacement for the fire station to recommended bidder, EESCO United at $12,839.44. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BID AWARDED FOR SEVEN 1996 FULL -SIZE POLICE SQUAD CARS Member Smith stated he had asked this item be removed from the consent agenda to request further of Chief Bernhjelm. Member Smith asked why the City needs to order seven vehicles at this time? Chief Bernhjelm explained that previously Edina's police cars had been full size Chevrolets but Ford is now the only auto manufacturer still making a full size police vehicle. Ordering all seven cars at this time guarantees they will be delivered when the City needs them. Member Maetzold stated he understands the need with ordering the Fords at this time, but in the future look at non traditional alternatives to the squads while still keeping an eye on size, safety and cost. Chief Bernhjelm informed the Council that Chevrolet is possibly developing a utility vehicle for use as police squads. Member Kelly asked if bidding our squad through the County Purchasing Cooperative is saving the City any money. Chief Bernhjelm responded that it saves in the context of staff time. Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for seven 1996 full -size police squad cars to Superior Ford, Inc., at $135,023.00 under Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Agreement, Contract #3532A5 -232. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR ABOUT TOWN PAPER SUPPLY FOR FALL ISSUE Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for About Town paper supply for the fall issue to sole bidder, Unisource at $6,185.85. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *REAPPOINTMENTS MADE TO THE EDINA FOUNDATION Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for reappointment of James Hoveland and Michael Kelly to the Edina Foundation for three year terms to June, 1998. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. VACANCIES EXIST ON HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Manager Rosland explained that two vacancies remain on the Human Relations Commission. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly encouraged Council Members to submit names of interested persons for possible appointment to the two unexpired terms. *RESOLUTION SETTING RESPONSIBILITY AUTHORITY FOR CITY DATA PRACTICES Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 13.02, Subdivision 16, as amended requires that the City of Edina appoint one person as the Responsible Authority to administer the requirements for collection, storage, use and dissemination of data on individuals, with the City and, WHEREAS, the City of Edina shares concerns expressed by the Legislature on the responsible use of all City data and wishes to satisfy this concern by appointing an administratively qualified Responsible Authority as required under the statute. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina to appoint Debra Mangen as the Responsible Authority for the purposes of meeting all requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, as amended, and with rule as lawfully promulgated by the Commissioner of Administration. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of October, 1995, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *NEW ON -SALE WINE/3.2 BEER LICENSE APPROVED Motion made by Member Paulus and seconded by Member Maetzold for approval of issuance of a new on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license to Chico's Taco's at 7078 Amundson Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Member Paulus made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 28, 1995, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $224,935.00; C.D.B.G. $4,684.50; Communications $114.24; Working Capital $433.73; Art Center $9,536.83; Swimming Pool Fund $420.15; Golf Course Fund $26,899.13; Ice Arena Fund $17,921.66; Gun Range Fund $627.04; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $13,865/53; Utility Fund $351,532.57; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $2,062.87; Recycling Program $8.66; Liquor Dispensary fund $66,030.84; Construction Fund $25,721.68; TOTAL $744,794.43. Motion was seconded by Member Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly adjourned the meeting at 9:32 P.M. City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # I I • A FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: October 16, 1995 ® To Council SUBJECT: Z -95 -1, R -1, Single Action ❑ Motion Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned X❑ Resolution Office District. 5015 West 70th Street. ❑ Ordinance Steve and Priscilla Williams. ❑ Discussion Info /Background: The rezoning request was continued from the September 18, 1995, Council meeting to allow time to do further traffic analysis and to allow time to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. As an alternative to the requested POD -1 rezoning staff has prepared an amendment which would allow day care, pre - school, and nurseries as an Conditional Use in the R -1 district. The amendment would also set a minimum lot size of two acres and a minimum setback of 35 feet from all property lines. Attached to this cover is a memorandum by Fran Hoffman, City Engineer, and a memorandum from the City's traffic consultant addressing the site specific and general area traffic issues. The proponents have indicated to staff that they continue to request the POD -1 office zoning classification. They have offered letters from two banks which indicate that financing may be problematic if the office zoning is not granted. If the Council decides to amend the Ordinance and make day care a Conditional Use in the R -1 zone, the amendment should be referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. Planning Commission action is required prior to adoption of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment by the Council. The Planning Commission could consider the matter at their November 1, 1995, meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 1995 -9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT DAY CARE FACILITIES, PRE - SCHOOLS AND NURSERIES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE R -1 DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 2 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended by adding a new paragraph G as follows: "G. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools" Section 2. Paragraph A of Subd. 5 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subparagraph 5 as follows: "5. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools 2 acres" Section 3. Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph A of Subd. 5 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "2. Elementary schools 5 acres" Section 4. Subparagraph 4 of Paragraph B of Subd. 6 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended as follows: "4. Other Uses a. All conditional use buildings or structures including buildings or structures accessory thereto except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools b. Driving ranges, tennis courts, maintenance buildings and swimming pools accessory to a golf course C. Day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools 50' 50' 50' 50' " 50' 50' 50' 50' 35' 35' 35' 35' " Section 5. Subparagraph 7 of Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 850.11 of Section 850 of the City Code is amended as follows: 117. Day care facilities, licensed by the State, located within the single dwelling �'�,,�, ld ,,1 nni It Section 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. AE►Re REENN NORWlSr BANKS X /1®N I1 'TER October 6, 1995 Ms. Priscilla Williams Mr. Steve Williams Especially for Children 5223 West 73rd Street Edina, MN 55439 RE: Commercial Real Estate Mortgage loan. Dear Steve and Priscilla: Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. Commercial Real Estate Bloomington Office 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55479 -2202 6121830 -8941 Fax: 6121830 -8957 Thank you for considering Norwest Bank for your commercial real estate financing requirements. We appreciate this opportunity to expand our relationship with you. Based on our discussion, you have indicated that the proposed site located at 5015 West 70th Street in Edina is currently zoned R -1 (Residential). This particular zoning restricts alternative uses of the property which influences the marketability and scope of potential buyers interested in the site. Key factors in a loan analysis include a review of the business cash flow and secondary repayment sources. The secondary repayment sources are dependent on the marketability of the property and its income producing potential. Although we have not completed a formal evaluation of this property, the Bank and an appraiser might well conclude the restrictive zoning determination negatively impacts the value of the property, thereby reducing the potential loan amount and influencing other terms of the loan including term and interest rate. We look forward to reviewing additional information for the proposed transaction as it becomes available. Please call Cindy at 830 -7067 or Marlene at 830 -8946 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cindy Goplen Vice President Marlene Dieterich Assistant Vice President A�- AMERICANA BANK October 5,1995 Mr. Steve Williams, Vice President Especially for Children 5223 West 73rd Street . Edina, MN. 55439 Re: Financing for the Proposed Center at 5015 W. 70th Dear Mr. Williams: As requested, I am responding to your inquiry about the effect of different zoning classifications upon our willingness to provide mortgage financing for the above referenced center. A zoning classification restricting the use of the building to a day care center, church, or school would severely reduce the marketability of the property. Under such circumstances, we would not be willing to provide a mortgage loan for this property. We would consider the loan only if the zoning classification permitted alternative uses, such as a commercial office building. This letter should not be understood to suggest or imply a commitment to provide financing for this project but it is fair to conclude that we would not be able to consider such financing if the zoning classification was too restrictive. Please call if there are any further questions. Sincerely s Conrad Newburgh Vice President 5050 FR. \ \CF . \ %'F\l'F_ SOUTH �& F_DINA INI\ 35410 � 612/930/0130 & FAX 612/920/7,149 CORRESPONDENCE FOR STEVE AND PRISCILLA WILLIAMS 5015 WEST 70TH STREET OCT. -11 95(THU) 09:27 EDINA RTY CITY LAKES TEL :925 7758 P.002 • • • rswYp 7.vA1[IM 91nee 1Baa'- City Lakes Office 3270 W. Lake St. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Office (612) 9264606 FAX (612) 925 -7758 October 12, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina MINNESOTA 55424 Dear Council Members: I am writing this letter to address the issue of the proposed use of the old Brookview Church at Highway 100 and 70th Street. I would like to speak to you personally on Monday evening but, unfortunately, I do have a conflict. I understand that Especially for Children, a child care facility, is wishing to occupy the property, I would like to voice my strong support for this use. My support essentially is three- pronged. First of all, as a Realtor, I am very aware and sensitive to issues that may impact property values in a given neighborhood. The residential area immediately adjacent to the church is a major concern. I understand the concern of neighbors regarding potentially increased traffic. It is my opinion that in this stretch of 70th is quite busy already with an exit from Highway 100 and a couple of office buildings nearby. It would appear that any depreciation in property values has long - since occurred. EFC traffic, while steady, is staggered as parents are both dropping off and picking up their children at different times of the mornings and afternoons. It is difficult for me to conceptualize that there would be any significant influx of traffic into this neighborhood with the addition of this child care center. Indeed, an argument might be made that the introduction of a quality day care center into this area could conceivably be viewed as a plus for the neighborhood and its property values. Secondly, as an Edina resident and a homeowner in the Cornelia neighborhood which is adjacent to the proposed site, I am, again, quite aware of the traffic issue in this area. It is not good. However, it is hard for me to see how the addition of a stream of vehicles that are entering and exiting the site in a staggered manner are going to significantly add to the traffic problem. No matter what goes in to this site, the traffic pattern does need to be altered at some point. I do feel that additional traffic from EFC is far less that if an office building went into the site. Traffic aside, The daycare program at Especially for Children has an excellent reputation both for its quality of care and its overall stability. Retaining this program in Edina should be a priority for our city. Finally, I am the parent of a child at Especially for Children. I know, firsthand how good this program is. My three- year-old daughter is thriving at the center and I am continually impressed by the fact that she is being cared for by some of the same people who cared for my fourteen and twelve year OCT.- 12195(THU) 09:28 EDINA RTY CITY LAKES TEL:925 7758 P. 003 old children when they were there! This is no fly -by -night organization that will use the space for a year or two and then disappear. I am not certain as to the best way to deal with the zoning of the site. I will leave that to the wisdom of the City Council. I do want to go on record, however, as being a strong supporter of the proposed site use and as a person who feels that the impact to the neighborhood will carry more positives than negatives with it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Josh Kaplan, Manager Edina Realty City Lakes Office 'FROM SCHWEBEL LAW FIRM (FRI) 10. 13' 95 11 :27 /ST. I1 :26/NO. 3760079002 P 2 LAW OFFICES SCNWEBEL, GOETZ, SIEBEN & MOSKAL, P.A. 5120 1 D5 CENTER JAMES R. SCHWEBEL11 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET JOHN C. GOETZ WILLIAM R. SIEBEN 1 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-2246 DAVIO J. MOSKALt RICHARD L. TOUSIGNANT WILLIAM A. CRANDALL 1 PAUL E. GODLEWSKII FAX (612) 333-6311 JOHN E. VUKELICH TOLL -FREE (800) 752-4265 DANIEL J. BRESNAHAN LARRY E. STERN TELEPHONE (612) 777 -7777 MARK H. GRUESNER MARY C. CADE PETER W. RILEY MARK L. PFISTER JAMES G. WEINMEYER October 13, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed Zoning Change for 5015 W. 70th Street Dear Council: MAX H. HACKER ROBERT J. SCHMITZ RONALD N. SCHUMEISTER RODCOT L. LA2EAO CANDACE L. DALE LAURIE J. SIEFF SHARON L. VAN DYCK T. JOSEPH CRUMLEY CHRISTINE O. ZONNCVCLO JAMES S. BALLENTINE ROY D. 21M MEP OF COUNSEL ROBERT LATZ THOMAS J. MILLER ANDREW P. ENGEBOETSON I reside at 5149 Abercrombie Drive and will be directly affected by what happens to the above site. I am not opposed to the daycare facility as a use for that property. In fact, I have been a customer of theirs in the past. I am, however, very concerned about the traffic conditions on West 70th at Rabun. I want to see the zoning change tied directly to the application for the site's use as a daycare. I don't want the plans for the daycare to fall through and then have the land remain zoned POD -1. I also don't want the entire parcel rezoned for the daycare's use opening up land zoned for future office development. This would be disastrous to the traffic conditions in this area. I think between the City and MnDOT we can work with the traffic increase caused by the daycare. I would urge the Council and the Planning Department to work out a deal whereby Especially for Children is allowed into the site on a conditional -use basis while protecting the entire site as R -1. Could the piece of land be split for the purpose of zoning parcels indiviudally? Please consider this matter as seriously as if this was your own neighborhood. Thank you. Very truly yours, Susan A. Kaiser "MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES • CERTIFIED BY THE NATIONAL BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCACY AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST 10/12/95 11:38 $612 893 6850 GRIFFIN COS MARK E. MOORE 5152 TIFTON DRIVE EDINA, MN 56439 (0)612/8934751 (H) 612/947 -0752 MR. KEN ROSLAND CITY MANAGER CITY OF EDINA 5015 W. SOTH ST. EDINA,MN SS424 RE: REZONING -70TH AND HWY. 100 DEAR KEN: ATTACHED IS AN INFORMATION FLYER I RECEIVED AT HOME. MY ORIGINAL IMPRESSION WAS THAT THIS FACILITY WAS GOING TO BE CONVERTED TO ONLY A DAY CARE CENTER AND NOT AN OFFICE COMPLEX. 1 LIVE 3 BLOCKS AWAY AND TAKE RABUN DRIVE TO AND FROM WORK EVERY DAY. THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT THIS TIME IS ENOUGH TO DISCOURAGE ANY HIGHER DENSITY USE ON THAT PROPERTY THAN A DAY CARE CENTER ALONE. IT DOESN'T WORK. I APPRECIATE WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS TRYING TO DO, HOWEVER, THE PRICE HE HAS TO PAY FOR THE PROPERTY DOES NOT NECESSARILY DETERMINE THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE. PLEASE ADVISE THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ON MY BEHALF THAT I OPPOSE THIS REZONING. TH KS. Z a MARK E. MOORE IM 002/003 10/12/95 11:38 $612 893 6850 GRIFFIN COS URGENT HOMEOWNER AGAINST-THE ZONING CHANGE AT 5015 West 70th Street /1003/003 The Edina City Council ut 1 1 vote on the request by Steve Williams to mange the zoning at 5015 West 70th Street (Evangelical Free Church) from 9-1. cesiaential, to Planned Office District, POD -1 at the October ie Council meeting. Steve Williams has included a 20,000 square foot four story office bu i i dl ng in his p l ans to convert and expand. the church_..£or., -use. as a cay care center. An office building is more profitable than a day care center and it will not be long before the office hover will be built in our neighborhood. Realtors and appraisers have stated that the resale value of our homes will be depressed by the visual impact of the office tower, the removal of large old trees and shrubs and the increased traffic. A law firm specializing in fighting rezoning stated that it could cost as much as $50,000 for the neighborhood to seek professional help in attempting to defeat the rezoning. The.firm, however. stated that the best method for fighting the change is for the residents to appear before the Council. in large numbers to show their objection. - - -' We hao a good showing at the September Council meeting but we need all of the 200+ residents receiving this notice to be at the October 16, 7:00 P.M. meeting. if you cannot attend, please show your opposition by signing and returning the bottom portion of this notice to City Hall by Friday, October 13. TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015 West lath Street. Comments: VE N M-1 Signature 4C i n r 4 ame /v -1Z -SS ACdress Date: From: Warren Eelakson To! C y of Edina Data! 1011 2M Time! 11!48!07 Pape i of I Octobcr 12, 1991 TO: file City of Edu1a.1'laluii ig llcpallmcllt We arc aeainct file 11rOT1Oecd 70t1itig Cha.n£c at .)01.) Wcct 70th Street 11CC1.11CC it will create addirional Tra$ic COI1 -QcsriOII at a pon1T where it already is a problem for Those of us who are residcnTs in 13rookvicw llts. We are also advised Tha.T iT Will adversely a.ffeCT our p1'upC1'lV� VHltw. VUIC agaftn't US z"niiI1l; L11i1I1,f�C. 'l'lial:i1C you, Mr. /Af1•s. Waiwii Erickson 5200 Meadow ltidgi. I-Aina., MN »439 941 -4331 URGENT HOMEOWNER AGAINST THE ZONING CHANGE AT 5015 West 70th Street The Edina C i t'r Council wi I 1 vote on the request by Steve Williams to �.nanue the caning at 5015 West 70th Street (Evangelical Free Church) from P -1 residential, to Planned Office District, POD -1 at the October la Council meeting. Steve Williams has included a 20,000 square foot four story office buiiding in his plans to convert and expand the church for use as a day care center. An office building is more profitable than a day care center and it will not be long before the office tower will be built in our, neighborhooa. Realtors and appraisers have stated that the resale value of our homes will be depressed by the visual impact of the office tower, the removal of large old trees and shrubs and the Increased traffic. A law firm specializing in fighting rezoning stated.that It could cost as mucn as $50,000 for the neighborhood to seek professional help in attempting to defeat the rezoning. The firm, however, stated that the best method for fighting the change is for the residents to appear before the Council. in large numbers to show their objection. We had a good showing at the September Council meetLng but we need all of the 200+ residents receiving this notice to bei at the October 16, 7:00 P.M. meeting. if you cannot attend, please show your oppositlon by signing and returning the bottom portion of this notice to City Hall by Friday, October 13. TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at- 5015 West 7Gth Street. Comments: Signature ri r, i am 13 Address Date: - ,; - -. ,, c.ui iia r, ann i rig uepartment I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015-West 70th Street. Comments: i Signature 1 +1 Address Date: /D — //- 9-S T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015-West 70th Street. ,qN 0FFi CE gcJi6TJ/�� ii✓ T%iS L oCAT /o,�/ W�cL Fv�PThe.p TidC'iPBASE T�Pi4Fi�� Comments : '9~� rNT/ -NSiFy TyC Fx i sT�.v� bA.vBe.�ous 7W AFF/ G Si tvgT�o v i9 r Q THE ridt -e /zSECTio�/ oi= 70, StRPef AND Signature Address 'VOSC -1"4x1 13 M017 Er,v b&�Vn II D C. /" 0 D,EJ51y c :nr. - iaffie T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015 West 70th Street. Comments: Lk, , � c� u ?' 1 Signature Address c Kz� + 01 C&&) Date: /40 f/ _ �,5 c n r. i.�-.rrae T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015' West 70th Street. Comments: D Signature YVESGEY C �i��r� . "` -:itC i_ure Address Da t e : zli/04. /A, /996' T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015- West 70th Street. Comments: Signature h� to\ C>La �r;nr, :i3.tr�e Address Date: `d As T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015-West 70th Street. Comments: Signature V� k N Q �-� \�� �-, as-b, n i _.rne Address Date: <nO�7 LCI( T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. :015-West 70th Street. Comments : ,a- ��. tiurx�L.-r -�. S %% �a'�L2K�u•c� � ��..ct.f�� Gv- �M.L' -F - vi1�f��c(' . �Z�`�i //.e``.c, , / ,'!//�G°'"t% )��lo� ��i..C•2C_.2cy..L�c•LP Y'✓l Signature L, C- STRo� ri Address Date: �Cr �/ i 9',,- T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015 West 70th Street. . Comments: Signature Q 5 r . r, r• i arr�e Address Date: TO: The City of Edina Planning Department A am against the proposed zoning change at 501.5 West 70th Street. . Comments : Sorry, we will be out of town. We do no and the zoning changed!! Signature Phil and Deloris Brain 5173 Abercrombie Drive Address Date: Oct. 12, 1995 :n- iree ------------------------------------- - - - - -- TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at- 5015-West 70th Street. Comments: i Address Cvk Date: T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015"West 70th Street. Comments: O� Signature r:nr, iarr,e Address Date: la- //- f-5- T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at: 5015 West 70th Street. JG� y � �a/ it r► . �ro Fr A y "J Comments : e- e � C4i G / A e e x lr gew era f ed c -c-Aer Wov(d waee Tofm ydiaQ�oc[� Q ✓r�r�q oC ae Signature Address P I f vcc v•uI Date: �rinr i�rne T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015 West 70th Street. Address 1 I _��tv i1 Date: Z' c i n i _.rne T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015 West 70th Street. Comments: 01" AWE 1 "fw -4u. n a l-c !q tkn ub V 4v k4t orl i -fkt DC,f -. 110 A&U-� - �e 'ignature sOl,rQ.% NOr�+cd ow�d� P.- in c { arrie bow'dAWA IF" Address � Agenda Item II. A. S'1fBIL TAM WERSELL Educators With A Plus October 16, 1995 The Edina City Council The Dina City Planning Commission This will register our disapproval about the proposal to rezone 5015 W. 70th St. into a commrecial zone from R.,1 Residential. The rezoning will cause undesireable traffic problems daily for residents, men and women, in the Brookview Heights area who use Rabun as an exit. We have experienced two major accidents on 70th by drivers going through red lights and hitting us. Exiting from Rabun has become more hazardous. A Day Care Center and an office building would increase the hazard for those who exit from Rabun as well as for those many drivers and service trucks who would use the Day Care and offices. This is not a safe location. Speed laws are not obeyed. Property values would decrease in this area. Do not vote for the proposed amendment. Sincerely, , � tc)u 5124 Tifton Drive Edina, MN 55435 (612) 941 -1980 am against cne proposea zoning cnange ac,o0lb. went turn Street. Comments: Signature s ,-. l��f3si:-F f r i ri Address Date: TO: The City of Edina Planning Department /� � ,�, ►mac I I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015-West 70th Street. Comments: Signature Address � /, �i �� L ' i crr,e TO: The C Signature Date:- lQ —r tlg, r a :j eQ ssaappv iv� Mad i avNt aUt1; a�nzeu6tc :sluawwoD •Iaa14S 4ROL 488A ST09 4v e5ueyo 5uruoz pasodoid ayl 4euTeSe me I 4uaw4jedaa 5uTuuela euTp3 ;o AITO aqj :py TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015' West 70th Street. Comments: Signature %there a (0-e-ri -00 r:nc Iarr,e Address �v Date• �r- ��----------- -- ------------------------------------- 0 `.The City of Edina Planning Department �:.. �am against the proposed zoning change. at 5015 West 70th Stree . tst Address r:• T0: The City of Edina Planning Department" I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015 West 70th Street. Comment &� Gs 4 A�' K IVV Signature Address Date: �'//5— �•c : n � i::rne --------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----'= '- - - - -- T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 501.55 West 70th Street. Comments: -rte v Signature ll1A- e6 4QE --r =:.ri - irre Address Date: 10- 13 -cry T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 50 IS- West 70th Street. Comments: OW Signature h�l�f t i6a- Address i Date:— r T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015'West 70th Street. Comments: Signature J FA Address Date: T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015-West 70th Street. Comments: Signature �• c : r� c. • i :.rc e Address Date:- /D - /V� - y�;- T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at.5015"West 70th Street. Comments: Signature NOW G• FATC-AWN) �r.nt ?izrne C I I I 0 0 6- &- A jU PLA &A Address Date: T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015- West 70th Street. Comments: Signature r:nr, 'iwe , 13 7 Address Date: /d - /4 - T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015 -West 70th Street. Comments: G`� �� Cl.• �`C/ 9 hra. Signature ,A • 0/- i- /," Address Date: /& ^ /,:? ,YLf— T0: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at 5015'West 70th Street. Comments: FaR.r.WRAW-70% Address Date: TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015- West 70th Street. k Le Address Date 7 T' URGENT HOMEOWNER AGAINST THE ZONING CHANGE AT 5015 West 70th Street The Edina city Council will vote on the request by Steve Williams to cn ange the zoning 'at 5015 West 70th Street (Evangelical Free Church) from R -1, resiaential. to Planned Office District, POD -1 at the October io Council meeting. Steve Williams has included a 20,000 square foot four story office bu i i di ng in n i s plans to convert and expand the church for use as a day care center. An office building is more profitable than a day care center and it w! i 1 ' • "not- - be . tha o.ff l e touver— ;4L! 1.1 Realtors and appraisers have stated that the resale value of our homes will be depressed by the visual Impact of the office tower, the removal of large old trees and shrubs and the increased traffic. A law firm specializing in fighting rezoning 9tated.that it could cost as much as $50,000 for the neighborhood to seek professional help In attempting to defeat the rezoning. The firm, however, stated that the best method for fighting the change is for the residents to appear before the Council. In large numbers to show their objection. We has a good showing at the September Council meetLng but we need all of the 200+ residents receiving this notice to be at the October 16, 7:00 P.M. meeting. if you cannot attend, please show your opposition by signing and returning the bottom portion of this notice to City' Hall by Friday, October 13: TO: The City of Edina Planning Department I am against the proposed zoning change at. 5015- West 70th Strertt Commen t s : Gr/� ✓J' v% �r+f� �/ -��- At '0natur -� Address �L.i1 an w-. dLer -t J• 4e U Date /O c i n r. : i arse Ree-e4 l v / /C0 /,qC � 1� 41 4 REPO RT /RECO M MEN DATI O N TO: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # I I • B FROM: Craig Larsen ❑ Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: October 16, 1995 To Council SUBJECT: Loa Cabin Location Action ❑x Motion on Lot 5, Mirror ❑ Resolution Oaks. Eugene Frey. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Staff recommends allowing the placement of the cabin within the conservation restriction area on Lot 5 provided that the building not be used as a dwelling unit. Info /Background: The Conservation Restriction allows the Council the right to allow the cabin to be placed within the restriction without vacating part of the easement. That provision is contained in paragraph No. 1 of page 2 of the attached Conservation Restriction. In the past the Council has granted permission in some cases, and in others has released a portion of the restricted area. Most recently, the council released a portion of the restricted area for a house pad in the Dalquist addition. The Council granted permission to locate play equipment on a lot on the south side of this same pond. The sport court situation raised at the Council meeting involved a drainage easement and not a Conservation Restriction. have spoken with the purchaser, Eugene Frey, and he has indicated that he plans to attend the Council meeting. between CONSERVATION RESTRICTION (Natural Condition) THIS INDENTURE, Made this day of .19� (hereinafter called "Owner," whether one or more), and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "Edinal. WITNESSETH: That Owner, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Sell and Convey unto Edina, its successors and assigns, Forever, a Conservation Restriction pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 84.64, for the purposes and on the terms hereinafter specified, over, on and across the tract(s) or parcel(s) of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (said tract(s) or parcel(s) of land being hereinafter together called the "Easement Area "). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, to Edina, its successors and assigns, Forever. And Owner, for Owner and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, covenants with Edina, its successors and assigns, that Owner is well seized in fee of the Easement Area, and has good right to convey pursuant hereto the interests hereby conveyed, and that the Easement Area is free from all encumbrances, except real estate taxes and installments of special assessments payable therewith which are not now delinquent. And the Easement Area, in the quiet and peaceable possession of Edina, its successors and assigns, for the purposes hereby granted against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to the encumbrances hereinbefore mentioned, Owner will warrant and defend. The purpose of this Conservation Restriction is to assure that the Easement Area shall at all times: (i) remain in its present natural condition; (ii) constitute scenic surroundings; and (iii) constitute a suitable habitat for fish and /or wildlife. To accomplish this purpose, Owner, for Owner and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, does hereby covenant and agree that: 1. No buildings or other structures of any kind, and no roads, signs, billboards or other advertising of any kind, and no utility equipment poles, wires or other material of any kind, shall hereafter be erected, installed, constructed or placed, or allowed to be erected, installed, placed or constructed, on or above all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 2. No soil or other substance or material shall be dumped or placed , or allowed to be dumped or placed, as landfill or for any other purpose, reason or cause on all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 3. No trash, waste or unsightly or offensive materials shall be dumped or placed, or allowed to be dumped or placed, on all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 2 4. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be removed, or be allowed to be removed, from all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 5. No loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other material or substance shall be excavated, dredged or removed, or allowed to be excavated, dredged or removed, from all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 6. No activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation or fish and /or wildlife habitat preservation, and no other acts or uses detrimental to the retention or preservation of the Easement Area as a natural and scenic open or wooded space or as a fish and /or wildlife habitat, shall be conducted or permitted to be conducted on all or any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 7. No surface use shall be made of all or any part of the Easement Area except for purposes consistent with the maintenance and preservation of the Easement Area in its natural condition without the express prior written approval of Edina. 8. The Easement Area shall be maintained at all times by Owner and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, in full compliance with all applicable ordinances of Edina now or hereafter enacted and in full compliance with the provisions of this Conservation Restriction. K 9. This Conservation Restriction shall not operate to grant to Edina the right to use or improve, or to permit the public to use or improve, the Easement Area as or for a park. 10. The rights and remedies in law and in equity given by the laws of Minnesota, including, without limitation, Minnesota Statutes § 84.65 or any successor statute, as such statutes may hereafter be supplemented, modified or amended, shall be available to Edina. Also, if there shall be a violation or breach, or an attempt to violate or breach, any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Conservation Restriction, Edina may prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person, firm or corporation violating or breaching, or attempting to violate or breach, any such term, covenant or condition, to either prevent such violation or breach or to recover damages for such violation or breach. Also, Edina, in the event of such violation or breach, without notice, may, at its option, enter upon the Easement Area with such personnel, equipment and material as it determines necessary, to undertake and perform the term, covenant or condition so violated or breached, or to cure the violation or breach, and the cost incurred, including attorneys' fees, witNinterest at the highest rate then allowed by law, or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, shall be payable by Owner, and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, on demand made by Edina, its successors and assigns.A Such entry shall without liability or obligation of any kind to Owner, or any owner or occupant of the Easement Area, for trespass or damage to the Easement Area, or any property or 4 r 742ZO34 CONSERVATION RESTRICTION (Natural Condition) THIS INDENTURE, made this day of October, 1995, between GROVES STICKNEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter called "Owner," whether one or more), and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "Edina "). WITNESSETH: That Owner, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Edina, its successors and assigns, forever, a Conservation Restriction pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 84.64, for the purposes and on the terms hereinafter specified, over, on and across the tract or parcel of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter called the "Easement Area "). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to Edina, its successors and assigns, forever. And Owner, for itself and its successors and assigns, covenants with Edina, its successors and assigns, that Owner is well seized in fee of the Easement Area and has good right to convey the interests therein pursuant hereto, and that the Easement Area is free from all encumbrances except the lien of real estate taxes and installments of special assessments payable therewith which are not yet due. And the Easement Area, in the quiet and peaceable possession of Edina, its successors and assigns, for the purposes hereby granted, against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to the encumbrances hereinbefore mentioned, Owner will warrant and defend. The purpose of this Conservation Restriction is to assure that the Easement Area shall at all times predominately: (i) remain in its present natural condition; (ii) constitute scenic surroundings; and (iii) constitute a suitable habitat for fish and wildlife. To accomplish this purpose, Owner, for itself and its successors and assigns, does hereby covenant and agree that: 1. No buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising of any kind, and no utilities or other structures of any kind, hereafter shall be erected or placed on or above any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written 742Z034 approval of Edina, and that no building within the Easement Area which is approved by Edina shall be used for residential purposes. 2. No soil or other substance or material shall be dumped or placed as landfill on the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 3. No trash, waste or unsightly or offensive materials shall be dumped or placed on the Easement Area. 4. No tress, shrubs or other vegetation shall be removed from the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 5. No loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other material substance shall be excavated, dredged or removed from the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 6. No activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation or fish and wildlife habitat preservation, nor other acts or uses detrimental to the Easement Area as a natural and scenic open or wooded space or as a fish and wildlife habitat, shall be conducted or permitted to be conducted on the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 7. No surface use shall be made of the Easement Area except for purposes consistent with the maintenance of the Easement Area in its natural open or wooded condition without the express prior written approval of Edina. 8. The Easement Area shall be maintained at all times by Owner, its successors or assigns, in full compliance with all applicable ordinances of Edina now or hereafter enacted, and in full compliance with the provisions of this Conservation Restriction. 9. This Conservation Restriction shall not operate to grant to Edina the right to use or improve, or to permit the public to use or improve, the Easement Area as or for a park. 10. The rights and remedies given by Minnesota Statutes § 84.65 shall be available to Edina. Also, if there shall be a violation or breach, or an attempt to violate or breach, any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Conservation Restriction, Edina may prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person, firm or corporation violating or breaching, or attempting to violate or breach, any such term, covenant or condition, either to prevent such violation or breach or to recover damages for such violation or breach. Also, Edina, in the event of such violation or breach, without -2- 742ZO34 notice, may at its option undertake to perform the term, covenant or condition so violated or breached, and the costs incurred, including attorneys' fees, with interest thereon at the highest rate then allowed by law or, if no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, shall be payable by Owner, or its successors or assigns, on demand made by Edina, its successors and assigns, and Owner, its successors or assigns, also shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including attorneys' fees, with interest thereon as above provided, if payment is not made on demand, whether or not suit be brought. In addition to other remedies then available for collection of such costs and interest, Edina may charge such costs and interest against the Easement Area and any other property then included in the same tax parcel(s) as the Easement Area, in the same manner as special assessments (without, however, any notice or hearing of any kind) and collect the same with the real estate taxes against the whole of such tax parcel(s) which are payable in the year following the year such costs and interest are so charged. If such charges are not paid, the whole of such tax parcel(s) may be sold and conveyed in the same manner as lands forfeited for nonpayment of real estate taxes are sold and conveyed. 11. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners and occupants of the Easement Area, and shall inure only to the benefit of Edina, its successors and assigns, and may be amended or modified at any time and from time to time by the sole act of Edina and the then owner(s) of the Easement Area, and may be released at any time by the sole act of Edina. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Owner has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. GROVES STICKNEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY By: George W. Stickney Its: Chief Manager This instrument is exempt from State Deed Tax. -3- 742Z034 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of If 1995, by George W. Stickney, the Chief Manager of Groves Stickney Limited Liability Company, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Moss & Barnett (JLW) A Professional Association 4800 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129 Telephone: (612) 347 -0300 Wlm 742Z034 EXHIBIT A Easement Area That certain real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: That part of Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Mirror Oaks, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of a line drawn parallel to and one hundred (100) feet northerly of the northerly line, as shown on said plat, of the pond which extends onto said Lot 5. C TO: FROM: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Kenneth Rosland Craig Larsen DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: S -95 -4, Preliminary Plat Approval, Kunz -Lewis Addition. 5229 Eden Avenue and 5200 Eden Circle. Agenda Item # I I . c - F] Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends n To HRA x❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion x❑ Resolution Ordinance Discussion Staff has received no additional information since the Council meeting on September 18, 1995. Member Kelly suggested continuing the issue until additional information is brought forward about how to incorporate day care use into the R -1 code. Member Smith made a motion to continue the prelimina ry�� y- :rezoning, R -1 Single :: Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District, E�specfally for Children (5015 West 70th Street) to October 16, 1995, allowing the proponent time to formulate hard �� data on the traffic issue and to allow staff to research an ordinance amendment Including day care as an acceptable use:>i a R -1 zoning district. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Member Paulus encouraged the pro �E �gone is to do some 'off -the -wall' brainstorming about the area. She suggested seeking inp�yt n the problem from the police. She reported that the high school had tremendous trouble with their parking area but solved it with a paid person who directs traffic in and.out of the high school lot. Ayes: Kelly, Pauius;-91iiith, Richards Abstaining: old _ e`z` Motion carte+ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL (S -95-4) 5200 EDEN CIRCLE AND 5229 EDEN AVENUE (KUNZ- LEWIS) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen reported that the subject property is generally located south of Eden Avenue and west of the railroad tracks and comprises two buildings and multiple parcels, some previously platted and some never platted. The total land area is 342,283 square feet or 7.86 acres. The proposed subdivision would combine all existing parcels into two new lots. Planner Larsen explained that Lot 1 would include the Lewis Engineering Building and Lot 2 would include the Parts Plus Warehouse building owned by the Kunz family. The proposed lot line between the two lots is shown as encroaching on the building on Lot 2. The building owner is proposing to remove a portion of the building to comply with the required two -foot building setback. Details of the building proposal are contained in the Final Development Plan proposal by Kunz Oil being, considered concurrently. Presently, the Lot 2 property has access to Eden Avenue by way of a private easement through the Lewis property. The proposal would eliminate the easement and propose that Lot 2, Kunz Oil would use only Eden Circle. Planner Larsen noted that at the Planning Commission meeting of August 30, 1995, the Commission recommended final development plan approval subject to hard surfacing of the road and two staff conditions, 1) final plat approval and 2) subdivision dedication for the unplatted portions of the property. Council Comments /Concerns Member Maetzold voiced concem with 1) the amount of truck traffic on Eden and Eden Circle and 2) whether the roadway is designed to handle it. Planner Larsen said Eden Circle is used most as the condition of the private easement area is very bad. Trucks bring products into the site and product leaves via small pickups, all on Eden Circle. Member Smith said he drove the private easement recently and it was nearly impassable. He believed any servicing of the Parts Plus Warehouse would need to use Eden Circle. He asked for more information about a letter the Planning Department received from Theodore Giannobile regarding history and data and requesting additional parking space from the adjacent property owner, Kunz Oil, Co. Planner Larsen responded there is now a window of time to reach a solution in meeting code with the number of parking spaces needed for the building. The subject of parking is private even though he has been working with Mr. Giannobile. Proponent Comments Steve Fictel, Architect for Kunz Oil, pointed out for the past year all traffic in and out of the site have used Eden Circle. Resident Comments Gordon Lewis, President of Lewis Engineering, 5229 Eden Avenue, explained that the subject easement is 16 feet wide and turns at a 900 angle. Kunz Oil Company uses the easement at his pleasure. He believes the road cannot be improved because of the nature of the soil. Bob Thomale, 5400 Edenmoor Street, explained his property abuts the Kunz Oil property. He inquired where the proposed parking would be in proximity to his lot. Planner Larsen said the parking setback would be 10 feet and would be a hard surface lot. John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, stated he is the immediate past president of the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association. He has attempted to meet with Mr. Kunz on a number of occasions, unsuccessfully but the Association is aware of the proposal. The nearest affected property is 5400 Edenmoor. If the parking area is landscaped properly, the Association would agree with the proposal. The biggest problem is the entrance and exit to the neighborhood where Sherwood Road meets Eden Circle. Kunz Oil small trucks adhere to the posted STOP sign approximately 50 percent of the time while the TAG gymnastic parents do not abide by the sign ever. Mr. Menke reminded Council there is a playground on the premises and voiced concern with safety for the neighborhood children. The Association would agree with the replatting, however, if offices were built on the Lewis property their wish is that an alternative route could be found other than Eden Circle. Member Smith asked clarification of lot lines and asked further if a decision on the issue could be reserved until the next agenda item is discussed. Mayor Richards said he could not support the proposal for the following reasons: 1) the development should be oriented to the north, 2) validating the proposal as presented would be a direct opposite, and 3) reorientation and expanding the building brings more traffic into the residential neighborhood in a circuitous route. Member Smith inquired whether the easement access is the responsibility of the City or the developer. Mayor Richards believes the City as a public body, has no obligation to improve or enhance their property and further, the developer has access to the site from Eden Circle. Member Smith asked if the developer could be prohibited from using Eden Circle. Mayor Richards said Eden Circle is a public roadway. Member Kelly asked if the preliminary plat approval for the transfer of land is approved, could the entrance to the site be tied to the final development plan. Planner Larsen said the intent of the plan, as presented, is not to have that access and may entail a change in land ownership to accomplish a north access to Eden Avenue for the Lot 2 property. Member Kelly asked, as a part of the Kunz Oil expansion, if any particulars have come forward regarding traffic counts on Eden Circle. Planner Larsen commented he has no numbers on traffic. The operation will not change but will expand the warehouse space. Member Kelly stated her approval of the concept but if the Council still has traffic concerns with that parcel she recommended answering those concerns before the project is ordered. Mayor Richards knows the area will be developed but he would rather it not be done in pieces. The potential traffic impact in the area could be detrimental for the whole neighborhood. He would not approve the preliminary rezoning. Member Maetzold believes this preliminary plat and the proposed final development plan focuses traffic on Eden Circle versus Eden Avenue. Development plans for the whole package should be presented at one time. Gordon Lewis elaborated that he and Mr. Kunz have come before the Council a number of times with different plans for development of the site. The plan is a logical, natural progression of what should happen on the site. Property access to Eden Avenue is impossible for reasons: 1) road bed is 16 feet wide while a trunk highway is 30 feet wide, 2) Kunz Oil loading docks are on east side, 3) Lewis property on west side bottles up Kunz property, and 4) Kunz parking lot location would be a logical buffer for the neighborhood. The Kunz building is loaded to the rafters, they are using free - standing storage trailers as well as off -site storage and the proposal would accommodate the expansion that has already taken place. Mr. Lewis observed this as a win -win situation for everyone concerned. Member Smith made a motion to continue the preliminary plat approval for Kunz Oil Company and Lewis Engineering Company, 5200 Eden Circle and 5229 Eden Avenue. Member Smith advised Mr. Lewis that traffic remains the key issue and reminded it has always been the intent of the Council that traffic orient from the north not the west. Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion carried. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTINUED FOR KUNZ OIL COMPANY AT 5200 EDEN CIRCLE AND LEWIS ENGINEERING-COMPANY AT. 5229 EDEN AVENUE Member Kelly made a motion to continue the final development plan for Kunz Oil Company at 5200 r M Q1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: P -95 -7. Final Development Plan. 5200 Eden Circle. Parts Plus and Kunz Oil. Agenda Item # I I. D. E] Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA x] To Council Action 0 Motion xl Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The proposed Final Development plan request remains the same as that presented at the September 18, 1995, Council meeting. The proposed project can not proceed prior to favorable action on the proposed Kunz -Lewis subdivision. Walter Kunz, owner of Kunz Oil will be attending the Council meeting to address Council concerning his proposed expansion plans. NEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION � ex +ua�Naurv�al�••s+wnw!!�nelnroo� v �newo(an �Aklfi�swTOn 1 a�i9'dEi &f6AWMpM1AlNtlIfO / / 1tT 4UMNlra"K- �Yrt® a•tlu�r®awlf o. a s m DO - 1- ti N J d d 3 a.n� Uw/w .ter ae. rw- fra> +�► i I �J1,'lll°I��f�i NEWPPJUQMLOT L-i ;!Z EMPUG KOGL JLM.. �ADCrf= SITE PLAN I I i o r so ar rn. A Arm wis. w w� •w�► . R u 7 u o Itfle. LANDSCAPE PLAN .ne . MIIL� nee eseso .... Suatl If a dol be w ee.ntrgeM weub peeve nal. Mw .el I.vfn Mf7D VIII. OOI•/NA!1Q e V w b YeR ' M.rtal�M•II Iv w!� • (w.I! •t. ra lunw.f% AAUP n~ 0•CF OINf FOAM& Rldlf%e>O NeE IUIa!» 'Mo. my Fmpm +P PLANTING SCHEDULE to , -- »� u C •anti •aE1 O OOIOMDo OPWMl eN - �lIptIfall"UCI 1wfMr P Ia.YI�t1Vl1. 7 ` d •1nb�0� � � h fgOtOD. WD TIM dam •D Cane 11 t dtot" •II 1 afoa 1 u' M M �M•OlatalAl - nre•r nrr. ; to •rrer M � .•e _ �_ 1 GO as ' I. /W�•�a�/�/r�••�Itr•.�1w��•!r� / 1 � I 0 1 _IDS• 1 rr•Yraiat�e »ItJ•••�M t•�!r 1 M•e •Ie.lee p•1/••�sM1 � _ — —_ __ _ ` R u 7 u o Itfle. LANDSCAPE PLAN .ne . MIIL� nee eseso .... Suatl If a dol be w ee.ntrgeM weub peeve nal. Mw .el I.vfn Mf7D VIII. OOI•/NA!1Q e V w b YeR ' M.rtal�M•II Iv w!� • (w.I! •t. ra lunw.f% AAUP n~ 0•CF OINf FOAM& Rldlf%e>O NeE IUIa!» 'Mo. my Fmpm +P TO FROM: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Kenneth Rosland Craig Larsen DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: S -95 -5. Preliminary Plat Approval. Tambornino Addition. 6608 Dakota Trail. Joseph Tambornino. Recommendation: Agenda Item # I I . ;L. r] Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA x❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ] Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion The Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed Preliminary Plat. Info /Background: Following the Planning Commission meeting the proponents presented a revised preliminary plat which creates only one new lot. The new lot in the revised plat is 287 feet wide, 182 feet deep, and has a lot area of 51,822 square feet. The change results in a new lot that needs only one variance for lot depth. The original request required variances for lot width, depth and area for each lot. While the proponents have offered a revised plat which eliminates all but one variance, they continue to request Council approval of the plat which creates two new lots. Draft Minutes September 27, 1995 S -95 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval Tambornino Addition Lot 4, Block 6, Indian Hills Dr. Joe Tambornino Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed R -1 lot with an area of 2.9 acres. The existing home is located in the south - central portion of the property and uses Dakota Trail as its driveway access. The proposed subdivision would create two new lots, both fronting on Mohawk Trail. Mr. Larsen pointed out the subject property exhibits significant areas of steep slopes where slopes are 20% or greater. As much as two- thirds of the area within the two new lots are such steep slope areas. Mr. Larsen explained the Subdivision Ordinance use the median average lot width, lot depth, and lot area to determine minimum dimensions and areas for new lots. The lot retained for the existing dwelling meets all standards and would continue in use as it is today. The proposed new lots require variances from all of the neighborhood standards. The requested variances are substantial. The Subdivision Ordinance was designed to provide a transition in areas moving from large lots to smaller lots. The proponent has suggested that the subdivision be judged on the lot sizes along Mohawk Trail. While the proposed lots are similar to those along Mohawk Trail they do not provide an appropriate transition from the larger lots to the east. Mr. Larsen said in addition, the topography of the proposed lots is much more severe than on lots west of Mohawk Trail. The severe topography limits the building pad area and would push the pads close to the street which is not the norm on the east side of Mohawk Trail. For the above reasons staff recommends denial of the proposed preliminary plat. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Tambornino, and Mr. Greg Tambornino were present. Mr. Tom Meyers, Edina Realty was also present. Chairman Johnson observed the frontyard setbacks along the east side of Mohawk Trail are deep, and the proposed new lots may require frontyard setback variances when developed. Mr. Larsen responded that may be correct. He pointed out the slopes on proposed Lot 3 are greater than the slopes on Lot 2, so Lot 3 would more than likely require a front yard setback variance to develop. Lot 2 may be able to set the house farther into the hill possibly avoiding the need for a variance. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if he knows the average frontyard setbacks on the west side of Mohawk Trail. Mr. Larsen responded on the west side of Mohawk Trail the frontyard setbacks are around 35 to 40 feet. Commissioner Bergman questioned Mr. Larsen on the Ratelle property, and if development of homes on it would require variances. Mr. Larsen explained when the Ratelle property was approved for subdivision a 40 foot conservation easement was placed along the Mohawk Trail street frontage. Currently the site indicates the property will be served from one driveway off Mohawk Trail, which is a different scenario from what was originally approved. Mr. Larsen concluded at this time it is not known if any variances will be required to locate building pads on the Ratelle property. Mr. Greg Tambornino addressed the Commission explaining he believes the proposed Lot 1 (Dakota Trail) will not negatively impact the neighborhood. Continuing, Mr. Tambornino stated in his opinion the two lots proposed on Mohawk Trail belong in the Mohawk and Iroquois Trail neighborhoods, adding if you walk the site, the topography of the site splits the lot into two completely different neighborhoods. Continuing, Mr. Tambornino said if the property were subdivided into one lot on Mohawk Trail, and one lot fronting Dakota Trail, the lot on Mohawk Trail would be twice the size of most the lots in the Mohawk/Iroquois neighborhoods. Mr. Tambornino observed the Mohawk/Iroquois neighborhood is transitional in Indian Hills, and creating two lots along Mohawk Trial aids in this transition. Ms. Jean Smith, 6600 Mohawk Trail stated in her opinion dividing this property into three lots destroys the integrity of the neighborhood. Ms. Smith said the subdivision, and current redevelopment of the Ratelle property has already created problems in the neighborhood because of large vehicles needed to access the site for excavation and roadway construction. Mr. Hamilton, 6604 Mohawk Trail told Commission Members he would never have purchased his home one year ago if he knew another subdivision would occur in such close proximity to his property. Continuing, Mr Hamilton said the Indian Hills neighborhood in unique in Edina because of the steep slopes, vegetation, and the large lots. Mr. Hamilton said in his opinion the area should be protected for this uniqueness. Ms. Marilyn Ryerse, 6612 Mohawk Trail echoed Mr. Hamiltons comments, stating she moved into the Indian Hills neighborhood because of the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. She concluded by stressing she does not want the character of this area altered. Mr. Tom Meyers, of Edina Realty, representing Mr. and Mrs. Tambornino stated in response to questions concerning the possibility of requiring frontyard setback variances that he has read the city ordinances and found the Tamborninos have the right to subdivide, and can construct new homes along Mohawk Trail with frontyard setbacks of 30 feet. Mr. Larsen responded that while the ordinance requires a minimum frontyard setback of 30 feet for new subdivisions, it is not the case for this subdivision. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained Indian Hills in a developed neighborhood so frontyard setbacks are determined by the existing placement of the homes. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he could explain the background on the Ratelle subdivision. Mr. Larsen said the Ratelle property was divided into four lots, and is approximately 4.9 acres in size (the subject property is under three acres). At the time of subdivision the Ratelle property met all city requirements, except one lot required a nine foot lot width variance. The lot width variance was required because at the time of subdivision the Ratelles desired to retain their home, and if you view the subdivision, the desired retention of their home created a rather odd shaped larger lot. Mr. Larsen concluded presently the Ratelle home has been razed, and the property will be served from Mohawk Trail with one curb cut, and not four curb cuts (two on Mohawk, two on Dakota) as originally proposed. Mrs. Tambornino questioned how the Ratelles can change the proposal from what was approved. It appears that the hill is being destroyed and they are removing a large amount of trees. Mr. Larsen said the City Council approved a four lot subdivision, with lots a certain size and dimension. The lots have not changed in size or number. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said at the time the Ratelle property received approval, a 40 foot conservation easement was recommended and recorded along Mohawk Trail, and the City thought the property would be served by four different curb cuts, with four private driveways. Since approval the property owner has decided to serve all lots with one street off Mohawk Trail. The width of the road does have the appearance of a public street, and it does impact Mohawk Trail, but is a private matter. Mr. Greg Tambornino pointed out the widths of the proposed lots on Mohawk Trail match the two lots directly across the street. Mr. Greg Tambornino noted for years the residents of the Indian Hills neighborhood have enjoyed the open space, and trees of their property, but now they have decided to exercise their right to subdivide. Commissioner Swenson said in reviewing the facts of the proposal she cannot support the request because of the number of variances required, and their magnitude. Commissioner McClelland stated she agrees with Commissioner Swenson, she cannot support subdivisions that require multiple variances. Mr. Tambornino agreed if one looks at the whole picture the variances appear substantial, but if you compare the two proposed lots to the lots along Mohawk Trail the variances do not seem as substantial. Mr. Tambornino reiterated in his opinion there are two significantly different neighborhoods separated by the topography. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend denial of the preliminary plat siting the substantial number and size of the variances. Commissioner seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. LOCATION MAP a ARROWHEAD LAKE ` po � I N � R 6 a AN 111 1 OA x p 0 J x J Y '^ m fH I 1 s u IAN AD L E s nj r f SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -95 -5 L O C A T 10 N 6608 Dakota Trail REQUEST To Create Three Lots EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 S -95 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval Tambornino Addition Lot 4, Block 6, Indian Hills Dr. Joe Tambornino The subject property is a developed R -1 lot with an area of 2.9 acres. The existing home is located in the south - central portion of the property and uses Dakota Trail as its driveway access. The proposed subdivision would create two new lots, both fronting on Mohawk Trail. The Subdivision Ordinance uses the median average lot width, lot depth, and lot area to determine minimum dimensions and areas for new lots. The median figures for this neighborhood of 37 lots are: 186 Feet 226 Feet 34,718 sq. ft. The dimensions and areas for lots in the proposed subdivision area as follows: Lot 1 260 Feet 275 Feet 75,631 Sq. Ft. Lot 2 143 Feet* 180 Feet* 25,456 Sq. Ft.* Lot 3 143 Feet* 182 Feet* 26,366 Sq. Ft.* *Variance Required The subject property exhibits significant areas of steep slopes where slopes are 20% or greater. As much as two - thirds of the area within the two new lots are such steep slope areas. The lot retained for the existing dwelling meets all standards and would continue in use as it is today. The proposed new lots require variances from all of the neighborhood standards. The requested variances are substantial. The Subdivision Ordinance was designed to provide a transition in areas moving from large lots to smaller lots. The proponent has suggested that the subdivision be judged on the lot sizes along Mohawk Trail. While the proposed lots are similar to those along Mohawk Trail they do not provide an appropriate transition from the larger lots to the east. In addition, the topography of the proposed lots is much more severe than on lots west of Mohawk Trail. The severe topography limits the building pad area and would push the pads close to the street which is not the norm on the east side of Mohawk Trail. For the above reasons staff recommends denial of the proposed preliminary plat. LEGEND • 00•IN q Y••LIpT I•! —•— Odortl _eIM. srro IK — � poorLt a1u 1.It —.— mnrtf aq ue mlora olwr�o rm IJ. • OOIOIO LWtNr Gp le,ll4[ a —� OMM 9 =04 mb• 10e .r ODOM @1.10 2POT amim pmts so tas 1! •Mf0 an a.m•Ta or ne rnsc nlTOl a � Is Ill II{RIM lM d Mllllt NLL •G011pl .pl 6 6fUO m rri • 6•un v wlrevc ee 11 m m ,Irt..lCD 0•ID d • 1m1 6LCR1.11 Y VWAM F M 0". b WU OtYM01 . m m — dMot1. a Om•IOI Y tMOOf TO Crt10• G100)f4 IIY 0141 0.► ,1[lm U • ..A O lllf .I.itt1. b 6 /IIOi IM 1®1<Om A YAl9.tD 4mlprt 00¢ e.01 Y . 11101 tl 116 OYM.. b VefOip•• 11101161 Q lOG/O 6 . MIII O, e6 •Y•R�. ,p0 Yp1_ f�ap 6ua a• F] P. i m I 4 t A 1/7 II I / N OwrFOC sCAU its 0010 . O11600t d 1.10.0 V PYOY cbOl OYL N IO.mY 00.1 1LY1 _, s.l• _R •w is wR 101/1 -Y•• L001 w ,.NCJL WAIMM /.D v e rj rl p Z A 1� w d�pSS a a2aqL. &d e..W" mn Y•. nvm na. -vlm aws Yv .R'R f YY RAM f ..Rfl Y;n4 KM MMm V.0 p nom a• epa...l s *&O *. o■e w... r w �.� tr.l .ro• Y .N � 1.1 .eY.00aa N �i p a_.j ------- j � D mow• -f�N pa wR ow u.uoo :rti -.ow a 'aura fW p un. • p aL•il Re. OY•Y1 01.01.0..1 q aw O W • p YYI O• fl101Oq oaa®.w r mow d 1srR s '�Y.11 YW a YIN . p 00Y .� Im(w mown sum el lo..m. ■ Isms .p � ®.e m wwo• r wpm 7YY r llutl >K Y arw. p wu.asa Yr1 •Oar■ �10.e 0 MI .YI■ M niLllta 0 ■■11'R • YM m 0.O • A■ blm. nY •fds o 1n Y110. M Olp ■IWW —r Mid {a also■ s ..w. �.•Y 8 as aauw /1 w■ •al R mow saw w. wlo msw �• ( aR scum .sm mole �- aYrlw s■ .p1YR malty s -_ an Oo. 1.1 n. maw —•- sa ram meo —.- ■.1 au wm.w usw — ■— GN393l e October 9, 1995 Edina City Council 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 This is a request to the City Council of Edina from Cynthia and Joseph Tambornino. We have been residents of Edina for 32 years. Our lot (lot 4, block 6 Indian Hills) borders on Dakota Trail on the west and Mohawk Trail on the east. Our home is located on the west Dakota Trail portion of the property. Our request is for approval to the east (Mohawk Trail) portion building lots. Two additional lots subdivide our property to utilize for two or one additional If two additional lots were approved the lot width would be approximately 145 feet for each and the lot depth approximately 180 to 185 feet each. Area about 0.6 acres. These dimensions are close to the median for the surrounding lots within 500 feet of ours in both area and depth. They are smaller in width, but only 19 feet below the median width and there are eight lots directly across on Mohawk or Iroquois Trail that are within nine feet of the proposed width. One additional lot One lot area would be 1.74 acres or 51,822 square feet. Width of 290 feet and depth of 185 feet. This lot would be much larger then any of the lots facing it on Mohawk Trail or in the surrounding area on Mohawk and Iroquois Trail. In fact, it would be almost twice as large as the lots across Mohawk Trail. October 9, 1995 Edina City Council Page 2 Summary. Therefore, we are requesting as follows: 1. Permission to subdivide the property. 2. Permission to subdivide the Mohawk Trail portion of the property into either 2 lots or a single lot. Thank you for consideration. Respectfully submitted, C thia and Joseph Tambornino 6608 Dakota Trail REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT w I � i 3, I I U; Iv 1 s� r "A Family Tradition Since 1955-1' Tom Meyers, REALTOR' CRS, GRI 3930 W. 49'.1= Street Edina, MN 55424 Office: (612) 924 -8757 October 9, 1995 Preliminary Plat - Mohawk Woods Dr. Joseph Tambornino City of Edina: r% Enclosed is a revised proposal for the development of one lot by Dr. Tambornino of his property at 6608 Dakota Trail. Lot 1 - current home 75,631 sq.ft. Lot 2 - 25,456 sq.ft. Lot 3 - 26,366 sq.ft. Revised Plan: Lot 1 - current home 75,631 sq.ft. Lot 2 - single lot proposal 51,822 sq.ft. Median lot size for properties within 500 feet is 34,700 sq.ft. Dr. Tambornino would like to propose this plan revision if the Edina City Council does not grant his original proposal of dividing his property into 3 lots. The last name you will need to know in Real Estate! W.121 ^•:: u: On The Move CORRESPONDENCE M; PETITION REGARDING TAMBORNINO SUBDIVISION PAMELA R. WESTON f 6516 INDIAN HILLS ROAD C/ / 9 _ EDINA. MINNESOTA 55439 , �Q 's Richard M. Smith Jean M. Smith 6600 Mohawk Trail Edina, Mn. 55439 October 5, 1995 City Council City of Edina Re: Proposed Subdivision of 6608 Dakota Trail Dear Council Members: I am writing to declare our opposition to the proposed subdivision of the Tambornino property. The variances required for the subdivision will despoil the character of the neighborhood as it now exists. The topography of the lots that are proposed would necessitate houses being placed too close to the street, especially disturbing the current conformity of set -backs by the existing homes. Our small street has lost all privacy temporarily and in the future by the increase in traffic that has been caused by the division of the Ratelle lot. 6ahat was once a charming and tranquil pocket of Edina has been altered by the Ratelle division. Adding an additional one of two lots to our street would cause undue hardship_ to the current home dwellers. We attended the Planning Commission meeting on September 27, 1995 and were in accord with the decision of the Planning Committee staff to deny the petition and with the subsequent decision to deny by the unanimous vote of the Committee. ;4e are unable to attend the Council Meeting scheduled for October 16, 1995 as we will both be out of town. :•;e Urge you to vote to deny this petition to subdivide. Thank you for your attnetion. Sincerely, William C. Ryerse 6612 Mohawk Trail Edina, Minnesota 55439 'fi�� ► �� ..� -cam- C- flwx -cL � �%�' „�L � D ► 0 � .� CL �r DONALD G. MCQUARRIE, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S. City of Edina Planning 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ('gentlemen- Department Re: Proposed Tambornino Subdivision 6608 Dakota Trail Lot 4, Block 6, Indian Hills Create 3 Lots I am writing this letter to express my concern and objection to the present plan for subdivision of this property. It is my understanding that the proposal is for both the subdivision and a variance in the set -back for buildings on these lots. As you know, this is a unique area of Edina that is notable for the lack of crowding of building lots. The Rattelle subdivision was done recognizing the need for an adequate set -back on these hillside lots. In our recent construction of a garden.. house,.. we. were rigorously held to neighborhood set -back' 'requiremen M nits. •y wife and I vigorously oppose variances that crowd the houses close to Mohawk trail. The Tambormino lot is smaller then the Rattelle property, conse4uently, lot sizes are smaller. Even one lot on Mohawk Trail is difficult if set -back requirements are to be observed. Obviously, there will be two driveways on Mohawk Trail. I harken back to Dr. Tambornino's impassioned objection to additional driveways on Dakota when the Rattelle subdivision was being discussed. :.rutting in two • driveways, creating space far -turnaround, and then building homes closer to the street than the current allowable setbacks will certainly destroy much of the fine character of the area. My wife and I strongly object to the planned subdivision in the /­ present proposal. (� l Donald G. McQu 'e, M:U. Dolores Jean McQuarrie PROFESSOR OF SURGERY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OFFICE: DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY, MINNEAPOLIS V.A. HOSPITAL 54TH STREET & 48TH AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55417 Mrs. William C. Ryerse 6612 Trail Edina, Ainnesota 55433: ( �s AJ �, �� V, JOHN C. NEIMEYER. JR. 6616 MOHAWK TRAIL MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 5$43$ ��L?i2G-lY� � �uC.- �• ice Z C/ Z,4 Xec L h I� City Council of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Meeting on October 16, 1995 for proposed subdivision of Lot 4 Block 6 Indian Hills, 6608 Dakota Trail Dear Sir or Madame, I am very concerned about the proposed subdivision for Lot 4, Block 6 of Indian Hills. Unfortunately, I will be out of the country on October 16, 1995 and will not be able to attend the City Council meeting. Thus, I am forwarding to you a copy of the letter my wife and I sent to the Planning Commission explaining our concerns. It is my understanding that the proposed lots would not meet the median lot requirements and that a variance for both depth and width would be necessary. For this reason, and the reasons explained in the attached letter, I am against the subdivision. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at home (829 -5349) or work (372- 2044). Sincerely, F. Douglas Watson 6620 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota Re: Lot 4 Block 6 Indian Hills ; 6608 Dakota Trail Dear Sir or Madame; This letter is in response to a notice to grant a variance for the subdivision of Lot 4 Block 6 Indian Hills, also known as 6608 Dakota Trail. We understand that the variance requests subdivision of the lot into three parcels. Two lots would be created on Mohawk Trail with access to Mohawk Trail. The third lot is the existing home which has access to Dakota Trail. We encourage the planning commission not to grant the variance to permit the building of two houses on Mohawk Trail for the following reasons: > The Planning Commission is already aware of the significant changes to the adjoining Ratelle parcel (6621 Mohawk Trail, a 4 -acre parcel that runs between Dakota Trail and Mohawk Trail). Originally, the Ratelle subdivision was to consist of two houses with access to Dakota Trail and two houses with access to Mohawk Trail (the original Ratelle driveway and one new driveway). That is what the Planning Commission approved. We feel however, that we have been victims of a "bait and switch." The plans were changed. Instead of only one additional driveway on Mohawk Trail we now have a new cul da sac with all four houses accessing Mohawk Trail. Obviously, there will be a significant increase in car traffic on Mohawk Trail. Since we are the propert owners directly across from the Ratelle property, we are the most adversely affected. �Ve are concerned that our property value may even be neea�tively impacted. The addition of two houses instead of one house on the Dakota parcel will increase the traffic further. So much for a peaceful, wooded setting where children can walk and ride bicycles safely. We have heard that the owner of 6601 Mohawk has considered building another house on his lot which would also require access on Mohawk Trail. Ratelle's property has added 3 homes, the Tamborino subdivision would add 2 more homes to Mohawk Trail traffic. At the end of the day, if all houses are built, the traffic on Mohawk Trail will increase by 6 households. > The Dakota lot is not well situated for the building of two homes. The lot which would be subdivided is bordered by a hill with the existing house at the top of the hill and a '� 1 M E_- 2� Fw c-aM ;,;�� ,� LR —TL A -G2oss rr(2�N1 c�u2 LIJI^I w 2cWA Wt^10OtfJ5, narrow space between the hill and the street. There simply is not sufficient space between the hill and the street or laterally between each house to build two houses. > Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the building of two houses will result in the removal of a significant number of trees which will permanently change the character of the neighborhood. Indian Hills has a reputation for quiet, wooded, and large lots. If two houses were built on inadequate space, it simply would not be in keeping with what people look for in Indian Hills. Thus, our property values could be adversely affected even more. We understand that most of the homeowners on Mohawk Trail share our concerns and oppose the granting of this variance. If you have any questions regarding our concerns, please contact us at 829 -5349. j jL.Aj Mary and Doug Watson 6620 Mohawk Trail Edina dakota David and Patty Hamilton 6604 Mohawk Trail Edina, Minnesota 55439 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn 55424 RE: Tambornino Proposal Dear Members of the City Council; As lifelong Minnesotans and ten year Edina residents, we'd like to voice our opposition to the proposed subdivision and development on our street. We recently moved from a crowded section of Edina to the peaceful, woodsy Mohawk Trail. The construction already going on at the end of our block has had a negative effect on the quality of life for our streets residents with added dirt, noise, traffic, and danger to our children. We feel that the Tambornino Development Proposal would have a disastrous effect on the neighborhood. In addition, it's our understanding that this proposal does not meet construction code. It's our hope that you'll do the right thing and say no to the Tambornino Subdivision Proposal. Si er y, nd Patty milton PETITION OPPOSING MOHAWK WOODS SUBDIVISION The undersigned are opposed to the proposed subdivision of 6608 Dakota Trail to create two new lots on Mohawk Trail and urge the Edina Planning Commission and Edina City Council to deny the proposed subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The proposed subdivision requires significant variances from the City's subdivision ordinance and there is no evidence that a hardship exists to justify such variances. 2. The topography and other physical characters of the proposed new lots would require development of the lots in a manner that would adversely impact the neighborhood. 3. The proposed subdivision will adversely impact the character and symmetry of the neighborhood, as evidenced by the significant variances from the City's subdivision ordinance required by the proposed subdivision. Signature Print Name :F►y� � Aiill /LT J 4 C�VJL( I Address 106 M014 ,4w4fTXAiL- 1,Y/ ng x-161-. i�l14 (J) t--� �-f1'� -t �blts�— �� 1 ._i 'v9 �c G►� ramie V r� 1 / - �I3 t C (�-+A 1� lid• yL�� (�l �� g.c: ,L-- � c, (r u Of r,�� t ,fin r� / �' + lzJ 1.7 y 71—t 12 s TR, 'Tai C ,� �• C c: III tl �, -w--� Signature Print Name et2 c11z -PC-, km,. W (�!-.s+0 V� ,D. G. l `fir c(k;.p f �5 Address _J. ro qu a c .s V. o 16 •.�v�d vt H 1 (is � �v a 2-S Mo ffiwg- :�Z+ i L-- PETITION OPPOSING MOHAWK WOODS SUBDIVISION The undersigned are opposed to the proposed subdivision of 6608 Dakota Trail to create two new lots on Mohawk Trail and urge the Edina Planning Commission and Edina City Council to dgny the proposed subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The proposed subdivision requires significant variances from the City's subdivision ordinance and there is no evidence that a hardship exists to justify such variances. 2. The topography and other physical characters of the proposed new lots would require development of the lots in a manner that would adversely impact the neighborhood. 3. The proposed subdivision will adversely impact the character and symmetry of the neighborhood, as evidenced by the significant variances from the City's subdivision ordinance required by the proposed subdivision. Signature Print Name A' Address 0308 Trnyuois �,;cle. td,,,a C 16r(-, 11� � F. ` N REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # I I, F . FROM: Craig Larsen Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA DATE: October 16, 1995 © To Council SUBJECT: C -95 -1. , Hennepin Action Motion County Courts Facility, Hennepin County ® Resolution Library. 7001 York ❑ Ordinance Avenue Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. LOCATION Y Q O Y o W. 69 TN. I W TO TM . a a I W O 2 I 1 RIO NO NAZELTON INERAN ! ITHE Y RKTOWN STER I I YORKTOW PARK'. F ... U MAP 9T ST. PUbLIC L IEFFARY r � IIR��■NII� Elm- I CONDITIONALUSE NUMBER LOCATION REQUEST C -9 5 -1 7001 York Avenue South Building Expansion EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Draft Minutes P.C. Meeting September 27 C -95 -1 Conditional Use Permit Hennepin County Library Southdale Zoning: R -1 Mr. Larsen informed the Commission libraries and public facilities such as the Courts facility are permitted Conditional Uses in the R -1 zoning district. A Conditional Use permit was granted for the current Library -Court facility in March 1991. The County is now proposing to amend the permit to allow the construction of a two story addition measuring 33 feet by 33 feet. The addition would be located in the southeasterly corner of the building. Mr. Larsen explained the ground floor addition would provide a secure indoor area for the transfer of prisoners to the holding cells and court rooms on the second floor. The second floor would provide space to increase the number of holding cells and interview rooms. Mr. Larsen said according to the project architect's letter the number of judges or other staff would not be increased. The design and materials of the addition would match the existing facility. Mr. Larsen told the commission the proposed addition would improve security and provide badly needed space at the Courts facility. The addition would not add to, parking demand since no new staff will be added. The addition will not compromise the architectural integrity of the building. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Chairman Johnson stated he does not have a problem with the proposal. He added as he understands the proposed addition, the court system is taking the transfer of prisoners out of public view, and making it more secure. A discussion ensued with Commission Members in agreement that the proposal will have minimal impact on the surrounding properties and is a good idea. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to the plans presented and the use of like materials. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 C -95 -1 Conditional Use Permit Hennepin County Library Southdale Zoning: R -1 Libraries and public facilities such as the Courts facility are permitted Conditional Uses in the R -1 zoning district. A Conditional Use permit was granted for the current Library -Court facility in March 1991. The County is now proposing to amend the permit to allow the construction of a two story addition measuring 33 feet by 33 feet. The addition would be located in the southeasterly corner of the building. The ground floor addition would provide a secure indoor area for the transfer of prisoners to the holding cells and court rooms on the second floor. The second floor would provide space to increase the number of holding cells and interview rooms. According to the project architect's letter the number of judges or other staff would not be increased. The design and materials of the addition would match the existing facility. The proposed addition would improve security and provide badly needed space at the Courts facility. The addition would not add to parking demand since no new staff will be added. The addition will not compromise the architectural integrity of the building. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. 0 0 . ftd.�s � �. � I N T, I - r -!f This is the site plan as it exists today. The only exception is the five additional parking spaces created during the library expansion project. See the partial site plan for the location of these new spaces. a tibrary.. Additions TWO STORY . im. t15 NEW 9PAC&� WERE &AINED DURIN& 774E GIB /Mmo 6t , 1 I RM—*--7—E:xIsting Skylight 24 Sp This partial plan shows the existing site conditions at the proposed new bay. When the bay is added we will loose two of the five current spaces, however, considering the five spaces gained during the library remodeling, our net change is three additional s aces be and the approved CUP TWO STORY Surface p y in 1990. Courts 1 26 Sp ces and Service Center:,,'.., 0IIIIII4ISpaIIIII@ 0IIIIII@ 11111111151 kL U NEW 13AY r , LEW 67: N GAN WN6 I � 1 m I I 0 .,ll Southdale Court Sheriff's Area Expansion HUNT Project Number 0031424 Meyer, Scherer and Rockcastle, Ltd. Architects Program & Schematic Phase Existing Site Plan 5- 17.9.5 We have substituted this three dimensional drawing for the elevations to better explain the addition to the building. The new bay will be an exact extension of the existing architecture. As demonstrated in the drawing, the lower level will OEUV RV PARKIN& NEW CPAV6E -- — — NEW BAY nunh - zca�e vsr- n.. J 7thdateCourt nsion 31424 sde, Lrd. Architects Program & Schematic Phase First Floor Garage -n -v; north scale 1/8 "= V- 0" le Court a Expansion lumber 00.11424 Meyer, Scherer and Rockcactle, Lrd. Architects Program & Schematic Phase Existing Second Floor OF r north scale 1/8 "= V- 0" le Court a Expansion lumber 00.11424 Meyer, Scherer and Rockcactle, Lrd. Architects Program & Schematic Phase Existing Second Floor _ CLERK A LP UVO&E A. CLERK B. JUDGE g CLERK C. JUDGE C. ❑ ❑ ❑❑ 8. HOLD''& G. (� SALLY PORT ` FILES HOLDING VEST SEARCH AREA INT r- VIS HO W& D. A. INTERVIEW B. INTERVIEW CONJ)70L EXI5T & COURT OM \ LOCKER�SNR PNONes UA2RK "?M &X/5r/No coulzrRM L,• T T U F_1 r aM1 KIT T__I ❑_1 17] F-1 _ IJ JURY RM niinnnn EXIST 6 57A /K north scale I/S Y- 0" Southdale Court Sheriff's Area Expansion HCPJI Project Nurnber 0031424 \lever, Scherer and Roc!<castle, Ltd. Archi;:�ts Program & Schematic Phase Second Floor: Scheme Cj & •.ZO 15 MS &R To: The City of Edina From: Meyer Scherer and Rockcastle Sept 6, 1995 CUP Application Southdale Hennepin Regional Center Courts Expansion and Remodeling We are requesting a CUP for a one bay ( 33'X 33'), two level expansion of the Sheriffs Division of the Southdale Regional Center. The expansion creates the following four changes to the building: I. New garage for prisoner transfers. Reason: I. The garage will provide a more secure environment for the transfer. 2. The weather frequently interferes with the transfer process. 3. There is a 42" change in elevation from the parking surface to the elevator and a handicap ramp is required (indoor slope 1:12 vs outdoor slope 1:24). 2. Expand the number of the second floor holding cells. Reason: I. Currently there are only two holding cells. Increasingly the deputies are encountering highly aggressive prisoners who do not play well with others and consequently must be separated. A single cell room is very important. 2. The current cells are frequently crowded. The deputies are very nervous about entering a cell with eight or nine less than happy prisoners. 3. Women and men cannot be in the same cells. Frequently the combinations of various problem prisoners makes additional cells essential to insure peace. 3. Increase the number of Interview Rooms. Reason: I. There is currently only one Interview Room which functions as a private setting for attorney meetings with the prisoners. This. situation is extremely short of the demand. In addition the current Interview Room occasionally is used a Holding Cell. 2. The current space has no non - visitation Interview Room, which allows meetings between lawyers and hostile prisoners where it is unsafe for the lawyer to be in the same room as the prisoner. 4. Addition of a Sally Port (controlled access to the Holding Cells). Reason: I. Currently all access to the Sheriffs area is through the Control Room. Frequently there are flurries of simultaneous activity where prisoners are being escorted to the Court Rooms, prisoners are being escorted onto the elevator and Lawyers are arriving for interviews. All this occurs within the confines of the Control Room. This situation creates opportunities for trouble. The addition of the Sally Port provides a second means of controlled, monitored access into the secure area, which greatly alleviates congestion and danger within the Control Room. Summary: -The number of Judges and Clerk offices remain the same. The Jury Room is slightly smaller than the current Jury Room. No additional staff nor deputies will be added.. The time of operations will be the same: Prisoners arrive from downtown at approximately 8:00 am and leave Southdale by 3:30pm. There are no overnight accommodations. -No additional parking is required beyond the current need. No additional increase in traffic will be created by this expansion. -All current outdoor, visible transfers of prisoners will occur within the garage. -The addition will essentially be invisible when completed. It will not decrease the values of the surrounding properties. TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: John Keprios, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 HATE- r)r#nhar d 1QQ5 AGENDA ITEM III .A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edina Park and Recreation Department's 1996 Activities Directory RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Budget Acct No:0600 -4600 Northwest Printing Company $13,690 GENERAL INFORMATION: For 23,000 printed copies of the Edina Park and Recreation Department's 1996 Activities Directory. �cj6ature The Recommended Bid is )( _ within budget not within bgAget Rosland, Park and Recreation Department k Tffr nager Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Northwest Printing 1. $13,690 2. Chargo Printing 2. $13,694 3. Nystrom Publishing 3. $13,888 4. Cooperative Printing 4. $13,900 5. Ideal Printers 5: $14,250 6. A -1 Printing 6. $14,969 7. Graphic Source 7. $15,996 8. DPI 8. $16,714 9. Alternatives 9. $19,057 10. Curtis 1000 10.$20,054 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Budget Acct No:0600 -4600 Northwest Printing Company $13,690 GENERAL INFORMATION: For 23,000 printed copies of the Edina Park and Recreation Department's 1996 Activities Directory. �cj6ature The Recommended Bid is )( _ within budget not within bgAget Rosland, Park and Recreation Department k Tffr nager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE October 10, 1995 AGENDA ITEM I I I. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Yeller Fence Co*inanv $14,995.00 2, Tennis West $15,773.00 3. Town & Country Fence $19,600.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Keller Fence Comnany $14,995.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Revlace the existing 7' and 4' galvanized fencing at the Edina Aquatic Center with black,vinyl coated framework and fabric. Park and Recreation gnature The Recommended bid is — within budget not Kenneth Rosland City Wallin, Finance Director REPORT/RECOMMENDATION I TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CRAIG SWANSON TRAFFIC SAFETY DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1995 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Recommendation: Adoption of the report Info /Background: Agenda Item # IV.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Special attention is drawn to See A(1), the signalization of Xerxes Avenue at West 60th Street. The staff recommends this project conditionally based on acceptable financial arrangements. 11 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OCTOBER 3. 1995 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 3, 1995. Staff present included the Assistant City Manager, the City Engineer, the Police Chief, the Traffic Safety Coordinator, and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the October 16, 1995, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. (1) Request for signalization of W. 60th Street at Xerxes Avenue. The staff reviewed a signalization Warrant Study prepared by the City of Minneapolis. Warrants for the signal are met on a volume and traffic control basis. Accidents and safety concerns are not included in the warrant justification. The City of Edina has not had requests from its public to signalize the intersection on either a volume or safety basis. The report also outlines financial participation by Edina in the project. The staff concluded that it would recommend support for the signalization project however, support is conditional on acceptable financial arrangements between the City of Minneapolis. Hennepin County and the City of Edina. (2) Review of traffic conditions on W. 70th Street between Metro Boulevard and T.H. 100. The staff was verbally apprised of the Strgar Roscoe Fausch, Inc. traffic engineering report. The combination of lane additions, turning lanes, reconfiguration of the intersection and changes in the signal function were identified as positive steps to improve safety. The staff supports the report. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW October 3, 1995 Page 2 SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. (1) Request for crosswalk on W. 77th Street to service north side overflow parking for Seagate. The staff recommends denial of the request due to a mid -block crosswalk is not consistent with the City's crosswalk policy. (2) Request for stop sign for southbound Doncaster Way at Merritt Circle. The staff examined the facts surrounding the intersection in light of the City's Residential Stop Sign Policy. No accidents were reported during a 3 -year search period. Volumes are consistent with other neighborhood collector streets. Approach speeds are slow due to the curving nature of the streets. The main impediment at the intersection appears to be sight distance due to trees and shrubs. The staff concluded that warrants were not met and denial of the request is recommended. The staff further recommends that the clearview ordinance be enforced to improve visibility. (3) Request for stop signs controlling Division Street traffic at Spur Road. The request is predicated on the perceived unsafe speed of vehicles and the threat they pose to children and pedestrians in the area. Additionally, residents report the route of Cooper Avenue and Division Street as a "cut- through" from Interlachen Boulevard to Brookside Avenue. The Residential Stop Sign Policy was reviewed as it relates to the intersection. • The intersection has not experienced any accidents during a 3 -year search period. • No sight- distance obstructions exist at the intersection. • The 85 percentile speed is less than 35 MPH. • Daily volumes are less than 550 vehicles along Division Street. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW October 3, 1995 Page 3 • No other engineering data support the installation of signs. Discussion surrounding these facts depict the intersection not unlike other residential streets. Volumes are well under 1000 vehicles daily, the residential street maximum. The entire length of Division Street is accident free. Seven hazardous speed violations were mechanically recorded during a continuous 48- hour period. They were patterned in the 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM hours. The installation of a stop sign would not enhance speed or volume control in the area. The staff recommends denial of the request based on lack of warrants. The staff further recommends the Police Department respond to the patterned hazardous speeders. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Three separate requests for stop signs and /or child warning signs on Maloney Avenue west of Blake Road. The staff discussed the relationship of Maloney Avenue, Park Terrace/ Interlachen, and Malibu /Parkwood being interrelated traffic routes in northwest Edina. Current construction prevents two of these routes from being studied. It was surmised that it will be several months until traffic patterns are established. The staff has formerly recommended that traffic controls in the above areas not be altered until a comprehensive study of traffic patterns can be conducted. The staff recommends continuance of the request. 16 �1 REPO RT /REC O M MEN DATI O N TO: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # IV. B FROM: David Velde Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends To HRA DATE: October 16, 1995 To Council SUBJECT: 4245 Alden Drive Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Background On September 26, 1995 1 investigated a complaint about a house at 4245 Alden Drive which was lacking paint. I observed that the home had badly deteriorated paint on the south and east sides and that the roofing was badly cracked, crumbling and in poor condition. I notified the homeowner, Mr. Herbert Knox, that the house was in violation of Edina City Ordinance No. 725.08 and directed him to replace the roof and scrape, prime and paint the exterior of the house. Mr. Knox called me asking for an extension of time to make the necessary repairs, however, he would not provide me with any assurance that the work will be done in a timely manner. I had discussed this same matter with Mr. Knox several years ago when I happened to notice the condition of the house at that time. Mr. Knox indicated to me that he was in the process of researching various paint formulas and that he intended to paint the house as soon as possible. Now Mr. Knox is claiming that he does not have the financial resources to paint the house and replace the roof. The letter I sent Mr. Knox asked him to replace the roof and paint the house by October 31, 1995. He has a right to appeal this order to the City Council, which he is exercising. The The City Council may affirm in whole or in part or deny the existence of a violation of . Ordinance No. 725.08, and if a violation is found to exist, confirm or modify the corrective action to be taken or the time allowed to correct the code violation. There is no provision for the City cause the repairs and assess the costs against the property. 4 9� \f�► o e z 0 City of Edina October 6, 1995, Herb Knox 4245 Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 Dear Mr. Knox: The City of Edina received your October 6, 1995 letter appealing the September 26, 1995 Health Department Notice. We have scheduled your appeal before the Edina City Council on the agenda of the October 16, 1995 meeting at 7:00 p.m. If you have questions regarding this matter feel free to call Edina City Hall. Sincerely, Debra Mangen City Clerk Enclosure cc: !wave Velde, Sanitarian city Ball (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST SOTH STREET (61:1 927 -7G35 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 FAX FAX (612) 927 -5461 Herb Knox 4245 Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 October 6, 1995 City of Edina 4801 'lest 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention of the City Clerk This is to inform you of my intention to appeal to the City Council the order of the Department of Health described in its letter of September 26. Sincerely, Herb Knox r J:n City of Edina Certified Mail September 26, 1995 Mr. Herbert Knox 4245 Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 Dear Mr. Knox: It has been brought to my attention that your house at 4245 Alden Drive is lacking adequate weather protection due to lack of paint and deteriorated roofing. On September 26, 1995 1 inspected your property and found the report to be true. The south side and east side of the house has badly deteriorated paint and I estimate that about 50 per cent of the paint has fallen off the siding. The west and north sides have paint missing on about 10 per cent of the siding. The roof material appears to be crumbling and appears to be in danger of leaking moisture into the house if not already doing so. These conditions are in violation of Edina City Ordinance No. 725.08. The roof must be replaced with an effective watertight roofing material. The loose and flaking paint must be removed, the siding primed and painted with an effective weatherproof protective covering. Please correct these Ordinance violations by October 31, 1995. Failure to correct the above listed Ordinance violations will result in the City of Edina seeking additional remedies available to the city to gain compliance with the Ordinance. These remedies include filing formal charges in Hennepin District Court requiring your appearance in Court or condemning the dwelling as unfit for human habitation and ordering the premises vacated as set forth in Ordinance No. 725.08, Subd. 3. Any person aggrieved by this order may appeal to the Edina City Council by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within 10 days of receipt of this order. The City Council will hear the appeal at the earliest possible Council meeting following the filing of the appeal. Sincerely, A(, �tux Q� David A. Velde Edina Health Department City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD i612) 927 -5461 City of Edina Health 725.05 access to any part of the dwelling or its premises, at all reasonable times, for the purpose of making the repairs or alterations as are necessary to effect compliance with the provisions of this Section. 725.05 Enforcement of Housing Code. Subd. 1 Notice of Violation. Whenever the Sanitarian determines that there has been a violation of any one or more provisions of this Section, the Sanitarian shall give notice of such alleged violation to the person or persons who are or may be responsible for it as enumerated in paragraph D. of this Subd. 1. The notice shall: A. Be in writing. B. Specify the violation or violations alleged to exist or to have been committed and the repairs or improvements required to bring the dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit into compliance with the provisions of this Section. C. Provide a reasonable time, but not less than ten days in any event, for the correction of the violation or violations specified. D. Be addressed to and served upon the owner of the property, the operator of the dwelling, and the occupant of dwelling unit or the rooming unit concerned, if the occupant is or may be responsible for the violation. E. Inform persons concerned of their rights of appeal under this Section. Service shall be as provided for personal service of a summons in a civil action by the rules of civil procedure for courts of record in Minnesota, or by registered or certified mail,' return receipt requested, delivered to the addressee only. If one or more persons to whom the notice is addressed cannot be found or served after diligent effort, service may be made upon such person or persons by posting a notice in a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling affected by the notice, in which event the Sanitarian shall include in the record a statement as to why such posting was necessary. Subd. 2 Imminent Hazard; Temporary Condemnation. When the Sanitarian finds any dwelling, dwelling unit, or rooming unit which does not conform to the standards established by this Section, and further finds (i) that by reason of such nonconformity it presents an imminent and serious hazard to public health, or to the physical or mental health of the occupants in it, and (ii) that the repairs or improvements required to remove such hazard does not appear reasonably possible within a time which will be adequate to eliminate such imminent hazard, then the written notice of violation provided for in Subd. 1 of this Subsection shall also state that the premises are unfit for human habitation and shall order that the dwelling, 725-3 City of Edina Health 725.05 dwelling unit or rooming unit be vacated either immediately or after such period of time as the Sanitarian shall find reasonable in view of the circumstances, pending the completion of action to eliminate such hazard. In such case the notice shall be served by delivering a copy to the person in real or apparent charge and control of the dwelling unit and by posting the same at a conspicuous place upon the structure. In the case of a hazard which affects more than one unit in a multiple dwelling residence, service shall be made upon such an occupant of each unit, except that the failure to make service upon an occupant of one unit shall not affect the validity or effect of service of notice upon an occupant of other units. Such notice shall also state that persons aggrieved may appeal such notice. Subd. 3 Failure to Correct Deficiencies. Whenever notice has been given in accordance with Subd. 1 of this Subsection and the person or persons responsible have failed to correct the deficiencies specified in Subd. 1 of this Section within the time allowed, the Sanitarian may either: A. Extend the time for correction of the deficiencies, or B. Serve upon the owner and occupant a written notice requiring that the dwelling, dwelling unit, or rooming unit be vacated because it is unfit for human habitation. The notice shall (i) state the violation or violations which remain uncorrected, and (ii) provide a reasonable time, but not less than ten days within which to vacate the premises. The written extension of time or notice to vacate may be served personally or by registered mail in accordance with the procedures set forth in Subd. 1 of this Subsection. Subd. 4 Appeal. Any person aggrieved by a notice issued under Subd. 1, 2, or 3 of this Subsection, may within ten days after service of the same, appeal to the Council by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk. In the case of an appeal from a notice to vacate pending elimination of imminent hazards issued pursuant to Subd. 2 of this Subsection, the appeal shall be heard as soon as possible after the time of filing. In the case of appeals from other notices, the appeal shall be heard at such time as may be established by the Council, but the taking of an appeal from a notice other than one to vacate pending the elimination of imminent hazards issued under Subd. 2 of this Subsection shall, during the pendency of such appeal, restrain the City and its officers from proceeding in any manner to enforce such notice. � Subd. 5 Decision of the Council. All appeals under this Subsection shall be heard by the Council. The Council may affirm in whole or in part or deny the existence of a violation of this Section, and if the violation is found to exist, confirm or I odify the corrective action to be taken or the order requiring vacation of the I remises and the time allowed for it. 725-4 City of Edina Health 725.08 Subd. 7 Screens. During the portion of each year when the Sanitarian finds it necessary to protect against mosquitoes, flies, and other insects, which are of such kind and occur in such numbers as to cause a hazard to health, every door opening directly from a dwelling to outdoor space shall have a screen door with a self - closing device; and every window or other device with openings to outdoor space used or intended to be used for ventilation, shall likewise be supplied with screens. 725.08 General Requirements for Maintenance of Parts of Dwellings and Dwelling Units. No person shall occupy or let to another for occupancy any dwelling unit which does not comply with the following requirements: Subd. 1 Exterior Wall, Foundation and Roof. Every foundation, exterior wall and roof shall be substantially weathertight, watertight, and rodent proof. The following conditions shall be promptly repaired or replaced: A. Deteriorated, crumbling or loose plaster. B. Deteriorated, or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof, foundations or floors including broken windows or doors. C. Defective, or lack of, weather protection including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering. D. Broken, rotted, split, or buckled exterior walls or roof coverings. I Subd. 2 Interior Walls, Ceilings, and Floors. Every floor, interior wall and ceiling shall be kept in sound condition and good repair. Subd. 3 Windows, Exterior Doors, and Basement Hatchways. Every window, exterior door, and basement hatchway shall be reasonably watertight, weathertight, and rodent proof and shall be kept in sound working condition and good repair. Subd. 4 Stairways. Every inside and outside stairway shall be maintained in safe and sound condition and good repair. Subd. 5 Plumbing. Every plumbing fixture and water and waste pipe shall be installed in compliance with this Code and shall be maintained in working condition, free from defects, leaks and obstructions. Subd. 6 Floor Material. Every water closet compartment floor surface and bathroom floor surface shall be constructed and maintained so as to be reasonably impervious to water and so as to permit such floor to be easily kept in a clean and sanitary condition. Subd. 7 Equipment, Facilities, and Utilities. Every facility, piece of equipment, 725-9 Ai. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1995 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO LIQUOR ORDINANCE REGARDING SERVICE OF WINE Report: Agenda Item # IV C . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA x❑ To Council Action x❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance x❑ Discussion On September 18, 1995, the City Council received correspondence from Wayne Kostroski, with respect to the City's Liquor Ordinances. In particular, Mr. Kostroski requested that the Liquor Ordinances be amended to permit the sale and service of wine or beer to a guest of a restaurant without the requirement that the guest purchase or receive any food. Current City Ordinances prohibit the service of wine and intoxicating malt liquor to a person who does not order a meal (the service of non - intoxicating malt liquor Is similarly prohibited if served in a restaurant which possesses a wine license.) After considering Mr. Kostroski's comments, the City Council instructed staff to present information concerning. 1. The history of the 1984 Advisory Referendum with respect to wine licensing. 2. A report from the Police Department concerning violations of our Liquor Ordinance. 3. The Police Department's assessment of the risk that would be Involved if the City were to amend the Liquor Ordinances as requested by Mr. Kostroski. - k REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - AMENDMENT TO LIQUOR ORDINANCE October 16, 1995 Page two The purpose of this report is to respond to the Council's questions concerning the history of the Wine License Ordinance. Chief BernhJelm has prepared the attached memos with respect to questions two and three above. The attached memo from Deb Mangen, City Clerk, summarizes the results of the 1984 Advisory Referendum concerning wine. As noted earlier, this was an Advisory Referendum, i.e. the Council was free to decide if a Wine License Ordinance should or should not be enacted notwithstanding the results of the Referendum vote. As noted, in Ms. Mangen's memo, the 1984 Election asked the following question; "Shall the City of Edina Issue on -sale licenses to qualifying sit - down restaurants to sell wine in conjunction with the sale of food." Individuals voting in the affirmative outnumbered individuals voting In the negative by a ratio of three to one. Also attached are Minutes of City Council Meetings where the issue of wine licensing was discussed. We hope that this information responds to the Council's questions with respect to the background of the wine licensing issue. If the Council wishes, the staff can proceed to prepare necessary ordinance amendments for your consideration at the November 6, 1995, meeting. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO: Agenda Item # iv C. MAYOR 8< COUNCIL FROM: Consent WILLIAM BERNHJELM POLICE CHIEF Information Only DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1995 Mgr. Recommends To HRA SUBJECT: To Council AMENDMENT TO LIQUOR ORDINANCE Action Motion RE: SERVICE OF WINE Resolution Ordinance aDiscussion REPORT: I have been asked to provide information to the Council on the Issues of violations of the liquor ordinance and the risk associated with the proposed changes. The attached report summarizes the' results of our Inspection program over the last four years. As you can see, the violations fall mainly In the category of violating the Edina specific regulations on serving wine (i.e., no licensed manager on duty and serving prior to the meal order). In only one Instance did We detect a case of underage service. Other observations I can'make are: * Inspecting officers are repeatedly told that servers don't understand the Edina regulation, in that it is unique In the industry. * Servers have frequently commented to officers on the ',silliness" of the regulation. * Failure to have licensed managers on duty results from two issues, in my opinion: -- Frequent turnover of restaurant staff, and -- The expense of paying the license fee ($65.00) REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - AMENDMENT TO LIQUOR ORDINANCE October 13, 1995 Page 2 * Calls for service are checked at each license renewal. I do not remember any calls relating to Intoxicated or disorderly patrons at any of our licensed premises. Enforcement of the Edina regulations has, to this point, Involved warnings, attempts to educate, and in the case of the underage service, referral to Council for action. As to the impact of removing the restriction on service of wine and/or strong beer, I am of the opinion that little noticeable change will occur. The limitation of on -sale to restaurants does not provide the typical 'Tung out' "heavy drinking" bar atmosphere that produces the most problems for police departments. Additionally, the licensee remains responsible for the conduct of their customers. We can monitor the licensed premises through our Inspection program and Increase attention for problem locations If necessary. Licensing of wine managers gives us an additional handle on employees who are expected to supervise servers and maintain the appropriate atmosphere. If the Council were to decide to remove the restriction, I would recommend the following: * Continue the twice- annual inspection policy that we are currently performing. Continue the licensing of wine managers. Limit the seating at "service counters" to no more than fire percent (5 %) of the total seating In the restaurant RESTAURANT 1995 1994 1993 1992 CIATTI'S OK OK OK License not posted DAYTONS No licensed No licensed Wine served at OK wine wine manager entrance manager EMPRESS Willing to No licensed OK OK (closed) serve wine wine manager, without meal 16 yr old server GOOD EARTH No licensed No licensed No licensed OK wine wine manager wine manager manager HAWTHORN No licensed OK Served wine License not SUITES wine without meal posted manager MICK'S OK Served wine to XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX ( a 17 yr old XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX X ORIGINAL OK OK OK License riot PANCAKE posted PANTRY OK No licensed OK State sign not wine manager visible PIZZERIA UNO OK OK No licensed License.in . wine manager office Q CUMBERS Served wine OK State signs not License not w/o ordering posted posted ROSSINI'S No licensed OK No licensed OK wine wine manager manager 2/2 & 9/25/93 Served wine before order. RUBY OK OK XX)UUUCXXXX XX)UUCXXXX TUESDAYS XX)UUU xmk XX)UUCXXXX SIDNEY'S JOK XX)UCX)UUUUC I XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX C • - _ SZECHUAN No licensed OK OK No licensed STAR wine wine manager manager License and signs not posted TEJAS DWI sign on XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX X order XX)UUUCXXXX XXXXXXXXXX X)UUUU xxx TOUR DE OK No code or No licensed OK FRANCE notice of meal wine manager with wine TWO GUYS OK OK OK Wine served FROM ITALY w/o meal License not posted To: Gordon Hughes MEMORANDUM From: Deb Mangen Subject: Results of 1984 advisory referendum on wine Date: September 26, 1995 In the 1984 Election files I found the information Council asked for at the last meeting. The question as stated on the ballot was: Yes or No. "Shall the City of Edina issue on -sales licenses to qualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine, in conjunction with the sale of food ?" In response to this question 19,697 voters voted Yes, 6,141 voted No. I attached a copy of the ballot and the marked page from the election return of the November 6, 1984 election. If you need further information just ask. ADVISORY POLL RESULTS NOT BINDING ON, ONLY ~� x- -1 ADVISORY TO, EDINA CITY COUNCIL City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota November 6, 1984 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: Voters desiring to vote in favor of the question, put a cross mark (X) in the square opposite the word YES. Voters desiring to vote against the question, put a cross mark (X) in the square opposite the word NO. ❑ YES ON -SALE WINE LICENSES "Shall the City of Edina issue on -sale licenses to qualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine, in NO conjunction with the sale of foed ?" ..._,.,. . _..- sr".rr.ac�ti�+: .... nat. t;_ a:" �].;'---- ..- aa..:nA.w6t•:A:3,,i1:.. .:,r1 Page 6 VOTING PRECINCT 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 18 19 110 Ill 012 , 113 114 115 116 017 el8 519 TOTAL CITY OF EDINA - -- ' - " -- MAYOR T. -Mayne Courtney 726 770 1,171 1,133 956 1,097 1,073 1,269 970 1,050 1,249 1,106 838 1,194 1,465 1,060 344 313 962 18,746 COUNCIL MEMBER 7oRn ew or, Jr. 383 374 507 520 434 412 538 732 436 510 651 492 451 729 559 570 179 112 455 9,044 Leslie C. Turner 477 584 948 693 756 880 736 944 694 701 906 826 463 825 1,158 632 246 240 646 13,355 Peggy Kelly 535 582 925 873 730 873 846 834 727 835 868 790 670 762 11101 782 216 233 746 13,928 ADVISORY POLL Off-SALE WINE LICENSES Yes 890 856 1,067 1,102 963 1,170 1,101 1,184 975 1,007 1,263 1,084 1,034 1,201 1,599 19177 500 373 1,151 19,697 No 200 260 397 322 311 363 361 479 383 323 440 364 251 385 438 357 101 142 164 6,141 STATE GENERAL ELECTION FIRST: PUBLIC LANDS Yes 809 826 1,125 1,059 1,014 19141 1,074 1,260 1,018 1,032 1,258 1,097 869 1,179 1,526 1,129 408 410 1,017 19,251 No 247 260 275 298 216 307 301 315 279 245 341 280 312 358 380 289 129 92 298 5,222 SECOND: SCHOOL FUNDS Yes 791 804 1,114 1,054 962 1,120 1,078 1,222 999 1,001 1,229 1,061 866 1,151 1,453 19130 429 408 1,002 18,874 No 264 278 300 301 270 316 297 344 291 268 369 318 323 368 420 296 112 103 313 5,551 4 4, r U a 8/16/82 137 ON -SALE WINE LICENSING TO BE CONSIDERED FURTHER ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1982. The Mayor recalled the history of the sale of liquor in Edina, including the fact that a liquor referendum was defeated by voters on February 4, 1975. He referred to letters received in regard to. the sale of wine in restaurants. Mayor Courtney referred also to the campaign by some restaurant owners which took place about one year ago and said that, of the 327 letters he had received in favor of serving wine in restaurants, 185 were from people who were not Edina residents. Speaking in favor of placing a wine referendum on the 1982 City ballot were Mr. Lee Heutmaker, President of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, who assured Council that the sale of wine in restaurants would not lead to a request for hard liquor licenses. Other Chamber representatives were Mrs. Virginia Bodine, Executive Director, and Mr. Alan Thiel, past President. Concurring with Chamber members were Messrs-Randy Goettlicher of the French Loaf, Kenneth John- son of Edina Realty, Michael Fruin, owner of Dimentions, Neil Berman, owner of Le Bistro, Jeff Thompson, Vice President of Daytons and Ms. Edna McKizzie, Man- ager of Southdale Center. Also speaking in favor of the referendum were Edina residents Mrs. Ann Overholt, Messrs. Phil Roberts, Lyle Bing, Richard Wyatt and Mr: Marc Carlson who said that he is the former manager of the Boulevard Cafe which has gone out of business. Mr. Earl Sharpe, 6600 Gleason Road, recalled that, when his father was Mayor in the early days of Edina's history, the Council had been concerned that the type of bars which had sprung up in St. Louis Park would also come to Edina. Arguments favoring the serving of wine in restaurants were that it would be good for restaurant business, that Edina residents would prefer to go to local restaurants if they could have a glass of wine rather to restaurants in other municipalities, that the private clubs are able to serve both wine and hard liquor, that better food is served at restaurants that serve wine, that the sale of wine would be good for Edina shopping centers, that people leave restaurants when they find that they can- not order wine, that Edina has a fine national reputation and should have fine restaurants also, and that business should respond to the demand of the customers. Speaking in opposition to the sale of wine in restaurants were Mr. Victor Chrisoner, Mrs. Molly Rouner, Mr. Winston Granger and the Reverend David Williamson of The Colonial Church of Edina. They contended that the cost of health care and ruined families must be considered along with business profits, that the ultimate goal is to sell hard liquor in Edina restaurants, that the sale of wine would be counter productive to the efforts of the City to prevent drug abuse in its youth, that any type of liquor is related to alcoholism and that Edina restaurant owners knew that the sale of wine would not be permitted when they opened their restaurants. Member Bredesen said that he did not believe in "government by referendum" and that the Council had been elected to make decisions. In response to a question from Mrs. Bodine, Chief Swanson said that the nature of the license would require an intensive investi- gation with associated costs, and that the Council would have to determine the extent of the investigation and the subsequent license fee. Mr. Rosland empha- sized that any referendum would be strictly advisory and that the Council could still make up its own mind. Member Turner said that she believed that the Council should deal with the issue at this meeting and that she is concerned that the community would not understand that the referendum is advisory only. She added that it is important to her to know how people think. Member Bredesen then moved that, at the next Regular Council Meeting, the staff recommend to the Council a method by which the question of issuance of wine licenses could be researched and recommendations brought forth as a result of that research that might include the formation of a committee on which both proponents and oppon- ents would serve; and to eliminate the possibility of a referendum on the question as a way of resolving the issue (with the understanding that the Council could still call for a referendum at a later date). The motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards, Schmidt Motion carried. NUCLEAR ENERGY DISCUSSED. The Reverend Andy Overman of the Colonial Church of Edina distributed a packet to Council expressing the concern of a group of citizens about the "grave threat of nuclear arms ". The packet contained a request to place a referendum on the November 2, 1982, City ballot urging the adoption of a mutual freeze by the United States and the Soviet Union on testing, production and deployment of nuclear weapons. Mr. Overman suggested that this issue, needs to be.approached from a grass roots level and advised that Edina churches have a great concern about our country's role in the nuclear arms race. He added that Edina should lead the way in an attempt to bring about a worldwide nuclear freeze. The Mayor said that everyone has a deep.con- cern for world peace but that such a question could not be placed on the ballot at this time. No formal action was taken. 155 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 13, 1982 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. EDINA AMERICAN LEGION BASEBALL TEAM COMMENDED. The Mayor read the following Resolution of Congratulations for the 1982 Edina American Legion Baseball Team: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, the 1982 Edina American Legion Baseball Team has achieved an admirable record of 44 wins and 7 losses for the entire season; and WHEREAS, during the 1982 Baseball Season, the Edina American Legion Baseball Team has won the South Hennepin League Championship, the District 10 Playoff Championship, the Minnesota State Championship and the Central Plains Regional Championship; and WHEREAS, the Edina American Legion Baseball Team placed fifth in the Boyertown, Pennsylvania American Legion World Series Baseball Tournament; and WHEREAS, the 1982 Edina American Legion Baseball Team is the fourth Minnesota team in 56 years to qualify for the World Series; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council, on behalf of the citizenry as a whole, does hereby offer most sincere congratulations to Tom Bjork, Steve Blietz, Steve Burdick, Scott Calvert, Dan Carroll, John DeVoe, Jim Donahue, Pat Donahue, Mike Halloran, Mark Hoffman, Brian Martinson, Tim 00 McGovern, Rick Raether, Carl Ramseth, Mike Rooney, Bill Ross, Robert Wassenaar 0 and Mark Zmeskal and to Assistant Coaches Paul Blanchard and Kevin Stoughton and to Head Coach Bruce Barron. Motion for adoption of the resolution was offered by Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Richards and unanimously carried. OCTOBER 5, 1982, SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUM DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland recalled that Council had requested that the matter of the October 5, 1982, School District Referendum be on the agenda for any discussion that might be heard. Member Richards said that he personally supports the referendum and that he hopes that residents take time to look over materials available and make up their own minds. The Mayor said that he personally agreed with Member Richards, but that he is not sure that the Council should take any action as a group. Speaking in favor of the referendum was Member Turner who said that she believes that this is an issue which affects the entire City. Member Bredesen spoke of the reliance that the City and the School District have on each other and said that he believes that the success of the referendum is a matter of necessity. Member Schmidt said that she supports the referendum from a personal standpoint but that she does not believe that any formal action should be taken by the Council. No formal action was taken. WINE ISSUE TO BE REVIEWED BY "STUDY COMMITTEE ". Mr. Rosland recalled that the Council has asked the staff to submit alternatives for Council study regarding the wine licensing issue. He listed the following alternatives for Council con- sideration: 1) Have the staff draft an ordinance and take it to public hearing; 2) Explore a one year licensing procedure (allowing the licenses for only one year) to study the impact of wine; and 3) Take the issue to the public through a more formalized poll than what was done in the past to see if a larger cross section of the public could be heard without taking the issue to the public through the voting process. Member Schmidt said that she would like to know the affect that wine licensing would have and the financial impact that it would have on the City. Member Richards said that he believed that, since a precedent was set previously, the City should have another advisory referendum which would be paid for by proponents. Mr. Neil Berman of LeBistro urged that a referendum be held. Council's attention was .called to a letter from Dr. Arthur A. Rouner, Jr., of Colonial Church of Edina, urging that the Council "re- affirm its past good judgment in this community and continue to oppose wine licensing in Edina ". Member Bredesen then moved that the staff be instructed to study the matter and report back by October 18, 1982, as to recommended fees, what wine licensing would cost the City, what impact it would have on the City, and further to ask other municipalities in the area about their experience. Motion was sec- onded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards Motion carried. LAWSUITS SERVED ON CITY. Mr. the City by Richard R. All have been submitted action was taken. Cooke, to the Rosland reported that suits have been served on The Yorker Corporation and Southmark Properties. insurance company and to the City Attorney. No 10/18/82 179 climate is such that it is impractical to start the project at this time and added that he is now considering construction of town houses on the site but that his plans will not be ready until some time next spring. Member Turner's motion granting a one year extension of the rezoning was then seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Schmidt (who said that the project was too dense for the area). Motion carried. BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB HOUSE SANITARY SEWER (CONTRACT 82 -10 ENG) BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for a sanitary sewer to serve Dewey Hill Road from Gleason Road to the Braemar Golf Club House. Tabulation showed Northdale Construction low bidder at $74,490.46; G. L. Contracting, $74,514.35; Orfei & Sons, Inc., $86.988.07; Lametti & Sons, Inc, $102,812.00; Orevedahl Construction, $110,053.70 and Nodland & Associates at $123,500.00, against Engineer's estimate of $71,117.95. Member Turner's motion for award to recommended low bidder, Northdale Construction, at $74,490.46, was seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. BRAEMAR PARK PICNIC SHELTER CONCRETE SLAB WITH FOOTINGS BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland 00 recalled that bids taken previously for the concrete slab for Braemar Park Picnic U Shelter footings had been rejected and new bids taken. Advising that the new m bids were no better than those preceived, Mr. Rosland presented tabulation show- ing the bid of Jones '& Ottenweller, Inc., at $7,219 against the bid of Hamele Recreation Co., Inc., at $7,860. Member Schmidt's motion for award to recommended low bidder at $7,219.00 was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. WINE LICENSES DISCUSSED; NONE TO BE ISSUED. Mr. Rosland recalled that, at the Council Meeting of September 13, 1982, the staff was instructed to study the possibility of issuing Wine Licenses and to report back at this meeting as to recommended fees, what wine licensing would cost the City, what impact it would have on the City, and further, to ask other municipalities in the area about their experience. He advised that the Administration, Health, Planning and Police Departments had been represented on the committee appointed to study the issue and referred to the report issued by this committee which included experiences of Bloomington, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley and Alexandria. A question was raised from a member of the audience as to how the sale of wine in restaurants would impact the revenue of the Edina Liquor Stores. Mr. Rosland said that this was an unknown factor-at this time. Mrs. Virginia Bodine, Executive Secretary of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, emphasized that Edina residents go out of Edina to dine when they want a glass of wine with their dinner and that this practice is hurting Edina restaurants particularly during difficult economic times. Speak- ing in opposition to wine licenses were Mrs. Ginger Hamer, 4709 Upper Terrace, and Mrs. Joan Findell who said that restaurants that serve liquor have also closed so that the fact that wine is not available should not be considered the reason for lack of business. Dr. Arthur A. Rouner, minister of Colonial Church of Edina, said that the sale of wine in restaurants could do irreparable damage to family life and that it is naive to think that wine is different from any hard liquor. Urging the serving of wine in restaurants were Mrs. Eleanor Reid, 6078 Blake Ridge Road, Mr. Jim Bissoner, the owner of the French Loaf and Mr. Jack Seltz who said that the City of Alexandria has experienced no problems since it started issuing Wine Licenses. Stating that she does not believe that morality can be legislated, Member Schmidt moved that no Wine Licenses be issued at this time. Motion was seconded by Member Turner who noted that the benefit to the City cannot be judged on the monetary benefit to restaurants. Member Richards said that he wished he was more certain of the community's feelings in this matter and that he would favor a referendum. Mayor Courtney said that it appears that only the.Edina Chamber of Commerce and restaurant owners are in favor of serving wine in restaurants and that until a great number of residents indicate more interest he would not favor the issuance of .Wine Licenses. Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: .None Motion carried. An unidentified gentleman in the audience suggested that if Wine Licenses are not permitted, the City should sell its liquor stores. 9/10/84 141 STREET NAME CHANGE ORDINANCE NO. 15 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The access road into the Londonderry Townhouse complex in London- derry Replat from Lincoln Drive to Nine Mile Creek is hereby named "Duncan Lane ". Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. 2. ATTEST: Alayor 1h OWL City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTED REQUESTING SIGNALIZATION AT VERNON /TRACY AND VERNON /BLAKE. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Traffic Safety Committee at its meeting of June 12, 1984, had recommended signalization of the Vernon Avenue /Blake Road and LD Vernon Avenue /Tracy Avenue intersections and had suggested that a public hearing be held in September so that residents of the area could voice their opinions. The Iq Committee had at that time recommended that the Council adopt a resolution to 00 request the Hennepin County Board to consider installations of traffic signals at 0 these locations with no assessment for the project to property owners. He noted further that the Committee's recommendation was based on a traffic survey which has been conducted by Hennepin County. Mr. Hoffman presented a graphic showing traffic volumes on a 24 -hour basis. Speaking in favor of signalization were Wayne Childs, 5725 Blake Road; Linda Farrell, 5700 Blake Road, stating she represented the families of the Highland and Countryside Schools communities; Carol Carlson, 5521 Glengarry Parkway; Rowenna.Hohman, 5714 Blake Road; Jack Eike, 5713 Vernon Avenue; and John Teifer, 5717 Hawkes Drive. Trish Brown, 6137 Sherman Circle, stated she was repre- senting the families in the area of Bredesen Park who have small children and they support signal lights at Olinger Boulevard and Vernon Avenue. Jim Felker, 5500 Merritt Circle voiced his opposition to a traffic signal at Vernon Avenue and Tracy. Tom Withhark, 5712 Tracy Avenue, stated that he was concerned that a signal light at Vernon and Tracy would draw more traffic from the area south of the Crosstown Highway going to the shopping area on Vernon Avenue. Member Richards questioned if the traffic volume numbers shown would meet the necessary warrants for signali- nation. Mr. Hoffman responded that they would and further advised that the City's portion of the costs could be funded by State Aid money for the greater portion, and that he would recommend adoption of a resolution requesting signalization. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNALS CSAH 158 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council requested a traffic study be conducted on CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) in October 1983; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County traffic studies indicate traffic movements at Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) and Blake Road, and Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) and Tracy Avenue meet warrants for signalization, and WHEREAS, the Edina Traffic Safety Committee has reviewed the traffic studies and would recommend that the signals be installed, based on the Hennepin County studies; and WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has reviewed the Edina Traffic Safety Committee actions, and WHEREAS, the Edina City Council conducted public hearings in which positive citizen reaction for the signals is substantial in both number attending the hearings and the Countryside PTA continued involvement seeking resolution to the traffic problems, and WHEREAS, the Edina City Council understands that the warrants are met and there- fore the signals are eligible for state aid funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council requests the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to approve installation of traffic signals on Vernon Avenue (CASH 158) at the Blake Road and Tracy Avenue intersections, subject to state aid funding of same. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ADVISORY WINE REFERENDUM AUTHORIZED FOR 11/6/84 BALLOT. Virginia Bodine, Executive Director of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, presented the request of the Chamber that the citizens of Edina be allowed the opportunity to express their wishes as to whether restaurants in Edina can serve wine with meals in compliance with Minnesota Statutes 7/ LU/ U'i 142 Section 340.11. It is understood that the results of the ballot would be advisory in nature and not binding upon the City Council. The proposed question for the ballot at the General Election on November 6, 1984, would read, "Shall the City of Edina, Minnesota issue wine only licenses to restaurants having the capacity and staff adequate to provide table service for a minimum of twenty -five guests so as to permit the sale of wine on the premises but only in conjunction with the sale of food, all in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Section 340.11." Mrs. Bodine then presented a petition with over 400 signatures from EXPO '83, signed by residents or persons who have businesses in Edina, in support of the request. She advised that a bank account has been established in which there is presently a balance of $1,500.00 to be held to pay for the cost of placing the wine license question on the ballot. Member Richards asked -if that amount would be adequate to defray the cost. Mr. Rosland responded that it should be adequate but pointed out that the cost can only be estimated at this time. Member Richards explained that the cost for an advisory referendum cannot be paid by the City. In response, Mrs. Bodine advised that the costs will be paid by the Chamber and supporters of the referendum. Sherwin Plummer, 6307 Kellogg Avenue, urged the Council to let the citizens of Edina express their wishes on the wine licensing issue. Speaking in support of the referendum were Gayle Kloster, President of the Edina Chamber of Commerce; Warren Beck, Manager of the Galleria and also representing the merchants association; and Connie Balcom, 5528 Halifax Lane. Discussion followed as to wording of the question to be placed on the ballot. Member Richards suggested that the wording should be similar to the type of question that was put to the citizens in 1975. Member Richards then moved that the City Manager and City Attorney research alternative wording of the question regarding issuing wine licenses and bring those back to the Council for consideration at its meeting of September 17, 1984. Motion was seconded by Member Turner who stated she would like to put the question to the citizens. Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TEMPORARY BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH DINNER. Mr. Rosland presented the request of the Church of St. Patrick of Edina for a temporary beer license in connection with a dinner to be served following a polka mass to be held on September 15, 1984, advising that this was the first request of this type. It was pointed out that under the present Ordinance No. 902, that temporary on -sale beer licenses may be issued to a religious corporation if all requirements of the ordinance are met. Member Richards submitted that several issues should be consicared, impact on the neighborhood, repeated requests if the event is successful and simil --r requests from other churches. After reviewing the ordinance, Attorney Erickson ad-.•ised that all requirements of the ordinance have been met with the exception that the application must be submitted 45 days prior to the event. He added that the City can be more restrictive in the ordinance than required by the State Statute and the Council may wish to consider amending the ordinance so that the sale of beer would have to be in conjunction with an event or with the serving of food. Member Richards moved approval of a temporary beer license for the Church of St. Patrick of Edina with the understanding that the beer would be sold only in conjunction with the dinner to be served after the mass. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Schmidt, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED FOR EDINAMITE '84. Mr. Rosland presented the request of The Edina Foundation for issuance of a temporary liquor license for the EDINAMITE '84 benefit to be held on November 2, 1984, at the Golf Dome in Braemar Park. He noted that the format has been changed this year and that wine and beer will be sold in connection with the Raffle drawing. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards to approve the issuance of a temporary on -sale liquor license, through the current on -sale license of Interlachen Country Club, for EDINAMITE '84 to be held on November 2, 1984 at Braemar Park. Ayes: Schmidt, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COUNTY 3% INCREASE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN EDINA TO BE APPEALED. Assessor Johnson reported that he has informed the Minnesota Revenue Department that the City of Edina will appeal the 3% increase set by Hennepin County on evaluations of single family homes in the City. He recalled that Edina's ration study showed 89.995 and that Hennepin County has raised it to 92.6. Following discussion, Member Richard moved that the Assessor be directed to send a formal letter of appeal to the state with the request for a hearing thereon. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Schmidt, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HARRASSMENT REMEDIES UNDER EXISTING LAW AND PROPOSED HARRASSMENT ORDINANCE DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland referred to an opinion letter addressed to the Council from Attorney Erickson in which he opined that existing remedies under the City ordinances and civil remedies available to Dr. Hanson should resolve most of the problems of which Dr. Hanson complained relative to alleged harrassment conducted recently in front of 155 ratified by the Council. Appearing and addressing the Council were: Cindy Heim, president of Cornelia PTA; Donna Montgomery, 6824 Oaklawn Av.; Joy Bartlett, 7029 Lanham Lane, Phyllis Kohler, 4512 W. 70th Street; Terri Sweatman, Dunberry Lane; Richard Foley, 4804 Dunberry Lane, Gary Chiebowski, 7004 Bristol Boulevard; and Steve Davies, 4720 Dunberry Lane. Concerns voiced were the potential danger to children and residents attempting to cross W. 70th Street, need for a semaphore at the intersection, that no right turns be allowed during certain hours and objection to the striping at the intersection for four lanes of traffic. Engineer Hoffman presented graphics illustrating the role of W. 70th Street as a collector street in the overall roadway system in the southeast quadrant of the City and explained how the Traffic Safety Committee had arrived at the recommenda- tions made to the Council regarding the intersection. The Committee had also recommended approval of a.four -way "Stop" at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive at its August 14 meeting and the Council moved to continue the recommendation until the next Committee meeting in September so that the views of the area residents could be heard and directed that the issue come back to the City Council on September 17, 1984. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the recommendation of a four -way "Stop" at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive is a highly disputed issue. In view of ,the concerns expressed by residents of the area concerning the traffic problems of West 70th Street, the Committee feels it may be advisable to authorize an independent traffic study to resolve the issue. Members Turner and Schmidt LO stated they would like to see an independent traffic study made of W. 70th Street from Highway 100 to France Avenue. Member Richards concurred and said if a study is to be made, testimony should also be heard at this time regarding.the West 70th CO Street and West Shore Drive intersection. He also raised questions regarding who U should work with a traffic consultant, representation from the area, estimated cost CD and time frame for a study. Mr. Hoffman indicated he could obtain proposals from CD several traffic consultants and bring those back for consideration by the Council at the next meeting. Speaking in favor of four -way "Stop" signs at West Shore Drive and W. 70th Street were: James Coppock, 7024 West Shore. Drive; Ronald Rich, 7008 West Shore Drive; and Jess Cohen, 4405 Dunham Drive. Speaking in opposition were: Harold Babb, 4701 W. 70th Street; Donald Barck, 4807 W. 70th Street and Carl Horsch, 4705 W. 70th Street. Donna Hamilton, 4805 W. 70th Street, asked that the speed limit on W. 70th Street be strictly enforced and that it remain a two lane street. Member Richards then moved that the City Engineer be instructed to bring back to the Council on October 1, 1984, proposals from several traffic consultants for a study of the entire area of W. 70th Street from Highway 100 to France Avenue, including the residential neighborhoods on either side. of W. 70th Street, and that no action be _ taken at the present time on the four -way "Stop" sign issue. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 9/11/84 REVIEWED. The Council reviewed the minutes of the Traffic Safety Committee for the meeting held September 11, 1984. In view of the previous motion of Member Richards, no action was taken on the request regarding the four -way "Stop" at West 70th Street and West Shore Drive. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt for approval of the Committee's recommendation in Section A that "No Parking Anytime" signs be erected along West 66th Street from Normandale Road eastward to Valley View Road, and for acknowledgement of Sections B and C. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ADVISORY POLL ON ISSUE OF WINE LICENSING APPROVED. Mr. Bernhardson recalled that at the September 10, 1984, Council Meeting the City Manager and City Attorney were directed to research alternative wording of the question regarding issuing of wine licenses were the Council to approve placing the question on the ballot at the General Election on November 6, 1984. Attorney Erickson then reviewed the four formats of the question which he had drafted for consideration by the Council and advised that staff would recommend the Question No. 1 format as follows: ADVISORY POLL RESULTS NOT BINDING ON, ONLY ADVISORY TO, EDINA CITY COUNCIL ON -SALE WINE LICENSES "Shall the City of Edina issue on -sale licenses to qualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine, in conjunction with the sale of food ?" Mr. Erickson also raised the issue for Council consideration of the wine license fee itself, noting that the statute relative to on -sale wine licenses states that the fee for on -sale wine licenses shall be set by the issuing authority, which will not exceed one -half of the license fee charged by the issuing authority for an on -sale license, or $2,000, whichever is less. Therefore pursuant to the statute, the most that the City can presently charge for an on -sale wine license is $100 and that the only present manner of increasing that fee will be to increase the fee for on -sale licenses to the V /1//64 156 country clubs. Following discussion as to the preferred wording of the question, Member Turner moved that the issue of on -sale wine licenses be placed on the ballot for the General Election on.November 6, 1984, in the format as recommended by staff. notion was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen Motion carried. PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; PUBLIC COMMENT HEARD. Mr. Bernhardson stated that as requested by the Council, the paramedic program was placed on the agenda for this meeting so that input from the public could be gathered regarding the current para- medic services to the citizens of the City. It was the Council intent that this would be used as part of their information gathering process to determine action regarding the staff proposed addition of one additional career personnel to the Fire Department staff as a paramedic. He noted that while the Council's immediate decision is whether to accept or reject the staff recommendation regarding the personnel addition as part of the 1985 budget recommendation, the overall issue is not whether the community at large will receive paramedic services, but who will be the provider of those services. Edina is the only municipality which provides this service for itself in Hennepin County. Mr. Bernhardson recalled that Fairview Southdale Hospital had been contacted regarding the possible provision of service, and subsequent to the last Council discussion on this, Methodist Hospital was also contacted. It was the indication from their Assistant Administrator that at this time Methodist Hospital was not interested. A decision on the staff recommendation must be reached prior to the final adoption of the budget for 1985. Comment from the public was then invited. Speaking in strong support of the paramedic service as now provided and urging Council approval of the staff proposal of one additional paramedic were: Roger Buxton, 6349 Wilryan Avenue; Bob Solberg, 5205 Tifton Drive; Everett Erickson, 5713 St. John's Avenue; Doug Erickson, 5020 Richmond Drive; Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road; Pam Keating, 6901 Dawson Lane; Glydewell Burdick, 5529 Vernon Avenue; Winston Granger, 5533 Vernon Avenue, and Peggy Buxton. Following the comments, Member Turner stated that the ultimate decision will be made upon final adoption of the budget and that the next budget discussion meeting will be September 24, at 3:30 p.m. for anyone interested in attending. No formal action was taken. METROPOLITAN LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION JOINT POWERS, AGREEMENT DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson advised that the Metropolitan Legislative Commission has requested that each City Council ratify an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement whereby the financial contri- bution of each party would be increased not to exceed $0.35 per capita, no individual municipality would contribute more than $14,000 per year. The contribution is used to pay all legal and consultant costs and expenses and other expenses as approved by the Boaxd. The 1985 budget proposal contains funds to cover the increase. After a brief discussion of the proposed increase in contribution, it was informally agreed to delay any action until after final adoption of the 1985 Budget. EDINA COMMUNITY LIBRARY COMMENDED ON 20TH ANNIVERSARY. Mr. Bernhardson advised that the Edina Community Library, 4701 W. 50th Street, is observing their 20th Anniversary at present location. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Edina Community Library has been in its present location at 50th and Eden Avenur for twenty years; and WHEREAS, the City was the initial constructor of the building; and WHEREAS, this facility provides excellent service to the residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, the excellent staff that serves in the Library has made the Library both accessible and enjoyable to Edina residents; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that in honor of the 20th Anniversary of the Library at its present location, that the staff be commended for its excellent work over these many years; and BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that the week of September 24 through September 29 be declared "EDINA LIBRARY WEEK" here in the City of Edina. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by MemberRichards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. WOODDALE SCHOOL PROPERTY TITLE OFFICIALLY TRANSFERRED TO CITY. Mr. Bernhardson advised that the property title for the Wooddale School has been officially transferred to the City of Edina from the Edina School District No. 273 as of September 4, 1984. The consulting firm of BRW has advised that the report on their study of the area should be available by mid- October. No action was taken. RICHFIELD /EDINA COUNCIL INFORMAL MEETING SCHEDULED. Council was advised that the date set for the informal meeting between the Richfield and Edina City Councils is Wednesday, September 62 1/21/85 ON -SALE WINE LICENSE REPORT CONTINUED. Mr. Rosland advised the Council that staff had brought back requested information and an ordinance regarding on -sale wine licensing. The first item submitted was entitled "Issues and Alternatives Identification," which is a list of items identified by staff, together with alternatives and recommendations developed for the eventual development of an ordinance. The second item was the Draft Ordinance, which is the staff's recommendation subject to refinement by .Council direction to incorporate on -sale wine licensing within the current Edina liquor licensing ordinance. The final item submitted was a list of the potential applicants, based on information from the Edina Chamber of Commerce. These applicants are restaurants who have expressed an interest in application for wine -only licensing: Szechuan Star, 3655 Hazelton Road, 175 seats; Brothers Deli, 50th and France, 185 seats; Empress, Yorktown Mall, 80 seats; J. P.'s, 5125 Vernon, 175 seats; Palm Court, Southdale Center, 118 seats; Daytons, Southdale Center, 200 seats; York Steak House, Southdale Center, 252 seats; Good Earth, Galleria, 120 seats; Vie de France, Galleria, 144 seats; Le Bistro Cafe, Yorktown Mall, 167 seats; Pantry, 5101 Arcadia, 115 seats; Ediner, Galleria, 110 seats; Original Pancake House, 3501 West 70th Street, 122 seats; Rigotto's Pizza, 450212 Valley View Road, 95 seats; and Southdale Bowl and Black Swan Pub, 3401 West 69th Street, 75 seats. Questions were raised as to the number of inspections there would be in a year, and staff clarified that there would be a minimum of two, either announced or unannounced. These inspections would not require any additional staff; the current staff could handle the anticipated 30 to 50 inspections during the year, based on 15 to 25 licenses that would likely be requested. It was suggested by staff that the wine -only fees be set in the range of $550 to $650. Location for potential wine -only sales would be limited to C -1, C -2 and C -3 mixed use districts. There can't be a common entrance with another establishment unless it opens to a concourse; this will prevent two in- compatible businesses from interfering in the other's activities. Restaurants in office areas and cafeteria -style restaurants will be excluded from this licensing. The issue of live entertainment and being "properly clothed" is overly vague and unenforceable. Mr. Erickson informed the Council that this is a wide -open area and one of dispute, and he felt it was not appropriate at this time to address the issue in the Ordinance. The following is the "Issues and Alternatives Identification" submitted by staff: AREA General Ordinance A. Duration of Ordinance B. Number of Licenses C. Ongoing Enforcement D. Application Information needed Amount required by ord. E. City access to: - Financial records - Property F. Temporary Licenses C. Proration of Fee H. Time In Business Financial A. Investigative Fees - Initial - Ongoing B. Deposit for Investigation C. Licensing Fees D. Bond E. Insurance F. Amount of investment G. 2 of sales H. Eligibility based on taxes, fees, assessments I. Transfer (other?) J. Financial review - indebtedness Conditions Prohib- iting Licensing Issue to Persons Limiting Conditions /Persons Conditions Required of Location /Prohiblting Loeat MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. Ongoing B. No limit C. Minimum two per year /in ord. D. BCA application plus enough to determine ordinance requirements at E. Not unless sales 2 set As at present F. Not permitted under State law C. Quarterly H. Comment: Beer has 6-mon. minimum unless 4 /5's A. Actual cost within limits waived Up to $100 unless ownership changes signlfl- cantly - 502 Or designated person in charge B. $500 /in state - if going out of state. $2000. Refund amount unused. C. Estimated cost $500 -550 D. State maximum - $5000 E. State requirement P. Nothing apart from approved kitchen G. No H. Yes I. 502 change in ownership /change in form J. Requirement as to sources and amounts Good moral character - Individual, partnership, corporation - U. S. citizen - Legal age - Criminal record /5 years - Liquor, gambling, other controlled substances, theft and vice - Revocation of liquor licenses - No limitation on s of licenses; person /spouse can have interest Non compatible activities I - Manufacturer /wholesaler of intoxicating liquor - Federal /wholesale /recall liquor dealers or gambling license - City of Edina employees or elected officers Falsification of information No restriction on who can be a building owner Designated person (partnership /corporation) in Charge must.mect same requirements as individual licensee, plus have an individual r..gr. licansc On renewal denial: - Violations of sale conditiuns - Failure to pass applicable codes - Zoning limited to C1. C2. C1, mixed use and restaurants permitted in RI districts - No limit from specific builduigs, schools, etc. - Parkinq tied to seating - Common entrance? - 25 -scat minimum O 00 U m 1/21/85 63 AREA ISSUES MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Prohibit sales at bar (counter'.) - Requirement to have fully equipped kitchen Condition of Sale A. Limitation to Food A. Bloomington language - in conjunction with food /meal General B. Qualification as Food Establishment B. Must possess valid health licenses C. Hours of Sale C. Same as beer /clubs D. Area of Service Limitation D. - Must be consumed on premises of owner - Rooms designated on plans - Physical barrier - Public concourse - Outside of building excluded E. Age of Worker E. Age of persons working /State law F. Size of Serving Container F. Limit service co under one liter container C. Amusement Devices C. Same as beer H. Live Entertainment Conditions of Sale/ A. Degree of Change Requiring Re- Licensing A. Any alteration effecting zoning, seating. Business apace of seating or serving areas, storage of food /vine B. Compliance with Applicable City Codes B. Must be in ongoing compliance with applicable codes C. Impact on Present Food Storage /Prep. /Service C. Sufficient product storage - Not effecting proper food storage /prep/ service areas Individual Licenses A. Of whom required A. Manager does not recommend Staff does recommend for wine -only for anyone actually serving B. Ineligible persona B. Disqualified if not of age or any law violaci - Liquor, gambling, etc. Individual licenses would be required for the managers of the restaurants serving wine. Not everyone working in these restaurants needs to be licensed; only those who actually serve the wine to the tables would be licensed. A correction was made regarding the size of the serving container; up to one liter can be served, but not in excess of that. Another change was made regarding "transfer "; any change in ownership is a transfer, except that limited partnership may change up to 10% and corporate ownership may change up to 10% without it being a transfer during the license period of one year; it is not 50% as indicated on the Issues Identification. Mr. Dick Moberg, a 14 -year Edina resident and businessman on 50th Street, spoke in favor of Council action enabling restaurants to serve wine in Edina. He felt that the option for serving wine in Edina would make it more economically viable for good restaurants to be established, and this in turn would better serve the City. Gayle Kloster, President of the Edina Chamber of Commerce which represents 500 companies, spoke up encouraging the Council to make a positive motion on the wine issue. Don Sather, a representative of the 50th and France Business Association, spoke up for the Association in support of the passing of the on -sale wine ordinance. Richard Maxwell, 5104 58th Street West, addressed the Sunset Provision; he said without that provision there is a possibility that if restaurants' licenses are to be withdrawn, the restaurants could sue for condemnation of the business that had been built on that license. This could result in an extortion problem years down the line; without the Sunset Provision, there would be no realistic way for Edina to end wine licensing. Mr. Maxwell also supported the concept of wine restriction by tY individual glass; he felt this would help people make a conscious decision a: .cep them from drinking more wine than they had intended. Finally, Mr. Maxwell spo;.:e up in support of a sidewalk system for safety after wine drinkers leave the restaurants. Perhaps funds from the wine sales could expand the sidewalk system. Mr. Erickson explained that revenue could not be generated from wine sales for this purpose. Jo Ann Findell reported that she had followed this issue for ten years, and she spoke out against the wine ordinance. She has been a resident of Edina for 31 years. She felt that the issue was a social and health issue, not political or moral. She believed the referendum took place before all the facts were in. An uninformed decision therefor is not a wise decision. Mr. John Bold and Nancy Landes, both representing Dayton's, stood up in favor of the wine ordinance. Mr. Erickson explained that once a license has been given to a restaurant and this restaurant fails to comply with the standards, the City can deny them a renewal of the license; without the Sunset Provision, the license could not be denied without sufficient cause or non - compliance feature. Council Member Richards felt some consideration should be given to graduated fees, based upon the number of seats at the particular establishments; specifically, make the licensing fees a little higher to take into account the total cost anticipated for reviewing and issuing the licenses and the follow up for inspections. He also stated that he felt the $650 fee is not high enough. Member Richards also supported having only the manager or owner be licensed as opposed to each individual server of wine being licensed as well. Mr. Erickson explained that the fees are based on the estimates of costs of licensing; the licensing'.fee is inclusive of ongoing inspections. The question was raised as to whether or not a larger establishment would be checked more often, and if so, this could in fact affect the fee. Mr. Erickson noted that the fee cannot exceed half the on -sale liquor license; it was suggested that wine -only licensing be $550 to $650, and the on -sale liquor licenses would be set at $1100 to $1300, which pertains to the country clubs. Mr. Bernhardson explained that State law prohibits anyone under the age of 19 to work as a waiter or waitress serving wine in a licensed establishment; musicians, dishwashers and busboys can be under 19 years of age. With 1/21/85 64 There being no further discussion, Member Richards made a motion to give concept approval to the wine licensing ordinance, to bring it back with two sets of language, to clarify the issues of individual licenses, zoning and graduated fees, to be reviewed at the Council Meeting of March 4, 1985. The motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REVISION OF 8/6/84 COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced the request for revision of the Council Minutes of August 6, 1984, with regard to the resolution granting an easement facation for Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat, and recommended the revision. He explained that at that meeting the Council had granted vacation of an easement for the subject property which was identified as a "wetland easement" according to data furnished by the surveyor. Upon presenting the resolution for recording at Hennepin County, it was discovered that the original document identified the easement as a "drainage and utility eastment" and the County would not accept the resolution as presented. Revision of the Council Minutes as it relates to the resolution is requested whereby all references to "wetland easement" is changed to "drainage and utility easement" so that the resolution can be placed of record. No objections being heard, Member Kelly offered the following resolution as revised and moved adoption: RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of June, 1984, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of easement for drainage and utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 6th day of August, 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electri or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, re- place, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the drainage and utility easement be and is vacated effective as of August 6, 1984: That part of the drainage and utility easement over Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn at right angles to the Northeasterly i.ne, from a point on the Northeasterly line, a distance of 85.00 feet .rthwesterly of the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6 and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Registrar of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the amended resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING BIDS FOR HANSEN WELL REDEVELOPMENT. Mr. Hoffman intro- duced this redevelopment project on Hansen Road with regard to Well No. 9. The pro- posed project is to bail out the sand in the well hole, extend the existing column down to approximately 530 feet and reinstall the well components. The net result of this project would be to increase the overall yield of the well to approximately 1.3 million gallons daily and extend the service life of the well considerably. The estimated cost of this project is approximately $48,000 to $50,000, depending on the amount of sand in the hole; the funds used for this project would be utility funds. Member Kelly offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR HANSEN WELL REDEVELOPMENT BE IT,RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now in file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin a notice of bids in substantially the following form: 3/18/85 RE of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) and recommended that Member Turner's name be submitted as a nominee to the AMM Board if she was willing to serve in that capacity. Member Turner stated she would be willing to have her name placed in nomination. Mayor Courtney then moved that a letter be sent to the AMM nominating Leslie Turner as a Board member. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL PLAN FOR FRANCE AV/494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF STATE AID FUNDS. Mr. Rosland referred to the memorandum of Engineer Hoffman regarding the France Avenue /I -494 Interchange Project which stated that the project is ready for bid letting on 3/22/85. The project has received final approval from the Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council for the appropriate federal aid urban funding which will be 76% of the job cost. Previously, during 1984, the City Council approved final plans for Hennepin County on this project. However, the linnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to assume contract administration of the project and this change necessitates that the Council re- approve the plans. As to financial participation, staff recommends the City participate to the extent that our State Aid Funds can be utilized. The total project cost is approximately 4.5 million dollars and the City participation is estimated at $478,095.63. The State Aid office requires that the Council must authorize this appropriation of State Aid Funds by resolution. Member Turner then introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways and identified in its records as S.P. No. 2785 -235, 2785 -237, 2785 -238, Federal Project 115024, and Edina S.A.P. 120 - 020 -13, 120 - 020 -14, and 120 - 020 -15; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $500,000.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has pre- pared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 393, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 494, and CSAH 17 (France Avenue) within the corporate limits of the City of Edina, from the So. Corp. Limits to 670 feet north of 77th Street; and seeks the approval thereof; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improve- ment �f said Trunk Highway and County Roadway within said corporate limits of the City. and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and coi.:,7 ._s hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said con- struction; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to ban the parking of all vehicles, on both sides of roadways as constructed per plans, and special pro- visions of above project. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolutions adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS GIVEN FIRST READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of January 21, 1985, the Council had given concept approval to a draft ordinance to allow sales of wine only in qualifiying restaurants and had directed the staff to bring back a revised draft which would address the issues on which the Council had not con- curred. Those issues were: 1) Zoning (whether on sale wine licenses should be issued in the PC -1 District), 2) Sunset provision, 3) Individual server and /or manager license, 4) Fees (whether fees should be graduated) 5) Size of service of wine, and 6) Live entertainment (possible concern). With regard to whether all wine servers should be licensed or just the manager, because of employee turn- over staff would recommend that licensed managers be on duty at all times but that individual servers not be licensed. Member Richards stated that he did not support individual licensing, either of servers or managers, that the applicant will hold the license and will be accountable for hiring responsible persons to serve the wine as is done with serving of liquor at the country clubs. In response ',Chief Swanson said that we are looking to do everything we can to assure that wine is dispensed legally and appropriately and that the difference is that wine served in restaurants is in a public setting versus the private setting of the clubs and that at least one licensed responsible person should be at the 3/18/85 95 location at all times to supervise the dispensing of wine. The licensing of one agent of the owner will assist that owner and help assure that as few violations as possible are made. Member Kelly voiced her concerns as follows: 1) consider limiting number of licenses, 2) concern about neighborhood restaurants serving wine, 3) enforcement and inspection procedures, 4) in support of graduated fee, 5) in support of licensing one responsible individual, not all servers, 6) opposed to sunset provision. Member Turner stated her position as follows: 1) in support of sunset provision, 2) opposed to limiting number of wine licenses, 3) supports wine licenses for C -1, C -2 and C -3 Districts, 4) in support of a graduated fee schedule. Member Bredesen gave his position as follows: 1) opposed to wine licenses in C -1 District, and would limit by ordinance the number of seats that can be licensed for wine within the C -2 District, 2) in support of sunset pro- vision, 3) not in support of licensing individual servers or managers, 4) that there be strict enforcement of the ordinance. Mayor Courtney stated that he felt all restaurants should be allowed to sell wine, that when the issue was put to the residents for an advisory vote it did not say some restaurants would be allowed to have wine licenses and others would not. Mayor Courtney called for comment from the public. Jerry Brower stated he was a resident of Bloomington and part owner of the new Bravo! Italian Specialties, 4936 France Avenue So. and said he was concerned about competition if the restaurant did not qualify for a wine license. He explained that the restaurant would provide that people 0 order and pick -up their food and carry it to tables to eat it. Mr. Rosland stated that according to the definition of "restaurant" in the ordinance, the U restaurant would not qualify for a wine license. June Schmidt, 7005 Bristol Boulevard, voiced her objection to the wine licensing ordinance and in summary stated that the passage of the ordinance will be divisive, will pit neighbor- hood.against neighborhood and food vendor against food vendor and will cost all the taxpayers in Edina. Jane Fuegner, 5225 Kellogg Avenue, asked if the serving of the wine will be limited by the glass, carafe or bottle. Mr. Rosland responded that the ordinance provides that wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter. Victor Oliver, 6620 Parkwood Road, stated he strongly objected to the ordinance to allow wine licensing. No further public comment being heard, Member Richards introduced Ordinance No. 902 -A1 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and amended as follows: "Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure .at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full menu service. "City" means the City of Edina. 'Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public Safety. "Council" means the Council of the City of Edina. "Li— `censed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. "Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation, or municipality, and includes also the municipal liquor store. "Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefore, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. This definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe and Restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902. 'State" means the State of Minnesota. "Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance." Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows: "PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS" Sec. 36. License Required. (a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, sell for on -sale any wine at or under 14% by volume in conjunction with the sale of food without first having received a license therefor pursuant to this Part H. (b) On -sale wine licenses shall be granted only to qualifying restaurants, as determined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance 731. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Stautues, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designed and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -354 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -175 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -369 The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on said Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, where said improvements are to be located. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 (ON -SALE WINE LICENSES) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had given First Reading to Ordinance No. 902 -A1 To Allow Sales of Wine Only in Qualifying Restaurants. At that meeting it appeared that there were still some issues on which the Council Members differed and staff would recommend the following procedure: a) that any amendments to the language in the First Reading be amended prior to passage of Second Reading, b) that if Second Reading is given, any changes then would be written into the ordinance, and c) that some action be taken regarding the license fees. No com- ment being heard, Member Richards moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A1. Motion was seconded by Mayor Courtney. Member Kelly then moved that the draft ordinance be amended in Section 42 to delete the provision that all person- nel who serve wine be licensed and to substitute the provision that a licensed manager in charge must be on the premises at all times that the restaurant is open for business. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen, Richards Motion carried. Member Turner moved that the draft ordinance be amended to provide for termination of all on -sale wine licenses after five years so that the ordinance would be reviewed by the Council at that time. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly, Richards Motion carried. City Attorney Erickson recommended that some minor changes be made to the draft ordinance: 1) that the definition of "person" delete the phrase "and includes also the municipal liquor store ", 2) that the ordinance be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication, and 3) that no license shall be effective prior to July 1, 1985. The recommended minor changes were approved by unanimous vote of the Council. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A1, amended as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and amended as follows: "Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full menu service. "City" means the City of Edina. "Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public Safety. "Council" means the Council of the City of Edina. "Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. "Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation or municipality. "Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe" or "restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance, ". Sec. 3. Part H. is hereby added as follows: 6/2/86 152 UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY. Member Turner gave an update on the second meeting of the I -494 Project Management Team summarized as follows. Mayor Gary Peterson, Eden Prairie, was elected chairman; BRW, Inc. has been selected as consultant for the project; public involvement process will include press released by the Metropolitan Council's Public Information office; next meeting will include a bus tour of the corridor and that Craig Larson has been appointed as alternate for Edina. The Land -Use Committee is working on an inventory of land uses in the cities.affected and that information should be available about July 1. Member Turner added that the Planning Commission and Council will need to pursue the TAZ question raised at the last Council meeting. No action was taken. WINE LICENSING PROCEDURE DISCUSSED; REVISED PROCEDURE APPROVED. Mr. Rosland stated that he and Chief Craig Swanson have developed a revised procedure for the processing of On Sale Wine License applications as directed by the Council at its meeting of May 19. Mr. Swanson commented that at that meeting, there did not seem to be support for a financial background investigation of wine license applicants and it appeared that an affidavit review process would be a sufficient standard to determine if issuance of a license is in the public interest. The following process is suggested: - Applicants should submit the modified Edina application forms that are not expanded beyond the scope of the State of Minnesota "Application for City On -Sale Wine License." - Applicants should submit City- furnished affidavits reflecting compliance with laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and sale of of intoxicating liquor, the rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner and ordinances of the City of Edina. - Applicants should submit an affidavit provided by the City from a Certified Public Accountant that reflects the fact that a review or audit has been conducted within the 12 -month period prior to application. Mr. Swanson added that a second part to this process could be included if certain facts deem it necessary. That second part would reserve the right of the Council to order an expanded investigation if, during the application process, irregular- ities, inconsistencies, law violations or other information not supportive to the issuance of a license is discovered. This action could be the result of police or citizen input and would allow the Council to address each applicant on an individual basis. Graphics were presented showing the information that would be sworn to in the affidavits. Member Turner asked if the City would be open to any risks with this procedure. Mr. Swanson responded that there is a risk in using the affidavit process in that for purposes of expediency or ignorance of the law or changes in the law people may sign an affidavit without intentially making a mistake that bridges the process. In the original process the City asked for documentation that would let us make the decision rather than by affidavit of the applicant. Although he prefers the original process, Mr. Swanson said that the revised procedure appears to be legal and would make the process expedient. Member Kelly then made a motion to adopt the revised wine licensing procedure as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen Motion carried. Member Bredqsen commented that he did not view the selling of wine as a right, and that as 'to the licensing process he did not favor loosening it as it would be very difficult to tighten it again. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council that several holders of wine licenses have raised questions as to ordinance intent and that the questions have been referred to the City Attorney for comment: 1) Can a wine licensee serve wine to a person ordering only appetizer items from a menu rather than an entree or sandwich as specified in Ordinance No. 902, Sec. 1 and Sec. 40(a)? 2) Can a wine licensee serve wine to a customer during the period of time prior to the placing of the food order? 3) Does the manager of a wine licensed establishment need be physically on the premise at all times? 4) Can a wine licensee serve samples of wine (approx. 1 ounce), free of charge, for promotional purposes? 5) Can an 18- year -old waiter /waitress serve wine even though the ordinance precludes them from possessing such a beverage? Attorney Erickson pointed out that with regard to question #5 Chapter 330 of the 1986 Legislature will clarify the point and will make two amendments to the ordinance necessary, one being to change the state established legal drinking age to 21 (effective September 1, 1986) and the other being to change Sec. 30(e) (again effective not later than September 1, 1986) to provide that 18, 19 and 20 year olds may work in the licensed premises, including the service of wine. Member Turner commented that she.did not see any reason for interpreting the ordinance other than literally for questions #1 through #4 and suggested that the ordinance only be amended with respect to question #5 to comply with state legislation. Members Bredesen and Kelly voiced their agreement. Member Turner then moved 0 /L /ts0 153 that in response to questions #1 through #4 no ordinance changes be made and staff be directed to draft an amendment to comply with state legislation by changing the legal drinking age to 21 years effective September 1, 1986 and to provide that 18, 19 and 20 year olds may work in the licensed premises, including the service of wine. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED FOR EMPRESS, SZECHUAN STAR AND GOOD EARTH RESTAURANTS. Mr. Rosland stated that the on -sale wine license renewal applica- tions for the Empress, Szechuan Star and Good Earth restaurants have been investi- gated by the Police, Health and Planning Departments and that renewal of these on -sale wine licenses is recommended conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota. Member Kelly made a motion to approve renewal of on -sale wine licenses to the Empress, Szechuan Star and Good Earth restaurants, conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RENEWAL OF CLUB LIQUOR LICENSES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland stated that the appli- cations for renewal of Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses have been investi- gated by the Police Department and approved. Renewal is recommended conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner approving issuance of Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor License LO renewals for the Edina Country Club and the Interlachen Country Club. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney m Motion carried. Q FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE REVOKED FOR GIM LOON CHOW MEIN RESTAURANT. Mr. Rosland referred to the memorandum dated May 29, 1986, from David Velde, City Sanitarian, in which he requested the Council'to consider revocation of the restaurant's Food Establishment License because continued operation under the present owner- ship presents a threat and danger to those members of the public who choose to purchase and consume food prepared in this establishment. Supporting documenta- tion for the requested action were: 1) City of Edina Department of Health Staff Report dated June 2, 1986, 2) Document A - Class List Food Production Clinic, October 16, 17, 1984 Crystal, 3) Document B - Letter dated July 11, 1985 to Gim Loong Chow Mein, and 4) Document C - Letter from O.P. Snyder, Jr., Hospital- ity Institute of Technology & Management. Mr. Rosland submitted that staff has been working over the past two years with the restaurant owner to improve the food handling procedures but the efforts have been unsuccessful. Mr. Velde stated that the Health Department's main concern is with procedures in the handling of the food from preparation to serving. Physical changes can be made to an establishment, equipment can be replaced and some cleaning can be done and that helps but the critical point is how food is prepared, handled, stored and reheated. The Department does not feel that the owner is committed to implementing safe food handling procedures for this restaurant. Speaking in support of keeping the restaurant open were two employees and Nghe Vinh Tran, the owner. Member Turner stated the Council has to be concerned about the health of the citizens and from documentation by the Health Department she would have to support the staff's recommendation. Member Kelly said she agreed because there have been too many offenses. Member Turner asked if the ordinance provided for a probationary period. Attorney Erickson responded that the authority of the Council is to ignore the recommendations of staff or to suspend the license on conditions or to revoke the license. Member Bredesen said that because of the violations have taken place over an extended period of time he did not feel a probationary period would be prudent and that their intent to improve their procedures have not solved the problem. Member Turner then made a motion to revoke the Food Establishment License for the Gim Loong Chow Mein Restaurant effective immediately based on the Staff Report of June 2, 1986 and supporting documents. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney License revoked. 1986 CONTRACT PROPOSALS FOR IAFF 1275 APPROVED. Mr. Rosland advised that the following items represent a proposed settlement of the labor agreement between IAFF 1275 and the City for the contract period of 1986: 1) Salary - 5% increase in wages, 2) Supplemental pay for fire motor operators and inspectors shall be 6% of the top firefighter pay, 3) Insurance - increase employer contribution for dependent health coverage to $165, 4) Shift exchange - all exchanges must be made up within 12 months from the date on which the exchange is made, and 5) Floating holidays - employees who are not actively employed with the City 12 months in any calendar year shall be granted floating holidays in accordance with Article 20.3 on a pro -rated ratio of one day for every three months of 5/2/88 155 Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted; Second Reading waived. Member Smith made a motion to submit the ordinance to the prosecuting attorney for comment and report back on May 16, 1988. Motion was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 CONTINUED TO MAY 16, 1988. Manager Rosland presented a proposed amendment to the Wine Licensing Ordinance advising that the present ordinance requires that a restaurant patron must order a meal prior to being served wine. This requirement conflicts with the customary practice whereby the patron orders a glass of wine prior to making a menu selection. The proposed amendment softens the present requirement provided that the restaurant informs patrons of the requirement that continued wine service is ultimately dependent on food service. He explained that in the last round of inspections it was found that there are violations of the ordinance requirements but that it is difficult to enforce. Following some discussion, Member Richards moved to continue First Reading of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 to May 16, 1988. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 (REQUIRING GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING) AND ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A5 (PERMITTING PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON CURB FOR PICK -UP) GIVEN FIRST READING. Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, recalled that, at the March 17, 1988 Council Meeting, Edina garbage haulers testified that a) In general, they were willing to implement separate yard waste pick -up, b) That two of the haulers had compost programs in 1987, and c) That curbside placement of compost would make the job much more efficient. Subsequently, the Minnesota Legislature has just passed an amendment to the Waste Management Act which states that effective January 1, 1990 yard waste may not be disposed of in mixed municipal solid waste, in a disposal facility or in a resource recovery facility except for the purpose of composting or co- composting. Further, Mrs. Chandler stated that the 1987 Morningside compost program was very successful and participation was high with many positive comments from residents. Similar results have been reported by our neighboring cities which have instituted compost programs. Public reaction to the newspaper report of the March 17 Council Meeting was positive. With regard to the compostable bag, Hennepin County has advised that it has no plans to make the bags available this year due to the problems of storage, distribution and cost. Consumers and haulers generally liked the compostable bags, but most cities do not wish to take on the task of distributing bags on an ongoing basis. The best hope is that they may become available in stores at a reasonable cost. In conclusion, Mrs. Chandler said that Hennepin County has stated its intention to continue development of compost sites and that Edina needs a compost program in order to meet our recycling goals. Following discussion, Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 1301 -A3 and Ordinance No. 711 -A5 and moved First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 TO REQUIRE GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1301 is amended by adding a new Section 15 as follows: "Sec. 15. Collection of Comflostable Materials. Haulers shall collect and segregate, from other garbage and refuse, all grass clippings and leaves which have been separated from other garbage and refuse and placed, in bags designed for such purpose by residential customers, for pick -up. Haulers shall report to the City Sanitarian the amount, by weight, of such leaves and grass clippings delivered to compost disposal sites approved by Hennepin County for the four -month periods ending April 30, August 31 and December 31. Such reports shall be submitted within fifteen (15) days following the end of each four month period." Sec. 2. Section 15 and Section 16 of Ordinance No. 1301 are hereby renumbered Section 16 and Section 17 respectively. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON THE CURB ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Refuse to be kept in containers. All refuse on any premise shall be stored in the containers required by Sec. 2 hereof, except as the same may be consumed or disposed of on such premises as permitted by said section and except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof." -)/ IV/ 00 166 enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot C, Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition except that part which lies southerly of a line which bears North 61 degrees 47 minutes 31 seconds East from the northeast corner of Outlot B, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition. For purposes of this description, the north line of said Outlot B is assumed to bear North 87 degrees 51 minutes 16 seconds East." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LANDMARK ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "LANDMARK ADDITION ", platted by The Lincoln Drive Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 16, 1988 be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted; resolution adopted. DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS UPHELD: VARIANCE DENIED FOR 6231 FRANCE AVENUE SO. Planner Larsen presented the appeal of Thelma Anderson, 6231 France Avenue South, from a Board of Appeals decision denying a 3 foot front yard setback variance to enlarge a dining room. The subject property is a double bungalow and the variance request would allow construction of a 5 x 11 foot addition to the front of the dwelling on the south one -half of the building. The proposed addition would extend 3 feet into the required minimum front yard setback and the bay window would project an additional 1.5 feet into the setback area. An aerial photograph illustrates that the homes on the east of France Avenue are in line and maintain a uniform front yard setback. The Board of Appeals considered the variance request on April 21, 1988 and denied the request on the grounds that the general uniformity of the area would be compromised and an unfavorable precedent would be set for an established neighborhood. Oren Bakken, a nephew representing Thelma Anderson, stated that the proposed variance would have little or no effect on the homes in the neighborhood. He explained that Mrs. Anderson cannot relocate the dining room within the double bungalow, does not wish to sell her home, and with her furniture in the dining room there is no room for people. He stated that the addition would not harm the beauty of the area or disturb the symmetry significantly as argued by the Board. He said that she could even manage with a variance of 1.5 to 2 feet if that could be approved. In conclusion, Mr. Bakken asked that the Council grant the requested variance as originally proposed or grant the alternate variance of 1.5 to 2 feet. Member Smith commented that he was concerned about the precedent that would be set if this variance were approved. No other comment being heard, Member Smith moved to uphold the decision of the Board of Appeals to deny the variance request for property at 6231 France Avenue So. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Board of Appeals decision upheld. ORDINANCE N0. 902 -A5 (AMENDING WINE LICENSING ORDINANCE) GRANTED FIRST READING. Manager Rosland recalled that First Reading of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 had been continued from the Council meeting of May 2, 1988 and that the Council had requested alternative language be drafted for the proposed amendment to the wine licensing ordinance. The present ordinance requires that a restaurant patron must order a meal prior to being served wine. This requirement conflicts with the customary practice whereby the patron orders a glass of wine prior to making a menu selection. He explained that during inspections it was found that there are violations of the ordinance requirements and that they are difficult to enforce. The proposed amendment softens the present requirement provided that the restaurant informs patrons of the requirement that wine service is dependent on food service. Chief Craig Swanson advised that alternative #2, which was essentially the proposal at the last meeting eliminating the term "intend to ", would be most acceptable and would reduce enforcement problems with the licensee. In discussing the alternatives with the City Attorney, they concluded that this would put the responsibility of ordering a meal to be consumed with the wine on the patron along with the licensee. He reviewed the present inspection process and the situation whereby the ordinance as presently written is violated. Member Smith commented that he was bothered about legislating what should be printed in menus. Attorney Erickson observed that the only virtue in having the additional language about placards being posted or notices contained in the menu is that that would be an objective fact that a police officer could observe. Chief Swanson commented that as the ordinance now stands there.is 80 -90% non - compliance. That information would be brought to the Council at the time of license renewals and the Council could act or not act relating to that type of violation. Member Richards moved approval of alternative #2 with First Reading of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 as follows: D/ iv /oo 16'7 ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO CLARIFY THE REQUIREMENT THAT A MEAL BE CONSUMED WITH WINE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of Section 40 of Part H of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) No person shall be sold, served or consume vine who does not order a meal to be consumed with vine. The licensee shall advise all patrons of the requirements of this paragraph (a) either through placards displayed in the restaurant or notices contained in the menu and vine list." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith First Reading granted. Member Smith asked that the Prosecuting Attorney review the ordinance amendment prior to Second Reading for any comment or suggestions. ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 (REOUIRING GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING) AND ORDINANCE N0. 711 -A5 (PERMITTING PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON CURB FOR PICK -UP) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING_. Member Richards moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1301 -A3 as follows: L ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 = TO REOIIlRE GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: m Section 1. Ordinance No. 1301 is amended by adding a new Section 15 as Q follows: "Sec. 15. Collection of Compostable Materials. Haulers shall collect and segregate, from other garbage and refuse, all grass clippings and leaves which have been separated from other garbage and refuse and placed, in bags designed for such purpose by residential customers, for pick -up. Haulers shall report to the City Sanitarian the amount, by weight, of such leaves and grass clippings delivered to compost disposal sites approved by Hennepin County for the four -month periods ending April 30, August 31 and December 31. Such reports shall be submitted within fifteen (15) days following the end of each four month period." Sec. 2. Original Section 15 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby renumbered Section 16. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. G _ ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Member Turner moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 711 -A5 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON THE CURB ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Refuse to be kept in containers. All refuse on any premise shall be stored in the containers required by Sec. 2 hereof, except as the same may be consumed or disposed of on such premises as permitted by said section and except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof." Sec. 2. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting "(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4, and by adding a new paragraph "(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows: "(b) Grass clippings and leaves may be placed next to the street or curb adjoining residential properties for pick -up provided that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored within a bag designed for such a purpose and ii) placed at the curb no more than twelve (12) hours prior to the scheduled pick -up." Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly, Richards 1'76 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DAYCARE SERVICES WITH GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION AND AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT'S ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Edina has executed a Joint Powers Agreement with Hennepin County, thereby agreeing to participate in a grant application under the Urban County designation provided for in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and, WHEREAS, part of the authorized activity for Year XIV is the support of daycare services through the administrative agency known as the Greater-Minneapolis Day Care Association; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant program as administered through the Urban Hennepin County requires that each city funding daycare activity with Community Development Block Grant monies must enter into a Public Service Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association; and, WHEREAS, the Public Service Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association allows the City to authorize Hennepin County to discharge the responsibilities of the City regarding the administration of the daycare program; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute an Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association for child daycare services for Year XIV of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and Development be requested to directly discharge the responsibilities of the City regarding the administration of this program for Year XIV, as provided for in the Public Service Agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. REPORT PRESENTED REGARDING DAY CARE IN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. Planner Craig Larsen stated that the report regarding day care in single family homes is presented in response to Member Turner's request that staff review its policy regulating day care. He said that the State Department of Human Services generates rules for licensing day care facilities which rules are administered by Hennepin County. By State Statute cities may not limit residential day care to less than 12 children. Several types of day care licenses are issued by the County in single family homes. They vary due to the total number of children, age of children and number of care givers. The City's policy has been to permit all but two of these license categories: 1) license for 14 children requiring 2 care givers, and 2) license for a specialized infant /toddler day care facility for 9 children also requiring 2 care givers. These were not allowed because they required outside employees which is not allowed by the Zoning Ordinance standards for "customary home occupations ". Planner Larsen explained that a review of the Zoning Ordinance indicates that we have erred in classifying day care as a customary home occupation. The Zoning Ordinance distinguishes day care from other home occupations by making it a permitted accessory use in the R -1 District provided it is licensed by the State. By making day care a permitted accessory use, the Ordinance does not limit the use in the same restrictive manner it does other customary home occupations. Specifically, a licensed day care operation with 12 or fewer children could have an employee who does not reside at the residence. The intent of the Ordinance was to provide for special treatment for day care. Staff would suggest the City change its administrative policy to allow all licensed family and group family day care operations with 12 or fewer children to operate in single family homes. This would allow all categories of residential licenses except the license for 14 children. Since both State law and the Zoning Ordinance single out day care for special treatment, it would not establish an undesirable precedent applicable to other home occupations. Planner Larsen concluded that this change_in policy will be put into practice in the future. Member Turner expressed her thanks for the research and report. No action was taken. ORDINANCE N0. 902 -A5 (WINE LICENSING) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards stated that First Reading had been granted to Ordinance No. 902 -A5, the wine licensing ordinance, at the last meeting following considerable discussion regarding the language of the ordinance. Member Smith commented that he felt the ordinance was still unclear. Member Smith made a motion to amend the first sentence of the ordinance as presented at First Reading to read as follows: "No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a meal." Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. Member Smith then moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 as amended: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO CLARIFY THE REQUIREMENT THAT A MEAL BE CONSUMED WITH WINE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of Section 40 of Part H of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a meal. The licensee shall advise all patrons of the requirements of this 6/6/88 177 paragraph (a) either through placards displayed in the restaurant or notices contained in the menu and vine list." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk *BID AWARDED FOR BRIDGE DECK REPAIRS (W. 78TH STREET BRIDGE). Motion vas made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for bridge deck repairs (W. 78th Street Bridge) to recommended low bidder, Progressive Contractors, Inc., at $33,376.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED. Motion vas made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve issuance of Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor License renevals for the Edina Country Club and the Interlachen Country Club. 1 ^� Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. u , ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE BY NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District m advising that they have allocated $25,000.00 to the City of Edina to repair damage Q resulting from flooding and erosion following the July, 1987 rain storms. Reimbursement of costs incurred will be made based upon receipt of an invoice from the City and certified by the Engineer indicating that the work has been completed. He said this is for the Council's information and that no action is needed. CITY WATER SYSTEM REPORT PRESENTED: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW WELL AND WATER TOWER AUTHORIZED. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council authorized staff to update the City Master Plan for Water Systems in June of 1987. The Master Plan update has been completed and the basic recommendations indicate an ultimate need for 3 additional wells and a one million gallon tower. Additional recommendations are: 1) completing a water main loop from Braemar Arena to West 78th Street and 2) installing an electronic supervisory control system. The total cost for the whole system in 1988 dollars is $2,500,000. The report further recommends that one additional well be drilled as soon as possible and that the one million gallon tower be installed in light of storage requirements that provide good fire protection as recommended by the Fire Chief. In support of the Master Plan recommendations, Engineer Hoffman explained that in the Edina community water pressures vary from 40 to 105 PSI depending on the land elevation, e.g. the high points experience the low pressures. He advised that at present the average day consumption of water is 7,890,000 gallons /day with the maximum at 21,160,000 gallons /day. Ultimate consumption as determined by the consultant would be average day consumption of 8,870,000 gallons /day with the maximum at 23,610,000 gallons /day. The system design assumes using 908 of well capacity and 180 gallons per capita consumption. Current storage capacity is 6,000,000 MGD and ultimate storage should be 7,000,000 MGD. Staff recommendation would be for Council to authorize that engineering plans and specifications be developed for a new well and water tower. Approximately one year is required to put a new well into operation. Engineer Hoffman stated that initial costs will be.funded from the utility fund and approximately $10- 15,000 from engineering funds. Estimated cost for the new well and tower is $1,300,000. The utility fund has a reserve of $1,600,000. The Finance Department will be bringing to the Council a financial statement showing the water /sewer charges and a recommendation that the rates be raised to pick up some of the costs. It was noted that a letter had been received from residents of Dublin Circle expressing their concern about the low water pressure to their homes during periods of dry and hot weather. Member Turner asked at what point staff would recommend adding the two additional wells. Engineer Hoffman said the recommendation is to locate the first well at Edina High School and the tower at Van Valkenburg Park. The second well would be in relationship to the Hedberg development, Phase II at the southeast corner. The third well would be at the northwest corner when final development is completed in that area. Member Smith asked about the impact of the current water system on fire insurance rates for Edina. Chief Paulfranz responded that we are doing as well as we can with our water system except for the recent crisis periods. If the City had a bad experience during a crisis period that would probably reflect on fire insurance rates. Member Kelly said she was concerned about the effect a change in land use for the Meadowbrook Golf Course would have on Edina's water system. Engineer Hoffman explained that there are no wells involved there, only a storm water system. There being no further comment, Member Smith made a motion authorizing that engineering plans and specification be developed for a new well TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Gordon Hughes DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IV.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: 1) Adopt resolution electing to participate in the Program. 2) Approve draft agreement prepared by staff. Info /Background: On September 18th, staff reported to the City Council on the status of negotiations with the Metropolitan Council with respect to the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. At that time, staff transmitted a draft Housing Goals Agreement prepared by the Metropolitan Council. This agreement (copy attached) provided the current city index and benchmarks for housing affordability, life cycle opportunities and density. The purpose of the agreement is to establish goals for each of these three categories. The Metropolitan Council prefers that the City's goals equate to the "benchmarks" established for each of the categories. Staff has prepared the attached revision to the Housing Goals Agreement. Based upon this draft agreement, the City would agree to goals for affordability, life cycle opportunities and density which are equal to our current city index. In the case of life cycle opportunities and density, these goals are within the benchmarks established by the Metropolitan Council, and therefore are clearly acceptable. In the case of affordability, our proposed goals (which are equal to our current city index) are substantially less than the benchmarks. The draft agreement prepared by staff provides findings and conclusions supporting such goals. The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed our proposed Housing Goals Agreement. Their staff advises that they would accept on the staff level our draft agreement albeit reluctantly. They encourage the City to adopt affordability goals which show an intent to increase, rather than simply preserve our current percentage of affordable housing. Based upon our findings, such an increase may be practically impossible to achieve. The City must decide by November 15, 1995, whether or not it desires to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. (A model resolution is attached for your consideration.) The Council need not conclude a Housing Goals Agreement by this date; however, such an agreement must be successfully negotiated prior to January 15, 1996. 0 �0 0 • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1996 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (1995 Minnesota Laws Chapter 255) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentives Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup finding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each munici- pality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, by June 30, 1996, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council must adopt, by resolution after a public hearing, the negotiated affordable and life - cycle housing goals for each municipality by January 15, 1996; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Pro- gram must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1996, a metropolitan area municipality can participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 only if: (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1995; (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality successfully negotiate affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality; and (c) by January 15, 1996 the Metropolitan Council adopts by resolution the negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each municipality; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the [specific municipality] hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during calendar year 1996. By: Mayor By: Clerk DRAFT HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT PRINCIPLES The city of Edina supports: 1. A balanced housing supply, with housing available for people at all income levels. 2. The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase, sale, rental and location of housing within the community. 3. A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life - cycle. 4. A community of well- maintained housing and neighborhoods, including ownership and rental housing. 5. Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. 6. The availability of a full range of services and facilities for its residents, and the improvement of access to and linkage between housing and employment. GOALS To carry out the above housing principles, the City of Edina agrees to use benchmark indicators for communities of similar location and stage of development as affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the period 1996 to 2010, and to make its best efforts, given market conditions and resource availability, to remain within or make progress toward these benchmarks. To achieve the above goals, the City of Edina elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program, and will prepare and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1996, indicating the actions it will take to carry out the above goals. CERTIFICATION Mayor Date CITY INDEX BENCHMARK GOAL Affordability Ownership 31% 64 -77% Rental 14% 3245% Life -Cycle Type (Non- single family detached) 43% 38-41% Owner /renter Mix 71/29% (64 -70) / (30 -36) % Density Single - Family Detached 2.3 /acre 2.3 -2.9 /acre Multifamilv 16 /acre 11 -15 /acre To achieve the above goals, the City of Edina elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program, and will prepare and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1996, indicating the actions it will take to carry out the above goals. CERTIFICATION Mayor Date DRAFT HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT FINDINGS: 1. Vacant, developable land comprises 110 acres or one percent of the total land area of Edina. Of this, 70 acres or .6 percent of the total land area is planned or zoned for residential purposes (of this, 50 acres have been subdivided and are undergoing development). 2. According to forecasts prepared by the Metropolitan Council, 400 housing units will be added to Edina's housing stock during the plan period (1996 - 2010). 3. According to the Metropolitan Council, affordable housing (rental and ownership combined) comprise 26 percent of all housing units in Edina. 4. If all 400 housing units constructed during the plan period were affordable, the aggregate percentage of affordable housing in Edina would increase one and one -half percentage points. 5. The estimated market value of the average ownership housing unit in Edina is $153,000.00. 6. Since 1990, the average ownership housing unit increased in value by 2.4 percent annually. There is no evidence that this rate of increase will slow during the plan period. 7. Since 1990, the average rent for a rental unit in Edina increased 2.2 percent annually. There is no evidence that this rate of increase will slow during the plan period. 8. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the United States Department of Commerce, the forecasted growth in per capita personal income is 1.3 percent annually during the next 10 years. 9. Based upon the forecasted increase in incomes, market values, and rental rates, the aggregate percentage of affordable housing units will likely decrease during the plan period even if all newly constructed housing units are affordable. 10. The average estimated market value of ownership housing units in Edina constructed since 1990 is $258,000.00. U, F J, 4 CONCLUSIONS Based upon these findings, the City of Edina concludes that: 1) Despite its best efforts, the current percentage of Edina's housing stock which is affordable (as defined by the Metropolitan Council) will decrease rather than increase during the planning period. 2) Edina is essentially fully- developed within only 400 units or less than 2% of its existing housing stock remaining to be built during the planning period. Edina's ability to progress significantly toward its benchmark indicator with respect to affordability is impossible. 3) The current composition of Edina's housing stock with respect to life cycle and density indices are within benchmark indicators and are not expected to change significantly during the planning period. IF IDRA�"�- GOALS Notwithstanding these findings and conclusions, the City of Edina: 1) Will use its best efforts to maintain its current affordability index despite the continual loss of affordable units during the planning period due to market forces. 2) Adopts the life cycle and density benchmark indices as its goals. 3) Strives for a balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. 4) Supports the accommodation of all social and ethnic groups in their housing choices. 5) Will provide a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. 6) Believes in a community of well- maintained housing and neighborhoods including ownership and rental housing. 7) Respects the natural environment while accommodating a variety of housing types and costs. 8) Will improve the access to and linkage between housing and employment. CITYINDEX ..BENCHMARK GOAL AFFORDABILITY OWNERSHIP 31% 64 -77% 31% RENTAL 14% 32-45% 14% LIFE -CYCLE TYPE (Non - single family detached) 43% 38-41% 43% OWNER/RENTERMIX 71/29% (64- 70)/(30 -36)% 71 %/29% DENSITY SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED 2.3 /acre 2.3 -2.9 /acre 2.3 /acre MULTIFAMILY 16 /acre 11 -15 /acre 16 /acre DRAFT To achieve the above goals, the City of Edina elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program, and will prepare and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 1996, indicating the actions it will take to carry out the above goals. CERTIFICATION: Mayor g1h/hsgo1s110495 Date AGENDA ITEM N0. IV. E. CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 1995 TO: Edina City Council Members FROM: Fred Richards, Mayor of Edina SUBJECT: Referendum Team and first meeting. In follow up to our discussions at the September 18, 1995, City Council meeting, I am pleased to serve as Chairman of the Referendum Team and would like to recommend the following Referendum Team volunteers be appointed by the City Council to work on the special election referendum campaign: CITY OF EDINA REFERENDUM TEAM 1) Fred Richards, Mayor City of Edina 7225 Fleetwood Dr. Edina, MN 55439 hm. 941 -7626 wk. 925 -7573 2) Bill Jenkins, Chairman Edina Park Board 6228 Knoll Dr. Edina, MN 55436 hm. 939 -0520 wk. 920 -7110 3) Jerry Witowski, President Edina Hockey Association 7224 Tara Road Edina, MN 55439 hm. 941 -3374 wk. 681 -5815 4) Gail Merrill, Vice President Edina Hockey Association (Involved in development of girls hockey) 4900 Hibiscus Ave. Edina, MN 55435 hm. 920 -4900 5) Donald Poage, Vice President Braemar City Of Lakes Figure Skating Club 6112 Sherman Circle Edina, MN 55436 -1954 hm. 925 -4417 wk. 925 -5515 6) Ken Rosland, City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 wk. 927 -8861 -2- 7) Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 wk. 927 -8861 8) John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 wk. 927 -8861 9) Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director Edina Park and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 wk. 927 -8861 10) Larry Thayer, Manager Braemar Arena 7501 Highway 169 Edina, MN 55439 wk. 941 -1322 11) Ralph Campbell, Communications Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 wk. 927 -8861 12) Mike Julius 4445 Ellsworth Dr. Edina, MN 55435 hm. 927 -7256 wk. 342 -2200 13) Annette Christenson 4247 Grimes Ave. Edina, MN 55424 hm. 927 -5223 14) Pam & Rick Cabalka 6413 Biscayne Blvd Edina, MN 55436 hm. 933 -0078 15) Todd & Barbara Nieland 5500 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 hm. 925 -0313 There is enough business at hand that I would further recommend that the Referendum Team's first meeting be scheduled for Monday, November 13, 1995, at 5:00 p.m. r I TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRED RICHARDS DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1995 SUBJECT: HUMAN RELATIONS APPOINTMENTS Recommendation: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IV.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action X❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Council appoint Hugh Wooldridge and Ardis Wexler to the vacant terms on the Human Relations Commission. Info /Background: I am recommending Council appoint Hugh Wooldrige and Ardis Wexler to the vacancies on the Human Relations Commission. Both candidates are excellent. I have attached their resumes for 'your review. CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS NAME / y L V j 4--j ADDRESS JX _ C V�(. ZIP CODE 5 �'�� HOME PHONE (^ ? " V 3,S- 6 WORK PHONE 'T ; — &7,C)3 (er, ) EDINA RESIDENT (number of years) 2 • + EMPLOYMENT (Firm/occupation/profession) wl C:)< CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTMTIES PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or Appointive) EDUCATION S - �v S t ,A-4 w.' Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board/commission and why you are interested in serving: (For additional space, use reverse side of application) APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: PLANNING COMMISSION H HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD PARK BOARD H HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS ART CENTER COMMITTEE completed form to City Clerk's office) S' Y-Cr- I CITY OF EDINA 4501 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOIN- .tNfflNT TQ ADVISORY BOARDSICOMMISSIONS NAME_ P'RD1S WF)(LIFR ADDRESS �q I k Pj'R K S Pun A Aj 9 ZIP CODE 55 gs- HOME PHONE q aE _ ao 5 '? WORK PHONE 9.Q 4— 4'T f T EDINA RESIDENT (number of years) EMPLOYMENT (Firm/occupation,/profession) oie r CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES &1(4 mom tYlLrmm & Glc'yrO 14^1, k� A� ThIPEA.49 c rA r'h0h' : ARC, ' - i ulthin EDUCATION BA ^ U 4 rrV wM - Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board/comntission and why you are interested in serving: *V tw "e. dvti4h,- AWAAreo Cntm e4X - AO G. 'jo a.,c�, -V �;,,, ,Q,vra.� �cOtinc• oP fa �a.v�Kam.�J 69 ft�- ..� (FoF additional space, use reverse side of application) APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: PIANNING COMMISSION HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD PARK BOARD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS ART CENTER COMMMEL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMISSION DATE /0 , SIGNATURE (Return completed form to City Clerk's office) COUNCIL CHE( -, ..EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 1A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT - - -- VENDOR- - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE ----------------- PROGRAM ------ OBJECT- --------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------- 159704 10/16/95 $244.50 ------ AAA TAB RENEWAL FOR 21.10 100995 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $244.50* 159706 10/16/95 $192.18 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $137.18 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $167.11 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $192.18 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $98.62 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $244.94 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $62.10 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 - $91.67 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $482.33 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $145.61 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $196.52 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $657.19 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $50.02 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $48.34 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $55.50 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 GUN RANGE RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $67.87 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SER RUBBISH REMOVAL 100195 PATHS & HARD S RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $2,706.02* 159707 10/16/95 $7,828.82* ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY FIBERGLASS UTILITY BO 031640 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 9883 $ 159708 10/16/95 $335.48 ACME WINDOW CLEAN WINDOW CLEANING FOR R 13418 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 4045 < *> $335.48* 159709 10/16/95 $112.00 ACSM 1996 DUES ACSM DON JO 100295 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $112.00* 159710 10/16/95 $85.20 ADAMS PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL 092795 GRILL PROF SERVICES 4150 < *> $85.20* 159711 10/16/95 $46.76 ADVANCED STATE SECURITY VIDEO COPIES 15308 LIQUOR YORK GE PROF SERVICES < *> $46.76* 159712 10/16/95 $68.48 AL'S LANDSCAPING & NURSE PALLET SOD 091295 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 9694 10/16/95 $68.48 AL'S LANDSCAPING & NURSE PALLET SOD 101595 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9694 < *� $136.96* 159713 10/16/95 $69.23 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCE IN EQUIPMENT RENTAL 23554917 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *� $69.23* 159714 10/16/95 $96.38 ALL FIRE TEST INC EXTINGUISHER MAINT 007736 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 3871 < *> $96.38* 159715 10/16/95 $490.55 ALPHAGRAPHICS COUPON BOOKS 31147 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 4026 < *> $490.55* 159716 10/16/95 $94.79 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 24870 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3642 < *> $94.79* 159717 10/16/95 $302.40 AMERICAN DATA PRODUCTS HOT PACKS 552742 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3863 < *> $302.40* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 2A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 159718 10/16/95 $109.40 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 0930 GRILL LAUNDRY 8138 10/16/95 $42.70 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $225.61 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $178.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $75.61 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $32.61 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $12.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 093095 LABORATORY LAUNDRY < *> $676.58* 159719 10/16/95 $29.00 ANDERSON, SYLIVA CLASS REFUND 092695 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $29.00* 159720 10/16/95 $203.64 ANDERSON, TODD 2 NITES HOTEL PGA SHO 092995 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $203.64* 159721 10/16/95 $58.65 ANDY'S PORTABLES SANITATION 5070 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 4149 < *> $58.65* 159722 10/16/95 $10.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $30.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 10/16/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR REPAIRS 10/16/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 10/16/95 $195.60 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL 10/16/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 FINANCE EQUIP RENTAL 10/16/95 $5.00 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER RENTAL 6938711 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $255.60* 159723 10/16/95 $174.46 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 091195/B INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $161.59 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE 0913 /PW GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $69.48 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE 0919 /DP DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $34.18 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE 0928 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $53.68 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULA PHONE 0928 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $157.38 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 092895/V BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 4056 10/16/95 $68.31 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CAR PHONE 092995/K COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE < *> $719.08* 159724 10/16/95 $5.00 AT &T TELEPHONE 091895 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 0918 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 0918 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 0918 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $16.54 AT &T TELEPHONE 0918 /CL ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 092495 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 092495 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $5.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 0927 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $9.04 AT &T TELEPHONE 093095 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $62.38* 159725 10/16/95 $30.90 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 31184 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8139 10/16/95 $27.93 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 31471 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8139 10/16/95 $18.09 AUGIE'S MOBILE CHEF CATE COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 32110 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8139 < *> $76.92* 159726 10/16/95 10/16/95 $127.75 $20.64 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY TOOLS BULB FOR LAMP 093095/P 093095/P EQUIPMENT OPER FIRE DEPT. GEN TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $523.50 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 093095/P EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS T COUNCIL CHEF EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 3A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $671.89* 159727 10/16/95 $14.45 AUTO SOUND /ENTRONIX REPAIR 21457 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1976 < *> $14.45* 159728 10/16/95 $23.50 AUTO TRAAC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 12581 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3817 < *> $23.50* 159729 10/16/95 $90.00 AWWA ANNUAL AWWA MEMBERSHI 100695 DISTRIBUTION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $90.00* 159730 10/16/95 $21.56 AXT, LYLE VENDING PRODUCT /GUN R 100495 GUN RANGE CST OF GD FOOD 10/16/95 $3.35 AXT, LYLE PART FOR GUN RANGE 100495 GUN RANGE CST OF GD FOOD 10/16/95 $9.18 AXT, LYLE REIMBURSEMENT FOR VEN 101095 GUN RANGE CST OF GD FOOD < +> $34.09* 159731 10/16/95 $209.44 B & S INDUSTRIES INC BUNKER HANGERS 10087598 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 3402 < *> $209.44* 159732 10/16/95 $53.16 BACHMANS NURSERY WHOLESA SUPPLIES 1371290 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 4144 < *> $53.16* 159733 10/16/95 $11.76 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 101095 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $19.70 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH MEETING 101095 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS 10/16/95 $17.24 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 101095 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $31.59 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES 101095 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $80.29* 159734 10/16/95 $1,402.00 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY PROF ENG SERVICE 23270221 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $1,402.00* 159735 10/16/95 $400.00 BCA /TRAINING & DEVELOPME CONTINUING EDUCATION T001119 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $400.00* 159736 10/16/95 $31.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 221675 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $25.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 81915 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $152.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 81914 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $54.40 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 221676 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $221.88 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 221927 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $67.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 221930 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $130.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 82149 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $116.45 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 82281 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $183.68 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 222011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $982.51* 159737 10/16/95 $22.00 BERNHJELM, WILLIAM MEETING EXPENSE /POLIO 100995 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS < *> $22.00* 159738 10/16/95 $123.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MISC BUSINESS SUPPLIE 2880030 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3643 10/16/95 $60.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. LABELING MACHINE I102740 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3584 10/16/95 - $11.08 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES CM289071 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 - $46.54 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES CM288947 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 -$7.83 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES CM286768 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $73.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2918860 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3862 10/16/95 $35.87 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2929820 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4130 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 4A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 159738 10/16/95 $48.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2929820 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 4130 10/16/95 $15.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2929820 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 4130 10/16/95 $73.78 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 2929920 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 4002 10/16/95 $4.35 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BINDER /GREEN 2956020 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 4212 10/16/95 $24.54 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BLACK & BLUE BIC PENS 2956020 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4212 10/16/95 $6.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALENDAR OFFICE 2944150 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $401.26* 159739 10/16/95 $279.56 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF REPAIR PARTS 22611 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3653 10/16/95 $27.64 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF REPAIR PARTS 23177 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3660 < *> $307.20* 159740 10/16/95 $5,417.83 BFI OF MN INC REFUSE 093095 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES 10/16/95 $40.00 BFI OF MN INC TRASH REMOVAL 95090011 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $5,457.83* 159741 10/16/95 $31,757.42 BFI RECYCLING SYS MONTHLY RECYCLING CON 95090070 RECYCLING Recycling Char < *> $31,757.42* 159742 10/16/95 $130.52 BIFFS INC SANITATION B1059261 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 4196 < *> $130.52* 159743 10/16/95 $8,152.67 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 69864 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 10/16/95 $12,219.04 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 69863 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 10/16/95 10/16/95 $12,648.38 $6,735.31 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS MIX LABOR & EQUIPMENT 69987 69985 STREET RENOVAT STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP CONTR REPAIRS 1114 < *> $39,755.40* 159744 10/16/95 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159745 10/16/95 $13.00 BOB STEIN BEER SYSTEMS M BEER LINES 50202 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 4194 < *> $13.00* 159746 10/16/95 $5,075.00 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CONTRACTED REPAIRS 407943 PUMP & LIFT ST CONTR REPAIRS 2838 < *> $5,075.00* 159747 10/16/95 $35.39 BOYER TRUCKS CATCH /LATCH 433109 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3840 < *> $35.39* 159748 10/16/95 $267.75 BRAUN INTERTEC PROF ENG SERVICE 066046 ST IMPROVEMENT CIP 10/16/95 $382.50 BRAUN INTERTEC PROF ENG SERVICE 066039 STREET IMPROVE CIP 10/16/95 $102.00 BRAUN INTERTEC PROF ENG SERVICES 066043 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $752.25* 159749 10/16/95 $732.72 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS LOOP ANALYZER 18638A TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR PARTS 1885 < *> $732.72* 159750 10/16/95 $3,350.00 BUCKHORN CANADA LTD RECYCLING CONTAINERS 18237 RECYCLING EQUIP REPLACEM 3488 < *> $3,350.00* 159751 10/16/95 $75.00 BUNN, DEAN SERVICES CL /EB 091595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 159752 10/16/95 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 1 COUNCIL CHEI._ - EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 5A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $100.00* 159753 10/16/95 $145.00 CADY COMMUNICATIONS REPROGRAM LINES 10134435 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $145.00* 159754 10/16/95 $177.90 CALLAHAN, FRAN SEPTEMBER MILEAGE 100295 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $177.90* 159755 10/16/95 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE LOGIS 9/27 -10 100995 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $50.00* 159756 10/16/95 $75.00 CARROLL, MARY ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 101095 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 159757 10/16/95 $46.82 CATCO SEAL /GLAD HAND 387279 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3836 10/16/95 $127.61 CATCO VALVE /KNOB 387437 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3848 10/16/95 $173.97 CATCO VALVE /PART 387835 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3940 10/16/95 32.49 CATCO FITTING 387923 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3948 10/16/95 V4.38 CATCO FITTINGS 387999 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3949 10/16/95 $176.80 CATCO CYLINDER 388094 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 2859 < *> $632.07* 159758 10/16/95 $86.07 CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS RENTAL FEE 2212747 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $86.07* 159759 10/16/95 $53.00 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL SYMPATHY 569508 CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLI 4164 < *> $53.00* 159760 10/16/95 $116.91 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 22056 ART SUPPLY GIP CST OF GD FOOD 3883 10/16/95 $220.15 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES 22058 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 3883 < *> $337.06* 159761 10/16/95 $570.50 CERES WOOD PRODUCTS TREE WASTE 093095 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $570.50* 159762 10/16/95 $141.19 CHOICE PLUS OVERPAYMENT OF #95004 100495 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $141.19* 159763 10/16/95 $69.98 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER COST OF GOODS - PRO S 28204 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $69.98* 159764 10/16/95 $120.95 CITY OF EDINA RESERVE NSF CHECK 100195 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. < *> $120.95* 159765 10/16/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 75355 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 10/16/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 75353 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 10/16/95 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 75354 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $47.13* 159766 10/16/95 $209.40 CMC RESCUE INC REPLACEMENT ROPE RESC 085589 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 3861 10/16/95 $35.00 CMC RESCUE TNC RESCUE STRETCHER RFPL ORS789 FIRE, DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACFM 3861 < *> $244.40* 159767 10/16/95 $117.83 CMI REFRIGERATION REPAIR PORTABLE BAR RS60988 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 3627 < *> $117.83* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 6A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 159768 10/16/95 $316.87 COBRA GOLF INC - COST OF GOODS PRO S 284810 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9029 < *> $316.87* 159769 10/16/95 $72.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05159693 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $230.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05231427 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $304.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 05230783 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $606.75* 159770 10/16/95 $30.00 COLICH, DAN REFUND SKATING EDINBO 092695 EDINB /CL FROG LESSON PRGM IN < *> $30.00* 159771 10/16/95 $1,410.37 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPOR MDOT TESTING SERVICES T7900000 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $1,410.37* 159772 10/16/95 $21.09 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE SERIAL ADAPT 707514 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4176 < *> $21.09* 159773 10/16/95 $84.25 CONVEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES 66578200 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 3664 < *> $84.25* 159774 10/16/95 $166.62 CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR WALKIE TALKIE 34573 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 4148 < *> $166.62* 159775 10/16/95 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J MEDICAL SERVICE OCT 1995 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $1,386.67* 159776 10/16/95 $60.00 CRISIS RESPONSE ASSOC BETH JORDON SCHOOL /PO 100695 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $60.00* 159777 10/16/95 $3,823.00 CRONSTROMS HEATING & AIR NEW FURNACE 092795 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $3,823.00* 159778 10/16/95 $29.90 CULLIGAN SOFT WATER SERVICE 093095 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES < *> $29.90* 159779 10/16/95 $73.25 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIF LAB SUPPLIES 6547419 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 3684 10/16/95 $31.24 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIF LAB SUPPLIES 6547418 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 3684 < *> $104.49* 159780 10/16/95 $1,574.75 CURTIS 1000 ENVELOPES 32457010 GENERALIBILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 3489 10/16/95 $1,204.18 CURTIS 1000 ENVELOPES 32444010 GENERALIBILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 3489 < *> $2,778.93* 159781 10/16/95 $49.95 CUSTOM TRUCK ACCESSORIES BED MAT 89402 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3668 < *> $49.95* 159782 10/16/95 $55.90 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORM JENSON 0016416 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 3876 < *> $55.90* 159783 10/16/95 $32.00 D.C. HEY CO. COPY MACHINE SERVICE 555307 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $32.00* 159784 10/16/95 $6,790.13 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 94 -3 FNL STORM SEWER CIP < *> $6,790.13* u COUNCIL CHEC 3GISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 7A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159785 10/16/95 $153.20 DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY DAIRY 101695 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8140 <*> $153.20* 159786 10/16/95 $447.28 DAYSTARTER BATTERIES 12020 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3955 <*> $447.28* 159787 10/16/95 $180.00 DEM -CON LANDFILL INC DEMO DISPOSAL 001454 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOVA 10/16/95 $180.00 DEM -CON LANDFILL INC DEMO DISPOSAL 1454 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI *> $360.00* 159788 10/16/95 $96.00 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUR PESTICIDE DISPOSAL 57953 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 3908 <*> $96.00* 159789 10/16/95 $38.76 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 403917 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8405 < *> $38.76* 159790 10/16/95 $301.93 DIAMOND VOGEL STRAINERS /PAINT 24742 RETAINING WALL GENERAL SUPPLI 1646 <*> $301.93* 159791 10/16/95 $168.25 DONAGHUE DOORS DOOR REPAIR 10215 50TH ST OCCUPA EQUIP MAINT <*> $168.25* 159792 10/16/95 $1,122.00 DORADUS CORP SERVICE CONTRACT 091095 CIVIL DEFENSE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,122.00* 159793 10/16/95 $321.63 DORHOLT PRINTING 28579 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 3154 <*> $321.63* 159794 10/16/95 $119.30 E-Z -GO TEXTRON CART PARTS 0030586 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3609 10/16/95 $225.85 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART PARTS 0030585 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3723 < *> $345.15* 159795 10/16/95 $155.00 EAGLE ELEVATOR TESTING 13839 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS <*> $155.00* 159796 10/16/95 $439.42 EARL F. ANDERSON ADOPT A PARK SIGN 00144127 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 3351 < *> $439.42* 159797 10/16/95 $432.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 577600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,360.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 577599 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $2,077.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 577601 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $23.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 580521 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $1,896.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 580521 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $841.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 580522 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,631.25* 159798 10/16/95 $94.79 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST ELIMINATION 3554586 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 10/16/95 $111.83 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST CONTROL 3554581 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $206.62* 159799 10/16/95 $275.00 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATIO CONTINUING EDUCATION 092995 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $275.00* 159800 10/16/95 $40.00 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL 4 FLATS FLOWER /NORMAN 092895 NORMAN. MAINT. PLANT & TREES <*> $40.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 8A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159801 10/16/95 $161,537.03 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -1 PYM STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $161,537.03* 159802 10/16/95 $262.66 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN GRAVEL 60572 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3420 < *> $262.66* 159803 10/16/95 $112.50 EICHSTADT, KENDRA SERVICE CL /EB 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $112.50* 159804 10/16/95 $39.60 ENGER, DON EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 100995 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $39.60* 159805 10/16/95 $35.00 EVANS, FRANK SERVICES CL /EB 080495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 159806 10/16/95 $45.00 FAEGRE & BENSON CLASS FEE 101095 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $45.00* 159807 10/16/95 $283.60 FAIRVIEW PHARMACY AUG 95 2748 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9275 < *> $283.60* 159808 10/16/95 $9.37 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO FILM C30311 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $9.37* 159809 10/16/95 $170.40 FASTSIGN SIGNS 4300 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4159 < *> $170.40* 159810 10/16/95 $40.00 FINE, AGNES SERVICES CL /EB 092595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $40.00* 159811 10/16/95 $295.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT SAFTEY 0 SAFETY OFFICER TRG 100295 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3401 < *> $295.00* 159812 10/16/95 $654.51 FLANAGAN SALES DBL WIDE SLIDE /48" DE 5085 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 2790 < *> $654.51* 159813 10/16/95 $118.22 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 262238 ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE 10/16/95 $67.10 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 1/4 ALARM SERVICE 264267 VERNON OCCUPAN BOND PRINCIPLE 10/16/95 $67.10 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 1/4 ALARM SERVICE 264266 YORK OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE 10/16/95 $111.00 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY SECURITY SERVICE 264026 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES < *> $363.42* 159814 10/16/95 $30.94 FOWLER ELECTRIC GEN MOTOR PARTS 133050 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3865 10/16/95 $31.51 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 135530 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3989 < *> $62.45* 159815 10/16/95 $157.41 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 092995 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $324.66 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 092995 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 10/16/95 $183.71 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 092995 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $405.24 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 092995 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $867.91 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 092995 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 10/16/95 $354.25 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 092995 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $2,293.18* 159816 10/16/95 $100.00 G & T TRUCKING COMPANY TRAILER CHARGE 102324 STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS COUNCIL CHEL_ SGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 9A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - -- - OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <*> $100.00* 159817 10/16/95 $53.00 GANZER DIST INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 193410 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $53.00* 159818 10/16/95 $125.00 GENE'S WATER & SEWER INC REPAIR STOP BOX 747 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 4074 < *> $125.00* 159819 10/16/95 $106.50 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE CHAIR 51072 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 4004 < *> $106.50* 159820 10/16/95 $116.62 GEREBI, LIZ SERVICES CL /EB 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $116.62* 159821 10/16/95 $88,263.07 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -1HRA UTILITIES -GRAN CIP < *> $88,263.07* 159822 10/16/95 $100.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERV REGISTRATION /ENGINEER 100595 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS 10/16/95 $50.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERV REGISTRATION /ENGINEER 100695 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $150.00* 159823 10/16/95 $212.47 GRAINGER TOOLS 49528526 DISTRIBUTION TOOLS 3645 10/16/95 $438.60 GRAINGER ROOF VENT 49867951 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 3685 10/16/95 $138.50 GRAINGER NORMANDALE SUPPLIES 49868042 NORMAN. MAINT. GENERAL SUPPLI 3728 10/16/95 $208.21 GRAINGER GAS LEAK DETECTOR 49529713 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 3937 < *> $997.78* 159824 10/16/95 $244.74 GRANDMA PFEIFFERS COST OF COMMODITIES A 101095 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD < *> $244.74* 159825 10/16/95 $392.26 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. MISC. ELEC. 10434489 TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL SUPPLI 3566 < *> $392.26* 159826 10/16/95 $833.61 GREER, PAT SERVICES CL /EB 082195 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $833.61* 159827 10/16/95 $29.61 GROVE NURSERY CENTER TREES FOR LEWIS PARK 80264 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 3832 < *> $29.61* 159828 10/16/95 $262.03 HACH CO. RUST REMOVER 215558 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3830 < *> $262.03* 159829 10/16/95 $31,705.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 082395 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 10/16/95 $24,595.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 082395 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 10/16/95 $17,910.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 092595 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 10/16/95 $31,707.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 092595 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $105,917.00* 159830 10/16/95 $18,395.38 HEALTH PARTNERS /GROUP HE HOSPITALIZATION 3999331 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $18,395.38* 159831 10/16/95 $352.00 HEALTH PARTNERS OVERPAYMENT N 951.135 100595 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $352.00* 159832 10/16/95 $114.22 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES -ART CE 101095 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 10A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $114.22* 159833 10/16/95 $223.50 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 100295 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8142 < *> $223.50* 159834 10/16/95 $1,236.71 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL AMBULANCE SUPPLIES RE 4426 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9074 < *> $1,236.71* 159835 10/16/95 $896.90 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE TUITION FIRE TRG 302164 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $896.90* 159836 10/16/95 $1,815.40 HERMAN MILLER INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT B- 002330 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 1504 10/16/95 $1,453.73 HERMAN MILLER INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT B- 002330 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 1504 < *> $3,269.13* 159837 10/16/95 $372.75 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG LINE MARKING POWDER 034342 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1066 < *> $372.75* 159838 10/16/95 $100.00 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159839 10/16/95 $137.91 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 47800 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $137.91* 159840 10/16/95 $141.68 HONEYWELL INC TRANSFORMER 286PT608 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 3907 < *> $141.68* 159841 10/16/95 $29.71 HOOTENS LAUNDRY 092695 POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY < *> $29.71* 159842 10/16/95 $146.70 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 100295 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE < *> $146.70* 159843 10/16/95 $52.07 HUEBSCH TOWELS /RUGS 870593 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 10/16/95 $12.42 HUEBSCH TOWELS 874443 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $64.49* 159844 10/16/95 $59.95 HUMAN RESOURCE EXECUTIVE SUBSCRIPTION 140187 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $59.95* 159845 10/16/95 $623.64 HYDRAULIC SERVICE REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT 36453 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3726 < *> $623.64* 159846 10/16/95 $125.00 IAAO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 797443 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $125.00* 159847 10/16/95 $119.96 IBM PERSONAL COMPUTER CO EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 899943SA POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 2666 < *> $119.96* 159848 10/16/95 $204.00 IBM DATA PROCESSING /SVC C 100995 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN < *> $204.00* 159849 10/16/95 $194.50 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTEN SIDE BROOM 9338 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 4031 < *> $194.50* COUNCIL CHEC- REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 11A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT -- VENDOR--------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION ---------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM -- - - - --- - - -- OBJECT- - - - - ---- -- - - -- 159850 ------------------------ 10/16/95 ----- $3,252.00 - - - - INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS ANNUAL SVC 100595 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *.> $3,252.00* 159851 10/16/95 $217,856.00 J & W SANDBLASTING STORAGE TANKS 95 -5 PYM UTILITY PROG STORAGE TANKS < *> $217,856.00* 159852 10/16/95 $13.16 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISING 12036 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $158.75 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISING 12037 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $400.00 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISING 12038 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $240.00 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISING 12039 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $326.25 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER ADVERTISING 12035 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $13,906.50 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER FALL ABOUT TOWN 12077 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 10/16/95 $234.97 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER GV DAYS /MSP AD 12097 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 10/16/95 $234.97 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER GV DAYS /MSP AD 12097 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER *� $15,514.60* 159853 10/16/95 $132.49 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C ADAPTOR /TAPE 92654110 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 3941 < *> $132.49* 159854 10/16/95 $96.85 JAMES & COMPANY INC MEMORIAL PLAQUE 78125 WORK. CAP. PRO ACCTS REC MISC 2649 <*> $96.85* 159855 10/16/95 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F POLICE SERVICE 101695 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159856 10/16/95 $15.50 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER BULB FOR AMBULANCE I2732 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3392 <*> $15.50* 159858 10/16/95 $54.86 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $11.00 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 GUN RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $19.14 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $232.44 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $216.09 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $240.26 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $6.29 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $92.92 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $7.67 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $51.36 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $62.39 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $53.00 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $270.40 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $20.62 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $15.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $23.74 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 NORMAN. MAINT. GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $8.29 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $13.61 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 GUN RANGE ADMI GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $5.77 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $16.42 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $3.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $5.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 093095 PARK MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $2.68 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL. SUPPLIES 093095 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI *� $1,434.22* 159859 10/16/95 $111.98 JERRYS PRINTING REMINDER POST CARDS AA2854 RECYCLING PRINTING 3901 <*> $111.98* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 12A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 159860 10/16/95 $455.07 JIM HATCH SALES PLOW MARKERS /BROOM /SH 5921 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 3580 < *> $455.07* 159861 10/16/95 $105.60 JOHNSON, LINNEA PART TIME MAINT 101095 ART CENTER BLD SALARIES TEMP < *> $105.60* 159862 10/16/95 $118.62 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES -ART CE 101095 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 10/16/95 $35.10 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES MAIN 101095 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $14.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI PRINTING 101095 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING < *> $168.12* 159863 10/16/95 $47.40 JOHNSON, STEVE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 092795 SUPERV. & OVRH CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $47.40* 159864 10/16/95 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159865 10/16/95 $703.97 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD HEATER 107471 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 3394 10/16/95 $500.55 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD HEATER 107470 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 3649 < *> $1,204.52* 159866 10/16/95 $16.60 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC REPAIR VAC 236019 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 4193 10/16/95 $20.24 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC VAC REPAIR 236074 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 4193 10/16/95 $32.81 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC REPAIR PARTS 090695 50TH ST OCCUPA REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $18.64 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC VAC REPAIR 236222 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 4193 < *> $88.29* 159867 10/16/95 $281.25 JONES, JENNIFER SERVICES CL /EB 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $281.25* 159868 10/16/95 $653.29 JP FOODSERVICES INC SUPPLIES 100295 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 8148 10/16/95 $496.85 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEAN 100295 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 8148 10/16/95 $3,265.66 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 100295 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8148 10/16/95 $642.07 JP FOODSERVICES INC SUPPLIES 100295 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 8148 10/16/95 $63.15 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 100295 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GD FOOD 8148 < *> $5,121.02* 159869 10/16/95 $39.94 JPM STORE FIXTURE & DISP SUPPLIES 272109 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 3915 < *> $39.94* 159870 10/16/95 $357.45 JR JOHNSON SUPPLY FLOWERS 98329 ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 4158 < *> $357.45* 159871 10/16/95 $100.00 JULIK, EDIE SERVICES CL /EB 091595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 159872 10/16/95 $59.11 KANE SERVICE, THE 9/16 SIMS 6631824 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $59.11* 159873 10/16/95 $56.52 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 2486874 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9335 < *> $56.52* 159874 10/16/95 $76.48 KATTREH, ANN POSTAGE 100995 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE 10/16/95 $27.48 KATTREH, ANN GENERAL SUPPLIES 100995 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $8.32 KATTREH, ANN CLEANING SUPPLIES 100995 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL COUNCIL CHEu_ tEGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 13A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ------ -------- - - - - -- OBJECT- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 159874 10/16/95 $24.95 KATTREH, ANN OFFICE SUPPLIES 100995 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 10/16/95 $152.15 KATTREH, ANN GENERAL SUPPLIES 100995 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *� $289.38* 159875 10/16/95 $71.34 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 173136 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3679 10/16/95 $41.64 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 173734 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3400 10/16/95 $47.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 173609 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3399 10/16/95 $27.68 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER & HARDWARE 173817 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3815 10/16/95 $105.70 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 174085 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 3906 10/16/95 $4.58 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 173991 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 3823 10/16/95 $95.95 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 174426 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 3981 < *� $393.89* 159876 10/16/95 $167.78 KOBBERVIG, E. M. OVERPAYMENT # 951465 100595 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $167.78* 159877 10/16/95 $56.00 KOLKMAN, TRISH CLASS REFUND 092695 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F <*> $56.00* 159878 10/16/95 $87.00 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 141465 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $872.20 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 141464 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $202.20 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 141489 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,192.75 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 141961 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,308.75 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 141984 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $15.95 KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 141984 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *� $3,678.85* 159879 10/16/95 $30.00 KVASNICK, BARB SERVICES CL /EB 110995 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 159880 10/16/95 $120.06 LABEL FACTORY, THE LABELS 100695 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3598 < *> $120.06* 159881 10/16/95 $962.00 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIAT FEE FOR SERVICE 090195 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $962.00* 159882 10/16/95 $100.00 LACASSE, ANDREW J. SERVICES CL /EB 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 159883 10/16/95 $947.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC AQUATIC TREATMENT 3561/ PONDS & LAKES PROF SERVICES 3696 < *> $947.00* 159884 10/16/95 $292.88 LANO EQUIPMENT BUCKET STEEL 65876 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3960 < *> $292.88* 159885 10/16/95 $434.83 LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY COM LATEX MARKING PAINT 599661 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PAINT 3670 < *> $434.83* 159886 10/16/95 $483.03 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1323277 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3554 10/16/95 $286.23 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. ACCESSORIES 1323276 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 10/16/95 $481.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS TNC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1323278 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 3555 10/16/95 $317.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS IN(. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1328615 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3673 10/16/95 $394.61 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. ACCESSORIES 1328613 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3672 10/16/95 $437.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. REPAIR PARTS 1329560 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 3692 10/16/95 $332.81 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. TOOLS 1330297 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 3816 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 14A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM -- - - - - -- OBJECT --------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159886 10/16/95 $135.53 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1331146 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 3902 < *> $2,868.70* 159887 10/16/95 $26.12 LEEF BROS. INC. TOWELS 093095/G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $26.12* 159888 10/16/95 $78.30 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 46516 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $157.18 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 46502 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $235.48* 159889 10/16/95 $313.38 LEITNER COMPANY SAND 149931 MAINT OF COURS SAND,GRVL & RO 8746 10/16/95 $231.91 LEITNER COMPANY SANDTRAPS 092995 MAINT OF COURS SAND,GRVL & RO 10/16/95 $1,042.38 LEITNER COMPANY NMDL BLK DIRT /TOPDRES 092995 NORMAN. MAINT. SOD & DIRT < *> $1,587.67* 159890 10/16/95 $222.32 LESSMAN, GREG COST OF GOODS - PRO S 8266 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9031 < *> $222.32* 159891 10/16/95 $164.14 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION 100195 CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 8144 10/16/95 $48.69 LIEN INFECTION CONTROL S SANITATION 100195 GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA 8144 < *> $212.83* 159892 10/16/95 $5,279.12 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $2,132.40 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $1,227.15 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $16.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 LIQUOR 50TH ST DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $16.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 LIQUOR YORK GE DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $16.90 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0995 VERNON LIQUOR DATA PROCESSIN < *> $8,689.37* 159893 10/16/95 $6.93 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI REPAIR PARTS 207368 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3719 < *> $6.93* 159894 10/16/95 $459.54 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40392 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $221.26 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40382 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $170.20 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40415 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $442.52 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40565 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $272.32 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40551 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $187.22 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40546 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $204.24 M AMUNDSON COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40659 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $1,957.30* 159895 10/16/95 $225.65 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. STROBE LIGHT /BOLT 2957237 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4063 10/16/95 - $498.08 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. CREDIT 839 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $233.38 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. SHOE /SPRING 2957963 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3858 10/16/95 - $93.93 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. CREDIT 868 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $460.54 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DRIVE WHEEL 2957316 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4060 10/16/95 $36.06 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. CLAMP 2957263 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4059 < *> $363.62* 159896 10/16/95 $77.50 MAHA ADVERTISING 091995 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 4142 < *> $77.50* 159897 10/16/95 $279.34 MANSFELDT, PHYLLIS J OVERPAYMENT /PD REFD T 100495 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $279.34* COUNCIL C!HEk EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 15A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ----- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT---------- - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 159899 10/16/95 -$1.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434097. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $179.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434433 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $634.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434417 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,321.91 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434441 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $23.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 434442 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $834.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434418 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $26.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 434419 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $43.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 436598 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $273.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 436597 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $52.00 MARK VII SALES BEER / NORMANDALE GOLF 092995 NORMANDALE GC CST OF GDS BEE 8145 10/16/95 $1,759.40 MARK VII SALES BEER /BRAEMAR GOLF COU 092995 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 8145 10/16/95 $2,283.30 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 436943 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $511.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 436920 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $12.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 436921 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,778.85 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 436918 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $63.45 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 436919 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $2,967.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 580519 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $79.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 580520 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $249.52 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 438987 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,482.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439360 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $34.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 439359 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $14,612.18* 159900 10/16/95 $369.64 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY PRESSURE TANK /BREDESE 15297 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3818 < *> $369.64* 159901 10/16/95 $100.00 MCCORMICK, CAROL SERVICES CL /EB 091595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 159902 10/16/95 $55.00 MCFGA STATE CONFERENCE /GREE 100695 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $55.00* 159903 10/16/95 $403.56 MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE COFFEE /TEA /COGS 7589198 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8146 10/16/95 - $39.50 MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE TEA 7589199 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8146 < *> $364.06* 159904 10/16/95 $31.09 MECO SLEEVE 68904 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3821 < *> $31.09* 159905 10/16/95 $25.54 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 TOOLS 10749 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 3680 10/16/95 $222.61 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 LUMBER 10939 CLUB HOUSE LUMBER 3920 10/16/95 $57.91 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 STARTER BUILDING 11034 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 4140 10/16/95 $203.14 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 STARTER BUILDING 613348 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 4140 10/16/95 $36.03 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 STARTER BUILDING 613351 MAINT OF COURS LUMBER 4140 < *> $545.23* 159906 10/16/95 $67.99 MENARDS BULBS 5587 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4209 10/16/95 $149.08 MENARDS DRILL,DRILL BITS 7021 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 3995 < *> $217.07* 159907 10/16/95 $100.00 MERFELD, BURT POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159908 10/16/95 $169.33 MERIT SUPPLY WRINGER /MOP BUCKET 40132 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3689 10/16/95 $184.33 MERIT SUPPLY CONCRETE CONQUER 40179 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3833 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 16A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT DUMPING CHARGES VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT BLACKTOP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159908 10/16/95 $439.47 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40224 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 3979 10/16/95 $404.40 MERIT SUPPLY VARIOUS CLEANING SUPP 40225 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 3788 10/16/95 $439.04 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40249 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 4123 10/16/95 $406.08 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40247 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 4015 10/16/95 $314.72 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 40268 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 4139 10/16/95 $456.13 MERIT SUPPLY SCRUBBER PARTS 40260 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 4137 < *> $2,813.50* 159909 10/16/95 < *> 159910 10/16/95 159911 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 159912 10/16/95 159913 10/16/95 159914 10/16/95 159916 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 10/16/95 159917 10/16/95 < *> $25.00 $25.00* $55.38 $55.38* MESSERLI & KRAMER GARNISHMENT FEES 092395 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES METRO APPLIANCE SERVICE REPAIR PARTS IN551231 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS $394.20 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY $250.38 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY $314.81 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY $959.39* $35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES $35.00* $200.00 $200.00* $250.00 $250.00* $51.47 $81.89 $10.38 $85.01 $2,212.08 $103.77 $145.99 $1,924.16 $3,303.78 $626.58 $486.91 $1,683.26 $797.99 $29.88 $63.53 $18.73 $6,720.00 $5,334.59 $2,777.25 $7,355.00 $9,570.97 $268.82 $43,652.04* $499.04 $499.04* METZGER, JUDY MIDWEST AQUA CARE MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 8266 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 2630 FOOTBALL PROGRAM 9196 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPLI 3474 COST OF GOODS SOLD 9326 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 3904 TITLE /TAX SEARCH 529063 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES EDINA P &R SCENE CONTE 101095 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 092595 AQUATIC WEEDS PROF SERVICES DUMPING CHARGES 2012MB DUMPING CHARGES 2080MB GENERAL SUPPLIES 2080MB GENERAL SUPPLIES 2080MB BLACKTOP 60823MB BLACKTOP 60823MB BLACKTOP 60823MB CASTINGS 60938MB BLACKTOP 60938MB BLACKTOP 60938MB GENERAL SUPPLIES 60992MB BLACKTOP 60992MB BLACKTOP 60992MB GENERAL SUPPLIES 2281MB DUMPING CHARGES 2281MB GENERAL SUPPLIES 2281MB ASPHALT SURFACE PAMEL 092995 MILL WORK 5608 MIILING WORK 5608/1 MILLING WORK 5608/2 BLACKTOP 61050MB DUMPING CHARGES 2349MB PAPER SUPPLIES 12778 STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP GENERAL STORM CASTINGS STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI PATHS & HARD S BLACKTOP STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP STREET RENOVAT DUMPING CHARGE CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 4000 1719 3903 2469 3104 1113 3900 COUNCIL CHE, EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 17A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -- - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - -- INVOICE- ------------------------------------------ PROGRAM OBJECT _ 159918 10/16/95 ------------------------ $103.51 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC LATCH /FEED ROLLER 48296 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3516 10/16/95 $129.96 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC WINDOWPANE 48436 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 2863 10/16/95 $11.00 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC SEAL 48861 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3663 10/16/95 - $161.76 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC CREDIT DUE 092595 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *� $82.71* 159919 10/16/95 $432.00 MINN COMM PAGING QUARTERLY PAGERS 30343010 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 10/16/95 $83.31 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER RENTAL 22509610 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *� $515.31* 159920 10/16/95 $1,047.32 MINNCOR CENTRAL CUSTOM BALL FIELD PLY 00006214 PARK C.I.P. CIP 2816 < *> $1,047.32* 159921 10/16/95 $719.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE LINE 30691 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3697 3700 10/16/95 $525.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPAIR STOP BOX 30694 DISTRIBUTION WATER TRTMT SU 10/16/95 $455.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPAIR STOP BOX 30707 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 4025 10/16/95 $560.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S STOP BOX REPAIR 30706 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS < *� $2,259.00* 159923 10/16/95 $115.34 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 10/16/95 $58.69 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 10/16/95 $123.45 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 PW BUILDING HEAT 10/16/95 $229.27 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 10/16/95 $83.29 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 10/16/95 $2,963.88 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 POOL OPERATION HEAT 10/16/95 $96.07 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 10/16/95 $24.57 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 10/16/95 $37.28 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 GOLF DOME HEAT 10/16/95 $1,236.66 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 10/16/95 $125.80 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 ED BUILDING & HEAT 10/16/95 $13.53 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 10/16/95 $823.80 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 10/16/95 $9.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 10/16/95 $15.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 10/16/95 $19.50 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT 10/16/95 $78.21 MINNEGASCO HEAT 101895 ED BUILDING & HEAT < *� $6,055.30* 159924 10/16/95 $338.80 MINNESOTA CROWN DIST CO COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 003407 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $338.80* 159925 10/16/95 $1,556.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF MN CARE TAX 3RD QUART 093095 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $1,556.00* 159926 10/16/95 $70.00 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC ELEVATOR SERVICE 90355 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $70.00* 159927 10/16/95 $130.46 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME HEADWALLS & SPILLWAYS 26441 GENERAL STORM HEADWL & SPILL 3294 < *> $130.46* 159928 10/16/95 $238.00 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF GENERAL SUPPLIES 092695 TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $238.00* 159929 10/16/95 $120.36 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO LEGAL AD PROPOSED ASS 16961 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 3922 10/16/95 $225.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADV NORMANDALE /EXEC 168713 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 18A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $345.36* 159930 10/16/95 $16.20 MINNESOTA WANNER ALUMINUM 27366IN EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3827 3957 10/16/95 $46.10 MINNESOTA WANNER BRASS TIP /CAP 27422IN EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 10/16/95 $2,130.00 MINNESOTA WANNER 55 GALLON UTILITY SPR 0027445I EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 3834 < *> $2,192.30* 159931 10/16/95 $76.00 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY FEE 1509238 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN < *> $76.00* 159932 10/16/95 $2,116.80 MN STATE TREASURER BUIL STATE SURCHARGE COLLE SEPT 199 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX < *> $2,116.80* 159933 10/16/95 $452.63 MODEL STONE READY MIX 46521 GENERAL STORM FILL MATERIALS 1006 3694 10/16/95 $150.21 MODEL STONE CAP /PINS 47444 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 - $11.00 MODEL STONE CREDIT 47712 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 10/16/95 $7.70 MODEL STONE CAP 47714 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1006 10/16/95 $270.61 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 48710 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1006 10/16/95 $316.60 MODEL STONE READY MIX 48249 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1006 10/16/95 $217.54 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 49426 GENERAL STORM FILL MATERIALS 1006 10/16/95 $339.47 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 50458 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 10/16/95 $214.16 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 50745 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 10/16/95 - $452.63 MODEL STONE CREDIT 51468 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 10/16/95 $160.64 MODEL STONE CONCRETE 51199 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE < *> $1,665.93* 159934 10/16/95 $93.46 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CASTOR FORK I63212 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3662 3797 10/16/95 $138.91 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 164609 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3793 10/16/95 $17.30 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO COIL ASSY I63020 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3826 10/16/95 $233.20 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO TIRE I63565 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3804 10/16/95 $194.72 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 164129 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3804 10/16/95 $29.64 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 16.5687 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS < *> $707.23* 159935 10/16/95 $14.63 MURPHY, SYDNEY SERVICS CL /EB 100595 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES . < *> $14.63* 159936 10/16/95 $423.15 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PREVENTION LITER 0223024 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTIO 3869 < *> $423.15* 159937 10/16/95 $195.00 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP INTERNET CONFERENCE 56250028 COMMUNICATIONS CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $195.00* 159938 10/16/95 $168.36 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB LIDS 422001 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 4151 10/16/95 $85.36 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 424858. ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD 10/16/95 - $56.12 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB LIDS 766241 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 4152 10/16/95 $206.89 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CUPS 439605 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 4195 10/16/95 $275.86 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CUPS 451005 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6115 10/16/95 $344.80 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB COST OF GOODS SOLD FO 451004 ARENA CONCESSI CST OF GD FOOD < *> $1,025.15* 159939 10/16/95 $133.23 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN LETTERS 2038139 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 3434 < *> $133.23* 159940 10/16/95 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES COUNCIL CHEF 2GISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 19A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - -- - - - - -- INVOICE ------------------ PROGRAM - - - OBJECT - -- -- - ------- - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- < *> $100.00* 159941 10/16/95 $18.74 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 113934 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3988 10/16/95 $6,975.75 NORTH STAR TURF 60 IN. TOPDRESSER TOW 114317 CONTINGENCIES EQUIP REPLACEM 3925 *� $6,994.49* 159942 10/16/95 $2.40 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 91196. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $36.00 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 18698 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $76.68 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 18684 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $55.80 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19950 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $55.20 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19952 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $102.30 NORTHSTAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 19308 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX *� $328.38* 159943 10/16/95 $60.42 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 235216 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3884 10/16/95 $210.91 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 235212 ART SUPPLY GIF CST OF GD FOOD 3884 *� $271.33* 159944 10/16/95 $363.76 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23872 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $297.61 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23873 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $470.73 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23876 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $137.98 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23929 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $379.31 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23987 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $442.53 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW23986 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $442.53 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES NW323988 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 10/16/95 $413.93 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW24144 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $118.94 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TUBELESS TIRE NW24146 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $498.42 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW24196 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $14.38 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TUBE NW24197 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $197.73 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES /LABOR NW24279 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3471 10/16/95 $135.00 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO JUNK TIRES NW24281 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS *� $3,912.85* 159946 10/16/95 $24.65 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $24,972.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER ` 10/16/95 $7,072.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $4,225.27 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $27.39 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $53.89 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $83.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $1,794.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $437.71 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $2,261.25 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $2,766.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 2,007.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 5,329.27 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $4,695.97 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $397.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $1,596.92 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $404.24 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 NORMANDALE GC LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $10,055.34 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $196.28 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 GUN RANGE LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $1,185.48 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $20,081.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 20A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 159946 10/16/95 $878.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $1,531.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $899.66 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $42.13 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $8,896.18 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER 10/16/95 $940.27 NSP LIGHT & POWER 101695 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER < *> $102,909.11* 159947 10/16/95 $55.33 OFFICE MAX INC OVERHEAD DISPLAY SUPP 3170 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 4207 < *> $55.33* 159948 10/16/95 $212.88 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE TOOLS 106989 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 3727 10/16/95 $114.00 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE SUPPLIES 107582 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 3984 < *> $326.88* 159949 10/16/95 $200.00 ONSTAD, CHERYL SERVICES CL /EB 101095 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $200.00* 159950 10/16/95 $139.19 ORDER UP /BANQUET CATERED CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 12028 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $139.19* 159951 10/16/95 $59.64 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 100395 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS P4186 < *> $59.64* 159952 10/16/95 $74.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 3787467 GRILL CST OF GD FOOD 8155 < *> $74.00* 159953 10/16/95 $13.79 PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES ALPHA PAGER A025039 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE < *> $13.79* 159954 10/16/95 $85.00 PARKER, ELAINE SERVICES CL /EB 091595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 159955 10/16/95 $56.46 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1066565 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 - $24.00 PARTS PLUS DOM STARTER 1066858 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $4.58 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1070647 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $95.63 PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 1070543 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $124.41 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1071992 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $50.37 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1072951 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $24.74 PARTS PLUS A/C / HEATER PROD 1073176 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $43.39 PARTS PLUS FILTER 1074766 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $375.58* 159956 10/16/95 $308.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55394 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $614.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5544? VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $308.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55392 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $308.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55391 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $101.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55449 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $267.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55444 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $544.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55484? YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 -$8.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM927 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $442.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55756 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $47.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 55757 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $943.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55758 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $460.55 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55755 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHEF EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 21A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT -------------------- 159956 10/16/95 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $449.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 55802 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,785.60* 159957 10/16/95 $110,502.61 PENN CONTRACTING INC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -6 PYM WATERMAIN CIP < *> $110,502.61* 159958 10/16/95 $102.30 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 38893409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $88.10 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40493207 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX *> $190.40* 159959 10/16/95 $1,656.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA RECONSTRUCT SAND TRAP 100995 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 3796 10/16/95 $475.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA GRADE RINK 101095 SKATING RINK M PROF SERVICES 4096 10/16/95 $125.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA LANDSCAPE REPAIR 1010 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $2,256.00* 159960 10/16/95 $166.41 PETERSON SEED COMPANY IN SEED 041186 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $166.41* 159961 10/16/95 $9.00 PETERSON, CHUCK FALL TRADE SHOW REIMB 100595 LIQUOR 50TH ST CONF & SCHOOLS 10/16/95 $123.00 PETERSON, CHUCK FALL TRADE SHOW REIMB 100595 LIQUOR YORK GE CONF & SCHOOLS 10/16/95 $90.00 PETERSON, CHUCK FALL TRADE SHOW REIMB 100595 VERNON LIQUOR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $222.00* 159962 10/16/95 $1,061.81 PGI FULLFILLMENT INC. SHOP FORMS 952484 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 3098 < *> $1,061.81* 159963 10/16/95 $953.13 PHYSIO CONTROL ELECTRODES A34705 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3295 < *> $953.13* 159964 10/16/95 $151.95 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 15101 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $244.95 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15125 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $379.85 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15123 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $105.95 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING CIGARS 15122 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $882.70* 159965 10/16/95 $290.75 PIP PRINTING RECIPE CARDS 14016238 SPEC PROJ DONA PRINTING 4188 10/16/95 $328.02 PIP PRINTING RECIPE CARDS 14016236 SPEC PROJ DONA PRINTING 4190 10/16/95 $290.75 PIP PRINTING RECIPE CARDS 14016239 SPEC PROJ DONA PRINTING 4189 < *> $909.52* 159966 10/16/95 $34.08 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 963089 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $34.08* 159967 10/16/95 $128.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE ART CENTER 101095 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $128.00* 159968 10/16/95 $225.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER 101695 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $225.00* 159969 10/16/95 $491.50 PRINT SHOP, THE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27185 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3782 < *> $491.50* 159970 10/16/95 $87.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC BLADE SHARPENING 11713 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT < *> $87.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 22A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 159971 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10/16/95 $21,916.02 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -7 PYM PARKING /PARKIN CIP < *> $21,916.02* 159972 10/16/95 $90.63 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR 2147 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 3756 10/16/95 $220.46 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR 2148 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 3785 < *> $311.09* 159973 10/16/95 $240.00 RAFIKI & ASSOCIATES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1226 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $109.00 RAFIKI & ASSOCIATES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1227 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $349.00* 159974 10/16/95 $235.00 REAL JUSTICE CONTINUING EDUCATION 1097 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 4163 < *> $235.00* 159975 10/16/95 $184.39 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6070 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 3791 < *> $184.39* 159976 10/16/95 $484.35 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145447. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $23.75 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 083195 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 -$1.35 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148088. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,032.65 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148835 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $27.45 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 148835 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $1,140.21 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148824 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,031.97 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148833 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95. $9.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 148831 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $16.45 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 149692 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $2,325.46 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149691 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,575.40 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149698 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $2,095.10 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 149699 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $12.00 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 149699 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $34.45 REX DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 149701 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $9,806.89* 159977 10/16/95 $100.00 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA REPLACE TOILET 7270 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159978 10/16/95 $76.40 RIFFEY, JANE CRAFT SUPPLIES -ART CE 101095 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $76.40* 159979 10/16/95 $10.64 RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 3753825 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3943 10/16/95 $8.39 RITZ CAMERA RITZ OUTLAB PROCESSIN 3754574 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $19.03* 159980 10/16/95 $273.17 ROAD RESCUE FLASHER 156926 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3687 10/16/95 $338.67 ROAD RESCUE FLASHER 156909 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3687 10/16/95 - $338.67 ROAD RESCUE CREDIT 1569091 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES < *> $273.17* 159981 10/16/95 $328.57 ROLLINS HUDIG HALL OF MI PREMIUM 147822 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $328.57* 159982 10/16/95 $42.30 ROLLINS OIL CO DIESEL FUEL 51903 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 8748 < *> $42.30* 159983 10/16/95 $111.59 S.T. ROBB HEX NUT /WASHERS 10637 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3675 COUNCIL CHEi EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 23A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $111.59* 159984 10/16/95 $97.50 SALUD AMERICA COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 204 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $137.70 SALUD AMERICA COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 205 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $235.20* 159985 10/16/95 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER PAN -FILM BATTERIES -TA 100295 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 146.30* 1`9986 10/16/95 $26.37* SAMUELSON, RONALD MEALS /ARSON INVESTIGA 100995 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 159987 10/16/95 $1$92.26 SCHAFER EQUIP CO MISC EQUIP 178278 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 3277 < *> $192.26* 159988 10/16/95 $4.50 SCHLENDER, KIM REFUND GUN SAFETY 100995 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $4.50* 159989 10/16/95 $50.72 SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 321865 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 3410 10/16/95 $112.32 SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 322847 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 3549 < *> $163.04* 159990 10/16/95 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 159991 10/16/95 $26.63 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SPRAY EQUIP 39910 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 3669 < *> $26.63* 159992 10/16/95 $190.00 SMITH, CECELIA ROTARY DUES 101095 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $190.00* 159993 10/16/95 $588.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 54522 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $1,349.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 54517 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $37.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 42307 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $3,724.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 54762 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $107.75 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 54763 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $713.05 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 54772 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,520.70* 159994 10/16/95 $6,401.91 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE FOURTH QUARTER 100395 COMMUNICATIONS PRO SVC OTHER < *> $6,401.91* 159995 10/16/95 $527.18 SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 3495 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3698 < *> $527.18* 159996 10/16/95 $114.73 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2416300 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 3320 10/16/95 $64.71 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2424293 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3578 10/16/95 $378.61 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2426272 SEWER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 3691 10/16/95 $77.16 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2426675 SEWER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 3693 < *> $635.21* 159997 10/16/95 $276.31 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN REPAIR PARTS S133751 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3665 10/16/95 $266.84 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN REPAIR PARTS S133763 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3667 10/16/95 $16.92 ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT IN REPAIR PARTS S133764 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3667 < *> $560.07* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 24A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - ------ PROGRAM - - - - -- OBJECT --------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 159998 10/16/95 $1,904.85 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 093095 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $1,904.85* 159999 10/16/95 $318.44 STREICHERS ELECTRONIC SIREN IN355271 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3824 4061 10/16/95 $42.00 STREICHERS LABOR 360101 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES < *> $360.44* 160000 10/16/95 $2,737.41 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PROF ENG SERVICES 0931826/ ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $2,737.41* 160001 10/16/95 $1,267.68 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR 256836 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 3857 3849 10/16/95 $22.37 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 16851 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3839 10/16/95 $45.33 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 16846 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3706 10/16/95 $155.77 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 16948 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3929 10/16/95 $70.29 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 16997 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3930 10/16/95 $16.84 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 16966 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $1,578.28* 160002 10/16/95 $279.77 SUBURBAN PROPANE L.P. FUEL 091795 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE < *> $279.77* 160003 10/16/95 $109.20 SWANSON, CRAIG MILEAGE JULY -SEPT 100395 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE < *> $109.20* 160004 10/16/95 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 160005 10/16/95 $99.00 SWANSON, KARNA ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 101095 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $99.00* 160006 10/16/95 $436.55 SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES SET UP DP CELL 1237 PUMP & LIFT ST WATER TRTMT SU 3946 < *> $436.55* 160007 10/16/95 $68.16 TAPE DISTRIBUTORS OF MIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 52220 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4028 < *> $68.16* 160008 10/16/95 $75.00 TAPESTRY FOLK DANCERS SERVICES CL /EB 091595 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 160009 10/16/95 $89.97 TARGET FIRST AID SUPPLIES 35622 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3997 10/16/95 $29.80 TARGET TAPES 48787 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 4124 10/16/95 $22.37 TARGET TAPES 92650 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $142.14* 160010 10/16/95 $45.95 TECHNIQUE MAG SUB 100695 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $45.95* 160011 10/16/95 $331.65 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO CLAMPS /WIRE /TERMINALS 5288300 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3822 < *> $331.65* 160012 10/16/95 $492.66 THIS END UP FURNITURE CO REPLACE CUSHIONS 092895 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $492.66* 160013 10/16/95 $1,615.00 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 94 -10 PY SIDEWALK CIP < *> $1,615.00* COUNCIL CHEC EGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 25A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 160014 10/16/95 $95.85 THOMPSON MEDICAL SPECIAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES 34880 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3390 < *> $95.85* 160015 10/16/95 $13,255.48 THOMSEN- NYBECK PROSECUTING 96998 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $13,255.48* 160016 10/16/95 $1,340.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 66747 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 10/16/95 $3,252.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 67132 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $4,592.15* 160017 10/16/95 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC SAFETY FENCING 4073 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 365.00* 160018 10/16/95 $3.00 TRANSWORLD SYSTEM INC REPLACE TRANSMITTAL 100595 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $3.00* 160019 10/16/95 $240.00 TREASURER STATE OF MINNE 2 YR AMBULANCE LICENS 100495 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIC & PERMITS < *> $240.00* 160020 10/16/95 $30.00 TRETTEL, KATHY SERVICES CL /EB 080495 'ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 10/16/95 $30.00 TRETTEL, KATHY SERVICES CL /EB 111495 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $60.00* 160021 10/16/95 $11.59 TROPHY WORLD ENGRAVED PLAQUE 12611 NORMANDALE GC GENERAL SUPPLI 4147 < *> $11.59* 160022 10/16/95 $71.57 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN -MTKA WEED CONTROL 237905 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 9561 10/16/95 $144.84 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN -MTKA WEED CONTROL 246412 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 9566 < *> $216.41* 160023 10/16/95 $163.98 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO TREE CREW SAW REPAIR 093095 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS < *> $163.98* 160024 10/16/95 $350.00 UNDIS, PAT ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 101095 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $350.00* 160025 10/16/95 $946.50 UNIQUE IDENTITY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 950350 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4192 < *> $946.50* 160026 10/16/95 $6,185.85 UNISOURCE PAPER FOR FALL ABOUT 0905300 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX < *> $6,185.85* 160027 10/16/95 $156.15 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP BULBS 1084360 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 3768 10/16/95 - $272.69 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT 92491300 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 10/16/95 $80.83 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP MISC ELEC 32458100 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 3837 10/16/95 $448.10 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELEC FOR EDEN LIFT 10924400 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 3927 < *> $412.39* 160028 10/16/95 $5.74 US WEST CELLULAR US WEST CELLULAR PHON 092095 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $28.95 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 092095/C ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $28.16 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 092095/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 10/16/95 $28.16 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 092095/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 10/16/95 $29.47 US WEST CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL 092095/F FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $120.48* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 26A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM __-- __OBJECT 160029 10/16/95 $55.88 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 DARE TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $3,594.35 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $181.58 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $291.41 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $125.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $193.47 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $76.28 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $113.89 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $251.29 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $40.67 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $109.87 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $55.88 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $186.14 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $212.70 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 10/16/95 $154.88 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 101695 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $5,643.89* 160030 10/16/95 $109.27 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS FRAME RELAY D0860860 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $109.27* 160031 10/16/95 $146,094.64 VALLEY PAVING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 95 -4 PYM ST IMPROVEMENT CIP < *> $146,094.64* 160032 10/16/95 $281.20 VANTAGE ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL PARTS 13624 ED BUILDING & ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS CONTR REPAIRS 3859 5431 10/16/95 $411.01 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 13630 < *> $692.21* 160033 10/16/95 $555.00 VARSITY SPORTS COMMUNICA ADVERTISING 6336 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 4143 < *> $555.00* 160034 10/16/95 $266.00 VELDE, DAVID LODGING COMM HEALTH C 100495 PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $266.00* 160035 10/16/95 $84.75 VENDORS SUPPLY & SERVICE REPAIR 385455 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 4138 < *> $84.75* 160036 10/16/95 $326.19 VESSCO REPAIR PARTS 9270 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 3938 < *> $326.19* 160037 10/16/95 $92.97 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS TOOLS 513555 TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 3952 < *> $92.97* 160038 10/16/95 $18.00 W. GORDON SMITH KEROSENE 01800 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 3986 < *> $18.00* 160039 10/16/95 $1,842.50 WALKER PARKING CONSULT /E PROF ENG SERVICE 67544 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $1,842.50* 160040 10/16/95 $236.43 WALLIN, JOHN GFOA CONFERENCE 100395 FINANCE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $236.43* 160041 10/16/95 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 160042 10/16/95 $489.90 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO ROAD SIGNS 5218 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 6540 COUNCIL,GHE� 3GISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 27A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160042 10/16/95 $479.36 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO SIGN - ARROWS 5298 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 3820 10/16/95 $210.60 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO PAVEMENT MARKING REMO 5402 TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL SUPPLI 3536 <+> $1,179.86* 160043 10/16/95 $165.32 WATER PRO SEWER PIPE 729007 SEWER TREATMEN PIPE 3690 10/16/95 $59.64 WATER PRO CURB BOXES 730791 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3844 < + >. $224.96* 160044 10/16/95 $72.56 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONT ED 101095 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 10/16/95 $62.82 WATERSTREET, JOAN MEETING EXPENSE 101095 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS 10/16/95 $54.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 101095 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE 10/16/95 $9.83 WATERSTREET, JOAN DATA PROCESSING 101095 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 10/16/95 $15.96 WATERSTREET, JOAN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 101095 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 10/16/95 $76.49 WATERSTREET, JOAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 101095 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 10/16/95 $7.02 WATERSTREET, JOAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 101095 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 10/16/95 $13.83 WATERSTREET, JOAN AMMUNITION 101095 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 10/16/95 $14.03 WATERSTREET, JOAN PRISONER MEALS 101095 POLICE DEPT. G PRISONER MEALS < +> $326.54* 160045 10/16/95 $476.25 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 95292266 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 3658 10/16/95 $211.16 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 95292967 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3829 10/16/95 $198.20 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. BIT /DIE 95293769 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3954 10/16/95 $233.76 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILL 95301 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 4047 < *> $1,119.37* 160046 10/16/95 $538.60 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT GAS DISP REPAIR 49103 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3854 < *> $538.60* 160047 10/16/95 $240.59 WILLIAMS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 63954901 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3552 10/16/95 $105.15 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 63598504 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 3211 10/16/95 $51.17 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 64082201 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3683 10/16/95 $52.04 WILLIAMS STEEL HARD HAT SPRAY 64082203 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3683 < *> $448.95* 160048 10/16/95 $106.24 WILSON, TERRI MILEAGE BANK & ERRAND 100495 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $106.24* 160049 10/16/95 $221.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 8570 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $89.35 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 8572 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $134.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 8573 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $35.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 8571 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $317.80 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 8814 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $186.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 8816 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $119.55 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 8815 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $22.85 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 8817 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $1,127.75* 160050 10/16/95 $163.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11758 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $136.70 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1245 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 10/16/95 $73.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11789 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $372.70* 160051 10/16/95 $24.95 WIRED MAG SUB 100995 COMMUNICATIONS DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $24.95* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:26 AM page 28A CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT ---- - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 160052 10/16/95 - $138.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 46958 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $223.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47022 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $989.70 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47021 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $409.25 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47020 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $138.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47064 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $861.50 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47132 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $268.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47134 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/16/95 $205.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 47135 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,957.60* 160053 10/16/95 $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY POLICE SERVICE OCT 1995 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 160054 10/16/95 $865.95 XEROX CORPORATION < *> $865.95* 160055 10/16/95 $36.37 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE < *> $36.37* $1,376,856.48* MAINTENANCE CHARGE 48267160 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54182292 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY THU, OCT 12, 1995, 8:50 AM page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $366,233.58 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $3,958.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $26,847.26 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $139,533.46 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $4,663.27 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $4,583.02 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $26,188.21 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $15,334.14 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE FUND $356.45 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $19,214.79 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $258,654.72 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $3,836.57 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $35,219.40 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $64,825.80 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $407,407.81 $1,376,856.48* r COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 154071 09/01/95 $494.30 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURAN INS PREMIUM 090195 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $494.30* 154072 09/01/95 $135.00 YMCA REFUND OVERPYMT DAILY 083095 SWIM PROG GEN ADMISSIONS < *> $135.00* 154073 09/08/95 $173,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 0908 LIQUOR PROG CASH 09/08/95 - $173,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 0908 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 154074 09/11/95 $26,611.82 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 0908 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $26,611.82* 154075 09/11/95 $30,657.43 PERA PERA 090895 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $30,657.43* 154076 09/11/95 $19.62 PERA PERA 090895 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 154077 09/18/95 $131.76 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 695705 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP < *> $131.76* 154078 09/18/95 $51,091.95 BITUMIONOUS CONSULTING TENNIS COURT CONSTRUC 004864 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP < *> $51,091.95* 154079 09/22/95 $189,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 092295 LIQUOR PROG CASH 09/22/95 - $189,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 092295 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 154080 09/25/95 $24,322.34 FIDELITY BANK PAYROLL TAXES 092295 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $24,322.34* 154081 09/27/95 $496.00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURAN BASIC LIFE & COBRA 092595 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $496.00* 154082 09/27/95 $30,492.81 PERA PERA 092595 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $30,492.81* 154083 09/27/95 $19.62 PERA PERA 092595 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 158899 09/11/95 $436.98 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96479 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $71.28 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96481 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $392.58 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96483 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $71.28 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96485 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $601.10 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96488 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,573.22* 158900 09/11/95 $63.18 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 95392 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 96103 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $$11.87 53.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96486 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $128.41* 158901 09/11/95 $1,870.02 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4339578 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $249.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339610 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 158901 09/11/95 $231.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339628 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $3,009.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4339636 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $30.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339644 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $1,274.03 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339651 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $570.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339669 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $2,219.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4339677 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $179.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339685 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $217.23 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4347183 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $9,850.78* 158902 09/11/95 -$6.34 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1060227 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 -$4.91 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1060235 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 - $31.62 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1060276 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1086651 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 09/11/95 $$19.00 64.35 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1086669 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $316.95 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1086685 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $1,095.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1086693 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $1,090.98 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1086701 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $330.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094135 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $309.23 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094143 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $585.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094150 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $3,769.59* 158903 09/11/95 $464.89 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 96480 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 09/11/95 $616.68 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 96484 96489 50TH YORK ST SELLIN SELLING CST CST OF OF GD GD WINE 09/11/95 $596.88 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST < *> $1,678.45* 158904 09/11/95 $2,043.12 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 319684 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD GD LIQU LIQU 09/11/95 $6,802.47 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 21622 YORK SELLING 09/11/95 $675.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 321234 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $798.46 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 321248 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $874.28 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 321268 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/11/95 $2,030.54 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 321619 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/11/95 $6,455.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 321621 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $19,679.77* 159301 09/18/95 - $182.01 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 25939 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE WINE 09/18/95 $71.28 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99197 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD 09/18/95 $414.81 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99198 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $440.45 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99199 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $414.40 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 99200 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 -$3.48 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26188 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,155.45* 159302 09/18/95 $4,044.16 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 96478 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $2,685.04 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 96482 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $1,475.95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99418 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $2,252.88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99419 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $572.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99420 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $720.01 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99421 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $21.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99422 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $802.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99423 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $1,214.28 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 99424 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $4,971.31 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 96487 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU k i r COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $18,760.28* 159304 09/18/95 698.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339552 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 674.83 1176.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339560 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4339586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 -$6.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4349031 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 -$4.71 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4349049 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $585.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4370086 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $585.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4370102 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $942.22 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377768 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $685.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $310.99 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43777792 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $183.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377826 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $197.73 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377834 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $304.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377842 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $281.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377867 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $347.57 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377883 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $580.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377891 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $3,199.83 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4377909 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $969.64 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4377917 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE *> $10,712.06* 159306 09/18/95 -1281.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1084540 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 121.45 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1086719 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 491.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1086727 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 962.45 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094168 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 -$5.26 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1103209 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $42.28 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1116193 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 09/18/95 $308.81 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1116094 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $973.55 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116102 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $442.09 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $38.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1116128 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 09/18/95 $42.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116136 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $19.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1116144 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 09/18/95 $249.90 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116151 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $551.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116169 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $1,173.76 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116177 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $2,198.07 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1116185 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $1,695.10 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116201 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $832.37 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116219 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $335.73 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1116227 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $193.20 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1116235 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 - $106.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1084557 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 - $18.80 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1084565 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE *> $10,260.05* 159307 09/18/95 $723.42 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98710 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 123.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 98711 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 09/18/95 128.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 98712 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 09/18/95 443.24 1707.08 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98713 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98714 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE .c*> $2,124.74* 159308 09/18/95 - $50.73 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31106400 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $1,355.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 322952 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 159308 09/18/95 $634.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 322993 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/18/95 $94.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 322993CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 09/18/95 $397.43 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 323004 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE .09/18/95 $1,998.21 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 323598 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $2,003.91 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 323602 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $149.89 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 324026 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/18/95 $3,354.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 323604 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $9,937.90* 159312 09/25/95 $12.73 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10084 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $195.03 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12450 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $930.10 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12451 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $74.19 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12453 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 09/25/95 $1,591.92 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12454 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $195.03 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12456 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $541.03 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12457 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $868.49 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12459 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $26.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12460 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 09/25/95 $195.03 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12462 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $176.42 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12463 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $497.77 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12465 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $23.71 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12466 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $5,327.60* 159313 09/25/95 $94.88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 10303 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $88.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 11475 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $1,571.42 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12449 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $3,905.84 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12452 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $500.45 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12455 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $1,976.61 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12458 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $2,099.51 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12461 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $3,637.76 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 12464 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 - $15.01 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26601 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 -$7.14 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26644 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $13,853.23* 159315 09/25/95 $946.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3503885 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 -$2.46 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4320065 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 - $83.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4332581 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 - $97.47 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4332599 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 -$2.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4349064 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 -$6.60 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4358487 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 - $217.23 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4359246 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 - $81.23 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4359253 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $6,511.11 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4377784 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $1,237.10 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4377859 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $513.21 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408639 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $543.49 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408647 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $3,092.89 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4408654 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $759.41 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408662 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $625.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408688 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $205.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408696 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $1,963.77 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4408704 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $537.79 JOHNSON WINE CO.. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408712 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $906.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408720 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT page 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159315 09/25/95 $726.56 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408738 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $2,327.07 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4408746 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $165.15 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4408753 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $20,570.36* 159317 09/25/95 $108.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 908988 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $563.91 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1086677 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $1,332.47 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1086735 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 -$1.59 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1109206 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 - $33.99 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1109206 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 09/25/95 $1,007.34 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1130087 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $845.33 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1130095 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $1,449.54 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1130103 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $427.43 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1135045 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $307.25 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135052 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $42.28 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1135052 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 09/25/95 $722.72 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135060 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $38.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135078 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $809.87 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135086 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $598.15 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1135094 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $939.02 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135102 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $36.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1135110 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 09/25/95 $$832.13 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1135128 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 68.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1135136 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $443.75 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1144658 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $10,936.36* 159318 09/25/95 $934.36 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11750 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $993.72 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11751 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $326.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11752 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $558.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11753 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $45.54 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 11754 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 09/25/95 $337.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11755 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $1,374.03 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11756 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,569.60* 159319 09/25/95 - $21.77 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 324678 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 - $12.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 324679 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $12.87 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 324812 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $2,328.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 324821 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $2,118.41 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 324822 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $4,272.15 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 324823 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $81.63 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 325208 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 09/25/95 $1,226.90 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 325530 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $2,122.16 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 325531 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $3,694.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 325532 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $122.28 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 326180 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 09/25/95 $837.31 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 326445 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU CST OF GD LIU 09/25/95 $380.73 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 326619 VERNONESELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $17,543.55* 159684 10/02/95 - $29.35 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 26598 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 - $13.83 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26872 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 - $90.88 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26874 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 159684 10/02/95 $297.91 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15348 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $376.45 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15349 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $737.55 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15350 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $384.61 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15420 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $113.55 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15422 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $578.26 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15424 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $21.08 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15351 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $2,375.35* 159685 10/02/95 $1,696.38 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15585 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $3,545.53 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $451.81 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15589 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $21.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15590 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $1,112.57 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15591 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $2,020.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15593 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $1,626.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 15594 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $10,474.62* 159687 10/02/95 $633.42 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43700094 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 - $62.12 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4391769 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 - $146.05 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4400297 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 - $91.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4400305 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $604.93 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438917 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $470.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438925 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $2,494.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4438933 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $346.25 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438941 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $166.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438958 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $283.61 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438966 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $717.52 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4438974 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $233.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438982 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $1,160.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4438990 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $912.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4439006 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $3,728.36 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4439014 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $182.69 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4439022 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $43.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 4439030 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/02/95 $107.19 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4445540 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $285.85 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4445557 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $357.31 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 4446696 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $12,428.01* 159688 10/02/95 - $50.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1103183 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 -$5.33 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1103191 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $259.29 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1155621 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $69.65 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155639 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $1,371.54 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155647 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $499.44 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155654 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $1,154.61 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1155662 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/02/95 $1,797.69 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155670 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $1,017.98 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155688 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $19.00 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1155696 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 10/02/95 $257.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155704 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $1,149.49 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155712 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $950.19 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155720 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $267.85 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1155738 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/02/95 $847.41 ED PHILLIPS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1155746 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:57 AM page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $9,605.71* 159689 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 159690 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 10/02/95 - $22.92 - $14.30 $160.00 $217.80 $137.81 $619.04 138.90 498.07 694.78 $$25.49 $2,726.67* $76.15 $1,795.38 $1,353.11 $1,111.15 $274.33 $1,263.05 $2,582.05 $3,416.07 $11,871.29* $376,385.70* PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26641 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 26642 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 15421 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15423 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15426 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15587 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15588 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15592 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 15595 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 15425 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 15596 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 326617 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 326735 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 326736 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 326770 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 327229 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 327459 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 327460 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 327461 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS THU, OCT 5, 1995, 9:58 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $164,337.65 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $135.00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $211,913.05 $376,385.70* page 1 t 1 Association of F81% Metropolitan Municipalities WRON Where Pi %l:* Thursday, Nov. 2, 1995 Sheraton Minneapolis Metrodome 1330 Industrial Blvd. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 $25 Livable Communities Info Session ..... ............................... 4 -5:30 p.m. SocialHour .............................................. ............................... 5:30 -6:30 p.m. (Cash Bar) BuffetDinner ........................................... ............................... 6 :30 -7:30 p.m. (Roast Sirloin of Beef, Lasagna, Chicken Marsala) Business Meeting .................................. ............................... 7:30 p.m. UFAVAftle Communities /nto Session Metropolitan Council staff will be available to discuss /update you about the Livable Com- munities Act. This is your chance to find out what other communities are doing and to ask any questions you may have! (4 -5:30 p.m.) There will be no speaker or panel discussion. This will allow more time to discuss 1996 AMM legislative initiatives. Copies of the policy initia- tives were mailed Oct. 4. AMM policy adoption is the keystone for our 1996 legislative program, so we encourage cities to send more than one representative to contrib- ute to the discussion. Place dinner reservations with Laurie Audette (215 -4000) no later than Monday, Oct. 30. Please channel all reservations through your office of city manager /administrator. Your city will be billed. If you choose to pay in advance, checks may be made payable to AMM. City officials attending the 7:30 p.m. business meeting only do not need reservations. Map and Agenda on reverse. Guests are welcome. Business Agenda 1. Call to order. 2. Welcome. 3. President's Report. (Joan Campbell) 4. Adoption of 1996 Legislative Policy Program. 5. Discuss /Establish 1996 Legislative Priorities. 6. Other Business. 7. Announcements. 8. Adjournment. Directions 1-694 3 Industrial Blvd. `'' Hwy. 36 W LO 5 3 CI' � o Broadway N 3� 2 University Ave. 1 -94 Sheraton Minneapolis Metrodome 1330 Industrial Blvd. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 (612) 331 -1900 From North: Take 35W South to Industrial Blvd. (exit #22). Turn left on Industrial Blvd. From South: Take 35W North to Industrial Blvd. (exit # 22). Turn right on Industrial Blvd. From West: Take 394 East to 1 -94, go east on 94 to 35W North. Take 35W North to Industrial Blvd. (exit #22). Sheraton is on the right. From East: Take 1 -94 West to Highway 280, go north on Highway 280 to Broadway Street. Take a left on Broadway Street to Industrial Blvd. Take a right on Industrial Blvd. Sheraton is on the left. This notice was mailed to all AMM member mayors, manager /administrators and councilmembers. I- i State of Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation 309 Administration Building • 60 Sherburne Avenue • Saint Paul, Minnesota 66166. 612/282 -2390 a Fax 612/282 -6333 '4tfenfion city AalininijtratorilManagerileterij PLEASE EXTEND THIS INVITATION TO THE MAYOR, ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND ALL SENIOR APPOINTED OFFICIALS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCEM State of Minnesota Board of Government innovation and Cooperation 309 Administration Bulldina • 60 Sherburne Avenue • Saint Paul. Minnesota 66166 • 612/282 -2390 • Fax 612/282 -6333 September 29, 1995 Dear local government officials: As state legislators, we recognize your responsibilities have become increasingly difficult in recent years. While strong public sentiment has precluded state and local officials from approving tax increases, the demand for high quality public services continues to grow. In an effort to discuss opportunities for addressing the fiscal challenges we face, we would like to invite you and your colleagues to a public forum on Wednesday, October 18, 1995. The public forum will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. in the Hopkins City Hall Council Chambers. The Hopkins City Hall is located at 1010 First Street in Hopkins. The purpose of our regional forum is to unite all elected and senior administrative officials from our counties, cities, and school districts to discuss our common goals. A portion of the public forum will focus on opportunities for intergovernmental cooperation and collaboration as a means of improving the efficiency of our public services. This forum will also give local officials an opportunity to let us know what the state can do to assist you in your effort to improve the quality and efficiency of the services you deliver. The public forum will be facilitated by Jim Gelbmann, Executive Director of the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation. This state Board was created by the 1993 Legislature to promote intergovernmental cooperation and innovation in the delivery of public services. Jim will be on hand to inform local officials about the various programs of the Board. The programs of the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation are designed to empower local officials to develop more efficient and effective ways to achieve desired public policy outcomes. For example, the Board has a relatively simple process for waiving state administrative rules and procedural laws that may impair the ability of local officials to administer their programs in the most effective and efficient manner possible. Jim will share with us the results of several of the projects the Board has sponsored in other areas of the state. If you have question about the forum, please feel free to contact Jim at (612) 282 -2390. We have enclosed an agenda for your review. Please feel free to extend an invitation to all senior administrative. officials from your jurisdiction. We look forward to seeing you on October 18th. Sincerel , T A. doda le Senator Steve Kelley Representative R eiwilliger Senator Edward C. Oliver Senator Eric Paulsen Representative Martha R. Robertson Senator Barbara Sykora Representative State of Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation 309 Administration Sulldlno • 50 Sherburne Avenue • Saint Paul. Minnesota 55155 • 812/282 -2390 • Fax 812/282 -5333 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS' REGIONAL FORUM Hopkins City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday, October 18, 1995 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. 6:30 P.M. Introduction By Legislators 6:45 P.M. Introduction Of Forum Attendees 6:55 P.M. Overview Of The Evening's Activities - Jim Gelbmann 7:00 P.M. The Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation: A Resource For Local Officials Identification and Discussion Of Several Pilot Projects and Waivers 7:20 P.M. Panel Discussion Of Local Officials - One representative of each of the following levels of government: County, City, and School District "What is the current status of intergovernmental cooperation and innovation within the region ?" Are there any intergovernmental forums for discussing expanded opportunities for intergovernmental cooperation and innovation? Identify specific intergovernmental initiatives that are currently in progress. What other activities have been tried? Have there been any notable successes? Have there been any initiatives that did not meet expectations? How do citizens react to intergovernmental cooperation and other innovative initiatives? Is there interest in pursuing consolidations of one or more fool governments within the region? What are some of the barriers to intergovernmental cooperation and innovation? How can those barriers be eliminated or minimized? Can you identify specific opportunities for future intergovernmental cooperation and innovation relative to the delivery of local government services? Are there examples of duplication of effort that results in inefficient or ineffective local government service delivery? 8:00 P.M. What role can the State play in assisting local officials? Participants will be asked to identify and discuss state policies that may impair the ability of local officials to effectively and efficiently deliver essential public services. 8:20 P.M. Small Group Discussions "What opportunities may exist for increasing intergovernmental cooperation within the region. Identify specific actions that need to be taken to take advantage of these opportunities. 8:45 P.M. Summary Of Small Group Discussions 9:05 P.M. Where do we go from here? How do we assure that there will be follow up to the day's discussions. 1. October 1995 Dear AMM member local officials: 'Attached are the recommendations for the 1996 Legislative Policy program from the AMM's four . standing committees. Please review the policies with your Council for action at the membership meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 2 at the Sheraton Metrodome in Minneapolis on Indus- trial Boulevard. A notice on the specifics of the meeting will follow. In order to give you the maximum time possible to review these policies, they are being distributed prior to AMM board review. Any changes made by the Board at their October 12 meeting will be sent to you in a subsequent mailing, but mark November 2 on your calendar now. Please review the policies and list your top five priorities by policy number. Your participation is important because the policy priorities help determine how staff time and resources are allocated. (The policy committee suggestions are on the back.) - Sincerely/, t� Joan Campbell President, AMM 1111'I141r 4140 yyoll f11111k ot • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. City Name (optional): Top Priority Policies Please bring your response to the November 2 membership meeting, or mail to the AMM office or fax to Roger at 281 -1299 after Oct. 16. 3.490 Lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490 -3301 POLICY COMMITTEE HIGH PRIORITY ISSUE SUGGESTIONS (1996) REVENUE I -B Mandated State And Federal Programs I -D -4 Property Tax Reform - - - - -- Preservation Of The Fiscal Relationship Between The State And Cities HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE A -6 Metropolitan Housing Policy B -4 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) C3 Land Use Planning And Regulation B -9 Livable Wage Policy METROPOLITAN AGENCIES D -2 Metropolitan Council Planning/Service Provision D -4 Metropolitan Land Planning Act Funding E -1 Budget Process G -3 Regional Wetlands Management IV -B Criteria For Extension of Metropolitan Governance Authority TRANSPORTATION VA, B, C Transportation Funding .0 o% 4" Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Policies & Legislative Proposals RI INDEX PART ONE MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION - PAGE I. MUNICIPAL REVENUES NUMBER 1 -9 - A. LEVY/VALUE LIMITS 1 1. Levy Limits 1 2. Oppose Valuation Or Operation Freezes 1 B. MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS 2 C. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 2 1. Aid Formula Criteria 2 2. Local Government Aid Formula 3 3. LGA Growth 3 D. PROPERTY TAX 4 1. General Class Rate Changes 4 2. Non - Governmental Tax Exempt Property 4 3. Governmental Tax Exempt Property 4 4. Property Tax Reform 4 E. GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES 6 1. Fiscal Note Continuation 6 2. Funding Shifts 6 3. State Revenue Stability 6 4. City Revenue Stability and Fund Balance 7 F. OPPOSE CONVERSION OF CITY LGA AND HACA TO SCHOOL AID 7 - G. HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURAL CREDIT AID (HACA) 8 1. HACA Continuation 8 2. HACA Growth Factor 8 3. HACA Buydown For Class Rate Changes 8 H. STATE OR METROPOLITAN IMPOSED FEE FOR SERVICE 8 I. FISCAL DISPARITY FUND DISTRIBUTION 9 J. CIRCUIT BREAKER AND TARGETING ON PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT 9 K. TAXATION OF MUNICIPAL BOND INTEREST 9 PART TWO GENERAL LEGISLATION H. GENERAL LEGISLATION 10 -12 A. OPPOSE REDUCTION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY 10 B. TORT LIABILITY 10 C. GENERAL PUBLIC DATA 10 D. POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS 11 1. Amortization Aid 11 2. Employee Contribution Amount 11 3. Benefit Increases 11 4. Assumption Changes 11 E. 911 TELEPHONE TAX 12 F. 800 MHz RADIO SYSTEM 12 PART THREE HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE M. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS 13 -24 A. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS 13 1. Examine Local Requirements That Affect Housing Costs 13 2. Practices By Other Levels Of Government Which Affect Housing Costs 14 3. Mandatory Land Use Standards 14 4. Developers/Builders Responsibility 14 5. State Housing Policy and Financial Assistance 14 6. Metropolitan Housing Policy 15 7. Local Housing Policy 16 8. Neighborhood Livability 16 9. State And/Or County Licensed Residential Facilities (Group Homes) 17 B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 18 1. Cities Economic Development Responsibilities 18 2. Re- instate/Expand Urban Revitalization Action Program 19 3. Equal Treatment Of Cities 19 4. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 19 5. Responsible Use Of TIF 20 6. Other Development Tools 21 7. Development Of Polluted Lands 21 8. Building Permit Fee Surcharge 22 9. Livable Wage Policy 23 C. LAND USE PLANNING AND REGULATION . 23 PART FOUR IV. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE 25 -36 A. PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 25 B. CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE. AUTHORITY 25 C. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND FUNDING 26 1. Selection Of Metropolitan Council Members 26 2. Restructuring Of Metropolitan Agencies 27 3. Funding For Regionally Provided Services 27 4. Regional Tax Rates And User Fees 27 D. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING /GROWTH MANAGEMENT 28 1. Planning: Local And Regional Interaction 28 2. Metropolitan Council Planning/Service Provision 29. 3. Planning And Land Use Controls Adjacent To The Metropolitan Area 29: 4. Metropolitan Land Planning Act Funding 30 E. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET/WORK PROGRAM PROCESS 31 1. Budget Process 3,1 2. Work Program Evaluation 31 F. METROPOLITAN PARK AND, OPEN SPACE FUNDING. 3,2 1. Operation And Maintenance Funding 32 2. Bonding For Regional Parks 32 G. WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 33: 1. Water Supply 33 2. Surface And Groundwater Water Management 33, 3. Regional Wetlands Management 34 4. Regional Wastewater (Sewer) Treatment System 35, . H. WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT 35 PART FIVE V. AMM TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT 37 -44 A. STREET, BRIDGE, AND HIGHWAY GENERAL FUNDING 38 B. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM GENERAL FUNDING 38 C. TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT FUNDING ALTERNATIVES 38 D. REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM 39: E. MSAS FUNDING FOR COMBINED CITY STREET DEPARTMENTS 40 F. HIGHWAY TURNBACKS AND FUNDING 40 G. TRANSPORTATION UTILITY 41 H. '3C' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ELECTED OFFICIALS ROLE 41 I. RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PRESERVATION 41 J. CITY SPEED LIMITS 42 K. TRANSPORTATION INCENTIVES/DISINCENTIVES 42 L. MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE 42 M. AIRPORT 43 N. MCTO ASSESSMENT/FEE EXEMPTION 43 O. METRO MOBILITY 43 APPENDIX 45 -48 Housing and Economic Development 45 Metropolitan Agencies 46 Revenue 47 Transportation and General Government 48 I Municipal Revenue & Taxation Pages 1 -9 LEGISLATIVE POLICIES 19% I MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION I -A LEVYNALUE LIMITS A -1 LEVY LIMITS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has consistently opposed levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide restrictions to cities and are too inflexible to accommodate inflation, uncertainties in state and federal financial aids, and the diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities throughout the state. The AMM strongly supports the legislature's decision to end levy limitations for cities and further urges that levy limits not be reinstated in the future. A -2 OPPOSE VALUATION OR OPERATION FREEZES During past legislative sessions several proposals related to levy limitation through freezes have been made. As in the case of the previous levy limitations these type of artificial restrictions will work adversely for the taxpayers in the long run. Property valuation freezes will create property tax disparities between current and new property and will create large individual tax bill fluctuations when the freeze is lifted. Payroll or operating freezes cause larger increases at some later point. The AMM opposes imposition of artificial gimmicks such as valuation freezes, payroll freezes, or other limitations to the local government budget and taxing process. I -B MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS The cost of local government is influenced more and more by state and federal legislatively mandated programs and increased mandated benefits or costs current programs. At the same time the legislature and administration has suggested that expenditures are far too great at the'local level and that cutbacks are needed. Cities cannot provide additional mandated programs without seriously impacting their ability to provide the traditional' services of public safety, street maintenance, snowplowing, etc. Mandated programs such as pay equity, binding arbitration, PELRA, certain Data Practice requirements, expensive election rules, waste recycling,'and truth in taxation cost money. These costs must be recovered through levy, state payment, or reduction of current service. There is no other way. The AMM urges the legislature to recognize that mandated increased expenditures in one t a corresponding infusion of funds, mandates a new pro program without p g ' petty °tax or 'a decreased expenditure in- the other service areas such as public safety, etc. Therefore, when new programs or increases to existing programs are mandated, the legislature should provide substantial state funding assistance. I -C LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID State Aid to cities has been a much debated legislative issue for over two decades. During that time the formula(s) have ranged from pure per capita, to need based on value and service, to a distribution based on location and past spending. Homestead Credit has changed to Homestead Aid and is no longer a direct taxpayer subsidy. New gimmicks such as Disparity Reduction Aid (Mill rate equalization) and Tax Base Equalization Aid, were invented to target money to various regions when the general aid formula could not be politically designed to work, and subsequently have been folded into the main LGA fund. With few exceptions, cities across the nation have access to more than one form of municipal revenue. The dedicated Local Government Trust Fund recognized that and was developed to provide Minnesota cities with a second source, the sales tax, in addition to the traditional small share of the property tax. However, the legislature created structural deficits in the fund to enure that LGA increases would be held to less than sales tax growth. Although, the LGTF has been eliminated, the legislature did recognize the need to continue its partnership with cities and replaced the trust fund with an LGA growth index, the Implicit Price Deflator for State and Local Government Services (IPD). The LGA fund will grow annually at the rate of the IPD with a minimum of 2.5% and a maximum of 50k. C -1 AID FORMULA CRITERIA . Any aid distribution formula should consider and substantially incorporate the following criteria: The sales tax is a general revenue source for city expenditures and thus some RFA distribution to each community must be provided to uphold the original commitment to all of the states taxpayers. • Recognition of burdens caused by rapid population growth. • Recognition of burdens caused by population loss in meeting the demands for public services. • Recognition of needs based on changing demographics such as aging population, housing stock, and infrastructure. • . Recognition of wealth or tax capacity. • Recognition of basic needed services which should be supported at an appropriate support level. • Recognition of property tax burden relative to individual wealth. C -2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FORMULA The aid formula proposal developed by the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) for the 1993 legislative session basically incorporated the criteria as stated in I -C -1 above. The legislature 3` modified the LMC proposal by using average statewide tax rate times tax capacity as the base rather than twice the average tax base, substituted a declining grandfather for the LMC rolling grandfather, and added some cap limitations. The 1994 legislature changed the grandfather to 1993. Although the distribution changed some, the adopted formula is based on need and does substantially include the need criteria. s Although the original 1993 LMC proposed LGA formula is preferred, the AMM can support continuation of the current LGA formula. If changes are considered by the 1996 legislature, AMM will support only changes offered to the current formula that have .a positive impact on metro area cities. C -3 LGA GROWTH In order to ensure that city property taxes do not grow abnormally, there needs to be continued growth in the LGA which is a major portion of the overall revenue base of cities. The AMM - supports continued growth of LGA at the growth rate of the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD) with a minimum of 2.5% per year to maintain the existing level of property tax relief. Additional property tax relief should be considered by the state as revenue warrants. 3 i -D PROPERTY TAX D -1 GENERAL CLASS RATE CHANGES A portion of the property tax relief provided to farms Eby the 1993 legislature was accomplished by shifting county and school taxes to city taxpayers. This shifting causes local property'tax burdens for certain properties to increase due to the actions of the state legislature. However,- local government officials are held responsible by their taxpayers. The AMM opposes changes to the property tax classification system that would cause significant shifting of property tax burdens from one class to others. D -2 NON - GOVERNMENTAL TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves the "free local services that are provided to tax exempt property owned by certain non - governmental organizations. It is widely acknowledged that such property benefits directly from governmental services such as police and fire protection and street services provided by cities. The AMM believes that owners of tax exempt property, except for constitutionally exempt property should be required to reimburse cities for, the cost of municipal services such as police, fire, and streets. D -3 GOVERNMENTAL TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY The state, some cities, counties and metropolitan agencies own a significant amount of property within the metropolitan area. Cities provide a range of services that benefit these properties. However, since they are exempt from paying property taxes, municipalities are not reimbursed for the cost of these services. This places an unreasonable burden on cities. The AMM encourages the state : egislature to establish a program for fairly reimbursing municipalities from the state, county, other city and metropolitan agencies for the cost of services such as police, fire, and streets to their facilities. D -4 PROPERTY TAX REFORM Many significant changes in the property tax system have been made since the 1988 Session. The AMM believes it is critical that any future proposals be evaluated on the basis of their impact on individual communities. A proposal that may appear balanced on a statewide basis can have very disparate effects on individual cities. The difference in property tax burdens among taxpayers living in neighboring tax jurisdictions which provide similar services must also be kept within reasonable limits. Any significant tax 4 burden disparities would adversely affect cities' abilities to compete on a fair basis for residents and economic development. Tax increment districts are1dependent on tax rates and assessment ratios of the current property tax system. The financial viability of those projects should not be jeopardized by state - imposed changes in the tax structure. Likewise, enterprise zone businesses have been recruited based on a commitment that they would receive a preferential classification ratio in the calculation of their property tax obligations. These development districts should be protected from any negative consequences of tax reform. The tax increment financing plan in effect at the time legislation is passed should be the basis for determining remedies. In enacting any major reforms of the Minnesota property tax system, including property tax relief through aids to local government, the AMM recommends that the Legislature pursue policies which meet the following conditions: The impact of any proposal should be thoroughly analyzed for its impact statewide, on the metropolitan region and on individual cities. Major shifts that increase disparities in tax burdens among taxing jurisdictions or regions within the state should not occur. All significant changes should be phased in so that cities can adequately plan for any needed adjustments. A property tax relief program, LGA, should remain an essential component of the property tax system. Categorical aid programs should not become a substitute for LGA and related property tax relief programs. Property tax reform should recognize the tax/cash flow needs of and not jeopardize existing development districts, tax increment finance districts or enterprise zones. The changes in tax statements made by the 1988 legislature have the potential to mislead taxpayers about the value of Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) payments made to local governments and should be corrected. An income - adjusted circuit breaker and renters' credit should continue. Simplification and accountability are desirable goals that should be addressed within the above tenets. 5 I -E GENERAL, FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES E -1 FISCAL NOTE CONTINUATION Many laws are passed each year by the legislature which have a substantial effect on the financial viability of cities. Some of these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an obvious and direct effect which is often calculated and reported during the hearing .process. Many` others, such as worker's compensation benefit increases, mandated activities, binding arbitration and other labor related legislation, social programs, etc., have costs which are,not as obvious but which will now be known due to a fiscal note requirement. Cities and others will now be able to determine the real cost of a program or proposal and be able to use this data in determining the merits. The state should continue a policy of deliberate restraint on its mandated programs and extensively utilize the fiscal note statute identifying local government costs on any new mandated programs. E -2 FUNDING SHIFTS The Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department annually prepares Major State Aids and Taxes: A Comparative Analysis. The statistics for 1985 - 1993 show an imbalance of state revenues collected and aids and credits distributed between the metropolitan, and outstate areas. Around 65% of the State Revenue is collected in the metropolitan, area while only about 46% of the aids and credits are redistributed in the metro area. In 1993 there was nearly $.55 returned, in aids and credits for each dollar collected in the metro area (down 4 cents from 1990) whereas, there was $1.16 returned per $1.00 collected in greater Minnesota'(down 17 cents from 1990). The trend in the past two to three years has been slightly in favor of the metro area but there is still a vast imbalance in favor of outstate distribution per amount collected. If the,imbalance continues, state tax and aid policies may jeopardize the future economic growth of the metro area to the detriment, of the whole state. The AMM requests the legislature to continue to reduce the imbalance of aids versus revenue between metro and outstate cities and to consider how this distribution of resources effects the economic growth and vitality of the metro area and thus the entire state. E -3 STATE REVENUE STABILITY The AMM has consistently supported a state reserve fund to deal with unanticipated economic changes that could result in midyear cuts to various city aid,programs, and to provide cash flow balances so that short term borrowing is unnecessary. It seems prudent to develop a mid term correction or unallotment process that does not penalize any one segment of the state budget recipients over another segment if the economy drops beyond a reasonable reserve balance. The AMM supports a continued state fund to provide for state budget cash flow needs and a Z reserve for unexpected budget shortfalls due to economic downturns. The AMM also encourages the legislature to adopt a uniform across the board unallotment process for major economic downturns. E -4 CITY REVENUE STABILITY AND FUND BALANCE Cities need substantial cash balances on hand to operate for the first six months of the fiscal/calendar year until the first property tax receipts are paid in June and/or state aid is paid in July. The alternative to an operating fund balance would be to engage in costly borrowing which is not in the best interest of local tax payers or the state. Many cities accumulate over a period of years capitol funds for fire engines, public works vehicles, etc. to save taxpayer dollars in interest costs. These funds may appear to be surplus reserves, but in reality are savings accounts for major purchases. Cities need to maintain some fund balance to meet emergency expenditures created by natural disasters, lawsuits, vital equipment breakdown and even unexpected mid year aid cuts. Finally bond rating firms require liquidity and a demonstrated ability to pay debt in order to receive a favorable bond rating which will in the long run save property tax dollars. The legislature should not attempt to control or restrict city fund balances. These funds are necessary to maintain fiscal viability to meet unexpected or emergency resource needs of city governments, to purchase capital goods and infrastructure, provide adequate cash flow and to maintain high level bond ratings. I -F OPPOSE CONVERSION OF CITY LGA AND HACA TO SCHOOL AID Converting city HACA or LGA to school aid would force many cities to dramatically increase their property taxes in order to maintain sufficient operating revenues. Reducing school levies across all jurisdictions by taking aids from cities would cause significant tax rate differential between cities that now receive a high proportion of aid versus those that receive little aid. This will be especially dramatic between cities and bordering towns. In addition, due to constant pressure to increase the resources available for schools, there is no assurance that conversion of city HACA or LGA to school aid would result in permanent reductions in school levies or have a neutral impact on the taxes paid by local taxpayers. In fact, based on previous history it is almost certain that local school property tax rates will increase. The AMM strongly opposes conversion of city LGA and HACA to school aid. 7 I -G HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURAL CREDIT AID (HACA) G -1 HACA CONTINUATION HACA is the residual aid from the old Homestead and Agricultural credit programs. Taxpayers see a Homestead calculation on their Property Tax Statements but as time has passed, this calculated number and the actual HACA payment to local governments is significantly different and of no relationship. $50 million of city HACA was shifted to schools in the late 1980's and has since been further reduced through general aid cuts. Unfortunately the school tax rates reduced by the shift have since risen beyond the buydown level. HACA is an integral part of the state and local governmental service financing. It is the vehicle used to control property tax increases when class rates are modified and it augments not duplicates the LGA system. HACA is as important as LGA and thus should be continued as a major part of the state and local fiscal partnership. HACA should be continued as a part of the state and local fiscal relationship and increased as appropriate. G -2 HACA GROWTH FACTOR HACA is approximately 40% of the total aid to cities. The 1993 legislature repealed the HACA growth factor for cities, towns, schools, and special taxing districts but not for counties beginning in 1994. A HACA growth factor assures that the property tax relief provided by the state through the classification system is paid by the state and not through tax shifts to other property. It is needed to continue property tax relief along with the LGA program. AMM urges the legislature to restore the HACA growth factor for all cities and to apply the same implicit price deflator index to the current HACA distribution as is applied to LGA. G -3 HACA BUYDOWN FOR CLASS RATE CHANGES In the past the legislature has used HACA to pay for class rate changes for C/I and high valued homestead properties to ensure that other property classes are not penalized. The AMM supports state buydown of future class rate changes through HACA to prevent shifting property tax burdens to other property classes. I -H STATE OR METROPOLITAN'IMPOSED FEE FOR SERVICE The 1993 legislature adopted a $5.21 fee for each municipal water hook up to pay for federally mandated water well testing. Local officials /cities were mandated to impose the fee and accept responsibility. It was not however imposed on trailer parks and certain other private interests. It has been reported that the fee has raised excess funds which were deposited in the state general fund. 8 In addition, the Metropolitan Council recently considered adding a surcharge on sewer charges billed to cities to augment cutbacks in transit funding. The AMM strongly opposed this proposal and it was abandoned. The AMM opposes the state or metropolitan council mandating fees in a manner that forces city officials to be held as the responsible culprits in levying and explaining the purpose. The AMM also opposes fees that are not spread equitably to all and opposes over collection or use of a revenue generated for a specific purpose or from a specific enterprise to be used for other government expenses. I -I FISCAL DISPARITY FUND DISTRIBUTION Fiscal Disparities (F.D.) is a fiscal tool that shares Commercial/Industrial property value for tax purposes in the seven- county metropolitan area. Its primary purpose is to help equalize, to some degree, the property tax wealth among the cities by sharing part of the growth in communities experiencing significant growth with those experiencing little growth. A secondary aspect is it tends toward equalizing taxes on similar C/I properties in various communities. Recently suggestions have been raised to use a percentage of the fiscal disparities funds for specific social or other programs in the metropolitan area. Because of the way F.D. is calculated, this would amount to a hidden property tax increase across the metropolitan area that impacts the property tax poorer cities the most. Fiscal disparities distribution is applied after levy certification so the property tax increase is automatic, not discretionary at the local level. Therefore, The AMM opposes use of fiscal disparities to fund social or physical metropolitan programs since it results in a metropolitan -wide property tax increase hidden from the public with an excessive impact on communities with lower property wealth. I -J CIRCUIT BREAKER AND TARGETING ON PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT Beginning in 1998, the circuit breaker and targeting payments which are currently made directly to individuals will be converted to a property tax statement credit and payments will be made directly to local units of government. As such, the funding for the program could be reduced without directly impacting the taxpayer but with substantial financial impact on cities. The circuit breaker should remain a direct payment to taxpayers. The 1995 law should be repealed. I -K TAXATION OF MUNICIPAL BOND INTEREST The state law that grants a tax exemption for municipal bond\interest is being reviewed and could be repealed. A repeal of this exemption will raise borrowing costs for cities at a time when budgets are extremely tight and property tax increases are unacceptable to the taxpayer. The state should maintain the tax exemption for municipal bond interest income. 9 :-O II General Legislation Pages 10 -12 H GENERAL LEGISLATION H -A OPPOSE REDUCTION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY The AMM has for many years opposed statutory changes that erode local authority or mandate activities which cost money to implement. unless there is a provision to recover those costs. The AMM opposes statutory changes which erode local control and authority or create additional tasks requiring new or added local costs without .a corresponding funding mechanism. This includes such issues as mandating election by wards, intrusion in setting local salaries, usurping licensing authority, or requiring land sale competitive bidding. H -B TORT LIABILITY The Municipal Tort Liability Act has served its purpose of protecting citizens damaged by public servants as well as protecting tax payers from debilitating tort suits against the special vulnerability of wide spread government operations. The need for tort recovery limitation is apparent based on the seemingly unlimited deep pockets of government and the cost of insurance coverage. Current'joint and several liability' provisions limit payments to double if the city is 35% or less liable. Although, if the responsibility is greater than 35 %, the city may be required to pay 100% damages. Limits do not apply to a municipal employee working for a second non municipal employer. Tort liability limits were last adjusted to the current level of $200,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence in 1983. The AMM supports the continued existence of municipal tort liability limits but does recognize that the real value of the current $200,000/$600;000 limits has lessened since 1983. Therefore, the AMM would support a modest increase in those limits to reflect inflation. Current 'joint and several liability' percentages should not be increased and exceptions to limits for municipal employees working second jobs should be eliminated. II -C - GENERAL PUBLIC DATA The Government Data Practices Act allows cities to charge actual costs for retrieving and copying public data if copies are requested but they cannot charge for inspection only. The law also prohibits charging for the time consuming task of separating public from non -public data which is legally necessary. - Profit making enterprises frequently use this free service to augment their businesses. An example 101 is a private special assessment search business that uses city facilities, city computer equipment, city staff time for explanations, and then dominates the publicly provided telephone for data transmission, all at taxpayer expense. The AMM encourages the legislature to amend Minn. Stat. 13.03, Subd. 3 to allow municipalities to charge for retrieving and explaining public data and for separating public from non - public data. This amendment would not apply, however, to the media or to private citizens requesting information about themselves or their own properties. H -D POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS Local police and full-time fire relief associations were phased out by the 1980 legislature unless the local council opts to keep the relief association. All new employees will become part of the state police and fire PERA fund and the state will reimburse local units for a portion of the unfunded liability remaining in the local fund. Also, 1979 Law set employee contributions at 8% and the Legislative Retirement Commission has in the past established a general policy requiring public safety employees to pay 40% of the normal pension costs. D -1 AMORTIZATION AID The AMM opposes legislation that provides for reductions of state amortization aid to local police and fire relief associations. D -2 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT Even though the employee contribution amount was set at 8 %, in many funds this is not equivalent to 40% of the normal costs. The AMM urges that the contribution level be set at 40% of the normal cost of financing the benefits even if this amount exceeds 8% of base salary. D -3 BENEFIT INCREASES The AMM opposes any benefit increases for local police and fire relief associations unless an increase, including any resulting deficit, is financed 50% by the employing city and 50% by employees on a current basis. D -4 ASSUMPTION CHANGES The AMM supports changes in actuarial assumptions relating to salaries and investment return to more truly reflect experiences. The AMM opposes payment of any type of bonus to active or retired members (13th Check) as a part of actuarial assumption changes. 11 H -E 911 TELEPHONE TAX The Department of Administration has the authority to impose up to a 30 cent fee per month per telephone line to offset the ongoing maintenance costs for 911 service for the 90 plus phone companies in the state providing at least a basic service. The current fee is 18 cents but will probably be increased for 800 MHz. There has been some pressure to increase the fee beyond the 30 cent level to provide outstate enhancements. The AMM supports the current 911 access fee and use of that fee for enhanced upgrade and other costs but any fee granted in excess of 30 cents per line per month should be returned to the municipality where collected. H -F 800 MHz RADIO SYSTEM The 1995 Legislature authorized implementation of a Metropolitan 800 MHz Radio System and created a governing board as well as identifying funding sources. It followed criteria put forth by the AMM to ensure that cities would have complete control of when or if they became a part of the system while insuring continued uninterrupted public safety service and fees levied only for locally occurring costs at the time of participation. The AMM will support the continuation of the Metropolitan 800 MHz Radio system legislation and board as long as the following criteria are part of the implementation: • Cities should not be forced to modify their current systems, purchase new equipment prematurely, or become part of the 800 MHz Radio system until they so choose; • The system should provide a phased transition so that there is guaranteed uninterrupted service; • The system should be technically capable of allowing communities the flexibility to form various coordinated arrangements for dispatching and service provision; and • The governance body for 800 MHz should continue to be representative of entities /users that ultimately must bear the cost but should not be dominated by any one group. 12 III Dousing and Economic Development & Land Use Pages 13 -24 II HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE A HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS The distribution and availability of affordable housing throughout the metropolitan area is a continuing concern. All levels of government and the private sector, including non - profit groups, must work cooperatively to address this issue. Each player in the production of housing must contribute if the issues are to be addressed: The federal and state governments can best contribute by providing more direct financial assistance and by creating a tax climate conducive to the production and maintenance of affordable housing. The Metropolitan Council should continue to give high priority to housing planning and provide technical assistance and guidance to the public and private sectors so better decisions relative to present and future housing needs can be made. Local governments should not inhibit the production of affordable housing through excessive regulatory requirements. They should also work with the private sector, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and the Metropolitan Council to make the best use of existing tools and programs which facilitate the production and maintenance of affordable housing. The private sector should work with government and the-non- profit sector in an effort to make more affordable housing. The use of covenants, while generally desirable in improving the quality of development, should be scrutinized by private developers to ensure that they don't have the impact of undermining the creation of more affordable housing. Policy makers at all levels must become more cognizant of their actions, decisions and requirements which may have an undesirable impact on housing affordability. A -1 EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS THAT AFFECT HOUSING COSTS Local requirements and practices can add to the cost of housing production. City officials should periodically review city requirements, such as zoning and subdivision ordinances, to ensure that these requirements do not prohibit the construction of affordable housing or become exclusionary. 13 A -2 PRACTICES BY OTHER LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT WHICH AFFECT HOUSING COSTS Decision makers at other levels of government must become more cognizant that actions they take may have a negative impact on housing costs. These actions at first may appear to be worthwhile and beneficial, but in the end may result in increased housing costs, especially on lower cost housing. Examples include the sewer availability charge, restricted growth policies, building and energy codes, environmental rules and transportation policies. Housing costs are often impacted by actions of all levels of government. These levels should examine current and pending regulations and policies to determine if changes can be made to make affordable housing more available throughout the region. A -3 MANDATORY LAND USE STANDARDS State- imposed uniform standards for housing style, type and lot size are not appropriate because of the great diversity among cities and differences within cities relative to density of development, topography, age of housing stock, the mix of housing values and the level of municipal services. The legislature should not mandate uniform zoning and subdivision standards or remove additional land use regulation authority from local units of government. Cities should retain the authority to regulate the location, size, amount and type of housing within their boundaries. No legislative initiative is needed. Cities do have a responsibility, however, to encourage affordable, life -cycle housing opportunities. A -4 DEVELOPERS /BUILDERS RESPONSIBILITY Local land use standards and regulations which help encourage affordable housing can be negated by developers and builders through the use of private covenants which increase housing costs by exceeding the local requirements. In working with local governments in their efforts to encourage affordable housing, developers and builders should not increase housing costs through private covenants by requiring expensive amenities and standards which unreasonably exceed the local and state requirements. A -5 STATE HOUSING POLICY AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE The state must continue to be an active participant in providing funding for housing needs. Allocation of state resources should be based on a statewide housing policy formulated in conjunction with regional and local governments to address local housing needs. Financing strategies must be devised which carry out the long -range goals of providing and maintaining affordable housing in rural and urban Minnesota. 14 The state can best contribute to the affordable housing situation by: • . Providing direct funding in the form of grants and loans from state - derived revenues. • Consolidating many of the existing small MHFA programs into a larger pool with more flexible criteria and guidelines for use, thereby decreasing administrative costs of applying for and administering such programs at the local level. • Setting general policy priorities for use of state funds based on the state housing .policy which can be accessed by local, non - profit and for - profit developers based on their specific activities. • Collaborating with the Metropolitan Council to provide technical assistance and information about state and federal housing funding programs, as well as providing easier access to these programs. • Providing incentives through the state tax policy to benefit the maintenance and production of affordable housing. Incentives to be considered but not limited to: (1) Sales tax exemption for the construction and operation of low income housing by public agencies. (2) Provide a state low income housing tax credit. (3) Remove local housing authority levy limits. (4) Reinstate the state deed and mortgage transfer tax exemption for public agencies. Assisting to make economic development tools, such as Tax Increment Financing (TIF) or Industrial Revenue Bonds (IRBS), attractive to cities with affordable housing strategy elements within their economic development or community master plans. A -6 METROPOLITAN HOUSING POLICY The Metropolitan Council should continue to place high priority on housing planning in the metropolitan area and provide information to the public and private sectors so rational decisions about future housing needs can be made. The regional housing policy plan should be consistent with the Regional Blueprint and take into account the essential linkages between housing, jobs and job training opportunities, transportation and human service needs of low income residents. 15 The Metropolitan Council should work cooperatively with local government -units as it implements the Livable Communities Act, which is designed to. provide- a� better 'mix. of life - cycle housing opportunities throughout the metropolitan area. The Metropolitan Council, through its housing policy: planning:process,,should continueto provide market analysis and up -to -date data on regional and local housing affordability needs and trends in the metropolitan area. The housing.policy.planmust consider the linkages between housing, jobs and training, transportation .and human service needs - asset forth in the Regional Blueprint and the Livable Communities -Act. Major changes to the Livable Communities Act should not be made until the evaluation and report mandated by MS 473.254, section 6 has been completed. A -7 LOCAL HOUSING POLICY Housing needs vary among cities in the'metropolitan area. Some cities need more housing for low income persons while other cities need housing to retain and/or attract more moderate to upper income persons. Cities should have the authority to promote housing types which are in their best interest, while at the same time encourage life -cycle housing opportunities for households of all income levels. Cities need to have,greater flexibility in financing_ their housing goals if they are to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Land Planning and Livable Communities acts. Cities should be granted sufficient authority and flexibility by the legislature to conduct and finance housing programs that meet their individual housing needs. Local funds can be used to leverage federal, state and metropolitan resources when they meet common policy goals. Cities should avail themselves of the resources provided through the Livable Communities Act. A -8 NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY Rapidly evolving social, demographic, economic and behavioral changes are converging on many cities and creating new challenges that exceed cities' capacity to deal effectively with their new environments. The challenges cities face, such as deteriorating neighborhoods, crime and drugs., need the cooperative efforts of public, private and business interests to solve. The problems continue to grow though cities have taken efforts to face these challenges. Cities should take the lead through working with other- appropriate groups and agencies in the development of local and regional strategies that will assist in addressing complex and growing neighborhood problems. These strategies should recognize that the physical and structural condition of the neighborhood is inextricably interrelated with the social welfare of the neighborhood and the educational and economic opportunities available to residents.: IR Where legislation is directed to assist low income individuals and children in poverty, legislators must recognize the need for linkages between housing and human services, jobs and training, health care and transportation. When the legislature considers low income programs, it should treat these activities in a comprehensive manner. The legislature should enact necessary legislation to identify and eliminate any barriers, including welfare reform, that would act to deter individuals from achieving their goal of economic and personal success for themselves and /or their family. A -9 STATE AND /OR COUNTY LICENSED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES (GROUP HOMES) Residential -based facilities (group homes) should not be concentrated. Over - concentration of such facilities could have a negative impact on the community and on facility residents. Cities have a responsibility to welcome such facilities on a fair share and rational basis. The AMM also believes that the state must ensure that residents living in residential -based facilities receive appropriate care and supervision relative to their disability or need to be housed in a group facility. The state's de- institutionalization policy is directly linked to the need for more residential -based care facilities in cities and the responsibility of the state to provide sufficient funding to ensure adequate care and supervision of the residents placed in such facilities. The following principles should be in law or rule to regulate residential -based facilities: State and county agencies must provide timely notification to cities of the status of facility license requests and renewals and provide adequate opportunity to respond. Cities must also be aware of the special care needed by residents of such facilities in case of public safety emergencies. Clustering of community residential facilities because of economic, geographic or other factors should be avoided. Standards of non - concentration for state or county - issued REP'S should be established. There must be an ongoing screening process, particularly in the corrections area, to ensure that persons placed in a residential facility will benefit from such an environment and will not be a danger to themselves or others. The licensing authority must be responsible for removing any persons found incapable of living peacefully in such an environment. Facilities licensed by the corrections department should not be exempt from reasonable local land use regulations. 17 A fair share concept should be considered within the metropolitan area. However, this concept should consider other factors including transportation facilities, jobs availability and other needed support services. The licensing authority and/or legislature should allow cities to participate in the search for facility locations in order to meet the needs of the providers, facility residents and the neighborhood. III -B ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT All communities address economic development through their local land use regulations, with each city striving for 'orderly development." However, metropolitan communities have varied development needs. Economic development is not just a matter of a greater tax base for the community, but requires tools that promote, regulate and service the development. Economic development is promoted through housing and redevelopment authorities, economic development authorities, port Authorities, TIF, revenue and general obligation bonds and the Star Cities program. Comprehensive plans and land use controls serve as regulators and water, sewer, streets and other municipal services are important components of economic development. B -1 CITIES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESPONSIBILITIES Cities are the primary units of government responsible for economic development and redevelopment. They require adequate fiscal tools to address these issues in a timely and effective way. The state should acknowledge the valuable role cities play in developing and maintaining the economic health of the state. A state development strategy plan should be established to promote job creation and redevelopment, prevent blight and decay, clean up polluted lands and provide adequate housing opportunities. Additional tools should be developed for cities to accomplish these objectives. The state should acknowledge cities as the primary units of government responsible for implementing these strategies and land use controls. In partnership with the state, cities should be charged with locally administering a development policy created by the legislature and governor, as well as any local economic development plans or policies. 18 B -2 RE- INSTATE/EXPAND URBAN REVITALIZATION ACTION PROGRAM One of the major keys to reducing poverty in decaying areas is providing access to good paying jobs like those available in the manufacturing industry. It is important to provide incentives or other tools. to help retain or introduce manufacturing .businesses into economically distressed areas. The Tax Base Revitalization Account within the Livable Communities Act helps to accomplish this goal. Another effective program that the central cities have had in the past was the Urban Revitalization Action Program (URAP). This program was very easy to administer and should be expanded to include suburban communities with deteriorating jobs base and aging housing stock. The AMM urges the legislature to enact a new version of the URAP program that includes all cities with characteristics and demographics meeting defined criteria. Such criteria should include factors such as poverty rates, age of housing, unemployment rates, income levels, etc. AMM also recommends that once a city is designated as a URAP- eligible community, it should be automatically eligible for benefits available under federal or state enterprise zone legislation and /or any other program targeted to cities whose characteristics and demographics cannot be met without state and /or federal assistance. B -3 EQUAL TREATMENT OF CITIES All cities regardless of size or location should be treated fairly and should be considered for state - authorized economic development programs, including redevelopment tools and programs, and other state funding. New or revised programs designed to address specific economic circumstances within cities or counties should use problem definition as the criteria for participation rather than geographic location, size of city, class, etc. B -4 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) TIF has enabled cities to plan and successfully carry out housing, economic development and redevelopment projects. TIF represented, prior to 1990, the most feasible and effective tool for cities to preserve and improve their own physical and economic environments. TIF is virtually the only tool available to cities for positive self intervention to curb the spread of blight and manage sound economic development in order to provide jobs and maintain a healthy tax base. Although changes made during the 1995 Session make the tool more usable, TIF authority has been seriously limited, causing the ability of cities to engage in needed development and redevelopment to be sharply reduced. The state must acknowledge cities as the primary governmental unit responsible for economic development, which includes the creation of jobs, I: stabilization of the state's economy, elimination of blight and decay, development of affordable rental and owner - occupied housing and clean-up of pollution. TIF is a proven tool for fulfilling these needs. The enactment of the local match provision will provide a local accountability mechanism, but the local match requirements may be a deterrent to projects in areas of the city experiencing disinvestment due to the presence of blight and decay of the public infrastructure and private property. The AMM encourages the legislature to make the following changes to the TIF laws: • Allow pooling for redevelopment and pollution districts at the same level and increase the level above the current 25 percent of increment. • Allow clean -up of contaminated soils, landfills and parcels that contain debris or other materials transported to the site or parcel. • Eliminate the Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead Agricultural Credit Act (HACA) penalty and local match requirement for redevelopment districts that have experienced a significant amount of disinvestment and pollution districts. • Provide authority for an effective, workable manufacturing TIF district that retains jobs for a locale or adds to the state's job base. • Allow redevelopment and renewal districts to be redesignated as a pollution district if contamination requiring significant clean -up costs is found. • Allow for all cities' redevelopment of small scattered site housing. • Eliminate from the act provisions, such as the green acres and agricultural preserves section, that provide different rules or criteria for districts based on geographic location in the state. • Oppose provisions that will require approval of TIF districts by state agencies, counties and school districts. B -5 RESPONSIBLE USE OF TIF The state continues to impose restrictions on the use of TIF because of the perception that it causes unnecessary competition between individual cities and regions of the state. There is also perception that cities are played against each other when developers consider projects and development would take place without TIF. Counties and schools also feel they should become more involved in the decision making process. 20 Governments that use TIF or other development tools should establish a policy to protect against competition with other Minnesota cities and should institute a developer disclosure process so cities are able to receive information from developers concerning negotiations with other communities. Cities should develop an economic development strategy in consultation with counties and schools. The review and comment requirements of the current TIF law should continue to be used to educate and involve other local governments and local legislators about proposed development projects. Counties and school boards should respond to these overtures for evaluation and participation and should take advantage of all available informational opportunities. B -6 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TOOLS Minnesota cities have the primary governmental responsibility for economic development, but additional tools are necessary to carry out that responsibility. The major existing tool is Tax Increment Financing (TIF) but its effectiveness has been diminished by legislative actions in recent years. The legislature should establish a This Old Storefront program as another economic development tool and provide limited property tax abatements to property owners rehabilitating their commercial properties. Abatements should be restricted to properties that are at least 35 years old, with an emphasis on properties that are 70 years old or older. The economic recovery grant program funding should be continued and increased to $10 million annually and clear rules should be established to govern its use. The state and federal funds that support this program should also be spread over the year to ensure projects across the state have access to the grants. Local municipalities should be allowed to participate in the study of the economic recovery grant program. The federal government should substantially increase the current appropriation for the community development block grant program and simplify the application process. Congress should remove the caps placed on industrial development bonds and acknowledge that extensive eligibility requirements adequately limit their use. B -7 DEVELOPMENT OF POLLUTED LANDS Most Minnesota cities have contaminated sites within their boundaries that remain underdeveloped and polluted because of obstacles preventing local government action. Among the roadblocks are liability issues and up -front financing costs of clean-up. Developers are reluctant to expose themselves to such liability and clean -up costs often exceed the value of the land despite incentives for private sector intervention. Public sector subsidy is critical. 21 The Legislature passed several measures during the last few sessions to help deal with the polluted lands problem including: • The 1992 Land Recycling Act which was designed to promote the transfer and reuse of contaminated land by offering an exemption from liability to those who are not otherwise liable and voluntarily clean up a site. • The 1993 Tax Act which made a step toward developing a pollution clean -up program and acknowledged that TIF is an appropriate tool to provide'a portion of the funding. • The 1995 Livable Communities Act which will provide about $6.5 million in grants for clean -up in the metropolitan area and reduce the local match for its Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) clean-up grant program from 18 percent to 12 percent and will,allow the regional funds to be used as part of the local match. • The 1995 Legislature also appropriated nearly $8 million to DTED for the statewide clean- up program of which up to two- thirds can be used in the metropolitan area. The Minnesota Superfund law was amended to authorize the (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) MPCA to consider the planned use of property when determining appropriate clean-up standards. The legislature should continue its strong commitment to polluted lands clean -up. by: • Continuing to fund the DTED clean -up grant program and determine if it should be increased based on the current biennium funding level and demand. • Allowing the clean -up tools created during the 1995 Session to. continue operating. • Requiring that condemnation commissioners. consider the cost of correcting pollution problems in determining the final value of property. • Eliminating the requirement to match a portion of the clean -up grant-program with local general funds. B -8 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SURCHARGE Local units of government levy a half - percent surcharge on building, permits which is paid to the state to operate the state Building Codes and Standards Division. Until the 1991 Legislature changed the law at the request of the governor, any excess fees over actual operating costs were proportionately rebated to local units to help pay for building officials training and continuing education costs. Local units of government are facing tough financial times and need every available resource, especially that which could be considered local money. 22 The AMM recommends reinstating the language providing that unused building permit surcharge fees in excess of state building code division costs be returned to cities. B -9 LIVABLE WAGE POLICY The 1995 Legislature adopted an amendment that requires a business that receives state or local government assistance for economic development or job growth purposes must create a net increase of jobs in Minnesota within two years of receiving the assistance. If the job and wage goals are not met, the business must repay the assistance. Assistance is defined to mean a loan or grant in excess of $25,000 or TIF. Annual reports to DTED are also mandated. The amendment basically requires a net increase in jobs for any type of public economic assistance. Because the act does not specify the type of TIF district, it is assumed that all types of districts, including housing districts, must retain a business and prevent relocation of that business. If the legislature intends to adopt a corporate welfare amendment, the AMM recommends that the current law be amended to incorporate the following: • A business be defined as an industrial entity and a for - profit corporation. • Assistance be a loan or grant equal to or greater than $25,000. TIF, for purposes of this act is not assistance. • Assistance may be used to retain and /or increase the number of jobs. • The state or local government making the assistance be authorized to establish by agreement with the business the,' wage and job goals, as well as the means to repay the assistance or another remedy to satisfy the goals. III -C LAND USE PLANNING AND REGULATION City land use regulation in the metropolitan area is governed by the statewide Municipal Planning Act (MS 462) and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MS 473), which was revised and updated during the 1995 Session. While not a perfect framework, the guidelines and requirements in these laws have worked well for metropolitan cities. Land use regulation is more than just one of the many powers exercised by cities and occupies a significant portion of the work of city policymakers and staff. There is a growing perception that existing land planning law is inadequate to deal with current development issues. Part of this perception is based on the fact that Minnesota does not have a statewide growth management policy. State legislators, Metropolitan Councilmembers, local officials and the public, have expressed 23 increased concern about the continued pattern of outward growth, or urban sprawl; in the metropolitan area. Specific issues include constrained funding for expansion of regional systems; a desire to preserve the urban core, the need for affordable housing throughout the region, protection of agricultural uses, environmental impacts and a desire to promote development patterns consistent with maintenance of a viable public transportation system. At the same time, studies have documented continued acceleration of often unplanned and uncontrolled growth in the next ring of counties surrounding the metropolitan area, including western Wisconsin. AMM members are concerned that imposing increased requirements and cost on growth within the seven counties covered by the Metropolitan Council, while leaving unaddressed the issue of exurban development outside the seven counties, will simply accelerate the trend of leap -frog development and make it more difficult to produce affordable housing. Similar issues, albeit on a smaller scale, are of concern to' cities throughout Greater Minnesota, particularly the regional centers. The AMM strongly encourages the Metropolitan Council and the state to devise effective methods of ensuring responsible and controlled development in counties surrounding the metropolitan area. Options may include expansio.of the Metropolitan Council's area-of authority and/or adoption of a statewide planning law requiring more responsible regulation of land development throughout the state. Discussions should also be opened. with officials in western Wisconsin nto encourage their adoption of effective growth control measures: Further investment intransportation infrastructure to connect with Wisconsin should be contingent upon- 'their implementation of such controls. The AMM encourages the Metropolitan Council. to' continue its flexible guided growth policy regarding Metropolitan Urban Service Area`(MUSA) expansion requests` as outlined in the Regional Blueprint. However, the Metropolitan Council must recognize that until there are effective growth management strategies and tools beyond ;the metropolitan area. Any tightening of MUSA expansion criteria within the metropolitan area will cause one or more of the following: • Leap -frog development into adjacent counties and%Wisconsin. • Increased housing costs within the metropolitan area: • Decreased economic growth due to increased. development costs. • Increased development activity in the Rural Service Area. 24 IV Metropolitan Governance. Structure & Issues Pages 25 -36 F0 METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND ISSUES IV METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE There are certain issues, concerns and problems which because of their complexity or breadth encompass the entire metropolitan area and can not be dealt with by a single local government or through a combination of local units. The region needs to deal with these regional issues through a regional governance structure which acts in cooperation with and as a partner with local units of government and officials. IV -A PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE The diversity in demographics and political subdivisions within our metropolitan area result in the need for planning on a metropolitan basis which must be done in cooperation with local government. There is also a need for a regional service delivery system to provide certain services or portions of services to most effectively and efficiently address the needs of the metropolitan area. The AMM affirms its support for the existence of a metropolitan governance system to deal with appropriate regional issues and concerns. The purposes of the metropolitan governance system should be to facilitate region -wide planning with the cooperation and consideration of the affected local governmental units; to provide certain region -wide services that do not duplicate those that can be provided by local governmental units, either individually or jointly; and'to fulfill other specific responsibilities mandated by the state and federal governments. IV -B CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE AUTHORITY Executive, legislative or self directed initiatives to expand responsibility or authority of the Metropolitan Governance System must be carefully considered and limited in focus with indepth review by all those impacted by the proposed expansion. The legislature, if granting the metropolitan governance structure additional responsibility or authority, should be specific in the grant. Expansion or extension, of authority should be considered only when one or more of the following conditions exist: 25 The service, function, or activity has been, shown to: be needed and, it. can. be demonstrated that it cannot or is not, being effectively or efficiently provided; hrough existing general purpose units of government; The service, function, or activity is not an appropriate state levetor local government level activity or function, Regional intervention is needed for protection of the region's investment in an, existing metropolitan system. IV -C METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND FUNDING The Metropolitan Council was created in 1967. to coordinate "the planning and development" of the Metropolitan Area. The Council was mostly advisory, but was given responsibility for regional policy development and coordination in the areas of wastewater treatment, transportation and airports. The Council was given limited approval authority for development proposals which were of metropolitan (regional) significance but was not given direct operational authority. The Metropolitan Council's responsibility has been expanded over the years and was given direct operational responsibility for regional transit and wastewater treatment in 1994. C -1 SELECTION OF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MEMBERS The 1994 Metropolitan Reorganization Act provides for a 17 person Metropolitan Council, appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Governor. This arrangement raises at least three significant concerns: Is it accountable to and understandable by the citizens of the metropolitan area who it serves and who pay for its operations? Does it contribute to the sense of regional citizenship and involvement necessary to effectively address many of the emerging issues of metropolitan governance? Will it achieve a consistency of policy direction and implementation over time? The AMM affirms that an elected Metropolitan Council is the best way to achieve accountability, citizen involvement, and long term stability for regional government. The procedures for election should follow the guidelines put forth in the AMM report on Metropolitan Governance. 26 C -2 RESTRUCTURING OF METROPOLITAN AGENCIES In 1994 the Legislature eliminated the Regional Transit Board (RTB), the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) as freestanding agencies but there are still separate agencies for sports facilities and airports. The AMM recommends: Removing the metropolitan sports facilities commission as a metropolitan agency since the back -up tax liability is limited to one city which also appoints all commissioners except the chair, contingent upon its divestiture of lands and properties in cities not responsible for the back -up tax. Clarifying the status of the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) so that it either becomes a metropolitan agency or a state directed agency. If the back up property tax is limited to the seven county metropolitan area then its membership should come from the metropolitan area. If the back up property tax is state wide then the MAC should have statewide representation. C -3 FUNDING FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES The funding for the Metropolitan Council an d it's regionally provided services is a combination of property taxes, user fees and federal and state grants. There have been discussions to replace these multiple sources with a single new revenue source. The AMM believes it is appropriate to continue to fund the regional services and activities by the existing combination of user fees, property taxes, state and federal grants. The AMM believes this method provides better visibility of expenditures by the "payers" and therefore opposes the imposition of a single new source to replace the present funding sources. The AMM also believes that the linkage between revenues and expenditures for each service should remain visible by function as the operating functions are absorbed by the new governance structure. C -4 REGIONAL TAX RATES AND USER FEES The Legislature controls the taxing authority of the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and it should continue to do so. User fees are determined by the Metropolitan entity collecting the fees. The setting of user fees and the process for. setting or changing fees has generally not been considered a problem except for isolated cases. 27 The AMM believes: • User fees for regional services should not be dictated by the legislature but should be determined by the entities collecting the fees. • All fees should be consistent with regional system plans and goals. • An open visible process /procedure should be employed for user fee rate changes when changes are proposed in order to ensure public notice and opportunity for input. • A clear linkage between fees and service should be maintained. IV -D COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING /GROWTH MANAGEMENT Land use planning and regulation in the metropolitan area is mostly governed by the statewide municipal planning act (M.S. 462) and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (M.S. 473). While not a perfect framework, the guidelines and requirements in these laws have worked reasonably well for the affected entities. There is a growing perception, however, that existing planning law and resource availability might not be adequate to deal with current planning and, development issues facing this state, region and local units of government. D -1 PLANNING: LOCAL AND REGIONAL INTERACTION Planning is an ongoing process, and several precepts should be kept in mind by local units of government, Metropolitan Council and the state as this metropolitan planning process continues. • Metropolitan system plans must continue to be sufficiently specific in terms of locations, capacities, and timing to allow for consideration in local comprehensive planning. • The regional investment in metropolitan physical service systems, transportation,. wastewater treatment, airports, and park and open space, should continue to be protected by preventing adverse impact on these systems due to lack of integration and coordination between regional and_ local, planning. • Local officials must have effective input into the regional, planning process on an. ongoing basis. • Designation of other regional. plans as metropolitan systems plans should not be made unless there is a compelling metropolitan: area wide problem or concern: that can best be addressed through a regional-system designation. The impact of mandates to update city comprehensive plans upon city financial and human resources should receive full consideration by the Metropolitan Council as the statutory requirements are administered. Timely and effective local planning assistance should be available to cities, including,. but not limited to: staff support; research and technical data; specific guidelines for interpreting policies; systems statements; and procedural criteria for the review and evaluation of plans and amendments. The Metropolitan Council must consider and account for the capacity of and efforts by cities to produce and implement comprehensive plans as Council policies and systems statements are developed and adopted. All requirements for local plan preparation and implementation should be subject to fiscal impact evaluation before adoption and should be accompanied by meaningful financial assistance upon adoption. D -2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PLANNING /SERVICE PROVISION The separation of responsibility for long range regional planning and service delivery at the regional level no longer exists as a result of the 1994 Metropolitan Reorganization Act (MRA). The Metropolitan Council is now responsible for both and is also responsible for administering the Livable Communities Act. The Council should not subordinate its visionary and long range planning and research functions to its newly assigned operational and administrative functions. The Council must also retain its capacity to deal with emerging issues in a timely manner as well as provide for the important linkage between transportation/transit, housing and economic development as delineated in its Regional Blueprint. The Council must develop staff capacity and internal administrative controls and procedures, as necessary, to ensure that its historic planning and data collection and dissemination functions are still fulfilled consistent with its statutory obligations. D -3 PLANNING AND LAND USE CONTROLS ADJACENT TO THE METROPOLITAN AREA State legislators, Metropolitan Council, local officials, and members of the public are all expressing increased concern about the continued pattern of outward growth, or what some call "urban sprawl" of the metropolitan area. Specific issues include constrained funding for expansion of regional systems, a desire to preserve the urban core, the need for affordable housing throughout the region, protection of agricultural uses, environmental impacts, and a desire to 29 promote development patterns consistent with maintenance of a viable public transportation system. A number of specific remedies have been suggested. - At the same time, studies have documented continued acceleration of oftentimes unplanned and uncontrolled growth in the next ring of counties surrounding the metropolitan area, including western Wisconsin. AMM members are concerned that imposing increased requirements and cost on growth within the seven counties covered by the Metropolitan Council, while leaving unaddressed the issue of exurban development outside the seven counties, will simply accelerate the trend of leap -frog development. The AMM notes that similar issues, albeit on a smaller scale, are of concern to cities throughout greater Minnesota, particularly the regional centers. The AMM strongly encourages the Metropolitan Council and the State of Minnesota to devise effective methods of ensuring responsible and controlled development in counties surrounding the metropolitan area. Options may include expansion of the Metropolitan Council's area of land use planning authority in surrounding counties, granting additional planning authority to Regional Development Commissions; and or adoption of a planning law requiring more responsible regulation of land development in counties surrounding the metro area. Discussions should also be continued with officials in western Wisconsin to encourage their adoption of effective growth control measures. Further investment in transportation infrastructure to connect with Wisconsin should be contingent upon their implementation of such controls. D -4 METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT FUNDING The 1995 Metropolitan Land Planning Act Amendments sponsored by the Metropolitan Council created additional unfunded mandates for local units of government. The AMM has a long standing policy opposing unfunded mandates and spoke to this issue before the Metropolitan Council and at several legislative hearings. The legislature did not provide funding in 1995 but directed the Metropolitan Council to assess the need for financial assistance and report to the Legislature early in the 1996 session. The Legislature should follow the precedent it established in 1976 when the original Metropolitan Land Planning was passed and provided funding to local units of government to implement the mandatory provisions. The amount of funding should be consistent with the need as related to the cost of complying with the mandate and should be distributed through the Council on a matching basis. 30 IV -E METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET/WORK PROGRAM PROCESS The Metropolitan Council, as restructured, is essentially a state agency with an annual operating budget of approximately 300 million dollars but unlike other state agencies its budget is not subject to legislative approval. Therefore its annual budget document and supporting data must convey sufficient information so that the stakeholders can evaluate what services are being provided, at what cost, who pays and who benefits. E -1 BUDGET PROCESS The 1996 Metropolitan Council Budget will be the first unified budget for the restructured Agency and it will be a challenge for the Council to provide the public with the appropriate information in a timely fashion so that the public can provide meaningful input and oversight. The Council should keep several principles in mind as it develops its first unified budget. Mandated and non - discretionary projects should be identified along with their funding sources and projects and activities which are discretionary but totally or mostly funded by state or federal funds should also be identified. Previous year's expenditures history for ongoing activities should also be provided. As the council develops a unified budget delineating the services formerly provided by the MWCC, MTC and RTB, the expenses and revenues for those services should be clearly identified and the linkages maintained. Further, the funds or reserve funds raised for a particular service should not be used or co- mingled with the funds raised for any other service or activity. E -2 WORK PROGRAM EVALUATION The Council as a non - elected body and therefore not subject to "ballot box" accountability or direct legislative oversight in its work program/budget development process, must take extra caution to ascertain the effectiveness and/or necessity of current and planned programs and services. This is particularly important for projects formerly funded by federal or state dollars that are now funded by property taxes. The AMM believes that every major council program/priority should meet four tests: The issue or problem being addressed is important to the well being of the region. Council intervention or activity will produce a positive result. Council effort or activity does not duplicate or serve as a substitute for a state level program or effort or what should be a state level activity. The council should 31 continue to divest itself of services it provides for the metropolitan area that state agencies provide for greater Minnesota.' Council is most appropriate agency to intervene or perform the activity. IV -F METROPOLITAN PARK AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING The Legislature established the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space System in 1914 and provided state /regional fiscal support for the acquisition and development of the System. However, the State and the Metropolitan area have failed to establish a permanent partnership relative to the long term financing of the Regional Park System. Failure to clearly define the role of regional parks within the State Park System has led to long term instability relative to the acquisition and development of regional parks and created significant funding concerns for implementing agencies. F -1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING Regional parks within the Metropolitan area provide the same basic function as state parks provide in Greater Minnesota. The State does not fully acknowledge this similarity and never provided an equitable amount of funding for the operation and maintenance of metropolitan regional parks while covering 100 percent of the cost of state parks in Greater. Minnesota. The Legislature and Governor should recognize the role of metropolitan regional parks and- provide appropriate funding to implementing agencies to assist them in the operation and maintenance of the regional parks and open space system. The state of Minnesota should provide 40 percent of the funding to operate andl maintain these facilities instead of less than 10 percent as has been recent practice. F -2 BONDING FOR REGIONAL PARKS The Legislature for the past several years has provided less than 25 percent of the funding requested for acquisition and development of regional parks by the Metropolitan Council. To allow for the orderly and planned development schedule for the regional parks and open space system, the Metropolitan Council is using previously granted authority and is issuing regional bonds backed by a regional property tax to make up part of the shortage. The metropolitan regional parks are essentially a substitute for state parks in the metro area and should be funded accordingly. Therefore, issuing regional bonds inappropriately shifts the burden of regional park funding from the state to metropolitan area property taxpayers. Metro area tax payers are paying twice for state park service and this is not equitable. The Metropolitan Council should continue its efforts to obtain an equitable share of state funding in future legislative funding cycles. Oki IV -G WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Water is a critical resource for this metropolitan area and it is necessary to plan and manage this resource to assure adequate supply, safeguard the public health, provide recreational opportunities and enhance economic opportunities. Many levels of government have a vested interest in protecting and managing water resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner and therefore it is in the public interest to clearly delineate each level's responsibility to prevent duplication, overlap, and conflicting requirements. This delineation is particularly important to cities since they are the level that ultimately has the most "hands on" responsibility. The aspects of water resources which have received the most attention in recent years are surface water runoff, groundwater quality, water supply and water recharge areas (wetlands). There is an interrelationship among all of these systems and there is need for coordination in managing them effectively. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for water resources management because they are the level closest to the problems but may need to look to the state and the Metropolitan Council for financial assistance and technical expertise necessary to implement this responsibility. G -1 WATER SUPPLY The AMM is in general agreement with the Water Supply Act passed in the 1993 legislative session. The thrust of this legislation is to promote water conservation, require contingency plans for water emergencies and to promote long range planning for local water supplies. There is no need for additional legislation pertaining to local water supply planning at this point in time but if legislation is proposed, it should be based on the following principles: Local units should retain the basic responsibility for water supply planning as in current law. Additional mandates should be funded by the state. Potable water should not be a Regional system. See policy D -1. G -2 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER WATER MANAGEMENT No one has the right to pollute either ground or surface water resources and in order to safeguard the public health and environment, it is necessary to preserve our water resources as critical state resources. Most water management organizations (WMO) and local units of government have done a good job of dealing with surface and groundwater management issues and have the ability to continue to do so in a cost effective manner. These existing structures should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems rather than create a new bureaucracy. KX' There is no need for new urban water management structure but, it is clear that ihe current 'system which contains duplicate reviews and approvals of local plans and development projects /proposals should be streamlined. If legislation is considered for surface water management, it should be based `on the following principles: The legislature should provide full funding if it mandates additional water management planning or implementing activities by local units of government. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for surface and groundwater management as they are the level closest to the problem. New. state requirements should not add to local costs and duplicate rev iews/appro.vals should be reduced or eliminated. The AMM would support the following initiatives /action: A thorough assessment of the board of water and soil resources (BWSk),structure and authorities to ascertain if it should continue to be the approval and oversight agency for surface water management planning and activities in the metropolitan area. A thorough assessment of the metropolitan "area surface water management planning and permitting process with the objective of developing improvements in conflict resolution, better coordination between and among state and local agencies, and streamlining the project permit approvals process. Compliance by local units of government in outstate Minnesota with the same standards and requirements for surface water management as those imposed on local units within the metropolitan area. G -3 REGIONAL WETLANDS MANAGEMENT While AMM recognizes the value of preservation of our regions wetlands it is important to recognize that one of the other regional goals -- creating a denser level of urban development, can run contrary to replacing all wetlands at a 2:1 ratio. There are also different priorities related to evaluating the benefits of wetland preservation in a heavily urbanized area versus a rural area. When evaluating the benefits and trade -offs between wetland preservation /replacement and greater urban densities the LGU's should be given authority in establishing priorities through a water management plan. Since a majority of Type 1 and Type 2 wetland has a significantly different benefit 34 than types 3,4 and 5, and since the primary benefit is the reduced rate of water run off created by these areas, AMM recommends they be eliminated from the direct replacement requirement, and be replaced by the appropriate designed storm water retention/water quality ponds approved by the LGU. AMM supports the inclusion of a defined "buffer" zone as a qualified portion of the replacement area for disturbed wetlands. G -4 REGIONAL WASTEWATER (SEWER) TREATMENT SYSTEM._ The metropolitan wastewater treatment and collection system, which was created in 1969, has contributed significantly'to the improvement of water quality in many of the major water resources of this area. As a result of a major study and analysis in the mid 1980's a uniform funding system was established. A new assessment and study of the cost allocation system is now in progress. The metropolitan wastewater collection and treatment system has been a major component of an integrated local- regional system which has helped improve the quality of the water in many of the major water resources of this area such as Lake Minnetonka, the Minnesota, Mississippi and St. Croix Rivers, White Bear Lake, etc. It is important that change not be made to this regional system that could lead to its breakup or to diminish its effectiveness. Since all 'users' benefit equally throughout the system the regional rates should be uniform throughout the system and a sub- regional system'of allocating the regional system, costs should not be reinstituted. IV -H WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT In the mid to late 1980's the,problem of managing the waste stream (for all types of waste) was a major concern at the local, regional, and state level. This resulted in major legislative initiatives, numerous "master plans," and ideas on the subject which were constantly changing. At the present the overall system is more settled with cities being responsible for collection and counties being responsible for disposal. The Metro Council role has been transferred to the State or defacto assumed by the seven - county joint powers arrangement. Legislative initiatives are more in the line of fine- tuning with the major issue being liability within the polluted land arena. AMM endorses the concept that the "generators" of waste must bear the responsibility for funding its disposal. "Generator" includes the manufactures of products. which become waste, the sellers of products which become waste and the consumer. of products which become waste. Materials which cause special problems in the waste stream should bear the costs (through the cost of purchasing the materials) associated with the problems. Legislation should be initiated which provide financial incentives to manufacturers, retailers or consumers for reducing packaging volume, using recycled materials in its fabrication, or, 35 particularly in, the case of food and beverage containers, facilitating, its return. Fees,: taxes,, or deposits on packaging materials should be considered with; these; costs:waived when: content goals are met, volumes are minimized, or effective materia Is: return systems are in. place. The net revenue generated from fees/taxes above administrative cost&should 1 be used; to promote or enhance local programs to reduce, reuse, recycle packaging. materials. AMM strongly supports the activities of the Office of environmental Assistance (replaced; the former Office of Waste Management and assumed. Metro Council duties), in particular its efforts in local government assistance and waste reduction education. This. of ,lice should not become involved in regulatory activities but continue to focus on helping local governments manage waste effectively. AMM opposes any legislation which would limit local initiatives in waste stream . management unless an overall state or metropolitan wide system is established which accomplishes the same goal or objective. The responsibilities now assigned to cities for solid waste management should remain with the cities. The AMM believes that the system ought to be flexible and based on performance standards and /or goals rather than mandated techniques. AMM believes that any funding system must guarantee distribution of the monies to all entities involved in the system and recognize all costs associated with the system. This means a significant portion of the funds raised through the sales tax should be distributed to cities which operate recycling programs. AMM also believes that the entire proceeds of the tax on solid waste should be dedicated to soled waste activities. AMM believes that host communities should not bear a financial liability associated with solid waste facilities. Costs incurred for monitoring operations and corrective action should be borne by facility operators or, in the absence of such regulations, be assumed by the State of Minnesota. The AMM supports the current compensation level allowed through surcharge fees as a minimum level; this compensation should be continued or increased. This form of compensation should be available to all types of solid waste facilities. AMM supports state and federal legislation that clarifies that municipal solid waste is not a hazardous substance and enables local governments involved in cleanups to have the opportunity to settle their potential liability quickly and safely. 36 v Transportation Pages 37 -44 V TRANSPORTATION AMM TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT The AMM believes that the recent passage of the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) provides the Metropolitan area with a unique opportunity, to rethink transportation, transit and development plans. It is.imperative that as we prepare to move into the next century, our transportation network become .multi- modal, offer flexibility, invest significantly in transit, and be designed to manage traffic. Within the last two decades, the number of miles driven per day has doubled. Traffic congestion is. expected to increase by 35 percent by the year 2000, creating nearly 200 miles of severely congested highways. Ridership by bus, car and van pool, continues to decline and the regional transit system continues to be inadequately funded. There is a growing awareness that the true cost of driving an automobile, when factoring in energy use, pollution, productivity loss due to congestion, and the resulting cost of motor vehicle accidents, are born by the general public. at large not solely the driving public. The majority of peak hour traffic is workers commuting to or from work. Achieving a balance between workers and jobs in a geographic area can reduce the volume of intra area commuting and balance the directional use of the interconnecting roads. Economic stratification and an aging population is creating a larger pool of transit dependent individuals. Our current transit system is not capable of providing adequate transit services in the entire metropolitan area. Local governmental units are facing funding shortfalls which prevent them from adequately maintaining the current transportation network. AMM calls upon the legislature, MNDOT and the Metropolitan Council to develop a more comprehensive transportation program that more closely integrates all modes of transportation. This coordinated approach at the minimum must be designed to increase accessibility, improve air quality, and serve the transit dependent and handicapped. The AMM supports a comprehensive transportation policy that; • Incorporates traffic management into local and regional zoning and planning actions; • Encourages traffic management plans by all employers; • Creates a series of incentives aimed at increasing vehicle occupancy levels; • Discourages the use of development incentives for any project of significant size that does not contain a comprehensive traffic management plan;, . • Studies the concept of jobs to workers balance in the metropolitan area; and • Establishes an adequate dedicated funding source for transit. In addition, local units of government must be provided with adequate funding or the authority to maintain their current investments in the local transportation infrastructure. The following recommended legislative proposals'are designed to meet this overall goal. 37 V -A STREET, BRIDGE, AND HIGHWAY GENERAL FUND, ING An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for physical, economic, and social_ development at the state, regional, and local levels. Funding for current roadway maintenance reconstruction, and construction of new streets, bridges, and highways in developing areas is a significant major element of a competitive and safe transportation system. The AMM urges the legislature to provide an increased level of funding so that needed street, bridge, and highway maintenance may be continued, necessary new street and highway construction may occur, the municipal state aid fund level continues growth, and requirements of ISTEA can be met. V -B METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM GENERAL FUNDING Because of the large economically diverse and spread out population of the Twin City Metropolitan Area, it is an absolute necessity to provide an effective and efficient public mass transit service augmented by a variety of programs, such as Rideshare and Proje f Mobility. Without a good transit system, many elderly, persons with disabilities, and transit dependent individuals residing in the area would be almost totally immobile. Federal legislation (ISTEA) established a modern trend by providing over 20% of its total 5, year funding for Transit and allowing a shift of highway funds to transit on a project by project basis. The Americans disability Act (ADA) and new air and noise quality standards will impact both the way we do transit as well as the cost. In order to obtain ISTEA funds and to continue providing reasonable transportation opportunities, the legislature must increase transit funding priority. The AMM believes the legislature must include metropolitan transit programs as very high priority and fund them sufficiently to take full advantage of federal ISTEA funding, address ADA requirements, enforce air and noise standards, make possible.economic development opportunities, and provide job accessibility for people within the Metropolitan Region. Funding alternatives should include but not be limited to the state general fund, motor vehicle excise tax or other sales tax, the fare box, property tax, and service efficiencies. V -C TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT FUNDING ALTERNATIVES The need for both highway and transit funding has been increasing significantly in the past several years while the resources dedicated or generally used for these purposes have either not kept pace or been diverted for other state priorities. ISTEA has shifted emphasis by providing significant funds for Transit and also placed increased burden on states by increasing the local match to 20 percent. Transit needs in the Metropolitan Area have become critical since in most cases highway expansion is physically or financially prohibitive. Therefore, capacity expansion can best be solved by transit alternatives. Funding should be multi- source with growth capability. Therefore, the AMM believes it is time to solve the problem on a permanent basis. 38 The AMM supports a combined strategy of gas tax increases including indexing to keep pace with highway maintenance and construction needs and other tax sources for transit funding expansion. Funding assurances for transit and transportation should be dedicated in a consistent manner. As an addition to the traditional gas tax and to provide funding for both highways and transit, the AMM would support a sales tax on gasoline at the pump with the entire 6.5 cents allocated to transportation or a statewide or metrowide half cent sales tax to be used for transit. Any arrangement that would substitute an alternate tax for the transit property tax in the Metropolitan area should continue to fund the current optout transit systems at comparable levels. As part of the combined strategy, the state legislature should consider using its bonding authority to provide transportation infrastructure since the relationship between interest rates and inflation is such that it is advantageous to make such strategic investments. V -D REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM The purpose of a transportation system is to provide mobility for people and accessibility to and . for economic development and services. The most effective system will make maximum use of all transportation alternatives and strategies where they are most appropriate, thus, creating a truly integrated system. Exclusive reliance on freeways is imprudent and cost prohibitive primarily due to social and economic upheaval of established neighborhoods for right of way acquisition. Transit improvements are imperative, but even with implementation of various load increasing strategies, the capacity is finite and will reach unacceptable saturation limits within the foreseeable future. The AMM supports more coordination and integration of Transit, including LRT, and highway planning and implementation. The Regional Transit System should be a combination of integrated traffic management systems and be included in all planning documents. The system components should include HOV lanes, express buses, and LRT which should be built to connect residents to job, retail, and commercial centers. The system should also include a variety of transit modes, including a taxi system, buses, pedestrian.and bicycle facilities, and park and ride facilities adequate to connect the regional centers, major trip generators and communities, both urban and suburban. Bus systems and LRT systems should include ample regional park and ride facilities for automobiles, motorcycles and bicycles, with easy access, consistent with the planning of a regional entity to accommodate the needs of the public. Feeder systems should be a major 39 consideration for bus park and ride and LRT stations. Plans should be considered to use van pools and bicycles as well as walking to feed the park and ride facilities for express buses and LRT. In keeping with the national recognition of the need to decrease dependance on single occupancy automobiles, the legislature should implement the Minnesota comprehensive bicycle plan to develop bicycle friendly zones in urban areas. These would include but not be limited to construction of both on and off road bicycle facilities, public education, promotion and monitoring. On road facilities could vary from stripped paved shoulders to designated bicycle lanes. V -E MSAS FUNDING FOR COMBINED CITY STREET DEPARTMENTS The State of Minnesota developed in the late 1950s a system for distributing highway funding to MNDOT, counties, and communities with populations over 5,000. This system has worked reasonably effectively to construct and maintain an integrated transportation network within the state. In recent years, the legislature has enacted statutes which call for the investigation of benefit that would be obtained through consolidation of services and reallocation of resources. One such area that presents such an option is the consolidation of Public Works and Maintenance departments within cities, townships, and counties. Such an"opportunity for streamlining capital expenditures and cost - effective maintenance of an integrated street system might be best served by recognizing such consolidation through the use of the Municipal State Aid System (MSAS). In that, if two or more governmental units consolidate their maintenance departments, having in effect a Joint Powers Agreement which reflects a single entity for budgeting and operations purposes, then the population of the governmental units participating in such a Joint Powers Agreement should be considered in determining the MSAS funding eligibility of these communities as per MS 162.09. The AMM urges the legislature to encourage the implementation of cooperation and consolidation of local government services such as is envisioned by MS 375. The state aid system statutes should be amended to allow for the eligibility of combined population within incorporated municipalities having a joint powers public works and maintenance department and contiguous borders, to qualify for MSAS funding under the municipal state aid street system population cutoff rule of 5,000. V -F HIGHWAY TURNBACKS AND FUNDING Various commissions, boards, and organizations, have studied the possibility of reclassifying many roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications and jurisdiction. This reassignment in 40 the metropolitan area is estimated to shift $6.1 million annually from the state and $1.2 million annually from the counties to the cities for an increase of $7.3 million annually for general maintenance and life cycle treatment (i.e. sealcoat, overlays, etc.). Current state law provides that the state and/or county may declassify a trunk highway and turn it back to a local unit of government. The only provision is that it must be in good condition. The AMM supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads on a phased basis using functional classification and other. appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continuing maintenance. Cities do not currently have the financial capacity other than significant property tax increase to absorb the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turnbacks. V -G TRANSPORTATION UTILITY Many cities are experiencing aging infrastructure, especially streets which are in need of replacement but because of few funding options continue to deteriorate. Chapter 429 bonds issued without election require a minimum of 20 percent assessment. However, the courts require a benefit proof that the assessment has actually increased the property value by the assessment value. For street replacement this is nearly impossible as would be a general referendum. A new funding mechanism similar to one that was created for stormsewers is needed. The AMM requests the legislature to establish a transportation utility authority for cities to use for street maintenance and reconstruction similar to the existing storm sewer utility. V -H '3C' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ELECTED OFFICIALS ROLE Federal law and rules have long required that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for comprehensive transportation planning commonly referred to as the '3C' process (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative) be composed at least partly of local elected officials. This process and requirement was reinforced by the federal ISTEA act of 1991. In this metro area the Metropolitan Council (MC) has been designated the MPO with a provision that there be a Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), which contains 17 local elected officials, to implement the '3C' planning process. The AMM supports the continuation of current local elected officials involvement in the 13C' process through the Transportation Advisory Board to meet requirements of the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991. 41 V -I RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PRESERVATION Minnesota has lost over half its rail system as national'carriers have abandoned lines. Abandoned rails represent a significant opportunity for future use for trails, natural,resource'access, light rail, highways or pipeline corridors. The AMM urges the legislature and state administrative departments to continue programs that ensure abandoned railroad grades be expediently preserved until such'time that th'e future public use can be determined. V -J CITY SPEED LIMITS Granting local authority to set speed limits on streets for free standing cities may be feasible. but could be extremely dangerous and confusing in the metropolitan area of 140 contiguous cities and 42 townships. It is often impossible to determine when one has crossed a boundary from one city to the next. Differing speed limits between cities would be costly, confusing 'to individuals, and might cause legal problems in case of accidents. The AMM supports speed limit control of city roads and "streets as currently provided by law and opposes changes allowing differential speed in contiguous cities. The court system should honor local speeding authority control where speed problems exist. V -K TRANSPORTATION INCENTIVES/DISINCENTIVES The AMM supports the development of a comprehensive system which will facilitate an increase in the occupancy level of cars and enhance the use of transit within the Metropolitan area. AMM suggests the development and passage of legislation that includes a commuter trip reduction program and creates a series of tax incentives and/or impact fees that encourages multiple occupancy Transit use. The state legislature is encouraged to consider exclusion from gross income the value of commuter transportation benefits provided by an employer and provide a tax deduction and tax credit for employers who provide commuter transportation benefits to employees. V -L MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE The Metropolitan Highway Districts 5 and 9 were combined in 1989 -90 to form one Metropolitan Highway District within the MNDOT structure. By law the MSA screening committee consists of one member from each Highway District and first class city. Technically, the combining of Districts 5 and 9 reduces the membership by one from the metropolitan area. This was not intended by MNDOT. 42 The AMM requests that the statutes be modified to preserve two seats on the MSA screening committee from the metropolitan highway district. V -M AIRPORT In 1987, the legislature adopted the dual -track strategy for airport planning. One track focuses on a new airport option; the other on improvements at the existing airport. The choice will be made when economic, operational, environmental and cost benefits studies are completed by 1996. The Metropolitan Council has identified a search area in northern Dakota County within which a major airport could be located. Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) must develop a long range'plan to ensure capacity at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport. By the end of 1995, the MAC must also identify a specific airport site within the search area identified by the Metropolitan Council. In 1996, both the Metropolitan Council and the MAC must prepare recommendations on major airport long -term development for consideration by the legislature. The AMM recommends and'supports the continuation of the dual track process to assure that all options are properly reviewed, as airport issues are being considered. The AMM encourages the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission, whether considering a new site or improvements to the existing site, to thoroughly study the societal and economic impacts of both sites in the following areas: environment, social, site area, general land use and cost. As studies are completed on possible expansion of the existing Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport and /or relocation of the airport to a new site, the AMM also encourages -the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission to consider the infrastructure costs at both sites as well as the cost - benefit ratio of all classifications of property for the areas surrounding both sites. V -N MCTO ASSESSMENT /FEE EXEMPTION Historically all governmental facilities are exempt from property taxes levied by local governments, but with the exception of the MCTO and its predecessors MTC and RTB, governmental facilities are subject to special assessments for construction projects such as streets and sewers. Neither the Metro Council nor Transit operations staff know why MCTO facilities are exempt from special assessments and other fees or even why they should be exempted. The AMM believes that the special assessment and fee exemption for Metropolitan Council Transit Facilities in Minnesota statute 473.448 should be repealed. V -O METRO MOBILITY The Metro Mobility program is a valuable tool for providing mobility to the transit dependent who are physically impaired. In 1994 the program served 25,000 individuals with 4400 rides per weekday at a public subsidy cost of $15 million. This subsidy cost has risen dramatically in the 43 last several years. Examination of rider characteristics shows that 69 % of the individuals served are ambulatory as opposed to being in a wheelchair. AMM supports efforts which would better integrate services for the mobility impaired into the regular route system of MCTO; AMM supports prioritization of the program with an emphasis on work- related and essential trips; AMM supports investigating alternative delivery methods especially for the ambulatory participants in the program. 44 Appendik Pages 45 -48 Joan Lynch (Chair) Councilmember Shakopee Beverly Aplikowski Councilmember Arden Hills Chuck Armstrong IGR St. Paul Kirstin Barsness Dir. of Economic Development Cottage Grove Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant Mendota Heights Frank Boyles Manager Prior Lake Dave Childs Manager Minnetonka Dan Donahue Manager New Hope Mike Ericson Administrator Watertown Keith Ford Regulatory Pro. Spec. Minneapolis Matt Fulton Manager New Brighton John Goedeke Councilmember Roseville Andrea Hart Kajer State Liaison Minneapolis Regina Harris HRA Director Bloomington Pat Hentges Manager Columbia Heights Coral Houle Mayor Bloomington Gordon Hughes Asst. Manager Edina Jim Hurm Administrator Shorewood Dwight Johnson Manager Plymouth Marvin Johnson Mayor Independence Katy Sears Lindblad Project Manager St. Paul Mary McNellis Councilmember Mahtomedi Eugene Ranieri Dir. Governmental Affairs Publicorp, Inc. Ron Rankin Dir. of Commun. Development Minnetonka Peggy Reichert Dir. of Commun. Development Eagan Charlotte Samuelson Councilmember New Brighton Mark Sather Manager White Bear Lake Charlotte Shover Councilmember Burnsville Beverly Schultz Mayor Bayport Craig Waldron Administrator Oakdale Julia Whalen Councilmember Champlin 45 Jerry Linke (Chair) Mayor Mounds View Bill Barnhart IGR Office Minneapolis Bruce Baumann Councilmember So. St. Paul Mike Beard Councilmember Shakopee Steve Billings Councilmember Fridley Craig Dawson Asst. Manager Maplewood Craig Ebeling Deputy City Manager Burnsville Sharon Feese Councilmember Brooklyn Park Kevin Frazell Administrator Cottage Grove Matt Fulton Manager New Brighton John Giovannini Planning Commissioner Newport Marie Grimm Councilmember St. Paul Mary Helen Guzek IGR Assistant St. Paul Anne Hurlburt Dir. of Commun. Development Plymouth Larry Lee Dir. of Commun. Development Bloomington Tom Link Dir. of Devel./Prot. Services Inver Grove Heights Paul Malone Councilmember Arden Hills Charlie Meyer Manager St. Louis Park Mark Nagel Manager Anoka Steve North Asst. Manager Roseville Joy Robb Mayor Robbinsdale Don Rye Planning Director Prior Lake Terry Schneider Councilmember Minnetonka Eric Thole Councilmember Stillwater Sherry Timmermann Councilmember Oakdale Blair Tremere Mayor Golden Valley Kurt Ulrich Administrator Champlin John Weaver Councilmember Anoka Michael Werner Mayor Hastings Roger Williams Councilmember New Brighton 46 e Sue Hoyt (Chair) Administrator Falcon Heights Karen Anderson Mayor Minnetonka Leslie Anderson Finance Director Burnsville Chuck Armstrong IGR Assistant St. Paul Mike Bisanz Mayor West St. Paul Bill Burns Manager Fridley Edward Burrell Finance Director Roseville Tom Burt Administrator Rosemount Dave Callister Administrator Osseo Joan Campbell Councilmember Minneapolis Dave Childs Manager Minnetonka Bill Craig Manager West St. Paul Tom Cran Budget Analyst St. Paul Steven Devich Assistant Manager Richfield Nick Duff Mayor Woodland Terry Dussault Asst. to the Manager Blaine Allen Greenfield Councilmember Prior Lake Fran Hagen, Sr. Manager Robbinsdale Barbara Jeanette Asst. to the Manager New Brighton Jim Keinath Administrator Circle Pines Jim Knutson Finance Director Anoka Ann Lenczewski Councilmember . Bloomington Dennis Maetzold Councilmember Edina Barb Mastel Councilmember Roseville Mike McGuire Manager Maplewood Glenn McKee Councilmember Burnsville Steven Mielke Manager Hopkins Jim Niland Councilmember Minneapolis Pat O'Hara Councilmember Oakdale Lyle Olson Fin. & Adm. Serv. Dir. Bloomington Samantha Orduno Administrator Mounds View Jim Smith Councilmember Independence Ginny Sterling Councilmember Apple Valley Robert Svehla Manager Coon Rapids Kurt Ulrich Administrator Champlin John Wallin Finance Director Edina Jim Willis Administrator Inver Grove Heights Liz Witt Administrative Assistant Eagan 47 Bill Thompson (Chair) Mayor Coon Rapids Dick Allendorf Councilmember Minnetonka Gary Bastian Mayor Maplewood Lyle Berg Transportation Engineer Bloomington Steve Billings Councilmember Fridley George Calebaugh Traffic Engineer Brooklyn Park Charlie Crichton Councilmember Burnsville Patryk Drescher Council Research St. Paul Jerry Dulgar Manager Crystal Dale Gustafson Councilmember Brooklyn Park Mary Helen Guzek IGR Assistant St. Paul Rolland Harrington Public Works Supt. Oakdale Fran Hoffman Engineer Edina Gary Humphrey Councilmember Apple Valley Tom Kedrowski Councilmember Prior Lake Tom Lawell Administrator Mendota Heights Charles Lenthe Public Works Director Blaine Sandy Masin Councilmember Eagan S. Dore' Mead Councilmember Minneapolis Dave Ornstein Attorney Bloomington Dave Osberg Administrator Hastings Gerald Otten Councilmember New Hope Bill Ottensmann Public Works Director Coon Rapids Desyl Peterson Attorney Minnetonka Pat Scott Councilmember Minneapolis Ceil Smith Asst. to the Manager Edina Joy Tierney Mayor Plymouth Donn Wiski Councilmember Roseville 48